DOCSLIB.ORG

Oppida: a Settlement Phenomenon of the Later Iron Ages of Britain and Temperate Europe: an Analysis of Colchester, Titelberg, and Canterbury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oppida: a Settlement Phenomenon of the Later Iron Ages of Britain and Temperate Europe: an Analysis of Colchester, Titelberg, and Canterbury Oppida: A Settlement Phenomenon of the later Iron Ages of Britain and Temperate Europe: An Analysis of Colchester, Titelberg, and Canterbury Volume Two The Sites: Later Iron Age Occupation at Colchester, Titelberg and Canterbury Emma Louise Jackson Classical and Archaeological Studies School of European Culture and Language Thesis Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Kent March 2017 7: Colchester The modern town of Colchester, (often referred to as Camulodunum in literature pertaining to the site’s later Iron Age, and Iron Age/Roman transitional period, occupation), has a long and vibrant history, with secure but not continuous evidence for occupation dating back to the Bronze Age (Crummy 1995b, 131-133). Flints dating to the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods have also been recovered through excavation (Brooks and Masefield 2006, 4; Brooks et al. 2007, 1); however, these are so limited in number that it is impossible to state definitively whether occupation was actually present at these times. Despite this early evidence for human activity it was not until the later Iron Age (Hawkes and Hull 1947, 5; Hawkes 1995, 4-6; Niblett 1985; 1-3) that Colchester truly became a flourishing centre of occupation. This is particularly true of the last c.50 years of the later Iron Age, (from c.15/10 BC1), when Colchester, (Figure 7.1), became one of Britain’s most significant settlements. Unsurprisingly, therefore, the archaeology associated with this period is both extensive and exciting; with, as N. Crummy rightly notes, ‘enormous research potential’ (2013, 38). Consequently, it was an ideal case study for the present thesis (see Chapter 1.2.3.1). This chapter is ultimately designed to provide a reassessment of Colchester, (see Chapter 7.3), using the methodology outlined in Chapter 6, that will be used not only to determine whether the current interpretations of the site, (see Chapter 7.2), are sound, but to provide an answer to the thesis’ overarching question: is the term ‘oppida’ still valid today? (see Chapter 11). As an oppidum Colchester is regularly cited as representing the centralisation of power during the later Iron Age whereby its leading individuals had economic and political pull over the site’s hinterland (see Chapter 7.2). Consequently, oppida such as Colchester are said to have conformed to core-periphery and central place theory models (Haselgrove 1976, 27-28; Haselgrove 1982, 85; Cunliffe 1988, 2-9; Pitts 2010, 32). In light of this, it was decided that a consideration of Colchester and its relationship to its hinterland would also be considered as part of the current thesis, (Chapter 8). This decision was made to ensure that the best possible understanding of Colchester, and its adherence to current thinking on both its occupation and oppida in general, was obtained; a process that had the added benefit of ensuring that as many avenues as possible were explored in answering the thesis’ primary research question. 1 This dating is based on the dates attributed to the Lexden Tumulus (Foster 1986) and the terminal date of Dressel 1b amphorae (Sealey 2009). 127 Figure 7.1: Plan from later Iron Age Colchester (after: After Radford 2013b, Fig. 4.8). Before we engage in a consideration of those elements of the present chapter outlined above however, it is pertinent that we first become better acquainted with the site’s archaeological record starting with its morphology and topographical setting. 7.1: Morphology and Topographic Setting 7.1.1: Colchester’s Landscape Setting The topographical setting of Colchester, located in modern north-eastern Essex (Figure 7.2), is one that would have been ideal for sustaining Iron Age life. According to Hawkes and Hull later Iron Age Colchester was ‘a natural peninsula of habitable land, sharply demarcated by river and forest.’ (1947, 8) To be more specific, the plateau upon which ancient Colchester was sited lies c.30m OD and displays evidence of well drained loamy soils and light woodlands (ibid, 2; Hawkes 1995, 3); key landscape features of Iron Age settlements. The loamy soils would have supported arable cultivation, the primary stimulus of Iron Age economy (see Chapter 4.1); while the light woodlands would have provided timbers for construction, fuel, and coverage suitable for the pannage of pigs (Cunliffe 2003, 15). Two rivers, (the Colne and Roman), can be said to have bound later Iron Age Colchester, and these too were of considerable import to the site and its habitants at this time. The Colne naturally bounds Colchester to the north and east, while in the south-easternmost extent of the settlement it joins the Roman River to form an estuary with tidal waters which flow into the North Sea (Hawkes 1995, 3) (see Figure 7.3). This system of waterways would have provided Colchester with water for sustenance and industrial processes; but in addition to this, it would have allowed the local population to move through the landscape and interact with their neighbours for both social and economic gain. Furthermore, the union of these rivers, to form a coastal estuary, granted the site access to the near Continent by way of the English Channel, thus expanding the site’s trading possibilities. Consequently, Colchester appears to have been situated within a landscape well suited to permanent habitation. 7.1.2: Morphology and Associated Archaeological Material Colchester’s morphology comprises a complex web of features spread across the ‘c.12 sq. mile [(19 square km)]’ (Hawkes and Hull 1947, 45) tract of land the site occupied (see Figure 7.1). These features can be said to represent five sub-sites within Colchester: Sheepen, Gosbecks, The Garrison, Lexden Tumulus, and Stanway Cemetery (see Figure 7.1); and a series of dykes that bound much of the site’s expanse (see Chapter 7.1.2.6). 129 Figure 7.2: Map of modern day Essex highlighting Colchester’s location (after: Gascoyne and Radford 2013, Fig.0.1; additions author’s own). During excavation many of the features associated with these sub-sites were found to contain material of later Iron Age date. Despite the relationship between some of these finds and their original contexts being poorly recorded, the data collected during excavation proved to be of considerable value to the thesis, not only because they were used to compile current thinking on the site (see Chapter 7.2), but because the author’s interpretations of Colchester (see Chapter 7.3), and the conclusions they reached as a result of these, were also founded in this material. It is therefore pertinent that we now briefly consider the archaeological records of each of Colchester’s component parts. 130 Sheepen Figure 7.3: Map of Ancient Colchester highlighting the rivers Colne and Roman (after: Hawkes 1995, Fig. 2.1; alterations and additions author’s own). 7.1.2.1: Sheepen Sheepen, or Sheepen Hill, covered a ‘quarter of a sq. mile [(0.4 square km)]’ (ibid, 45) of Colchester’s landscape. The site sat alongside a tributary of the river Colne, and had access to the Sheepen Ford the lowest tide-free crossing on the Colne. Furthermore, the Sheepen Springs provided the site with fresh water (ibid, 45) that could have been used to sustain its population; while the site’s standing water, as a collective entity, is believed to have given the site religious significance (Willis 2007, 121-122). During the 20th Century Sheepen was subject to two major archaeological investigations, one in the 1930s (Hawkes and Hull 1947), and the other the 1970s (Niblett 1985). Although these 131 investigations overlapped spatially their archaeology will be considered herein as separate entities. 7.1.2.1.1: 1930s Morphology Work conducted during the 1930s identified six zones of occupation/activity at Sheepen (see Figure 7.4); across which a range of features were identified, including in: Zone 1: The Sheepen dyke and the site’s north-western entrance; occupation sites, located within the bounds of the Sheepen dykes; pits; and wells (Hawkes and Hull 1947, 66-67), Zone 2: Occupation sites, located outside of the Sheepen dyke; and large ditches, filled with domestic/occupation/consumption debris (ibid, 75), Zone 3: Ditches and ramparts linked to boundary markers; and Sheepen’s western entrance marked out in post-holes (ibid, 87), Zone 4: A trackway; a number of substantial pits; and a potential former hut site (ibid, 103), Zone 5: Three stretches of the Sheepen dyke, including the south-west entrance to the site; occupation sites, within the bounds of the Sheepen dyke; pits; and sleeper-beam gullies for rectilinear timber buildings (ibid, 118-119), Zone 6: Occupation sites, with associated sleeper-beam gullies for rectilinear buildings; an occupation hollow; and a series of pits (ibid, 122-124). Finally with regards to Sheepen’s 1930’s morphology it is important to note that the excavation techniques and recording methods employed at this time were not of the same standard as those used today. The site was excavated by non-specialist workers whose appreciation for the value 132 of context, and what we now term stratigraphic principles in excavation, is likely to have been limited; with, potential, structures made of wood not systematically recognized and finds not grouped by layer/deposit. Consequently, the morphology recorded and presented by Hawkes and Hull (1947) may not be completely accurate, as the features may have been over excavated, not fully recorded, or completely unrecorded. Therefore, we must err on the side of caution and apply good judgment to the identifications of those features presented within Hawkes and Hull’s report, rather than taking them at face value. The same must also be said of the artefacts recovered at Sheepen during the 1930s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives
    Comparative and Global Perspectives on Japanese Archaeology Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives edited by Access Thomas Knopf, Werner Steinhaus and Shin’ya FUKUNAGAOpen Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 007 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 008 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2018 © All image rights are secured by the authors (Figures edited by Werner Steinhaus) Access Cover illustrations: Mori-shōgunzuka mounded tomb located in Chikuma-shi in Nagano prefecture, Japan, by Werner Steinhaus (above) Magdalenenberg burial mound at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany,Open by Thomas Knopf (below) The printing of this book wasArchaeopress financed by the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... iii List of authors .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Four Kings of Kent
    Four kings of Kent In 54 BC (de bello Gallico 5.22) Caesar's naval camp was attacked by Cingetorix, Carvilius, Taximagulus, and Segovax, four kings of districts in Kent, upon the orders of Cassivellaunus. Little more is known of any of them as individuals. Cingetorix Cingetorix was a name also borne by a chief of the Treveri, a Belgic tribe living near the Rhine, whom Caesar encountered (5.3) just before invading Britain properly. It also formed part of Vercingetorix, who led the Gauls’ revolt in 52 BC. These names are commonly likened to Old Irish cing ‘warrior, champion’ and cingid ‘he steps’ appropriate for a leader walking in front, but this does not necessarily imply Celtic speech since PIE *gheng- ‘to step, to march’ had descendants in many language families. (The word king is probably different, being related to kin. C and G were well-nigh interchangeable on coins in that period.) The element –rix is often claimed to be diagnostic for Celtic speech, because of its vowel I, but actually it was just a conventional name element in the shadow of Latin rex. Elements with which –rix coupled in ancient names tend to have better parallels in later Germanic languages and its post-Roman usage was greatest among Germanic tribes. Carvilius Carvilius was a name borne by a gens (clan) in Rome for more than two centuries before Caesar. There seems to be no accepted etymology for that Roman name, but perhaps it came from PIE *gerbh- ‘to scratch, to carve’. In 54 BC it is unlikely that many British chieftains had sent sons to be educated in Rome, so presumably Caesar Latinised an indigenous name, possibly based on words for ‘deer’, such as Welsh carw and Latin cervus, derived from PIE *ker- ‘horn’, like the Carvetii people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Oppida and the Urban Question in Late Iron Age Europe
    J World Prehist (2017) 30:281–300 DOI 10.1007/s10963-017-9109-4 Alternatives to Urbanism? Reconsidering Oppida and the Urban Question in Late Iron Age Europe Tom Moore1 Published online: 6 September 2017 Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The mega-sites of Late Iron Age Europe (traditionally known as oppida) provide an important dataset for exploring how complex social systems can artic- ulate power in novel ways. The question of whether these can be described as ‘urban’ has overshadowed a deeper understanding of the development and role of such sites, with many studies examining this issue almost wholly against peculiarly classical concepts of urbanism, isolating Iron Age studies from wider debate. Rather than seek to redefine ‘towns’, this paper explores how and why oppida diverge from traditional concepts of urbanism, arguing that the form of oppida reflects their focus on particular aspects—assembly, theatricality, and the household—which reflect the nature of Late Iron Age societies. It will be suggested that oppida are comparable to a range of mega-sites and low-density settlements recognised throughout the world that represent alternative solutions to the social complications urbanism seeks to address. Keywords Europe Á Iron Age Á Low-density settlements Á Oppida Á Assembly Introduction Large complexes, known as oppida, in Late Iron Age Europe (c. second century BC to first century AD) represent one of the most significant developments in prehistoric Europe. Spread from southern Britain to Bohemia (Fig. 1), their large size and extensive ramparts have led to discussion of oppida being dominated by debate over whether they can be regarded as the first manifestation of urbanism in & Tom Moore [email protected] 1 Department of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, DH1 3LE Durham, UK 123 282 J World Prehist (2017) 30:281–300 123 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Grain Use on the Titelberg, Luxembourg
    ]. Ethnobiol. 2(1): 79-88 May 1982 DIFFERENTIAL GRAIN USE ON THE TITELBERG, LUXEMBOURG RALPH M. ROWLETT and ANNE L. PRICE Department ofAnthropology, University ofMissouri-Columbia Columbia, MO. 65211 MARIA HOPF Emeritus Curator of Ethnobotany, Romisch-Germanische Zentral Museum Mainz Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT.-The "Titelberg," Luxembourg, is an Iron Age hillfort which was occupied from La Tene II (ca. 200 B.C.) until the end of the Roman Empire in northern Gaul (ca. A.D. 400). Prior to the Iron Age there was also a Neolithic use of the mountain top in the third millenium B.C. From the Iron Age until its abandonment, the Titelberg was mainly populated by Celtic folk, apparently of the Treveri tribal chiefdom. Carbonized cereal grains have been recovered from most levels. At the emplacement excavated by the Uni­ versity of Missouri, there were a stratified series of mint foundries. From the late Neolithic comes a small variety of wheat, while oats appear as early as the hearths of La Tene II. From the Dalles Floor phase, after the Roman conquest, barley is the most frequently encountered grain. Bread wheat does not make a strong appearance until the late fourth century, when either the last inhabitants of the Titelberg or immigrating Franks left the most recent feature to be excavated. Although the remains are found in the context of a continuing cultural tradition, the particular combinations of cereals recovered change with either major shifts in cultural trajectory or the appearance of intrusive cultures nearby. These changes seem not necessarily "caused" simply by either overt introductions or the prestige of the intrusive culture, but as a way to adjust to other factors, such as taxation, political status, and meat supply.
    [Show full text]
  • 183Volume 4 Pt.2.Pdf
    Oppida: A Settlement Phenomenon of the later Iron Ages of Britain and Temperate Europe: An Analysis of Colchester, Titelberg, and Canterbury Volume Four Part 2 Appendices for Chapters 9 and 10 Emma Louise Jackson Classical and Archaeological Studies School of European Culture and Language Thesis Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Kent March 2017 Appendix 9.1 Titelberg’s Complete Ceramic Assemblage The table presented here provides an overview of the vessels comprising Titelberg’s later Iron Age ceramic assemblage. The data contained within this table was collated using the information presented in Metzler’s (1995a, 1995b) reports on the excavations conducted by Luxembourg’s National Museum of History and Art at Titelberg, and comprises details of these vessels’ forms, (recorded using the system presented within Metzler’s report as this was also utilised in the reports documenting excavations at Lamadelaine and Goeblange-Nospelt); form types, (in other words were they beakers, bowls, or platters etc.); dates of manufacture; origins, (in terms of where they were manufactured); and the number of each form present. Furthermore, these vessels are grouped within the table based on the contexts from which they were recovered (following the order in which the contexts were presented in the site report), as the site reports also contained details of Titelberg’s stratification. This table was included here to ensure that the author’s overview of the archaeology attributed to the Titelberg’s later Iron Age occupation as a whole, (see Chapter 9.1.2.2), was not burdened by raw data when its purpose was to provide a brief outline of the evidence that was to be explored later on in the chapter (Section 9.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Luxemburg.Nl/5/Terrerouge.Html
    Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the capital and its environment, worth a visit. The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has an enormous wealth of tourism opportunities, either by car, bicycle or on foot. There is something for everyone. Luxembourg city is primarily known for shopping, but also for visiting the remains of the old establishment and a pleasant walk along streets and squares. Those who rather explore the city on a cultural level, best start their trip at the Place de la Constitution, overlooking the valley of the Pétrusse and the Cathedral, Notre-Dame de Luxembourg. Since 1994, the bulwarks and the old city were listed as UNESCO World Heritage sites. Going towards the south, visitors will discover the "land of red earth." The deep red iron-containing soil contributes to the typical atmosphere of this area. This region, the triangle of Dudelange, Esch-sur-Alzette and Differange, has a rich industrial heritage and is also trendy and young. The mine installations, the miners’ cafe and the two museums with historical heritage will catapult you back into the late 19th century. Source: http://www.lcto.lu Source : http://www.wandelen-in-luxemburg.nl/5/TerreRouge.html 1 Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, “hiking or cycling” A selection of the many Gallo-Roman archaeological sites : Goeblange (15 km from Arlon / 22 km from Messancy): ruins of a “villa rustica” and Merovingian tombs. Open all year. Free entrance. Guided visits tel. +352 30 96 64 e-mail [email protected] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goeblange Mamer (15 km from Arlon / 21 km from Messancy): Vicus along the Roman road between Reims and Trier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commentaries of Caesar, by Anthony Trollope
    Project Gutenberg's The Commentaries of Caesar, by Anthony Trollope This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Commentaries of Caesar Author: Anthony Trollope Release Date: November 9, 2017 [EBook #55926] Language: English *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE COMMENTARIES OF CAESAR *** Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Books project.) Ancient Classics for English Readers EDITED BY THE REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS, M.A. C Æ S A R The Volumes published of this Series contain HOMER: THE ILIAD, BY THE EDITOR. HOMER: THE ODYSSEY, BY THE SAME. HERODOTUS, BY GEORGE C. SWAYNE, M.A. Late Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. The following Authors, by various Contributors, are in preparation:— VIRGIL. HORACE. ÆSCHYLUS. SOPHOCLES. ARISTOPHANES. CICERO. JUVENAL. XENOPHON. OTHERS WILL FOLLOW. A Volume will be published on the 1st of every alternate Month, price 2s. 6d. T H E C O M M E N T A R I E S OF C Æ S A R BY ANTHONY TROLLOPE WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCLXX CONTENTS. CHAP. PAGE I. INTRODUCTION, 1 FIRST BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CÆSAR DRIVES FIRST THE SWISS AND II. 28 THEN THE GERMANS OUT OF GAUL.—B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasure Exhibition Objects
    Treasure Exhibition Objects The main focus of the exhibition is the Coin Hoard found in 2012. This is displayed in a conservation laboratory in the middle of the exhibition. There is live conservation ongoing to the Le Catillon Hoard II. Coins are being taken off the main hoard, cleaned, identified and then catalogued and packaged. The rest of the exhibition contains items from Jersey, Guernsey, Sark , Alderney and France from both the Romans and the Celts. l The rest of the exhibition contains items from The ship timbers from Guernsey Jersey, Guernsey, Sark , Alderney and France from l The Orval Chariot Burial from France both the Romans and the Celts. l Coins from Le Catillon Hoard I from Grouville The amount of items from bothe the cultures l Paule Statues from Brittany show their similarities and differences. They l Kings Road burials from Guernsey also demonstrate the variety of objects found archaeologically in these areas. The below list gives you details of every artefact There are a number of artefacts of particular within the exhibition. significance: Orval Chariot Burial Iron ring bolts, possibly elements connected with the chariot shaft. Five copper alloy phalerae decorated with small carved coral plaques, mounted on their support Iron hoops intended to strengthen the hub of each with a birch resin-based glue, occasionally finished of the two wheels. off with a small bronze rivet. (metal disc used to Iron eye bolts and forked rod which were probably adorn the harness) used as shock absorbers between the axel and the Two rein rings. carriage. Two copper alloy harness rings.
    [Show full text]
  • King Sam of Kent Came Back from the Dead
    Mud picture courtesy of www.texturez.com Insight CHRIS RUDD How King Sam of Kent came back from the dead HORTLY after daybreak on a chilly Saturday morning, January 16, 2016, in a grassy field near Deal on the east coast of Kent, metal detectorist Charlie Gibbens unearthed a 2,000 year old gold coin of the highest rarity, possibly unique (figure 1). It was an Ancient British gold stater struck early in the 1st century AD by a little known ruler of the Cantiaci S(“people of Cantion”), a confederacy of four tribes who occupied the county of Kent in the late iron age. What makes this coin particularly important is that it is believed to be the first known gold stater—the only known gold stater—of King Sam of Kent. “A fantastic coin”, says Dr John Sills, “Almost as important as the Anarevito stater” (see COIN NEWS, December 2010, p. 10; Current Archaeology 250, January 2011, p. 7). Some 20 years ago nobody had heard of King Sam of Kent. Cunobelin, then this presumably cannot have happened until Bronze units inscribed SA (ABC 375 [ABC number refers to after AD c. 10, when Cunobelin came to power. If the influence Ancient British Coins by Chris Rudd]) had been recorded from operated in the other direction, the Sam coins may have been Kent since 1864, and silver units (ABC 369) since the early produced shortly before, or perhaps, during the earliest years 1980s, but nobody knew who had issued them (figure 7). of Cunobelin’s reign (the Cunobelin bronzes under discussion The man who really brought King Sam “back from the dead” here seem likely to be among his earliest coins).
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign of Aulus Plautius
    Archaeological Journal ISSN: 0066-5983 (Print) 2373-2288 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raij20 The Campaign of Aulus Plautius Edwin Guest LL.D. To cite this article: Edwin Guest LL.D. (1866) The Campaign of Aulus Plautius, Archaeological Journal, 23:1, 159-180, DOI: 10.1080/00665983.1866.10851344 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00665983.1866.10851344 Published online: 11 Jul 2014. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=raij20 Download by: [University of California, San Diego] Date: 29 June 2016, At: 13:17 CAMPAIGN OF AULUS PLAUTIUS. CAMBORITVM Η(ύιιιώτ·ιώ/ι^ ^MV^ODVNVM 7 'GLEVVM; tpZUrn^&ldicstcr ^Aylesbury \VER0LAMl VN! \KSPAlbans fandiim Abinadom >VLL0NIAC£ MoiJafortL iiibiimjioiHiiotif LONDIN WaiiiuraCPwll' Thames ν— ί or,Forest \ή*όmines Teddawto'V VERLVCIO "2 Sum ihpltifonLj' ^XlGiujstoiv iRIWEi Fu.i'ojjibe Wood <Si Gcarg es HilL· '•'ppily Wood ilu'ltf Wood. (mUdJbrcL W Downloaded by [University of California, San Diego] at 13:17 29 June 2016 DorlaJig PORTVSfiVBs J Se-CCARVM PORTVS/LEFOTNIS Winchester FORTIFIED FORD. CowayStates. ^rcijaeoltrstcal Journal. SEPTEMBER, 1866. THE CAMPAIGN OF AULUS PLAUTIUS.1 By EDWIN GUEST, LL.D., Master of Gonvil and Caius College, Cambridge. BEFORE we can discuss with, advantage the campaign of Aulus Plautius in Britain, it will be necessary to settle, or at least endeavour to settle, certain vexed questions which have much troubled our English antiquaries. The first of these relates to the place where Caesar crossed the Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain
    JOHN CREIGHTON Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York ny 10011–4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarco´n 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain © John Creighton 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in Plantin 10/12pt [vn] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library isbn 0 521 77207 9 hardback CONTENTS List of Wgures page viii List of tables x Preface xi Acknowledgements xii List of abbreviations xiii Note on translations used xiv Introduction 1 1 The Middle to Late Iron Age transition 4 2 Coin and the representation of individual authority 22 3 The Southern and Eastern kingdoms 55 4 Classical imagery and ideology in Britain 80 5 The location of Britain in the Roman world 126 6 Legends and language 146 7 Dynasties and identities 174 8 Conclusion and epilogue: from Britain to Britannia 216 Appendix: A brief introduction to Iron Age coinage in Britain 222 References 228 Index of coin types 238 General index 241 vii FIGURES Fig. 2.1 The development of coinage in northern Europe from the Phillipus to its regional successors page 27 Fig.
    [Show full text]