DOCSLIB.ORG

Lead in Shot, Final Report 2012)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lead in Shot, Final Report 2012) ANNEX XV RESTRICTION REPORT PROPOSAL FOR A RESTRICTION SUBSTANCE NAME: Lead IUPAC NAME(S): Not applicable EC NUMBER(S): 231-100-4 CAS NUMBER(S): 7439-92-1 CONTACT DETAILS OF THE DOSSIER SUBMITTER: European Chemicals Agency Annankatu 18, Helsinki, Finland DATE: 7 April 2017 Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, FI-00121 Helsinki, Finland | Tel. +358 9 686180 | Fax +358 9 68618210 | echa.europa.eu ANNEX XV RESTRICTION REPORT – LEAD IN GUNSHOT IN WETLANDS Contents Annex A: Manufacture and uses ......................................................................... 1 Lead shot production .................................................................................................. 1 A.1.1. Tower process .................................................................................................... 1 A.1.2. Bleimeister process ............................................................................................. 2 A.1.3. Wire process....................................................................................................... 2 Use of lead gunshot in or over wetlands......................................................................... 2 A.2.1. Hunting within or over a wetland ........................................................................... 2 A.2.2. Sports shooting in or over wetlands ....................................................................... 3 Annex B: Information on hazard, releases, exposure and risk ........................... 9 Identity of the substance and physical and chemical properties ......................................... 9 B.1.1. Name and other identifiers of the substances .......................................................... 9 B.1.2. Composition of the substances .............................................................................. 9 B.1.3. Physicochemical properties .................................................................................. 12 B.1.4. Justification for grouping ..................................................................................... 13 Manufacture and uses (summary) ................................................................................ 14 B.2.1. Lead shot production .......................................................................................... 14 B.2.2. Use of lead gunshot in or over wetlands ................................................................ 14 Classification and labelling .......................................................................................... 15 B.3.1. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation) ..................................................... 15 B.3.2. Industry self-classification and labelling ................................................................. 15 Environmental fate properties ..................................................................................... 16 B.4.1. Degradation ...................................................................................................... 16 B.4.2. Biodegradation .................................................................................................. 16 B.4.3. Environmental distribution ................................................................................... 17 B.4.4. Bioaccumulation ................................................................................................. 42 B.4.5. Secondary poisoning ........................................................................................... 45 Human health hazard assessment ................................................................................ 46 B.5.1. Toxicokinetics .................................................................................................... 46 B.5.2. Acute toxicity .................................................................................................... 48 B.5.3. Irritation ........................................................................................................... 49 B.5.4. Corrosivity ........................................................................................................ 49 B.5.5. Sensitisation ...................................................................................................... 49 B.5.6. Repeated dose toxicity ........................................................................................ 49 B.5.7. Mutagenicity ...................................................................................................... 58 B.5.8. Carcinogenicity .................................................................................................. 58 B.5.9. Toxicity for reproduction...................................................................................... 58 i ANNEX XV RESTRICTION REPORT – LEAD IN GUNSHOT IN WETLANDS B.5.10. Lead gunshot in food ......................................................................................... 59 B.5.11. Derivation of DNEL(s) and other hazard conclusions .............................................. 60 Human heath hazard assessment of physico-chemical properties...................................... 62 Environmental hazard assessment ............................................................................... 62 B.7.1. Compartment specific hazard assessment .............................................................. 62 B.7.2. Non compartment specific effects ......................................................................... 63 B.7.3. PNEC derivation and other hazard conclusions ........................................................ 87 PBT and vPvB assessment .......................................................................................... 91 Exposure assessment ................................................................................................. 91 B.9.1. Exposure Scenario: use of lead gunshot in or over wetlands ..................................... 91 Risk characterisation .............................................................................................. 112 B.10.1. Environment (risks to birds) ............................................................................. 112 B.10.2. Human health ................................................................................................ 129 Appendix B.1: Bioconcentration / bioaccumulation factors for lead in freshwater organisms and soil...................................................................................................................... 130 Appendix B.2: Benchmark dose estimated and IQ impacts of lead ......................................... 146 Appendix B.3: Summary of the existing legal requirements (and international agreements) ...... 148 Annex C: Justification for action on a union-wide basis ................................. 156 Annex D: Baseline .......................................................................................... 157 Problem definition – risk to be addressed .................................................................... 157 Outlook without any additional risk management ......................................................... 157 D.2.1. Current quantities of lead dispersed in wetlands ................................................... 157 D.2.2. Estimates of bird mortality due to lead poisoning .................................................. 157 Additional consequences of non-action ....................................................................... 158 Annex E: Impact Assessment ......................................................................... 160 Risk Management Options ......................................................................................... 160 E.1.1. Proposed restriction .......................................................................................... 160 E.1.2. Other evaluated but discarded restriction options .................................................. 165 E.1.3. Other union-wide risk management options than restriction .................................... 170 Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 175 E.2.1. Description of the use and function of the restricted substances .............................. 175 E.2.2. Identification of potential alternatives/ techniques (overview of existing alternatives) . 175 Risk reduction, technical and economic feasibility and availability of alternatives ............... 177 E.3.1. Most likely alternative: steel .............................................................................. 177 Restriction scenario(s) ............................................................................................. 217 E.4.1. Proposed restriction .......................................................................................... 217 Economic impacts .................................................................................................... 217 E.5.1. Substitution costs ............................................................................................. 217 ii ANNEX XV RESTRICTION REPORT – LEAD IN GUNSHOT IN WETLANDS E.5.2. Enforcement costs ............................................................................................ 222 Human health and environmental impacts ................................................................... 222 E.6.1. Human health impacts ...................................................................................... 222 E.6.2. Environmental impacts .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cocktail Menu
    Cocktail Menu monday - friday happy hour 3pm-6pm $2 domestic bottles, $3 house wine, $4 rail drinks Specialty Cocktails & Crushes thyme will tell orange crush evan williams bourbon, maple syrup, lemon juice, orange vodka, triple sec, fresh squeezed orange, sprite thyme grapefruit crush algonquin barrel-aged cocktail grapefruit vodka, triple sec, fresh squeezed grapefruit, sagamore rye, dry vermouth, shrub district pineapple sprite allspice perfect crush Peppermint Mocha Frappe grapefruit vodka, triple sec, fresh squeezed orange, peppermint mocha kahlua, stoli vanil, cream, and coffee sprite mayor's mule fuzzy's crush mango vodka, muddled orange & lime, ginger beer peach vodka, peach schnapps, fresh squeezed orange, respect your elderflowers sprite gin, elderflower liqueur, lime juice, blood orange juice, jillian's crush ginger ale, muddled blood orange, thyme pineapple vodka, fresh squeezed orange, splash of spicy margarita pineapple & cranberry juices house infused pepper tequila, guava sour mix, salt & tilghman crush cayenne salt rim mango and banana rums, triple sec, fresh squeezed blackberry sage tequila smash orange, sprite dobel reposado tequila, grapefruit juice, muddled blackberry lemon crush blackberry and sage, simple syrup deep eddy lemon, triple sec, muddled blackberry & blood orange bourbon smash lemon, sprite, lemonade buffalo trace, bitters, blood orange juice, muddled blood apple harvest crush orange, club soda, vanilla cayenne sugar rim apple vodka, shrub district apple nutmeg, apple cider, Apple Cider sangria on draft
    [Show full text]
  • The Berlin Boat Club Gazette
    Volume 1 June 2012 The Berlin Boat Club Gazette NEWSLETTER OF THE BE RLIN BOAT CLUB AND THE EUREKA LOCKS Welcome to the New Season of the Eureka Lock After months and months of work the S P E C I A L Eureka Lock is again open for traffic P O I N T S O F thanks to the hard work of the Berlin INTEREST: Boat Club members, support from other New Season for area boat clubs, Friends of the Fox and newly renovat- other organizations. A donation from an ed Locks anonymous benefactor, an interest free loan and monetary support from across 2012 Brat & the boating community has allowed the Corn Roast BBC to have the Lock gates completely rebuilt, new concrete work done and the August 10 & 11 turnstiles refurbished. New parking area Visit our web- and lighting have been added to the grounds and the gates electrified for eas- site and make ier operation. a donation to- Call (920)361-BOAT (2628) for lockages. day Lockages free but DONATIONS AC- AN EARLY VIEW OF THE 1876 BUILT CEPTED EUREKA LOCK In 2010 the Wisconsin DNR again entered into Historic Corn Roast to Be Held a lease agreement with the Berlin Boat Club for Join the Berlin Boat Club for their annual the Eureka Lock and property and plans went Brat & Corn Roast on Friday and Satur- into high gear to determine work required to day August 10th & 11th at Riverside make the gates operable again. With help from Park in Berlin, WI. Fun, food and games equipment from Magnum Products, Berlin INSIDE THIS fill the 2-day event.
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Analysis of Nineteenth Century Lead Artifacts from Lewis and Clark and Hudson's Bay Sites of the Pacific Northwest
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2006 Elemental analysis of nineteenth century lead artifacts from Lewis and Clark and Hudson's Bay sites of the Pacific Northwest Jamie Ryan Lockman The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lockman, Jamie Ryan, "Elemental analysis of nineteenth century lead artifacts from Lewis and Clark and Hudson's Bay sites of the Pacific Northwest" (2006). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2205. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2205 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission X No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature: - P Date: April 24. 2006 Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. 8/98 ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF NINETEENTH CENTURY LEAD ARTIFACTS FROM LEWIS AND CLARK AND HUDSON'S BAY SITES OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST By JAMIE RYAN LOCKMAN B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Gerdeman USA | Germany
    Elizabeth Gerdeman USA | Germany Education 2008 • Master of Fine Arts (M.F.A.), in Art, The Ohio State University • Additional Certificate of Graduate Interdisciplinary Specialization in Fine Arts with concentrations in Art History and Social Geography 2004 • Bachelor of Fine Arts (B.F.A.), in Fine Art, Columbus College of Art and Design Summa Cum Laude, Concentrations in Painting and Printmaking • Minors: Art History and Art Therapy Teaching Experience 2015-Present Lecturer, Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst Leipzig | Academy of Fine Arts Leipzig, Germany 2015 – 2011 Independent Instructor, WIR Projects, Leipzig, Germany 2011 – 2010 Visiting Assistant Professor of Painting, Ohio University Athens, OH, USA 2010 – 2008 Lecturer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA Adjunct Faculty, Columbus College of Art & Design Columbus, OH, USA 2008 – 2007 Instructor of Record, M.F.A. Student Teacher, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA 2006 – 2005 Art Specialist, ScholARTS Preparatory School, Columbus, OH, USA 641 North High Street · Columbus, Ohio 43215 · 614-238-3000 [email protected] · hammondharkins.com 2001 – 2000 Americorps Artist Member, Greater Columbus Arts Council’s Children of the Future Program, Columbus, OH, USA Solo Exhibitions 2020 Casting Light, Throwing Shade, Billboard Display at Galerie Jochen Hempel, Curated by Markus Dreßen, Leipzig, Germany 2017 Straight from the Horse’s Mouth, (Z)ORTEN, Graubünden, Switzerland Scratching the Surface, in collaboration with Michael Hahn, Modern Art Museum Yerevan, Armenia
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué /Press Release
    Centre Canadien d’Architecture 1920, rue Baile Canadian Centre for Architecture Montréal, Québec Canada H3H 2S6 t 514 939 7000 f 514 939 7020 www.cca.qc.ca communiqué /press release For Immediate Release Cedric Price: Mean Time From 19 October 1999 to 27 February 2000 In the Octagonal Gallery “Time present has no length as a line has no thickness” Montréal, 19 October 1999 — The Canadian Centre for Architecture presents the exhibition Cedric Price: Mean Time from 19 October 1999 to 27 February 2000, in the museum’s Octagonal Gallery. British architect Cedric Price has been one of the most challenging and witty provocateurs in the field, forcing us to look with a fresh eye at what architecture is and suggesting radical ideas of what it might be. Price’s work proposes a dynamic approach to architecture. Arguing that “movement is implicit, together with change, in the surrounding conditions,” Price stands against the production of permanent, specific spaces for particular functions, stressing the unpredictability of future use and the need for adaptability. He asks us to think about a built environment that anticipates unexpected social needs rather than accommodating those we think we know, that relishes the possibilities for re-use and obsolescence, and that explores the ways space can be constructed to participate in movement. At the same time, he is convinced that there are ways of gauging and responding to the apparent unpredictability of time and movement: “The speed of a total life span can be measured”, he adds. “The fourth dimension can thus be introduced to design.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent Office Patented Mar
    2,930,685 United States Patent Office Patented Mar. 29, 1960 2 always a low-order detonation which radiates a non-reac tive shock ahead into the unexploded charge. This non 2,930,685 reactive shock itself then initiates chemical reactions EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION ahead of the region of the booster and the initial low Melvin A. Cook, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Henry E. order wave. Then after a period of time which may Farlam, Jr., Seven Islands, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada, amount to as much as 30 to 100 microseconds, a new assignors to Iron Ore Company of Canada, Sever high-order, or a higher order, detonation suddenly com Islands, Quebec, Canada, a corporation of Canada mences at the front of the non-reactive shock wave that has previously run away from the low-order wave front. No Drawing. Application October 13, 1953 This is made possible by the continuous medium pro Serial No. 766,730 vided by the slurried condition of the mixture and the 9 Claims. (C. 52-11) peculiar characteristics of the coarse trinitrotoluene dis tributed within this slurry. That is, the inert shock actu ally travels in the slurry at a higher velocity than the This invention relates to an explosive composition. 15 inital low-order wave. This is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. Owing to the favorable influence of high pressure and 701,330, filed December 9, 1957, now abandoned. reduced temperature on the "coke oven' reaction, It has previously been customary scrupulously to avoid 2CO-C-CO, which is very important in the detonation the presence of moisture in explosives.
    [Show full text]
  • New Sign at Shot Tower Heralds Pride, Teaches Physics
    President’s Report BY JEFF HORNSTEIN, QVNA PRESIDENT QVNA General Meeting From a dedicated garden APRIL, 2013 • VOLUME 50, NO. 4 Thursday, April 18, 7:30 pm group, a seedling grew QUEEN VILLAGE St. Philip Neri, 218 Queen Street In a sure sign that spring has arrived despite GUEST SPEAKER: the chilly weather, my wife and I found ourselves at the Southwark-Queen Village STATE REPRESENTATIVE Community Garden on a recent Sunday Crier MIKE O’BRIEN morning, weeding and preparing our little plot for another season. Our city’s commu- nity gardens are an amazing asset, and SW- New sign at Shot Tower heralds pride, teaches physics QV Community Garden is, in many ways, Shot Tower—it’s one of the iconic structures in the neighborhood, seen from near and far. the mother of them all. Its history is a Built in 1808, and one of the first towers of its kind in the United States, the tower now fascinating and instructive example of the has a new interpretive sign worthy of its history. Visit the Front Street side of the play- power of community organization to ground and you’ll learn not only a bit of the history of Shot Tower, but with the aid of achieve a greater good. clear graphics, you will better understand the physics behind the making of ‘shot.’ Founded in 1976 by the intrepid members of the QVNA gardening commit- The Friends of tee, SW-QV’s gardeners reclaimed a huge Shot Tower, led by vacant lot on the site of a former school and Cynthia Temple spent the better part of a decade both (pictured with gardening and attempting to persuade young friend, elected officials to give them some degree Fiona Savarese) of control over the 18,000 square-foot received approval property.
    [Show full text]
  • Shot Pellets: an Overview
    SHOT PELLETS: AN OVERVIEW By: Mary-Jacque Manni, Edgard O. Espinoza', Rhoda M. Ralston', Richard K. Stroud', Michael D. Scanlan2 and Steven 1. Strauss2 ·Senior Forensic Scientist, Criminalistics Section Chief: Forensic Specialist (Wildlife Pathology), and Veterinary Medical Examiner, respectively, Na- tional Fish & Wildlife Forensic Laboratory, Ashland, OR ~minalistics m, Oregon State Police Crime Laboratory, Medford, OR Shot pellets are frequently recovered from migratory waterfowl carcasses in connection with the investigation of alleged violations of hunting regulations. A substantial body of information has been published on the composition and shot tower method ofmanufactu:ntfor lead shot There is a dearth of information available in the scientific literature on alternative manufacturing methods for lead shot, and on the production and composition of steel, bismuth and tungsten-polymer shot pellets. We have attempted to collate existing information on shot pellets from a wide variety of resoUrces. In addition, we have characterized the four main types of shot pellets, lead, steel, bismuth and tungsten-polymer, according to their physical and chemical properties, and target impact features. We also offer presumptive field tests to assist the investigator in making a preliminary determination of type prior to laboratory submission. Routine forensic laboratory analysis provides the field agent with an approximate size and the basic elemental composition of these pellets. The laboratory examiner should be prepared to provide additional information on the manufacture,' physical characteristics and general elemental analysis of shot pellets during courtroom testimony. Shot pellets examined in connection with this study were from manufactured shot shells purchased from commercial sources. The lead and steel shells were obtained locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Ferry SHOT TOWER
    The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Jackson Ferry SHOT TOWER NATIONAL HISTORIC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LANDMARK May 1981 LOCATION Shot Tower Historical State Park is located where US 52 crosses the New River, 8 miles south of Fort Chiswell, Virginia. By Interstate it is adjacent to I-77 eight miles south of I-81. Exit from I-77 at Poplar Camp onto US 52 and travel north for two miles, bearing left at the Jack- son's Ferry Farm. As described later, a proposed ASME Historical Marker may be in place to guide the traveler to the landmark location. INTRODUCTION The Jackson Ferry Shot Tower is a unique, single-purpose structure with an interesting history that verifies that it has served our nation and people well. Lead projectiles have been produced for centuries, pri- marily by two methods: casting (molding) and dropping in a free fall. Both processes continue in use today in both limited and mass-production quantities. Additional processes have also been developed, such as grinding, tumbling, punching/trimming, and combinations of these techniques. Projectiles, either spherical or of other configuration, larger than 20 caliber (0.200 in. diameter), are usu- ally molded regardless of the quantity produced. Smaller sizes are normally produced only in large quan- tities and by "dropping" in a free fall. Shotgun pel- lets as large as FF size (0.23 in. diameter) have been made, but the BB size (0.18 in. diameter) is the larg- est drop shot made today. The shot tower on the New River is the only one of its kind in Wythe County and is one of only three such re- maining antiquities in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Cocktails
    SEASONAL COCKTAILS Mission for 007 barreled shot tower gin, black fig vodka, lillet blanc 16 Voyage Ahead grace gin, svol swedish aquavit, el bandarra vermut white, green chartreuse, sage 17 The Goddess of Spring bluecoat gin, lavender mastiha cordial, sparkling rosé, lemon, pomegranate 16 Oia Sunrise papa’s pilar rum, jägermeister cold brew, banane du bresil, pistachio tahini orgeat, orange, lime 15 Mount Olympus Dew j. riddle peated bourbon, chareau, acidified honeydew melon, mint, chrysanthemum 15 Athens After Dark woodford double oaked bourbon, el silencio mezcal, otto’s athens vermouth, rhubarb & xocolatyl mole bitters 17 WINES BY THE GLASS champagne & sparkling Veuve Clicquot “Yellow Label,” Brut, NV 28 Champagne, France Domaine Karanika, NV 15 Amyntaion, Greece Los Monteros, Cava Brut, NV 11 Penedés, Spain Gruet, Brut Rosé, NV 14 New Mexico whites Buketo Malagousia, Assyrtiko, Sauvignon Blanc, 2017 13 Macedonia, Greece Wine Art Estate “Idisma Drios,” Assyrtiko, 2017 12 Drama, Greece Moraitis, Assyrtiko, 2018 14 Paros, Greece Ramon Bilbao, Albariño, 2018 12 Rias Baixas, Spain Masi, Pinot Grigio, 2018 12 Veneto, Italy Mokoroa, Sauvignon Blanc, 2018 14 Malborough, New Zealand Raeburn, Chardonnay, 2018 14 Russian River Valley, California Albert Bichot Vire-Clesse, Chardonnay, 2018 13 Burgundy, France Bollig-Lehnert, Riesling Kabinett, 2018 13 Mosel, Germany reds Tetramythos, Agiorgitiko, 2018 11 Achaia, Greece Tsantali, Xinomavro Blend, 2014 13 Rapsani, Greece Dalamara “Naoussa,” Xinomavro, 2017 14 Naoussa, Greece Vineyard Origins
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 192 Tuesday, October 7,1969 • Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 192 Tuesday, October 7,1969 • Washington, D.C. Pages 15519-15588 Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Research Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Commodity Credit Corporation Consumer and Marketing Service Customs Bureau Engineers Corps Federal Aviation Administration Federal Housing Administration Federal Reserve System Fiscal Service Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Forest Service Health, Education, and Welfare Department Internal Revenue Service Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Park Service Public Health Service Securities and Exchange Commission Treasury Department Wage and Hour Division Detailed list of Contents appears inside. /934 Latest Edition Guide to Record Retention Requirements [Revised as of January 1, 1969] This useful reference tool is designed them, and (3) how long they must be to keep businessmen and the general kept. Each digest carries a reference to public informed concerning the many the full text of the basic law or regulation published requirements in Federal laws providing for such retention. and regulations relating to record retention. The booklet’s index, numbering over 2,000 items, lists for ready reference The 86-page “Guide” contains over 900 the categories of persons, companies, digests which tell the user ( 1 ) what type and products affected by Federal records must be kept, (2) who must keep record retention requirements. Price: 75 cents Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nat on FEDERALÄREGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration,.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midtown Greenway (EMG) Existing Conditions 53Rd to 61St Street, Manhattan Archaeological Assessment
    East Midtown Greenway (EMG) Existing Conditions 53rd to 61st Street, Manhattan Archaeological Assessment SHPO Project Review No. 13PR02723 CEQR No. 13SBS004M Viele 1865, detail;. the EMG, 54th Street sewer, and APE are indicated Prepared for the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) Through Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. By Joan H. Geismar, Ph.D., LLC March 2018 East Midtown Greenway (EMG) Existing Conditions 53rd to 61st Street, Manhattan Archaeological Assessment SHPO Project Review No. 13PR02723 CEQR No. 13SBS004M Prepared for the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) Through Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. By Joan H. Geismar, Ph.D., LLC March 2018 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ----- SHPO Project Review Number: 13PR02723 CEQR Number: 13SBS004M Involved Agency: NYSHPO, LPC Phase of Survey: Archaeological Component of an Existing Conditions Report Location: East Midtown Greenway (EMG) East 53rd Street to East 61st Street and the East River Borough of Manhattan County of New York Survey Area: Approximately 2+ acres in a mainly linear corridor USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map: Central Park Archaeological Survey Overview: An existing conditions report for the EMG in an archaeological perspective was prepared for the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) through Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. It assessed the project's archaeological area of potential effect (APE), a 40-foot (12-m) wide, eight city block long corridor bounded south by 53rd Street, east by the East River, north by 61st Street, and west by the FDR Drive with the exception of the most southerly block where it extends west to Sutton Place South. The EMG APE extends one block north of the APE assessed in a 2013 Phase 1A completed at least five years ago with a finding of no effect.
    [Show full text]