Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. C /I~ ",,'r-,..f ';) .... "3., -'(''1,./ 24th annual report JUNE 1981 U.S. Department of Justice 80693 National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. \ Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by I Tom Sargant , to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. " , . ~',; . ' ;.,. '., . ~-- - -------- ~-- ------ , 'JUSTICE British Se-~l'i<fh'oT'''the International Commission of JUrists CHAIRMAN OF COUNCIL Sir John Foster, K.B.E., Q.c. CONTENTS VICE-CHAIRMAN PAGE Lord Foot Chairman's Introduction 3 Human Rights CHAIRMAN OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 6 Paul Sieghart Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure 8 Complaints against the Police ... VICE-CHAIRMAN 12 Miscarriages of Justice '" William Goodhart, Q.C. 14 Compensation for Wropgful Imprisonment HONORARY TREASURER 22 Prisoners' Rights Committee Philip English 22 Court of Last Resort 23 COUNCIL Financial Relief after Foreign Divorce ... Peter Archer, Q.c., M.P. Sir Jack Jacob, Q.C. 23 Peter Carter-Ruck Committee on Civil Procedure ... Ivan Lawrence, Q.C., M.P. 24 Diana Cornforth Anthony Lester, Q.c. Official Receivers Anthony Cripps, D.S.O., Q.c. 24 Blanche Lucas Information Law Prof. Aubrey Diamond Edward Lyons, Q.C., M.P. 25 Sir Denis Dobson, K.C.B., Q.C. British Nationality Norman Marsh, C.B.E., Q.c. 26 Michael Ellman Andrew Martin, Q.c. Public Order Act ... Lord Elwyn-Jones, C.H. Gavin McKenzie 27 Lord Gardiner, C.H. Ainslie Nairn JUSTICE-All Souls Review 28 Edward Gardner, Q.C., M.P. Anthony Pugh-Thomas Administrative Law Prof. J. F. Garner 29 Lord Rawlinson, Q.c. Courts Administration Committee Geoffrey Garrett, M.B.E. Michael Sherrard, Q.C. 30 Gerald Godfrey, Q.C. International Commission of Jurists Laurence Shurman 31 Prof. Roy Goode, O.B.B. Sam Silkin, Q.c., M.P. Membership and Finance David Graham, Q.C. David Sullivan, Q.C. 32 Percy Grieve, Q.c., M.P. Norman Turner, C.B.E. JUSTICE Educational and Research Trust 33 Joseph Harper Charles Wegg-Prosser Annual General Meeting Sir Desmond Heap 34 David Widdicombe, Q.c. John Alderson's Address Muir Hunter, Q.c. Lord Wigoder, Q.C. 35 Annual Members' Conference 37 December Recital SECRETARY 37 Visit of French Section \ Tom Sargant, O.B.E., J.P., LL.M.(Hon.) 37 Hong Kong Branch 38 LEGAL SECRETARY Scottish Branch ... R. C. H. Briggs 39 Bristol Branch 39 LEGAL ASSISTANT Membership Particulars ... P. F. Ashman 40 Publications 41 DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH Alec Samuels, J.P. 95A Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1DT 01-4056018 " Extracts from the Constitution CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTION In last year's Annual Report I was able to record the publication of four important reports on a wide range of subjects. During the past PREAMBLE twelve months our committees have been working just as hard but some of them are not yet ready to report. The JUSTICE-All Souls Review Whereas JUSTICE was formed through a common endeavour of of Administrative Law, which is very wide-ranging, has recently lawyers representing the three main political parties to uphold the completed a discussion paper for circulation to interested parties. We principles of justice and the right to a fair trial, it is hereby agreed and have, further submitted a number of memoranda to official declared by us, the Founder Members of the Council, that we will committees. These include a memorandum on the Reform of the faithfully pursue the objects set out in the Constitution of the Society Public Order Act, a critical appraisal of the Triennial Review Report without regard to considerations of party or creed or the political of the Police Complaints Board, a memorandum to the Department of character of governments whose actions may be under review. Trade strongly criticizing its proposal to abolish the office of the Official Receiver in Bankruptcy, and answers to a Law Commission We further declare it to be our intention that a fair representation of Questionnaire on Financial Relief after Foreign Divorce. the main political parties be maintained on the Council in perpetuity All these are summarised in the body of this report. and we enjoin our successors and all members of the Society to accept Our committee on British Nationality, with the full support of the and fulfil this aim. Executive Committee, has been particularly active in pressing on the Government and M.P.s our main objections to the British Nationality OBJECTS Bill which is now on its way through Parliament. We take the view that the Bill will leave far too many citizens of the United Kingdom The objects of JUSTICE, as set out in the Constitution, are: and Colonies without a right of abode in any territory, will abolish the age-long Common Law right to British Nationality of a person born in to uphold and strengthen the principles of the Rule of Law in the the U.K. and will create many anomalous and unjust situations. More territories for which the British Parliament is directly or ultimately importantly, it would give the Home Secretary, which means in effect responsible; in particular to assist in the maintenance of the highest Home Office officials, an absolute discretionary power which cannot standards of the administration of justice and in the preservation of the be challenged in the courts on any grounds whatsoever. fundamental liberties of the individual; Since last October we have set up three new committees. The first is examining every aspect of prisoners' rights, an area in which the to assist the International Commission of Jurists as and when requested United Kingdom is becoming the subject of increasing criticism, if not in giving help to peoples to whom the Rule of Law is denied and in condemnation, by the European Commission of Human Rights. The giving advice and encouragement to those who are seeking to secure the second is looking into the adequacy of existing remedies for fundamental liberties of the individual; complaints of maladministration in the courts. The third has been asked to formulate reforms in civil procedure which are generally to keep under review all aspects of the Rule of Law and to publish such regarded as desirable and could be implemented without primary material as will be of assistance to lawyers in strengthening it; legislation. The recommendations of the Royal Commission on Criminal \ to co-operate with any national or international body which pursues the Procedure are dealt with at some length in the body of this report. If aforementioned objects. fully implemented and given statutory force they should bring an improvement in the present unsatisfactory state of affairs; but they evade the thrust of our two main recommendations, namely that incriminating statements should not be admitted in evidence unless they are authenticated and that the responsibility for deciding criminal charges, and not just the right to refuse to put them forward, should be given to independent prosecuting solicitors. For myself, I would have liked to see the Commission propose 2 3 , more radical changes in our present system, particularly in respect of to celebrate Tom Sargant's 75th birthday. It was attended by over 50 the right of silence. I regard it as ridiculous that, when a suspect is past and present members of the Council and Lord Elwyn-~ ones pai? clearly anxious to confess his part in a crime, a police officer should a generous tribute to his 24 years' devoted servi.ce to the SOCIety .. I.n hIS have to warn him of the consequences of doing so, or that a solicitor reply Tom Sargant paid his own warm trIbute to the spmt ?f present at the interview should be able to advise him not to answer any friendship and goodwill which the Council and all the membershIp questions. The important thing is that whatever takes place at the had consistently shown to him. interview should be truly reported in the court of trial. If an accused We welcome the setting-up, in the Netherlands last year, of the has personal reasons for not giving information, or is in fear of his European Human Rights Foundation, a trust fund supported by the accomplices, then he should be allowed to inform the court. EEC and others to help advance human rights in the world by My main fear, however, is that the safeguards proposed by the providing much-needed finance for new and existing activities in this Commission will be still further emasculated when they emerge from field. Its administration is provisionally being carried out from our the Home Office in legislative form. These fears are not groundless. offices by Peter Ashman. The recommendations of the Devlin Committee on Evidence of Finally, I should like to thank most warmly all those members who Identification have been sidetracked by the failure to give them have helped in the work of our committees du~ing the year or w~o statutory force. Perhaps this is not really surprising. After all, the have assisted in the preparation and presentatIon of appeals or m Home Office is responsible for the security of the realm, the police and advising on civil cases. the prisons-as well as the state of the criminal law and the administration of criminal justice (which ought to include the redress of injustice).
Recommended publications
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Torrible, Clare Title: How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? Clare Torrible A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Social Sciences and law.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Police ,~, "
    eA~If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. '1- Z-9' -& '-- ~t, REPORT OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE .Report OF THE WEST MIDLANDS POLICE ,~, ", FOR THE OF YEAR 1981 .. 'T':-'f. CHIEF CONSTABLE c::) I o o co I CY") OF THE co , ,-t' ,1' /1 t WEST MIDLANDS POLICE I, ; Chief Constable's Office " Lloyd House ;:, '. .1/' ,.~ Co/more Circus Oueensway i 1 -: , t'l Birmingham B46NO I) ( . 1 \.' ..J. • '''1 '.1 c ; 1", r' , :', L') ~_ " "I 1981 11' Ql'" 1..l' : L_ ;. tf" '+(' t- L :.' (' ll_ :") I ! WEST MIDLANDS POLICE , Police Headquarters Lloyd House Colmore Circus Queensway Telephone No. 021-236 5000 Birmingham B4 6NQ Telex 337321 MEMBERS OF THE POLICE AUTHORITY Chief Constable Deputy Chief Constable Sir Philip Knights CBE QPM Assistant Chief Constables Mr R Broome Chairman: Councillor E T Shore (Birmingham, Sattley) Administration and Supplies Crime Mr L Sharp LL.B Operations Mr D H Gerty LL.B. Mr K J Evans Vice-Chairman: Councillor T J Savage (Birmingham, Erdington) Organisation & Development Mr G E Coles B Jur Personnel & Training Staff Support Mr J B Glynn Mr T Meffen Local Authority Representatives Magistrate Criminal Investigation Department Members Chief Superintendent C W Powell (Operations) Chief Superintendent T Light (Support Services) Ward Chief Administrative Officer Councillor D M Ablett (Dudley, No.6) JD Baker Esq JP FCA ... Chief Superintendent PC J Price MA (Oxon) Councillor D Benny JP (Birmingham, Sandwell) K H Barker Esq Councillor E I Bentley (Meriden, No.1) OBE DL JP FRICS ..;. Personnel Department Councillor D Fysh (Wolverhampton No.4) Captain J E Heydon Chief Superintendent R P Snee Councillor J Hunte (Birmingham,Handsworth) ERD JP i Councillor K RIson (Stourbridge, No.1) J B Pendle Esq JP I.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Act 1964 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 28 January 2021
    Status: Point in time view as at 31/12/1994. This version of this Act contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 28 January 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Police Act 1964 1964 CHAPTER 48 An Act to re-enact with modifications certain enactments relating to police forces in England and Wales, to amend the Police (Scotland) Act 1956, and to make further provision with respect to the police. [10th June 1964] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act applied by Heathrow Express Railway Act 1991 (c. vii), s. 43(4)(a) PART I ORGANISATION OF POLICE FORCES Modifications etc. (not altering text) C2 Pt. I(ss. 1-27) restricted (6.3.1992) by Local Government Act 1992 (c. 19), s. 18(4)(a) County, county borough and combined forces [F11 Police areas. (1) England and Wales shall be divided into police areas. (2) The police areas referred to in subsection (1) of this section shall be— (a) those listed in Schedule 1A t o this Act (subject to any amendment made to that Schedule by an order under section 21 or 21A of this Act, section 58 of the M1Local Government Act 1972, or section 17 of the M2Local Government Act 1992), together with (b) the City of London police area and the metropolitan police district.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Act 1964 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 09 April 2021
    Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 09 April 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Police Act 1964 1964 CHAPTER 48 An Act to re-enact with modifications certain enactments relating to police forces in England and Wales, to amend the Police (Scotland) Act 1956, and to make further provision with respect to the police. [10th June 1964] Textual Amendments F1 Act (except ss. 37, 60-65, Sch. 5 and the provisions of Sch. 9 other than the entry relating to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933) repealed (22.8.1996) by 1996 c. 16, ss. 103(3), 104(1), Sch. 9 Pt. I Ss. 37, 60-62, 64 (except subsection (2)), 65(2)-(4), Sch. 5 repealed (1.4.1999) by 1996 c. 16, s. 103(3), Sch. 9 Pt. II; S.I. 1999/533, art. 2(a) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act applied by Heathrow Express Railway Act 1991 (c. vii), s. 43(4)(a) PART I ORGANISATION OF POLICE FORCES County, county borough and combined forces Forces outside London 2 Police Act 1964 (c. 48) Part I – Organisation of Police Forces Document Generated: 2021-04-09 Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 09 April 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • National Policing Guidelines on Charging For
    1 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED National Policing Guidelines on Charging for Police Services The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) has agreed to these revised guidelines being circulated to, and adopted by, Police Forces in England, Wales & Northern Ireland. It is NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED under the Government Protective Marking Scheme and any referrals for advice and rationale in relation to Freedom of Information Act disclosure should be made to the NPCC Central Referral Unit at [email protected]. Document information Protective marking: OFFICIAL Author: Linda Waters Force/Organisation: Thames Valley Police NPCC Coordination Committee Area: Finance APP/Reference Material Reference Material Contact details: 01234 842 800 Review date: April 2020 Version: 14.3 These revised guidelines have been produced and approved by the NPCC Finance Coordination Committee. This document was considered and approved by the Professional Practice Gateway Group on the 15 July 2013 as reference material to Authorised Professional Practice (APP). The document has been assessed by Home Office Counsel in July 2018. The purpose of this document is to provide comprehensive advice on cost recovery. Please note Appendix 3 will be updated annually and re-published as necessary. Disclosure of any documents, images or data held by a Police Force is subject to any such disclosure being lawful, in accordance with legal professional privilege and being in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) & EU Data Protection Directive 2016/680 (‘Law Enforcement Directive’). Any queries relating to this document should be directed to either the author detailed above or the NPCC Business Support Office on 020 7084 8959/8958.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Police Acts of Commonwealth Countries
    INTERNATIONAL POLICE EXECUTIVE SYMPOSIUM GENEVA CENTRE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC CONTROL OF ARMED FORCES WORKING PAPER NO 13 CONTROLLING THE POLICE AN ANALYSIS OF THE POLICE ACTS OF COMMONWEALTH COUNTRIES G. P. Joshi The joint IPES and DCAF Working Paper Series is an open forum for the global community of police experts, researchers, and practitioners provided by the International Police Executive Symposium (IPES) and the Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (DCAF). It intends to contribute to worldwide dialogue and information exchange in policing issues by providing an access to publication and the global public sphere to the members of the interested community. In essence, the Working Paper Series is pluralist in outlook. It publishes contributions in all fields of policing and manuscripts are considered irrespective of their theoretical or methodological approach. The Series welcomes in particular contributions from countries of the South and those countries of the universe which have limited access to Western public sphere. Members of the editorial board are Ihekwoaba D. Onwudiwe (editor-in-chief, professor of Administration of Justice at Texas Southern University), Philipp Fluri (Deputy Director of the Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces, Geneva), Rick Sarre (professor of Law and Criminal Justice at the University of South Australia, Adelaide), Kam C. Wong (associate professor and chair of the Department of Criminal Justice of Xavier University, Ohio), and Dominique Wisler (Coginta, Geneva, Switzerland). Manuscripts can be sent electronically to the editorial board ([email protected]). © 2007 by G. P. Joshi. All rights reserved. Short sections of this text, not to exceed two paragraphs, might be quoted without explicit permission provided full credit is given to the source.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated Powers Memorandum
    POLICING AND CRIME BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM BY THE HOME OFFICE Introduction 1. This Memorandum has been prepared for the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee to assist with its scrutiny of the Policing and Crime Bill. The Bill was introduced in the House of Lords on 14 June 2016. The memorandum identifies the provisions of the Bill which confer powers to make delegated legislation. It explains in each case why the power has been taken and the nature of, and reason for, the procedure selected. The memorandum has been prepared by the Home Office and HM Treasury. 2. The Bill gives effect to the Conservative Party’s manifesto commitment to “finish the job of police reform”. The Bill is in nine Parts: Part 1 places a duty on police, fire and ambulance services to collaborate, enables Police and Crime Commissioners (“PCCs”) to take on responsibility for fire and rescue services where a local case is made, and abolishes the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority and transfers its functions to the London Fire Commissioner. It also provides for inspection of fire and rescue services. Part 2 reforms the police disciplinary and complaints systems, provides for a new system of “super-complaints” and confers new protections on police whistle-blowers. This Part also further strengthens the independence of HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and ensures that it is able to deliver end-to-end inspections of the police. Part 3 better enables chief officers to make the most efficient and effective use of their workforce by giving them the flexibility to confer a wider range of powers on police staff and volunteers and conferring a power on the Home Secretary to specify police ranks in regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Act 1964 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 28 March 2021
    Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 28 March 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Police Act 1964 CHAPTER 48 POLICE ACT 1964 PART I ORGANISATION OF POLICE FORCES County, county borough and combined forces 1 Police areas. 2A Police authorities for metropolitan counties and Northumbria police area. Forces outside London 2 Maintenance of police forces. 3 Establishment of police authorities. 3A Membership of police authorities etc. 3B Reductions in size of police authorities. 4 General functions of police authorities. 4A Local policing objectives. 4B Local policing plans. 4C Annual reports by police authorities. 5 General functions of chief constables. 5A Appointment and removal of chief constables. 6 Assistant chief constables. 6A Deputy chief constables— supplementary. 7 Other members of police forces. 8 Police fund. 8A Supply of goods and services. 9 Acquisition of land. 10 Civilian employees. ii Police Act 1964 (c. 48) Document Generated: 2021-03-28 Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 28 March 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes 10A Appointment of clerk. 10B Appointment of persons not employed by police authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Police Training in England and Wales, 1945 – 2009
    Initial Police Training in England and Wales, 1945 – 2009 Shauna Mary Peacock Doctorate in Education University of East Anglia School of Education 31st May 2010 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author’s prior, written consent.” © Abstract A thematic inspection by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in 2002 concluded that dramatic changes needed to be made to the training of police recruits to reflect the policing needs of the twenty-first century. The training, it reported, had not changed since the end of the Second World War. This thesis charts the developments of Initial Police Training from 1945 until 2009. Each chapter represents a decade of continuity and change in the training programme. Whilst there is much emphasis on the programme of the time there is reference to the social and political issues impacting on the development of police training. Policing cannot be conducted without the support of the community and the links between the service and the public they serve are evident throughout the research. Initial police training has not been a major field of academic endeavour and the little that has been written is often focussed on the significant change to probationer training made in the 1980’s as a result of work conducted by the University of East Anglia. This thesis presents the continuity and change in the training since the Second World War to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 2017-02-12T13:49:07Z Dplqq~ W!Tls Vi3 Bob5"'~
    Title Police accountability in Ireland: an analysis of the problems posed by the legal, constitutional and political dimensions and how they might be addressed Author(s) Walsh, Dermot P. J. Publication date 1992 Original citation Walsh, D. P. J. 1992. Police accountability in Ireland: an analysis of the problems posed by the legal, constitutional and political dimensions and how they might be addressed. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Link to publisher's http://library.ucc.ie/record=b1203650 version Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 1992, Dermot P. J. Walsh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1654 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T13:49:07Z DPlqq~ W!tLS vI3 bOb5"'~ POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY IN IRELAND: An Analysis of the Problems Posed by the Legal, Constitutional and Political Dimensions and how They Might be Addressed. volume: 3 of 3 By DERMOT PATRICK JOSEPH WALSH LL.B.; B.L. Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND Research Conducted in: THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK Submitted for Examination: September 1992 Head of Department and Supervisor: PROFESSOR JOHN O'CONNOR CONTENTS Sumaary Acknowledgements Chapters Beadings Page 1 Introduction 1 2 The Garda Siochana as a Police Force 32 3 The Legal, Political and Administrative Structure of the Force 92 4. The Legal and Constitutional Status of the Police: The British Dimension 146 5. The Legal and Constitutional Status of the Garda Siochana 214 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Act 1996
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Police Act 1996. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Police Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 16 An Act to consolidate the Police Act 1964, Part IX of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Chapter I of Part I of the Police and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1994 and certain other enactments relating to the police. [22nd May 1996] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Extent Information E1 For the extent of this Act see s.105 Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act applied (6.11.2000) by 1998 c. 32, s. 51, Sch. 3 para. 8(8); S.R. 2000/399, art. 3 (with arts. 4-5) Act: power to modify conferred (2.4.2001) by 2000 c. 39, s. 7(2); S.I. 2001/766, art. 2(1)(a) (with art. 3) Commencement Information I1 Act partly in force at 22.8.1996, partly prospective; see s.104; Act wholly in force at 1.4.1999 by S.I. 1999/533, arts. 2, 3 2 Police Act 1996 (c. 16) Part I – Organisation of Police Forces Document Generated: 2021-09-30 Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Police Act 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing Powers Colin Rogers and James Gravelle 6
    Chapter 6 Policing Powers Colin Rogers and James Gravelle 6 Policing Powers Colin Rogers and James Gravelle Overview and main recommendations Devolving policing powers to Wales would bring a range of benefits. Firstly, given the predisposition of local authorities, police forces and the Welsh Government, there is potential for improved communication and closer partnership working. Secondly, whilst reform of public services in related areas of community safety is not dependent on transfer of policing powers, the latter could act as a catalyst to their reform. Redesigning service delivery could, in turn, serve to make Wales’ police forces more effective and efficient than at present. Thirdly, with powers devolved, Welsh Government Ministers would need to become fully informed about policing matters. In combination with their working more closely with Chief Constables, this should lead to clearer lines of accountability, both between police forces and the Welsh Government, and between these bodies and the Welsh public. However, while benefits arising from proximity are evident, there could be pitfalls, such as the potential for politicisation of policing matters. This risk has been underlined by the new system of Police and Crime Commissioners, but could possibly be even greater where working relationships were particularly close. The most significant practical consideration in the debate on devolution of policing is the financial effect of transfer of powers. There are two elements to this. Firstly, resources would need to be sufficient to ensure at least as good a standard of delivery as under the existing settlement. Over one third of funding for policing comes from the Home Office.
    [Show full text]