Thorny Issues in the Abortion Debate $5.00 “He Who Acts Against His Conscience Always Sins.” — St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thorny Issues in the Abortion Debate $5.00 “He Who Acts Against His Conscience Always Sins.” — St the newsjournal of catholic opinion vol. xxxiii—no. 1 2012 A Case We Can’t Afford Not to Make Regaining Lost Ground on Funding Abortion Care andrea miller A Perspective on Later Abortion … From Someone Who Does Them willie parker, md A Statement on Later Abortion So, Who Has Second- Trimester Abortions? rachel k. jones and lawrence b. finer Why We Need to Choose ‘Choice’ ann furedi also: Book reviews by Thomas P. Doyle, Carole Joffe, Gail Grossman Freyne and Sarah Raleigh-Halsing www.catholicsforchoice.org Thorny Issues in the Abortion Debate $5.00 “He who acts against his Conscience always sins.” — St. Thomas Aquinas “ Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that being a natural and unalienable right.” — James Madison “A good Conscience is the palace of Christ.” — St. Augustine “ I shall drink—to the Pope, if you please—still to Conscience first and to the Pope afterwards.” — Blessed John Henry Newman “But no man has a monopoly of Conscience.” — Mary A. Ward Great minds think alike. Subscribe to Conscience today $15 for a year’s subscription www.conscience-magazine.org CONSCIENCE editor’s note the newsjournal of catholic opinion Executive Editor jon o’brien Editor david j. nolan [email protected] Contributing Editor sara morello destigmatizing abortion is vitally important Editorial Adviser rosemary radford ruether Editorial Associate for the health and well-being of women around the world. kim puchir Conscience is published by Catholics for Choice. Catholics for Choice shapes and advances sexual In some (too few) places, abortion care is considered to and reproductive ethics that are based on justice, reflect a commitment to women’s well-being and respect and affirm the capacity of women and men be part of the national healthcare framework, is relatively to make moral decisions about their lives. Catholics for Choice easy to access and does not impose undue financial President jon o’brien Executive Vice President burdens on the patient. sara morello Board of Directors susan wysocki, ph.d., b.s.n., n.p., chair Sadly, in too many places, abortion is a thorny issue. It can be unavailable if sheila briggs, m.a. neil corkery not illegal, and stigmatized beyond all reason. At Catholics for Choice, we are barbara deconcini, ph.d. especially concerned with the obstacles that disproportionately affect poorer daniel a. dombrowski, ph.d. susan farrell, ph.d. women. Social justice demands that neither they—nor indeed any woman—face cheryl a. francisconi, m.s.w., m.p.h. ofelia garcia, m.f.a. difficulties when accessing abortion care. john lesch, j.d. The first of the thorny issues we explore is the controversy in the United eileen moran, ph.d. marysa navarro-aranguren, ph.d. States over whether the state should fund abortion care. In “A Case We Can’t anthony padovano, m.a., ph.d., s.t.d. denise shannon Afford Not to Make,” Andrea Miller argues in favor of public funding. Chris- rosemary radford ruether, ph.d. (emerita) tian Fiala also investigates how various European countries deal with funding Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Argentina for abortion and contraception. marta alanis Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Bolivia Willie Parker, an ob/gyn, describes why his outlook on abortions changed and teresa lanza monje Católicas pelo Direito de Decidir, Brasil why he now provides them. We also include “A Statement on Later Abortion” in maría jose rosado nunes which leading prochoice advocates state that “healthcare that does not include Catholics for Choice, Canada rosemary ganley access to later abortions does not meet what women, and society, need.” Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Chile We continue with statistical analysis from our colleagues at the Guttmacher verónica díaz ramos Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Colombia Institute. Rachel Jones and Lawrence Finer answer the question, “So, Who Has sandra patricia mazo Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, El Salvador Second-Trimester Abortions?” And, in “Between a Rock and a Hard Place,” nubia lazo Jane Fisher, the director of Antenatal Results and Choice, discusses what Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, España mar grandal happens when people receive a prenatal diagnosis of a fatal, life-limiting or Catholics for Choice, Europe disabling condition. henk baars Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, México Finally, we move on to the political and advocacy worlds, and examine what maría consuelo mejía Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Nicaragua we have learned from past battles and how we should gear up for future ones. mayte ochoa, magaly quintana Ann Furedi, the executive director of bpas, the British Pregnancy Advisory Ser- and bertha sanchez Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Paraguay vice, explains why “choice” is an important part of our lexicon. Tracy Weitz then monín carrizo examines the political battles over access to abortion services. In “Lessons for Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, Perú eliana cano seminario the Prochoice Movement from the ‘Partial Birth Abortion’ Fight,” she argues Design and Production letterforms typography & graphic design that we must not shy away from difficult issues, but rather embrace them as Design Consultants opportunities for educating both those who support us and those who do not. point five, ny A lot of thought and planning goes into every issue of Conscience. We would Catholics for Choice 1436 U St., NW • Suite 301 • Washington, DC like to ensure that those who should be reading it get the opportunity to do so. 20009-3997 • USA • +1 (202) 986-6093 If you know of somebody who should subscribe, or would like us to send them a www.CatholicsForChoice.org [email protected] sample copy, please let us know via e-mail at [email protected]. issn 0740-6835 david j. nolan Editor vol. xxxiii—no. 1 2012 1 table of contents “What if we started to create new rules … where we proudly declare support for abortion coverage as a matter of fairness and justice?” —andrea miller, p12 departments 1 Editor’s Note 43 Body Building: Intervention 4 Letters in Evolution 5 In Catholic Circles Thomas Banchoff’s 39 In Spite of the Embryo Politics: Hierarchy: Ethics and Policy in Understanding Clergy Atlantic Democracies Sexual Abuse gail grossman freyne Brendan Geary and 46 The Ties that Bind: Joanne Marie Greer Religious Communities (eds.), The Dark Night of and Political Change the Catholic Church Timothy A. Byrnes’ thomas p. doyle, jcd, cadc Reverse Mission: 41 Politics and Science: Transnational Religious The Tortuous Road Communities and for Emergency the Making of US Contraception in Foreign Policy the US sarah raleigh-halsing Conscience offers in-depth, cutting-edge coverage Heather Munro 42 Bookshelf of vital contemporary issues, including reproductive Prescott’s The Morning 44 Reports Worth Reading rights, sexuality and gender, feminism, the religious After: A History of right, church and state issues and US politics. Emergency Contraception 48 Postscript Our readership includes national and international in the United States Back Cover opinion leaders and policymakers, members of the carole joffe Index: Abortion Law press and leaders in the fields of theology, ethics and Women’s Health and women’s studies. Worldwide 2 conscience volume xxxiii—no. 1 2012 p12 features 12 A Case We Can’t Afford Not to Make 26 Lessons for the Prochoice Movement from the Regaining Lost Ground on Funding Abortion Care ‘Partial Birth Abortion’ Fight andrea miller tracy a. weitz 17 A Perspective on Later Abortion … From Someone 30 Between a Rock and a Hard Place Who Does Them Deciding about a Pregnancy after a Prenatal willie parker, md, mph, msc Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly jane fisher 20 A Statement on Later Abortion 34 Who Pays the Piper? 22 So, Who Has Second-Trimester Abortions? Funding for Contraception and Abortion rachel k. jones and lawrence b. finer christian fiala, md, phd 24 Why We Need to Choose ‘Choice’ 36 Contraception: My Health, My Conscience, ann furedi Our Freedom jennifer becker-landsberger cover: © corbis / inspirestock above: © shutterstock / coolr vol. xxxiii—no. 1 2012 3 letters Argentina Lacks Catholic Healthcare approach in their latest Should Be Guided by campaign to insist that Accountability for Women’s Medical Standards, Catholic hospitals and Not Church Politics social services agencies Reproductive Health when phoenix bishop should be allowed to deny Thomas Olmsted revoked contraceptive coverage to the Catholic status of their employees. They seem St. Joseph’s Hospital and to have conveniently Medical Center for forgotten that these hospi- providing a life-saving tals and agencies are not abortion in 2010, he did the churches, but rather arta alanis and Systems exist in Argentina hospital a huge favor. nonprofit entities that Jacqueline Nolley to ensure that public offi- He effectively took that receive millions in tax MEchegaray cials and medical providers hospital out of the line of dollars every year through (“Fighting for Women’s comply with the law—but fire in the “Nuns vs. Medicaid, Medicare and Lives in Argentina,” Vol. they are rarely used to safe- Bishops” battle your recent government grants. xxxii No. 3), provide a guard access to reproductive issue so effectively The struggle over who has hopeful overview of how health services. In our 2010 described (Vol. xxxii the final say on Catholic the decriminalization of report, we documented how No. 3). healthcare policies—the abortion has emerged as a women pay the price—with Is it any wonder that the nuns who founded most human rights issue in their suffering or even with health system to which Catholic hospitals or the Argentina. This is an their death—for the failure St. Joseph’s Hospital bishops who outrank them important connection for to enforce the law.
Recommended publications
  • Catholic Women Redesign Catholicism: an Essay in Honor of Maria Jose Rosado Nunez
    CATHOLIC WOMEN REDESIGN CATHOLICISM: AN ESSAY IN HONOR OF MARIA JOSE ROSADO NUNEZ Mary Elizabeth Hunt* ABSTRACT This essay explores how Catholic women have changed Catholicism as a culture, if not so much the institutional church, in the years be- tween 1970 and 2020. Catholic women have not endeared ourselves to Catholic hierarchs; in fact many dislike and fear us. But we have saved lives, spiritual as well as physical, by providing solid opposition and creative alternatives to the institutional church. A redesign of Catholicsm begins with the culture and ethos. Catholic women en- vision it as a global movement rooted in particular cultures, united by values of love and justice, open to the wisdom of many religious traditions, and structured to provide ministry and meaning through cooperative, horizontally organized communities. While there has been progress, more work remains to be done. INTRODUCTION Maria José Rosado Nunez is a deeply respected and beloved col- league in struggles for women’s well-being, especially in the area of reproductive justice. Her decades of creative, fearless, and pioneering work are a legacy for Brazilians as well as for other justice-seekers throughout the world. As a highly skilled sociologist, someone who is deeply informed on theological, philosophical, artistic, and cultural issues, Zeca, as she is known to all, is a unique and valued collaborator. We met decades ago through Catholics for a Free Choice as it was known in those days, as well as in international feminist theological circles. I have had the privilege of collaborating with her and the won- derful team at Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholics for Choice
    Nos. 19-431 and 19-454 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Respondents. DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Petitioners, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRcuIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE CATHOLICS FOR CHOICE, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, THE CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM, JEWISH WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, KESHET, MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES, RABBINICAL ASSEMBLY, RECONSTRUCTING JUDAISM, SOCIETY FOR HUMANISTIC JUDAISM, T’RUAH: THE RABBINIC CALL FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, AND UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS B. JESSIE HILL Counsel of Record CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW 11075 East Boulevard Cleveland, Ohio 44106 (216) 368-0553 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae 295696 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................. ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST .......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ........................... 4 ARGUMENT ...................................................... 7 I. PEOPLE OF DIVERSE FAITHS SUPPORT ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION ............................... 7 II. THE CONTRACEPTIVE BENEFIT SERVES COMPELLING GOVERNMENT INTERESTS AND THE REGULATIONS THREATEN IRREPARABLE HARM ....................... 14 CONCLUSION ................................................ 22 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687 (1994) .............................................. 15 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014) .............................................. 16 Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) .............................................. 15 Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972) .............................................. 16 Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc., 472 U.S. 703 (1985) .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documents/Hf P- Vi Enc 25071968 Humanae- Vitae.Html
    Nos. 18-1323, 18-1460 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L.L.C., et al., Petitioners, v. DR. REBEKAH GEE, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Respondent. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– DR. REBEKAH GEE, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Cross-Petitioner, v. JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L.L.C., et al., Cross-Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRcuIT AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CATHOLICS FOR CHOICE, NATIONAL COUncIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, METHODIST FEDERATION FOR SOCIAL AcTION, MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES, PRESBYTERIANS AFFIRMING REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE, RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE, RELIGIOUS InSTITUTE, UnION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, UnITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, AND 19 OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, SUppORTING PETITIONERS EUGENE M. GELERNTER Counsel of Record PATTERSON BELKNAP WEbb & TYLER LLP 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212) 336-2553 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae (For Continuation of Appearances See Inside Cover) BARBARA MULLIN KEVIN OPOKU-GYAMFI PATTERSON BELKNAP WEbb & TYLER LLP 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212) 336-2553 Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF INTEREST ............................. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 8 ARGUMENT .......................................................... 10 I. RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS RECOGNIZE WOMEN’S MORAL RIGHT TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TERMINATE A PREGNANCY ............. 10 II. WOMEN’S MORAL RIGHT TO TERMINATE A PREGNANCY SHOULD NOT BE VITIATED BY UNNECESSARY IMPEDIMENTS ON ACCESS TO SAFE AND AFFORDABLE ABORTION .................. 21 III. ACT 620 INJURES WOMEN’S HEALTH AND DIGNITY BY INCREASING COSTS AND DECREASING ACCESS TO SAFE ABORTION CARE ................................... 26 CONCLUSION ...................................................... 31 i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Eisenstadt v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconciliation of Religion and Reproductive Rights: Catholicism’S Role in the American Abortion Controversy
    Hannah Lynch Culture, Cognition & Justice Psychology Seminar The Reconciliation of Religion and Reproductive Rights: Catholicism’s Role in the American Abortion Controversy Abstract This project explores the cultural and cognitive effects of religious faith on psychological conception of justice in the realm of reproductive rights. For the sake of specifying my research question, I confine the scope of my research to Catholicism’s influence on opinion about abortion. To further narrow the radius of my research, I restrict my context to Catholicism’s influence in the United States due to the increasing attention to and division over abortion in America since Trump’s election. In this paper, I draw on psychological, theological, and statistical sources to identify which conditions enable individuals to reconcile Catholic values with permission of abortion. Paper Given my personal passion for reproductive rights and the political prominence of the pro-choice v. pro-life debate, I see the topic of abortion both relevant and fascinating to study. In this research paper, I analyze the cultural and cognitive influences Catholicism may have on people’s perceptions of abortion. More specifically, I aim to determine if and under which conditions individuals can psychologically reconcile Catholic doctrines to permiss abortion. To understand the framework in which Catholicism affects individuals’ conceptions of abortion, I conducted preliminary research on how religion influences cognition in general. Although religion is commonly recognized as expansively influential in history and politics, it is rarely acknowledged as an influential factor in cognition. According to a 2011 study by Shariff at the University of British Columbia, nonetheless, spirituality can have significant impacts on mental processes.
    [Show full text]
  • [NOT YET SCHEDULED for ORAL ARGUMENT] No. 13-5069 ______
    USCA Case #13-5069 Document #1441480 Filed: 06/14/2013 Page 1 of 53 [NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No. 13-5069 __________________________________________________________________ In the United States Court Of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit __________________________________________________________________ Francis A. Gilardi, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan __________________________________________________________________ Brief In Support of Appellees and Affirmance by Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State; American Civil Liberties Union; Anti-Defamation League; Catholics for Choice; Central Conference of American Rabbis; Hadassah, The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc.; Hindu American Foundation; Interfaith Alliance Foundation; National Coalition of American Nuns; National Council of Jewish Women; Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice; Religious Institute; Union for Reform Judaism; Unitarian Universalist Women’s Federation; and Women of Reform Judaism __________________________________________________________________ Daniel Mach ([email protected]) Ayesha N. Khan ([email protected]) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES Gregory M. Lipper ([email protected]) UNION FOUNDATION AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION 915 15th Street, NW OF CHURCH AND STATE
    [Show full text]
  • Human Life International Introduction
    OPPOSITION NOTES AV N I N E STI G A TI V E S ERIES O N T HOSE W H O O P P O SE W O M E N ’ S R I G H TS A N D R E P R O D U C TI V E H EALTH TABLE OF CONTENTS Human Life International Introduction . 1 Key Findings . 2 “Scandal indeed is the media’s business while the care of souls is the History . 3 Timeline . 9 business of the Church.” Affiliates . 10 — Father Tom Euteneuer Offshoot Groups . 13 Finances . 15 Issues . 17 INTRODUCTION Conclusion . 25 Key Individuals . 27 uman Life International may be one of the better-known antichoice groups on the extreme fringes of the antichoice movement, but it is not because of its Heffectiveness or coherence. Its notoriety is largely based on a reputation for vicious, hyperbolic pronouncements and a body of scandals as extensive as any that we have come across to date. Its infractions over the past 30 years include accusations of racism, incitement to violence, infighting, a woeful lack of managerial oversight, financial malfeasance, nepotism and sexual misconduct. HLI has attracted well-deserved criticism from both inside and outside the church hierarchy. In fact, the organization seems to thrive within an atmosphere that generates exactly the sort of stereotypes about the church that generations of Catholics have devoted lifetimes to dispelling. HLI is a declared enemy of reproductive choice — as well as any other person, group or practice that doesn’t fit in with its far-right worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Extremism $5.00 “ Reason Often Makes Mistakes, but CONSCIENCE Never Does.” — Henry Wheeler Shaw
    THE NEWSJOURNAL OF CATHOLIC OPINION VOL. XXXIV—NO. 2 2013 Playing Hardball against Women’s Rights The Holy See at the UN JOANNE OMANG Keeping it All in the Family Europe’s Antichoice Movement NEIL DATTA Fatwas are Opinions MARIEME HELIE LUCAS At the Back of the Bus Ultra-Orthodox Judaism and Women DAHLIA LITHWICK ALSO: Book reviews by Bennett Elliott, Roger Ingham, Henk Baars and Eileen Moran WWW.CATHOLICSFORCHOICE.ORG Religious Extremism $5.00 “ Reason often makes mistakes, but CONSCIENCE never does.” — Henry Wheeler Shaw “ He who acts against his CONSCIENCE always sins.” — St. Thomas Aquinas “C ONSCIENCE is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that being a natural and unalienable right.” — James Madison “A good CONSCIENCE is the palace of Christ.” — St. Augustine “ I shall drink—to the Pope, if you please—still to CONSCIENCE first and to the Pope afterwards.” — Blessed John Henry Newman “But no man has a monopoly of CONSCIENCE.” — Mary A. Ward Great minds think alike. Subscribe to CONSCIENCE today $15 for a year’s subscription www.conscience-magazine.org Conscience EDITOR’ S NOTE THE NEWSJOURNAL OF CATHOLIC OPINION Executive Editor Jon O’Brien Editor David J. Nolan ELIGION IS NOT THE BARRIER TO PROGRESS AT THE UNITED NATIONS [email protected] or in parliaments around the world. Religious extremism, on the Contributing Editor Sara Morello other hand, is. Religious extremism ignores the moderate views of Editorial Adviser most religious people and those with no religion, and it has the Rosemary Radford Ruether potential to do serious damage to the health and well-being of Editorial Associate anybody in its path.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prochoice Religious Community May Be the Future of Reproductive Rights, Access, and Justice
    The Prochoice Religious Community May Be the Future of Reproductive Rights, Access, and Justice By Frederick Clarkson April 30, 2020 Draft - Not for Distribution or Citation Contents Report 3 Recommendations 28 Endnotes 32 Directory of the U.S. Prochoice 35 Religious Community “No one after lighting a lamp puts it under the bushel basket, but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all in the house.” –Matthew 5:15 NRSV here is a vast prochoice religious community in the United States that Tcould provide the moral, cultural, and political clout to reverse current antiabortion policy trends in the United States. Most, but not all, of this co- hort are Christians and Jews. There are also deeply considered, theologically acceptable, prochoice positions and, therefore, prochoice people and insti- tutions within all of major world religious traditions present in the United States, including Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Chinese traditions.1 Taken together, they have vast resources, institutional capacity, historic and cen- tral roles in many towns and cities, and cadres of well-educated leaders at every level — from national denominational offices to local congregational leaders, current and retired. This cohort is often measured by reputable pollsters and may actually com- prise the majority or near majority of the religious community. Neverthe- less, it is not well identified or sought out by the organized prochoice com- munity, the media, and elected officials. What’s more, this wide and diverse constituency is insufficiently organized by the prochoice religious communi- ty itself. But it could be. This essay will show that this demographic and the institutions and tradi- tions that inform it, may be vital for the restoration and sustaining of abor- tion rights, access, and justice in the United States at a time when the Chris- tian Right and its allies in state and federal government are undermining and seeking to eliminate them.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Educate About Abortion: a Guide
    How to educate about abortion: A guide How to educate about abortion A guide for peer educators, teachers and trainers 1 April 2016 How to educate about abortion: A guide Who we are The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) is a global service provider and a leading advocate of sexual and reproductive health and rights for all. We are a worldwide movement of national organizations working with and for communities and individuals. IPPF works towards a world where women, men and young people everywhere have control over their own bodies, and therefore their destinies. A world where they are free to choose parenthood or not; free to decide how many children they will have and when; free to pursue healthy sexual lives without fear of unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. A world where gender or sexuality are no longer a source of inequality or stigma. We will not retreat from doing everything we can to safeguard these important choices and rights for current and future generations. 2 How to educate about abortion: A guide Contents Acknowledgements 5 Key terms 6 Overview of this guide 8 Why do we need a guide for rights-based abortion workshops? 8 Who is this guide for? 8 The aim of this guide 9 Why talk about abortion? 10 How to advocate for abortion to be included in sexuality education 13 Planning educational sessions on abortion 15 Instructions for facilitators 15 Talking Points 19 “Have you had an abortion?” 19 “When does life begin?” 20 “What does X religion say about abortion?” 21 “Is abortion legal?” 22 “How is abortion performed?” 22 “Is abortion dangerous?” 23 “Is abortion a right?” 25 “How do people feel after having an abortion?” 25 Activities 26 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholics for Choice Hyde Amendment
    Catholics For Choice Hyde Amendment Coital Sal write-down quiescently while Joshuah always enamor his miaou bedabbles piping, he obumbrates so trippingly. Irvin doom disgracefully? Prenatal Ahmad still machinates: gimcrack and fossiliferous Sal contemporizing quite despitefully but stevedoring her relegating adventitiously. Sign the Abortion in Good on Pledge from Catholics for Choice. Dale Kildee D-Mich says he's satisfied with the abortion funding. Contents page joins to existing law were about one should apply them not discriminate against hyde amendment for catholics choice: no one has abortion. My remarks of hyde amendment which does not to provide abortion legal definition of catholics for choice hyde amendment comes to supporting local pregnancy. It was too high marks an error. Taxpayer dollars should support pay for abortion The majority of Americans including many who bind themselves pro-choice agree communicate this. Catholic supporter of choice caucus providers may not spell out of catholics for choice hyde amendment is. American Catholics and American Presidents 1960-2004 Lawrence John McAndrews can and Paul Begala an unofficial political advisoropposed abortion. Filed Under Advocacy Faith Tagged With catholics for choice national council. Daphtary said ads to have positions on particular, for choice website about social security act. At considerable financial health choices for choice website to decide freely whether those within your documents are thrilled to. American people have a hyde amendment for catholics voted against hyde. Pro-lifers fear 'hard-core pro-abortion forces' in a Biden. Pat McQuillan founder of Catholics for Choice demonstrates in neglect of St. Affordable for choice freely whether that might not give their theological, taken out early states that option to helping women into thinking that this disproportionately high marks an issue, catholics for choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer: the Faith Prayed Catechetical Sunday 2016
    Prayer: The Faith Prayed Catechetical Sunday 2016 Copyright © 2016, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. All rights reserved. 25th Sunday in Ordinary Time September 18, 2016 “Praise, you servants of the LORD, praise the name of the LORD. Blessed be the name of the LORD both now and forever.” Psalm 113 This year, as the Church celebrates Catechetical Sunday, we reflect on the theme, "Prayer: The Faith Prayed." Those who the Community has designated to serve as catechists will be called forth to be commissioned for their ministry. Catechetical Sunday is a wonderful opportunity to reflect on the role that each person plays, by virtue of Baptism, in handing on the faith and being a witness to the Gospel. Catechetical Sunday is an opportunity for all to rededicate themselves to this mission as a community of faith. This year’s theme invites all the baptized—especially catechists and Catholic school teachers—to devote themselves to a deeper study and practice of prayer, for their own spiritual good and for the good of those they serve. St. Thérèse of Lisieux, our own patron, says of prayer “…prayer is a surge of the heart; it is a simple look turned toward heaven, it is a cry of recognition and of love, embracing both trial and joy.” St. Francis de Sales says “every one of us needs half an hour of prayer each day, except when we’re busy—then we need an hour.” Our Lord’s disciples frequently observed him interrupting his journeys in order to spend long hours alone in prayer to his heavenly Father.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Perspectives on the Abortion Decision: the Sacredness of Women's Lives, Morality and Values, and Social Justice
    RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVES ON THE ABORTION DECISION: THE SACREDNESS OF WOMEN'S LIVES, MORALITY AND VALUES, AND SOCIAL JUSTICE REVEREND DR. CARLTON W. VEAZEY & MARJORIE BRAHMS SIGNER I. INTRODUCTION .................................................. 281 II. REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS AND VALUES................ ............................ .... 283 III. RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES AND VALUES UNDERLYING SUPPORT FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE .......................... ..... 288 A. Women's Moral Agency and Freedom of Choice .......... 288 B. Protecting and Fostering Health................. ...... 289 C. Religious Liberty and Freedom of Conscience ...... ....... 292 D. Respect for All Life.................... ..... ....... 295 IV. ABORTION POLICY THAT TAKES RELIGIOUS AND MORAL VALUES INTO CONSIDERATION ...................... ..... 297 V. CONCLUSION ................................... ...... 301 I. INTRODUCTION There is a long tradition of religious support for reproductive rights on moral and religious grounds. The views of the denominations and religious organizations comprising the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC), as well as those of other denominations, suggest how faith can illuminate our understanding of the moral and ethical underpinnings of reproductive rights and perhaps increase support for reproductive rights. This essay outlines some of the religious values that favor reproductive freedom, including women's moral agency, the sacredness of both women's lives and the developing life of the fetus, and respect for
    [Show full text]