DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Working Group on Biological Effects of Contaminants (Wgbec)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Working Group on Biological Effects of Contaminants (Wgbec) ICES WGBEC REPORT 2006 ICES MARINE HABITAT COMMITTEE ICES CM 2006/MHC:04 Ref. ACME REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CONTAMINANTS (WGBEC) 27-31 MARCH 2006 ICES HEADQUARTERS, COPENHAGEN, DENMARK International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2006. Report of the Working Group on Biological Effects of Contaminants (WGBEC), 27–31 March 2006, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2006/MHC:04. 79 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. ICES WGBEC Report 2006 | i Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 1 Opening of the meeting ........................................................................................... 4 2 Adoption of the agenda ........................................................................................... 4 3 Appointment of Rapporteurs.................................................................................. 4 4 REGNS integrated assessment of the North Sea................................................... 4 5 Assess the amount of biological effects data on the ICES database and develop a means to encourage further submissions as well as the use of the data ........................................................................................................................... 5 6 Review progress with the TIMES........................................................................... 7 7 Consider progress with activities: i) BEQUALM, ii) EU FIRE Project iii) Prestige oil spill, and iv) BSRP/Baltic activities .................................................. 10 7.1 BEQUALM ................................................................................................... 10 7.2 EU FIRE Project............................................................................................ 12 7.3 Consider progress with national activities pertaining to the Prestige oil spill ................................................................................................................ 13 7.4 Review BSRP/Baltic activities ...................................................................... 13 8 Review the use of background responses in biological effects ........................... 14 9 WGBEC to consider and assess the long term impact of oil spills on marine and coastal life as requested from OSPAR and provide a guidance document on the use of biological effects techniques for oil spill situations ..... 15 9.1 Background.................................................................................................... 16 9.2 Strategy for using biological effects methods................................................ 17 9.3 Selection of appropriate target species .......................................................... 19 9.4 Confounding factors ...................................................................................... 20 9.5 Selection of appropriate biological effects techniques .................................. 20 10 Provide expert knowledge to the ICES Data Centre as appropriate ................ 23 11 Evaluate the WKIMON 2006 workshop and feedback from SIME (Feb 2006 meeting) ......................................................................................................... 24 12 Assess the development of the CEMP Guidelines............................................... 28 12.1 Respond to WKIMON/SIME: Are biological effects methods appropriate to meet the requirements of the OSPAR JAMP?; and................................... 28 12.2 What methods need to be developed?............................................................ 28 12.3 Respond to WKIMON: review integrated methods to assess effects on biota from lindane and BFRs......................................................................... 33 12.4 Respond to WKIMON: Review of comet assay and is application............... 34 12.5 Respond to WKIMON: Compare across species (12e) and........................... 35 12.6 Selection of species, gender and size range (12f).......................................... 35 12.7 Respond to WKIMON: Review background levels for ALA-D.................... 36 13 Assess the development of the CEMP.................................................................. 36 ii | ICES WGBEC Report 2006 14 Any other business; Review progress with 1) genomics and proteomics 2) nanotechnology, 3) 2-tier approach to monitoring, and 4) amphipod decline in the Baltic ............................................................................................................ 36 14.1 Review progress with genomics and proteomics........................................... 36 14.2 Review progress with nanotechnology.......................................................... 38 14.3 2-tier biomarker approach to monitoring....................................................... 39 14.4 Amphipod decline and crash in the Baltic ..................................................... 40 15 Joint discussions with WGSAEM and WGMS ................................................... 42 15.1 WGBEC terms of reference item j: Development of assessment criteria and integrated assessment.............................................................................. 42 15.2 WGBEC used the opportunity to meet with WGSAEM to initiate an assessment of imposex data on the ICES database........................................ 42 15.3 WGBEC terms of reference k. (WGMS Agenda item 4): Passive samplers: review the response of the WGBEC to WGMS suggestions for areas of cooperative work on (bio)availability and related issues to report on opportunities for cooperative work........................................................... 44 15.4 WGBEC terms of reference l; discuss and report back to ACME on potential contributions for the ecosystem overview of the advisory reports ie WGRED reports of 2005 and 2006............................................................ 46 16 Recommendations and action list......................................................................... 47 16.1 Recommendations ......................................................................................... 47 17 Adoption of the report and closure of the meeting ............................................. 49 Annex 1: List of participants ....................................................................................... 52 Annex 2: WGBEC Terms of reference 2005 .............................................................. 54 Annex 3: WGBEC draft agenda.................................................................................. 55 Annex 4: List of Rapporteurs ...................................................................................... 57 Annex 5: List of documents ......................................................................................... 58 Annex 6: WGBEC draft resolutions ........................................................................... 60 Annex 7: Progress with national activities pertaining to the Prestige oil spill (Agenda Item 7.3) .................................................................................................. 62 Annex 8: Provide expert knowledge to the ICES data centre as appropriate (Agenda item 10).................................................................................................... 68 Annex 9: Assessment of temporal trends in imposex (Agenda Item 15)................. 71 Annex 10: A regional assessment of VDSI in dogwhelks from Sullom Voe and Yell Sound (Agenda item 15) ............................................................................... 75 ICES WGBEC Report 2006 | 1 Executive Summary The Working Group on the Biological Effects of Contaminants [WGBEC] (Chair, John Thain, United Kingdom) met in Copenhagen, from 27–31 March 2006. A summary of the key outcomes of the meeting in respect of the Terms of Reference is described below. REGNS integrated assessment of the North Sea The Chair of REGNS had provided WGBEC with documents outlining the current progress with the REGNS programme. The group reviewed the overall assessment and some comments were made regarding the assessment scope and methodology employed. It was noted that although many parameters had been included in the assessment, contaminants and their effects were not represented. Rather the assessment had been restricted to biological and hydrographic parameters and the overall conclusions of the assessment were related to these. Some concern was expressed regarding the level of data aggregation, annual averaging and the potential for correlating parameters not causally related in such an assessment. It was considered by the group that biological effects of contaminants should form an important component of an integrated ecosystem assessment; however the data-sets available to WGBEC do not match the spatial and temporal scale that seems to be required for REGNS. Biological effects data will be relevant to the forthcoming thematic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where to Go: Puffin Colonies in Ireland Over 15,000 Puffin Pairs Were Recorded in Ireland at the Time of the Last Census
    Where to go: puffin colonies in Ireland Over 15,000 puffin pairs were recorded in Ireland at the time of the last census. We are interested in receiving your photos from ANY colony and the grid references for known puffin locations are given in the table. The largest and most accessible colonies here are Great Skellig and Great Saltee. Start Number Site Access for Pufferazzi Further information Grid of pairs Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Great Skellig V247607 4,000 worldheritageireland.ie/skellig-michael check local access arrangements Puffin Island - Kerry V336674 3,000 Access more difficult Boat trips available but landing not possible 1,522 Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Great Saltee X950970 salteeislands.info check local access arrangements Mayo Islands l550938 1,500 Access more difficult Illanmaster F930427 1,355 Access more difficult Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Cliffs of Moher, SPA R034913 1,075 check local access arrangements Stags of Broadhaven F840480 1,000 Access more difficult Tory Island and Bloody B878455 894 Access more difficult Foreland Kid Island F785435 370 Access more difficult Little Saltee - Wexford X968994 300 Access more difficult Inishvickillane V208917 170 Access more difficult Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Horn Head C005413 150 check local access arrangements Lambay Island O316514 87 Access more difficult Pig Island F880437 85 Access more difficult Inishturk Island L594748 80 Access more difficult Clare Island L652856 25 Access more difficult Beldog Harbour to Kid F785435 21 Access more difficult Island Mayo: North West F483156 7 Access more difficult Islands Ireland’s Eye O285414 4 Access more difficult Howth Head O299389 2 Access more difficult Wicklow Head T344925 1 Access more difficult Where to go: puffin colonies in Inner Hebrides Over 2,000 puffin pairs were recorded in the Inner Hebrides at the time of the last census.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Condition Monitoring for Otters (Lutra Lutra) in 2011-12
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 521 Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 521 Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12 For further information on this report please contact: Rob Raynor Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Findlay, M., Alexander, L. & Macleod, C. 2015. Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 521. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12 Commissioned Report No. 521 Project No: 12557 and 13572 Contractor: Findlay Ecology Services Ltd. Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Otter; Lutra lutra; monitoring; Special Area of Conservation. Background 44 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) for which otter is a qualifying interest were surveyed during 2011 and 2012 to collect evidence to inform an assessment of the condition of each SAC. 73 sites outside the protected areas network were also surveyed. The combined data were used to look for trends in the recorded otter population in Scotland since the first survey of 1977-79. Using new thresholds for levels of occupancy, and other targets agreed with SNH for the current report, the authors assessed 34 SACs as being in favourable condition, and 10 sites were assessed to be in unfavourable condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys of Dogwhelks Nucella Lapillus in the Vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2015
    Tí Cara, Point Lane, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire, SA72 4UN, UK Tel office +44 (0) 1646 687946 Mobile 07879 497004 E-mail: [email protected] Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2015 A report for SOTEAG Prepared by: Jon Moore and Matt Gubbins Status: Final th Date of Release: 18 December 2015 Recommended citation: Moore, J.J. and Gubbins, M.J. (2015). Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2015. A report to SOTEAG from Aquatic Survey & Monitoring Ltd., Cosheston, Pembrokeshire and Marine Scotland Science, Aberdeen. 42 pp +iv. Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2015 Page i Acknowledgements Surveyors: Jon Moore, ASML, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire Christine Howson, ASML, Ormiston, East Lothian Dogwhelk imposex analysis: Melanie Harding & Matt Gubbins, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Other assistance and advice: Alex Thomson and colleagues at BP Pollution Response Base, Sella Ness; Tanja Betts, Louise Feehan & Craig Robinson, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Report review: Ginny Moore, Coastal Assessment, Liaison & Monitoring, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire Dr Mike Burrows and other members of the SOTEAG monitoring committee Data access This report and the data herein are the property of the Sullom Voe Association (SVA) Ltd. and its agent the Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group (SOTEAG) and are not to be cited without the written agreement of SOTEAG. SOTEAG/SVA Ltd. will not be held liable for any losses incurred by any third party arising from their use of these data. © SOTEAG/SVA Ltd. 2015 Aquatic Survey & Monitoring Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys of Dogwhelks Nucella Lapillus in the Vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2013
    Tí Cara, Point Lane, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire, SA72 4UN, UK Tel office +44 (0) 1646 687946 Mobile 07879 497004 E-mail: [email protected] Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2013 A report for SOTEAG Prepared by: Jon Moore and Matt Gubbins Status: Final th Date of Release: 14 February 2014 Recommended citation: Moore, J.J. and Gubbins, M.J. (2014). Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2013. A report to SOTEAG from Aquatic Survey & Monitoring Ltd., Cosheston, Pembrokeshire and Marine Scotland Science, Aberdeen. 42 pp +iv. Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, July 2013 Page i Acknowledgements Surveyors: Jon Moore, ASML, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire Christine Howson, ASML, Ormiston, East Lothian Dogwhelk imposex analysis: Matthew Gubbins, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Other assistance and advice: Alex Thomson and colleagues at BP Pollution Response Base, Sella Ness; Tanja Betts, Louise Feehan and Kelly MacNeish, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Report review: Ginny Moore, Coastal Assessment, Liaison & Monitoring, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire Matthew Gubbins, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Dr Mike Burrows and other members of the SOTEAG monitoring committee Data access This report and the data herein are the property of the Sullom Voe Association (SVA) Ltd. and its agent the Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group (SOTEAG) and are not to be cited without the written agreement of SOTEAG. SOTEAG/SVA Ltd. will not be held liable for any losses incurred by any third party arising from their use of these data.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Leaflet on Yell from Shetland
    Yell The Old Haa Yell Gateway to the northern isles The Old Haa at Burravoe dates from 1672 and was opened as a museum in 1984. It houses a permanent display of material depicting the history of Yell. Outside there is a monument to the airmen who lost their lives in 1942 in a Catalina crash on the moors of Some Useful Information South Yell. Accommodation: VisitShetland, Lerwick The Old Haa is also home to the Bobby Tulloch Tel: 08701 999440 Collection and has rooms dedicated to photographic Ferry Booking Office: Ulsta Tel: 01957 722259 archives and family history. Neighbourhood The museum includes a tearoom, gallery and craft Information Point: Old Haa, Burravoe, Tel 01957 722339 shop, walled garden and picnic area, and is also a Shops: Cullivoe, Mid Yell, Aywick, Burravoe, Neighbourhood Information Point. and Ulsta Fuel: Cullivoe, Mid Yell, Aywick, Ulsta and Bobby Tulloch West Sandwick Bobby Tulloch was one of Yell’s best-known and Public Toilets: Ulsta and Gutcher (Ferry terminals), loved sons. He was a highly accomplished naturalist, Mid Yell and Cullivoe (Piers) photographer, writer, storyteller, boatman, Places to Eat: Gutcher and Mid Yell musician and artist. Bobby was the RSPB’s Shetland Post Offices: Cullivoe, Gutcher, Camb, Mid Yell, representative for many years and in 1994 was Aywick, Burravoe, and Ulsta awarded an MBE for his efforts on behalf of wildlife Public Telephones: Cullivoe, Gutcher, Sellafirth, Basta, and its conservation. He sadly died in 1996 aged 67. Camb, Burravoe, Hamnavoe, Ulsta and West Sandwick Leisure Centre: Mid Yell Tel: 01957 702222 Churches: Cullivoe, Sellafirth, Mid Yell, Otterswick, Burravoe and Hamnavoe Doctor and Health Centre: Mid Yell Tel: 01957 702127 Police Station: Mid Yell Tel: 01957 702012 Contents copyright protected - please contact shetland Amenity Trust for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Jul 2013 Edition
    Biannual Jul 2013 Vol XIV Issue 2 A Publication of the Indian Coast Guard m.v. SHRIJOY-II 18th NOSDCP MEETING COLOUR CODED SYMBOLS From the Director General’s Desk Having assumed the reigns of the Indian Coast Guard on 28 Feb 13, it was a pleasure to chair the 18th National Oil Spill Disaster Contingency Plan (NOSDCP) and Preparedness meeting at Dehradun on 31 May 13. The active participation of various Government departments, ports and oil companies was illustrative of their continuing commitment to the success of the National Plan. Shale gas is expected to change energy trade patterns and thereby the risk of oil spills in the coming future. Nevertheless, our annual consumption of 220 million metric tonnes of oil necessitates that we maintain the highest level of preparedness for responding to oil spills in our waters notwithstanding the fact that there have been no spills over the preceding six months. In this regard I would urge the ports and oil handling agencies to maintain the requisite inventory and trained manpower to respond to spills within jurisdiction with alacrity. It may be appreciated that apart from facility contingency plans, the Indian Coast Guard has remained focussed on local contingency plans for shoreline response through sustained liaison with all coastal State Governments. Meanwhile, stakeholders have also been working towards acquiring of technological capabilities for detection and nailing of polluters. I assure that the Indian Coast Guard, being the Central Coordinating Agency for combating oil pollution at sea in Indian waters, will always strive to enhance the pollution response preparedness at all levels through info sharing, consolidation of assets, training and simulated drills.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys of Dogwhelks Nucella Lapillus in the Vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, August 2009
    Tí Cara, Point Lane, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire, SA72 4UN, UK Tel office +44 (0) 1646 687946 Mobile 07879 497004 E-mail: [email protected] Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, August 2009 A report for SOTEAG Prepared by: Jon Moore and Matt Gubbins Status: Final th Date of Release: 13 January 2010 Recommended citation: Moore, J.J. and Gubbins, M.J. (2010). Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, August 2009. A report to SOTEAG from Aquatic Survey & Monitoring Ltd., Cosheston, Pembrokeshire and Marine Scotland Science, Aberdeen. 56 pp +iv. Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, August 2009 Page i Acknowledgements Surveyors: Jon Moore, ASML, Cosheston, Pembrokeshire Christine Howson, ASML, Ormiston, East Lothian Gordon Wilson, Environmental Advisor, BP, Sullom Voe Terminal Dave Manson, Assistant Environmental Advisor, BP, Sullom Voe Terminal Dogwhelk imposex analysis: Matthew Gubbins, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Other assistance and advice: Alex Thompson and colleagues at BP Pollution Response Base, Sella Ness; Gordon Wilson and Alan Inkster, BP, Sullom Voe Terminal Clive Norris, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Gavin Grewar, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Report review: Christine Howson, ASML, Ormiston, East Lothian Matthew Gubbins, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Dr Mike Burrows and other members of the SOTEAG monitoring committee Aquatic Survey & Monitoring Ltd. January 2010 Surveys of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus in the vicinity of Sullom Voe, Shetland, August 2009 Page ii Summary This report presents the 2009 results of a dogwhelk Nucella lapillus monitoring programme carried out by Aquatic Survey & Monitoring Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Working Group on Biolgocial Effects of Contaminants
    ICES WGBEC REPORT 2007 ICES MARINE HABITAT COMMITTEE CM 2007/MHC:03 Ref. ACME REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CONTAMINANTS (WGBEC) 19–23 MARCH 2007 ALESSANDRIA, ITALY International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2007. Report of the Working Group on Biological Effects of Contaminants (WGBEC), 19-23 March 2007, Alessandria, Italy. CM 2007/MHC:03. 129 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2007 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGBEC Report 2007 | i Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 1 Opening of the meeting ........................................................................................... 4 2 Adoption of the agenda ........................................................................................... 4 3 Appointment of Rapporteurs.................................................................................. 4 4 Evaluate the report from WKIMON third workshop and the intersessional work undertaken
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5.3 Coastal Character Areas
    Appendix 5.3 Coastal Character Areas Contents Introduction 1 Coastal Character Areas within 20km 2 Coastal Character Area Descriptions 2 References 7 ENERGY ISLES WIND FARM i APPENDIX 5.3 This page is intentionally blank. ENERGY ISLES WIND FARM ii APPENDIX 5.3 Appendix 5.3 Coastal Character Areas Introduction The Shetland Coastal Character Assessment (CCA) was prepared by the NAFC Marine Centre (NAFC) in 2016 with guidance from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), as part of the development of the Shetland Island’s Marine Spatial Plan. It provides information about the various coastal character types (CCTs) found around Shetland, the experiences the coast currently offers to local people and visitors, and identifies sensitivity to development. The report identifies and maps different coastal character types, describes the key features and character of each area and identifies any areas around the coast which are considered to be sensitive to onshore and/or offshore development. The report was developed so that it relates to the Shetland Landscape Character Assessment which was prepared by Gillespies in 1998. The twenty two Coastal Character Areas (CCAs) which fall within the 40km study area are illustrated in Figure 5.1.3 Volume III and listed below: . 3. Lunna Ness . 6. West Linga . 7. East Whalsay Coast . 11. Skerries . 12. Bluemull Sound . 13. Burrafirth . 14. Colgrave Sound . 15. East Fetlar . 16. East Unst . 17. East Yell . 18. Gloup-Breckon . 19. Hermaness . 20. Skaw . 21. Whalefirth . 22. Eshaness . 23. Hillswick . 24. North Roe Coast
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Working Group on Statistical Aspects of Environmental Monitoring (WGSAEM)
    ICES WGSAEM Report 2007 ICES Marine Habitat Committee CM 2007/MHC:02 REF. ACME Report of the Working Group on Statistical Aspects of Environmental Monitoring (WGSAEM) 12–16 March 2007 Paris, France International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2007. Report of the Working Group on Statistical Aspects of Environmental Monitoring (WGSAEM), 12–16 March 2007, Paris, France. CM 2007/MHC:02. 68 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2007 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGSAEM Report 2007 | i Contents Executive summary.......................................................................................................... 1 1 Opening of the meeting ........................................................................................... 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ........................................................................................... 2 3 Terms of Reference.................................................................................................. 2 4 Develop and review tools for assessing and improving
    [Show full text]
  • Puffin Colonies in Eire
    Where to go: puffin colonies in Eire Over 15,000 puffin pairs were recorded in Eire at the time of the last census. We are interested in receiving your photos from ANY colony and the grid references for known puffin locations are given in the table. The largest and most accessible colonies here are Great Skellig and Great Saltee. Start Number Site Access for Pufferazzi Further information Grid of pairs Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Great Skellig V247607 4,000 worldheritageireland.ie/skellig-michael check local access arrangements Puffin Island - Kerry V336674 3,000 Access more difficult Boat trips available but landing not possible 1,522 Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Great Saltee X950970 salteeislands.info check local access arrangements Mayo Islands l550938 1,500 Access more difficult Illanmaster F930427 1,355 Access more difficult Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Cliffs of Moher, SPA R034913 1,075 check local access arrangements Stags of Broadhaven F840480 1,000 Access more difficult Tory Island and Bloody B878455 894 Access more difficult Foreland Kid Island F785435 370 Access more difficult Little Saltee - Wexford X968994 300 Access more difficult Inishvickillane V208917 170 Access more difficult Access possible for Puffarazzi, but Horn Head C005413 150 check local access arrangements Lambay Island O316514 87 Access more difficult Pig Island F880437 85 Access more difficult Inishturk Island L594748 80 Access more difficult Clare Island L652856 25 Access more difficult Beldog Harbour to Kid F785435 21 Access more difficult Island Mayo: North West F483156 7 Access more difficult Islands Ireland’s Eye O285414 4 Access more difficult Howth Head O299389 2 Access more difficult Wicklow Head T344925 1 Access more difficult Where to go: puffin colonies in Southern England Only 480 puffin pairs were breeding in Southern England at the time of the last national seabird census.
    [Show full text]
  • European Storm-Petrels
    July 2011 THE DATA AND MAPS PRESENTED IN THESE PAGES WAS INITIALLY PUBLISHED IN SEABIRD POPULATIONS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE SEABIRD 2000 CENSUS (1998-2002). The full citation for the above publication is:- P. Ian Mitchell, Stephen F. Newton, Norman Ratcliffe and Timothy E. Dunn (Eds.). 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002). Published by T and A.D. Poyser, London. More information on the seabirds of Britain and Ireland can be accessed via http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1530. To find out more about JNCC visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1729. Table 1 Response rates to tape playback of purr calls by European Storm-petrels. Administrative area or country Response rate (95% CLs) Source Yell Islands (Linga, Bigga, Samphrey, Copister, 0.43 (0.34–0.52) Fowler (2001) Brother), Shetland Mousa, Shetland 0.25 (0.23–0.27) Ratcliffe et al. (1998e) Auskerry, Orkney Grassland (rabbit burrows) 0.53 (0.39–0.66) Mitchell & Williams (unpubl.) Boulder beach 0.59 (0.41–0.77) Mitchell & Williams (unpubl.) Stone ruins 0.56 (0.36–0.76) Mitchell & Williams (unpubl.) North Rona, Western Isles 0.40 (0.36–0.44) Murray et al. (in prep.) Hirta, St Kilda, Western Isles 0.43 (0.21–0.58) Mitchell et al. (2003) Treshnish Isles, Argyll & Bute 0.37 (0.23–0.51) Ratcliffe et al. (1998e) Priest Island, west coast Ross & Cromarty Boulder beach 0.47 (0.40–0.54) Mayhew et al. (2000) Stone Wall 0.42 (0.38–0.45) Mayhew et al.
    [Show full text]