DOCSLIB.ORG

Layout Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Layout Final the International Religious Liberty Association THE INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS LIBERTY ASSOCIATION LIBERTY RELIGIOUS THE INTERNATIONAL 12501 Old Columbia Pike Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6600, USA Fax: 301.680.6695 www.IRLA.org FIDES ET LIBERTAS 2001 International Religious Liberty Association (Printed in partnership with Liberty Magazine) 12501 Old Columbia Pike Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6600, United States of America Phone: +301.680.6683 - Fax: +301.680.6695 Email: ViHughes@compuserve.com - Web site: www.IRLA.org Roland Minnerath (France) International Mario Niño (Colombia) Religious Liberty Robert Nixon, Association vice president (USA) Jan Paulsen (Norway) Leo Ranzolin (Brazil) Officers Donald Robinson, Denton Lotz, treasurer (USA) president 2001 (USA) Gunnar Stålsett, John Graz, vice president (Norway) secretary general (Switzerland) Staff Donald E Robinson, treasurer (USA) Viola R Hughes, Matthew A Bediako, communication/media relations asst. vice president (Ghana) (Malaysia) Eugene Hsu, Marilyn Riley, vice president (Hong Kong) administrative assistant (USA) Robert W Nixon, International vice president (USA) Representatives Gunnar Stålsett, vice president (Norway) Africa-Indian Ocean Region: Leo S Ranzolin, Jean Emmanuel Nlo Nlo (Abidjan, Côte vice president (Brazil) d’Ivoire) Jonathan Gallagher, Eastern Africa Region: deputy secretary general (Britain) N Moses Msimanga (Nairobi, Kenya) Euro-Africa Region: Board of Directors Maurice Verfaillie (Bern, Switzerland) Siloé Joao de Almeida (Brazil) Euro-Asia Region: Bert B Beach, Victor P Krushenitsky (Moscow, Russia) vice president (USA) Inter-American Region: Matthew Bediako, Mario Niño (CoralGables, Florida, USA) vice president (Ghana) North American Region: Lee Boothby (USA) Clarence E Hodges (Silver Spring, Ray Coombe (Australia) Maryland, USA) Rajmund Dabrowski, Northern Asia-Pacific Region: vice president (Poland) Tadaomi Shinmyo (Koyang, South Korea) W. Cole Durham, Jr. (USA) South American Region: Jonathan Gallagher, Siloé Joao de Almeida (Brasilia, Brazil) deputy secretary general (Britain) South Pacific Region: John Graz, Ray Coombe (Washroonga, New South secretary general (Switzerland) Wales, Australia) James D Standish, Southern Africa Region: assistant secretary general for legislative Velile S. Wakaba (Bloemfontein, Free affairs (Australia) State, South Africa) Clarence Hodges (USA) Southern Asia Region: Eugene Hsu, P.H. Lall (Hosur, Tamil Nadu, India) vice president (Hong Kong) Southern Asia-Pacific Region: Anatoly Krasikov (Russian Federation) Hiskia I Missah (Silang, Cavite, Victor Krushenitsky (Russian Philippines) Federation) Trans-European Region: Denton Lotz, XXXXXXXXXXX (St. Albans, president (USA) Hertfordshire, UK) Declaration of Principles We believe that religious liberty is a God-given right. We believe that legislation and other governmental acts which unite church and state are contrary to the best interests of both institutions and are poten- tially prejudicial to human rights, and hold that it is best exercised where sep- aration is maintained between church and state. We believe that government is divinely ordained to support and protect citi- zens in their employment of natural rights, and to rule in civil affairs; and that in so doing, government warrants respectful obedience and willing support. We believe in the natural and inalienable right of freedom of conscience – to have or not to have a religion; to adopt the religion or belief of one’s choice; to change religious belief according to conscience; to manifest one’s religion indi- vidually or in community with others, in worship, observance, practice, prom- ulgation and teaching – subject only to respect for the equivalent rights of oth- ers. We believe that religious liberty includes also the freedom to establish and operate appropriate charitable or educational institutions, to solicit or receive voluntary financial contributions, to observe days of rest and celebrate holi- days in accordance with the percepts of one’s religion, and to maintain com- munication with fellow believers at national and international levels. We believe that religious liberty and the elimination of intolerance and dis- crimination based on religion or belief are essential to promote understand- ing, peace and friendship among people. We believe that citizens should use lawful and honorable means to prevent the reduction of religious liberty, so that all may enjoy its inestimable blessing. We believe that the spirit of true religious liberty is epitomized in the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. S tat e m e n t o f P u r p o s e s The purposes of the International Religious Liberty Association are universal and nonsectarian. 1 To disseminate the principles of religious liberty throughout the world. 2 To defend and safeguard the right of all people to worship, to adopt a reli- gion or belief of their choice, to manifest their religious convictions in observance, promulgation and teaching, subject only to the respect for the equivalent rights of others. 3 To support the right of religious organizations to operate in every country by their establishing and owning charitable or educational institutions. 4 To organize local, national, and regional chapters, and to conduct semi- nars, symposiums, conferences and congresses. Mission Statement The mission of the International Religious Liberty Association is to defend, protect and promote religious liberty for all people everywhere. F i d e s E t L i b e rtas T h e J o u r n a l o f t h e I n t e r n at i o nal R e l i g i o u s L i b e rt y A s s o c i at i o n 12501 Old Columbia Pike Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6600, USA Fax: 301.680.6695 www.IRLA.org John Graz, Publisher Phone: 301.680.6680 E-mail: 74532.240@compuserve.com Jonathan Gallagher, Editor Phone: 301.680.6682 E-mail: JonGallagher@compuserve.com Viola R Hughes, Managing Editor/Production Manager Phone: 301.680.6683 E-mail: ViHughes@compuserve.com Editorial Committee Jonathan Gallagher (Chair) Roy Adams, Bert B Beach, Rajmund Dabrowski, John Graz Clarence Hodges, Viola Hughes, Angel Rodriguez, Mitchell A Tyner Statements of fact in this issue of FIDES ET LIBERTAS are those of the authors as they understand the facts. The views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the International Religious Liberty Association. Copyright © 2001 International Religious Liberty Association. All rights reserved. Printed at House of Printing, Burtonsville, MD Price US$5. contents Jonathan gallagher AFTER TWENTY YEARS: The Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief 10 W. Cole Durham, Jr. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS: The Protection of Religious Persuasion 17 Rosa maria martinez de codes THE FIGHT AGAINST DESCRIMINATION IN WESTERN EUROPE 32 REINDER BRUINSMA RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IN COUNTRIES IN TRANSITION IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE 45 Silvio ferrari THE WESTERN EUROPEAN MODEL OF CHURCH AND STATE RELATIONS 55 JOHN GRAZ SECTS: France Versus U.S.A. 64 Jonathan gallagher THE HIJACKING OF RELIGION: How Religious Beliefs Are Exploited for Political and Secular Ends and the Consequences for Religious Liberty 72 Bert b. beach PROSELYTISM IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION, RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND NONDISCRIMINATION 78 MITCHELL A. TYNER INTERNATIONAL PROVISION FOR PROSELYTISM: The United States 89 walter sawatsky THE SCHOLARLY DEBATE OVER PROSELYTISM 97 After Twent y Years: The Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief J o nat h a n G a l l a g h e r Deputy Secretary General, International Religious Liberty Association I n t r o d u c t i o n On 25 November 1981, The United Nations General Assembly promulgat- ed the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief—a lengthy catch-all title for a Declaration that was intended to be a milestone achievement in the develop- ment of religious liberty and mutual toleration. (In fact it had taken almost twenty years to arrive at the final text of the Declaration.) The 1981 Declaration set out in clear terms the expectations required of signatories–and amplified the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Its primary provisions are for complete religious freedom, non-discrimi- nation on religious grounds, and the rejection of religious-based intolerance. In explicit language, countries adopting the Declaration agree to adopt and support such provisions, and agree to work for the elimination of religious intolerance and discrimination. At the time of the twentieth anniversary of the Declaration, we are entitled to question its impact and effectiveness. D i s c l a i m e r S First, it cannot be expected that any declaration in and of itself can trans- form world society. The 1981 Declaration is an expression of expectations and ideals to be strived for. However, it does provide a baseline by which the actions of states parties can be judged. Secondly, compliance with the Declaration is monitored by the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, along with the special rapporteur on Religious Intolerance. The reports of the Commission are, therefore, a commentary on the success or otherwise of the Declaration. 10 Fides et Libertas the Journal of the International Religious Liberty Association Thirdly, the Declaration has no force of law; its provisions are the agreed- upon standards, not a mandatory legal framework. Have religious
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thecultphenomenonhowgroup
    Authors: Mike Kropveld Executive Director Info-Cult Marie-Andrée Pelland Doctoral Student in Criminology Université de Montréal Translated by: Natasha DeCruz Gwendolyn Schulman Linguistic Landscapes Cover Design by: Philippe Lamoureux This book was made possible through the financial support of the Ministère des Relations avec les citoyens et de l'Immigration. However, the opinions expressed herein are those of the authors. The translation from the French version (Le phénomène des sectes: L’étude du fonctionnement des groupes ©2003) into English was made possible through the financial support of Canadian Heritage. ©Info-Cult 2006 ISBN: 2-9808258-1-6 The Cult Phenomenon: How Groups Function ii Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................... ii Preface .......................................................................................................................viii Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: History of Info-Cult.......................................................................................3 Cult Project................................................................................................................3 Description.............................................................................................................3 Cult Project’s objectives.........................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty for 2004
    TORTURE ENSLAVEMENT L INTIMIDATION 3ULSION EXPULSION DENIAL OF TRAY L RIGHTS ICTION IMPRISONMENT NT MURDER TORTURE MURDER PHYSI STARVAT ION BAN IMPRISONMENT EATINGS STARVATION I PR SO NT RAN ON CONVERSION HYSICAL INTIMIDATION EXPULSION TORTURE ENSLAVEMENT VICTION 'IMPRIS NMENT MURDER N ON CONVERSION STARVATION FORCED CONVERSION EXPULSION PHYSICAL INTIMIDATION very morning the president starts his day dangers posed to the nation into an understand- in the Oval Office, surrounded by attor- able format. A freedom matrix is particularly E ney general John Ashcroft, FBI director easy to build because threats to religious free- Robert Mueller, and CIA director George Tenet, doms fit into predictable, repeated patterns. reviewing the threat matrix. The threat matrix provides details on who is trying to attack Understanding and America, how they are trying to attack, their Using the Freedom Matrix chances of success, and what is being done to A sample freedom matrix is reproduced in stop them. It must be a startling way to begin this article. The purpose of the freedom matrix each day—particularly knowing that there is no is to put acts against religious freedom into con- one else the terrorists would rather kill or cap- text and provide perspective on their relative ture than the commander in chief himself. It is severity. As a general rule, the closer the act serious business, and the stakes are the highest comes to the upper left-hand corner of the By iT4 JAMES STANDISH since the Civil War: in many ways, the very sur- matrix the more severe the act in question. The vival of American civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching New Religious Movements
    Researching New Religious Movements ‘The most important “first” that this book achieves is its bold questioning of the whole intellectual apparatus of the sociology of religion as it has been applied to the understanding of the new religious movements. I am confident that Elisabeth Arweck’s study will quickly become required reading in the sociology of new religious movements.’ Professor David Martin, Emeritus Professor of Sociology, London School of Economics, University of London ‘Powerful and original . it succeeds triumphantly in being at the same time an important, high-quality academic study and a book for our times.’ Professor David Marsland, Professorial Research Fellow in Sociology, University of Buckingham New religious movements such as Scientology, Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Unification Church (Moonies) are now well established in mainstream cul- tural consciousness. However, responses to these ‘cult’ groups still tend to be overwhelmingly negative, characterized by the furious reactions that they evoke from majority interests. Modern societies need to learn how to respond to such movements and how to interpret their benefits and dangers. Researching New Religious Movements provides a fresh look at the history and development of ‘anti-cult’ groups and the response of main- stream churches to these new movements. In this unique reception study, Elisabeth Arweck traces the path of scholarship of new religious move- ments, exploring the development of research in this growing field. She con- siders academic and media interventions on both sides, with special emphasis on the problems of objectivity inherent in terminologies of ‘sects’, ‘cults’, and ‘brainwashing’. Ideal for students and researchers, this much- needed book takes the debate over new religious movements to a more sophisticated level.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Secular State: French Report
    BLANDINE CHELINI-PONT NASSIMA FERCHICHE Religion and the Secular State: French Report PROLOGUE In the context of the political and legal controversy raging in the United States since the 1990s around the meaning of the U.S. Constitution and the spirit that animated its Framers, many in the academic and legal community in the United States reject the interpretation of the principles of neutrality and separation as they have been interpreted by the Supreme Court, especially since Everson in 1947.1 We are well aware that the expression ‘Secular State’ can have a pejorative sense in the American milieu and can cause fierce criticism against ‘radical’ liberalism, its ethical weakness ethics or its contaminating atheism. We start from the French understanding of the term Secular State. This term is not pejorative in the French context, and what it represents to lawyers in France is the exact definition of their state: a non-confessional state, without organic or conventional ties to one or more religions, whose “philosophical” ideal is republican and democratic. These notions are no longer contested by any French political or academic factions. A consensus has operated since the synthesis of the Fifth Republic. I. SOCIAL CONTEXT France is a country of some 66 million people with three characteristics, a population of ancient roots possessed of a great many traditions, customs, and a particular way of life, and a population highly urbanized due to various industrial transformations. At the same, the modern population is the fruit of intense and constant immigration since the nineteenth century. France today has four million foreigners, most of them with European familial roots that are ancient (Italy, Belgium, Poland, Spain, Portugal) or more recent (Poland, Lithuania, Romania), but also many from the Maghreb (Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia), Africa (Mali, Chad, Senegal, Niger, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, Benin, Zaire, Rwanda, Comoros), or Asia (Vietnam, China, Sri Lanka).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword by the Chairman
    Foreword by the Chairman A long time ago, some 25 years, the State did not preoccupy itself with movements which were, without further consideration, given the name of sects. Some would smirk, but others wished to awaken public opinion on the matter. A Prime Minister entrusted the mission of producing a report on the subject to a member of parliament. Roger Ikor drew the attention of the President of the Republic, families organised themselves into associations in defence of the victims, the Parliament created an Investigatory Commission, the Government set up an Observatory, a new minister created a Commission to combat sects, another transformed this into the Inter- ministerial Mission of Vigilance and Combat against Sectarian Aberrations, and media sources almost unanimously denounced the plague of the methods of manipulation used by these groups. In short, the growing awareness of this phenomenon was very real and an almost unanimous consent formed that this problem could be not resolved via private initiatives. Far and beyond the intricacies linked to the political sensitivities of the various parties, beyond the language subtleties, it was in fact an entire policy of prevention, of information, of assistance to the victims and their families, and of combat against all forms of sectarian aberrations which took shape, step by step, in the light of past experience, with the largest political consensus which any sociological subject has ever been able to command in our country. The sectarian movement, whether it manifests itself in spiritual, philosophical, esoteric or occultist domains, which have suffered a very noticeable decline since the beginning of the century, or whether it is found in its more modern forms, which are better adapted to the expectations of our fellow citizens, via the fields of health, education, personal development, coaching or personal guidance, etc…could not remain idle in the face of such policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Miviludes 2007
    PREMIER MINISTRE Report to the Prime Minister 2007 Interministerial Mission of Vigilance and Combat against Sectarian Aberrations - MIVILUDES - This document is a translation of the French version. Only the original French version is legally binding. Contents Foreword by the Chairman................................................................ 5 Introduction........................................................................................ 7 1st section Prevention and assessment of risk ................................. 10 Sectarian Aberrations: analysis of legal provisions......................... 10 Mental hold examined in legal decisions......................................... 24 Psychotherapeutic aberrations: induced false memories................ 42 2nd Section Childhood and education ........................................................ 57 Follow-up to the Parliamentary investigatory commission on "Stolen childhood"........................................................................................ 57 3rd section The detection of risk in the economic domain........ 79 The inherent risks of multi-level marketing networks ...................... 79 The risks linked to certain business coaching techniques .............. 92 4th Section Various studies ............................................................................. 105 Stupefacients and sectarian aberrations....................................... 105 Satanism: an ever-present risk of aberration ................................ 115 Influential strategies used
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Mike Kropveld\My Documents\Site Web (Info-Secte)\AUTHLIST.TXT
    <pre> CATALOGUE OF INFO-CULT’S LIBRARY HOLDINGS / CATALOGUE DE LA COLLECTION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE D’INFO-SECTE March 1, 2010 / le 1 mars 2010 ---------------- To search this page: Ctrl f This page contains a list of a large part of Info-Cult’s collection of books, booklets, reports, theses, etc… Some of them have added details about their contents (such as contributors, subjects or groups) and is provided as an additional source of information. The collection consists of materials in more then one language (principally English and French). When searching, additional references may be found in another language - for example if using the search word “children “also try “enfants”. ---------------- Pour rechercher dans la page: Ctrl f Cette page énumère une grande partie de la collection de livres, livrets, rapports, thèses et documentation reliée détenue par Info-Secte. Le contenu de certains documents est décrit plus en détails (contributeurs, sujets ou groupes) pour fournir une source d’information supplémentaire. Dans la collection, les ouvrages sont catalogués dans plusieurs langues, la plupart en anglais et en français. Lors d'une recherche, des références peuvent donc être trouvées dans plusieurs langues. Par exemple si on fait une recherche avec le mot "enfants", essayer aussi avec "children". Pour le moment, les mots de la liste peuvent aussi présenter des erreurs d'accents, dont il faut tenir compte dans une recherche. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A course in miracles. Combined Volume : I. Text. II. Workbook for Students. III. Manual for teachers. Tiburon (CA.): Foundation for Inner Peace [1985] 299.93 Fip Aarons, Mark Unholy trinity: the Vatican, the Nazis, and the Soviet intelligence New York, NY, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport N° 3507
    N° 3507 ______ ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 DOUZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée nationale le 12 décembre 2006. RAPPORT FAIT (1) AU NOM DE LA COMMISSION D’ENQUÊTE relative à l’influence des mouvements à caractère sectaire et aux conséquences de leurs pratiques sur la santé physique et mentale des mineurs Président M. Georges FENECH, Rapporteur M. Philippe VUILQUE, Députés. —— (1) La composition de cette commission figure au verso de la présente page. La commission d’enquête relative à l’influence des mouvements à caractère sectaire et aux conséquences de leurs pratiques sur la santé physique et mentale des mineurs est composée de : M. Georges FENECH, Président ; Mme Martine DAVID, M. Alain GEST, vice- présidents ; MM. Jean-Pierre BRARD, Rudy SALLES, secrétaires ; M. Philippe VUILQUE, rapporteur ; Mmes Patricia ADAM, Martine AURILLAC, MM. Serge BLISKO, Philippe COCHET, Christian DECOCQ, Marcel DEHOUX, Guy GEOFFROY, Michel HEINRICH, Jean-Yves HUGON, Michel HUNAULT, Jacques KOSSOWSKI, Jérôme LAMBERT, Mme Geneviève LEVY, MM. Pierre Morel-A-L’HUISSIER, Jacques MYARD, Daniel PRÉVOST, Éric RAOULT, Jacques REMILLER, Mme Chantal ROBIN-RODRIGO, M. Serge ROQUES, Mme Michèle TABAROT, MM. Philippe TOURTELIER, Christian VANNESTE, Philippe VITEL. 3 SOMMAIRE ___ Pages INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 9 COMPTE RENDU DU DÉPLACEMENT DE LA COMMISSION D’ENQUÊTE DANS LA COMMUNAUTÉ DE TABITHA’S PLACE À SUS (PYRÉNÉES-ATLANTIQUES) ........ 13 PREMIÈRE PARTIE : LES ENFANTS, UNE PROIE POUR LES SECTES ............ 17 I. L’ENFANT VICTIME........................................................................................................ 19 A. L’ENFERMEMENT SOCIAL ...................................................................................... 19 1. Un phénomène dissimulé derrière la liberté d’opinion.................................... 19 2. Un nombre important d’enfants victimes, qui reste difficile à évaluer ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Liberte, Egalite, Et Fraternite at Risk for New Religious Movements in France Hannah Clayson Smith
    BYU Law Review Volume 2000 | Issue 3 Article 2 9-1-2000 Liberte, Egalite, et Fraternite at Risk for New Religious Movements in France Hannah Clayson Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Hannah Clayson Smith, Liberte, Egalite, et Fraternite at Risk for New Religious Movements in France, 2000 BYU L. Rev. 1099 (2000). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2000/iss3/2 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact hunterlawlibrary@byu.edu. HSMI-FIN.DOC 10/12/00 3:14 PM Liberté, Egalité, et Fraternité at Risk for ∗ New Religious Movements in France I. INTRODUCTION During the past several years, the French government has sys- tematically targeted the freedoms of new religious movements (“NRMs”)1 with legislative initiatives.2 On June 22, 2000, the ∗ My interest in this topic stems from my experience as a volunteer missionary for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in France beginning in the fall of 1995. While the LDS Church has not been officially listed as a secte, I encountered first-hand as a missionary the effects of anti-sect sentiment, specifically those arising out of the tragic Ordre du Temple Solaire deaths in southeastern France in the fall of 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Face Aux Dérives Sectaires : Une Mobilisation De Tous
    Face aux dérives sectaires : Une mobilisation de tous Colloque national Lyon, 26 novembre 2009 Crédit photographique : Ministère de la Justice et des Libertés - Dicom - Patrick Sèbe Patrick - Dicom - Libertés des et Justice la de Ministère : photographique Crédit UBIQUS Crédit photographique : Rectorat de Lyon Elus, fonctionnaires, magistrats, monde associatif et religieux rassemblés pour établir un état des lieux et tracer de nouvelles perspectives d’action 2 Vigilance et lutte contre les dérives sectaires : État des lieux et propositions Colloque national, Hôtel de Ville de Lyon, 26 novembre 2009 À propos Crédit photographique : Ministère de la Justice et des Libertés - Dicom - Patrick Sèbe Georges FENECH Président de la Miviludes Les travaux du colloque dont rendent compte les actes ici présentés, se sont te- nus le 26 novembre 2009 à l’Hôtel de ville de Lyon. La Mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires a été accueillie par Gérard Collomb, maire de Lyon, dans l’imposant salon Justin Godart où d’éminentes personnalités du monde politique, universitaire, religieux, médical, ju- diciaire, administratif et associatif sont venues enrichir le nécessaire et légitime débat sur les moyens de lutter contre les atteintes aux droits fondamentaux commises sous des masques pseudo-religieux, pseudo-philosophiques, pseudo-thérapeutiques ou pseudo-scientifiques. Lyon, capitale de la Résistance, d’une voix unanime et forte, a marqué son refus de céder une once de terrain aux organisations qui prônent une vision du monde contraire aux principes qui fondent une démocratie. Les citoyens de l’ensemble de l’espace européen doivent rester libres de leur destinée et protégés d’atteintes à leur dignité, c’est le message d’avenir que Jean-Marie Bockel, Secrétaire d’État à la Justice a lancé devant un nombreux auditoire venu des quatre coins de France.
    [Show full text]
  • Cults : Do Democracies Need Laws of Exception ?
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Avenue d’Auderghem 61/16, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: international.secretariat.brussels@hrwf.net – Website: http://www.hrwf.net Cults : Do democracies need laws of exception ? The Belgian experience By Willy Fautré Brussels, 2004 Cults : Do democracies need laws of exception ? The Belgian experience Willy Fautré, Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Are most of the religious minorities in the European Union that have not received a form of legitimization from the State threatened with expulsion from the religious sphere protected by relevant international instruments and are they not going to be reduced to the status of cults, disarmed and disempowered of all means of defence against intolerance? As astonishing as it may appear, this is the question that has been posed since the end of the twentieth century. Several tragic events which were caused by a very restricted number of religious movements brought their criminal activities to light, stimulated public emotion and provoked various, sometimes disproportionate, reactions from certain EU States towards recently settled religious minority groups. Situation in the European Union Towards the end of the 20th century, following an examination of the situation within their borders, eleven of the fifteen Member States of the European Union determined that so-called cults posed no threat to the individual, the family, society or the state’s democratic institutions. They estimated that the challenges raised by certain religious movements could be resolved, as in the past, ideally through dialogue or necessarily via the judiciary. These countries have not become safe havens for unseemly or even mafia-like religious movements, nor has a proliferation of offenses or harmful activities on their part been noted in these same countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 23 1996 Issue 70
    Review of African Political Economy No.70:469-474 © ROAPE Publications Ltd., 1996 ISSN 0305-6244; RIX #7001 The Horn of Africa John Markakis Some things have changed for the better since ROAPE's last special issue (No. 44,1989) on the Horn of Africa. The continent's oldest conflict ended when Eritrea won its struggle for independence in 1991. As a result, Ethiopia has known a period of relative peace since then. Some things have changed for the worse. Civil conflict, the scourge of the region, caused the collapse of the Somali state. It also spread to Djibouti, and to parts of northern Sudan, a country which now enjoys the dubious distinction of having Africa's oldest conflict in its southern region. Conflict has its creative side, as new states are forged in the anvil of war. Eritrea's independence set a precedence for the continent, one likely to be followed by others in the Horn. The secession and de facto independence of Somaliland in 1991 is another alteration in the political map of the region. Dissolved with genocidal violence, the unhappy union between north and south in Somalia is not likely to be restored in its original form. The irony of it all, for those who decry colonialism's political legacy is that, given a chance to design state boundaries, Africans in both instances have returned to the colonial blueprint. The disintegration of the Somali state, the only one in black Africa endowed with a national identity, raises a host of questions for theorists of nationalism. In this instance, the Somali reverted to the pre-colonial pattern of total clan autonomy.
    [Show full text]