General Index

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Index http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society GENERAL INDEX Page numbers in italics refer to illustrations. Acton Farm, nr Charing, sarsen stones Anguish, Thomas, rector 285, 286-9 326 animal bone Adam of Lyminge 55 Dickson's Corner, Worth 111, Adcock, A.J., builder 384 112, 114, 115, 120, 141, 141, Addington Long Barrow 319, 320, 145 321, 322, 323, 324, 337, 338 ox skeleton 112 Addington-Trottiscliffe, sarsen stone fossil skeletal material 172 spreads in area 326 Minster in Thanet, Neolithic 361 Adel (Yorks), lion carving 387, 389 Arbuthnot, Sergeant James 282 adzes, Late Neolithic 'shaft-hole' archbishops of Canterbury 351-2 173, 175 Arkcoll, Charles 245, 246, 251, 252 Alkham, stater 2\0, 219 arrowheads Allen, Tim, 'The origins of the Swale: flint, Bronze Age 361, 363 an archaeological interpretation' iron, medieval, Sandwich 67, 68, 169-86 70-1 Allfree, Revd Edward Mott, head- Ash, (book review) 422-4 master 237 Ashbee, Paul, 'The Medways' mega- Alton (Hants), coin hoards 212-13 lithic long barrows' 319-45 Amherst, Mary, Dowager Countess Ashcroft, Peter, Chief Engineer 194, 190,203 n.32 195, 197, 198, 199, 200 Amminus, coinage 207, 209, 213, Ashford, railway 23, 350 216 Ash next Sandwich see Gilton Anderson, Graham, obituary by 431 assizes, in Maidstone 351 Anglo-Saxon period Astle, Thomas 317, 318 Late Saxon glass analysed 300, Austen, Francis 190, 191 301-2 Aveling, Stephen Thomas 267 Marquise stone used 18 axes and hand-axes Minster in Thanet, burials 361, Acheulian hand-axes 172, 173, 364-6, 367-8 174, 373-4 St Peter's Church, Whitfield 381, Lower Palaeolithic hand-axes 172, 384-5 174 Sandwich 52 Mesolithic 171, 172, 174 settlement and Quoit Brooch Style Neolithic, flint 120, 139, 140 (book review) 426-8 Bronze Age 173 settlement site 385 Aylesford, reservoirs for 408 Swalecliff and Hampton 179-80 see also knife; pottery Bank Holiday Act (1871) 249 449 GENERAL INDEX Baptists, of Smarden and the Weald Bigberry Camp, linchpins 377 (book review) 424-6 Bigbury, hillfort 216, 218, 279 Bargrave, Elizabeth (nee Dering) Birchington 84,85 glass from Netherhale Farm 310 Bargrave, Dean Isaac 77, 79, 84-5, Minnis Bay, Neolithic finds 366, 90, 95, 99 368 Bargrave, John and Robert, travels potin coin hoard, Iron Age 208, while exiled during the 219, 226 Civil War 77-105 railway 34 Robert's travel diary (book review) Woodchurch, Roman finds 379-81 417-18 'bird head' motifs 377 Barham, Beaker pottery 368 Birling, watercress beds 397, 401, Barham, Lord, First Lord 161 404 Barlow, John, engraver 317-18 Birmingham family 394, 396 Barlow, Robert, Commissioner at Bishopstone (Sussex), weights 127 Chatham 164 Black, Shirley Burgoyne, 'The emerg- barns(?), medieval, Salmeston Grange ence of Edward Hasted as hist- 381 orian of Kent' 311-18 Barrow, John, Second Secretary at Blackheath Hundred 280, 283, 284 the Admiralty 161 Blagg, T.F.C., obituary 431 barrows Blean 170, 171, 181,181, 182-3,182 Chatham Lines 306 Blean Forest area 221 Medway's megalithic long barrows Blue Bell Hill, sarsen stones 326 319-45 Boast, Emma, and Alex Gibson, Neolithic 366 'Neolithic, Beaker and Anglo- Saxon funerary 371 n.5 Saxon remains: Laundry Road, Bate, Revd James, vicar in Deptford Minster in Thanet' 359-72 285,286-8,289,291-2 Bolognini, Mattio, portrait 88, 89 beads bone see animal bone; fish bone; cane, Minster in Thanet 359 human remains glass cane bead, Dark Age, boroughs 353-4, 356 analysed 300, 301, 310 Boughton Aluph Beakers (Early Bronze Age), en- long mound 325 closure, Minster in Thanet 361, watercress beds near 401, 402, 363, 364, 367, 368, 370, 371; 405, 408 see also pottery Boughton Lees, watercress beds at Beauclerk, Lord Henry 281, 282 Park Barn Farm 402, 409 Beazley, Charles Nightingale, arch- Boughton Monchelsea, oppida, Iron itect 27, 33, 33, 37, 41, 41 Age 218, 219, 227 Beechmont (house) 190,191,194,195 Bournemouth 28 beetles, Tankerton 180 bout coupe-type tools and hand-axe Bendish, Sir Thomas 77, 85, 87, 89, 172, 173, 174 97-8 Boxley, potin coin hoard 219, 226 Berkenhead, John 90 bracelet, copper alloy, Dickson's Bifrons, Bargrave family home 77, Corner 125, 126 82, 85, 92, 96, 99 Brady, Francis, civil engineer 191 Bifrons, glass claw and cone beakers Bramhall, Dr John, Bishop of Derry analysed 299, 300, 309 86, 104 n.36 450 GENERAL INDEX Brasted, Court Lodge, Hogtrough Bull, Revd Herbert 47 Hill, watercress beds 406; see Bullfinch Corner, Riverhead, water- also Winfield Mill cress beds 401, 403, 405 Brasted Place, chapel 14 Bunyard (Thomas) & Son, nursery- Brayton (Yorks), lion on capital 389, men 245, 246, 247, 248, 249 391 burials Bredgar coin hoard 217, 279, 227 Neolithic 366 Bredhurst, tombstones 270 Beaker 367 Brennan, Michael G. Anglo-Saxon 269 (ed.), The Travel Diary of Robert Minster in Thanet 361, 364-6, Bargrave, reviewed 417-18 367-8 'The exile of two Kentish royalists pagan Jutish, Margate 381 during the English Civil War' medieval 379, 380 77-105 inhumations of unknown date, brick, Roman 175, 176 Minster in Thanet 359, 367-8 brickwork, Sevenoaks railway tunnel, Busshe, Joan, of Boxley 264 and sources 197 Briggs, Joan, on the marine shell at Caen stone see stone Dickson's Corner 142 Calleva (Silchester), coin mint 214, Briggs, John, of the Victualling Board 228 161 Canterbury Brisley, William, mason at Roch- Assembly rooms 348 ester Cathedral 11-13, 20 Burghmote 347-8, 352, 353, 354-5, Broadstairs 356, 357, 358 Acheulian hand-axe from West- Canterbury Lane 134 wood 373-4 Cathedral and Dickens 394, 395 Archives 78, 80, 82 potin coin hoard, Iron Age 208, influence of 351-2 279, 226 lions in the crypt 386-93 Bronze Age 173, 175, 178, 179 St Gabriel's chapel 386, 387, enclosures 378 388-9, 391 flints 145 Trinity Chapel 20 metalwork hoard (Late Bronze Christ Church Priory 18 Age) 173 Dane John pleasure gardens 348 Minster in Thanet (Beaker) 367, elections 352, 356, 357 368, 370, 371 finances and government (1700- see also Beaker; pottery 1850) 347-58 bronze object see brooches Freemen 347, 352, 354, 357 brooches Iron Age and coins 208, 216, 220, La Tene I, bronze, Worth 374-5,374 221, 227 'Nauheim derivative', Dickson's kilns fabric, Roman 128, 134, 137 Corner 125, 726, 142 magistrates 351, 353, 354, 355, 356 Quoit Style (book review) 427-8 as a market town 350-1, 355 Broom Downs, Newington, water- Marlowe Theatre site 134 cress beds 399, 403, 404-5 military presence 352-3, 356 Broomwood, St Paul's Cray 367 oppida, Iron Age 218 Buckwell Farm, nr Boughton Aluph, Pavement Commissioners 348, watercress beds 402, 405 351, 353, 355, 357 451 GENERAL INDEX police force 357 Chetney Marshes 170, 182 Poor Priests Hospital 355 Chilham, gold coin hoard 219, 226 population 350 Chilton Farm, flint assemblage 366 pottery 128, 132, 137 Chislehurst, railway line 200 St Augustine's Abbey 18 Chislet, Beaker pottery 368 lion 387 Christian, Ewan, architect 384, 385 St Margaret's Street baths 137 churches and chapels textile/weaving industry 348-9, 355 Dissenting 282 Canterbury Archaeological Trust Lidsing 261-76 (CAT) 172, 173, 385 for railway navvies 190, 197 Canterbury to Whitstable Railway Whitfield, Anglo-Saxon and Vic- (CWR) 349, 350, 355 torian features 381-5 Cantiaci 218 see also Westgate on Sea Carn Ban (Arran) 324 Cingetorix, king in Kent 218 Caroe, Martin, cathedral surveyor 3,15 Civil War, two Kentish royalists Carvilius, king in Kent 218 exiled during 77-105 Castle House, Otford, watercress clay tobacco pipes, Sandwich 67, 70 beds 406 Clifford, Isabella 264 castles see Sandwich Cliffsend, Oaklands Nursery site 367 CAT see Canterbury Archaeological Clinch, James, 'Maidstone Grammar Trust School 1833-1882' 235-60 'causewayed camps', Neolithic 366 coat of arms, Bargrave 82, 83 cemeteries Cobham, sarsen stones 326 Anglo-Saxon 368 Cockham Wood Reach 152, 158, 163 pagan Jutish 297, 298, 306, 307, Coffin Stone, Aylesford 319, 320, 309,310,381 321, 322, 323, 324, 334,335 Chalk Hill, Ramsgate 366 coins Channel Tunnel route, Beaker settle- Iron Age 205-33 ment sites 367 Amminus 207, 209, 213, 216 Chapman, Alexander 78, 81, 88, 89 Cunobelin 207, 209,213, Charles 191,92-3,94,95-6,102 n. 12 214-16, 225, 230,231 Charles II 79, 89, 90, 91, 94, 96-7, Dubnovellaunos 207, 209, 98-9 212-13, 230 Chatham Eppillus 207, 209, 211, 214, 228 base cup from Chatham Lines 306 imported gold 207, 210-11, bell from Lidsing chapel at dock- 224-5 yard 267, 275 n.4 Kentish Uninscribed Series dockyard 149,150, 151, 152, 154, 207,209, 211-12,229 155, 156, 157-8, 164, 166-7 potins 206, 220-7, 229, 230-1 mud dredger 163 Flat Linear I 207-8, 207, Chequers Inn 143 220-4, 225-6, 230 Cherry Gardens, watercress beds Flat Linear II 207, 207, 208, 402,406,411 209, 210, 221-4,225-6 Chessell Down, Isle of Wight, base Kentish Primary Series cup 306 ('Thurrock type') 206-7, The Chestnuts, Addington, barrow 208,209, 220,221, restored 319, 320, 321, 322, 225-6, 230 323, 324, 325, 337, 339, 340 Sam— 207, 209, 213,226 452 GENERAL INDEX coins (cont) Crouch, Dawn, 'Westgate on Sea - Sego (Tasciovanus) 207, 209, fashionable watering-place: the 213-14 first thirty years' 23-50 Vosenos 207, 213 Crowther, Joseph 86, 104 n.33 Gallo-Belgic (inch staters) 173, crucible, Beaker pottery 370 207, 209, 210,211, 225,228 Cumberland, Duke of 285-6, 292 Mediterranean region, inch Carth- Cunobelin, coinage 207, 209, 213, aginian Sicily and Ebusus 214-16, 225, 230, 231 (Ibiza)217 Roman 142-3, 216-17, 379 Darenth, watercress beds 409 medieval 178 Darent river post-medieval 68 Iron Age 218,
Recommended publications
  • Four Kings of Kent
    Four kings of Kent In 54 BC (de bello Gallico 5.22) Caesar's naval camp was attacked by Cingetorix, Carvilius, Taximagulus, and Segovax, four kings of districts in Kent, upon the orders of Cassivellaunus. Little more is known of any of them as individuals. Cingetorix Cingetorix was a name also borne by a chief of the Treveri, a Belgic tribe living near the Rhine, whom Caesar encountered (5.3) just before invading Britain properly. It also formed part of Vercingetorix, who led the Gauls’ revolt in 52 BC. These names are commonly likened to Old Irish cing ‘warrior, champion’ and cingid ‘he steps’ appropriate for a leader walking in front, but this does not necessarily imply Celtic speech since PIE *gheng- ‘to step, to march’ had descendants in many language families. (The word king is probably different, being related to kin. C and G were well-nigh interchangeable on coins in that period.) The element –rix is often claimed to be diagnostic for Celtic speech, because of its vowel I, but actually it was just a conventional name element in the shadow of Latin rex. Elements with which –rix coupled in ancient names tend to have better parallels in later Germanic languages and its post-Roman usage was greatest among Germanic tribes. Carvilius Carvilius was a name borne by a gens (clan) in Rome for more than two centuries before Caesar. There seems to be no accepted etymology for that Roman name, but perhaps it came from PIE *gerbh- ‘to scratch, to carve’. In 54 BC it is unlikely that many British chieftains had sent sons to be educated in Rome, so presumably Caesar Latinised an indigenous name, possibly based on words for ‘deer’, such as Welsh carw and Latin cervus, derived from PIE *ker- ‘horn’, like the Carvetii people.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppida: a Settlement Phenomenon of the Later Iron Ages of Britain and Temperate Europe: an Analysis of Colchester, Titelberg, and Canterbury
    Oppida: A Settlement Phenomenon of the later Iron Ages of Britain and Temperate Europe: An Analysis of Colchester, Titelberg, and Canterbury Volume Two The Sites: Later Iron Age Occupation at Colchester, Titelberg and Canterbury Emma Louise Jackson Classical and Archaeological Studies School of European Culture and Language Thesis Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Kent March 2017 7: Colchester The modern town of Colchester, (often referred to as Camulodunum in literature pertaining to the site’s later Iron Age, and Iron Age/Roman transitional period, occupation), has a long and vibrant history, with secure but not continuous evidence for occupation dating back to the Bronze Age (Crummy 1995b, 131-133). Flints dating to the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods have also been recovered through excavation (Brooks and Masefield 2006, 4; Brooks et al. 2007, 1); however, these are so limited in number that it is impossible to state definitively whether occupation was actually present at these times. Despite this early evidence for human activity it was not until the later Iron Age (Hawkes and Hull 1947, 5; Hawkes 1995, 4-6; Niblett 1985; 1-3) that Colchester truly became a flourishing centre of occupation. This is particularly true of the last c.50 years of the later Iron Age, (from c.15/10 BC1), when Colchester, (Figure 7.1), became one of Britain’s most significant settlements. Unsurprisingly, therefore, the archaeology associated with this period is both extensive and exciting; with, as N. Crummy rightly notes, ‘enormous research potential’ (2013, 38). Consequently, it was an ideal case study for the present thesis (see Chapter 1.2.3.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient British Kings and Other Significant Britons
    Ancient British kings and other significant Britons Here are the names of over 70 people who ruled in Britain c.60 BC-AD 85. Two thirds are known solely from coins, which proves the pivotal importance of coins in helping to piece together the complex politics of pre-Roman Britain. Names on coins are Red. First compiled by Chris Rudd in 2010, this unique king list includes a dozen groups of unknown rulers who minted money, such as the ‘Kings of Herts’. For more info consult ABC or [email protected] NAME IDENTITY REGION REGNAL REGNAL COINS TRIBE DATES (if known) Addedomaros Catuvellauni ‘great in chariots’ or younger brother or son North (and part of c.45-25 BC ‘great in steadfastness’ of Cassivellaunos? Thames Trinovantes) Aesu ‘lord’ or ‘holy’ pagus chief or official of Iceni East Iceni c.AD 30-43? Anglian Agr short for Agricu son or daughter or ally North Trinovantes? c.AD 35-43? ‘war dog’ of Cunobelinus? Thames or Agrippa ‘griffin’? moneyer of Scavo or sub-king East Iceni c.AD 35-45? Ale ‘rock?’ in north Norfolk? Anglian Amminus ‘friend’ son of Cunobelinus and Kent Cantiaci c.AD 30-40 supplicant to Caligula Andoco short for Andocomaros ‘the greatest’ or minor ruler associated with North Catuvellauni c.20-1 BC Andocombogios Tasciovanos, nephew of Thames ‘ace destroyer’? Cassivellaunos? Anarevitos ‘one with foresight’ a son of Eppillus? Kent Cantiaci c.AD 10-15 or ‘unforeknowable’ Anted short for Antedios ‘very Dobunnic ruler (after Corio and Western Dobunni c.AD 20-43? fiery?’ or perhaps ‘one Catti?), self-styled rig ‘king’ who sits in front?’ Antedios ‘very fiery?’ or perhaps powerful king and possible East Iceni c.AD 10-30 ‘one who sits in front?’ ally of Cunobelinus Anglian Arviragus a son of Cunobelinus North Catuvellauni ‘manly/true in battle?’ (Caratacus?) or could be Thames? and mid 1st cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar's Invasion of Britain / Nathan Braman
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OPUS: Open Uleth Scholarship - University of Lethbridge Research Repository University of Lethbridge Research Repository OPUS http://opus.uleth.ca Theses Arts and Science, Faculty of 2011 Caesar's invasion of Britain / Nathan Braman Braman, Nathan Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of History, c2011 http://hdl.handle.net/10133/2595 Downloaded from University of Lethbridge Research Repository, OPUS CAESAR’S INVASION OF BRITAIN NATHAN BRAMAN Bachelor of Arts, University of Lethbridge, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS History Department University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Nathan Braman, 2011 Abstract This paper examines the Roman invasions of and interactions with Britain in the mid first century BCE and early first century CE and evaluates the results. Specifically, this paper analyzes motives and the actual military events of the invasions of Julius Caesar in 55 and 54 BCE and evaluates their aftermath, leading up to the invasion of Claudius in 43 CE. Caesar’s stated motive for launching the invasion was to prevent the islanders from interfering in the new Roman order being constructed in Gaul. However, as will be shown, Caesar’s more personal motives, in the form of a desire for wealth and glory, played as much if not more of a role in the launching of these expeditions. In light of these motives, the invasions can be defined, at best, as partial successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Britons in Cosgrove
    Early Britons in Cosgrove The Catuvellauni When the Romans first came to Britain under Julius Caesar in 55 BC there were already tribes living there who had divided territories and recognised areas which could be mapped out. The Catuvellauni were probably a Belgic tribe from the North Sea or Baltics, part of the third wave of Celtic settlers in Britain in the second century BC. They may have been related to the Catalauni, a Belgic tribe of Gaul. The Catuvellauni lived in the modern counties of Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire and southern Cambridgeshire. Their territory also probably included tribes in what is today Buckinghamshire and parts of Oxfordshire. The tribal name possibly means 'good in battle'. Cassivellaunus, British war leader in 55 BC, is the first British individual known to history. He appears in Julius Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico, as commander of British warriors opposing Caesar's second invasion of Britain. Caesar does not mention Cassivellaunus's tribe, but his territory, north of the River Thames, corresponds with that of the Catuvellauni at the time of the later invasion under Claudius. Cassivellaunus had been at constant war with other British tribes, and had overthrown the king of the Trinovantes, the most powerful tribe in Britain at the time Despite Cassivellaunus's harrying tactics, designed to prevent Caesar's army from foraging and plundering for food, Caesar advanced to the Thames. The only fordable point was defended and fortified with sharp stakes, but the Romans managed to cross it. Cassivellaunus dismissed most of his army and resorted to guerilla tactics, relying on his knowledge of the territory and the speed of his chariots.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME REMARKS on the INDIVIDUAL and POWER in LATE IRON AGE PRE-ROMAN BRITAIN* 1. a Tale of Kings and Kingdo
    doi: 10.19090/i.2020.31.78-92 UDC: 903(410) ISTRAŽIVANJA ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES Received: 16 July 2019 31 (2020) Accepted: 27 August 2019 ANTON BARYSHNIKOV Nizhny Novgorod State University Russian State University for the Humanities (Moscow) [email protected] REGES, REGULI, DUCES: SOME REMARKS ON THE INDIVIDUAL AND POWER IN LATE IRON AGE PRE-ROMAN BRITAIN Abstract: The paper considers one of the most significant changes in late pre-Roman Iron Age in Britain—the emergence of individual power, usually labeled as kingship. The modern perception of this sociopolitical phenomenon has been largely determined according to texts from Greek and Roman authors. This paper argues that this image is distorted and says more about the ancient writers than it does about ancient political leaders, their status, or the essence of their power. Avoiding terms like king to prevent a general misunderstanding of the phenomenon is reasonable; nevertheless, coins from so-called dynasties and tribes as well as other material sources show the emergence of individual power from the first century B.C.E. to the first century C.E. This new phenomenon should be analyzed with new (and re-worked) theoretical frameworks. Additionally, comparative studies can play a significant role in exploring the nature of what is referred to as Iron Age kingship in Britain. Keywords: Iron Age kings, Pre-Roman Britain, rex, Caratacus, Togidubnus, kingship. 1. A tale of kings and kingdoms he end of the pre-Roman Iron Age in Britain witnessed quantitative changes that affected many (if not all) aspects of life on the island.1 In the political sphere, these T transformations were manifested in its most visible form in the southeastern region.2 It was here that proto-state entities emerged that are often referred to in scholarly literature I would like to thank the editorial board of the journal for the opportunity to publish this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • CAESAR's INVASION of BRITAIN NATHAN BRAMAN Bachelor of Arts, University of Lethbridge, 2009 a Thesis Submitted to the School O
    CAESAR’S INVASION OF BRITAIN NATHAN BRAMAN Bachelor of Arts, University of Lethbridge, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS History Department University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Nathan Braman, 2011 Abstract This paper examines the Roman invasions of and interactions with Britain in the mid first century BCE and early first century CE and evaluates the results. Specifically, this paper analyzes motives and the actual military events of the invasions of Julius Caesar in 55 and 54 BCE and evaluates their aftermath, leading up to the invasion of Claudius in 43 CE. Caesar’s stated motive for launching the invasion was to prevent the islanders from interfering in the new Roman order being constructed in Gaul. However, as will be shown, Caesar’s more personal motives, in the form of a desire for wealth and glory, played as much if not more of a role in the launching of these expeditions. In light of these motives, the invasions can be defined, at best, as partial successes. The Romans militarily defeated the enemy but failed to materially benefit from that victory. Caesar’s account also leaves numerous points of scholarly debate unresolved on the surface, but a careful examination of the evidence allows us to answer them in part. This paper provides a thorough discussion of this interesting period as well as a look at the motives, actions, and fortunes of the participants. iii Acknowledgements I would like to extend thanks to my supervisor, Christopher Epplett, for his encouragement and assistance in writing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Julius Caesar Vol. 2
    History Of Julius Caesar Vol. 2 By Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte History Of Julius Caesar Vol. 2 Of 2 JULIUS CÆSAR. BOOK III. THE WARS IN GAUL, AFTER THE “COMMENTARIES.” CHAPTER I. I. THERE are peoples whose existence in the past only reveals itself by certain brilliant apparitions, unequivocal proofs of an energy which had been previously unknown. During the interval their history is involved in obscurity, and they resemble those long-silent volcanoes, which we should take to be extinct but for the eruptions which, at periods far apart, occur and expose to view the fire which smoulders in their bosom. Such had been the Gauls. The accounts of their ancient expeditions bear witness to an organisation already powerful, and to an ardent spirit of enterprise. Not to speak of migrations which date back perhaps nine or ten centuries before our era, we see, at the moment when Rome was beginning to aim at greatness, the Celts spreading themselves beyond their frontiers. In the time of Tarquin the Elder (Years of Rome, 138 to 176), two expeditions started from Celtic Gaul: one proceeded across the Rhine and Southern Germany, to descend upon Illyria and Pannonia (now Western Hungary); the other, scaling the Alps, established itself in Italy, in the country lying between those mountains and the Po. The invaders soon transferred themselves to the right bank of that river, and nearly the whole of the territory comprised between the Alps and the Apennines took the name of Cisalpine Gaul. More than two centuries afterwards, the descendants of those Gauls marched upon Rome, and burnt it all but the Capitol.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesars Britannienfeldzüge
    Michael Schupp, 9a[Kd], LGG Latein Caesars Britannienfeldzüge Ich halte euch jetzt ein Referat über Caesars Britannienfeldzüge. Jetzt erst einmal zum Allgemeinen: Während seines gallischen Krieges führte Caesar auch zwei Invasionen nach Britannien durch. Die erste Invasion war 55 vor Christus, die Zweite 54 vor Christus. Seine Eroberungen führten aber zu keinen dauerhaften Folgen für das römische Reich. Erst 100 Jahre später wurde ein Teil Britanniens zur Provinz des römischen Reiches unter Kaiser Claudius. Britannien war den Griechen und den Römern erst seit den Seefahrten des Pytheas von Massalia bekannt. Pytheas war ein griechischer Kaufmann und Entdecker, der ungefähr von 380 vor Christus bis 310 vor Christus gelebt hat. Im Gegensatz zu Alexander dem Großen, der durch seine Eroberungen den Osten Europas kennenlernte, erforschte Pytheas den Nordwesten Europas. Wie viele Reisen Pytheas unternommen hat ist unbekannt. Man ist sich jedoch sicher, dass sich diese Ereignisse um 320 vor Christus abspielten. Massalia war zu der Zeit griechische Provinz. Höchstwahrscheinlich ist mit Massalia die heutige Stadt Marseille gemeint. Das war ungefähr im 4. Jahrhundert vor Christus. Vor seinem Einmarsch erkundigte sich Caesar bei gallischen Kaufleuten über die Lebensweise und die Kriegsstrategien der Bewohner, gute Anlegeplätze und entfernte Regionen der Insel. Vor seiner zweiten Invasion berichtet er dann kurz über die Geographie und das Klima Britanniens sowie auch über die Lebensweise der Menschen. Nun komme ich zu der ersten Invasion: Als Grund dafür nannte Caesar, dass die Briten den Galliern helfen würden, zum Beispiel, dass sie Gallische Flüchtlinge aufnehmen würden. 56 vor Christus kam es zu einem Aufstand der Veneter, weil sie ihren Handel durch den drohenden Einmarsch bedroht fühlten.
    [Show full text]