DOCSLIB.ORG

Didier Kahn, Alchimie Et Paracelsisme En France (1567–1625) (Genève, Librarie Droz, 2007), Pp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Didier Kahn, Alchimie Et Paracelsisme En France (1567–1625) (Genève, Librarie Droz, 2007), Pp 524 Book Reviews / Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 509-530 Didier Kahn, Alchimie et Paracelsisme en France (1567–1625) (Genève, Librarie Droz, 2007), pp. x+806, figs., table, bibls., indexes, €82.00, ISBN 978 2 600 00688 0. The last three decades have witnessed a proliferation of studies devoted to the philo- sophical, medical and religious aspects of Paracelsianism, and to the Paracelsian move- ment in specific geographical contexts. Didier Kahn’s considerable research into alchemy and Paracelsianism in France has resulted in a scholarly work of great value. This lengthy volume (the first of a projected trilogy) deals with the place of alchemy and Paracelsianism on the book market and with the reception of Paracelsus’ works and ideas, paying special attention to the controversies between the academic establish- ment and the chemists. The two forthcoming volumes, as announced­­ in the introduc- tion, deal with patronage and alchemy, and with the relationships of alchemy to science, religion and literature. In the general introduction, the author tackles the vexed question of the signifi- cance of alchemy. By rejecting the symbolic and spiritual interpretation of alchemy, Kahn maintains that the latter is not to be seen as a single monolithic system, but as complex set of practice, theories, and philosophical views. The historian’s task is to locate texts and authors in their specific cultural contexts, so philology is an indispens- able tool in order to get rid of a number of clichés that had long affected the history of alchemy. Though the contribution of alchemy to the emergence of experimental chemistry cannot be denied, the relationship between experiments and theories in alchemy remains problematic. The author endorses Robert Halleux’s lucid interpreta- tion of the role of experiments in alchemy. “L’experientia, c’est à dire la réalisation du procédé au laboratoire, a pour principale utilité de démontrer à l’opérateur qu’il a compris l’art. Mais si l’expérience échoue, il faut la recommencer. Car si la réussite du procédé confirme ‘expérimentalement’ la théorie, l’échec ne l’infirme jamais. On touche ici à la faiblesse majeure de l’expérience alchimique: réduite au rôle d’il lustra- tion de la théorie, elle ne tranche jamais de sa véracité. Les anciens ont raison quoi qu’il arrive au laboratoire.” ("Pratique de laboratoire et experience de pensee chez les alchimistes." in J.-F. Bergier (ed. ), Zwischen Wahn, Glaube und Wissenschaft [Zurich, 1988], 115-126; 120). Kahn does much to elucidate the relationship of Paracelsian- ism to alchemy, notably in late Renaissance France. It is well known that Paracelsus dismissed transmutational alchemy, but promoted medical alchemy as fundamental to the new medicine. He adopted significant aspects of medieval medical al chemy, notably the views of Roger Bacon, Arnald of Villanova and Johannes of Rupescissa, claiming that the aim of alchemy was the separation of the curative properties latent in natural substances, the pure from the impure, the useful from the useless. Paracel- sus’ followers did not share the master’s rejection of transmutational alchemy and pursued the preparation of both the universal medicine and the philosophers’ stone. This is apparent in the works of the early generation of Paracelsians, such as Gerard Dorn, Leonard Thurneisser, George Forberger, and Adam von Bodenstein. The diffusion of Paracelsian works occurred mainly after the death of the master (1541) and was promoted by his followers. Between 1527 and 1538, 28 works of © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI: 10.1163/157338208X345821 Book Reviews / Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 509-530 525 Paracelsus were published, whereas, in the six following decades, 192 editions of Paracelsus’ works saw the light. As Kahn points out, the so-called Paracelsian revival was largely the outcome of a distorted interpretation of his views: “le renouveau paracelsien se caractérise quant à lui, a partir de 1550, par la légende d’un Paracelse entièrement alchimiste, ayant su obtenir la pierre philosophale grâce à laquelle il a pu ac­­­complir ses guérisons de maladies réputées incurables” (p. 597). The alliance between alchemy and Paracelsianism was beneficial to both, as an impressive amount of alchem- ical books was printed in the second half of the sixteenth century—mainly in the German states and in Switzerland. This process culminated in the publication of the famous Theatrum Chemicum (1602-1622). The Paracelsian revival reached France around 1567, when Jacques Gohory published his influential Compendium of Para- celsus’ medi cine. In fact, Gohory’s work was much more than a synthesis of Paracelsus’ medicine: it dealt with alchemy, magic and philosophy. Gohory’s portrait of Paracel- sus followed the model created by the German and Swiss Paracelsians, namely that of a physician and experienced alchemist pursuing the prolongation of life. Gohory added something new to the representation of Paracelsus. He published Erasmus’ letter to Paracelsus in the preface to the Compendium in order to associate the Swiss iconoclast to the litterae humaniores. Furthermore, Gohory sought to reconcile Paracelsianism and Aristotelianism—a conciliatory position that was not isolated. It was also adopted by Johann Albrecht (De concordia Hippocraticorum et Paracelsistarum, 1569), by Win- ther von Andernach (De medicina veteri et nova, 1571) and later by Daniel Sennert (De chymicorum cum Aristotelicis et Galenicis consensu ac dissensu, 1619). Kahn gives a detailed account of the publication of Paracelsian (and anti-Paracelsian) works in the early 1570s—both in France and in Central Europe—paying special attention to the role played by printers, notably Pietro Perna, an Italian Protestant who settled in Basel, where he published a number of Latin translations of Paracelsus’ works. In the 1570s, Joseph Duchesne (Quercetanus), a Protestant physician, appeared on the scene and was to play a central part in the Paracelsian movement in France and in the rest of Europe. Despite the impact of his works, very little was known about him before Kahn took pain to investigate his life and his role in the Paracelsian debate thoroughly. In France, the reaction against chemical medicines and Paracelsianism started before Thomas Erastus’Disputationes (1571-3) provided the learned world with a store house of arguments against the new chemical medicine. In 1564, Loys de Launay of the Montpellier Faculty of Medicine published a work on antimony, which prompted Jacques Grévin’s reply in 1566, rejecting antimony as a poison. In 1566 the Parisian Medical Faculty, where Grévin was a reputed professor, decreed that antimony was a poison and could not be corrected. So its internal use was forbidden. Whereas in the debate on antimony Paracelsianism played but a marginal part, the trial of Roch le Baillif (1578-80) was aimed at preventing the diffusion of Paracelsianism in the med- ical world. Indeed, as Kahn convincingly argues, the Paracelsian medical heresy had already reached the Paris Medical Faculty, and this explains the Academic doctors’ ruthless attack on Roch le Baillif..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alchemical Culture and Poetry in Early Modern England
    Alchemical culture and poetry in early modern England PHILIP BALL Nature, 4–6 Crinan Street, London N1 9XW, UK There is a longstanding tradition of using alchemical imagery in poetry. It first flourished at the end of the sixteenth century, when the status of alchemy itself was revitalised in European society. Here I explain the reasons for this resurgence of the Hermetic arts, and explore how it was manifested in English culture and in particular in the literary and poetic works of the time. In 1652 the English scholar Elias Ashmole published a collection of alchemical texts called Theatrum Chymicum Britannicum, comprising ‘Several Poeticall Pieces of Our Most Famous English Philosophers’. Among the ‘chemical philosophers’ represented in the volume were the fifteenth-century alchemists Sir George Ripley and Thomas Norton – savants who, Ashmole complained, were renowned on the European continent but unduly neglected in their native country. Ashmole trained in law, but through his (second) marriage to a rich widow twenty years his senior he acquired the private means to indulge at his leisure a scholarly passion for alchemy and astrology. A Royalist by inclination, he had been forced to leave his London home during the English Civil War and had taken refuge in Oxford, the stronghold of Charles I’s forces. In 1677 he donated his impressive collection of antiquities to the University of Oxford, and the building constructed to house them became the Ashmolean, the first public museum in England. Ashmole returned to London after the civil war and began to compile the Theatrum, which was intended initially as a two-volume work.
    [Show full text]
  • Williams, Robert (2019) Mundus Imaginalis & Intellectus Agens: Imagination and Agency in Making Relational Organigrammes
    Williams, Robert (2019) Mundus Imaginalis & Intellectus Agens: Imagination and agency in making relational organigrammes. In: Organigrammes. L’art face aux mondes complexes, 22nd - 23rd November 2019, l’Axe A2S (Arts, Sciences, Société) de l’Institut ACTE. (Unpublished) Downloaded from: http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/5440/ Usage of any items from the University of Cumbria’s institutional repository ‘Insight’ must conform to the following fair usage guidelines. Any item and its associated metadata held in the University of Cumbria’s institutional repository Insight (unless stated otherwise on the metadata record) may be copied, displayed or performed, and stored in line with the JISC fair dealing guidelines (available here) for educational and not-for-profit activities provided that • the authors, title and full bibliographic details of the item are cited clearly when any part of the work is referred to verbally or in the written form • a hyperlink/URL to the original Insight record of that item is included in any citations of the work • the content is not changed in any way • all files required for usage of the item are kept together with the main item file. You may not • sell any part of an item • refer to any part of an item without citation • amend any item or contextualise it in a way that will impugn the creator’s reputation • remove or alter the copyright statement on an item. The full policy can be found here. Alternatively contact the University of Cumbria Repository Editor by emailing [email protected]. Mundus Imaginalis et Intellectus Agens: Imagination and agency in making relational organigrammes Imagination et agence dans la création d'organigrammes relationnels Robert Williams Professor of Fine Art, The University of Cumbria Institute of the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Verse and Transmutation History of Science and Medicine Library
    Verse and Transmutation History of Science and Medicine Library VOLUME 42 Medieval and Early Modern Science Editors J.M.M.H. Thijssen, Radboud University Nijmegen C.H. Lüthy, Radboud University Nijmegen Editorial Consultants Joël Biard, University of Tours Simo Knuuttila, University of Helsinki Jürgen Renn, Max-Planck-Institute for the History of Science Theo Verbeek, University of Utrecht VOLUME 21 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/hsml Verse and Transmutation A Corpus of Middle English Alchemical Poetry (Critical Editions and Studies) By Anke Timmermann LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 On the cover: Oswald Croll, La Royalle Chymie (Lyons: Pierre Drobet, 1627). Title page (detail). Roy G. Neville Historical Chemical Library, Chemical Heritage Foundation. Photo by James R. Voelkel. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Timmermann, Anke. Verse and transmutation : a corpus of Middle English alchemical poetry (critical editions and studies) / by Anke Timmermann. pages cm. – (History of Science and Medicine Library ; Volume 42) (Medieval and Early Modern Science ; Volume 21) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-25484-8 (hardback : acid-free paper) – ISBN 978-90-04-25483-1 (e-book) 1. Alchemy–Sources. 2. Manuscripts, English (Middle) I. Title. QD26.T63 2013 540.1'12–dc23 2013027820 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1872-0684 ISBN 978-90-04-25484-8 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-25483-1 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Demons and Angels Brill’S Studies in Intellectual History
    THE LANGUAGE OF DEMONS AND ANGELS BRILL’S STUDIES IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY General Editor A.J. Vanderjagt, University of Groningen Editorial Board M. Colish, Oberlin College J.I. Israel, University College, London J.D. North, University of Groningen R.H. Popkin, Washington University, St. Louis-UCLA VOLUME 119 THE LANGUAGE OF DEMONS AND ANGELS Cornelius Agrippa’s Occult Philosophy BY CHRISTOPHER I. LEHRICH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2003 This book is printed on acid-free paper. The cover image shows the harmony and proportion of the human body with respect to the seven heavenly bodies, demonstrating the theory of the microcosm. From De occulta philosophia 2.27, 331/347 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lehrich, Christopher I. The language of demons and angels : Cornelius Agrippa’s occult philosophy / by Christopher I. Lehrich. p. cm. — (Brill’s studies in intellectual history, ISSN 0920-8607 ; v. 119) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 90-04-13574-X 1. Agrippa von Nettesheim, Heinrich Cornelius. 1486?-1535. 2. Occultism. I. Title. II. Series. B781.A34L44 2003 130’.92-dc22 2003055665 ISSN 0920-8607 ISBN 90 04 13574 X © Copyright 2003 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lexicon of Alchemy
    A Lexicon of Alchemy by Martin Rulandus the Elder Translated by Arthur E. Waite John M. Watkins London 1893 / 1964 (250 Copies) A Lexicon of Alchemy or Alchemical Dictionary Containing a full and plain explanation of all obscure words, Hermetic subjects, and arcane phrases of Paracelsus. by Martin Rulandus Philosopher, Doctor, and Private Physician to the August Person of the Emperor. [With the Privilege of His majesty the Emperor for the space of ten years] By the care and expense of Zachariah Palthenus, Bookseller, in the Free Republic of Frankfurt. 1612 PREFACE To the Most Reverend and Most Serene Prince and Lord, The Lord Henry JULIUS, Bishop of Halberstadt, Duke of Brunswick, and Burgrave of Luna; His Lordship’s mos devout and humble servant wishes Health and Peace. In the deep considerations of the Hermetic and Paracelsian writings, that has well-nigh come to pass which of old overtook the Sons of Shem at the building of the Tower of Babel. For these, carried away by vainglory, with audacious foolhardiness to rear up a vast pile into heaven, so to secure unto themselves an immortal name, but, disordered by a confusion and multiplicity of barbarous tongues, were ingloriously forced. In like manner, the searchers of Hermetic works, deterred by the obscurity of the terms which are met with in so many places, and by the difficulty of interpreting the hieroglyphs, hold the most noble art in contempt; while others, desiring to penetrate by main force into the mysteries of the terms and subjects, endeavour to tear away the concealed truth from the folds of its coverings, but bestow all their trouble in vain, and have only the reward of the children of Shem for their incredible pain and labour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image and Identity of the Alchemist in Seventeenth-Century
    THE IMAGE AND IDENTITY OF THE ALCHEMIST IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NETHERLANDISH ART Dana Kelly-Ann Rehn Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the coursework requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Studies in Art History) School of History and Politics University of Adelaide July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE i TABLE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS iii DECLARATION v ABSTRACT vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 ALCHEMY: A CONTROVERSIAL PROFESSION, PAST AND PRESENT 7 3 FOOLS AND CHARLATANS 36 4 THE SCHOLAR 68 5 CONCLUSION 95 BIBLIOGRAPHY 103 CATALOGUE 115 ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1 Philip Galle (After Pieter Bruegel the Elder), The Alchemist, c.1558 118 FIGURE 2 Adriaen van de Venne, Rijcke-armoede („Rich poverty‟), 1636 119 FIGURE 3 Adriaen van Ostade, Alchemist, 1661 120 FIGURE 4 Cornelis Bega, The Alchemist, 1663 121 FIGURE 5 David Teniers the Younger, The Alchemist, 1649 122 FIGURE 6 David Teniers the Younger, Tavern Scene, 1658 123 FIGURE 7 David Teniers the Younger, Tavern Scene, Detail, 1658 124 FIGURE 8 Jan Steen, The Alchemist, c.1668 125 FIGURE 9 Jan Steen, Title Unknown, 1668 126 FIGURE 10 Hendrik Heerschop, The Alchemist, 1671 128 FIGURE 11 Hendrik Heerschop, The Alchemist's Experiment Takes Fire, 1687 129 FIGURE 12 Frans van Mieris the Elder, An Alchemist and His Assistant in a Workshop, c.1655 130 FIGURE 13 Thomas Wijck, The Alchemist, c.1650 131 FIGURE 14 Pierre François Basan, 1800s, after David Teniers the Younger, Le Plaisir des Fous („The Pleasure of Fools‟), 1610-1690 132 FIGURE 15
    [Show full text]
  • John Dee, Willem Silvius, and the Diagrammatic Alchemy of the Monas Hieroglyphica
    The Royal Typographer and the Alchemist: John Dee, Willem Silvius, and the Diagrammatic Alchemy of the Monas Hieroglyphica Stephen Clucas Birkbeck, University of London, UK Abstract: John Dee’s Monas Hieroglyphica (1564) was a work which involved a close collaboration between its author and his ‘singular friend’ the Antwerp printer Willem Silvius, in whose house Dee was living whilst he composed the work and saw it through the press. This article considers the reasons why Dee chose to collaborate with Silvius, and the importance of the intellectual culture – and the print trade – of the Low Countries to the development of Dee’s outlook. Dee’s Monas was probably the first alchemical work which focused exclusively on the diagrammatic representation of the alchemical process, combining diagrams, cosmological schemes and various forms of tabular grid. It is argued that in the Monas the boundaries between typography and alchemy are blurred as the diagrams ‘anatomizing’ his hieroglyphic sign (the ‘Monad’) are seen as revealing truths about alchemical substances and processes. Key words: diagram, print culture, typography, John Dee, Willem Silvius, alchemy. Why did John Dee go to Antwerp in 1564 in order to publish his recondite alchemical work, the Monas Hieroglyphica? What was it that made the Antwerp printer Willem Silvius a suitable candidate for his role as the ‘typographical parent’ of Dee’s work?1 In this paper I look at the role that Silvius played in the evolution of Dee’s most enigmatic work, and at the ways in which Silvius’s expertise in the reproduction of printed diagrams enabled Dee to make the Monas one of the first alchemical works to make systematic use of the diagram was a way of presenting information about the alchemical process.
    [Show full text]
  • Paracelsus, Helmont, Iatrochemistry, Pharmacology
    Basic Sciences of Medicine 2014, 3(3): 60-62 DOI: 10.5923/j.medicine.20140303.03 Paracelsus, the Founder of Chemical Therapeutic Who Initiated the Application of Chemistry to Life Hosein Tajadod Hafiz, an International Journal of Iranian studies, Tehran, Iran Abstract Paracelsus, a German-Swiss physician, alchemist, philosopher, and astrologer who denounced the Galenic system of medicine. The application of chemistry to life was initiated by him. In fact, he stressed the spiritual side of disease but also advocated the use of mineral as drugs, rather than just using plants and animal products. He burned the works of Avicenna, and quarreled with most of his colleagues at Basel and was dismissed in disgrace and resumed his wandering from place to place, teaching chemical therapy (iatrochemistry). Johannes Baptiste van Helmont, Flemish physician was the leading iatrochemist of seventeenth century, but he opposed the dogma of Galen, astrology of Paracelsus and many other established doctrines. Keywords Paracelsus, Helmont, Iatrochemistry, Pharmacology In the Renaissance some Europeans reacted against the 1. Paracelsus, the Creator of anatomy and other medical teachings expounded in medieval Iatrochemistry Islamic text, particularly the “Canon of Medicine” (al-Quanon fil-Tib), written by Avicenna (980-1037), a Iatrochemistry , the study of chemical phenomena in order famous and influential Iranian physician and to obtain results of medical value was founded by Paracelsus. philosopher-scientist. Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), Iatrochemists the followers of Paracelsus treated the Italian and the greatest artist and scientist of the Renaissance human body as a chemical system. In iatrochemistry, disease who studied the skeletal movement and muscle structures in was associated with upsets of body chemistry and treatment relation to function, rejected the anatomy, though by was directed toward restoration of the chemical balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob Böhme and the Theology of Paracelsus (1493/94–1541)
    Chapter 7 The New Adam: Jacob Böhme and the Theology of Paracelsus (1493/94–1541) Urs Leo Gantenbein Elsewhere in this volume,1 reference has been made to Winfried Zeller’s con- cept of the “crisis of piety” (Frömmigkeitskrise), said to have developed around 1600.2 This concept implies that the narrow religious atmosphere of a hard- ening theological orthodoxy, whether Catholic, Calvinist, or Lutheran, was mainly concerned with the defense of its own teachings against all opponents. This gave rise to a vacuum in the sphere of lived religion. Believers became alienated from their authentic spiritual feelings by the dominance of rigid dogmatic norms. What they therefore longed for was a teaching which might provide consolation and guidance through devotion to God, indeed a teach- ing that might perhaps offer a mystically experienced union with the deity. This may help explain how in the first two decades of the seventeenth century so many independent thinkers sought new modes of religious expression in their publications. Other contributors to this volume have discussed Johann Arndt (1555–1621), whose four books Vom wahren Christentum (1605–1610) be- came a religious bestseller, as well as Martin Moller (1547–1606), who was for a time Böhme’s pastor in Görlitz. Both men conform to Zeller’s crisis concept which stresses experience over doctrinal polemic. Notably, however, even the Lutheran theologian Philipp Nicolai (1556–1608), a harsh polemicist against Calvinism, published writings that gave voice to a mystical piety.3 1 I wish to express my thanks to Andrew Weeks for the continuing fruitful discussions, his many helpful comments, and the English translation in parts of my text.
    [Show full text]
  • Alchemical Reference in Antony and Cleopatra
    SYDNEY STUDIES Alchemical Reference in Antony and Cleopatra LYNDALL ABRAHAM Lepidus: Your serpent of Egypt is bred now of your mud by the operation of your sun: so is your crocodile. (II.vii.26-7) The phrase "the operation of your sun" is a distinctly alchemical term. It refers to the opus alchymicum as a whole and is first known to occur in one of the oldest and most famous alchemical documents, the Emerald Table: "What I have said concerning the operation of the Sun is finished."1 The Tabula Smaragdina or Emerald Table, ascribed to Hermes Tris­ megistus or the Egyptian Thoth, was not only one of the most important sources of medieval alchemy, but continued to be considered as the basis of alI alchemical law by alchemists right through to the seventeenth cen­ tury. The earliest known version was discovered by E. J. Holmyard in an eighth-century Arabic text, and it was translated into Latin around the time of the thirteenth century. The first English translation appears as a part of Roger Bacon's The Mirror of Alchimy (London 1597). The con­ tents of the influential Table occur repeatedly in both Renaissance and seventeenth-century alchemical treatises, including John Dee's Monas Hieroglyphica (1564: reprinted in 1591 and included in the alchemical anthology Theatrum Chemicum in 1602), the De Alchemia (1541-Table included in full), George Ripley's The Compound of Alchymie (1591), William Bloomfield's Bloomfield's Blossoms, Thomas Norton's Ordinal of Alchemy (1477), and Michael Maier's Atalanta Fugiens (1617).2 In Euphrates or The Waters
    [Show full text]
  • Magic, Religion, and Science: a Special Issue
    Accessus Volume 6 Issue 2 Magic, Religion, and Science Article 1 2020 Magic, Religion, and Science: A Special Issue Eve Salisbury Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/accessus Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation Salisbury, Eve (2020) "Magic, Religion, and Science: A Special Issue," Accessus: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/accessus/vol6/iss2/1 This Introduction has been accepted for inclusion in Accessus by the editorial board of the journal and administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact wmu- [email protected]. Salisbury: Magic, Religion, and Science: A Special Issue 1 Magic, Religion, and Science: A Special Issue The inspiration for this special issue of Accessus arose from a combined conference of the Medieval Association of the Pacific (MAP) and the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS) held in Scottsdale in February of 2019. Entitled “Magic, Religion, and Science in the Global Middle Ages and Renaissance,” the conference brought together medieval and early modern scholars working on areas of study too often considered to be separate from one another and bound by disciplinary constraints. The essays in this fourth special issue of Accessus challenge that presumption by addressing the innovative work of four prominent writers and demonstrating how magic, religion, and science, when considered together, had the capacity to generate new ideas and innovative ways of thinking. From the rhetorical magic of John Gower, the hermetic readings of Elias Ashmole, the occult philosophy of Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, and the onstage illusions of Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale, the four essays featured in this special issue unveil some of the most mesmerizing aspects of magic in the late medieval and early modern era.
    [Show full text]
  • Iznīqī and Jābir, Sirr and Miftāḥ: Two Authors, Four Titles, One Alchemical Treatise Iznīqī Y Ŷābir, Sirr Y Miftāḥ: Dos Autores, Cuatro Títulos, Un Tratado Alquímico
    Alcantara Vol XXXVII-2 (segundas)_Maquetación 1 17/02/17 14:06 Página 299 AL-QANTARA XXXVII 2, julio-diciembre 2016 pp. 299-327 ISSN 0211-3589 doi: 10.3989/alqantara.2016.010 Iznīqī and Jābir, Sirr and Miftāḥ: Two Authors, Four Titles, One Alchemical Treatise Iznīqī y Ŷābir, Sirr y Miftāḥ: dos autores, cuatro títulos, un tratado alquímico Paola Carusi Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Rome An alchemical Arabic treatise alternatively en- El tratado árabe alquímico titulado Miftāḥ al- titled Miftāḥ al-ḥikma, Miftāḥ jannāt al-khuld, ḥikma, Miftāḥ ŷannāt al-juld, Sirr al-asrār y Sirr al-asrār and Sirr al-sārr wa-sirr al-asrār Sirr al-sārr wa-sirr al-asrār se atribuye en sus is attributed in its manuscripts to two different manuscritos a dos autores diferentes: al-Iznīqī authors: al-Iznīqī and Jābir b. Ḥayyān. In this y Ŷābir b. Ḥayyān. En este artículo se discu- article I briefly discuss some characteristic as- tirán brevemente algunos aspectos caracterís- pects of the treatise and its significance for the ticos del tratado y su importancia para la history of alchemy. These aspects include its historia de la alquimia. Estos aspectos inclu- ancient and important sources, such as the yen fuentes antiguas importantes, tales como Muṣḥaf al-jamā‛a (Turba philosophorum) and el Muṣḥaf al-ŷamāʻa (Turba philosophorum) the Kitāb al-Ḥabīb, and its connection with y el Kitāb al-Ḥabīb y su conexión con la tra- the tradition of the artists and the activity of dición de los artistas y la actividad de taller y the workshop and laboratory, which first laboratorio, que primero aparece en la alqui- comes to the fore in Greek alchemy and later mia griega y posteriormente en la islámica.
    [Show full text]