DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Monitoring Report INDONESIA: Tangguh Liquefied Natural Gas Project Operator's Environmental, Healt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Environmental and Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 38919 April – October 2012 INDONESIA: Tangguh Liquefied Natural Gas Project Operator’s Environmental, Health and Safety Report Prepared by BP Berau Limited Tangguh LNG Project Operator This report has been submitted to ADB by BP Berau Limited and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. Operator’s Environmental, Health and Safety Report Tangguh LNG April– October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH SAFETY REPORT TANGGUH LNG PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 1 Table List .......................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 3 1. Regulatory Compliance ............................................................................................ 4 1.1. Summary Description ...................................................................................... 4 1.2. Implications for Tangguh ................................................................................. 4 2. Environmental Management Plan ............................................................................ 5 2.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities ................ 5 2.1.1. Wastewater Management ................................................................... 5 2.1.2. Solid Waste Management ................................................................... 8 2.1.3. Revegetation ..................................................................................... 12 2.1.4. Air Emission ...................................................................................... 12 2.1.5. Water Management ........................................................................... 12 2.1.6. Hydrocarbon and Chemical Storage and Handling ........................... 12 2.2. Gas Production Facilities and Gas Transmission (GPF) ............................... 13 2.3. Drilling Activities ............................................................................................ 13 2.4. Environmental Management System ............................................................ 13 3. Environmental Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 14 3.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities ............... 14 3.1.1. Wastewater Monitoring ...................................................................... 14 3.1.2. Solid Waste Monitoring ..................................................................... 19 3.1.3. Revegetation ..................................................................................... 21 3.1.4. Air Emission ...................................................................................... 22 3.1.5. Hydrocarbon and Chemical Storage and Handling ........................... 23 3.2. Gas Production Facilities and Gas Transmission (GPF) ............................... 24 3.3. Drilling Activities ............................................................................................ 24 4. Environmental Studies ........................................................................................... 24 5. Health and Safety .................................................................................................. 25 6. External Panel Annual Review and Status of Non Compliances ........................... 28 7. Additional Information ............................................................................................ 29 8. Evaluation Results ................................................................................................. 29 Environmental Health and Safety Report 1 Tangguh LNG Project April– October 2012 FIGURE LIST Figure 1 LNG PLANT ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2 PUMP AT LEACHATE POND ................................................................................ 6 Figure 3 PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT PLANT .......................................................... 7 Figure 4 INERT LANDFILL ................................................................................................... 8 Figure 5 NEW LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION (STATUS OF 15 OCTOBER 2012) ................ 9 Figure 6 PLASTIC GRANULATOR AND CAN COMPACTOR .............................................. 9 Figure 7 WOOD CHIPPER ................................................................................................. 10 Figure 8 ORGANIC WASTE LANDFILL ............................................................................. 10 Figure 9 WASTEWATER QUALITY FROM STP STEP 3 CAMP ZONE A ......................... 14 Figure 10 WASTEWATER QUALITY FROM STP STEP 3 CAMP ZONE C ....................... 15 Figure 11 WASTEWATER QUALITY FROM STP UTILITY ................................................ 15 Figure 12 PRODUCED WATER QUALITY ......................................................................... 17 Figure 13 DESALINATION UNIT BRINE WATER QUALITY .............................................. 18 Figure 14 NEUTRALISING PIT WASTEWATER QUALITY ................................................ 19 Figure 15 Calophyllum inophyllum l (TREE), Paradisaea minor (BIRD OF PARADISE), Litotia genimaculata (FROG), Pitta sordida (BIRD), Nephentes ampularia jack (SEMAR BAG), Lygisaurus macfarlani (LIZARD), Chelonodon patoca (PUFFERS) and Dobsonia minor (BAT) ........................................................................................................................ 24 TABLE LIST Table 1 WASTEWATER TYPE AND FLOW RATE (APRIL 2012 – OCTOBER 2012) ......... 6 Table 2 RESULT OF EMISSION SAMPLING ON AGI IN JULY 2012 ................................ 22 Table 3 RESULT OF EMISSION SAMPLING ON BOILER IN JULY 2012 ......................... 22 Table 4 RESULT OF REGENERATION GAS HEATER EMISSION SAMPLING IN JULY 2012 .................................................................................................................................... 22 Table 5 RESULT OF GAS TURBINE TRAIN 1 EMISSION SAMPLING IN JULY 2012 ...... 23 Table 6 RESULT OF GAS TURBINE TRAIN 2 EMISSION SAMPLING IN JULY 2012 ...... 23 Table 7 RESULT OF FLARING SAMPLING IN JUNE 2012 ............................................... 23 Table 8 KEY INDICATORS ON SAFETY PERFORMANCE............................................... 25 Table 9 TANGGUH HEALTH KPI ....................................................................................... 27 Environmental Health and Safety Report 2 Tangguh LNG Project April– October 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tangguh is in steady operation at the design capacity. Tangguh conducted scheduled major turnaround activity (TAR) for Train 1 from 28 September 2012 for 36 days. The environmental management and monitoring programmes continue to be implemented in line with the approved AMDAL and relevant permits granted for Tangguh as well as the Environmental Management System ISO 14001:2004 to maintain the certification that was obtained in December 2010. The latest external audit by accreditation body was done in October 2011 with no major/minor finding and some recommendations for continuous improvement. The next external audit is planned in January 2013. The Tangguh Lenders’ External Panel (EP) visited Jakarta and Tangguh site in November 2011 with the objective of performing a compliance review of environmental and social performance. During their visit, the EP found no Level-2 non-compliance related to the environment or social section. There were four Level-1 non-compliances related to environment and also some recommendations proposed by EP on the environmental program. All Level-1 non-compliances have been closed. Tangguh issued the AMDAL Implementation report for the period of April– October 2012 on 29 October 2012 to the Minister of Environment (MOE) and related government institutions including the local government, Ditjen MIGAS and BPMIGAS. This report is developed mainly based on the AMDAL Implementation report. Tangguh maintains strong focus on all aspects of health and safety. Following the 2 HIPO cases and 1 DAFW case in Q1 2012, BP has conducted significant efforts to improve overall 2012 HSE performance. The 4-point safety intervention was introduced, covering simplify CoW at Non Production Facilities (NPF), management of contractors, behaviour conditioning, and significantly increase time at front line. Obvious improvement in HSE performance is noticeable compared to Q1 2012. A number of campaigns were run in the period of April to October 2012, including Driving Safety Campaign, Stop Unsafe Job Campaign, and Near Miss Reporting Awareness Sessions. The BP Control of Work (CoW) implementation is continuously improving, where a detailed CoW Roadmap has been developed to identify improvement areas and to date this approach is beginning to show benefits. Revision of Contractor Safety Management System (CSMS) Procedure has been completed in August 2012. Health management system self-verification was conducted using the Health Management Assessment Tool (HMAT). The self-verification result indicated that Tangguh Operations has a good foundation of health management system. Industrial hygiene team supported the turnaround
Recommended publications
  • Testing the Relevance of Binary, Mosaic and Continuous Landscape Conceptualisations to Reptiles in Regenerating Dryland Landscapes

    Testing the Relevance of Binary, Mosaic and Continuous Landscape Conceptualisations to Reptiles in Regenerating Dryland Landscapes

    Testing the relevance of binary, mosaic and continuous landscape conceptualisations to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes Melissa J. Bruton1, Martine Maron1,2, Noam Levin1,3, Clive A. McAlpine1,2 1The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, St Lucia, Australia 4067 2The University of Queensland, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, St. Lucia, Australia 4067 3Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Geography, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel, 91905 Corresponding author: [email protected] Ph: (+61) 409 875 780 The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0157-9 Abstract: Context: Fauna distributions are assessed using discrete (binary and mosaic) or continuous conceptualisations of the landscape. The value of the information derived from these analyses depends on the relevance of the landscape representation (or model) used to the landscape and fauna of interest. Discrete representations dominate analyses of landscape context in disturbed and regenerating landscapes; however within-patch variation suggests that continuous representations may help explain the distribution of fauna in such landscapes. Objectives: We tested the relevance of binary, mosaic, and continuous conceptualisations of landscape context to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes. Methods: For each of thirteen reptile groups, we compared the fit of models consisting of one landscape composition and one landscape heterogeneity variable for each of six landscape representations (2 x binary, 2 x mosaic, and 2 x continuous), at three buffer distances. We used Akaike weights to assess the relative support for each model. Maps were created from Landsat satellite images.
  • Fauna of Australia 2A

    Fauna of Australia 2A

    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA Mark N. Hutchinson & Stephen C. Donnellan 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA This review summarises the current hypotheses of the origin, antiquity and history of the order Squamata, the dominant living reptile group which comprises the lizards, snakes and worm-lizards. The primary concern here is with the broad relationships and origins of the major taxa rather than with local distributional or phylogenetic patterns within Australia. In our review of the phylogenetic hypotheses, where possible we refer principally to data sets that have been analysed by cladistic methods. Analyses based on anatomical morphological data sets are integrated with the results of karyotypic and biochemical data sets. A persistent theme of this chapter is that for most families there are few cladistically analysed morphological data, and karyotypic or biochemical data sets are limited or unavailable. Biogeographic study, especially historical biogeography, cannot proceed unless both phylogenetic data are available for the taxa and geological data are available for the physical environment. Again, the reader will find that geological data are very uncertain regarding the degree and timing of the isolation of the Australian continent from Asia and Antarctica. In most cases, therefore, conclusions should be regarded very cautiously. The number of squamate families in Australia is low. Five of approximately fifteen lizard families and five or six of eleven snake families occur in the region; amphisbaenians are absent. Opinions vary concerning the actual number of families recognised in the Australian fauna, depending on whether the Pygopodidae are regarded as distinct from the Gekkonidae, and whether sea snakes, Hydrophiidae and Laticaudidae, are recognised as separate from the Elapidae.
  • Mount Webb National Park Management Statement 2013

    Mount Webb National Park Management Statement 2013

    Mount Webb National Park Management Statement 2013 Legislative framework Park size: 414ha a Aboriginal Land Act 1991 Bioregion: Cape York Peninsula a Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 a Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act QPWS region: Northern 1999 (Cwlth) Local government Cook Shire a Nature Conservation Act 1992 estate/area: Plans and agreements State electorate: Cook a Bonn Convention a China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Republic of Korea–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement Vision Mount Webb National Park is managed to conserve the endangered and of concern regional ecosystems, with a particular emphasis on maintaining the integrity of its vine forests. Conservation purpose Originally part of Starcke Pastoral Holding, the original 220ha of Mount Webb National Park was gazetted in 1973. In 1995, the park was extended to better protect its semi-deciduous mesophyll/notophyll vine forests from clearing. Protecting and presenting the park’s values Landscape Mount Webb National Park features a low hill rising to an altitude of 127m, and its foot slopes. Volcanic soils within the park and in surrounding areas are very fertile. Located within the Jeannie River catchment, the Morgan River forms part of the park’s southern boundary. The existing house site offers uninterrupted views towards the Cape Flattery silica dunes. Cattle and horse grazing occurs on properties surrounding Mount Webb National Park. A gazetted road reserve adjoins the eastern boundary, and an oil palm plantation is situated to the south of the park. Regional ecosystems Seven regional ecosystems are mapped within Mount Webb National Park, including one ‘endangered’ community.
  • Fauna of Australia 2A

    Fauna of Australia 2A

    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA Harold G. Cogger 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA The Squamata are members of the diapsid subclass Lepidosauromorpha, a group whose only living descendants are the lizards, amphisbaenians, snakes and tuataras. The lizards, amphisbaenians and snakes together constitute the Order Squamata (or Superorder Squamata, according to Estes 1983). Because the Squamata include approximately 95% of living reptiles, the phylogenetic position of this group within the Lepidosauromorpha, its component taxa, and their diagnostic features, have been the subject of numerous reviews (Estes & Pregill 1988; Kluge 1989). The three suborders of the Squamata include the Sauria (lizards) and the Serpentes (snakes), which are represented in Australia by diverse faunas of nearly 500 species, and 250 species, respectively. The third suborder, the Amphisbaenia, comprises a small group of worm lizards and related species which do not occur in Australia. The earliest known squamate fossils date from the late Permian and early Triassic, approximately 230 million years ago. These early fossils were already clearly lizard-like in their preserved features. Carroll (1988a) points out that lizards (the first squamates) do not appear to have originated as a result of ‘...a significant shift in behavioral patterns or the evolution of major new structural elements, but rather may be seen as resulting from the gradual accumulation of improvements in feeding, locomotion, and sensory apparatus.’ Carroll (1988b) includes among these changes the emargination of the lower temporal fenestra and the development of a joint between the upper end of the quadrate and the squamosal.
  • Systematics of the Carlia “Fusca” Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands

    Systematics of the Carlia “Fusca” Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands

    Systematics of the Carlia “fusca” Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands George R. Zug Bishop Museum Bulletin in Zoology 5 Bishop Museum Press Honolulu, 2004 Cover: Published by Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Copyright ©2004 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 0893-312X Zug — Carlia “fusca” Lizards from New Guinea and Nearby Islands v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ viii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Carlia: An Analysis for Species Relationships ........................................................................... 1 Characters and Taxa .................................................................................................................. 2 Phylogenetic Analysis................................................................................................................ 8 New Guinea Carlia “fusca” ....................................................................................................... 9 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................................
  • Reptiles, Frogs and Freshwater Fish: K'gari (Fraser Island)

    Reptiles, Frogs and Freshwater Fish: K'gari (Fraser Island)

    Cooloola Sedgefrog Photo: Robert Ashdown © Qld Govt Department of Environment and Science Reptiles, Frogs and Freshwater Fish K’gari (Fraser Island) World Heritage Area Skinks (cont.) Reptiles arcane ctenotus Ctenotus arcanus Sea Turtles robust ctenotus Ctenotus robustus sensu lato loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta copper-tailed skink Ctenotus taeniolatus green turtle Chelonia mydas pink-tongued skink Cyclodomorphus gerrardii hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata major skink Bellatorias frerei olive ridley Lepidochelys olivacea elf skink Eroticoscincus graciloides flatback turtle Natator depressus dark bar-sided skink Concinnia martini eastern water skink Eulamprus quoyii Leathery Turtles bar-sided skink Concinnia tenuis leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea friendly sunskink Lampropholis amicula dark-flecked garden sunskink Lampropholis delicata Freshwater Turtles pale-flecked garden skink Lampropholis guichenoti broad-shelled river turtle Chelodina expansa common dwarf skink Menetia greyii eastern snake-necked turtle Chelodina longicollis fire-tailed skink Morethia taeniopleura Fraser Island short-neck turtle Emydura macquarii nigra Cooloola snake-skink Ophioscincus cooloolensis eastern blue-tongued lizard Tiliqua scincoides Geckoes wood gecko Diplodactylus vittatus Blind or Worm Snakes dubious dtella Gehyra dubia proximus blind snake Anilios proximus * house gecko Hemidactylus frenatus striped blind snake Anilios silvia a velvet gecko Oedura cf. rhombifer southern spotted velvet gecko Oedura tryoni Pythons eastern small blotched
  • Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective

    Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective

    Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget.
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater Southern Sydney Region

    Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater Southern Sydney Region

    Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater Southern Sydney Region VOLUME 2 Fauna of Conservation Concern and Priority Pest Species Species profiles and habitat maps A joint project between the Sydney Catchment Authority and Parks and Wildlife Group of the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW). Special Areas Strategic Plan of Management (SASPoM) Research and Data Program: Project No: RD01 Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Climate Change and Environment Protection Group Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) July 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This is a joint project between the Sydney List of Abbreviations Catchment Authority and the Parks and BA Birds Australia Wildlife Group of the Department of CRA Comprehensive Regional Assessments (part Environment and Climate Change (NSW) of the Regional Forestry Agreement process) DEC Department of Environment and This volume has been produced and written by Conservation (NSW) Kylie Madden, Peter Ewin and Daniel Connolly DECC Department of Environment and Climate with assistance from Martin Schulz, Elizabeth Change (NSW) Magarey and Cate Ewin (map production). DEM Digital elevation model DEH Australian Government Department of Many individuals were involved in the fauna Environment and Heritage survey and the development and review of the DPI Department of Primary Industries (NSW) species profiles and habitat maps. For a full list of EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity acknowledgements, please see Volume 1 – Conservation Act (1999) Background Report. GAM Generalised Additive Model GLM Generalised Linear Model KTP Key Threatening Process (under the TSC Act This report may be referenced as follows: (1995)) DECC (2007) Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater LGA Local Government Area Southern Sydney Region: Volume 2 Fauna of Conservation NP National Park Concern and Priority Pest Species.
  • Wet Tropics Bioregion Reptiles Species List

    Wet Tropics Bioregion Reptiles Species List

    Wet Tropics Bioregion Reptiles Species List NCA Key C - Common, V – Vulnerable, NT – Near threatened, E – Endangered, Introduced - Scientific Name Common Name NCA Acalyptophis peronii C Acanthophis antarcticus common death adder NT Acanthophis praelongus northern death adder C Acrochordus arafurae Arafura file snake C Acrochordus granulatus little file snake C Aipysurus duboisii Dubois’s sea snake C Aipysurus mosaicus mosaic sea snake C Amolosia lesueurii Lesueur’s velvet gecko C Amolosia rhombifer zig-zag gecko C Anomalopus gowi C Antaioserpens warro robust burrowing snake NT Antaresia maculosa spotted python C Aspidites melanocephalus black-headed python C Astrotia stokesii C Bellatorias frerei major skink C Boiga irregularis brown tree snake C Cacophis churchilli C Calyptotis thorntonensis NT Caretta caretta loggerhead turtle E Carlia jarnoldae C Carlia longipes C Carlia munda C Carlia rhomboidalis C Carlia rostralis C Carlia rubrigularis C Carlia schmeltzii C Carlia storri C Carlia vivax C Carphodactylus laevis chameleon gecko C Chelodina canni Cann’s longneck turtle C Chelonia mydas green turtle V Chlamydosaurus kingii frilled lizard C Coeranoscincus frontalis NT Crocodylus johnstoni Australian freshwater crocodile C Crocodylus porosus estuarine crocodile V Cryptoblepharus adamsi Adams’ snake-eyed skink C Cryptoblepharus litoralis litoralis coastal snake-eyed skink C Cryptoblepharus metallicus metallic snake-eyed skink C Cryptoblepharus plagiocephalus sensu lato C Cryptoblepharus virgatus striped snake-eyed skink C Cryptophis nigrescens
  • Lialis Burtonis Burton's Legless Lizard LC X X SCINCIDAE Carlia Amax Two-Spined Rainbow Skink LC X X X X X X Carlia Munda Stripe

    Lialis Burtonis Burton's Legless Lizard LC X X SCINCIDAE Carlia Amax Two-Spined Rainbow Skink LC X X X X X X Carlia Munda Stripe

    Terrestrial Fauna Survey Report Dhupuma Plateau LandRoc REPTILE STATUS* SITES Scientific name Common Name TPWC EPBC TR01 TR02 TR03 TR04 TR05 TR06 GARMA Inc. Lialis burtonis Burton's Legless Lizard LC X X SCINCIDAE Carlia amax Two -spined Rainbow Skink LC X X X X X X Carlia munda Striped Rainbow Skink LC X X X X X Carlia sexdentata Six-Toothed Rainbow-Skink LC X X X X X X X Cryptoblepharus metallicus Metallic Snake-eyed Skink LC X X X X X X Ctenotus spaldingi Straight-Browed Ctenotus LC X X Lygisaurus macfarlani Translucent Litter-Skink LC X X X Tiliqua scincoides Blue-tongued Lizard LC X AGAMIDAE Chlamydosaurus kingii Frill -necked Lizard LC X Diporiphora bilineata Two-lined Dragon LC X VARANIDAE Varanus scalaris Spotted Tree Monitor LC X X BOIDAE Lialis olivaceus Olive Python LC X X ELAPIDAE Acanthophis rugosa Papuan Death Adder LC X BIRD STATUS* SITES Scientific name Common Name TPWC EPBC TR01 TR02 TR03 TR04 TR05 TR06 GARMA Inc. MEGAPODIDAE Megapodius reinwardt Orange -footed Scrubfowl LC X COLUMBIDAE Dhupuma Plateau Report.docx Page B2 Terrestrial Fauna Survey Report Dhupuma Plateau LandRoc BIRD STATUS* SITES Scientific name Common Name TPWC EPBC TR01 TR02 TR03 TR04 TR05 TR06 GARMA Inc. Ducula bicolor Pied Imperial-Pigeon LC X Geopelia humeralis Bar-shouldered Dove LC X X X X X X X Geopelia striata Peaceful Dove LC X X X X X X X PODARGIDAE Podargus strigoides Tawny Frogmouth LC X APODIDAE Apus pacificus Fork -tailed Swift LC Mig X ARDEIDAE Ardea pacifica White -necked Heron LC X ACCIPITIRIDAE Accipiter fasciatus Brown Goshawk LC X X
  • A Catalogue of the Non-Fossil Amphibian and Reptile Type Specimens in the Collection of the Australian Museum: Types Currently, Previously and Purportedly Present

    A Catalogue of the Non-Fossil Amphibian and Reptile Type Specimens in the Collection of the Australian Museum: Types Currently, Previously and Purportedly Present

    © Copyright Australian Museum, 1999 Technical Reports of the Australian Museum (1999) No. 15. ISSN 1031-8062, ISBN 0-7313-8873-9 A Catalogue of the Non-fossil Amphibian and Reptile Type Specimens in the Collection of the Australian Museum: Types Currently, Previously and Purportedly Present GLENN M. SHEA 1 & ROSS A. SADLIER 2 1 Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathology, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia [email protected] 2 The Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. Full registration data for all identifiable non-fossil primary and secondary type specimens of reptiles and amphibians currently or previously in the Australian Museum are presented, and the current status and registration history of these specimens described, together with any discrepancies between these data and those published in original descriptions. The current identity of the taxa represented by these types is given, together with reference to the original proposer of synonymies and new combinations. Some new synonymies, particularly involving species described by R.W. Wells and C.R. Wellington, are proposed. SHEA, GLENN M., & ROSS A. SADLIER, 1999. A catalogue of the non-fossil amphibian and reptile type specimens in the collection of the Australian Museum: types currently, previously and purportedly present. Technical Reports of the Australian Museum 15: 1–91. Several changes to the herpetological collections of the Shine, 1985; King & Miller, 1985; Tyler, 1985; Cogger, Australian Museum have prompted us to prepare this 1986; Shea, 1987a; King, 1988; Ingram & Covacevich, second, updated catalogue of the amphibian and reptile 1989; Underwood & Stimson, 1990; Hutchinson & type specimens, though following only 20 years after the Donnellan, 1992), culminating in an application to the first herpetological type catalogue for the collection International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (Cogger, 1979).
  • Systematics of the Carlia "Fusca^^ Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands

    Systematics of the Carlia "Fusca^^ Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands

    Systematics of the Carlia "fusca^^ Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands George R. Zug Bishop Museum Bulletin in Zoology 5 Bishop Museum Press Honolulu, 2004 Cover: Published by Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bemice Street Honolulu, Hawai'i 96817-2704, USA Copyright ©2004 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN0893-312X Zug • Carlia "fusca" Lizards from New Guinea and Nearby Islands TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Abstract viii Introduction 1 Carlia: An Analysis for Species Relationships 1 Characters and Taxa 2 Phylogenetic Analysis 8 New Guinea Carlia "fusca" 9 Materials and Methods 9 Characters Examined 10 Mensural characters 10 Meristic characters 12 Color pattern 12 General analytical protocols 12 Character Analysis: Results 13 Sample Size and Variation 13 Body Size and Proportions 14 Size at sexual maturity 14 Sexual dimorphism 16 Head Scalation 17 Interparietal and prefrontals 17 Supraoculars, supraciliaries, and eyelid scales 17 Temporals and loreals 17 Labials 17 Auricular lobes and ear shape 18 Body and Limb Scalation 18 Dorsal and midbody scale rows 18 Keeling 18 Precloacal scales 18 Subdigital lamellae 18 Evaluation of Quantitative Characters 18 Color pattern 19 Juvenile 20 Adult 23 Color pattern resume 27 Geographic Patterns of Variation 27 Decisions on speciation in Carlia "fusca" 35 Taxonomy 39 History and decisions 39 Taxa recognized 41 Carlia Gray 41 Carlia fusca (Duméril & Bibron) 42 Carlia pulla (Barbour) 44 Sepik populations 45 Carlia mysi new species 45