Red Rock Corridor Commission Thursday June 30, 2011 4:00 P.M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40Th Annual ESOP Conference Visit Us
July 2017 Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40th Annual ESOP Conference Company and professional members of the Minnesota / Dakotas Chapter attended numerous legislative meetings at the 40th Annual ESOP Conference in Washington, D.C., May 11 and 12. Visits were arranged where employee owners met with legislators or their respective aides to gain additional support for ESOPs. A special thank you to the legislative staff and aides at all of the MN, ND and SD congressional and senatorial offices for coordinating and participating in the meetings. We appreciate your continued support and would be interested in hosting a company visit in your district! Congresswoman Kristi Noem, North Dakota Congressman Rick Nolan, Minnesota Congressman Collin Peterson, Minnesota A New Congress with a New ESOP Bill This year on April 12, 2017, six members of congress introduced the Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2017. Today, 14 more representatives have joined in co-sponsoring HR 2092. Thank you Co-Sponsors: Erik Paulsen, Kristi Noem, and Kevin Cramer. We would like to thank the following representatives for their support of the 2015 ESOP bills, HR. 2096 & S. 1212: Tim Walz (MN-1), Erick Paulsen (MN-3), Keith Ellison (MN-5), Tom Emmer (MN-6), Collin Peterson (MN-7), Rick Nolan (MN-8), Kevin Cramer (ND), Kristi Noem (SD), John Thune (SD), Al Franken (MN), Amy Klobuchar (MN), Heidi Heitkamp (SD) and John Hoeven (ND). Many of these representatives have been dedicated partners in supporting ESOP legislation for many years. In recognition of their consistent support, the MN/DAK ESOP Association Chapter presented Certificate of Appreciations during the Capitol Hill visits May 10 and 11th. -
Presidential Election Results
2016 Election Overview The outcome of the 2016 elections has definitely altered the landscape for transportation policy and funding initiatives. From the Presidency down to state legislative races, we face a new legislative dynamic and many new faces. What hasn’t changed: the huge need for resources to increase the nation’s and the state’s investment in the transportation system and bipartisan agreement on that fact. Prior to the outcome of Tuesday’s election we were hearing from candidates on both sides of the aisle that increasing investments in infrastructure was an area of agreement. Candidates for Minnesota’s legislature brought up the need for a comprehensive, long-term transportation funding package over and over again in news stories, candidate profiles and candidate forums. We were hearing more from candidates about transportation than we have in previous election cycles. Voters in other states, made their voices heard by approving ballot initiatives in 22 states that increased and stabilized funding for transportation. As we head into 2017, transportation advocates have a huge opportunity to capitalize on the widespread support for infrastructure improvements. However, it will take the involvement of transportation advocates across the state making their voices heard to rise above partisan squabbling and the many other issues that will be on the table. National Presidential Election Results Electoral Votes Needed to Win: 270 *Remaining: 16 Trump (R) Electoral Votes 290 Popular Vote 60,375,961 Clinton (D) Electoral Votes 232 Popular Vote 61,047,207 Minnesota Clinton (D) percent 46.9% votes 1,366,676 Trump (R) percent 45.4% votes 1,322,891 The race for the White House defied the polls and expectations as Donald Trump won more than the needed 270 votes in the electoral college while Hillary Clinton narrowly won the popular vote. -
Indiana Corn & Soybeanpost
INDIANA CORN & SOYBEANPOST Election 2020 Former Indiana State Police Trooper happy to farm full-time – See story on page 24 Permit No. 589 No. Permit Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, PAID U.S. Postage U.S. Indiana Soybean Alliance, 8425 Keystone Crossing, Ste. 200, Indianapolis, IN 46240 IN Indianapolis, 200, Ste. Crossing, Keystone 8425 Alliance, Soybean Indiana 1 Standard INDIANAPresorted CORN & SOYBEAN POST unitedsoybean.org Whether it’s improving soybean HELPING meal to outperform the competition or promoting the YOU DELIVER sustainability of U.S. soy, the soy checkoff has been working behind the scenes to help farmers satisfy ON DEMAND their customers’ needs. We’re looking inside the bean, beyond the bushel and around the world to keep preference for U.S. soy strong. And for U.S. soybean farmers like you, the impact is invaluable. See more ways the soy checkoff is maximizing profit opportunities for farmers at unitedsoybean.org 2 INDIANA CORN & SOYBEAN POST IN-Deliver on Deman Ad 8.125 x 10.875.indd 1 8/29/18 6:26 AM WINTER 2020 | VOL. 13, NO. 5 Chairman Directors David Rodibaugh, Rensselaer / D1 Nancy Cline, Kirklin / D1 ISA, Purdue partnership discovers Kendell Culp, Rensselaer / D1 Vice Chairman Joseph Stoller, Bremen / D1 Matt Chapman, Springport / D2 John Emmert, Ligonier / D2 new products from soy Elaine Gillis, Dunkirk / D2 Secretary Carey McKibben, LaGrange / D2 Dr. Nate Mosier, ISA Chair in Soybean Utilization Research Jim Douglas, Flat Rock / D4 Larry Wilkinson, Kimmell / D2 and Professor of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Kevin Cox, Brazil / D3 Treasurer Andrew Miller, Oaktown / D3 talks about soybean innovation and discovery at Purdue Denise Scarborough, LaCrosse / D1 Mark Legan, Coatsville / D3 Derika Lynam-Spaetti, Richland / D3 University. -
Congressional Scorecard 109Th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006
IRANIAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE Congressional Scorecard 109th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006 Please visit us on the web at www.iranianamericanpac.org About IAPAC IAPAC is a registered bipartisan political action committee that contributes to candidates for public office who are attuned to the domestic concerns of the Iranian American community. IAPAC focuses exclusively on domestic policy issues such as civil rights and immigration, and it encourages Americans of Iranian descent to actively participate in civic affairs. Mission • To support and promote the election of candidates for federal, state and local office, regardless of party affiliation, who are attuned to the domestic needs and issues of the Iranian American community • To support and promote Iranian American participation in civic affairs Issue Advocacy Civil Liberties: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security in the Post-9/11 Era. Protecting our security and ensuring that the government does not infringe upon basic constitutional rights have long been important issues for civil libertarians and certain ethnic communities. IAPAC believes that our government must take the appropriate measures to protect our nation from further atrocities, but that it can do so without eliminating basic constitutional rights. Immigration: Immigration reform that is driven by proper national security concerns and remedies based on a fair and accurate appraisal of deficiencies in the immigration process, and not simply on national origin. Specifically, IAPAC advocates for a fair and measured execution of federal regulations governing the issuance of non-immigrant and immigrant visas for Iranian nationals. Congressional Scorecard The IAPAC 2005-2006 Congressional Scorecard rates members of Congress on votes and other positions taken in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 109th Congress, which affect the domestic needs of the Iranian American community. -
NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby”
NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby” Script Documentation AUDIO: Taxpayers pay for Colin Peterson’s Since 1991, Peterson Has Been Reimbursed At personal, private airplane when he’s in Minnesota. Least $280,000 For Plane Mileage. (Statement of Disbursements of House, Chief Administrative Officer, U.S. House of Representatives) (Receipts and Expenditures: Report of the Clerk of TEXT: Collin Peterson the House, U.S. House of Representatives) Taxpayers pay for Peterson’s private plane Statement of Disbursements of House AUDIO: But do you know where else he’s going? Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From March AUDIO: That’s right. Vegas, Baby. Vegas. 22, 2002 To March 25, 2002 Costing, $1,614. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The American Federation Of Musicians From June 23, 2001 To June 25, 2001, Costing $919. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From January 11, 2001 To January 14, 2001, Costing $918.33. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) AUDIO: Colin Peterson took 36 junkets. Vacation- Throughout His Time In Congress, Peterson like trips, paid for by special interest groups. Has Taken At Least 36 Privately Funded Trip Worth $57,942 (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) TEXT: 36 Junkets paid for by special interest groups See backup below Legistorm AUDIO: In Washington, Peterson took $6 million in Collin Peterson Took $6.7 Million In Campaign campaign money from lobbyists and special Money From Special Interest Group PACs interests. -
Congressional Recommendations Congressional Recommendations
Page 6 October 2010 UTU News October 2010 UTU News Page 7 These candidates deserve your vote! Congressional Recommendations Congressional Recommendations Dist. 4 Henry Johnson (D)* Dist. 5 Emanuel Cleaver II (D)* Dist. 13 Betty Sutton (D)* Dist. 15 Ruben Hinojosa (D)* Alabama Colorado Maine New York Dist. 16 Silvestre Reyes (D)* House of Representatives Senate Dist. 5 John Lewis (D)* House of Representatives Dist. 7 Scott Eckersley (D) Senate Dist. 14 Steve C. LaTourette (R)* Michael Bennet (D)* Dist. 8 Jim Marshall (D)* Dist. 8 JoAnn Emerson (R)* Dist. 15 Mary Jo Kilroy (D)* Dist. 17 Chet Edwards (D)* Dist. 2 Bobby Bright (D)* Dist. 1 Chellie Pingree (D)* Charles E. Schumer (D)* Dist. 18 Sheila Jackson Lee (D)* Dist. 3 Steve Segrest (D) Dist. 12 John Barrow (D)* Dist. 2 Michael Michaud (D)* Kirsten E. Gillibrand (D)* Dist. 16 John Boccieri (D)* House of Representatives Dist. 13 David Scott (D)* Dist. 17 Timothy J. Ryan (D)* Dist. 20 Charles A. Gonzalez (D)* Dist. 5 Steve Raby (D) Dist. 1 Diana DeGette (D)* Dist. 23 Ciro D. Rodriguez (D)* Dist. 6 Spencer Bachus (R)* Maryland House of Representatives Dist. 18 Zack Space (D)* Dist. 2 Jared Polis (D)* Hawaii Dist. 1 Timothy H. Bishop (D)* Dist. 25 Lloyd Doggett (D)* Dist. 7 Terri A. Sewell (D)* Dist. 3 John Salazar (D)* Senate Dist. 27 Solomon P. Ortiz (D)* Senate Barbara Mikulski (D)* Dist. 2 Steve J. Israel (D)* Dist. 4 Betsy Markey (D)* Daniel Inouye (D)* Dist. 3 Peter T. King (R)* Dist. 28 Henry Cuellar (D)* Dist. 29 Gene Green (D)* Alaska Dist. -
AHIP Testimony, House Tax Committee 07232012
Good morning Mr. Chairman and Members. I am Phil Griffin, Minnesota counsel for America’s Health Insurance Plans – AHIP. Thank you for the opportunity to speak this morning about this important and very timely topic. AHIP is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. AHIP’s members provide health and supplemental benefits to more than 200 million Americans through employer-sponsored coverage, the individual insurance market, and public programs including Medicare and Medicaid. AHIP advocates for public policies that expand access to affordable health care coverage to all Americans through a competitive marketplace that fosters choice, quality, and innovation. The Affordable Care Act brought us some good news, most notably that it will expand coverage to millions of Americans, a goal that has long been supported by health plans. But there is bad news, too. And the bad news is that unless some critical changes are made, the Affordable Care Act will be anything but affordable. More to the point, as a result of the premium tax and other costly provisions of ACA, you can count on significant increases in the cost of coverage not only in the individual and small group markets, but also for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries who receive their coverage through private insurers. A significant source of these rate increases is a new sales tax on health insurance which is the focus of my comments today. The amount of the tax will be $8 billion in 2014, increasing to $14.3 billion in 2018. The tax does not sunset and is indexed thereafter. The Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the premium tax will exceed $100 billion over the next ten years. -
Editor's Corner November 3, 2010 by Peter Coyle
Editor's Corner November 3, 2010 by Peter Coyle Minnesota's political landscape has been altered very dramatically based on yesterday's election results, though not exactly in the manner most pundits had expected. As of this writing, Mark Dayton holds a narrow lead (less than 1 percent) over Tom Emmer in the race for governor of Minnesota. More dramatic is the fact that Republicans handily won control of both the House and Senate in Minnesota. Republicans in the Minnesota legislature will ride a roller-coaster of emotions over the next day or two, but very quickly they will need to come to grips with the reality that while their political fortunes have changed, the dire economic conditions confronting the state and nation have not. It remains necessary to resolve a nearly $6 billion state budget deficit for the next biennium; regardless of the outcome in the governor's race, this financial quagmire will need to be resolved with no tax increases and no help from their Democrat counterparts. We will be watching very closely to see who emerges as leaders of the various party caucuses in the House and Senate; it will be especially interesting to see who emerges as chairs of the multiple committees in the House and Senate. The results in Minnesota were mirrored to a great extent by the national elections in which Republicans regained control of the House of Representatives after ceding it to the Democrats four years ago. While control of the Senate remains with the Democrats, Republicans picked up at least 6 seats. -
Congressional Pictorial Directory.Indb I 5/16/11 10:19 AM Compiled Under the Direction of the Joint Committee on Printing Gregg Harper, Chairman
S. Prt. 112-1 One Hundred Twelfth Congress Congressional Pictorial Directory 2011 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2011 congressional pictorial directory.indb I 5/16/11 10:19 AM Compiled Under the Direction of the Joint Committee on Printing Gregg Harper, Chairman For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Offi ce Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800; Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-087912-8 online version: www.fdsys.gov congressional pictorial directory.indb II 5/16/11 10:19 AM Contents Photographs of: Page President Barack H. Obama ................... V Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. .............VII Speaker of the House John A. Boehner ......... IX President pro tempore of the Senate Daniel K. Inouye .......................... XI Photographs of: Senate and House Leadership ............XII-XIII Senate Officers and Officials ............. XIV-XVI House Officers and Officials ............XVII-XVIII Capitol Officials ........................... XIX Members (by State/District no.) ............ 1-152 Delegates and Resident Commissioner .... 153-154 State Delegations ........................ 155-177 Party Division ............................... 178 Alphabetical lists of: Senators ............................. 181-184 Representatives ....................... 185-197 Delegates and Resident Commissioner ........ 198 Closing date for compilation of the Pictorial Directory was March 4, 2011. * House terms not consecutive. † Also served previous Senate terms. †† Four-year term, elected 2008. congressional pictorial directory.indb III 5/16/11 10:19 AM congressional pictorial directory.indb IV 5/16/11 10:19 AM Barack H. Obama President of the United States congressional pictorial directory.indb V 5/16/11 10:20 AM congressional pictorial directory.indb VI 5/16/11 10:20 AM Joseph R. -
Congressional Plan 2012 State Panel
Congress Plan: State Panel 10/26/2018 Administrator: Peter S. Wattson 10:15 p.m. Population Equality Overall Range: 0.00 Percent 1 Persons Largest District: 662,991 Deviation: 0.00 Percent 0 Persons Smallest District: 662,990 Deviation: 0.00 Percent -1 Persons Mean Deviation: 0.00 Percent 0 Persons Standard Deviation: 0 0.48 Persons Ideal District: 662,991 District Population Deviation % Devn. 1 662,991 0 0.00 2 662,991 0 0.00 3 662,990 -1 0.00 4 662,990 -1 0.00 5 662,991 0 0.00 6 662,990 -1 0.00 7 662,991 0 0.00 8 662,991 0 0.00 State Total: 5,303,925 1-1 Congress Plan: State Panel 10/26/2018 Administrator: Peter S. Wattson 10:15 p.m. Minority Voting-Age Population Minority Opportunity Districts (30% or more Total Minority) Total District Black % Asian % Hispanic % Indian % Other % Minority % Total District Black % Asian % Hispanic % Indian % Other % Minority % 1 10,250 2 11,434 2 21,164 4 2,145 0 597 0 45,590 9.0 2 15,753 3 20,451 4 20,658 4 3,624 1 972 0 61,458 12.7 3 28,256 6 30,006 6 14,932 3 2,673 1 829 0 76,696 15.4 4 41,858 8 44,339 9 25,452 5 4,717 1 876 0 117,242 23.3 5 70,883 14 29,763 6 39,067 7 7,961 2 1,493 0 149,167 28.5 6 9,444 2 11,463 2 8,659 2 3,436 1 480 0 33,482 6.9 7 3,376 1 4,068 1 13,882 3 13,648 3 476 0 35,450 7.0 8 4,772 1 3,478 1 5,022 1 15,334 3 407 0 29,013 5.6 State Totals 184,592 5 155,002 4 148,836 4 53,538 1 6,130 0 548,098 14 Definitions Black = 18+ Non-Hispanic Black or African American + Non-Hispanic Black or African American and White Asian = 18+ Non-Hispanic Asian + Non-Hispanic Asian and White Hispanic = 18+ Hispanic of Any Race Indian = 18+ Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native + Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native and White Other = 18+ Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian + Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian and White + Non-Hispanic Some Other Race + Non-Hispanic Some Other Race and White + Non-Hispanic Other Multi-Race (where more than one minority race is listed) 2-1 Congress Plan: State Panel 10/26/2018 Administrator: Peter S. -
Advocatevolume 20, Number 5 September/October 2006 the Most Partisan Time of the Year Permanent Repeal of the Estate Tax Falls Victim to Congressional Battle
ADVOCATEVolume 20, Number 5 September/October 2006 The Most Partisan Time of the Year Permanent repeal of the estate tax falls victim to congressional battle By Jody Milanese Government Affairs Manager s the 109th Congress concludes— with only a possible lame-duck Asession remaining—it is unlikely Senate Majority Leader William Frist (R-Tenn.) will bring the “trifecta” bill back to the Senate floor. H.R. 5970 combines an estate tax cut, minimum wage hike and a package of popular tax policy extensions. The bill fell four votes short in August. Frist switched his vote to no dur- ing the Aug. 3 consideration of the Estate Tax and Extension of Tax Relief Act of 2006, which reserved his right COURTESY ISTOCKPHOTO as Senate leader to bring the legisla- The estate tax—and other parts of the current tax system—forces business owners to tion back to the floor. Despite Frist’s pay exorbitant amounts of money to the government and complete myriad forms. recent statement that “everything is any Democrats who voted against that, as of now, there is no intension on the table” for consideration prior the measure would switch their of separating elements of the trifecta to the November mid-term elections, position in an election year. package before a lame-duck session. many aides are doubtful the bill can Frist has given a task force of Since failing in the Senate in be altered enough to garner three four senators—Finance Chairman August, there has been wide debate more supporters. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Budget over the best course of action to take Senate Minority Leader Harry Chairman Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), in achieving this top Republican pri- Reid (D-Nev.) has pushed hard to Policy Chairman Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) ority. -
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Essays
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Essays in American Political Behavior A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Robert Bond Committee in charge: Professor James Fowler, Chair Professor Charles Elkan Professor David Huber Professor Thad Kousser Professor Gary Jacobson 2013 Copyright Robert Bond, 2013 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Robert Bond is approved, and it is accept- able in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii DEDICATION My grandparents – Harry Bycroft, Betty Bycroft, Ronald Bond, and Lucy Stockton – did not live to see the completion of this dissertation. It is dedicated to their lives and their memory. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page . iii Dedication . iv Table of Contents . v List of Figures . vii List of Tables . x Acknowledgements . xii Vita and Publications . xiii Abstract of the Dissertation . xiv Chapter 1 Social Information and Participation . 1 1.1 Introduction . 2 1.2 Social norms and voting behavior . 4 1.3 Experimental Process and Results . 6 1.4 Discussion . 18 Chapter 2 The Dynamic Spread of Voting . 21 2.1 Introduction . 22 2.2 Peer effects and voting . 23 2.3 Data and methods . 24 2.4 Matching . 26 2.5 Calculation of Treatment Effect . 28 2.6 Results . 28 2.7 Discussion . 32 2.8 Conclusion . 33 Chapter 3 Estimating Ideology using Facebook’s ‘Like’ Data . 36 3.1 Introduction . 37 3.2 Facebook ‘Like’ Data . 39 3.3 Using Facebook data to scale ideological positions . 42 3.3.1 Model of liking .