The Squall Line and Massachusetts Tornadoes of June 9, 1953

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Squall Line and Massachusetts Tornadoes of June 9, 1953 VOL. 36, No. 3, MARCH, 1955 109 The Squall Line and Massachusetts Tornadoes of June 9, 1953 SAMUEL PENN, CHARLES PIERCE AND JAMES K. MCGUIRE U. S. Weather Bureau, Boston, Mass. (Manuscript received April 25, 1954) ABSTRACT Some features of the squall line situation of June 9, 1953 and accompanying tornadoes in central and eastern Massachusetts are discussed. From radarscope photographs, it is pointed out (1) that the Worcester tornado and the Franklin-Wrentham tornado each occurred in the right-rear quadrant of a squall-line thunderstorm cell, and (2) that this relative position, with an associated tail or hook in the radar echo, is similar to that of the Illinois tornado of April 9, 1953. A tentative explanation is suggested for tornado formation in this position. INTRODUCTION storms, violent in spots, were general over New ON the afternoon of June 9, 1953, two se- England. These disturbances accompanied the vere tornadoes roared through central and passage of a prefrontal squall line which developed eastern Massachusetts, while a third struck early that afternoon as a low pressure system Exeter, N. H. In addition, a "baby twister" was moved into the New England area. On the two reported from Rollinsford, N. H., and thunder- preceding days, squall line developments in the FIG. 1. Paths of the two Massachusetts tornadoes of June 9, 1953. Path widths exaggerated to show regions of maximum intensity. Dashed tracks indicate "skipping." Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/08/21 09:01 PM UTC 110 BULLETIN AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY FIG. 2. Photograph of tornado taken about 1625E 6 miles east of Worcester by Robert P. Resch, 2nd, of Westboro, Mass. Funnel estimated % mile away. FIG. 3. Surface chart for 1330E June 7, 1953. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/08/21 09:01 PM UTC VOL. 36, No. 3, MARCH, 1955 111 FIG. 4. Surface chart for 1930E June 8, 1953. same region of the Low generated tornadic ac- the fact that echoes from the thunderstorms as- tivity in the Great Plains, Mid-West and Great sociated with the Massachusetts tornadoes were Lakes regions. observed on radar sets operated by the Depart- In this paper, attention will be concentrated on ment of Meteorology of the Massachusetts In- the two Massachusets tornadoes whose paths are stitute of Technology, at Cambridge, Mass., un- given in FIGURE 1, and primarily on the first and der contract with the U. S. Army Signal Corps more devastating of these, the "Worcester tor- Engineering Laboratories, and by Project Lincoln nado". This storm, a photograph of which is of M.I.T. at Lexington, Mass. Through the shown in FIGURE 2, ranks among the most de- courtesy of these organizations, photographs of structive storms of its type on record for the radar echoes obtained on the afternoon of June 9 United States. The other Massachusetts tornado, were made available. It is proposed, then, to the so-called Franklin-Wrentham storm, was some- point out some of the features of the tornado situa- what less intense but still of major magnitude. tion on that date as revealed by a study of the Considerable information on both of these was synoptic background, the squall-line activity, and collected at the New England Climatological Sec- the radar scope photographs. tion Center of the U. S. Weather Bureau. In par- ticular, it was possible to construct detailed maps SYNOPTIC BACKGROUND of the paths of the tornadoes and to obtain a num- As is often the case, large-scale surface analysis ber of reliable time-checks on their movement. yielded few clues as to the mechanism of either the The value of such information is enhanced by squall line or the associated tornadoes. The fol- Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/08/21 09:01 PM UTC 112 BULLETIN AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY FIG. 5. Surface chart for 1330E June 9, 1953. lowing brief description gives the main sequence the first of the day's tornadoes occurred only five of events leading up to the disastrous Massachu- hours afterwards, and a squall line associated setts storms. with tornado activity is a feature of the 1930E The 1930E map of June 6 showed a Pacific map (FIG. 4). The widespread nature of this ac- front moving into the Rockies, whose northern tivity, however, suggests that more than one portion was occupied by a broad area of low squall line was involved, a conclusion which may pressure. On the morning of June 7, as the Pa- also be drawn from a synoptic study of the situa- cific front crossed over to the eastern side of the tion earlier on June 8. range, a well-defined Low formed in Eastern This same feature—violent activity following Colorado. That afternoon, tornadoes broke out quickly from a relatively quiescent situation—was in northeastern Colorado, western Nebraska and repeated on June 9. The night of the 8-9th and Iowa, some of these occurring in the vicinity of the morning of the 9th showed little or nothing in the pre-cold-frontal squall line which appears on the way of squall line weather as the system passed the 1330E map (FIG. 3) of June 7. During the over Pennsylvania and New York. On the early late afternoon and evening of the following day, afternoon of the 9th, however, squall line activity with the regeneration of squall line activity, south- developed afresh in west-central New England. eastern Michigan and northwestern Ohio experi- Violent hailstorms broke out in the northwestern enced widespread tornadic activity. The 1330E Massachusetts-southeastern Vermont-southwestern map of June 8 showed practically no showers or New Hampshire border region. Fanning out from thunderstorms in advance of the cold front, though this center, hailstorms developed during the course Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/08/21 09:01 PM UTC VOL. 36, No. 3, MARCH, 1955 113 of the afternoon in two bands along the squall line. the property losses were caused by the first tor- One hail track extended eastward to the New nado, mainly in and around Worcester. Here the Hampshire coast, while the other led southeast- twister attained its greatest intensity and its maxi- ward across Massachusetts to Cape Cod. It is mum width, almost one mile. worth noting that the tornadoes occurred on the The 1330E, 1630E and 1930E sectional surface same segments of the squall line that produced maps of the 9th, given in FIGURES 5-7, delineate these hailstorms. the progress of the squall line across New Eng- The first tornado struck in Petersham, Mass., land. The first of these charts coincides closely shortly before 1525E and moved forty-six miles, with the outbreak of the hailstorms. The second as shown in FIGURE 1, to its point of dissolution map is near the time of the ending of the Wor- in Southborough about 1645E. The second cester tornado, the occurrence of the Exeter struck Exeter, N. H., around 1620E, while the twister, and the beginning of the second Massa- third (see FIG. 1) travelled a twenty-nine-mile chusetts tornado. The 1930E chart represents path, starting in Sutton, Mass., about 1630E and conditions after the tornadic activity had ended ending in Mansfield at 1737E. These three and the squall line, in other respects still vigorous, storms combined to take ninety lives, inflict over had swept east of New England except for Cape 400 major and close to 900 minor injuries, and Cod and northeastern Maine. Over Cape Cod destroy an estimated $60,000,000 in property. All that evening there was a magnificent display of the fatalities, most of the injuries, and the bulk of vivid, continuous lightning for nearly three hours. FIG. 6. Surface chart for 1630E June 9, 1953. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/08/21 09:01 PM UTC 114 BULLETIN AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY FIG. 7. Surface chart for 1930E June 9, 1953. FIG. 8. 850-mb chart for 1030E June 7, 1953. FIG. 9. 850-mb chart for 1030E June 8, 1953. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/08/21 09:01 PM UTC VOL. 36, No. 3, MARCH, 1955 115 FIG. 10. 850-mb chart for 1030E June 9, 1953. THE SQUALL LINE The synoptic parameter most closely associated FIG. 11. Plotted raob sounding for Mt. Clemens, Mich., with the squall line in this case was warm-air 1030E June 7 and 8, 1953. advection in the lowest layers of the atmosphere. This statement is not meant to offer the advec- tion as a mechanism for the squall line, but to point out its importance as a means of affecting the thermal stratification of the air in advance of the cold front. Several investigators have called attention to relationships between squall lines and various types of advection. Newton [1] mentions that a warm tongue at 850 mb is very often found in advance of a pre-colcl-frontal squall line, and states that the squall line will dissipate upon reach- ing the axis of the warm tongue. According to Crawford [2] and MacDonald [3], a squall line develops along the axis of an 850-mb warm tongue, in conjunction with certain features of 700-mb cold-air advection. In the case under examination, the squall line on June 7th lay immediately to the west of the 850-mb warm tongue. The squall lines that de- veloped on the next two days appeared in the same relative position. FIGURES 8-10 give the 850-mb charts for June 7, 8 and 9; FIGURE 11 contains the Mount Clemens, Mich., raobs for the 7th and 8th; FIGURE 12 shows the Portland, Me., and FIGURE 13 the Hempstead, N. Y., raobs for the 8th and 9th. These clearly indicate the effect FIG. 12.
Recommended publications
  • Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & a Brief Look at the 18
    Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & A Brief Look At The 18 June 2010 Derecho Gino Izzi National Weather Service, Chicago IL Outline • Meteorology 301: Squall lines – Brief review of thunderstorm basics – Squall lines – Squall line tornadoes – Mesovorticies • Storm spotting for squall lines • Brief Case Study of 18 June 2010 Event Thunderstorm Ingredients • Moisture – Gulf of Mexico most common source locally Thunderstorm Ingredients • Lifting Mechanism(s) – Fronts – Jet Streams – “other” boundaries – topography Thunderstorm Ingredients • Instability – Measure of potential for air to accelerate upward – CAPE: common variable used to quantify magnitude of instability < 1000: weak 1000-2000: moderate 2000-4000: strong 4000+: extreme Thunderstorms Thunderstorms • Moisture + Instability + Lift = Thunderstorms • What kind of thunderstorms? – Single Cell – Multicell/Squall Line – Supercells Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? – Short/simplistic answer: CAPE vs Shear Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? (Longer/more complex answer) – Lot we don’t know, other factors (besides CAPE/shear) include • Strength of forcing • Strength of CAP • Shear WRT to boundary • Other stuff Thunderstorm Types • Multi-cell squall lines most common type of severe thunderstorm type locally • Most common type of severe weather is damaging winds • Hail and brief tornadoes can occur with most the intense squall lines Squall Lines & Spotting Squall Line Terminology • Squall Line : a relatively narrow line of thunderstorms, often
    [Show full text]
  • NWS Unified Surface Analysis Manual
    Unified Surface Analysis Manual Weather Prediction Center Ocean Prediction Center National Hurricane Center Honolulu Forecast Office November 21, 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Surface Analysis – Its History at the Analysis Centers…………….3 Chapter 2: Datasets available for creation of the Unified Analysis………...…..5 Chapter 3: The Unified Surface Analysis and related features.……….……….19 Chapter 4: Creation/Merging of the Unified Surface Analysis………….……..24 Chapter 5: Bibliography………………………………………………….…….30 Appendix A: Unified Graphics Legend showing Ocean Center symbols.….…33 2 Chapter 1: Surface Analysis – Its History at the Analysis Centers 1. INTRODUCTION Since 1942, surface analyses produced by several different offices within the U.S. Weather Bureau (USWB) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Weather Service (NWS) were generally based on the Norwegian Cyclone Model (Bjerknes 1919) over land, and in recent decades, the Shapiro-Keyser Model over the mid-latitudes of the ocean. The graphic below shows a typical evolution according to both models of cyclone development. Conceptual models of cyclone evolution showing lower-tropospheric (e.g., 850-hPa) geopotential height and fronts (top), and lower-tropospheric potential temperature (bottom). (a) Norwegian cyclone model: (I) incipient frontal cyclone, (II) and (III) narrowing warm sector, (IV) occlusion; (b) Shapiro–Keyser cyclone model: (I) incipient frontal cyclone, (II) frontal fracture, (III) frontal T-bone and bent-back front, (IV) frontal T-bone and warm seclusion. Panel (b) is adapted from Shapiro and Keyser (1990) , their FIG. 10.27 ) to enhance the zonal elongation of the cyclone and fronts and to reflect the continued existence of the frontal T-bone in stage IV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the 10–11 June 1985 PRE-STORM Squall Line: Initiation
    478 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 125 The Evolution of the 10±11 June 1985 PRE-STORM Squall Line: Initiation, Development of Rear In¯ow, and Dissipation SCOTT A. BRAUN AND ROBERT A. HOUZE JR. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Manuscript received 12 December 1995, in ®nal form 12 August 1996) ABSTRACT Mesoscale analysis of surface observations and mesoscale modeling results show that the 10±11 June squall line, contrary to prior studies, did not form entirely ahead of a cold front. The primary environmental features leading to the initiation and organization of the squall line were a low-level trough in the lee of the Rocky Mountains and a midlevel short-wave trough. Three additional mechanisms were active: a southeastward-moving cold front formed the northern part of the line, convection along the edge of cold air from prior convection over Oklahoma and Kansas formed the central part of the line, and convection forced by convective out¯ow near the lee trough axis formed the southern portion of the line. Mesoscale model results show that the large-scale environment signi®cantly in¯uenced the mesoscale cir- culations associated with the squall line. The qualitative distribution of along-line velocities within the squall line is attributed to the larger-scale circulations associated with the lee trough and midlevel baroclinic wave. Ambient rear-to-front (RTF) ¯ow to the rear of the squall line, produced by the squall line's nearly perpendicular orientation to strong westerly ¯ow at upper levels, contributed to the exceptional strength of the rear in¯ow in this storm.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of Turbulent Kinematics and Lightning-Inferred Electric Potential Structure in a Severe Squall Line Eric C
    XV International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, 15-20 June 2014, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A. Observations of turbulent kinematics and lightning-inferred electric potential structure in a severe squall line Eric C. Bruning1∗ Vicente Salinas1, Vanna Sullivan1, Scott Gunter1, and John Schroeder1 1Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: Recent work by Bruning and MacGorman [2013] proposed an energetic measure of lightning flashes based on flash size (area) and rate. The resulting energy spectrum as a function of flash size had a consistent shape, and had an apparently linear scaling regime at the same length scales where a turbulent thunderstorm’s inertial subrange would be expected. They hypothesized that electrical potential was organized by the (possibly turbulent) character of the convective flow. Since then, flash extent has also been applied to the energy available for NOx production by lightning, and the geometric, space-filling character of the lightning channel itself. A severe squall line that moved across West Texas on the night of 5 June 2013 caused extensive dam- age, including much that was consistent with 80-90 mph winds in the vicinity of Lubbock. The storm was samplednear Pep, TX during the onset of severe winds by two Ka-band mobile radars operated by Texas Tech University (TTU), as well as the West Texas Lightning Mapping Array (WTLMA). In-situ observa- tions by TTU StickNet probes verified the severe winds. Vertical scans with the radars were taken ahead of the storm and continuously for one hour behind the line in conditions consistent with the conceptual model for the transition zone of a mesoscale convective system.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi-Linear Convective System Mesovorticies and Tornadoes
    Quasi-Linear Convective System Mesovorticies and Tornadoes RYAN ALLISS & MATT HOFFMAN Meteorology Program, Iowa State University, Ames ABSTRACT Quasi-linear convective system are a common occurance in the spring and summer months and with them come the risk of them producing mesovorticies. These mesovorticies are small and compact and can cause isolated and concentrated areas of damage from high winds and in some cases can produce weak tornadoes. This paper analyzes how and when QLCSs and mesovorticies develop, how to identify a mesovortex using various tools from radar, and finally a look at how common is it for a QLCS to put spawn a tornado across the United States. 1. Introduction Quasi-linear convective systems, or squall lines, are a line of thunderstorms that are Supercells have always been most feared oriented linearly. Sometimes, these lines of when it has come to tornadoes and as they intense thunderstorms can feature a bowed out should be. However, quasi-linear convective systems can also cause tornadoes. Squall lines and bow echoes are also known to cause tornadoes as well as other forms of severe weather such as high winds, hail, and microbursts. These are powerful systems that can travel for hours and hundreds of miles, but the worst part is tornadoes in QLCSs are hard to forecast and can be highly dangerous for the public. Often times the supercells within the QLCS cause tornadoes to become rain wrapped, which are tornadoes that are surrounded by rain making them hard to see with the naked eye. This is why understanding QLCSs and how they can produce mesovortices that are capable of producing tornadoes is essential to forecasting these tornadic events that can be highly dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Meteorology
    Lecture Notes on Synoptic Meteorology For Integrated Meteorological Training Course By Dr. Prakash Khare Scientist E India Meteorological Department Meteorological Training Institute Pashan,Pune-8 186 IMTC SYLLABUS OF SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY (FOR DIRECT RECRUITED S.A’S OF IMD) Theory (25 Periods) ❖ Scales of weather systems; Network of Observatories; Surface, upper air; special observations (satellite, radar, aircraft etc.); analysis of fields of meteorological elements on synoptic charts; Vertical time / cross sections and their analysis. ❖ Wind and pressure analysis: Isobars on level surface and contours on constant pressure surface. Isotherms, thickness field; examples of geostrophic, gradient and thermal winds: slope of pressure system, streamline and Isotachs analysis. ❖ Western disturbance and its structure and associated weather, Waves in mid-latitude westerlies. ❖ Thunderstorm and severe local storm, synoptic conditions favourable for thunderstorm, concepts of triggering mechanism, conditional instability; Norwesters, dust storm, hail storm. Squall, tornado, microburst/cloudburst, landslide. ❖ Indian summer monsoon; S.W. Monsoon onset: semi permanent systems, Active and break monsoon, Monsoon depressions: MTC; Offshore troughs/vortices. Influence of extra tropical troughs and typhoons in northwest Pacific; withdrawal of S.W. Monsoon, Northeast monsoon, ❖ Tropical Cyclone: Life cycle, vertical and horizontal structure of TC, Its movement and intensification. Weather associated with TC. Easterly wave and its structure and associated weather. ❖ Jet Streams – WMO definition of Jet stream, different jet streams around the globe, Jet streams and weather ❖ Meso-scale meteorology, sea and land breezes, mountain/valley winds, mountain wave. ❖ Short range weather forecasting (Elementary ideas only); persistence, climatology and steering methods, movement and development of synoptic scale systems; Analogue techniques- prediction of individual weather elements, visibility, surface and upper level winds, convective phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Flooding
    NationalNational OceanicOceanic andand AtmosphericAtmospheric AdministrationAdministration (NOAA)(NOAA) NationalNational WeatherWeather ServiceService (NWS)(NWS) PresentsPresents SevereSevere WeatherWeather ObserverObserver andand SafetySafety TrainingTraining 20052005 Severe Weather Spotter Line 1-888-668-3344 Spotter Reports E-mail: www.crh.noaa.gov/espotter Homepage Address: www.crh.noaa.gov/iwx 2 GoalsGoals ofof thethe TrainingTraining You will learn: • Definitions of important weather terms and severe weather criteria • How thunderstorms develop and why some become severe • How to correctly identify cloud features that may or may not be associated with severe weather • What information the observer is to report and how to report it • Ways to receive weather information before and during severe weather events • Observer Safety! 3 WFOWFO NorthernNorthern IndianaIndiana (WFO(WFO IWX)IWX) CountyCounty WarningWarning andand ForecastForecast AreaArea (CWFA)(CWFA) Work with public, state and local officials Dedicated team of highly trained professionals 24 hours a day/7 days a week Prepare forecasts and warnings for 2.3 million people in 37 counties 4 SKYWARNSKYWARN (Severe(Severe Weather)Weather) ObserversObservers Why Are You Critical to NWS Operations? • Help overcome Doppler Radar limitations • Provide ground truth which can be correlated with radar signatures prior to, during, and after severe weather • Ground truth reports in warnings heighten public awareness and allow us to have confidence in our warning decisions 5 SKYWARNSKYWARN (Severe(Severe Weather)Weather) ObserversObservers Why Are You Critical to NWS Operations? • The NWS receives hundreds of reports of “False” or “Mis-Identified” funnel clouds and tornadoes each year • We strongly rely on the “2 out of 3” Rule before issuing a warning. Of the following, we like to have 2 out of 3 present before sending out a warning.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Severe Weather Terms
    Glossary of Severe Weather Terms -A- Anvil The flat, spreading top of a cloud, often shaped like an anvil. Thunderstorm anvils may spread hundreds of miles downwind from the thunderstorm itself, and sometimes may spread upwind. Anvil Dome A large overshooting top or penetrating top. -B- Back-building Thunderstorm A thunderstorm in which new development takes place on the upwind side (usually the west or southwest side), such that the storm seems to remain stationary or propagate in a backward direction. Back-sheared Anvil [Slang], a thunderstorm anvil which spreads upwind, against the flow aloft. A back-sheared anvil often implies a very strong updraft and a high severe weather potential. Beaver ('s) Tail [Slang], a particular type of inflow band with a relatively broad, flat appearance suggestive of a beaver's tail. It is attached to a supercell's general updraft and is oriented roughly parallel to the pseudo-warm front, i.e., usually east to west or southeast to northwest. As with any inflow band, cloud elements move toward the updraft, i.e., toward the west or northwest. Its size and shape change as the strength of the inflow changes. Spotters should note the distinction between a beaver tail and a tail cloud. A "true" tail cloud typically is attached to the wall cloud and has a cloud base at about the same level as the wall cloud itself. A beaver tail, on the other hand, is not attached to the wall cloud and has a cloud base at about the same height as the updraft base (which by definition is higher than the wall cloud).
    [Show full text]
  • Mergers Between Isolated Supercells and Quasi-Linear Convective Systems: a Preliminary Study
    P1.2 MERGERS BETWEEN ISOLATED SUPERCELLS AND QUASI-LINEAR CONVECTIVE SYSTEMS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY Adam J. French∗ and Matthew D. Parker North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 1. INTRODUCTION been observed in actual cases as well. In the case dis- cussed by Knupp et al. (2003) two dierent supercell Past research within the convective storms commu- storms were observed to permanently lose supercel- nity has often viewed supercell thunderstorms and lular characteristics following mergers with a left- larger-scale quasi-linear convective systems (QLCSs, moving split from an earlier storm. In a similar case, commonly referred to as squall lines) as distinct Lindsey and Bunkers (2005) examined a merger be- entities to be studied in isolation. While this has tween a left-moving supercell and a tornadic right- lead to immeasurable advances in the understand- mover, nding that the merger appeared to disrupt ing of supercells and squall lines it overlooks the fact the circulation of the right-mover and temporarily that these organizational modes can be found occur- suspended tornado production. Furthermore, in a ring simultaneously, in close proximity to each other study examining long-lived supercells, Bunkers et al. (e.g. French and Parker 2008), often resulting in (2006) listed the supercell merges or interacts with the merger of multiple storms. While the basic con- other thunderstorms which can either destroy its cir- cept of mergers between convective cells has been culation or cause it to evolve into another convec- studied at great length (e.g. Simpson et al. 1980, tive mode as one mechanism for supercell demise, Westcott 1994), a number of questions remain re- however they also pointed out that not all storm garding the processes at work when well-organized mergers were destructive.
    [Show full text]
  • 6A.4 the National Weather Service Unified Surface Analysis
    6A.4 THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE UNIFIED SURFACE ANALYSIS Robbie Berg* NWS/NCEP/National Hurricane Center, Miami, FL James Clark NWS/NCEP/Ocean Prediction Center, Camp Springs, MD David Roth NWS/NCEP/Hydrometeorological Prediction Center, Camp Springs, MD Thomas Birchard NWS/Honolulu Forecast Office, Honolulu, HI 1. INTRODUCTION 2. HISTORY The Unified Surface Analysis is a near- For several decades, various offices within hemispheric surface analysis created every six the NWS and its predecessor the U. S. Weather hours at the four synoptic times and produced by Bureau produced separate surface analyses which four different offices within the U. S. National covered geographic areas important to their Weather Service—the Hydrometeorological forecast and warning operations. These analyses Prediction Center (HPC), the Ocean Prediction usually overlapped and led to a duplication of Center (OPC), the National Hurricane Center effort by the offices—and often brought confusion (NHC), and the Honolulu Weather Forecast Office to users who would see features analyzed (HFO). While each office produces separate differently from office to office. To remedy this analyses to suit their own operational needs and redundancy, the various analysis centers agreed objectives, a process is in place whereby a to limit their analyses to their respective areas of collaboration between the four offices results in responsibility and to combine them to create one one seamless analysis covering an area of seamless Unified Surface Analysis covering much 177,106,111 km 2 , or about 70% of the Northern of the Northern Hemisphere (Figure 1). This effort Hemisphere. was intended to make the entire process more Users of any of the various surface efficient and to allow each center to bring its own analyses produced within the NWS may not be particular regional and meteorological expertise to aware that all contain contributions from the other the analysis process.
    [Show full text]
  • Thunderstorm & Lightning
    Guidelines for Preparation of Action plan - Prevention and Management of Thunderstorm & Lightning/ Squall/Dust/Hailstorm and Strong Winds 2018 National Disaster Management Authority Government of India Table of Contents Guidelines for preparation of Action Plan – Prevention and Management of Thunderstorm & Lightning / Squall /Dust / Hailstorm and Strong Winds(TLSD/HSW) Table of Contents i Foreword ii Acknowledgements iii Abbreviations iv Executive Summary v Chapters 1. Background and Status 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Impact 3 1.3 Definitions 4 2. Action Plan 6 2.1 Rationale for the Plan 6 2.2 Objectives of the Plan 6 2.3 Key Strategies 7 2.4 Steps to Develop an Action Plan 7 3 Early Warning and Communication 9 3.1 Forecast and Issue of Alerts or Warnings 9 3.2 Early Warning/Alerts: Communication and Dissemination Strategy 10 3.3 Public Awareness, Community Outreach and Information, Education and 11 Communication 3.4 Review and Evaluation of the Early Warning System 12 4 Prevention, Mitigation and Preparedness Measures 13 4.1 Prevention Measures 13 4.2 Mitigation and Preparedness Measures 13 4.3 Structural Mitigation Measures 15 4.4 Action – Before, During and After 16 5 Capacity Building 18 6 Roles and Responsibilities 22 6.1 Roles and Responsibilities matrix for managing TLSD/HSW 23 7 Record and Documentation 28 Annexure 1: Do‟s and Don‟ts 29 Annexure 2: Format A to C for reporting 30 Annexure 3: States' Experiences on TLSD/HSW 33 Appendix A: List of Expert Group and Subgroups Appendix B: Contact Us i FOREWORD India, with approximately 1.32 billion people, is the second most populous country in the world.
    [Show full text]