DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater Southern Sydney Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater Southern Sydney Region Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater Southern Sydney Region VOLUME 2 Fauna of Conservation Concern and Priority Pest Species Species profiles and habitat maps A joint project between the Sydney Catchment Authority and Parks and Wildlife Group of the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW). Special Areas Strategic Plan of Management (SASPoM) Research and Data Program: Project No: RD01 Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Climate Change and Environment Protection Group Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) July 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This is a joint project between the Sydney List of Abbreviations Catchment Authority and the Parks and BA Birds Australia Wildlife Group of the Department of CRA Comprehensive Regional Assessments (part Environment and Climate Change (NSW) of the Regional Forestry Agreement process) DEC Department of Environment and This volume has been produced and written by Conservation (NSW) Kylie Madden, Peter Ewin and Daniel Connolly DECC Department of Environment and Climate with assistance from Martin Schulz, Elizabeth Change (NSW) Magarey and Cate Ewin (map production). DEM Digital elevation model DEH Australian Government Department of Many individuals were involved in the fauna Environment and Heritage survey and the development and review of the DPI Department of Primary Industries (NSW) species profiles and habitat maps. For a full list of EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity acknowledgements, please see Volume 1 – Conservation Act (1999) Background Report. GAM Generalised Additive Model GLM Generalised Linear Model KTP Key Threatening Process (under the TSC Act This report may be referenced as follows: (1995)) DECC (2007) Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Greater LGA Local Government Area Southern Sydney Region: Volume 2 Fauna of Conservation NP National Park Concern and Priority Pest Species. A joint project between the NR Nature Reserve Sydney Catchment Authority and the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) (DECC) by the NPW Act National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974) Information and Assessment Section, Metropolitan Branch, NPWS NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Climate Change and Environment Protection Group, DECC. PWD Parks and Wildlife Division, DECC RAOU Royal Australian Ornithological Society RLPB Rural Lands Protection Board All photos are copyright of the photographer. To RLP Act NSW Rural Lands Protection Act (1998) obtain a copy please contact the Bioregional Data RP Regional Park Group Coordinator, DECC Hurstville. For photos by Michael Todd visit www.wildlifing.com. SCA State Conservation Area SF State Forest TSC Act NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act Cover Photos (1995) Eastern Pygmy-possum © N. Williams Swift Parrot © DECC Green Tree Frog © N. Williams Masked Owl © M. Todd ISBN 978 1 74122 600 3 DECC 2007/471 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. REASONS FOR THIS PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3. ABOUT THIS REPORT...................................................................................................................... 4 2. SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN.......................................................................................... 7 2.1. WHY CONDUCT A REGIONAL REVIEW OF SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN? .............................. 7 2.2. WHAT SPECIES WERE INCLUDED AS SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN? .................................... 7 3. PRIORITY FAUNA SPECIES.................................................................................................................. 8 4. PRIORITY FAUNA HABITATS ............................................................................................................. 11 4.1. GRASSY BOX WOODLANDS.......................................................................................................... 11 4.2. UPLAND SWAMPS ........................................................................................................................ 12 4.3. ALLUVIAL WOODLANDS AND FORESTS .......................................................................................... 12 4.4. COASTAL WETLANDS................................................................................................................... 13 4.5. WHY PRIORITY FAUNA HABITATS ARE IMPORTANT .......................................................................... 13 5. SPECIES PROFILES............................................................................................................................ 15 5.1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 15 5.2. DESCRIPTION AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE................................................................................. 15 5.3. THREATS AND IMPACTS................................................................................................................ 15 5.4. LOCAL AND BIOREGIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS......................................................................... 16 5.5. RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................... 16 6. MORE ABOUT THE MAPS................................................................................................................... 17 6.1. ABOUT PREDICTIVE HABITAT MAPS................................................................................................ 17 6.2. BUILDING THE FAUNA HABITAT MAPS ............................................................................................. 17 6.3. THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF MAP..................................................................................................... 18 6.4. USING THE HABITAT MAPS ............................................................................................................ 18 AMPHIBIANS ................................................................................................................................................ 21 BIBRON’S TOADLET .................................................................................................................................. 22 BOOROOLONG FROG................................................................................................................................ 24 GIANT BURROWING FROG......................................................................................................................... 26 GREEN AND GOLDEN BELL FROG.............................................................................................................. 28 GREEN TREE FROG.................................................................................................................................. 30 LITTLEJOHN’S TREE FROG ........................................................................................................................ 32 RED-CROWNED TOADLET ......................................................................................................................... 34 STUTTERING FROG................................................................................................................................... 36 REPTILES ..................................................................................................................................................... 39 BLUE MOUNTAINS WATER SKINK .............................................................................................................. 40 BROAD-HEADED SNAKE ............................................................................................................................ 42 EASTERN SNAKE-NECKED TURTLE ............................................................................................................ 44 HIGHLANDS COPPERHEAD ........................................................................................................................ 46 MAINLAND TIGER SNAKE .......................................................................................................................... 48 ROSENBERG’S GOANNA ........................................................................................................................... 50 TREE-BASE LITTER-SKINK ......................................................................................................................... 52 DIURNAL BIRDS .......................................................................................................................................... 55 AUSTRALASIAN BITTERN ........................................................................................................................... 56 BEAUTIFUL FIRETAIL................................................................................................................................. 58 BLACK BITTERN........................................................................................................................................ 60 BLACK-CHINNED HONEYEATER.................................................................................................................. 62 BROWN TREECREEPER............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Influence of Metal Exposure History on Metal Tolerance in the Sydney Rock Oyster (Saccostrea Glomerata)
    Influence of metal exposure history on metal tolerance in the Sydney rock oyster (Saccostrea glomerata) Thanvapon Senee Yingprasertchai A thesis submitted to the Discipline of Biological Sciences, University of Newcastle, in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervised by: Dr Geoffrey MacFarlane and Dr Richard Yu Declaration The thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis has been done in collaboration with other researchers, or carried out in other institutions (delete if not applicable). I have included as part of the thesis a statement clearly outlining the extent of collaboration, with whom and under what auspices. Thanvapon Senee Yingprasertchai ii Acknowledgements Firstly, I wish to acknowledge the untiring efforts of my supervisors; Dr. Geoff MacFarlane and Dr. Richard Yu, in providing logistical support, critical appraisal, encouragement and friendship over the many years that it has taken for this thesis to come to fruition. Secondary, I am indebted to Dr Wayne O‘Connor at Port Stephens Fisheries Institute, Taylors Beach (PSFI) who works as an unofficial supervisor and has provided great support in field oyster sampling and laboratory facilities for exposure experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 11:408–425. Submitted: 26 January 2016; Accepted: 2 September 2016; Published: 16 December 2016. Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland Joanne F. Ocock1,4, Richard T. Kingsford1, Trent D. Penman2, and Jodi J.L. Rowley1,3 1Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia 2Centre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, Institute of Conservation Biology and Environmental Management, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia 3Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia 4Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Amphibian abundance and occupancy are often reduced in regulated river systems near dams, but com- paratively little is known about how they are affected on floodplain wetlands downstream or the effects of actively managed flows. We assessed frog diversity in the Macquarie Marshes, a semi-arid floodplain wetland of conserva- tion significance, identifying environmental variables that might explain abundances and detection of species. We collected relative abundance data of 15 amphibian species at 30 sites over four months, coinciding with a large natural flood. We observed an average of 39.9 ± (SE) 4.3 (range, 0-246) individuals per site survey, over 47 survey nights. Three non-burrowing, ground-dwelling species were most abundant at temporarily flooded sites with low- growing aquatic vegetation (e.g., Limnodynastes tasmaniensis, Limnodynastes fletcheri, Crinia parinsignifera). Most arboreal species (e.g., Litoria caerulea) were more abundant in wooded habitat, regardless of water permanency.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Abatement Plan
    gus resulting in ch fun ytridio trid myc chy osis ith w s n ia ib h p m a f o n o i t THREAT ABATEMENTc PLAN e f n I THREAT ABATEMENT PLAN INFECTION OF AMPHIBIANS WITH CHYTRID FUNGUS RESULTING IN CHYTRIDIOMYCOSIS Department of the Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 ISBN 0 642 55029 8 Published 2006 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary Natural Resource Management Policy Branch Department of the Environment and Heritage PO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 This publication is available on the Internet at: www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/chytrid/ For additional hard copies, please contact the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Community Information Unit on 1800 803 772. Front cover photo: Litoria genimaculata (Green-eyed tree frog) Sequential page photo: Taudactylus eungellensis (Eungella day frog) Banner photo on chapter pages: Close up of the skin of Litoria genimaculata (Green-eyed tree frog) ii Foreword ‘Infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting Under the EPBC Act the Australian Government in chytridiomycosis’ was listed in July 2002 as a key implements the plan in Commonwealth areas and seeks threatening process under the Environment Protection the cooperation of the states and territories where the and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). disease impacts within their jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollow-Bearing Trees As a Habitat Resource Along an Urbanisation Gradient
    Hollow-Bearing Trees as a Habitat Resource along an Urbanisation Gradient Author Treby, Donna Louise Published 2014 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1674 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367782 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Hollow-bearing Trees as a Habitat Resource along an Urbanisation Gradient Donna Louise Treby MPhil (The University of Queensland) Environmental Futures Centre. Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast. A thesis submitted for the fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. December 2013. “If we all did the things we are capable of doing. We would literally live outstanding lives. I think; if we all lived our lives this way, we would truly create an amazing world.” Thomas Edison. i Acknowledgements: It would be remiss of me if I did not begin by acknowledging my principal supervisor Dr Guy Castley, for the inception, development and assistance with the completion of this study. Your generosity, open door policy and smiling face made it a pleasure to work with you. I owe you so much, but all I can give you is my respect and heartfelt thanks. Along with my associate supervisor Prof. Jean-Marc Hero their joint efforts inspired me and opened my mind to the complexities and vagaries of ecological systems and processes on such a large scale. To my volunteers in the field, Katie Robertson who gave so much of her time and help in the early stages of my project, Agustina Barros, Ivan Gregorian, Sally Healy, Guy Castley, Katrin Lowe, Kieran Treby, Phil Treby, Erin Wallace, Nicole Glenane, Nick Clark, Mark Ballantyne, Chris Tuohy, Ryan Pearson and Nickolas Rakatopare all contributed to the collection of data for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan Conservation Reserve
    Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 : Report August 2009 Conservation Management Plan property address month & year only Conservation Management Plan Volume 1of 2 - Report Prepared for Jenolan Caves Reserve Trust and the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change August 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................i 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve .......................................................................................1 1.2 Scope of the Report .........................................................................................................................1 1.3 Aims of the Report............................................................................................................................1 1.4 Structure of the Report.....................................................................................................................2 1.5 Site Ownership.................................................................................................................................2 1.6 Site Location.....................................................................................................................................2 1.7 Site Visits..........................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to Questions on Notice Environment Portfolio
    Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to questions on notice Environment portfolio Question No: 3 Hearing: Additional Estimates Outcome: Outcome 1 Programme: Biodiversity Conservation Division (BCD) Topic: Threatened Species Commissioner Hansard Page: N/A Question Date: 24 February 2016 Question Type: Written Senator Waters asked: The department has noted that more than $131 million has been committed to projects in support of threatened species – identifying 273 Green Army Projects, 88 20 Million Trees projects, 92 Landcare Grants (http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/3be28db4-0b66-4aef-9991- 2a2f83d4ab22/files/tsc-report-dec2015.pdf) 1. Can the department provide an itemised list of these projects, including title, location, description and amount funded? Answer: Please refer to below table for itemised lists of projects addressing threatened species outcomes, including title, location, description and amount funded. INFORMATION ON PROJECTS WITH THREATENED SPECIES OUTCOMES The following projects were identified by the funding applicant as having threatened species outcomes and were assessed against the criteria for the respective programme round. Funding is for a broad range of activities, not only threatened species conservation activities. Figures provided for the Green Army are approximate and are calculated on the 2015-16 indexed figure of $176,732. Some of the funding is provided in partnership with State & Territory Governments. Additional projects may be approved under the Natinoal Environmental Science programme and the Nest to Ocean turtle Protection Programme up to the value of the programme allocation These project lists reflect projects and funding originally approved. Not all projects will proceed to completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Inland Water Quality Assessment West Dapto Urban Release Area and Adjacent Growth Areas
    Appendix D Inland water quality assessment West Dapto Urban Release Area and Adjacent Growth Areas WATER QUALITY, AQUATIC ECOLOGY AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT 12 December 2011 West Dapto Urban Release Area and Adjacent Growth Areas WATER QUALITY, AQUATIC ECOLOGY AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT 12 December 2011 Sinclair Knight Merz ABN 37 001 024 095 100 Christie Street St Leonards NSW 2065 Australia Postal Address PO Box 164 St Leonards NSW 2065 Australia Tel: +61 2 9928 2100 Fax: +61 2 9928 2500 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Objectives 1 1.2. Report Structure 1 1.3. Director-General’s Requirements 2 1.4. Background 4 1.4.1. Existing Wastewater Systems 7 1.4.2. Port Kembla Wastewater System 7 1.4.3. Wollongong Wastewater System 7 1.4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bathurst Region Destination Planner
    2020 DESTINATION PLANNER BATHURSTREGION.COM.AU Bathurst is a city of contrasts in one of the most fascinating and diverse regions of NSW. Heritage listed buildings and world class museums and galleries are only a part of the rich history on offer, whilst spectacular natural wonders co-exist with a modern cultural landscape and the lively villages that surround the city. KING’S PARADE If there is one thing you can expect from lap of the circuit and visiting the National Bathurst it’s the unexpected. A city of Motor Racing Museum. BATHURST COURTHOUSE surprises, a historical town brought Mixing the new and exciting with its right up to the moment by the people heritage is what Bathurst is all about – who live and work here. Bathurst is a there truly is something for everyone here. city of contrasts, from the heritage listed buildings to quirky bars and restaurants, modern accommodation and a host of arts, Bathurst Visitor Information Centre crafts and music events in the surrounding The Bathurst Visitor Information Centre areas guaranteed to delight. One moment (known affectionately as BVIC to the locals) you can be exploring the heritage Town is the proud heart of the Bathurst region. Square guided by local Grant Denyer on Call in and visit the friendly team. We love the Bathurst Step Beyond App, the next what we do and no one knows the best of sitting in a cosy cafe sipping a latte or in a the region like us. Begin your adventures new restaurant trying an innovative dish. and chat with a local expert at the Bathurst Or walking through the impressive T.Arts Visitor Information Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Monitoring Report INDONESIA: Tangguh Liquefied Natural Gas Project Operator's Environmental, Healt
    Environmental and Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 38919 April – October 2012 INDONESIA: Tangguh Liquefied Natural Gas Project Operator’s Environmental, Health and Safety Report Prepared by BP Berau Limited Tangguh LNG Project Operator This report has been submitted to ADB by BP Berau Limited and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. Operator’s Environmental, Health and Safety Report Tangguh LNG April– October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH SAFETY REPORT TANGGUH LNG PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 1 Table List .......................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 3 1. Regulatory Compliance ............................................................................................ 4 1.1. Summary Description ...................................................................................... 4 1.2. Implications for Tangguh ................................................................................. 4 2. Environmental Management Plan ............................................................................ 5 2.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities ................ 5 2.1.1. Wastewater Management
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Relevance of Binary, Mosaic and Continuous Landscape Conceptualisations to Reptiles in Regenerating Dryland Landscapes
    Testing the relevance of binary, mosaic and continuous landscape conceptualisations to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes Melissa J. Bruton1, Martine Maron1,2, Noam Levin1,3, Clive A. McAlpine1,2 1The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, St Lucia, Australia 4067 2The University of Queensland, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, St. Lucia, Australia 4067 3Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Geography, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel, 91905 Corresponding author: [email protected] Ph: (+61) 409 875 780 The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0157-9 Abstract: Context: Fauna distributions are assessed using discrete (binary and mosaic) or continuous conceptualisations of the landscape. The value of the information derived from these analyses depends on the relevance of the landscape representation (or model) used to the landscape and fauna of interest. Discrete representations dominate analyses of landscape context in disturbed and regenerating landscapes; however within-patch variation suggests that continuous representations may help explain the distribution of fauna in such landscapes. Objectives: We tested the relevance of binary, mosaic, and continuous conceptualisations of landscape context to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes. Methods: For each of thirteen reptile groups, we compared the fit of models consisting of one landscape composition and one landscape heterogeneity variable for each of six landscape representations (2 x binary, 2 x mosaic, and 2 x continuous), at three buffer distances. We used Akaike weights to assess the relative support for each model. Maps were created from Landsat satellite images.
    [Show full text]