DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pennsylvania State University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School IMPROVED METHODS FOR MONITORING AND ESTIMATING OCCUPANCY OF NORTHERN GOSHAWKS: A FIELD TEST OF MODIFIED SURVEY METHODS A Thesis in Wildlife and Fisheries Science by Chelsea DeMarco © 2020 Chelsea DeMarco Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2020 ii The thesis of Chelsea DeMarco was reviewed and approved by the following: Margaret C. Brittingham Professor of Wildlife Resources Thesis Advisor Matthew R. Marshall Adjunct Assistant Professor of Wildlife Conservation National Park Service Eastern Rivers and Mountains Network Program Manager David A.W. Miller Associate Professor of Wildlife Population Ecology Scott Stoleson Research Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Special Signatory David Eissenstat Professor of Woody Plant Physiology Interim Head of the Department of the Ecosystem Science and Management iii ABSTRACT Determining status and trend of raptor populations is critical to their conservation and management, though acquiring sufficient data can be challenging and expensive, especially when species are rare or elusive. Northern goshawks (Accipiter genitilis) are a species of concern in several states, and status reviews require information on population trends and potential threats. Currently there is no cost-effective way for single states to determine goshawk population trends, especially when abundance is low. We modified two existing survey methods, the Northern Goshawk Bioregional Monitoring Design and the pre-dawn survey technique, with the goal of developing a protocol that would be more affordable and statistically relevant in areas with low goshawk abundance. First, we present modifications to and a field test of the Northern Goshawk Bioregional Monitoring Design which was developed by the U.S. Forest Service to evaluate regional trends in goshawk populations. We made 4 modifications to this design to make it affordable at smaller spatial scales and statistically relevant for areas with low abundance. We decreased the size of sampling units, stratified the sample based on known historic goshawk use instead of habitat suitability, used a conditional design to allocate survey effort and incorporated surveys conducted during the courtship and incubation breeding phases. These modifications allowed us to increase sample size, concentrate survey effort in occupied areas, detect non-breeding territorial adults, and optimize allocation of replicate survey effort, to improve detection probability and occupancy estimates. We field tested the modified method during the goshawk breeding season in 2018 to estimate detection probability and occupancy of goshawks in the iv Allegheny National Forest (ANF), Pennsylvania. Each modification contributed to the success of the method, and we estimated that goshawks occupy 6% (95% CI = 0.02-0.14) of suitable habitat in the ANF. We also found that including detections from courtship surveys was critical for the success of the method. However, current methods used to survey goshawks during courtship are logistically challenging and expensive. Second, we examine the efficacy of replacing human observers with autonomous recording units (ARUs) to overcome budgetary and logistical limitations of traditional pre-dawn surveys that are used to survey goshawks during courtship. Over 2 seasons we recorded 5040 survey hours at 91 sites in northern Pennsylvania. We built a recognizer in the program monitoR to identify goshawk vocalizations in the recordings and assessed the performance of the recognizer by evaluating precision (the proportion of identified calls that were goshawk calls), recall (the proportion of goshawk calls that were identified) and processing time. We compared results from the recognizer to results from traditional survey methods to determine the efficacy of the method. The recognizer had recall and precision rates of 72% and 67% respectively and detected goshawks in 80% (12 out of 15) of sites that were known to be occupied which was more than any other survey method. Additionally, using ARUs and the recognizer greatly reduced analysis time and survey costs. Detections from ARUs and monitoR recognizers can reduce costs and effectively identify occupied territories and vocalization patterns of elusive forest raptors as long as sufficient survey windows are used. We provide our recognizer to expedite location of goshawk calls in recordings and provide guidance for recognizer development and use in monitoR. v Modifying the Northern Goshawk Bioregional Monitoring Design and the pre- dawn survey technique enabled us to estimate occupancy of goshawks in an area with low abundance. These methods overcome limitations of previous methodologies and can be employed in other areas with low goshawk abundance allowing management entities to make conservation decisions based on local results. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 The Need for a New Methodology for Surveying Northern Goshawks .... 1 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 Improving Occupancy Estimates of Northern Goshawks in Areas with Low Abundance .................................................................................................... 14 Methods ................................................................................................................ 18 Results................................................................................................................... 30 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 33 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................... 38 Chapter 3 Efficacy of Using Autonomous Recording Units to Detect Northern Goshawks .............................................................................................................. 55 Methods ................................................................................................................ 60 Results................................................................................................................... 67 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 73 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................... 80 Chapter 4 Goshawk Status and Future Surveys .......................................................... 101 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................... 108 Appendix A Example Detection Data ......................................................................... 112 Appendix B Recognizer Development and Testing .................................................... 113 Appendix C Recordings Used to Create and Test Goshawk Recognizer ................... 133 Appendix D monitoR Preparation and R Code........................................................... 135 Appendix E Template Performance ............................................................................ 163 Appendix F Detecting Goshawk Pairs Using Copulation Vocalizations.................... 180 Appendix G Goshawk Detection Data From Occupied Sites ..................................... 185 vii Appendix H Occupancy and Abundance Calculations ............................................... 187 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Comparison of northern goshawk distribution between the first and second Pennsylvania Breeding Bird Atlases. ....................................................... 10 Figure 1-2: Trends in northern goshawk migration counts from 2006-2016 analyzed by the Raptor Population Index. ............................................................ 11 Figure 1-3: Status of goshawks in the eastern U.S. in 2019 according to NatureServe (2019). .............................................................................................. 12 Figure 2-1: Location of sampling units that were surveyed to estimate goshawk occupancy in the Allegheny National Forest, PA, in 2018. Upper right inset displays location of broadcast stations within the sampling units. ....................... 49 Figure 2-2: Detection probability estimates for each survey method used to estimate goshawk occupancy in the Allegheny National Forest, PA in 2018. ..... 50 Figure 3-1: Spectrograms of goshawk alarm and wail calls recorded at each 100m broadcast interval from detection distance trials conducted in February 2018 near State College, PA on an SM2 unit (Wildlife Acoustics Inc.) with 16000Hz sampling rate. Panels A, B, D and E are from alarm calls broadcast towards the ARU at distances of 100m, 200m, 300m and 400m respectively. Panel C was broadcast directly away from the unit at 200m. Panels F, G, H, are wail calls broadcast toward the ARU at 100m, 200m, and 300m. Panel I displays wail calls broadcast directly away from the ARU at 300m. ................... 90 Figure 3-2: Accumulation curve showing the cumulative proportion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common Birds of the Prescott Area Nuthatch.Cdr
    Birds are listed by their typical habitats. Coniferous Forest Riparian (Creekside) Woodland (Some species may be found in more Sharp-shinned Hawk (w) Anna's Hummingbird (s) than one habitat.) Cooper's Hawk Black-chinned Hummingbird (s) (w) = winter (s) = summer Broad-tailed Hummingbird (s) Rufous Hummingbird (s) Acorn Woodpecker Black Phoebe Pinyon/Juniper/Oak Woodland Red-naped Sapsucker (w) Plumbeous Vireo (s) and Chaparral Hairy Woodpecker Warbling Vireo (s) Gambel's Quail . Western Wood-Pewee (s) House Wren (s) Ash-throated Flycatcher (s) Cordilleran Flycatcher (s) Lucy's Warbler (s) Western Scrub-Jay Hutton's Vireo Yellow Warbler (s) Bridled Titmouse Steller's Jay Summer Tanager (s) Juniper Titmouse . Mountain Chickadee Song Sparrow (w) Bushtit White-breasted Nuthatch Lincoln's Sparrow (w) Bewick's Wren . Pygmy Nuthatch Blue Grosbeak (s) Ruby-crowned Kinglet (w) Brown Creeper Brown-headed Cowbird (s) Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (s) Western Bluebird Bullock's Oriole (s) Crissal Thrasher Hermit Thrush Lesser Goldfinch Phainopepla (s) Yellow-rumped Warbler (w) Lake and Marsh Virginia's Warbler (s) Grace's Warbler (s) Black-throated Gray Warbler (s) Red-faced Warbler (s) Pied-billed Grebe Spotted Towhee Painted Redstart (s) Eared Grebe (w) Canyon Towhee Hepatic Tanager (s) Double-crested Cormorant Rufous-crowned Sparrow Western Tanager (s) Great Blue Heron White-crowned Sparrow (w) Chipping Sparrow Gadwall (w) Black-headed Grosbeak (s) Dark-eyed Junco (w) American Wigeon (w) Scott’s Oriole (s) Pine Siskin Mallard Lake and Marsh (cont.) Varied or Other Habitats Cinnamon Teal (s) Turkey Vulture (s) Common Birds Northern Shoveler (w) Red-tailed Hawk Northern Pintail (w) Rock Pigeon of the Green-winged Teal (w) Eurasian Collared-Dove Prescott Canvasback (w) Mourning Dove Ring-necked Duck (w) Greater Roadrunner Area Lesser Scaup (w) Ladder-backed Woodpecker Bufflehead (w) Northern Flicker Common Merganser (w) Cassin's Kingbird (s) Ruddy Duck (w) Common Raven American Coot Violet-green Swallow (s) .
    [Show full text]
  • PPCO Twist System
    A Brown-headed Nuthatch brings food to the nest. Color-coded leg bands enable the authors and their colleagues to discern the curious and potentially complex relationships among the various individuals at Tall Timbers Research Station on the Florida–Georgia line. Photo by © Tara Tanaka. photos by Tara Tanaka Tallahassee, Florida [email protected] 46 BIRDING • FEBRUARY 2016 arblers are gorgeous, jays boisterous, and sparrows elusive, Wbut words like “cute” and “adorable” come to mind when the conversation shifts to Brown-headed Nuthatches. The word “cute” doesn’t appear in the scientifc literature regularly, but science may help to explain its frequent association with nuthatch- es. The large heads and small bodies nuthatches possess have propor- tions similar to those found on young children. Psychologists have found that these proportions conjure up “innate attractive” respons- es among adult humans even when the proportions fall on strange objects (Little 2012). This range-restricted nuthatch associated with southeastern pine- woods has undergone steep declines in recent decades and is listed as a species of special concern in most states in which it breeds (Cox and Widener 2008). The population restricted to Grand Bahama Island appears to be critically endangered (Hayes et al. 2004). Add to these concerns some intriguing biology that includes helpers at the nest, communal winter roosts, seed caching, social grooming, and the use of tools, and you have some scintillating science all bound up in one “cute” and “adorable” package. James
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Downy Woodpecker and White-Breasted Nuthatch Use "Vice" to Open Sunflower Seeds: Is This an Example of Tool Use?
    DOWNY WOODPECKER AND WHITE-BREASTED NUTHATCH USE "VICE" TO OPEN SUNFLOWER SEEDS: IS THIS AN EXAMPLE OF TOOL USE? By William E. Davis, Jr. During the past three winters I have watched Downy Woodpeckers and White-breasted Nuthatches using knotholes as "vices" to hold sunflower seeds while shucking them. I have found no direct reference to this behavior for either species, although nuthatches are well-known cachers of food and presumably open cached food items where they are cached. The purpose of this paper is to document this vice-using Behavior and to discuss whether it should Be considered as tool use. On February 2, 1993, I watched a male Downy Woodpecker at my sunflower feeder remove a seed and fly five feet directly to a knothole (hole #1) that was 6.5 feet above the ground in a vertical three-inch stem of the same lilac cluster from which the feeder was suspended. The Downy proceeded to insert the seed into the knothole, which had a hard, flat lower surface (Figure 1), and pound it open and eat the seed. It repeated this procedure five times in three minutes. The woodpecker did not hold the seed with its feet the way chickadees and titmice do when they open sunflower seeds and, in fact, did not touch the seed with its feet at any time. On March 3 I watched the same male Downy (it had a distinctive pattern of red, white, and Black on its nape) make nine trips to hole #1 and sBc trips to a second knothole (hole #2) five feet from the feeder on a nearly horizontal stem 4.5 feet above the ground in the same lilac complex (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • White-Breasted Nuthatch Sitta Carolinensis ILLINOIS RANGE
    white-breasted nuthatch Sitta carolinensis Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The white-breasted nuthatch averages five to six Class: Aves inches in length. It has blue-gray back feathers and Order: Passeriformes white belly feathers. The male has a cap of black feathers while the female has a blue-gray-feathered Family: Sittidae cap. ILLINOIS STATUS common, native BEHAVIORS The white-breasted nuthatch is a common, permanent resident statewide in Illinois. Nesting takes place from April through May. This bird nests in deciduous woodlands in a knothole in a large tree, an old woodpecker hole or a nest box. The nest is placed 15 to 50 feet above the ground. The nest cavity is lined with grasses, hair, rootlets, sticks and other materials. The female builds the nest. She deposits six to nine white eggs with red-brown spots and incubates them for the 12-day incubation period. One brood is raised per year. The white- breasted nuthatch lives in woodlands, parks and orchards. It searches for food by walking down tree trunks head-first. It eats insects, nuts and acorns. ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. provided by stevebyland/pond5.com adult Aquatic Habitats bottomland forests Woodland Habitats bottomland forests; coniferous forests; southern Illinois lowlands; upland deciduous forests Prairie and Edge Habitats edge © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species 02 05 Restore Canada Jay as the English name of Perisoreus canadensis 03 13 Recognize two genera in Stercorariidae 04 15 Split Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus) into two species 05 19 Split Pseudobulweria from Pterodroma 06 25 Add Tadorna tadorna (Common Shelduck) to the Checklist 07 27 Add three species to the U.S. list 08 29 Change the English names of the two species of Gallinula that occur in our area 09 32 Change the English name of Leistes militaris to Red-breasted Meadowlark 10 35 Revise generic assignments of woodpeckers of the genus Picoides 11 39 Split the storm-petrels (Hydrobatidae) into two families 1 2018-B-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 280 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species Effect on NACC: This proposal would change the species circumscription of Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus by splitting it into four species. The form that occurs in the NACC area is nominate pacificus, so the current species account would remain unchanged except for the distributional statement and notes. Background: The Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus was until recently (e.g., Chantler 1999, 2000) considered to consist of four subspecies: pacificus, kanoi, cooki, and leuconyx. Nominate pacificus is highly migratory, breeding from Siberia south to northern China and Japan, and wintering in Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The other subspecies are either residents or short distance migrants: kanoi, which breeds from Taiwan west to SE Tibet and appears to winter as far south as southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Migration in the Mediterranean Storm Petrel Hydrobates Pelagicus Melitensis
    Lago et al.: Partial migration in Mediterranean Storm Petrel 105 PARTIAL MIGRATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN STORM PETREL HYDROBATES PELAGICUS MELITENSIS PAULO LAGO*, MARTIN AUSTAD & BENJAMIN METZGER BirdLife Malta, 57/28 Triq Abate Rigord, Ta’ Xbiex XBX 1120, Malta *([email protected]) Received 27 November 2018, accepted 05 February 2019 ABSTRACT LAGO, P., AUSTAD, M. & METZGER, B. 2019. Partial migration in the Mediterranean Storm Petrel Hydrobates pelagicus melitensis. Marine Ornithology 47: 105–113. Studying the migration routes and wintering areas of seabirds is crucial to understanding their ecology and to inform conservation efforts. Here we present results of a tracking study carried out on the little-known Mediterranean Storm Petrel Hydrobates pelagicus melitensis. During the 2016 breeding season, Global Location Sensor (GLS) tags were deployed on birds at the largest Mediterranean colony: the islet of Filfla in the Maltese Archipelago. The devices were retrieved the following season, revealing hitherto unknown movements and wintering areas of this species. Most individuals remained in the Mediterranean throughout the year, with birds shifting westwards or remaining in the central Mediterranean during winter. However, one bird left the Mediterranean through the Strait of Gibraltar and wintered in the North Atlantic. Our results from GLS tracking, which are supported by data from ringed and recovered birds, point toward a system of partial migration with high inter-individual variation. This highlights the importance of trans-boundary marine protection for the conservation of vulnerable seabirds. Key words: Procellariformes, movement, geolocation, wintering, Malta, capture-mark-recovery INTRODUCTION The Mediterranean Storm Petrel has been described as sedentary, because birds are present in their breeding areas throughout the year The Mediterranean Storm Petrel Hydrobates pelagicus melitensis is (Zotier et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Brettsmithersthesis2003.Pdf
    Copyright © 2003 Brett Smithers i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study would not have been possible without the efforts and contributions of many organizations and individuals. My appreciation is extended to Dr. Clint Boal, my major advisor, for helpful and timely editing, guidance and for serving as my mentor. Thanks are extended to Dr. David Andersen, my co-advisor, for his scholarly and insightful comments and advice. Funding for this project was provided by the Chippewa National Forest, The National Council for Air and Steam Improvement, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Potlatch Corporation, Superior National Forest, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I owe a great deal to those individuals who assisted with nest inventories, trapping, equipment installation, and changing tapes and batteries at monitored nests: Aimee Roberson, Lisa Smithers, Amanda Wester, Wayne Steffans, Frank Nicoletti, Cameron Trembath, Jeremy Ridelbauer, and Ann Bellman. Matt Solensky assisted with hawk trapping, and Steve Day of Airways Aviation provided air service for relocating telemetered goshawks during the 2001 field season. Personnel from the many cooperating agencies and organizations provided assistance and logistical support during this project. They included, in no particular order, Jim Gallagher, John Casson, Jeff Hines, Mike Houser, Rich Baker, Al Williamson, Ben Ohlander, Steve Mortensen, Carol Mortensen, Robin Vora, Maya Hamady, Lissa Grover, Ed Lindquist, and Wayne Russ. ii Video equipment for the 2000 and 2001 field seasons was provided by Alaska Department of Fish & Game, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources provided office space, computer, and an all- terrain vehicle during the 2002 field season.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Management Practices for Excluding Barn Swallows and Chimney Swifts from Buildings and Structures
    Best Management Practices for Excluding Barn Swallows and Chimney Swifts from Buildings and Structures Photo: R. Kimpel (flickr.com/creative commons) ontario.ca/speciesatrisk BLEED Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2017 Suggested Citation Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2017 Best Management Practices for Excluding Barn Swallows and Chimney Swifts from Buildings and Structures. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2017. 22 pp. Authors This document was prepared by Debbie Badzinski, Brandon Holden and Sean Spisani of Stantec Consulting Ltd. and Kristyn Richardson of Bird Studies Canada on behalf of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Acknowledgements The project team wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for providing guidance and review of this document: ´ Todd Copeland, Darlene Dove, Lauren Kruschenske, Megan McAndrew, Kerry Reed, Chris Risley, Lara Griffin and Erin Thompson Seabert from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry ´ Larry Sarris from the Ontario Ministry of Transportation ´ Nicole Kopysh from Stantec Consulting Ltd. This document includes best available information as of the date of publication and will be updated as new information becomes available. If you are interested in providing information for consideration in updates of this document, please email [email protected]. Page 1 | Best Management Practices for Excluding Barn Swallows and Chimney Swifts from Buildings and Structures 1.0 Introduction & Purpose ..........................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • The White-Breasted Nuthatches of North America
    uring 2013, the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU) evaluated a proposal to “split” the White- Dbreasted Nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis) into any- where from two to four species. The proposal did not Cryptic pass (AOU 2013a). Members of the AOU’s Commit- tee on Classification and Nomenclature of North and Middle American Birds were, however, nearly unani- mous in their desire to revisit the question soon, after more data have been gathered (AOU 2013b). What does this mean for North American birders? Certainly more Species identification challenges, but also an opportunity to con- The White-breasted tribute to our understanding of the current and changing ranges of these birds. Nuthatches Background A key geological event was the formation, 14–2½ mil- lion years ago, of the “Basin and Range” district of west- ern North America. This event promoted the splitting 4UFWFO(.MPEJOPX of forests of the U.S. and Canada into three distinct re- gions: Eastern (east of the Mountain West, and extend- -POHNPOU $PMPSBEP ing north to include much of the continent’s northern THNMPE!BPMDPN reaches); Interior West (from the Rocky Mountains west to the eastern slopes of the Sierra Nevada and the Cas- cades, south to the mountains of northern Mexico, and including the Davis and Chisos mountains of Texas); and Pacific (from the crests of the Sierra Nevada and the Cascades west to the Pacific Coast). A more complete summary is given by Graham (1999). These distinctions were reinforced by “recent” Quaternary Period glacial cycles (Van Devender 1990, Graham 1999) and sub- This article presents an overview, based on recent scientific literature and the author’s field and museum work, of our present knowledge of the identification and geographic distribution of the White-breasted Nuthatches of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmy Nuthatch in Mountain Region
    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Assessment Forest Service Rocky of the Pygmy Nuthatch in Mountain Region Black Hills the Black Hills National National Forest Custer, Forest, South Dakota and South Dakota May 2003 Wyoming Cameron Ghalambor Conservation Assessment of the Pygmy Nuthatch in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming Cameron Ghalambor Department of Biology University of California – Riverside Riverside, CA 92521 Under a personal services contract with: USDA Forest Service Black Hills National Forest Cameron Ghalambor is currently a postdoctoral research biologist at the University of California at Riverside. He received his B. A. from University of California at Los Angeles and his Ph.D. from the University of Montana at Missoula. His Ph.D. and subsequent research has focused in part on the comparative reproductive biology of Pygmy, Red-breasted, and White-breasted Nuthatches. His work on nuthatches and related species has investigated such questions as 1) the ecological and evolutionary determinants that shape different incubation strategies, 2) the role of life histories in determining parental investment strategies, and 3) the adaptive significance of conifer resin use at Red-breasted Nuthatch nests. His current address is: Department of Biology, University of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 CURRENT MANAGEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Characteristics of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch (Sitta Tephronota) in Southwestern Iran
    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 66(1), pp. 85–98, 2020 DOI: 10.17109/AZH.66.1.85.2020 NEST CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EASTERN ROCK NUTHATCH (SITTA TEPHRONOTA) IN SOUTHWESTERN IRAN Arya Shafaeipour1*, Behzad Fathinia1 and Jerzy Michalczuk2 1Department of Biology, University of Yasouj, Yasouj, Iran E-mails: [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-536X [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5752-9288 2Department of Nature Protection and Landscape Ecology, University of Rzeszów Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland E-mail: [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-7731 In the springs of 2015–2017, the population size and nest characteristics of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch (Sitta tephronota) were investigated. The study was conducted in a 400 hectare area of the mountainous region of southwestern Iran. In 2016, the population of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch was estimated at 33 pairs and its density was 8.25 breeding pairs per 100 ha of the study area. During the study, 45 nuthatch nests were investigated, of which 15 (33%) were found in cliffs and 28 (62%) were located in tree holes; 2% were built in house and bridge walls. The height of the nest was 214.3±112.3 cm above ground level. The mean of the horizontal and vertical depths of the nest chambers in trees was 17.8±3.7 and 12.6±3.2 cm respectively, and statistically differed from those in rocky nests (respectively 23.9±5.5 and 10.8±4.6 cm). However, chamber volumes did not statistically differ between these two nest type categories.
    [Show full text]