DOCSLIB.ORG

The Wider Vision of Social Policy: an Analysis of the Transformative Role of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme in Zvimba District (Zimbabwe)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Wider Vision of Social Policy: an Analysis of the Transformative Role of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme in Zvimba District (Zimbabwe) THE WIDER VISION OF SOCIAL POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSFORMATIVE ROLE OF THE FAST TRACK LAND REFORM PROGRAMME IN ZVIMBA DISTRICT (ZIMBABWE) by TOM TOM Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY In the subject SOCIOLOGY At the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR JIMI O. ADESINA APRIL 2020 Declaration I declare that the thesis is my own work, based on original research, and has not been submitted elsewhere for another award. The secondary sources consulted have been acknowledged by way of references. The Government of Zimbabwe granted permission through the relevant ministries, to access and reside in Zvimba district for data collection. Signed: Date: 20/04/2020 Tom Tom This thesis was submitted for examination with my approval. Signed: Date: 20/04/2020 Supervisor: Professor Jimi Adesina ii Dedication Felistas Ngombe, my wife. Lestencia Nyasha, Taombekwa and Rukudzo Mazvitaishe, my daughters. i Acknowledgements I honour my supervisor/promoter Professor Jimi Adesina (DST/NRF SARChI Chair in Social Policy), for the intellectual and professional guidance throughout the phases of the doctoral studies. Without such principal and towering support, this contribution to knowledge would not have succeeded. I am also grateful for the financial support provided by the South African Research Chair Initiative (SARChI) - Chair in Social Policy. The project would not have been achieved without the SARChI funding. I also thank my colleagues of the Zimbabwe land reform cohort at the Chair: Clement Chipenda, Musavengana Winston Theodore Chibwana and Newman Tekwa for constructive criticism, encouragement and sharing of field experiences. I also acknowledge the intellectual support provided by other colleagues at the SARChI Chair – Ashley Sarimana, Kola Omomowo, Oluranti Samuel, Austin Omoruan, Marion Ouma, Kim Usher, Kafui Tsepko, Mitchell Peens, Affiz Lawal, Sivuyisiwe Wonci, Kehinde Omotosho and Christal Spel Babalwa. To Ms. Bridget Ngobeni and Ipeleng Chauke, thank you for the administrative support at the SARChI Chair in Social Policy. You made my stay at the Chair pleasant. I also benefited tremendously from Professor Sam Moyo, the late Executive Director of the African Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS), now Sam Moyo African Institute for Agrarian Studies (SMAIAS), through extraordinaire insights and guidance in land and agrarian reform. I am also indebted to colleagues at SMAIAS – Dr. Walter Chambati (Acting Executive Director), Dr. Freedom Mazwi and Rangarirai Gavin Muchetu for the inspirational discussions on Zimbabwe’s land reforms. Mr. Charles Munyanyi and Ms. Malieta Kagura, and your team, I thank you for guiding me throughout my fieldwork in Zvimba district. My special acknowledgement goes to the ii Zvimba farming community for sharing with me their lived experiences and situated meanings of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme as a social policy instrument. May your lives be transformed through appropriate use of land and effective government policy in the agricultural sector. I am grateful to the University Council of the Zimbabwe Open University (ZOU) for affording me study leave to pursue doctoral studies. Such time was utilised for a good cause. My sincere acknowledgement also goes to the staff in the Faculty of Applied Social Sciences at the Zimbabwe Open University for inspiring me throughout the doctoral studies. These include, but are not limited to: Professor T. M. Kaputa (Dean), Shephard Mutsau, Edna Billiat, Kwaedza Kaseke, Tobias Guzura, Didmus Dewa, Wisdom Moyo, Professor Maxwell Constantine Chando Musingafi, the late Dr. Dick Ranga, Dr. Emmanuel Munemo, Professor Lincoln Hlatywayo, Professor Phillipah Mutswanga, Professor Barbra Mapuranga, Leonard Mpezeni, Dr. Esther Gandari, Andrew Mukono, Edith Karimanzira, Godffrey Tsvuura, Kudzai Chiwanza, Collen Chikowe, Caroline Mutara, Daniel Mrewa, Teurai Chiriseri, Masiiwa Jojo, Moddie Nhimura, Barbra Garura and Chipo Muuya. Special acknowledgement to my wife, Felistas Ngombe and my daughters (Lestencia Nyasha, Taombekwa and Rukudzo Mazvitaishe) for insights and inspiration. Above all, I thank the Almighty Lord God for life, health and the will to achieve. iii List of Acronyms AAPG All Africa Parliamentary Group AGRITEX Agricultural , Technical and Extension Services AIAS African Institute for Agrarian Studies AIDS Acquired Immunity Deficiency Syndrome AKTIS Agriculture, Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Systems AR Agrarian Reform ARDA Agriculture and Rural Development Authority AREX Department of Agriculture and Rural Extension BIPPA Bilateral Promotion and Protection Agreement CA Communal Area CAADP Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme CAIS Command Agriculture Inputs Scheme CBO Community Based Organisation CFSS Commercial Farm Settlement Scheme CF Contract Farming CFU Commercial Farmers Union COTTCO Cotton Company of Zimbabwe CSO Central Statistical Office/ Civil Society Organisation DA District Administrator DAC District AIDS Committee DAEO District Agricultural Extension Officer DCC District Co-ordinating Committee DDF District Development Fund DLC District Lands Committee DLIC District Land Identification Committee EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return EMA Environmental Management Agency ESAP Economic Structural Adjustment Programme FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FCTZ Farm Community Trust of Zimbabwe FGD Focus Group Discussion FLIs Farm Level Institutions FNSP Food and Nutrition Security Policy FTFs Fast Track Farms FTLR Fast Track Land Reform FTLRP Fast Track Land Reform Programme GAPWUZ General Agriculture and Plantation Workers Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GMB Grain Marketing Board GoZ Government of Zimbabwe GPA Global Political Agreement Ha Hectare HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IAPRI International Agricultural Policy Research Institute ICA Intensive Conservation Area IDS Institute of Development Studies INGO International Non-Governmental Organisation iv JAG Justice for Agriculture LC Land Commission LCA Land Commission Act LCB Land Commission Bill LRRP Land Reform and Resettlement Programme LLA Land Acquisition Act LSCF Large Scale Commercial Farm MDC Movement for Democratic Change MDC-A Movement for Democratic Change (Alliance) MA1 Model A1 MA2 Model A2 MLRR Ministry of Lands and Rural Resettlement NAC National AIDS Council NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NR Natural Region NRAs New Resettlement Areas ORAs Old Resettlement Areas OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PF ZAPU Zimbabwe African People’s Union Patriotic Front PLIC Provincial Land Identification Committee RBZ Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe RCZ Research Council of Zimbabwe RDC Rural District Council SADC Southern Africa Development Community SAFIRE Southern Alliance for Indigenous Resources SIRDC Scientific Industrial Research and Documentation Centre SMAIAS Sam Moyo African Institute for Agrarian Studies SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences SSCF Small Scale Commercial Farm TCAS Targeted Command Agriculture Scheme TIMB Tobacco Industrial Board TSP Transformative Social Policy TTL Tribal Trust Land UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme VIDCO Village Development Committee WAC Ward AIDS Committee WB World Bank WADCO Ward Development Committee ZAIP Zimbabwe Agricultural Investment Plan ZANU PF Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front ZCAPF Zimbabwe Comprehensive Agricultural Policy Framework ZESA Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Company ZFU Zimbabwe Farmers Union ZIDERA Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act ZIJRI Zimbabwe Joint Resettlement Initiative ZIMASSET Zimbabwe Agenda for Socio-Economic Transformation ZIMSTAT Zimbabwe National Statistical Agency ZNA Zimbabwe National Army ZNAPF Zimbabwe National Agricultural Policy Framework v ZNFU Zimbabwe National Farmers Union ZRDC Zvimba Rural District Council ZRP Zimbabwe Republic Police vi Abstract The thesis focuses on the social policy dimension of Zimbabwe’s Fast Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP). Interrogating land reform in the context of Transformative Social Policy (TSP) is a critical lacuna in Zimbabwe’s land reform and dominant social policy literature, implying the absence of a wider vision of social policy. This vision emphasises the consideration of the five tasks of social policy (production, redistribution, reproduction, protection and social cohesion); and acknowledges the symbiotic link between social policy and development. The thesis asks, how did the FTLRP and land occupations unfold; what is the new agrarian structure and, forms of social organisation in the aftermath of the fast track land reform; and how has the programme played out in relation to redistribution, production, social protection, reproduction and social cohesion? The thesis is based on a qualitative- dominant mixed methods research approach, and is complemented by predominantly quantitative data gathered by the African Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS), now Sam Moyo African Institute for Agrarian Studies (SMAIAS); and a sample of 150 A1 land beneficiaries drawn from Dalkeith, Whynhill and St Lucia Farms. Using grounded empirical data gathered in an eight (8) months-long ethnography in Zvimba district, Mashonaland West Province; and transcending ideological and epistemological debates, the thesis argues that, despite shortcomings, the fast track land reform is a crucial social policy ‘instrument’ with immense potential to transform lives. Across the district, land is a core economic,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the National Stakeholders Initiation Workshop For
    Proceedings of the National Stakeholders Initiation workshop for BID project of “Mobilization of data on non- timber forest products’ species in Zimbabwe’s five biodiversity hotspots: towards the enhancement of food security and human health” held at Mayfair Lodge, Bindura, Zimbabwe, from 01-02 March 2017. Prepared by L. Mujuru Bindura University, Department of Natural Resources. P. bag 1020 Bindura, Zimbabwe 1 Disclaimer This Workshop Report is a project output in the Financial Assistance provided by the European Union through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility to Bindura University and its partners: National Herbarium and botanic gardens, and the Forestry Commission. The views and conclusions herein are those of the workshop participants and the authors, and should not be taken to correspond to the policies, procedures, opinions, and views of the European Union, GBIF, BUSE or Government of Zimbabwe. 2 Executive Summary The overall objective of the initiation workshop was to familiarize stakeholders with the objectives of the project, consolidate the lists of priority NTFPs species (Food and medicinal) from representative communities in and around the five biodiversity hotspots, identify additional information holding institutions and develop a plan of action and to share knowledge and skills acquired from the BID capacity enhancement workshop with all stakeholders. The Workshop also sought to lay the foundation for subsequent work on the mobilisation and digitisation of biodiversity data in Zimbabwe with specific activities described in the approved project proposal. The initiation workshop was a formal review of information gathered during some community meetings held in five biodiversity hotspot areas: Hwange, Chipinge, Chimanimani, Nyanga and the Great dyke.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Detailed timeline: Zimbabwe Rick de Satgé This timeline provides additional information to the Land Portal profile on Zimbabwe Year Event Context Land Portal Profile Tags Precolonial Zimbabwe was originally populated by A trading regime is developed between Shona polities and #Precolonial history history groups of San hunter gatherers. the Portuguese on the coast of Mozambique in the mid- The first Bantu speakers migrated into 1500s. the territory between 200-400 A.D. Shona speaking people settled on the Zimbabwean plateau around a thousand A.D. 1840’s An Nguni group, the Ndebele were Relations between Ndebele and various Shona polities in the #Precolonial history displaced during a period of social precolonial period combined periods of conflict, coexistence upheaval in South Africa known as the and assimilation. The Shona term describing the Ndebele as mfecane, first migrating from Zululand madzviti – ‘those who do not belong’1 provides an indicator up into the Transvaal, before settling in of the potential for future conflict and division. the south of modern-day Zimbabwe. 1881 Colonial concession seekers expand into The Ndebele leader Lobengula signs the Rudd Concession #Colonial encroachment present day Botswana and Zimbabwe in valid for 25 years, authorising “the complete and exclusive search of gold and minerals. charge over all metals and minerals situated and contained in my kingdoms, principalities, and dominions, together with full power to do all things that they may deem necessary to 1 (Ndlovu 2017: 117) 1 Year Event Context Land Portal Profile Tags win and procure the same, and to hold, collect, and enjoy the profits and revenues”.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Annual Budget Review for 2016 and the 2017 Outlook
    ZIMBABWE ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW FOR 2016 AND THE 2017 OUTLOOK Presented to the Parliament of Zimbabwe on Thursday, July 20, 2017 by The Hon. P. A. Chinamasa, M.P. Minister of Finance and Economic Development 1 1 2 FOREWORD In presenting the 2017 National Budget on 8 December 2016, I indicated the need to strengthen the outline of the Budget Statement presentation as an instrument of Budget accountability and fiscal transparency, in the process improving policy engagement and accessibility for a wider range of public and targeted audiences. Accordingly, I presented a streamlined Budget Statement, and advised that extensive economic review material, which historically was presented as part of the National Budget Statement, would now be provided through a new publication called the Annual Budget Review. I am, therefore, pleased to unveil and Table the first Annual Budget Review, beginning with Fiscal Year 2016. This reports on revenue and expenditure outturn for the full fiscal year, 2016. Furthermore, the Annual Budget Review also allows opportunity for reporting on other recent macro-economic developments and the outlook for 2017. As I indicated to Parliament in December 2016, the issuance of the Annual Budget Review, therefore, makes the issuance of the Mid-Term Fiscal Policy Review no longer necessary, save for exceptional circumstances requiring Supplementary Budget proposals. 3 Treasury will, however, continue to provide Quarterly Treasury Bulletins, capturing quarterly macro-economic and fiscal developments, in addition to the Consolidated Monthly Financial Statements published monthly in line with the Public Finance Management Act. This should avail the public with necessary information on relevant economic developments, that way enhancing and supporting their decision making processes, activities and engagement with Government on overall economic policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Report 2014
    ANNUAL FIRE REPORT 2014 FIRE Hay bailing along the Victoria Falls- Kazungula Road to reduce road side fires Page 1 of 24 ANNUAL FIRE REPORT 2014 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Fire Prediction Modelling ..................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Fire Monitoring .................................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Environmental Education and Training ................................................................................................ 8 5.0 EMA/ZRP Fire Management Awards ................................................................................................. 14 6.0 Law enforcement ............................................................................................................................... 17 7.0 Impacts of Fires .................................................................................................................................. 18 7.0 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 21 8.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 22 Annex 1: Pictures ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking History:Citizenship, Power, and the Recasting of Heroes and Villains
    REMAKING HISTORY:CITIZENSHIP, POWER, AND THE RECASTING OF HEROES AND VILLAINS BY DALE DORÉ In a reworked narrative on nationalism, veterans were cast as the heroic liberators of the land from whites, seen as unreconstructed racists, and a former colonial power which was, twenty years after independence, portrayed more fervently than ever as the obstacle to ‘real’ decolonisation. ~ Jocelyn Alexander1 SUMMARY Joseph Hanlon, Jeanette Manjengwa and Teresa Stewart’s book, Zimbabwe Takes Back the Land,2 gives fresh impetus to Scoones’ narrative on land.3 Their blurb on the back cover recognises the deprecations of the Mugabe government, but assures readers that “ordinary” Zimbabwean settlers took charge of their destinies, are improving their lives, and are becoming increasingly productive. Like Scoones, it is fundamentally a plea to the international community to support new farmers on contested land. The main thrust of their argument is that Zimbabweans justifiably and successfully took back their land from white Rhodesian colonialist farmers. In this paper I challenge their remaking of history that casts war veterans as heroes and white farmers as villains. I focus primarily on identity, citizenship, and belonging: what it means to be Zimbabwean. Contrary to this reworking of the nationalist narrative, I argue that the land invasions were primarily used as a means to crush the opposition and as a tool of patronage ahead of crucial elections. But more than this, land seizures follow a well-practiced pattern of widespread and systematic violence against civilians – from Gukurahundi and Murambatsvina, to premeditated political violence. Robert Mugabe’s single-minded purpose has been to maintain his imperious powers against the sovereign will of the people at any cost.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Natural Resource Management in Zimbabwe's Communal Lands
    NYIKA VANHU: THE LAND IS THE PEOPLE: An Examination of Natural Resource Management in Zimbabwe’s Communal Lands A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Applied Social Sciences) Charles James Kingsley Latham Centre for Applied Social Sciences University of Zimbabwe November 2005 1 Table of Contents List of figures.............................................................................................................................. iv List of tables................................................................................................................................ iv List of boxes ................................................................................................................................ iv Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... v Abstract......................................................................................................................................vii Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................viii Chapter 1 Purpose and Methodology.......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Methodology 7 1.3 Continuity and Change 11 Chapter 2 Worldviews, Science and Natural Resources.......................................................................... 13 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Assistance for Grassroots Human Projects in Zimbabwe
    Grant Assistance for Grassroots Human Projects in Zimbabwe Amount Amount Ｎｏ Year Project Title Implementing Organisation District (US) (yen) １ 1989 Mbungu Primary School Development Project Mbungu Primary School Gokwe 16,807 2,067,261 ２ 1989 Sewing and Knitting Project Rutowa Young Women's Club Gutu 5,434 668,382 ３ 1990 Children's Agricultural Project Save the Children USA Nyangombe 8,659 1,177,624 Mbungo Uniform Clothing Tailoring Workshop ４ 1990 Mbungo Women's Club Masvingo 14,767 2,008,312 Project Construction of Gardening Facilities in ５ 1991 Cold Comfort Farm Trust Harare 42,103 5,431,287 Support of Small-Scale Farmers ６ 1991 Pre-School Project Kwayedza Cooperative Gweru 33,226 4,286,154 Committee for the Rural Technical ７ 1992 Rural Technical Training Project Murehwa 38,266 4,936,314 Training Project ８ 1992 Mukotosi Schools Project Mukotosi Project Committee Chivi 20,912 2,697,648 ９ 1992 Bvute Dam Project Bvute Dam Project Committee Chivi 3,558 458,982 １０ 1992 Uranda Clinic Project Uranda Clinic Project Committee Chivi 1,309 168,861 １１ 1992 Utete Dam Project Utete Dam Project Committee Chivi 8,051 1,038,579 Drilling of Ten Boreholes for Water and １２ 1993 Irrigation in the Inyathi and Tsholotsho Help Age Zimbabwe Tsholotsho 41,574 5,072,028 PromotionDistricts of ofSocialForestry Matabeleland andManagement Zimbabwe National Conservation １３ 1993 Buhera 46,682 5,695,204 ofWoodlands inCommunalAreas ofZimbabwe Trust Expansion of St. Mary's Gavhunga Primary St. Mary's Gavhunga Primary １４ 1994 Kadoma 29,916 3,171,096 School School Tsitshatshawa
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL VELD FIRE REPORT 2020.Cdr
    2020 VELD FIRE REPORT Environmental Management Agency 685/6 Lorraine Drive, Bluffhill, Harare Toll Free: 08080028 [email protected] Whatsapp: 0779 565 707 Environmental Management Agency Muzarabani Vehicle and 3 Tractors for Hurungwe, Mbire and Muzarabani Districts @EMAeep Fire Update Email: fi[email protected] Contents Foreword 2 1.0 Introduct ion 3 2.0 Fire management intervent ions 3 2.1 Fire Risk Modelling 4 2.2 Interventions to Reduce Veld Fires 5 . 3.0 Impacts of veld fires 5 4.0 Fire Education and Awar eness 7 5.0 Fire management proj ects 8 5.1 Hay Baling 8 5.2 Fire guard construction 10 5.3 Thatch grass combing 12 5.4 Road servitude maintenance 13 5.5 Apiculture projects 14 5.6 Fire Orders Issued 15 5.7 Fire related material donated 16 6.0 Conclusion 16 Annex 1: District area burnt (H a) 17 Annex 2: Fire pictures 18 1 2020 Fire Report Foreword This report gives a synopsis of veld fire management in the country in the year 2020. The fire season which started on 31 July to 31 October 2020 came in the backdrop of the Covid19 pandemic which challenged the Agency and its partners to be innovative in veld fire management. To comply with Covid19 regulations limited meetings were conducted with increased social distancing and reduced travel . The Agency adopted social media as a means of information dissemination on veld fire management as well as working with local leadership. A total of 1 178 veld fire incidences were recorded between 31 July and 31 October 2020 resulted in 806 457.84 hectares being burnt.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Perspectives on the Land Reform in Zimbabwe 91 Approaches with Varying Implications
    90 Kudzayi Savious DIVERGENT PERSPECTIVES ON Tarisayi THE LAND REFORM IN ZIMBABWE Postdoctoral Fellow, Geography Education, School of Education, Abstract Edgewood Campus, University of A variety of views on land reform in Zimbabwe have KwaZulu-Natal. emerged in recent years. The background to the Email: TarisayiK@ukzn. discussion on the perspectives on the land reform ac.za revealed the significant contribution of the outcome of the February 2000 referendum on the Fast Track Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe. This paper interrogates DOI: https://dx.doi. the various views on land reform in Zimbabwe under org/10.18820/24150509/ four dominant perspectives: the political perspective, JCH44.v1.5 livelihoods perspective, human rights perspective and ISSN 0258-2422 (Print) agricultural perspective. The paper shows that there are ISSN 2415-0509 (Online) divergent views within these dominant perspectives. Journal for Contemporary One view within the political perspective holds that the History government ruling party, the Zimbabwe African National 2019 44(1):90-106 Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF), led by Robert Mugabe, manipulated demand for land to gain political mileage. © Creative Commons With Views within the political perspective further argue that Attribution (CC-BY) land reform was used as a weapon against white farmers for allegedly supporting the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) opposition party. There was no consensus on what happened to the livelihoods of black farmers after the Fast Track Land Reform Programme. Whereas, within the livelihoods perspectives it was noted that the livelihoods of farmworkers declined. Keywords: land reform; political perspective; livelihoods perspective; agricultural productivity; human rights perspective; Zimbabwe Sleutelwoorde: grondhervorming; politieke perspektief; lewensbestaan perspektief; landbouproduksie; menseregte perspektief; Zimbabwe 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Livelihood Baseline Profile
    Zimbabwe Livelihood Baseline Profile Kariba Valley Kariangwe Jambezi Communal August-September 20101 Main Conclusions and Implications Crop production is the main food source over the reference year contributing 38 percent of very poor household food access and 82 percent for the Better-off. The main constraints to improved land utilisation and crop production are lack of draught power and poor access to seeds and fertiliser. Extension services and monitoring of agriculture activities should be strengthened through support to the ministry of agriculture’s department of extension services (AGRITEX). The livelihood zone borders with Mutusadona and Chizarira national parks. Proximity to national parks increases human, livestock and wildlife interaction. Elephants, Baboons, Buffaloes and Quela birds often stray into fields and destroy crops. Livestock production, which has relatively increased in recent years, is also limited by concerns over tsetse fly outbreaks. Surrounding communities receive little benefit from resources in the national parks except for the occasional slaughter of wild animals. Strengthening the CAMPFIRE scheme provides a framework for legal and sustainable access to natural resources found in the national parks. Food aid distributed for six months enabled very poor and poor households to access their minimum food requirements. Limited livelihood options and adverse weather conditions combine to increase very poor and poor households’ vulnerability to food insecurity and poverty. Over the last ten years, the risk of food insecurity has been addressed primarily through food aid distributions. External assistance whose focus has been on addressing immediate consumption needs has created dependency and is undermining long term household coping capacity and development prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural District Planning in Zimbabwe: a Case Study
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT Environmental Planning Issues No.23, December 2000 Local Strategic Planning and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods Rural District Planning in Zimbabwe: A Case Study By PlanAfric Bulawayo, Zimbabwe A Report to the UK Department for International Development (Research contract: R72510) PlanAfric Suite 416, 4th Floor, Treger House, 113 Jason Moyo Street PO Box FM 524, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Tel/Fax: +263-9-66142; Email: [email protected] IIED 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD Tel: +44-171-388-2117; Fax: +44-171-388-2826 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.iied.org ISBN: 1 899825 76 2 NOTE This manuscript was completed in November 1999. It has not been possible to include any updates to the text to reflect any changes that might have occurred in terms of legislation, institutional arrangements and key issues. RURAL PLANNING REPORTS This report is one of a suite of four prepared for a study of rural planning experience globally, and published by IIED in its Environmental Planning Issues series: Botchie G. (2000) Rural District Planning in Ghana: A Case Study. Environmental Planning Issues No. 21, Internationa l Institute for Environment and Development, London Dalal-Clayton, D.B., Dent D.L. and Dubois O. (1999): Rural Planning in the Developing World with a Special Focus on Natural Resources: Lessons Learned and Potential Contributions to Sustainable Livelihoods: An Overview. Report to UK Department for International Development. Environmental Planning Issues No.20, IIED, London Khanya-mrc (2000) Rural planning in South Africa: A case study. A report prepared by Khanya – managing rural change, Bloemfontein.
    [Show full text]
  • ZANU-PF's Use of Ethnic Conflict As a Means of Maintaining Political
    S TRATEGY OF D OMINATION ZANU-PF’S USE OF ETHNIC CONFLICT AS A MEANS OF MAINTAINING POLITICAL CONTROL IN ZIMBABWE, 1982-2006 Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy Thesis Submitted by Brian Eric Abrams 25 April 2006 © 2006 Brian Eric Abrams http://fletcher.tufts.edu Abstract Zimbabwe is currently a country in crisis politically and economically. President Robert Mugabe’s extreme policies against the opposition have led to Zimbabwe’s international isolation. Within Africa, however, Mugabe has largely been shielded from criticism. The framing of his campaign against the opposition within the rhetoric of anti- colonialism has created a veil of legitimacy behind which Mugabe has been free to act. This paper argues that Robert Mugabe and his ZANU-PF party have habitually used ethnic conflict as a self-serving political weapon in Zimbabwe. It first develops a two- tiered theoretical framework within which the case of Zimbabwe can analyzed. It then analyzes three case studies in which Mugabe utilized ethnic conflict to neutralize political opposition: the campaign against the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (1982-1987); the legitimization of the seizure of white-owned farms by ex-combatants (1998-2005); and the repression of the Movement for Democratic Change (2000-2006). 2 3 Table of Contents I. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................5 II. Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]