Transmission of Japanese Encephalitis Virus from the Black Flying Fox, Pteropus Alecto , to Culex Annulirostris Mosquitoes, Despite the Absence of Detectable Viremia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transmission of Japanese Encephalitis Virus from the Black Flying Fox, Pteropus Alecto , to Culex Annulirostris Mosquitoes, Despite the Absence of Detectable Viremia Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 81(3), 2009, pp. 457–462 Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Transmission of Japanese Encephalitis Virus from the Black Flying Fox, Pteropus alecto , to Culex annulirostris Mosquitoes, Despite the Absence of Detectable Viremia Andrew F. van den Hurk , * Craig S. Smith , Hume E. Field , Ina L. Smith , Judith A. Northill , Carmel T. Taylor , Cassie C. Jansen , Greg A. Smith , and John S. Mackenzie Virology, Queensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia; School of Chemical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Queensland, Australia; Australian Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia; Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Abstract. To determine the potential role of flying foxes in transmission cycles of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) in Australia, we exposed Pteropus alecto (Megachiroptera: Pteropididae) to JEV via infected Culex annulirostris mosquitoes or inoculation. No flying foxes developed symptoms consistent with JEV infection. Anti-JEV IgG antibodies developed in 6/10 flying foxes exposed to infected Cx. annulirostris and in 5/5 inoculated flying foxes. Low-level viremia was detected by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in 1/5 inoculated flying foxes and this animal was able to infect recipient mosquitoes. Although viremia was not detected in any of the 10 flying foxes that were exposed to JEV by mosquito bite, two animals infected recipient mosquitoes. Likewise, an inoculated flying fox without detectable viremia infected recipient mosquitoes. Although infection rates in recipient mosquitoes were low, the high population densities in roosting camps, coupled with migratory behavior indicate that flying foxes could play a role in the dispersal of JEV. INTRODUCTION in eastern Australia. Certainly, the behavioral ecology of fly- ing foxes deems them potential dispersal hosts of mammalian Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne fla- viruses, and several recently emerged zoonotic viruses, includ- vivirus of Southeast Asia responsible for over 40,000 clinical ing Hendra virus (HeV) and Australian bat lyssavirus, have 1 cases annually, with a 25% fatality rate. Japanese encephali- been described in flying foxes in Australia. 12 Furthermore, tis virus is an emerging virus in the Australasian region with both experimental and natural infection studies have sug- 2 potentially serious public and animal health implications. gested a possible role for bats in the transmission cycles of Widespread JEV activity was first detected in Australia in 1995 a number of arboviruses, including JEV (reviewed by Sulkin on Badu Island in Torres Strait, when it caused an outbreak and Allen). 13 However, the majority of these experiments have 3 consisting of three human cases and two deaths. Subsequently, examined insectivorous bats of the order Microchiroptera. except for 1999, JEV activity was recognized every year in the The only experimental infection of Megachiropteran bats Torres Strait between 1995 and 2005, when the sentinel pig with JEV has been undertaken in India. In these earlier stud- program was discontinued. In 1998, human and pig infections ies, viremia developed in both Rousettus leschenaulti and were identified for the first time on the Australian mainland Cynopterus sphinx , with the latter species able to infect recip- 4 at the mouth of the Mitchell River on Cape York Peninsula. ient mosquitoes. 14,15 Entomologic studies implicated Culex annulirostris as the pri- We undertook laboratory-based infection and transmis- 5,6 mary mosquito vector of JEV in northern Australia. sion experiments to determine whether flying foxes can Pigs and ardeid wading birds, such as herons and egrets are act as amplifying hosts for JEV. Specifically, we examined the primary amplifying hosts of JEV, as they produce viremia 1) the ability of flying foxes to develop clinical illness, vire- 7–10 sufficient to infect mosquitoes. Although humans and horses mia, and specific antibodies after being exposed to JEV via can develop fatal encephalitis, they are considered to be dead- infected mosquitoes or by inoculation; and 2) the likelihood 11 end hosts of the virus, developing only low-level viremia. of recipient mosquitoes becoming infected after feeding on Should JEV become established on the Australian main- flying foxes that had been previously exposed to JEV. The land, the potential importance of Australian fauna species Black flying fox, Pteropus alecto , was chosen because of acting as vertebrate amplifying hosts is largely unknown. its widespread geographic distribution throughout north- Experimental studies at the Commonwealth Scientific and ern Australia, including areas where JEV has previously Industrial Research Organization Australian Animal Health occurred. 16 Laboratory previously examined the possible role of a num- ber of Australian native species (such as wallabies and pos- sums) as reservoir or amplifying hosts.2 However, flying MATERIALS AND METHODS foxes (Megachiroptera: Pteropididae) were not included in All animal experimentation complied with the Queensland these studies, and mosquitoes were not used as the route of Animal Care and Protection Act 2001 and was approved by virus exposure or to show transmission of JEV. Flying foxes the Queensland Department of Primary Industries Animal are of particular interest as a potential reservoir or amplify- Ethics Committee (AEC; approval no. 33/08/02), University ing host of JEV as a result of their nomadic behavior, and of Queensland AEC (approval no. MICRO/PARA/463/02/), because of their increasing abundance in major urban areas and Queensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services AEC (QHFSS; approval no. VIR 1/03/32). In addition, the collection of wild flying foxes was approved by the * Address correspondence to Andrew F. van den Hurk, Virology, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (Scientific Purposes Queensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services, 39 Kessels Rd, Coopers Plains, Queensland 4108, Australia. E-mail: andrew_hurk@ permit no. WISP01419503). As JEV is considered an exotic health.qld.gov.au virus in Australia, all infection and transmission experiments 457 458 VAN DEN HURK AND OTHERS were undertaken at the Physical Containment Level 3 the commencement and cessation of feeding, samples of the insectary/animal house at QHFSS , Brisbane. blood/virus suspension were diluted 1:20 in growth media Animals. Pteropus alecto were collected from flying fox (GM; Opti-MEM [Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY] with 3% colonies located in the Brisbane suburbs of East Brisbane fetal bovine serum, antibiotics and fungizone) and stored at (27°28′S, 153°03′E) and Indooroopilly (27°30′S, 152°58′E), −70°C for later titration. which also contained the Grey-headed flying fox, Pteropus After 18 hr, mosquitoes were anesthetized with CO2 and poliocephalus and the Little red flying fox, Pteropus scapulatus . blood engorged mosquitoes were placed into 1 L contain- Flying foxes returning from overnight foraging were captured ers within an environmental growth cabinet (Sanyo Electric, using mist nets for a period of approximately 90 min before Gunma, Japan) maintained at 28°C, 70–75% RH, and 12:12 sunrise. Flying foxes were anaesthetized using the inhalation (L:D), and offered 10% sucrose as a nutrient source. Mosqui- anesthetic Isoflurane (Isoflurane Inhalation Anesthetic, Laser toes were held under such conditions for an extrinsic incuba- Animal Health, Salisbury, Australia) administered by a portable tion period of 13 d. To determine if the mosquitoes intended Ohmeda Isotec 3 vaporizer (BOC Health Care, West Yorkshire, for the infection of the flying foxes were indeed infected, a England) at a concentration of 5% for induction and 1.5% sample of ≤ 6 individual mosquitoes were removed on day 12 during maintenance with an oxygen flow rate of 1 L/min.17 Each post virus exposure and tested for the presence of virus. bat was assessed for age, weight, forearm length, and female Flying fox husbandry. On the afternoon before the infection bats for pregnancy status by abdomen palpitation. Pregnant experiments, flying foxes were moved from ARI to QHFSS females were excluded from the study and released. To aid and placed in individual cages in a room within the PC3 in future identification, each flying fox was injected with a animal house. The dimensions of the cages were 900 × 900 × microchip containing a unique identification number (LifeChip, 900 mm, and were of wire mesh construction (25 × 25 × 25 Destron Fearing, South St. Paul, MN). A 1–2 mL blood sample mm aperture), elevated 1 m above the ground, with 10–15 cm was obtained from the propatagial vein using a 3 mL syringe between cages. Seasonal fruits (including rockmelon, bananas, (Terumo [Philippines] Corporation, Laguna, Philippines), a mangoes, apples, etc.), supplemented by full cream milk 0.50 × 16 mm needle (Terumo [Philippines] Corporation), powder, were fed to the flying foxes between 4 and 6 pm daily; and lithium heparin (Heparin Injection BP, David Bull water was provided ad libatum via drip bottles. Artificial light Laboratories, Mulgrave North, Australia) as an anticoagulant. was provided for the flying foxes each day between the hours The serum
Recommended publications
  • Culex Annulirostris
    Mosquito Fact Sheet 2: Culex annulirostris Prepared by Stephen Fricker, Mosquito and Public Health Research Group, University of South Australia 2 1 1 3 3 2 Larva distinctive features; Adult Female distinctive features; 1. Typically with two dark patches on abdomen. 1. Proboscis with pale band in middle. 2. Long siphon (7-8 X long as wide) with 6 hair tufts. 2. Abdomen with distinctive pattern 3. Antennae pale with end third dark 3. Leg segments with pale bands. Ecology This medium sized brown species is found throughout Australia, particularly in warmer weather following rain flooding. Studies have demonstrated adult dispersal of 7 km although the in reality it is possibly fur- ther. The larvae of this species are typically found in fresh and brackish water environments including swamps , lagoons, transient pools. It is an opportunistic feeder bitting a variety hosts including humans, other mammals and birds during the day and at dusk. Identification Adults are a medium sized brownish mosquito with a distinct pale band at the midpoint of the proboscis, a rounded abdomen, and pale bands at the base of each leg segment. The larvae have a long siphon, antennae pale on the basal ⅔ and typical with two dark dorsal patches on abdomen. Disease Risk This species is considered to be one of the most significant vectors of arbovirus such as Ross River Virus and Barmah Forest virus in Australia. Further information : Mosquitoes and Public Health Research Group UNISA: http://www.unisa.edu.au/sansominstitute/mosquito/ Department of Medical Entomology, University of Sydney and Westmead Hospital ; http://medent.usyd.edu.au/ .
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficiency of Various Collection Techniques For
    502 J. A*. Mosg. Coxrnol Assoc. Vor. l, No.4 THE EFFICIENCYOF VARIOUS COLLECTION TECHNIQUES FOR SAMPLING CULEX ANNULIROSZRIS IN SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA RICHARD C. RUSSELL School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia ABSTRACT. Dry-ice (COr) baited EVS (Encephalitis Virus Surveillance) light traps collected significantly more Culex annulirostris than unbaited EVS or CDC light traps, chicken-, guinea pig- and rabbit-baited EVS traps, or cubic foot resting boxes. Results from the animal-baited traps indicated a preference for bird versus mammal bait. Females sampled by the resting boxes had significantly lower parity rates than females sampled by dry-ice baited EVS traps. Parity rates were generally similar among females sampled by dry-ice baited EVS traps, unbaited CDC light traps and animal baited EVS light traps. INTRODUCTION trap) similar to the model of Goodwin (1942)1. Traps were set in pairs 20 m apart across the The mosquito Culex annulirostris Skuse is an prevailing breeze, and each test was replicated important vector of arboviruses from both bird three times. The traps were situated approx- and mammal reservoirs in Australia (Doherty imately 250 m from the major larval habitats at 1974). Mosquito populations can be monitored Appin, and approximately 2 km from the larval to predict seasons when above average abun- habitats at Echuca. dance can occur, and investigate the bionomics Female Cx. annulirosfris were counted and of the vector species that relate to its involve- parity status was determined according to the ment in virus cycles. The use of different tech- dissection technique of Detinova (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Acute and Sublethal Effects of (S)-Methoprene on Some Australian
    1997 Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 13(2):153-155' Copyrighi @ lgg7 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc' ACUTE AND SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF (^'-METHOPRENE ON SOME AUSTRALIAN MOSQUITOES SCOTT A. RITCHIE,T'' MICHAEL ASNICAR3 rNo BRIAN H' KAY' 7 species ABSTRACT. Laboratory bioassays were used to determine the efficacy of (S)-methoprene against to 6'54 of Australian mosquitoes. The gOVo lethal concentration (LC*) ranged from 0.17 ppb for Aedes vigilax ppb for Culex sitiins. The survival of adults exposed as larvae to 2 sublethal dosages of (S)-methoprene was co-purea to a control group. Little effect was noted for Cx. sitiens and Culex annulirostris. However, survival of male and female Ae. vigilax was significantly reduced and appeared to be dose related. Bloodfeeding success of female Ae. vigilctx was also significantly reduced. INTRODUCTION iprasasna et al. 1996). Methoprene is also docu- mented to affect body size (wing length) and sex The insect growth regulator methoprene has been ratio (Robert and Olson 1989). We investigated the successfully used to control many species of mos- effects of sublethal amounts of (S)-methoprene on (for quitoes, with minimal nontarget toxicity a re- adult longevity in Ae. vigilax, Cx. annulirostis, and view see Ross et al. 1994a, 1994b). Methoprene Cx. sitiens, and on bloodfeeding success in Ae. vi- occurs in 2 forms, the (R) and (S) isomers, with gilax, the primary target for mosquito control pro- (.f)-methoprene having the greatest insecticidal ac- grams in coastal Australia. tivity. (,S)-methoprene is available in many formu- lations. Liquid formulations (ALTOSID@ Liquid MATERIALS AND METHODS Larvicide tA.L.L.l) provide control over a limited period, whereas sustained-release formulations Laboratory bioassays: Laboratory bioassays such as ALTOSID@ Pellets and XR Briquets can were used to determine the effectiveness of (S)- control mosquitoes for several months (Kramer et methoprene (A.L.L., 5Vo active ingredient) against al.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Ecology of the Common Banded Mosquito, Culex Annulirostris, a Major Vector of Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus
    ASPECTS OF lHE ECOLOGY OF lHE CCJrvM>N BANDED r-t:>SQUITOJ CULEX ANNULIROSTRIS~ A MAJOR VECTOR OF MURRAY VALLEY ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS by GARRICK McDONALD Dip.Ag.Sci. (Dookie), B.Sc. (La Trobe} A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Agricultural Science, in the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne. December, 1981. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND STATEMENT OF SOURCES vi LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW 1 1.1 CuZex annuZirostris Skuse 1 1.1.1 Importance 1 1.1.2 Distribution 3 1.1.3 Description 4 1.1.4 Life cycle and biological studies 8 1.1.5 Habitat preferences 10 1.1.6 Relative abundance 11 1.1.7 Host preferences 12 1.1.8 Vector status and disease epidemiology 12 1.2 Age specific life and fecundity tables and PoPUlation growth potential 15 1.2.1 The theory 15 1.2.2 Use in mosquito studies 18 CHAPTER 2: EXPERIMENTAL 20 General Introduction 20 2.1 The influence of temperature on development, survival and fecundity of CuZex annuZirostris in the laboratory 21 (a) Juvenile development and survival 22 (b) Adult survival and fecundity 23 (c) ·Age specific life and fecundity tables, and population" statistics 27 2.2 The behaviour of Culex annuZirostris larvae in the laboratory 42 2.3 Field studies of juvenile CuZex annuZirostris 47 2.3.1 .Ecology of Culex annulirostris within a fresh water pond - Mildura 48 (a) Colonization, larval survival and development 50 (b) Time-specific life tables 50 (c)
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: a Review
    viruses Review Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: A Review Oselyne T. W. Ong 1,2 , Eloise B. Skinner 3,4 , Brian J. Johnson 2 and Julie M. Old 5,* 1 Children’s Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; [email protected] 2 Mosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; [email protected] 3 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; [email protected] 4 Biology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 5 School of Science, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mosquito-borne viruses are well recognized as a global public health burden amongst humans, but the effects on non-human vertebrates is rarely reported. Australia, houses a number of endemic mosquito-borne viruses, such as Ross River virus, Barmah Forest virus, and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. In this review, we synthesize the current state of mosquito-borne viruses impacting non-human vertebrates in Australia, including diseases that could be introduced due to local mosquito distribution. Given the unique island biogeography of Australia and the endemism of vertebrate species (including macropods and monotremes), Australia is highly susceptible to foreign mosquito species becoming established, and mosquito-borne viruses becoming endemic alongside novel reservoirs. For each virus, we summarize the known geographic distribution, mosquito vectors, vertebrate hosts, clinical signs and treatments, and highlight the importance of including non-human vertebrates in the assessment of future disease outbreaks. The mosquito-borne viruses discussed can impact wildlife, livestock, and companion animals, causing significant changes to Australian Citation: Ong, O.T.W.; Skinner, E.B.; ecology and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Infection of Culex Annulirostris, Culex Gelidus, and Aedes Vigilax with a Yellow Fever/Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Chimera (Chimerivax™-Je)
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 75(4), 2006, pp. 659–663 Copyright © 2006 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION OF CULEX ANNULIROSTRIS, CULEX GELIDUS, AND AEDES VIGILAX WITH A YELLOW FEVER/JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS VACCINE CHIMERA (CHIMERIVAX™-JE) MARK REID,* DONNA MACKENZIE, ANDREW BARON, NATALIE LEHMANN, KYM LOWRY, JOHN AASKOV, FARSHAD GUIRAKHOO, AND THOMAS P. MONATH Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Life Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Acambis Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts Abstract. Australian mosquitoes from which Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) has been recovered (Culex annu- lirostris, Culex gelidus, and Aedes vigilax) were assessed for their ability to be infected with the ChimeriVax™-JE vaccine, with yellow fever vaccine virus 17D (YF 17D) from which the backbone of ChimeriVax™-JE vaccine is derived and with JEV-Nakayama. None of the mosquitoes became infected after being fed orally with 6.1 log10 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL of ChimeriVax™-JE vaccine, which is greater than the peak viremia in vaccinees (mean peak vire- days). Some members of all three 11–0 ס PFU/mL of 0.9 days mean duration, range 30–0 ס PFU/mL, range 4.8 ס mia species of mosquito became infected when fed on JEV-Nakayama, but only Ae. vigilax was infected when fed on YF 17D. The results suggest that none of these three species of mosquito are likely to set up secondary cycles of transmission of ChimeriVax™-JE in Australia after feeding on a viremic vaccinee. INTRODUCTION tralia,7–9 and all three species of mosquito have been infected experimentally by membrane feeding with JEV isolates ob- Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a member of the fam- tained from the Torres Strait of Australia.10 ily Flaviviridae and is a leading cause of viral encephalitis in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Culex Sitiens
    International Journal of Mosquito Research 2021; 8(1): 25-30 ISSN: 2348-5906 CODEN: IJMRK2 IJMR 2021; 8(1): 25-30 Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Culex sitiens © 2021 IJMR www.dipterajournal.com (Diptera: Culicidae) based on the mitochondrial Received: 13-11-2020 Accepted: 15-12-2020 COI sequence Deepika Panda Post-Graduate Dept. of Zoology, Deepika Panda and Tapan K Barik Berhampur University, Berhampur, Odisha, India DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/23487941.2021.v8.i1a.496 Tapan K Barik (1) Post-Graduate Dept. of Abstract Zoology, Berhampur University, Culex is mosquito commonly known to transmit several arboviral diseases which have a significant Berhampur, Odisha, India impact on human health. An earlier study shows the dominancy of Culicine having 57 mosquito species (2) Post-Graduate Dept. of under 12 genera were in coastal regions of Odisha state. Culex sitiens Weidmann is a proficient coastal Biotechnology, Berhampur vector of the Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV). Bio-ecology of mosquito vector and their precise University, Berhampur, Odisha, identification is of paramount importance to develop species specific vector control strategies. In this India study, molecular identification of Cx. sitiens was made using mitochondrial COI after collection. Genetic divergence study was performed to analyze the intra-specific distance among the studied mosquito species. Additionally, a haplotype network was constructed based on the nucleotide differences, to determine the genealogical relationship between haplotypes. The current study shows the abundance and efficiency of use of the mt COI gene marker which strongly supports the positioning of Cx. sitiens by clustering with their respective group. Further, the study of population genetics illustrated the occurrence of genetic differentiation within the population and the haplotype network study suggested that the Indian Cx.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Source of Blood Meals in Mosquitoes Collected From
    Gyawali et al. Parasites Vectors (2019) 12:198 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3455-2 Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Identifcation of the source of blood meals in mosquitoes collected from north-eastern Australia Narayan Gyawali1,2,3*, Andrew W. Taylor‑Robinson4, Richard S. Bradbury1, David W. Huggins5, Leon E. Hugo3, Kym Lowry2 and John G. Aaskov2 Abstract Background: More than 70 arboviruses have been identifed in Australia and the transmission cycles of most are poorly understood. While there is an extensive list of arthropods from which these viruses have been recovered, far less is known about the non‑human hosts that may be involved in the transmission cycles of these viruses and the relative roles of diferent mosquito species in cycles of transmission involving diferent hosts. Some of the highest rates of human infection with zoonotic arboviruses, such as Ross River (RRV) and Barmah Forest (BFV) viruses, occur in coastal regions of north‑eastern Australia. Methods: Engorged mosquitoes collected as a part of routine surveillance using CO 2‑baited light traps in the Rock‑ hampton Region and the adjoining Shire of Livingstone in central Queensland, north‑eastern Australia, were ana‑ lysed for the source of their blood meal. A 457 or 623 nucleotide region of the cytochrome b gene in the blood was amplifed by PCR and the amplicons sequenced. The origin of the blood was identifed by comparing the sequences obtained with those in GenBank®. Results: The most common hosts for the mosquitoes sampled were domestic cattle (26/54) and wild birds (14/54). Humans (2/54) were an infrequent host for this range of mosquitoes that are known to transmit arboviruses causing human disease, and in an area where infections with human pathogens like RRV and BFV are commonly recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • S41598-021-83919-1.Pdf
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The environmental and ecological determinants of elevated Ross River Virus exposure in koalas residing in urban coastal landscapes Brian J. Johnson1,4*, Amy Robbins2,4, Narayan Gyawali1, Oselyne Ong1, Joanne Loader2, Amanda K. Murphy1,3, Jon Hanger2 & Gregor J. Devine1 Koala populations in many areas of Australia have declined sharply in response to habitat loss, disease and the efects of climate change. Koalas may face further morbidity from endemic mosquito-borne viruses, but the impact of such viruses is currently unknown. Few seroprevalence studies in the wild exist and little is known of the determinants of exposure. Here, we exploited a large, spatially and temporally explicit koala survey to defne the intensity of Ross River Virus (RRV) exposure in koalas residing in urban coastal environments in southeast Queensland, Australia. We demonstrate that RRV exposure in koalas is much higher (> 80%) than reported in other sero-surveys and that exposure is uniform across the urban coastal landscape. Uniformity in exposure is related to the presence of the major RRV mosquito vector, Culex annulirostris, and similarities in animal movement, tree use, and age-dependent increases in exposure risk. Elevated exposure ultimately appears to result from the confnement of remaining coastal koala habitat to the edges of permanent wetlands unsuitable for urban development and which produce large numbers of competent mosquito vectors. The results further illustrate that koalas and other RRV-susceptible vertebrates may serve as useful sentinels of human urban exposure in endemic areas. Te koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is an important emblem of Australia’s biodiversity and a globally-recognised Australian icon, yet many populations continue to decline1.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Explains Broad Patterns of Ross River Virus Transmission Across Australia
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/286724; this version posted March 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Temperature explains broad patterns of Ross River virus transmission across Australia 2 3 Marta S. Shocket1* ([email protected]), Sadie J. Ryan2,3,4 ([email protected]), and Erin A. 4 Mordecai1 ([email protected]) 5 6 1Department of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, USA 7 2Department of Geography, University of Florida, Turlington Hall, Gainesville, FL, USA 8 3Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 9 4School of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering, and Science, University of 10 KwaZulu Natal, Scottsville, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa 11 12 Statement of authorship: EAM conceived of and designed the study. MSS collected data, 13 performed statistical analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SJR performed 14 geographic analyses. All authors revised the manuscript. 15 Data accessibility statement: Upon acceptance, all data will be archived in a public repository. 16 17 Keywords: Aedes vigilax, arbovirus, Culex annulirostris, mosquito-borne disease, infectious 18 disease, Murray Valley Encephalitis virus, Ross River virus, R0 model, temperature, vector- 19 borne disease 20 Running Title: Temperature & Ross River virus transmission Article type: Letter 21 Words in abstract: 147 Words in main text: 5000 Number of references: 94 22 Number of figures, tables and text boxes: 6 figures, no tables or text boxes 23 * Corresponding Author: Marta S. Shocket, [email protected], phone: 650-723-5923 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/286724; this version posted March 22, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Appraisal of the Culex Sitiens Subgroup in Australasia: Major Arbovirus Vectors
    Genetic appraisal of the Culex sitiens subgroup in Australasia: major arbovirus vectors by Stephane Paul Gerard Hemmerter B. Sc., rv1.Sc. (Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science Institute for the Biotechnology of Infectious Diseases UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY Sydney, Australia 2009 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORSHIP/ORIGINALITY I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Stephane Hemmerter -I, 11 AKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to Dr. Nigel Beebe who welcomed me into his group and who always provided me valuable advice. Nigel, I am glad to have done my PhD with you and appreciate you letting me work independently while still being available to answer my questions and encourage new ideas. Thanks for letting me work on this topic and giving me the freedom to organise conferences and workshops. Nigel, I am very grateful for this. Prof. Nick Smith, thank you for your total and constant support from the first day onwards and in valuable proof reading. Thanks for welcoming me into your team. I am also very grateful to have met Dr. Jan Slapeta, your advice and your support was so much appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito Isolates of Ross River Virus from Cairns, Queensland, Australia
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 62(5), 2000, pp. 561–565 Copyright ᭧ 2000 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene MOSQUITO ISOLATES OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS FROM CAIRNS, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA DAVID HARLEY, SCOTT RITCHIE, DEBRA PHILLIPS, AND ANDREW VAN DEN HURK Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition, The University of Queensland, Medical School, Herston Road, Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia; Tropical Public Health Unit, Cairns, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Public Health Sciences, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, Queensland, 4108, Australia; Department of Microbiology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia Abstract. During 1996–1998 60,619 mosquitoes were collected around Cairns, Australia and processed for Al- phavirus isolation. Thirty-three isolates of Ross River (RR) virus were made from 9 species, Aedes imprimens, Aedes kochi, Aedes notoscriptus, Aedes vigilax, Culex annulirostris, Culex gelidus, Mansonia septempunctata, Verrallina (formerly Aedes) carmenti, and Verrallina lineatus. Attempts to isolate RR virus from 121 Aedes aegypti were unsuccessful. Twenty-six (79%) of the isolates came from within 1 km of a colony of spectacled flying-foxes, Pteropus conspicillatus. The minimum infection rate for these mosquitoes was 1.0 compared with 0.2 per 1,000 for mosquitoes trapped at all other sites. Ross River virus has not previously been isolated from Ae. imprimens, Cx. gelidus, Ma. septempunctata, Ve. carmenti, or Ve. lineatus. This is also the first isolation of an arbovirus from Cx. gelidus in Australia. In conclusion, the vector status of Ve. carmenti, Ae. aegypti and Ma. septempunctata warrants further study. This study also provides evidence that P.
    [Show full text]