DOCSLIB.ORG

Let Φ : R → Z Under Addition Be Given by Φ(X) = the Greatest Integer ≤ X

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Let Φ : R → Z Under Addition Be Given by Φ(X) = the Greatest Integer ≤ X 13.02 (Determine whether or not φ is a homomorphism.) Let φ : R → Z under addition be given by φ(x) = the greatest integer ≤ x. Solution: It is not a homomorphism, since φ(1.5) + φ(1.5) = 1 + 1 = 2 6= 3 = φ(1.5 + 1.5). 13.04 (Determine whether or not φ is a homomorphism.) Let φ : Z6 → Z2 be given by φ(x) = the remainder of x when divided by 2, as in the division algorithm. Solution: It is a homomorphism: φ(a + b) = φ(a) + φ(b) for all a, b ∈ Z6. 13.06 (Determine whether or not φ is a homomorphism.) Let φ : R → R∗, where R is additive and R∗ is multiplcative, be given by φ(x) = 2x. Solution: It is a homomorphism: φ(a + b) = 2a+b = 2a2b = φ(a)φ(b) for all a, b ∈ R. 13.08 (Determine whether or not φ is a homomorphism.) Let G be any group and let φ : G → G be given by φ(g) = g−1 for g ∈ G. Solution: If G is not abelian then φ is not a homomorphism. Because when G is not abelian, there exist a, b ∈ G such that ab 6= ba. Then φ(ab) = (ab)−1 6= (ba)−1 = a−1b−1 = φ(a)φ(b). 13.10 (Determine whether or not φ is a homomorphism.) Let F be the additive group of all continuous functions mapping R into R. Let R be the additive group of real numbers, and let φ : F → R be given by Z 4 φ(f) = f(x) dx. 0 Solution: It is a group homomorphism, since for any f, g ∈ F , Z 4 Z 4 Z 4 φ(f + g) = (f + g)(x) dx = f(x) dx + g(x) dx = φ(f) + φ(g). 0 0 0 13.18 Compute ker(φ) and φ(18) for φ : Z → Z10 such that φ(1) = 6. Solution: For any integer k, φ(k) = φ(1 + 1 + ··· + 1) = φ(1) + φ(1) + ··· + φ(1) = 6k mod 10. | {z } | {z } k copies k copies 23 So ker φ = {k ∈ Z | 6k = 0 mod 10} = 5Z, φ(18) = 6 ∗ 18 = 108 = 8 ∈ Z10. 13.21 Compute ker(φ) and φ(14) for the homomorphism φ : Z24 → S8 where φ(1) = (2, 5)(1, 4, 6, 7). Solution: By homomorphism property, φ(k) = φ(1 + 1 + ··· + 1) = φ(1)φ(1) ··· φ(1) = φ(1)k = (2, 5)k(1, 4, 6, 7)k. | {z } | {z } k copies k copies Therefore, φ(14) = (2, 5)14(1, 4, 6, 7)14 = (1, 4, 6, 7)2 = (1, 6)(4, 7), and ker(φ) = 4Z24. 13.29 Let G be a group, and let g ∈ G. Let φg : G → G be defined by −1 φg(x) = gxg for x ∈ G. For which g ∈ G is φg a homomorphism? Solution: For every x, y ∈ G we have −1 −1 −1 φg(xy) = gxyg = (gxg )(gyg ) = φg(x)φg(y). So for every g ∈ G the map φg is a homomorphism. 13.32 a. T. b. T. Let φ : G → G0 such that φ(g) := e0 for g ∈ G. c. F. d. T. e. F. When |G| is finite, |φ[G]| is a divisor of |G|. f. F. g. T. For example the trivial homomorphism. h. T. For example the trivial homomorphism. i. F. Kernel contains at least the identity. j. F. Let φ : Z2 → Z2 × Z by φ(a) := (a, 0). 24 13.35 (If possible, give an exmaple of a nontrivial homomorphism φ. If not, explain why.) φ : Z2 × Z4 → Z2 × Z5. Solution: Define φ : Z2 × Z4 → Z2 × Z5 by φ((a, b)) := (a, 0) ∈ Z2 × Z5, for (a, b) ∈ Z2 × Z4. It is easy to check that φ is a nontrivial homomorphism. 13.36 (If possible, give an exmaple of a nontrivial homomorphism φ. If not, explain why.) φ : Z3 → Z. Solution: No such nontrivial homomorphism exists. Since if φ : Z3 → Z is a homomorphism, then 0 = φ(0) = φ(3) = 3φ(1) in Z, and so φ(1) = 0, and so φ is trivial. 13.44 Let φ : G → G0 be a group homomorphism. Show that if |G| is finite, then |φ[G]| is finite and is a divisor of |G|. Solution: φ[G] = {φ(a) | a ∈ G}. So |φ[G]| ≤ |G| is finite. Let H := ker φ. Partition G into left cosets of H: G = a1H t a2H t · · · t akH. Then φ[G] = {φ(a1), ··· , φ(ak)} and |φ[G]| = k. Clearly |G| = k|H|. So |φ[G]| is a divisor of |G|. 13.45 Let φ : G → G0 be a group homomorphism. Show that if |G0| is finite, then |φ[G]| is finite and is a divisor of |G0|. Solution: The image φ[G] is a subgroup of G0. By Theorem of La- grange in Section 10, when |G0| is finite, |φ[G]| is a divisor of |G0| and is finite. 13.49 Show that if G, G0 and G00 are groups and if φ : G → G0 and γ : G0 → G00 are homomorphisms, then the composite map γφ : G → G00 is a homomorphism. Solution: Let x, y ∈ G, then γφ(xy) = γ(φ(xy)) = γ(φ(x)φ(y)) = γφ(x)γφ(y) So γφ satisfies the homomorphism property. Thus it is a homomor- phism. 25 13.51 Let G be any group and let a be any element of G. Let φ : Z → G be defined by φ(n) = an. Show that φ is a homomorphism. Describe the image and the possibilities for the kernel of φ. Solution: First we show that φ is a homomorphism. Given m, n ∈ Z, φ(m + n) = am+n = aman = φ(m)φ(n). So φ is a homomorphism. Second we describe the image of φ: φ[Z] = {φ(n) | n ∈ Z} = {an | n ∈ Z} = hai (≤ G). Finally we describe the possibilities for the kernel of φ. Let e be the identity of G. If a has a finite order m (so that |hai| = m), then am = e and so ker φ = φ−1({e}) = {n ∈ Z | an = e} = mZ. If a has infinte order, then there exists no positive integer m such that am = e. So ker φ = φ−1({e}) = {n ∈ Z | an = e} = {0}. 13.52 Let φ : G → G0 be a homomorphism with kernel H and let a ∈ G. Prove the set equality {x ∈ G | φ(x) = φ(a)} = Ha. Solution: Let e0 be the identity of G0. Then {x ∈ G | φ(x) = φ(a)} = {x ∈ G | φ(x)φ(a)−1 = e0} = {x ∈ G | φ(xa−1) = e0} = {x ∈ G | xa−1 ∈ H} = {x ∈ G | x ∈ Ha} = Ha. 26.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Group Homomorphisms
    1-17-2018 Group Homomorphisms Here are the operation tables for two groups of order 4: · 1 a a2 + 0 1 2 1 1 a a2 0 0 1 2 a a a2 1 1 1 2 0 a2 a2 1 a 2 2 0 1 There is an obvious sense in which these two groups are “the same”: You can get the second table from the first by replacing 0 with 1, 1 with a, and 2 with a2. When are two groups the same? You might think of saying that two groups are the same if you can get one group’s table from the other by substitution, as above. However, there are problems with this. In the first place, it might be very difficult to check — imagine having to write down a multiplication table for a group of order 256! In the second place, it’s not clear what a “multiplication table” is if a group is infinite. One way to implement a substitution is to use a function. In a sense, a function is a thing which “substitutes” its output for its input. I’ll define what it means for two groups to be “the same” by using certain kinds of functions between groups. These functions are called group homomorphisms; a special kind of homomorphism, called an isomorphism, will be used to define “sameness” for groups. Definition. Let G and H be groups. A homomorphism from G to H is a function f : G → H such that f(x · y)= f(x) · f(y) forall x,y ∈ G.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Linear Group
    18.704 Gabe Cunningham 2/18/05 [email protected] The General Linear Group Definition: Let F be a field. Then the general linear group GLn(F ) is the group of invert- ible n × n matrices with entries in F under matrix multiplication. It is easy to see that GLn(F ) is, in fact, a group: matrix multiplication is associative; the identity element is In, the n × n matrix with 1’s along the main diagonal and 0’s everywhere else; and the matrices are invertible by choice. It’s not immediately clear whether GLn(F ) has infinitely many elements when F does. However, such is the case. Let a ∈ F , a 6= 0. −1 Then a · In is an invertible n × n matrix with inverse a · In. In fact, the set of all such × matrices forms a subgroup of GLn(F ) that is isomorphic to F = F \{0}. It is clear that if F is a finite field, then GLn(F ) has only finitely many elements. An interesting question to ask is how many elements it has. Before addressing that question fully, let’s look at some examples. ∼ × Example 1: Let n = 1. Then GLn(Fq) = Fq , which has q − 1 elements. a b Example 2: Let n = 2; let M = ( c d ). Then for M to be invertible, it is necessary and sufficient that ad 6= bc. If a, b, c, and d are all nonzero, then we can fix a, b, and c arbitrarily, and d can be anything but a−1bc. This gives us (q − 1)3(q − 2) matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fundamental Homomorphism Theorem
    Lecture 4.3: The fundamental homomorphism theorem Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 4120, Modern Algebra M. Macauley (Clemson) Lecture 4.3: The fundamental homomorphism theorem Math 4120, Modern Algebra 1 / 10 Motivating example (from the previous lecture) Define the homomorphism φ : Q4 ! V4 via φ(i) = v and φ(j) = h. Since Q4 = hi; ji: φ(1) = e ; φ(−1) = φ(i 2) = φ(i)2 = v 2 = e ; φ(k) = φ(ij) = φ(i)φ(j) = vh = r ; φ(−k) = φ(ji) = φ(j)φ(i) = hv = r ; φ(−i) = φ(−1)φ(i) = ev = v ; φ(−j) = φ(−1)φ(j) = eh = h : Let's quotient out by Ker φ = {−1; 1g: 1 i K 1 i iK K iK −1 −i −1 −i Q4 Q4 Q4=K −j −k −j −k jK kK j k jK j k kK Q4 organized by the left cosets of K collapse cosets subgroup K = h−1i are near each other into single nodes Key observation Q4= Ker(φ) =∼ Im(φ). M. Macauley (Clemson) Lecture 4.3: The fundamental homomorphism theorem Math 4120, Modern Algebra 2 / 10 The Fundamental Homomorphism Theorem The following result is one of the central results in group theory. Fundamental homomorphism theorem (FHT) If φ: G ! H is a homomorphism, then Im(φ) =∼ G= Ker(φ). The FHT says that every homomorphism can be decomposed into two steps: (i) quotient out by the kernel, and then (ii) relabel the nodes via φ. G φ Im φ (Ker φ C G) any homomorphism q i quotient remaining isomorphism process (\relabeling") G Ker φ group of cosets M.
    [Show full text]
  • Homomorphisms and Isomorphisms
    Lecture 4.1: Homomorphisms and isomorphisms Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 4120, Modern Algebra M. Macauley (Clemson) Lecture 4.1: Homomorphisms and isomorphisms Math 4120, Modern Algebra 1 / 13 Motivation Throughout the course, we've said things like: \This group has the same structure as that group." \This group is isomorphic to that group." However, we've never really spelled out the details about what this means. We will study a special type of function between groups, called a homomorphism. An isomorphism is a special type of homomorphism. The Greek roots \homo" and \morph" together mean \same shape." There are two situations where homomorphisms arise: when one group is a subgroup of another; when one group is a quotient of another. The corresponding homomorphisms are called embeddings and quotient maps. Also in this chapter, we will completely classify all finite abelian groups, and get a taste of a few more advanced topics, such as the the four \isomorphism theorems," commutators subgroups, and automorphisms. M. Macauley (Clemson) Lecture 4.1: Homomorphisms and isomorphisms Math 4120, Modern Algebra 2 / 13 A motivating example Consider the statement: Z3 < D3. Here is a visual: 0 e 0 7! e f 1 7! r 2 2 1 2 7! r r2f rf r2 r The group D3 contains a size-3 cyclic subgroup hri, which is identical to Z3 in structure only. None of the elements of Z3 (namely 0, 1, 2) are actually in D3. When we say Z3 < D3, we really mean is that the structure of Z3 shows up in D3.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Localization
    52 Andreas Gathmann 6. Localization Localization is a very powerful technique in commutative algebra that often allows to reduce ques- tions on rings and modules to a union of smaller “local” problems. It can easily be motivated both from an algebraic and a geometric point of view, so let us start by explaining the idea behind it in these two settings. Remark 6.1 (Motivation for localization). (a) Algebraic motivation: Let R be a ring which is not a field, i. e. in which not all non-zero elements are units. The algebraic idea of localization is then to make more (or even all) non-zero elements invertible by introducing fractions, in the same way as one passes from the integers Z to the rational numbers Q. Let us have a more precise look at this particular example: in order to construct the rational numbers from the integers we start with R = Z, and let S = Znf0g be the subset of the elements of R that we would like to become invertible. On the set R×S we then consider the equivalence relation (a;s) ∼ (a0;s0) , as0 − a0s = 0 a and denote the equivalence class of a pair (a;s) by s . The set of these “fractions” is then obviously Q, and we can define addition and multiplication on it in the expected way by a a0 as0+a0s a a0 aa0 s + s0 := ss0 and s · s0 := ss0 . (b) Geometric motivation: Now let R = A(X) be the ring of polynomial functions on a variety X. In the same way as in (a) we can ask if it makes sense to consider fractions of such polynomials, i.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoids: Theme and Variations (Functional Pearl)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (CIS) Department of Computer & Information Science 7-2012 Monoids: Theme and Variations (Functional Pearl) Brent A. Yorgey University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers Part of the Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, Software Engineering Commons, and the Theory and Algorithms Commons Recommended Citation Brent A. Yorgey, "Monoids: Theme and Variations (Functional Pearl)", . July 2012. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers/762 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monoids: Theme and Variations (Functional Pearl) Abstract The monoid is a humble algebraic structure, at first glance ve en downright boring. However, there’s much more to monoids than meets the eye. Using examples taken from the diagrams vector graphics framework as a case study, I demonstrate the power and beauty of monoids for library design. The paper begins with an extremely simple model of diagrams and proceeds through a series of incremental variations, all related somehow to the central theme of monoids. Along the way, I illustrate the power of compositional semantics; why you should also pay attention to the monoid’s even humbler cousin, the semigroup; monoid homomorphisms; and monoid actions. Keywords monoid, homomorphism, monoid action, EDSL Disciplines Programming Languages and Compilers | Software Engineering | Theory and Algorithms This conference paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers/762 Monoids: Theme and Variations (Functional Pearl) Brent A. Yorgey University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Abstract The monoid is a humble algebraic structure, at first glance even downright boring.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Vector Spaces
    AM 106/206: Applied Algebra Prof. Salil Vadhan Lecture Notes 18 November 25, 2009 1 Vector Spaces • Reading: Gallian Ch. 19 • Today's main message: linear algebra (as in Math 21) can be done over any field, and most of the results you're familiar with from the case of R or C carry over. • Def of vector space. • Examples: { F n { F [x] { Any ring containing F { F [x]=hp(x)i { C a vector space over R • Def of linear (in)dependence, span, basis. • Examples in F n: { (1; 0; 0; ··· ; 0), (0; 1; 0;:::; 0), . , (0; 0; 0;:::; 1) is a basis for F n { (1; 1; 0), (1; 0; 1), (0; 1; 1) is a basis for F 3 iff F has characteristic 2 • Def: The dimension of a vector space V over F is the size of the largest set of linearly independent vectors in V . (different than Gallian, but we'll show it to be equivalent) { A measure of size that makes sense even for infinite sets. • Prop: every finite-dimensional vector space has a basis consisting of dim(V ) vectors. Later we'll see that all bases have exactly dim(V ) vectors. • Examples: { F n has dimension n { F [x] has infinite dimension (1; x; x2; x3;::: are linearly independent) { F [x]=hp(x)i has dimension deg(p) (basis is (the cosets of) 1; x; x2; : : : ; xdeg(p)−1). { C has dimension 2 over R 1 • Proof: Let v1; : : : ; vk be the largest set of linearly independent vectors in V (so k = dim(V )).
    [Show full text]
  • Homomorphism Learning Problems and Its Applications to Public-Key Cryptography
    Homomorphism learning problems and its applications to public-key cryptography Christopher Leonardi1, 2 and Luis Ruiz-Lopez1, 2 1University of Waterloo 2Isara Corporation May 23, 2019 Abstract We present a framework for the study of a learning problem over abstract groups, and introduce a new technique which allows for public-key encryption using generic groups. We proved, however, that in order to obtain a quantum resistant encryption scheme, commuta- tive groups cannot be used to instantiate this protocol. Keywords: Learning With Errors, isogenies, non-commutative cryptography 1 Introduction Lattice based cryptography is nowadays the most prominent among the candidate areas for quantum resistant cryptography. The great popularity of lattice based cryptography is, in great part, due to its versatility|several different primitives have been constructed based on lattice problems|and security guarantees such as average-case to worst-case reductions to problems that are presumably hard even for quantum algorithms. Particularly, the short integers solutions problem (SIS), used by Ajtai in his seminal paper [1] to construct a one-way function, and the learning with errors problem (LWE), introduced by Regev in [18], have served as the backbone for several cryptographic constructions. The importance of these two problems goes beyond their applications in cryptography, since their formulation was motivated by purely mathematical problems of a mixed geometric and algebraic character. For example, SIS can be thought as the problem of finding short elements in the kernel of a linear function. For its part, LWE is the problem of finding solutions to a system of noisy linear equations. With these statements of the problems it is possible to imagine several generalizations of them, since some elements in the statements may seem rather arbitrary.
    [Show full text]
  • Commutative Algebra
    Commutative Algebra Andrew Kobin Spring 2016 / 2019 Contents Contents Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Radicals . .1 1.2 Nakayama's Lemma and Consequences . .4 1.3 Localization . .5 1.4 Transcendence Degree . 10 2 Integral Dependence 14 2.1 Integral Extensions of Rings . 14 2.2 Integrality and Field Extensions . 18 2.3 Integrality, Ideals and Localization . 21 2.4 Normalization . 28 2.5 Valuation Rings . 32 2.6 Dimension and Transcendence Degree . 33 3 Noetherian and Artinian Rings 37 3.1 Ascending and Descending Chains . 37 3.2 Composition Series . 40 3.3 Noetherian Rings . 42 3.4 Primary Decomposition . 46 3.5 Artinian Rings . 53 3.6 Associated Primes . 56 4 Discrete Valuations and Dedekind Domains 60 4.1 Discrete Valuation Rings . 60 4.2 Dedekind Domains . 64 4.3 Fractional and Invertible Ideals . 65 4.4 The Class Group . 70 4.5 Dedekind Domains in Extensions . 72 5 Completion and Filtration 76 5.1 Topological Abelian Groups and Completion . 76 5.2 Inverse Limits . 78 5.3 Topological Rings and Module Filtrations . 82 5.4 Graded Rings and Modules . 84 6 Dimension Theory 89 6.1 Hilbert Functions . 89 6.2 Local Noetherian Rings . 94 6.3 Complete Local Rings . 98 7 Singularities 106 7.1 Derived Functors . 106 7.2 Regular Sequences and the Koszul Complex . 109 7.3 Projective Dimension . 114 i Contents Contents 7.4 Depth and Cohen-Macauley Rings . 118 7.5 Gorenstein Rings . 127 8 Algebraic Geometry 133 8.1 Affine Algebraic Varieties . 133 8.2 Morphisms of Affine Varieties . 142 8.3 Sheaves of Functions .
    [Show full text]
  • Isomorphisms, Automorphisms, Homomorphisms, Kernels
    Isomorphisms, Automorphisms, Homomorphisms, Kernels September 10, 2009 Definition 1 Let G; G0 be groups and let f : G ! G0 be a mapping (of the underlying sets). We say that f is a (group) homomorphism if f(x · y) = f(x) · f(y) for all x; y 2 G. The composition f G−!G0−!h G" of two homomorphisms (as displayed) is again a homomorphism. For any two groups G, G0 by the trivial homomorphism from G to G0 we mean the mapping G ! G0 sending all elements to the identity element in G0. Recall: Definition 2 A group homomorphism f : G ! G0 is called a group isomorphism|or, for short, an isomorphism|if f is bijective. An isomorphism from a group G to itself is called an automorphism. Exercise 1 Let f : G ! G0 be a homomorphism of groups. The image under the homomorphism 0 f of any subgroup of G is a subgroup of G ; if H ⊂ G is generated by elements fx1; x2; : : : ; xng then its image f(H) is generated by the images ff(x1); f(x2); : : : ; f(xn)g; the image of any cyclic subgroup is cyclic; If f is an isomorphism from G to G0 and x 2 G then the order of x (which|by definition—is the order of the cyclic subgroup generated by x) is equal to the order of f(x). For G a group, let Aut(G) be the set of all automorphisms of G, with `composition of automorphisms" as its `composition law' (denoted by a center-dot (·). As noted in class, Proposition 1 If G is a group then Aut(G) is also a group.
    [Show full text]
  • Oriented Steiner Quasigroups
    Oriented Steiner quasigroups Izabella Stuhl Abstract We introduce the notion of an oriented Steiner quasigroup and de- velop elements of a relevant algebraic apparatus. The approach is based upon (modified) Schreier-type f-extensions for quasigroups (cf. earlier works [14, 11, 10]) achieved through oriented Steiner triple sys- tems. This is done in a fashion similar to in [13] where an analogous construction was established for loops. As a justification of this con- cept briefly discuss an application of oriented Steiner triple systems in cryptography using oriented Steiner quasigroups. 1 Introduction A Steiner triple system S is an incidence structure consisting of points and blocks such that every two distinct points are contained in precisely one block and any block has precisely three points. A finite Steiner triple system with n points exists if and only if n ≡ 1 or 3 (mod 6). A possible way to enrich Steiner triple systems is to introduce in each block a cyclic order. These objects occur in the literature as oriented Steiner triple systems (S, T ) (see [16]) or as Mendelsohn triple systems (see [8] Section 28, p. 388). Steiner triple systems play an important role in applications, particulary in cryptography, coding theory, statistics and computer science. Cf. [3], [6] (where a number of chapters are dedicated to this concept), and also [5] and the references therein. A particular example of an application is given in [15]. The results of the present paper develop an algebraic background that arXiv:1402.4644v2 [math.GR] 22 Apr 2014 can be useful, e.g., in the context of [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7.3: Ring Homomorphisms
    Lecture 7.3: Ring homomorphisms Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 4120, Modern Algebra M. Macauley (Clemson) Lecture 7.3: Ring homomorphisms Math 4120, Modern algebra 1 / 10 Motivation (spoilers!) Many of the big ideas from group homomorphisms carry over to ring homomorphisms. Group theory The quotient group G=N exists iff N is a normal subgroup. A homomorphism is a structure-preserving map: f (x ∗ y) = f (x) ∗ f (y). The kernel of a homomorphism is a normal subgroup: Ker φ E G. For every normal subgroup N E G, there is a natural quotient homomorphism φ: G ! G=N, φ(g) = gN. There are four standard isomorphism theorems for groups. Ring theory The quotient ring R=I exists iff I is a two-sided ideal. A homomorphism is a structure-preserving map: f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y) and f (xy) = f (x)f (y). The kernel of a homomorphism is a two-sided ideal: Ker φ E R. For every two-sided ideal I E R, there is a natural quotient homomorphism φ: R ! R=I , φ(r) = r + I . There are four standard isomorphism theorems for rings. M. Macauley (Clemson) Lecture 7.3: Ring homomorphisms Math 4120, Modern algebra 2 / 10 Ring homomorphisms Definition A ring homomorphism is a function f : R ! S satisfying f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y) and f (xy) = f (x)f (y) for all x; y 2 R: A ring isomorphism is a homomorphism that is bijective. The kernel f : R ! S is the set Ker f := fx 2 R : f (x) = 0g.
    [Show full text]