DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Contributions & Related Activity Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Contributions & Related Activity Report Political Contributions & Related Activity Report 2010 CARTER BECK JOHN JESSER DAVID KRETSCHMER SVP & Counsel VP, Provider Engagement & COC SVP, Treasurer & Chief Investment Officer ANDREW LANG LISA LATTS SVP, Chief Information Officer Staff VP, Public Health Policy MIKE MELLOH VP, Human Resources DEB MOESSNER ANDREW MORRISON 2010 WellPAC President & General Manager KY SVP, Public Affairs BRIAN SASSI WellPAC Chairman EVP, Strategy & Marketing, Board of Directors BRIAN SWEET President & CEO Consumer VP, Chief Clinical Pharmacy Officer JOHN WILLEY Director, Government Relations TRACY WINN ALAN ALBRIGHT WellPAC Treasurer Manager, Public Affairs Legal Counsel to WellPAC WellPAC Assistant Treasurer & Executive Director 1 from the Chairman Recognizing the impact that public policy decisions have on our stakeholders, WellPoint has made a commitment to be involved in the political process. Our efforts include policy development, direct advocacy, lawful corporate contributions and the sponsorship of WellPAC, the non- partisan political action committee of WellPoint associates. WellPAC’s purpose is to help elect candidates for federal and state office who share our mission of making health care reform work for our customers, our associates, our investors and the communities we serve. WellPoint pays the PAC’s administrative costs as allowed by law, but all WellPAC contributions are funded through the voluntary support of eligible WellPoint associates. In 2010, WellPAC contributed $596,999 to federal candidates, political parties and committees, and $192,581 to candidates and committees at the state and local levels. In total, WellPoint made more than $2.8 million in corporate political contributions. Additionally, our public affairs team actively engaged with lawmakers and candidates at the federal level, and in our 14 core business states. Further details about these political contributions and lobbying activities are contained within this report. The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010 didn’t signal an end to health care reform for WellPoint. It created an opportunity for us to help positively shape how reform is implemented so that it works for all consumers. Participating in the political process helps us deliver on that commitment. Andrew Morrison SVP, Public Affairs, WellPAC Chairman 2 Political Contributions Policy and Procedure As one of the nation’s leading health benefits company, WellPoint can play a key role advocating national health care policy and practices to benefit our customers and the general public. Health care is an increasingly regulated and legislated industry both at the federal and state level. Elected and appointed officials make decisions that directly affect our ability to make quality health care coverage affordable and to improve the health of the communities we serve. Our active participation in the political process is essential to ensure that we have a voice in those decisions. At WellPoint, we are committed to advocating public policy solutions that best serve our customers, our stakeholders, our associates and our communities. CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS WellPoint’s corporate political WellPAC disbursement of funds are contributions, both direct and made in accordance with a budget, While federal law prohibits WellPoint indirect, are included in its total and the same contribution criteria from making corporate contributions annual fiscal budget, which is subject identified for corporate contributions to federal candidates, WellPoint to the approval and oversight of is used in determining WellPAC makes direct contributions to WellPoint’s Board of Directors. In contributions. support state candidates in those addition, a copy of this report is states where such corporate made available to WellPoint’s Board Throughout the year, members of contributions are allowed by law and of Directors. WellPoint’s public affairs organization may make indirect contributions, and associate PAC members offer such as hosting a reception and Throughout the year, members of recommendations for WellPAC paying expenses associated with WellPoint’s public affairs organization contributions. WellPAC contributions an event. Certain criteria are used make recommendations for are approved by the senior vice in making corporate contributions, corporate contributions. The senior president of Public Affairs of the including the following which have vice president of Public Affairs of company. WellPAC operates pursuant been endorsed by WellPoint’s Board the company must approve each to all relevant state and federal of Directors: corporate contribution. Other laws, and complies with all public members of the public affairs disclosure requirements. Information @@ Does the candidate support organization involved with political about WellPAC’s contributions may public policy that promotes contributions include the vice be found on the Federal Election private competition, choice and president of State Affairs, the vice Commission’s web site at free markets in the delivery and president of Federal Affairs and their www.fec.gov. financing of health care? direct reports. In making corporate @@ Has the candidate voted or contributions, WellPoint complies When participating in the political announced positions on issues with all disclosure requirements as process, WellPoint associates must important to WellPoint and its prescribed by state and federal law. comply with the company’s ethics customers? and compliance requirements identified in the “Standards of @@ Has the candidate demonstrated WELLPOINT POLITICAL ACTION Ethical Business Conduct,” which leadership on key committees of COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTIONS is available on our website. This importance to our business? WellPoint provides an opportunity document sets forth appropriate @@ Does the candidate represent a for eligible WellPoint associates, as associate conduct relating to political state or district where WellPoint defined by federal law, to participate activity and contributions, as well as has a large concentration of in the political process by sponsoring interaction with government officials customers and/or employees? the nonpartisan WellPoint Political and agencies. @@ Would WellPoint’s contribution Action Committee (“WellPAC”), which have an impact on the allows them to voluntarily combine candidate’s campaign? their personal funds to support federal and state candidates. 3 Lobbying Activity WellPoint engages in lobbying activity to advocate our positions on public policy issues with elected officials and others in federal and state government. These are issues that affect our company, our associates and, most importantly, our customers. In 2010, WellPoint spent $5.7 million on state lobbying activities* and $4 million for federal lobbying activities.** In 2010, WellPoint paid dues to national and state business and trade associations of which a portion may be allocated to non-deductible lobbying activity. Below is a list of the national and state business and trade associations whose dues were $50,000 or more for 2010, including the portion allocated to non-deductible lobbying activity. PORTION ALLOCATED TO NON-DEDUCTIBLE ASSOCIATION TOTAL DUES*** LOBBYING*** America’s Health Insurance Plans $1,037,400 $487,578 Association of California Life & Health Insurance Companies**** $270,400 $27,040 Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association $13,746,132 $1,869,474 California Association of Health Plans**** $559,583 $251,961 Indiana Chamber of Commerce $90,000 $11,700 Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Foundation $100,000 $10,000 Maine Association of Health Plans $53,177 $425 Maine State Chamber of Commerce $50,000 $17,500 The Business Roundtable $235,560 $179,026 U.S. Chamber of Commerce $250,000 $125,000 Virginia Association of Health Plans $89,944 $26,983 Wisconsin Association of Health Plans $54,640 $13,660 *State laws vary on how they define lobbying activity, expenses and what is reportable. For purposes of this report, state lobbying expenses include applicable percents of associate compensation and overhead and outside lobbying consultant fees. ** Federal lobbing expenses are reported as required by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 and the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007. Visit http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=selectfields to search for copies of WellPoint’s Lobbying Disclosure Reports filed with the U.S. Congress. ***The annual dues are reported based on the calendar year in which they are paid. The portion of annual dues allocated to non-deductible lobbying is based on the percent or amount provided on the annual dues invoice by the organization listed. ****Both 2010 and 2011 dues were paid in calendar year 2010. 4 2010 Statements of Cash Receipts & Expenditures HEALTHCARE WORKS EMPIRE HEALTH PAC IN WI CONDUIT WELLPAC CASH BALANCE January 1, 2010 $0 $10,327 $446,635.24 RECEIPTS Associate Contributions $0 $13,013 $658,747.09 Corporate Contributions* $35,000 $0 $0.00 Refunds from Candidates $0 $0 $304.44 Total Receipts $35,000 $13,013 $659,051.53 EXPENDITURES Federal Contributions $0 $0 $596,999.61 State Contributions $15,500 $12,350 $192,581.00 Operating Expenses $1,000 $0 $ 777.83 Other Expenses $0 $0 $0.00 Refund of Associate Contribution $0 $250 $131.99 Total Expenditures $16,500 $12,600 $790,490.43 CASH BALANCE December 31, 2010 $18,500 $10,740 $315,196.34 *Multiple corporate entities contributed up to $5,000 per corporation per year as allowed by New York law. 5 WellPAC Contributions to Federal Candidates by State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of Redistricting in Georgia
    GEORGIA LAW REVIEW(DO NOT DELETE) 11/6/2018 8:33 PM THE HISTORY OF REDISTRICTING IN GEORGIA Charles S. Bullock III* In his memoirs, Chief Justice Earl Warren singled out the redistricting cases as the most significant decisions of his tenure on the Court.1 A review of the changes redistricting introduced in Georgia supports Warren’s assessment. Not only have the obligations to equalize populations across districts and to do so in a racially fair manner transformed the makeup of the state’s collegial bodies, Georgia has provided the setting for multiple cases that have defined the requirements to be met when designing districts. Other than the very first adjustments that occurred in the 1960s, changes in Georgia plans had to secure approval from the federal government pursuant to the Voting Rights Act. Also, the first four decades of the Redistricting Revolution occurred with a Democratic legislature and governor in place. Not surprisingly, the partisans in control of redistricting sought to protect their own and as that became difficult they employed more extreme measures. When in the minority, Republicans had no chance to enact plans on their own. Beginning in the 1980s and peaking a decade later, Republicans joined forces with black Democrats to devise alternatives to the proposals of white Democrats. The biracial, bipartisan coalition never had sufficient numbers to enact its ideas. After striking out in the legislature, African-Americans appealed to the U.S. Attorney General alleging that the plans enacted were less favorable to black interests than alternatives * Charles S. Bullock, III is a University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia where he holds the Richard B.
    [Show full text]
  • James.Qxp March Apri
    COBB COUNTY A BUSTLING MARCH/APRIL 2017 PAGE 26 AN INSIDE VIEW INTO GEORGIA’S NEWS, POLITICS & CULTURE THE 2017 MOST INFLUENTIAL GEORGIA LOTTERY CORP. CEO ISSUE DEBBIE ALFORD COLUMNS BY KADE CULLEFER KAREN BREMER MAC McGREW CINDY MORLEY GARY REESE DANA RICKMAN LARRY WALKER The hallmark of the GWCCA Campus is CONNEE CTIVITY DEPARTMENTS Publisher’s Message 4 Floating Boats 6 FEATURES James’ 2017 Most Influential 8 JAMES 18 Saluting the James 2016 “Influentials” P.O. BOX 724787 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 31139 24 678 • 460 • 5410 Georgian of the Year, Debbie Alford Building A Proposed Contiguous Exhibition Facilityc Development on the Rise in Cobb County 26 PUBLISHED BY by Cindy Morley INTERNET NEWS AGENCY LLC 2017 Legislators of the Year 29 Building B CHAIRMAN MATTHEW TOWERY COLUMNS CEO & PUBLISHER PHIL KENT Future Conventtion Hotel [email protected] Language Matters: Building C How We Talk About Georgia Schools 21 CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER LOUIE HUNTER by Dr. Dana Rickman ASSOCIATE EDITOR GARY REESE ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES Georgia’s Legal Environment on a PATTI PEACH [email protected] Consistent Downward Trend 23 by Kade Cullefer The connections between Georggia World Congress Center venues, the hotel MARKETING DIRECTOR MELANIE DOBBINS district, and the world’world s busiest aairporirport are key differentiaferentiatorsators in Atlanta’Atlanta’s ability to [email protected] Georgia Restaurants Deliver compete for in-demand conventions and tradeshows. CIRCULATION PATRICK HICKEY [email protected] Significant Economic Impact 31 by Karen Bremer CONTRIBUTING WRITERS A fixed gateway between the exhibit halls in Buildings B & C would solidify KADE CULLEFER 33 Atlanta’s place as the world’s premier convention destination.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 GENERAL ASSEMBLY ROSTER STATE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 3 State Executive Officers Governor
    General Assembly Roster 2021 101st General Assembly Schedule First Regular Session Bill filing opens . .Dec. 1, 2020 Session convenes ..............................Jan. 6, 2021 Last day for bills to be considered . .May 14, 2021 Session adjourns ..............................May 30, 2021 Governor’s approval by .........................July 14, 2021 Effective date of laws . .Aug. 28, 2021 Veto session.................................Sept. 15, 2021 Second Regular Session Bill filing opens . .Dec. 2, 2021 Session convenes ..............................Jan. 8, 2022 Last day for bills to be considered . .May 15, 2022 Session adjourns ..............................May 30, 2022 Governor’s approval by .........................July 14, 2022 Effective date of laws . .Aug. 28, 2022 Veto session.................................Sept. 16, 2022 Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft State Capitol Room 208 Missouri Secretary of State E PLU UM RIB N US U Jefferson City, MO 65101 John R. Ashcroft www.sos.mo.gov JOHN R. ASHCROFT SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF MISSOURI JAMES C. KIRKPATRICK STATE CAPITOL STATE INFORMATION CENTER (573) 751-2379 (573) 751-4936 Dear Fellow Missourians, Welcome to Missouri’s 101st General Assembly and a year-long celebration of Missouri’s Bicentennial! Many organizations around the state are participating in Bicentennial projects to bring Missouri’s history to life as we mark the 200th anniversary of the state on August 10, 2021. I encourage you to visit Missouri2021.org to familiarize yourself with the events and projects that are available to you, and to visit www.sos.mo.gov/ Archives/Bicentennial for a trip through Missouri history through primary sources, organized by a division of my office, the Missouri State Archives. In the following pages, you will find information about Missouri’s state and federal elected officials, the roles they serve and how to contact them.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA FAH MEMBER FACILITIES Federation of American Hospitals Represents America’S Tax-Paying SENATE Community Hospitals and Sen
    GEORGIA FAH MEMBER FACILITIES Federation of American Hospitals represents America’s tax-paying SENATE community hospitals and Sen. Jon Ossoff (D) health systems. Sen. Raphael Warnock (D) HOUSE (Click name to view the district) Rep. Buddy Carter (R) / Georgia 1st Rep. Sanford Bishop (D) / Georgia 2nd Rep. Drew Ferguson (R) / Georgia 3rd Rep. Nikema Williams (D) / Georgia 5th Rep. Lucy McBath (D) / Georgia 6th Rep. Carolyn Bourdeaux (D) / Georgia 7th Rep. Austin Scott (R) / Georgia 8th TOTAL Rep. Andrew Clyde (R) / Georgia 9th FACILITIES Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R) / Georgia 11th Rep. Rick Allen (R) / Georgia 12th 32 Rep. David Scott (D) / Georgia 13th Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R) / Georgia 14th TOTAL HOSPITAL BEDS 4,762 TOTAL EMPLOYEES 18,110 FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS® 750 9th Street, N.W. Suite 600, Washington, DC 20001 fah.org GEORGIA FAH MEMBER FACILITIES Beds Employees REP. BUDDY CARTER (R) / GEORGIA 1ST 6 HOSPITALS Coastal Behavioral Health Savannah Universal Health Services, Inc. 50 121 Coastal Harbor Treatment Center Savannah Universal Health Services, Inc. 145 295 Memorial Health Savannah Savannah HCA Healthcare 612 2,919 Memorial Satilla Health Waycross HCA Healthcare 231 566 Rehabilitation Hospital of Savannah Savannah Encompass Health 50 188 St. Simons by the Sea St. Simons Island Universal Health Services, Inc. 101 181 REP. SANFORD D. BISHOP JR. (D) / GEORGIA 2ND 2 HOSPITALS Coliseum Medical Centers Macon HCA Healthcare 310 1,049 Coliseum Center for Behavioral Health Macon HCA Healthcare REP. DREW FERGUSON (R) / GEORGIA 3RD 3 HOSPITALS Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Newnan Newnan Encompass Health 50 154 St. Francis Hospital Columbus LifePoint Health 376 2,561 Talbott Recovery Columbus Columbus Universal Health Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress
    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Education Session Roars Back at Sine
    V20, N32 Thursday, April 30, 2015 Education session roars back at sine die Pence priorities addressed in final hours of compromise By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – With Religious Free- dom Restoration Act and the Common Wage repeal settled, the “education session” came roaring back for the final days of the 2015 119th Indiana General Assembly. The House passed the budget 69- 30 literally minutes to midnight Wednesday evening. Only a short period before the Senate passed the biennial spending measure 40-9. The two super majorities passed legisla- Speaker Brian Bosma makes a point with House Minority Leader Scott Pelath in tion that addressed priorities Republican leader- the final hours of the Indiana General Assembly on Wednesday. (HPI Photo by ship and Gov. Mike Pence highlighted back in Mark Curry) January, such as increased funding for K-12 edu- terms of powers and responsibilities. Oversight of ISTEP, cation, a revised school funding formula, increased school most of the A-through-F grading system, and the state’s choice funding, and significant reforms to the State Board burgeoning school voucher program will be transferred to of Education (SBOE). the SBOE’s control and, starting in 2017, the superinten- Between SB1 and the budget, the superintendent of public instruction as an elected office is diminished in Continued on page 3 Pence in wonderland By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On the Indiana Republican Party website under the “events” tab, the Marion County Rea- gan Dinner had been scheduled for tonight with Gov. Mike Pence on the bill as keynoter. It made perfect sense: The governor fresh off of his second “Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives
    House of Representatives JON BURNS MAJORITY LEADER ROOM 338, STATE CAPITOL ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30334 December 4, 2020 SENT VIA EMAIL: Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger Chairperson of the State Election Board Mrs. Rebecca N. Sullivan Vice-Chairperson of the State Election Board Dear Secretary Raffensperger and Mrs. Sullivan, As I am sure you have seen over the past month, many Georgians, including my colleagues who have signed this correspondence, have serious concerns about Georgia’s elections. As we approach a critical election on January 5, 2021, it is clear that Georgia voters must have confidence in the election process going forward. To that end, below you will find two common-sense suggestions: a rule that should be promulgated by the State Election Board (the “SEB”) and additional resources of which the Office of the Secretary of State (the “SOS”) or the SEB could take advantage. I. Absentee Ballot Application and Mail-In Absentee Ballot Signature Review Process. As the process currently stands, when a voter wishes to vote early by mail, they submit an Absentee Ballot Application (“Application”) either through the mail or online. When a local Board of Registrars (the “BOR”) receives a paper Application, typically, a single employee of the BOR is responsible for the initial review of a signature on a paper Application. If that paper Application is accepted, the BOR mails an Absentee Ballot to the voter. The process for reviewing signatures on the external envelope of a returned Absentee Ballot is the same – a single employee of the BOR is allowed to “approve” a signature without oversight by other employees or independent observers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer Summer 2018 Issue
    The McKinney Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Lawyer Summer 2018 Issue IU McKinney Master of Laws Program Commemorates 15th Anniversary In Small Towns and Big Cities, McKinney Alumni Thrive Health Law Professors Collaborate on IU Addictions Crisis Grand Challenges Project Message from the Dean I am pleased to present this latest issue of The McKinney Lawyer, our school’s alumni magazine, designed to keep you up-to-date on happenings in the life of the law school. As I write this, it occurs to me that our school does, indeed, almost have a life of its own, with the same types of ups and downs that we experience in our individual lives. For example, in the following pages, you will read that we celebrated two anniver- saries last fall: the 15th anniversary of our Master of Laws (LL.M.) program and the 20th anniversary of our Program in International Human Rights Law (PIHRL). The LL.M. program, founded by Professor Emeritus Jeff Grove, has graduated more than 650 students from 71 countries since its inception. Our PIHRL has had a similar inter- national reach. That program, founded by Professor George Edwards, has facilitated more than 250 internship placements for students in 67 countries. We are proud of these milestones and hope that you will enjoy reading about them. In this issue, we also celebrate the many professional opportunities that our school affords to graduates. We highlight alumni who have chosen Bright Lights/Big City careers, as well as those who choose to make noteworthy impacts in smaller locales, becoming part of the fiber of the communities in which they live.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Champions List
    AbilityOne Congressional Champions Becoming an AbilityOne® Congressional Champion may be the most important step a Member of Congress can take toward effective representation of their constituents who are blind or have significant disabilities. The AbilityOne Program provides employment opportunities through Federal contracts for nearly 40,000 people who are blind or have significant disabilities. Despite years of effort, nearly 70 percent of this population do not have jobs. Hundreds of Members of Congress have historically become AbilityOne Champions. Join the more than 160 current Members of Congress by becoming an AbilityOne Champion today. Every AbilityOne Congressional Champion completes a four-step process: 1. Meet with representatives from 3. Support the Javits-Wagner-O’Day an AbilityOne agency at the Act by using AbilityOne products member’s district or Washington, or services in the member’s D.C. office. district or Washington, D.C. office. 2. Tour an AbilityOne agency’s 4. Voice support for the AbilityOne manufacturing or service Program through a public contract site(s). communication, such as a press conference statement, Congressional Record statement, social media post, or a similar communication SourceAmerica® and National Industries for the Blind (NIB) established the AbilityOne® Congressional Champions Program in 2002 to honor Representatives and Senators who have demonstrated a commitment to their constituents with disabilities and to the AbilityOne Program. If you have questions, please contact the SourceAmerica Government Affairs Department at [email protected]. SourceAmerica®, an AbilityOne® Authorized Enterprise This document is proprietary to SourceAmerica. 1 AbilityOne Congressional Champions There are currently 140 Congressional Champions, who are listed below by state: Alabama Hawaii Minnesota Rhode Island • Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State House Legislative Districts
    20212021 GeorgiaGeorgia HouseHouse DistrictsDistricts 025 ( 985 046 §¨¦ 035 575 ( 24 ( §¨¦ 048 §¨¦ Towns ( (049 050 103 044 ( ( ( 097 DeWayne Hill (R-03) ( (102 045 Mike Cameron (R-01) Catoosa Fannin 036 034 ( Whitfield Rabun ( ( 101 Union 051 095 ( Stan Gunter (R-08) 043 ( ( Dade Jason Ridley (R-06) (037 §¨¦75 ( (096 Cobb (100 (105 (052 §¨¦59 285 042 §¨¦ Speaker 041 080 079 85 Gwinnett 107 Walker ( ( ( ( 099 ( David Ralston (R-07) §¨¦( Murray 081 Habersham ( Steve Tarvin (R-02) (040 (108 Kasey Carpenter (R-04) White 038 ( 054 106 Gilmer ( 082 ( ( 088 ( 094 053 ( Lumpkin Victor Anderson (R-10) (039 ( (087 Chattooga 061 085 Stephens ( Fulton ( 086 093 Gordon Will Wade (R-09) 20 ( DeKalb ( (114 Rick Jasperse (R-11) §¨¦ (056 066 Douglas Lauren McDonald (R-26) ( 057 Lee Hawkins (R-27) ( 083 285 Matt Barton (R-05) ( §¨¦ Pickens 058 Eddie Lumsden (R-12) (055 ( Franklin 20 (059 §¨¦ (092 Dawson 060 75 Hall Chris Erwin (R-28) Hart ( §¨¦ 089 Floyd (062 ( 084 Banks ( (091 Mandi Ballinger (R-23)Cherokee Wes Cantrell (R-22) Todd Jones (R-25) Matt Dubnik (R-29) Alan Powell (R-32) 675 (065 076 090 Mitchell Scoggins (R-14) (074 §¨¦ ( ( Forsyth §¨¦985 Jackson Rockdale Katie Dempsey (R-13) 85 077 Bartow §¨¦ 85 ( Tommy Benton (R-31) §¨¦ 075 Newton Tim Barr (R-103) ( Matthew Gambill (R-15) Emory Dunahoo (R-30) Madison 078 Brad Thomas (R-21) ( Sheri Gilligan (R-24) 064 109 Fulton Rob Leveret (R-33) ( (063 Clayton 75 ( Charlice Byrd (R-20) §¨¦ Elbert 071 Henry Polk Barrow ( Fayette Spencer Frye (D-118) (111 Jan Jones (R-47) Gwinnett Oglethorpe Chuck Efstration (R-104) Houston GainesClarke (R-117) Coweta Trey Kelley (R-16) Martin Momtahan (R-17) Cobb Terry England (R-116) Butts Paulding Joseph Gullett (R-19) Oconee Haralson Walton Lincoln Wilkes Tom Kirby (R-114) Mark Newton (R-123) Marcus Wiedower (R-119) Trey Rhodes (120-R) DeKalb Bruce Williamson (R-115) §¨¦20 Tyler Smith (R-18) Douglas Rockdale Micah Gravley (R-67) Greene Mandisha Thomas (D-65) Clayton Morgan Taliaferro J.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of LEGISLATIVE LEGAL SERVICES Facsimile: 303-866-4157 Rep
    Committee on Legal Services Telephone: 303-866-2045 Sen. Jennifer Veiga, Chair OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE LEGAL SERVICES Facsimile: 303-866-4157 Rep. Anne McGihon, Vice Chair COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY E-mail: [email protected] Rep. Morgan Carroll Rep. Mike Cerbo Rep. Bob Gardner Rep. Ellen Roberts Sen. Peter Groff Sen. Shawn Mitchell Sen. Brandon Shaffer Sen. Steve W ard State Capitol Building, Room 091 200 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203-1782 Director Charles W. Pike Deputy Directors Dan L. Cartin May 25, 2007 Sharon L. Eubanks Revisor of Statutes The Honorable Mike Coffman Jennifer G. Gilroy Secretary of State Senior Attorneys Gregg W. Fraser 1700 Broadway Deborah F. Haskins Suite 270 Bart W. Miller Julie A. Pelegrin Denver, CO 80290 Senior Staff Attorneys Jeremiah B. Barry Dear Mr. Secretary: Christine B. Chase Edward A. DeCecco Michael J. Dohr Kristen J. Forrestal Attached in this document is a copy of House Bill 07-1167 which was signed Duane H. Gall Jason Gelender by the Governor on May 10, 2007. As evidenced by such act, please note that Robert S. Lackner Stephen M. Miller specified rules and regulations adopted or amended on or after November 1, Thomas Morris Nicole S. Myers 2005, and before November 1, 2006, and which were therefore scheduled for Senior Staff expiration May 15, 2007, have been allowed to expire pursuant to section 24- Attorney for 4-103 (8) (c) (I), C.R.S. In accordance with section 24-4-103 (11) (d), C.R.S., Rule Review Charles Brackney and with the following exceptions noted in this document, please direct the Senior Staff expeditious removal of such rules and regulations from the Code of Colorado Attorney for Annotations Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • AHIP Testimony, House Tax Committee 07232012
    Good morning Mr. Chairman and Members. I am Phil Griffin, Minnesota counsel for America’s Health Insurance Plans – AHIP. Thank you for the opportunity to speak this morning about this important and very timely topic. AHIP is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. AHIP’s members provide health and supplemental benefits to more than 200 million Americans through employer-sponsored coverage, the individual insurance market, and public programs including Medicare and Medicaid. AHIP advocates for public policies that expand access to affordable health care coverage to all Americans through a competitive marketplace that fosters choice, quality, and innovation. The Affordable Care Act brought us some good news, most notably that it will expand coverage to millions of Americans, a goal that has long been supported by health plans. But there is bad news, too. And the bad news is that unless some critical changes are made, the Affordable Care Act will be anything but affordable. More to the point, as a result of the premium tax and other costly provisions of ACA, you can count on significant increases in the cost of coverage not only in the individual and small group markets, but also for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries who receive their coverage through private insurers. A significant source of these rate increases is a new sales tax on health insurance which is the focus of my comments today. The amount of the tax will be $8 billion in 2014, increasing to $14.3 billion in 2018. The tax does not sunset and is indexed thereafter. The Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the premium tax will exceed $100 billion over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]