DOCSLIB.ORG

Delegated Powers Memorandum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delegated Powers Memorandum POLICING AND CRIME BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM BY THE HOME OFFICE Introduction 1. This Memorandum has been prepared for the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee to assist with its scrutiny of the Policing and Crime Bill. The Bill was introduced in the House of Lords on 14 June 2016. The memorandum identifies the provisions of the Bill which confer powers to make delegated legislation. It explains in each case why the power has been taken and the nature of, and reason for, the procedure selected. The memorandum has been prepared by the Home Office and HM Treasury. 2. The Bill gives effect to the Conservative Party’s manifesto commitment to “finish the job of police reform”. The Bill is in nine Parts: Part 1 places a duty on police, fire and ambulance services to collaborate, enables Police and Crime Commissioners (“PCCs”) to take on responsibility for fire and rescue services where a local case is made, and abolishes the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority and transfers its functions to the London Fire Commissioner. It also provides for inspection of fire and rescue services. Part 2 reforms the police disciplinary and complaints systems, provides for a new system of “super-complaints” and confers new protections on police whistle-blowers. This Part also further strengthens the independence of HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and ensures that it is able to deliver end-to-end inspections of the police. Part 3 better enables chief officers to make the most efficient and effective use of their workforce by giving them the flexibility to confer a wider range of powers on police staff and volunteers and conferring a power on the Home Secretary to specify police ranks in regulations. This Part also strengthens the accountability and transparency of the Police Federation for England and Wales. Part 4 contains a number of reforms to police powers, including to: pre-charge bail to put a stop to people remaining on bail for lengthy periods with no independent judicial scrutiny of its continued necessity; provide for the retention of biometric material where a person has committed an offence outside of England and Wales; the powers under sections 135 and 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to stop vulnerable people experiencing a mental health crisis being detained in police custody; to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 to ensure that 17 years olds who are detained in police custody are treated as children for all purposes; to extend the geographical reach of police enforcement powers so that they can effectively detect and investigate any offence on ships at sea; and to provide for cross-border powers of arrest. 1 Part 5 makes further provision in respect of the term of office of Deputy PCCs and confers a power on the Home Secretary to change the name of a police area by regulations. Part 6 amends the Firearms Acts, including to better protect the public by closing loopholes that can be exploited by criminals and terrorists and by ensuring that, through statutory guidance, robust background checks are made on the suitability of persons to hold a firearms licence or shotgun certificate. Part 7 amends the Licensing Act 2003 to make the licensing system more effective in preventing crime and disorder. Part 8 strengthens the enforcement regime for EU, UN and other financial sanctions by increasing the maximum custodial sentence on conviction for a breach offence, introducing new enforcement powers including monetary penalties, and by providing for the immediate implementation of UN-mandated sanctions. Part 9 includes miscellaneous and general provisions, including an amendment to the Sexual Offences Act 2003 to better protect children and young people from sexual exploitation. This Part also contains provision to: require arrested persons to state their nationality; for suspected foreign nationals to produce their nationality document(s) following arrest; for defendants in criminal proceedings to provide their name, date of birth and nationality to the court; to give police and immigration officers further powers to seize cancelled foreign travel documents; to provide lifelong anonymity for victims of forced marriage and to provide for statutory guidance in respect of the licensing of taxis and private hire vehicles. PART 1: EMERGENCY SERVICES COLLABORATION Schedule 1, paragraph 5 – new section 4A(1) of the Fire and Rescue Act 2004: Power to provide for PCC to be fire and rescue authority Power conferred on: Secretary of State Power exercisable by: Order made by statutory instrument Parliamentary procedure: Negative procedure 3. As set out within the Government’s response to its consultation on emergency services collaboration, Enabling closer working between the emergency services: consultation responses and next steps published on 26 January 2016, the Government intends to enable PCCs to take on responsibility for fire and rescue services where it would be in the interests of economy, efficiency and effectiveness or public safety and where a local case is made. This builds on the Government’s manifesto commitment to “enable fire and police services to work more closely together and develop the role of our elected and accountable Police 2 and Crime Commissioners”. Chapter 2 of Part 1 to the Bill gives effect to these proposals. 4. The Government does not intend to mandate the transfer of fire and rescue services to PCCs and the policy intention is that arrangements for PCCs seeking responsibility for their local fire and rescue authority should be locally determined. Given this approach, it is necessary to confer on the Secretary of State delegated powers to give effect to changes in the governance arrangements in a particular area. Accordingly, new section 4A(1) of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 (“the 2004 Act”) provides a power, by order, to create a new corporation sole as the fire and rescue authority for the area covered by the order and for the PCC for that area to be that fire and rescue authority. Before making an order under new section 4A(1), the Bill requires the Home Secretary to be satisfied that such an order would be in the interests of economy, efficiency and effectiveness, or in the interests of public safety (new section 4A(5)). Given this requirement for a PCC’s proposals to meet one or other (or both) of these tests, this again necessitates leaving the implementation of changes to the governance of particular fire and rescue services to secondary legislation so that a judgement as to the efficacy of the proposals can be taken on a case-by-case basis. This is consistent with the Government’s broader position in relation to the local devolution of powers as provided for in the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act 2016. 5. New Schedule A1 to the 2004 Act (as inserted by paragraph 12 of Schedule 1 to the Bill) sets out the procedure for orders under new section 4A. Such an order may only be made if a PCC brings forward a proposal on which they have consulted locally (new section 4A(4) and paragraph 3 of new Schedule A1). Where an upper-tier local authority does not support the proposal put forward by the PCC, paragraph 4 of new Schedule A1 requires the Home Secretary to obtain an independent assessment of the proposal. 6. New sections 4B and 4D and 4G of the 2004 Act set out the further provisions that may be made by an order made under new section 4A. 7. The Government’s policy is that where a PCC takes on responsibility for the governance of fire and rescue services, the area served by the new style fire and rescue authority must be coterminous with the police force area. In cases where police and fire and rescue boundaries are not coterminous, new section 4B(1) enables an order under new section 4A to amend the boundaries of the relevant fire and rescue authorities It is expected that a PCC’s proposal would set out any proposed boundary changes, and the Secretary of State will have regard to these when considering whether it would be in the interests of economy, efficiency and effectiveness or public safety for the order to be made. The power cannot be used to alter police force areas; the procedure in section 32 of the Police Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) will continue to apply. 8. By virtue of new section 4D, an order under new section 4A may also make various supplementary provision, including about the delegation of functions of the new authority to a deputy PCC, the sub-delegation of functions by that deputy PCC and the delegation of functions to employees of the fire and rescue 3 authority. The Government considers that it is preferable to make bespoke provision in an order made under new section 4A rather that generic provision, of restricted application, on the face of the 2004 Act. 9. New section 4G of the 2004 Act particularises the transitional provision that can be made by an order under new section 4A of the 2004 Act by virtue of the existing powers in section 60(2) of the 2004 Act. This is intended to confirm that an order under section 4A can, if local arrangements should require, include provision for a PCC specified in that order to act as a shadow FRA to exercise preparatory functions in a period prior to assuming full responsibility for fire and rescue functions. Such functions may relate for example to governance matters or financial matters where the PCC may have a role in setting the fire precept that they would inherit. The powers also enable provision to be made, after the order is fully in force, for the equalisation of council tax precepts over a specified period where fire and rescue authority areas are altered by a section 4A order.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Torrible, Clare Title: How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? Clare Torrible A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Social Sciences and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration 12Th March 2010
    STATUTORY GUIDANCE FOR POLICE COLLABORATION 12TH MARCH 2010 Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration 1 2 Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration Contents INTRODUCTION 5 NOTE ON DIRECTION AND CONTROL 6 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE POLICE ACT 1996 7 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 7 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 12 RIPA AND COLLABORATIONS 25 THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MUTUAL AID AND COLLABORATIONS 27 MODELS OF COLLABORATION 29 AVOIDING BUREAUCRACY 29 CHOOSING COLLABORATION PARTNERS AND COLLABORATION MODELS 29 GOVERNANCE 31 FUNDING 35 WORKFORCE ARRANGEMENTS 37 LEGAL DUTIES AND LIABILITY FOR BREACH 41 PROCUREMENT 51 PROCUREMENT CONSIDERATIONS 51 MANAGING THE COLLABORATION OVER TIME 53 REVIEWING AND AMENDING THE AGREEMENT 53 NEW PROJECTS 53 ENDING THE AGREEMENT 53 EXIT STRATEGY 53 ANNEX A – DECISION PROCESS FOR COLLABORATION 55 ANNEX B – GLOSSARY 57 Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration 3 This Statutory Guidance was developed by the Home Office with the assistance of consultants from Tribal involving wide consultation and review with partners throughout the police service. It has been endorsed by the tripartite National Police Protective Services Board (a sub-committee of the National Policing Board) whose member organisations include the Home Office, the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Association of Police Authorities, the Association of Police Authority Chief Executives, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and the National Policing Improvement Agency. It has also been approved by the Police Advisory Board of England and Wales. All of the above organisations, as well as the many individual reviewers and reference group members, are thanked for their substantial contributions. Through this Statutory Guidance document the Secretary of State is exercising his power (in section 23F of the Police Act 1996 (as amended by the Policing and Crime Act 2009)) to provide guidance about collaboration agreements or related matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular 2018/01: Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act
    Circular 2018/01 TITLE: ASSAULTS ON EMERGENCY WORKERS (OFFENCES) ACT 2018 From: Bail, Sentencing and Release Policy Distribution Date: 13/11/2018 Implementation Date: 13/11/2018 For further information Ashir Mir, Sentencing Policy Advisor contact: Bail, Sentencing and Release Policy [email protected] 07547 970008 BroaD subject: Criminal Law Sub category: Assaults on Emergency Workers This circular is for: Lord Chief Justice, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Senior Presiding Judge, Justices of the Supreme Court, Lords Justices of Appeal, High Court Judges, Crown Court Judges, District Judges (Magistrates Courts), Bench Chairmen, Clerks to the Justices, Chief Crown Prosecutors, Council of Circuit Judges, Magistrates’ Association, Justices’ Clerks’ Society, Registrar of Criminal Appeals, The Law Society, The Bar Council, the Criminal Bar Association, National Police Chief’s Council, Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, Police Federation, Superintendents’ Association, Chief Police Officer’s Staff Association, College of Policing, Association of Special Constabulary Officers, Unison, Royal College of Nursing, Fire and Rescue Services Association, Fire Brigades Union, Fire Officers Association, National Fire Chiefs Council, Local Government Association, National Joint Council, Prison Officers’ Association, Prison Governors Association ASSAULTS ON EMERGENCY WORKERS (OFFENCES) ACT 2018 INTRODUCTION 1. The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 received Royal Assent on 13 September 2018 and will come into force on 13 November 2018. The Act is set out in full at Annex A. 2. The Act is a response to the increase, in recent years, in the number of assaults on emergency workers. There were 26,000 assaults on police officers in the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC)
    Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) Basics Web site http://www.hmic.gov.uk/Pages/home.aspx Geographical England and Wales coverage Constitutional Aspects Legal Her Majesty’s Inspectors of the Constabulary (‘HMICs’) have an Framework/Basis extensive history, as the first HMICs were appointed under the provisions of the County and Borough Police Act 1856. In 1962, the Royal Commission on the Police (Final Report, Cmnd. 1728) formally acknowledged their contribution to policing. HMIC is governed by the Police Act 1996, which states that ‘inspectors of constabulary’ will inspect every police force in England and Wales in relation to their ‘efficiency and effectiveness’. The Police Act 1996 (sections 54 to 56 and Schedule 4A) describes the appointment procedure, functions and powers of HMIC including its duty to arrange for publication of its reports. HMIC’s core function is to inspect the efficiency and effectiveness of police forces (s. 54). The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 made significant changes to the powers/functions of HMIC. HMIC no longer reports directly to the Secretary of State, in order to secure its independence, and it is now HMIC that arranges to publish its reports as it considers appropriate. HMIC’s powers now include the ability to request (and be mandatorily given) information by chief police officers and the power to enter police premises (paragraphs 6A and 6B of Schedule 4A) as appear to HMIC to be required for the purposes of an inspection under section 54. In addition to HMIC’s proactive inspections, if a local policing body requests inspectors to carry out an inspection of a particular police force, or a specified section or activity of that force, HMIC may carry out such an inspection (with the policing body paying HMIC’s reasonable costs per s.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Police ,~, "
    eA~If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. '1- Z-9' -& '-- ~t, REPORT OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE .Report OF THE WEST MIDLANDS POLICE ,~, ", FOR THE OF YEAR 1981 .. 'T':-'f. CHIEF CONSTABLE c::) I o o co I CY") OF THE co , ,-t' ,1' /1 t WEST MIDLANDS POLICE I, ; Chief Constable's Office " Lloyd House ;:, '. .1/' ,.~ Co/more Circus Oueensway i 1 -: , t'l Birmingham B46NO I) ( . 1 \.' ..J. • '''1 '.1 c ; 1", r' , :', L') ~_ " "I 1981 11' Ql'" 1..l' : L_ ;. tf" '+(' t- L :.' (' ll_ :") I ! WEST MIDLANDS POLICE , Police Headquarters Lloyd House Colmore Circus Queensway Telephone No. 021-236 5000 Birmingham B4 6NQ Telex 337321 MEMBERS OF THE POLICE AUTHORITY Chief Constable Deputy Chief Constable Sir Philip Knights CBE QPM Assistant Chief Constables Mr R Broome Chairman: Councillor E T Shore (Birmingham, Sattley) Administration and Supplies Crime Mr L Sharp LL.B Operations Mr D H Gerty LL.B. Mr K J Evans Vice-Chairman: Councillor T J Savage (Birmingham, Erdington) Organisation & Development Mr G E Coles B Jur Personnel & Training Staff Support Mr J B Glynn Mr T Meffen Local Authority Representatives Magistrate Criminal Investigation Department Members Chief Superintendent C W Powell (Operations) Chief Superintendent T Light (Support Services) Ward Chief Administrative Officer Councillor D M Ablett (Dudley, No.6) JD Baker Esq JP FCA ... Chief Superintendent PC J Price MA (Oxon) Councillor D Benny JP (Birmingham, Sandwell) K H Barker Esq Councillor E I Bentley (Meriden, No.1) OBE DL JP FRICS ..;. Personnel Department Councillor D Fysh (Wolverhampton No.4) Captain J E Heydon Chief Superintendent R P Snee Councillor J Hunte (Birmingham,Handsworth) ERD JP i Councillor K RIson (Stourbridge, No.1) J B Pendle Esq JP I.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thepdf
    Volume 59, Issue 5 Page 1395 Stanford Law Review KEEPING CONTROL OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Clive Walker © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the Stanford Law Review at 59 STAN. L. REV. 1395 (2007). For information visit http://lawreview.stanford.edu. KEEPING CONTROL OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Clive Walker* INTRODUCTION: THE DYNAMICS OF COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICIES AND LAWS................................................................................................ 1395 I. CONTROL ORDERS ..................................................................................... 1403 A. Background to the Enactment of Control Orders............................... 1403 B. The Replacement System..................................................................... 1408 1. Control orders—outline................................................................ 1408 2. Control orders—contents and issuance........................................ 1411 3. Non-derogating control orders..................................................... 1416 4. Derogating control orders............................................................ 1424 5. Criminal prosecution.................................................................... 1429 6. Ancillary issues............................................................................. 1433 7. Review by Parliament and the Executive...................................... 1443 C. Judicial Review..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Police Officers As Victims
    Police officers as victims Sentencing standards and their justifications in England and Germany Prof Dr Osman Isfen, Ruhr-University Bochum Dr Regina E Rauxloh, University of Southampton1 Abstract While there is plenty research in crime committed by police officers surprisingly little debate can be found regarding the situation where a police officer becomes a victim. This is remarkable as the police not only embody criminal law enforcement but also epitomises State power. Based on a comparative study, this article examines how criminal law in England and Germany deals with attacks against police officers through separate criminal offences as well as increased sentences. The authors examine how the use of criminal law reflects on the State’s perception and valuation of the role of the police officer. It will be shown that while in England there is the clear understanding that the status of the victim as police officer has an aggravating effect, Germany strongly opposes the idea that the office-holder deserves more protection than ordinary citizens. On the contrary, the law takes in consideration that the offender finds him- or herself in a vulnerable situation when faced with the power of the State. Keywords Police officers as victims, resistance against law enforcement, sentencing standards, comparison England and Germany, mitigating and aggravating circumstances I. Introduction In the context of criminal law, law enforcement is usually associated with the role of the police in protecting the victim of crime, but one easily forgets that quite often police officers themselves become the victim of crime. Interestingly, while crimes committed by police officers are subject to extensive research and debate, violence against police officers rarely appears in literature, legislation or case law.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Act 1964 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 28 January 2021
    Status: Point in time view as at 31/12/1994. This version of this Act contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 28 January 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Police Act 1964 1964 CHAPTER 48 An Act to re-enact with modifications certain enactments relating to police forces in England and Wales, to amend the Police (Scotland) Act 1956, and to make further provision with respect to the police. [10th June 1964] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act applied by Heathrow Express Railway Act 1991 (c. vii), s. 43(4)(a) PART I ORGANISATION OF POLICE FORCES Modifications etc. (not altering text) C2 Pt. I(ss. 1-27) restricted (6.3.1992) by Local Government Act 1992 (c. 19), s. 18(4)(a) County, county borough and combined forces [F11 Police areas. (1) England and Wales shall be divided into police areas. (2) The police areas referred to in subsection (1) of this section shall be— (a) those listed in Schedule 1A t o this Act (subject to any amendment made to that Schedule by an order under section 21 or 21A of this Act, section 58 of the M1Local Government Act 1972, or section 17 of the M2Local Government Act 1992), together with (b) the City of London police area and the metropolitan police district.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Act 1964 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 09 April 2021
    Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 09 April 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Police Act 1964 1964 CHAPTER 48 An Act to re-enact with modifications certain enactments relating to police forces in England and Wales, to amend the Police (Scotland) Act 1956, and to make further provision with respect to the police. [10th June 1964] Textual Amendments F1 Act (except ss. 37, 60-65, Sch. 5 and the provisions of Sch. 9 other than the entry relating to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933) repealed (22.8.1996) by 1996 c. 16, ss. 103(3), 104(1), Sch. 9 Pt. I Ss. 37, 60-62, 64 (except subsection (2)), 65(2)-(4), Sch. 5 repealed (1.4.1999) by 1996 c. 16, s. 103(3), Sch. 9 Pt. II; S.I. 1999/533, art. 2(a) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act applied by Heathrow Express Railway Act 1991 (c. vii), s. 43(4)(a) PART I ORGANISATION OF POLICE FORCES County, county borough and combined forces Forces outside London 2 Police Act 1964 (c. 48) Part I – Organisation of Police Forces Document Generated: 2021-04-09 Changes to legislation: Police Act 1964 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 09 April 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • [2021] Csoh 65 P925/20 Opinion of Lord
    OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2021] CSOH 65 P925/20 OPINION OF LORD FAIRLEY In the petition of CALUM STEELE Petitioner for JUDICIAL REVIEW Petitioner: Dean of Faculty, Young; MacRoberts LLP Respondent: Ross QC, Blair; Clyde & Co 22 June 2021 Introduction [1] The petitioner is the General Secretary of the Scottish Police Federation (“the SPF”). The SPF is a body established under section 59 of the Police Act 1996 for the purpose of representing members of the police force in Scotland in all matters affecting their welfare and efficiency. [2] The petitioner is also a police constable with the Police Service of Scotland. Since his appointment as General Secretary of the SPF in around 2009 the petitioner has not undertaken any operational police duties. He nevertheless remains subject, in his capacity 2 as a police constable, to the misconduct procedures contained within the Police Service of Scotland (Conduct) Regulations 2014 (SSI 2014/68) (“the 2014 Regulations”). [3] The respondent is the Deputy Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland. The petitioner seeks declarator that a decision made on behalf of the respondent to institute and maintain misconduct proceedings against him was unlawful at common law and incompatible with his right to freedom of expression in terms of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). He seeks reduction of a particular decision taken by the respondent on 22 September 2020, on which date a Misconduct Form under Regulation 15 of the 2014 Regulations was issued to him. “Misconduct” by police officers [4] Issues of alleged misconduct by police officers are regulated principally by the 2014 Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Reform Act 2002
    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Police Reform Act 2002. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Police Reform Act 2002 2002 CHAPTER 30 An Act to make new provision about the supervision, administration, functions and conduct of police forces, police officers and other persons serving with, or carrying out functions in relation to, the police; to amend police powers and to provide for the exercise of police powers by persons who are not police officers; to amend the law relating to anti-social behaviour orders; to amend the law relating to sex offender orders; and for connected purposes. [24th July 2002] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 POWERS OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE 1 National Policing Plan After section 36 of the 1996 Act there shall be inserted— “36A National Policing Plan (1) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State, before the beginning of each financial year, to prepare a National Policing Plan for that year. (2) The Secretary of State shall lay the National Policing Plan for a financial year before Parliament. (3) Subject to subsection (4), any such plan must be laid before Parliament not later than 30th November in the preceding financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • National Policing Guidelines on Charging For
    1 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED National Policing Guidelines on Charging for Police Services The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) has agreed to these revised guidelines being circulated to, and adopted by, Police Forces in England, Wales & Northern Ireland. It is NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED under the Government Protective Marking Scheme and any referrals for advice and rationale in relation to Freedom of Information Act disclosure should be made to the NPCC Central Referral Unit at [email protected]. Document information Protective marking: OFFICIAL Author: Linda Waters Force/Organisation: Thames Valley Police NPCC Coordination Committee Area: Finance APP/Reference Material Reference Material Contact details: 01234 842 800 Review date: April 2020 Version: 14.3 These revised guidelines have been produced and approved by the NPCC Finance Coordination Committee. This document was considered and approved by the Professional Practice Gateway Group on the 15 July 2013 as reference material to Authorised Professional Practice (APP). The document has been assessed by Home Office Counsel in July 2018. The purpose of this document is to provide comprehensive advice on cost recovery. Please note Appendix 3 will be updated annually and re-published as necessary. Disclosure of any documents, images or data held by a Police Force is subject to any such disclosure being lawful, in accordance with legal professional privilege and being in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) & EU Data Protection Directive 2016/680 (‘Law Enforcement Directive’). Any queries relating to this document should be directed to either the author detailed above or the NPCC Business Support Office on 020 7084 8959/8958.
    [Show full text]