Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Schedule of Proposed Major Documents Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, Assessments Table of Contents Publications Recreational Activities Volunteering Executive Summary

KEY FINDINGS AND Newberry National RECOMMENDATIONS Volcanic Monument

Conservation Ed. Chapter I - Introduction Contracting Health BACKGROUND Forest Products ROAD ANALYSIS PROCESS Geology ANALYSIS PLAN Heritage Partnerships Scope and Plantlife Scale of the Water/Fisheries Analysis Wildlife Objectives Information Links Needs Public Involvement http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (1 of 6)5/31/2007 1:01:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments ANALYSIS OVERVIEW on our service and your suggestions for improvement. INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM Forest Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

Deschutes National Forest 1001 SW Emkay Drive ROADS Bend, OR 97702 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC (541) 383-5300 CULTURAL RESOURCES Ochoco National Forest BOTANY 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Prineville, OR 97754 WILDLIFE (541) 416-6500 AQUATIC Crooked River National RECREATION Grassland 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions Madras, OR 97741 (541) 475-9272 ISSUE SUMMARY KEY QUESTIONS

Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

ASSESSMENT PROCESS RATING FACTORS AND RESULTS WATERSHED SUMMARIES

Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

ROAD MAINTENANCE OPPORTUNITIES ROAD IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS DECISION GUIDE FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (2 of 6)5/31/2007 1:01:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

List of Tables

Table 2-1: Miles of roads by Maintenance Level for the Ochoco Table 2-2: Miles of roads by Maintenance Level for the Deschutes Table 2-3: Primary and Secondary Road System for the Ochoco Table 2-4: Primary and Secondary Road System for the Deschutes Table 2-5: Forest Highway System for the Deschutes Table 2-6: Forest Highway System for the Ochoco Table 2-7: Proposed Public Forest Road Projects for the Deschutes Table 2-8: Proposed Public Forest Road Projects for the Ochoco Table 2-9: Comparison of Existing Maintenance Costs with Annual and Deferred Maintenance Needs for the Deschutes Table 2-10: Comparison of Existing Maintenance Costs with Annual and Deferred Maintenance Needs for the Ochoco Table 2-11: Site Type Determined Susceptible to affects Table 2-12: Noxious Weed Species Table 2-13: Management Objectives for Open Roads Table 4-1: Human Use rating distribution summary for the Deschutes Table 4-2: Human Use rating distribution summary for the Ochoco Table 4-3: Aquatic risk rating distribution summary for the Deschutes Table 4-4: Aquatic risk rating distribution summary for the Ochoco Table 4-5: Wildlife risk rating distribution summary for the Deschutes Table 4-6: Wildlife risk rating distribution summary for the Ochoco Table 4-7: Botany risk rating distribution summary for the Deschutes Table 4-8: Botany risk rating distribution summary for the Ochoco Table 5-1: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and Work Frequencies for the Deschutes National Forest Table 5-2: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and Work Frequencies for the Ochoco National Forest Table 5-3: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and corresponding costs for the Deschutes National Forest Table 5-4: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and corresponding costs for the Ochoco National Forest

Appendices

Appendices-Volume I

Appendix I-1: GIS Core Data pilot Program Final Regional Report Appendix I-2: Roads Analysis INA Summary Report (pdf) Appendix I-3: Road Management Direction, Wildlife and

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (3 of 6)5/31/2007 1:01:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Aquatic Appendix I-4: Issue Background Papers Appendix I-5: Watershed Summaries

Appendices-Volume II (Ochoco Tables)

Appendix II-1:

● Code Definitions (Road Management Recommendations Table) ● Road Management Recommendations

● Road Management RecommendationTable (pdf)

Appendix II-2:

● Code Definitions (Human Uses Assessment Table)

● Access Needs Assessment (Human Uses)

● Human Uses Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix II-3:

● Code Definitions (Aquatic Assessment Table)

● Aquatic Risk Assessment

● Aquatic Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix II-4:

● Code Definitions (Wildlife Assessment Table)

● Wildlife Risk Assessment

● Wildlife Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix II-5:

● Code Definitions (Botany Assessment Table)

● Botany Risk Assessment

● Botany Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendices-Volume III (Deschutes Tables)

Appendix III-1:

● Code Definitions (Road Management Recommendations Table) ● Road Management Recommendations

● Road Management RecommendationTable (pdf)

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (4 of 6)5/31/2007 1:01:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Appendix III-2:

● Code Definitions (Human Uses Assessment Table)

● Access Needs Assessment (Human Uses)

● Human Uses Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix III-3:

● Code Definitions (Aquatic Assessment Table)

● Aquatic Risk Assessment

● Aquatic Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix III-4:

● Code Definitions (Wildlife Assessment Table)

● Wildlife Risk Assessment

● Wildlife Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix III-5:

● Code Definitions (Botany Assessment Table)

● Botany Risk Assessment

● Botany Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendices-Volume IV

These map files range in size from 500 to 800 K at 150 dpi.

Map IV-1: Vicinity Map Map IV-2: Roads Analyzed (Ochoco) Map IV-3: Roads Analyzed (Deschutes) Map IV-4: Existing Highway Safety Act Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-5: Proposed Highway Safety Act Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-6: Existing Highway Safety Act Road System (Deschutes) Map IV-7: Proposed Highway Safety Act Road System (Deschutes) Map IV-8: Existing Primary/Secondary Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-9: Proposed Primary/Secondary Road System (Ochoco) - NO MAP Map IV-10: Existing Primary/Secondary Road System (Deschutes) http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (5 of 6)5/31/2007 1:01:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Map IV-11: Proposed Primary/Secondary Road System (Deschutes) - NO MAP Map IV-12: Forest Highway Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-13: Forest Highway Road System (Deschutes) Map IV-14: Potential Public Forest Service Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-15: Potential Public Forest Service Road System (Deschutes) Map IV-16: 5th Field Watersheds (Ochoco) Map IV-17: 5th Field Watersheds (Deschutes) Map IV-18: Road Management Strategies (Deschutes) Map IV-19: Road Management Strategies (Ochoco) Map IV-20: Road Maintenance Frequencies (Deschutes) Map IV-21: Road Maintenance Frequencies (Ochoco)

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:38 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (6 of 6)5/31/2007 1:01:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Executive Summary

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment Roads Analysis Report ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Forest-Wide Assessment INFORMATION Maps & Brochures PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Executive Summary Major Documents Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information This report documents the Forest-Wide Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, Roads Analysis for the Ochoco and Assessments Deschutes National Forests and the Crooked River National Grassland. The Publications purpose of this analysis is to provide Recreational Activities Line Officers with information necessary Volunteering to identify and manage a safe, efficient, environmentally sound road system that is responsive to public and agency needs. The road analysis document Newberry National provides a recommended strategy for Volcanic Monument managing the road system, but is NOT considered a decision document. Conservation Ed. As required by the final road Contracting management policy published on Health January 12, 2001, this analysis followed Forest Products the six step process outlined in the report Roads Analysis: Informing Geology Decisions About Managing the Heritage National Forest Transportation Partnerships System (USDA Forest Service, Plantlife 1999, Misc. Report FS-643). Water/Fisheries This forest-wide analysis focused on the Wildlife main road system of the two forests

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/exe-sum.shtml (1 of 6)5/31/2007 1:02:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Executive Summary

and grassland. Roads selected for Links analysis at this scale include all Evaluate Our Service currently designated Highway Safety We welcome your comments Act roads (maintenance level 3, 4, and on our service and your 5), plus any maintenance level 1 or 2 suggestions for improvement. roads that have a functional Forest classification of arterial or collector. Main roads from other jurisdictions such as State, County, and BLM were also considered in the analysis if they are Deschutes National Forest within the National Forests or connect 1001 SW Emkay Drive forest roads to other adjacent Bend, OR 97702 transportation networks. The remaining (541) 383-5300 maintenance level 1 and 2 local roads Ochoco National Forest under Forest Service jurisdiction will be 3160 N.E. 3rd Street analyzed in the future, at the Prineville, OR 97754 watershed or project scale, as project opportunities and budgets allow. (541) 416-6500 Following the six-step analysis process, Crooked River National the existing condition of the road Grassland system as related to access needs, 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 current uses, and resource concerns is Madras, OR 97741 described and documented. Using a set (541) 475-9272 of screening questions, the interdisciplinary team identified important road-related issues that were used to drive the analysis. A set of rating factors were developed and used to compare the relative value of the road system in terms of access needed and current uses with any associated problems or risks to important resource values such as wildlife, water, fish, and vegetation. The benefit/risk assessment led to some recommended changes to road maintenance and management strategies. Some specific road improvement opportunities were also identified in the process. In addition to describing the benefit/ risk rating assessment discussed above, chapter 4 of the road analysis document provides a summary of the important access issues and resource concerns found within each of the 5th field watersheds in the analysis area. The purpose of the watershed summaries is to provide ID teams working on project or watershed scale road analyses, or other NEPA documents, a quick reference for important road related issues and opportunities identified at the broader forest scale. The final chapter of the road analysis

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/exe-sum.shtml (2 of 6)5/31/2007 1:02:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Executive Summary

document summarizes the opportunities and recommendations for altering existing maintenance activities and management plans to better meet the current access needs identified through this analysis. Chapter 5 also provides guidance and suggestions for conducting finer scale road analyses at the watershed and project levels.

KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Current maintenance levels do not match access needs. The current road network provides adequate access for Public, Private, and Administrative needs; however this Roads Analysis indicates a need to adjust maintenance levels on some roads to better serve our road users and to minimize adverse effects to resources.

Recommendations

❍ Change objective maintenance levels to those proposed in the Road Management Recommendation Tables in the Appendix. ❍ Move roads from existing operational maintenance levels to proposed objective maintenance levels as opportunities and budgets allow. ❍ Adjust the Highway Safety Act road system as proposed on Maps 5 and 7 in the Appendix. ❍ Update Road Management Objectives for all roads in the analysis to reflect changes listed above. ❍ Update road data in INFRA and GIS databases.

2. Current maintenance budgets are insufficient to meet current maintenance needs. Recent forest-wide condition surveys indicate that our current road maintenance funding only meets approximately 30% of the annual maintenance needs on the Ochoco and Deschutes National Forests. The deferred maintenance backlog for both forests exceeds 70 million dollars and will continue to grow until additional funds can be found.

Recommendations

❍ Seek additional funding for road maintenance through regular appropriations.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/exe-sum.shtml (3 of 6)5/31/2007 1:02:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Executive Summary

❍ Seek additional funding sources and methods for rock replacement on aggregate surfaced roads. ❍ Seek new and additional funding sources for road maintenance and improvements through any available funding programs such as Capital Investment Programs, Payments to Counties, Forest Highway Programs, etc. ❍ Develop the Public Forest Service Road System as proposed on Maps 14 and 15 in the Appendix.

3. The current road system poses risks to water quality/ quantity and fish habitat. Many roads were constructed in close proximity to streams or cross streams and contribute to sediment movement. Many culverts throughout the project area are too small (undersized) and are barriers to fish passage. The current road system has increased the hydrologic network causing water to flow more quickly from most 5th field watersheds.

Recommendations

❍ Check for proper culvert sizes on all stream crossings. ❍ Check roads for adequate cross drainage during project analysis. ❍ Evaluate surfacing needs on roads with high traffic volumes. ❍ Adjust alignment away from riparian areas, as opportunities arise. ❍ Repair fill and cut slope failures in a timely manner, especially those located within landslide terrain. ❍ Seek additional funding for road maintenance.

4. The current road system and its uses pose risks to wildlife and wildlife habitats. Many roads were constructed in close proximity to streams or cross streams. Most areas outside of Wildernesses and Roadless Areas are well roaded. Many roads and land areas see extensive use year round by passenger vehicles and off-highway-vehicles (OHV), including over-snow vehicles. These factors often result in collisions, harassment, and displacement of animals, as well as the roads acting as a barriers to movement. In addition, the roads themselves often result in habitat loss and fragmentation.

Recommendations

❍ Relocate roads away from sensitive wildlife http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/exe-sum.shtml (4 of 6)5/31/2007 1:02:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Executive Summary

areas where feasible and when opportunities arise ❍ Review and update forest-wide travel and access management policies for motorized traffic both on and off roads. ❍ Minimize wildlife harassment by enforcing existing travel management policies. ❍ Ensure existing seasonal restrictions are effective. ❍ Implement additional seasonal restrictions where needed.

5. The road system and its uses pose risks to plants and plant habitats. Some roads are affecting unique habitats and plant communities, including TES, and riparian and wetland habitats. In addition, some roads also facilitate access to gathering sites by Native Americans.

Recommendations

❍ Continue to treat, and monitor for noxious weed infestations along all roads. ❍ Relocate roads away from sensitive plant habitats where feasible and as opportunities arise. ❍ Review and update forest-wide travel and access management policies for motorized traffic both on and off roads. ❍ Minimize off-road ground disturbance by OHV's by enforcing existing travel management policies.

GO TO

● Table of Contents

● Executive Summary ● Chapter I - Introduction

● Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

● Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions

● Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

● Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/exe-sum.shtml (5 of 6)5/31/2007 1:02:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Executive Summary

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:37 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/exe-sum.shtml (6 of 6)5/31/2007 1:02:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment Roads Analysis Report ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Forest-Wide Assessment INFORMATION Maps & Brochures PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Chapter 1 - Introduction Major Documents Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information The Ochoco and Deschutes National Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, Forests and the Crooked River National Assessments Grassland have developed this "forest level" roads analysis. The purpose of Publications this analysis is to provide Line Officers Recreational Activities with information necessary to identify a Volunteering road system that is safe and responsive to public and agency needs, is environmentally sound, affordable, and efficient to manage. The area Newberry National considered in the analysis is shown on Volcanic Monument Map IV-1, Vicinity Map, in the Appendices-Volume IV. Conservation Ed. This analysis identifies opportunities for Contracting increasing benefits of our road systems Health and reducing existing problems and Forest Products risks. It provides a framework for examining important issues and Geology developing relevant information before Heritage managers enter into formal decision- Partnerships making processes under the National Plantlife Forest Management Act (NFMA) and Water/Fisheries National Environmental Policy Act Wildlife (NEPA) that change characteristics and uses of national forest road networks. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (1 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

This analysis does not make land Links management decisions nor allocate Evaluate Our Service land for specific purposes since both We welcome your comments require NFMA and NEPA based forest on our service and your and project planning. It follows a suggestions for improvement. process, similar to a watershed Forest analysis, that is intended to produce a management strategy NOT a decision document. Deschutes National Forest 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702 (541) 383-5300

Ochoco National Forest 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Prineville, OR 97754 (541) 416-6500 BACKGROUND Crooked River National Grassland On January 12, 2001 the Department of Agriculture published its 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 final rule and policy regarding the national forest transportation Madras, OR 97741 system. The road rule and policy, as they have become known, are (541) 475-9272 intended to ensure that the National Forest Road System meets current and future land and resource management objectives; provides for public uses of National Forest System lands; allows for economical and efficient management; and, minimizes and begins to reverse adverse ecological impacts associated with our current transportation system. The policy requires that a forest-wide (mid- scale) roads analysis be completed by 1/12/2003. In addition, roads analysis at finer scales (watershed and/or project level) will likely be needed to support site-specific transportation system decisions in the future.

ROAD ANALYSIS PROCESS

The Road Policy requires the use of a science-based road analysis process to identify road needs, issues, and opportunities and to actively engage the public and other state, federal, local, and tribal partners in the analysis. The document Roads Analysis: Informing Decisions About Managing the National Forest Transportation System (USDA Forest Service, 1999, Misc. Report FS-643) was developed and published in 1999 to provide guidance and direction in conducting the analysis. The process consists of the following six steps:

Step 1: Setting up the analysis Step 2: Describing the situation Step 3: Identifying the issues Step 4: Assessing benefits, problems, and risks Step 5: Describing opportunities and setting priorities

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (2 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

Step 6: Reporting

The product of the roads analysis process is a report that documents the information and analyses used to help identify the optimum road system needed for safe and efficient travel and for the administration, utilization, and protection of National Forest System lands. Again, roads analysis is NOT a decision-making process. Rather it is designed to provide an assessment of the existing forest road system from a landscape perspective. It highlights problem areas and opportunities in the road system so that Forest Service land managers can make well-informed management decisions regarding the transportation system on national forest lands.

ANALYSIS PLAN

The six-step process described above is meant to be an integrated, science-based approach to transportation planning that considers ecological, social, and economic issues. Line-officer participation is essential to completing the process. As such, the Forest Supervisors for the two forests assembled an interdisciplinary team (IDT) of resource specialists to conduct the analysis, and established a Board of Directors, made up of the Forest Planning Staff Leader, the Forest Natural Resources Staff Leader, and the Forest Engineering Staff Leader, to help guide the process. The Board of Directors and the IDT worked together to develop the analysis plan that established the scope and scale of the analysis, identified project objectives, established information needs, and determined how best to invoke public participation and involvement in the process. Each of these elements of the Analysis Plan is further described in the sections that follow.

SCOPE AND SCALE OF THE ANALYSIS

This forest-scale analysis focused on the main roads or "backbone" of the transportation system for the two Forests and Grassland, including the interrelationship with state, county, tribal, and other federal agency transportation facilities. This includes all arterial and collector roads on the forests, as well as all other roads open and maintained for passenger car travel, (i.e., maintenance level 3 through 5 roads, also referred to as Highway Safety Act roads). The intensive analysis was limited to roads under Forest Service jurisdiction, but the use and effects of roads under other jurisdictions were considered where those roads ran through the forests or connected forest roads to other main transportation outlets and facilities.

OBJECTIVES

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (3 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

The goal of this analysis is to provide line officers with critical information to identify and manage road systems that are safe and responsive to public needs and desires, are affordable and efficiently managed, have minimal negative ecological effects on the land, and are in balance with available funding for needed management actions. The objectives of this analysis are to review the main road systems of the two forests and grassland to:

● Determine consistency of current road management practices with Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines ● Establish the context, provide guidance, and define analysis needs at finer scales ● Compare current maintenance budgets with existing and future maintenance needs ● Identify existing parts of the road system that are essential for public access and resource management ● Identify where additions to the existing road system are necessary for public access and resource management ● Identify where changes to existing road management objectives are warranted ● Identify major environmental risk factors for individual roads ● Identify ecological, social, financial, and economic issues pertinent to future decisions about the transportation system ● Identify potential maintenance and restoration needs for future project consideration

INFORMATION NEEDS

This Roads Analysis project was one of eight projects selected for study under a National GIS Core Data Pilot Program in 2001(See Appendices-Volume I, Appendix I-1, GIS Core Data Pilot Program Final Regional Report, for more information). As part of the pilot program, the project team conducted an intensive Information Needs Assessment (INA). The BLM actively participated in the INA in an attempt to establish the same definitions and data standards for transportation planning across all of Central Oregon. The INA helped determine what information was available, what additional information was needed to address the key questions and issues, and what resources, (time, people, skills, etc.), were needed to conduct the forest-scale roads analysis (See Appendices-Volume I, Appendix I-2, Roads Analysis INA Summary Report for more information). This analysis was based on the best scientific information available at the time of writing. The final report is considered to be a "living" document and will be updated and revised as new and additional data become available and conditions warrant.

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

It was decided early on in the process to reach the individuals, agencies, and organizations that may be interested in participating in this Roads Analysis process; or may have specific issues, concerns, or recommendations regarding specific roads. As a result, an intensive Public Involvement Framework and Communication Plan http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (4 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

were developed. As part of this effort a letter describing the Roads Analysis Process and how to get involved was sent to all members of the public on our forest-wide mailing list. A second letter, tailored to Federal, State, and Local agencies, and organizations, was also circulated. In addition, individual contacts were made with Indian tribes, environmental organizations, forest products industries, and county road masters, to name a few. An article also appeared in the Schedule of Projects, which is circulated quarterly to both the Ochoco and Deschutes National Forest mailing lists and to the Prineville District of the BLM. Once this Roads Analysis Report is completed we will again ask for feedback on its content and make adjustments as needed.

ANALYSIS OVERVIEW

The following is a brief overview of how the six-step process was followed by the interdisciplinary team for this analysis. The first step was discussed in detail above and the remaining four steps will be discussed in detail in the each of the following chapters in this document. Step 1 - Setting up the analysis. The interdisciplinary team and the Board of Directors worked together to establish the scope and scale of the analysis, identified project objectives, established information needs, and determined public involvement procedures.

Step 2 - Describing the situation. The interdisciplinary team described the existing road system in relation to current forest plan direction. Products from this step include: maps of the existing road system, descriptions of access needs, and information about physical, biological, social, cultural, economic, and political conditions associated with the road system. Step 3 - Identifying issues. The interdisciplinary team identified important road-related issues and the information needed to address these concerns. The interdisciplinary team also determined data needs associated with analyzing the road system in the context of important issues, for both existing and future roads. The output from this step includes a summary of key road-related issues and a list of screening questions used to evaluate them. Step 4 - Assessing benefits, problems, and risks. After identifying the important issues and associated analytical questions, the interdisciplinary team reviewed the major uses and effects of the road system including the environmental, social, and economic effects of the existing road system, and the values and sensitivities associated with unroaded areas. Step 5 - Describing opportunities and setting priorities. The interdisciplinary team identified management opportunities, established priorities, and formulated technical recommendations that respond to the issues and effects. Step 6 - Reporting. The interdisciplinary team produced this report and maps that portray management opportunities and supporting

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (5 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

information important for making decisions about the future characteristics of the road system. This information sets the context for developing proposed actions to improve the road system and may be used for future amendments and revisions of forest plans.

INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM

The following resource specialists made up the core interdisciplinary team who conducted the analysis and developed this report. It is important to keep in mind that this project encompasses two National Forests, a National Grassland, and a significant portion of a BLM Resource Area. IDT members were responsible for the entire analysis area, not just their individual Forest.

Member Responsibilities Paul Cuddy Team Leader/Economic/Social Elly Young Co-Team Leader/GIS Coordinator Rick Collins Transportation/Financial Rodd Kubitza Transportation Kathy Farrell/Les Moscoso Writer/Editor Jim Minogue GIS Analyst Larry Chitwood/Carrie Gordon Geology/Soils Dan Rife Aquatic/Fisheries Marv Lang Recreation Dana Butler Hydrology Kyrie Murphy Public Affairs Shane Jeffries Wildlife Dave Owens Fire/Fuels Katie Grenier Botany/Weeds Terry Holtzapple Traditional uses/Archeology

In addition to the core IDT members, the resource specialists listed below worked directly with the team and played a significant role in completing this analysis. Also, there were many occasions when the IDT met with other district staff members and resource specialists to seek input and guidance at different phases of the analysis. So there are many other individuals who are not listed that also played key roles in completing this project.

Member Responsibilities Jim David Soils Barb Franano/Rich Vacirca Fisheries Jim Seymour Hydrology Bill Johnson/Tom Mountz Fire/Fuels

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (6 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis - Chap 1

Dave Zalunardo/Heather Bernier/Monte Kuk Wildlife Laurel Skelton/Barb Smith Recreation Paul Claeyssens Traditional uses/Archeology Deb Mafera Botany/Weeds Walt Miller Landline Brenda Warner Special Forest Products Bob Rock Range

Phil Horton/Ray Horgen/Steve Bigby/Ken Transportation Kittrell/Dale Putman

GO TO

● Table of Contents

● Executive Summary

● Chapter I - Introduction ● Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

● Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions

● Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

● Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:27 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap1.shtml (7 of 7)5/31/2007 1:02:36 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment Roads Analysis Report ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Forest-Wide Assessment INFORMATION Maps & Brochures PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Chapter 2 - Existing Situation Major Documents Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information The analysis area discussed in this Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, document includes the Deschutes Assessments National Forest, the Ochoco National Forest, the Crooked River National Publications Grassland, and portions of the Prineville Recreational Activities District of the BLM. Some segments of Volunteering roads from other jurisdictions, such as state, county, and private, are also considered in this analysis. The study area includes over 12,000 total miles of Newberry National roads; however, the in-depth analysis Volcanic Monument is limited to approximately 2,500 miles of arterial and collector roads and 100 Conservation Ed. miles of high standard local roads Contracting under the jurisdiction of the National Forests. (See Maps IV-2 and IV-3 in the Health Appendices-Volume IV for a description Forest Products of the roads included in the analysis.) Geology The arterial and collector roads, and the Heritage high standard locals were selected for Partnerships in-depth study because they provide Plantlife primary access to and through the Water/Fisheries National Forests and are best suited for Wildlife analyzing the broad scale issues that are addressed through a forest-wide http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (1 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

roads analysis. The remaining "local" Links roads will be analyzed, in-depth, in the Evaluate Our Service future through site-specific watershed We welcome your comments and project scale roads analysis. on our service and your Management direction for the suggestions for improvement. transportation system is detailed in the Forest Ochoco and Deschutes Land and Resource Management Plans, the Northwest Forest Plan, the Inland Deschutes National Forest Native Fish Strategy (Infish), and the 1001 SW Emkay Drive Interim Strategies for Managing Bend, OR 97702 Anadromous Fish-producing Watersheds in Eastern Oregon and (541) 383-5300 Washington, Idaho, and Portions of Ochoco National Forest California (PacFish). Forest Service 3160 N.E. 3rd Street transportation management policy is Prineville, OR 97754 outlined under Title 7700 of the Forest (541) 416-6500 Service Manual (FSM) (USDA 1994). Crooked River National The following describes the existing Grassland condition by resource area for the 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Deschutes and Ochoco National Madras, OR 97741 Forests, as well as the Crooked River National Grassland. Descriptions are (541) 475-9272 based on how each resource area is affected by the road system in terms of condition of roads themselves and use of the roads.

ROADS

Ochoco National Forest and Crooked River National Grassland

The Ochoco National Forest and Crooked River National Grassland include more than 3,200 miles of Forest Service roads. Most of the transportation system on the Ochoco National Forest has been developed primarily on the more gentle slopes found on the southern portions of the Forest. This part of the Forest, (approximately two- thirds of the total area), has the transportation system needed to provide access for most present and future management activities. The northern one-third of the Ochoco National Forest has a less extensive transportation system and more difficult terrain for road construction. State highways and county roads provide primary access to the Crooked River National Grassland. These roads are suitable for passenger car use. The remainder of the transportation system on the Grassland is composed of roads constructed by previous land

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (2 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

owners (prior to 1960, the area was composed of homesteaded lands). These roads were designated as Public Usage Roads by Jefferson County. Under this designation, the county assures that the roads remain open to public use. However, the roads are to be maintained by the public that uses them. Under terms of a cooperative agreement with Jefferson County, the Forest Service maintains approximately 84 miles of these roads for public and administrative use. These roads are normally suitable only for high clearance vehicle use and are impassable or closed seasonally during wet weather. The Grassland has more roads than are necessary for management, but the Public Usage designation prohibits closure. The open, flat terrain generally makes road closure ineffective. There are 3,257 miles of Forest Service Roads on the Ochoco National Forest and Crooked River National Grassland transportation inventory. Seven percent of the road system is in the Maintenance Level 3, 4, and 5 categories, (maintained for standard passenger cars and subject to the Highway Safety Act). Maintenance Level 2, (maintained for high clearance vehicles), accounts for 62% of the road system, and 31% of roads are currently closed to vehicular traffic, (Maintenance Level 1). Approximately 695 miles, or 20 percent of the total road system, are arterial and collector roads. The remaining 2,564 miles (80 percent) of roads are local roads that are generally designated for high clearance access.

Table 2-1: Miles of Forest Service Roads by Maintenance Level for the Ochoco National Forest.

Maintenance Level Arterial Collector Local Miles 1 - Basic Custodial Care (Closed 0 9 1,003 1,012 Roads) 2 - Maintained for High Clearance 52 412 1,549 2,013 Vehicles 3 - Maintained Suitable for 84 40 4 127 Passenger Cars, Low User Comfort, Aggregate Surface 4 - Maintained For Passenger Cars, 39 2 8 48 Moderate Degree of User Comfort 5 - High Standard Paved Passenger 55 2 0 57 Car Road, High degree of User Comfort TOTAL 230 465 2,564 3,257

Forest Plan Direction (Ochoco National Forest and Crooked River National Grassland Land and Resource Management Plan) Goal: The overriding goal of the Ochoco Forest Plan for management of the transportation system is to plan, design, operate, and maintain a safe and economical transportation system providing efficient access for the movement of people and materials involved in the use and protection of National Forest lands.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (3 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

Desired Future Condition: The principal access roads will be readily identifiable; they will have paved or gravel surfaces and will be suitable for passenger car use. Signs will assist the traveler in finding their destination. The other roads will appear rough or primitive. Some roads will be closed with gates or signs. Resource Objectives: Transportation systems will be planned to support resource activities in the management areas and to serve multiple resource needs rather than individual project proposals. Manage traffic as needed to control access due to structural limitations of the road, safety, or to meet resource objectives, such as (ORV) travel management needs. Traffic safety will exist for all roads on the transportation system. Safety of traffic using Forest roads will be ensured through restrictions. The full range of traffic management strategies will be used including prohibiting traffic to unrestricted use by all vehicle types. Use signs to inform the public of the reason for restrictions to the transportation system. During commercial hauling activities, public access will generally be discouraged or prohibited on single user local access roads. All system roads would be maintained to at least the basic custodial care required to maintain drainage, protect road investment, and minimize damage to adjacent land and resources. Basic road maintenance would occur at intervals approximately every 5 years, higher levels may be chosen to reflect greater use or for resource protection. The miles of roads open to passenger vehicles (Mtc. Levels 3-5) and high clearance vehicles (Mtc. Level 2), should be 67% at the end of the first decade and decreasing to 59% by the end of the fifth decade. The Forest Plan objective for roads Open and Maintained for Passenger Car use at the end of the first decade is 844. The forest currently has only 232 miles in this category, primarily due to declining maintenance budgets that have lead to a reduction of road miles maintained. Standards and Guidelines: Specific direction concerning construction, reconstruction, operational management and environmental protection requirements for the Forest road system are described in the Forest-wide Standards and Guidelines section (pages 4-224 through 4-227), as well as in the Management Area Prescriptions section (pages 4-228 through 4-235) in the Ochoco National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan; and in the Grassland-wide Standards and Guidelines section (pages 4-108 through 4-111), as well as in the Management Area Prescriptions section (pages 4-111 through 4-118) in the Crooked River National Grassland Land and Resource Management Plan. Additional standards and guidelines affecting road management are found in the Northwest Forest Plan, and the PacFish and Infish documents.

Deschutes National Forest

The Deschutes National Forest transportation system includes over 8,500 miles of Forest Service roads. A primary road system was developed throughout the forest to provide essential access to communities and State or County highways. A secondary system was developed off of the primary system to meet most other inter-forest land management needs. Most of the forest has gentle terrain that http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (4 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

has made road construction inexpensive and convenient; thus, the forest has been roaded extensively. The gentle terrain of the Deschutes National Forest also makes effective road closures difficult. There are 8,517 miles of Forest Service Roads in the forest transportation inventory. Five percent of the road system is in the Maintenance Level 3, 4, and 5 categories, (maintained for standard passenger cars and subject to the Highway Safety Act). Maintenance Level 2, (maintained for high clearance vehicles), accounts for 84% of the road system, and 11% of roads are currently closed to vehicular traffic, (Maintenance Level 1). Approximately 21 % (1,788 miles), of the total system are arterial and collector roads. Only 363 miles of those are maintained for passenger car travel. The remaining 79% of the system (6,729 miles) are designated as local roads of which only 87 miles are maintainted for passenger car use. Table 2-2: Miles of Forest Service Roads by Maintenance Level for the Deschutes National Forest.

Maintenance Level Arterial Collector Local Miles 1 - Basic Custodial Care (Closed 0 13 923 936 Roads) 2 - Maintained for High Clearance 75 1,338 5,719 7,132 Vehicles 3 - Maintained Suitable for 101 100 67 268 Passenger Cars, Low User Comfort, Aggregate Surface 4 - Maintained For Passenger Cars, 86 21 19 126 Moderate Degree of User Comfort 5 - High Standard Paved Passenger 52 3 1 56 Car Road, High degree of User Comfort TOTAL 314 1,474 6,729 8,517

Forest Plan Direction (Deschutes National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan - 1990) Goal: The overriding goal of the Deschutes Forest Plan for management of the transportation system is to plan, design, operate, and maintain a safe and economical transportation system providing efficient access for the movement of people and materials involved in the use and protection of National Forest lands. Desired Future Condition: Access to and within the Forest is well balanced between travel needs and the environment. The planned increase or decrease in recreation activities are coordinated with road and trail construction, reconstruction, and management. Roads and trails are maintained in safe conditions consistent with the expected user; the signing is accurate and informative. Roads to most recreation sites are paved or gravel surfaced in a conditions suitable for passenger cars. Many of these roads are also constructed with adequate alignment, grades, and structural capacity

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (5 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

to safely allow the hauling of commercial products. The quality of scenic views has been maintained through timber management and road maintenance operations. The Cascade Lakes Highway continues to be maintained and improved to the standards of a National Scenic Byway. Some of the road system has been closed for the protection of wildlife habitat or to reduce erosion; however, the majority of the mileage remains open for ongoing timber management activities or for general public access such as hunting, fishing, pleasure driving, and fuel wood gathering. These lower standard roads are available for use by the more experienced drivers. Maps, signing and primitive conditions at the beginning of the roads managed for high clearance vehicles give traveler's advice on what to expect. Unexpected road conditions are adequately signed. Resource Objectives: The development, maintenance, and management of the Forest development road system will be responsive to resource management objectives. Many road-related activities will occur in support of the timber management program, with additional activities undertaken to facilitate recreational use, forest administration, and resource protection. The miles of roads open to passenger vehicles (Mtc. Levels 3-5) and high clearance vehicles (Mtc. Level 2), should be 73% at the end of the first decade. The Deschutes is currently at 90%. The Forest Plan objective for roads Open and Maintained for Passenger Car use at the end of the first decade is 850 miles and should increase to 1000 miles by the end of the third decade. The forest currently has only 450 miles in this category, primarily due to declining maintenance budgets that have lead to a reduction of road miles maintained. Standards and Guidelines: Specific direction concerning construction, reconstruction, operational management and environmental protection requirements for the Forest road system are described in the Forest-wide Standards and Guidelines section (pages 72-73), as well as throughout the Management Area Prescriptions section in Chapter 4 of the Deschutes National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Additional standards and guidelines affecting road management are found in the Northwest Forest Plan, and the PacFish and Infish documents. Roads of Issue: Four roads within the forest-wide roads analysis have been identified as "roads of issue" in the Deschutes LMRP. They are the Waldo Lake Road (FDR 4290), the Windigo Pass Road (FDR 60), the Todd Lake Road (4600370), and the Irish-Taylor Road (4600600). Specific management direction outlined for each of these roads is as follows:

Waldo Lake Road - Road 4290 provides a connecting link between the Cascade Lakes Highway on the Deschutes National Forest and the Waldo Lake Recreation Facilities on the Willamette National Forest. The Forest Plan identifies an opportunity to enhance recreation on both of these forests by improving this connecting route and adjacent recreational facilities. However, the need to improve and pave the road must be driven by an analysis of future recreation opportunities and not merely by a desire to provide an http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (6 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

additional travel route between Bend and Eugene. Until the analysis is done, the road between Clover Meadow and Waldo Lake will be maintained as a single- lane gravel road. This road will be closed to all commercial haul, and not be plowed for winter use. Windigo Pass Road - Road 60 provides a connecting link between the Crescent Lake areas on the Deschutes National Forest to the Oregon Cascades Recreation Area on the Umpqua National Forest. Forest Plan direction is to manage this road at its current design and maintenance standards for the foreseeable future. This road is left unplowed and maintained as a snowmobile route in the winter. The road may be improved in the future to accommodate increased traffic demands. However, any future upgrading of this road cannot be undertaken until further NEPA analysis and coordination with the Umpqua National Forest is completed. Todd Lake Road (FS road 4600370) - Maintain for passenger cars, at low speed, between Hwy 46 and Road 4600380. Maintain for high clearance vehicles only from road 4600380 to Three Creeks Lake. Irish-Taylor Road (FS road 4636) - Maintain for high clearance vehicles only at the current standard.

Road System Classifications (Ochoco & Deschutes NF's)

There are several road system classifications either in use today, or proposed for use, by the Forest Service that are important to any discussions about roads at the forest scale. These include the Highway Safety Act road system, the Primary/Secondary road system, the Forest Highway road system, the Public Forest Service Road system, and the unclassified road system. These road system classifications are briefly discussed below. Highway Safety Act Road System Forest Service maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 roads are subject to the Highway Safety Act of 1966. The Forest Service maintains a Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Highway Administration requiring that certain safety standards from the Highway Safety Act be met on all roads "open to public travel", as defined in the MOU. Maintenance level 3-5 roads are given this designation because they are generally available and maintained for low-clearance passenger car use. The present Highway Safety Act Road System includes 232 miles on the Ochoco National Forest and 449 miles on the Deschutes National Forest. (The HSA road systems for the two forests are displayed on Maps IV-4 and IV-6 in the Appendices-Volume IV.) Primary/Secondary Road System The primary/secondary road system was identified for both forests through a forest-wide Access and Travel Management (ATM) analysis between 1995 and 1996. These roads provide the key travel routes

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (7 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

needed for long-term management of the National Forest. They provide vital linkages to local communities, State and County Highways, private land ownership as well as furnishing inter-forest connections to trailheads and major recreation sites. The Ochoco National Forest identified 686 miles of these roads, and the Deschutes identified 2,667 miles for the primary/secondary system. The remaining roads not designated as primary/secondary ("other roads") are generally local routes whose long-term status will be analyzed at the watershed or project scale. These routes will be considered for including as secondary routes, or as candidates for reduction of maintenance standards or decommissioning. The primary/secondary road system is summarized for each forest in the following tables and displayed on Maps IV-8 and IV-10 in the Appendices-Volume IV. Table 2-3: Primary and Secondary Road System for the Ochoco National Forest.

Access and Travel Management Designation Miles Primary (High standard through-routes maintained for standard 270 passenger cars). Secondary (key inter-forest connections maintained for 226 standard passenger cars). Secondary (key inter-forest connections maintained for high 190 clearance vehicles). Other (Candidates for review under watershed analysis for 2,580 reduction of maintenance standards or decommissioning).

Table 2-4: Primary and Secondary Road System for the Deschutes National Forest.

Access and Travel Management Designation Miles Primary (High standard through-routes maintained for standard 399 passenger cars) Secondary (key inter-forest connections maintained for high 2,268 clearance vehicles) Other (Candidates for review under area watershed analysis for 5,873 reduction of maintenance standards or decommissioning).

Forest Highway Road System The Forest Highway Program is a federal program administered by the Federal Highway Administration with an objective of constructing and improving roads that connect National Forests to the main state transportation network. These routes may be state, county, or Forest Service roads that provide access to and through the National Forests. Designated Forest Highways qualify for federal funding for both improvements and enhancements under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21). Forest Highway funding can be used for planning, design, and construction work on designated routes as well as for other enhancement work along the routes such

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (8 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

as parking areas, interpretive sites, bicycle lanes, etc. Tables 2-5 and 2-6 below lists the roads designated as Forest Highways within the analysis area; they are also displayed on Maps IV-12 and IV-13 in the Appendices-Volume IV.

Table 2-5: Forest Highway Road System for the Deschutes National Forest

FH # Other # FH Name Length County(s) 19 US 97 Dalles/California 73 Deschutes / Klamath Highway 21 OR 58 Willamette 24 Klamath Highway 22 OR 126/242 McKenzie Highway 34 Deschutes 23 US 20 Santiam Highway 38 Deschutes / Jefferson 29 OR 31 Fremont 46 Deschutes / Klamath / Lake 46 FS 46 Cascade Lakes 69 Deschutes / Klamath Highway 90 FS 61 Crescent Cutoff 9 Klamath 92 FS 42 South Century 28 Deschutes Drive 93 FS 21 Paulina Lake Road 19 Deschutes 94 FS 23 Spencer Wells Road 7 Deschutes 97 FS 14 Metolius River Road 5 Jefferson 157 FS 43 Burgess Road 11 Deschutes 243 FS 60 Crescent Lake 2 Klamath 244 FS 45 Sunriver to Mt. 13 Deschutes Bachelor

Table 2-6: Forest Highway Road System for the Ochoco National Forest

FH # Other # FH Name Length County(s) 27 US 26 Prineville-Ochoco 48 Crook / Wheeler 96 FS 96 Haystack Reservoir 10 Jefferson 99 FS 33 Mill Creek Road Steins Pillar 11 Crook 100 Co. 123 Ochoco Ranger Station 9 Crook Road 101 FS 22 Johnson Creek Road 7 Wheeler 120 OR 380 Prineville-Logdell Highway 74 Crook 123 Co. 135 Puett Road 13 Crook 124 Co. 113 Beaver Creek Road 13 Crook 125 Co. 224 Newsome Creek 7 Crook

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (9 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

186 FS 64 Jordan Road 34 Jefferson 188 FS 27 McKay Road 13 Crook

Public Forest Service Road System The Forest Service has been working closely with the Federal Highway Administration recently to develop a new Public Forest Service Road Program that is somewhat similar to the Forest Highway Program discussed above. This program would also be funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program using Highway Trust Funds under TEA21 (or the next Transportation Bill to be voted on in 2003). By definition, a Public Forest Service Road (PFSR) is a Forest Service road that is "open to public travel", as in the definition of our Highway Safety Act roads. However, not all Highway Safety Act roads will qualify as Public Forest Service Roads. To qualify as a PFSR, the road must be a maintenance level 3, 4, or 5 road under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service, provide unrestricted access, and serve a compelling public need. Under this definition most of our Highway Safety Act roads that are arterials or collectors are listed as "potential" PFSR's; it is not anticipated that many local roads will fit this definition. Tables 2-7 and 2-8 list the potential PFSR's that the forests have selected to perform work on and include in the new program under the first round of funding (2004 - 2006), if the PFSR program is approved and funded. All potential PFSR's are displayed on Maps IV-14 and IV-15 in the Appendices-Volume IV.

Table 2-7: Proposed Public Forest Service Road Projects for the Deschutes National Forest (FY 2004 - FY 2006).

Forest Length Estimate Road Project Name Priority (Mi) (M$) 1 42 South Century Drive 9 $ 1,024 2 40 Three Trappers Road 19 $ 2,540 3 1815 Horse Butte Road 2 $ 580 4 11/1170 Lake Billy Chinook Access 26 $ 2,470 5 41 Conklin Road 7 $ 1,210 6 18/25 Eastside Tour Loop 21 $ 360 7 5800680 Odell Resort Road 1 $ 862 8 60/6020 Crescent Lake Access 9 $ 1,220 9 16 Three Creeks Lake Road 12 $ 3,820 10 22 South Ice Cave Road 7 $ 2,310 11 12 West Metolius Access 9 $ 2,712 12 4625 Elk/Hosmer Lakes Road 3 $ 480

Table 2-8: Proposed Public Forest Service Road Projects for the Ochoco National Forest (FY 2004 - FY 2006)

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (10 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

Forest Length Estimate Road Project Name Priority (Mi) (M$) 1 42 Big Summit Loop 43.5 $ 15,670 2 58 Paulina Road 7 $ 2,705 3 33 Mill Creek 11.5 $ 3,035

Unclassified Roads Unclassified roads typically result from low-standard temporary roads either built within the scope of timber sale contracts or from other unplanned, off-road vehicle uses such as gathering firewood and accessing dispersed recreation sites. After their intended use, such roads are typically decommissioned but are often visible as primitive wheel tracks or show up as features in aerial photos. In general, it is thought that unclassified roads have a low impact in terms of erosion and sedimentation. It is estimated that the Ochoco National forest has approximately 600 miles or more of unclassified wheel tracks and the Deschutes may have a higher number than that. These roads typically have not been mapped or recorded in the forest transportation database, but management direction in the new Transportation Policy of 2001 requires that we begin to inventory and track these unclassified roads in the future.

Road Maintenance Funding (Ochoco & Deschutes NF's)

Road maintenance funding has declined substantially over the past decade for both forests. Over the past 3 years the Deschutes National Forest road budget, (including both road construction and maintenance funds), has averaged around $1,800,000 and the Ochoco has averaged around $1,000,000. After overhead and other administrative expenses have been factored out, approximately $750,000 has been available for "on-the-ground" road maintenance work on the Deschutes and approximately $280,000 has been available on the Ochoco. These amounts are expected to remain relatively stable or slightly increase in the foreseeable future; however, they are substantially less than what is needed to fully maintain the road system to the objective standards. Beginning in 1998, the Forests began conducting road condition surveys to determine the annual costs necessary to fully maintain the road system to standard. In addition, any deferred maintenance work items necessary to bring the roads back to standard are recorded and documented. Tables 2-9 and 2-10 below compare the amount of road maintenance dollars currently being spent on the road analysis study roads with the amount of dollars needed to maintain those roads to standard as determined through the annual and deferred maintenance condition surveys. Table 2-9: Comparison of Existing Maintenance costs with Annual and Deferred Maintenance Needs for the Deschutes National Forest.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (11 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

Operational Existing Annual Deferred Total Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Miles Level Costs* Needs* Needs* 1 14 $284 $46 $1,499 2 1,422 $250,449 $691,892 $19,739,120 3 268 $228,656 $780,967 $5,787,375 4 126 $179,013 $526,361 $6,572,377 5 55 $87,150 $154,055 $1,064,517 TOTAL 1,886 $745,552 $2,153,321 $33,164,888

* Note: The figures in the table above reflect actual on-the-ground maintenance costs only. Overhead and other administrative costs (approximately 40%) are not included.

Table 2-10: Comparison of Existing Maintenance costs with Annual and Deferred Maintenance Needs for the Ochoco National Forest.

Operational Existing Annual Deferred Total Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Miles Level Costs* Needs* Needs* 1 9 $1,039 $5,288 $13,060 2 468 $92,516 $622,059 $8,764,696 3 127 $54,251 $354,893 $7,635,694 4 48 $50,869 $258,637 $7,211,219 5 57 $80,363 $361,497 $13,426,727 TOTAL 709 $279,038 $1,602,375 $37,051,396

* Note: The figures in the table above reflect actual on-the-ground maintenance costs only. Overhead and other administrative costs (approximately 40%) are not included.

For the Deschutes National Forest, the results of this analysis show that we need to spend approximately $33 million dollars to bring the road system back up to standard and then spend approximately $2.1 million annually to keep it maintained in a safe and environmentally sound condition. For the Ochoco National Forest we would need $37 million for deferred maintenance and $1.6 million annually. Although it would be desirable to request the funding necessary to accomplish this work, it is not anticipated that increases in funding of this magnitude are going to be available anytime in the foreseeable future. Therefore, options for managing the road systems are limited to either reducing the mileage and/or standard of roads to maintain, or continuing to prioritize maintenance work on the existing system and accept a continued increase in our deferred maintenance backlog. In addition to the large discrepancy between our present road maintenance funding and our projected road maintenance needs, the amount of road maintenance work traditionally performed by timber purchasers has been dramatically reduced over the past decade. The http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (12 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

reduced opportunity for sharing road maintenance responsibilities with timber purchasers, both in terms of work performed and collection deposits, will continue to compound our lack of ability to keep up with our maintenance needs. This condition is becoming very evident in our backlog of both surface rock replacement on our main roads and brushing on our local roads. The crushed aggregate and cinder surfacing on most of our main roads is worn out. We have traditionaly shared the work and expense of replacing surfacing materials with timber purchasers during active timber sales. With the dramatic decrease in the timber program, we have very limited means of replacing surface materials on our roads. This condition is becoming severe on both forests and can only get worse without new funding sources being found. We are also noticing a profound increase in the number of our objective maintenance level 2 roads that we can no longer drive in a full sized vehicle due to encroaching brush. These roads were typically brushed out as part of our active timber sales, but many have not had project use in years. We expect to see a significant portion of these objective maintenance level 2 roads move into an operational level 1 (closed) category due to lack of ability to maintain.

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC

The communities surrounding the Forests depend on the forests and grasslands to help meet their needs and the road system serves as the interface between the needs of the local communities (e.g. timber, forage, mining, and recreation) and the ecosystems themselves. Livestock, agriculture, minerals, and timber were/are the backbone of the local economies and as a result strongly shaped the social fabric that still defines most of the communities today. The existing road system was developed largely in the context of this historical perspective. The goods (e.g. timber, minerals, livestock) and many of the services (recreation, scenery) supported by the Forests are highly dependent on the types and location of roads that provide access for these uses. As a result, access to the resources on the Forests will continue to have a profound effect on both the economic and social dimensions of the communities that surround them. Over all uses of the road system and public lands within the area is changing in character as a result of the changing social an economic conditions in the region. Roads have become vital components of the human use of forested systems. Without roads, developing the economic activity critical to the quality of modern life would have been difficult, and roads remain central to many forest uses today.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (13 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

CULTURAL RESOURCES

On both the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests, there are over 3,200 known cultural resource sites, the majority of which reflect prehistoric use patterns prior to the 19th Century (the most common site type being a scatter of stone tool detritus), and the remaining are associated with more recent historic uses related to exploration, early settlement, mining, ranching, timbering and recreation. Cultural Resource sites can be found in almost any location on public lands. In general archaeological sites are found in or near riparian areas and terraces, including their confluences, areas providing shelter and access to food and other economic resources such as, camas prairies, on lithosols productive for lomatiums and bitterroot, at natural fisheries (cascades, falls and freshwater shellfish concentrations), by obsidian and other suitable tool-stone sources, along riparian areas productive for willows, red osier dogwood and tule marshes, etc. During the 1840s and 1850s thousands of emigrants passed through Oregon territory on the way to their future homesteads in the Willamette Valley. Few looked to dry Central Oregon for land until the valley filled-up with settlement. Hostilities between Native Americans and emigrant wagon trains and parties of miners passing through, also limited settlement of Central Oregon. Mining developed more fully during the 1860s in Eastern Oregon, which resulted in improved transportation routes, establishment of small communities and created local needs for natural resources and foodstuffs. Settlement took root during this era, with small populations centered around water, protection from weather and winds, and adjacent to transportation routes. The following site types and/or features are known to have high values and/or be at risk due to proximity to identified travel routes: Table 2-11: Site Type Determined Susceptible to affects of transportation system.

Code Site Type Code Site Type 101 Prehistoric structure 102 Burial/grave/cemetery 103 Ethonographic village 104 Hearth 105 Housepit 106 Midden 107 Shell midden 109 Petroglyph 110 Pictographs 117 Rockshelter/cave 118 Traditional Cultural 122 Flaked tools Properties 123 Ground stone tools 124 Cache 204 Historic structure 205 Historic structure remains 206 Historic structure complex 207 Historic structure complex remains 211 Dendroglyphs 213 Mine/Adit 215 Road 216 Stock driveway/corridor

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (14 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

217 Trail 17 Root gathering area (obsolete) 19 Fishing station (obsolete) 41 LS w/ flaked tools (obsolete) 42 LS w/ ground stone tools 43 LS w/ both flaked tools (obsolete) & ground stone (obsolete) 44 Lithic scatter w/ features 46 Hearth and/or fire (obsolete) cracked rocks (obsolete) 67 Logging camp (obsolete) 68 Historic camp/ community (obsolete) 85 Picnic/community kitchen 118 Traditional Cultural (obsolete) Property

BOTANY

The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests as well as the Crooked River National Grassland encompass a wide variety of plant communities. Roads within this analysis area travel through high elevation mixed conifer forests, ponderosa pine forests, juniper woodlands, and low elevation shrub-steppe communities. Plant habitats include:

● Ponderosa pine, dry mixed conifer forests and meadow openings. ● Juniper woodlands, grasslands, pine forest fringe. ● Riparian (including cottonwood galleries, swamps, and meadows). ● High elevation wet meadows and springs. ● High elevation forest/alpine habitats (dry and wet mixed conifer forests, lodgepole forests, and alpine areas). ● Shrublands.

Special Habitats

Botanical species diversity is dependent on the variety of habitats found throughout the National Forest. This diversity is a vital part of ecosystems that is important to the viability of other organisms, such as insects, birds, and mammals. Special habitats for this analysis are defined as those habitats that are unique in plant species composition in comparison to the common and dominant coniferous forests, juniper woodlands, and shrub-steppe communities. Special habitats considered in this analysis are wetlands (i.e., ponds, bogs, swamps), wet, moist and dry meadows, aspen stands, cottonwood bottomlands, and scablands. These habitats often represent a relatively small portion of the landscape, yet are vital to overall

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (15 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

ecosystem health.

Threatened, Endangered & Sensitive Plants

There are no listed Threatened or Endangered plant species on either the Deschutes or Ochoco National Forests. The Deschutes National Forest has 25 plant species on its Sensitive Plant List; the Ochoco National Forest has 26 plant species on its Sensitive Plant List.

Current maps and GIS analysis indicated the following sensitive species occur within 200 feet of roads:

● Achnatherum hendersonii (Henderson's rice grass) ● Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. estesii (Estes artemisia) ● Astragalus tegatarioides (bastard kentrophyta) ● Botrychium crenulatum ● Botrychium minganense ● Botrychium montanum ● Botrychium pinnatum ● Botrychium pumicola ● Calochortus longebarbatus var. longebarbatus (long-bearded mariposa lily) ● Calochortus longebarbatus var. peckii (Peck's long-bearded mariposa lily) ● Castilleja chlorotica (green-tinged paintbrush) ● Gentiana newberryi var. newberryi (Newberry's gentian) ● Penstemon peckii (Peck's penstemon) ● Scheuchzeria palustris var. americana (scheuchzeria)

Noxious Weeds

Weed populations are found along road shoulders, in dispersed campsites, trailheads, and timber harvest landings -- anywhere there is a ground-disturbing activity. The introduction of noxious weeds threatens habitats for sensitive species, such as Peck's penstemon, and degrades wildlife habitats. Noxious weeds threaten essentially all types of habitats, including low elevation ponderosa pine forests, juniper woodlands, grasslands, and shrublands. Diffuse and spotted knapweeds are spreading rapidly along roadsides and disturbed sites. Cheatgrass is an invasive non-native species that rapidly spreads off disturbed roadside shoulders into native plant communities. Noxious weeds can out compete native species and reduce habitat quality. Roads have a direct effect on the introduction and movement of noxious weeds. People, animals, and machinery move noxious weeds from place to place. Roads provide constantly disturbed habitats, devoid of competing vegetation, for establishment of weeds. Road maintenance contributes to the movement of weed seed, especially along major road corridors, such as Highway 97. One contributing factor is the movement of seed from cinder pits or other aggregate sources when the materials (and seeds) are moved and placed on roads for surfacing or to treat icy highways in the winter. Sometimes these material sources are used as waste disposal areas for other projects further contaminating them with seeds from the waste

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (16 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

debris. Another factor is the large amount of recreational traffic coming through and from the cities of Bend, Redmond, Sisters, and LaPine, where spotted and diffuse knapweeds are well established. Table 2-12 lists State-listed noxious weed species that are documented or suspected to occur on the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests, and indicates what species occur within 200 ft. of roads within the scope of this analysis. However, mapping is incomplete and the actual number of noxious weed species occurring within 200 feet of roads may be greater than listed below. Two hundred feet is an arbitrary distance; noxious weeds, such as yellow star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis), may not occur within 200 feet of roads (it does occur within 500 feet) but are likely to become spread and become established along roadsides and are a serious concern.

Table 2-12: State-listed Noxious Weed Species that are documented (D) or suspected (S) to occur on Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests. Noxious Weed species that will be analyzed in this analysis are those known to occur within 200 ft. of roads with the Road Analysis Area.

Mapped in GIS Ochoco within Deschutes NF TES 200 ft. of Species Common Name NF Noxious Plant Roads Weed List List within Analysis Area Agropyron Quackgrass D repens Cardaria draba Whitetop S D X Carduus nutans Musk thistle S Carduus Italian thistle S pycnocephalus Centaurea Diffuse D D X diffusa knapweed Centaurea Spotted D D X maculosa knapweed Centaurea Meadow D pratensis knapweed Centaurea Russian S D X repens knapweed Centaurea Yellow S D solstitialis starthistle Centaurea Squarrose S virgata ssp. knapweed Squarrosa Cirsium arvense Canada thistle D D X Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle D D X

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (17 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

Conium Poison hemlock S maculatum Convolvulus Field bindweed S D X arvensis Cynoglossum Common D D X officinale houndstongue Cytisus Scotch broom D D X scoparius Euphorbia esula Leafy spurge D D X Hypericum St. Johnswort D D X perforatum Isatis tinctoria Dyer's woad S Kochia scoparia Kochia S Linaria dalmatica Dalmation D D X toadflax Linaria vulgaris Butter & eggs D D X Lythrum salicaria Purple S loosestrife Onopordum Scotch thistle D D X acanthium Potentilla recta Sulfur cinquefoil S D X Salvia aethiopis Mediterranean S D X sage Senecio Tansy ragwort D D X jacobaea Taeniatherum medusahead D D X caput-medusae

Survey and Manage Plant Species

In 1994, the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service adopted standards and guidelines for the management of habitat for late-successional and old growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl, commonly known as the Northwest Forest Plan (USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management 2001). The Northwest Forest Plan (as amended by USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management 2001) includes mitigation measures (Standards and Guidelines) for species that, either because of genuine rarity or because of a lack of information about them, the Agencies did not know whether they would adequately be protected by other elements of the Northwest Forest Plan. These species are called "Survey and Manage". These Survey and Manage species are largely non-vascular plants (mosses and liverworts), lichens and fungi. The importance of these species to the health of ecosystems is just being recognized. The majority of

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (18 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

these species are found in mature to late-successional forests. Intact forests have substrates and microclimate (temperature and humidity) preferred by these species. Several species are dependent on pristine riparian or aquatic conditions. Roads create openings to interior forest habitats, reducing the quality of the habitat. Fragmentation of habitat creates conditions that many species may not survive. (USDA Forest Service 1998). Western portions of the Deschutes National Forest are within the Northwest Forest Plan. However, due to lack of GIS and database information, this level of botanical analysis will not evaluate the effects of roads on Survey & Manage plant species. These organisms will be evaluated in future analysis, assuming that more complete information will be available.

WILDLIFE

The roads analysis for the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests including the Crooked River National Grassland and portions of the Prineville BLM encompass close to two million acres. Habitats across this vast area range from low elevation sagebrush bunch grass to high elevation subalpine fir communities and from remote areas with very limited human intrusion to rural habitats adjacent to large population centers. Many species are sensitive to harassment or human presence at particular use sites, which is often facilitated by road access; potential reductions in productivity, increases in energy expenditures, or displacements in population distribution or habitat use can occur (Bennett 1991, Mader 1984, Trombulak and Frissell 2000). Examples are human disturbance of leks (sage grouse and sharp-tailed grouse), of nests (raptors such as ferruginous hawk), and of dens (kit fox).

Threatened, Endangered & Sensitive Animals

There are three species listed as threatened (Northern Spotted Owl, Bald Eagle, and Canada Lynx), one candidate (Oregon Spotted Frog), and several other species have been petitioned, or have some other potential for listing under the Endangered Species act (western sage grouse, California wolverine, mountain quail, northern goshawk, and fisher) by the US Fish and Wildlife Service that occur within the planning area. Negative effects of roads on western sage grouse, California wolverine, Canada Lynx, and fisher have been well documented in many studies.

Wildlife Management Objectives for Roads

Deschutes, Ochoco NF, and Crooked River NG Plans set management objectives for open road densities and seasonal closures to prevent disturbance to sensitive populations or habitats. Table 2-13: Management Objectives for Open Roads and Seasonal http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (19 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

Closures by Area. (m/m2 = miles per square mile)

Crooked River Road Densities Deschutes NF Ochoco NF NG Winter Range 0.5 - 1.5 m/m2 1 m/m2 1 m/m2 During 1.0 - 2.5 m/m2 During closure closure MA7 3 m/m2 3 m/m2 Outside Outside closure closure Summer Range 2.5 m/m2 3 m/m2 3 m/m2 Season of Deschutes NF Ochoco NF Crooked River Closure NG Winter Range Dec. 1 - May 1 Dec. 1 - May 1 Dec. 1 - March 31 Calving Areas May 1 - July 31 May 15 - May 15 to June June 30 30 Rutting Areas Sept. 1 - Sept. 1 - October 15 October 15 Lynx Denning April 15 - July 15 N/A N/A Bald Eagle Dec. 1 - August 31 Dec. 1 - May 1 Dec. 1 to May 1 Spotted Owl March 1 - July 31 N/A N/A Osprey April 1 - August 31 March 1 - March 1 - August 1 August 1

In most areas existing open road densities are higher than the identified objectives. The Trail System and Off-Highway Vehicle Management and Development EIS completed by the Ochoco N.F. in 1996 found road densities ranged from 0 to > 12 m/m2. Average road densities in General Forest and Winter Range designations were 4.01 m/m2 and 3.14 m/m2 respectfully. Similar results would be expected for the Deschutes N.F. Road densities in some areas have been reduced from these levels due to an increased effort to close roads. Since 1996 very little administrative road construction has occurred; however, non-system roads continue to be created by forest users. Other Forest Plan objectives for wildlife management as related to roads and road uses are described in Appendices-Volume I, Appendix I-2, Wildlife and Aquatic Road Direction.

Wildlife Habitat Effectiveness

Many of the low-elevation habitats in the analysis area are declining primarily due to increased conifer competition. Low elevation ponderosa pine stands once contained a sparse distribution of large diameter trees with very open stand conditions under the primary canopy. In some situations the presence of roads reduces the effectiveness of returning these habitats to more open stand conditions. Higher densities of conifer trees have been providing increased hiding cover and habitat security. Returning these habitats http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (20 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

to more natural open conditions increases impacts of road associated factors like hunting, poaching, sight seeing, etc. The majority of interior old-forest habitats exist at higher elevations. Both the Deschutes NF and Ochoco NF have designated large blocks of high elevation old-forest habitats as wilderness or roadless areas. Higher elevation habitats dominated by large structure have not been impacted as extensively as the lover elevation habitats; however these habitats were historically very stable with limited amounts of edge habitat. These habitats have been penetrated for timber harvest, recreation, and mass transit. Highway 26, 97, and 126 all go through high elevation habitats. In a review of forest fragmentation effects Reed et al. 1996, found that roads added to forest fragmentation more than clear-cutting by dissecting large patches into smaller pieces and by converting forest interior habitat into edge habitat. The total landscape area affected by clear-cut and roads was 2.5-3.5 times the actual area occupied by these disturbances (Reed 1996). Analysis for the Trail System and Off Highway Vehicle Management and Development EIS for the Ochoco NF and Crooked River NG found 33% of the analysis areas riparian habitats were influenced by road construction. Roads in the analysis area were within 25 feet on 17% and 400 feet on 52% of riparian habitats measuring from the center point of the riparian area (Ochoco NF, 1996). Similar influences could be expected on the Deschutes NF with potentially higher percentages in areas of the Cascade Mountains with greater annual precipitation and higher concentrations of riparian habitats. The population of Central Oregon is one of the fastest growing in Oregon. This is resulting in increased volume and type of vehicle access into wildlife habitats. Higher volume roads have been shown to preclude habitat use by some species. Increasing numbers of people walking through forested environments searching for mushrooms, antlers, and for other recreational activities increase energy expenditures of wildlife avoiding these contacts and can lead to habitat avoidance or death. Species most sensitive to road influences, road densities, or human activities include: elk, deer, antelope, bighorn sheep, wolverine, Canada lynx, and small mammals. Although vehicle induced mortality of larger animals occurs on forest roads it is generally less frequent than on highways due to generally lower vehicle speeds and traffic volumes. Higher levels of mortality are common for small mammals like squirrels on forest roads due to the direct association with forested habitats. Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) use has increased dramatically in the past several years. These new vehicles are capable of directly accessing habitats and further damaging habitats and reducing security levels. The Crooked River National Grasslands is closed to vehicle use off of designated roads. Some management areas on the Deschutes NF are designated route only use, others including the largest land base designation (General Forest) are open to off road vehicle use. The Ochoco NF is open to motorized vehicle use off of established roads except in riparian areas, on slopes greater than 30%, or if there is a designated closure. Quantifying the potential effects of OHV use associated with system roads is much more difficult in areas where vehicles area allowed to travel off of designated routes. Although OHV use off of established roads occurs on all administrative units it is safe to assume the levels and associated impacts are greater on http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (21 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

those areas allowing vehicle use off of designated routes. There are three designated OHV trail systems where OHV use is concentrated on National Forest and Grasslands, and one on adjacent BLM lands. These areas allow OHV use on designated routes only. Effects of OHVs on wildlife may include increased expenditure of energy due to stress from disturbance, destruction of vegetation which supports wildlife habitat and food, lower reproductive success due to disturbance during critical mating and reproductive periods, greater competition for resources due to population concentrations, displacement of animals, and although rare, even mortality. Species with greater sensitivity to human disturbance are likely precluded from utilizing habitats associated with these areas. Species like big game can adapt to predictable activities in specific areas but surprise encounters cause increased stress and may cause animals to move to other areas. This movement may cause greater risk of predation (Lyon 1979). In the Blue Mountains of Washington, Perry and Overly (1976) found reductions of deer use in habitat 1/8 mile from roads and reductions in elk use ½ mile from roads. Other species acclimate to the disturbance with only occasional increased energy expenditures due to disruption or low frequencies of death from vehicle impact or nest destruction. ODF&W in conjunction with the Forests have identified three major migration corridors within the analysis area. Deer, elk, and antelope migration routes have been altered due to several state highways. The expansion and sprawl of population centers has forced several sheet migrations into more restricted corridors. When these focused migration points come in contact with a state highway of the magnitude of Highway 97 numerous animals are killed yearly. Public lands in Central Oregon receive the bulk of hunting pressure because of their open access to the general public. This results in drastic increases in the number of individuals utilizing forest roads just prior to and during the big game hunting seasons running primarily from August through December. In some populations on the Ochoco NF and Crooked River National Grasslands there is a definite shift from public to private land use by big game animals during the hunting season (Pers. comm. Ferry). Poaching and recreational shooting of small mammals is well documented throughout central Oregon. Private and commercial fire woodcutting is a way of life for many people in Central Oregon. This has resulted in reduced down log and snag levels within 200 yards of most roads. Repeated woodcutting in areas where off road vehicle use is allowed have resulted in numerous nonsystem roads being created. The greatest effect of woodcutting on down logs and snags occurs in areas with high road densities relatively close to population centers. Species that depend on large trees, snags, or down logs, particularly cavity-using birds and mammals, are vulnerable to increased harvest of these structures along roads (Hann and others 1997). Post sale monitoring on one timber sale on the Ochoco N.F. revealed woodcutters had removed >80 snags after sale activities were completed. Management objectives for snag numbers were met after timber harvest activities but subsequent woodcutter activity reduced snag numbers below desired levels (Kuk, 1999 pers. com.).

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (22 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

AQUATIC RESOURCES

The roads analysis for the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests encompasses national forest lands and streams within the Deschutes basin above Trout Creek, the Crooked River basin lands, and portions of the upper John Day River basin. It covers ten 4th level HUC watersheds that encompass 69 5th level HUCs and xxx 6th level HUC's. Problems associated with roads that affect fisheries on both forests include increases in sediment from surface erosion and road fill failures. Fine sediment effects spawning and rearing success, and can decrease pool depth. Deep pools are an important habitat parameter for survival of both adults and juveniles in winter and summer, as these areas provide modulated temperatures. Roads on both forests have constricted floodplains and stream channels, reducing habitat complexity and area, and ground water retention, along with the reducing the streams ability to respond to floods and other catastrophic events. Constriction of the channel cause changes in channel type and gradient, which can result in channel incision, which further contributes to decreases in fish habitat. In addition, roads paralleling streams interrupt the flow of riparian and upland materials to the stream system. Shade, large wood debris, subsurface water flow, and course sediment inputs have all been interrupted resulting in reduced habitat complexity and increased temperatures. Perhaps the largest impact from roads on the fisheries resource has been in the form of reduced access to habitat from impassable culverts. Many stream crossings have culverts that are poorly designed not only for fish passage but also for passage for flood flows. These culverts have effectively eliminated upstream fish passage for juveniles and in some cases adults. Genetic interchange is therefore limited in these areas to a downstream flow, although perhaps more importantly is the loss of upstream passage for fish during summer low flows when cooler temperatures are likely in the headwater areas, which could result in mortality. Forest Plan direction for Aquatic Resources as related to roads and road uses is described in Appendices-Volume I, Appendix I-2, Wildlife and Aquatic Road Direction.

RECREATION

The Central Oregon area is a premier attraction for a wide variety of motorized and non-motorized recreation. The quality, quantity, and variety of recreation opportunities invite recreationists of all types to visit and reside in the area. The variety ranges from Cascade crest to high desert; from high elevation winter activities to the summer flats of Fort Rock, from designated areas for motorized activities to a multitude of non-motorized opportunities. With reasonable driving http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (23 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

times from much of the west coast, the area is accessible all year long for a number of attractive recreation opportunities. The consistently desirable weather increases the popularity and the population of central Oregon. The gentle topography of much of the area made it easy to utilize the railroad to log much of this area in the early 1900's. Many of these railroad grades became roads after they were abandoned, while open forest stands on the gentle terrain provided easy access to large portions of the area. Over the years, access roads to key recreation sites, mostly related to water or geologic features, were constructed by the agencies or in some cases by the users. With the advent and refinement of the 4-wheel drive vehicle, additional roads were created accessing other dispersed recreation sites, firewood cutting, and in some cases, just accessing new areas. The increase of access lead to the increase the stocking of water-bodies, leading to more recreation use. The development of the reservoirs added to the draw of fishing and further access needs around the reservoirs. As a result, there are more roads across the landscape than is necessary to provide appropriate access to the developed and dispersed recreation sites. The relatively easy topography and the sparse vegetation have allowed the construction of user created roads.

Developed Recreation

State, county, or level 3-5 roads generally access developed recreation sites. In most cases these are paved or high standard gravel surfaced roads. In most cases, these are 2 or 4 digit roads. There are some sites, which are accessed by level 2 roads. These usually get maintained over other level 2 roads. Approximately half of the recreation use on the Deschutes NF is associated with developed recreation sites, whereas on the Ochoco it makes up approximately twenty percent of the use. The typical season of use is the May through October with the bulk of the use occurring from the 4th of July through Labor Day. In addition to USFS sites there are many (8 on the DNF) private resorts, which are operated under a special use permit. In just about all cases state or county roads access these sites.

Dispersed Recreation

Dispersed Recreation takes place outside of developed recreation facilities and includes such activities as camping, hunting, fishing, hiking, caving, forest product collection, rockhounding, mountain biking, ORV use, and horseback riding. Much of these activities take place at locations associated with a water feature (lake or river). This is where roads and trails have been constructed over the years, either planned or user created. It is also where some of the most significant impacts occur, such as the degradation of water quality and erosion problems. Approximately half of the total recreation use is attributed to dispersed types of recreation as mentioned above. In general,

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (24 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

dispersed recreation takes place on the lower standard roads as well as user created roads accessing the more remote parts of the area, further from developed sites and higher standard roads. Driving for pleasure is the number one national recreation pastime. People drive roads of all types and standards just to explore. All types of vehicles will utilize most roads in order to access desirable areas.

Trailheads are considered developed sites, which access dispersed recreation activities such as hiking, horseback riding, mountain biking and OHV riding. Trail use has grown significantly in the last 20 years, in part from user trails being created (especially mountain bike and OHV). There has been a consistent increase in trail use due to the population and popularity of the area growing dramatically in the last 20 years. The types of use seeing the most increase in central Oregon in recent years have been OHV, mountain bike and snowmobiles. In all 3 cases, the central Oregon area has become known as a destination for these uses. All of these uses utilize roads as trails, especially lower standard roads. There is continued opportunity for utilizing unnecessary roads as trails. There has been a move to reconstruct and authorize user created trails in OHV and mountain bike trailed areas. Dispersed camping is desirable by those who seek a more pimative camping experience or for those who don't want to pay fees associated with many developed campgrounds. The more primitive experience fits well for some people. The increase in self-contained recreational vehicles has increased the level of dispersed camping. Dispersed sites are usually unmaintained and can contribute to resource impacts such as soil erosion and water quality degradation. As a result of this and the trend for less roads to maintain, more and more of these dispersed campsites are being closed, obliterated, or just made less accessible due to the closing of roads. These are generally lower standard roads that access dispersed campsites. Collection of forest products is a common use of the area. This includes woodcutting, plant collection, cone collection, rock hounding, Christmas tree cutting, etc. This generally requires the use of lower standard roads or user created roads for access into more remote areas. Fishing and hunting are two very popular pastimes for today's society. Both require use of all types of roads. The popular fishing spots in most cases have primary roads leading to them. There are some cases where lower standard roads are used to reach more remote fishing holes. Hunting generally uses all roads but especially lower standard roads to reach remote areas.

Primitive Areas

There are a number of primitive areas in central Oregon, including Wilderness areas, Oregon Cascades Recreation Area, and other unroaded areas. There are a total of eight National Forest Wilderness areas in central Oregon as well as numerous unroaded areas, such as old growth, research natural areas, Wilderness study areas, and more. Improved level 3-5, or state and county roads mostly access these areas. There are additional restrictions in most of these areas, http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (25 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 2

such as non-motorized and non-mechanical transportation means used within these areas. Travel is generally by foot or horseback. Roads leading to trailheads accessing these areas may be lower standard roads, but usually come off of primary roads. Use of these primitive areas is classified as dispersed recreation and consists of hiking, backpacking, horseback riding, sightseeing, photography, and others. The current trend is toward more (80%) day use, rather than overnight use.

GO TO

● Table of Contents

● Executive Summary

● Chapter I - Introduction

● Chapter 2 - Existing Situation ● Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions

● Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

● Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:30 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap2.shtml (26 of 26)5/31/2007 1:02:52 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment Roads Analysis Report ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Forest-Wide Assessment INFORMATION Maps & Brochures PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Chapter 3- Issues and Key Major Documents Actions Questions Monitoring Reports Project Information Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, Roads and road management have Assessments become hot topics for resource Publications specialists and the general public when discussing most resource management Recreational Activities activities today. Many issues and Volunteering concerns revolve around the balance between resource management, aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitats, plants and plant habitats, and access to Newberry National public lands. In order to address this Volcanic Monument topic and focus the direction of the analysis, the Road Analysis Team Conservation Ed. developed a set of issues (business Contracting needs) and key questions for Health addressing the issues, using the results Forest Products of a public involvement effort and an Information Needs Assessment (INA). Geology The public involvement effort and the Heritage INA were discussed in Chapter 1. Partnerships Following is a summary of the Issues Plantlife and Key Questions developed through Water/Fisheries these efforts and used for this Roads Wildlife Analysis.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (1 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

Links Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments on our service and your suggestions for improvement. Forest ISSUES SUMMARY

Deschutes National Forest 1001 SW Emkay Drive Below is a list of the issues, by resource area, that were used to Bend, OR 97702 guide the analysis. They were identified by members of the IDT during the INA process, as well as from comments received by the (541) 383-5300 general public from this and other site-specific analyses proposals. Ochoco National Forest This is not an exhaustive list, but was used to direct the Roads 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Analysis Team to key areas of concern for this analysis (See Prineville, OR 97754 Appendices-Volume I, Appendix I-4 for more background on these issues). (541) 416-6500 Crooked River National Grassland Aquatics 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 Water Quality/Quantity: There is a concern that roads are (541) 475-9272 affecting water quality in terms of sediment and stream temperature, and may be affecting water quantity from increased drainage networks that deliver water quickly to stream systems. Additionally, stream channels across the forests have been impacted by roads and have changed channel types, caused channel incision, and wetlands and floodplains have been filled and disconnected from their stream channels. Aquatic Populations: Aquatic populations of fish, amphibians and invertebrates have been impacted by roads. Stream systems have a reduced capability to produce these populations due to increased stream temperatures and sediment, and channel constrictions. Road crossings have affected the ability of fish populations and other aquatic species to migrate successfully into previously occupied habitat or to have upstream genetic interchange.

Botany

Effects on plant habitats: The presence, type, and location of roads may affect unique habitats and plant communities, reserve areas and their associated species, research natural areas, and the quality of riparian and wetland habitats. TES Plant Species: The presence, type, and location of roads may affect sensitive plant species and other plant species of concern. Noxious Weeds: The presence, type, and location of roads affect the establishment and spread of noxious weeds and non-native invasive plant species. Cultural Plants: The presence, type, and location of roads may affect plant species used by Native Americans. Road type and location may also affect access to gathering sites.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (2 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

Wildlife

There is a concern that the road system or the human activities it facilitates causes adverse impacts to wildlife such as collisions, harassment, displacement, avoidance, or serve as a barrier to movement. There is a concern that the road system or the human activities it facilitates causes indirect impacts to wildlife including habitat loss, fragmentation, negative edge effects, and snag/down wood losses. There is a concern that the effects of the road system may have adverse impacts on the ecological conditions needed to maintain species viability including impacts to critical or key habitats.

Social/Economic

With the concerns outlined above, there has been a trend of managing roads to better enhance or protect plant and animal habitats. Many roads have been closed and/or restored to natural conditions in an effort to do this. Though many miles of road are still open and available for travel, the impression of the general public is that they are being locked out of their public lands. They are concerned that this, along with fees to utilize some forest resources, will conglomerate until they are totally locked out of many "free" places open to them now.

KEY QUESTIONS

The key questions below were developed to help the Roads Analysis Team address the issues and concerns discussed above. Many of the questions came from the Roads Analysis Guide (FS-643, August 1999), and others were developed by the interdisciplinary team during the INA process. They are intended to identify potential areas of conflict, public issues or concerns, and/or known problem areas as they relate to the issues described above. By defining quantifiable criteria to measure the issues by, the team was better able to identify real problems and opportunities to resolve them. Like the key issues, the key questions are categorized by resource area. Not all key questions are applicable to all locations.

Aquatics

Where and how do roads and 303d listed streams interact? Are roads contributing to the listing of water bodies to the 303 (d) list? How do road/stream interactions influence temperature, dissolved oxygen and ph parameters? Where is sediment potentially coming from relative to roads? What is the potential for sediment delivery from identified road to stream? Where are the areas of vegetation loss due to road proximity and/or http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (3 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

crossings? How many miles of roads contribute to an increase in drainage? Where and how does the road system generate surface erosion? Where do roads and all streams interact? Where do roads constrict stream channels and flood plains? Where do we have Rosgen A-G type streams? How much riparian vegetation has been impacted from roads? Where are the areas of vegetation loss due to road proximity and/or crossings? Where do fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates occur in the watershed relative to roads? Where are roads constricting streams and reducing aquatic species habitat? How does the existing road system affect water quality? Should the transportation system in identified special watersheds (key, A1/2, high priority restoration) be treated differently then roads in other watersheds? Where and how does the road system affect mass wasting? Where are landslide prone areas likely to be? Where and how does the glacial terrain interact with the road system? Where and how does the Mazama Ash falls interact with the road system? How many roads do we have in riparian areas? What is the density of roads in riparian areas? Where are there barriers to fish passage? How does road development and use affect water quality in municipal watersheds? How and where does the road system affect risks to water quality from chemical spills or roadway-applied chemicals such as oil, deicing salts, herbicides, and fertilizers? How and where do roads affect wetlands? How and where does the road system affect fine sediments that enter streams lakes, and wetlands? How and where does the road system modify drainage density that affects water quality and quantity? How are road culverts affecting stream quality? How and where do roads affect water quantity? How and where do roads affect stream geomorphology? How does the road system affect access construction, maintaining, monitoring and operations of water diversions, impoundments, and canals? Are roads affecting municipal watersheds?

Botany

How and where do roads affect special and unique habitats?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (4 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

How do roads impact reserved lands (Late Successional Reserves and Riparian Reserves) that are habitat for rare and unique species? What Late Successional related species are found adjacent to roads and how is their habitat affected? How and where do roads affect Research Natural Areas? Are there unique plant communities affected by current or potential roads? How and where do roads affect the quality of riparian and wetland plant communities? What TES plant species are located in habitats with high probability of impact from roads? How and where do roads, mineral material sources, water sources and their use contribute to the spread of noxious weeds? How and where do contribute to the spread of noxious weeds? How and where do developed recreation areas and trailheads contribute to the spread of noxious weeds? What are the relationship of the transportation system and the intro/ spread of noxious weeds and other non-native invasive species?

Wildlife

Are their threatened and/or endangered species in the planning area? Where does the road system intersect areas important to wildlife movement (dispersal, migration etc.) thus increasing mortality due to collision? Where does the road system allow public access to areas used by wildlife during critical periods (reproduction, rearing, wintering) or is rare or unique habitat (caves, wetlands)? Where is road induced fragmentation and habitat loss causing negative edge effects? Where is the road system contributing to the reduction of habitat for species dependent upon snags and down logs (where snags and down logs are limited)? Do the impacts of the road system contribute to a decline in the ecological conditions necessary to maintain species viability?

Fire

Does the road system provide necessary (based on risk) access for firefighting resources, water sources, fire camp locations, and other improvements? Does the road system provide necessary access for fuels treatment including personnel, contract administration, equipment, and water sources? How does the road system affect access to water sources for road reconstruction/fire/range needs (water wells, pump chances, tanks, etc.)?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (5 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

Lands/Minerals

What is the likely transportation system needed for future needs (mineral materials, geothermal etc.)? How does the road system affect access to rock hounding areas?

Recreation

Is there adequate road access to all existing and planned developed sites? Are access roads maintained at a level commensurate with the type and amount of use? Is there an adequate amount of roads available to meet the demands for driving for pleasure and other dispersed recreation activities access needs such as, camping, hunting, fishing, sight seeing, forest products collection, caving, etc.? Are current regulations for road and trail systems adequate for current and future OHV use needs? Should OHVs be required to operate on roads and trails only in designated areas? Is road and trailhead access appropriate to primitive areas/ Wilderness areas/unroaded areas appropriate for the type of use and carrying capacity of the site?

Archeological

How and where do roads provide access for traditional cultural practice sites for Native Americans? How and where do roads and their use affect cultural plant species and access to gathering sites? How and where does road access affect archeological sites and historic properties? Which roads are historic transportation routes?

Social/Economic

How does the road system connect public roads and provide primary access to communities? How does the road system connect large blocks of land in other ownership to public roads? How does the road system affect managing roads with shared ownership or with limited jurisdiction? How does the road system address the safety of road users? How does the road system affect access needed for Administrative use? How does the current Highway Safety Act roads system affect or support current Travel Access Plan? What is the impact of converting roads to highway safety act standards or designation as Public Roads? Can we afford the cost of maintaining roads in risk-prone (unstable terrain, high erosion potential, etc.) areas? http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (6 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

How does the road system affect managing the timber base and other lands? How does the road system affect access to range allotments? How does the road system affect operating water diversions, impoundments? How does the road system affect access for collecting special forest products? How does the road system affect managing special use permit sites? What are the economic characteristics of the surrounding geographic area? What are the social characteristics of the surrounding geographic area? What social and economic trends are occurring in the region relevant to management of the road system? What is stakeholder perceptions related to the road system? What conflicts exist among the various uses, users, and managers of the road system? How does the road system affect the costs and revenues to the Forests? How are local communities social and economic health affected by road management? To what extent are the local communities dependent on forest resources (timber, mining, grazing, recreation, etc.)? How does the road system affect market and non-market, and priced and non-priced outputs? What is the road system relationship with the urban interface zones? Does the road system affect people's sense of place? Does the road system affect certain groups more than others (civil rights)? Does the road system affect who receives the benefits and who receives the costs associated with the forests (equity).

GO TO

● Table of Contents

● Executive Summary

● Chapter I - Introduction

● Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

● Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions ● Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

● Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (7 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 3

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:32 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap3.shtml (8 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:07 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Heritage Partnerships Plantlife Water/Fisheries ASSESSMENT PROCESS Wildlife

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (1 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

The basic principal behind the assessment was to compare the Links benefits (needs) of the road system with the impacts or risks that the Evaluate Our Service roads impose on key resources. In order to make this comparison, We welcome your comments the study roads were divided into individual segments and given a on our service and your set of ratings to measure the relative values of their road use suggestions for improvement. benefits against their resource risks. The rating system used was Forest based on a set of "factors" developed by the Roads Analysis Team to address the issues and key questions identified in Step 3 of the process as described in the previous section. Deschutes National Forest As mentioned above, the roads were divided into segments for the 1001 SW Emkay Drive road rating assessment. The segments were based on a variety of Bend, OR 97702 physical and administrative changes along the road, such as surface (541) 383-5300 types, jurisdictional changes, watershed boundaries, etc. The reason for breaking the roads into these segments was to allow for the Ochoco National Forest maximum flexibility of resource specialists to tailor their individual 3160 N.E. 3rd Street resource analyses to the study roads. For example, an aquatic Prineville, OR 97754 analysis may need to know when the surface type changes on a road (541) 416-6500 to assess surface runoff and sedimentation, and a wildlife analysis may need to know where a certain management area crosses the Crooked River National road to assess habitat disturbance. Grassland 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 (541) 475-9272 RATING FACTORS AND RESULTS

The rating factors were developed for four broad topic areas: Human Uses, Aquatics, Botany, and Wildlife. To ensure consistency across all four areas, a numerical rating system of, 0 = no effect/not applicable, 1-3 = low use/effect, 4-6 = moderate use/effect, and 7-9 = high use/effect was used for each category. The following sections give a brief summary of the factors used in the assessment followed by tables showing the overall distribution of the rating results for each factor. These results include all roads rated in the analysis for each forest. A more complete description of each factor, including the environmental processes, social, economic, and biological attributes, key question(s) addressed, the criteria for its numerical rating, and the data and analysis process used, is included in Appendices-Volumes 2 and 3. The Appendices also include a set of spreadsheets showing the individual ratings for each factor on each individual road segment.

Human Use

The Human Use rating factors considered public, private and administrative uses. Human Uses of the road system within the project area are the benefits associated with roads. Public and private uses of roads include access to both developed and dispersed recreation sites, access to private lands, and as travelways through the Forest to other lands. Administrative uses include all major activities necessary for resource management including access for timber stand management and livestock grazing, and access for wildfire prevention and suppression.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (2 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

Table 4-1: Human Use rating distribution summary for the Deschutes National Forest.

Rating Factor No Use Low Moderate High Community Ties 81% 4% 4% 11% Special Forest Products 9% 23% 37% 32% Developed Recreation 69% 4% 12% 15% Dispersed Recreation Sites 5% 30% 52% 12% Dispersed Recreation Uses 0% 13% 43% 43% Ownership 63% 4% 8% 26% Special Uses 52% 8% 16% 24% Timber Use 4% 7% 13% 76% Range Use 69% 12% 7% 12% Fire Use 0% 1% 2% 97% Lands and Minerals 73% 7% 5% 14% Tribal Uses 0% 22% 15% 63% Heritage Resources 0% 38% 0% 62%

Table 4-2: Human Use Rating distribution summary for the Ochoco National Forest.

Rating Factor No Use Low Moderate High Community Ties 73% 10% 10% 7% Special Forest Products 2% 13% 55% 30% Developed Recreation 45% 13% 31% 11% Dispersed Recreation Sites 2% 10% 57% 31% Dispersed Recreation Uses 1% 4% 31% 64% Ownership 53% 1% 13% 33% Special Uses 62% 10% 6% 22% Timber Use 2% 1% 8% 89% Range Use 1% 4% 19% 75% Fire Use 0% 0% 0% 100% Lands and Minerals 9% 21% 15% 55% Tribal Uses 0% 0% 9% 91% Heritage Resources 0% 38% 0% 62%

Aquatics

Aquatic risk rating factors were developed to assess key processes associated with roads as they link to aquatic environments. The list

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (3 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

of factors includes: geologic hazard; road related sediment; floodplain off-channel habitat; riparian habitat function; flow effects; at risk fish populations; and wetlands. Geologic hazard relates to both active and dormant landslide terrain and its potential for mass wasting, and also to soil types and the potential for erosion (sediment movement).

Table 4-3: Aquatic risk rating distribution summary for the Deschutes National Forest.

Rating Factor No Risk Low Moderate High Geologic Hazard 98% 1% 1% 0% Fine Sediment 70% 24% 5% 1% Flood Plane Function 84% 15% 1% 0% Flow 84% 13% 3% 1% Fish Populations (TES) 90% 6% 3% 1% Wetlands 80% 19% 2% 0%

Table 4-4: Aquatic risk rating distribution summary for the Ochoco National Forest.

Rating Factor No Risk Low Moderate High Geologic Hazard 12% 68% 16% 3% Fine Sediment 49% 38% 13% 0% Flood Plane Function 67% 17% 16% 0% Flow 64% 29% 7% 0% Fish Populations (TES) 80% 14% 4% 2% Wetlands 74% 19% 7% 0%

Wildlife

Wildlife rating factors were developed to address five main issues: wildlife movement (dispersal and migration), human disturbance during critical periods (reproduction, rearing, wintering), habitat fragmentation, decline in habitats for threatened, endangered, and sensitive species, and reduction of key habitat elements (i.e. snags and down logs).

Table 4-5: Wildlife risk rating distribution summary for the Deschutes National Forest.

Rating Factor No Risk Low Moderate High Migration 0% 26% 54% 20% Special Habitats 0% 22% 41% 37% Fragmentation 0% 28% 52% 19%

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (4 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

T&E Species 0% 57% 25% 18% Snags / Down Logs 0% 21% 69% 10%

Table 4-6: Wildlife risk rating distribution summary for the Ochoco National Forest.

Rating Factor No Risk Low Moderate High Migration 0% 33% 48% 19% Special Habitats 0% 33% 40% 27% Fragmentation 0% 45% 49% 6% T&E Species 0% 71% 28% 1% Snags / Down Logs 8% 52% 22% 17%

Botany

Botany rating factors were developed to address three main issues: special plant habitats, TES plant species, and noxious weeds and non- native invasive plant species. Special habitats considered in this analysis are wetlands and riparian plant communities; wet, moist and dry meadows; aspen stands; cottonwood bottomlands; and scablands. Road proximity to plant populations and/or habitat (within 200 feet), current use, and other factors were used to develop the overall ratings.

Table 4-7: Botany risk rating distribution summary for the Deschutes National Forest.

Rating Factor No Risk Low Moderate High Special Habitats 65% 2% 23% 10% T&E Species 72% 2% 12% 14% Noxious Weeds 2% 21% 20% 57%

Table 4-8: Botany risk rating distribution summary for the Ochoco National Forest.

Rating Factor No Risk Low Moderate High Special Habitats 37% 2% 42% 19% T&E Species 61% 5% 29% 5% Noxious Weeds 2% 17% 37% 44%

WATERSHED SUMMARIES

As mentioned earlier in this chapter the overall strategy for the benefit/risk assessment was to use fifth field watersheds as the basic http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (5 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

geographic scale to bound the analysis, and to look at individual road segments within that watershed. The fifth field watershed scale was selected for a number of important reasons. Given the scale of this analysis (two National Forests and a National Grassland), using fifth field watersheds would allow one to discern important interactions without getting bogged down in too much detail (sixth field), or become so watered down (fourth field or sub-basin) as to become meaningless. Focusing at this scale will also help to prioritize watersheds for further analysis based on resource concerns and potential restoration needs, identify issues within individual watersheds, establish the context for watershed analysis or project scale analysis, and identify potential management options for the main road system within a watershed. Since the roads being analyzed in this process consisted of the major road network that accesses the Forests, and are the major travel routes within and through the Forest, it was important to not only look at a road within a particular watershed, but where it originated, where it was going to, and its relationship to other roads. For example, although there may not have been anything significant about a road within a particular watershed, if this road was the major access to a destination resort in another watershed, than the rating in this watershed would reflect that fact. Whereas, if there was another access to this resort that provided the primary access to the same members of the public or communities as the road being evaluated, then the road being evaluated would get a different rating within this watershed.

A watershed summary was developed for each of the 69 fifth field watersheds within the analysis area. It is believed that this is an important component of the process in that it provides an opportunity to look at a watershed in a holistic manor not just on a road-by-road perspective. The watershed boundaries are displayed on Maps IV-16 and IV-17 in the Appendices-Volume IV. A summary of benefits, problems, and risks associated with the roads within each watershed may be found in Appendices-Volume I, Appendix I-5.

GO TO

● Table of Contents

● Executive Summary

● Chapter I - Introduction

● Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

● Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions

● Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks ● Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (6 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 4

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:33 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap4.shtml (7 of 7)5/31/2007 1:03:17 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning Documents About Us Contact Us Roads Analysis Report SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment ACTIONS FAQ'S Forest-Wide Assessment PROJECT Fire & Aviation INFORMATION Maps & Brochures PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Chapter 5 - Opportunities and Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Recommendations Major Documents Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information Step four of the road analysis process identified Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, the level of use and need for each road segment as well as identified relative levels of Assessments environmental impacts and risks associated Publications with the roads. This chapter describes how that Recreational Activities information was used to identify opportunities Volunteering and formulate recommendations for potential changes to road management activities and road improvement projects. Recommendations and guidance for further road analysis at the Newberry National project or watershed scale is also provided at Volcanic Monument the end of the chapter.

Conservation Ed. Contracting Health Forest Products Geology Heritage Partnerships ROAD MAINTENANCE OPPORTUNITIES Plantlife Water/Fisheries By comparing the access needs with the environmental risks identified in Wildlife Step 4, an initial assessment was made as to whether present road management practices were sufficient for a given road segment or whether Links road maintenance efforts need to be adjusted either up or down to match present conditions. The following strategies were assigned to each road segment and are detailed in the Road Management Recommendation Tables in Appendices-Volume II for the Ochoco National Forest and Appendices-

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (1 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

Evaluate Our Service Volume III for the Deschutes National Forest. These recommended changes We welcome your comments are also displayed on Maps IV-18 through IV-21 in the Appendices-Volume on our service and your IV. suggestions for improvement. Forest Management Strategies

Deschutes National Forest Maintain As Is: (Existing maintenance efforts are generally 1001 SW Emkay Drive in balance with access needs, no resource impacts are Bend, OR 97702 identified that would warrant a change in maintenance levels.) (541) 383-5300 Increase Maintenance Level: (Access needs identified exceed existing maintenance efforts and/or resource impacts Ochoco National Forest have been identified that indicate a need to perform 3160 N.E. 3rd Street maintenance at a higher level.) Prineville, OR 97754 Decrease Maintenance Level: (Access needs identified do (541) 416-6500 not support maintaining road at current level. Resource Crooked River National impacts are low and do not require maintenance to continue at Grassland present level.) 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Implement Seasonal Travel Restrictions: (Access is Madras, OR 97741 generally needed during the snow free season, but resource (541) 475-9272 concerns indicate a need for travel restrictions to be implemented at some time of the year to mitigate negative impacts.) Close Year Around: (Access needs are low and only necessary for administrative or project use. Road can be closed between projects. Resource concerns or maintenance budget limitations indicate a need to close road between project activities.) Decommission or Convert to Other Uses: (Full-sized vehicle access is no longer needed, road can be removed from the transportation inventory. Road can either be stabilized and returned to resource production or converted to other uses such as a motorized or non-motorized trail.)

Work Required

In addition to the management strategies listed above, the frequency of road maintenance activities was further categorized as needing to be performed on an annual, regular or "as needed" basis. These terms are defined where annual maintenance is performed at least one time per year, regular maintenance is performed at least every other year, and as needed maintenance occurs infrequently as conditions require, maybe once every 5 to 10 years. The following tables summarize recommended changes to maintenance levels and maintenance work frequencies on the analysis roads:

Table 5-1: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and work frequencies for the Deschutes National Forest. (all units in miles)

Operational Total Maintenance Level Maintenance Frequency Maint Level Length Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 1 14 2 2 1422 66 35 4 73 3 268 72 1

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (2 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

4 126 7 5 55 1 Total: 1886 147 37 4 73

Table 5-2: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and work frequencies for the Ochoco National Forest. (all units in miles)

Operational Total Maintenance Level Maintenance Frequency Maint Level Length Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 1 9 2 468 135 34 79 3 127 23 10 14 27 4 48 4 5 57 Total: 709 158 10 48 110

For the Deschutes National Forest, the results of this part of the analysis show that the majority of the road system, or 1702 miles of road, should be maintained at the present level, 147 miles should have an increase in maintenance level, and 37 miles should have a decrease in maintenance level. Thirty five miles of roads in the analysis were identified to be put into a maintenance level 1 category, (closed), and no roads were identified for decommissioning. Approximately 32 miles were identified that would have a benefit to resource values if some type of seasonal restriction were implemented. For the Ochoco National Forest, 541 miles of road, should be maintained at the present level, 158 miles should have an increase in maintenance level, and 10 miles should have a decrease in maintenance level. None of the roads in the analysis were identified for seasonal restrictions or additional closures. It is important to note that these recommendations were made based on a comparison of access needs and environmental effects without consideration to available funding. Each road segment that had a change in maintenance level or work frequency was evaluated for the resulting effect to the maintenance costs associated with the change. The individual changes to maintenance costs for each road segment are shown in the Road Management Recommendation Tables in Appendices-Volume II for the Ochoco National Forest and Appendices-Volume III for the Deschutes. Those changes are summarized by maintenance level for the two forests in the tables below: Table 5-3: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and corresponding costs for the Deschutes National Forest.

Current (OPML) Proposed (OBML) Difference m/l Miles $/mi Cost Miles $/mi Cost Miles Cost 1 14 $20 $284 48 $105 $5,058 34 $4,773 2 1422 $176 $250,448 1324 $151 $199,202 -98 -$51,247 3 268 $854 $228,656 262 $725 $190,174 -5 -$38,482 4 126 $1,420 $179,013 189 $1,340 $253,604 63 $74,591 5 56 $1,570 $87,150 62 $1,572 $98,063 7 $10,913 Total: 1886 $395 $745,551 1886 $396 $746,100 0 $548

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (3 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

Table 5-4: Summary of changes to Maintenance Levels and corresponding costs for the Ochoco National Forest.

Current (OPML) Proposed (OBML) Difference m/l Miles $/mi Cost Miles $/mi Cost Miles Cost 1 9 $115 $1,039 9 $119 $1,071 0 $32 2 468 $198 $92,516 344 $159 $54,668 -124 -$37,848 3 127 $426 $54,251 229 $364 $83,208 101 $28,957 4 48 $1,055 $50,869 71 $913 $64,977 23 $14,108 5 57 $1,415 $80,363 57 $1,415 $80,363 0 $0 Total: 709 $393 $279,038 709 $401 $284,287 0 $5,249

The results of the analysis show that if the road maintenance recommendations are implemented, there would be a net increase of 65 miles of Highway Safety Act (HSA) roads on the Deschutes and a net increase of 124 miles on the Ochoco. With compensating maintenance cost increases and decreases from changes to both maintenance levels and maintenance work frequencies, the overall change to the maintenance cost requirements would almost break even on the Deschutes, with an estimated overall increase of $548, and would increase by $5,249 on the Ochoco. However, as discussed earlier in the Existing Condition section of this report, our available maintenance funding would still only be about 1/3 of what is needed to fully maintain the road system to standard. If we were to try to reduce the number of miles of road to that which we could fully maintain on the Deschutes National Forest with our present appropriated maintenance budget of $750,000, we would only be able to maintain approximately 200 miles of our main road system. The remaining 1680 miles of our arterial and collector road system would either have to be closed or put into a self maintaining condition. On the Ochoco National Forest we could fully maintain less than 100 miles of our highest use roads before the current $300,000 maintenance allocation is used up. With the amount of public, private, and administrative use identified for most of the roads on our road systems, it would not be feasible to close any significant number of these main roads. If maintenance levels are significantly reduced below where they are presently at today, we will not be able to provide the transportation service that is expected and necessary for our administrative and public needs.

ROAD IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

In addition to the road maintenance opportunities discussed above, several road reconstruction projects and other opportunities for site specific resource improvement projects were identified during step four of the analysis. These projects are listed in the watershed summary sections of Chapter 4 and need to be further analyzed for feasibility at the watershed or project scale. If further analysis finds them to be desired projects, funding for implementation would be sought through any appropriate programs that come up in the future such as the Capital Investment Program, the 10% Road and Trail Program, the Deferred Maintenance Program, etc. No site specific needs were identified for adding new roads to the main

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (4 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

transportation system through presently unroaded areas. However there are a few identified needs for realigning some sections of existing roads to alleviate resource concerns. These roads are identified in the spreadsheets and discussed in the watershed summaries. There will undoubtedly be occasional needs to add local roads to the system in the future to support various commercial and administrative needs. The need for and standard of any of these roads will be identified during project scale analysis and appropriate decisions made through site specific NEPA analysis.

KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Current maintenance levels do not match access needs. The current road network provides adequate access for Public, Private, and Administrative needs; however this Roads Analysis indicates a need to adjust maintenance levels on some roads to better serve our road users and to minimize adverse effects to resources. Recommendations

● Change objective maintenance levels to those proposed in the Road Management Recommendation Tables in the Appendices-Volumes II and III. ● Move roads from existing operational maintenance levels to proposed objective maintenance levels as opportunities and budgets allow. ● Adjust the Highway Safety Act road system as proposed on Maps IV-5 and IV-7 in the Appendices_Volume IV. ● Update Road Management Objectives for all roads in the analysis to reflect changes listed above. ● Update road data in INFRA and GIS databases.

Current maintenance budgets are insufficient to meet current maintenance needs. Recent forest-wide condition surveys indicate that our current road maintenance funding only meets approximately 30% of the annual maintenance needs on the Ochoco and Deschutes National Forests. The deferred maintenance backlog for both forests exceeds 70 million dollars and will continue to grow until additional funds can be found. Recommendations

● Seek additional funding for road maintenance through regular appropriations. ● Seek additional funding sources and methods for rock replacement on aggregate surfaced roads. ● Seek new and additional funding sources for road maintenance and improvements through any available funding programs such as Capital Investment Programs, Payments to Counties, Forest Highway Programs, etc. ● Develop the Public Forest Service Road System as proposed on Maps IV- 14 and IV-15 in the Appendices_Volume IV.

The current road system poses risks to water quality/quantity and fish habitat. Many roads were constructed in close proximity to streams or cross streams and contribute to sediment movement. Many culverts throughout the project area are too small (undersized) and are barriers to

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (5 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

fish passage. The current road system has increased the hydrologic network causing water to flow more quickly from most fifth field watersheds. Recommendations

● Check for proper culvert sizes on all stream crossings. ● Check roads for adequate cross drainage during project analysis. ● Evaluate surfacing needs on roads with high traffic volumes. ● Adjust alignment away from riparian areas, as opportunities arise. ● Repair fill and cut slope failures in a timely manner, especially those located within landslide terrain. ● Seek additional funding for road maintenance.

The current road system and its uses pose risks to wildlife and wildlife habitats. Many roads were constructed in close proximity to streams or cross streams. Most areas outside of Wildernesses and Roadless Areas are well roaded. Many roads and land areas see extensive use year round by passenger vehicles and off-highway-vehicles (OHV), including over- snow vehicles. These factors often result in collisions, harassment, and displacement of animals, as well as the roads acting as a barriers to movement. In addition, the roads themselves often result in habitat loss and fragmentation. Recommendations

● Relocate roads away from sensitive wildlife areas where feasible and when opportunities arise. ● Review and update forest-wide travel and access management policies for motorized traffic both on and off roads. ● Minimize wildlife harassment by enforcing existing travel management policies. ● Ensure existing seasonal restrictions are effective. ● Implement additional seasonal restrictions where needed.

The road system and its uses pose risks to plants and plant habitats. Some roads are affecting unique habitats and plant communities, including TES, and riparian and wetland habitats. In addition, some roads also affect access to gathering sites by Native Americans. Recommendations

● Continue to treat, and monitor for noxious weed infestations along all roads. ● Relocate roads away from sensitive plant habitats where feasible and as opportunities arise. ● Review and update forest-wide travel and access management policies for motorized traffic both on and off roads. ● Minimize off-road ground disturbance by OHV's by enforcing existing travel management policies.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS

According to the Forest Service Road Management Policy published January 12, 2001, all NEPA decisions signed after January 12, 2002, that involve any

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (6 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

of the items listed below, must be informed by a Roads Analysis.

1. Changes in access such as current use, traffic patterns or road standards (FSM 7712.13c). (e.g., closing currently open roads, opening currently closed roads, adding/changing seasonal restriction periods, changing maintenance levels, etc.) 2. When adding new roads to the transportation system (FSM 7712.12b). (This includes both new construction and newly acquired roads.) 3. Road construction, reconstruction, or decommissioning (FSM 7712.12b, FSM 7712.13c).

This Forest-Wide Roads Analysis satisfies the requirement for informing decisions about road related projects on our arterial and collector road system and on all maintenance level 3, 4, or 5 local roads included in this analysis. In some cases it may be sufficient to inform decisions about specific projects involving other local roads. Although a Roads Analysis below the Forest Scale is not automatically required for individual projects, it is anticipated that watershed or project specific roads analysis will be necessary to inform most road related decisions at the project level. It is the responsibility of the Responsible Official to determine the need for such additional analyses. The flowchart on the following page was developed as a guidance tool to help the Responsible Official determine the need for roads analysis for individual projects. When the Responsible Official determines that a watershed or project level roads analysis is needed, the analysis must be conducted according to the same six step process used in this analysis, but will be focused on the needs and issues associated with the local road system in the project area. The risk assessment tables and watershed summaries developed in step four of this analysis should provide good broad-scale background information when beginning site specific project analysis. The ID team who worked on the Forest-Wide Roads Analysis, (as listed in chapter 1), is available to help offer advice and guidance to project ID teams starting their project analyses.

Decision Guide for Project Analysis

Step 1: Will the NEPA decision involve any of the following?

● Changes in access such as current use, traffic patterns, or road standards ● Adding new roads to the transportation system. This includes both new construction and newly acquired roads ● Road construction, reconstruction, or decommissioning, where there may be adverse effects on soils and water resources, ecological processes or biological communities.

NO - Document and proceed with project planning YES - Go to step 2

Step 2: Is the project on an arterial or collector road? If so, is the Forest-wide Roads Analysis adequate to inform the project decision?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (7 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Chapter 5

YES - Reference Forest-Wide Roads Analysis and proceed with project planning NO - Go to step 3

Step 3: Is there sufficient information within the Forest-Wide Roads Analysis, Watershed Analyses, ATM Plan, etc., to inform the project decision?

YES - Document and proceed with project planning NO - Go to step 4

Step 4: Conduct Watershed or Project Scale Roads Analysis

● Ø Identify appropriate scale and intensity of road analysis to inform decision. ● Proceed with road analysis following six step process outlined in FS-643. ● Address the following items at a minimum: 1. 1. Identification of needed and unneeded roads. 2. Identification of road associated environmental and public safety risks. 3. Identification of site-specific priorities and opportunities for road improvements and decommissioning. 4. Identification of areas of special sensitivity, unique resource values, or both. 5. Any other specific information that may be needed to support project level decisions. ● Proceed with project

GO TO

● Table of Contents

● Executive Summary

● Chapter I - Introduction

● Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

● Chapter 3 - Issues And Key Questions

● Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

● Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:35 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/chap5.shtml (8 of 8)5/31/2007 1:03:30 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

KEY FINDINGS AND Newberry National RECOMMENDATIONS Volcanic Monument

Conservation Ed. Chapter I - Introduction Contracting Health BACKGROUND Forest Products ROAD ANALYSIS PROCESS Geology ANALYSIS PLAN Heritage Partnerships Scope and Plantlife Scale of the Water/Fisheries Analysis Wildlife Objectives Information Links Needs Public Involvement http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (1 of 6)5/31/2007 1:16:39 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments ANALYSIS OVERVIEW on our service and your suggestions for improvement. INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM Forest Chapter 2 - Existing Situation

Chapter 4 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, And Risks

ASSESSMENT PROCESS RATING FACTORS AND RESULTS WATERSHED SUMMARIES

Chapter 5 - Opportunities And Recommendations

ROAD MAINTENANCE OPPORTUNITIES ROAD IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS DECISION GUIDE FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (2 of 6)5/31/2007 1:16:39 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

List of Tables

Appendices

Appendices-Volume I

Appendix I-1: GIS Core Data pilot Program Final Regional Report Appendix I-2: Roads Analysis INA Summary Report (pdf) Appendix I-3: Road Management Direction, Wildlife and

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (3 of 6)5/31/2007 1:16:39 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Aquatic Appendix I-4: Issue Background Papers Appendix I-5: Watershed Summaries

Appendices-Volume II (Ochoco Tables)

Appendix II-1:

● Code Definitions (Road Management Recommendations Table) ● Road Management Recommendations

● Road Management RecommendationTable (pdf)

Appendix II-2:

● Code Definitions (Human Uses Assessment Table)

● Access Needs Assessment (Human Uses)

● Human Uses Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix II-3:

● Code Definitions (Aquatic Assessment Table)

● Aquatic Risk Assessment

● Aquatic Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix II-4:

● Code Definitions (Wildlife Assessment Table)

● Wildlife Risk Assessment

● Wildlife Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix II-5:

● Code Definitions (Botany Assessment Table)

● Botany Risk Assessment

● Botany Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendices-Volume III (Deschutes Tables)

Appendix III-1:

● Code Definitions (Road Management Recommendations Table) ● Road Management Recommendations

● Road Management RecommendationTable (pdf)

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (4 of 6)5/31/2007 1:16:39 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

Appendix III-2:

● Code Definitions (Human Uses Assessment Table)

● Access Needs Assessment (Human Uses)

● Human Uses Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix III-3:

● Code Definitions (Aquatic Assessment Table)

● Aquatic Risk Assessment

● Aquatic Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix III-4:

● Code Definitions (Wildlife Assessment Table)

● Wildlife Risk Assessment

● Wildlife Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendix III-5:

● Code Definitions (Botany Assessment Table)

● Botany Risk Assessment

● Botany Risk Assessment Table (pdf)

Appendices-Volume IV

These map files range in size from 500 to 800 K at 150 dpi.

Map IV-1: Vicinity Map Map IV-2: Roads Analyzed (Ochoco) Map IV-3: Roads Analyzed (Deschutes) Map IV-4: Existing Highway Safety Act Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-5: Proposed Highway Safety Act Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-6: Existing Highway Safety Act Road System (Deschutes) Map IV-7: Proposed Highway Safety Act Road System (Deschutes) Map IV-8: Existing Primary/Secondary Road System (Ochoco) Map IV-9: Proposed Primary/Secondary Road System (Ochoco) - NO MAP Map IV-10: Existing Primary/Secondary Road System (Deschutes) http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (5 of 6)5/31/2007 1:16:39 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Roads Analysis Report

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:39:38 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/index.shtml (6 of 6)5/31/2007 1:16:39 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning Documents About Us Contact Us ROAD ANALYSIS SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment ACTIONS FAQ'S Appendix I-1 PROJECT Fire & Aviation GIS Core Data Pilot Program INFORMATION Maps & Brochures Final Regional Report PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Region and Forest(s): Region 6 - Ochoco and Deschutes Projects & Plans National Forests and Crooked River Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Grassland Major Documents Pilot Title: Forest-wide Road Analysis Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information Key Contacts : Elvira Young Jim Minogue Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, Assessments

Publications Recreational Activities Volunteering I. Introduction A. Project Description: Newberry National Volcanic Monument ● Forest Service policy requires that a forest-wide (mid-scale) roads analysis be completed within two years (January 12, 2003) Conservation Ed. ● The Forests (Deschutes and Ochoco) and Grassland proposed to analyze the "backbone" transportation system including the inter-relationship with State, Counties, Contracting Tribal, and other Federal agency transportation facilities. The project area covers Health 5,759,493 acres and 13,367 miles of roads. Forest Products ● Roads analysis is an integrated ecological, social, and economic approach to Geology transportation planning, addressing both existing and future roads. Heritage ● The Analysis is designed to be flexible and driven by road-related issues important to Partnerships the public and to resource managers. ● Roads Analysis will neither make decisions nor allocate lands for specific purposes. Plantlife ● Roads Analysis helps implement Forest Plans by identifying management opportunities Water/Fisheries that can lead to site-specific projects. It can also identify needed changes in Forest Wildlife Plans to be addressed in Plan amendments or revisions. ● Roads Analysis provides information for decision making by examining important Links ecological, social, and economic issues. Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments The project selected a specialist from each resource area to serve as a primary on our service and your Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) member. The primary specialist worked with their suggestions for improvement. counterparts on the other units to get input into the analysis. The core team had 12 Forest people and the whole team consisted of 25 people. There was also a GIS person fulltime assigned to get the data needed for the analysis and help the IDT with analysis. B. Project Timeline: Information Needs Assessment -This started as soon as the IDT was selected in March 2001. Most of the team members had not done an INA before this project so there was

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (1 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

Deschutes National Forest some time needed up front to explain the process and how necessary it was to get the 1001 SW Emkay Drive pre-work done before everyone met to do the assessment. Not all of the IDT knew what Bend, OR 97702 data was available on their units or how to set priorities on what data they needed first. Since this information was not supplied to the IDT along with their pre-work, it made the (541) 383-5300 assessment process even more difficult. If the information had been provided at the start, Ochoco National Forest the process might not have taken as long. 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Data Collection - One of the units required data from our stream layer. The collection Prineville, OR 97754 was in progress when the project started and was completed for the project. There were (541) 416-6500 other layers needed from other agencies to answer questions in the Road Analysis process. This process was slow as not all the information was electronic. Crooked River National Grassland Data Conversion - Data conversion was the most time-consuming activity. The road 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 layer was the most important layer and trying to combine two Forest datasets together Madras, OR 97741 was very difficult. Combining overlaying routes, deciding which theme to use over another's, which attribute data in INFRA to use, adding in the Prineville BLM roads and (541) 475-9272 adding their attribute data were all difficult since the two agencies are using different database applications. Private roads were not going to be analyzed by this project. Streams were the next challenge, as we needed to route the streams on the Deschutes National Forest and combine them with the Ochoco National Forest and Crooked River Grassland. The streams were routed by June, and combined with the other Forest and Grassland by July. As the stream and road layers were being worked on, Cultural Resource layers were also being worked. Combining these three layers took the most GIS time. The rest of the data conversion time was used to convert existing Ochoco data into the UTM 10 projection so that projections were consistent across agencies. Time to consolidate attributes was not available. Analysis - Most of the analyses combined two or more layers. Once the layers were unioned together the IDT used ARCVIEW to do some of their queries. The rest of their queries were done in Excel and then reconnected to ARCVIEW to view results. There were queries that the GIS analyst needed to do, for example, calculating the road density by watershed. The analysis is on-going as the project is not complete. Products - Most of the products are "GLOBS" ( one coverage created from multiple layers). From the GLOBS, the data was converted to Excel or Access format to make queries. The results of these queries were connected back to ARCVIEW to display the results. There will be more products produced as the project progresses, most likely maps to display recommendations for public involvement and additional spatial analysis requests. Management decision - From the results of the roads analysis, management will prioritize which watersheds for possible restoration opportunities. This analysis will also help determine which road maintenance levels need to be raised or lowered, based on the level of use and resource issues. This will help determine the funding needs for road maintenance. Final report - Due to the large amount of data for this analysis and the time required to combine it all, the final report will not be completed until March. The analysis portion of this project was scheduled to be completed by the end of January. Project Timeline

Nov- Spring Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Jan Dec 2002 INA X X X X X Data Collection X X X X Data Conversion X X X Roads Analysis X X X X X X Products X X X X X X ManagementDecision X Final Report X

C. Project Costs --- Cost Accounting Spreadsheets, attached as Appendix 1 D. ID Team Participation - The ID Team varied in their level of understanding of what they could do with GIS. Until this project, about 50% of the members used GIS on a

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (2 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

regular basis on their own. Most of the time the GIS analyst provided all the support to getting the data ready for analysis, answered the IDT questions and produced all of the maps. Now 90% of the team are able to make maps on their own or show results of their queries in ARCVIEW. It has increased their awareness of what they can do with GIS and has shown them that having common layers and attributes will help them get their work done more efficiently. For some this has been a steep learning curve and they would prefer the GIS analyst provide all the support. E. GIS Core Data Layers Used in the Pilot - summary of use, Data Standards Reporting Spreadsheets attached as Appendix 2.

GIS Core Layer Comments about Use Roads and Trails Used with core attributes Did not put the trails and roads together into one layer. Streams Used with the attributes set by the NW Hydrology Framework. Water Bodies Used core attributes Watersheds Used core attributes Land Used legacy data and did not change to met the core attributes. Terrestrial Ecological Units Not Used - Does not exist TEU: Soil Used legacy data TEU: Geology Used legacy data TEU: Geomorphology Used legacy data where it existed. TEU: Potential Natural Communities Used legacy data Topography Used with core attributes Existing Vegetation Used legacy data Wildlife Observations Used legacy data Wildlife Surveys Used legacy data Allotments Not used, but meets core standards Heritage Sites Used legacy data (meets proposed attributes) Heritage Surveys Used legacy data (meets proposed attributes) Developed Recreation Sites Used legacy data

F. Status of National Applications for use by the Pilot - Infra Travel Routes was the only application used for this pilot. As for the rest of the national applications we tried to meet the core data standards suggested for the application. II. GIS Core Layer Discussion The layers on the Ochoco needed to be projected into UTM10 to match all other datasets. For members from the Ochoco it was hard to remember that the data was in meters. In addition, if they wanted to use it back on their unit they needed to either re-project the Core Pilot data to Stateplane or project the home data to UTM10. Roads and Trails Data Collection There was very little data collection needed because most of the information needed for the analysis were available on the three units. What was missing were the connecting private and BLM roads. Data Conversion: Since this was the base layer and the reason for this analysis, both the spatial and tabular data needed to reflect what was really out there. We were faced with the problem of getting data from both Forests and the BLM into one database and not having the expertise to do so. As a result, we kept both forest Infra databases separate. A layer was created where the basic attributes were attached to the spatial data along with the BLM roads and their associated data. Use of Layer: This layer was used 100% of the time in combination with all of the layers listed below to analyze effects. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (3 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

Adequacy of Core Attributes There were many of the attributes that were not used during this analysis. However, the ones that were used were adequate. Other Layer Comments Need to decide how to store other agency's spatial and attribute data in Infra Travel Routes. In addition, how to include private roads and collect the data needed to be used in our analysis. Streams: Data Collection' On the Deschutes N.F., stream survey locations were manuscripted and digitized from paper maps. On the Ochoco National Forest, there was no need for data collection. Data Conversion: On the Deschutes, one stream layer was created from multiple sources. Using the Stream Routing Tool, streams were routed to meet the NW Hydro Framework data standards using LLID as the core attribute. Once this was completed it was to be appended with the Ochoco and BLM layers. There were problems associated with this that prevented this work from being accomplished during the Pilot. Use of Layer: This was used to determine stream proximity to roads, where we have anadromous fish close to the roads and where we need to protect soils and other resources associated with streams. Adequacy of Core Attributes; The data attributes used were adequate. Waterbodies The layer existed and needed very little data collection or conversion. Use of Layer: To analyze their relationship to recreation areas and the impacts from access provided by the transportation system. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Watersheds This layer has existed for the Central Oregon area for approximately two years. This layer was created in cooperation with the BLM and NRCS. ArcInfo regions were created for HUC4, HUC5 and HUC6. Use of Layer: The watersheds were used to divide up the analysis area to help make recommendations of where to concentrate future analyses and restoration work. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Lands We did not do any data collection or conversion except to create common layers between the units. We did not region the entire layer together. Not all the region layers existed on both forests. Use of Layer: This layer was used to show where land ownership and land designations were. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Soils No data collection or data conversion was done. Use of Layer: This layer was used to identify where the highly erosive soils are in relation to the roads. Combined with slope and streams, analyzed sediment transport. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Geology No data was collected or converted. Used the 500k layer developed by the State. Use of Layer To see what parent material lay under the roads and their inherent stability. Adequacy of Core Attributes

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (4 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

The data attributes used were adequate. Geomorphology No new data was collected or converted. Used what existed. Use of Layer Combined with the roads, analyzed where potential slides, slumps and fault might occur. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Potential Natural Communities Data Collection This existed on both Forest Service Units but not on the BLM Unit. Data Conversion: There was inconsistency of how the attributes were created between the two Forest Service units and there needed to be coordination between the two to create a common set. We created one layer carrying all of the attributes from both. Use of Layer This was used to help determine where potential habitat was and how the roads affected it. It was also used to determine where to add wet areas to the waterbodies layer for swamps, seeps and springs. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Topography No data collection Data Conversion We used 10 meter DEMS. Use of Layer This layer was used to determine elevation and to calculate slope and aspect. This was one of the layers that was used in the majority of the analyses. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Existing Vegetation No data collection was done. Data conversion: There were many different layers to use between the two Forests. On the Ochoco, classified satellite data was used and on the Deschutes, Photo Interpreted Vegetation and the Activity layer was used. Use of Layer This layer was used to identify habitat needs for wildlife. Analyzed the habitat in relation to the roads and if there was enough suitable habitat without fragmentation. Wildlife Observations Data collection: Data was gathered from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Data Conversion: Attribute data was in Oracle and from this, observation locations needed to be generated. There were many different layers where we have the various threatened, endangered and sensitive species. Use of Layer Wildlife observation points were used to analyze their relationship with roads. Allotments This layer was used only for display. Developed Recreation Sites Data Collection and Conversion No new data was collected but what existed was converted to meet the core standard Use of Layer Where there was data it was used to display its location in relation to roads. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate Heritage Sites Data Collection and Conversion

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (5 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

Data that already existed on both Forests and the Grassland was used. Use of Layer The points, lines and polygons in this layer were overlayed with the roads to see how close the roads were to these features. From this information the archeologists were able to evaluate whether a road might affect the site. Adequacy of Core Attributes The data attributes used were adequate. Heritage Surveys This layer was not used. It would have been used if there had been more time to collect and verify a predictive model of where sites might be found. III. Lessons Learned - report in terms of 1) The data; 2) The people; 3) The technology A. What worked well: Getting a common data set across Central Oregon has gotten a lot of specialists' attention. They are now able to use the layers created in this pilot to do other province wide projects as well as local projects that cross Agency and Forest boundaries. This project has helped the Forests to understand what data is out there and what they still need to work on. This put emphasis on the need for common data standards. B. What could have worked better: Access to the data on the two Forests would have been better if we had better network speed. Because the network speed between the two Forests was slow, many IDT members copied the data and GIS layers on to their PCs. Putting data on individual PCs made updates hard to track. C. Major obstacles/problems and their Resolutions -In terms of data, the major obstacle was combining road data between the units. It is becoming a common practice to share data and GIS layers between Forests and other agencies. As the ID team was made up of employees from both Forests, they all needed to get computer profiles on both systems to access GIS layers and data. This did not always work even though they had access to both systems because permissions would not allow it. The decision was made to store all the project layers and data on one forest and copy layers and information on to the other when needed. This created a lot of maintenance work for the GIS Analyst. Tracking copies when updates were made etc. The ID Team had a hard time keeping up with what was where, so most made copies onto their own PC. As we continue to work on the access issue, we have also set up a team room where some of the analysis data is stored for the ID team to share. Technology obstacles are network speed and shared access. We have not been successful at increasing network speed but have come up with band-aid solutions which all have pro's and con's. To get around the slow network, we have been copying the GIS layers on to both Forest's servers. Then some ID team members have copied that information on to their PCs. This has increased the work on everyone's part to make sure all have the same data when an update is made. This has the potential of creating too many copies and not knowing which one has the correct information. Shared access has been a problem because we have the originals on one forest and an IDT member is working on the other and many times they lose their connection and their data. The solution has been the same as for the network speed problem and that has not been the best solution. D. Use of the National Applications - This pilot used Infra Travel Routes and without help from Curtis Day we would have had a harder time. The ID team needed to learn how to use event tables in Arcview. Developing a process to combine the data with other layers to do analysis took time. There were numerous problems associated with combining the two Oracle databases and we did not have the expertise to do it, so we did not tackle the problem and kept them separate. This created a problem for the ID Team until we created separate event tables and they did their analyses separately and then combined them together. This needs to be solved in the future because we are always crossing Forest boundaries and need to have the ability to see the data together. Infra Travel Routes is not an easy application for the general users. E. What could others learn from your experience? I underestimated what it would take to combine data. The challenges of combining two separate Forest Service datasets and another agency's took more time than I thought. Also learning how to use routes and getting the data combined with others layers for the analysis took a lot more than the estimated time. When we get all the different applications, there will be a need to learn how each works so that you can link one dataset to another to query from both.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (6 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-1

F. Value of the pilot project : 1. Toward progress in the implementation of core data standards on your forest (and region). This has given the two Forests a jump on combining layers and having common data standards. There is still lots of work to be done in getting all the layers to meet core data standards but it has given the forests an idea of what it takes to get the job done. For the region it gives them an idea of how much time and effort it is going to take to combine datasets for all of the planned mergers of individual Forests. Lots of coordination and collaboration will need to take place in order to decide who's data are you going to use when they overlap and who has the data steward responsibilities. 2. In increasing awareness of use/capability of GIS to support management decisions. Among the forest ID team assigned to this project it has given them more of an understanding of what you can use GIS for and what it is capable of doing. Staff on the Forest has been given updates on this project so they also have a better understanding. As for most of the managers, there is still a need to understand the value of GIS to support management decisions. 3. Training: Everyone associated with this pilot has learned new skills. Arcview, Spatial Analyst, and Access. Terrain Analysis training was given to the GIS Analyst and he found it to be of value. He was able to use what he learned and apply it to some of the analysis needs. 4. In increasing awareness on your unit of the Forest Service in addressing geospatial issues. Presentations have been made to the Forest Leadership team as to the role of GEB and GAC. PowerPoint presentations of the issues the GAC is working on have also been presented. Both of these have also been shared with GIS personnel on both Forests. Aside from the presentations, the Forest Leadership Team has a very low level of understanding of what is going on Nationally. However with continued information on what the GEB and GAC are doing they are becoming aware of the issues and what needs to be done.

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:36:28 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-1.shtml (7 of 7)5/31/2007 1:16:59 PM Appendix I-2

Roads Analysis INA Summary Report Appendix I-2: Roads Analysis INA Summary Report Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments 1990 RPA Resource values 1 0 0 Existing info., book

Layer Total: 1 0 0 1995 PI Layer Location 1 0 0 Des. Cover, Och. Has Veg polys. Type 1 0 0

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Activities Location 2 0 0 Low Pri., Take what we have. Och 2 week to update Type 2 0 0 Harv., Fuel treatments, disturbance, etc.

Layer Total: 8 0 0 Annual Monitoring Report Costs, revenues 2 0 0 Document, existing info.

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Aquatic populations Location 2 1 1 H. Pri., Fish only, get data from Districts. Need to unifi the covers Type 2 0 0 H. Pri., Species - fish, amphibians, invertebrates. Fish only, get data from Districts. Need to unifi the covers

Layer Total: 6 2 2 Calving Areas Location 2 2 1 H. Pri., Och. - In Forest Plan Des. - Wild. Will get Type 2 0 0

Layer Total: 6 2 1

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 1 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Caves Location 1 1 1 M. Pri., Dispersed Rec. Feature Major ones only. Rec will get.

Type 1 0 0 Bend Fort Rock has a cover Visitor days 1 0 0 Use if available

Layer Total: 7 3 3 Climate Precipitation - in inches 1 0 0 Pricip. Map by state or NOAA. GIS will get

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Community Density 10 0 0 M. Pri. Incorporated, unincorporated 10 0 0 M. Pri. Location 10 1 1 H. Pri., US Censis data, etc. COCC library has a source Origin 10 0 0 M. Pri. Size population 10 0 0 H. Pri.,

Layer Total: 54 2 2 County Age 10 0 0 H. Pri. Attitudes 10 0 0 H. Pri. Communities 7 0 0 H. Pri. Education 10 0 0 H. Pri. Employment - Diversity index 7 0 0 H. Pri. Employment - Numbers by sector 7 0 0 H. Pri. Employment - Unemployment 7 0 0 H. Pri. Income - Transfer payments 7 0 0 H. Pri. Income - Poverty Level 7 0 0 H. Pri. Income - Sector, ave by 7 0 0 H. Pri. Land Use 1 0 0 H. Pri.

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 2 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Land Use Plans - document 7 0 0 H. Pri. Payments to 1 0 0 H. Pri. Racial composition 10 0 0 H. Pri., US Censis data, etc.COCC library has a source Religious affiliations 1 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: Cohesion 1 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: 3 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: 3 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: 3 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: 3 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: 3 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: Resiliency 4 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: Resiliency 4 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: Resiliency 4 0 0 H. Pri. Social Organizations: Resiliency 4 0 0 H. Pri. Zoning 1 0 0 H. Pri.

Layer Total: 132 0 0 Cultural Plants Location 2 0 0 L. Pri., No GIS or DB use anedotal from Tribes, may have tabular data Species 2 0 0 L. Pri.

Layer Total: 4 0 0 DEMS Aspect 9 0 0 H. Pri., Och. Need to convert to 10m Elevation 9 0 0 H. Pri., DEM Analysis - 4500’band, GIS wil Generate, Och. Geomorphic Landform 13 0 0 H. Pri., Och. Need to convert to 10m Slope 2 0 4 H. Pri., Location of 0-15%, 16-25%, 26-35%, 36-50%, 51-70%, 71-90%, 91+%, (and others +- 30%) Och. Need to convert to 10m. Jim will talk w/Bill on methods. Valley Bottom Width 1 1 1 H. Pri., Terrian analysis Och. Need to convert to 10m

Layer Total: 77 3 27

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 3 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Dispersal Location 3 0 0 H. Pri., Des. Issue - Generate from Veg., Och. - NA Type 3 0 0 H. Pri., Owl Classification - Des. Issue

Layer Total: 6 0 0 FARSITE Aspect 3 0 0 Product Fuel model 3 0 0 Product Slope 3 0 0 Product, percent

Layer Total: 9 0 0 FFIS Costs 2 0 0 Reports, existing info.

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Financial statements Costs, revenues 1 0 0 Reports, existing info.

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Fire Occurrence Location 2 0 1 Jun Both Forests need to add 2000 data Type 2 0 0 H. Pri., Both Forests need to add 2000 data Year 2 0 0 H. Pri., Both Forests need to add 2000 data

Layer Total: 6 0 1 Fire Resource Points Location 3 2 0 H. Pri., Do from 1" scale maps, heads up digitizing Type 3 0 0 H. Pri., fire camps, helispots,

Layer Total: 6 2 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 4 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Firewood Areas Location 1 0 0 Have paper map, Y/N by road. No GIS needed. Name 1 0 0

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Flood Plain Location 2 0 0 M/L Pri., Outside data, EPA, FEMA? Check with Des. Co. to proto type a model Type 1 0 0 M/L Pri., 100 year, Crook Co. See Howard Becker.

Layer Total: 6 0 0 Fuel Model Location 2 0 1 H. Pri., Put Des. & Och. Together need cross walks Type 2 0 0 H. Pri., Put Des. & Och. Together need cross walks

Layer Total: 4 0 1 Fuels, Natural Location 1 1 1 L Pri at this scale Type 1 0 0 L Pri at this scale

Layer Total: 2 1 1 Geology Location 1 0 0 In SRI classifications & State Geolgy map Ptype 1 0 0 In SRI classifications & State Geolgy map

Layer Total: 30 0 0 Geothermal Sites Location 1 0.2 0 H. Pri., Och. - NA, Geol. Will provide lease areas Status 1 0 0 H. Pri., Och. - NA, Geol. Will provide lease areas

Layer Total: 2 0.2 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 5 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Glacial Terrain Age 9 0 0 Des. - Generate from SRI for this scale. Distribution 9 0 0 Des. - Generate from SRI for this scale. Location 9 2 0 Des. - Generate from SRI for this scale. Type 9 0 0 Landforms: Des. - Generate from SRI for this scale.

Layer Total: 36 2 0 Ground water Location 1 0 0 L Pri at this scale

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Heritage Locations 2 0 8 H. Pri., Points, lines, polys: Des. -Updates on Districts. SO 1.5 year out of date. (Och. - Stephany Cooper) Type 2 0 0 H. Pri., Des. -Updates on Districts. SO 1.5 year out of date. (Och. - Stephany Cooper)

Layer Total: 10 0 16 Historic Transportation Routes Location 1 0 1 H. Pri., Och. - In LMP see codeing. Summit Trail in Heritage cover. Des. - NA Type 1 0 0 H. Pri., Summate Trail in Heritage layer

Layer Total: 2 0 1 ICBEMP Economic factors, trends 2 0 0 H. Pri., Reports, existing info. Socal factors 2 0 0 H. Pri., Reports, existing info.

Layer Total: 4 0 0 Improvements Jurisdiction 2 0 0 H. Pri., Public, Private

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 6 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Location 2 2 2 H. Pri., Some in INFRA, on paper for water see Real Property DB and Keri. Type 2 0 0 H. Pri., Electronic sites, water

Layer Total: 12 4 4 Irrigation Canals Location 1 0 0 In INFRA and BOR? Type 1 0 0 In INFRA and BOR?

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Labor Trends Report 1 0 0 Report, existing

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Landslide Terrain Location 13 1 0 H. Pri., Des. - Add 8 polygons at this scale. Otherwise 52 wks. for full detail. Photo interpretation Status 1 0 0 H. Pri., Active/dormant: Add 8 polygons at this scale, mor detail at other scales

Layer Total: 30 3 0 Large Fire History Location 3 0 0 L. Pri., Och. 1 wk. For full detail. Type 3 0 0 L. Pri., Greater then 100 ac. Year 3 0 0 L. Pri.,

Layer Total: 9 0 0 Late Successional Rserves Location 1 0 0 Type 2 0 0

Layer Total: 6 0 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 7 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments LEK Sites Location 1 3 0 now H pri. Can use paper. See Fort Rock District, ODF&W, BLM by end of May Type 1 0 0 H pri.

Layer Total: 2 3 0 LRMP Allocations 1 0 1 Category, MA-F7Och. - match INFRA Location, 1 0 1 Och. - some updates. Not needed at this scale Reports 1 0 Outputs, costs, revenues by resoutce area

Layer Total: 42 0 15 Mars Outputs 1 0 0 Report, existing

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Material sources Location 3 1 0 H pri. Des. - See CFF & Keri, Shawn Servos Type 3 0 0 H pri. rock pits, queries, cinter pits, borrow pits, road cuts used to borrow fill Use levels 1 0 0 active or not

Layer Total: 11 1 0 Mazama Ash Isopach Ages 9 0 0 H pri. Des. Issue: 3 - 4 large polys for now. Depth 9 0 0 H pri. Des. Issue: 3 - 4 large polys for now. Engineering properties 9 0 0 H pri. Des. Issue: 3 - 4 large polys for now. Location 9 0.2 0 H pri. Des. Issue: 3 - 4 large polys for now. 2 wks. For full detail.

Layer Total: 36 0.2 0 Migration Routes

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 8 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Location 3 0.5 0 H pri. Monte will update. Type 3 0 0 H pri. Which species?

Layer Total: 6 0.5 0 Mining Claims Location 1 0 4 ? Low Pri., Unknown data source Status 1 0 0 Low Pri. Type 1 0 0 Low Pri., Keri will do for self

Layer Total: 3 0 4 Municipal Watershed Improvements 1 0 0 M. Pri. Location 4 1 0 M. Pri., In Fores Plan split out Name of city 1 0 0 M. Pri. Type 1 0 0 M. Pri.Water treatment systems, Access restriction, location of constructed improvements, road management objectives.

Layer Total: 16 4 0 Noxious Weeds Location 2 0 0 Species 1 0 0 Treatments 1 0 0

Layer Total: 7 0 0 OHV Areas Location 1 1 0 Och. - Done (Dick Deforth), Des. - Ask Bend/Fort Rock, Marv is working on it. Use 1 0 0 OHV use: Code authorized vs unauth. Och. - Done (Dick Deforth), Des. - Ask Bend/Fort Rock, Marv is working on it.

Layer Total: 3 2 0 Ownership

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 9 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Location 1 0 0 now Owner 1 0 0

Layer Total: 12 0 0 Past Fuel Treatments Location 1 4 8 M. Pri., Des. - some from Harvest. No natural Type 1 0 0 M. Pri., Year 1 0 0 M. Pri., 20 years to present

Layer Total: 4 8 16 Plant Associations/Plant Location 3 0 0 Type 5 0 0 Scabland plant associations and communities, rock cairns, soil types, roads

Layer Total: 20 0 0 PLSS Location 3 0 0 Township, Section, Range Range 3 0 0 Section 3 0 0 Township 3 0

Layer Total: 37 0 0 Range Allotment Location 1 0 0 L. Pri. Number of cows 4 0 0 L. Pri. Plans 4 2 2 Jun L. Pri.Data source unknown, Time a guess Season of use 4 0 0 L. Pri.

Layer Total: 29 8 8 Rec Sites, Developed

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 10 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Location 2 1 1 H. Pri., Use CFFs, LMRP and points from Marv Lang. Type 2 0 0 H. Pri., Type of site Use Levels 2 0 0 H. Pri., Existing, Ave., Persons at one time Use Type 1 0 0 H. Pri.

Layer Total: 16 3 3 Rec. Sites, Dispersed Improvements 1 0 0 L. Pri. Location 1 12 12 L. Pri. Resource Concerns 1 0 0 L. Pri. Size 1 0 0 L. Pri. Type 1 0 0 L. Pri. Use Level 1 0 0 L. Pri.

Layer Total: 12 24 24 Regional Economic Profile Economic statistics 1 0 0 Published reports.

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Research Natural Areas Location 2 0 0

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Resource accomplishment Outputs, costs 1 0 0 Report

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Riparian Plant Communities Existing Vegetation 1 0 0 L. Pri. Location 1 24 20 L. Pri., To get full detail later: Des. 24 wks., Och. 20 wks. Plant Associations 1 0 0 L. Pri.

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 11 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments

Layer Total: 7 72 60 Riparian Reserves Length 2 0 0 Location 2 1 0 Des. Need streams finished Type 2 0 0 Width 2 0 0

Layer Total: 16 4 0 Roadless Location 1 0 0 Name 1 0 Type 1 0 0

Layer Total: 43 0 0 Roads Access travel mgt 6 0 0 Work with paper maps Accident records on FS Roads 2 2 2 L. Pri., Not at this scale, may need for step 4 Annual, def., Capital 5 0 0 To put to events Ave daily traffic 10 0 0 Clearing Width 6 0 0 Product, generated as a buffer. Closed roads - with gate, barrier, 10 1 0 Eng will input, some available Desnsity-Miles / unit area 2 0 0 Analysis Easements, right of ways, mtce. 3 0 0 Jun In paper Atlas, not needed at theis scale. For full detail: Des. 4 wks., Och. 1 wk. Ecomomics roads data table ( 8 0 0 Analysis output Fish passage culvert 1 2 2 Des. On paper Functional Class (FS only) 11 0 0 Highway Safety Act Road 13 0 0 Written description INFRA – features like slumps,rock 13 0 0 For full detail: Des. 4 wks., Och. 2 wks. Jurisdiction 7 0 0 Derived from cross with ownership

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 12 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Location 1 0 0 Jun also BLM, County, State and Other Feds w/label Locations of gates, barriers, 6 1 0 Locations w/in 50, 100, 200, 300, 9 0 0 Analysis - buffering Maintenance level 10 0 0 Jun (open/closed) Objective Maintenance Level 13 0 0 Resource needs 6 0 0 (What does the road provide access for.) Data base. Analysis output Road hazard analysis data base 2 0 0 Not at this scale, may need for step 4 Roads financial analysis product/ 2 0 0 Analysis Route Status 13 0 0 Surface type (for locations below) 10 2 0 Jun BLM - Rough by June Traffic classification (vehicle 7 0 0 Travel time from RS and Guard 3 0 0 Analysis

Layer Total: 530 38 8 Rock Hounding Areas Location 1 0 0 Use Paper map Type 1 0 0 Use Paper map

Layer Total: 4 0 0 ROS Classification 2 0 0 Imbeded in LRMP Location 2 1 0 Imbeded in LRMP

Layer Total: 4 1 0 Slope Erosion Hazard Location 9 0 0 Model or calssify from field and aerial photos? Full detail: Des. 52 wks Type 1 0 0 Model or calssify from field and aerial photos? Full detail: Des. 52 wks

Layer Total: 22 0 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 13 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Soils Erosion potential 1 0 0 Interp. From soil Scientiest. Des. 52 wks to complete Location 1 0 6 now BLM - half done Och. - SRI 90% done, 6 wks to complete Type 1 0 0

Layer Total: 48 0 24 Special Forest Products Access restrictions 1 0 0 Low Pri. Not needed at RA scale Location 1 4 0 Low Pri., Land allocations, access restrictions, identifying collectors. Type 1 0 0 Low Pri.

Layer Total: 13 12 0 Special-use Permit Sites Critical design vehicle 1 0 0 Location 1 1 0 Location of sites, travel restrictions, roads. Och. - Mapped points need to connect to INFRA. Alice Doremus coordinator. Type 1 0 0 of special-use permit,

Layer Total: 12 5 0 Stream 303d category 1 1 0 Des. 100K, Need to convert to 24K Och. 24K Class 2 0 0 Condition 1 0 0 Density 2 0 0 Analysis product Fish barriers location and 1 1 0 From Culvert survey Gaging stations 1 0 0 Length 3 0 0 Location 13 8 0 Monitoring sites 1 0 0 Name 2 0 0 Order 2 0 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 14 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Reaches 1 0 0 RHCA’s and riparian reserves 1 0 0 Rosgen class, channel type 2 4 4 Routing number 1 0 0 Stream road crossings 2 0 0 Analysis Survey Locations 2 0 0 Uses 1 0 0 Woody Debris 1 0 0

Layer Total: 139 61 8 Stream - delivery zone Distribution of zone 13 0 0 Analysis result Location 13 0 0 Analysis result

Layer Total: 26 0 0 Structures Location 3 2 2 Real property DB, check what it contains Type 2 0 0 Real property DB, check what it contains

Layer Total: 23 6 6 Survey and Manage Location 1 0.2 0 ISMS not connected Species 1 0 0

Layer Total: 6 0.4 0 TEP Habitat Location 1 0 1 In Programatic BA Type 1 0 0 In Programatic BA

Layer Total: 2 0 1 TEP Nest Sites

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 15 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Location 1 0 1 Jun In Programatic BA Type 1 0 0 In Programatic BA

Layer Total: 2 0 1 TES Plants Species Location 1 0 0 Botany will check Och. Status Species 1 0 0

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Timber Milpond values 1 0 0 Published Material

Layer Total: 1 0 0 Timber Harvest Date 1 0 0 Land allocations 4 4 0 Location 1 2 4 BLM - some will check Suitable 4 3 2 Treatment type 1 0 0 Volume 1 3 1

Layer Total: 35 39 30 Trailhead Location 1 2 1 H. Pri., Point layer, attach to infra. Do with Developed Rec. Parking capacity 1 0 0 Type 1 0 0 H. Pri., Of use

Layer Total: 8 6 3 Trails Location 1 2 0 now Only need trailheads. (BLM - in GTRN and Milican area GPS's)

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 16 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Season of use 1 0 0 Only need trailheads Type 1 0 0 of use. Only need trailheads (Also code authorized vs unauth.)

Layer Total: 6 4 0 Travel Access Forest Plan Access Standards and 1 1 0 Use what we have for this scale. Management areas, restrictions 1 1 1 Use what we have for this scale. Travel access area restrictions 1 2 2 Use what we have for this scale. 2 - 3 wks to update if needed.

Layer Total: 3 4 3 TSPIRS Reports/ cost, revenues 2 0 0 Published report

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Unique Plant Communities Location 3 1 1 Not avail and not needed at this scale. Plant Associations 3 0 0 Not avail and not needed at this scale. Type 3 0 0 Not avail and not needed at this scale.

Layer Total: 9 1 1 Unique Special Habitats Location 3 4 4 Des. - 4 wks to update, Och. - 4 wks to update Type 3 0 0 Not avail and not needed at this scale.

Layer Total: 6 4 4 Vegetation Crown closure 4 0 0 Location 2 0 0 Plant Association 5 0 1 Jun Des. - PI cover from 1999 Och. - ISAT data 25m pixels, ground truth BLM - Sat. interpretation

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 17 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Species 1 0 0 Stand Density 1 0 0 Structure 3 0 0 Dense/Old Structure Classes (large blocks) Type 1 0 0

Layer Total: 39 0 4 Vegetation Down woody debris 1 0 0 Polygon data from PAG-SC or PI Snag 1 0 0 Polygon data from PAG-SC or PI

Layer Total: 2 0 0 Water Improvements Locationmanagement objectives. 1 0 0 See Improvements. of constructed improvements, road State Water rights data base 1 0 1 See Improvements

Layer Total: 14 0 4 Water Sources Location 9 1 0 June H. Pri., Fire wil do with Fire Resource points. Och. - classify, digitize Ownership 1 0 0 H. Pri., Status 1 0 0 H. Pri., Type 1 0 0 H. Pri., Wells, springs, etc. Use levels 1 0 0 H. Pri.,

Layer Total: 40 5 0 Waterbody 303d classification 6 0 0 Location 9 0 0 Jun BLM - Rough by June Type 1 0 0 Lakes, ponds, impoundments, etc

Layer Total: 52 0 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 18 of 19 Layer Attribute Number of # Weeks to Prepare Requests DES OCH BLM Done by Comments Watersheds A 1&2 (high priority restoration) 1 0 0 Fifthfield 3 0 0 Key watersheds, 14 0.2 0 Need Crosswalk old to new Location, 13 0 0 Monitoring category 1&2 1 0.2 0 Need Crosswalk Sixthfield 1 0 0

Layer Total: 64 1 0 Wetlands Location 1 4 4 USF&W has, see Jerry Cordova Type 1 0 0

Layer Total: 6 8 8 Wild and Scenic River Location 1 0 0 Name 1 0 0

Layer Total: 4 0 0 Winter Range Location 1 1 0 Jun Wildlife will get. Type 1 0 0

Layer Total: 2 1 0

Tuesday, October 30, 2001 Page 19 of 19 Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (1 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

Links To protect and perpetuate a predominantly unmodified Evaluate Our Service natural environment where natural ecological process We welcome your comments can continue. To provide habitat for a variety of on our service and your wildlife species, and to specifically maintain or suggestions for improvement. enhance habitat for bald eagles. To provide an Forest opportunity for primitive recreation within this undeveloped forest environment. Trails and roads will be designed, constructed, and maintained to minimum standard needed to achieve objectives and goals of Deschutes National Forest this Management Area. Some roads may be closed by 1001 SW Emkay Drive entrance treatment, or by obliteration and Bend, OR 97702 revegetation. Temporary closures may be used to limit (541) 383-5300 access during sensitive nesting or migratory times. Ochoco National Forest Unneeded roads and skid trails will be closed and 3160 N.E. 3rd Street returned to a natural vegetative condition. Prineville, OR 97754 (541) 416-6500 Metolius Spotted Owl Crooked River National Grassland Manage habitat to enhance the carrying capacity for 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Northern Spotted Owls. Road management to restrict Madras, OR 97741 public access within ¼ mile of active nests during (541) 475-9272 March 1 through July 31 may be needed.

Management Area 3 Bald Eagle

Manage habitat to enhance the carrying capacity of bald eagles. Nesting habitat and foraging areas will be protected and enhanced. Road networks will be designed to facilitate easy control of access during nesting season. Road management will minimize public disturbances within ¼ mile of active nests from 1/1 through 8/31, to prevent disruption of nesting activities. Additional measures may be needed to prevent disturbance to juveniles from 9/1 to winter departure. Road closures are needed to restrict public access to the feeding area along Browns Creek at the Sheep Bridge fall kokanee spawning stream and along the west side of Wickiup Reservoir from 9/15 until freeze over.

Management Area 4 Spotted Owl

Manage habitat to enhance the carrying capacity for Northern Spotted Owls. Road management to restrict public access within ¼ mile of active nests during 3/1 through 7/31 may be needed.

Management Area 5 Osprey

Manage the habitat to enhance the carrying capacity for osprey. Road management may be needed to

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (2 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

restrict public access to nesting areas during 4/1 through 8/31.

Management Area 7 Deer Habitat (Winter and Transition habitats)

To manage vegetation to provide optimum habitat conditions on deer winter ranges while providing some domestic livestock forage, wood products, visual quality and recreation opportunities. Target open road densities shall average 1.0 - 2.5 miles per square mile in each implementation Unit, unless impacts to deer can be avoided or the proposed project would result in a net benefit to deer habitat.

Three Sisters Lynx Analysis Unit

Open road densities will be managed for a maximum goal of 2 miles of road per square mile. Minimize building of roads directly on ridge tops or areas identified as important for lynx habitat connectivity. Prohibit motorized vehicle use on all roads except arterial and collector roads within denning habitat from the period of April 15 to July 15. Limit public use on temporary roads, such as those constructed for timber sales or to access mines or leases, in lynx habitat. Dirt and gravel roads traversing lynx habitat should not be paved or otherwise upgraded in a manner that is likely to lead to significant increases in traffic volumes, traffic speeds, increased width of cleared ROW (right of way), or would foreseeably contribute to increases in human activity in lynx habitat.

OCHOCO NATIONAL FOREST

Eagle Roosting Areas

Provide winter roosting habitat for migrating bald eagles annually during the period December through April. The area will be free of potentially disturbing human activity in the vicinity of roosting areas from December 1 to May 1.

General Forest Winter Range and Winter Range

Big game use on winter range will be seen as the primary activity with other management activities and human intervention restricted, from December 1 to May 1. Habitat effectiveness for big game will be improved over time, due to increases in both quality http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (3 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

and quantity of thermal cover, and reductions in open road density. Road and trail use will be limited to one mile of open access per section, from December 1 to May 1; a greater density of trail and road access will be available during the remainder of the year, up to three miles per section.

Hammer Creek Wildlife/Recreation Area

Provide and maintain habitat diversity for a variety of wildlife species where open road density is minimal; and provide scenic, semi natural or natural appearing setting for non-motorized recreational opportunities. Access roads to trailheads will be open. All other roads will be closed to motorized use and rehabilitated after management projects are completed.

CROOKED RIVER NATIONAL GRASSLANDS

Antelope Winter Range

Manage for optimum winter range conditions for antelope. Harassment and stress on wildlife caused by motorized vehicle traffic will be reduced.

Metolius Deer Winter Range

Manage for big game winter range habitat. The implementation of seasonal road closures will reduce harassment and stress on wildlife from motorized traffic.

Rimrock Springs Wildlife Area

Provide unique habitat (wetlands, ponds, springs) within the juniper-sagebrush steppe.

EXISTING CLOSURES:

ODF&W delineated winter habitats throughout central Oregon. Separate designations of wintering areas were identified in each of the Forest Plans. In general the Forest designations are much smaller than those recognized by ODF&W. Throughout the analysis area there are seasonal closures in place for big game winter range, raptor nests, caves with bat populations, elk calving areas, green dot hunting closures, and year round closures. These closures were prescribed to protect habitats for species that are sensitive to human disturbance for all or a portion of their life cycle. Below is a list of the closures as well as a list of special management area designations with specific road related requirements to protect wildlife values. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (4 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

Numerous roads or area closures prescribed in planning documents have not been closed due to funding or existing closure efforts are marginally effective. Current budget levels do not support adequate implementation or enforcement.

AQUATIC

Forest Plan direction for the roads analysis area encompasses five documents: Deschutes and Ochoco National Forest & Crooked River National Grassland Plans, Northwest Forest Plan,Infish, and Pac-Fish. Each of these documents outlines important management direction, especially for aquatic and riparian resources. In general, the overriding concern is for the maintenance and restoration of the riparian areas and stream systems resulting in improving native fish and aquatic species populations. This can include removal, redesign, rehabilitation or change of maintenance of roads that effect stream and riparian systems.

Roads Management Direction

RF-1. Federal, state, and county agencies should cooperate to achieve consistency in road design, operation, and maintenance necessary to attain Aquatic Conservation Strategy and Riparian Management Objectives. RF-2. For each existing or planned road, meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy and Riparian Management Objectives by:

a. minimizing road and landing locations in Riparian Reserves b. completing watershed analyses (including appropriate geotechnical analyses) prior to construction of new roads or landings in Riparian Reserves. c. preparing road design criteria, elements, and standards that govern construction and reconstruction d. preparing operation and maintenance criteria that govern road operation, maintenance, and management e. minimizing disruption of natural hydrologic flow paths, including diversion of stream flow and interception of surface and subsurface flow. f. restricting side casting as necessary to prevent the introduction of sediment to streams. g. avoiding wetlands entirely when construction new roads.

RF-3. Determine the influence of each road on Aquatic Conservation Strategy and Riparian Management Objectives through watershed analysis. Meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy and Riparian Management Objectives by:

a. reconstructing roads and associated drainage features that pose a substantial risk. b. prioritizing reconstruction based on current and potential impact http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (5 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

to riparian resources and the ecological value of riparian resource affected. c. closing and stabilizing, or obliterating and stabilizing roads based on the ongoing and potential effects to Aquatic Conservation Strategy and Riparian Management Objectives and considering short-term and long-term transportation needs.

RF-4. New culverts, bridges and other stream crossings shall be constructed, and existing culverts, bridges and other stream crossings determined to pose a substantial risk to riparian conditions will be improved, to accommodate at least the 100-year flood, including associated bedload and debris. Priority for upgrading will be based on the potential impact and the ecological value of the riparian resources affected. Crossings will be constructed and maintained to prevent diversion of stream flow out of the channel and down the road in the even of crossing failure. RF-5. Minimize sediment delivery to streams from roads. Outsloping of the roadway surface is preferred, except in cases where outsloping would increase sediment delivery to streams or where outsloping is infeasible or unsafe. Route road drainage away from potentially unstable channels, fills, and hillslopes. RF-6. Provide and maintain fish passage at all road crossings of existing and potential fish-bearing streams. RF-7. Develop and implement a Road Management Plan or a Transportation Management Plan that will meet the Aquatic Conservation Strategy and Riparian Management Objectives. As a minimum, this plan shall include provisions for the following activities:

a. inspections and maintenance during storm events. b. inspections and maintenance after storm events. c. road operation and maintenance, giving high priority to identifying and correcting road drainage problems that contribute to degrading riparian resources. d. traffic regulation during wet periods to prevent damage to riparian resources. e. establish the purpose of each road by developing the Road Management Objective.

Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives

1. Maintain and restore the distribution, diversity, and complexity of watershed and landscape-scale features to ensure protection of the aquatic systems to which species, populations and communities are uniquely adapted. 2. Maintain and restore spatial and temporal connectivity within and between watersheds. Lateral, longitudinal, and drainage network connections include floodplains, wetlands, upslope areas, headwater tributaries, and intact refugia. These network connections must provide chemically and physically unobstructed routes to areas critical for fulfilling life history requirements of aquatic and riparian-dependent species. 3. Maintain and restore the physical integrity of the aquatic system, http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (6 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-3

including shorelines, banks, and bottom configurations. 4. Maintain and restore water quality necessary to support healthy riparian, aquatic, and wetland ecosystems. Water quality must remain within the range that maintains the biological, physical, and chemical integrity of the system and benefits survival, growth, reproduction, and migration of individuals composing aquatic and riparian communities. 5. Maintain and restore the sediment regime under which aquatic ecosystems evolved. Elements of the sediment regime include the timing, volume, rate, and character of sediment input, storage, and transport. 6. Maintain and restore in-stream flows sufficient to create and sustain riparian, aquatic, and wetland habitats and to retain patterns of sediment, nutrient, and wood routing. The timing, magnitude, duration, and spatial distribution of peak, high, and low flows must be protected. 7. Maintain and restore the timing, variability, and duration of floodplain inundation and water table elevation in meadows and wetlands. 8. Maintain and restore the species composition and structural diversity of plant communities in riparian areas and wetlands to provided adequate summer and winter thermal regulation, nutrient filtering, appropriate rates of surface erosion, bank erosion, and channel migration and to supply amounts and distributions of coarse woody debris sufficient to sustain physical complexity and stability.

Maintain and restore habitat to support well-distributed populations of native plant, invertebrate, and vertebrate riparian-dependent species.

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:36:29 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-3.shtml (7 of 7)5/31/2007 1:17:20 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment ROAD ANALYSIS ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Appendix I-4 INFORMATION Maps & Brochures Issue Background Papers PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Access Issue Statement: Forest Plans Schedule of Proposed Major Documents Actions The road system provides access for Monitoring Reports public, private, and administrative uses. Project Information Roads Analysis Because historical patterns of use are Plans, Analyses, changing and the agency's road Assessments maintenance budget is not currently Publications able to keep up with increasing Recreational Activities maintenance needs, changes to the road system may be necessary. There Volunteering is a concern that any changes to the road system may affect access for goods and services provided. Newberry National Volcanic Monument Background Conservation Ed. The Forest Service currently manages more than 380,000 miles of Contracting roads in the national forests and grasslands. These roads range from Health permanent, double-lane paved highways to single-lane, low standard Forest Products roads intended to be used by only high-clearance vehicles. The majority of this vast road system was constructed to facilitate timber Geology harvest or otherwise support timber management. Other Heritage administrative uses, commercial uses, and recreational activities Partnerships have all benefited from the development of the forest road system. Plantlife The use of the road system has changed dramatically over the years Water/Fisheries from being predominantly used for support of timber management Wildlife objectives to present day conditions where over 90 percent of use is

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (1 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

estimated to be related to some form of recreation activity such as Links hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, skiing, berry picking, driving for Evaluate Our Service pleasure, etc. We welcome your comments Along with the changing use patterns on the road system, and on our service and your especially the dramatic increase in recreation traffic, the Forest suggestions for improvement. Service road budget is not able to keep up with road maintenance Forest needs. It is estimated that, nation-wide, the Forest Service has a growing $8.4 billion dollar maintenance and reconstruction backlog and receives only 20 percent of the annual maintenance funding Deschutes National Forest needed to maintain the road system to environmental and safety 1001 SW Emkay Drive standards. Bend, OR 97702 The shift in use patterns, changes in user expectations, and the (541) 383-5300 inability of current road maintenance funding to keep up with road maintenance needs have led the Forest Service to conclude that Ochoco National Forest finding new approaches to road management and new sources of 3160 N.E. 3rd Street road maintenance funding will be necessary to support resource Prineville, OR 97754 management objectives now and into the future. (541) 416-6500 Crooked River National Social and Economic Issue Statement: Grassland 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 The existing road system plays an important role in support of local/ (541) 475-9272 regional social and economic sustainability. Based on recent road budget trends, we may not be able to afford to maintain our existing road system. Changes to the road system may have social and economic ramifications. Background The communities surrounding the Forests depend on the forests and grasslands to help meet their needs and the road system serves as the interface between the needs of the local communities (e.g. timber, forage, recreation) and the ecosystems themselves. As a result, the interaction of humans and ecosystems needs to be looked at in a broader context than the physical and biological. From a historical prospectus it is evident that all of the local community's economies and cultural values were natural resource based and to a certain degree, especially in the more rural, less populated areas, still are. Livestock, agriculture, and timber were/are the backbone of the local economies and as a result strongly shaped the social fabric that still defines most of the communities today. The existing road system was developed largely in the context of this historical perspective. The goods (e.g. timber, livestock) and many of the services (recreation, scenery supported by the Forests are highly dependent on the types and location of roads that provide access for these uses. As a result, access to the resources on the Forests will continue to have a profound effect on both the economic and social dimensions of the communities that surround them. Over all uses of the road system and public lands within the Zone is changing in character as a result of the changing social an economic conditions in the region, while at the same time changes in resource and road management policies on federal lands are influencing economic and social conditions. Roads have become vital components of the human use of forested

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (2 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

systems. Without roads, developing the economic activity critical to the quality of modern life would have been difficult, and roads remain central to many forest uses today. With less emphasis on commodity production, mainly timber harvest, the current road system cannot be maintained given the existing funding structure. The Forests need to identify a road system that is affordable, meets both public and administrative access needs, and minimizes resource damage.

Recreation Issue Statement:

How and where does the existing and planned road system affect recreation areas, sites, and facilities? Background The Central Oregon area contains a unique mix of topography and vegetation, which; 1) invites recreation exploration, as well as destination recreation, and 2) allows for relatively easy vehicular access to many areas. Hence, the developed and dispersed recreation sites have, over the years been discovered and accessed by roads, many of which have been user created. Many of these roads are currently system roads, but there are many which are not. These user created roads tend to access dispersed recreation sites and opportunities such as caves, campsites, geologic features, etc. Developed recreation sites have system, county or state routes accessing them in most cases. Many of the user created roads are accessing areas that may or may not be desirable to be accessed from a resource standpoint. There may be impacts to vegetation, water and wildlife from these user created roads. Erosion is a common concern as well as soil compaction and mass movement. From a use/social standpoint, increased access to these areas, which could cause overuse of areas that are vulnerable from a resource standpoint exacerbating the impacts. In general, the population and popularity of the Central Oregon area is consistently increasing, bringing more and more people who want to pursue developed and dispersed recreation opportunities. As the population ages, there is also an increase in the relative amount of motorized recreation activity, be it 4 wheel drive vehicle, OHV, snowmobile, etc.

Botany Issue Statement:

In some areas, roads may affect the long-term health and functioning of plant resources, including special habitats, such as wetlands and wet meadows, and Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plant populations. Roads are increasing noxious weed populations, which impact native plant communities. Background Wetland habitats may be impacted by increased sedimentation and changes in hydrologic function and water quality. A road may alter http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (3 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

the function of a stream's floodplain and/or off-channel habitat by changing drainage patterns. Roads may intercept runoff, which can accelerate erosion and lower water tables, increase sediment loading and delivery of toxic pollutants, change plant species composition by introducing noxious weeds, and degrade water quality. A culvert that is not functioning properly (for e.g., the culvert is under-sized and the hydraulic capacity is exceeded) may increase sediment into wetlands and streams. In some areas, productive wetlands have been converted to compacted road surfaces. Many of these habitats have had fill placed on top of existing habitat as roads are built through them. Road failures in landslide terrain can impact special habitats. The resulting changes in drainage patterns, soil composition, and introduction of noxious weeds from roadside shoulders may cumulatively result in significant alteration of the existing plant communities. Of these effects, those that affect the areas ability to receive, store and move water will likely have the greatest impact on a wetland's condition and function. Other impacts could occur due to increased public access. There may be increased collecting of unique plant species that occur within special habitats. Roads may facilitate the use of off-highway vehicles into adjacent special habitats. High-use recreation areas, both dispersed and developed sites, may impact special habitats, such as wetlands and riparian areas. Recreation use also affects riparian plant communities. Roads may provide access for off-highway vehicles into riparian habitats. Dispersed and develop recreation can impact the health and vigor of riparian plants, depending on the level of reaction use. Roads facilitate the establishment and spread of noxious weeds, which impact native plant communities. Areas scheduled for road reconstruction, as well as on-going maintenance activities, have a high risk of introducing and spreading noxious weeds, which can alter species composition and associated wildlife use within habitats such as meadows. These types of uses will use more and more of system and user created roads to access recreation areas. Driving for pleasure is the number one recreation activity.

Wildlife Issue Statement:

Wildlife populations and habitats have been impacted by road systems and the resulting human activities associated with increased access to remote habitats. Road-associated factors are additive to that of habitat loss from roads and other activities. These cumulative impacts have led to several species becoming locally extinct or being listed as Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive throughout their range. The physical presence of the road and potential for collisions with cars has resulted in animals being killed when traveling between habitats, disrupted habitat selection processes for home ranges, reduced habitat suitability, allowed invasion of edge species and non natives, road associated habitats accumulate lead and other toxins that originate from motorized vehicles with potentially lethal effects, and altered migration movements.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (4 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

Human associated activities have resulted in a reduced sense of security resulting in habitat avoidance, death from legal and illegal hunting, increased stress resulting in reductions in productivity or death, over-trapping, collection, and habitat degradation. Background With the increased western expansion of civilization has come an increased in the amount of roads, size of roads, volume of traffic, and type of vehicles. In their own way each of these have impacted wildlife populations and habitats. Areas in the west including Central Oregon have been experiencing the effects of roads and road related activities increase in the last decade. Local examples of these effects include: Deer, elk, and antelope migration routes have been altered due to several state highways. The expansion and sprawl of population centers has forced several sheet migrations into more restricted corridors. When these focused migration points come in contact with a state highway of the magnitude of Highway 97 numerous animals are killed yearly. Wolf and grizzly bear were extirpated from Oregon several decades ago primarily due to hunting. Since that time the amount of human occupation and level of roading have increased to a level where it is unlikely populations could be restored. In places on the Deschutes and Ochoco N.F. road densities reach levels greater than 10 miles per square mile. Contiguous blocks of habitat have been fragmented and habitats previously excluded from human intrusion accessed. Forest roads originally constructed to facilitate logging activities now facilitate numerous types of recreational activities. The popularity of these activities, increasing population base, and new technologies has increased the number and type of vehicles utilizing National Forests. This has resulted in higher traffic volumes on primary and secondary roads, increased violation of road and area closures, noise disturbance, and previously inaccessible habitats being disturbed by motorized and nonmotorized recreationalists. Technology and human population growth are changing faster than the scientific knowledge regarding the associated effects. Some of the effects of roads and road associated human activities are well documented others are yet to be discovered. The effects of roads and road related activities vary by species; however, documented species- specific effects tend to remain consistent from one geographical area to another. The following is a summary of the findings of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Plan's comprehensive survey of existing literature regarding the effects of roads and road associated human activity: Various road-associated factors can negatively affect habitats and populations of terrestrial vertebrates (Bennett 1991, Forman and Hersperger 1996, Forman and others 1997, Mader 1984, Trombulak and Frissell 2000). Effects of road-associated factors can be direct, such as habitat loss and fragmentation (Miller and others 1996, Reed and others 1996) or indirect, such as population displacement or avoidance in areas near roads in relation to motorized traffic and associated human activities (Mader 1984). Indirect effects can be subtle, such as the negative effects of all-terrain vehicles (Busack and Bury 1974, Lukenbach 1978) that can and do travel over a myriad of offroad and onroad conditions, and whose movements are http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (5 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

facilitated by road access. Negative factors associated with roads, and their specific effects on habitats and populations, are diverse and not always easily recognized. These factors go beyond the obvious, direct effects of habitat loss from road construction and maintenance, which affects all species. 1. Road construction converts large areas of habitat to nonhabitat (Forman 2000, Hann and others 1997, Reed and others 1996); the resulting motorized traffic facilitates the spread of exotic plants and animals, further reducing quality of habitat for native flora and fauna (Bennett 1991, Hann and others 1997). Roads also create habitat edge (Mader 1984, Reed and others 1996); increased edge changes habitat in favor of species that use edges, and to the detriment of species that avoid edges or experience increased mortality near or along edges (Marcot and others 1994). 2. Species that depend on large trees, snags, or down logs, particularly cavity-using birds and mammals, are vulnerable to increased harvest of these structures along roads (Hann and others 1997). Motorized access facilitates firewood cutting, as well as commercial harvest, of these structures. 3. Several large mammals are vulnerable to poaching, such as caribou, pronghorn, mountain goat, bighorn sheep, wolf, and grizzly bear (e.g., Dood and others 1985, 1986; Knight and others 1988; McLellan and Shackleton 1988; Mech and others 1970; Scott and Servheen 1985; Stelfox 1971; Yoakum 1978). Roads facilitate poaching (Cole and others 1997). 4. Wolves and grizzly bears experience chronic, negative interactions with humans, and roads are a key facilitator of such interactions (Mace and others 1996, Mattson and others 1992, Thiel 1985). Repeated, negative interactions of these two species with humans increases mortality of both species and often causes high-quality habitats near roads to function as population sinks (Mattson and others 1996a, 1996b, Mech 1973). 5. Carnivorous mammals such as marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine are vulnerable to over-trapping (Bailey and others 1986, Banci 1994, Coulter 1966, Fortin and Cantin 1994, Hodgman and others 1994, Hornocker and Hash 1981, Jones 1991, Parker and others 1983, Thompson 1994, Witmer and others 1998), and over-trapping can be facilitated by road access ( Bailey and others 1986, Hodgman and others 1994, Terra-Berns and others 1997, Witmer and others 1998). Movement and dispersal of some of these species also is believed to be inhibited by high rates of traffic on highways (Ruediger 1996) but has not been validated. Carnivorous mammals such as lynx also are vulnerable to increased mortality from highway accidents with motorized vehicles (as summarized by Terra-Berns and others 1997). 6. Reptiles seek roads for thermal cooling and heating, and in doing so, these species experience significant, chronic mortality from motorized vehicles (Vestjens 1973). Highways and other roads with moderate to high rates of motorized traffic may function as population sinks for many species of reptiles, resulting in reduced population size and increased isolation of populations (Bennett 1991). For example, in Australia, 5 million reptiles and frogs are estimated to be killed annually by motorized vehicles on roads (Ehmann and Cogger 1985, as cited by Bennett 1991). Roads also http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (6 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

facilitate human access into habitats for collection and killing of reptiles. 7. Many species are sensitive to harassment or human presence at particular use sites, which is often facilitated by road access; potential reductions in productivity, increases in energy expenditures, or displacements in population distribution or habitat use can occur (Bennett 1991, Mader 1984, Trombulak and Frissell 2000). Examples are human disturbance of leks (sage grouse and sharp-tailed grouse), of nests (raptors such as ferruginous hawk), and of dens (kit fox). Another example is elk avoidance of large areas near roads open to traffic (Lyon 1983, Rowland and others 2000), with the magnitude of elk avoidance increasing with rate of traffic (Wisdom and others 1999, Johnson and others 2000). 8. Bats are vulnerable to disturbance and displacement caused by human activities in caves, mines, and on rock faces (Hill and Smith 1984, Nagorsen and Brigham 1993). Cave or mine exploration and rock-climbing are examples of recreation that potentially reduce population fitness of bats that roost in these sites (Nagorsen and Brigham 1993, Tuttle 1988). Such activities may be facilitated by human developments and road access (Hill and Smith 1984). 9. Ground squirrels often are targets of recreational shooting ("plinking"), which is facilitated by human developments and road access (Ingles 1965). Most species of ground squirrels included in our analysis are local endemics; consequently, these small, isolated populations may be especially vulnerable to recreational shooting, potentially resulting in severe reductions or local extirpations of populations. 10. Roads often restrict the movements of small mammals (Mader 1984, Merriam and others 1988, Swihart and Slade 1984). Consequently, roads can function as barriers to population dispersal and movement of some species of small mammals (Oxley and Fenton 1974). 11. Many granivorous birds are attracted to grains and seeds along roadsides, resulting in high mortality from vehicle collisions (Vestjens 1973). For example, pine siskens and white-winged crossbills are attracted to road salt, which can result in mortality from vehicle collisions (Ehrlich and others 1988). 12. Terrestrial vertebrates inhabiting areas near roads accumulate lead and other toxins that originate from motorized vehicles, with potentially lethal but largely undocumented effects (Bennett 1991). In summary, no terrestrial vertebrate taxa appear immune to the myriad of road-associated factors that degrade habitat or that increase mortality. These multifaceted effects have strong management implications for landscapes characterized by moderate to high densities of roads, which is the typical pattern across large areas of the basin (figs. 21, 22). That is, about 51 percent of the basin supports road densities estimated as moderate, high, or extremely high (Quigley and others 1996).

Aquatics/Fisheries Issue Statement:

Aquatic populations of fish, amphibians, and invertebrates have been impacted by roads. As a result, stream systems have a reduced http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (7 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

capability to produce and maintain these populations due to increased stream temperatures and sediment, reductions in channel complexity, and channel constriction. Road crossings have affected the ability of fish populations and other aquatic species to migrate successfully into previously occupied habitat, or to have upstream genetic interchange. There is a concern that roads are affecting water quality and quantity in terms of stream temperature and sediment. Increased drainage networks are affecting timing by delivering water with shorter lag times and higher peaks to stream systems. Stream channels across the forest have been impacted by roads causing stream channel aggradation, channel incision and changes in channel types. Wetlands and floodplains have been filled in and disconnected from their stream channels. Background Problems associated with roads that affect aquatic populations on both forests include increases in sediment from surface erosion and road fill failures. Fine sediment effects reproductive and rearing success of aquatic populations, and can decrease pool depth. Deep pools are an important habitat parameter for survival of fish adults and juveniles in winter and summer, as these areas provide modulated temperatures. Roads on both forests have constricted floodplains and stream channels, reducing habitat complexity and area, and ground water retention, along with the reducing the streams ability to respond to floods and other catastrophic events. Constriction of the channel cause changes in channel type and gradient, which can result in channel incision, which further contributes to decreases in aquatic habitats. In addition, roads paralleling streams interrupt the flow of riparian and upland materials to the stream system. Shade, large wood debris, subsurface water flow, and course sediment inputs have all been interrupted resulting in reduced habitat complexity and increased temperatures. Perhaps the largest impact from roads on the fisheries, and to some extent the amphibian resources, has been in the form of reduced access to habitat from impassable culverts. Many stream crossings have culverts that are poorly designed not only for aquatic species passage but also for passage for flood flows. These culverts have effectively eliminated upstream passage for juveniles and in some cases adults. Genetic interchange is therefore limited in these areas to a downstream flow, although perhaps more importantly is the loss of upstream passage for aquatic species during summer low flows when cooler temperatures are likely in the headwater areas, which could result in mortality. On the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forest 98 streams do not meet water quality standards and have been added to the 303d list for non-compliant streams. Of these streams, 51 are listed for temperature and 2 are listed for sediments. The other 35 occurrences are listed for various other habitat threatening parameters. In the Little Deschutes Sub-basin of the Deschutes Basin, 4 streams are listed for temperature and 0 for sediment. In the Upper Deschutes Sub-basin of the Deschutes Basin, 5 streams are listed for temperature and 2 are listed for sediments. On the Lower Crooked Sub-basin of the Deschutes Basin, 12 streams are listed for temperature and 0 are listed for sediments. In the Upper

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (8 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

Crooked Sub-basin of the Deschutes Basin, 30 streams are listed for temperature and 0 are listed for sediments. The existence of roads in our forest has been shown to contribute to the degradation of some streams through an increase in temperature and an increase in sediment. Undersized culverts are a frequent occurrence in the Ochocos. It has been estimated by Jim Seymour, hydrologist on the Ochocos, that as many as 2/3 of the culverts are undersized. His definition of undersized is that the culvert is less than 80% of the stream bankfull width. Due to the constriction, water passing through undersized culverts have increased velocities and have contributed to scouring below the culverts. At times, this constriction causes sediment to be deposited on the upstream end, and shallow pools to form that would reduce the culvert carrying capacity. Most of the arterial and collector roads are located in stream bottoms. In many locations, where the stream meanders the stream cuts into the road fillslope. Some roads cut into paleolandslides, and contribute to landslides. Paved roads being upgraded to meet wider national standards cause a larger disturbance area. Ditch maintenance provides another source of fine sediment for delivery to the streams. Roads intercept groundwater and surface water causing increased overland flow and greater erosion on road surfaces and below drainage structures. Inadequate cross drainage has caused many roads to become entrenched and berms to develop. Berms often confine water on the roadway, increasing the velocity and scouring. In many cases, there is a lack of relief culverts that would pull water off the road onto the hillslope. During field reviews of rainfall events, an estimated 10% of the water runs down the road. The high use of natural surface roads during the wet season can cause rutting which reduces the effectiveness of cross drains and contributes to an increase in sediment delivery. These cumulative impacts often cause the water and sediments to flow directly into the streams with a shorter lag time and a greater peak. Road construction has required the removal of riparian vegetation to accommodate road right-of-way, improve visibility, and reduce the hazard of trees falling on the roadway. The removal of vegetation has caused a reduction in the shading of streams, thereby causing increased stream temperatures in our forest. The reduction of shade trees continues to affect the quality of stream water causing streams to fail to meet water quality standards. It is important to the health of the aquatic ecosystem that streams meet or surpass water quality standards. Decreases in vegetation cover, the modification of slopes to accommodate roads, and surface water concentration on roads has lead to increases in sediments in the streams. Historically, organic debris has plugged culverts at road crossings. Improper alignment and undersizing of road stream crossings has encouraged debris blockage. There are places where road culverts are dented by maintenance equipment, thereby reducing its design capacity. Other roads are equipped with culverts with an insufficient flow capacity. Plugged, damaged, and insufficiently sized culverts have caused streams to rise up onto the road and cause erosion or to "blow out" the road crossings. The increase in water flow on forest service roads has adversely affected the water quality causing the streams to fail to meet water quality standards. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (9 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-4

Mass wasting has occurred on some forest roads, especially on steeper slopes. Mass wasting often severely affects road-stream crossing fills and transports fill and channel materials to higher order streams. In the process of building roads, wetlands and floodplains have been filled in and disconnected from their stream channels. Wetlands and floodplains are crucial components of natural flood control. The cumulative effects are an increase in flood frequency in the watershed. Roads and associated structures influence the quantity and timing of stream flows, resulting in impacts to downstream channels and aquatic ecosystems. Excessive outflow falls and increased velocity of stream flow have caused downstream channel aggradation. The cumulative effects are an increase in flood frequency in lower sections of the watershed. In the past, roads have been evaluated and upgraded whenever money has been available. Usually money has been made available when a timber sale occurs. This has resulted in spotty evaluations of roads made only as a part of specific environmental analysis. This Roads Analysis will make evaluations of roads on a forest wide scale.

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:36:31 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-4.shtml (10 of 10)5/31/2007 1:17:32 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

concerns and potential restoration Conservation Ed. needs, identify issues within individual Contracting watersheds, establish the context for Health watershed analysis or project scale Forest Products analysis, and identify potential Geology management options for the main road Heritage system within a watershed. Partnerships Since the roads being analyzed in this Plantlife process consisted of the major road network that accesses the Forests, and Water/Fisheries are the major travel routes within and Wildlife through the Forest, it was important to http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (1 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:44 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

not only look at a road within a Links particular watershed, but where it Evaluate Our Service originated, where it was going to, and We welcome your comments its relationship to other roads. For on our service and your example, although there may not have suggestions for improvement. been anything significant about a road Forest within a particular watershed, if this road was the major access to a destination resort in another watershed, than the rating in this Deschutes National Forest watershed would reflect that fact. 1001 SW Emkay Drive Whereas, if there was another access to Bend, OR 97702 this resort that provided the primary (541) 383-5300 access to the same members of the Ochoco National Forest public or communities as the road being 3160 N.E. 3rd Street evaluated, then the road being Prineville, OR 97754 evaluated would get a different rating within this watershed. (541) 416-6500 Crooked River National A watershed summary was developed for each of the 69 fifth field Grassland watersheds within the analysis area. It is believed that this is an 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 important component of the process in that it provides an Madras, OR 97741 opportunity to look at a watershed in a holistic manner not just on a (541) 475-9272 road-by-road perspective. Following is a brief summary of benefits, problems, and risks associated with the roads within each watershed. The watershed boundaries are displayed on Maps 16 and 17 in the Map Appendix

Badlands

The Badlands watershed is located on the Fort Rock side of the Bend/ Fort Rock Ranger District. The majority of lands within the watershed are administered by the Forest Service (northeast part of the District) and by the BLM. Within the BLM lands, there are large blocks of private lands. The watershed drains east from NFS lands onto BLM lands. There are no perennial or intermittent streams. The main travelways include Road 18, which provides access through the watershed, and road 23, which provides access from Highway 20. Recreation facilities and attractions include access to the East Fort Rock OHV trail system, Sand Springs, and Lava Cycle Cave. Recreational activities also include dispersed driving, camping, OHV, and hunting activities. The watershed contains a number of recognizable features including China Hat, Pine Mountain, East Butte, and the PotHoles. Utilities include power lines, and the Pine Mountain electronic site. Administratively the area is managed for timber, range, and other uses. Roads within the Badlands Watershed rate low to moderate for special habitats, TES plants, and noxious weeds. Currently, the noxious weed species of primary concern is spotted knapweed. Though all roads have the potential to increase the spread of noxious weeds, Road 2017 has existing spotted knapweed populations that threaten sensitive plant habitat. Roads 23 and 2312 bisect fragile buckwheat flats/rhyolite pumice areas, elevating concerns about off- road vehicle use and introduction and spread of noxious weeds, and

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (2 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:44 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

travel through sensitive plant (green-tinged paintbrush and pumice grape fern) populations. Regarding TES plants, known sensitive plant populations occur along Roads 2017, 23, 2312, and 2510; other roads in this analysis area cross through sensitive plant habitat. Roads that rated high concerns for wildlife habitats include 2017, 201500, 2017501, 23, 2312, 2313, and 2315. Roads 2017, 2017500, 2017501 provide access to sage grouse nesting and migration, and mule deer winter range areas. Road 23 provides access to a very heavy mule deer movement area and is just south of key sage grouse areas. Roads 2312 and 2313 provide access to mule deer winter range, elk wintering near Mahogany Butte, and Lava Cycle Cave. Road 2315 passes through an important deer movement area. All of these roads can interfere with sage grouse nesting and seasonal migrations, and mule deer and elk movements. There are no roads of concern for the aquatic portion of this analysis. Potential future management considerations:

● Control OHVs from going off the roads in the vicinity of Roads 2017, 2017500, 2017501, and 23. These areas contain important sage grouse nesting habitat. ● Roads 2017 (on the Ft. Rock side), 23, 2312, 2313, and 2315 pass through winter range/migration route areas. Recommend efforts, such as signing, to reduce traffic speeds. Road improvements, such as widening and straightening, that would promote higher traffic speeds may further impact deer. Seasonal closures are encouraged in all winter range areas. ● Consider seasonal closures on Road 2312 to reduce access to Lava Cycle Cave.

Bear Creek

The Bear Creek watershed drains the southwest side of the Maury Mountains into Prineville Reservoir (Crooked River). Bear Creek is the main stream channel with tributaries of Little Bear, Kloochman, Faught, and Friday Creeks. Private and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administered lands dominate this watershed. The Forest Service (FS) administers a minor amount of land. The ranching community is a large presence within the watershed and is dependent on State Highway 27 and FS Road 1640 that accesses the Paulina valley and Prineville. Road 1640 is a school bus route. Two reservoirs, Kloochman and Antelope, are used for irrigation and recreation. Hunting use is high and the area has become a focus for wild turkey hunting. The watershed has a high level of Native American artifacts, and "pot hunting" has historically been a major influence. Administratively, the area is actively managed for timber, range, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of over 80 percent highly erosive pyroclastics, landslide debris, and unconsolidated gravels. The remainder is a combination of intrusive basalts and extrusive olivine basalt flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises 1 percent of the landform. The following roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics: 16, 1640, and 17. A combination of moderately rated factors and road position (either mid-slope or stream bottom) http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (3 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:44 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

lead to the concerns. Roads 16 and 1750 had moderate concerns for geology, flow, and fish passage and crossed mid-slope. Road 1640 parallels Kloochman Creek and had moderate concerns for fine sediment and floodplain interaction, while Road 17 had the same types of concerns and parallels Faught Creek. County and State roads with high traffic and existing noxious weed populations contribute to noxious weed seed movement. These roads were rated high for noxious weed concerns. Noxious weeds of concern include diffuse and spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, sulfur cinquefoil, and Mediterranean sage. The Bear Creek Watershed has largely not been surveyed for Sensitive plants. There is only low probability of finding Sensitive plants. Road 17 was rated as high from a wildlife standpoint because it is within 400 yards of a bald eagle nest and is used almost year round. Potential future management considerations:

● Replace undersized culverts along Road 16.

Bear Creek (Bridge)

The Bear Creek (Bridge) watershed is located on the Prineville side of the Lookout Mountain Ranger District. Bear Creek is the main stream within the watershed. The southern end of the watershed is mainly public land administered by the Forest Service. The watershed grades to private land with some interspersed BLM-administrated lands to the north. There are no major communities within the watershed. State Highway 27, which borders the watershed to the south, is a major portal road through the Ochoco NF from McKay Creek (Prineville) over to Highway 26. The Lucky Strike and Valley View mines are within the watershed. In addition, there are a number of other agate claims. Whistler Springs is a public agate collecting area. Road 27 borders the Mill Creek Wilderness, the largest and most heavily used Wilderness on the Ochoco NF. There are a number of trailheads along this road and hunting use is high. Administratively, the area is actively managed for timber, range, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of 3 percent landslide debris and 89 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The remaining 8 percent is a combination of intrusive basalts and extrusive rhyolite flows. The active and dormant landslide terrain comprises 10 percent of the landform. The following roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics: 2730, 2730250, and 2735. A combination of moderate and low rated factors leads to the concerns. Road 2730 has a high rating for geology because it is on landslide terrain, a moderate rating for fine sediment and flow, and a low rating for floodplain and fish. This road is a gravel surface road that is midslope. The road crosses Bear Creek and twelve intermittent streams. Road 2730250 has a high rating for geology, a moderate rating for fine sediment and flow, and a low rating for fish and wetlands. The road is native surface with some spots of gravel. The road is midslope in landslide terrain and crosses Rail Creek, Scotty Creek, and several intermittent streams. Road 2735 has a high rating

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (4 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:44 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

for geology; a moderate rating for fine sediment, floodplain, and flow; and a low rating for fish. The road crosses the north fork of Bear Creek, parallels Bear Creek and crosses Scotty and Grant Creeks. The road crosses landslide terrain. The paved portion of Road 27 was rated as high risk for noxious weeds with existing spotted knapweed and Canada thistle populations. Roads 2730, 2735, and 2750 were rated as moderate risk. All roads in this watershed were rated as low or no risk to special habitats and sensitive plants. Road 27 has a high rating for wildlife because it runs along the top (north) of the Mill Creek Wilderness and fragments interior habitats adjacent to the Wilderness. Road 2730 was rated high because it parallels and enters winter range area. Road 2735 was also rated as high because the seasonal road closure is not implemented on the ground and adds to road density in winter range. Potential future management considerations:

● Consider relocating portions of Road 27 for wildlife concerns. This road provides access to two trails, the Mill Creek Wilderness, and rock hounding/locatable mineral sites. Alternately, close a section in the middle (north of the Mill Creek Wilderness) to eliminate "loop" access. The section between Whistler and the end of the asphalt is a good candidate for closure because it is constructed on landslide scarp. Closing a section of the road would maintain access to the two trailheads. If a section of the road is closed, need to increase maintenance on other roads to account for increased traffic. Continue to maintain an east-west route through the area (compliant with the Highway Safety Act). ● Continue treating noxious weeds (specifically spotted knapweed). ● Upgrade/replace undersize culvers on Roads 2730 and 2730250. ● Modify the seasonal closure method on Road 2735. The current method is not effective.

Bridge Creek

The Bridge Creek watershed drains the north side of the Ochoco Mountains into the John Day River. Bridge Creek is the main stream channel with tributaries of Johnson, West Branch Bridge, Thompson, and Nelson Creeks. Two very small reservoirs, Nelson and Thompson, are located in this watershed and are primarily for stock watering. The south end of the watershed is mainly public land administered by the Forest Service. The watershed grades to private land with substantial blocks of BLM administrated lands to the north. The National Park Service administers the John Day Fossil Beds National Monument within this watershed. The town of Mitchell is within the watershed, as well as Mitchell's public water supply. Road 2630 is a major east-west route across the north end of the Ochoco NF. Road 2630 runs from Highway 26 in the west to Road 12 in the east. Road 2630 road is the historically important Summit Trail (MA-F7), and within this watershed there are high value, single lane, native surface segments. It also borders the Bridge Creek Wilderness, one of three Wildernesses on the Ochoco NF. Road 2210 is a major access portal http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (5 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

from Mitchell and the surrounding ranching communities to the Ochoco NF from the north. Road 2210 is part of the old Prineville to Mitchell Highway. The Crystal Springs church camp is also accessed from this road. There are a number of historically significant trails, particularly the Maxwell and Vowell. There is a lot of dispersed recreation use in this watershed, particularly hunting. One major campground, Wildwood, is located in the watershed. Administratively, the area is actively managed for timber, range, minerals, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of 30 percent Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, 6 percent basalt, 10 percent landslide debris and 54 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The active and dormant landslide terrain comprises 10 percent of the landform. On NFS lands, steelhead trout and redband trout are the primary fish species of concern. There were only four roads that were rated, and two had high concern for aquatic risk. A combination of moderately rated factors and road position (either mid-slope or stream bottom) lead to the concerns. Road 2210 had moderate concerns for all risk factors except fish and geology which were rated high. This road parallels West Branch Bridge Creek for much of its length, is on landslide terrain, and has steep switchbacks in the upper drainage. Road 2630, while located near the top of the watershed, rated high due to landslide terrain and crossing the upper end of Bridge Creek. Bridge Creek contains steelhead trout. There were low road-related risks to special habitats and Sensitive plants in this watershed. Road 2210 has a high risk rating for noxious weeds. A large hound's tongue population occurs along this road. Road 2630 was rated as a moderate noxious weed risk due to hound's tongue and Canada thistle populations along this road. Road 2630 has a high wildlife rating because it parallels the wilderness boundary where there is a high potential for wolverine use. Illegal firewood along this road is a huge problem because firewood cutting remove important down woody debris habitat components. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue treating noxious weeds along Road 2210 (large population of hounds tongue). ● Upgrade/replace undersize culverts on Road 2210. ● Consider seasonal closures on Road 2630 during spring runoff to reduce sediment delivery. ● Consider closing loop access along Road 2630. This is an important wildlife "solitude" area. Closing loop access to large habitat blocks and primitive areas will reduce harassment.

Camp Creek

The northeastern part of the Maury Mountains makes up the headwaters of this watershed. Ownership within the watershed is mostly private and BLM, with a minor amount of FS administered lands. Although there are no major communities, ranching is a significant presence within the watershed and depends on the few roads within the watershed. In particular, http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (6 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

Road 450 a level two road ties into County Road 127, which provides access to the Forest for private lands to the south. County Road 127, which borders the watershed on the south, is the major east-west access route north of Highway 20. There are a couple of small developed recreation sites, and Arrow Point is a major dispersed recreation destination. Administratively, the area is actively managed for timber, range, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of 4 percent landslide debris and 77 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The remaining 19 percent are extrusive basalt flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises 4 percent of the landform. Road 16 rated out as the highest concern for aquatics. Road 16 has a high rating for geology, a moderate rating for flow and a low rating for fine sediment, floodplain, and wetlands. The road is a gravel midslope road on landslide terrain. The road crosses Double Creek, Wiley Creek and Wiley Tributary 1 as well as five intermittent tributaries. Road-related risks to Sensitive plants in the Camp Creek watershed are low because there is low probability that Sensitive plants occur. There is a lack of surveys in this area. Special habitat concerns due to roads are primarily because of risk of invasion by noxious weeds. State Highway 380 and Crook County roads have high traffic and high potential to spread weeds. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● None

Crescent

The Crescent watershed is located on the Crescent RD. It drains the area to the west of the Upper Little Deschutes watershed. The Forest Service (Crescent RD) administers the majority of lands within the watershed. From NFS lands, the watershed drains east onto private lands. Crescent Creek is the main stream channel with tributaries of Big Marsh, Cold, Whitefish, Summit, and Refrigerator Creeks. Big Marsh, Crescent Lake, and Summit Lake are the major features in this watershed. There are a couple of large private inholdings within the contiguous NFS lands. The main travel routes include Roads 60 (over Windigo Pass), 58 (to Crescent Lake Junction), 46 (to Summit Lake), and 61 (to Willamette Pass). Major recreational attractions include the Crescent Lake complex, developed campgrounds, Oregon Crest Recreation Area, and the Diamond Peak Wilderness area. Uses include all kinds of developed and dispersed activities, including mushroom harvesting. The State also maintains a small airport within this watershed. Administratively, the area is primarily managed for timber and range. This land consists mostly of glacial canyons, glacial outwash plains, and shield volcanoes, and is covered by 15 to 80 inches of Mazama ash. On NFS lands, redband trout are the primary fish species of http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (7 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

concern, although brown trout and brook trout are also present. The following five roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics: 58, 5826, 60, 6010, and 6020. A combination of low to moderately rated factors and road position (either mid-slope or stream bottom) lead to the concerns. Road 6020 had the highest overall concern due to its position and crossing of wetlands and Big Marsh Creek. Road 5826 at the upper end of Big Marsh was also a concern. Noxious weed concerns are rated high along Roads 46, 58, 6015, and 61. Currently, the noxious weed species of primary concern are diffuse and spotted knapweeds, Canada thistle, bull thistle, tansy ragwort, and St. John's wort. Roads 46, 58, and 61 have high traffic and are major road corridors for spreading weeds. According to current GIS maps and the FS Region 6 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plant List, TES plants are not an issue at this time in this watershed. There is a diversity of special habitats and Roads 6010, 6020, and 6030 rated high risk for impacting numerous wetland type habitats. Road 46 rated as a very high concern for wildlife habitats. This road accesses or passes through lynx, bald eagle, spotted owl, old growth, and late-successional habitats. This road has high traffic volumes and crosses several riparian areas. It also borders wilderness areas. Concrete barriers along this road can also interfere with wildlife movements. Roads 4660 and 60 also had high concerns for wildlife movement because paved sections contain concrete barriers. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Roads 46, 58, and 61. ● There are existing populations of diffuse and spotted knapweed, Canada and bull thistle, St. John's wort, and tansy along Road 46 which is a high traffic area. There are existing populations of spotted knapweed, Canada and bull thistle, St. John's wort, dalmatian toadflax, and butter and eggs along Highway 58, where there have been repeated disturbances (highway maintenance, cinder distribution) in weed sites. ● Check for and replace undersize culverts along Roads, 60, 6010, 6020, and 6030. The culvert on Road 60 at Refrigerator Creek is a low priority for replacement. ● Consider upgrading the native surface section on Road 60 to aggregate. Aggregate surfacing would reduce the need for annual maintenance and would reduce fine sediment delivery. ● There is visible evidence of erosion on Road 6010. Road needs to be upgraded or maintenance frequency needs to increase. ● Pave the stream crossing where Road 6020 crosses Refrigerator Creek (Big Marsh). This project is being submitted for county funding. Currently, the road bisects the stream. The existing culvert needs to be replaced or additional culverts needs to be installed to maintain wetlands.

Crooked River Grasslands

The Crooked River Grasslands watershed drains several intermittent streams into Lake Billy Chinook.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (8 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

The communities of Culver, Crooked River Ranch, and Round Butte Estates are within the watershed. The entire watershed is considered a major urban interface zone. There are a lot of private lands and major farming and ranching operations. Highway 97 is within the watershed as well as the Lower Crooked River Road, which provides the majority of access to the westside of the Crooked River National Grassland. There are numerous special use endurance events, Smith Rock State Park, Cove Palisades State Park, Henderson Flats OHV area, horse and bike trails, and the Crooked River arm of Lake Billy Chinook within the watershed. As with most of the Crooked River National Grassland, there are numerous historic and prehistoric sites. The Crooked River Wild and Scenic River Corridor is also within the watershed. The underlying lithology is composed of 46 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The remainder is extrusive basalt flows. The reservoir underlies 3 percent of the watershed. The dormant landslide terrain comprises 5 percent of the landform. Road 63 rated out as the highest concern for aquatics. The road has a high rating for fish. The road crosses Lake Billy Chinook, which has threatened and endangered specie. The road is in landslide terrain. Road-related risks to special habitats and Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants are low to non-existent in the Crooked River Grassland watershed. Noxious weeds are the primary road-related issue, with Roads 5740, 5770, 62, 63, and U.S. Highway 97 rated as high risk due to existing weed populations and moderate to high traffic along these roads. Spotted knapweed and medusahead are the primary noxious weed concerns. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Roads 5740, 5770, 62, and 63.

Deep Creek

The Deep Creek watershed drains the west side of the Paulina RD and flows into the North Fork of the Crooked River downstream of Big Summit Prairie. Deep Creek is the main stream channel with tributaries of Crazy, Jackson, Double Corral, and Little Summit Creeks. Little Summit Prairie is within the watershed. There are two private inholdings within this watershed. Road 42 is a major access road across the Ochoco NF from Highway 26 to Paulina. It is also a summer link to the town of Paulina. In addition, Roads 30, 4270, and 4250 are major access portals. There are two small campgrounds and lots of dispersed recreation. Deep Creek is the only watershed with a lot of dispersed recreation, other than hunting, on the Paulina RD. The Camp Watson Military Road is mostly in this watershed and prehistoric sites are plentiful. Administratively this is one of the more active watersheds for timber, range, and other uses, and includes the North Fork of the Crooked River Wild and Scenic River.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (9 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

The underlying lithology is composed of 99 percent basalt and 1 percent unconsolidated gravels. The dormant landslide terrain comprises 1 percent of the landform. Deep Creek is a strong hold for redband trout and includes key spawning, rearing, and refugia habitat for the species. Fish passage barriers exist at numerous road crossings. Road 4250 has the most risk to aquatic resources in the watershed. This road parallels Deep Creek and crosses numerous tributaries. A combination of factors and road position (stream bottom) lead to the concerns. The road had a high rating for fish species and moderate concerns for flow and fish passage. A diversity of special habitats occurs in Deep Creek watershed. Road 4250 was rated as having a high risk from roads due to a combination of noxious weed, high recreation, and high concerns for floodplain functioning. Moderate road-related risks to special habitats were identified along Roads 12, 30, 4254, 4256, 4270, 4272, and 4274 due to noxious weeds, dispersed recreation use, and/or concerns about road effects on the hydrology. Deep Creek is an important watershed for the sensitive plant Peck's long-bearded mariposa lily (Calochortus longebarbatus var. peckii). In addition, scalloped moonwort (Botrychium crenulatum) also occurs in this watershed. Roads 12, 42, 4250, 4270, 4272, and 4274 were rated as high risk to Sensitive plants due to noxious weed risks, high recreation use in the riparian habitats where it occurs, and/or concerns about hydrologic interference. A variety of high-risk noxious weeds occur in this watershed, including spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, hound's tongue, whitetop, and Russian knapweed. Roads 42 and 4270 were identified as having a high risk of spreading noxious weeds. Roads 30, 4250, 4254, 4256, 4274, and 4276 were rated as moderate risk for noxious weeds. Potential future management considerations:

● Replace undersize culverts on Roads 12, 2630 (near Happy Camp and Double Corral), 30, 42, 4250, and 4276. ● Consider seasonal closures on Road 2630 during spring runoff to reduce sediment delivery. ● The surfacing on Road 30 is worn out and needs to be replaced. ● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Roads 42, 4250, 4270, and 4274. ● Protect occupied Calochortus habitat near Road 42, 4270, 4272, and 4274. A population of hounds tongue is increasing and is likely to spread into Calochortus habitat along Road 42. The population on Road 4270 is a key population center and has been identified for protection under the draft Conservation Strategy. ● Protect Salix drummondiana, a rare willow species on the Ochoco. Noxious weeds are present in habitat. This is one of two known occurrences of this willow on the Ochoco NF.

Deschutes South

The Deschutes South watershed is located on the Crooked River National Grasslands and is north west of the town of Madras. The northwest side of the watershed encompasses part of the http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (10 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

Confederated Tribes of the Warm Spring Reservation. The communities of Metolius and Round Butte are within the watershed. Most of the watershed is considered a major urban interface zone. There are lots of private lands and farming is an important activity. The Pelton dam, Lake Simtustus, along with PPE's regulatory dam, and Haystack reservoir, are all within the watershed. There are numerous special use endurance events, Haystack reservoir campground, and the Cyrus Horse Camp within the watershed. There are substantial historic (Gray Butte cemetery, Perryville historic town site) and prehistoric sites. The underlying lithology is composed of 63 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The remainder is a combination of extrusive basalt and andesite flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises 1 percent of the landform. There are several intermittent streams and reservoirs. No roads were rated as high or moderate for the aquatics resource. Road 5740 rated as high risk for spreading noxious weeds due to existing weed populations and high traffic along this road. Roads 55, 56, 5750, 66, 6670, 96, 9605, 9601, and 97 rated as moderate risk for noxious weeds. Problem weed species include whitetop, medusahead, Russian, diffuse and spotted knapweeds. No roads were rated as high or moderate for special habitats or Sensitive plants. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Road 5740.

Devils Garden

The Devils Garden watershed is located on the Fort Rock side of the Bend/Fort Rock RD. The majority of lands within the watershed are administered by the Forest Service (southeast part of the District) and by the BLM. There are large blocks of privately owned lands along the NF boundary and within the BLM lands. From NFS lands, the watershed drains southeast onto BLM and private lands. There are no perennial or intermittent streams. The main travelways include Road 18, which provides north-south access through the RD and is a secondary (summer) community tie for Bend and Fort Rock; Road 22, which provides access west-east across the RD from Highway 97 and is a major portal route for LaPine; and Road 23, which provides north-south access within and through the watershed. Recreation facilities include South Ice Cave Picnic area and China Hat campground. Recreational activities include dispersed driving and camping, OHV (Road 2248 provides access to OHV play areas), and hunting. The BLM area to the southeast contains the Devil Garden geologic area, which is a prime example of an area that offers desert solitude. Administratively the area is managed for timber, range, and other uses. Road 2268 rated as high risk for noxious weeds due to a large infestation of spotted knapweed at Opal Mine. Roads 18 and 23 have http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (11 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

known noxious weed populations (moderate rating; spotted knapweed and Canada thistle). The majority of roads within this watershed are fairly weed-free except for bull thistle in old timber harvest areas. The sensitive plant pumice grape fern (Botrychium pumicola) occurs in this watershed. However, all roads in this analysis rated as low risk for impacts to pumice grape fern. No special habitats were identified in this analysis. Roads 23, 2315, 2320, 2325, and 2350 rated the highest concerns for wildlife. All five of these roads provide access to important mule deer winter range areas and important deer movement areas. There are no roads of concern for aquatics. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed control efforts along Road 2268 (spotted knapweed, bull thistle). ● Consider seasonal closures along Roads 23, 2315, 2320, 2325, and 2350 for mule deer winter range and movement.

Fall

The majority of lands within the watershed are administered by the Forest Service (east part of the Bend/Fort Rock RD). It drains the area northeast of Crane Prairie and Wickiup Reservoirs. Fall River is the main stream channel and flows into the Deschutes River. There are large blocks of privately owned lands along the NF boundary. From NFS lands, the watershed drains east onto primarily private lands along the Fall and Deschutes river corridors. The main travel routes include Road 46, the Cascade Lakes Highway; Road 45, a major north-south access route; and Roads 40, 42, and 43, which are primarily east-west travel routes that connect Highway 97 with the Cascades Lake Highway. Major recreational facilities include Mount Bachelor ski area, Edison Snow Park, and Fall River campground. There is a lot of dispersed camping along the Deschutes River, and hunting and fishing are both very popular. Outside of the heavy recreational and special use permit administration; the area is managed for timber, range, and other uses. The land consists of youthful lava fields of the Mt. Bachelor volcanic chain to the west, a plateau of lava fields and volcanic cones to the east, and thick fine-grained sediments of the LaPine Basin to the south. The area is covered with 10 to 30 inches of Mazama ash. The following roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics: 4360 and 4370. Road 4360 has a moderate rating for fine sediment and a low rating for floodplain. This road is a native surface road that crosses Fall River multiple times and has several culverts that are insufficient for flow and fish passage. Road 4370 has a moderate rating for fine sediment and a low rating for wetlands. The road is a native surface road that parallels the west side of the Deschutes River below Wickiup Reservoir. All roads within Fall Watershed ranked low for special habitats and TES plants. High noxious weed ratings were given to Roads 40, 42, 43, 4370, 4380, 44, 46. The primary noxious weed species of

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (12 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

concern is spotted knapweed, although dalmation toadflax does occur along Road 42. Roads 40, 41, 42, 43, 4330, 4358, 4360, 4370, and 4525 had high wildlife concerns. Road 40 is a paved highway and is a major route to the Cascade Lakes and wilderness areas. Roads 41, 4180, 43, 4330, 4360, and 4370 are high traffic roads that pass through important deer and elk migration areas. Roads 42, 4358, and 4360 are within the Fall key elk area. Road 4360 also provides access to two bald eagle management areas with active nests. Road 4370 passes directly under a bald eagle nest and provides access to the Pringle Falls RNA. Road 4525 passes through an owl territory; nesting, roosting, and foraging habitat; and a late-successional reserve. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Roads 40, 42, 43, 4370, 4380, 44, and 46. ● Resurface Road 41. This project has already been scheduled. ● Road closures on and adjoining Road 4358 are not effective. Gates need to be maintained or removed. Other closure methods should be considered. ● Upgrade or replace a series of undersize culverts along Road 4360 (Fall Road). ● Consider installing a gate to permanently close Road 4370. This road passes under a bald eagle nest. Road passes through a BEMA (Bald Eagle Management Area) and a RNA (Research Natural Area). Traffic to the campground would need to be rerouted.

Freemount

This watershed does not contain any Forest Development Roads that were analyzed at the Forest-wide scale.

Grindstone

The Grindstone watershed drains the area southeast of the town of Paulina and west of the Upper Beaver Watershed. Grindstone Creek is the main stream channel with the major tributary being Trout Creek. This watershed does not contain any Forest Development Roads that were analyzed at the Forest-wide scale.

Hampton

The Hampton watershed is located near the eastside of Fort Rock. There are no perennial streams and one intermittent stream. The only road in the analysis area is Highway 20, which is not a concern from an aquatics perspective. No risks were identified for special habitats and TES plants. A high risk for noxious weeds was identified due to high traffic and high road maintenance activities.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (13 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5 Headwaters

The Headwaters watershed is located on the Bend side of the Bend/ fort Rock RD and is contained entirely within the National Forest. It drains the upper Deschutes from Mt. Bachelor downstream to Crane Prairie Reservoir. The Deschutes River is the main stream channel with numerous tributaries throughout the watershed. Highway 46, the Cascade Lakes Highway, is the major access through the watershed. This area receives the highest recreational use on the Deschutes NF. There are many developed campgrounds that cater to water-related activities. Mount Bachelor, Dutchman Snow Park, and trailheads into the Three Sisters Wilderness are all within this watershed. Reservoirs, especially Crane Prairie, receive very heavy dispersed recreation use. Other attractions include the Three Sisters Wilderness, the popular South Sister, and Devil and Green Lake trails. Outside of the heavy recreational and special use permit administration; the area is managed for a variety of uses including timber and range. This land consists of deeply glaciated volcanic terrain to the north, the youthful Mt. Bachelor volcanic chain of lava to the east, glaciated lava fields to the west, and glacial outwash fans in the middle and to the south. The area is covered with 0 to 24 inches of Mazama ash. On NFS lands, redband trout are the primary fish species of concern, although brown trout and brook trout are also present. Roads 46 and 4630 rated out as the highest concern for aquatics. Road 46 had the highest concern where it crosses the Sparks Lake area and associated tributaries that influencing wetlands and channel form, where it crosses other wetland habitat areas as it heads south along the Deschutes River, and the area 2-5 miles north of the reservoir where the road encroaches on the floodplain of the Deschutes River. Road 4630 is of greatest concern where it crosses Cultus River, and where it influences Cultus Creek, Deer Creek, and four wetlands. Road 46 rated as high risk to special habitats because it crosses through or near a variety of habitats, such as subalpine meadows and wetlands. Road-related concerns are noxious weeds and off-road vehicle trespass into fragile habitats, such as the buckwheat flats near Mt. Bachelor. There were no TES plant concerns identified in this analysis. Noxious weeds are a high concern on numerous roads: 40, 42, 4240, 4285, 4286, 4290, 4291, and 46 and many of the spur roads that lead off of it. Spotted knapweed is of primary concern, although other species do occur, such as dalmation toadflax, diffuse knapweed, and Canada thistle. Numerous roads in this watershed had high concerns for wildlife. Roads 4285 and 4286 pass through high use migration areas for mule deer and elk. Roads 4600472, 4625, 4625-100, 4625-500, 4625-605, 4625-607, all provide access to wilderness areas and lakes. Bald eagles nest and roost in and around these areas. High recreation use, especially camping and woodcutting, associated with these lakes can affect eagles and modify important habitat characteristics (i.e. removing down logs). Roads 4628, 4630, 4631, 4632, 4635, 4635-110, 4635120, and 4636 all pass through late- sucessional reserves, spotted owl home ranges, and Critical Habitat Units.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (14 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed control projects on Roads 42, 4240, 4285, 4286, 4290, 46, 4600319, 4600400, 4600420, 4600430, 460450, 4600472, 4600480, 4600482, 46500, 4600655, 4600659. There are several different weed species; spotted knapweed and dalmatian toadflax seem to be the most prevalent. ● Consider seasonal closures on Roads 4285 and 4286 to reduce disturbance during big game migration. ● On Road 46,consider installing a series of relief culverts or stream crossings near Sparks Lake to restore floodplain and wetland function. ● Consider permanent closure of loop access routes. These loops are formed by or in the vicinity of Roads 4600472, 4625, 462510, 462530, 462550, 4625605, 4625607, 462580, 4630, 4631, 4632, 4635, 4635110, 4635120, and 4636. This closure effort would need to a coordinated effort because some of these roads access campgrounds/lodges. These roads are in the proximity of key wildlife areas for owls and eagles and wilderness areas. ● Replace the undersize culvert on Road 4635110.

Irrigation Canals

The Irrigation Canal watershed is located on BLM administered land west of Powell Butte. The Irrigation Canal watershed has no perennial or intermittent streams. The underlying lithology is composed of 100 percent extrusive basalt flows. The only roads in the analysis area are paved and are not a concern for aquatics.There are no perennial or intermittent streams. This watershed does not contain any Forest Development Roads that were analyzed at the Forest-wide scale. Four Deschutes County roads, U.S. Highway 20 and State Highway 126 have a high risk for introducing and spreading noxious weeds due to high traffic levels and high road maintenance activities. Lake Billy Chinook The Lake Billy Chinook watershed is located partially on the Crooked River National Grassland and partially on the Sisters RD. There are no perennial streams in this watershed. Road 63 and 64 originates within this watershed and provides primary access to the subdivisions of Geneva and Three Rivers. There are also lots of interspersed private lands and rural homesites creating a major urban interface within the watershed. Part of the Lake Billy Chinook State park and the Deschutes arm of Lake Billy Chinook are within the watershed. There are substantial historic (cemeteries, rock walls, town sites, travel ways) and prehistoric sites. The underlying lithology is composed of 25 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The reservoir covers 3 percent of the area. The remaining 72 percent is underlain by extrusive basalt flows. Dormant and active landslide terrain comprises 1 percent of the landform. The Deschutes and Crooked Rivers converge to form Lake Billy Chinook, behind the Round Butte dam. Road 63 crosses landslide terrain, as it passes through the http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (15 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

state park. Road 6510 rated as high risk to special habitats and Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants. A rare lichen, Texasporium sancti jacobi, occurs along this road. Noxious weed concerns were also identified along this road (moderate risk rating). Road 6520 also rated as high risk for this same rare lichen and a moderate risk for noxious weeds. Other road-related risks in this watershed for special habitats and Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants were low to non-existent. A high noxious weed risk rating was identified for Road 6320. Moderate noxious weed risks were identified for Roads 11, 1126, and 2055. Road 2055 is of special concern because of the high weed infestations in the Fly Lake area. Road 2055 was also identified as having a high risk to special habitats (scablands) due to high off-road use and noxious weeds and to Peck's penstemon, a Sensitive Plant. Road 63 was rated as high for wildlife. Road 63 accesses a heavily used deer wintering area. This road has a high traffic volume that travels at high speed. Potential future management considerations:

● Consider increasing or improving signage along Road 63 to slow traffic and reduce potential wildlife/vehicle collisions. ● Treat weed populations along Road 6320 because weeds may threaten populations of cultural plants. ● Protect habitat for rare lichen, Texosporium sancti jacobi, near Roads 6510 and 6520. Begin or continue control measures to prevent nearby noxious weeds (medusahead) from spreading.

Little Deschutes

The Little Deschutes watershed drains the area west of the town of LaPine. The Little Deschutes River is the main stream channel and flows into the Deschutes River. Most of the land within the Watershed is privately owned. The Forest Service (Crescent RD) administers one large block and a few scattered parcels. The BLM administers a couple of large blocks and numerous smaller parcels scattered throughout the watershed. The area is considered a major urban interface zone as exemplified by the presence of LaPine and many rural subdivisions and remote homesites. Highway 97 runs directly through the watershed and Road 9745 is the primary access route for a number of subdivisions. Road 22 is a major portal route for the people of LaPine to access the Deschutes NF. Administratively the area is managed for timber, range, and other uses. Much of the BLM lands are OHV play areas. This area consists of youthful lava fields of the Mt. Bachelor volcanic chain to the west, a plateau of lava fields and volcanic cones to the east, and thick fine-grained sediments of the LaPine Basin to the south. From 10 to 30 inches of Mazama ash cover the area. Road 43 rated out as the highest concern for aquatics. Road 43 has a moderate rating for floodplain and wetlands. This road is commonly known as the Wickiup Junction Road and crosses the Little Deschutes River. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (16 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

There were no road related concerns to special habitats and TES plants identified in this analysis. Special habitats may occur and there may be TES plant populations close to roads that are not mapped. Highway 97 is a major vector for noxious weeds, primarily spotted knapweed with some diffuse knapweed populations. Other roads in this watershed rated as low or moderate risk for noxious weeds. Road 62 rated out as the highest concern for wildlife. Road 62 passes through a late-successional reserve and a spotted owl territory. Potential future management considerations:

● None

Long Prairie

The Long Prairie watershed is located on the Fort Rock side of the Bend Fort Rock RD. About half the land base is administered by the Forest Service. NFS lands in this watershed are largely contiguous. At the lower elevations the ownership pattern changes to private (30 percent). There are large blocks of BLM lands in the valley bottom (20 percent). There are also a scattering of lands administered by the Fremont NF in the southwestern part of the watershed. Highways 97 and 31, which provides access to Silver Lake, Christmas Valley, Lakeview, and beyond, are within the watershed. Road 2220 is a major access road to large blocks of industrial timberlands. Road 22 is a major portal road onto the Ft. Rock RD for the citizens of the LaPine area, as well as a secondary community route for Fort Rock. The area gets very heavy hunting during the fall deer-hunting season. There is a moderate level of dispersed use, mainly in the summer and fall seasons. The Spring Butte fire lookout and the powerlines to Christmas Valley are also within the watershed. The area is managed for a variety of uses including timber and range. Roads in Long Prairie watershed rated low or zero for risk to special habitats. Only a few special habitats were identified in the analysis: an aspen stand along Road 2415 and a wet meadow along Highway 97 south of LaPine. There are moderate concerns for pumice grape fern populations occurring along Road 24, with low concerns for other populations occurring along Roads 31, 3115, 3117, and 3118. Roads 31 and Highway 97 are rated as high risk for spreading noxious weeds (diffuse and spotted knapweeds). Highway 31 rated a high concern for wildlife because of heavy traffic and the large number of vehicle collisions with deer. There are no roads of concern for aquatics. Potential future management considerations:

● Continue noxious weed control efforts along Road 31. Biggest problem is weed populations on private land that are not being treated. Populations on NFS lands have been reduced by control efforts but reinfestations are likely.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (17 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5 Lower Beaver

The headwaters of the Beaver Creek watershed are located on the Paulina RD. Wolf Creek is the main stream channel. The watershed drains south onto private lands with interspersed BLM lands. There are two large private inholdings surrounded by NFS lands. The community of Paulina, which services the very large and productive Paulina valley ranching community, is within the watershed. Road 12 is a major north-south portal, Road 58 links to the Rager Ranger Station and to Road 42, which is a school route. County roads 112 and 113 are also school routes, and State Highway 380 leads to the community of Izee and large ranches in the east. The second most used campground on the District, Wolf Creek, is within the watershed. Disperses recreation, especially hunting, is also high. The underlying lithology is composed of 28 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The remaining 72 percent are extrusive basalt flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises less than 1 percent of the landform. The following two roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics: 3810 and 4290. A combination of moderately rated factors leads to the concerns. Road 3810 has a moderate rating for fine sediment and floodplain as well as a low rating for flow and fish. This road is gravel and parallels Wolf Creek. Road 3810 crosses Wolf Creek twice and also crosses four intermittent tributaries. Road 4290 road is a gravel road that parallels an intermittent tributary to Wolf Creek and three to four perennial streams that are not on the stream layer. Roads 3810, 4260, 4290, and 5810 rated as moderate risk to special habitats. Special habitats include meadows, scablands, springs, and aspen stands. Roads 4260 and 4290 rated as moderate risk to Sensitive plants. The remaining roads analyzed for this watershed rated as either low or no risk to special habitats and TES plants. Roads 3810, 42, 4280, and 5810 rated as high risk for noxious weeds. Problem species include Canada thistle, hound's tongue, whitetop, and diffuse and spotted knapweeds. Most of the high risk ratings were due to high traffic combined with relatively high recreation use. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Roads 3810, 42, 4280, and 5810. ● Upgrade portions of Road 58 and convert to county jurisdiction.

Lower Crooked River Valley

The Lower Crooked River Valley watershed includes the area of the Crooked River from just south of Prineville downstream to about Smith Rock State Park and north to the top of Grizzly Mountain. The Crooked River is the main stream channel with the McKay Creek drainage as the major tributary. Joe Fisher Reservoir is located in the watershed and is primarily a stock watering lake. The southeast http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (18 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

corner of the Crooked River National Grassland is within the watershed. The majority of the watershed is under private ownership, with interspersed BLM lands. The City of Prineville, along with the communities of Lone Pine and Juniper Canyon are all within the watershed. Highway 26, a major State Highway, is within the watershed along with road 7960 (Lone Pine Road). The Lone Pine Road is a major access route into the Crooked River National Grassland. The Lone Pine Road is also a major community access route for Madras, Redmond, and Terrebone, and is also a Jefferson County tour route. The southern part of the Crooked River National Grassland supports major recreational activities such as camping at Skull Hollow campground, heavy dispersed recreation use at McCoin Orchards, and the Gray Butte Trailhead and trail. There are two major electronic sites, Gray Butte and Grizzly Mountain, along with Portland General Electric's natural gas pipeline and substation. The area has very high prehistoric and historic significance, such as the old town site of Grizzly. The underlying lithology is composed of 36 percent basalt/andesite/ rhyolite, 4 percent landslide debris and 60 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The dormant landslide terrain comprises 5 percent of the landform. Redband trout are the main species of concern within this portion of the Crooked River. There were no roads of concern from aquatics in this watershed. Road 5710 rated as moderate risk to special habitats (riparian and aspen). All other roads analyzed in this watershed rated as low or no risk to special habitats. There were no Threatened, Endangered or Sensitive plant concerns identified. For road-related risks to noxious weeds, State Highway 380 was of greatest concern, rating as a high risk due to existing weed populations and high traffic. All other roads rated as low risk to introducing and spreading noxious weeds. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● None

Lower Dry River

The Lower Dry River watershed is located partially on the Crooked River National Grassland and partially on the Ft. Rock side of the Bend/Fort Rock RD. The headwaters of Lower Dry River are on the northeastern side of the Fort Rock RD. There are no perennial or intermittent streams in the watershed. The watershed drains to the northeast onto BLM lands. Lands administered by the BLM dominate the watershed. There are also numerous large blocks of privately owned lands. The primary travelways include Road 18 (China Hat). The China Hat Road is the second most heavily used road on the Ft. Rock RD. It is the major north-south portal through the Ft. Rock RD and is a secondary (summer) community access route for the communities of Bend and Fort Rock. Highway 20, which is the primary access from Bend to

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (19 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

Burns, also cuts through this watershed. This watershed is close to Bend; it receives heavy use and exhibits a lot of urban interface interactions. There are a number of day-use areas but no developed campgrounds. The main features/attractions are caves. Wind, Ice, Boyd, and Skeleton caves are all unique features and generate a lot of recreational use. In addition, the Skeleton wildfire burned most of this watershed. In the past this created additional traffic as people come to see the effects of a major wildfire. Administratively the area is managed for timber, range, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of the over 30 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The remaining 70 percent are extrusive basalt flows. There are no roads of concern for the aquatic portion of this analysis. No special habitats were identified within 200 feet of roads within this analysis. Sensitive plant (green-tinged paintbrush) populations occur along roads 1825 and 2015, but the roads are considered low risk to these populations. Road 1815, U.S. Highway 20, State Highway 126, and Deschutes County roads are high risk for spreading noxious weeds due to high traffic and existing weed populations. Numerous roads in this watershed were rated as high concerns for wildlife. Roads 18, 1800-200, 1814, 1815, 1815-800, 1819, 1820, 1825, and 2015 all provide access to mule deer winter range, including some low elevation winter range areas. Road 2015 provides access to a sage grouse lek located on private land. Roads 1800 and 1820 provide access to caves. Potential future management considerations:

● Road 1800-200 access Wind and Bat caves. Consider some form of heritage site protection. ● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Road 1815 (spotted and diffuse knapweed). ● Consider seasonal closures along Roads 18 and 1818. These roads provide access to caves and winter range areas. ● Consider closing portions of Road 2015. This road accesses an important sage grouse lek site.

Lower Metolius

The northwest part of the Crooked River National Grassland and northeastern part of the Sisters RD lie within this watershed. The Lower Metolius watershed drains the lower half of the Metolius basin and includes the Metolius arm of Lake Billy Chinook. Numerous tributaries are present throughout the area with the Metolius River as the main channel. The town of Metolius and the Three Rivers subdivision are within the watershed. There are numerous ranching operations within this watershed. Road 11 provides access to Green Ridge, Sisters, and Lake Billy Chinook. Road 1170 is the continuation of Road 11, and provides access to private lands and the Three Rivers Subdivision. Road 1170 is in need of resurfacing. Roads 11 and 1170 are involved in the relicencing of Portland General Electric's hydroelectric facility.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (20 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

Although most of the Metolius River facilities do not fall in this watershed, it does receive heavy dispersed recreational use along the river, heavy developed recreation along the lake, and contains a couple of major campgrounds. The area contains lots of rock pits and private timberlands. The underlying lithology is composed of 30 percent highly erosive pyroclastics, landslide debris, and unconsolidated gravels. Lake Billy Chinook underlies 2 percent of the area. The remaining 68 percent is composed of mafic intrusive and a combination of basalt, andesite, and rhyolite extrusive flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises less than 1 percent of the landform. This land consists of older, dissected, volcanic rocks, which include lavas, thick layers of ash, and sand and gravel. The steep and long slopes of Green Ridge and the Horn-of-the-Metolius above the Metolius River can produce debris flows during major storms. On NFS lands, redband and bull trout are the primary fish species of concern, although brown trout and brook trout are also present. The following two roads rated out as far and away the highest concern for aquatics: 1499 and 64. These two roads parallel the eastern and southern sides of the Metolius River. Road 1499 starts on the southern end of the watershed and parallels the eastern edge of the river. It is native surfaced and crosses over 30 intermittent tributaries and debris fans from debris flows. Road 64 is in the lower section of the drainage and the final two miles are a major concern. This has some major fine sediment problems due to surface erosion and sloughing slopes. Roads 1499, 6510, and 6520 rate as high risk to all three botanical factors: special habitats, TES plants, and noxious weeds. High risk weed species, medusahead, threatens scabland habitats that contain a rare lichen, Texosporium sancti jacobi. High noxious weed risks were identified along Roads 1129, 1170, 1180, 1190, 1193, 1499, 63, 64,and 65. Hydrologic interference and weed risk were concerns identified for special habitats that occur along Roads 11, 1140, 1190, 1193, 1499, 6320, and 64 within the Lower Metolius watershed. Two sensitive plants, peck's penstemon (Penstemon peckii) and tall agoseris (Agoseris elata), occur within the Lower Metolius watershed. The primary road-related concern for these sensitive plants is the introduction and spread of noxious weeds along roads into sensitive plant habitats. Several other roads rated as moderate concern for risk to TES plants. Roads 11, 1140, 1150, 1190, and 64 were rated as a high concern for wildlife. Road 11 passes through a heavy, winter-time deer movement area. Road 1190 is a major north-south route that affects big game migration. Roads 1150 and 1190 border primitive wildlife areas and possible wolverine habitat. Illegal fire wood harvest along Roads 1140 and 1150 reduces large woody debris. Roads 1140, 1150, and 1190 access Late-Successional Reserves and spotted owl nesting, roosting, and foraging habitat. Roads 1140 and 1190 also access Old Growth Management Areas and Critical Habitat Units. Road 64 is the main paved access route from Highway 97 to the Perry South and Monty Campgrounds. High recreation use is affecting bald eagles. Potential future management considerations:

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (21 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

● Review undersize culverts at intermittent tributaries along Road 1150. Upgrade or remove undersize culverts. If it were determined that culverts would not be effective in this area, convert to drivable dips. ● On Roads 1490 and 1499 convert culverts to drivable dips. Minimize the amount of fill at stream crossings. ● Consider obliterating the last 2 miles of Road 64. Major sloughing is occurring on the cut/fill slopes and contributing sediment into bull trout habitat. ● Begin or continue noxious weed control projects along Roads 1170, 1180, 1499, and 64. Diffuse knapweed is the most prevalent species.

Lower North Fork Crooked

The Lower North Fork Crooked watershed is located on the Big Summit side of the Lookout Mountain RD. The southeast end of the Big Summit RD contains the headwaters of this watershed. The North Fork Crooked River is the main stream channel. The watershed grades from Forest Service to BLM to private lands as one moves south. Although there are few major roads, Teaters Road provides access from the Paulina Highway to the Ochoco NF. There is lots of dispersed recreation, especially hunting and river related. Lower Falls on the Crooked River occurs within the watershed. The Star Gazer Party is held in this watershed every summer. The South Boundary Road Closure area, where motorized access is limited, is within the watershed. Administratively, the area is actively managed for timber, range, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of 16 percent highly erosive pyroclastics, landslide debris, and unconsolidated gravels. The remaining 84 percent are extrusive basalt flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises less than 1 percent of the landform. Road 4230 rated out as the highest concern for aquatics. A combination of moderate and low rated factors leads to the concerns. Road 4230 has a moderate rating for fine sediment, floodplain, and wetlands and a low rating for flow and fish. This road parallels Rough Canyon Creek, then Fox Canyon Creek, then North Fox Canyon Creek. The road also runs close to five reservoirs. Road 4260 rated high for TES plants due to a small, vulnerable isolated population of Peck's long-bearded mariposa lily that is threatened by noxious weeds. This road also rated high for noxious weeds because connecting roads have hound's tongue. Roads 4225 and State Highway 380 rated moderate risk for noxious weeds. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● Upgrade/replace culverts along Road 4230. ● Consider closing Road 4230 through route. The native surface section is contributing fine sediment to stream courses.

Lower Ochoco http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (22 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

The Lower Ochoco watershed drains the area to the east of Prineville including Ochoco Reservoir and the lower part of Ochoco Creek. Ochoco Creek and Veazie Creek are the major streams in the drainage. The majority of this watershed is private land, interspersed with BLM lands. There are few Forest Service administered lands. The City of Prineville and the Ochoco Reservoir are main influences. The Green Mountain Trailhead is within this watershed. The underlying lithology is composed of 12 percent basalt, 5 percent landslide debris, and 82 percent highly erosive pyroclastics and unconsolidated gravels. The dormant landslide terrain comprises less than 1 percent of the landform. Ochoco Reservoir underlies 1 percent of the watershed. Ochoco Reservoir contains rainbow/redband trout, large mouth bass, crappie, and catfish. The primary fish species of concern is redband trout in Ochoco Creek. The following two roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics (although overall concern was only moderate): Highway 26 and Road 4215. The primary cause for concern, for both roads, is the position of the road adjacent to the streams and impacts to floodplains. Road 3380, located on landslide terrain, rated moderate for geology. Noxious weeds are the highest botanical concern in the Lower Ochoco watershed. Three of the five roads analyzed in this watershed rated as high risk for noxious weeds (Roads 26, 27, and State Highway 380). The other two roads rated as moderate risk for noxious weeds. Problem noxious weed species include whitetop, dalmation toadflax, Canada thistle, spotted and Russian knapweed. Road 4215 rated as moderate risk to special habitats (riparian habitat with willow, alder, and possibly cottonwoods). The floodplain has been altered. All roads in this watershed rated as low or no risk to Sensitive plants. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● Monitor area along Road 26 for noxious weed spread. There are several noxious weeds species on private land with few or no control efforts. ● Begin or continue noxious weed treatments along Road 27.

Lower South Fork

The Lower South Fork watershed is located on the Paulina RD. The South Fork John Day River is the main stream channel. The watershed drains to the South Fork of the John Day River. The community of Dayville's primary access to the Ochoco NF is Road 42. The Black Canyon Wilderness, one of three Wildernesses on the Ochoco NF, is in the upper end of the watershed. The area is known for its "trophy" hunting (deer and elk), has two developed campgrounds, Frazier and Mud spring), and trailheads into the wilderness. Administratively, the area is actively managed for timber,

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (23 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

range, and other uses. The underlying lithology is composed of 3 percent Mesozoic sedimentary rocks and 3 percent landslide debris and unconsolidated gravels. The remaining 94 percent are extrusive basalt flows. The dormant landslide terrain comprises a little over 1 percent of the landform. The following two roads rated out as the highest concern for aquatics: 5850 and Grant County Road 42. A combination of high, moderate, and low rated factors leads to the concerns. Road 5850 has a moderate rating for fine sediment, floodplain, and fish and a low rating for flow and wetlands. This road crosses the North Fork Wind Creek, Squaw Creek and numerous intermittent tributaries. Grant County Road 42 has a high rating for fish, a moderate rating for fine sediment and floodplain and a low rating for flow. The road is gravel and follows the South Fork John Day River. There are no roads that rated a high concern for botany in this watershed. There are no roads that were rated as a high concern for unique wildlife features or habitat characteristics. Potential future management considerations:

● None

Lower South Fork Crooked

The Lower South Fork Crooked River watershed drains the South Fork of the Crooked River. This watershed does not contain any Forest Development Roads that were analyzed at the Forest-wide scale. Lower Crooked River (RM 56.5 - 70.5) The Lower Crooked River watershed drains the Crooked River from Bowman Dam downstream to about 5.5 miles south of Prineville. This watershed does not contain any Forest Development Roads that were analyzed at the Forest-wide scale. State Highway 27 was rated with a high risk for introducing and spreading noxious weeds.

Next section of Appendix I-5 Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (24 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix I-5

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:36:33 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-1-5-a.shtml (25 of 25)5/31/2007 1:17:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Road Codes

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Schedule of Proposed Field Heading Major Documents Actions ROAD - Road Number Monitoring Reports Project Information BMP - Beginning mile point for a Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, segment of road Assessments EMP - Ending mile point for a segment Publications of road Recreational Activities SURF - Road Surface Type Volunteering

● NAT = Native Material (Dirt) ● IMP = Improved Surface (Cinders, Pit Run rock, etc.) Newberry National ● AGG = Aggregate (Gravel) Volcanic Monument ● BIT = Bituminous Surface Treatment (Chip Seal, Oil Mat, Conservation Ed. paved) Contracting ● AC = Asphalt Concrete (Hot Mix, Health paved) Forest Products Geology Maint Level - Existing or Proposed Heritage Maintenance Level Partnerships

Plantlife ● 1 = Road is CLOSED year around Water/Fisheries ● 2 = Road is OPEN and maintained Wildlife for HIGH CLEARANCE vehicles ● 3 = Road is OPEN and maintianed http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-1a.shtml (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:18:01 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Road Codes

for LOW CLEARANCE vehicles, Links (usually has native or gravel Evaluate Our Service surfacing) We welcome your comments ● 4 = Road is OPEN and maintained on our service and your for LOW CLEARANCE vehicles, (low suggestions for improvement. standard paved road or might have Forest stabilized gravel surfacing) ● 5 = Road is OPEN and maintained for LOW CLEARANCE vehicles, (high standard, double lane, paved road) Deschutes National Forest 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702 Mgmt Strategy - Recommended (541) 383-5300 Management Strategy (See following page for definitions) Ochoco National Forest 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Maint Frequency - Existing or Prineville, OR 97754 Proposed Maintenance Frequency (See following page for definitions) (541) 416-6500

Crooked River National Grassland Back to Table of Contents 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 . (541) 475-9272

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:01 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-1a.shtml (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:18:01 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Road Recommendations

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Conservation Ed. Management Strategies Contracting Health A. Maintain As Is: (Existing Forest Products maintenance efforts are generally in Geology balance with access needs, no Heritage resource impacts are identified that Partnerships would warrant a change in Plantlife maintenance levels.) B. Increase Maintenance Level: Water/Fisheries (Access needs identified exceed Wildlife existing maintenance efforts and/or

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-1b.shtml (1 of 3)5/31/2007 1:18:12 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Road Recommendations

resource impacts have been Links identified that indicate a need to Evaluate Our Service perform maintenance at a higher We welcome your comments level.) on our service and your C. Decrease Maintenance Level: suggestions for improvement. (Access needs identified do not Forest support maintaining road at current level. Resource impacts are low and do not require maintenance to continue at present level.) Deschutes National Forest D. Implement Seasonal Travel 1001 SW Emkay Drive Restrictions: (Access is generally Bend, OR 97702 needed during the snow free (541) 383-5300 season, but resource concerns Ochoco National Forest indicate a need for travel 3160 N.E. 3rd Street restrictions to be implemented at Prineville, OR 97754 some time of the year to mitigate negative impacts.) (541) 416-6500 E. Close Year Around: (Access needs Crooked River National are low and only necessary for Grassland administrative or project use. Road 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 can be closed between projects. Madras, OR 97741 Resource concerns or maintenance (541) 475-9272 budget limitations indicate a need to close road between project activities.) F. Decommission or Convert to Other Uses: (Full-sized vehicle access is no longer needed, road can be removed from the transportation inventory. Road can either be stabilized and returned to resource production or converted to other uses such as a motorized or non-motorized trail.)

Maintenance Frequency:

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-1b.shtml (2 of 3)5/31/2007 1:18:12 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Road Recommendations

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:02 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-1b.shtml (3 of 3)5/31/2007 1:18:12 PM Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency /mile COST REMARKS 1200000 0.00 0.80 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $339 3 ANNUAL $424 $339 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 0.80 0.94 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $60 3 ANNUAL $424 $60 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 0.94 1.18 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $101 3 ANNUAL $424 $101 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 1.18 1.38 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $84 3 ANNUAL $424 $84 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 1.38 1.85 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $202 3 ANNUAL $424 $202 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 1.85 7.45 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,374 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,374 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 7.45 7.63 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $74 3 ANNUAL $424 $74 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 7.63 7.92 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $123 3 ANNUAL $424 $123 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 7.92 8.22 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $130 3 ANNUAL $424 $130 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 8.22 8.87 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $273 3 ANNUAL $424 $273 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 8.87 9.13 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $112 3 ANNUAL $424 $112 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 9.13 10.25 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $475 3 ANNUAL $424 $475 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 10.25 10.33 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $34 3 ANNUAL $424 $34 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 10.33 13.60 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,386 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,386 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 13.60 15.22 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $1,882 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $1,882 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 15.22 20.00 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $5,535 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $5,535 has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 20.00 21.50 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $2,136 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $2,136 1250000 0.00 0.19 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $45 2 AS NEEDED $189 $36 some of summit trail 1250000 0.19 0.38 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $44 2 AS NEEDED $189 $36 some of summit trail 1250000 0.38 0.45 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $17 2 AS NEEDED $189 $13 some of summit trail 1250000 0.45 0.52 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $16 2 AS NEEDED $189 $13 some of summit trail 1250000 0.52 0.56 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $10 2 AS NEEDED $189 $8 some of summit trail 1250000 0.56 0.64 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $17 2 AS NEEDED $189 $14 some of summit trail 1250000 0.64 0.96 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $76 2 AS NEEDED $189 $61 some of summit trail 1250000 0.96 2.49 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $360 2 AS NEEDED $189 $289 some of summit trail 1250000 2.49 2.70 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $49 2 AS NEEDED $189 $40 1250000 2.70 2.81 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $25 2 AS NEEDED $189 $20 some of summit trail 1250000 2.81 2.83 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $6 2 AS NEEDED $189 $5 1250000 2.83 2.85 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $5 2 AS NEEDED $189 $4 some of summit trail 1250000 2.85 3.46 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $141 2 AS NEEDED $189 $113 1250000 3.46 3.75 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $70 2 AS NEEDED $189 $56 some of summit trail 1250000 3.75 3.80 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $11 2 AS NEEDED $189 $9 (not on map - check spatial data) out of Barnhouse Springs CG - first 0.10 to CG remaining 3 miles closed year round by gate - one of few roads on dist w/no dispersed sites - dispersed use by walking during hunting season - runs along pvt boundary - some interest in using for 1280000 0.00 3.40 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED $128 $435 1 AS NEEDED $137 $466 log haul under road use permit 1600000 6.60 11.03 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $979 $4,340 4 ANNUAL $979 $4,340 major loop rd 1600000 11.03 11.10 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $979 $66 3 ANNUAL $979 $66 major loop rd 1600000 11.10 21.00 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $2,644 3 REGULAR $285 $2,824 major loop rd 1600000 21.00 26.87 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $1,567 3 REGULAR $285 $1,674 major loop rd 1600000 26.87 29.13 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $604 3 REGULAR $285 $646 major loop rd 1600000 29.13 36.70 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $2,020 3 REGULAR $285 $2,158 major loop rd 1610000 0.00 6.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,131 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,131 1610000 6.00 6.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $0 2 AS NEEDED $189 $0 1620000 0.00 3.20 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $574 2 AS NEEDED $189 $603 1640000 0.00 3.21 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $979 $3,147 4 ANNUAL $979 $3,147 school route, ranches, Bend to Antelope rd 1640000 3.22 3.40 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $979 $176 4 ANNUAL $979 $176 school route, ranches, Bend to Antelope rd 1670000 0.00 0.32 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $46 2 AS NEEDED $144 $46 1670000 0.32 0.58 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $36 2 AS NEEDED $144 $36 1670000 0.58 1.18 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $87 2 AS NEEDED $144 $87 1670000 1.18 4.30 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $447 2 AS NEEDED $144 $447 1670000 4.30 4.40 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $15 2 AS NEEDED $144 $15 1670000 4.40 7.29 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $414 2 AS NEEDED $144 $414 1670000 7.29 11.14 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $553 2 AS NEEDED $144 $553 1680000 0.00 4.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $753 2 AS NEEDED $189 $753 access to agate bed 1680000 4.00 4.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $29 2 AS NEEDED $144 $29 access to agate bed 1680000 4.20 5.42 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $175 2 AS NEEDED $144 $175 access to agate bed 1680000 5.42 5.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $26 2 AS NEEDED $144 $26 access to agate bed 1690000 0.00 0.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $54 2 REGULAR $134 $54 to agate bed, continues on to private land 1690000 0.40 1.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $55 2 REGULAR $69 $55 to agate bed, continues on to private land 1690000 1.20 1.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $35 2 REGULAR $69 $35 to agate bed, continues on to private land 2 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 1700000 0.00 9.35 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $3,963 3 ANNUAL $424 $3,963 ranch 3 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 1700000 9.35 10.30 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $404 3 ANNUAL $424 $404 ranch 4 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 1700000 10.30 12.80 IMP A 3 ANNUAL $379 $948 3 ANNUAL $379 $948 ranch 5 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 1700000 12.80 13.90 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $466 3 ANNUAL $424 $466 ranch 1700600 0.00 0.66 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $280 3 REGULAR $332 $219 1700600 0.66 0.66 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $1 3 REGULAR $332 $1 1750000 0.00 2.42 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $168 2 AS NEEDED $69 $168 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 2.42 2.89 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $33 2 AS NEEDED $69 $33 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 2.89 2.94 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 2.94 3.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $25 2 AS NEEDED $69 $25 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 3.30 4.09 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $106 2 AS NEEDED $134 $106 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 4.09 10.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $820 2 AS NEEDED $134 $820 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 10.20 10.59 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $27 2 AS NEEDED $69 $27 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 10.59 11.52 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $64 2 AS NEEDED $69 $64 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 11.52 16.22 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $326 2 AS NEEDED $69 $326 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 16.22 16.89 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $46 2 AS NEEDED $69 $46 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 16.89 17.06 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $12 2 AS NEEDED $69 $12 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.06 17.12 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $4 2 AS NEEDED $69 $4 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.12 17.17 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.17 17.36 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $13 2 AS NEEDED $69 $13 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.36 17.44 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $5 2 AS NEEDED $69 $5 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.44 17.73 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $20 2 AS NEEDED $69 $20 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.73 17.87 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $10 2 AS NEEDED $69 $10 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.87 18.12 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $17 2 AS NEEDED $69 $17 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 18.12 19.72 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $111 2 AS NEEDED $69 $111 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 19.72 23.39 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $254 2 AS NEEDED $69 $254 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 23.39 23.44 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 23.44 25.09 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $114 2 AS NEEDED $69 $114 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 25.09 26.28 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $82 2 AS NEEDED $69 $82 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 26.28 27.38 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $76 2 AS NEEDED $69 $76 all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1760000 0.00 0.66 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $45 2 AS NEEDED $69 $45 fire lookout 1760000 0.66 0.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 2 AS NEEDED $69 $3 fire lookout 1760000 0.70 0.99 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $20 2 AS NEEDED $69 $20 fire lookout 1760000 0.99 1.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $8 2 AS NEEDED $69 $8 fire lookout 2200000 0.00 7.61 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $10,841 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $10,841 walton lake rd 2200000 7.61 8.00 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $551 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $551 walton lake rd 2200000 8.00 18.34 AGG A 4 ANNUAL $729 $7,536 4 ANNUAL $729 $7,536 walton lake rd 2200000 18.34 21.20 AGG A 4 ANNUAL $484 $1,385 4 ANNUAL $484 $1,385 walton lake rd 2200000 21.20 21.23 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $13 3 ANNUAL $424 $13 walton lake rd 2200000 21.23 26.90 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,404 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,404 Accesses two dispersed sites - Travel Routes has this segment listed as a collector, it should be changed to a local and dropped from 2200930 0.00 0.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $250 $100 2 AS NEEDED $102 $41 analysis Provides access to Walton Lake, Wildwood CG, and Crystal Springs 2210000 0.00 1.13 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $479 3 ANNUAL $424 $479 church camp (first segment), at the bottom is county rd. 2210000 1.13 1.43 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $127 3 ANNUAL $424 $127 2210000 1.43 3.53 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $888 3 ANNUAL $424 $888

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Ochoco) 1 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency /mile COST REMARKS Provides access to Walton Lake, Wildwood CG, and Crystal Springs 2210000 3.53 8.40 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $1,616 3 REGULAR $332 $1,616 church camp (first segment) 2220000 0.00 0.20 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $285 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $285 Walton Lake Loop 2220000 0.20 2.00 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,159 $2,086 5 ANNUAL $1,159 $2,086 Walton Lake Loop 2220010 0.00 0.20 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $285 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $285 Walton Lake Day Use, boat ramp South side of Pisgah, secondary access to lookout, comm sites, etc. 2230000 0.00 1.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $172 2 AS NEEDED $144 $172 2230000 1.20 2.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $144 2 AS NEEDED $144 $144 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 2.20 4.11 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $150 2 AS NEEDED $79 $150 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.11 4.45 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $27 2 AS NEEDED $79 $27 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.45 4.53 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $6 2 AS NEEDED $79 $6 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.53 4.56 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $3 2 AS NEEDED $79 $3 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.56 4.57 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $1 2 AS NEEDED $79 $1 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.57 4.59 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $1 2 AS NEEDED $79 $1 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.59 4.63 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $4 2 AS NEEDED $79 $4 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.63 4.68 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $4 2 AS NEEDED $79 $4 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.68 4.77 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $7 2 AS NEEDED $79 $7 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.77 4.81 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $3 2 AS NEEDED $79 $3 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.81 4.89 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $7 2 AS NEEDED $79 $7 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.89 4.99 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $7 2 AS NEEDED $79 $7 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.99 4.99 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $0 2 AS NEEDED $79 $0 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.99 5.14 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $12 2 AS NEEDED $79 $12 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 5.14 5.37 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $18 2 AS NEEDED $79 $18 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 5.37 7.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $128 2 AS NEEDED $79 $128 county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2300403 0.00 0.10 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $116 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $116 Ochoco Ranger Station (admin site road) 2600150 0.00 0.20 BIT C 3 ANNUAL $1,159 $232 2 AS NEEDED $1,095 $219 Cougar Campground 2600550 0.00 0.50 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $580 4 REGULAR $1,159 $580 Ochoco Divide CG - much lower use than Walton Lk CG 2600550 0.50 0.53 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $30 4 REGULAR $1,159 $30 2600828 0.00 0.17 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $197 4 REGULAR $1,159 $197 Rimrock Springs rest area/trail head, high use at rest area 2610000 0.00 4.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $754 2 AS NEEDED $189 $754 Little Hay Cr - alternate access from HWY 26 to Ranger Station 2610000 4.00 7.90 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $735 2 AS NEEDED $189 $735 2610400 0.00 0.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $348 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $348 to picknic shelter at Ochoco Forest Camp 2610401 0.00 0.10 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $116 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $116 Ochoco Forest Camp (Ochoco Cr CG) 2610500 0.00 0.40 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $464 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $464 Ranger Station roads (admin site) 2610510 0.00 0.05 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $58 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $58 2610511 0.00 0.04 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $46 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $46 2610515 0.00 0.20 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $232 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $232 first seg part of compound (admin site) 2610515 0.20 1.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $102 2 AS NEEDED $79 $102 this section closed second "tie-through" from HWY 26 to Ranger Station, first 1/2 mile has high community link for residences along Marks Cr @ Hwy 26 2620000 0.00 4.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $689 2 AS NEEDED $144 $689 sled hill, part of summit trail, access to crystal spring, mitchell 2630000 0.00 3.50 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,484 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,484 watershed, private haul 2630000 3.50 5.10 AGG C 3 ANNUAL $424 $678 2 AS NEEDED $221 $353 2630000 5.10 6.22 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $88 2 AS NEEDED $79 $88 2630000 6.22 6.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $38 2 AS NEEDED $79 $38 2630000 6.70 10.24 AGG C 3 REGULAR $332 $1,174 2 REGULAR $267 $946 2630000 10.24 10.30 AGG C 3 REGULAR $332 $19 2 AS NEEDED $221 $13 2630000 10.30 10.71 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $32 2 AS NEEDED $79 $32 2630000 10.71 11.92 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $95 2 AS NEEDED $79 $95 2630000 11.92 14.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $203 2 AS NEEDED $79 $203 2630000 14.50 14.57 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $5 2 AS NEEDED $79 $5 2630000 14.57 15.13 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $44 2 AS NEEDED $79 $44 2630000 15.13 16.09 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $75 2 AS NEEDED $79 $75 2630000 16.09 17.88 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $140 2 AS NEEDED $79 $140 2630000 17.88 19.21 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $104 2 AS NEEDED $79 $104 2630000 19.21 19.22 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $1 2 AS NEEDED $69 $1 2630000 19.22 19.23 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $0 2 AS NEEDED $69 $0 2630000 19.23 19.33 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $7 2 AS NEEDED $69 $7 2630000 19.33 19.51 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $12 2 AS NEEDED $69 $12 2630000 19.51 19.51 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $0 2 AS NEEDED $69 $0 2630000 19.51 21.72 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $153 2 AS NEEDED $69 $153 2630000 21.72 21.75 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $2 2 AS NEEDED $69 $2 2630000 21.75 22.37 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $43 2 AS NEEDED $69 $43 2630000 22.37 22.69 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $22 2 AS NEEDED $69 $22 2630000 22.69 22.86 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $12 2 AS NEEDED $69 $12 2630000 22.86 23.22 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $25 2 AS NEEDED $69 $25 2630000 23.22 24.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $61 2 AS NEEDED $69 $61 2630000 24.10 24.11 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $1 2 AS NEEDED $69 $1 2630000 24.11 26.49 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $164 2 AS NEEDED $69 $164 2630000 26.49 26.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $8 2 AS NEEDED $69 $8 summit trail 2630000 26.60 27.43 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $120 2 AS NEEDED $144 $120 2630000 27.43 27.74 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $44 2 AS NEEDED $144 $44 2630000 27.74 28.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $167 2 AS NEEDED $144 $167 2630000 28.90 29.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $100 2 AS NEEDED $144 $100 2630000 29.60 30.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $144 2 AS NEEDED $144 $144 2630000 30.60 33.70 BIT A 2 AS NEEDED $1,073 $3,325 2 AS NEEDED $1,073 $3,325 2680000 0.00 0.30 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $43 2 AS NEEDED $144 $43 HQ road (admin site), historic buildings, etc. 2700000 12.00 20.60 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $12,246 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $12,246 2700000 20.60 23.20 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,424 $3,697 4 ANNUAL $1,424 $3,697 2700000 23.20 24.20 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,430 4 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,430 2700000 24.20 25.80 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $1,854 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $1,854 2700000 25.80 26.00 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $232 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $232 2700000 26.00 26.26 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $41 3 REGULAR $222 $58 2700000 26.26 29.43 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $498 3 REGULAR $222 $702 2700000 29.43 29.84 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $64 3 REGULAR $222 $91 2700000 29.84 29.97 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $20 3 REGULAR $222 $28 2700000 29.97 30.24 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $43 3 REGULAR $222 $60 2700000 30.24 30.59 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $54 3 REGULAR $222 $77 2700000 30.59 30.61 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $3 3 REGULAR $222 $4 2700000 30.61 30.61 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $1 3 REGULAR $222 $2 2700000 30.61 31.55 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $147 3 REGULAR $222 $207 Major connector from Bandit Springs to McKay,lucky strike mine 2700000 31.55 31.85 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $47 3 REGULAR $222 $67 2700000 31.85 32.00 NAT B 2 REGULAR $157 $24 3 REGULAR $222 $33 Major connector from Bandit Springs to McKay,lucky strike mine 2700000 32.00 34.59 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $3,690 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $3,690 2700000 34.59 35.89 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,855 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,855 Major connector from Bandit Springs to McKay 2700000 35.89 36.00 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $151 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $151 2700000 36.00 36.20 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $282 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $282 2700000 36.20 37.47 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,811 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,811 2705000 0.00 4.66 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $879 2 AS NEEDED $189 $879 2710000 0.00 2.98 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $562 2 AS NEEDED $189 $562 2710000 2.98 3.10 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $22 2 AS NEEDED $189 $22 Stops at folly lookout, ties into rd 27 2710000 3.10 3.39 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $55 2 AS NEEDED $189 $55 2710000 3.39 3.64 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $47 2 AS NEEDED $189 $47 2710000 3.64 5.70 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $388 2 AS NEEDED $189 $389 2710000 5.70 5.90 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $38 2 AS NEEDED $189 $38 2710000 5.90 6.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $38 2 AS NEEDED $189 $38 2715000 0.00 0.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1 2715000 0.00 1.30 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $244 2 AS NEEDED $189 $244 2720000 0.00 0.02 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $3 2 AS NEEDED $144 $3 the west end of this loop road is closed 2720000 0.02 0.12 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $14 2 AS NEEDED $144 $14 2720000 0.12 0.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $12 2 AS NEEDED $144 $12 2720000 0.20 0.30 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED $128 $13 1 AS NEEDED $128 $13 2720000 0.30 1.10 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED $128 $102 1 AS NEEDED $128 $102

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Ochoco) 2 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency /mile COST REMARKS 2720000 1.10 4.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $517 2 AS NEEDED $144 $517 2720000 4.70 11.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $990 2 AS NEEDED $144 $990 2720000 11.60 17.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $904 2 AS NEEDED $144 $904 2725000 0.00 0.18 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $34 2 AS NEEDED $189 $34 2725000 0.18 6.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,191 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,191 Stevensen lookout 2730000 0.00 8.30 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $2,716 3 REGULAR $332 $2,751 2730000 8.30 12.89 IMP A 3 ANNUAL $379 $1,741 3 REGULAR $287 $1,316 2730000 12.89 12.90 IMP A 3 ANNUAL $379 $3 3 REGULAR $287 $2 2730000 12.90 13.40 IMP B 2 ANNUAL $282 $141 3 REGULAR $287 $143 2730000 13.40 21.86 IMP B 2 ANNUAL $282 $2,387 3 REGULAR $287 $2,423 2730000 21.86 21.90 IMP B 2 ANNUAL $282 $12 3 REGULAR $287 $12 2730000 21.90 21.94 IMP B 2 ANNUAL $282 $11 3 REGULAR $287 $11 2730250 0.00 4.00 AGG C 3 REGULAR $332 $1,326 2 AS NEEDED $221 $883 Lucky strike mine???? 2735000 0.00 0.57 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $134 2 AS NEEDED $189 $107 2735000 0.57 0.70 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $31 2 AS NEEDED $189 $25 2735000 0.70 10.30 IMP A 2 REGULAR $190 $1,822 2 AS NEEDED $144 $1,378 2740000 0.00 2.20 IMP A 2 REGULAR $190 $417 2 AS NEEDED $144 $316 2745000 0.00 1.72 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $569 3 REGULAR $332 $569 2745000 1.72 1.99 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $90 3 REGULAR $332 $90 2745000 1.99 2.92 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $307 3 REGULAR $332 $307 2745000 2.92 3.80 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $293 3 REGULAR $332 $293 2750000 0.00 0.70 AGG A 2 REGULAR $235 $164 2 AS NEEDED $189 $132 walton lake rd Cold Springs developed site near 42 end, secondary access to east 3000000 0.00 8.42 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $2,792 3 ANNUAL $424 $3,571 side of summit prairie 3000000 8.42 8.70 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $92 3 AS NEEDED $285 $79 3000000 8.70 16.70 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $2,652 3 AS NEEDED $285 $2,282 another secondary access to east side of prairie, chamber of 3010000 0.00 5.80 AGG B 3 REGULAR $332 $1,923 4 ANNUAL $424 $2,459 commerce promotes this road as a prime wildflower viewing area 2 segments for analysis,one from 27 to the campground, the other 3300000 0.00 4.44 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,881 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,881 from campground to 26- high community 3300000 4.44 4.44 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $1 3 ANNUAL $424 $1 3300000 4.44 4.44 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $1 3 ANNUAL $424 $1 3300000 4.44 4.60 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $68 3 ANNUAL $424 $68 3300000 4.60 5.24 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $270 3 ANNUAL $424 $270 3300000 5.24 11.40 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,614 3 REGULAR $332 $2,044 3300300 0.00 0.30 AC A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $348 4 AS NEEDED $1,159 $348 3320000 0.00 5.00 NAT A 2 REGULAR $157 $785 2 AS NEEDED $111 $554 3320000 5.00 5.09 NAT A 2 REGULAR $157 $15 2 AS NEEDED $111 $10 campground the closed part of this rd is not on the map! We wanyt to keep some 3330000 0.00 1.30 NAT A 2 REGULAR $157 $204 2 AS NEEDED $111 $144 and decomission parts 3330000 1.30 1.33 NAT A 2 REGULAR $157 $5 2 AS NEEDED $111 $3 3330000 1.33 1.34 NAT A 2 REGULAR $157 $1 2 AS NEEDED $111 $1 3330000 1.34 3.00 NAT A 2 REGULAR $157 $261 2 AS NEEDED $111 $184 gravel pit. Rod check the maintaince level- closed, change functional 3330010 0.00 0.20 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED $63 $13 1 AS NEEDED $63 $13 class 3330010 0.20 0.40 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED $63 $13 1 AS NEEDED $63 $13 3350000 0.00 0.02 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $4 2 AS NEEDED $189 $4 part of it is closed, missing some of it on ,map 3350000 0.02 0.20 AGG A 1 AS NEEDED $173 $31 1 AS NEEDED $173 $31 steins pillar trailhead? 3350000 0.20 1.00 AGG A 1 AS NEEDED $173 $138 1 AS NEEDED $173 $138 3350000 1.00 1.80 AGG A 1 AS NEEDED $173 $138 1 AS NEEDED $173 $138 3350000 1.80 4.00 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED $63 $138 1 AS NEEDED $63 $138 3350000 4.30 4.30 NAT B 1 AS NEEDED $63 $0 2 AS NEEDED $63 $0 3350000 4.30 AGG A 1 AS NEEDED $63 $19 1 AS NEEDED $63 $19 3350000 4.30 9.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,037 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,037 3360000 0.00 4.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $754 2 AS NEEDED $189 $754 3360000 4.00 4.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $113 2 AS NEEDED $189 $113 3370000 0.00 2.50 AGG B 2 AS NEEDED $189 $471 3 REGULAR $332 $829 cabins 3370000 2.50 5.20 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $509 2 AS NEEDED $189 $509 3370000 5.20 6.06 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $162 2 AS NEEDED $189 $162 3380000 0.00 3.00 AGG B 2 AS NEEDED $189 $566 3 AS NEEDED $285 $857 green mtn, horse camp, 2ndary access to private 3380000 3.00 3.42 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $78 2 AS NEEDED $189 $78 3380000 3.42 7.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $770 2 AS NEEDED $189 $770 3380000 7.50 7.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $24 2 AS NEEDED $79 $24 primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 3800000 0.00 2.00 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $655 3 REGULAR $332 $663 (unknown status) 3800000 2.00 3.49 BIT B 2 ANNUAL $1,338 $1,996 3 REGULAR $1,424 $2,125 primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 3800000 3.49 3.50 BIT B 2 ANNUAL $1,338 $11 3 REGULAR $1,424 $11 (unknown status), trailhead 3800000 3.50 8.12 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $1,511 3 REGULAR $424 $1,958 primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 3800000 8.12 10.91 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $912 3 REGULAR $424 $1,182 (unknown status) primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 3800000 10.91 10.93 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $8 3 ANNUAL $424 $11 (unknown status) 3800000 10.93 11.00 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $23 3 ANNUAL $424 $29 3800000 11.00 12.70 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $375 $635 2 AS NEEDED $191 $324 3800000 12.70 13.12 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $315 $133 2 AS NEEDED $176 $74 3800000 13.12 13.37 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $315 $79 2 AS NEEDED $176 $44 3800000 13.37 13.43 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $315 $18 2 AS NEEDED $176 $10 3800000 13.43 13.56 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $315 $40 2 AS NEEDED $176 $22 3800000 13.57 14.24 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $315 $212 2 AS NEEDED $176 $118 3800000 14.24 16.74 IMP A 2 ANNUAL $315 $787 2 AS NEEDED $176 $440 3800000 16.74 18.83 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $176 $367 2 AS NEEDED $176 $367 3800000 18.83 19.01 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $176 $31 2 AS NEEDED $176 $31 3800000 19.01 20.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $176 $333 2 AS NEEDED $176 $333 3800000 20.90 21.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $71 2 ANNUAL $217 $196 3810000 0.00 6.70 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,263 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,263 4200000 0.00 6.51 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $9,263 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $9,263 from ochoco RS to Rager Rs, aceess to big summit prarie 4200000 6.51 14.76 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $11,752 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $11,752 4200000 14.76 19.30 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $6,468 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $6,468 4200000 19.30 23.30 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $5,697 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $5,697 first seg rank same as 12 - accesses pvt land and "Millers Ditch" - seg from 6 corners to Deep Cr provides some access to Dev sites at 4200000 23.30 24.80 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $2,135 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $2,135 Deep Creek 4200000 24.80 26.10 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $1,507 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $1,507 4200000 26.10 28.88 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,180 4 ANNUAL $424 $1,180 first seg rank same as 12 - accesses pvt land and "Millers Ditch" - seg from 6 corners to Deep Cr provides some access to Dev sites at 4200000 28.88 33.50 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,957 4 ANNUAL $424 $1,957 Deep Creek first seg rank same as 12 - accesses pvt land and "Millers Ditch" - seg from 6 corners to Deep Cr provides some access to Dev sites at 4200000 33.50 34.03 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $224 4 ANNUAL $424 $224 Deep Creek 4200000 34.03 34.04 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $4 4 ANNUAL $424 $4 4200000 34.04 34.13 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $41 4 ANNUAL $424 $41 4200000 34.13 34.18 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $18 4 ANNUAL $424 $18 4200000 34.18 35.50 AGG B 3 ANNUAL $424 $562 4 ANNUAL $424 $562

4200000 35.50 43.50 AC A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $9,272 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $9,272 (4200850 not on map, Wolf Cr. CG - special use/access to ditch) road to old Canyon Cr CG, now a dispersed site, level 3 local in travel 4200100 0.00 1.00 AGG C 3 REGULAR $267 $267 2 AS NEEDED $221 $221 routes (should be dropped to level 2) 4200460 0.00 0.33 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $109 3 AS NEEDED $285 $94 Deep Cr. Campground 4205000 0.00 0.05 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $8 2 AS NEEDED $144 $8 Lookout Mtn, mine access, interpretive work ongoing, etc. 4205000 0.05 0.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $93 2 AS NEEDED $144 $93 Lookout Mtn, mine access, interpretive work ongoing, etc. 4205000 0.70 0.90 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $15 2 AS NEEDED $79 $15 4205000 0.90 1.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $24 2 AS NEEDED $79 $24

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Ochoco) 3 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency /mile COST REMARKS 4210000 0.00 4.30 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $1,407 3 ANNUAL $424 $1,823 Tie through from 42 to 22 along west edge of prairie presently level 2, main access from 42 through Gray Prairie, ties through Ochoco Lumber Co land to 23 road, administrative easement 4215000 0.00 7.70 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $609 $4,689 3 ANNUAL $609 $4,689 on Ochoco (Wolf Cr.) segment 4215000 7.70 9.43 IMP B 2 REGULAR $222 $385 3 REGULAR $287 $497 presently level 2, main access from 42 through Gray Prairie, ties through Ochoco Lumber Co land to 23 road, administrative easement 4215000 9.43 11.70 IMP B 2 REGULAR $222 $503 3 REGULAR $287 $649 on Ochoco (Wolf Cr.) segment 4215000 11.70 11.74 IMP B 2 REGULAR $222 $9 3 REGULAR $287 $11 4215000 11.74 13.90 IMP A 2 REGULAR $222 $480 2 AS NEEDED $176 $380 4220000 0.00 6.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $961 2 AS NEEDED $144 $961 4225000 0.00 3.65 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $687 2 AS NEEDED $189 $687 Williams Prairie, add county/BLM segment on south end 4225000 3.65 3.70 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $10 2 AS NEEDED $189 $10 4225000 3.70 4.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $144 2 AS NEEDED $144 $144 4225000 4.70 4.85 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $22 2 AS NEEDED $144 $22 4230000 0.00 3.95 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $567 2 AS NEEDED $144 $567 4230000 3.95 4.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $7 2 AS NEEDED $144 $7 4230000 4.00 7.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $566 2 AS NEEDED $189 $566 4230000 7.00 10.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $222 2 AS NEEDED $69 $222 4230000 10.20 11.66 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $195 2 AS NEEDED $134 $195 4230000 11.66 11.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $20 2 AS NEEDED $134 $20 4230000 11.80 11.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $12 2 AS NEEDED $134 $12 4230000 11.90 15.50 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $484 2 AS NEEDED $134 $484 4230000 15.50 19.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $627 2 AS NEEDED $179 $627 4235000 0.00 11.90 AGG B 2 AS NEEDED $179 $2,133 3 REGULAR $332 $3,945 4240000 0.00 1.93 AGG B 2 AS NEEDED $179 $345 3 REGULAR $332 $638 road to Upper Falls, star gazer group has permit for annual event 4240000 1.93 4.70 AGG B 2 AS NEEDED $179 $497 3 REGULAR $332 $920 4240000 4.70 6.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $282 2 AS NEEDED $134 $282 4240000 6.80 7.20 IMP B 2 AS NEEDED $134 $54 3 AS NEEDED $231 $92 4250000 0.00 9.00 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $327 $2,945 3 REGULAR $332 $2,984 highest dispersed use on district 4250000 9.00 15.17 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $179 $1,106 3 REGULAR $332 $2,045 4250000 15.17 15.19 AGG B 2 ANNUAL $179 $4 3 REGULAR $332 $7 4254000 0.00 4.30 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $771 2 AS NEEDED $179 $771 Keyas Cabin - check on special use? 4256000 0.00 2.30 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $309 2 AS NEEDED $134 $309 4258000 0.00 0.70 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $125 2 AS NEEDED $179 $125 4258000 0.70 3.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $430 2 AS NEEDED $134 $430

4260000 0.00 4.49 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $805 2 AS NEEDED $179 $805 private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface

4260000 4.49 7.39 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $520 2 AS NEEDED $179 $520 private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 7.39 9.23 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $127 2 AS NEEDED $69 $127 4260000 9.23 9.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $50 2 AS NEEDED $134 $50 4260000 9.60 10.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $53 2 AS NEEDED $134 $53 4260000 10.00 11.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $104 2 AS NEEDED $69 $104 4260000 11.50 11.82 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $22 2 AS NEEDED $69 $22 4260000 11.82 13.07 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $167 2 AS NEEDED $134 $167 4260000 13.07 14.08 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $181 2 AS NEEDED $179 $181 private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 14.08 16.49 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $433 2 AS NEEDED $179 $433 private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 16.49 17.33 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $150 2 AS NEEDED $179 $150 4260000 17.33 17.40 - PAVE A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $5 2 AS NEEDED $69 $5 4270000 0.00 8.90 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $2,376 3 REGULAR $332 $2,950 4272000 0.00 4.20 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $753 2 AS NEEDED $179 $753 4274000 0.00 4.80 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $860 2 AS NEEDED $179 $860 4276000 0.00 0.16 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $29 2 AS NEEDED $179 $29 one of two main accesses to Little Summit Prairie 4276000 0.16 2.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $437 2 AS NEEDED $179 $437 one of two main accesses to Little Summit Prairie 4280000 0.00 0.68 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $92 2 AS NEEDED $134 $92 4280000 0.68 4.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $526 2 AS NEEDED $134 $526 4290000 0.00 4.20 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $753 2 AS NEEDED $179 $753 closed during green dot period 5310000 0.00 0.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $121 2 AS NEEDED $134 $121 5480000 0.45 3.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $208 2 AS NEEDED $69 $184 5730000 0.00 1.95 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $144 $280 2 AS NEEDED $144 $280 Sumner Springs Road, ours add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view 5800000 0.00 1.62 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $2,307 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $2,307 area) add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view 5800000 1.62 6.20 AC A 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $6,522 5 ANNUAL $1,424 $6,522 area) 5800000 6.20 7.00 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $484 $387 3 ANNUAL $484 $387 5800000 9.50 13.70 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $4,868 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $4,868 5800000 13.70 14.26 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $237 3 ANNUAL $424 $237 add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view 5800000 14.26 15.84 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $670 3 ANNUAL $424 $670 area) add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view 5800000 15.84 21.00 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,188 3 ANNUAL $424 $2,188 area) 5800000 21.00 21.67 AGG A 3 ANNUAL $424 $284 3 ANNUAL $424 $284 5800050 0.00 0.08 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $27 3 AS NEEDED $285 $23 5800050 0.08 0.10 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $7 3 AS NEEDED $285 $6 5800141 0.00 5.00 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $5,795 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $5,795 compound roads (admin site) 5800142 0.00 0.23 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $267 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $267 compound roads (admin site) 5800142 0.23 0.40 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $197 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $197 compound roads (admin site) 5800143 0.00 0.10 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $116 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $116 compound roads (admin site) 5800143 0.10 0.21 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $131 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $131 compound roads (admin site) 5800145 0.00 0.20 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $232 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $232 compound roads (admin site) 5800145 0.20 0.26 BIT A 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $65 4 ANNUAL $1,159 $65 compound roads (admin site) 5800500 0.00 0.87 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $287 3 REGULAR $332 $287 5800500 0.87 2.40 AGG A 3 REGULAR $332 $509 3 REGULAR $332 $509 5800500 2.40 2.70 NAT B 2 AS NEEDED $79 $24 3 REGULAR $222 $66 5800500 2.70 2.73 NAT B 2 AS NEEDED $79 $2 3 REGULAR $222 $7 main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 0.00 3.55 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $947 3 REGULAR $332 $1,176 land midway main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 3.55 8.52 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $1,328 3 REGULAR $332 $1,648 land midway 5810000 8.52 8.60 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $22 3 REGULAR $332 $27 5810000 8.60 9.12 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $140 3 REGULAR $332 $174 main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 9.12 11.18 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $548 3 REGULAR $332 $680 land midway main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 11.18 11.29 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $30 3 REGULAR $332 $37 land midway 5810000 11.29 11.31 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $6 3 REGULAR $332 $8 5810000 11.31 11.40 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $23 3 REGULAR $332 $29 5810000 11.40 11.43 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $7 3 REGULAR $332 $8 5810000 11.43 11.43 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $1 3 REGULAR $332 $1 5810000 11.43 11.65 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $60 3 REGULAR $332 $74 5810000 11.65 11.90 AGG B 2 REGULAR $267 $66 3 REGULAR $332 $83 5820000 0.00 6.40 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,206 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,206 5820000 6.40 9.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $79 $204 2 AS NEEDED $79 $204 5830000 0.00 5.40 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,018 2 AS NEEDED $189 $1,018 5840000 0.00 1.78 AGG A 2 ANNUAL $360 $638 2 REGULAR $267 $474 5840000 1.78 2.38 AGG A 2 ANNUAL $360 $217 2 REGULAR $267 $162 5840000 2.38 6.37 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $715 2 REGULAR $235 $937 5840000 6.37 6.80 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $77 2 REGULAR $235 $101 5840000 6.80 7.35 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $38 2 REGULAR $125 $69 5840000 7.35 8.84 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $103 2 AS NEEDED $69 $103 5840000 8.84 8.99 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $11 2 AS NEEDED $69 $11

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Ochoco) 4 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency /mile COST REMARKS 5840000 8.99 12.24 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $225 2 AS NEEDED $69 $225 5840000 12.24 12.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $5 2 REGULAR $125 $8 5840000 12.30 12.52 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $15 2 REGULAR $125 $27 5850000 0.00 0.18 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $32 2 AS NEEDED $179 $32 5850000 0.18 2.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $434 2 AS NEEDED $179 $434 5850000 2.60 5.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED $134 $416 2 AS NEEDED $134 $416 5850000 5.70 9.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $229 2 AS NEEDED $69 $229 5870000 0.00 4.55 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $816 2 REGULAR $235 $1,069 5870000 4.55 4.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED $179 $8 2 REGULAR $235 $11 5870000 4.60 6.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $132 2 REGULAR $125 $237 7210000 0.38 1.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED $69 $98 2 AS NEEDED $69 $98 9605000 0.00 0.54 AC A 4 ANNUAL $1,424 $769 4 REGULAR $1,424 $769 Road into Haystack Reservoir 9605000 0.54 1.64 AC A 4 ANNUAL $1,424 $1,566 4 REGULAR $1,424 $1,566

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Ochoco) 5 Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Codes

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment ROAD ANALYSIS ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Code Definitions INFORMATION Maps & Brochures (Human Uses Assessment Table) PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Forest Plans Major Documents Schedule of Proposed Field Heading Actions ROAD - Road Number Monitoring Reports Project Information BMP - Beginning mile point for a Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, segment of road Assessments EMP - Ending mile point for a segment Publications of road Recreational Activities WATERSHED - 5th field watershed Volunteering PUBLIC USES Com Tie - Ties to Communities SFP - Special Forest Products Newberry National Dev Rec - Developed Recreation Sites Volcanic Monument Dis Rec - Dispersed Recreation Sites Dis Use - Dispersed Recreation Uses Conservation Ed. PRIVATE USES Contracting Own - Ownership Health SU - Special Uses Forest Products ADMINISTRATIVE USES Geology (T) - Timber Use Heritage (R) - Range Use Partnerships (F) - Fire Use Plantlife (LM) - Lands and Minerals (TR) - Tribal Use Water/Fisheries (H) - Heritage Resources Wildlife AVG - Average Score http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2a.shtml (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:18:34 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Codes

SUM RATING - Summary Rating Links

Evaluate Our Service Back to Table of Contents We welcome your comments on our service and your . suggestions for improvement. Forest

Deschutes National Forest 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702

(541) 383-5300

Ochoco National Forest 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Prineville, OR 97754 (541) 416-6500 Crooked River National Grassland 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 (541) 475-9272

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:05 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2a.shtml (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:18:34 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Schedule of Proposed Public and Tribal Access: Major Documents Actions Monitoring Reports Project Information Community/public roads: Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, Assessments ● How does the road system connect Publications public roads and access to Recreational Activities communities? ● As defined here a community is at a Volunteering minimum: yearlong occupancy of at least 10 permanent households. Other situations will be captured Newberry National under the ownership category. Volcanic Monument Should community size be a factor?

Conservation Ed. 0 - Does not provide any access Contracting to or between communities and Health no connection to public roads . Forest Products Geology 1-3 Road segment is Heritage secondary and low use Partnerships (less than 25% of total Plantlife ingress/egress) access to communities and/or Water/Fisheries provides only cursory Wildlife access to the Forest).

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (1 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

4-6 Road segment is Links secondary and moderate Evaluate Our Service use (more than 25%, We welcome your comments less than 50% of total on our service and your ingress/egress) access to suggestions for improvement. communities and/or Forest provides secondary access to the Forest).

7-9 Road segment is Deschutes National Forest primary access route and 1001 SW Emkay Drive receives high use (more Bend, OR 97702 than 50% of total (541) 383-5300 ingress/egress) access to Ochoco National Forest communities and/or is a 3160 N.E. 3rd Street "portal" (provides Prineville, OR 97754 primary access to the Forest). (541) 416-6500

Crooked River National Grassland 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 Special Forest Products: (541) 475-9272

● How does the road system affect access for collecting special forest products? ● How does the road system affect managing special use permits?

0 - Road does not access special forest product or special use permit areas.

1-3 Road provides secondary access to special forest product area and special use permit areas and short- term (one time event) special use permit areas. 4-6 Road provides primary access to special forest product area and short-term (one time event) special use permit areas. 7-9 Road provides primary access to special forest product areas and long-term (multiple year) special use permit areas..

Developed Sites:

● Where are the caves for protection/recreation with respect to the road system? ● Is there adequate road access to all existing and planned developed sites: campgrounds, trailheads, day use areas, viewpoints, interpretive sites, etc. Are access roads maintained at a level commensurate with the type and amount of use? There

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (2 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

are many short spur roads that access developed campgrounds included in this analysis. This factor includes sites on the individual road being considered and the access it provides to other developed sites. Should size (PAOT, etc.) be a factor?

0 - Road does not lead to any existing or planned developed sites. 1-3 Road leads to one or more low use developed sites (little to no week-day use, less than 25% of capacity on all but holiday weekends). 1-3 Road leads to one or more trail-heads that access low use wilderness/unroaded area (<5 people per day). 4-6 Road leads to one or more moderate use developed sites (moderate {10-25%} week-day use, less than 50% of capacity on all but holiday weekends). 4-6 Road leads to one or more trail-heads that access moderate use wilderness/unroaded area (5 20 people per day). 7-9 Road leads to one or more high use developed sites (moderate to high {>25%} week-day use, more than 50% of capacity on weekends). 7-9 Road leads to one or more trail-heads that access high use wilderness/unroaded area . (>20 people per day)

Dispersed Sites:

● Is there road access to dispersed use sites? ● This factor only considers sites on the segment being considered. The access to other sites will be captured under the dispersed use factor.

0 - Road leads to no dispersed recreation sites. 1-3 Road provides access to low number of dispersed sites with low usage (little to no week-day use, occupied less than 25% of summer weekends). Primary use is only during big game hunting season. 4-6 Road provides access to moderate number of dispersed sites with moderate use (some week-day use, occupied 25% to 50% of summer weekends). 7-9 Road provides access to high number of dispersed sites with high use (some week-day use, occupied > 50% of summer weekends).

Dispersed Use:

● Is there an adequate amount of roads available for driving for

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (3 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

pleasure and other dispersed recreation needs such as hunting, fishing, sight seeing, forest products collection and caving?

0 - Road leads to no dispersed recreation opportunities. 1-3 Road provides access to low level of use and types of dispersed opportunities. Primary use is only during big game hunting season. 4-6 Road provides access to moderate level of use and types of dispersed opportunities. Primary use is summer-fall. 7-9 Road provides access to high level of use and types of dispersed opportunities. Primary use is summer-fall. Roads that may only have a moderate amount of use but also provide access to winter recreation use are included here.

Private Access

This factor includes access needs for private or other legal obligations such as providing access to private land ownership through right-of- way easements, cost-share agreements, road use permits, or other special use permit sites like rock pits, communication sites, etc. The private access factor is categorized into the following two groups according to the related key questions:

Ownership:

● How does the road system connect large blocks of land in other ownership to public roads? ● How does the road system affect managing roads with shared ownership or with limited jurisdiction?

Special uses:

● How does the road system affect operating water diversions and impoundments? ● How does the road system affect access for collecting special forest products? ● How does the road system affect managing special use permits?

0 = Road segment does not include any private use, right-of- way, cost-share, or other special use permit access.

(1-3) = Road segment has short-term commitments through road use or other special use permits. (4-6) = Road segment provides long-term access to private land or other special use permit areas. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (4 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

Alternative routes are available to provide reasonable access to the land owner or permittee. (7-9) = Road segment provides long-term, primary access (alternative routes are not available) to private land or other special use permit areas. Access is required by law.

Administrative

This factor addresses the importance of the road system for administration, management, or protection of forest resources. The forest manager has flexibility to analyze options and select the one that provides the best balance of resource, social and economic needs. Administrative Human Use Factor is related to the following sub- factors and key questions: Timber (T):

● How does the road system affect access needed for administrative use? ● How does the road system affect managing the timber base and other lands?

Rating System (T) Will the segment of road be needed for access for administrative use (timber sales), and managing the timber base (Silviculture)? Does the road segment provide primary (main route) or secondary (more than one access route) for timber management.

0 = Road segment does not affect access needs for timber management and administration. (1-3) Road segment will not be needed for 10 or more years for timber management and administration. (4-6) Road segment is the secondary route and will be used in the next 5 years, or road will not be needed for 5 to 10 years for timber management and administration. (7-9) Road segment is the primary route and will be used in next 5 years for timber management and administration.

Range (R):

● How does the road system affect access to range allotments or http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (5 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

pastures? ● Will the permittee need the road segment for access to check on livestock or developments, haul water, or drop-off or pick-up livestock). ● Will the FS need the road for access to monitor livestock presence, utilization, or ecosystem health? Rating System (R) Will the road segment be needed for access for range allotments. Does the road segment provide primary (main route) or secondary (more than one access route) for range allotments (pastures)?

0 = Road segment is not needed for access to range allotments. (1-3) Road segment provides secondary access to one range allotment (pastures). (4-6) Road segment provides secondary access to 2 or more range allotments (pastures). (7-9) Road segment provides primary access to one or more range allotments (pastures).

Fire (F):

● Does the road system provide necessary (based on risk) access for firefighting resources, water sources, fire camp locations, and other improvements? ● Does the road system provide necessary access for fuels treatment including personnel, contract administration, equipment, water sources? ● What impact does the road system have on the current fire organization with respect to budget, and effectiveness? ● How does the road system affect access to water sources for road reconstruction/fire/range needs (water wells, pump chances, tanks, etc.)? Rating System (F) Does the road segment provide primary (main route) or secondary (more than one access route) for fire management (suppression, fuel treatment).

0 = Road segment is not needed for access for fire management. (1-3) Road segment provides secondary access for fire management to a limited area. Does not provide access to water source, fire camp location or other improvements (improvements include both public and private and what would be considered the urban interface. It is not needed as an escape route. (4-6) Road segment provides secondary access for fire management and provides access to one, water source, fire camp location or other improvements. (7-9) Road segment provides primary access

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (6 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

for fire management and provides access to one or more water sources, fire camp location or other improvements.

Lands/Minerals (LM):

● What is the likely transportation system needed for future needs (geothermal, mining claims, mineral material sources, etc)? We were thinking about adding a quality component? ● How does the road system affect access to rock-hounding areas? ● Where are the caves for protection with respect to the road system?

Rating System (LM) Will the road segment be needed for access for Lands and Minerals, (rock-hounding, geothermal). Primary access is the main route and secondary access has more than one route into the area..

0 = Road segment does not provide access needs for Lands and Minerals. (geothermal, mining claims, mineral material sources, etc) (1-3) Road segment provides secondary access to one area. (geothermal, mining claims, mineral material sources, etc) (4-6) Road segment provides secondary access to 2 or more areas. (geothermal, mining claims, mineral material sources, etc) (7-9) Road segment provides primary access to one or more areas. (geothermal, mining claims, mineral material sources, etc)

Heritage (H):

All known heritage sites in the GIS spatial layer were intersected with the routes of roads to be analyzed. A subset of selected site types was identified. Ratings of 8 (high) were assigned when heritage sites of selected site types intersected with roads analyzed. Rating of 3 (low) was assigned when sites with site types with low risks or no intersects with roads to be analyzed. ***Heritage data was not available for roads outside Ochoco NF boundaries and these public, state, or county roads were assigned a rating of 9 to indicate risk associated with no data. Site types and/or features were selected known to have high values and, or be at risk due to proximity to identified travel routes. These site types include:

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (7 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Human Uses

101 Prehistoric structure 211 Dendroglyphs 102 Burial/grave/cemetery 213 Mine/Adit 103 Ethonographic village 215 Road 104 Hearth 216 Stock driveway/corridor 105 Housepit 217 Trail 106 Midden 17 Root gathering area (obsolete) 107 Shell midden 19 Fishing station (obsolete) 109 Petroglyph 41 LS w/ flaked tools (obsolete) 110 Pictographs 42 LS w/ ground stone tools 117 Rockshelter/cave (obsolete) 118 Traditional Cultural Properties 43 LS w/ both flaked tools and 122 Flaked tools ground stone (obsolete) 123 Ground stone tools 44 Lithic scatter w/ features 124 Cache (obsolete) 204 Historic structure 46 Hearth and/or fire cracked 205 Historic structure remains rocks (obsolete) 206 Historic structure complex 67 Logging camp (obsolete) 207 Historic structure complex 68 Historic camp/community remains (obsolete) 85 Picnic/community kitchen (obsolete)

(TR) Tribal:

Ratings for Tribal access and concerns were based on knowledge of the area and potential for gathering. Ratings of 9 were assigned for very high values, 8 for high, and 6 and 7 for moderate.

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:06 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-2b.shtml (8 of 8)5/31/2007 1:18:43 PM PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS 1200000 0.00 0.80 Lower Beaver 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 9 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 0.80 0.94 Deep Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 0.94 1.18 Lower Beaver 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 1.18 1.38 Deep Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 3 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 1.38 1.85 Lower Beaver 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 3 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 1.85 7.45 Deep Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 3 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 7.45 7.63 Rock Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 3 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 7.63 7.92 Deep Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 3 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 7.92 8.22 Rock Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 8.22 8.87 Deep Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 8.87 9.13 Rock Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 9.13 10.25 Deep Creek 5 6 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.2 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 10.25 10.33 Rock Creek 5 8 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.4 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 10.33 13.60 Deep Creek 5 8 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.4 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 13.60 15.22 Deep Creek 5 8 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 8 6.4 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 15.22 20.00 Mountain Creek 5 8 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 9 3 6.6 H has Barnhouse Springs CG (highest use dev site on district) 1200000 20.00 21.50 Mountain Creek 5 8 5 6 8 8 2 8 8 8 9 6 3 6.4 H 1250000 0.00 0.19 Deep Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 3 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.19 0.38 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 8 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.38 0.45 Deep Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 8 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.45 0.52 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 8 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.52 0.56 Deep Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 8 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.56 0.64 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 3 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.64 0.96 Deep Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 3 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 0.96 2.49 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 6 3 2.7 L some of summit trail 1250000 2.49 2.70 Lower Beaver 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 9 3 2.9 L 1250000 2.70 2.81 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 9 8 2.9 L some of summit trail 1250000 2.81 2.83 Lower Beaver 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 9 3 2.9 L 1250000 2.83 2.85 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 9 8 2.9 L some of summit trail 1250000 2.85 3.46 Lower Beaver 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 9 3 2.9 L 1250000 3.46 3.75 Rock Creek 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 8 8 2.8 L some of summit trail 1250000 3.75 3.80 Lower Beaver 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 8 3 8 2 8 8 2.8 L (not on map - check spatial data) out of Barnhouse Springs CG - first 0.10 to CG remaining 3 miles closed year round by gate - one of few roads on dist w/no dispersed sites - dispersed use by walking during hunting season - runs along pvt boundary - some interest in using for 1280000 0.00 3.40 Mountain Creek 0 1 5 0 3 0 0 8 2 8 0 8 8 2.3 L log haul under road use permit 1600000 6.60 11.03 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 7 6 4 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 7 9 3 7.3 H major loop rd 1600000 11.03 11.10 Bear Creek 7 6 4 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 7 9 8 7.3 H major loop rd 1600000 11.10 21.00 Bear Creek 7 6 4 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 7 9 8 7.3 H major loop rd 1600000 21.00 26.87 Camp Creek 7 6 4 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 7 9 8 7.3 H major loop rd 1600000 26.87 29.13 Mid Crooked River RM110- 7 6 4 6 7 8 7898 7 9 3 7.3 H major loop rd 1600000 29.13 36.70 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 7 5 4 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 7 9 8 7.2 H major loop rd 1610000 0.00 6.00 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 5 4 8 2 8 5 7 2 9 3 4.4 M 1610000 6.00 6.00 Bear Creek 0 2 0 5 4 8 2 8 5 7 2 9 3 4.4 M 1620000 0.00 3.20 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 5 3 0 0 8 5 7 5 9 3 2.9 L 1640000 0.00 3.21 Bear Creek 8 2 0 7 8 8 8 8 5 8 2 9 3 6.5 H school route, ranches, Bend to Antelope rd 1640000 3.22 3.40 Bear Creek 8 2 0 7 8 8 8 8 5 8 2 8 8 6.4 H school route, ranches, Bend to Antelope rd 1670000 0.00 0.32 Mid Crooked River RM110- 0 2 0 5 3 8 8878 7 9 8 5.9 M 1670000 0.32 0.58 Camp Creek 0 2 0 5 3 8 8 8 7 8 7 9 3 5.9 M 1670000 0.58 1.18 Mid Crooked River RM110- 0 2 0 5 3 8 8878 7 9 3 5.9 M 1670000 1.18 4.30 Camp Creek 0 2 0 5 3 8 8 8 7 8 7 9 3 5.9 M 1670000 4.30 4.40 Mid Crooked River RM110- 0 2 0 5 3 8 8878 7 9 3 5.9 M 1670000 4.40 7.29 Camp Creek 0 2 0 5 3 8 8 8 7 8 7 9 3 5.9 M 1670000 7.29 11.14 Mid Crooked River RM110- 0 2 0 5 3 8 8878 7 9 3 5.9 M 1680000 0.00 4.00 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 0 5 5 8 0 8 6 7 7 9 3 4.8 M access to agate bed 1680000 4.00 4.20 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 0 5 5 8 0 8 6 7 7 9 3 4.8 M access to agate bed 1680000 4.20 5.42 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 0 5 5 8 0 8 6 7 7 9 8 4.8 M access to agate bed 1680000 5.42 5.60 Bear Creek 0 5 0 5 5 8 0 8 6 7 7 8 8 4.7 M access to agate bed 1690000 0.00 0.40 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 5 5 7 7 8 8 2.7 L to agate bed, continues on to private land 1690000 0.40 1.20 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 5 5 7 7 8 8 2.7 L to agate bed, continues on to private land 1690000 1.20 1.70 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 8 5 7 3 7 8 2 9 8 8 2 8 9 6.0 H to agate bed, continues on to private land 2 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 ranch 1700000 0.00 9.35 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 7 3 7 4 2 9 8 8 2 8 8 4.7 M 3 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 ranch 1700000 9.35 10.30 Bear Creek 0 5 7 3 7 4 2 9 8 8 2 8 8 4.7 M 4 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 ranch 1700000 10.30 12.80 Bear Creek 0 5 7 3 7 4 2 9 8 8 2 8 8 4.7 M 5 segs for analysis, the first has high community, 2nd access to 1 ranch 1700000 12.80 13.90 Bear Creek 0 5 7 3 7 4 2 9 8 8 2 8 8 4.7 M 1700600 0.00 0.66 Bear Creek 0 0 7 0 1 0 8 0 0 9 0 8 9 2.9 L 1700600 0.66 0.66 Bear Creek 0 0 7 0 1 0 8 0 0 9 0 9 3 3.0 L 1750000 0.00 2.42 Mid Crooked River RM70.5 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 7 5 9 7 8 8 3.7 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 2.42 2.89 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 7 5 9 7 9 8 3.7 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 2.89 2.94 Bear Creek 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 7 5 9 7 9 8 3.7 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 2.94 3.30 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 7 5 9 7 9 3 3.7 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 3.30 4.09 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 7 5 9 7 9 8 3.7 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 4.09 10.20 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 9 3 3.6 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 10.20 10.59 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 10.59 11.52 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 9 3 3.6 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 11.52 16.22 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 16.22 16.89 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 16.89 17.06 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.06 17.12 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.12 17.17 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.17 17.36 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.36 17.44 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.44 17.73 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.73 17.87 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 17.87 18.12 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 18.12 19.72 Bear Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 9 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 19.72 23.39 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 23.39 23.44 Camp Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 23.44 25.09 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 25.09 26.28 Camp Creek 0 5 3 4 5 0 0 8 7 9 4 8 3 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1750000 26.28 27.38 Mid Crooked River RM110- 0 5 3 4 5 0 0879 4 8 8 3.5 M all one segment, some access to private, really want to close it 1760000 0.00 0.66 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 5 3 9 1 9 8 2.2 L fire lookout 1760000 0.66 0.70 Camp Creek 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 5 3 9 1 9 8 2.2 L fire lookout 1760000 0.70 0.99 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 5 3 9 1 8 8 2.2 L fire lookout 1760000 0.99 1.10 Camp Creek 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 5 3 9 1 9 8 2.2 L fire lookout 2200000 0.00 7.61 Upper Ochoco 2 9 9 9 9 6 8 9 6 9 9 9 8 7.6 H walton lake rd 2200000 7.61 8.00 Upper N. Fork Crooked 2 8 9 9 9 6 8 9 6 9 9 8 8 7.4 H walton lake rd 2200000 8.00 18.34 Upper N. Fork Crooked 2 8 7 7 9 5 6 9 7 9 9 9 8 6.8 H walton lake rd 2200000 18.34 21.20 Middle N. Fork Crooked 2 8 7 7 9 5 6 9 7 9 9 8 8 6.7 H walton lake rd 2200000 21.20 21.23 Middle N. Fork Crooked 2 8 7 7 9 5 8 9 7 9 9 9 8 7.1 H walton lake rd 2200000 21.23 26.90 Mountain Creek 3 9 7 7 9 5 8 9 8 9 9 8 8 7.3 H Accesses two dispersed sites - Travel Routes has this segment listed as a collector, it should be changed to a local and dropped from 2200930 0.00 0.40 Mountain Creek 0 1 0 3 3 7 0 3 1 9 0 9 8 3.1 M analysis Provides access to Walton Lake, Wildwood CG, and Crystal Springs 2210000 0.00 1.13 Upper Ochoco 2 3 5 7 6 7 9 8 7 8 0 9 8 6.2 H church camp (first segment), at the bottom is county rd. 2210000 1.13 1.43 Upper Ochoco 2 3 5 7 6 7 9 8 7 8 0 8 8 6.2 H 2210000 1.43 3.53 Upper Ochoco 2 3 5 7 6 0 3 8 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 1 PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS 83 Provides access to Walton Lake, Wildwood CG, and Crystal Springs 2210000 3.53 8.40 Bridge Creek 2 3 4 4 5 9 3 8 7 8 0 5.2 M church camp (first segment) 2220000 0.00 0.20 Upper Ochoco 0 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 3 1.8 L Walton Lake Loop 2220000 0.20 2.00 Upper Ochoco 0 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 1.8 L Walton Lake Loop 2220010 0.00 0.20 Upper Ochoco 0 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 3 1.8 L Walton Lake Day Use, boat ramp South side of Pisgah, secondary access to lookout, comm sites, etc. 2230000 0.00 1.20 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M 2230000 1.20 2.20 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 3 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 2.20 4.11 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.11 4.45 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.45 4.53 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.53 4.56 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.56 4.57 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.57 4.59 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.59 4.63 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.63 4.68 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.68 4.77 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.77 4.81 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 6 3 3.9 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.81 4.89 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 6 3 3.9 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.89 4.99 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.99 4.99 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 8 8 4.0 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 4.99 5.14 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 6 8 3.9 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 5.14 5.37 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 7 5 7 8 0 6 8 3.9 M county rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2230000 5.37 7.00 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 5 7 0 8 5 7 9 0 6 3 4.1 M couty rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2300403 0.00 0.10 Upper Ochoco 5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 3 8.5 H Ochoco Ranger Station (admin site road) 2600150 0.00 0.20 Upper Ochoco 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 3 1.0 L Cougar Campground 2600550 0.00 0.50 Upper Ochoco 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 8 1.3 L Ochoco Divide CG - much lower use than Walton Lk CG 2600550 0.50 0.53 Upper Ochoco 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 3 1.3 L 2600828 0.00 0.17 Willow Creek 0 0 9 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 1.5 L Rimrock Springs rest area/trail head, high use at rest area 2610000 0.00 4.00 Upper Ochoco 1 5 3 6 6 0 8 8 8 8 5 6 8 5.0 M Little Hay Cr - alternate access from HWY 26 to Ranger Station 2610000 4.00 7.90 Upper Ochoco 1 5 3 6 6 0 8 8 8 8 5 6 3 5.0 M 2610400 0.00 0.30 Upper Ochoco 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 8 1.0 L to picknic shelter at Ochoco Forest Camp 2610401 0.00 0.10 Upper Ochoco 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 8 1.0 L Ochoco Forest Camp (Ochoco Cr CG) 2610500 0.00 0.40 Upper Ochoco 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 6 3 2.7 L Ranger Station roads (admin site) 2610510 0.00 0.05 Upper Ochoco 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 6 3 2.7 L 2610511 0.00 0.04 Upper Ochoco 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 6 3 2.7 L 2610515 0.00 0.20 Upper Ochoco 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 6 3 2.7 L first seg part of compound (admin site) 2610515 0.20 1.50 Upper Ochoco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 7 0 6 3 1.3 L this section closed second "tie-through" from HWY 26 to Ranger Station, first 1/2 mile has 2620000 0.00 4.80 Upper Ochoco 6 4 0 4 4 9 0 8 7 7 0 6 3 4.6 M high community link for residences along Marks Cr @ Hwy 26 sled hill, part of summit trail, access to crystal spring, mitchell 2630000 0.00 3.50 Upper Ochoco 5 7 7 7 7 0 9 8 8 8 9 8 8 6.4 H watershed, private haul 2630000 3.50 5.10 Upper Ochoco 5 7 7 7 7 0 9 8 8 8 9 8 8 6.4 H 2630000 5.10 6.22 Upper Ochoco 5 7 7 7 7 0 9 8 8 8 9 8 8 6.4 H 2630000 6.22 6.70 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 5 8 8 9 9 8 8 5.0 M 2630000 6.70 10.24 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 5 8 8 9 9 8 3 5.0 M 2630000 10.24 10.30 Bridge Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 5 4 8 9 9 8 3 4.7 M 2630000 10.30 10.71 Bridge Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 5 4 8 8 8 6 8 4.5 M 2630000 10.71 11.92 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 9 8 8 8 8 6 8 5.4 M 2630000 11.92 14.50 Bridge Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 9 4 8 8 8 8 8 5.3 M 2630000 14.50 14.57 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 9 4 8 8 8 6 8 5.1 M 2630000 14.57 15.13 Bridge Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 4 8 8 8 6 8 3.8 M 2630000 15.13 16.09 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 4.2 M 2630000 16.09 17.88 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 4.2 M 2630000 17.88 19.21 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 19.21 19.22 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 19.22 19.23 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 19.23 19.33 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 19.33 19.51 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 19.51 19.51 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 19.51 21.72 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 21.72 21.75 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 21.75 22.37 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 22.37 22.69 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 22.69 22.86 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 2 8 8 3.8 M 2630000 22.86 23.22 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 5 8 8 4.0 M 2630000 23.22 24.10 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 4.2 M 2630000 24.10 24.11 Mountain Creek 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 8 8 3 4.2 M 2630000 24.11 26.49 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 7 0 7 7 0 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 4.2 M 2630000 26.49 26.60 Deep Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 2 8 8 3.3 M summit trail 2630000 26.60 27.43 Deep Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 2 8 8 3.3 M 2630000 27.43 27.74 Mountain Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 2 8 8 3.3 M 2630000 27.74 28.90 Deep Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 2 8 8 3.3 M 2630000 28.90 29.60 Mountain Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 2 8 8 3.3 M 2630000 29.60 30.60 Deep Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 5 8 8 3.5 M 2630000 30.60 33.70 Deep Creek 0 8 2 5 6 0 0 8 2 8 5 8 8 3.5 M 2680000 0.00 0.30 Willow Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 3 9 8 1.8 L HQ road (admin site), historic buildings, etc. 2700000 12.00 20.60 McKay 0 8 5 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 3 7.8 H 2700000 20.60 23.20 McKay 0 8 5 8 9 7 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 7.3 H 2700000 23.20 24.20 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 24.20 25.80 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 8 6.1 H 2700000 25.80 26.00 Trout Headwater 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 26.00 26.26 Trout Headwater 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 8 6.1 H 2700000 26.26 29.43 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 8 6.1 H 2700000 29.43 29.84 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 29.84 29.97 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 29.97 30.24 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 30.24 30.59 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 30.59 30.61 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 30.61 30.61 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 30.61 31.55 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 8 3 6.1 H Major connector from Bandit Springs to McKay,lucky strike mine 2700000 31.55 31.85 Mill 0 8 5 8 9 0 9 8 7 9 8 9 3 6.1 H 2700000 31.85 32.00 Bear Creek (Bridge) 4 6 1 7 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5.7 M Major connector from Bandit Springs to McKay,lucky strike mine 2700000 32.00 34.59 Bear Creek (Bridge) 4 6 1 7 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 6 3 5.5 M 2700000 34.59 35.89 Upper Ochoco 4 6 1 7 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 6 3 5.5 M Major connector from Bandit Springs to McKay 2700000 35.89 36.00 Bear Creek (Bridge) 4 6 1 7 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 6 3 5.5 M 2700000 36.00 36.20 Bear Creek (Bridge) 4 6 1 7 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 9 3 5.7 M 2700000 36.20 37.47 Upper Ochoco 4 6 1 7 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 6 3 5.5 M 2705000 0.00 4.66 McKay 0 4 0 5 6 0 0 8 7 8 4 9 3 3.3 M 2710000 0.00 2.98 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 2.98 3.10 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M Stops at folly lookout, ties into rd 27 2710000 3.10 3.39 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 3.39 3.64 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 3.64 5.70 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 5.70 5.90 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 5.90 6.10 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2715000 0.00 0.00 McKay 0 5 0 3 4 0 0 9 6 9 7 9 3 3.5 M 2715000 0.00 1.30 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 3 4 0 0 9 6 9 7 9 3 3.5 M 2720000 0.00 0.02 Trout Headwater 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 7 6 8 2 9 3 2.9 L the west end of this loop road is closed 2720000 0.02 0.12 McKay 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 7 6 8 2 9 3 2.9 L 2720000 0.12 0.20 Trout Headwater 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 7 6 8 2 9 3 2.9 L 2720000 0.20 0.30 Trout Headwater 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 7 6 8 2 9 8 2.9 L 2720000 0.30 1.10 Trout Headwater 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 7 6 8 2 9 8 2.9 L 2720000 1.10 4.70 Trout Headwater 0 4 0 3 4 0 0 7 6 8 2 9 3 2.9 L

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 2 PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS 2720000 4.70 11.60 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 0 0 9 6 9 7 9 8 3.7 M 2720000 11.60 17.90 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 0 0 9 6 9 7 9 3 3.7 M 2725000 0.00 0.18 McKay 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 6 9 7 9 8 3.7 M 2725000 0.18 6.50 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 6 9 7 9 8 3.7 M Stevensen lookout+BB247 2730000 0.00 8.30 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 3 4.4 M 2730000 8.30 12.89 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 8 4.4 M 2730000 12.89 12.90 Trout Headwater 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 8 4.4 M 2730000 12.90 13.40 Trout Headwater 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 3 4.4 M 2730000 13.40 21.86 Trout Headwater 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 3 4.4 M 2730000 21.86 21.90 McKay 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 8 4.4 M 2730000 21.90 21.94 McKay 0 8 3 6 8 0 0 9 7 9 8 9 3 4.4 M 2730250 0.00 4.00 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 6 0 3 5 0 0 7 4 8 8 9 3 3.3 M Lucky strike mine???? 2735000 0.00 0.57 Trout Headwater 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2735000 0.57 0.70 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2735000 0.70 10.30 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2740000 0.00 2.20 Trout Headwater 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2745000 0.00 1.72 Trout Headwater 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2745000 1.72 1.99 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2745000 1.99 2.92 Trout Headwater 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 3 3.2 M 2745000 2.92 3.80 Mill 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 7 6 8 1 9 8 3.2 M 2750000 0.00 0.70 Bear Creek (Bridge) 0 1 0 1 4 8 8 7 4 9 1 8 9 5.0 M walton lake rd Cold Springs developed site near 42 end, secondary access to east 3000000 0.00 8.42 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 5 7 7 7 6 0 6 8 8 3 6 8 4.7 M side of summit prairie 3000000 8.42 8.70 Deep Creek 0 8 0 6 7 0 0 8 7 8 2 8 8 3.6 M 3000000 8.70 16.70 Deep Creek 0 8 0 6 7 0 0 8 7 8 2 8 8 3.6 M another secondary access to east side of prairie, chamber of 3010000 0.00 5.80 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 7 7 6 0 8 7 8 3 6 8 4.2 M commerce promotes this road as a prime wildflower viewing area 2 segments for analysis,one from 27 to the campground, the other from 3300000 0.00 4.44 McKay 0 7 6 7 8 0 0 9 5 9 7 9 3 4.4 M campground to 26- high community+BB266 3300000 4.44 4.44 McKay 0 7 6 7 8 0 0 9 5 9 7 9 3 4.4 M 3300000 4.44 4.44 McKay 0 7 6 7 8 0 0 9 5 9 7 9 3 4.4 M 3300000 4.44 4.60 McKay 0 7 6 7 8 0 0 9 5 9 7 9 3 4.4 M 3300000 4.60 5.24 McKay 0 7 6 7 8 0 0 9 5 9 7 9 8 4.4 M 3300000 5.24 11.40 Mill 0 7 6 7 8 0 0 9 5 9 7 9 8 4.4 M 3300300 0.00 0.30 Mill 0 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 9 3 1.8 L 3320000 0.00 5.00 Mill 0 5 0 5 6 0 0 9 5 9 2 9 3 3.3 M 3320000 5.00 5.09 Mill 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 7 3 7 1 9 9 2.3 L campground the closed part of this rd is not on the map! We wanyt to keep some 3330000 0.00 1.30 Mill 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 7 3 7 1 9 3 2.3 L and decomission parts 3330000 1.30 1.33 Mill 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 3 1.1 L 3330000 1.33 1.34 Mill 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 3 1.1 L 3330000 1.34 3.00 Mill 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 3 1.1 L gravel pit. Rod check the maintaince level- closed, change functional 3330010 0.00 0.20 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 2.9 L class 3330010 0.20 0.40 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 2.9 L 3350000 0.00 0.02 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 8 2.9 L part of it is closed, missing some of it on ,map 3350000 0.02 0.20 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 2.9 L steins pillar trailhead? 3350000 0.20 1.00 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 2.9 L 3350000 1.00 1.80 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 2.9 L 3350000 1.80 4.00 Mill 0 3 0 3 4 1 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 2.9 L 3350000 4.30 4.30 Upper Ochoco 0 6 6 6 7 0 0 9 5 8 9 9 3 4.2 M 3350000 4.30 Marks Creek 0 8 5 6 7 0 5 8 8 9 9 6 3 5.2 M 3350000 4.30 9.80 Upper Ochoco 0 4 0 6 7 5 0 7 5 7 6 9 8 4.2 M 3360000 0.00 4.00 Mill 0 4 0 4 7 0 0 7 3 9 1 9 8 2.9 L 3360000 4.00 4.60 Mill 0 4 0 4 7 0 0 7 3 9 1 9 8 2.9 L 3370000 0.00 2.50 Mill 0 4 6 6 7 5 0 8 5 8 1 9 8 4.3 M cabins 3370000 2.50 5.20 Mill 0 4 6 6 7 5 0 8 5 8 1 9 8 4.3 M 3370000 5.20 6.06 Mill 0 4 6 6 7 5 0 8 5 8 1 9 8 4.3 M 3380000 0.00 3.00 Mill 0 4 6 6 7 6 0 7 5 8 7 9 8 4.8 M green mtn, horse camp, 2ndary access to private 3380000 3.00 3.42 Lower Ochoco 0 4 6 6 7 6 0 7 5 8 7 9 8 4.8 M 3380000 3.42 7.50 McKay 0 4 6 6 7 6 0 7 5 8 7 9 8 4.8 M 3380000 7.50 7.80 McKay 0 4 6 6 7 6 0 7 5 7 7 9 8 4.7 M primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 (unknown 3800000 0.00 2.00 Lower Beaver 0 8 0 6 7 0 0 8 7 8 2 8 8 3.6 M status) 3800000 2.00 3.49 Lower Beaver 0 8 0 6 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 3.9 M primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 (unknown 3800000 3.49 3.50 Rock Creek 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 3 4.3 M status), trailhead 3800000 3.50 8.12 Rock Creek 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 9 8 4.4 M primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 (unknown 3800000 8.12 10.91 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 9 8 4.4 M status) primary access to inactive allotment - mining claim near 3810 (unknown 3800000 10.91 10.93 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 9 3 4.4 M status) 3800000 10.93 11.00 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 9 3 4.4 M 3800000 11.00 12.70 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 12.70 13.12 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 13.12 13.37 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 13.37 13.43 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 13.43 13.56 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 13.57 14.24 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 14.24 16.74 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 16.74 18.83 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 18.83 19.01 Lower South Fork 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 19.01 20.90 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 8 8 4.3 M 3800000 20.90 21.80 Upper Middle John Day 0 8 6 7 7 0 0 8 7 8 7 9 8 4.4 M 3810000 0.00 6.70 Lower Beaver 0 5 1 2 5 0 0 8 7 8 5 9 3 3.3 M 4200000 0.00 6.51 Upper Ochoco 6 8 6 8 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 6 8 8.0 H from ochoco RS to Rager Rs, aceess to big summit prarie 4200000 6.51 14.76 Upper N. Fork Crooked 6 8 6 8 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 8.2 H 4200000 14.76 19.30 Middle N. Fork Crooked 6 8 6 8 8 8 5 8 9 9 9 9 8 7.5 H 4200000 19.30 23.30 Middle N. Fork Crooked 4 8 6 8 8 0 5 8 9 9 9 9 8 6.0 M first seg rank same as 12 - accesses pvt land and "Millers Ditch" - seg from 6 corners to Deep Cr provides some access to Dev sites at Deep 4200000 23.30 24.80 Deep Creek 2 7 5 8 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.8 M Creek 4200000 24.80 26.10 Deep Creek 2 7 5 8 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.8 M 4200000 26.10 28.88 Deep Creek 2 7 5 8 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.8 M first seg rank same as 12 - accesses pvt land and "Millers Ditch" - seg from 6 corners to Deep Cr provides some access to Dev sites at Deep 4200000 28.88 33.50 Paulina 2 5 2 5 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.3 M Creek first seg rank same as 12 - accesses pvt land and "Millers Ditch" - seg from 6 corners to Deep Cr provides some access to Dev sites at Deep 4200000 33.50 34.03 Lower Beaver 2 5 2 5 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.3 M Creek 4200000 34.03 34.04 Deep Creek 2 5 2 5 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.3 M 4200000 34.04 34.13 Lower Beaver 2 5 2 5 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.3 M 4200000 34.13 34.18 Deep Creek 2 5 2 5 8 0 0 8 8 9 9 9 8 4.3 M 4200000 34.18 35.50 Lower Beaver 5 6 5 3 8 8 5 8 8 8 9 9 8 6.8 H 4200000 35.50 43.50 Lower Beaver 5 6 5 3 8 8 5 8 8 8 9 9 8 6.8 H (4200850 not on map, Wolf Cr. CG - special use/access to ditch) road to old Canyon Cr CG, now a dispersed site, level 3 local in travel 4200100 0.00 1.00 Upper Ochoco 0 3 0 8 8 0 0 8 5 7 3 9 8 3.3 M routes (should be dropped to level 2) 4200460 0.00 0.33 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 9 8 1.7 L Deep Cr. Campground 4205000 0.00 0.05 Upper Ochoco 0 3 7 6 7 0 0 2 5 8 7 9 8 3.4 M Lookout Mtn, mine access, interpretive work ongoing, etc. 4205000 0.05 0.70 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 3 7 6 7 0 0 2 5 8 7 9 8 3.4 M Lookout Mtn, mine access, interpretive work ongoing, etc. 4205000 0.70 0.90 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 3 7 6 7 0 0 2 5 8 7 9 3 3.4 M 4205000 0.90 1.20 Upper Ochoco 0 3 7 6 7 0 0 2 5 8 7 9 3 3.4 M 4210000 0.00 4.30 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 7 7 8 6 8 7 8 7 9 8 6.1 H Tie through from 42 to 22 along west edge of prairie

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 3 PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS presently level 2, main access from 42 through Gray Prairie, ties through Ochoco Lumber Co land to 23 road, administrative easement 4215000 0.00 7.70 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 6 5 8 9 8 0 8 7 8 8 9 8 5.7 M on Ochoco (Wolf Cr.) segment 4215000 7.70 9.43 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 6 5 8 9 8 0 8 7 8 8 9 8 5.7 M presently level 2, main access from 42 through Gray Prairie, ties through Ochoco Lumber Co land to 23 road, administrative easement 4215000 9.43 11.70 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 6 5 8 9 8 0 8 7 8 8 9 8 5.7 M on Ochoco (Wolf Cr.) segment 4215000 11.70 11.74 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 6 5 8 9 8 0 8 7 8 8 9 8 5.7 M 4215000 11.74 13.90 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 6 5 8 9 8 0 8 7 8 8 9 3 5.7 M 4220000 0.00 6.70 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 6 0 0 8 7 8 2 9 8 3.3 M 4225000 0.00 3.65 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 4 7 6 0 7 8 8 0 9 8 4.1 M Williams Prairie, add county/BLM segment on south end 4225000 3.65 3.70 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 4 7 6 0 7 8 8 0 9 8 4.1 M 4225000 3.70 4.70 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 4 7 6 0 7 8 8 0 9 8 4.1 M 4225000 4.70 4.85 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 4 0 4 7 6 0 7 8 8 0 9 9 4.1 M 4230000 0.00 3.95 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 3.95 4.00 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 4.00 7.00 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 7.00 10.20 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 10.20 11.66 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 11.66 11.80 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 11.80 11.90 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 11.90 15.50 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4230000 15.50 19.00 Upper N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 3.5 M 4235000 0.00 11.90 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 2 4 0 6 7 0 0 8 8 8 7 9 8 3.9 M 4240000 0.00 1.93 Middle N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 8 7 8 7 7 7 9 8 6.1 H road to Upper Falls, star gazer group has permit for annual event 4240000 1.93 4.70 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 8 7 8 7 7 7 9 8 6.1 H 4240000 4.70 6.80 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 8 0 8 7 7 7 9 3 5.0 M 4240000 6.80 7.20 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 5 0 5 7 8 0 8 7 7 5 9 8 4.8 M 4250000 0.00 9.00 Deep Creek 0 8 0 9 7 0 0 8 7 8 2 9 8 3.8 M highest dispersed use on district 4250000 9.00 15.17 Deep Creek 0 8 0 9 7 8 0 8 7 8 2 9 3 5.2 M 4250000 15.17 15.19 Deep Creek 0 8 0 9 7 8 0 8 7 8 2 9 3 5.2 M 4254000 0.00 4.30 Deep Creek 0 3 0 3 7 0 8 8 6 8 5 9 3 4.5 M Keyas Cabin - check on special use? 4256000 0.00 2.30 Deep Creek 0 5 0 3 5 0 0 8 5 8 2 9 3 3.0 L 4258000 0.00 0.70 Deep Creek 0 5 5 6 5 0 0 8 5 8 2 9 3 3.4 M 4258000 0.70 3.90 Deep Creek 0 5 5 6 5 0 0 8 5 8 2 9 3 3.4 M 4260000 0.00 4.49 Lower Beaver 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 8 9 3 4.9 M private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 4.49 7.39 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 6 9 3 4.7 M private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 7.39 9.23 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 6 9 3 4.7 M 4260000 9.23 9.60 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 2 9 3 4.5 M 4260000 9.60 10.00 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 2 9 3 4.5 M 4260000 10.00 11.50 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 2 9 3 4.5 M 4260000 11.50 11.82 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 2 9 3 4.5 M 4260000 11.82 13.07 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 8 0 5 8 9 2 9 8 4.5 M 4260000 13.07 14.08 Paulina 0 3 0 6 6 6 0 5 8 9 5 9 3 4.3 M 4260000 14.08 16.49 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 3 0 6 6 6 0 5 8 9 8 9 8 4.5 M private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 16.49 17.33 Deep Creek 0 3 0 6 6 6 0 5 8 9 8 9 8 4.5 M private access, lower timber use, high fire value due to pvt interface 4260000 17.33 17.40 Deep Creek 0 3 0 6 6 6 0 5 8 9 8 9 8 4.5 M 4270000 0.00 8.90 Deep Creek 0 5 5 5 8 8 0 8 7 8 2 9 8 5.0 M 4272000 0.00 4.20 Deep Creek 0 7 0 5 5 0 0 3 7 8 0 9 3 2.9 L 4274000 0.00 4.80 Deep Creek 0 5 0 3 3 0 0 8 6 8 0 9 8 2.8 L 4276000 0.00 0.16 Lower Beaver 0 5 0 6 6 6 0 8 7 8 0 9 8 4.2 M one of two main accesses to Little Summit Prairie 4276000 0.16 2.60 Deep Creek 0 5 0 6 6 6 0 8 7 8 0 9 8 4.2 M one of two main accesses to Little Summit Prairie 4280000 0.00 0.68 Lower Beaver 0 2 0 3 6 0 0 5 7 8 4 9 8 2.9 L 4280000 0.68 4.60 Paulina 0 2 0 3 6 0 0 5 7 8 4 9 3 2.9 L 4290000 0.00 4.20 Lower Beaver 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 8 5 8 4 8 8 2.9 L closed during green dot period 5310000 0.00 0.90 Willow Creek 0 3 0 4 6 8 0 0 8 8 0 9 8 3.8 M 5480000 0.45 3.10 Crooked River Grasslands 3 3 0 4 7 9 9 0 0 8 0 9 8 5.2 M 5730000 0.00 1.95 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 5 0 3 0 7 8 0 9 8 2.8 L Sumner Springs Road, ours

5800000 0.00 1.62 Lower Beaver 8 8 7 5 7 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 8 7.6 H add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view area)

5800000 1.62 6.20 Middle Beaver 8 8 7 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 8 7.6 H add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view area) 5800000 6.20 7.00 Middle Beaver 8 8 7 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 8 7.6 H 5800000 9.50 13.70 Middle Beaver 8 5 7 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 3 7.4 H 5800000 13.70 14.26 Middle Beaver 0 5 5 5 8 7 7 5 8 9 9 8 3 6.4 H

5800000 14.26 15.84 Lower South Fork 0 5 5 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 8 6.6 H add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view area)

5800000 15.84 21.00 Middle South Fork 0 5 0 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 8 6.3 H add road to data base/map? (Seg 3 accesses SF John Day view area) 5800000 21.00 21.67 Middle South Fork 0 5 0 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 8 6.3 H 5800050 0.00 0.08 Middle Beaver 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 3 0 6 0 8 8 1.8 L 5800050 0.08 0.10 Middle Beaver 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 3 0 6 0 8 8 1.8 L 5800141 0.00 5.00 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 8 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800142 0.00 0.23 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 8 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800142 0.23 0.40 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 9 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800143 0.00 0.10 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 8 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800143 0.10 0.21 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 8 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800145 0.00 0.20 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 8 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800145 0.20 0.26 Middle Beaver 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 8 8 3.7 M compound roads (admin site) 5800500 0.00 0.87 Middle South Fork 0 2 6 4 4 4 0 8 7 9 0 8 8 3.7 M 5800500 0.87 2.40 Lower South Fork 0 2 6 4 4 4 0 8 7 9 0 8 8 3.7 M 5800500 2.40 2.70 Lower South Fork 0 2 6 4 4 4 0 8 7 9 0 8 8 3.7 M 5800500 2.70 2.73 Lower South Fork 0 2 6 4 4 4 0 8 7 9 0 8 8 3.7 M main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 0.00 3.55 Middle Beaver 0 4 6 5 7 8 0 8 8 9 7 8 8 5.3 M land midway main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 3.55 8.52 Lower Beaver 0 4 6 5 7 8 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 5.4 M land midway 5810000 8.52 8.60 Middle Beaver 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 8 4.2 M 5810000 8.60 9.12 Middle Beaver 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 8 8 4.2 M main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 9.12 11.18 Rock Creek 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M land midway main access to Black Canyon Wilderness - important access to pvt 5810000 11.18 11.29 Lower South Fork 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M land midway 5810000 11.29 11.31 Rock Creek 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M 5810000 11.31 11.40 Lower South Fork 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M 5810000 11.40 11.43 Lower South Fork 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M 5810000 11.43 11.43 Rock Creek 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M 5810000 11.43 11.65 Lower South Fork 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 8 4.2 M 5810000 11.65 11.90 Rock Creek 0 6 6 5 7 0 0 8 8 9 7 9 3 4.2 M 5820000 0.00 6.40 Middle Beaver 0 4 0 7 6 0 0 6 7 9 7 9 8 3.6 M 5820000 6.40 9.00 Middle Beaver 0 4 0 7 6 0 0 6 7 9 7 9 3 3.6 M 5830000 0.00 5.40 Middle Beaver 0 4 0 7 6 0 0 6 7 8 2 9 8 3.2 M 5840000 0.00 1.78 Middle Beaver 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 8 4.0 M 5840000 1.78 2.38 Lower South Fork 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 3 4.0 M 5840000 2.38 6.37 Middle Beaver 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 3 4.0 M 5840000 6.37 6.80 Lower South Fork 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 8 4.0 M 5840000 6.80 7.35 Lower South Fork 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 8 4.0 M 5840000 7.35 8.84 Middle Beaver 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 3 4.0 M 5840000 8.84 8.99 Lower South Fork 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 8 4.0 M 5840000 8.99 12.24 Middle Beaver 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 3 4.0 M 5840000 12.24 12.30 Rock Creek 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 8 4.0 M 5840000 12.30 12.52 Rock Creek 0 4 5 5 8 0 0 8 7 9 7 9 8 4.0 M 5850000 0.00 0.18 Middle Beaver 0 4 0 7 6 8 0 8 8 9 5 9 8 5.0 M 5850000 0.18 2.60 Lower South Fork 0 4 0 7 6 8 0 8 8 9 5 9 8 5.0 M

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 4 PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS 5850000 2.60 5.70 Lower South Fork 0 4 0 7 6 8 0 8 8 9 5 9 8 5.0 M 5850000 5.70 9.00 Lower South Fork 0 4 0 7 6 0 0 8 8 9 5 9 3 3.7 M 5870000 0.00 4.55 Middle South Fork 0 4 0 6 8 8 2 8 7 8 2 9 3 5.0 M 5870000 4.55 4.60 Upper Beaver 0 4 0 6 8 8 2 8 7 8 8 9 3 5.4 M 5870000 4.60 6.50 Upper Beaver 0 4 0 6 8 8 2 8 7 8 8 9 3 5.4 M 7210000 0.38 1.80 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 5 5 7 0 7 8 0 6 9 4.2 M 9605000 0.00 0.54 Deschutes South 0 0 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 8 1.8 L Road into Haystack Reservoir 9605000 0.54 1.64 Deschutes South 0 0 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 9 1.9 L

COUNTY AND OTHER JURISDICTION ROADS

4235000 11.90 13.56 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 2 4 0 6 7 9 0 0 8 8 7 9 9 4.9 M add 4235050, to Post 1600000 0.00 6.60 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 7 6 4 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 7 9 9 7.3 H major loop rd 2150000 0.00 2.60 McKay 8 0 0 1 3 8 0 1 5 9 0 9 9 3.8 M first seg school bus route, fooy lookout, grazing on private lands 2150000 2.60 3.21 Willow Creek 8 0 0 1 3 8 0 1 5 9 0 9 9 3.8 M first seg school bus route, fooy lookout, grazing on private lands 2150000 3.21 4.52 Trout Headwater 0 0 0 1 3 8 0 1 5 9 0 9 9 3.2 M first seg school bus route, fooy lookout, grazing on private lands 2150000 4.52 5.00 McKay 0 0 0 1 3 8 0 1 5 9 0 9 9 3.2 M first seg school bus route, fooy lookout, grazing on private lands 2200000 26.90 28.27 Mountain Creek 3 9 7 7 9 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 7.9 H 2200000 28.27 34.40 Bridge Creek 5 9 7 7 9 8 8 9 8 9 9 8 9 8.0 H walton lake rd Provides access to Walton Lake, Wildwood CG, and Crystal Springs 2210000 8.40 13.50 Bridge Creek 2 3 4 4 5 9 3 8 7 8 0 8 9 5.2 M church camp (first segment) 2300000 0.00 8.25 Upper Ochoco 5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.5 H couty rd., from y to ranger station (?) 2690000 0.00 2.85 Willow Creek 0 6 0 1 6 9 0 0 7 8 7 9 9 4.5 M county rd. seg one goes to forest boundary, 1 developed campground, 2 traiheads 2700000 0.00 0.01 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 0 5 8 9 9 9999 8 8 9 7.8 H 2700000 0.01 3.33 Lower Ochoco 9 0 5 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 9 7.8 H 2700000 3.33 3.67 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 0 5 8 9 9 9999 8 8 9 7.8 H seg ment 2 along Willderness boundary 2700000 3.67 12.00 McKay 9 0 5 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 9 7.8 H Segment 3 access to mining claim 3300000 11.40 12.28 Mill 8 1 8 7 8 8 9 9 7 9 7 9 9 7.6 H 3300000 12.30 12.31 Mill 8 1 8 7 8 8 9 9 7 9 7 9 9 7.6 H 3300000 12.32 14.70 Mill 8 1 8 7 8 8 9 9 7 9 7 9 3 7.6 H 3300000 14.70 21.50 Mill 8 1 8 7 8 8 9 9 7 9 7 9 3 7.6 H Round Butte road - access view points along rim of round butte, 3500000 0.00 2.57 Crooked River Grasslands 9 4 0 7 7 9 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 5.0 M accesses round butte estates subdivision Round Butte road - access view points along rim of round butte, 3500000 2.57 5.47 Lake Billy Chinook 9 4 0 7 7 9 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 5.0 M accesses round butte estates subdivision Round Butte road - access view points along rim of round butte, 3500000 5.47 5.81 Deschutes South 9 4 0 7 7 9 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 5.0 M accesses round butte estates subdivision 3500000 5.81 5.91 Lake Billy Chinook 9 4 0 7 7 9 0 0 7 8 0 9 3 5.0 M 3500000 5.91 6.15 Deschutes South 9 4 0 7 7 9 0 0 7 8 0 9 3 5.0 M 5100000 0.00 7.80 Mud Springs Creek 0 3 0 5 7 0 9 0 9 7 3 9 9 4.3 M Herford road - power line / gas pipeline, etc. 5100000 7.80 8.70 Mud Springs Creek 0 3 0 5 7 0 9 0 9 7 3 9 9 4.3 M 5100000 8.70 8.75 Mud Springs Creek 0 3 0 5 7 0 9 0 9 7 3 9 9 4.3 M 5130000 0.00 2.10 Mud Springs Creek 2 3 0 5 6 7 9 0 7 7 0 9 9 5.2 M Elm Lane 5160000 0.00 3.85 Mud Springs Creek 9 4 0 9 9 9 9 0 8 8 7 9 3 7.2 H 5160000 3.85 5.70 Willow Creek 9 4 0 9 9 9 9 0 8 8 7 9 9 7.2 H 5200000 0.00 3.88 Mud Springs Creek 0 4 0 7 9 0 9 0 8 7 0 9 9 4.3 M 5200000 3.88 5.00 Willow Creek 0 4 0 7 9 0 9 0 8 7 0 9 3 4.3 M 5250000 0.00 0.97 Mud Springs Creek 0 4 0 3 6 0 0 0 7 7 0 9 9 2.4 L 5250000 0.97 1.50 Willow Creek 0 4 0 3 6 0 0 0 7 7 0 9 9 2.4 L 5300000 0.00 2.11 Willow Creek 7 4 0 5 7 8 7 0 8 8 0 9 9 5.8 M Grizzly Road - powerlines/pipelines 5300000 2.11 12.20 Willow Creek 7 4 0 5 7 8 7 0 8 8 0 9 9 5.8 M 5300153 0.00 0.52 Willow Creek 0 2 0 3 4 8 0 0 7 7 0 9 9 3.4 M dump pasture 5300153 0.52 1.80 Willow Creek 0 2 0 3 4 8 0 0 7 7 0 9 6 3.4 M 5310000 0.90 6.50 Willow Creek 0 3 0 4 6 8 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 3.8 M 5320000 0.00 2.20 Willow Creek 0 3 0 3 4 8 8 0 7 8 0 9 9 4.9 M 5330000 0.00 2.50 Willow Creek 0 3 0 3 4 0 8 0 7 8 0 9 9 3.6 M 5340000 0.00 2.00 Willow Creek 0 3 0 3 5 0 8 0 7 8 0 9 9 3.6 M 5350000 0.00 0.75 Willow Creek 0 3 0 4 6 0 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5350000 0.75 1.90 Willow Creek 0 3 0 4 6 0 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5400000 0.00 4.65 Willow Creek 3 3 0 6 7 8 9 0 7 8 0 9 9 5.7 M Blanchard Well to….. 5480000 0.00 0.45 Crooked River Grasslands 3 3 0 4 7 9 9 0 0 8 0 9 9 5.2 M extention of Park Lane,last 2i/2 miles is ours, railroad access 5500000 0.00 1.48 Willow Creek 0 0 0 3 7 5 5 0 8 8 5 9 9 4.2 M Boyce coral 5500000 1.48 3.67 Deschutes South 0 0 0 3 7 5 5 0 8 8 5 9 9 4.2 M 5500000 3.67 5.49 Deschutes South 0 0 0 3 7 5 5 0 8 8 5 9 9 4.2 M 5500000 5.49 6.20 Willow Creek 0 0 0 3 7 5 5 0 8 8 5 9 9 4.2 M 5540000 0.00 4.40 Steelhead 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 2 8 0 9 9 2.8 L Lower Bridge Road - almost all pvt - access to one FS allotment 5600000 0.00 0.50 Deschutes South 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 4 8 0 9 9 2.8 L Ford Lane 5600000 0.50 1.95 Deschutes South 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 4 8 0 9 9 2.8 L 5700000 0.00 3.32 Crooked River Grasslands 0 4 7 6 7 0 8 0 8 8 7 9 9 4.9 M Pine ridge corral to Henderson Flat 5700000 3.32 4.96 Willow Creek 0 4 7 6 7 0 8 0 8 8 7 9 9 4.9 M Pine ridge corral to Henderson Flat 5700000 4.96 5.31 Lower Crooked River Valley 0 4 7 6 7 0 8088 7 9 9 4.9 M Pine ridge corral to Henderson Flat 5700000 5.31 6.34 Willow Creek 0 4 7 6 7 0 8 0 8 8 7 9 9 4.9 M 5700000 6.34 7.90 Lower Crooked River Valley 0 4 7 6 7 0 7088 7 9 9 4.7 M 5710000 0.00 2.55 Lower Crooked River Valley 0 3 5 5 8 0 7088 0 9 9 4.1 M Skull Hollow Road 5720000 0.00 1.55 Lower Crooked River Valley 0 1 0 3 5 0 9078 0 9 9 3.6 M Sherwood Canyon Road - Gray butte electronic site on first seg 5720000 1.55 1.75 Lower Crooked River Valley 0 1 0 3 5 0 9078 0 9 9 3.6 M 5720000 1.75 3.40 Crooked River Grasslands 0 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 2.1 L Sherwood Canyon Road - Gray butte electronic site on first seg 5740000 0.00 0.01 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5740000 0.01 0.08 Deschutes South 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5740000 0.08 0.30 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5740000 0.30 0.39 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5740000 0.39 0.75 Deschutes South 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 2.4 L 5750000 0.00 0.44 Deschutes South 0 4 6 5 7 0 5 0 7 8 0 9 9 3.8 M Cyrus Orchards / horse camp 5750000 0.44 0.60 Willow Creek 0 4 6 5 7 0 5 0 7 8 0 9 9 3.8 M Cyrus Orchards / horse camp 5760000 0.00 0.90 Willow Creek 0 3 4 3 6 0 0 0 7 8 0 9 9 2.6 L 5770000 0.00 1.50 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 6 4 7 0 9 0 7 8 0 9 9 4.3 M Sherwood Drive 5800000 7.00 9.50 Middle Beaver 8 8 7 5 8 7 7 9 8 9 9 8 3 7.6 H 5920000 0.00 1.47 Willow Creek 9 7 0 5 7 9 9 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.7 H Ashwood Drive / Haycreek Road 5920000 1.47 2.74 Willow Creek 9 7 0 5 7 9 9 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.7 H 5920000 2.74 8.20 Mud Springs Creek 9 7 0 5 7 9 9 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.7 H Ashwood Drive / Haycreek Road 6000000 0.00 7.00 Crooked River Grasslands 7 3 0 0 7 9 0 0 8 9 0 9 9 4.5 M "old culver highway" 6010000 0.00 0.59 Crooked River Grasslands 0 1 8 5 6 0 7 0 7 7 0 9 9 3.8 M King Lane - Haystack Res to 60 road / Osborne Springs 6010000 0.59 1.60 Deschutes South 0 1 8 5 6 0 7 0 7 7 0 6 9 3.6 M King Lane - Haystack Res to 60 road / Osborne Springs 6080000 0.00 3.32 Crooked River Grasslands 3 5 4 3 9 5 8 0 8 8 0 6 9 5.2 M Norris Lane - potential waterline location from Cogentrics project 6080000 3.32 4.75 Deschutes South 3 5 4 3 9 5 8 0 8 8 0 6 9 5.2 M Norris Lane - potential waterline location from Cogentrics project 6100000 0.00 0.49 Crooked River Grasslands 7 3 0 2 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 7 9 5.8 M Monroe Lane 6100000 0.49 6.00 Crooked River Grasslands 7 3 0 2 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 7 9 5.8 M 6110000 0.00 0.76 Crooked River Grasslands 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 2.1 L All Private 6110000 0.76 2.77 Crooked River Grasslands 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 2.1 L 6120000 0.00 1.02 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 3 9 8 0 0 8 5 9 9 4.9 M Deschutes Valley Water District to Opal Springs (special use) 6120000 1.02 2.82 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 3 9 8 0 0 8 5 9 9 4.9 M 6200000 0.00 0.11 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H main road through Crooked River Ranch 6200000 0.11 0.76 Lake Billy Chinook 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H main road through Crooked River Ranch 6200000 0.76 1.56 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 1.56 1.92 Lake Billy Chinook 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 1.92 2.12 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 2.12 2.14 Lake Billy Chinook 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 2.14 2.20 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 2.20 2.24 Lake Billy Chinook 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 2.24 3.46 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 5.90 9.92 Steelhead 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 9.92 11.07 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 11.07 11.73 Steelhead 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 5 PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS 6200000 11.73 14.90 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6300000 0.00 5.25 Crooked River Grasslands 7 7 5 6 7 9 7 0 8 9 0 7 9 6.4 H Jordan Road - Squaw Flat/Geneva Ghost town/3 Rivers Subdivision 6300000 5.25 9.81 Lake Billy Chinook 7 7 5 6 7 9 7 0 8 9 0 6 9 6.4 H Jordan Road - Squaw Flat/Geneva Ghost town/3 Rivers Subdivision 6300000 9.81 10.68 Lower Metolius 7 7 5 6 7 9 7 0 8 9 0 6 9 6.4 H 6300000 10.68 14.35 Lower Metolius 7 7 5 6 7 9 7 0 8 9 0 6 9 6.4 H 6300000 14.35 23.24 Lake Billy Chinook 7 7 5 6 7 9 7 0 8 9 0 6 9 6.4 H main road / Squaw Cr crossing/ (not on map or db/important 6300000 23.24 25.70 Whychus 7 7 5 6 9 9 7 0 8 9 0 6 9 6.5 H road/coded as "local" needs to be added as collector) 6310000 0.00 0.26 Lower Metolius 0 3 0 5 6 8 0 0 8 8 0 6 9 3.7 M 6310000 0.26 1.54 Lake Billy Chinook 0 3 0 5 6 8 0 0 8 8 0 6 9 3.7 M 6310000 1.54 2.55 Lower Metolius 0 3 0 5 6 8 0 0 8 8 0 6 9 3.7 M 6320000 0.00 0.18 Lower Metolius 0 3 0 3 5 6 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.1 M "Hell Road" - to Geneva Ponds 6320000 0.18 1.70 Lake Billy Chinook 0 3 0 3 5 6 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.1 M "Hell Road" - to Geneva Ponds 6330000 0.00 3.10 Lake Billy Chinook 0 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 2.4 L 6340000 0.00 1.10 Lake Billy Chinook 0 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 2.4 L to Geneva Overlook 6350000 0.00 3.10 Lake Billy Chinook 0 3 0 3 5 5 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 2.9 L 6355000 0.00 0.46 Lake Billy Chinook 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 1.9 L 6355000 0.00 2.31 Whychus 0 3 0 4 7 7 7 0 8 8 0 6 9 4.7 M Jordan Road - Squaw Flat/Geneva Ghost town/3 Rivers Subdivision 6355000 0.46 1.70 Lake Billy Chinook 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 1.9 L recently closed (all but first 1/2 mile), big hunting camp on first 6370000 0.00 2.31 Whychus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 6 9 1.3 L segment, permittee needs first seg to haul water to allotment 6400000 0.00 2.75 Lower Metolius 9 3 0 2 7 7 8 0 7 8 0 6 9 5.4 M connects 3 Rivers subdivision, paved, good road 6500000 0.00 0.98 Lower Metolius 0 3 0 3 5 6 7 0 7 8 5 6 9 4.6 M within state park boundary, old gravel pit 6500000 0.98 2.45 Lake Billy Chinook 0 3 0 3 5 6 7 0 7 8 5 6 9 4.6 M within state park boundary, old gravel pit 6510000 0.00 1.16 Lake Billy Chinook 3 3 0 3 6 5 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.2 M back side of 3 Rivers 6510000 1.16 4.60 Lower Metolius 3 3 0 3 6 5 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.2 M back side of 3 Rivers 6520000 0.00 0.28 Lower Metolius 0 1 0 2 5 8 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.2 M to Canadian Bench, mostly on pvt land 6520000 0.28 0.90 Lake Billy Chinook 0 1 0 2 5 8 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.2 M to Canadian Bench, mostly on pvt land 6520000 0.90 3.55 Lower Metolius 0 1 0 2 5 8 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.2 M 6600000 0.00 5.27 Deschutes South 0 3 0 3 5 7 8 0 7 8 0 6 9 4.6 M Elbe Drive - out of Madras 6600000 5.27 5.75 Deschutes South 0 3 0 3 5 7 8 0 7 8 0 6 9 4.6 M 6600000 5.75 7.57 Willow Creek 0 3 0 3 5 7 8 0 7 8 0 6 9 4.6 M Elbe Drive - out of Madras 6610000 0.00 2.00 Deschutes South 0 3 0 3 5 0 7 0 7 8 7 6 9 3.7 M 6620000 0.00 5.25 Deschutes South 8 3 0 2 5 7 0 0 7 8 0 6 9 3.9 M Williams Road - back way to round butte - rock pit 6630000 0.00 3.80 Deschutes South 0 0 0 2 3 7 7 0 0 8 0 6 9 3.5 M Elk Drive - goes to Pelton Park 6630000 3.80 4.60 Willow Creek 0 0 0 2 3 7 7 0 0 8 0 6 9 3.5 M Elk Drive - goes to Pelton Park Mtn View Drive - round butte overlook - big developed site - main 6670000 0.00 1.38 Deschutes South 9 3 7 3 5 5 7 0 7 8 0 6 9 5.2 M access to round butte CG and observatory Mtn View Drive - round butte overlook - big developed site - main 6670000 1.38 2.65 Lake Billy Chinook 9 3 7 3 5 5 7 0 7 8 0 6 9 5.2 M access to round butte CG and observatory 6671000 0.00 0.75 Lake Billy Chinook 0 3 7 3 5 5 7 0 0 8 0 6 9 4.0 M 6700000 0.00 0.60 Crooked River Grasslands 8 2 0 1 2 6 0 0 5 8 0 6 9 3.3 M 7210000 0.00 0.38 Crooked River Grasslands 0 3 0 3 5 5 7 0 7 8 0 6 3 4.1 M Accesses Opal City 7260000 0.00 1.80 Crooked River Grasslands 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0.5 L closed road 7290000 0.00 1.60 Crooked River Grasslands 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 1.9 L all private - access McPheeters rock pit at end on FS 7290000 1.60 2.10 Crooked River Grasslands 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 1.9 L 7290000 2.10 3.00 Crooked River Grasslands 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 1.9 L 7850000 0.00 4.45 Willow Creek 8 3 0 4 5 8 8 0 7 8 0 8 9 5.6 M Rams Road - main access to Grizzly Substation / pipeline / etc. 7960000 0.00 4.85 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 3 5 3 7 8 8078 0 8 9 6.0 H Lone Pine Road - pipeline/etc. 8900000 0.00 6.51 Deschutes South 5 3 0 5 7 6 7 0 8 8 0 8 9 5.1 M west end of Rams Road - main tie through road across grassland 8900000 6.51 7.51 Deschutes South 5 3 0 5 7 6 7 0 8 8 0 8 9 5.1 M 8900000 7.51 10.25 Willow Creek 5 3 0 5 7 6 7 0 8 8 0 8 9 5.0 M west end of Rams Road - main tie through road across grassland 8910000 0.00 1.64 Deschutes South 0 3 0 2 5 5 0 0 8 8 0 6 9 3.1 M Imbler Lane - 8910000 1.64 1.99 Deschutes South 0 3 0 2 5 5 0 0 8 8 0 9 9 2.9 L 8910000 1.99 3.77 Deschutes South 0 3 0 2 5 5 0 0 8 8 0 6 9 3.1 M 8910000 3.77 4.10 Lake Billy Chinook 0 3 0 2 5 5 0 0 8 8 0 8 9 3.1 M Imbler Lane - Laurel Lane/Springer road/Jerico Lane - to Haystack Reservoir & CG. 9600000 0.00 0.22 Lake Billy Chinook 9 5 9 5 7 9 5 0 8 9 9 9 9 6.9 H Main cut through from 26 to 97 - (missing segment at 97) Laurel Lane/Springer road/Jerico Lane - to Haystack Reservoir & CG. 9600000 0.22 5.40 Deschutes South 9 5 9 5 7 9 5 0 8 9 9 7 9 6.9 H Main cut through from 26 to 97 - (missing segment at 97) Laurel Lane/Springer road/Jerico Lane - to Haystack Reservoir & CG. 9600000 5.40 8.55 Willow Creek 9 5 9 5 7 0 5 0 8 9 9 7 8 5.4 M Main cut through from 26 to 97 - (missing segment at 97) 9610000 0.00 1.29 Deschutes South 0 3 0 4 5 0 5 0 7 7 0 7 9 2.9 L 9610000 1.29 2.50 Willow Creek 0 3 0 4 5 0 5 0 7 7 0 6 9 2.9 L fiber optics line - possible cogentrics line, etc. 9620000 0.00 1.55 Willow Creek 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 7 7 0 6 9 3.0 M CRO-111 0.00 18.13 Bear Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.9 H CRO-112 55.93 56.66 Lower Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9.0 H CRO-112 56.66 59.21 Grindstone 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-112 59.21 60.22 Upper Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-113 0.00 1.44 Lower Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-113 1.44 3.04 Grindstone 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-113 3.04 7.00 Lower Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-127 0.00 6.06 Camp Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-127 6.06 6.09 Camp Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-127 6.09 11.66 Camp Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-127A 0.00 15.45 Camp Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-127A 15.45 16.14 Bear Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-134 0.00 1.80 Bear Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-134 1.80 2.24 Mid Crooked River RM70.5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-135 0.00 0.46 Middle Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-135 0.46 1.42 Grindstone 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-135 1.42 5.16 Middle Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-135 5.16 6.12 Upper Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-135 6.12 10.24 Middle Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-217 0.00 3.30 Camp Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-226 0.00 6.16 Bear Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-312 0.00 3.32 Upper Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H CRO-325 0.00 2.00 Bear Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-42 0.00 14.08 Lower South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-42 14.08 19.93 Murderers Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-42 19.93 19.95 Lower South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-42 19.95 19.99 Murderers Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-42 19.99 30.00 Lower South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-42 30.00 36.98 Middle South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-67 0.00 11.79 Middle South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-67 11.79 19.92 Upper Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-68 0.00 5.09 Middle South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-68 5.09 7.08 Upper South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-69 0.00 4.43 Middle South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-69 4.43 8.68 Upper South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H GRA-69 8.68 22.54 Upper Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.8 H 2710000 6.10 7.61 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0979 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 7.61 7.88 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 7.88 8.36 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M 2710000 8.36 8.38 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M 2710000 8.38 8.45 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 8.45 8.48 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M 2710000 8.48 8.56 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 8.56 8.74 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M 2710000 8.74 8.98 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M 2710000 8.98 9.01 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 9.01 9.39 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 3 5.1 M 2710000 9.39 9.56 Trout Headwater 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M 2710000 9.56 9.60 McKay 0 5 0 5 6 8 0 9 7 9 7 9 8 5.1 M

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 6 PUBLIC PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE

Com Dev Dis Dis SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED Tie SFP Rec Rec Use Own SU (T) (R) (F) (LM) (TR) (H) AVG RATING REMARKS 4215000 13.90 18.67 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 9 3 2.6 L presently level 2, main access from 42 through Gray Prairie, ties through Ochoco Lumber Co land to 23 road, administrative easement 4215000 18.67 21.96 Upper Ochoco 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 9 3 2.6 L on Ochoco (Wolf Cr.) segment presently level 2, main access from 42 through Gray Prairie, ties through Ochoco Lumber Co land to 23 road, administrative easement 4215000 21.96 23.00 Lower Ochoco 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 9 8 2.6 L on Ochoco (Wolf Cr.) segment 4215000 23.00 28.99 Lower Ochoco 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 9 8 2.6 L 4240000 7.20 9.41 Lower N. Fork Crooked 0 2 0 5 7 8 0 8 7 7 2 9 3 4.4 M 4240000 9.41 9.44 Paulina 0 2 0 5 7 8 0 8 7 7 2 9 8 4.4 M road to Upper Falls, star gazer group has permit for annual event 6200000 3.46 3.70 Crooked River Grasslands 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 3.70 4.19 Lake Billy Chinook 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H 6200000 4.19 5.90 Steelhead 9 5 0 6 7 9 8 0 8 9 0 9 9 6.5 H main road through Crooked River Ranch 2600000 0.00 2.09 Deschutes South 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 2.09 6.27 Willow Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 6.27 6.90 Deschutes South 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 6.90 6.91 Willow Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 6.91 7.40 Deschutes South 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 7.40 11.84 Willow Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 11.84 17.95 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 17.95 18.11 McKay 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.3 H 2600000 18.11 18.30 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H 2600000 18.30 18.71 Lower Ochoco 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.3 H 2600000 18.71 19.52 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 0 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 8.3 H 2600000 19.52 19.56 Lower Ochoco 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.3 H 2600000 19.56 19.83 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 0 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 8.3 H 2600000 19.83 25.10 Lower Ochoco 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.2 H 2600000 25.10 25.45 Mill 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.2 H 2600000 25.45 28.57 Lower Ochoco 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.8 H 2600000 28.57 37.90 Upper Ochoco 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.8 H 2600000 37.90 39.54 Bear Creek (Bridge) 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 8.3 H 2600000 39.54 48.34 Bridge Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.8 H 2600000 48.34 51.16 Bridge Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.8 H 2600000 51.16 62.83 Mountain Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.9 H 2600000 62.83 65.52 Rock Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.9 H 2600000 65.52 69.29 Upper Middle John Day 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.9 H 2600000 69.29 69.76 Lower South Fork 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.9 H 9700000 0.00 17.88 Steelhead 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.8 H 9700000 17.88 28.67 Crooked River Grasslands 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.9 H 9700000 28.67 29.70 Crooked River Grasslands 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8.8 H 9700000 29.70 32.38 Lake Billy Chinook 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 8.9 H 9700000 32.38 35.78 Deschutes South 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9.0 H 9700000 35.78 42.10 Willow Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H 9700000 42.10 49.53 Mud Springs Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-126 0.00 1.80 Steelhead 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-126 1.80 5.93 Irrigation Canals 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-126 5.93 13.77 Lower Dry River 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-126 13.77 18.50 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-27 0.00 6.28 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-27 6.28 19.61 Lwr Crooked River RM56.5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-27 19.61 19.72 Mid Crooked River RM70.5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.9 H OR-27 19.72 24.00 Mid Crooked River RM70.5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9.0 H OR-27 24.00 42.52 Bear Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-27 42.52 44.90 Upper Dry River 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 0.00 0.50 Lower Ochoco 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 0.50 6.68 Lower Crooked River Valley 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 6.68 11.77 Lower Ochoco 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 11.77 15.67 Mid Crooked River RM70.5 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 15.67 36.50 Mid Crooked River RM86.2 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 36.50 36.57 Lower N. Fork Crooked 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 36.57 41.08 Mid Crooked River RM110- 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 41.08 41.72 Camp Creek 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 41.72 47.51 Mid Crooked River RM110- 9 9 9 9 9 9 9999 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 47.51 47.82 Lower South Fork Crooked 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H OR-380 47.82 55.91 Lower Beaver 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H US-20 0.00 18.93 Upper Dry River 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H US-20 18.93 22.91 Lower Dry River 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H US-20 22.91 25.82 Irrigation Canals 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H US-20 25.82 29.34 Pilot Butte 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H US-20 29.34 34.94 Steelhead 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.0 H US-20 34.94 40.73 Three Creeks 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8.9 H US-20 40.73 42.00 Whychus 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 #REF! #REF!

3/17/2003 HUMAN USES (Ochoco) 7 Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Assessment Codes

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment ROAD ANALYSIS ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation Code Definitions INFORMATION Maps & Brochures (Aquatic Assessment Table) PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits Projects & Plans Forest Plans Field Heading Major Documents Schedule of Proposed ROAD - Road Number Actions BMP - Beginning mile point for a Monitoring Reports Project Information segment of road Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, EMP - Ending mile point for a segment Assessments of road Publications WATERSHED - 5th field watershed Recreational Activities Volunteering Rating Factors GEO - Geologic Hazard (landslide potential) FINE SED - Fine Sediment (surface Newberry National erosion) Volcanic Monument FLOOD PLANE - Flood Plane (function) FLOW - Flow (intercepts surface runoff) Conservation Ed. FISH - Fish Populations (listed species) Contracting WET LAND - Wetlands (presence along Health roads) Forest Products SUM - Total numerical sum of all rating Geology factors for a given road segment Heritage Partnerships SUM RATING - Summary Rating - (L) Low, (M) Moderate, (H) High Plantlife Water/Fisheries Wildlife Back to Table of Contents http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3a.shtml (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:19:06 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Assessment Codes

Links . Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments on our service and your suggestions for improvement. Forest

Deschutes National Forest 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702 (541) 383-5300 Ochoco National Forest 3160 N.E. 3rd Street Prineville, OR 97754 (541) 416-6500 Crooked River National Grassland 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 (541) 475-9272

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:08 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3a.shtml (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:19:06 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Schedule of Proposed aquatic habitat at the subbasin (5th Major Documents Actions level HUC) and subwatershed (6th level Monitoring Reports HUC) scale. The assessment at the Project Information Roads Analysis subbasin and subwatershed scale is Plans, Analyses, basically the same, the primary Assessments difference being the scale of watershed Publications and road segment to be analyzed. The basic units of assessment at the Recreational Activities subbasin scale are the watersheds Volunteering within the subbasin and road segments of arterial and collector roads within the watersheds. The basic units of assessment at the subwatershed scale Newberry National are subwatersheds within the Volcanic Monument watershed and road segments of local roads. The subbasin scale analysis will Conservation Ed. help prioritize watersheds for further Contracting analysis based upon aquatic resources Health and potential restoration needs, identify Forest Products issues within watersheds, establish context for the subwatershed or project Geology scale analysis and identify potential Heritage management of the arterials and Partnerships collectors. Analysis of local roads at the Plantlife subwatershed or project level is Water/Fisheries essentially the same, but the segment Wildlife scale will be different and watershed conditions are based upon the condition http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (1 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

of the subwatershed. The watershed Links and subwatershed condition ratings are Evaluate Our Service based upon the watershed BAs with We welcome your comments further information provided by on our service and your completed watershed analysis and suggestions for improvement. existing GIS layers. The watershed Forest condition ratings establish a context for the road segment ratings. The segment ratings are based upon stream survey data, road logs, culvert surveys, and Deschutes National Forest local knowledge. 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702 (541) 383-5300 Road Segments - Roads will be divided into segments. The Ochoco National Forest segments can be delineated in a manner analogous to a stream 3160 N.E. 3rd Street reach. When the character of a road changes then there will be a Prineville, OR 97754 new segment. Segments should be delineated as long as possible (541) 416-6500 without losing the characteristics of the road. Road segments in the subbasin analysis will be divided into individual lengths for that Crooked River National subbasin (i.e. a road segment in a 5th level HUC will start as the Grassland road passes into the HUC and end as it passes out). Road segments 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 on the 6th field HUC level are first defined as valley bottom road mid- Madras, OR 97741 slope road or ridge top road. The segments are then further (541) 475-9272 delineated based upon the risk factors, or changes in a physical characteristic recognized as affecting resources, such as frequency of stream crossings. A road segment would change when the segment changed from a valley bottom to mid-slope, mid-slope to ridge top, or if the definition remains the same (valley bottom, mid-slope, ridge top), a new road segment would be delineated when one of the risk factors (below) changes. For example, a new road segment should be delineated when the road goes from a high risk geologic hazard to a low risk, the impact on floodplain function changes, the road goes from a significant subwatershed to a subwatershed that is not felt to be significant, etc. Road maintenance level may also need to be included. Development of the Aquatic Impact/Risk Factors Aquatic factors were developed to capture key processes associated with roads as they link to aquatic environments. The list of factors includes: geologic hazard; road related sediment; floodplain off- channel habitat riparian reserve function; flow effects; at risk fish populations; and wetlands. The term "at risk fish" in this document refers to fish listed as Threatened or Endangered or Sensitive. Numbers following each section are associated with the Key Questions associated with the INA for the Aquatics section. Geologic hazard (AQ-2, 9, 10, 11): This factor was developed to incorporate the natural risk of mass wasting as an effect on roads or potential for roads to accelerate mass movement events. Three forms of mass movement were identified: debris flows (shallow rapid landslides); earth slumps (fairly deep land slides); and deep-seated landslides. The interpretation of mass wasting was taken from the Oregon State Geology Map and 1985 resource photo interpretation. These interpretations were based upon observations of landslide features, the Ochoco Soil Resource Inventory (SRI), literature references,

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (2 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

geomorphic mapping, bedrock weathering properties, geologic structural features, slope gradient, drainage characteristics and patterns, and regolith features. On the Ochoco National Forest, the higher risk terrain is located at the intersection of any combination of the dormant and active landslide terrain with Quaternary landslide debris, Clarno-Formation and John Day Formation, L soil mapping units of the Ochoco SRI or the Piture Gorge basalt/John Day/Clarno interface. On the Deschutes national Forest, debris flows are associated with extreme rain-on-snow weather events in the Metolius River drainage. They are most likely to occur on steep slopes of glacial valleys and on the steeper slopes of Green Ridge. Geologic hazard was considered a highly important factor relating to aquatic conditions. Each road segment will receive a rating for Geologic Hazard. Listed below is a summary of hazard rating:

● 0 = NO RISK - There is no risk of landslides along the road. ● 1-3 = LOW RISK - The terrain that the road corridor crosses has 1 to 2 of the site features associated with landslide probability. Little evidence of natural landslides have been observed and if present are localized and small. Delivery of fine sediment from natural landslides is considered low. Risk assessment indicates slope stability has a low probability of occurrence (<25%) with normal (proper) road design measures. Normally the degree of site limitation is minor and can be overcome. Generally, off-site sediment generation from road caused failures is low. ● 4-6 = MODERATE RISK - The terrain that the road corridor crosses has 2 or more site features associated with landslide probability. Evidence of natural landslides has been observed locally but the landslide risk is not common throughout the area. Delivery of fine sediment from natural landsides is considered moderate within a few hundred feet of perennial streams. Risk assessment indicates that slope failure has a moderate probability of occurrence (25-50%) with normal (proper) road design. Special planning, design, or maintenance can usually overcome the degree of limitation. However, occasionally landslides have been triggered within the road corridor delivering moderate levels off-site sediment. ● 7-9 = HIGH TO VERY HIGH RISK - The terrain that the road corridor crosses has most or all of the site features associated with landslide probability. Natural landslides have been observed and occur over much to most of the area. Delivery of fine sediment from natural landslides is considered high to very high. Risk assessment indicates that significant slope failure has a high to very high probability of occurrence (50-75% or >75%) with normal (proper) road design measures. The degree of limitation may not be completely overcome with special design or maintenance measures. Large and/or small scale landslides have been triggered within road corridors delivering high levels of off- site sediment.

Road Related Fine Sediment (AQ-1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, 18) Surface erosion occurs on wildland roads due to erosion of the road surface,

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (3 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

cutslopes and fillslopes and accelerated mass failures. Surface erosion of the road is sensitive to road design, road maintenance and geologic hazard. Road surface, design and maintenance of drainage structures can influence the amount of road surface erosion. Insufficient drainage structures, culverts, including ditch-relief culverts can also be sources of sediment. Roads crossing areas of high geologic hazard or with unstable fill slopes may contribute to accelerated mass wasting initiated by the failure of the fill slope. Culverts at stream crossings can be a sediment source if the culvert is under-sized and the hydraulic capacity is exceeded, or the culvert inlet is plugged causing streamflow to overtop the road. Large amounts of sediment or mass wasting can also be generated if the plugged culvert results in failure of the crossing resulting in a debris flow, or if the culvert is overrun resulting in the stream flowing down the road surface eroding the surface and fill. Ditch relief culverts that erode fill material directly into streams are another sediment source. The increase in sediments can cause streams that do not meet water quality standards to be listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Fine Sediment - (AQ-1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, 17, 18) -

● 0 = NO RISK - Road segment has a paved surface, crossings are bridged or sufficient to pass the 100 year flood and associated debris. Cut and fill slopes are vegetated and are not eroding. Crossings are not impacting channel morphology downstream. ● 1-3 = LOW RISK - Road segment is native surfaced, or graveled but has no visible erosion. Ditch relief culverts are not causing erosion of fill into streams, crossings are perpendicular to the stream and sufficient to pass the 100 year flood, or designed so that if failure occurs, only the prism at the crossing fails. Crossings are not impacting channel morphology downstream or causing downstream bank erosion. There is no evidence of accelerated mass wasting due to the road segment. The stream is on the 303d list for sediments. ● 4-6 = MODERATE RISK - Road segment is not meeting above criteria to some degree. Potential impacts to at risk fish habitat appear to be minor due to amount of erosion. Potential for sediment delivery if a crossing failure or fill slope failure were to occur is minor. Change to channel morphology due to a crossing is confined to the site or does not alter the channel type. The stream is on the 303d list for sediments. ● 7-9 = HIGH RISK/VERY HIGH RISK - Road segment has high potential impacts to at risk fish habitat. Road surface and/or fill slopes exhibit erosion into streams, visible ditch erosion, or cut slope erosion into ditches. Sediment directly enters fish-bearing stream from ditch. Fill slopes are beginning to fail, and there is evidence of accelerated mass wasting due to the sediment and/or crossings with high potential for failure where failure of the prism will result in a large amount of sediment delivered into at risk fish habitat. If culverts are over-topped it is probable that the stream will travel down the road and deliver sediment to at risk fish habitat. Crossings are altering stream channel type downstream and/or causing downstream bank erosion. The stream is on the 303d list for sediments.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (4 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

Floodplain Function, Off-Channel Habitat and Riparian Reserves (AQ-1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16): This factor addresses how the road segment has altered the function of a stream's floodplain and/or off-channel habitat. Floodplains are important regulators of streamflow and water quality. They absorb overbank floodwaters, allowing water to soak through the vegetation/organic mat and into the ground where it is stored and released more slowly into streams. In doing so, functioning floodplains can provide more water in late summer and reduce peak floods in winter and spring. Roads can affect floodplains by limiting the frequency of overbank flows thereby concentrating greater volumes of water within stream banks, and by interfering with the ability of the stream to migrate across its floodplain. In addition, roads can prevent hillslope runoff from recharging floodplain aquifers, intercept runoff and flood waters thereby eroding and degrading water quality, and indirectly degrade floodplain function by encouraging off-road motorized access from roads onto floodplains. Indicators of direct and indirect floodplain or riparian reserve degradation include soil compaction, noxious weed introduction, evidence of soil erosion or mass wasting of road fill during peak runoff, water quality changes, artificial confinement of streams, stream bank erosion, interruption of hillslope delivery of water onto floodplain, and loss of downed or standing woody debris which is both an energy dissipater and a habitat component. Similar impacts occur if roads are within or provide vehicle access to the portion of a riparian reserve which affects aquatic habitat; loss of bank vegetation with associated loss in cover and accelerated bank erosion, reduction in large wood from the channel or potential large wood due to wood cutting or hazard tree removal, soil compaction and accelerated surface erosion. Off-road access, provided by roads onto floodplains or riparian reserves, is influenced by factors which include: proximity of road to floodplain, slope of ground leading from road onto floodplain, and desirability of floodplain determined by its width and demands for dispersed use. With more alteration, the likelihood increases that stream systems will not be functioning properly and those road segments within the floodplain will be at higher risk of damage. Off-channel habitats provide important rearing habitat and refuge habitat during high flows. Roads in the floodplain may isolate these off-channel areas so they are no longer accessible to fish or completely fill them. A road system may not isolate or fill an off- channel area but by providing access to vehicles result in loss of vegetation, bank stability, large wood input, cover and a loss of overall habitat quality. Floodplain Function - (AQ-1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16)

● 0 = NO RISK - Road segment is not located in valley bottom or is located on toe slope in confined valley bottom outside the 100 year floodplain and not interfering with floodplain functions and does not provide for dispersed recreation access. ● 1-3 = LOW RISK - Road segment located on slightly confined valley or unconfined bottoms with localized areas of road encroachment on stream channel or off channel habitats. Road location may be providing limited motorized off-road access onto floodplain or within riparian reserves such that floodplain or riparian habitat conditions which affect aquatic habitat could start http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (5 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

degrading in localized areas within a few years with continued use (see indicators above). ● 4-6 = MODERATE RISK - Road segment located on moderately confined valley or unconfined bottoms with localized areas of road encroachment on stream channel. Road location may be providing motorized off-road access onto floodplain or within riparian reserve such that floodplain or riparian habitat conditions which affect aquatic habitat showing signs of degrading in localized areas (see indicators above). ● 7-9 = HIGH RISK/VERY HIGH RISK - Road segment is located on unconfined valley bottom which frequently or continuously restricts channel migration and off-channel habitat. Road segment is affecting riparian habitat conditions affecting vegetation, altering movement of water, accelerating erosion processes, and interfering with recruitment of large woody debris. Road segment is providing access for motorized off-road dispersed use within the floodplain or riparian reserve to the point riparian habitat conditions affecting riparian habitat are being degraded or channel changes from a class B to a class C type stream, or there is a greater width to depth ratio. Stream is 303(d) listed for temperature, lack of shade contributes to elevated temperatures.

Flow effects (AQ-1, 3, 4, 5, 12, 19): This factor addresses road segments that, 1) intercept surface runoff and near surface ground water along cut slopes and ditchlines, converting subsurface flows to surface flows, and 2) increase delivery efficiency of these flows by diverting them directly to streams. Where these combined flows are continuous between roads and stream systems there is hydrologic connectivity. Hydrologic connectively is defined as any road segment that during runoff has a continuous surface flow between any part of the road prism and a natural stream channel. Water moves from hillslopes to valley bottom via surface and subsurface paths. Roads affect flow when they cut across hillslopes and/or require fill material through depressions that interrupt these natural paths. Road cutslopes or ditches intercept surface runoff and groundwater, accelerating their movement toward stream crossings. This action frequently increases soil erosion risks and routing efficiencies, which deliver road derived sediments and contaminants to streams and can alter peak flows and channel characteristics downstream. Precipitation/runoff mechanisms including rain-on-snow, spring snowmelt and convectional storms should be considered when evaluating a road segment's hydrologic connectivity. Indicators of these effects include water interception on road surfaces and ditchlines, absences of ditchline relief culverts or crossdrains, or interruption and detention of flows by road fill. Flow Effects - (AQ- AQ-1, 3, 4, 5, 12, 19)

● 0 = NO RISK - Road segment is not intercepting concentrating runoff or groundwater in ditchlines. Runoff is cross-drained through a vegetative filter prior to reaching stream channels. Natural flow paths are maintained uninterrupted. ● 1-3= LOW RISK - Road segment is occasionally intercepting runoff (<25% of length), esp. during peak events but generally not groundwater. Delivery efficiencies are low due to combination http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (6 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

of landform slope and weakly developed stream networks (usually greater than 300 feet from the stream. Some additional ditch relief is necessary for routing surface runoff through vegetative filter. Downstream stream reaches may be susceptible to damage from increase peak flows. Road densities are 2-3 miles per square mile (only use during 6th field analysis). ● 4-6= MODERATE RISK - Road segment frequently intercepts both surface runoff and/or groundwater (25-50% of the length of the segment) in sufficient volumes to influence flow downstream and moderately delivering waters directly to streams. Landform slopes are moderately steep and drainage densities moderate, providing increased delivery efficiency to stream channels (usually 150-300 feet from the stream channel). Downstream stream channels have occasional unstable reaches and are susceptible to damage from increased peak flows. Road prisms may be interrupting and detaining water preventing it from recharging floodplain aquifers. Road has moderately hydrologic connectivity to the stream system. Road densities are 4-5 miles per square mile (only use during 6th field analysis). ● 7-9= HIGH RISK/VERY HIGH RISK - Road segment frequently intercepts both surface runoff and/or groundwater (>50% of segment length) in sufficient volumes to influence flow downstream and delivers waters directly to streams. Steep slopes and high drainage densities provide increased delivery efficiency to stream channels (usually less than 150 feet from stream channels). Downstream stream channels are unstable and susceptible to damage from increased peak flows. Road prisms may be interrupting and detaining water preventing it from recharging floodplain aquifers. Road has high hydrologic connectivity to the stream system. Road densities are 6 miles per square mile or greater (only use during 6th field analysis).

At Risk Fish Populations (AQ-2, 6, 7, 13, 14): This factor addresses whether fish listed for protection under the Endangered Species Act or on the Regional Foresters Sensitive Species List or Essential Fish Habitat, are present in the watershed and the relative importance to recovery within the subbasin. The term "significant" here is used to denote important spawning and/or rearing habitat that is key to populations persistence. This factor addresses the relative importance of a subwatershed to the conservation and recovery of at risk fish and to help weight the potential for adverse impacts to at risk fish or their habitat. Besides the potential impacts to aquatic habitat, roads can increase the potential for poaching or introduction of exotic species. At Risk Fish Populations - (AQ-2, 6, 7, 13, 14)

● 0 = NO RISK - Road segment with the following set of conditions: road segments located in a watershed with no listed fish species; stream crossings are not migration barriers (any life stage) for other fish species. ● 1-3 = LOW RISK - Road segment is in a subwatershed with at risk fish but is not a significant subwatershed for At Risk species. Stream crossings are not barriers to at risk fish but may be to other species. Or at risk fish are not present and some stream http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (7 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

crossings are barriers to some life stages of other species. ● 4-6 = MODERATE RISK - Road segment is in a subwatershed with at risk fish but is not a significant subwatershed for an At Risk species. One or more crossings are a barrier to at risk fish at some life stage; or road segment is in a significant subwatershed for an at risk species, no road crossings are barriers to any life stage of an at risk species, poaching is not a major concern. ● 7-9 = HIGH RISK/VERY HIGH RISK - Road segment is in a significant subwatershed for an at risk species and no road crossings are barriers to any life stage of an at risk species, but poaching due to access from the road segment is a concern though not necessarily documented. The road segment is or has potential, based upon the previous factors, to have serious adverse impacts to at risk fish habitat; and/or there are road crossing barriers to some life stage of an at risk species and/or there is known poaching of at risk fish occurring.

Wetlands and Wet Meadows AQ-3, 5, 6: This factor addresses whether wetlands are present along road systems and do road segments interfere with their condition and function, ground water movement or wetland vegetation. The wetlands also include seeps, springs and sag ponds related to landslide terrain. A road segment's influence on the condition and function of adjacent wetlands is a result of either a direct impact, such as a road location relative to the wetland, or indirect impacts related to the road's effect on the wetland's supporting hydrology, vegetative community and soil characteristics. The most notable effects include converting productive wetlands to compacted road surfaces, providing motorized off-road access into these areas, constraining and diverting both surface and subsurface flows that support the water table, intercepting runoff which can accelerate erosion and lower water tables, increasing sediment loading and delivery of toxic pollutants, conversion of plant species composition by introducing noxious weeds, reducing baseflows and increasing peak flow and flood frequencies and degrading water quality. Of these effects, those that affect the areas ability to receive, store and move water will likely have the greatest impact on the wetland's condition and function. Wetlands and Wet Meadows AQ-3, 5, 6:

● ·0 = NO RISK - Road segment is either not near or adjacent to wetlands/wet meadows, or road design characteristics are providing for the uninterrupted movement of surface and groundwater necessary to support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. ● 1-3 = LOW RISK - Road segment is adjacent to, or crosses small localized wetlands or wet meadows (<5 acre in size). Road design characteristics, particularly crossings of surface and near surface water paths are limiting the available water necessary to inundate and saturate the landform and support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. Initiation of wetland degradation including noxious weed establishment, increased sediment loading, and decreased area of saturation is occurring. ● 4-6= MODERATE RISK - Road segment is adjacent to, or crosses large scale wetlands or wet meadows (6-50 acres in

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (8 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Aquatic Risk

size). The road's location and design have displaced or degraded the wetland's size and function. Runoff is being delivered directly to the wetland during high flow events, increasing sediment and contaminant loadings. Crossings of surface and near surface water paths have somewhat limited the volume, timing and distribution of water necessary to saturate the landform and support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. Road segment could, or is starting to provide motorized off-road vehicles access into the area, further contributing to its degradation. ● 7-9 = HIGH RISK - Road segment is adjacent to, or crosses landscape scale wetlands or wet meadows (greater than 50 acres). The road's location and design have displaced or degraded the wetland's size and function. Runoff is being delivered directly to the wetland, increasing sediment and contaminant loadings. Crossings of surface and near surface water paths have severely limited the volume, timing and distribution of water necessary to saturate the landform and support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. Road segment is providing motorized off-road vehicles access into the area, further contributing to its degradation.

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:11 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-3b.shtml (9 of 9)5/31/2007 1:19:16 PM FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some replace undersize culverts (moderate 1200000 21.20 21.23 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated rating).

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 21.23 26.90 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 26.90 28.27 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 28.27 34.40 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 0.00 0.08 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 0.08 0.10 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 0.00 5.00 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated

Undersized culverts @ Little Summit and Derr Cr. Segments causing fine sediment and adjustments to channel morphology, some 1200000 0.00 0.10 Deep Creek 13 2 2 3 4 15 M fish passage problems associated 1200000 2.42 2.89 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 1 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 1200000 2.89 2.94 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge 1200000 2.94 3.30 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge Mac Creek Drainage, paved, gnarly 1200000 0.00 0.10 Mountain Creek 5 004 009Mswitchbacks 1200000 0.00 0.40 Mountain Creek 5 004 1010 M Mac Creek Drainage, paved 1200000 0.20 0.26 Rock Creek 10 0 1 0 0 2 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1200000 0.00 3.55 Rock Creek 10 0 1 0 0 2 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1200000 3.55 8.52 Rock Creek 10 0 1 0 0 2 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1200000 8.52 8.60 Rock Creek 10 0 1 0 0 2 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 0.00 3.32 Deep Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of ridge 1250000 3.32 4.75 Deep Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of ridge 1250000 0.00 1.02 Deep Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of ridge 1250000 1.02 2.82 Deep Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of ridge 1250000 17.44 17.73 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge 1250000 17.73 17.87 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge 1250000 17.87 18.12 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge 1250000 18.12 19.72 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Ridge 1250000 11.40 11.43 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 11.43 11.43 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 11.43 11.65 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 11.65 11.90 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 0.00 5.40 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 0.00 0.18 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap 1250000 0.18 2.60 Rock Creek 10 0 2 0 0 3 L Ridge top, little bit of ash cap Gravel barnhouse campground road, 1280000 4.96 5.31 Mountain Creek 5 200108Mlandslide debris School bus route, increase Four perennial stream crossings (Friday maintenance level and maintenance 1600000 1.38 1.85 Bear Creek 4 32442 19 M creek), three intermittent stream crossings frequency.

Four perennial stream crossings (Friday 1600000 1.85 7.45 Bear Creek 4 32442 19 M creek), three intermittent stream crossings Replace undersize culverts.

Gravel, midslope, crosses Double Cabin, Wiley Creek and Wiley Trib 1, and five intermittent tribs, landslide terrain and Increase maintenance level and 1600000 18.67 21.96 Camp Creek 7 224 0318 H landslide debris - 100%, pretty low small pack maintenance frequency. Crosses three intermittent tributaries, Increase maintenance level and 1600000 29.97 30.24 Mid Crooked River 32 0 2 0 0 7Lmidslope at top of watershed maintenance frequency. Parallels Newsome and Sherwood Creek, some wetland, aggregate, then crosses and 1600000 0.00 8.30 Mid Crooked River 3 4422318 M parallels Wildcat and Drake Creek

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 2 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Parallels Newsome and Sherwood Creek, some wetland, aggregate, then crosses and 1600000 8.30 12.89 Mid Crooked River 3 4422318 M parallels Wildcat and Drake Creek Parallels Newsome and Sherwood Creek, some wetland, aggregate, then crosses and 1600000 12.89 12.90 Mid Crooked River 3 4422318 M parallels Wildcat and Drake Creek 1610000 7.45 7.63 Bear Creek 20 0 0 0 0 2 L No roads, on top ridge, 50 ft in watershed Current seasonal closure method is Crosses Newsome Creek, adjacent to ineffective. Needs to find better 1610000 12.90 13.40 Mid Crooked River 2 4422317 M Woods Springs method. Private land owner would like gates to 1620000 0.00 0.02 Mid Crooked River 44 4 22319 M Parallels Gibson Creek, landslide terrain 25% close road. Potential project - Increase maintenance level to reduce sediment Parallels Kloochman Creek for 2.5 miles, delivery. Road parallels Newsome 1640000 0.00 0.80 Bear Creek 3 5432219 M gravel Creek.

Monitor to determine actual need. Seasonal closure is ineffective. Need Parallels Kloochman Creek for 2.5 miles, to find better closure. Private land 1640000 0.80 0.94 Bear Creek 3 5432219 M gravel owner would like to see Gates. 1670000 21.96 23.00 Camp Creek 21 0 2 0 0 5 L Crosses three intermittent tributaries 1670000 23.00 28.99 Camp Creek 21 0 2 0 0 5 L Crosses three intermittent tributaries 1670000 0.00 0.40 Camp Creek 21 0 2 0 0 5 L Crosses three intermittent tributaries Crosses Rimrock Creek and upper end of 1670000 30.24 30.59 Mid Crooked River 4 3020110 M Maury Creek Crosses Rimrock Creek and upper end of 1670000 30.59 30.61 Mid Crooked River 4 3020110 M Maury Creek Crosses Rimrock Creek and upper end of 1670000 30.61 30.61 Mid Crooked River 4 3020110 M Maury Creek Crosses Rimrock Creek and upper end of 1670000 30.61 31.55 Mid Crooked River 4 3020110 M Maury Creek 1680000 7.63 7.92 Bear Creek 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Top of ridge Crosses Wildcat Creek, wetland, 80% 1680000 13.40 21.86 Mid Crooked River 6 3220316 H landslide terrain Crosses Wildcat Creek, wetland, 80% 1680000 21.86 21.90 Mid Crooked River 6 3220316 H landslide terrain Crosses Wildcat Creek, wetland, 80% 1680000 21.90 21.94 Mid Crooked River 6 3220316 H landslide terrain 1690000 1.10 4.70 Mid Crooked River 4 300007 M Crosses Wildcat Creek 1690000 4.70 11.60 Mid Crooked River 4 300007 M Crosses Wildcat Creek Increase maintenance level and 1690000 11.60 17.90 Mid Crooked River 4 300007 M Crosses Wildcat Creek frequency.

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 3 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Parallels Faught Creek for 3 miles, native surfaced, road to Antelope Reservoir, First two segments may not need 1700000 7.92 8.22 Bear Creek 2 5422217 M crosses Bear Creek increased maintenance. Parallels Faught Creek for 3 miles, native surfaced, road to Antelope Reservoir, 1700000 8.22 8.87 Bear Creek 2 5422217 M crosses Bear Creek Parallels Faught Creek for 3 miles, native surfaced, road to Antelope Reservoir, 1700000 8.87 9.13 Bear Creek 2 5422217 M crosses Bear Creek 1700000 0.00 0.57 Mid Crooked River 2 4422014 M Parallels Pine Creek 1700600 0.94 1.18 Bear Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Antelope Reservoir campground 1700600 1.18 1.38 Bear Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Antelope Reservoir campground

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 9.13 10.25 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 10.25 10.33 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 10.33 13.60 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 13.60 15.22 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 15.22 20.00 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 20.00 21.50 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 0.00 4.44 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 4.44 4.44 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams

Top of ridge, but crosses to south side, native 1750000 4.44 4.44 Bear Creek 22 1 3 0 0 8Lsurface, crosses four intermittent streams 1750000 0.40 1.20 Camp Creek 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Top of ridge 1750000 1.20 1.70 Camp Creek 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Top of ridge 1750000 31.55 31.85 Mid Crooked River 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of watershed 1750000 34.59 35.89 Mid Crooked River 33 0 0 0 2 8 L Crosses Sanford Creek and its wetland 1750000 0.57 0.70 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 4 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 1750000 0.70 10.30 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 0.00 0.70 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 0.00 8.42 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 8.42 8.70 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 8.70 16.70 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 0.00 5.80 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 0.00 5.00 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 5.00 5.09 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 0.00 0.20 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1750000 0.20 0.40 Mid Crooked River 32 0 0 0 0 5 L Top of drainage, 30% landslide terrain 1760000 0.00 9.00 Camp Creek 22 0 3 0 0 7 L Native surfaced, midslope 1760000 9.00 15.17 Camp Creek 22 0 3 0 0 7 L Native surfaced, midslope 1760000 0.00 0.02 Mid Crooked River 23 0 0 0 0 5 L Goes to Tower Point Lookout 1760000 0.02 0.20 Mid Crooked River 23 0 0 0 0 5 L Goes to Tower Point Lookout Road up Allen Creek, native surfaced, Crosses Allen Creek four times, Parallels Allen Creek for 10 miles, then Fall Creek for 2150000 22.37 22.69 McKay 4 7 6 22021 2H two miles Road up Allen Creek, native surfaced, Crosses Allen Creek four times, Parallels Allen Creek for 10 miles, then Fall Creek for 2150000 22.69 22.86 McKay 4 7 6 22021 2H two miles

Crosses east fork Foley Creek, parallels County road - gravel entire road 2150000 2.12 2.14 Trout Headwater 3 4 3 4 1116 M Foley, native surfaced (potential project for county funding) gravel would reduce fine sediment delivery. Verify accuracy of data 2150000 0.00 0.30 Willow Creek 22 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native surface (may be partial gravel) 2200000 3.22 3.40 Bridge Creek 2 442 7 0 19 H Parallels Johnson Creek ditto Crosses by Allen Creek Reservoir and Beetle 2200000 0.00 0.20 Middle N. Fork Cro 33 2 1 1 313 L Creek, parallels Booth Creek ditto Crosses by Allen Creek Reservoir and Beetle 2200000 0.00 0.10 Middle N. Fork Cro 33 2 1 1 313 L Creek, parallels Booth Creek Gravel, parallels Badger Creek, crosses numerous dry meadows, crosses Hoffman, Bug and four intermittent tribs, landslide 2200000 0.00 2.50 Mountain Creek 6 3327 1 22 2H terrain Gravel, parallels Badger Creek, crosses numerous dry meadows, crosses Hoffman, Bug and four intermittent tribs, landslide 2200000 0.00 2.00 Mountain Creek 6 3327 1 22 2H terrain

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 5 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Parallels and crosses Howard Creek, and parallels and crosses west Howard Creek, crosses Indian Creek, Cross White Creek, 2200000 0.90 1.20 Upper N. Fork Cro 1 44224 17 M Stump Creek, Fox Creek, Elliot Creek Parallels and crosses Howard Creek, and parallels and crosses west Howard Creek, crosses Indian Creek, Cross White Creek, 2200000 0.00 0.50 Upper N. Fork Cro 1 44224 17 M Stump Creek, Fox Creek, Elliot Creek Parallels Ochoco Creek, crosses numerous 2200000 0.00 18.13 Upper Ochoco 30 5 3 4520 M times, paved, near Walton Lake 2200930 0.00 0.20 Mountain Creek 6 000107 H Scott's campground, landslide terrain Parallels west branch of Bridge Creek, crosses O'Kelly and other unamed creeks, 2210000 0.00 1.00 Bridge Creek 66 5 4 7 0 28 3H very steep with switchbacks Parallels west branch of Bridge Creek, crosses O'Kelly and other unamed creeks, 2210000 0.00 4.30 Bridge Creek 66 5 4 7 0 28 3H very steep with switchbacks Parallels Thronson Creek for half stream 2210000 0.00 3.30 Upper Ochoco 4 3 4 20215 M length

County segment- West Branch Parallels Thronson Creek for half stream Bridge Creek Federal Highways 2210000 0.00 3.32 Upper Ochoco 4 3 4 20215 M length Project, replace undersize culverts. Parallels Thronson Creek for half stream 2210000 0.00 14.08 Upper Ochoco 4 3 4 20215 M length 2220000 14.08 19.93 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 2 4 L Road around Walton Lake 2220000 19.93 19.95 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 2 4 L Road around Walton Lake 2220010 36.57 41.08 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Spur 2230000 0.00 0.20 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 0.00 6.51 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 6.51 14.76 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 14.76 19.30 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 19.30 23.30 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 23.30 24.80 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 24.80 26.10 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 26.10 28.88 Middle N. Fork Cro 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, native 2230000 0.50 1.95 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 0.00 0.98 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 0.98 2.45 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 55.93 56.66 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 56.66 59.21 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 59.21 60.22 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 0.00 1.80 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 1.80 2.24 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 6 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 2230000 0.00 1.44 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2230000 1.44 3.04 Upper N. Fork Cro 3 4 320012 M Parallels Fox Creek 2300000 19.95 19.99 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 1 3 L Parallels Ochoco Creek 2300403 41.08 41.72 Upper Ochoco 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Road to Big Summit RD compound Paved, parallels Heflin Cree for 1.5 miles, crosses two intermittent tributaries, landslide 2600000 14.70 21.50 Bear Creek (Bridg 4 004 008Mterrain Paved, crosses one intermittent trib, parallels 2600000 0.00 7.70 Bridge Creek 21 4 2 7 0 16 H west fork of Bridge Creek Paved, crosses one intermittent trib, parallels 2600000 7.70 9.43 Bridge Creek 21 4 2 7 0 16 H west fork of Bridge Creek State Highway, crosses numerous 2600000 0.00 1.10 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0Lintermittent tributaries State Highway, crosses numerous 2600000 0.00 2.31 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0Lintermittent tributaries State Highway, crosses numerous 2600000 0.00 2.75 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0Lintermittent tributaries Paved, crosses Grizzly Mountain Canyon 2600000 0.00 0.40 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0LCreek, Lytle Creek Paved, crosses Grizzly Mountain Canyon 2600000 0.00 1.13 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0LCreek, Lytle Creek Paved, crosses Grizzly Mountain Canyon 2600000 1.13 1.43 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0LCreek, Lytle Creek Paved, crosses Grizzly Mountain Canyon 2600000 1.43 3.53 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0LCreek, Lytle Creek 2600000 19.83 25.10 Lower Ochoco 23 4 20112 M Paved, follows Ochoco Creek 2600000 25.10 25.45 Lower Ochoco 23 4 20112 M Paved, follows Ochoco Creek 2600000 25.45 28.57 Lower Ochoco 23 4 20112 M Paved, follows Ochoco Creek 2600000 28.57 37.90 Lower Ochoco 23 4 20112 M Paved, follows Ochoco Creek 2600000 4.00 7.90 Lower South Fork 20 0 0 0 0 2 L State Highway at Dayville 2600000 22.86 23.22 McKay 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved highway Crosses Mill Creek right above Ochoco 2600000 0.00 0.16 Mill 20 4 0006Mreservoir Highway, major reconstruction, landslide 2600000 0.20 1.50 Mountain Creek 6 000107Hterrain Highway crosses Rock Creek that has adult 2600000 11.18 11.29 Rock Creek 23 0 2 7 0 14 H steelhead 2600000 0.00 0.54 Upper Middle John 23 0 2 7 0 14 H Crosses cottonwood creek 2600000 19.99 30.00 Upper Ochoco 1 463 4422 H Parallels Mark's Creek 2600000 5.90 6.10 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved 2600000 6.10 7.61 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved aka Marks Creek watershed 2600000 7.61 7.88 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved 2600150 41.72 47.51 Upper Ochoco 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Cougar Campground 2600550 30.00 36.98 Upper Ochoco 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Ochoco Divide Campground

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 7 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 2600550 0.00 11.79 Upper Ochoco 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Ochoco Divide Campground 2600828 7.88 8.36 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Spur Parallels Little Hay Creek, aggregate, 2610000 11.79 19.92 Upper Ochoco 33 4 20315 M parallels Coyle Creek Parallels Little Hay Creek, aggregate, 2610000 0.00 4.43 Upper Ochoco 33 4 20315 M parallels Coyle Creek 2610400 4.43 8.68 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground 2610401 47.82 55.91 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground 2610500 0.00 6.28 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground 2610510 8.68 22.54 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground 2610511 0.00 5.09 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground 2610515 6.28 19.61 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground 2610515 19.61 19.72 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Compound, Campground Parallels Long Hollow Creek for part of road 2620000 19.72 24.00 Upper Ochoco 44 4 10215 M length Top of watershed, crosses Dunn Spring Lake and upper end of Bridge Creek, native surface, springs, landslide terrain, landslide 2630000 9.43 11.70 Bridge Creek 64 327 4 26 2H debris Top of watershed, crosses Dunn Spring Lake and upper end of Bridge Creek, native surface, springs, landslide terrain, landslide 2630000 11.70 11.74 Bridge Creek 64 327 4 26 2H debris Top of watershed, crosses Dunn Spring Lake and upper end of Bridge Creek, native surface, springs, landslide terrain, landslide Monitor road on annual basis. High 2630000 11.74 13.90 Bridge Creek 64 327 4 26 2H debris concern from wildlife standpoint. Top of watershed, crosses Dunn Spring Lake and upper end of Bridge Creek, native Implement seasonal closures to surface, springs, landslide terrain, landslide reduce erosion potential during spring 2630000 13.90 18.67 Bridge Creek 64 327 4 26 2H debris melt.

Top of ridge, crosses Happy Camp, Double Corral (both fish barriers and undersized), 2630000 0.00 6.40 Deep Creek 13 3 0 3 313 L GIS layer does not show all stream crossings,do not increase maintenance level

wildlife would like to close roads that provide loop access to major habitat Top of ridge, crosses Happy Camp, Double blocks and major primitive areas--this Corral (both fish barriers and undersized), is important wildlife area for 2630000 6.40 9.00 Deep Creek 13 3 0 3 313 L GIS layer does not show all stream crossings,solitude/lack of human disturbance.

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 8 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

Top of ridge, crosses Happy Camp, Double Native Surface section - implement Corral (both fish barriers and undersized), seasonal closures to reduce erosion 2630000 0.00 1.78 Deep Creek 13 3 0 3 313 L GIS layer does not show all stream crossings,potential during spring melt.

Top of ridge, crosses Happy Camp, Double Corral (both fish barriers and undersized), replace undersize culverts near 2630000 1.78 2.38 Deep Creek 13 3 0 3 313 L GIS layer does not show all stream crossings,Happy Camp and Double Corral

Top of ridge, crosses Happy Camp, Double Corral (both fish barriers and undersized), 2630000 2.38 6.37 Deep Creek 13 3 0 3 313 L GIS layer does not show all stream crossings, 2630000 28.88 33.50 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 33.50 34.03 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native All of these, seasonal closures to reduce erosion during spring runoff 2630000 34.03 34.04 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native and wet season in the fall. 2630000 34.04 34.13 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 34.13 34.18 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 34.18 35.50 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 35.50 43.50 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 0.00 0.33 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 0.00 6.70 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 0.00 3.65 Middle N. Fork Cro 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge top, native 2630000 0.00 0.75 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 0.75 1.90 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road All of these, seasonal closures to reduce erosion during spring runoff 2630000 0.00 4.65 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road and wet season in the fall. 2630000 0.00 1.48 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 1.48 3.67 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 3.67 5.49 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 5.49 6.20 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 0.00 4.40 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 0.00 3.32 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 3.32 4.96 Mountain Creek 31 0 0 1 0 5 L Ridge top road 2630000 3.04 7.00 Upper N. Fork Cro 12 0 0 0 2 5 L Ridge top 2630000 0.00 0.46 Upper N. Fork Cro 12 0 0 0 2 5 L Ridge top see Bridge Creek comments - wildlife, increase maintenance level 2630000 0.46 1.42 Upper N. Fork Cro 12 0 0 0 2 5 L Ridge top on aggregate section. 2630000 5.09 7.08 Upper Ochoco 4 200028 M Ridge top 2630000 0.00 0.50 Upper Ochoco 4 200028 M Ridge top

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 9 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

increase maintenance level rather than travel restrictions because of 2630000 0.50 6.68 Upper Ochoco 4 200028 M Ridge top dormant landslide terrain and seeps. Implement seasonal closures to reduce erosion potential during spring 2680000 1.99 2.92 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0L melt. No consistent recommendations. Increased maintenance would increase use of loop road. Suggestions to implement seasonal closure instead of increased 2690000 2.92 3.80 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0L maintenance. 2700000 0.00 0.30 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 00104 11 H Paved portion is at top of ridge

Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, 2700000 0.00 1.30 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road Parallels wilderness boundary for about 5 miles. This is a high value Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, segment of the Summit Trail-- 2700000 1.30 1.33 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road maintain as native surface. Relocate section of 27 road to the ridge top (north of current location). Would affect two trails. Illegal firewood cutting along roadway. Potential vehicle access to Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, wilderness. Heavy use - additional 2700000 1.33 1.34 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road maintenance. Unable to increase maintenance in Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, current location (wilderness, summit 2700000 1.34 3.00 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road trail).

Close a section in the middle to eliminate through "loop" road. Close at whistler through to asphalt because this section is constructed on Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, landslide scarp. This option maintains 2700000 0.00 4.00 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road access to trailheads.

If a section of the 27 road were closed, then maintenance would need Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, to be increased on other roads to 2700000 4.00 4.60 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road account for increased traffic.

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 10 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

Native surfaced portion is still at top of ridge, 2700000 0.00 2.57 Bear Creek (Bridg 6 100029Hlandslide terrain above and below road Little McKay road that goes North out of 2700000 3.53 8.40 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0LPrineville Finally, leave it the same. These Little McKay road that goes North out of recommendations include all native 2700000 8.40 13.50 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0LPrineville surface sections. 2700000 37.90 39.54 Lower Ochoco 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Little McKay Paved follows McKay Creek, then follows 2700000 23.22 24.10 McKay 31 4 3 5 2 18 M Little McKay Paved follows McKay Creek, then follows 2700000 24.10 24.11 McKay 31 4 3 5 2 18 M Little McKay Paved follows McKay Creek, then follows 2700000 24.11 26.49 McKay 31 4 3 5 2 18 M Little McKay Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.16 2.60 Mill 20 2 2 0 4 10 M paved Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.00 0.68 Mill 22 1 1 0 4 10 M native surfaced Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.68 4.60 Mill 22 1 1 0 4 10 M native surfaced see Bear Creek (Bridge) comments Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.00 0.19 Mill 22 1 1 0 4 10 M native surfaced Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.19 0.38 Mill 22 1 1 0 4 10 M native surfaced Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.38 0.45 Mill 22 1 1 0 4 10 M native surfaced Six wetland hits, almost a ridgetop road, 2700000 0.45 0.52 Mill 22 1 1 0 4 10 M native surfaced 2700000 2.14 2.20 Trout Headwater 10 0 0 1 0 2 L Ridge top 2700000 2.20 2.24 Trout Headwater 10 0 0 1 0 2 L Ridge top 2700000 6.68 11.77 Upper Ochoco 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, paved 2700000 11.77 15.67 Upper Ochoco 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top, paved Aggregate, crosses two intermittent streams, 2705000 26.49 26.60 McKay 4 3130314 M wetland 2710000 30.60 33.70 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 0.00 0.01 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 0.01 3.33 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 3.33 3.67 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 3.67 12.00 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 12.00 20.60 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 20.60 23.20 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 23.20 24.20 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 24.20 25.80 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 11 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 2710000 25.80 26.00 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 26.00 26.26 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 26.26 29.43 McKay 31 0 0 0 0 4 L Top of ridge 2710000 0.00 3.10 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.00 3.10 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.00 0.46 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.46 1.70 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.00 0.28 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.28 0.90 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.90 3.55 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top 2710000 0.00 5.27 Trout Headwater 20 0 0 1 0 3 L Ridge top Near Dutchman Spring, 100 feet in 2715000 29.43 29.84 McKay 7 000007Hwatershed, landslide debris 2715000 5.27 5.75 Trout Headwater 8 3201014 H Follows Dutchman Creek, landslide terrain 2720000 26.60 27.43 McKay 30 0 0 0 1 4L Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman 2720000 2.24 3.46 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman 2720000 3.46 3.70 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman Need annual monitoring on active 2720000 3.70 4.19 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain landslide. Replace undersize culverts Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman 2720000 4.19 5.90 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain Upgrade pipes Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman 2720000 5.90 9.92 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman 2720000 9.92 11.07 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain Midslope road, native surface, Potlid Creek, Cartwright Creek, Big Log Creek, Dutchman 2720000 11.07 11.73 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 540 23 H Creek, landslide terrain 2725000 29.84 29.97 McKay 30 0 0 0 1 4L Follows Trout Creek, crosses Potlid, landslide 2725000 5.75 7.57 Trout Headwater 7 3333019 H terrain Gravel, midsloped road, crosses Bear Creek and twelve smaller and intermittent streams, 2730000 2.57 5.47 Bear Creek (Bridg 8 4 2 5 2021 H landslide terrain

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 12 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Gravel, midsloped road, crosses Bear Creek and twelve smaller and intermittent streams, Need annual monitoring. Determine 2730000 5.47 5.81 Bear Creek (Bridg 8 4 2 5 2021 H landslide terrain upgrade/replace undersize culverts.

Need annual monitoring. Determine 2730000 27.43 27.74 McKay 30 0 0 0 1 4L upgrade/replace undersize culverts. Parallels and enters winter range - seasonal closure. Propose increase 2730000 27.74 28.90 McKay 30 0 0 0 1 4L maintenance level. Crosses Potlid Creek, West fork of Trout Creek, Auger Creek, one meadow, midslope, Need annual monitoring. Determine 2730000 11.73 14.90 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 541 24 H landslide terrain upgrade/replace undersize culverts. Crosses Potlid Creek, West fork of Trout Creek, Auger Creek, one meadow, midslope, Propose regular maintenance, 2730000 0.00 0.26 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 541 24 H landslide terrain increase maintenance. Crosses Potlid Creek, West fork of Trout Creek, Auger Creek, one meadow, midslope, Need annual monitoring on active 2730000 0.26 1.54 Trout Headwater 8 4 2 541 24 H landslide terrain landslide. Replace undersize culverts Native surface with spot gravel road, midslope, landslide terrain, Rail Creek, Scotty Propose regular maintenance, 2730250 0.00 3.20 Bear Creek (Bridg 8 5 0 5 3122 H Creek, several intermittents increase maintenance. Crosses north fork of Bear Creek, parallels Bear Creek, crosses Scotty Creek and Grant 2735000 5.81 5.91 Bear Creek (Bridg 8 5542024 H Creek, landslide terrain Crosses north fork of Bear Creek, parallels Bear Creek, crosses Scotty Creek and Grant Need annual monitoring. Replace 2735000 5.91 6.15 Bear Creek (Bridg 8 5542024 H Creek, landslide terrain undersize culverts.

Need more effective seasonal closure winter range. Needs annual 2735000 1.54 2.55 Trout Headwater 7 3103014 H Crosses a trib to Auger Creek montitoring, possible upgrades. 2740000 0.00 2.00 Trout Headwater 4 3 5 3 4423 M Midslope road up Dutchman

2745000 0.00 3.21 Bear Creek (Bridg 7 000007 H Top of ridge, small segment, landslide terrain 2745000 0.52 1.80 Mill 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Top of the watershed Monitor road for water quality/aquatic 2745000 0.00 5.25 Trout Headwater 7 000018 H Ridgetop, landslide terrain concerns. 2745000 0.00 3.80 Trout Headwater 7 000018 H Ridgetop, landslide terrain Ties into options for 27 road. 2750000 0.00 6.70 Bear Creek (Bridg 7 3020012 H Midslope, landslide terrain Crosses west fork and east fork of Crazy Creek, Happy Camp, Double Corral, and five intermittents, midslope, fish presence in five perennial streams, more stream crossings 3000000 6.37 6.80 Deep Creek 13 2 3 4 3 16 M than GIS shows

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 13 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Crosses west fork and east fork of Crazy Creek, Happy Camp, Double Corral, and five intermittents, midslope, fish presence in five perennial streams, more stream crossings Monitor road for water quality/aquatic 3000000 6.80 7.35 Deep Creek 13 2 3 4 3 16 M than GIS shows concerns.

Crosses North Fork of Crooked River, Porter Surfacing is worn out and needs to be 3000000 3.65 3.70 Middle N. Fork Cro 13 2 1 1 4 12 M Creek, wetlands replaced. Replace undersize pipes. Surfacing is worn out and needs to be 3010000 3.70 4.70 Middle N. Fork Cro 13 2 1 1 4 12 M Parallels Peterson Creek for 2mi, wetland replaced. Surfacing is worn out and needs to be 3300000 19.33 19.51 McKay 44 5 20015 M Follows McKay Creek, aggregate replaced. 3300000 19.51 19.51 McKay 44 5 20015 M Follows McKay Creek, aggregate

Need more effective closure techniques (party spots, mud- 3300000 19.51 21.72 McKay 44 5 20015 M Follows McKay Creek, aggregate bogging, uncontrolled use in winter). 3300000 21.72 21.75 McKay 44 5 20015 M Follows McKay Creek, aggregate 3300000 21.75 22.37 McKay 44 5 20015 M Follows McKay Creek, aggregate Mill Creek road, parallels Mill Creek, goes up west fork Mill, then up Harvey Creek, paved - 3300000 1.93 4.70 Mill 4 000004Mprivate

Mill Creek road, parallels Mill Creek, goes up 3300000 4.70 6.80 Mill 4 000004Mwest fork Mill, then up Harvey Creek, gravel Mill Creek road, parallels Mill Creek, goes up west fork Mill, then up Harvey Creek, paved - FS section - county is proposing to 3300000 6.80 7.20 Mill 44 6 20016 H private upgrade to double lane, asphalt. Mill Creek road, parallels Mill Creek, goes up west fork Mill, then up Harvey Creek, paved - 3300000 7.20 9.41 Mill 44 6 20016 H private Mill Creek road, parallels Mill Creek, goes up west fork Mill, then up Harvey Creek, paved - 3300000 9.41 9.44 Mill 44 6 20016 H private 3300300 0.00 4.30 Mill 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Wildcat campground

Revisit some pipes (I.e. Doe Creek), 3320000 0.52 0.56 Mill 64 2 4 0218 H Hash Rock Creek active landslide, 18-inch pipe. 3320000 0.56 0.64 Mill 64 2 4 0218 H Hash Rock Creek Monitor road for water quality/aquatic 3330000 0.00 2.30 Mill 54 2 4 0217 M Crosses two intermittent tribs concerns. 3330000 0.00 0.70 Mill 54 2 4 0217 M Crosses two intermittent tribs

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 14 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

Monitor road for water quality/aquatic 3330000 0.70 3.90 Mill 54 2 4 0217 M Crosses two intermittent tribs concerns. Check culvert sizes. 3330000 0.00 8.90 Mill 54 2 4 0217 M Crosses two intermittent tribs 3330010 0.64 0.96 Mill 5 000016 M Small road 3330010 0.96 2.49 Mill 5 000016 M Small road 3350000 2.49 2.70 Mill 9 4420019 H Crosses Benefield Creek 3350000 2.70 2.81 Mill 9 4420019 H Crosses Benefield Creek Monitor, check pipes. This should be 3350000 2.81 2.83 Mill 9 4420019 H Crosses Benefield Creek Upper Ochoco. 3350000 2.83 2.85 Mill 9 4420019 H Crosses Benefield Creek Check in Mill EIS should the entire 3350000 2.85 3.46 Mill 9 4420019 H Crosses Benefield Creek road be closed. Upgrade native surface sections to aggregate if road remains open. 3350000 3.46 3.75 Mill 9 4420019 H Crosses Benefield Creek Disregard if the road is closed. Crosses Wildcat, Sears, Jim Elliot, Peterson Creek, midslope, active landslides and 3350000 15.67 36.50 Upper Ochoco 4 324 0013 M landslide terrain Crosses Wildcat, Sears, Jim Elliot, Peterson Creek, midslope, active landslides and 3350000 36.50 36.57 Upper Ochoco 4 324 0013 M landslide terrain 3360000 0.00 4.20 Mill 64 4 20016 H Parallels Lemon Creek 3360000 0.00 4.80 Mill 64 4 20016 H Parallels Lemon Creek Monitor for water quality/aquatic 3370000 3.75 3.80 Mill 3 4420013 M Parallels Dry Creek concerns. 3370000 0.00 2.11 Mill 3 4420013 M Parallels Dry Creek 3370000 2.11 12.20 Mill 3 4420013 M Parallels Dry Creek Increase maintenance level. 3380000 39.54 48.34 Lower Ochoco 5 000005 M Top of Ridge, landslide terrain Within the old Dry Creek area, landslide 3380000 28.90 29.60 McKay 5 324 0014 M terrain Monitor for water quality/aquatic Within the old Dry Creek area, landslide concerns. Upgrade native surface to 3380000 29.60 30.60 McKay 5 324 0014 M terrain aggregate. 3380000 0.00 0.52 Mill 64 4 20117 H Parallels White Tail Springs 3500000 10.00 11.50 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Paved, comes out of Round Butte 3500000 0.00 5.25 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved 3500000 5.25 9.81 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved Goes from Island crosses Deschutes river 3500000 6.60 11.03 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0Larm of Lake Billy, paved Goes from Island crosses Deschutes river 3500000 11.03 11.10 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0Larm of Lake Billy, paved

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 15 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Crosses Wolf Creek, two intermittent tributaries, part paved, part aggregate, Not all 3800000 10.59 11.52 Lower Beaver 13 3 3 1 011 L streams in GIS Crosses Wolf Creek, two intermittent tributaries, part paved, part aggregate, Not all 3800000 11.52 16.22 Lower Beaver 13 3 3 1 011 L streams in GIS Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 0.00 0.30 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 0.00 0.05 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 0.00 0.04 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 0.00 3.50 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 3.50 5.10 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 5.10 6.22 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek Top of ridge road, crosses South Fork of 3800000 6.22 6.70 Lower South Fork 22 0 0 0 2 6LBlack Canyon Creek

Parallels Squaw Creek #2, crosses Squaw 3800000 11.29 11.31 Rock Creek 23 3 2 7 2 19 H Creek #2 Trib #11, Parallels Rock Creek

Parallels Squaw Creek #2, crosses Squaw 3800000 11.31 11.40 Rock Creek 23 3 2 7 2 19 H Creek #2 Trib #11, Parallels Rock Creek 3800000 0.54 1.64 Upper Middle John 2 4 02008 M Check pipe sizes. 3800000 0.00 3.40 Upper Middle John 2 4 02008M 3800000 3.40 ##### Upper Middle John 2 4 02008M 3800000 0.00 1.29 Upper Middle John 2 4 02008M 3800000 1.29 2.50 Upper Middle John 2 4 02008M 3800000 0.00 1.55 Upper Middle John 2 4 02008M 3800000 0.00 4.80 Upper Middle John 2 4 02008M Parallels Wolf Creek, crosses twice, crosses 3810000 3.30 4.09 Lower Beaver 2 6623019 2H four intermittent tribs, gravel Either paved or graveled, Paved parallels Deep Creek, then parallels Buck Hollow Creek (one fish barrier and sediment delivery from cut slope), then ridge top, in and out of 4200000 7.35 8.84 Deep Creek 13 5 33217 M watershed.

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 16 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Either paved or graveled, Paved parallels Deep Creek, then parallels Buck Hollow Creek (one fish barrier and sediment delivery from cut slope), then ridge top, in and out of Monitor for water quality/aquatic 4200000 8.84 8.99 Deep Creek 13 5 33217 M watershed. concerns. Check pipes. Either paved or graveled, Paved parallels Deep Creek, then parallels Buck Hollow Creek (one fish barrier and sediment delivery from cut slope), then ridge top, in and out of 4200000 8.99 12.24 Deep Creek 13 5 33217 M watershed. Upgrade pipes where needed. Either paved or graveled, Paved parallels Deep Creek, then parallels Buck Hollow Creek (one fish barrier and sediment delivery from cut slope), then ridge top, in and out of Aggregate sections are proposed to 4200000 12.24 12.30 Deep Creek 13 5 33217 M watershed. be upgraded to single-lane asphalt. Either paved or graveled, Paved parallels Deep Creek, then parallels Buck Hollow Creek (one fish barrier and sediment delivery from cut slope), then ridge top, in and out of 4200000 12.30 12.52 Deep Creek 13 5 33217 M watershed. 4200000 16.22 16.89 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 2 0 3 L Paved, crosses Wolf Creek 4200000 16.89 17.06 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 2 0 3 L Paved, crosses Wolf Creek 4200000 17.06 17.12 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 2 0 3 L Paved, crosses Wolf Creek 4200000 17.12 17.17 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 2 0 3 L Paved, crosses Wolf Creek Paved, south edge of Big Summit Prarrie, 4200000 4.70 4.85 Middle N. Fork Cro 10 4 215 13 M parallels North Fork Crooked River Paved, south edge of Big Summit Prarrie, 4200000 0.00 3.95 Middle N. Fork Cro 10 4 215 13 M parallels North Fork Crooked River 4200000 21.00 21.67 Paulina 12 0 0 0 0 3 L Top of the ridge Paved, crosses Johnson Creek and Polio Creek, Brush Creek, and North Fork Crooked 4200000 1.42 5.16 Upper N. Fork Cro 6 0 6 305 20 2H River, 20% landslide terrain

4200000 47.51 47.82 Upper Ochoco 30 2 3 0 1 9 L Parallels Canyon Creek, Kyle Creek, paved 4200100 6.09 11.66 Upper Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Spur Upgrade pipes where needed. 4200460 3.95 4.00 Middle N. Fork Cro 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Deep Creek Campground?? 4205000 0.00 6.06 Upper N. Fork Cro 5 200018 M Ridge top, wetland, landslide terrain 4205000 6.06 6.09 Upper N. Fork Cro 5 200018 M Ridge top, wetland, landslide terrain Monitor all sections for water 4205000 24.00 42.52 Upper Ochoco 4 000004 M Road to Independent mine, ridge top quality/aquatic concerns. 4205000 42.52 44.90 Upper Ochoco 4 000004 M Road to Independent mine, ridge top West side of Big Summit Prarrie, crosses 4210000 0.00 0.05 Upper N. Fork Cro 13 2 2 1 211 L Cram, Merrit Creek, Howard Creek 4215000 19.52 19.56 Lower Ochoco 23 4 20011 M Follows Veazie Creek, aggregate

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 17 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 4215000 19.56 19.83 Lower Ochoco 23 4 20011 M Follows Veazie Creek, aggregate Crosses Lodgepole, Buck, Horse Heaven, Rock Crusher, West Fork Horse Heaven Creek, native surfaced and gravel, 20% 4215000 0.02 0.12 Mid Crooked River 33 2 4 0012 M landslide terrain Crosses Lodgepole, Buck, Horse Heaven, Rock Crusher, West Fork Horse Heaven Creek, native surfaced and gravel, 20% 4215000 0.12 0.20 Mid Crooked River 33 2 4 0012 M landslide terrain Crosses Lodgepole, Buck, Horse Heaven, Rock Crusher, West Fork Horse Heaven Creek, native surfaced and gravel, 20% 4215000 0.20 0.30 Mid Crooked River 33 2 4 0012 M landslide terrain Crosses Lodgepole, Buck, Horse Heaven, Rock Crusher, West Fork Horse Heaven Creek, native surfaced and gravel, 20% 4215000 0.30 1.10 Mid Crooked River 33 2 4 0012 M landslide terrain 4215000 0.05 0.70 Upper N. Fork Cro 2 46204 18 H Parallels Gray Creek 4215000 0.70 0.90 Upper N. Fork Cro 2 46204 18 H Parallels Gray Creek 4215000 0.00 2.00 Upper Ochoco 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Ridge top Upgrade pipes where needed. Parallels Lookout Creek, crosses Lytle 4220000 5.16 6.12 Upper N. Fork Cro 23 4 20213 M Creek, native surface Upgrade pipes where needed. Parallels Committee Creek, native surfaced, 4225000 5.37 7.00 Lower N. Fork Cro 23 3 0 0 0 8Lroad to Upper Falls Parallels Committee Creek, native surfaced, 4225000 0.00 8.25 Lower N. Fork Cro 23 3 0 0 0 8Lroad to Upper Falls Parallels Committee Creek, native surfaced, 4225000 0.00 2.09 Lower N. Fork Cro 23 3 0 0 0 8Lroad to Upper Falls Parallels north fork of Crooked River, past 4225000 6.12 10.24 Upper N. Fork Cro 12 0 0 0 2 5LWilliams Prarrie, gravel Parallels Rough Canyon Creek, then Fox Canyon Creek, then parallels North Fox 4230000 2.09 6.27 Lower N. Fork Cro 1 56214 19 H Canyon Creek, close to five reservoirs Parallels Rough Canyon Creek, then Fox Canyon Creek, then parallels North Fox 4230000 6.27 6.90 Lower N. Fork Cro 1 56214 19 H Canyon Creek, close to five reservoirs Parallels Rough Canyon Creek, then Fox Canyon Creek, then parallels North Fox 4230000 6.90 6.91 Lower N. Fork Cro 1 56214 19 H Canyon Creek, close to five reservoirs Upgrade pipes where needed. Parallels Rough Canyon Creek, then Fox Canyon Creek, then parallels North Fox Close through route, native surface 4230000 6.91 7.40 Lower N. Fork Cro 1 56214 19 H Canyon Creek, close to five reservoirs section.

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 18 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Parallels Rough Canyon Creek, then Fox Canyon Creek, then parallels North Fox 4230000 7.40 11.84 Lower N. Fork Cro 1 56214 19 H Canyon Creek, close to five reservoirs 4230000 4.00 7.00 Middle N. Fork Cro 1 4520315 M Parallels Hickey Creek for 2 mi 4230000 0.00 6.16 Upper N. Fork Cro 5 200018 M Top of watershed 4230000 0.00 15.45 Upper N. Fork Cro 5 200018 M Top of watershed 4230000 15.45 16.14 Upper N. Fork Cro 5 200018 M Top of watershed Long section of road, midslope, crosses numerous stream channels, gravel, 100% 4235000 0.20 1.00 Mid Crooked River 8 3330118 H landslide debris and terrain Long section of road, midslope, crosses numerous stream channels, gravel, 100% 4235000 1.00 1.80 Mid Crooked River 8 3330118 H landslide debris and terrain Crosses Donnelly Creek and Lame Dog Monitor for water quality/aquatic. 4240000 11.84 17.95 Lower N. Fork Cro 13 2 2 0 0 8LCreek Check corrugated metal pipes. Crosses Donnelly Creek and Lame Dog 4240000 17.95 18.11 Lower N. Fork Cro 13 2 2 0 0 8LCreek Crosses Donnelly Creek and Lame Dog 4240000 18.11 18.30 Lower N. Fork Cro 13 2 2 0 0 8LCreek Crosses Donnelly Creek and Lame Dog 4240000 18.30 18.71 Lower N. Fork Cro 13 2 2 0 0 8LCreek 4240000 7.00 10.20 Middle N. Fork Cro 12 0 0 0 0 3 L Crosses one intermittent trib 4240000 0.00 0.23 Paulina 11 0 0 0 0 2 L barely pokes in Parallels Deep Creek after road 42 leaves, crosses Jackson, Toggle, Happy Camp, Deep Creek, graveled, road impairs meander pattern along Deep Creek, some undersized 4250000 0.10 0.21 Deep Creek 2 4 7 453 25 H culverts Parallels Deep Creek after road 42 leaves, crosses Jackson, Toggle, Happy Camp, Deep Creek, graveled, road impairs meander pattern along Deep Creek, some undersized 4250000 0.00 0.87 Deep Creek 2 4 7 453 25 H culverts Parallels Deep Creek after road 42 leaves, crosses Jackson, Toggle, Happy Camp, Deep Creek, graveled, road impairs meander pattern along Deep Creek, some undersized Check size of corrugated metal pipes. 4250000 0.87 2.40 Deep Creek 2 4 7 453 25 H culverts Increase maintenance level. Parallels Little Summit Creek, crosses four 4254000 0.00 4.55 Deep Creek 23 4 324 18 M intermittent tributaries

Parallels Happy Camp Creek, native 4256000 4.55 4.60 Deep Creek 2 5520216 M surfaced, crosses three intermittent streams

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 19 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Parallels for the first 1.5 mile Toggle Creek, 4258000 4.60 6.50 Deep Creek 2 4430114 M native surfaced Parallels for the first 1.5 mile Toggle Creek, 4258000 0.00 1.47 Deep Creek 2 4430114 M native surfaced 4260000 2.40 2.70 Deep Creek 13 0 0 0 0 4 L No stream crossings 4260000 2.70 2.73 Deep Creek 13 0 0 0 0 4 L No stream crossings Midslope Road, crosses North Wolf Creek, Miles Creek, seven intermittent tributaries, 4260000 4.09 10.20 Lower Beaver 23 2 4 1012 M gravel 4260000 5.14 5.37 Lower N. Fork Cro 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Gravel, crosses one intermittent tributary

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 0.00 1.62 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 1.62 6.20 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 6.20 7.00 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 7.00 9.50 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 9.50 13.70 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 13.70 14.26 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 14.26 15.84 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

Crosses Paulina Creek, Burnt Corral Creek, Indian Creek, Roba Creek, Hewed Log 4260000 15.84 21.00 Paulina 2 4 232013 M Creek, Dipping Vat Creek, Dry Paulina Creek

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 20 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

Crosses little Summit Creek, Thornton Creek, crosses seven intermittent tributaries, close to 4270000 1.47 2.74 Deep Creek 13 3 4 3 4 18 M little Summit Prarie, MidSlope, Aggregate Parallels and crosses west Fork Thornton Creek, gravel road, crosses one intermittent 4272000 2.74 8.20 Deep Creek 2 4422115 M stream Parallels Thornton Creek, Aggregate 4274000 0.00 0.59 Deep Creek 2 4422014 M surfaced, Crosses Thornton Creek once Crosses Little Summit Creek, at head of Little 4276000 0.59 1.60 Deep Creek 13 2 2 2 212 L Summit Prarie 4276000 17.17 17.36 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of ridge Native surface, parallels intermittent to North Replace the pipe/upgrade silly metal 4280000 17.36 17.44 Lower Beaver 23 3 2 0 010 L Wolf Creek 3/4 mile thing in the road. 4280000 0.23 0.40 Paulina 2 4 311011 M Parallels Dipping Vat Creek Parallels intermittent tributary to Wolf Creek, aggregate, three to four perennial streams 4290000 10.20 10.59 Lower Beaver 2 5530217 M not on stream layer Parallels Dewies Canyon, crosses Red Shed 5100000 6.34 7.90 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 0 0 4LCanyon, native surfaced Parallels Dewies Canyon, crosses Red Shed 5100000 0.00 2.55 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 0 0 4LCanyon, native surfaced Parallels Dewies Canyon, crosses Red Shed 5100000 0.00 1.95 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 0 0 4LCanyon, native surfaced 5130000 0.00 0.01 Mud Springs Cree 21 0 0 0 0 3L 5160000 0.01 0.08 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 4 0 8 M Crosses Mud Springs Creek 5160000 18.93 22.91 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1L 5200000 0.08 0.30 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 0 3 7 L Parallels Mud Springs Creek 5200000 22.91 25.82 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 5250000 0.30 0.39 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 0 0 4L 5250000 25.82 29.34 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5300000 8.36 8.38 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 5300000 8.38 8.45 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 5300153 8.45 8.48 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Spur 5300153 8.48 8.56 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Spur 5310000 29.34 34.94 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5310000 34.94 40.73 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5320000 40.73 42.00 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5330000 8.56 8.74 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5340000 8.74 8.98 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5350000 8.98 9.01 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5350000 9.01 9.39 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5400000 9.39 9.56 Willow Creek 02 2 0 0 0 4 L Crosses Willow Creek 5480000 11.50 11.82 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 21 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 5480000 11.82 13.07 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 5500000 0.00 1.16 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Hwy 26 to Hwy 97 5500000 1.16 4.60 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Hwy 26 to Hwy 98 5500000 9.56 9.60 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 5500000 0.00 0.00 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 5540000 0.00 0.76 Steelhead 30 0 0 0 0 3 L No tribs 5600000 17.88 28.67 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0L 5600000 28.67 29.70 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0L 5700000 0.00 3.88 Crooked River Gra 21 0 0 0 0 3 L Crosses three intermittent tributaries 5700000 0.00 0.20 Lower Crooked Riv 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No tribs 5700000 0.20 2.00 Lower Crooked Riv 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No tribs 5700000 0.00 1.30 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5700000 0.00 0.18 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5710000 0.00 1.20 Lower Crooked Riv 22 0 0 0 0 4 L Skull Hollow Road 5720000 13.07 14.08 Crooked River Gra 20 0 0 0 0 2L 5720000 0.66 0.70 Lower Crooked Riv 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Road to Sherwood Saddle 5720000 0.70 0.99 Lower Crooked Riv 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Road to Sherwood Saddle Crosses five intermittent tributaries and goes 5730000 3.88 5.00 Crooked River Gra 11 0 0 0 2 4Lto wetland Flat road near Kings Gap, some sloughing 5740000 0.00 0.97 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1Linto ditches Flat road near Kings Gap, some sloughing 5740000 0.97 1.50 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1Linto ditches Flat road near Kings Gap, some sloughing 5740000 0.00 0.90 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1Linto ditches 5740000 0.00 0.75 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L South of Haystack Reservoir 5740000 0.00 0.60 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L South of Haystack Reservoir 5750000 0.00 1.80 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L South of Haystack Reservoir 5750000 0.18 6.50 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5760000 0.00 2.85 Willow Creek 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Isolated Dirt Road 5770000 0.90 6.50 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Crosses two intermitent tribs 5800000 19.72 23.39 Lower Beaver 20 0 1 1 0 4 L Paved, road to Rager RD 5800000 6.70 10.24 Lower South Fork 12 0 0 0 0 3 L Crosses south fork of Wind Creek Road to Rager and beyond, paved, crosses Rager Creek, Powell Creek, Tamarack Creek, Sugar Creek, North Fork Beaver 5800000 2.00 3.49 Middle Beaver 22 5 134 17 M Creek, Bear Creek Road to Rager and beyond, paved, crosses Rager Creek, Powell Creek, Tamarack Creek, Sugar Creek, North Fork Beaver 5800000 3.49 3.50 Middle Beaver 22 5 134 17 M Creek, Bear Creek

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 22 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Road to Rager and beyond, paved, crosses Rager Creek, Powell Creek, Tamarack Creek, Sugar Creek, North Fork Beaver 5800000 3.50 8.12 Middle Beaver 22 5 134 17 M Creek, Bear Creek Check on the funny pipes Road to Rager and beyond, paved, crosses Rager Creek, Powell Creek, Tamarack Creek, Sugar Creek, North Fork Beaver 5800000 8.12 10.91 Middle Beaver 22 5 134 17 M Creek, Bear Creek Road to Rager and beyond, paved, crosses Rager Creek, Powell Creek, Tamarack Creek, Sugar Creek, North Fork Beaver 5800000 10.91 10.93 Middle Beaver 22 5 134 17 M Creek, Bear Creek Gravel, parallel Murray Creek, Sunflower 5800000 11.80 11.90 Middle South Fork 13 5 214 16 M Creek Gravel, parallel Murray Creek, Sunflower 5800000 11.90 15.50 Middle South Fork 13 5 214 16 M Creek 5800050 4.00 4.30 Middle Beaver 20 2 0 0 0 4 L Road into Sugar Creek Campground Check on the funny pipes 5800050 4.30 4.30 Middle Beaver 20 2 0 0 0 4 L Road into Sugar Creek Campground 5800141 4.30 9.80 Middle Beaver 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Compound roads 5800142 10.93 11.00 Middle Beaver 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Compound roads 5800142 11.00 12.70 Middle Beaver 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Compound roads 5800143 0.00 2.50 Middle Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Compound roads 5800143 2.50 5.20 Middle Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Compound roads 5800145 12.70 13.12 Middle Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Compound roads 5800145 13.12 13.37 Middle Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Compound roads 5800500 62.83 65.52 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 1 2 L Road to Frazier Campground 5800500 65.52 69.29 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 1 2 L Road to Frazier Campground 5800500 69.29 69.76 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Road to reservoir 5800500 10.20 11.66 Middle South Fork 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Road to Frazier Campground 5810000 23.39 23.44 Lower Beaver 12 0 0 0 0 3 L Crosses one intermittent trib 5810000 10.24 10.30 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Black Canyon Wilderness 5810000 10.30 10.71 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Black Canyon Wilderness 5810000 10.71 11.92 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Black Canyon Wilderness 5810000 11.92 14.50 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Top of Black Canyon Wilderness Parallels Sugar Creek, crosses twice, gravel 5810000 13.37 13.43 Middle Beaver 1 4 223214 M road Parallels Sugar Creek, crosses twice, gravel 5810000 13.43 13.56 Middle Beaver 1 4 223214 M road Parallels Sugar Creek, crosses twice, gravel 5810000 13.57 14.24 Middle Beaver 1 4 223214 M road 5810000 2.60 5.70 Rock Creek 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Ridge top 5810000 5.70 9.00 Rock Creek 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Ridge top 5810000 0.00 7.00 Rock Creek 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Ridge top 5810000 0.00 0.49 Rock Creek 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Ridge top

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 23 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Crosses Powell Creek and three intermittent 5820000 5.20 6.06 Middle Beaver 13 2 2 2 010 L tribs Crosses Powell Creek and three intermittent 5820000 0.00 3.00 Middle Beaver 13 2 2 2 010 L tribs Crosses Tamarack, Rager, Heisler, Beaver 5830000 14.24 16.74 Middle Beaver 13 2 4 1011 M Dam Creek, midslope 5840000 0.00 0.50 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Ridge Top, South side of Black Canyon 5840000 0.50 0.53 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Ridge Top, South side of Black Canyon Increase maintenance level. Probably no increase on native 5840000 0.00 0.17 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Ridge Top, South side of Black Canyon surface sections. 5840000 0.00 4.00 Lower South Fork 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Ridge Top, South side of Black Canyon 5840000 3.00 3.42 Middle Beaver 22 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge Top 5840000 3.42 7.50 Middle Beaver 22 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge Top 5840000 7.50 7.80 Middle Beaver 22 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge Top 5840000 0.00 2.00 Middle Beaver 22 0 0 0 0 4 L Ridge Top 5840000 8.60 9.12 Rock Creek 20 0 2 0 0 4 L Ridge top 5840000 9.12 11.18 Rock Creek 20 0 2 0 0 4 L Ridge top Crosses N. Fork Wind Creek, Squaw Creek, 5850000 14.50 14.57 Lower South Fork 1 543 6 1 20 H numerous intermittent tribs Crosses N. Fork Wind Creek, Squaw Creek, 5850000 14.57 15.13 Lower South Fork 1 543 6 1 20 H numerous intermittent tribs Crosses N. Fork Wind Creek, Squaw Creek, 5850000 15.13 16.09 Lower South Fork 1 543 6 1 20 H numerous intermittent tribs Check pipes. 5850000 16.74 18.83 Middle Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Check pipes. Parallels Sunflower Creek and associated 5870000 11.66 11.80 Middle South Fork 13 4 21314 M tribs Check pipes. 5870000 3.80 4.60 Upper Beaver 22 0 2 0 0 6 L Ridgetop 5870000 0.00 1.38 Upper Beaver 22 0 2 0 0 6 L Ridgetop 5920000 0.39 0.75 Mud Springs Cree 22 0 0 0 2 6 L Crosses Mud Springs Creek, gravel 5920000 0.00 2.98 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 5920000 2.98 3.10 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 6000000 0.00 2.20 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, four intermittent tribs 6010000 14.08 16.49 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved 6010000 9.81 10.68 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Road to Haystack Reservoir 6080000 16.49 17.33 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6080000 10.68 14.35 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Crosses intermittent tributary 6100000 0.00 0.45 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6100000 0.45 3.10 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6110000 0.00 2.60 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6110000 2.60 3.21 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6120000 17.33 17.40 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6120000 0.00 4.20 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, one intermittent trib 6200000 3.21 4.52 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 24 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 6200000 4.52 5.00 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 0.00 1.55 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 1.55 1.75 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 1.75 3.40 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 0.00 0.90 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 0.00 7.61 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 7.61 8.00 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1L 6200000 0.58 1.18 Lake Billy Chinook 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Goes North towards island 6200000 1.18 4.30 Lake Billy Chinook 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Goes North towards island 6200000 4.30 4.40 Lake Billy Chinook 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Goes North towards island 6200000 4.40 7.29 Lake Billy Chinook 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Goes North towards island 6200000 7.29 11.14 Lake Billy Chinook 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Goes North towards island 6200000 0.76 2.77 Steelhead 20 0 0 0 0 2 L No tribs 6200000 0.00 0.11 Steelhead 20 0 0 0 0 2 L No tribs 6200000 0.11 0.76 Steelhead 20 0 0 0 0 2 L No tribs

Crosses Lake Billy Chinook, landslide terrain - fairly active, keep losing the road, T&E 6300000 0.00 0.66 Crooked River Gra 7 0007 0 14 2H species, in Cove Palisades State Park Crosses three intermittent tributaries, 6300000 11.10 21.00 Lake Billy Chinook 4 000015Mlandslide terrain Crosses three intermittent tributaries, 6300000 21.00 26.87 Lake Billy Chinook 4 000015Mlandslide terrain 6300000 4.56 4.57 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Crosses two intermittent tributaries 6300000 4.57 4.59 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Crosses two intermittent tributaries 6300000 5.93 13.77 Whychus 30 0 0 0 0 3L 6310000 0.00 4.00 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L No tribs 6310000 4.77 4.81 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No stream crossings 6310000 4.81 4.89 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No stream crossings 6320000 26.87 29.13 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Crosses one intermittent trib 6320000 4.59 4.63 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No stream crossings 6330000 4.00 4.20 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L No tribs 6340000 29.13 36.70 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L No tribs 6350000 4.20 5.42 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Two tribs 6355000 5.42 5.60 Lake Billy Chinook 12 2 3 0 311 L Stevens Canyon area 6355000 0.00 9.35 Lake Billy Chinook 12 2 3 0 311 L Stevens Canyon area 6370000 13.77 18.50 Whychus 30 0 0 0 0 3L Crosses Juniper Creek, close to Juniper 6400000 4.63 4.68 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1LReservoir, paved West of Deschutes River Arm of Lake Billy Chinook, native surfaced, parallels one 6500000 0.00 2.42 Lake Billy Chinook 01 0 0 0 0 1Lintermittent trib Proposed to be closed under Alder 6500000 4.99 5.14 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Crosses two intermittent tributaries Springs EA. Check with Laurel.

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 25 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 6510000 0.00 6.00 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L One intermittent trib Crosses two intermittent tributaries, goes into 6510000 4.68 4.77 Lower Metolius 12 0 0 0 0 3LBig Canyon 6520000 9.35 10.30 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L No tribs 6520000 4.89 4.99 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No tribs 6520000 4.99 4.99 Lower Metolius 10 0 0 0 0 1 L No tribs 6600000 0.00 1.60 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Southwest of Madras 6600000 1.60 2.10 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Southwest of Madras 6600000 0.00 4.00 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road Southwest of Madras, road to round butte, 6610000 2.10 3.00 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1Lloose pyroclastics 6620000 0.00 4.45 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 1 1 L Southwest of Madras West of Madras, crosses one intermittent 6630000 0.00 4.85 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0Ltributary

6630000 0.00 2.20 Willow Creek 01 0 1 0 0 2 L Paved road down to mouth of Willow Creek Three intermittent tribs, west of Madras, 6670000 0.00 6.51 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0Lpaved 6670000 10.30 12.80 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L No tribs 6671000 6.00 6.00 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L No tribs 6700000 0.66 0.66 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Paved 7210000 8.00 18.34 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L High flat plateau, Osborn Canyon 7210000 18.34 21.20 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L High flat plateau, Osborn Canyon 7260000 0.00 7.80 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L High flat plateau, Osborn Canyon 7290000 7.80 8.70 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L High flat plateau, Osborn Canyon 7290000 8.70 8.75 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L High flat plateau, Osborn Canyon 7290000 0.00 2.10 Crooked River Gra 10 0 0 0 0 1 L High flat plateau, Osborn Canyon 7850000 3.10 3.39 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Grizzly mountain road 7960000 0.99 1.10 Lower Crooked Riv 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Follows Lone Pine Creek for a bit Gravel, south of Madras, crosses Dry Canyon 8900000 14.35 23.24 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1L#2, crosses four intermittent tribs Gravel, south of Madras, crosses Dry Canyon 8900000 23.24 25.70 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1L#2, crosses four intermittent tribs 8900000 3.39 3.64 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated paved road Crosses five intermittent tribs, North of 8910000 6.51 7.51 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1LHaystack Reservoir Crosses five intermittent tribs, North of 8910000 7.51 10.25 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1LHaystack Reservoir Crosses five intermittent tribs, North of 8910000 0.00 0.22 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1LHaystack Reservoir 8910000 12.80 13.90 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highway 97 9600000 0.00 0.18 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 1 2 L Goes to Haystack Reservoir and south 9600000 0.00 0.32 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highway 97 9600000 3.64 5.70 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated gravel road

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 26 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Goes to campground on Haystack Reservoir, 9605000 0.22 5.40 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1Lpaved Goes to campground on Haystack Reservoir, 9605000 5.40 8.55 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1Lpaved 9610000 0.00 17.88 Deschutes South 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Southeast of Haystack, no tribs 9610000 0.00 1.72 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Isolated Dirt Road 9620000 1.72 1.99 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Crosses intermittent streams 9700000 0.00 3.85 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved 9700000 3.85 5.70 Crooked River Gra 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved highway 9700000 0.18 1.70 Deschutes South 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved, crosses dry canyon 9700000 0.32 0.58 Lake Billy Chinook 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highway 97 9700000 0.00 0.44 Mud Springs Cree 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Crosses Mud Springs Creek 9700000 0.49 6.00 Steelhead 00 0 0 0 0 0L 9700000 5.70 5.90 Willow Creek 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved Gravel road out of forest, mostly BLM and private, parallels along Bear Creek with multiple culvert confined stream crossings, crosses twelve intermittent streams, "Bear CRO-111 12.30 12.31 Bear Creek 22 0 1 5 2 12 M Creek Road" CRO-112 29.70 32.38 Grindstone 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Paulina country

CRO-112 23.44 25.09 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Road to Izee, could be potential fish barrier CRO-112 1.38 2.65 Upper Beaver 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Road to Izee CRO-113 32.38 35.78 Grindstone 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Paulina country County road to Rager before it changes to 58, crosses two intermittent streams and CRO-113 25.09 26.28 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1LBeaver Creek County road to Rager before it changes to 58, crosses two intermittent streams and CRO-113 26.28 27.38 Lower Beaver 10 0 0 0 0 1LBeaver Creek CRO-127 0.00 4.49 Camp Creek 20 4 22010 M Parallels Camp Creek, paved CRO-127 4.49 7.39 Camp Creek 20 4 22010 M Parallels Camp Creek, paved CRO-127 7.39 9.23 Camp Creek 20 4 22010 M Parallels Camp Creek, paved CRO-127A 5.24 11.40 Bear Creek 11 0 0 0 0 2 L Boat Ramp

CRO-127A15.17 15.19 Camp Creek 20 2 2 2 0 8 L Crosses several streams, connected to 127 CRO-134 4.44 4.60 Bear Creek 10 3 2 0 0 6 L Parallels salt creek, paved CRO-134 35.89 36.00 Mid Crooked River 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Crosses two intermittent streams CRO-135 35.78 42.10 Grindstone 10 0 0 0 0 1 L Paulina country CRO-135 18.83 19.01 Middle Beaver 21 2 0 0 0 5 L Gravel, south of Beaver Creek CRO-135 19.01 20.90 Middle Beaver 21 2 0 0 0 5 L Gravel, south of Beaver Creek CRO-135 20.90 21.80 Middle Beaver 21 2 0 0 0 5 L Gravel, south of Beaver Creek CRO-135 0.00 0.38 Upper Beaver 22 2 0 0 0 6 L Crosses south fork beaver

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 27 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Parallels Indian Creek #2, crosses Indain CRO-217 9.23 9.60 Camp Creek 22 2 2 2 010 L Creek #2, west fork Camp Creek Paved, parallels Little Bear Creek, crosses CRO-226 4.60 5.24 Bear Creek 10 3 2 0 0 6Lnumerous intermittent streams CRO-312 0.38 1.80 Upper Beaver 22 2 0 0 0 6 L Crosses south fork beaver, gravel

CRO-325 11.40 12.28 Bear Creek 22 2 2 2 212 L Aggregate, coming out of Klootchman Creek GRA-42 16.09 17.88 Lower South Fork 2 451 7 0 19 H Follows South Fork John Day, gravel GRA-42 17.88 19.21 Lower South Fork 2 451 7 0 19 H Follows South Fork John Day, gravel GRA-42 19.21 19.22 Lower South Fork 2 451 7 0 19 H Follows South Fork John Day, gravel All segments. Monitor for water quality. Check pipes with understanding that we would work throught Title II or III funding to GRA-42 15.50 19.00 Middle South Fork 2 4541016 M South Fork John Day River Road modify. GRA-42 0.44 0.60 Murderers Creek 2 4541016 M South Fork John Day River Road GRA-42 0.00 1.50 Murderers Creek 2 4541016 M South Fork John Day River Road Follows Pine Creek and Funny Creek, near GRA-67 0.00 11.90 Middle South Fork 20 4 2008MLittle Funny Butte GRA-67 0.00 1.64 Upper Beaver 20 0 0 0 0 2L GRA-68 0.00 1.93 Middle South Fork 20 4 2008 M Izee GRA-68 1.80 5.93 Upper South Fork 20 0 0 0 0 2L GRA-69 11.90 13.56 Middle South Fork 20 4 2008 M Parallels and crosses Warm Springs GRA-69 1.64 1.99 Upper Beaver 20 0 0 0 0 2L GRA-69 0.00 1.80 Upper South Fork 20 0 0 0 0 2L OR-126 42.10 49.53 Irrigation Canals 00 0 0 0 0 0L OR-126 4.11 4.45 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paved OR-126 4.45 4.53 Lower Dry River 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highways OR-126 0.76 1.56 Steelhead 00 0 0 0 0 0L Parallels Bear Creek, crosses Bear Creek OR-27 12.32 14.70 Bear Creek 10 3 2 0 0 6LTwice, paved Follows Crooked River, south of Prineville, OR-27 2.20 4.11 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0Lpaved OR-27 19.23 19.33 Lwr Crooked River 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highways OR-27 36.20 37.47 Mid Crooked River 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Crooked River Highway, paved OR-27 0.00 4.66 Mid Crooked River 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Crooked River Highway, paved OR-27 1.99 3.77 Upper Dry River 00 0 0 0 0 0L OR-380 9.60 10.00 Camp Creek 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Paulina Highway, paved Paulina Highway, levees that constrict OR-380 0.00 0.66 Lower Beaver 10 4 0005Mfloodplain on Beaver Creek OR-380 1.20 2.20 Lower Crooked Riv 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Road to Paulina OR-380 18.71 19.52 Lower N. Fork Cro 10 0 0 0 0 1 L State Highway OR-380 48.34 51.16 Lower Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Paulina Highway OR-380 51.16 62.83 Lower Ochoco 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Paulina Highway

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 28 FINE FLOOD WET SUM ROAD BMP EMP WATERSHED GEO SED PLANE FLOW FISH LAND SUM RATING COMMENTS RECOMMENDED PROJECTS OR-380 19.22 19.23 Lower South Fork 20 0 0 0 0 2 L Paulina Highway OR-380 31.85 32.00 Mid Crooked River 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Paulina Highway OR-380 32.00 34.59 Mid Crooked River 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Paulina Highway OR-380 36.00 36.20 Mid Crooked River 30 0 0 0 0 3 L Paulina Highway OR-380 1.80 4.00 Mid Crooked River 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Paulina Highway US-20 0.00 6.60 Irrigation Canals 00 0 0 0 0 0L US-20 4.53 4.56 Lower Dry River 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highways US-20 0.00 0.20 Pilot Butte 00 0 0 0 0 0 L Highway US-20 1.56 1.92 Steelhead 00 0 0 0 0 0L US-20 1.92 2.12 Three Creeks 00 0 0 0 0 0L US-20 3.77 4.10 Upper Dry River 00 0 0 0 0 0L US-20 0.00 18.93 Whychus 20 0 0 0 0 2L 5.31 6.34 Mountain Creek 0 L

3/17/2003 AQUATICS (Ochoco) 29 Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Codes

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4a.shtml (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:19:57 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Codes

Links Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments on our service and your suggestions for improvement. Forest

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:12 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4a.shtml (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:19:57 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Deschutes & Ochoco Projects & Plans National Forests Home Large Area Planning About Us Documents Contact Us SCHEDULE OF Current Conditions PROPOSED Employment ROAD ANALYSIS ACTIONS FAQ'S PROJECT Fire & Aviation WILDLIFE RISK ASSESSMENT INFORMATION Maps & Brochures PLANS, ANALYSES, Newsroom Evaluation scale ASSESSMENTS Passes & Permits 0 Doesn't Apply No Effect Forest Plans Projects & Plans 1- Low Schedule of Proposed 3 Moderate Major Documents 4- High Actions Monitoring Reports 6 Project Information 7- Roads Analysis Plans, Analyses, 9 Assessments Publications Roads or road segments will be given a specific score. This score will Recreational Activities be based on a set of evaluation criteria. Elements designed to answer Volunteering issue driven questions regarding effects will be broken into physical aspects of the road and watershed level aspects. The evaluation criteria will be used to place roads in categories of low, moderate, and high. Once it is determined a road segment meets the evaluation Newberry National criteria to fit into a category it will then be given a score based on it's Volcanic Monument fit within that category. Each of the evaluation criteria will then be added up with a weighted average being applied to the watershed Conservation Ed. level measures, and a final score will be attributed to each road Contracting segment. If there is no effect or the criteria don't apply to a specific road it will receive a score of zero. Health Forest Products Geology EXAMPLE: If the scoring for a criteria indicates that LOW = > 0% but < 5% of winter range impacted by Heritage the road segment and the road segment impacts 1.5% Partnerships it would receive a score of 1 whereas if it scored 4.9% Plantlife it would score a 3. Water/Fisheries Wildlife Road scoring efforts were designed to provide a relative ranking of

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (1 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

road segments based on their impact to habitats or populations. Links Local Forest Plans and the most recent scientific information was Evaluate Our Service used to establish ranking factors when available. When possible We welcome your comments evaluation criteria limits necessary to fit into the high category were on our service and your based on limits established in local Forest Plans and the most recent suggestions for improvement. scientific information. While there is utility to direct management Forest efforts, criteria established to evaluate road effects are not intended for use as thresholds. Local knowledge combined with road rankings and desired future conditions should be used to determine future direction for the management of the specified road or subsequent Deschutes National Forest roads coming off it. 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702 Roads should be evaluated not only on their over-all relative score but on individual effects based scores as well, ex.) A road that scores (541) 383-5300 10 based on impacts to a Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive Ochoco National Forest (TE&S) species nest or critical reproductive habitat but has an over- 3160 N.E. 3rd Street all relatively low score should still be addressed by management. Prineville, OR 97754 Relative road ranking is only of use when complete data concerning (541) 416-6500 wildlife habitats is available in all areas to be analyzed. Analysis should be done at the 6th field HUC and aggregated up to 5th fields. Crooked River National For large ranging species you may need to use multiple 5th field or Grassland even 4th field HUCs to adequately address concerns. 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 Madras, OR 97741 Terrestrial Wildlife (TW) Questions: Roads Analysis - Informing Decisions About Managing the National Forest Transportation (541) 475-9272 System, USDA, FS-643, 1999.

● TW1 - What are the direct effects of the road system on terrestrial species habitat? This question is answered in Wildlife A1, A2, A3, B1, and B2 ● TW2 - How does the road system facilitate human activities that affect habitat? This question is answered in Wildlife A1, A2, B1, and B2 ● TW3 - How does the road system affect legal and illegal human activities (including trapping, hunting, poaching, harassment, road kill, or illegal kill levels)? What are the effects on wildlife species? This question is answered in Wildlife A1, A2, and B2 ● TW4 - How does the road system directly affect unique communities or special features in the area? This question is answered in Wildlife A1, A2, A3, B1, and B2

Deschutes and Ochoco NF. Issue Associated Questions:

Wildlife A1 - Where does the road system intersect areas important to wildlife movement (dispersal, migration, etc.) thus precluding or altering wildlife movement and increasing the chance of mortality due to collision?

Answers Questions TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4

Measures/Analysis Needed

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (2 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Over-all Rating

High (7-10): Road segment is contributing to changing direction and ease of flow, concentration of flow, and/ or increasing the potential for mortality for animals migrating or dispersing due to road interactions or increased exposure to predation. This road segment may also have high secondary effects by facilitating human use in the area. Medium (4-6): Road segment is impacting migration or dispersal in similar ways as described above; however impacts may be due to more localized and specific to one causal agent. Additional impact to associated factors in surrounding habitats could move this segment into the high category. Consider limiting factors that would increase the score or implementing one or more of the above listed options. Low (1-3): Road segment is having minimal impact on migration or dispersal. If other roads in the watershed are scoring in the high category this road segment may become more critical due to focused migration in this area. Maintain current management strategy considering this road in the context of the surrounding watershed parameters. Possible Mitigations: increase surrounding dispersal vegetation, reduce primary and subsequent road factors (seasonal or permanent closures), remove physical barriers or provide unobstructed crossing point, close surrounding area to off road vehicle travel, and/or reduce traffic speeds.

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road

(A1-a) What is the objective maintenance level and average traffic volume of the road and does the road run perpendicular or parallel to the corridors? (Local knowledge was used to modify the roads layer to show the traffic volumes and objective maintenance level). Higher maintenance levels are indicative of higher traffic volumes, increased speeds, and larger areas required to cross. Higher traffic volumes and wider roads limit the ability of wildlife to cross the road and increase the potential they will be killed or injured in the process. (A1-b) What is the percentage of the road influence area that is within the wildlife movement corridor? This is a relative measure of the percentage of the road buffer that contains wildlife movement corridor habitat. The greater the amount of habitat that is effected the greater the influence of the road and the higher the potential for exposure to poaching, road kill, or habitat loss.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (3 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(A1-c) How does this road contribute to the areas open road density? (total road density could be used for specific purposes) A road segment may be located in a watershed with high road density, but that particular road may or may not have a significant contribution to the road density. This also gives managers a measure to determine potential benefits of closing particular roads. (A1-d) Are there physical barriers associated with the roads? Physical barriers limit the ability of some animals such as amphibians to cross roads. Barriers also increase the time or difficulty of crossing a road which can preclude animals from utilizing adjacent habitats or possibly resulting in them being killed. (A1-e) How wide is the road? (cut slope to cut slope) The width of a road also increases the degree of difficulty to cross the road. Slow moving animals are exposed to traffic flow for greater distances and depending on the species could be precluded from crossing. Prey species that typically utilize cover to move from area to area are exposed to predation when crossing openings such as roads. Wider roads tend to have higher traffic speeds which reduces the amount of time individuals have to escape without being hit. (A1-f) Is there sufficient hiding cover adjacent to the road? To measure this it was assumed that areas with > 70% canopy cover typically would provide multiple canopy layers sufficient to provide hiding cover and would provide vertical screening. Hiding cover adjacent to the road allows individuals the opportunity to approach the road in security before having to cross. When adjacent habitats provide hiding cover it also reduces the risk of individuals being susceptible to poaching. (A1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? This factor measures the amount of roads that the road being analyzed facilitates access to. The subsequent roads then add to the amount of disturbance associated with the movement corridor. This data can also assist with determining the number of road miles that could be closed if this road were closed. (A1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) use is facilitated in areas due to primary road access. OHV activities reduce habitat security and in the case of smaller less mobile species can kill individuals. The greater the amount of area adjacent to a road with a designation allowing OHV use the greater the potential for impacts to surrounding habitats.

Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (4 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(A1-i) What is the surrounding road density? This allows the road segment to be analyzed in the context of the surrounding watershed. A road located in an area with high road densities increases the magnitude of factors influencing the effectiveness of the area as migration habitat. An isolated road segment with negative factors affecting migration habitat effectiveness may not be critical in the watershed if all of the surrounding habitat is suitable, or it may be a critical peace in an already heavily influence watershed. If movement corridors are wide enough and adequate habitat exists the effects of individual barriers is reduced. This is somewhat dependant on the species and specific location of the road segment. (A1-j) What is the amount of human activity centers (dwellings, campgrounds, etc.) in the area? Human activity centers have increased vehicle traffic and a much greater potential for human wildlife interactions. These areas also have other influences like dogs and habitat removal. Human activity centers combined with other factors reducing migration habitat effectiveness can cause pinch points which increase the potential conflict with a road segment and in some cases multiple factors can reduce or eliminate the potential for wildlife to utilize the corridor.

Wildlife A2 - Where does the road system allow public access to areas used by wildlife during critical periods (reproduction, rearing, wintering, etc.) or are rare or unique (caves, wetlands, etc)?

Answers Question TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4

Measures/Analysis Needed

Over-all Rating

High (7-10): Road segment is affecting one or more critical habitats within the watershed to a point where species use may be limited due to road influence at a level that may impact local populations. Medium (4-6): Road segment has potential to be limiting use of critical habitat areas. Decreased availability of habitats will increase potential effects of other habitat factors. Low (1-3): Road segment is currently having little impact to critical habitats. Maintain current management strategy considering this road in the context of the surrounding watershed parameters. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (5 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Possible Mitigations: improve vegetative conditions within the watershed or critical habitat areas, reduce primary and subsequent road factors (seasonal or permanent closures), and/or close unique habitat areas to off road vehicle use.

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road

(A2-a) How many acres of riparian habitats (RHCA buffers) does the road affect? Roads reduce habitat security, remove habitat, and introduce habitat factors like noxious weeds, non- native species, dust, etc. These effects vary by species and type. For this analysis a mid point figure was used for road impacts (440 yards). When this area is intersected with the unique habitats in the watershed it allows for a measure of the amount of road buffer impacting these habitats. Roads with higher percentages of buffered area containing riparian habitats have greater potential to negatively impact these habitats and populations dependant on them. (A2-b) What percent of the unique habitat is affected? (See unique habitat definition) Unique habitats are some of the most rare and sensitive habitats. By intersecting the road influence area with the unique habitat areas you can determine the percent of the unique habitats that are being influenced. Unique habitats are often associated with reproductive activities for a variety of species. This could lead managers to decide to seasonally or permanently close roads if high levels of impact are identified. (A2-c) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently come off of this road that effect unique habitats? See A1-g (A2-d) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? See A1-c (A2-e) Does the road completely intersect the area or only a portion of the road segment enters the habitat feature in a manner that does not intersect the area? Roads that completely intersect habitats reduce habitat connectivity and reduce habitat effectiveness. This is particularly true for less mobile or species extremely sensitive to human disturbance. (A2-f) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? See A1-h (A2-g) Does this road access a roadless area? Roadless areas provide unique habitats. Roads that allow access to human activities to these areas can reduce the quality of these habitats.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (6 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects

(A2-h) What is the surrounding road density? See A1-I

Wildlife A3 - Where is road induced fragmentation and habitat loss causing negative edge effects?

Answers Questions TW1 and TW4

Measures/Analysis Needed

Over-all Rating

High (7-10): Road segment is contributing to fragmentation directly by impacting large amounts of core habitat and/or subsequently facilitating traffic to secondary roads and human associated activities within core habitats or roadless areas. Roads in this category exist in already highly fragmented habitats or provide primary access into an otherwise unfragmented area. Medium (4-6): Road segment is contributing to the total fragmentation in the watershed. It may not be the dominant cause based on a Medium rating; however the watershed could still have excessive fragmentation. Road related fragmentation my be due to it's location or the number of subsequent roads that come off of it. Low (1-3): Road segment is contributing to the fragmentation of some habitats but not significantly. Maintain current management strategy considering this road in the context of the surrounding watershed parameters. Possible Mitigations: close the road, reduce the number of subsequent roads coming off this road, and/ or limit future vegetation management practices that would fragment habitats.

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road

(A3-a) What percent of existing interior habitat does the road effect? Fragmentation related with roads reduces the amount and quality of habitat for interior dependant species. By measuring the amount of the road buffer that is influencing interior habitat you can determine the relative influence on interior habitat a specific road has. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (7 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(A3-b) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? See A1-g

Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects

(A3-c) Are there other fragmentation factors in the area (ex. Power line corridors, train tracks, or pipelines)? Fragmentation within a watershed is cumulative. Roads that contribute to the fragmentation within a watershed that has numerous other fragmentation factors is worse than one in a relatively unfragmented watershed. Clear-cut edges have the potential to grow back and eventually reduce the amount of fragmentation. Fragmentation factors like train tracks and power line corridors are long term influences and not easily removed. (A3-d) What is the existing fragmentation level within the watershed? Roads that contribute to the fragmentation within a watershed that has numerous other fragmentation factors is worse than one in a relatively unfragmented watershed. (A3-e) Does the watershed have desired levels of necessary vegetation / habitat? This is a measure to determine if vegetation levels are within historic or desired levels. This would require some type of watershed wide analysis of existing and historic or desired levels. Roads that contribute to fragmentation of habitats when the watershed is below the historic or desired levels of interior habitat are worse than those that influence habitats in a watershed that has interior habitat levels above historic or desired levels. (A3-f) What percentage of the watershed is currently occupied by road-beds (cut slope to cut slope)? Road beds remove ground from tree production and reduces the total acres in the watershed with the capability to produce interior habitats. Forest Service regulations require that no more than 20% of watershed soils will be in a disturbed condition at any one time.

Wildlife B1 - Do the impacts of the road system contribute to a decline in the ecological conditions necessary to maintain species viability?

Answers Questions TW1, TW2, and TW4

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (8 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Measures/Analysis Needed

Over-all Rating

High (7-10): Road segment is reducing the ecological condition of surrounding wildlife habitats to a point where it may be reducing use of these habitats or effecting sensitive habitats that are in limited quantities. Medium (4-6): Road segment is reducing the ecological condition of surrounding wildlife habitats enough to reduce use seasonally or to the extent the habitat has the potential to be used. Low (1-3): Road segment is having a minimal impact on the ability of wildlife to utilize the surrounding habitat. The quality of the surrounding habitat and lack of additional roads may be the mitigating factor keeping this road in the low category. Continue current management practices considering this road in the context of other watershed factors. Possible Mitigations: close the road (permanently or seasonally), reduce the number of subsequent roads coming off this road, close surrounding areas to off road vehicle use, and/ or implement silvicultural practices that will return habitat quantities to desired levels within watershed.

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road

(B1-a) What level of affects is the road segment having on identified or active TE&S species reproductive areas? (See reproductive areas list in Appendix B). Reproductive habitats are critical to the perpetuation of the species and local populations. Roads can reduce habitat security, remove habitat, and introduce habitat factors like noxious weeds, non-native species, dust, etc. that reduces the effectiveness of these habitats. These effects vary by species and type. For this analysis a mid point figure was used for road impacts (440 yards). When this area is intersected with the reproductive habitats in the watershed it allows for a measure of the amount of road buffer that is impacting identified reproductive core habitats. Roads with higher percentages of buffered area containing reproductive habitats have greater potential to negatively impact local reproductive activities. (B1-b) Does the road influence habitats within the minimum buffer for nest stands or reproductive areas? Most wildlife species are extremely sensitive to human disturbance during the reproductive season. The level

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (9 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

of disturbance varies based on the type and distance of the disturbance. Traffic associated with roads and the associated human use has the potential to disrupt reproductive activities if they occur within species tolerance levels. Roads that enter identified minimum human activity restriction buffers or known reproductive areas have greater potential for disrupting reproduction than those that don't. (B1-c) What percent of road buffer effects existing TE&S habitat (primary and secondary reproductive) within the watershed is affected? This question is similar to question B1-a; however, it would measure the effects to potential habitats as apposed to active reproductive habitats. Potential habitats would be identified based on existing vegetation or special feature. Roads with extensive impact to potential reproductive habitats could be the limiting factor to these habitats being utilized. (B1-d) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently come off of this road that effect identified or active TE&S habitat (primary and secondary reproductive) within the watershed? The measure and effects would be similar to question B1-a, but would address how this road facilitates access to additional roads that have impacts to identified or active TE&S reproductive habitats. (B1-e) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently coming off this road that effect identified active TE&S species reproductive areas? (See reproductive areas list in Appendix B). The measure and effects would be similar to question B1-a, but would address how this road facilitates access to additional roads that have impacts to potential TE&S reproductive habitats. (B1-f) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? See A1-c (B1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? See A1-g Similar to B1-d and e this measures subsequent roads but is specific to road density. (B1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? See A1-h (B1-i) Are there noxious weed populations along the road that could spread and reduce adjacent habitats? Noxious weed infestations can drastically reduce forage and cover for wildlife species. Noxious weed species are typically less palatable and often contain toxins that are harmful to wildlife. Roads and the associated vehicle traffic allow increased rates of spread into wildlife habitats. Large areas of critical habitat such as winter range can be converted to noxious weed dominated areas in relatively short periods of time. These conversions can reduce wildlife carrying capacities over large areas.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (10 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects

(B1-j) What is the road density in the watershed? See A1-i

Wildlife B2 - Where is the road system contributing to the reduction of habitat for species dependent upon snags and down logs (where snags and down logs are limited)?

Answers Questions TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4

Measures/Analysis Needed

Over-all Rating

High (7-10): Road segment is contributing to potential reduction of snag and down log densities and is located in a watershed where past activities have resulted in currently lower densities. Road segments that are on relatively mild slopes in areas where off road travel is permitted present the greatest risk for snag and down log reductions extended distances from the road. This road may also provide access to numerous subsequent roads that increase the potential for reducing snag numbers. Possible mitigation options include: closing the area to wood cutting, closing the area to of road vehicle use, closing secondary roads in the area, and/or creating snags and/or down logs in deficient areas of the watershed. Medium (4-6): Road segment is located in with surrounding conditions such that it has the potential to facilitate impacts to snag and down log levels sufficient to move levels below desired levels. This road segment may also be located in a watershed that is currently below desired levels. Management should focus on limiting secondary effects of the road (see possible mitigation measures). Low (1-3): Road segment has limited potential to have a large impact on snag and down log levels with the watershed. Possible Mitigations: close the road, reduce the number of subsequent roads coming off this road, and/ or limit future vegetation management practices that would fragment habitats.

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (11 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(B2-a) What distance is the road segment from town? Legal and illegal wood cutting activities that reduce snag and down log levels are typically greater closer to population centers. The more remote and inaccessible the road is the less traffic it typically receives, and thus has lower potential for impacts to snag and down log levels. (B2-b) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? See A1-c (B2-c) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? See A1-g (B2-d) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? See A1-h (B2-e) Is the area this road is in open to woodcutting? Areas open to wood cutting have higher impacts to snag and down log levels.

Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects

(B2-f) How much timber harvest has occurred in the watershed? Timber harvest removes existing and potential snags and down logs. Past timber harvest practices typically left minimal snag and down log levels remaining after treatment. Because snag and down log levels have already been reduced these areas have a greater potential to have snag and down log levels reduced below desired levels by wood cutting activities. The percentage of the watershed that has been harvested indicates the level of risk of reducing the watershed below desired levels. (B2-g) What is the snag density in the watershed and how does that relate to historic or desired levels? A road that allows access to wood cutting within a watershed that is already deficient in snag and down log levels has the potential for greater impacts than a road in a watershed with snag and down log levels greater than historic or desired. (B2-h) What is the road density in the watershed? Roads provide access for wood cutters. Total road density in the watershed can imply the relative potential for wood cutting to impact snag and down log levels.

APPENDIX A - ANALYSIS PROCESS AND GRADING SCHEME

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (12 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Answers Questions TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road (A1-a) What is the objective maintenance level and average traffic volume of the road and does the road run perpendicular or parallel to the corridors? (Local knowledge was used to modify the roads layer to show the traffic volumes and objective maintenance level). Use the roads data for objective maintenance level and designation as arterial or collector to determine probable types of traffic and volumes. Objective maintenance level indicates that a review was completed based on local knowledge of traffic volumes and maintenance levels adjusted accordingly. Measure length of the road within wildlife movement corridor and the relation to corridor width and length and determine primary direction of road impact (ie. Parallel or perpendicular).

High: 9 = Maintenance level 4 with locally known high volume or maintenance level 5 and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 67% - 100% of wildlife movement corridor. 8 = Maintenance level 4 with locally known high volume or maintenance level 5 and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 34% - 66% of wildlife movement corridor. 7 = Maintenance level 4 with locally known high volume or maintenance level 5 and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects .1% - 33% of wildlife movement corridor. Medium: 6 = Maintenance level 3 or maintenance level 4 with locally known low volume and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 67% - 100% of wildlife movement corridor. 5 = Maintenance level 3 or maintenance level 4 with locally known low volume and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 34% - 66% of wildlife movement corridor. 4 = Maintenance level 3 or maintenance level 4 with locally known low volume and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects .1% - 33% of wildlife movement corridor. Low: 3 = Maintenance level 2 or below unless local knowledge warrants medium and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 67% - 100% of wildlife movement corridor. 2 = Maintenance level 2 or below unless local knowledge warrants medium and runs perpendicular, http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (13 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

parallel, or intersects 34% - 66% of wildlife movement corridor. 1 = Maintenance level 2 or below unless local knowledge warrants medium and runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects .1% - 33% of wildlife movement corridor.

(A1-b) What is the percentage of the road influence area that is within the wildlife movement corridor? Buffer the road by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the corridor. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A1-c) How does this road contribute to the areas open road density? (total road density could be used for specific purposes) Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will create a polygon cover that will be intersected with the road segments to determine which segment the road is predominantly within. If the segment intersects two bands they will be given a weighted average. (Categories were established based on Wisdom's model to evaluate elk habitat). High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333 (A1-d) Are there physical barriers associated with the roads? Buffer the road by 100 feet and intersect with the following features to determine if they are adding to the difficulty of crossing the road: cement median dividers, guard rails, fences, slopes greater than 60 degrees, stream class 1, power line corridors, and train tracks. This new coverage should then be buffered by 100 feet and intersected with the road segment buffered by 440 yards. Evaluation is based on the percentage of buffers within the road influence polygon. Some of the features may be contained in TMS, Range Allotment fence layers but others may require local knowledge. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A1-e) How wide is the road? (cut slope to cut slope) Using data in TMS determine the width of the road and any maintained shoulder width. High: 9 =, 8 =, 7 = Medium: 6 =, 5 =, 4 = (use the data from maintenance level data) Low: 3 =, 2 =, 1 = (A1-f) Is there sufficient hiding cover adjacent to the road? To measure this it was assumed that areas with > 70% canopy cover typically would provide multiple canopy layers sufficient to provide hiding cover and would provide vertical screening. Utilizing PMR satellite data develop a layer showing where all habitats with > 70% canopy cover would provide adequate hiding cover adjacent to the road to reduce effects. Buffer the road by 440 yards and intersect with > 70% canopy cover layer to determine the

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (14 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

percent of the road buffer that is occupied by > 70% canopy cover. All figures are based on the % of the buffer containing > 70% cover. High: 9 = .1% - 3.3%, 8 = 3.4% - 6.6%, 7 = 6.7% - 10% Medium: 6 = 10.1% - 15%, 5 = 15.1% - 20%, 4 = 20.1% - 25% Low: 3 = 25.1% - 30%, 2 = 30.1% - 35%, 1 = > 35% (A1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? Calculate the number of road miles of lower order roads coming off of the specified road within the watershed. This measures how the specified segment facilitates other access routes in the watershed. *This is only practical at the watershed scale where road segments can be identified that connect with other segments. High: 9 = > 7.5, 8 = 6.3 - 7.4, 7 = 5.1 - 6.2 Medium: 6 = 4.1 - 5.0, 5 = 3.1 - 4.0, 4 = 2.1 - 3.0 Low: 3 = 1.333 - 2, 2 = .667 - 1.334, 1 = .1 - .667 (A1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? Create a layer that shows where off road use is allowed based on Forest Plan Direction and determine percent of road buffer (440 yards) containing areas open to off road use. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects (A1-i) What is the surrounding road density? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will then be used to calculate percentages of the watershed in each category of road density. Using a weighted average based on the percent of the watershed in a given road density category calculate the weighted average for the watershed. This analysis should be done at the 6th field HUC level and aggregated up to the 5th field depending on the size of the watershed and the length of the roads. High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333 (A1-j) What is the amount of human activity centers (dwellings, campgrounds, etc.) in the area? Buffer human activity centers within the Forest Boundary and ½ mile beyond by 1 mile and intersect with Wildlife Movement Corridors. Buffer cities and subdivisions by 5 miles. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5%

Data Layers to Use and Union Analysis Description:

Generate a Dbase file for each of the above with breaks by watershed. Migration Routes - Generate using Existing identified and buffering ridges and saddles by 440 yd. And

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (15 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

RHCA buffers (not all just class 1 -3). *Metolius Winter Range encompasses a know sheet migration route but will not be used in this analysis. Intersect/union with 440 yd road buffer. Output is percent of the road buffer containing migration routes. Road Maintenance Level - (Exists in road cover) Add to road data. Connectivity Habitats - Data not complete needs to be done on a Watershed analysis basis. If data existed analysis would be done the same as Migration Routes. Physical Barriers - Buffer the road by 100 feet and intersect with the following features converted to a 'barrier' coverage, to determine if they are adding to the difficulty of crossing the road: cement median dividers - don't have, guard rails - don't have, fences - incomplete and low accuracy, slopes greater than 60 degrees - have, stream class 1 - have, power line corridors - have at province level, and train tracks - have at province level. This new coverage should then be buffered by 100 feet and intersected with the road segment buffered by 440 yards. Answer to be in percent of the 440 yd. road buffer containing physical barrier buffer. Road Density Run - Focal sum analysis needs redone on both Forests. As follows: (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2). Used twice: 1. Which break is the road predominately ie the weighted average based on length of the categories the road is in. Output is a road density adjacent to that road. 2. Use Watershed road density based on BLM GTRN cover ( not focal sum). Answer is road density by watershed (6th field) Canopy Closure >= 70% - Use PMR from both Forests, may be different. Intersect with 440 yd road buffer to determine percent of the 440 yd buffer containing >= 70 % crown cover. ( See Bruce Wright for Ochoco process) Road buffer - Buffer road segments by 440 yd. from mid point. To be used with the rest of the analysis. Watershed Boundaries - Use to summarize data. Camp Grounds, Trailheads, Private Dwellings, OHV use - Buffer Forest boundaries ½ mile and intersect with campground cover ( just have data within the Forest). Buffer features with the intersect by 1 mile. Intersect that layer with Migration Routes, Connectivity Habitats, Key Linkage Areas, Cities and sub divisions - buffer 5 mi. (Don't have boundaries for sub-divisions). Answer is the percent of the watershed occupied with these buffers. Area open to off road use - Therefore all areas not restricted to motorized vehicles maybe just General Forest is open. Ochoco the following are closed: slopes greater then 30%, riparian areas, old growth allocations, any area closures. Create poly cover of areas open to OHV use (ie not closed) and intersect with 440 yd road buffer to determine percent of buffer occupied with open areas.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (16 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Where does the road system intersect areas important to wildlife movement (dispersal, Score Weighting migration, etc.) thus increasing mortality due to collision or precluding wildlife movement? (A1-a) What is the maintenance level and average 1 traffic volume of the road and does the road run perpendicular or parallel to the corridors? (A1-b) What is the percentage of the road 1 influence area that is within the corridor? (A1-c) How does this road contribute to the areas 1 road density? (A1-d) Are there physical barriers associated with 1 the roads? (A1-e) How wide is the road? 1 (A1-f) Is there sufficient cover adjacent to the 1 road? (A1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come 1 off this segment within the watershed? A1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road 1 use? (A1-i) What is the surrounding road density? 1.5 (A1-j) What is the amount of human activity 1.5 centers (dwellings, campgrounds, etc.) in the area? TOTAL SCORE WEIGHTED AVERAGE

Wildlife A2 - Where does the road system allow public access to areas used by wildlife during critical periods (reproduction, rearing, wintering, etc.) or are rare or unique (caves, wetlands, etc)?

Answers Question TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road (A2-a) How many acres of riparian habitats (RHCA buffers) does the road affect? Buffer the road by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the riparian layers. Determine the percentage of riparian habitats affected by the road buffer. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5%

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (17 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(A2-b) What percent of the unique habitat is affected? (See unique habitat definition) Unique habitats must be identified throughout the analysis area to provide a relative rating. Buffer the road by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the unique habitats layers. Determine the percentage of unique habitats affected by the road buffer. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A2-c) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently come off of this road that effect unique habitats? *This is only practical at the watershed scale where road segments can be identified that connect with other segments. Buffer the subsequent roads within the watershed by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the unique habitats layers. Determine the percentage of unique habitats affected by the road buffer. Include riparian in this analysis. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A2-d) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will create a polygon cover that will be intersected with the road segments to determine which segment the road is predominantly within. If the segment intersects two bands they will be averaged. High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333 (A2-e) Does the road completely intersect the area or only a portion of the road segment enters the habitat feature in a manner that does not intersect the area? Measure length of the road within unique habitats and the relation to unique habitat width and length and determine primary direction of road impact (ie. Parallel or perpendicular). (how to measure).

High 9 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects > 88.1% of wildlife movement corridor. 8 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 77.1% - 88% of wildlife movement corridor. 7 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 66.1% - 77% of wildlife movement corridor. Medium: 6 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 55.1% - 66% of wildlife movement corridor. 5 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 44.1% - 55% of wildlife movement corridor. 4 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 33.1% - 44% of wildlife movement corridor. Low: 3 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 22.1% - 33% of wildlife movement corridor. 2 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects 11.1% - 22% of wildlife movement corridor. 1 = Runs perpendicular, parallel, or intersects .1% - 11% of wildlife movement corridor. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (18 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(A2-f) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? Create a layer that shows where off road use is allowed based on Forest Plan Direction and determine percent of road buffer (440 yards) containing areas open to off road use. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A2-g) Does this road access a roadless area? Buffer identified roadless areas including wilderness areas by 1 mile and intersect with buffered road (440 yards) to determine the percentage roadless buffer within the road buffer. This will give an indication of how the road allows access to the roadless area. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects (A2-h) What is the surrounding road density? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will then be used to calculate percentages of the watershed in each category of road density. Using a weighted average based on the percent of the watershed in a given road density category calculate the weighted average for the watershed. This analysis should be done at the 6th field HUC level and aggregated up to the 5th field depending on the size of the watershed and the length of the roads. High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333

Data Layers to Use and Union Analysis Description:

Generate a Dbase file for each of the above with breaks by watershed. Riparian areas- RHCA buffers (streams, springs, wet meadows) - Use RHCA buffers intersect w/ 440 yd road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by RHCA buffers BEMA/BECA - Cover not complete so. Buffer Bald Eagle nests by ½ mile and intersect w/ 440 yd road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by nest buffer. Calving, fawning, kidding areas - Cover not complete analysis would have been the same as above. Wilderness Areas/Roadless Areas - Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Wilderness Winter Ranges - Use Forest's covers. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied with Winter Range.

ODF&W winter range exists and could be used at a Watershed scale. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (19 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Connectivity Habitats - Cover not complete Wilderness/Roadless Areas - Buffer all Wilderness/Roadless Areas by one mile. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Wilderness/ Roadless buffer. Caves - Cover not complete. If available buffer caves ¼ mile and intersect that cover with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Cave buffer. Migration Routes - Generate using Existing identified and buffering ridges and saddles by 440 yd. And RHCA buffers (not all just class 1 -3). *Metolius Winter Range encompasses a know sheet migration route but will not be used in this analysis. Intersect/union with 440 yd road buffer. Output is percent of the road buffer containing migration routes Watershed Boundaries - Use to summarize data Leks - Buffer LEK points by 2 miles, intersect that buffer with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by LEK buffer Raptor Nests - Cover not complete. If available buffer nest points ¼ mile and intersect that buffer with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Raptor Nest buffer Area open to off road use - Therefore all areas not restricted to motorized vehicles maybe just General Forest is open. Ochoco the following are closed: slopes greater then 30%, riparian areas, old growth allocations, any area closures. Create poly cover of areas open to OHV use (ie not closed) and intersect with 440 yd road buffer to determine percent of buffer occupied with open areas. Special Habitats - Cover not complete. Could be done at watershed scale. All covers would be buffered by ¼ mile and intersected with the road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Special Habitat buffer. TE&S species habitat - Cover not complete. Could be done at watershed scale. Intersect habitats of species of interest with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Habitat buffer. Road buffer - Buffer road segments by 440 yd. from mid point. To be used with the rest of the analysis. Road Density Run - Focal sum analysis needs redone on both Forests. As follows: (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2). Used twice: 1. Which break is the road predominately ie the weighted average based on length of the categories the road is in. Output is a road density adjacent to that road. 2. Use Watershed road density based on BLM GTRN cover ( not focal sum). Answer is road density by watershed (6th field) F. Plan Wildlife Allocations - Use lists of allocations for both Forests provided by Monte. Intersect those allocations with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Wildlife Allocations

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (20 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Where does the road system allow public access to areas used by wildlife during critical periods (reproduction, rearing, Score Weighting wintering, etc.) or are rare or unique (caves, wetlands, etc)? (A2-a) How many acres of riparian habitats does 1 the road affect? (A2-b) What percent of the unique habitat is 1 affected? (A2-c) How many miles of road subsequently 1 come off of this road that effect unique habitats? (A2-d) How does this road contribute to the areas 1 road density? (A2-e) How many miles of lower order roads come 1 off this segment within the watershed? (A2-f) Does the road completely intersect the area 1 or only slightly enter? (A2-g) Is the area this road is in open to off road 1 use? (A2-h) Does it access a roadless area? 1 (A2-i) What is the surrounding road density? 1.5 TOTAL SCORE WEIGHTED AVERAGE

Wildlife A3 - Where is road induced fragmentation and habitat loss causing negative edge effects?

Answers Questions TW1 and TW4

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road (A3-a) What percent of existing interior habitat does the road effect? Buffer the road by 300 feet (based on average of two tree lengths from road) and intersect with the vegetation layer where there is > 40% canopy closure. Determine the percentage of road buffer that contains > 40% canopy closure. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A3-b) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? Calculate the number of road miles of lower order roads coming off of the specified road within the watershed. This measures how the specified segment facilitates other access routes in the watershed.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (21 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

High: 9 = > 7.5, 8 = 6.3 - 7.4, 7 = 5.1 - 6.2 Medium: 6 = 4.1 - 5.0, 5 = 3.1 - 4.0, 4 = 2.1 - 3.0 Low: 3 = 1.333 - 2, 2 = .667 - 1.334, 1 = .1 - .667 Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects (A3-c) Are there other fragmentation factors in the area (ex. Power line corridors, train tracks, or pipelines)? Buffer the power line or train tracks by 300 feet and intersect with the vegetation layer where there is > 40% canopy closure. Determine the percentage of power line or train track buffer that contains > 40% canopy closure. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (A3-d) What is the existing fragmentation level within the watershed? Run the Fragstats model on the at the watershed level including an analysis of the following: Number of patches, mean patch area, mean interior area, mean are of edge influence, mean patch perimeter, total perimeter, mean patch shape. This would require being able to determine a desired condition based on the models outputs. High: 9 = , 8 = , 7 = We would have to run the model on a few watershed Medium: 6 = , 5 = , 4 = and determine a grading scale that would work. Low: 3 = , 2 = , 1 = (A3-e) Does the watershed have desired levels of necessary vegetation / habitat? *This is only practical if the data exists. This would require some form of comparison of existing vegetative condition (grass, forb, shrub - E1 or large structure late seral - L5) review for the watershed comparing it to a desired or historical level. Compare existing habitat levels with desired or historic (use mid point for analysis) and add up the percentages to come up with one percentage (ie. E1 is +5% and L5 is -3% score = 2%). High: 9 = > 17.8%, 8 = 15.6% - 17.7%, 7 = 13.4% - 15.5% Medium: 6 = 11.2% - 13.3%, 5 = 8.9% - 11.1%, 4 = 6.7% - 8.8% Low: 3 = 4.5% - 6.6%, 2 = 2.3% - 4.4%, 1 = < 2.2% (A3-f) What percentage of the watershed is currently occupied by road-beds (cut slope to cut slope)? Calculate the area occupied by all non-obliterated road beds and use the area of the watershed to calculate the percent of the watershed occupied by road beds. High: 9 = > 20%, 8 = 13.1% - 20%, 7 = 6.1% - 13% Medium: 6 = 5.1% - 6%, 5 = 4.1% - 5%, 4 = 3.1% - 4% Low: 3 = 2.1% - 3%, 2 = 1.1% - 2%, 1 = .1% - 1%

Data Layers to Use and Union Analysis Description:

Generate a Dbase file for each of the above with breaks by watershed. Watershed level quantities of identified habitats - Data not complete needs to be done on a Watershed analysis basis. Polygon maps would be generated by the biologists or computer using existing vegetation layers. Analysis could be run on reproductive http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (22 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

habitat or foraging depending on the species. Polygons would be intersected with the 440 yard road buffer coverage. Answer is percent of the 440 yard road buffer containing habitats. Utilities - buffer the existing train tracks, power lines, and pipe lines by 300 feet and intersect with the PMR canopy layer where it shows canopy greater than 40% canopy closure. Answer = determine the percentage of the utility corridor that contains 40% canopy closure. Fragmentation Run - Fragstats - Run the fragmentation model that Curtis Day has for the Ochoco, this will be used in two ways. It will identify the interior habitat which will then be intersected with the 440 yard road buffers to determine the percentage of the road buffer containing interior habitat. The second way will be to determine the fragmentation score for the watershed. This will be based on how the model is set up, and will be relative to other watersheds. Road buffer - Buffer road segments by 440 yd. from mid point. To be used with the rest of the analysis. Vegetation HRV in the watershed - Data not complete needs to be done on a Watershed analysis basis. Identify existing quantities of vegetation and compare to HRV or desired levels. Answer = the percentage the watershed's vegetation deviates from HRV or desired. This would have to be a sum total of deviation of each vegetation type looked at. Road Maintenance Levels - Using and average width for the road bed times the length of the road convert the actual road bed into an acreage figure and compare to the acres in the watershed. Answer= Percent of the watershed that is occupied by road beds.

Where is road induced fragmentation and Score Weighting habitat loss causing negative edge effects? (A3-a) What percent of existing habitat does the 1 road effect? (A3-b) What is the maintenance level and average 1 traffic volume of the road and does the road run perpendicular or parallel to the corridors? (A3-c) How many miles of lower order roads come 1 off this segment within the watershed? (A3-d) Are there other fragmentation factors in 1.1 the area (ex. Power line corridors or train tracks)? (A3-e) What is the existing fragmentation level 1.5 within the watershed? (A3-f) Does the watershed have desired levels of 1.5 necessary vegetation / habitat? (A3-g) What percentage of the watershed is 1.1 currently occupied by road beds? TOTAL SCORE WEIGHTED AVERAGE

Wildlife B1 - Do the impacts of the road system contribute to a

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (23 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

decline in the ecological conditions necessary to maintain species viability?

Answers Questions TW1, TW2, and TW4

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road (B1-a) What level of affects is the road segment having on identified or active TE&S species reproductive areas? (See reproductive areas list in Appendix B). Buffer the road by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the TE&S reproductive habitat layers. Determine the percentage of TE&S reproductive habitat affected by the road buffer. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B1-b) Does the road influence habitats within the minimum buffer for nest stands or reproductive areas? Buffer known reproductive areas by ¼ mile and intersect with road buffer (440 yards). Determine the percentage of the buffer around the reproductive area that is within the road buffer. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B1-c) What percent of road buffer effects existing TE&S habitat (primary and secondary reproductive) within the watershed is affected? *This would have to be done at a watershed scale where data exists. Buffer the road by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the TE&S non-reproductive habitat layers. Determine the percentage of TE&S non-reproductive habitat affected by the road buffer. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B1-d) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently come off of this road that effect identified or active TE&S habitat (primary and secondary reproductive) within the watershed? *This would have to be done at a watershed scale where data exists. Buffer the subsequent roads within the watershed by 440 yards on both sides from the mid point and intersect with the unique habitats layers. Determine the percentage of unique habitats within the road buffer. Include riparian in this analysis. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B1-e) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently coming off this road that effect identified active TE&S species reproductive areas? (See reproductive areas list in Appendix B). *This would have to be done at a watershed scale where data exists. Buffer the subsequent roads within the watershed by 440 yards on

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (24 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

both sides from the mid point and intersect with the unique habitats layers. Determine the percentage of unique habitats within the road buffer. Include riparian in this analysis. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B1-f) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will create a polygon cover that will be intersected with the road segments to determine which segment the road is predominantly within. If the segment intersects two bands they will be averaged. High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333 (B1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? Calculate the number of road miles of lower order roads coming off of the specified road within the watershed. This measures how the specified segment facilitates other access routes in the watershed. High: 9 = > 7.5, 8 = 6.3 - 7.4, 7 = 5.1 - 6.2 Medium: 6 = 4.1 - 5.0, 5 = 3.1 - 4.0, 4 = 2.1 - 3.0 Low: 3 = 1.333 - 2, 2 = .667 - 1.334, 1 = .1 - .667 (B1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? Create a layer that shows where off road use is allowed based on Forest Plan Direction and determine percent of road buffer (440 yards) containing areas open to off road use. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B1-i) Are there noxious weed populations along the road that could spread and reduce adjacent habitats? Utilize the evaluation rating given for noxious weeds in the vegetative analysis. Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects (B1-j) What is the road density in the watershed? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will then be used to calculate percentages of the watershed in each category of road density. Using a weighted average based on the percent of the watershed in a given road density category calculate the weighted average for the watershed. This analysis should be done at the 6th field HUC level and aggregated up to the 5th field depending on the size of the watershed and the length of the roads. High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333

Data Layers to Use and Union Analysis Description:

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (25 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Generate a Dbase file for each of the above with breaks by watershed. TE&S special habitats - Data not complete needs to be done on a Watershed analysis basis. Polygon maps would be generated by the biologists or computer using existing vegetation layers. Analysis could be run on reproductive habitat or foraging depending on the species. Polygons would be intersected with the 440 yard road buffer coverage. Answer is percent of the 440 yard road buffer containing habitats.

TE&S reproductive sites - Used 2 ways: 1.) Use the reproductive sites utilized in the programmatic BA. Buffer bald eagle nests by ½ mile, use the Lynx Analysis Unit (LAU), and buffer spotted from sites by ¼ mile. Buffer the sage grouse leks by 2 miles and other raptor nests by ¼ mile. Other sensitive species could be included if desired using the latest research or planning document to determine an appropriate buffer. 2.) measure the closest the road comes to the center point of the above mentioned polygons. Road buffer - Buffer road segments by 440 yd. from mid point. Will be used with the rest of the analysis. Vegetation for TE&S species HRV in Watershed - Data not complete needs to be done on a Watershed analysis basis. Identify existing quantities of habitat and compare to HRV or desired levels. Answer = the percentage the watershed's habitat deviates from HRV or desired. This would have to be a sum total of deviation of each habitat type looked at. Road Density Run - Focal sum analysis needs redone on both Forests. As follows: (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2). Used twice: 1. Which break is the road predominately ie the weighted average based on length of the categories the road is in. Output is a road density adjacent to that road. 2. Use Watershed road density based on BLM GTRN cover ( not focal sum). Answer is road density by watershed (6th field) F. Plan Wildlife Allocations - Use lists of allocations for both Forests provided by Monte. Intersect those allocations with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Wildlife Allocations Area open to off road use - Therefore all areas not restricted to motorized vehicles maybe just General Forest is open. Ochoco the following are closed: slopes greater then 30%, riparian areas, old growth allocations, any area closures. Create poly cover of areas open to OHV use (ie not closed) and intersect with 440 yd road buffer to determine percent of buffer occupied with open areas.

Do the impacts of the road system contribute to a decline in the ecological conditions Score Weighting necessary to maintain species viability? (B1-a) Road effects on TE&S species reproductive 1 areas? (B1-b) Does the road influence habitats within the 1 minimum buffer for nest stands or reproductive areas?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (26 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(B1-c) What percent of TE&S habitat within the 1 watershed is affected by the road segment? (B1-d) What is the percent of existing TE&S 1 habitat within the watershed effected by all subsequent roads? (B1-e) How does this road contribute to the areas 1 road density? (B1-f) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? (B1-g) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? (B1-h) Are there noxious weed populations along the road that could spread and reduce adjacent habitats? (B1-i) What is the road density in the watershed? 1.5 TOTAL SCORE WEIGHTED AVERAGE

Wildlife B2 - Where is the road system contributing to the reduction of habitat for species dependent upon snags and down logs (where snags and down logs are limited)?

Answers Questions TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4

Evaluation Factors Used to Determine Score

Physical Elements Associated with Road (B2-a) What distance is the road segment from town? Buffer population centers by 1 mile and measure distance from edge of buffer to closest point on road segment being analyzed. High: 9 = < 10 miles, 8 = 10.1 - 15 miles, 7 = 15.1 - 20 miles Medium: 6 = 20.1 - 25 miles, 5 = 25.1 - 30 miles, 4 = 30.1 - 35 miles Low: 3 = 35.1 - 40 miles, 2 = 40.1 - 45 miles, 1 = > 45 miles (B2-b) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will create a polygon cover that will be intersected with the road segments to determine which segment the road is predominantly within. If the segment intersects two bands they will be averaged. High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333 (B2-c) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? *This is only practical at the watershed scale

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (27 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

where road segments can be identified that connect with other segments. Calculate the number of road miles of lower order roads coming off of the specified road within the watershed. This measures how the specified segment facilitates other access routes in the watershed. High: 9 = > 7.5, 8 = 6.3 - 7.4, 7 = 5.1 - 6.2 Medium: 6 = 4.1 - 5.0, 5 = 3.1 - 4.0, 4 = 2.1 - 3.0 Low: 3 = 1.333 - 2, 2 = .667 - 1.334, 1 = .1 - .667 (B2-d) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? Create a layer that shows where off road use is allowed based on Forest Plan Direction and determine percent of road buffer (440 yards) containing areas open to off road use. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% (B2-e) Is the area this road is in open to woodcutting? Create a layer showing where woodcutting is allowed (use the past 5 years of maps) and intersect it with the road buffer (440 yards) to determine the percentage of area open to wood cutting within the road buffer. High: 9 = > 81%, 8 = 61% - 80%, 7 = 41% - 60% Medium: 6 = 34% - 40%, 5 = 27% - 33%, 4 = 20% - 26% Low: 3 = 13% - 19%, 2 = 6% - 12%, 1 = .1% - 5% Watershed Level Elements Adding to Road Effects (B2-f) How much timber harvest has occurred in the watershed? Calculate the percent of the watershed harvested in the last 50 years. Use the activities layers to determine what areas have been harvested. High: 9 = > 50%, 8 = 43.75% - 50%, 7 = 37.6% - 43.75% Medium: 6 = 31.26% - 37.5%, 5 = 25.1% - 31.25%, 4 = 18.76% - 25% Low: 3 = 12.6% - 18.75%, 2 = 6.26% - 12.5%, 1 = < 6.25% (B2-g) What is the snag density in the watershed and how does that relate to historic or desired levels? Using existing snag density numbers obtained through field inventories in the watershed (if they exist) rate the risk of wood cutting dropping levels below desired levels. High: 9 = >40% Below Desired Levels (BDL), 8 = 34.3% - 39.9% BDL, 7 = 28.6% - 34.2% BDL Medium: 6 = 22.9% - 28.5% BDL, 5 = 17.2% - 22.8% BDL, 4 = 11.5% - 17.1% BDL Low: 3 = 5.8% - 11.4% BDL, 2 = 0 - 5.7% BDL, 1 = Within or above desired levels (B2-h) What is the road density in the watershed? Run the roving windows road density analysis using the following categories (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2), this will then be used to calculate percentages of the watershed in each category of road density. Using a weighted average based on the percent of the watershed in a given road density category calculate the weighted average for the watershed. This analysis should be done at the 6th field HUC level and aggregated up to the 5th field depending on the size of the watershed and the length of the roads. http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (28 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

High: 9 = > 6.0, 8 = 4.76 - 6.0, 7 = 3.5 - 4.75 Medium: 6 = 2.665 - 3.5, 5 = 1.833 - 2.665, 4 = .999 - 1.833 Low: 3 = .666 - .999, 2 = 333 - .666, 1 = 0 - .333

Data Layers to Use and Union Analysis Description:

Generate a Dbase file for each of the above with breaks by watershed. Percent of Watershed harvested in the last 50 years - Use the activities data to determine harvest activities. Answer = Percentage of the watershed that has been harvested in the past 50 years. Cities - Use the city layer to measure the closest distance to the road segment. Answer = minimum mileage from the city perimeter to the closest road segment. Answer = distance in miles. Snag Density - Cover not complete. Could be done at watershed scale. Compare the snag density to historic or desired levels. Answer = Percentage the existing snag density varies from the historic or desired. Area open to off road use - Therefore all areas not restricted to motorized vehicles maybe just General Forest is open. Ochoco the following are closed: slopes greater then 30%, riparian areas, old growth allocations, any area closures. Create poly cover of areas open to OHV use (ie not closed) and intersect with 440 yd road buffer to determine percent of buffer occupied with open areas. F. Plan Wildlife Allocations - Use lists of allocations for both Forests provided by Monte. Intersect those allocations with road buffer. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by Wildlife Allocations Road Density Run - Focal sum analysis needs redone on both Forests. As follows: (0 - .333, .333 - .666, .666 - .999, .999 - 1.833, 1.833 - 2.665, 2.665 - 3.5, 3.5 - 4.33, 4.33 - 5.16, 5.167- 6.0, >6.0 m/m2). Used twice: 1. Which break is the road predominately ie the weighted average based on length of the categories the road is in. Output is a road density adjacent to that road. 2. Use Watershed road density based on BLM GTRN cover ( not focal sum). Answer is road density by watershed (6th field) Wood cutting area - Develop a map of the existing, past (5 years), and expected future years woodcutting areas. Intersect with the 440 yard road buffer to determine the percentage of the road buffer containing areas where woodcutting is allowed. Answer = percent of road buffer occupied by area open to woodcutting.

Where is the road system contributing to the reduction of habitat for species dependent Score Weighting upon snags and down logs (where snags and down logs are limited)? (B2-a) What distance is the road segment from 1 town? (B2-b) How does this road contribute to the areas 1 road density?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (29 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(B2-c) How many miles of lower order roads come 1 off this segment within the watershed? (B2-d) Is the area this road is in open to off road 1 use? (B2-e) Is the area this road is in open to 1 woodcutting? (B2-f) How much timber harvest is in the 1.2 watershed? (B2-g) What is the snag density in the watershed? 1.5 (B2-h) What is the road density in the watershed? 1.5 TOTAL SCORE WEIGHTED AVERAGE

APPENDIX B - DEFINITIONS

Wildlife Movement Corridors: migration routes, RHCA layers, saddles and ridges (buffered 440 yards), and identified connectivity habitats (this will not be used in this analysis because the layers are incomplete). TE&S Reproductive Habitats: Goshawk Post Fledging Area (PFA), Bald Eagle Management Area (BEMA), Bald Eagle Conservation Area (BECA), sensitive rapter species nest buffers, lynx denning habitat, Spotted Owl reproductive cores, Townsend's maternity roosts, etc. Historic Range of Variability - a range of vegetative and/or structural conditions that could occur at any given time dependent on the environmental and disturbance parameters. The quantities that make up the range were established based on historic (1880s) vegetative communities and data associated with disturbance size, pattern, and intensity for the Central Oregon. Lek - Generally open areas surrounded by sagebrush that are used for courtship and breeding by sage grouse. Post Fledging Area - within the nesting home range, the area (approximately 420 acres) of concentrated use by the goshawk family after the young leave the nest. The 420 acres are exclusive of the suitable replacement nest areas.

Special Habitats

Natural Artificial Cliffs Trails (game) Stock water tank Abandoned home site Waterfall Elk Wallows Fuel breaks Artificial nest box Beaver Dams Boulder/Rock Ponds Mine Tunnels outcrop Grouse Lek Salting Area Buildings http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (30 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

Insect mound Talus slope Culverts Wet meadow Rodent colony Brush pile Otter Slides Seeps Bridge Talus field Winter trail Material source Brush fields Stream crossing Log jam Cave Rocky crags Dry wash

APPENDIX C - SUMMARY LIST OF QUESTIONS

$ (A1-a) What is the objective maintenance level and average traffic (2) volume of the road and does the road run perpendicular or parallel to the corridors? (Local knowledge was used to modify the roads layer to show the traffic volumes and objective maintenance level). (A1-b) What is the percentage of the road influence area that is within the wildlife movement corridor? # (A1-c) How does this road contribute to the areas open road (4) density? (total road density could be used for specific purposes) (A1-d) Are there physical barriers associated with the roads? (A1-e) How wide is the road? (cut slope to cut slope) (A1-f) Is there sufficient hiding cover adjacent to the road? To measure this it was assumed that areas with > 70% canopy cover typically would provide multiple canopy layers sufficient to provide hiding cover and would provide vertical screening. * (A1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come off this (5) segment within the watershed? ~ A1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? (4) ^ (A1-i) What is the surrounding road density? (4) (A1-j) What is the amount of human activity centers (dwellings, campgrounds, etc.) in the area? (A2-a) How many acres of riparian habitats (RHCA buffers) does the road affect? (A2-b) What percent of the unique habitat is affected? (See unique habitat definition) (A2-c) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently come off of this road that effect unique habitats? # (A2-d) How does this road contribute to the areas road density?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (31 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

* (A2-e) Does the road completely intersect the area or only a portion of the road segment enters the habitat feature in a manner that does not intersect the area? ~ (A2-f) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? (A2-g) Does this road access a roadless area? ^ (A2-h) What is the surrounding road density? (A3-a) What percent of existing interior habitat does the road effect? * (A3-b) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? (A3-c) Are there other fragmentation factors in the area (ex. Power line corridors, train tracks, or pipelines)? (A3-d) What is the existing fragmentation level within the watershed? (A3-e) Does the watershed have desired levels of necessary vegetation / habitat? (A3-f) What percentage of the watershed is currently occupied by road-beds (cut slope to cut slope)? (B1-a) What level of affects is the road segment having on identified or active TE&S species reproductive areas? (See reproductive areas list in Appendix B). (B1-b) Does the road influence habitats within the minimum buffer for nest stands or reproductive areas? (B1-c) What percent of road buffer effects existing TE&S habitat (primary and secondary reproductive) within the watershed is affected? (B1-d) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently come off of this road that effect identified or active TE&S habitat (primary and secondary reproductive) within the watershed? (B1-e) What is the percent of road buffers of roads subsequently coming off this road that effect identified active TE&S species reproductive areas? (See reproductive areas list in Appendix B). # (B1-f) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? * (B1-g) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? ~ (B1-h) Is the area this road is in open to off road use? (B1-i) Are there noxious weed populations along the road that could spread and reduce adjacent habitats? ^ (B1-j) What is the road density in the watershed? (B2-a) What distance is the road segment from town? # (B2-b) How does this road contribute to the areas road density? * (B2-c) How many miles of lower order roads come off this segment within the watershed? ~ (B2-d) Is the area this road is in open to off road use?

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (32 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Wildlife Risk

(B2-e) Is the area this road is in open to woodcutting? (B2-f) How much timber harvest has occurred in the watershed? (B2-g) What is the snag density in the watershed and how does it relate to historic and desired levels? ^ (B2-h) What is the road density in the watershed?

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:15 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-4b.shtml (33 of 33)5/31/2007 1:20:13 PM SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Bear Creek Primary access route into the Maury Mts., crosses seveal drainages, this watershed was the most out of balance of all the WA analyzed in the Maury WA, goes past a goshawk PFA, along the top of wilderness and above the Antelope BEMA, heavily harvested in the past with limited snag and down 1600000 67 6451Hlog values. Goes from Sherwood saddle down Klootchman Creek off forest. Runs along riparian most of the way, goes past a goshawk PFA, heavy turkey use. Plowed by the county in the winter. Beginning to get heavy 1640000 55 434Msnowmobile use in the winter from Sherwood Saddle.

Major road access goes to numerous dispersed sites, accesses Antelope Reservoir. This road gets use almost year round. Road is within 400 yards of Bald Eagle nest at Antelope, goes through winter range, goes along Faught creek with several aspen stands and wet meadows. Deer, Elk, and 1700000 67 5572HTurkey use. Wood cutting is high due to the campground at Antelope.

Short section going into Antelope Camp ground. It's withing winter range 1700600 57 3572Hand BEMA, goes along Bear Creek. High recreational use in the area. Goes all the way along the top of the crest of the Maurys, goes through dense canopy mixed conifer stands, goes through the only high canopy closure in the Maurys, goes through the head waters of numerous creeks, provides access to the top of the Hammer Creek WL / Roadless area. Bear Creek WA is the most out of balance vegetative conditions of all WAs in the surrounding area. Heavy spring Turkey use, and elk calving associated 1750000 76 7362Hwith springs. Bear Creek Total 5.8 6.4 5.0 4.0 5.8 Bear Creek (Bridge) Goes along Heflin Creek, high traffic and speeds, limits wolverine movement, goshawk nest. Watershed is fragmented from logging in this 2600000 96 5641Harea.

Provides access to large portions of Mill Creek wilderness, numerous subroads with high dispersed recreation. High deer and elk numbers adjacent, fragments interior habitats adjacent to the wilderness, poor road 2700000 88 7484Hcondition above wilderness slightly reduces traffic volumes and speed. Parallels and enters winter range, crosses numerous drainages, goes above an old growth block, high use deer and elk habitat, heavy hunting pressure deer, elk, goes from pine dominated stands lower in WA to mixed 2730000 87 7343Hconifer interior habitats higher in WA.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 1 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Goes through north slope mixed conifer, some riparian habitats, provides a through from 2700 to 2730. Lower volume road, with a gravel pit near the bottom, winter range on the lower end and wilderness on the upper end. Numerous past clear cuts along the road, with the watershed and adjacent areas having higher levels of fragmentation especially since the Hash Rock 2730250 54 535Mfire. Adds to road density in winter range, parallels Bear and Scotty Creek, seasonally closed but not implemented on the ground, goes through an old growth block, high use turkey, deer and elk habitat, heavy hunting pressure deer, elk, turkey, numerous dispersed sites along creek, calving in flats 2735000 78 7353Hassociated with creek. Very short section in this watershed. Numerous springs and wet meadows, high turkey, elk, and deer use, high deer and elk crossing of this road, 2745000 66 6491Hnumerous clear cuts along road. Relatively short road the provides access to private timber lands, goes through sparse pine stands with high harvest levels in the past. Provides 2750000 43 323Maccess to Stevenson Lookout. Bear Creek (Bridge) Total 6.7 6.0 5.7 3.6 5.4 Bridge Creek Majority of the road is on private land, crosses OG corridors, access Ochoco Divide RNA, deer and primarily elk use, bisects major ridge on 2210000 66 656MOchocos for travel, high firewood cutting. 2230000 Not in this watershed.

The road passes through relatively contiguous block of old growth with high canopy closure, heavy big game use, fairly low traffic volume lessens impact to movement. High potential for wolverine use. Fair amount of snowmobile use in the winter (from Mitchell). HUGE problem of illegal 2630000 38 9693Hfirewood collecting. Run parallels wilderness boundary. Bridge Creek Total 4.5 7.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 Camp Creek

Primary access route through this watershed. Majority of the watershed is shrub step and juniper, heavily harvested pine stands, near winter range, 1600000 76 4331Hgoes past a goshawk PFA, crosses several drainages.

Access Arrowwood point, highly cut over, interface between lower elevation shrub communities and higher elevation conifer stands. Two lynx sightings with a mile of this road. Goes along the edge of winter range, is a loop road that gets through hunting. Forested portion of WA is deficit in snag and 1670000 64 423Mdown log levels, provides access to several water developments.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 2 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Very short piece that goes through a wet meadow and spring with aspen. 1750000 35 322MSome turkey and elk use in spring. Goes right above a goshawk PFA. Camp Creek Total 5.3 5.0 3.7 2.3 2.7 Deep Creek Relatively heavy traffic, low hiding cover adjacent, greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Road is very near goshawk, cooper's and red-tailed hawk nests. High level of illegal and legal woodcutting activities 1200000 62 2571Hin the area.

Local significance to big game due to surrounding habitat. Paulina portion of the road has a lower road density than is described for the road in its 2630000 43 222Mentirety. Potential wolverine habitat to the north (winter access).

Relatively heavy traffic, low hiding cover adjacent, greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Heavy big game use in the area, calving areas, some raptor nest stands (goshawk). Area is naturally fragmented with roads within much of the covered stringers. Moderate level of illegal and legal woodcutting activities in the area, esp. from 710 west to the Forest 3000000 63 654Mboundary. Heavy traffic, low hiding cover adjacent, greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Heavy big game use in the area, esp. movement from north and south. Area is naturally fragmented with roads within much of the covered stringers. The road falls within an area deficient 4200000 74 6472Hof snags (<2.25 snags/acre). 4200460 13 113LVery short stretch 4250000 44 444M 4254000 33 443M Road is low impact in a higher impact watershed relative to fragmentation. 4256000 23 322LIllegal firewood cutting in the adjacent stringer. Very little cover, moderate amount of vehicle travel, no physical barriers. 4270000 43 131MMountain quail. Deep Creek Total 4.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.7 Lower Beaver

Some cover, small spur on the top of the ridge with some big game 1250000 31 222Lmovement across it. Little impact to unique habitat or TE&S species. Moderate amount of traffic, no barriers, moderate amount of cover, crosses some RHCA, along a ridgetop between wilderness and roadless area. TE&S impact is low but may have some potential for wolverine. Impacts to 3800000 53 541Msnags are probably limited to camp use.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 3 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Very little cover, moderate amount of vehicle travel, no physical barriers. 3810000 44 233MAlong an RHCA, No cover, along a draw, crosses drainages, little impact to fragmentation or 5810000 32 232LTE&S, low impact to snags (low use). Lower Beaver Total 3.8 2.5 2.8 3.0 2.0 Lower N. Fork Crooked Heavy traffic, low hiding cover adjacent, greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Heavy big game use in the area, esp. movement from north and south. Area is naturally fragmented with roads within much of the covered stringers. The road falls within an area deficient 4200000 74 6472Hof snags (<2.25 snags/acre). 4200460 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Wrong watershed, see Middle North Fork Low wildlife habitat diversity, value, forested areas have been cutover. This reach bisects a pileated feeding area. Accesses north end of Fox Canyon OGMA. Road crosses general forest winter range and is within the South Boundary Cooperative Road Closure area. Heavy year round elk use in the 4230000 33 223Larea. Low wildlife habitat diversity, value, forested areas have been cutover. Road crosses winter range and is within the South Boundary Cooperative Road Closure area. Heavy year round elk use in the area. Access to upper 4240000 33 223Lfalls, relatively heavy rec use. Lower N. Fork Crooked Total 3.3 2.5 2.5 2.0 3.3 Lower Ochoco Goes along Marks Creek entire way, paved, high volume and speed, lower 2600000 98 3683H1/3 in winter range, all private lands. Lower Ochoco Total 9.0 8.0 3.0 6.0 8.0 Lower South Fork Moderate amount of traffic, no barriers, moderate amount of cover, crosses some RHCA, along a ridgetop between wilderness and roadless area. TE&S impact is low but may have some potential for wolverine. Impacts to 3800000 53 541Msnags are probably limited to camp use. No cover, along a draw, crosses drainages, little impact to fragmentation or 5810000 32 232LTE&S, low impact to snags (low use).

Moderate amount of traffic, no barriers, moderate amount of cover, southern portion in elk and deer winter range, little impact to TE&S, low impact to 5840000 32 212Lsnag and down wood. Low traffic volume, low physical barriers, little cover, relatively high value to big game for movement coming out of wilderness down to the S.Fork of the John Day. Not conducive to wood cutting therefore low impact to snags and 5850000 53 332Mdown wood. Lower South Fork Total 4.0 2.5 3.0 2.8 1.8 McKay

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 4 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Loop road, paved, high volume and speeds, very little public lands, heavily harvested in the past, snag deficient, public lands are old growth, goes along Allen Creek most of the way, high deer and elk numbers, numerous private dwellings scattered along here. Biological winter range in lower 2150000 78 5273Helevations.

Paved road with incredibly high traffic, goes by a bald eagle nest on private land, lower half is on private land, main access to the north end of Prineville District, goes through winter range, goes along McKay and little McKay for most of length, provides access to Mill Creek wilderness, goes by one old growth area, numerous subroads with high dispersed recreation, gets relatively heavy OHV use off road and snowmobile in winter. High deer and elk numbers adjacent, and it runs down the primary drainage most likely historically used to access winter range. Lower sections of private are 2700000 88 7694Hagricultural.

Lower 1/3 goes through winter range, highly fragmented habitats adjacent to 2705000 55 5271Hroad, heavy wood cutting, deer and elk move across this road.

Highly fragmented pine on east end and mixed conifer on west end, several springs along the road, high deer and elk use, goes near an old growth area, accesses private timber land to the west, high traffic volumes, numerous dispersed recreation sites, runs along the ridge. Influences local 2710000 65 4271Hbig game movement along the ridge. High traffic road, goes along riparian area entire length, access an OHV trail, extensive party spots, sledding hill, and mud bogging, high dispersed camping and OHV use in riparian areas, numerous past clearcuts on upper end, good deer numbers. Goes through winter range, closure efforts have 3300000 57 4392Hbeen unsuccessful.

Goes through winter range - winter closure is effective, accesses Brennan Palisades/Dry Creek campground and horse trails, goes along riparian 3380000 77 5373Hhabitat for end terminal, access the Green Ridge OHV trail system. McKay Total 6.3 6.7 5.0 3.0 7.7 Mid Crooked River RM110-125 Primary access route into the Maury Mts., goes entirely along a drainage, goes through dense mixed conifer with numerous clear cuts in WA, majority of WA is private land, goes along the Hammer Creek Roadless area. Had a wolverine sighting just off this road in 1992. Goes along a winter range at 1600000 57 7362Hthe bottom.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 5 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Access Arrowwood point, highly cut over, goes along a riprian area with wet meadows and aspen stand, higher elevation portions access mixed conifer stands. Loop road that gets through hunting. Forested portion of WA is deficit in snag and down log levels, provides access to several water 1670000 64 423Mdevelopments. Very short piece that goes through a wet meadow and spring with aspen. 1750000 35 322MSome turkey and elk use in spring. Mid Crooked River RM110-125 T 4.7 5.3 4.7 2.3 3.7 Mid Crooked River RM70.5-86.2 Very short piece that goes through a wet meadow and spring with aspen. 1750000 35 322MSome turkey and elk use in spring. Goes through an old growth area. Mid Crooked River RM70.5-86.2 3.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 Mid Crooked River RM86.2-110

Primary access route into the upper portions of this WA., limitted access to the remaining public lands, heavily harvested watershed, crosses the head waters of several streams with unique habitats of small wet meadows and aspen stands. Goes within 200 yards of a Bald Eagle Nest, heavy turkey and deer use. Majority of the lower portion is juniper and private land. Section along Sherwood creek is plowed in the winter by the county. Historic Sand Hill Crane use lower in the watershed. Comes off the Post Paulina Hwy which goes along the Crooked River one of the primary winter 1600000 47 5762Hroosting habitats for Bald Eagle. Goes along Newsome Creek, starts in winter range, Sand hill Crane use lower in the watershed, goes past a PFA and numerous wet meadows. Winter range signing is not effective. Private land owner would like to see a gate put in. Heavily harvested area in the past. Lower in the WA it is 1610000 67 4341Hprimarily ag. use.

Goes along Gibson Creek, starts in winter range, Sand hill Crane use lower in the watershed provides access to a gravel pit. Winter range signing is not effective. Private land owner would like to see a gate put in. Heavily 1620000 56 434Mharvested area in the past. Lower in the WA it is primarily ag. use.

Starts in winter range, goes through numerous wet meadows and highly fragmented habitats with old clear cuts, goes past and old growth area, accesses mixed conifer, access Drake Butte and Tower point look out, goes 1680000 67 6351Hpast a goshawk PFA, heavy turkey and elk use in the spring.

1690000 34 323MGoes down to winter range, has a goshawk PFA near it, pretty short road.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 6 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Major road access goes to numerous dispersed sites, accesses Antelope Reservoir. Higher traffic volumes and speeds. This road gets use almost year round. Goes through winter range, goes along Pine creek with several aspen stands and wet meadows. Lower portion goes throug winter range and private lands to the Paulina Hwy. Lower habitats are juniper and 1700000 67 5572Hagriculture.

Goes all the way along the top of the crest of the Maurys, goes through dense canopy mixed conifer stands, goes through the only high canopy closure in the Maurys, goes through the head waters of numerous creeks, provides access to the top of the Hammer Creek WL / Roadless area. Bear Creek WA is the most out of balance vegetative conditions of all WAs in the surrounding area. Heavy spring Turkey use, and elk calving associated 1750000 76 7362Hwith springs. Provides access to Tower Point lookout. Map shows as 1750 680 road, going to Tower Point. Short section of higher elevations habitats on the south slope. Goes through some higher canopy 1760000 34 422Mcover and stiff sage scabs. Borders winter range - South Boundary Closure, goshawk PFA, crosses several drainages, some turkey sitings. Half this road is on private. Access 4215000 67 3421HLookout Mt. Roadless Area. South Boundary Road Closure Area, entirely in winter range, accesses BLM, high elk use, goshawk PFA on one end, open pine, heavily cut over, a lot of mountain mahogany in this area. Goes along several riparian areas, 4235000 35 312Mwith some meadow habitat. Mid Crooked River RM86.2-110 4.9 6.0 4.4 3.3 4.1 Middle Beaver Low traffic volume, low physical barriers, little cover, relatively high value to big game for movement. RHCA crossings, little fragmentation input. 5820000 42 433MModerate impact to snags and down wood.

Was not originally on the spreadsheet. Moderate level of traffic with very little cover high impact to potential wildlife movement areas, just north of big game winter range. No TE&S concerns, low end of snag and down wood 5830000 53 424Mrequirements with moderate woodcutting use. Moderate amount of traffic, no barriers, moderate amount of cover, southern portion in elk and deer winter range, little impact to TE&S, low impact to 5840000 32 212Lsnag and down wood. Middle Beaver Total 4.0 2.3 3.3 2.0 3.0 Middle N. Fork

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 7 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Crooked Parallels Beetle creek for the majority of the reach. Crosses old growth corridors, good elk populations. A lot of firewood activity. Low traffic limits effects of fragmentation. Potential winter use by elk along the southern end of this reach during low snow years. A lot of rec use including snowmobiles. 2200000 35 326MAllen Creek HorseCamp is accessed by this road. Main access road to Pisgah lookout, passes thru OG connectivity corridors, top end of a relatively unroaded watershed, if traffic volume increases could interrupt movement between Allen creek and the wilderness to the north. Heavy subalpine fir. On boundary of PIF special bird conservation area due 2230000 11 261Mto subalpine fir.

The road passes through relatively contiguous block of old growth with high canopy closure, heavy big game use, goshawk PFA and nest area adjacent to the road, fairly low traffic volume lessens impact to movement. High potential for wolverine use. Fair amount of snowmobile use in the winter 2630000 37 8693H(from Mitchell). HUGE problem of illegal firewood collecting. Road passes by OGMA on the north end, moderate traffic. Moderate big game use in the area. Area is naturally fragmented with roads within much of the covered stringers. High level of illegal and legal woodcutting activities 3000000 23 3271Hin the area.

Road passes thru biological antelope migration but low traffic volume lessons the impact, small stretch on the north end passes through pileated feeding and heavy canopy closure area. Access to Allen Creek Reservoir. Low snow years, elk winter in the area. Moderate amount of snowmobile 3010000 45 414Muse. Road passes through stringers.

Heavy traffic, wild and scenic highway, thus greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions, parallels an OGMA, paved road, low hiding cover adjacent. Area is naturally fragmented with roads within much of the covered stringers. The road falls within an area deficient of snags (<2.25 snags/acre). Western portion travels through the Big Summit Prairie. High 4200000 74 6411Himpact to species using OG on western reach of the road for movement. 4200460 11 111LShort segment down to the drainage, parallels 4200000 Low wildlife habitat diversity, value, forested areas have been cutover, northern end of road accesses Big Summit Prairie. Southern end of this 4230000 22 213Lreach bisects a pileated feeding area. Low wildlife habitat diversity, value, forested areas have been cutover, 4240000 22 213Lnorthern end of road accesses Big Summit Prairie. Middle N. Fork Crooked Total 2.8 3.3 3.4 2.7 3.9 Middle South Fork

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 8 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS High traffic volume, low cover, crosses deer and elk winter range, crosses or circles two bald eagle winter roosts, moderate impact to movement 5800000 65 455Mcorridors, area is deficient of snags.

Moderate amount of traffic volume, low cover, moderate impact to potential 5870000 44 334Mmovement areas, key fall use areas for deer, area is deficient in snags. GRA-42 Middle South Fork Total 5.0 4.5 3.5 4.0 4.5 Mill First 1/3 is paved road with high traffic, provides access to large portions of Mill Creek wilderness and Bingham Prairie campground, numerous subroads with high dispersed recreation, gets relatively heavy OHV use off road and snowmobile in winter. High deer and elk numbers adjacent, fragments interior habitats adjacent to the wilderness, goes past a goshawk PFA, poor road condition above wilderness slightly reduces traffic volumes 2700000 88 7484Hand speed. Near an elk calving area, Cooper's hawk nest, numerous springs and wet meadows, high elk, and deer use, numerous clear cuts along road. Right 2745000 66 6491Habove the wilderness.

High traffic road, goes along riparian area entire length, access an OHV trail, extensive party spots, accesses Wildcat campground, numerous past clearcuts on upper end, good deer numbers. Good elk numbers on both sides of road with some crossing, goes through winter range, closure efforts have been moderately successful. Goes along an old growth area, was probably historic migration route to lower habitats, provides access to Mill Creek Wilderness and roadless area on Wildcat Mountain. Bald Eagle 3300000 88 3673Hforaging along Mill Creek.

Short stretch that access Wildcat Camp ground, provides access to Mill Creek Wilderness, it's within winter range, gated closed during the winter to camp ground, parkinglot is still accessible. Very high snag numbers in the 3300300 56 232Mwatershed, deficit in late and old structure.

Rough road, provides cut across to 2700, access to wilderness, numerous rock structures along road, with numerous past clear cuts, one wet meadow 3320000 54 335Mwith aspen, high deer and elk use going east west into wilderness. Closed road, goes up the bottom of West for of Mill Creek, wet meadown habitats. Although closed gets vehicle use in the winter, higher dispersed recreation on horses. Goshawk PFA and bottom of road is near winter range. Majority of cover was removed in this watershed by the Hash rock 3330000 54 221Mfire.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 9 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Provides through access from Mill Creek to Hwy 26. Road is gated at the bottom and blocked with a berm on the top. Road goes all the Benefield Creek and through very dense north slope habitats. Road is currently open in the summer, but existing NEPA calls for it to be closed year round. Provides access to the Wildcat Roadless area, goes through winter range, 3350000 57 7342Hand crosses an old growth corridor. Goes through winter range most of the length, winter closure is effective, accesses Dry Creek campground and horse trails, goes along riparian habitat from end terminal. Lower elevation pine habitats predominantly with high harvest levels in this portion of the watershed in the past. Snag and 3370000 55 4281Hdown log levels area low.

Goes through winter range and goshawk PFA, winter closure is effective, accesses Brennan Palisades, goes along riparian habitat for end terminal, access the Green Ridge OHV trail system.Lower elevation pine habitats predominantly with high harvest levels in this portion of the watershed in the 3380000 77 5373Hpast. Snag and down log levels area low. Mill Total 6.0 6.1 4.3 3.3 5.7 Mountain Creek Relatively heavy traffic, low hiding cover adjacent, greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Road is very near goshawk, Cooper's and red-tailed hawk nests. High level of illegal and legal woodcutting 1200000 62 2571Hactivities in the area. Little or no traffic, year round closure except for administrative use, no known physical barriers, intersect a contiguous block of north slope habitat including some of the best LOS habitat on the District. No woodcutting 1280000 25 550Mallowed.

About half the road occurs on private land. Parallels Badger Creek for the entire reach. Crosses old growth corridors, good elk populations, accesses a lot good old growth unroaded LOS habitat. A lot of firewood activity in the 2200000 35 3281HLOS. Low traffic limits effects of fragmentation. Accesses private timber company land, parallels a stream, short stretch, 2200930 11 111Lopen Ppine habitat.

3010000 N/A Looks like this road is entirely in the Middle N Fork of the Crooked River.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 10 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Mountain Creek Total 3.0 4.0 3.8 3.8 5.0 Rock Creek

Very heavy traffic, low hiding cover adjacent, greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Heavy impacts to migrating wildlife from east- 1200000 62 454Mwest. Snags and down wood have moderate levels of impact.

No cover, along a draw, crosses drainages, little impact to fragmentation or 5810000 32 232LTE&S, low impact to snags (low use). Low traffic volume, low physical barriers, little cover, relatively high value to big game for movement. RHCA crossings, little fragmentation input. 5820000 42 433MModerate impact to snags and down wood. Rock Creek Total 4.2 2.0 3.4 3.4 2.4 Trout Headwater Loop road, paved, high volume and speeds, very little public lands, near a bald eagle nest, heavily harvested in the past, snag deficient, public lands are old growth, goes along Allen Creek most of the way, high deer and elk numbers, numerous private dwellings scattered along here. Biological 2150000 78 5373Hwinter range in lower elevations.

Ppaved road with high traffic, provides access to Mill Creek wilderness. Receives high snowmobile use in winter. High deer and elk numbers adjacent, fragments interior habitats adjacent to the wilderness. Short section of the road is in this watershed. High canopy cover in this area and 2700000 87 5462Hnatural movement point between Mill and Trout WA.

Very small portion of road in the WA. Highly fragmented pine on east end and mixed conifer on west end, several springs along the road, high deer and elk use, goes near an OGMA, accesses private timber land to the west, high traffic volumes, numerous dispersed recreation sites, runs along the 2710000 65 4271Hridge. Influences local big game movement along the ridge.

Entire length runs along a riparian area, numerous old clear cuts, heavy deer, elk, and turkey use and hunting, heavy Christmas tree cutting in 2715000 57 4241Hwinter, high levels of wood cutting. More local migration issues.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 11 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Lower section is in General Forest Winter Range, two Goshawk PFAs, numerous deer, elk, and turkey, lower portion of road effects up slope migration have to cross this road, heavy turkey hunting traffic in spring big game hunting in fall. Numerous springs right near road. Several moderate slope calving areas, south east portion is not a through road. Some wood cutting, several habitat improvement projects near road. Highly fragmented 2720000 57 5341Hwatershed.

A lot of historic mixed conifer old growth on north slopes, numerous old clear cuts, heavy hunting traffic, accesses lower Trout creek, lower section goes through winter range and parallels Trout Creek, road accesses private timber lands to the north and is plowed in winter occasionally to facilitate haul, numerous deer, elk, and turkey. Road is used to access much of the 2725000 66 636Mnorth slope country.

A lot of historic mixed conifer old growth on north slopes, numerous old clear cuts, goes along an OGMA, goes along Auger Creek, heavy hunting traffic, accesses lower Trout and Bear creek, lower section parallels winter range, road accesses private timber lands to the north and is plowed in winter occasionally to facilitate haul, numerous deer, elk, and turkey. Road is used to access much of the north slope country. Two goshawk PFAs 2730000 77 6373Hnear road. Short segment in this watershed, road access private lands to north, 2735000 33 222Lnumerous deer, elk, and turkey, dense pine regeneration. Accesses heavily used calving area, heavy turkey hunting, goes along a riparian for entire length, lower portion is in winter range, highly fragmented 2740000 47 4331Harea. Near an elk calving area, Cooper's hawk nest, numerous springs and wet meadows, high turkey, elk, and deer use, high deer and elk crossing of this 2745000 66 6491Hroad, numerous clear cuts along road. Trout Headwater Total 5.7 6.3 4.7 2.9 5.5 Upper Middle John Day 3800000 Upper Middle John Day Total #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ##### #DIV/0! Upper N. Fork

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 12 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Crooked

Crosses old growth corridors, good elk populations. A lot of firewood activity. Low traffic limits effects of fragmentation. Potential winter use by elk along the southern end of this reach during low snow years. A lot of rec use including snowmobiles. Influences movement of big game to Big Summit Prairie numerous calving area habitats, crosses several drainages, very close to bald eagle nest. Eastern section goes along riparian. Interfaces with biological winter range on moderate years, high snowmobile 2200000 57 6551Huse.

Main access road to Pisgah Lookout, passes thru OG connectivity corridors on the north end, top end of a relatively unroaded watershed, if traffic volume increases could interrupt east west movement. Heavy subalpine fir on the north end. North end of road is on boundary of PIF special bird conservation area due to subalpine fir. Southern portion of the road travels through an area of heavy overstory removal, and natural stringer/scab habitat. Potential moderate to heavy elk wintering (during low snow winters) on southern exposures above Big Summit Prairie. High snowmobile use, heavily roaded area with relatively high rec use. Area is deficit of snags and 2230000 16 313Mdown wood on the south end.

The road passes near OGMA and through pileated feeding area, and old growth connectivity corridors, heavy big game use, higher traffic volume along this section of the road. Fair amount of snowmobile use in the winter. 2630000 43 3391HHUGE problem of illegal firewood collecting.

Heavy traffic, paved road, crosses numerous drainages, on the east portion of the road more timber and cover to the south. As the road progresses west cover occurs on both the north and south sides of the road thus greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. The road interferes with animal movement from LO Mtn MA (roadless) to the north. Eastern half of the road travels thru the big summit prairie. On west end of the road we're trying to emphasize developed rec. Potential wolverine habitat winter 4200000 76 6561Huse. More access to firewood cutting.

Near a bald eagle nest, elk, deer, and antelope use, interface between Big Summit Prairie and forest, high traffic, high recreation, numerous riparian meadows, high habitat diversity, antelope kidding and elk calving, cross old 4210000 78 3473Hgrowth corridor, numerous large dispersed camp sites.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 13 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Follows riparian habitat entire length, deer, elk, antelope, along Wild and Scenic River Corridor, goes along OGMA, goes along prairie habitat might have potential for upland sandpiper, curlews, and sandhill cranes if the road wasn't there, fragments prairie meadow habitat. High dispersed recreation, 4215000 77 7734Hvery open habitats. Goes through some pvt. Runs primarily along Lookout Creek, goes through OG connectivity, high canopy cover areas, provides secondary access to Lookout Mt. Roadless, 4220000 36 455Mhigh dispersed rec. use.

Low wildlife habitat diversity, value, forested areas have been cutover. This reach bisects a pileated feeding areas. Accesses north end of Fox Canyon OGMA. Half the road crosses general forest winter range and is within the South Boundary Cooperative Road Closure Area. Heavy year round elk use in the area. Road passes within proximity of a historic goshawk nest. 4230000 33 223LCrosses into good turkey population area and added hunting. Upper N. Fork Crooked Total 4.6 5.8 4.4 4.0 4.8 Upper Ochoco

Paved road, high traffic and speed. High rec. with dispersed sites, accesses Walton Lake and snow park (snowmobile). Along riparian area the entire length. Provides access to the old growth area. Good elk area 2200000 67 5472Hlimits north to south travel. Wild horse populations.

Goes to Crystal Springs. Organizational camp, goshawk PFA, goes along 2210000 36 4271HOG corridor, open pine and meadow habitat, elk and deer use. Road that goes around Walton Lake, high recreational use, influences local movement patterns. Secondary recreational use impacts surrounding 2220000 56 222Mhabitats. 2220010 11 111LRoad going to Walton Lake Boat ramp. Most of this is on pvt. Goes along Ochoco creek with significant meadow habitat, turkey, elk, antelope, and deer, primarily grazed fields, paved, high volume and speed. Higher potential for road kill. Biological winter range. 2300000 85 2111HBald eagle foraging on creek. 2300403 11 111LOchoco Bunkhouse road, Mt. Quail, very short road. Goes along Marks Creek entire way, goes past OG connectivity areas, provides access to Mill Creek Wilderness, Ochoco Divide RNA and numerous sub roads, potential barrier to wolverine habitat, paved, high volume and speed, lower 1/3 in winter range, goes to Ochoco Divide campground, high dispersed camping and hunting pressure. Provides 2600000 98 3683Haccess to large areas for woodcutting. 2600150 11 111LSmall pullout on Hwy 26

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 14 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Ochoco snowpark, wolverine sightings in this area. Short loop road. 2600550 22 161MSecondary use of snowmobiles is the highest impact of this road.

Goes past the administrative site, goes through general forest winter range, old growth connectivity, turkeys and elk use, goes primarily along a riparian zone, access HWY 26, couple of goshawk nests. Meadow habitat diversity on the north end, road causes fragmentation, high vehicle use and 2610000 47 6272Hrecreational use, and woodcutting. Residence, parking lot, campground, picnic area, paved moderate traffic. 2610400 11 111LHabitat is reduced due to administrative site. Residence, parking lot, campground, picnic area, paved moderate traffic. 2610401 11 111LHabitat is reduced due to administrative site. Residence, parking lot, campground, picnic area, paved moderate traffic. 2610500 11 111LHabitat is reduced due to administrative site. Residence, parking lot, campground, picnic area, paved moderate traffic. 2610510 11 111LHabitat is reduced due to administrative site. Residence, parking lot, campground, picnic area, paved moderate traffic. 2610511 11 111LHabitat is reduced due to administrative site. Residence, parking lot, campground, picnic area, paved moderate traffic. 2610515 11 111LHabitat is reduced due to administrative site.

Crosses OG connectivity and next to OGMA, goshawk nest near here, 1/3 2620000 45 4271Halong riparian area, scattered meadow habitat, elk and deer use.

The road passes thru old growth connectivity corridors, higher traffic volume along this section of the road. Fair amount of snowmobile use in the winter (from snowpark). HUGE problem of illegal firewood collecting. Access to 2630000 43 2191HCrystal Creek Campground. High rec use.

Lower portion is paved. Provides access to large portions of Mill Creek wilderness and Whistler campground, numerous subroads with high dispersed recreation. High deer and elk numbers adjacent, fragments interior habitats adjacent to the wilderness, poor road condition above 2700000 88 7484Hwilderness slightly reduces traffic volumes and speed. 2730000 N/A See Bear Creek (Bridge) not really in this watershed 2730250 N/A See Bear Creek (Bridge) not really in this watershed

High traffic goes through winter range, past old growth area and corridors, crosses several drainages, ad two goshawk PFAs. Provides access to White Rock camp ground, numerous subsequent access roads and high 3350000 77 6373Hdispersed use. Highly fragmented watershed.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 15 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Heavy traffic, paved road, follows the drainage/impacts the riparian all the way down. Cover occurs on both the north and south sides of the road thus greater potential for direct mortality, vehicle collisions. Roadless area occurs to the south for the entire stretch of road, high disbursed rec use. The road interferes with animal movement from LO Mtn MA (roadless) to the north. On east end of the road we're trying to emphasize developed rec. Potential wolverine habitat winter use. Provides access to Wildcat roadless 4200000 77 7474Harea and Mill Creek Wilderness. Numerous dispersed sites along road, Goes along riparian entire way, wild horses, access Lookout Mt. Roadless area, provides hunting access to this 4200100 46 221Marea.

Access Lookout Mt. Trail and Baneberry Trail, high canopy cover, Lookout Mt. Roadless area, will be highlighted for recreation and accesses Lookout 4205000 46 642MMt. Mine, good elk habitat, high snowmobile use, some riparian association. 4215000 N/A All on Private Land / closed by land owner Upper Ochoco Total 3.7 4.0 2.9 2.3 3.6 Upper South Fork GRA-69 Upper South Fork Total #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ##### #DIV/0! Crooked River Grasslands Mostly agricultural lands, crosses Fall Canyon Creek - good condition, sage grouse, popular falconry area, near Townsend's big eared bat roost, high volume of traffic, goes to a gravel pit, not much vehicle conflict with big 3500000 46 640Mgame, some bald eagle use. Road doesn't go as far as on the map. Dense juniper woodland, good deer 5480000 43 323Mpopulation. Possibly closed at CRNG boundary. Access Henderson Flat resulting in high OHV use, higher deer levels high traffic volumes, native veg. WA DPS sage grouse. High levels of riffle 5700000 65 633Mshooting and garbage dumping. Follows riparian habitat entire length, high deer and elk, high horse use - access Gray butte horse trail, rock outcropping special habitats, sage 5720000 57 6331Hgrouse. Accesses endurance ride trail. Steep juniper woodland. Fair deer and elk 5730000 44 324Mpopulations. Connects with Cyrus Horse camp. Goes by riparian habitat - two springs. 5740000 46 525MJuniper woodland. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, WA DPS western 5770000 33 221Lsage grouse.

Old Redmond Highway. Paved, high traffic road. Crested wheat seeding. 6000000 64 521MLow habitat diversity and value. Wildlife mortality from vehicle collisions.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 16 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS High traffic volume gravel road. Through crested wheat grass, low diversity 6010000 32 222Lhabitat. High human presence

Major gravel road. High traffic use, adjacent to Henderson Flat - high OHV 6080000 66 622Muse. Some antelope use in area. Raptors on Haystack Butte. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 6100000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. 6110000 N/A Not on NF ground in this watershed Partially paved, very little public land, primarily agricultural land around 6120000 34 210Mthere, small deer population.

Very little public land, accesses Crooked River Ranch, high human use, a lot of poaching, trash dumping, borders ODF&W big horn sheep release 6200000 67 4251Harea - effects would be drastically increased when sheep are released. Very little public land, high volume high speed, access Lake Billy Chinook Res. Very high recreational use, there are cabins on public lands. Little wildlife habitat currently do to the huge level of recreation use, sage grouse, used to be deer winter range. Facilitates effects in other watershed (not 6300000 24 320Mreflected in this score). Paved, goes to some farm houses, very short length, high volume and 6700000 21 110Lspeeds, not much wildlife habitat.

Accesses riparian habitats, cliff/canyon habitats, native plants, high year- 7210000 57 4261Hround deer popns. Raptor nests on cliffs. High woodcutting area. Norris Lane. Most of this road that is on Grassland is closed. Low habitat 7260000 43 310Mvalues. Agricultural land. To McPheeter's Turf. Mostly agricultural land on private, parallels north unit canal on Grassland. Heavily grazed crested wheat grass. Very limited 7290000 33 110Lwildlife value.

Mostly agricultural lands, crosses Fall Canyon Creek - good condition, sage grouse, popular falconry area, high volume of traffic, goes to a gravel pit, 3500000 46 640Mnot much vehicle conflict with big game, some bald eagle use.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 17 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5500000 33 230LWA DPS western sage grouse. Mostly on private land - agricultural. On CRNG crested wheat seedings very low wildlife habitat value. High traffic road. Accesses antelope winter 5600000 34 220Mrange. Connects with Cyrus Horse camp. Goes by riparian habitat - two springs. 5740000 46 525MJuniper woodland. Access Cyrus Horse Camp, high degree of human use, borders small 5750000 56 434Mriparian areas, WA DPS western sage grouse. Adjacent to Osborne Spring riparian area and exclosure. High traffic, high 6010000 66 521Mhuman presence. High habitat value due to riparian.

Major gravel road. High traffic use, adjacent to Henderson Flat - high OHV 6080000 66 622Muse. Some antelope use in area. Raptors on Haystack Butte. Crosses private, agricultural, and industrial lands, public lands are dominated by crested wheat grass seedings therefore low habitat diversity, 6600000 22 111Lwildlife are acclimated to people in the area. Small two track road on Round Butte. Juniper habitat isolated by large area of agricultural land. Small resident deer herd. Sage grouse proposed WA 6610000 33 323Llisting area. Accesses PGE offices. Goes through small amount of public land. Area all seeded with crested wheat grass - low habitat diversity and value. Sage 6620000 32 220Lgrouse proposed WA listing area. Segment is entirely on private land in this watershed does cross Willow creek. Creek is major travel area. Bald eagles hunt the shoreline in the 6630000 32 220Larea.

Paved road, high traffic, accesses subdivision and a park, state closed most 6670000 44 524Mroads off of this one. Mostly in park boundary. Juniper veg on public land.

Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 8900000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Heavy use by dog trainers. Antelope winter range, veg on public lands crested wheat seeding - low 8910000 45 320Mhabitat value and diversity for wildlife

One old growth juniper area, antelope winter range, WA DPS western sage grouse, much of the area seeded to crested, parallels riparian habitat along Rodman drainage, provides access to Haystack Res., year round bald 9600000 67 6511Heagle, redtail, and seasonal buffleheads, some poaching from road. Paved road to Haystack campground. Adjacent to riparian habitat. WA DPS 9605000 46 632Mwestern sage grouse Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 9610000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Guzzler near road.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 18 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Very little public land, accesses Crooked River Ranch, high human use, a lot of poaching, trash dumping, borders ODF&W big horn sheep release 6200000 67 4251Harea - effects would be drastically increased when sheep are released. Extremely dense deer wintering area - deer winter range LRMP, High volume high speed, access Lake Billy Chinook. Very high recreational use, access several housing developments and dispersed dwellings. High levels of poaching, high OHV use. Facilitates effects in other watershed (not 6300000 78 6252Hreflected in this score).

Deer winter range, adjacent to old growth juniper area. Road may not exist. 6310000 36 325MRate it as a low travel road. Near private land potential for woodcutting. Deer winter range - extremely heavy use, very bad road so light travel. 6320000 45 323MClosed in the winter. Rough road, some traffic, dense winter popns of deer, significant poaching 6330000 66 635Mproblems. Private land near potential woodcutting. Rough road, some traffic, dense winter popns of deer, significant poaching 6340000 66 635Mproblems. Private land near potential woodcutting.

Seasonally closed road, significant elk use and concentrated deer winter 6350000 76 6251Huse. Meadow, juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Some elk use and concentrated deer winter use. Meadow, juniper and 6355000 66 625Mburned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Seasonally closed road, concentrated deer winter use. Juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Leads to private land. Adjacent to 6500000 66 623Mguzzler. Seasonally closed road, concentrated deer winter use. Juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Leads to private land. Adjacent to 6510000 66 623Mguzzler. Seasonally closed road, concentrated deer winter use. Juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Leads to private land. Adjacent to 6520000 66 623Mguzzler.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 19 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Paved road, high traffic, accesses subdivision and a park, state closed most 6670000 44 524Mroads off of this one. Most in park boundary. Juniper veg on public land. Paved road, high traffic, accesses subdivision and a park, state closed most roads off of this one. Most in park boundary. Juniper veg on public land. 6671000 11 111LClosed road by parks. Doesn't exist anymore Antelope winter range, veg on public lands crested wheat seeding - low 8910000 45 320Mhabitat value and diversity for wildlife Agriculture, all private land, low habitat diversity, WA DPS western sage 9600000 33 231Lgrouse.

Major US HWY, asphalt surface, major access to east side of grasslands, heavy antelope, deer, elk crossing and vehicle collisions including all other wildlife species. Goes thru DPS of WA popn of western sage 9700000 77 5512Hgrouse…occasional bald eagle winter foraging along roadside. Lake Billy Chinook Total 5.1 5.5 4.7 2.4 3.2 Lower Crooked River Valley Paved, high volume, high speed traffic, but not as many wildlife and vehicle collisions as in 97. Crosses LRMP antelope WR, deer and elk both cross 2600000 88 5612Hthe highway in this watershed. Entire length is on private land, becomes Main Street Prineville, high incidence of residence and agricultural fields, high volume of traffic and 2700000 76 3401Hspeeds. There is a bald eagle nest within 1/2 mile of this road. Higher deer levels high traffic volumes, native veg. WA DPS sage grouse. High levels of riffle shooting and garbage dumping. Range handling 5700000 55 533Mfacilities on this road. Follows riparian habitat entire length, high deer and elk, high horse use - access Gray butte horse trail, rock outcropping special habitats, sage 5710000 57 6331Hgrouse. 5720000 54 423MSeasonally closed, biological deer winter range, sage grouse. Paved road, high traffic, parallels riparian zone, major poaching area, provides access to Skull Hollow Campground, unmapped movement 7960000 77 6222Hcorridor for big game, sage grouse. OR-126 N/A Doesn't touch National Forest OR-27 N/A Doesn't touch National Forest OR-380 N/A Doesn't touch National Forest Lower Crooked River Valley Tota 6.2 6.2 4.8 3.3 2.0 Lower Metolius Extremely dense deer wintering area - deer winter range LRMP, High volume high speed, access Lake Billy Chinook Res. Very high recreational use, access several housing developments and dispersed dwellings. High levels of poaching, high OHV use. Facilitates effects in other watershed (not 6300000 78 6252Hreflected in this score).

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 20 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Paved road, high speed road, accesses three rivers residential area, high 6400000 67 6742Hnumbers of wintering deer. Provides access to three bald eagle nests. Seasonally closed road, concentrated deer winter use. Juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Leads to private land. Adjacent to 6500000 66 623Mguzzler. Seasonally closed road, concentrated deer winter use. Juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Leads to private land. Adjacent to 6510000 66 623Mguzzler. Seasonally closed road, concentrated deer winter use. Juniper and burned habitat. Poaching a problem in this area. Leads to private land. Adjacent to 6520000 66 623Mguzzler. Lower Metolius Total 5.4 6.3 5.1 2.7 3.7 Mud Springs Creek

Bisects biological antelope WR, parts are located in an intermittent draw thus greater abundance big sage and juniper in an otherwise treeless environment. Section runs along the Monner springs drainage which has significant restoration investments and riparian habitat value. Good 5100000 67 5511Hpotential reintro or restoration area for WA DPS of western sage grouse.

Adjacent to large tracks of private land, public lands have been reseeded to crested wheat grass therefore habitat diversity is low. Primary access points to east grasslands from Madras. WA DPS of western sage grouse. 5160000 43 231MTouches edge of biological antelope WR. Accesses gravel pit. Looks like this should be the 53 road. Parallels Mud Springs creek, high restoration investments (fence, burning, seeding, guzzlers) with objective to restore wet meadow complex and cottonwood gallery forest. Road impedes this objective. WA DPS western sage grouse and gray flycatcher. Heavy 5200000 57 5421Hpartying, poaching.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 21 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS

Parallels Mud Springs creek, high restoration investments (fence, burning, seeding, guzzlers) with objective to restore wet meadow complex and cottonwood gallery forest. Road impedes this objective. WA DPS western 5250000 57 5421Hsage grouse and gray flycatcher. Heavy partying/ poaching. Adjacent to large tracks of private land, public lands have been reseeded to crested wheat grass therefore habitat diversity is low. Primary access points to east grasslands from Madras. WA DPS of western sage grouse. 5920000 43 231MTouches edge of biological antelope WR.

Not on map as an analysis road. Seasonally closed accesses dispersed rec and Alder Springs trail. Crosses Squaw Creek (Shane's spot!) Best winter 6360000 77 6352Hrange in area. Poaching big problem. People violate road closure. Extremely dense deer wintering area - deer winter range LRMP, High volume high speed, access Billy Chinook Res. Very high recreational use, access several housing developments and dispersed dwellings. High levels of poaching, high OHV use. Facilitates effects in other watershed (not 6300000 78 6252Hreflected in this score).

Half of road is obliterated. Rest is seasonally closed. Accesses best deer 6370000 66 622Mwinter range. Poaching a problem. Squaw Creek Roadless area US-20 N/A Not on CRNG in this watershed

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 22 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Whychus Total 6.7 7.0 6.0 2.3 4.0 Willow Creek Loop road, paved, high volume and speeds, very little public lands, heavily harvested in the past, snag deficient, public lands are old growth, goes along Allen Creek most of the way, high deer and elk numbers, numerous private dwellings scattered along here. Biological winter range in lower 2150000 78 5273Helevations. Paved, high volume, high speed traffic, but not as many wildlife and vehicle collisions as HWY 97. Large portion parallels willow creek, several raptor nests along the highway. Crosses LRMP antelope WR, deer and elk both cross the highway in this watershed. Access to Rimrock spring and road, passes to within 200 yds of the only know burrowing owl nests (2) on the 2600000 78 5612HGrassland.

Accesses parking lot, restroom, and trail head to Rimrock Sprg. Wildlife 2600828 14 110Marea, facilitates people dumping garbage and vandalizing facilities. Locked gate, no public access, Grassland field headquarters, very short 2680000 13 111Lroad, a lot of fencing. Antelope winter, accesses large gravel pit, sage grouse, year round elk use, lot of wildlife habitat improvement in the area, traffic has a lot of heavy 2690000 66 555Mtrucks, access to BPA power lines. Adjacent to large tracks of private land, public lands have been reseeded to crested wheat grass therefore habitat diversity is low. Primary access points to east grasslands from Madras. WA DPS of western sage grouse. 5160000 43 231MAccesses gravel pit. 5200000 54 542MWA DPS western sage grouse and gray flycatcher. WA DPS western sage grouse and gray flycatcher. Accesses LRMP Winter 5250000 56 542MRange Not sure this is the correct road, It appears to be inside Madras city limits, 5300000 11 111Lall private land. Primarily noxious weed surrounding it, county dump near here. WA DPS 5300153 24 331Mwestern sage grouse Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5310000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5320000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5330000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5340000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse.

Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5350000 23 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Jeep two track so it gets less vehicle use.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 23 SPECIAL SNAGS/ SUMMARY WATERSHED ROAD MIGRATION HABITATS FRAGMENTATION TE&S DOWN LOGS RATING COMMENTS Heavy traffic goes to Rimrock Spring Wildlife Area, crosses Willow creek, antelope winter range, bisects several wildlife enhancement projects. WA 5400000 55 642MDPS sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5500000 33 230LWA DPS western sage grouse.

5700000 54 533MHigher deer levels high traffic volumes, native veg. WA DPS sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 5750000 33 230LWA DPS western sage grouse.

Past seeded to crested wheat grass however, natives are reestablishing, 5760000 43 321Mfair habitat diversity, antelope winter range, WA DPS western sage grouse.

Adjacent to large tracks of private land, public lands have been reseeded to crested wheat grass therefore habitat diversity is low. Primary access 5920000 43 231Mpoints to east grasslands from Madras. WA DPS of western sage grouse. Crosses private, agricultural, and industrial lands, low habitat diversity, 6600000 21 110Lwildlife are acclimated to people in the area. Segment is entirely on private land in this watershed does cross willow creek. Creek is major travel area. Bald eagles hunt the shoreline in the 6630000 65 351Marea. Paved goes to BPA substation, moderate traffic, would access Cogentrix 7850000 56 641Msubstation, crosses Willow creek, antelope winter range. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 8900000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. One old growth juniper area that was burnt off, antelope winter range, WA 9600000 33 231LDPS western sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 9610000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse. Seeded to crested wheat grass, low habitat diversity, antelope winter range, 9620000 33 231LWA DPS western sage grouse.

3/17/2003 WILDLIFE (Ochoco) 24 Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Codes

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

Newberry National SUMMARY RATING - Summary Rating - (L) Low, (M) Moderate, (H) High Volcanic Monument (1H means one element rated high, 2H

means two elements rated high, etc.) Conservation Ed. Contracting Health Back to Table of Contents Forest Products Geology . Heritage Partnerships Plantlife Water/Fisheries Wildlife

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5a.shtml (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:20:34 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Codes

Links Evaluate Our Service We welcome your comments on our service and your suggestions for improvement. Forest

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:16 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5a.shtml (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:20:34 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Crooked River National Grassland

KEY ISSUE A: Effects on Plant Habitats. The presence, Newberry National type, and location of roads may affect special plant Volcanic Monument habitats. Conservation Ed. Contracting To address Key Issue A, the following question was analyzed: Health Forest Products Key Question A1: How and where do roads affect Geology special habitats? Heritage Partnerships Examples of potential impacts Plantlife Water/Fisheries Impact to plant species within special habitats and the overall Wildlife condition of the plant communities that occur in special habitats is http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (1 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

often directly related to many of the same physical attributes that Links will be evaluated in the aquatic risk rating. For example, wetland Evaluate Our Service habitats may be impacted by increased sedimentation and changes We welcome your comments in hydrologic function and water quality. A road may alter the on our service and your function of a stream's floodplain and/or off-channel habitat by suggestions for improvement. changing drainage patterns. Roads may intercept runoff, which can Forest accelerate erosion and lower water tables, increase sediment loading and delivery of toxic pollutants, change plant species composition by introducing noxious weeds, and degrade water quality. A culvert that is not functioning properly (for e.g., the culvert is under-sized and Deschutes National Forest the hydraulic capacity is exceeded) may increase sediment into 1001 SW Emkay Drive wetlands and streams. In some areas, productive wetlands have Bend, OR 97702 been converted to compacted road surfaces. Many of these habitats (541) 383-5300 have had fill placed on top of existing habitat as roads are built Ochoco National Forest through them. Road failures in landslide terrain can impact special 3160 N.E. 3rd Street habitats. The resulting changes in drainage patterns, soil Prineville, OR 97754 composition, and introduction of noxious weeds from roadside shoulders may cumulatively result in significant alteration of the (541) 416-6500 existing plant communities. Of these effects, those that affect the Crooked River National areas ability to receive, store and move water will likely have the Grassland greatest impact on a wetland's condition and function. 813 S.W. Hwy. 97 As with special habitats, the impacts to riparian plant communities Madras, OR 97741 often tie directly to the criteria that are used in the aquatic risk (541) 475-9272 ratings. If the road segment has a high aquatic risk rating, the riparian plant community is likely to be impacted by the same factors, resulting in a high botany risk rating. Roads often intersect riparian areas and can cause changes in hydrologic function and water quality. Roads intercept runoff that can accelerate erosion and lower water tables. Bank erosion can cause an associated loss of bank vegetation. A road segment may alter the function of a stream's floodplain and/or off-channel habitat, therefore impacting riparian and floodplain-related plant communities. Roads may constrain and divert both surface and subsurface flows that support the water table, potentially causing changes in species composition or altered vigor of riparian plants. Roads facilitate the establishment and spread of noxious weeds, resulting in changes in plant species composition. Other impacts could occur due to increased public access. There may be increased collecting of unique plant species that occur within special habitats. Roads may facilitate the use of off-highway vehicles into adjacent special habitats. High-use recreation areas, both dispersed and developed sites, may impact special habitats, such as wetlands and riparian areas. Recreation use also affects riparian plant communities. Therefore, the Recreation Risk Rating might also be used to evaluate potential impacts to riparian habitats. Roads may provide access for off-highway vehicles into riparian habitats. Dispersed and develop recreation can impact the health and vigor of riparian plants, depending on the level of reaction use. Roads facilitate the establishment and spread of noxious weeds, which impact native plant communities. Areas scheduled for road reconstruction, as well as on-going maintenance activities, have a high risk of introducing and spreading noxious weeds, which can alter species composition and associated wildlife use within habitats such as meadows.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (2 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

Analysis Procedure

Special habitats considered in this analysis are defined as wetlands (i.e., ponds, bogs, swamps), wet, moist and dry meadows, aspen stands, cottonwood bottomlands, and scablands. Plant associations for both the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests were reviewed, and those plant associations that fit the above definition of special habitat were selected. Originally, the electronic data summary did not include scablands; these areas were added with hindsight because they are extremely fragile, with shallow clay soils, and have extremely diverse vegetation. Any road built in these areas becomes a permanent road due to impacts. The scablands also are very important because roads built across these areas can cause sediment loading into riparian areas. Plant association GIS layers and associated data tables were queried for both the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests, and a wetland GIS layer was queried for the Deschutes National Forest. Any of the desired plant associations that occurred within 200 feet of roads within this analysis area were identified in the analysis and buffered by 200 feet to determine relative miles of road that intersect these special habitats. The resulting data table provided information on the number of miles of special habitat that the road segment passes through. Unfortunately, many special habitats were not mapped and the analysis relied heavily upon knowledge of district botanists and ecologists.

Assumptions

● Many small special habitats are not mapped and information will be lacking for these areas.

Risk Factors to Evaluate Issue A1

0 = NO RISK -- There are no special habitats found along the road segment. 1-3 = LOW RISK -- One or more special habitats occur(s) along the road segment, but it occupies a relatively small area along the road and/or the special habitat is not considered at risk because of one or a combination of the following factors:

● The special habitat is unique but relatively common in the watershed so that concern about road effects is reduced. ● Noxious weeds are currently not present, therefore, risk to the special habitat is low. The road segment is far enough away from high density weed infestations to reduce the risk of noxious weed spread and establishment. ● The special habitat occupies a small area relative to overall road length. The habitat may have some impacts, but these impacts are relatively localized and small in scope. ● The road segment crosses through or near a very small portion of the special habitat.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (3 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

● The risk rating for aquatics is low. For wetland habitats, road design characteristics are providing for the uninterrupted movement of surface and groundwater necessary to support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. Potential landslides and road failures, which can greatly increase sediment loading into adjacent habitats, are not expected to occur. ● The risk rating for recreation is low. Dispersed and developed recreation use is low or non-existent.

4-6 = MODERATE RISK -- One or more special habitats occur along the road segment and there is a slightly elevated concern about the future of this (these) habitats because of a combination of factors:

● Noxious weeds are not known to occur within the special habitat, but occur either along the road segment OR occur along roads feeding into this road. Therefore, there is an elevated concern that the special habitat may be at risk from noxious weeds. ● The risk rating for aquatics is moderate. For wetland habitats, there is increased sediment loading, which is likely decreasing the saturation of wetlands and moist meadows. Delivery of fine sediment from natural landslides is considered moderate within a few hundred feet of perennial streams. Slope failure has a moderate probability of occurrence (25-50%) with normal (proper) road design. ● The risk rating for recreation is moderate. Dispersed and developed recreation use is occurring, and it is of some concern. However, it is rated moderate relative to other areas where concerns are greater. ● The special habitat occupies a relatively large area along the road segment. ● The road segment contains a diversity of special habitats (e. g., moist meadow, aspen, scablands). The concern is elevated due to this increased diversity. ● Road segment travels through a relatively significant portion of the special habitat.

7-9 = HIGH RISK -- One or more special habitats occur along the road segment and there is a elevated concern about the future of this (these) habitats because of one or a combination of the following factors:

● The special habitat is rare (i.e., rarely occurs in central Oregon); and, therefore, should be maintained for overall biodiversity and ecosystem health. ● Noxious weeds are present along the road segment that crosses or parallels the special habitat. Noxious weeds are known to exist within the special habitat and are considered "high risk" species (therefore, the Noxious Weed Risk Rating is High). ● The risk rating for aquatics is high. For wetland habitats, the road impacts the movement of surface and groundwater necessary to support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. The road's location and design have displaced or degraded the wetland's size and function. Runoff is being

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (4 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

delivered directly to the wetland, increasing sediment and contaminant loadings. Crossings of surface and near surface water paths have severely limited the volume, timing and distribution of water necessary to saturate the landform and support the wetland's vegetation and soil characteristics. Potential landslides and road failures, which can greatly increase sediment loading into adjacent habitats, are at high risk. ● The risk rating for recreation is high. The area receives an abundance of dispersed and/or developed recreation use to the point at which habitat degradation is likely to be occurring or is known to occur. Dispersed and developed recreational use of the special habitat is high and causing habitat degradation, such as soil compaction and vegetation trampling. ● The road segment travels through a relatively significant portion of the special habitat. The road may parallel the special habitat or travel through it to the point where it is likely that road impacts may be occurring. ● There are or may be cumulative impacts to the special habitat due to a variety of different recreational uses (e.g., the area is used by bicyclists, off-highway vehicles, horses, hikers, campers, etc.).

Key ISSUE B. TES Plant Species: The presence, type, and location of roads may affect threatened, endangered, or sensitive plant species and other plant species of concern.

Key Question B1: How and where do roads affect TES plant species

Examples of potential impacts

Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plant habitats often occur in special habitats, such as moist or wet meadows, wetlands, or riparian habitats. Roads can impact these types of habitats by the same factors discussed above (see Examples of potential impacts for Special Habitats).

Other impacts could occur due to increased public access and recreational use. There may be increased collecting of sensitive plant species that occur within sensitive plant habitats (e.g., flower picking is a threat for the Newberry gentian, Gentiana newberryi, in popular campsites). Roads may facilitate the use of off-highway vehicles into sensitive plant habitats. High-use recreation areas, both dispersed and developed sites, may impact sensitive plant habitats, by trampling vegetation, compacting soils, and introducing noxious weeds. Some sensitive plant species, such as the green-tinged paintbrush (Castilleja chlorotica) depend on a host plant; if high recreation use impacts the host plant, then indirect impacts can occur to the sensitive plant.

Analysis Procedure

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (5 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

The sensitive plant GIS layer was overlain with the roads evaluated in this analysis. Sensitive plant populations were buffered by 200 feet; any roads that intersect the resulting polygon were identified. If a sensitive plant occurs within a special habitat (e.g., wetland), then the Aquatic Risk Rating for wetlands would also be considered in the analysis. Potential habitat is not addressed in this analysis because it is not mapped.

Assumptions

● TES plant populations are not always in the exact same locations. Individuals increase, decrease, and colonize new areas. Therefore, locations of TES plants in this analysis may change in the future.

Risk Factors to Evaluate Issue B

0 = NO RISK -- There are no TES plant populations along the road segment. 1-3 = LOW RISK -- One or more TES plant populations occurs along the road segment, but there is a low concern for the population because of one or a combination of the following factors:

● The population occupies a relatively small area along the road and individuals and their associated habitat are considered to be in good condition and not at risk ● The majority of known populations in other locations are protected and, therefore, there are no long-term viability concerns for the species. ● The TES plant habitat is not being degraded or directly impacted by the road and its associated use and maintenance (i.e., the Aquatic Risk Rating for wetlands is Low). ● Low recreation use occurs along the road segment. ● The area has not been surveyed for TES plants and there is some possibility and low-level concern that TES plant populations may occur along the road segment. ● Noxious weeds either do not occur along the road or low-risk species (e.g. bull thistle) occur; therefore, there is a low risk to the TES plant population(s) from noxious weeds.

4-6 = MODERATE RISK -- One or more TES plant populations occurs along the road segment and there is a slightly elevated concern about the future of the population(s) because of a one or a combination of following factors:

● The TES plant population occurs in a wetland habitat and the Aquatic Risk Rating is moderate. For example, The Aquatic Risk Rating for the road segment indicates that fine sediment loading may be occurring or the floodplain is not functioning properly. ● The TES plant population is a "protected" population in a Conservation Strategy and/or the population is considered

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (6 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

important genetically for maintaining long-term viability of the species. However, the road is not necessarily degrading the habitat. There is a higher concern than low because it is an important population, but not enough to warrant a high risk rating. ● The TES plant population occurs in a special habitat that received a moderate Aquatic Risk Rating. For example, there may be a TES plant population in a riparian area below a road, but the design of the road is such that a timbered buffer exists between the road and the riparian area that filters sediments and reduces the risk. ● The Recreation Risk Rating is Low or Moderate. There is a slightly elevated concern about an existing TES plant population, but either the design of the road limits recreation use (e.g., steep slope between the road and creek where TES plants occur) so that the risk rating is not high OR the road is allowing access to the plant population or it's habitat only to a moderate degree. ● Noxious Weed Risk Rating is Moderate. ● Some level of habitat degradation is occurring that can be attributed to the road, but not enough to be considered at high risk.

7-9 = HIGH RISK -- One or more TES plant populations occurs within 200 feet of the road segment and there is an elevated concern about the future of the population(s) because of one or a combination of the following factors:

● Each TES plant population is considered important to maintain the long-term viability of the species. There may be several factors that contribute to this determination. For example, there may be a low number of known populations for the species, or the majority of known sites are at risk. ● The TES plant population occurs in a special habitat, such as a wetland, that is at high risk due to the road (i.e., the Risk Rating for Aquatics is High). ● The Recreation Risk Rating is High. High recreation use occurs. There are or may be cumulative impacts to the TES plant habitat due to a variety of different recreational uses (e.g., the area is used by bicyclists, off-highway vehicles, horses, hikers, campers, etc.) ● The TES plant population is a "protected" population in a Conservation Strategy and/or the population is considered important genetically for maintaining long-term viability of the species, and there are impacts occurring or likely to occur due to the road. ● High risk noxious weed species exist along the road segment or close enough to be of high concern. ● The TES plant populations are small, fragmented, and vulnerable to habitat loss that may be occurring due to a combination of factors that can be linked to roads, such as noxious weeds, high recreation use, high road density, etc.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (7 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk KEY ISSUE C. Noxious Weeds: Roads facilitate the establishment and spread of noxious weeds and non- native invasive plant species.

To address Key Issue C, the following question is analyzed:

1. Key Question C1: How and where do roads and their use contribute to the spread of noxious weeds?

Examples of potential impacts

Noxious weeds can reduce ecological values by displacing native vegetation, increasing soil erosion, reducing forage for wildlife and livestock, and degrading recreational values. Road maintenance has the ability to increase the establishment and spread of noxious weeds by moving the seed and/or propagules along the road prism, introducing infected aggregate or providing a vector for infected vehicles/equipment to transport seed.

● roads directly encourage and cause the establishment and spread of noxious weeds. ● effects may be measured as a relative comparison of risk of introducing or spreading weeds; risk it to the native plant communities adjacent to the road segment. ● Weed Prevention Practices (BMP's) can reduce the risk. ● all road segments are at risk of being invaded by noxious weeds, particularly spotted and diffuse knapweeds and St. John'swort. ● doesn't matter if it's 1 or 2 miles from a weed population - seeds can be spread even by low or intermittent use of a road. ● the risk is alleviated by annual inventories (sophisticated search & destroy), and BMP's. ● describe prevention measures (BMP's, annual inventory & treatment, ….) in this section and refer below simply as "prevention measures". ● volume of traffic and proximity to large weed population centers can elevate the risk.

Analysis Procedure

The noxious weed GIS layer was overlain with the roads evaluated in this analysis. Noxious weed mapped sites were buffered by 200 feet; any roads that intersect the resulting polygon were identified.

Assumptions

● All roads have a high risk of facilitating the spread and establishment of noxious weeds. ● Due to limited budgets, inventory and mapping of noxious weeds is limited and not keeping up with the rapid rate of spread of noxious weeds. As a result, existing noxious weed sites were

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (8 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

missing in the electronic analysis; therefore, the noxious weed analysis relied heavily upon the knowledge of district botanists and ecologists. ● Noxious Weed Risk can be reduced by: ❍ Annual inventory and treatment (i.e., early detection and treatment). ❍ Following Best Management Practices for road maintenance and projects that occur along or near roads.

Risk Factors to Evaluate Issue C

0 = NO RISK -- All roads in this scale/level of analysis are at risk of being invaded by noxious weeds. Therefore, there is never a "no risk" situation. 1-3 = LOW RISK -- The risk is determined relatively low due to one or a combination of the following factors:

● The road segment is relatively far away from large infestation areas (e.g., cities of Bend, Sisters, Redmond, LaPine; Highway 97, etc.). ● The species along the road segment or closest to the road segment is of relatively low risk (e.g., bull thistle). ● Recreation use and overall traffic is low or limited seasonally (e.g. spring chanterelle mushroom hunting) such that there is a relatively lower risk of weeds spreading and becoming established. ● A relatively small noxious weed infestation occurs along the road and it is fairly stable and contained, and not expected to spread (assuming that yearly treatment continues). ● There exists low or limited potential habitat for the noxious weed species; therefore the population is not expected to expand it's size and range along the road segment.

4-6 = MODERATE RISK -- The risk is determined to be moderate due to one or a combination of the following factors:

● Weeds occur along the road segment, but the population is reduced and considered contained due to years of treatment. (However, this road segment could become a high risk if a year of treatment is skipped due to lack of funding and personnel). ● Medium traffic flow occurs along the road segment. ● Weeds do not occur along the road segment, but high risk species are established on road(s) feeding into this road. ● The area has not been surveyed and the risk is not known. However, the area has received a high amount of ground disturbance and contains private lands which have not been surveyed and are assumed to be uncontrolled or it is known that the private land noxious weed populations are not being treated. There is moderate concern that noxious weeds exist in the area and will spread along the road system.

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (9 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests - Road Analysis - Appendix Botany Risk

7-9 = HIGH RISK -- The risk is determined to be high due to one or a combination of the following factors:

● High risk noxious weed species occur along the road segment. Examples include spotted and diffuse knapweeds, Canada thistle, leafy spurge, yellow star thistle, medusahead, and houndstongue. ● Road segment may not have weeds, but is located relatively close to high infestation areas; therefore it is likely that weeds will spread into this road segment. ● Recreation use is high. ● High traffic flow. The road is a major arterial road that has a higher risk of spreading weeds. ● The road segment travels through an area that has a high fire risk in combination with a high risk weed problem. If the area does burn, weeds will spread rapidly along the roads. ● Existing populations, use, and previous disturbance. ● The area has not been surveyed and the risk is not known. However, the area has received a high amount of ground disturbance and contains private lands which have not been surveyed and are assumed to be uncontrolled or it is known that the private land noxious weed populations are not being treated, and contains high risk noxious weed species. There is high concern that noxious weeds exist in the area and will spread along the road system.

Back to Table of Contents

top Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Print This Page

USDA Forest Service - Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests Last Modified: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 at 16:38:18 EDT

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/planning/roadsanalysis/append-2-3-5b.shtml (10 of 10)5/31/2007 1:20:45 PM Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes Diffuse knapweed, Canada thistle, Sulfur Crosses 4 perennial streams and 3 intermittent streams. In Aspen (common), moist meadow. cinquefoil. Weeds present, but being Mowries, south side - contours along slope and intercepts 7 Bear Creek 1600000 9.97 4 1 4MRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. treated. streams. Probably in rel. steep terrain. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 1610000 0.00 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Weeds present or near, being treated. Only about 50 ft. in watershed and on top of ridge. Diffuse knapweed, Canada thistle. Weeds 1640000 3.39 4 1 4 M Moist meadow, willow. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. treated. Parallels Koochman Creek for about 2.5 miles. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 1680000 0.18 0 1 4Mof road. of road. Weeds present or near, being treated. Top of ridge. Parallels Faught Creek for about 3 miles. Native surfaced. 1700000 4.55 2 1 4 M Willow (common). Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present or near, being treated. Road goes to Antelope Reservoir. Crosses Bear Creek. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 1700600 0.66 0 1 4Mof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present or near, being treated. Campground? Goes to Antelope reservoir. Off the top of ridge at top of wateshed. Lot on south side of No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Canada thistle; med sage. Weeds present ridge, occasionally crosses ridge. 4 intermittents; native 1750000 13.28 0 1 4Mof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. or near, being treated. surfaced. CRO-111 18.13 4 1 7 1H Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-127A 0.69 4 0 7 1H Riparian weed risk. of road. High traffic. CRO-134 1.80 4 1 7 1H Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Parallels Salt Creek; paved. Paved; follows Little Bear Creek; crosses numerous intermittent CRO-226 6.16 4 1 7 1H Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. tribs. CRO-325 2.00 4 1 4 M Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present or near, being treated. OR-27 18.51 4 1 7 1H Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Parallels Bear Creek, crosses it 2X; Paved. Bear Creek Total 79.34 Paved; Paralells Helfin Creek for 1.5 miles; crosses 2 Bear Creek (Bridge) 2600000 1.64 1 2 2 L Could be some springs along here. Potential Botrychium in springs. Knapweed. intermittents. Low risk - habitat not being Dry, moist, & wet meadows, aspen, at impacted by road. Lower part Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle. 7 for 8 segments (goes in/out watershed); part paved, part native 2700000 4.68 2 2 7(3) 1H; L least 1 cottonwood. potential for Calochortus . paved portion; 3 for native surface. surface. Canada thistle, sulfur cinquefoil, diffuse No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. knapweed. Heavier traffic; several weed Gravelled, midslope road; crosses Bear Creek and approx. 12 2730000 12.89 1 1 6Mof road, but aspen likely to occur. Potential Cypripedium parviflorum . infestations being treated. smaller streams & intermittent creeks. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2730250 4.00 1 0 3LWet meadow. of road. Unknown. Can't find on map; hits 1 wetland. Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, St. Johnswort, sulfur cinquefoil. Heavier No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. traffic; several weed infestations being Follows N. Fork Bear Creek; lots switchbacks;parallels Bear 2735000 9.73 1 1 6Mof road, but aspen likely. Potential Cypripedium parviflorum . treated. Creek. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2745000 0.27 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Top of ridge; small segment. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2750000 0.70 0 0 5Mof road. of road. Diffuse knapweed, Canada thistle. Midslope, crosses Grant, Scotty & Rail Creeks. Gravelled. Bear Creek (Bridge) Total 33.92 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Bridge Creek 2200000 6.13 0 0 3Lof road. of road. Parallels Johnson Creek; Native surface, main road. Private? No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. of road. Low risk; any plant habitat Large houndstontue population. Close to Follows the west branch of Bridge Creek; crosses creeks; Old 2210000 9.98 2 2 9 1H Dry meadow; Occupies small area. not being degraded. high infestation areas on private land. Mitchell Hwy (used to be 26). No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Paved; Crosses 1 intermittent trib; parallels west branch of 2600000 11.62 1 2 2Lof road. of road. 0.05 CYOF Bridge Creek. .1 mi. FS in Watershed. Don't know - maybe Dunn Spring Lake is a lodgepole bog? At least a meadow. Low Not been surveyed for TES plants. Houndstongue; Canada thistle; Treated w/ risk - road segment crosses thru small Habitat not being degraded or herbicide; reduced to a few plants. Top of watershed; crosses Dunn Spring Lake (filled in meadow?) 2630000 3.62 2 2 5Mportion. directly impacted by road. Additional plants further down adjacent road. and the upper end Bridge Creek. Native surfaced. Bridge Creek Total 31.34 Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, Wetlands. Midslope road, crosses Double Cabin, Wiley Ck. Camp Creek 1600000 5.87 2 1 4 M Aspen; dry & moist meadow. Weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Med sage; being treated. Gravelled. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Whitetop, diffuse & spotted knapweed, 1670000 6.25 1 1 4Mof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Canada thistle; being treated. Crosses 3 intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 1750000 1.24 0 1 4Mof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present or near, being treated. Top of ridge. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 1760000 0.15 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds present or near, being treated. Native surfaced, no trib crossings, midslope for a mile. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. CRO-127 11.66 4 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Parallels Camp Creek, paved. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. CRO-127A 15.45 4 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. CRO-217 3.30 4 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Parallels Indian Creek; crosses Indian & W. Fk. Camp Creek.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 1 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. OR-380 0.64 1 0 71HRiparian weed risk. of road. High traffic. Paulina hwy. Goes from Prineville to Paulina. Camp Creek Total 44.56 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed & maybe other species. Crooked River Grasslands 3500000 2.57 0 0 6Mof road. of road. High traffic; being treated. Paved. Don't Don't No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5480000 3.10 know 0 know of road. of road. No stream crossings. Native surface. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed along at least a portion of Skull Hollow Rd. -- major recreation (mt. Biking, ATV, 5700000 3.32 0 0 5Mof road. of road. road. Moderate traffic, being treated. mudbogging, weed risk). No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5720000 1.65 0 0 1Lof road. of road. weeds in area, closed in winter Could not find on map. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5730000 1.95 1 0 1 L Cottonwood-Willow. Low traffic of road. weeds in area, closed in winter No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5740000 0.32 1 0 71HPossible cultural plants of road. high traffic, weeds being treated Could not find on map. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5770000 1.50 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Medusahead nearby. Moderate traffic. Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. Just south of Haystack Butte. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Probably not many weeds but high traffic. 6000000 7.00 0 0 3Lof road. of road. Some weeds are being treated. Paved. Parallels the highway after cross Crooked River Bridge. Spring occurs just south of this road. Lombardy poplar. Fenced and probably No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6010000 0.59 1 0 2Lold homestead. of road. Infestations being treated; light traffic. Paved; From 60 Rd. over to Haystack Reservoir. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Paved; 1 intermittent trib. Crosses. Just south of proposed 6080000 3.32 0 0 1Lof road. of road. Moderate to high traffic. Haystack Butte RNA. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Paved; crosses 1 intermittent trib. Back road to Culver around 6100000 6.00 0 0 3Lof road. of road. No known infestations but high traffic. south side Juniper Butte. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6110000 2.77 0 0 1Lof road. of road. Residential traffic. Paved; crosses 1 intermittent trib. All private land. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6120000 2.82 0 0 1Lof road. of road. Residential traffic. Paved; crosses 1 intermittent trib. Road to Opal Springs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6200000 6.96 0 0 81Hof road. of road. Lot weeds, some being treated; high traffic. Road that goes through Crooked River Ranch. Lake or Pond? BLM ACEC, RNA, and The Island type habitats. Because Island BLM ACEC, Texasporium sancti- closed to public use, low risk rating due to jacobi . Very little use but some High traffic, spotted knapweed & Paved. Rd. crosses Lake Billy Chinook; goes through Cover 6300000 5.25 1 1 81Hroad. weeds present in the area. medusahead. Palisades State Park and continues to Sisters RD. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6700000 0.60 0 0 1Lof road. of road. none known, some traffic Road to Haystack Reservoir?. Could not find on any maps. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 7210000 1.80 0 0 1Lof road. of road. none known, some traffic No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 7260000 1.80 0 0 1Lof road. of road. none known, some traffic No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 7290000 3.00 0 0 1Lof road. of road. none known, some traffic High traffic, spotted knapweed & No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. medusahead. Not 9 because weeds are 9700000 11.82 0 0 81Hof road. of road. sprayed. Paved. Crooked River Grasslands Total 68.14

Calochortus (CALLOP) protected population & BOTCRE; 2 miles concentrated TES plant habitat Appears to be mostly ridgetop road but from habitat standpoint along southern part of Rd. 12. Road TES - drainages are not steep but are moist, broad plains over parallels CALLOP population for 2 picture gorge basalts, very shallow soils. Almost entire road Dry meadow; moist meadow; aspen (1 of miles, Canada thistle population aggregate; goes to paved at head of watershed (about 1.5 mi. biggest stands on district); Rd. goes along road (weed risk). Calochortus paved). Aspen stand needs culvert replaced. Deep Creek - lot Deep Creek 1200000 12.89 5 7(6) 3 1H; M through moist meadow. in aspen. Canada thistle small site. dispersed recreation. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Ridgetop about .5 mi. section, then drops out of watershed. Dry 1250000 0.63 1 0 2Lof road. of road. High use hunting season. meadows occur on ridgetop. CALLOP; Important population - in upper reaches of watershed & will likely move downstream; both pops are protected in draft Conservation Strategy. Road is elevated above Far away from population, low recreation, but the habitat so are having runoff into huge knapweed populaiton off Forest along Ridgetop crosses Double Corral and Happy Camp Cks. Low 2630000 6.21 2 5 2 M Dry & moist meadows. the meadows. Rd. 12 rd. recreation use. Summit historic trail.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 2 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes

Spotted knapweed, treated yearly & CALLOP; small population; not declining. 743 Rd. has a large population of Crosses W. & E. Forks of Crazy Creek; Happy Camp Creek, and Moist meadow, scablands (intermittent protected in CS; no weeds around spotted knapweed and feeds into this road. Double Corral Creek, along with 5 intermittent tribs. Appears to 3000000 8.28 6 2 4Malong rd), aspen stand parallel to road. it; About 5 mi. from Calochortus. High traffic. be midslope. Gravelled.

CALLOP; 7 because estimate 3 mi. of the 6 mi. within the watershed have Calochortus. Protected population along Buck Hollow Ck. Aquatics rated floodplain function as 5 (moderate), so elevated concern. High weed risk; weeds within TES Alder wetland (where 42 road connects plant population. Canada thistle is Variety of weed species, including spotted with 4250). Roads come together where contained (very small, localized that knapweed, Canada thistle, houndstongue, Multiple segments; either paved or gravelled. Paved portion creeks come together. Potential for are stable); but houndstongue is an St. Johnswort, whitetop & Russian thistle. parallels Deep Creek for lower 1 1/2 miles; then heads up and houndstongue within alder wetland. Low increasing population. Rest of road Houndstongue increasing & potential to get parallels Buck Hollow Creek, then essentially ridgetop coming in rating because < 2% of road length within (50%) no concerns, but 50% high into alder wetland. Whitetop increasing, and out of watershed. Most paved. Rd. in good shape, mostly 4200000 5.63 2 7 82Hwatershed is at risk. concern. manually treated. along ridgetop.

Moist & wet meadows, alder wetland. Alder habitat follows the length of Deep BOTCRE, CALLOP; 7 because Ck. & into Jackson Ck. Fairly minor moist Calochortus occurs within special meadow sites. 7 because noxious weeds habitat, which has a high aquatic present within special habitats; risk rating rating. Not protected in for aquatics for floodplain function is high Conservation Strategy. High (7); high recreation use (dispersed). recreation use; Calochortus along > Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, Essentially on the creek. Parallels Deep Creek the rest of the Population of rare willow (rare for Ochoco) -50% of road. Botrychium occurs at houndstongue, sulfur cinquefoil; 6 because way in the drainage from where leaves 42 almost to headwaters only 2 populations known for Forest -- north end of road, where several several species; treat road yearly, of Deep creek. Crosses Jackson Creek, Toggle, Ck., Happy 4250000 15.19 7 7 62HSalix drummondiana. springs, boggy wetlands. populations are declining, but risk still there. Camp Ck., and 1 crossing of Deep Creek. Gravelled entire way. Wet meadow, alder wetland. 4 because there is alder habitat along the west portion of road (1.5 miles) along Little Diffuse knapweed, Canada thistle, sulfur Summit Creek and have various small wet cinquefoil, dal. toadflax. Not included in EA; To west of Little Summit Prairie, parallels Little Summit Creek, meadows. Noxious weeds not in habitats BOTCRE, CALLOP; Much of road manual treat when and where can; several crosses 4 tribs. Midslope road; creek below road, runs parallel but are along road; Aquatics rating parallels but is above creek; reduces populations declining (LINDAL), but fairly well to creek, which makes risk lower because buffer to filter out 4254000 4.30 4 4 6Mmoderate. risk. traveled road. sediments; steep so no recreation.

CALLOP; 6 because road parallels habitat (vs. just crossing through); Alder wetland; alder actually goes about a aquatics ratings moderate; not mile where really steep. Steep canyon ranked high because relatively for No known noxious weed sites, but gets 4 and road goes right up the creek. watershed - pops along that road are because population of spotted knapweed on Aquatics ratings moderate. Road parallels small but disjunct (therefore, high 743 rd. ties in with 4256. Risk there to feed Parallels Happy Camp Creek for entire road segment length. 4256000 2.30 5 6 4Mspecial habitat. end of moderate). into the 4256. Native surface, crosses 3 intermittents.

CALLOP; Not protected population in draft Conservation Strategy. Road is perpendicular to the Don't have weeds along road, however, do population (crosses it rather than have weeds along Rd. 12 which 4258 runs Wet meadow. No weeds, recreation risk paralleling it). No noxious weeds. into, but far enough away to stay in low 4258000 3.90 3 4 2Mlow. Moderate aquatic risk rating. rating. Parallels for the 1st 1.5 miles Toggle Creek. Native surfaced. CALLOP; 4 because part of Buck Hollow (protected) population; otherwise would have been low because where road intersects it is flat, has low aquatics rating, not much risk. Elevated to moderate No stream crossings. Aggregate, starts adjacent to Buck Hollow because protected population in Only .1 mile road segment. But 3 because of Creek, then heads uphill, so fine sediment probably runs down 4260000 0.91 2 4 3 M Dry-moist meadow. Well travelled. Flat. Conservation Strategy. high risk species that are along Rd. 42. into Buckhollow Creek. Road is intersection with 42 rd.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 3 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes

BOTCRE, CALLOP; For about 1 1/4 miles, have large population of Dry, moist, & wet meadow; lots of Calochortus that is protected under scablands (1/3 of road occurs on scabs draft Conservation Strategy that is and they grade in and out from scablands adjacent to Little Summit Prairie. Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, to dry meadows), several aspend stands. Have huge meadow system that St. Johnswort, sulfur cinquefoil. 7 because No weeds in special habitats, but in road varies from wet to moist to dry to numerous high risk species well established. prism. Traffic seasonally high; developed scab by the undulations. High traffic. Developed rec site along road recreation site. Aquatics ratings Populations go hand in hand with gets high use during hunting season. Not moderate, amount traffic, amount of special habitats. Flow effects is a 4. higher than 7 because populations fairly Crosses Little Summit, Thornton Creeks, and 7 intermittent tribs, scabland (fragile area), fact that road in Important Calochortus center (main small, do manual when can, populations passes close to Little Summit Prairie; midslope, looks like 4270000 8.90 6 8 72Hscablands is flat and easily go off-road. population). stable for now but at risk. contours slope. Aggregate. Wet meadow; 4 because one Canada thistle population (therefore bumped up BOTCRE, CALLOP; According to from low); fine sediment & floodplain Ochoco map, about 80% of road has functios are moderate; however, amount Calochortus. Not a protected Canada thistle at intersection; eradicated? of special habitat is very small and fact population. Road next to creek for Population basically contained and stable; Parallels West Fork Thornton Creek; Gravelled. 90% of road that Canada thistle is either extremely long distance and parallels road doesn't feed into any high population segment along creek, crosses 1 intermittent stream. Crosses 4272000 4.20 4 7 31Hsmall or gone (lower risk). Calochortus population. weed centers. West Thornton once. BOTCRE, CALLOP; 80% Spotted knapweed (by Botrychium site, fairly Round Meadow (moist meadow). Weed Calochortus along road segment. small & contained); Canada thistle (3 Parallels Thornton Creek for whole length of road segment; 4274000 4.80 4 7 51Hrisk. Weeds, road parallels population. populations, fairly small& contained). crosses creek once. Aggregate.

Dry meadow; alder wetland. Junction of CALLOP (protected population in 4276/4270 is riparian (wet boggy creek draft Conservation Strategy occurs with alder). Degraded area; culvert needs right at junction of 4270/4276). 2.5 Canada thistle in the middle of the road, may to be replaced. High use dispersed mi. road with only .3 Calochortus. not be there anymore. Small infestation that recreation site (actually on 4270 where Degraded condition at culvert and is relatively stable and in habitat where low 4276000 2.44 3 5 4Mroads come together). recreation concerns. potential for spread (very dry). Crosses Little Summit Creek at head of Little Summit Prairie. Deep Creek Total 80.58 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse knapweed, being treated. All pvt Deschutes South 2600000 3.21 0 0 1Lof road. of road. land. State Highway, crosses numerous intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3500000 0.58 0 0 1Lof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated North of Cove Palisades. Paved. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Whitetop, spotted knapweed, bull thistle. Gravel, flat. From Hwy 26 to Hwy 97 in Crooked River 5500000 4.01 0 0 5Mof road. of road. Moderate traffic. Grassland. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5600000 1.95 0 0 5Mof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. South of Haystack Reservoir. Barely in this watershed. Couple 5740000 0.43 1 0 7 1H possible cultural plants of road. High traffic, weeds being treated intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. South of Haystack Reservoir. Barely in this watershed. Couple 5750000 0.44 0 0 5Mof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated intermittent tribs. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Weeds present, being treated, moderate 6010000 1.02 1 0 2 L Osborne spring of road. traffic Native surface, goes to Haystack Reservoir. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Bull thistle; being treated, moderate traffic. 6080000 1.43 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Norris Ln. Crosses an intermittent trib to Haystack Reservoir. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6600000 5.75 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated Southwest of Madras, no streams. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Weeds present, being treated Near Round 6610000 2.00 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Butte No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6620000 5.25 1 0 2 L dry portion of willow cr of road. Weeds present, being treated Belmont Dr No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6630000 3.80 0 0 2Lof road. of road. No weeds moderate traffic. Elk Dr. All PVT. West of Madras. Crosses 1 intermittent trib. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Weeds present, being treated. High traffic. 6670000 1.38 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Mt View Dr. West of Madras. Crosses 3 intermittent tribs, paved. Whitetop, diffuse & spotted knapweed, bull No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. thistle, field bindweed. Weeds being treated. South of Madras, gravelled. Crosses Dry Canyon #2. Crosses 4 8900000 7.51 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Moderate traffic. County Road. intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Bull thistle, field bindweed; being treated, Crosses 5 intermittent tribs in farm fields area N of Redmond. N. 8910000 3.77 0 0 2Lof road. of road. moderate traffic. of Haystack Reservoir.

Cottonwood-willow with shrub dominated. Whitetop, bull thistle, bindweed, Russian Springs in area Moderate to high traffic, No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. knapweed. Moderate to high traffic. Laurel 9600000 5.18 2 0 4Mso weed threat to riparian. of road. Ln. Goes to Haystack Reservoir and south. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Russian knapweed, being treated. High 9605000 1.64 2 0 4Mof road. of road. traffic. Appears to go to Haystack Reservoir campground. Paved. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Whitetop, bull thistle; medusahead, not SE of Haystack Reservoir. Native surfaced. No stream 9610000 1.29 0 0 4Mof road. of road. being treated. Moderate traffic. crossings.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 4 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Weeds present, being treated. Very high 9700000 3.40 0 0 4Mof road. of road. traffic, residual herbicide, all PVT. Paved. Crosses Dry Canyon. Deschutes South Total 54.02 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Grindstone CRO-112 2.55 0 0 3Lof road. of road. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-113 1.60 0 0 3Lof road. of road. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-135 0.96 0 0 3Lof road. of road. Grindstone Total 5.11 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No known infestations but high vehicle use. Irrigation Canals OR-126 4.13 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Have to ask BLM. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No known infestations but high vehicle use. US-20 2.91 0 1 71Hof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Have to ask BLM. Irrigation Canals Total 7.05 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. From The Island, across the Deschutes River Arm of Billy Lake Billy Chinook 3500000 3.00 0 0 6Mof road. of road. Weeds present being treated. High traffic. Chinook; paved. Same as in Crooked River Grasslands watershed. Goes north No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. toward The Island. Rides area bet. Crooked and Deschutes 6200000 1.54 1 0 6 M cultural plants of road. Weeds present, not treated. Rivers. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6300000 13.45 3 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. Weeds present, being treated. Crosses 3 intermittent tribs. Lake. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No tribs. On Deschutes arm, south Lake Billy Chinook 6310000 1.28 2 0 1 L Cultural plants. of road. Low traffic. (essentially). No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6320000 1.52 4 0 7 1H Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. Low traffic. Geneva Pond. Crosses 1 intermittent tribs. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6330000 3.10 2 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. Low traffic, weeds in area. No streams. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6340000 1.10 2 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. Low traffic, weeds in area. No streams. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6350000 3.10 2 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. Low traffic. 2 tribs. Passes the old Geneva town site. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6355000 1.70 4 0 4 M Dry meadow. Weed risk. of road. Low traffic. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. West of Deschutes River Arm of Billy Chinook, Native surface. 6500000 1.47 2 0 4 M Cultural plants. of road. Moderate traffic. Parallels 1 intermittent trib. Nearby habitat for rare lichen, 6510000 1.16 9 9 52HTexosporium sancti jacobi . Rare lichen and weeds. Lichen at Big Canyon. 1 intermittent trib. Nearby habitat for rare lichen, 6520000 0.62 2 9 51HTexosporium sancti jacobi . Rare lichen and weeds. Lichen at Big Canyon. No tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6670000 1.27 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Moderate traffic, weeds present. No tribs. To NE of Haystack Draw. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6671000 0.75 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Moderate traffic, weeds present. No tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 8910000 0.33 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 9600000 0.22 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated. NW of Haystack. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Weeds present, being treated, all PVT 9700000 2.68 0 0 2Lof road. of road. agricultural land. Lake Billy Chinook Total 38.28 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Lower Beaver 1200000 1.51 0 0 2Lof road. of road. No weeds currently. Fairly low risk. South and eastof Little Summit. Top of Ridge. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No weeds currently. Weeds at 38 1250000 0.88 0 0 3Lof road. of road. intersection. South and eastof Little Summit. Top of Ridge. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 0.03 CEDI; Treated; elsewhere on 38 road Crosses Wolf Creek and 2 intermittent tribs. Partly paved, partly 3800000 3.49 3 0 4 M Dry meadow/scab. of road. have high and moderate segments. aggregate. 0.9 CADR; 0.24 CEDI; 0.12 CEMA; 0.26 CIAR; 0.11 ?; 0.23 PORE; whitetop population increasing; diffuse & spotted stable due to years of treatment; stable PORE populations; Main road, high traffic, Parallels Wolf Creek and appears to cross it 2X. Crosses 4 Small amount of dry meadow. 4 because No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. developed campground, high recreation use intermittent tribs. Gravelled. Probably stringer wetlands. 3810000 6.70 4 0 7 (8) 1H of high weed rating. of road. (high for Regor). Follows creek all the way.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 5 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes 0.21 CEMA; 0.05 CIAR; 0.15 HYPE; 0.25 PORE; 2 segments for ratings; From boundary to 3810 junction = 8 because spotted knapweed on private that has been treated for years but still there, plus developed campground, very high rec use; main entrance to Forest; From 3810 to 6 Large scab; several springs on one corners = 6 -- no weeds but connected to segment (from 3810 junction to 6 corners); No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. high risk area and has 2 developed 4200000 9.95 4 (0) 0 8(6) 1H rest of road = 0 of road. campgrounds along it, main road. Paved. Crosses Wolf Creek. Midslope; crosses N. Wolf Creek, Miles Creek, 7 intermittent Spring and aspen stand on road. Very tribs. Gravelled. Wetlands: appears come close to or small for length of road, but 4 because of No weeds currently, but this road is main crosses Clayton Reservoir, but no actual designation on our 4260000 4.49 4 6 6Mweed risk. CALLP. Weed risk. road into the large houndstongue population. map of the reservoir. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 4276000 0.16 0 0 4Mof road. of road. No weeds currently. Top of ridge. Small segment, east of Little Summit Prairie. Spotted knapweed, scattered houndstongue, medusahead, herbicides not yet approved Native surfaced, parallels intermittent trib to N. Wolf Creek, No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. via EA; one of main roads in houndstongue about 3/4 mi. segment. Camp Reservoir? May be in different 4280000 0.68 2 0 8 1H Scablands. of road. infestation. watershed. 0.12 CIAR; 0.02 PORE; High whitetop BOTCRE (large pop), BOTMON populations on 3810, which intersects with (small pop). Weed risk, moderate this road. CIAR and PORE are stable. But, aquatic rating and size of BOTCRE on spur road, large medsage population & Parallels intermittent trib to Wolf Creek. Gravelled. S34 4290000 4.20 4 6 5 M Moist meadow, springs. Weed risk. population (> 300 plants). increasing CIAR population. possible wetlands. ASTTEG; 4 due to weeds; paved No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. road, timbered to edge of road; Spotted knapweed, on private land (also?), 5800000 1.62 0 3 5Mof road. ATTEG in timber. houndstongue eradicated? Paved. Road to Rager Ranger District?

Springs, alder wetland, dry meadow, moist No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Canada thistle (stable); houndstongue Stringer scabland road goest to ridgetop? Crosses 1 5810000 4.97 5 0 71Hmeadow, scabs. 5 due to weeds. of road. increasing. High traffic. intermittent. Special habitats unknown. Paulina to CRO-112 0.73 1 1 5MIzee. Never surveyed; unknown. Whitetop and spotted knapweed. Road to Izee. Paved.

From Pivots to Rd. 58. Special habitats - Private population knapweed. Main road, County road to Rager before changes to Rd. 58. Crosses 2 CRO-113 5.40 2 1 5Mboggy, alder salix area; rest unknown. Never surveyed; unknown. high traffic. intermittent tribs and crosses Beaver Creek. Paved. Main road, high traffic, lots whitetop, teasel that is not being treated by private land OR-380 8.10 1 1 6 M Paulina west. Special habitats unknown. Never surveyed; unknown. owners. Paulina Hwy. Lower Beaver Total 52.89 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada thistle; Lower Crooked River Valley 2600000 7.38 0 0 2Lof road. of road. being treated. Paved, crosses Grizzly Mt. Canyon Creek. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2700000 0.34 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated. Little McKay Rd. that goes north Prineville. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse knapweed, being treated. All pvt 5700000 1.91 1 0 2 L Cultural plants. of road. land. Behind Smith Rock. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5710000 2.55 4 0 1 M Riparian/aspen/weeds. of road. Weeds present, being treated. Follows Skull Hollow Draw. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5720000 1.75 0 0 1Lof road. of road. Weeds present, being treated.

No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse & spotted knapweed; St. Johnswort. 7960000 4.85 1 0 4 M Riparian and weed risk. of road. High traffic, weeds being treated. Follows a little bit Lone Pine Creek. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. OR-126 4.73 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds being treated. High traffic. Paved. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. OR-27 6.28 2 0 2 L Riparian and weed risk. of road. Weeds being treated. High traffic. Follows the Crooked River, south of Prineville. Paved. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Road to Paulina. Only portion we deal with is portion right out of OR-380 6.18 0 0 71Hof road. of road. High traffic. Weeds not treated. Prineville. Lower Crooked River Valley Total 35.97 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Lower Dry River OR-126 7.85 1 1 71Hof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. US-20 3.98 0 1 71Hof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Lower Dry River Total 11.82 No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. To the west of Deschutes River Lower Metolius 6300000 4.54 3 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. 0.11 CEMA being treated Arm. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6310000 1.27 2 0 1 L Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. low traffic No streams.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 6 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6320000 0.18 4 0 7 1H Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. low traffic, but TACA No streams. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Crosses Juniper Creek. Comes close to Juniper Reservoir. 6400000 2.75 2 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. low traffic, but TACA Appears to be paved. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6500000 0.98 2 0 4 M Weeds may threaten cultural plants. of road. moderate traffic Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. Weeds may threaten rare Texosporium Crosses 2 intermittent tribs and goes into Big Canyon, which 6510000 3.44 9 9 93Hlichen. Lichen threatened by medusahead. Medusahead. drains Fly Lake. Weeds may threaten rare Texosporium 6520000 2.93 9 9 93Hlichen. Lichen threatened by medusahead. Medusahead. No streams. Lower Metolius Total 16.09

No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Adjacent diffuse knapweed & medusahead. Parallels Committee Creek. Native surfaced. East of Prineville, Lower N. Fork Crooked 4225000 1.20 2 0 5 M Aspen. of road. Moderate vehicle use. look for N. Fk. Crooked River Wild and Scenic River area. Look south from Big Summit Prairie. Goes off map and comes back on. Paralles Rough Canyon Creek, skips over and parallels Aspen, wet meadows, probably dry No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Fox Canyon Creek, then up north Fox Canyon Creek. Comes 4230000 7.79 3 0 2Lmeadows. Moderate vehicle use. of road. 0.12 CEMA; close to 5 reservoirs. CALOP4; Not selected populaion. Probably stable. Road goes to Lomatium ochocense , but no Aspen, dry & wet meadows. Moderate influence from road on this Scotch thistle, med sage, spotted in or near. 4240000 7.48 2 2 2Lvehicle use. population. Being treated. Crosses Donnelly Creek and Lamedog Creek; CALLOP. Small, vulnerable, No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. isolated population with high noxious No weeds currently, but connected to 4260000 2.41 0 8 72Hof road. weed risk. houndstongue. Crosses 1 intermittent trib, gravel. Special habitats not mapped, but small OR-380 0.07 0 1 6Mpiece of road. TES not surveyed. Paulina Hwy. Lower N. Fork Crooked Total 18.96

Scotch, Canada, whitetop, dalmation toadflax, spotted knapweed, teasel, Russian No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. knapweed, probably medusahead. All on Lower Ochoco 2600000 8.85 2 0 8 1H Willow, ditches. of road. private with very little treatment. Ochoco Reservoir area. Paved. Follows Ochoco Creek. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2700000 3.33 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Weeds present, high traffic. Main street Prineville. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 3380000 0.41 0 1 4Mof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present, being treated. Top of ridge. Willow, alder. Maybe cottonwood. Low No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CIAR, teasel. All on private with very little 4215000 7.03 5 0 6Mtraffic, but floodplain has been altered. of road. treatment. Follows Veazie Creek for all of its length. Gravelled. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Russian, CENMAC. All private very little OR-380 5.59 0 0 7 1H All private. of road. treatment. Probably whitetop too. Paulina Hwy. Lower Ochoco Total 25.21 TES unknown; low probability of Knapweed, Scotch thistle, teasel in areas Area includes Black Canyon Wilderness up to Mitchell. S. Fork Lower South Fork 2600000 0.47 6 1 6 M Special habitats unknown; low probability. occurrence. along road and main road. John Day River. This road is state hwy. Canada thistle (small populations). Fair amount hunter traffic in fall; Spotted No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. knapweed eradicated; Historical yellow 3800000 7.61 6 0 6 M Alder wetland, springs. Weed risk. of road. starthistle population. Crosses S. Fk. Black Canyon Creek at top, rest ridgetop.

No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Main road, moderate traffic. Canada thistle, 5800000 1.58 4 0 4 M Extensive dry meadows. of road. sulfur cinquefoil; stable populations. Crosses S. Fk. Wind Creek,

No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed, diffuse, at intersection 5800500 1.87 6 0 6Mof road. of road. 58/58500. Treated annually, but persisting. Campground? Or to reservoir?

No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No weeds currently, but are further south on 5810000 0.45 6 0 6Mof road. of road. the 5810 (CIAR, CENMAC). Main road. Ridgetop. Top of Black Canyon Wilderness. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5840000 1.74 5 0 5Mof road. of road. Canada thistle. Main road. Ridgetop. S. side Black Canyon Wilderness.

Canada thistle, sulfur cinquefoil; stable, but Crosses N. Fk. Wind Creek, Squaw Creek, and numerous No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. nearby private land large teasel pop. which is intermittent tribs. Appears to come close to variety small 5850000 8.82 5 0 5 M Scablands. of road. not being treated. Logging traffic on 5850. reservoirs.

From Murderers Creek north to Dayville: 6(8 for 6(8 for TES unknown. Never surveyed. houndstongue, diffuse, spotted, scotch thistle northern northern Special habitats not mapped, but there are Probability low to moderate. Lots & historical dalmation toadflax population GRA-42 24.12 segment) 1 segment) M; 2H springs, moist meadows, rock outcrops. cattle grazing. (partly on BLM). North portion = 8; overall 6. Follows S. Fk. John Day River. Gravelled. Lower South Fork Total 46.66

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 7 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Lower South Fork Crooked OR-380 0.30 0 0 3Lof road. of road. Paulina Hwy.. Lower South Fork Crooked Total 0.30 No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. Lwr Crooked River RM56.5-7 OR-27 13.32 1 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Lwr Crooked River RM56.5-70.5 Total 13.32 North and East of Prinveville, road up Allen Creek. Entire length No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. 0.01 CEDI; 0.24 CEMA; 0.03 CIAR; High Allen Creek paralleled by road (10 miles?). Parallels Fall Creek McKay 2150000 3.08 1 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. traffic, little treatment. for 2 miles. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2600000 0.16 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Very high traffic. Some treatment. Paved. Follows McKay Creek and then breaks off and follows Little McKay Creek. Appears to be paved entire distance to top of 2700000 19.53 2 5 5 M Wet meadow. Riparian weed risk. CALOP; Recreation & weed risk. Heavy traffic and some treatment. ridge. Wet meadow at top? CALOP4; High recreation use Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada thistle; 2705000 4.66 2 8 4 1H Dry & wet meadows. Riparian weed risk. threatens selected population. some treatment. Gravelled. Crosses 2 intermittent streams. Spotted knapweed; Canada thistle; being 2710000 8.54 1 3 4 M Dry meadow. Surveys unknown, higher probability. treated. Top of ridge. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 2715000 0.00 0 3 4Mof road. Surveys unknown, higher probability. Canada thistle; being treated. By Dutchman Spring. Approx. 100 ft. in watershed. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. 2720000 0.10 1 3 4MRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, higher probability. Spotted knapweed; being treated. Canada thistle; spotted knapweed; being 2725000 0.18 1 3 4 M Wet meadow. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, higher probability. treated.

2730000 0.08 1 3 4 M Wet meadow. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, higher probability. Canada thistle; being treated. Knapweeds, Canada thistle, bindweed, No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. houndstongue, scotch broom, medusahead, 3300000 5.24 2 0 5MRiparian weed risk. of road. all being treated. Follows rest of McKay Creek, parallels it. Aggregate. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. 3380000 4.38 4 1 5MRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Leafy spurge; being treated. Within the old Dry Creek area. McKay Total 45.96 Mid Crooked River RM110-121600000 2.26 4 1 4 M Aspen common. Surveys unknown, low probability. Canada thistle, being treated. Crosses 3 intermittent tribs. Midslope, but top of watershed. SE Maury Creek wetland. Riparian weed Whitetop, diffuse knapweed, Canada thistle; 1670000 4.89 4 1 4Mrisk. Surveys unknown, low probability. being treated. Crosses Rimrock Creek and upper end Maury Ck. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 1750000 1.10 0 3 4Mof road. CALOP nearby. Weeds present, being treated. At very top watershed. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. OR-380 10.30 1 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Paulina Hwy. Mid Crooked River RM110-125 Total 18.55 Rd. crosses Sanford Creek & its assoc small wetland. Mid Crooked River RM70.5-861750000 2.42 4 4 4 M Dry & moist meadow. Weed risk. Traffic. Weeds present, being treated. Otherwise, top of watershed. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. CRO-134 0.44 1 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Crosses 2 intermittent tribs for .5 mi. in watershed. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. OR-27 4.40 4 1 71HRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Crooked River Hwy. Paved. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. OR-380 3.89 1 1 71Hof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. High traffic. Paulina Hwy. Mid Crooked River RM70.5-86.2 Total 11.15

Parallels Newsome& Sherwood Creeks. Appears to have some wetland involvement. Gravelled. Leaves watershed, comes across top of other watersheds andre-enters watershed. Mid Crooked River RM86.2-1 1600000 18.60 4 1 4 M Dry meadow; Willows. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Canada thistle, being treated. Crosses and parallels Wildcat and Drake Creek (east section). Parallels Newsome Creek. Adjacent to Wood Springs. 1610000 6.00 4 1 4 M Dry & wet meadows. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present; being treated. Wetlands. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. 1620000 3.20 4 1 4MRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present; being treated. Parallels Gibson Ck.

Moist meadow (Upper end Wildcat Creek Diffuse knapweed, Canada thistle, being 1680000 5.42 4 1 4Mhas wetland?). Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. treated. Crosses Wildcat Creek; SE part of watershed. 1690000 1.70 4 1 4 M Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Canada thistle, being treated. Crosses Wildcat Creek; SE part of watershed. Dry meadow.; less risk to dry meadow 1700000 9.35 1 1 4Mcompared to other areas. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present, being treated. Parallels Pine Creek. Same as 1600. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. 1750000 9.34 4 1 4MHigher weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present, being treated. At top of watershed. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 1760000 0.95 0 1 2Lof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds nearby but less traffic. Might go to Tower Point Lookout?

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 8 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes Crosses Lodgepole, Buck, Horse Heaven, Rock Crusher, W. Fk. Wet meadow, aspen. Low to moderate No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Canada thistle, spotted knapweed; Horse Heaven Creeks (all intermittents?). Part native surface; 4215000 9.24 2 0 3Lrecreation use. of road. moderate vehicle traffic. part gravel. Dry (?) & wet meadow, aspen, Mt. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Knapweeds, medusahead. Moderate vehicle Long section road, midslope, crosses numerous stream 4235000 13.56 2 0 5MMahogany. of road. use. channels; gravelled. Whitetop, Canada thistle, Russian Willows, wetlands. Nature Conservancy No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. knapweed; yellow starthistle & leafy spurge OR-380 20.84 1 0 81HJuniper Hills Preserve along part of road. of road. on private. Some control. Paulina Hwy. Mid Crooked River RM86.2-110 Total 98.19 Whitetop, knapweeds, Canada thistle, St. Johnswort, sulfur cinquefoil; paved, weeds Wet meadow; willow wetland; dry likely stay within road prism. All decreasing, Goes to Rager and beyond. Paved. Crosses numerous streams meadow, extensive scabs. High use; treated yearly. Developed, well-used (Rager, Powell, Tamarac, Sugar, N. Fork Beaver, Bear). Middle Beaver 5800000 12.64 6 3 5Mmain rd. to Regor RD, weeds. ASTTEG; weeds. campground. Numerous wetlands. Canada thistle declining but high use area; Willow wetland. 7 because in developed No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. also spotted knapweed at entrance to 5800050 0.10 7 0 51Hrec area; high use and weed risk. of road. campground. Campground road at Sugar Creek. Willow wetland at creek? Moist meadow, willow. Special habitats degraded due to admin site. Potential to increase habitat quality if money becomes No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5800141 5.00 4 0 5Mavailable. of road. Whitetop, spotted knapweed. Campgrounds and Compound Roads. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5800142 0.40 0 0 5Mof road. of road. Campgrounds and Compound Roads. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5800143 0.21 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Whitetop increasing. Campgrounds and Compound Roads. Moist meadow, willow, aspen. Special Whitetop, teasel, spotted knapweed. Teasel habitats degraded due to admin site. decreasing. Road to bunkhouse, open Potential to increase habitat quality if No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. storage, warehouse; lots trucks, equipment, 5800145 0.26 4 0 71Hmoney becomes available. of road. traffic. Campgrounds and Compound Roads.

No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No weeds currently, but developed rec site at 5810000 4.15 2 0 3 M Willow wetland. of road. junction; weeds along 58, high use. Parallels Sugar Creek, crosses it 2X. Gravelled. Early invader whitetop pop.; decreasing No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. spotted knapweed and medusahead; stable 5820000 9.00 2 0 6 M Dry meadow. of road. Canada thistle. Crosses Powell Ck., 3 intermittent tribs.

No weeds currently; fairly low risk but Crosses Tamarac, Rager, Heisler, and Beaver Dam Creek. 5830000 5.40 1 2 3 L Spring. ORYHEN medusahead on side road. Beaver Dam Ck. Becomes N. Fk. Beaver Ck. Midslope road. Weed problem northern part road; Knapweed & St. Johnswort decreasing to Springs, dry meadow, scablands. Weed No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. nearly gone; Canada thistle concentrated & 5840000 10.50 3 0 6Mrisk. of road. persisting. Ridgetop; No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5850000 0.18 0 0 2Lof road. of road. No weeds currently. Only maybe 1/4 mi. in watershed. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-135 8.32 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Private land access; little whitetop. Gravelled; South of Beaver Ck.; crosses S. Fk. Beaver Creek. Middle Beaver Total 56.15

Calochortus along lower slopes; this is an upper slope population. Probably fringe pop, high in the Dry & wet meadow; alder wetland, aspen. watershed, which could make it Threats: channel went from D to C, narrow important. Low numbers of CALOP, Canada thistle somewhere along road but (Area essentially encompasses eastern 1/2 of Big Summit floodplain, get flash flows - no beaver, but relatively protected because not not mapped, need > information. Yellow star Prairie). On northern 1/2 of prairie, passes N. of Allen Ck. more ephemeral, dries ou, more directly affected by road or thistle in adjacent watershed; very high risk Reservoir. Crosses Allen & Boothe Creek, parallels Beetle Ck. Middle N. Fork Crooked 2200000 2.89 2 5 71Hconducive to conifers. recreation use associated with road. of moving into this watershed via roads. Wetlands at upper end of Beetle Creek. Potential Carex stenophylla in scablands. Not surveyed; low risk to scablands from recreation, vehicles. Ventenata dubia probably along this road. Native surface. Rd. goes from Big Summit Prairie to top Mt. 2230000 2.36 3 2 2 L Scablands (Artemisia cana type). Suspect habitat stable. Tends to occupy disturbed scablands. Pisgah. No known TES plants within 200 ft. Dry meadow. Low vehicle use, LMP of road. Parts of area surveyed. directs low maintenance, so not lot Probably low risk because known Low risk - low vehicle use, few nearby Ridgetop road (Summit Trail). Historic, special management 2630000 8.79 2 2 2Ldisturbance. potential habitat. infestations. area, cannot improve it. Aspen; dry meadow & wet meadow; cottonwood. Road in and out of Probably Canada thistle. Moderate risk - not 3000000 8.42 2 2 5Mdrainages; traverses many ecotypes. CALOP4; Low risk from the road. State or Forest priority species. Crosses N. Fk. Crooked River & Porter Ck., numerous wetlands. No known TES plants within 200 ft. Dry meadow & wet meadow, aspen? Not of road. Low risk - habitat not 3010000 5.80 2 2 2Lthreatened by road. degraded or directly impacted. ODA "category B" species (not state-listed). Parallels Peterson Ck. for 2 miles.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 9 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes Dry & wet meadow; willow & alder Scotch & Canada thistles, whitetop (small Paved, S. edge Big Summit Prairie. Parallels N. Fk. Crooked 4200000 8.54 5 4 4Mwetlands, very few cottonwoods. CALLOP, CALOP4; Weed risk. pop, sprayed by private landowner). River. Numerous wetlands. Willow wetland; Threatened by high use CALOP4; Clematis hirsutissima recreation (flower picking, ATV's, bicycles, (Rich Helliwell says edge of range), 4200460 0.33 7 5 51Hpeople, horses). Downingia elegans . Probably Canada thistle. Medium traffic flow. Deep Ck. Campground road. Aspen; Dry meadow; Low traffic; low CALOP4; habitat not being directly maintenance road, but moderate aquatics degraded but probably some riparian None mapped; probably most weed-free area Parallels Hickey Creek for about 2 miles (about 1/2 road 4230000 3.95 4 3 2Mrating? degradation. (M. Lesko). segment). Canada & Scotch thistles, spotted & diffuse CALOP4; Road goes to Lomatium knapweed, Med sage just off of road, ochocense ; CALOP common along potential for houndstongue to invade. road; some inside exclosures. Not Existing infestations appear controlled. High Aspen; Dry meadow; Flat, low erosion. high concern - road not directly risk species, lot traffic; problem if miss year 4240000 1.93 2 2 5MMuch aspen treated and fenced. impacting or degrading habitat. treatment. Crosses 1 intermittent. Middle N. Fork Crooked Total 43.01 Dry meadow; Willow & alder wetlands. Weeds and moderate floodplain aquatics No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Canada thistle, sulfur cinquefoil, spotted Middle South Fork 5800000 5.83 4 0 4Mrating. of road. knapweed jnct. 500 rd. Treated annually. Gravel; parallels Murray and Sunflower Creeks. Spotted & diffuse; Canada thistle, medushead (?), sulfur cinquefoil, leafy No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. spurge (only site on District). Road provides 5800500 0.87 4 0 7 1H Dry meadows. Weed risk. of road. access to private land. Road to Frazier Campground. Whitetop (lots), diffuse & spotted, yellow starthistle, Canada thistle. Leafy spurge in GIS actually on 5800500. Historical St. Dry meadows; aspen along creek. Weed No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Johnswort. Sunflower Pit is 1/4 mi. off road, 5870000 4.55 6 0 81Hrisk. of road. has large knapweed pop. Parallels Sunflower Ck.& associated tribs.

GRA-42 6.98 2 2 5 M Special habitats unknown. TES unknown. Whitetop in area. Weed situation unknown. Follows S. Fk. John Day River.

GRA-67 11.79 2 2 5 M Special habitats unknown. TES unknown. Whitetop in area. Weed situation unknown. Follows Pine Ck. And Funny Ck. Paved.

GRA-68 5.09 2 2 5 M Special habitats unknown. TES unknown. Whitetop in area. Weed situation unknown. Don't know where it is.

GRA-69 4.43 2 2 5 M Special habitats unknown. TES unknown. Whitetop in area. Weed situation unknown. Parallels and crosses Warm Springs Creek. Paved. Middle South Fork Total 39.53 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Hwy 26; Crosses Mill Creek, above Ochoco Reservoir. Bottom Mill 2600000 0.35 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Very high traffic. Some treatment. of drainage, cuts off floodplain. Dry & wet meadows. Weed and No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2700000 6.56 2 0 4Mrecreation risk. of road. Canada thistle, being treated. Paved & native surface. In and out watershed - lot segments. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 2745000 0.88 0 1 2Lof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds nearby. Top ridge. Parallels Mill Ck., goes up W. Fk. Mill and Harvey Creeks. 5 No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse & spotted, bindweed, Scotch broom, segments. 1st 2 segments paved (all on private land); rest 3300000 16.24 2 0 5MRiparian weed risk. of road. medusahead; all being treated. gravelled. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3300300 0.30 1 0 5MRiparian weed risk. of road. Canada thistle, being treated. Wildcat campground. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle; being 3320000 5.09 1 0 2 L Wet meadow.; Riparian weed risk. of road. treated. Low traffic. Wet meadow. Road through Hash Rock Ck. Area (burned). Moist & wet meadows. Riparian weed No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3330000 3.00 1 0 2Lrisk. of road. Scotch broom, being treated. Low traffic. Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3330010 0.40 1 0 2 L Wet meadow; Riparian weed risk. of road. Weeds present, being treated. Low traffic. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road.; No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse knapweed, bindweed, being treated. 3350000 4.30 1 0 4MRiparian weed risk. of road. High traffic. Parallels Benefield Creek.

No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3360000 4.60 3 0 5MRiparian weed risk. Nearby weeds. of road. Weeds present, being treated. High traffic. Parallels Lemon Creek. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3370000 6.06 3 3 5MRiparian weed risk. of road. Leafy spurge, being treated. Traffic. Parallels Dry Creek. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Canada thistle, leafy spurge; being treated. Shrub bottom. Parallels White springs Creek & cuts thru 3380000 3.00 3 0 5 M Shrub bottom. Riparian weed risk. of road. More weeds and traffic. Whitetail Springs. Mill Total 50.79 At boundary, spotted knapweed & teasel. On No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. private, fairly extensive spotted &diffuse Mountain Creek 1200000 6.28 2 0 5 M Springs. of road. knapweed. Road in Mack Ck drainage. Paved.

No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed pop behind locked gate; 1280000 3.40 0 0 4Mof road. of road. road accesses logging & allotment; remote.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 10 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes Parallels Badger Creek, crosses numerous moist-wet Not recently surveyed for TES Potentilla recta; yellow starthistle primarily on (cinquefoil) meadows, crosses Hoffman & Bug Cks & 4 2200000 7.04 2 2 9 1H Aspen;, meadows. plants. private. intermittents. Gravelled. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2200930 0.40 1 1 5 M Wet meadow (spring). of road. Moderate use, adjacent weeds. Probably Scotts campground?? 2600000 11.68 3 1 2 L Mountain Creek. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present, some treatment. Hwy 26. Private land or BLM No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2630000 3.64 2 0 2 L Dry meadow. of road. No weeds. Low risk, low traffic. Ridgetop. Summit Trail. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. (blank) ###### of road. Mountain Creek Total ###### No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Mud Springs Creek 5100000 8.75 of road. Spotted knapweed. Parallels Dewies Canyon, crosses Redshed Canyon. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 5130000 2.10 of road. 5160000 3.85 0 0 4 M Wetland? Crosses Mud Springs Creek.

5200000 3.88 0 0 4 M Cottonwood-willow with shrub dominated. Parallels Mud Springs Creek. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 5250000 0.97 0 0 6Mof road. 5920000 5.46 1 0 2 L Cottonwood willow? Wetlands? Crosses Mud Springs Creek. Gravelled. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 9700000 7.43 0 0 4Mof road. Crosses Mud Springs Creek. Mud Springs Creek Total 32.44 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Murderers Creek GRA-42 5.88 DEB of road. 2 segments. Paulina District? Murderers Creek Total 5.88

No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Whitetop (increasing), Diffuse & spotted, Paulina 4200000 4.62 0 0 71Hof road. of road. Canada thistle, houndstongue. High traffic. Top of the ridge. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Location in vicinity of houndstongue 4240000 0.03 0 0 5Mof road. of road. infestation. CALLOP; one pop is selected in Conservation Strategy; high weed Crosses Paulina, Burnt Corral, Indian, Roba, Hewed Log, 4260000 9.59 2 7 9 2H Little dry meadow/scabland. risk. Houndstongue (epidemic), medusahead. Dipping Vat & dry Paulina Creeks. Canada thistle, houndstongue, spotted CALLOP; 2 separate pops; high knapweed, medusahead. Road connects to 4280000 3.92 1 6 8 1H Spring. weed risk. the large houndstongue pop. Parallels Dipping Vat Ck for 1+ miles. Paulina Total 18.15 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Pilot Butte US-20 3.52 0 0 71Hof road. Unknown. High traffic, connects to high weed pops. Pilot Butte Total 3.52 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No weeds, low risk, but well-travelled, Rock Creek 1200000 0.83 0 0 3Lof road. of road. especially in fall by hunters. Ridgetop. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 1250000 2.29 0 0 2Lof road. of road. No weeds currently. Ridgetop Spotted knapweed, scotch thistle, whitetop 2600000 2.69 5 Special habitats unknown. No TES surveys; unknown. on 26. Hwy 26. BOTCRE, BOTMIN, BOTPIN; High Dry, moist, & wet meadow; Alder wetland, weed risk; small, fragmented & Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, 3800000 4.63 6 7 72Haspen. Weed risk. highly vulnerable species. whitetop. Well-travelled in fall by hunters. Parallels & crosses Squaw Ck.; parallels Rock Ck. Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle. 5810 No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. (Wolf Creek watershed), increasing 5810000 2.33 2 0 7 1H Dry meadow. of road. houndstongue population. Dry Meadow. Ridgetop. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Canada thistle; large intersection connects 5840000 0.28 0 0 6Mof road. of road. with other roads with weeds. Ridgetop. Rock Creek Total 13.03 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Area due south Lake Billy Chinook and takes in Steelhead Falls. Steelhead 5540000 4.40 0 0 4Mof road. Some treatment, moderate traffic. No tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 6200000 6.40 0 0 81Hof road. Weeds not treated, high traffic. No tribs. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 9700000 17.88 0 0 4Mof road. High traffic, some treatment. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. OR-126 1.80 0 0 4Mof road. High traffic, some treatment. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. US-20 5.60 0 0 4Mof road. High traffic, some treatment. Steelhead Total 36.08 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Three Creeks US-20 5.79 0 0 4Mof road. High traffic, some treatment.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 11 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes Three Creeks Total 5.79

Trout Headwater 2150000 1.31 2 1 5 M Moist meadow. Riparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Weeds present, less treatment. Crosses E. Fk. Foley Creek, parallels Foley. Native surfaced. 2700000 0.46 1 1 2 L Some meadow habitat. Surveys unknown, low probability. Canada thistle, being treated. Ridgetop. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle; being 2710000 1.06 0 0 2Lof road. of road. treated. Ridgetop. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2715000 1.30 1 0 2LRiparian weed risk. of road. Canada thistle, being treated. Follows Dutchman Creek.

No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. ACHE just off road system, near Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, St. Midslope road crosses Potlid Ck., Cartwright Ck., and Big Log 2720000 17.80 1 1 2LRiparian weed risk. material sources. Johnswort, sulfur cinquefoil; being treated. Ck., crosses Dutchman Ck. Native surfaced. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. ACHE just off road system, near Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, St. 2725000 6.32 1 1 2LRiparian weed risk. material sources. Johnswort; being treated. Follows Trout Ck., crosses Potlid Ck. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2730000 8.97 1 0 2 L Meadow. Riparian weed risk. of road. Canada thistle, being treated. Crosses Potlid, W. Fk. Trout, Trout, Anger Creeks. No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse knapweed, being treated, higher 2735000 0.57 1 0 3LRiparian weed risk. of road. weed densities. Crosses trib to Anger Ck., No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2740000 2.20 0 0 2Lof road. of road. 0.5 CIAR; Weeds present, being treated. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2745000 2.64 1 0 1 L Meadow. Weed risk. of road. Nearby weeds. Ridgetop. Trout Headwater Total 42.63 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Upper Beaver 5870000 1.95 0 0 3Lof road. of road. Suflur cinquefoil. Ridgetops. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-112 1.01 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Rd. to Izee. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-135 0.96 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Crosses S. Fk. Beaver Ck, gravelled. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. CRO-312 3.32 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Crosses S. Fk. Beaver Ck, gravelled. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. GRA-67 8.13 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Paved. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. GRA-69 13.86 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Paved. Upper Beaver Total 29.24 No special habitats within 200 ft. of road. Upper Dry River OR-27 2.39 1 1 3LRiparian weed risk. Surveys unknown, low probability. Some treatment. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. US-20 18.93 0 1 3Lof road. Surveys unknown, low probability. Some treatment. Upper Dry River Total 21.32 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Upper Middle John Day 2600000 3.77 1 2 2Lof road. of road. Hwy No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 3800000 6.06 3 0 4 M Dry meadow. of road. Upper Middle John Day Total 9.83

(Area West 1/2 of Big Summit Prairie - just labelled "Upper N"). CALOP4; Select population in draft Parallels and crosses Howard Ck and W. Howard Ck., crosses Cottonwood bottomland; Aspen; dry & wet conservation strategy. Heavy CENMAC and houndstongue but being Indian Creek, Crosses Crosswhite Ck., Stump Ck., Fox Ck., Elliot Upper N. Fork Crooked 2200000 10.73 4 4 5Mmeadows; willow & alder wetlands. dispersed use could be due to road. treated; high traffic also. Ck. (little whimpy piddle things). Howard Ck. Of most concern. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. Parallels Fox Ck. 2 miles. Same notes as 2230 in Middle 2230000 4.65 1 1 2Lof road. North Fork Crooked. Veratrum wetland, scabland, aspen. Houndstongue, whitetop, Canada thistle; 2630000 5.23 4 2 4MSome recreation use. Potential habitat for ricegrass. being treated. High traffic. Ridgetop, crosses 1 wetland. CALOP4; select population in draft Scablands, wet meadows. Some conservation strategy. Some Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, burdock. Paved. Crosses Johson, Polio, & Brush Creeks, N. Fk. Crooked 4200000 8.25 2 4 4Mrecreation use. recreation use. Being treated. River. Crosses thru middle of wettest part of Big Summit Prairie. Butter & eggs; Installed traffic barriers to reduce risk and plan to spray in 2002. Hard 4205000 0.84 1 0 3 L Aspen, wet meadow, alder, springs. to control but pretty slow spreading. Ridgetop. Goes to Independent Mine.

Cottonwood bottomland; Aspen; Dry No known infestations but houndstongue and W. side Big Summit Prairie, crosses Cram, Merritt, and Howard 4210000 4.30 2 2 2Lmeadow. Some recreation use. CALOP adjacent to road. spotted knapweed nearby. High traffic. Creeks. Gravelled. Dry & wet meadows; Dry meadow is not scabland (or at least quality habitat). Select CALOP population. High Whitetop and Canada thistle. Being treated. 4215000 9.43 2 4 3MAspen. Some recreation use. traffic and recreation use. High traffic. Parallels Gray Creek for 5 miles of about 9 mi. of road. Habitat present for CALOP and Whitetop along road. Pretty small and 4220000 6.70 3 2 2 L Wet meadow, Aspen. Recreation use. some recreation use. restricted to road shoulder. Parallels Lookout Creek, crosses Lytle Ck., Native surfaced;

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 12 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes CALOP4; Select population on Dry & wet meadow; Willow wetland. Williams Prairie. Fenced, pretty wet; Parallels N. Fk. Crooked River, goes past Williams Prairie. 4225000 3.65 2 2 2LSome recreation use. CALOP appears protected. High traffic and adjacent noxious weeds. Gravelled. CALOP4; select population Goldie Springs. CALOP appears protected. Moderate recreation use in area but Dry & wet meadows, aspen. Not not much in meadows where CALOP No known infestations but weeds nearby. 4230000 7.25 2 2 1Lthreatened by road. Some recreation use. occurs. Low use. Top of watershed. Upper N. Fork Crooked Total 61.02 Veratrum wetland; Cottonwood bottomland; Aspen; dry & wet meadows; Alder wetland. Floodplain not functioning Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, Med great. Channelized, road took out sage adjacent. Currently treated but high Parallels Ochoco Ck. for entire length, crosses it numerous Upper Ochoco 2200000 7.61 4 0 3Mfloodplain. recreation. times. Paved 90%. Goes past Walton Lake. CALOP4; not select population. Diffuse & spotted knapweed, bindweed, Low vehicle use within CALOP adjacent houndstongue. High recreation Parallels Thronson Creek for 1/2 of the creek's length. 2210000 3.53 4 2 3 M Aspen; wet meadow; alder wetland. populations. use. Gravelled. Veratrium wetland; wet meadow. Little Spotted knapweed, being treated. High 2220000 2.00 2 0 3Limpact from recreation. No known TES plants. vehicle use. Road around Walton Lake. Paved. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. 2220010 0.20 4 2 3Mof road. Campground? Not on Ochoco atlas. Alder wetland. Some agriculture, old Spotted knapweed; burdock; being treated. 2300000 8.25 2 0 3Lburn.. Habitat improving. No known TES plants. High vehicle use. Parallels Ochoco Creek. Paved.

Spotted knapweed, whitetop, sulfur Alder wetland. Influenced by road but cinquefoil; being treated. Admin site. High 2300403 0.10 2 0 2Lstable. No known TES plants. vehicle use but site kept fairly weed free. Road to Big Summit RD building. CALOP4; Select population (Spears Meadow/Shamrock Creek) Spotted knapweed, Russian knapweed, Cottonwood bottomland; aspen; dry & wet threatened by teasel but Diffuse knapweed, Scotch thistle, Dalmation meadows; willow & alder wetlands. All notpresently by other weeds. Low toadflax, whitetop, Canada thistle. Very high 2600000 9.33 4 3 5Mimpacted by road. vehicle & recreation use. vehicle use and being treated. Parallels Marks Ck., CALOP habitat. High potential. High vehicle use. Moderate No known infestations but high vehicle use & 2600150 0.20 4 4 2 M Moist/wet meadow. recreation use. adjacent weeds. Connector road. Spotted knapweed, Canada thistle, houndstongue, medusahead in or near. 2600550 0.53 1 0 2 L Aspen, cottonwood, alder, willow. No known TES plants. Road blocked but gets some ATV traffic. Peterson Creek. Whitetop, teasel, spotted knapweed and Dry & wet meadow; willow & alder adjacent houndstongue CYOF. Currently 2610000 7.90 3 0 3Lwetlands, aspen, cottonwood. No known TES plants. being treated but high vehicle use. Parallels Little Hay Ck. & Coyle Ck. Gravelled. Alder wetland, aspen, willow. Stable, Spotted and whitetop but being treated, high 2610400 0.30 33Lthough alders declining slightly. Unknown. vehicle use. Campground road (Ochoco Forest Camp). Alder wetland, aspen, willow. Stable, Spotted, whitetop, being treated. High 2610401 0.10 33Lthough alders declining slightly. Unknown. vehicle use. Roads associated with Ranger District. Alder wetland, aspen, willow. Stable, Spotted, whitetop, being treated. High 2610500 0.40 33Lthough alders declining slightly. Unknown. vehicle use. Goes to houses at Ranger District. Alder wetland, aspen, willow. Stable, Spotted, whitetop, being treated. High 2610510 0.05 33Lthough alders declining slightly. Unknown. vehicle use. Roads associated with Ranger District. Alder wetland, aspen, willow. Stable, Spotted, whitetop, being treated. High 2610511 0.04 33Lthough alders declining slightly. Unknown. vehicle use. Roads associated with Ranger District. Alder wetland, aspen, willow. Stable, Spotted, whitetop, being treated. High 2610515 1.50 33Lthough alders declining slightly. Unknown. vehicle use. Roads associated with Ranger District.

CALOP4; not select population. No known infestations, but adjacent spotted 2620000 4.80 4 5 2 M Wet meadows, willow, alder. Moderate recreation use. knapweed and moderate vehicle use. CALOP4; select population (Trail Aspen; dry & wet meadow; willow & alder Spring). High recreation use, high Whitetop, CENMAC, teasel, but being 2630000 6.22 3 7 41Hwetlands. Affected by road but stable. traffic. treated. High vehicle use. CALOP. Not being impacted, Aspen; Wet meadow. One of few areas though aspen is impacted; aspen where CALOP growing in aspen. Aspen may need moister environment than Spotted knapweed, being treated. High 2700000 2.58 4 2 4Mdeclining; may not be totally road related. CALOP. vehicle use. Paved section. Carex interior -- only known population is along this road at Swamp Spring. Habitat was Dry meadow, small Swamp Spring. impacted when culverts installed; Spotted & diffuse knapweed, houndstongue. 3350000 5.50 4 2 2MModerate vehicle use. may now be stable. Moderate vehicle use. Alder wetland, cottonwood, wet meadow, No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Burdock, spotted knapweed; being treated; 4200000 6.51 2 0 2Lwillow, aspen. Fairly stable. of road. high vehicle use.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 13 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 4200100 1.00 3 0 4 M Alder wetland, wet meadow, willow, alder. of road. Spotted knapweed. High recreation use. Butter & eggs. Installed traffic barriers to No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. reduce risk and plan to spray in 2002. Hard 4205000 0.36 1 0 3L of road. to control but pretty slow spreading. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 4215000 3.28 of road. of road. Way off Forest -- no idea. Upper Ochoco Total 72.28 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Upper South Fork GRA-68 2.00 1 1 3Lof road. of road. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. GRA-69 4.25 1 1 3Lof road. of road. Upper South Fork Total 6.25 Whychus 6300000 2.46 3 0 4 M Cultural plants and weeds. No known TES, not surveyed. Some weed treatment . 6370000 2.31 3 0 4 M Cultural plants and weeds. No known TES, not surveyed. Some weed treatment . No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. US-20 1.27 2 2 6Mof road. of road. Whychus Total 6.04 No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Willow Creek 2150000 0.61 0 of road. of road. Unable to locate. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Diffuse & spotted knapweed, St. Johnswort; 2600000 8.62 0 0 2Lof road. of road. being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2600828 0.17 of road. of road. Unable to locate. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2680000 0.30 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Diffuse knapweed, being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 2690000 2.85 0 0 91Hof road. of road. Medusahead; not being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5160000 1.85 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Some weed treatment, in Madras. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5200000 1.12 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Some treatment. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5250000 0.53 0 0 6Mof road. of road. Medusahead nearby. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5300000 12.20 0 0 91Hof road. of road. Medusahead, not being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5300153 1.80 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Weeds being treated, mod/high traffic. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5310000 6.50 1 0 4 M some riparian weeds of road. Weeds being treated, mod/high traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5320000 2.20 1 0 2Lof road. of road. No known infestations, but nearby weeds. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No known infestations, but nearby weeds 5330000 2.50 0 0 1Lof road. of road. low traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No known infestations, but nearby weeds 5340000 2.00 0 0 1Lof road. of road. low traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. No known infestations, but nearby weeds 5350000 1.90 1 0 1Lof road. of road. low traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Whitetop, spotted knapweed, bull thistle; 5400000 4.65 1 0 2Lof road. of road. being treated. High traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5500000 2.19 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Whitetop; being treated. High traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5700000 2.67 1 0 2Lof road. of road. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Spotted knapweed, bull thistle; being treated. 5750000 0.16 0 0 2Lof road. of road. High traffic. Cyrus Horse Camp. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5760000 0.90 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds being treated. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 5920000 2.74 1 0 2 L Some riparian weeds. of road. Road to Hay Cr Ranch. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6600000 1.82 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Weeds being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 6630000 0.81 0 0 2Lof road. of road. No known weeds, moderate traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 7850000 4.45 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Weeds being treated, moderate traffic. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 8900000 2.74 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Bull thistle; bindweed; being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Whitetop, spotted knapweed, bull thistle, 9600000 3.15 0 0 2Lof road. of road. bindweed; being treated.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 14 Length Special TES Noxious Summary WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes General Notes No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 9610000 1.21 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Weeds being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. 9620000 1.55 0 0 2Lof road. of road. Spotted knapweed, bindweed; being treated. No special habitats mapped within 200 ft. No TES plants mapped within 200 ft. Weeds being treated. Hwy 97 through 9700000 6.32 0 0 4Mof road. of road. Madras, urban and agriculture. Willow Creek Total 80.51

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Ochoco) 15 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 1000390 0.00 0.60 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $784 4 ANNUAL 1307 $784 Cold Springs Campground, McKinzie Wagon Road. 1000900 0.00 0.57 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $270 3 ANNUAL 474 $270 Lava Camp Lake CG, PCT access, McKinzie Wagon Road. secondary access for Tollgate Subdivision - main fire exit route. McKinzie Wagon Road, Brooks Mainline Railroadbed. Road to old 1008000 0.00 6.44 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $1,710 2 REGULAR 266 $1,710 Sisters RS - Troute Creek. Graham Corral C.G. route, secondary access/fire escape from Black Butte Ranch - very important route for district - always requests for more maintenance on this route. McKinzie Wagon road, Brooks Mainline railroad bed. Opportunity to upgrade to level 4 and pave with 1012000 0.00 0.30 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $392 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 recycled asphalt from HWY 20 project. 1012000 0.30 3.03 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 877 $2,394 4 ANNUAL 1572 $4,292 Graham Corral C.G. route, second segment, Brooks Mainline 1012300 0.00 0.02 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $16 3 ANNUAL 659 $16 Railroadbed. 1012300 0.00 0.02 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $16 3 ANNUAL 659 $16 1012300 0.02 1.20 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $775 3 ANNUAL 659 $775 1012300 1.20 2.40 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $283 2 REGULAR 236 $283 1012300 2.40 3.08 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $152 2 REGULAR 224 $152 1012300 3.08 3.78 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $156 2 REGULAR 224 $156 1012340 0.00 0.68 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $445 3 ANNUAL 659 $445 final segment to Graham Corral C.G. 1012340 0.68 0.76 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $55 3 ANNUAL 659 $55 1012340 0.68 0.76 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $55 3 ANNUAL 659 $55 1012340 0.76 0.80 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $27 3 ANNUAL 659 $27 Skylite Cave, five mile butte pvt pit (inactive), Brooks mainline railroad 1014000 0.00 2.42 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $182 2 AS NEEDED 75 $182 bed. Skylite Cave, five mile butte pvt pit (inactive), Brooks mainline 1014000 2.42 3.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $112 2 AS NEEDED 75 $112 railroadbed. horse camp - two trail heads - share cost with Willamette Ind, McKinzie 1018000 0.00 0.71 BIT B 2 ANNUAL 1295 $919 3 ANNUAL 1295 $919 Wagon RD, Scotts Pass Trail, Rd to old Sisters RS. 1018000 0.71 8.45 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 486 $3,762 3 ANNUAL 486 $3,762 (Increase mtc lvl to whispering pine horse camp/ level 2 beyond) 1024000 0.00 1.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $128 2 AS NEEDED 75 $128 Millican Crater Trail Head - low use 1026000 0.00 1.10 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $292 2 REGULAR 266 $292 Scott Pass Road mixed ownership with Willamette Ind - Heritage sites, Santiam Wagon 1028000 0.00 3.16 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,225 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,225 Road 1028000 3.16 5.97 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,091 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,091 McKinzie Wagon RD. 1030000 0.00 2.24 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $527 2 REGULAR 236 $527 1030000 2.24 5.40 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $745 2 REGULAR 236 $745 1040000 0.00 1.00 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $334 2 REGULAR 334 $334 share cost with Willamette Ind, McKinzie Wagon Rd. 1040000 1.00 1.62 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $146 2 REGULAR 236 $146 1040000 1.62 2.84 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $273 2 REGULAR 224 $273 1040000 2.84 3.52 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $160 2 REGULAR 236 $160 1040000 3.52 4.96 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $339 2 REGULAR 236 $339

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 1 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS community ties to 3 Rivers subdivision due to only access for large RV's and mobile homes who can't use bridges on Jordan Road, Brooks 1100000 0.00 2.80 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $4,402 4 ANNUAL 1572 $4,402 Mainline Railroadbed. 1100000 2.80 7.14 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $6,829 4 ANNUAL 1572 $6,829 community ties to 3 Rivers subdivision due to only access for large 1100000 7.14 8.58 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,257 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,257 RV's and mobile homes who can't use bridges on Jordan Road community ties to 3 Rivers subdivision due to only access for large 1100000 8.58 10.01 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,248 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,248 RV's and mobile homes who can't use bridges on Jordan Road 1100000 10.01 20.75 AGG A 4 ANNUAL 877 $9,419 4 ANNUAL 877 $9,419 1100021 0.00 0.65 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $850 4 ANNUAL 1307 $850 Indian Ford Campground - Primary water site base of black butte - seg 2 is used for mtn bike trai, Brooks Mainline 1105000 0.00 2.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $177 2 AS NEEDED 63 $177 railroad bed. 1105000 2.80 3.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 1105000 3.10 6.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $183 2 AS NEEDED 63 $183 base of black butte - seg 2 is used for mtn bike trail main road up black butte to lookout, heavy use, needs more maintenance, trail head is promoted and advertised by black butte "hike 1110000 0.00 0.60 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $456 3 ANNUAL 757 $456 the butte" main road up black butte to lookout, heavy use, needs more maintenance, trail head is promoted and advertised by black butte "hike 1110000 0.60 4.10 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $2,647 3 ANNUAL 757 $2,647 the butte" 1110000 4.10 5.05 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $300 2 REGULAR 224 $213 1110000 5.05 5.25 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $64 2 REGULAR 224 $45 1120000 0.00 0.30 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $115 2 ANNUAL 388 $115 back way to camp sherman, fire evac route

1120000 0.30 5.03 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,836 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,836 back way to camp sherman, fire evac route, road 1120200 wagon road. mostly private - provides access to half and half cinder pit. Brooks 1126000 0.00 1.40 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 Mainline Railroad bed. 1126000 1.40 1.53 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 mostly private - provides access to half and half cinder pit, Brooks 1126000 1.53 4.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 mainline railroadbed. mostly private - provides access to half and half cinder pit, Brooks 1129000 0.00 1.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 mainline railroadbed. 1130000 0.00 3.01 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $190 2 AS NEEDED 63 $190 share cost with Willamette Ind 1130000 3.01 4.50 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $94 2 AS NEEDED 63 $94 share cost with Willamette Ind 1140000 0.00 2.63 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $863 2 REGULAR 236 $621 access Green Ridge Lookout 1140000 2.63 4.32 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $554 2 REGULAR 236 $399 1140000 4.32 7.23 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $920 2 REGULAR 224 $652 1140000 7.23 10.59 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,102 2 REGULAR 236 $793 fire evac route - accesses summit of green ridge to fs/county repeater 1149000 0.00 1.20 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 site 1149000 1.20 7.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $411 2 AS NEEDED 63 $411

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 2 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 1150000 0.00 0.76 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $253 2 REGULAR 334 $253 heaviest use road on north end of green ridge 1150000 0.76 14.05 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $4,432 2 REGULAR 334 $4,432 1152000 0.00 1.50 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $398 2 REGULAR 266 $398 (1154 not in db or map - accesses green ridge L.O.) 1154000 0.00 0.70 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $233 2 REGULAR 334 $233 CONNECTS 1150 TO 1140 1158000 0.00 2.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $203 2 AS NEEDED 75 $203 1160000 0.00 4.20 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $989 2 REGULAR 236 $989 road connecting 11 to county 64 - provides access to 3 Rivers 1170000 0.00 2.30 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,741 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,741 subdivision and Lake Billy Chinook 1170000 2.30 4.90 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,968 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,968 1180000 0.00 3.50 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,701 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,701 1190000 0.00 7.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $480 2 AS NEEDED 63 $480 accesses furthest point on green ridge 1190000 7.60 12.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $297 2 AS NEEDED 63 $297 1190000 12.30 13.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $63 2 AS NEEDED 63 $63

1193000 0.00 0.10 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 closed by gate - access lots of ground on breaks of Metolious River 1193000 0.10 2.10 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1193000 2.10 3.60 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 secondary access for camp sherman and Metolious Basin - a main access route for Warm Springs Reservation, Huckel Berry Trail, Minto 1200000 0.00 4.53 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $7,121 5 ANNUAL 1572 $7,121 trail. 1200000 4.53 11.98 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $4,906 3 ANNUAL 659 $4,906 1200000 11.98 11.98 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $2 3 ANNUAL 659 $2 1200000 11.98 11.98 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $2 3 ANNUAL 659 $2 1200000 11.98 13.06 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $713 3 ANNUAL 659 $713 1200900 0.00 0.40 NAT C 3 AS NEEDED 314 $126 2 AS NEEDED 314 $126 Abott Creek C.G. (could be reduced to ml 2) 1200980 0.00 1.60 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $758 3 ANNUAL 474 $758 Candle Creek C.G. 1210000 0.00 5.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $329 2 AS NEEDED 63 $329 Access for Christian Camp and Trail Head 1210000 5.20 9.29 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $1,284 3 AS NEEDED 314 $1,284 1210000 9.29 9.94 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $204 3 AS NEEDED 314 $204 1210000 9.94 11.00 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $333 3 AS NEEDED 314 $333 1210600 0.00 0.60 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 462 $277 3 ANNUAL 462 $277 Access for Christian Camp and Trail Head 1216000 0.00 1.00 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $877 3 ANNUAL 877 $877 1216000 1.00 1.95 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $833 3 ANNUAL 877 $833 1216000 1.95 3.28 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $1,166 3 ANNUAL 877 $1,166 cut off road from camp sherman to suttle lake - Willamette agreement, 1217000 0.00 2.50 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $820 2 ANNUAL 328 $820 Minto Trail. Possible location for waterline relocation. 1217000 2.50 3.50 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $1,572 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,572 1220000 0.00 5.80 AGG A 2 REGULAR 364 $2,108 2 REGULAR 364 $2,108 1220000 5.80 6.96 NAT C 2 REGULAR 224 $259 1 REGULAR 224 $259

1230000 0.00 0.70 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $1,100 3 ANNUAL 1572 $1,100 Jack Lake road - Cabot Lake T.H. - on edge of wilderness, Mento Trail.

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 3 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 1230000 0.70 1.70 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $877 3 ANNUAL 877 $877 1230000 1.70 4.30 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,009 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,009 1230000 4.30 8.60 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,410 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,410 Mento trail 1232000 0.00 1.20 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $791 3 ANNUAL 659 $791 Jack Creek Campground 1232000 1.20 3.30 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $495 2 REGULAR 236 $495 1232200 0.00 0.90 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $582 3 ANNUAL 647 $582 1232400 0.00 0.30 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $198 3 ANNUAL 659 $198 Jack Cr. Day Use 1232400 0.30 0.60 IMP C 2 REGULAR 236 $71 1 REGULAR 236 $71 (New road and Trail Head needs to be mapped)\ 1234000 0.00 5.90 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $4,466 3 ANNUAL 757 $4,466 Mento trail 1235000 0.00 3.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,474 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,474 Bear Valley Trailhead 1237000 0.00 1.10 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $259 2 REGULAR 236 $259 1237000 1.10 1.40 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $71 2 REGULAR 236 $71 1237000 1.40 3.70 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $542 2 REGULAR 236 $542 (end segment needs to be remapped) 1260000 0.00 1.10 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 534 $587 3 ANNUAL 534 $587 Sheep springs Horse Camp - first segment 1260000 1.10 3.00 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $447 2 REGULAR 236 $447 1260200 0.00 1.30 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $616 3 ANNUAL 474 $616 1260200 1.30 1.90 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $134 2 REGULAR 224 $134 1270000 0.00 4.50 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,476 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,476 Schilling cinder pit 1280000 0.00 3.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,246 2 REGULAR 236 $897 1290000 0.00 0.93 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 388 $361 3 ANNUAL 388 $361 Access to Warm Springs Reservation - Candle Creek Bridge 1292000 0.00 2.30 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $754 2 ANNUAL 328 $754 Jefferson Creek Trailhead secondary access/fire evac from Wizzard Falls fish hatchery - primary 1298000 0.00 2.40 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $565 2 REGULAR 236 $565 access for Nature Conservancy 1400000 2.60 13.22 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $16,695 4 ANNUAL 1572 $16,695 1400029 0.00 0.10 AC A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $157 5 ANNUAL 1572 $157 information kiosk - relatively low use 1400140 0.00 0.30 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 Head of the metolious developed site 1400700 0.00 0.08 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $105 4 ANNUAL 1307 $105 Allen Springs Campground 1400800 0.00 0.40 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $523 4 ANNUAL 1307 $523 Pioneer Ford Campground 1400900 0.00 0.10 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 Lower Bridge Campground 1419000 2.75 3.05 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 1419060 0.00 0.34 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $224 3 ANNUAL 659 $224 TRANSFER SITE 1419700 0.83 1.53 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 "campground strip" 5 campgrounds including allingham, backway to "House on the Metolious" Mento Trail. Possible location for waterline 1419900 0.00 2.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $3,616 4 ANNUAL 1572 $3,616 relocation for Allingham G.S. New BST, winter access to Dahl Ranch - primary access to "House on 1420000 0.00 0.68 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,069 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,069 the Metolius". Mento Trail 1420000 0.68 3.65 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $4,669 4 ANNUAL 1572 $4,669 1420400 0.00 0.80 AGG A 3 REGULAR 480 $384 3 REGULAR 480 $384 Canyon Cr. C.G. 1425000 0.00 1.60 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $425 2 REGULAR 266 $425 Mento trail 1430000 0.00 3.30 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $876 2 REGULAR 266 $876

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 4 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 1490000 0.00 2.14 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,095 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,095 1490000 2.14 3.93 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $920 2 ANNUAL 513 $920 1490000 3.93 4.70 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $253 2 REGULAR 236 $182 1490000 4.70 5.37 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $285 2 REGULAR 334 $224 1490000 5.37 5.84 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $200 2 REGULAR 334 $157 1499000 0.00 1.51 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $337 2 REGULAR 224 $337 closed by gate - pvt access through gate (could be 1490900), 1499000 1.51 7.50 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $1,339 2 REGULAR 224 $1,339 1499000 7.50 9.60 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1500000 0.00 1.20 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $1,886 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,886 McKinzie Wagon RD. 1500000 1.20 7.20 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $5,262 3 ANNUAL 877 $5,262 1500000 7.20 10.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 426 $1,534 2 REGULAR 236 $850 1505000 0.00 0.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $60 2 AS NEEDED 75 $60 edgington road - county rd 1505000 0.80 6.13 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $337 2 AS NEEDED 63 $337 1505000 6.13 8.33 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $139 2 AS NEEDED 63 $139 1510000 0.00 1.29 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $82 2 AS NEEDED 63 $82 Hap Taylor Gravel Pit - HT has easement and all mtc on west end 1510000 1.29 2.46 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $74 2 AS NEEDED 63 $74 1510000 2.46 3.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $40 2 AS NEEDED 63 $40 1512000 0.00 2.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $126 2 AS NEEDED 63 $126 1513000 0.00 3.88 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $245 2 AS NEEDED 63 $245 primary access to Chang's property 1514000 0.00 1.32 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $433 2 ANNUAL 328 $433 Squaw creek gravel pit 1514000 1.32 8.25 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $2,952 2 ANNUAL 426 $2,952 1516000 0.00 3.70 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $982 2 REGULAR 266 $982 1520000 0.00 3.90 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $918 2 REGULAR 236 $918 Wispering Pines Horse Camp 1520000 3.90 4.00 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $24 2 REGULAR 236 $24 1526000 0.00 3.15 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $836 2 REGULAR 266 $836 Pole creek cinder pit 1526000 3.15 3.40 NAT A 2 REGULAR 254 $63 2 REGULAR 254 $63 1600000 4.40 8.49 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $6,426 4 ANNUAL 1572 $6,426 1600000 8.49 14.29 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,121 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,121 McKinzie Wagon RD. 1600000 14.29 14.94 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $428 3 ANNUAL 659 $428 1600000 14.94 16.48 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $1,200 3 ANNUAL 779 $1,200 1600000 16.48 16.60 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $79 3 ANNUAL 659 $79 Black Pine Springs CG - breached closure - now dispersed site - high 1600550 0.00 0.36 IMP C 3 AS NEEDED 314 $113 2 AS NEEDED 314 $113 use for snowmobilers 1600550 0.36 1.22 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 Black Pine Springs CG - breached closure - now dispersed site - high 1600550 1.22 1.23 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 use for snowmobilers 1600800 0.00 0.40 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $303 3 ANNUAL 757 $303 3 creeks meadow horse camp, Snow Creek Ditch. 1600820 0.00 0.12 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $78 3 ANNUAL 647 $78 driftwood campground - little 3 creeks trailhead 1600825 0.00 0.20 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $151 3 ANNUAL 757 $151 TRAPPER MEADOW 1600900 0.00 0.60 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $395 3 ANNUAL 659 $395 Three creeks lake campground, Snow Creek Ditch.

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 5 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS old mainline road - bridge recently converted to foot bridge - no vehicle 1605000 0.00 1.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $90 2 AS NEEDED 75 $90 access across 1608000 0.00 0.41 BIT A 2 AS NEEDED 1030 $422 2 AS NEEDED 1030 $422 1608000 0.41 1.64 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $410 2 REGULAR 334 $410 1608000 1.64 1.90 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $87 2 REGULAR 334 $87 Brooks Mainline railroad bed. 1608000 1.90 2.15 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $83 2 REGULAR 334 $83 1608000 2.15 3.37 NAT C 2 REGULAR 224 $273 1 REGULAR 224 $273 1612000 2.35 2.83 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $113 2 REGULAR 236 $113 1620000 0.00 5.49 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $413 2 AS NEEDED 75 $413 Snow Creek Ditch. 1620000 5.49 5.66 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $12 2 AS NEEDED 75 $12 1620000 5.66 5.80 BIT A 2 AS NEEDED 1295 $181 2 AS NEEDED 1295 $181 1622000 0.00 0.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 1624000 0.00 1.40 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $105 2 AS NEEDED 75 $105 1628000 0.00 3.22 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $204 2 AS NEEDED 63 $204 irrigation ditch access, Snow Creek Ditch. 1628000 3.22 4.36 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $72 1 AS NEEDED 63 $72 1800000 1.84 6.96 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $8,053 5 ANNUAL 1572 $8,053 one of two most important routes on Ft Rock - missing part of seg 1 (disconnected) - gave developed use a 6 hard to give 8 when 1800000 6.96 9.17 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $3,469 5 ANNUAL 1572 $3,469 compared to "high" on Bend District 1800000 9.17 16.95 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 877 $6,821 4 ANNUAL 877 $6,821 1800000 16.95 25.37 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $9,448 4 ANNUAL 1122 $9,448 Brooks Camp2 railroad logging one of two most important routes on Ft Rock - missing part of seg 1 (disconnected) - gave developed use a 6 hard to give 8 when 1800000 25.37 31.48 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $6,861 4 ANNUAL 1122 $6,861 compared to "high" on Bend District one of two most important routes on Ft Rock - missing part of seg 1 (disconnected) - gave developed use a 6 hard to give 8 when 1800000 31.48 37.29 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $6,509 4 ANNUAL 1122 $6,509 compared to "high" on Bend District East Butte telephone line. 1800000 37.29 37.94 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $735 4 ANNUAL 1122 $735 1800000 37.94 40.01 AGG A 4 ANNUAL 1122 $2,323 4 ANNUAL 1122 $2,323 1800000 40.01 42.06 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 1122 $2,305 3 ANNUAL 1122 $2,305 one of two most important routes on Ft Rock - missing part of seg 1 (disconnected) - gave developed use a 6 hard to give 8 when 1800000 42.06 46.66 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 1122 $5,157 3 ANNUAL 1122 $5,157 compared to "high" on Bend District 1800010 0.00 0.24 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $246 3 ANNUAL 1024 $246 Bend/Pine Nursery Admin Site 1800010 0.24 1.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1800200 0.00 0.95 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $298 3 AS NEEDED 314 $298 Wind Cave - surfaced to cave, level 2 beyond 1800200 0.95 1.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $41 2 AS NEEDED 63 $41 1801000 0.00 0.22 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $14 2 AS NEEDED 63 $14 1801000 0.22 2.14 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $121 2 AS NEEDED 63 $121 1810000 0.00 5.57 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 633 $3,526 3 ANNUAL 877 $4,885 1810000 5.57 10.57 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $3,165 2 ANNUAL 633 $3,165

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 6 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 1814000 0.00 0.88 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 minor collector 1814000 0.88 3.28 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $151 2 AS NEEDED 63 $151 1814000 3.28 6.24 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $187 2 AS NEEDED 63 $187 1815000 0.00 0.79 IMP B 3 ANNUAL 1024 $804 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,234 lots of use and community ties 1815000 0.79 2.56 IMP B 3 ANNUAL 1024 $1,818 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,790 1815800 0.00 0.23 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $71 3 AS NEEDED 314 $71 Horse Butte Trail head 1815800 0.23 0.47 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $77 3 AS NEEDED 314 $77 1816000 0.00 2.27 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $745 2 ANNUAL 328 $745 Swamp Wells campground 1816000 2.27 3.17 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $284 2 ANNUAL 316 $284 1818000 0.00 1.34 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $85 2 AS NEEDED 63 $85 tie through from 1810 to 1820 1818000 1.34 4.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $174 2 AS NEEDED 63 $174 1819000 0.00 1.51 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $95 2 AS NEEDED 63 $95 Skeleton Cave - only first quarter mile is of interest 1819000 1.51 2.96 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 1820000 0.00 10.88 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $688 2 AS NEEDED 63 $688 1825000 0.00 4.62 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $292 2 AS NEEDED 63 $292 1825000 4.62 9.49 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $308 2 AS NEEDED 63 $308 1825000 9.49 10.67 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $75 2 AS NEEDED 63 $75 1825000 10.67 11.19 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $33 2 AS NEEDED 63 $33 1829000 0.00 3.27 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $207 2 AS NEEDED 63 $207 1830000 0.00 5.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $322 2 AS NEEDED 63 $322 1835000 0.00 5.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $373 2 AS NEEDED 63 $373 1840000 0.00 6.08 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $384 2 AS NEEDED 63 $384 1840000 6.08 6.54 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $29 2 AS NEEDED 63 $29 1845000 0.00 4.89 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $309 2 AS NEEDED 63 $309 1845000 4.89 6.75 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $118 2 AS NEEDED 63 $118 1849000 0.00 4.02 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $254 2 AS NEEDED 63 $254 to top of China Hat 1849000 4.02 4.19 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 1849000 4.19 5.45 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $80 2 AS NEEDED 63 $80 to top of China Hat 1849000 5.45 5.83 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 1849000 5.83 6.21 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 1849000 6.21 6.34 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 1849000 6.34 6.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 1850000 0.00 2.32 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $762 2 ANNUAL 328 $762 water source (well) 1850000 2.32 2.62 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $97 2 ANNUAL 328 $97 water source (well) 1850000 2.62 3.57 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $300 2 ANNUAL 316 $300 East Portal Road / City of Sisters and District are disussing transfer of 2000010 0.00 0.20 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 jurisdiction from FS to the City. 2015000 6.67 7.26 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 632 $373 3 ANNUAL 632 $373 2016000 2.67 6.65 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2017000 3.52 8.04 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $3,966 3 ANNUAL 877 $3,966 2017000 8.04 8.31 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $235 3 ANNUAL 877 $235 Pine Mountain from Millican - Pine Mountain Observatory

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 7 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 2017000 8.31 8.43 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $59 2 AS NEEDED 63 $7 2017000 8.43 8.99 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $281 2 AS NEEDED 63 $35 2017000 8.99 10.46 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $93 2 AS NEEDED 63 $93 2017000 11.85 12.51 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $42 2 AS NEEDED 63 $42 2017500 0.00 0.03 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $8 3 AS NEEDED 277 $8 road into Pine Mtn CG and Comm site - top of butte 2017500 0.03 0.13 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $29 3 AS NEEDED 277 $29 road into Pine Mtn CG and Comm site - top of butte 2017500 0.13 0.23 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $27 3 AS NEEDED 277 $27 2017501 0.00 0.10 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 spur into observatory 2050000 4.70 6.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $82 2 AS NEEDED 63 $82 2050000 6.00 8.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $158 2 AS NEEDED 63 $158 pvt access - Willamette does most maintenance, incomplete data. 2050000 8.50 11.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $164 2 AS NEEDED 63 $164 2052000 0.00 4.15 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $312 2 AS NEEDED 75 $312 2055000 0.00 5.77 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $364 2 AS NEEDED 63 $364 needs better signing - hard to find your way through 2055000 5.77 7.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $84 2 AS NEEDED 63 $84 needs better signing - hard to find your way through 2058000 0.25 0.65 BIT B 2 AS NEEDED 1295 $518 3 REGULAR 1572 $629 2058000 0.65 2.45 AGG B 2 AS NEEDED 63 $114 3 REGULAR 480 $864 2058000 2.45 4.20 NAT B 2 AS NEEDED 63 $111 3 REGULAR 480 $840 2058030 0.00 0.31 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $405 3 ANNUAL 1307 $405 DISTRICT OFFICE & RESIDENCES 2058080 0.00 0.20 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 district warehouse (admin site) 2058100 0.00 0.60 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $784 3 ANNUAL 1307 $784 Cutoff road from north end of compoud to HWY 20. 2059000 0.00 3.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $215 2 AS NEEDED 63 $215 Zimmerman Pit access 2060000 1.76 4.22 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $155 2 AS NEEDED 63 $155 2061000 0.00 0.13 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $10 2 AS NEEDED 75 $10 Brooks Mainline Railroad Bed. 2061000 0.13 0.55 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $32 2 AS NEEDED 75 $32 Brooks Mainline railroad bed. 2061000 0.55 1.29 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $56 2 AS NEEDED 75 $56 2061000 1.29 4.70 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $256 2 AS NEEDED 75 $256 2064000 0.00 2.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $164 2 AS NEEDED 63 $164

2066000 0.00 0.20 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 486 $97 2 ANNUAL 486 $97 back access to suttle and scout lakes, Brooks Mainline Railroadbed. 2066000 0.20 2.77 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,249 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,249 2066000 2.77 3.00 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $362 4 ANNUAL 1572 $362 2066700 0.00 0.40 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $523 4 ANNUAL 1307 $523 Scout Lake road 2066705 0.00 0.20 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 4 ANNUAL 1307 $261 Scout Lake day use 2067000 0.00 3.00 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,458 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,458 Brooks Mainline railroad bed, Santam Wagon road. 2067000 3.00 5.35 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,142 2 ANNUAL 486 $1,142 2068000 0.00 1.52 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 486 $739 2 ANNUAL 486 $739 secondary access to meadow lakes, Brooks Mainline Railroadbed. 2068000 1.52 4.00 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $962 2 ANNUAL 388 $962 2070000 0.00 2.50 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $3,930 5 ANNUAL 1572 $3,930 2070450 0.00 0.08 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $107 4 ANNUAL 1307 $107 blue bay campground 2070450 0.08 0.09 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $16 4 ANNUAL 1307 $16 2070450 0.08 0.09 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $16 4 ANNUAL 1307 $16

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 8 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 2070450 0.09 0.10 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $8 4 ANNUAL 1307 $8 2070500 0.00 0.30 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $392 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 South shore campground 2070700 0.00 0.11 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $144 4 ANNUAL 1307 $144 link creek campground 2070700 0.11 0.11 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $5 4 ANNUAL 1307 $5 2070700 0.11 0.11 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $5 4 ANNUAL 1307 $5 2070700 0.11 0.20 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $112 4 ANNUAL 1307 $112 2076000 0.00 2.75 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 328 $902 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,304 Corbit snowpark 2076000 2.75 2.89 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 328 $46 3 ANNUAL 474 $67 2076000 2.89 2.95 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 328 $19 3 ANNUAL 474 $28 2076000 2.89 2.95 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 328 $19 3 ANNUAL 474 $28 2100000 18.38 19.78 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $883 2 ANNUAL 633 $883 analyzed as two segments - seg1 from hwy97 to E.Lake - seg2 from 2100000 19.78 20.33 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $351 2 ANNUAL 633 $351 E.Lake to 18 road incomplete data from hertiage. 2100000 20.33 24.39 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 621 $2,523 2 ANNUAL 621 $2,523 analyzed as two segments - seg1 from hwy97 to E.Lake - seg2 from 2100000 24.39 27.39 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 621 $1,862 2 ANNUAL 621 $1,862 E.Lake to 18 road 2100000 27.39 27.60 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 621 $130 2 ANNUAL 621 $130 2100050 0.00 0.74 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $232 3 AS NEEDED 314 $232 Ogden Group Camp spur rd. 2100055 0.00 0.17 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $53 3 AS NEEDED 314 $53 PETER SKEEN OGDEN GROUP SITE 2100060 0.00 0.34 P - AC A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $107 3 AS NEEDED 314 $107 Prairie Campground 2100200 0.00 0.20 AC A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $314 3 ANNUAL 1572 $314 Sixmile snowpark 2100400 0.00 0.04 AC A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $61 3 ANNUAL 1572 $61 tenmile snowpark, wooden pipe line 2100400 0.04 0.13 AC A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $135 3 ANNUAL 1572 $135 wooden pipe line. 2100400 0.13 0.13 AC A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $14 3 ANNUAL 1572 $14 2100400 0.20 0.23 AC A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $50 3 ANNUAL 1572 $50 2100400 0.23 0.30 AC A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $112 3 ANNUAL 1572 $112 2100450 0.00 0.18 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $235 4 ANNUAL 1307 $235 PAULINA CREEK FALLS 2100500 0.00 1.53 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $992 3 ANNUAL 647 $992 Paulina Peak Road 2100500 1.53 2.20 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $433 3 ANNUAL 647 $433 Paulina Peak Road 2100500 2.20 3.90 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $1,096 3 ANNUAL 647 $1,096 Paulina Peak Road 2100500 3.90 3.93 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $21 3 ANNUAL 647 $21 2100500 3.93 4.00 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $44 3 ANNUAL 647 $44 2100500 4.00 4.02 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 647 $16 3 ANNUAL 647 $16 2100505 0.00 0.18 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $235 3 ANNUAL 1307 $235 Paulina Lake Lodge 2100507 0.00 0.10 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 PAULINA LAKE BOAT RAMP 2100530 0.00 0.61 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $797 4 ANNUAL 1307 $797 Paulina Lake campground 2100530 0.61 0.81 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 4 ANNUAL 1307 $261 2100540 0.00 0.10 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $76 3 ANNUAL 757 $76 DUMP STATION 2100560 0.00 0.77 IMP A 4 ANNUAL 474 $365 4 ANNUAL 474 $365 CHEIF PAULINA HORSE CAMP 2100565 0.00 0.31 AC C 5 ANNUAL 1307 $405 4 ANNUAL 1307 $405 Newberry Group site 2100570 0.00 1.08 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $1,412 4 ANNUAL 1307 $1,412 Little Crater CG

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 9 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 2100580 0.00 0.10 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 Obsidian Flow 2100580 0.10 0.13 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $33 4 ANNUAL 1307 $33 2100660 0.00 0.51 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $667 4 ANNUAL 1307 $667 East Lake CG 2100680 0.00 0.42 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $549 4 ANNUAL 1307 $549 Hot Springs Day Use and Boat Launch 2100690 0.00 0.04 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $52 4 ANNUAL 1307 $52 Hot Springs CG 2100700 0.00 1.92 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $2,509 4 ANNUAL 1307 $2,509 Cinder Hill CG 2100710 0.00 0.10 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 East Lake Lodge 2100730 0.00 0.25 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $327 4 ANNUAL 1307 $327 CINDER HILL CG LOOP 2100750 0.00 0.10 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $57 3 ANNUAL 572 $57 ON EAST LAKE? 2120000 0.00 2.45 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $2,151 3 ANNUAL 877 $2,151 McKay Crossing 2120000 2.45 2.54 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $76 3 ANNUAL 877 $76 2120000 2.45 2.54 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $76 3 ANNUAL 877 $76 2120991 0.00 0.14 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $80 3 ANNUAL 572 $80 MCKAY CROSSING LOOP A 2120993 0.00 0.14 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $183 3 ANNUAL 1307 $183 MCKAY CROSSING LOOP B 2121000 0.00 0.39 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $29 2 AS NEEDED 75 $29 9 for Archeology - old pipeline runs along it 2121000 0.39 2.67 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $171 2 AS NEEDED 75 $171 9 for Archeology - old pipeline runs along it 2121000 2.67 6.39 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $280 2 AS NEEDED 75 $280 9 for Archeology - old pipeline runs along it 2121000 6.39 8.52 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $160 2 AS NEEDED 75 $160 2125000 0.00 3.43 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $217 2 AS NEEDED 63 $217 2125000 3.43 4.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $62 2 AS NEEDED 63 $62 2127000 0.00 2.24 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $142 2 AS NEEDED 63 $142 2127000 2.24 6.69 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $281 2 AS NEEDED 63 $281 first mile lots of private ownership. Major portal for Lapine. Some 2127000 6.69 8.02 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $84 2 AS NEEDED 63 $84 concetion FortRock to LaPine.first 18 miles paved. WILLAMETTE ROAD: Willamette NF is proposing to upgrade this road - will need close coordination on how we want to manage road segment 2154000 6.50 6.90 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 0 $0 3 ANNUAL 0 $0 on Deschutes NF. 2200000 1.22 1.42 BIT B 4 ANNUAL 1572 $311 5 ANNUAL 1572 $311 2200000 1.42 3.10 BIT B 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,644 5 ANNUAL 1572 $2,644 2200000 3.10 8.62 BIT B 4 ANNUAL 1572 $8,677 5 ANNUAL 1572 $8,677 2200000 8.62 11.32 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $4,244 4 ANNUAL 1572 $4,244 2200000 11.32 17.40 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,556 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,556 2200000 17.40 24.93 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $11,834 4 ANNUAL 1572 $11,834 2200000 24.93 26.73 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,834 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,834 2200000 26.73 32.53 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,902 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,902 2200000 32.53 32.68 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $60 2 ANNUAL 388 $60 2200000 32.68 41.20 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $3,304 2 ANNUAL 388 $3,304 2200550 0.00 0.10 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 Ice cave parking lot goes through state and BLM, access to scaling station, FS only has 2205000 0.00 0.44 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 small section at the beginning. 2205000 0.44 2.31 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $118 2 AS NEEDED 63 $118

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 10 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 8 miles ours, rest is private -crownland large parcell. Legal access, 2210000 0.00 0.94 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 logging cam;p 2210000 0.94 1.83 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2210000 1.83 4.30 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2210000 4.30 8.42 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2215000 0.00 1.56 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $98 2 AS NEEDED 63 $98 wooden pipe line. 2215000 1.56 6.24 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $296 2 AS NEEDED 63 $296 wooden pipe line. 2220000 0.00 3.43 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,331 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,331 loop rd, access to some of crown's land 2220000 3.43 4.57 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $360 2 ANNUAL 316 $360 2220000 4.57 6.04 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $570 2 ANNUAL 388 $570 2220000 6.04 6.26 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $70 2 ANNUAL 316 $70 2220000 6.26 6.29 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $9 2 ANNUAL 316 $9 2220000 6.29 8.41 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $670 2 ANNUAL 316 $670 2220000 9.36 9.51 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $9 2 AS NEEDED 63 $9 2220000 11.79 12.81 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $64 2 AS NEEDED 63 $64 2222000 0.00 4.41 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $279 2 AS NEEDED 63 $279 2222000 4.41 5.67 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $80 2 AS NEEDED 63 $80 2222000 5.67 7.41 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $110 2 AS NEEDED 63 $110 2225000 0.00 4.42 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $279 2 AS NEEDED 63 $279 2225000 4.42 7.13 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $171 2 AS NEEDED 63 $171 2225000 7.13 9.65 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $159 2 AS NEEDED 63 $159 2225000 9.65 11.25 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $101 2 AS NEEDED 63 $101 2225000 11.25 14.35 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $196 2 AS NEEDED 63 $196 2227000 0.00 1.82 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $115 2 AS NEEDED 63 $115 2227000 1.82 5.43 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $228 2 AS NEEDED 63 $228 2230000 0.00 3.94 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $1,677 2 ANNUAL 426 $1,677 long road, major haul road, access to ?? 2230000 3.94 4.37 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $184 2 ANNUAL 426 $184 2230000 4.37 10.94 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $2,799 2 ANNUAL 426 $2,799 2233000 0.00 0.35 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2233000 0.35 2.41 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $130 2 AS NEEDED 63 $130 2233000 2.41 4.38 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $125 2 AS NEEDED 63 $125 2235000 0.00 1.13 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $71 2 AS NEEDED 63 $71 2235000 1.13 2.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $55 2 AS NEEDED 63 $55 2235000 2.00 4.97 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $188 2 AS NEEDED 63 $188 2235000 4.97 5.18 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $13 2 AS NEEDED 63 $13 2236000 0.00 2.67 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $169 2 AS NEEDED 63 $169 active timber sale 2236000 2.67 4.32 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $104 2 AS NEEDED 63 $104 2238000 0.00 3.79 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $240 2 AS NEEDED 63 $240 lots oof post sale activity 2239000 0.00 5.32 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $336 2 AS NEEDED 63 $336 lots oof post sale activity 2239000 5.32 5.87 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $35 2 AS NEEDED 63 $35 2240000 0.00 2.72 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $172 2 AS NEEDED 63 $172 vacant allotment but traditionally it gets used.

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 11 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 2240000 2.72 5.63 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $184 2 AS NEEDED 63 $184 significant hardrock, and ORV staging area, allotment vacant but 2248000 0.00 0.71 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $45 2 AS NEEDED 63 $45 traditionally used 2248000 0.71 1.89 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $75 2 AS NEEDED 63 $75 2248000 1.89 2.74 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $54 2 AS NEEDED 63 $54 2248000 2.74 3.95 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2259000 0.00 0.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 cutoff rds 18 and 22, has a vacant and a active allottment 2259000 0.60 2.42 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $115 2 AS NEEDED 63 $115 2259000 2.42 7.44 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $317 2 AS NEEDED 63 $317 2268000 0.00 2.29 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $145 2 AS NEEDED 63 $145 2268000 2.29 3.37 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $68 2 AS NEEDED 63 $68 2269000 0.00 1.57 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $99 2 AS NEEDED 63 $99 possible mining claim - old opal-quatz 2269000 1.57 2.45 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 2269000 2.45 3.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $79 2 AS NEEDED 63 $79 2269000 3.70 3.82 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 2269000 3.82 3.88 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2269000 3.88 5.34 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 2269000 5.34 5.68 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2269000 5.34 5.68 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2270000 0.00 2.72 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $204 2 AS NEEDED 75 $204 cutoff, from rd. 22 to 18 2270000 2.72 3.49 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $58 2 AS NEEDED 75 $58 2270000 3.49 3.62 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $10 2 AS NEEDED 75 $10 2270000 3.49 3.62 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $10 2 AS NEEDED 75 $10 2270000 3.62 3.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $21 2 AS NEEDED 75 $21 2270000 3.62 3.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $21 2 AS NEEDED 75 $21 2270000 3.90 3.99 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $6 2 AS NEEDED 75 $6 2270000 3.90 3.99 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $6 2 AS NEEDED 75 $6 2270000 3.99 4.68 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $52 2 AS NEEDED 75 $52 2270000 3.99 4.68 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $52 2 AS NEEDED 75 $52 2274000 0.00 1.08 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $68 2 AS NEEDED 63 $68 2274000 1.08 2.73 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $104 2 AS NEEDED 63 $104 2300000 6.87 12.38 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 633 $3,488 3 ANNUAL 779 $4,292 2300000 12.38 23.49 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 633 $7,033 3 ANNUAL 779 $8,655 22 road is at MP 18.68 (best place for ml 3/2 break) 2300000 23.49 25.89 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $787 2 ANNUAL 328 $787 2300000 25.89 30.18 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,406 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,406 2300000 30.18 42.65 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $4,091 2 REGULAR 236 $2,944 2310000 0.00 6.69 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $423 2 AS NEEDED 63 $423 very primative

2312000 0.00 3.59 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 75 $270 2 AS NEEDED 75 $270 not on map where it leaves FS boundary, it peters-out> BLM > private 2313000 0.00 1.14 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $72 2 AS NEEDED 63 $72 same as 12 2313000 1.14 3.50 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 12 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS a little piece of BLM and private, runs off the Forest at southend, private 2315000 0.00 2.61 IMP D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $165 2 AS NEEDED 63 $165 lands at southend. 2315000 7.31 8.98 IMP D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $105 2 AS NEEDED 63 $105 2315000 9.87 11.97 IMP D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 2316000 0.00 4.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $291 2 AS NEEDED 63 $291 2320000 0.42 3.56 IMP D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $199 2 AS NEEDED 63 $199 follows power line for awhile, has a road permit power line, touches some pieces of private, leaves Forest at southend - 2325000 0.00 5.30 IMP D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $335 2 AS NEEDED 63 $335 blm-private 2350000 0.00 4.98 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $315 2 AS NEEDED 63 $315 very primative, access one vacant and one active allotment 2350000 4.98 8.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $229 2 AS NEEDED 63 $229 comes offthe 31 rd., ends at the 22rd., Shevilin- Hixon Summit line and 2400000 0.00 0.08 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $51 2 REGULAR 266 $21 station. 2400000 0.08 0.46 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $241 2 REGULAR 266 $101 2400000 0.46 0.78 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $203 2 REGULAR 266 $85 2400000 0.78 1.54 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $481 2 REGULAR 266 $202 2400000 1.54 2.00 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $291 2 REGULAR 266 $122 2400000 2.00 3.01 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $637 2 REGULAR 266 $268 2400000 3.01 15.23 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $7,738 2 REGULAR 266 $3,252 2415000 0.00 2.50 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,893 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,893 Sheviln-Hixon camp and RR tresile 2420000 0.00 0.53 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $34 2 AS NEEDED 63 $34 2420000 0.53 0.73 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $12 2 AS NEEDED 63 $12 2420000 0.73 0.79 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2420000 0.79 0.84 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 173 $8 2 AS NEEDED 173 $8 2420000 0.84 0.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 173 $11 2 AS NEEDED 173 $11 2420000 0.90 4.57 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 173 $635 2 AS NEEDED 173 $635 2422000 0.00 1.67 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $105 2 AS NEEDED 63 $105 2422000 1.67 1.72 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2422000 1.72 4.89 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $200 2 AS NEEDED 63 $200 2424000 0.00 6.44 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $407 2 AS NEEDED 63 $407 2428000 0.00 5.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $322 2 AS NEEDED 63 $322 2430000 0.00 2.83 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $179 2 AS NEEDED 63 $179 runs into the 31 rd., access large block of private 2430000 2.83 5.13 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $145 2 AS NEEDED 63 $145 2430000 5.13 5.35 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $14 2 AS NEEDED 63 $14 2430000 5.35 6.62 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $80 2 AS NEEDED 63 $80 2430000 6.62 9.53 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $184 2 AS NEEDED 63 $184 2430000 9.53 9.61 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 2430000 9.61 9.65 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2430000 9.65 14.77 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $324 2 AS NEEDED 63 $324 2430000 14.77 15.99 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $77 2 AS NEEDED 63 $77 2435000 0.00 9.43 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $596 2 AS NEEDED 63 $596 2438000 0.00 4.35 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $275 2 AS NEEDED 63 $275

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 13 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 2440000 0.00 1.21 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2440000 1.21 3.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $138 2 AS NEEDED 63 $138 2451000 0.00 2.54 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $161 2 AS NEEDED 63 $161 starts on the Fremont 2451000 2.54 6.52 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $252 2 AS NEEDED 63 $252 2500000 0.72 4.75 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $6,335 4 ANNUAL 1572 $6,335 2510000 0.00 2.77 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,075 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,075 very rough, hard rock surface 2510000 2.77 13.76 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $4,264 2 ANNUAL 388 $4,264 Summitside rest station. Starts on Fremont. Big Road, mostly on 2517000 0.00 2.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 Fremont, lots of private lands 2524000 0.00 0.50 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 63 $32 2 ANNUAL 63 $32 FREMONT ROAD 2524000 0.00 0.09 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 same as 2517 2524000 0.09 0.23 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $9 2 AS NEEDED 63 $9 3115000 0.00 2.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $158 2 AS NEEDED 63 $158 3115000 2.50 2.84 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $21 2 AS NEEDED 63 $21 3115000 2.84 3.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $29 2 AS NEEDED 63 $29 3117000 0.00 4.40 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $278 2 AS NEEDED 63 $278 starts on rd. 31 ends on rd 24, borders someprivate 3117000 4.40 5.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $88 2 AS NEEDED 63 $88 3118000 0.00 1.85 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $117 2 AS NEEDED 63 $117 3118000 1.85 3.37 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $96 2 AS NEEDED 63 $96 3125000 0.00 3.00 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,899 3 ANNUAL 779 $2,337 Hole-in-the-ground 3125000 3.00 3.65 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $326 2 AS NEEDED 63 $41 3125000 3.65 3.74 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $43 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 3125000 3.74 5.19 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $725 2 AS NEEDED 63 $91 3125000 5.19 5.20 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 3125000 5.19 5.20 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 3130000 0.00 0.83 IMP B 2 AS NEEDED 75 $62 3 ANNUAL 534 $441 3130000 0.83 1.09 IMP B 2 AS NEEDED 75 $20 3 ANNUAL 534 $141 3130000 1.09 2.65 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $99 2 AS NEEDED 63 $99 3145000 0.00 2.63 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $166 2 AS NEEDED 63 $166 3145000 2.63 7.69 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $320 2 AS NEEDED 63 $320 3145000 7.69 9.76 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $131 2 AS NEEDED 63 $131 3145000 9.76 9.83 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 3145000 9.83 10.16 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $21 2 AS NEEDED 63 $21 4000000 4.51 15.26 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $16,893 5 ANNUAL 1572 $16,893 4000000 15.26 21.48 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $9,784 5 ANNUAL 1572 $9,784 4000395 0.00 0.15 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 534 $80 3 ANNUAL 534 $80 WAKE BUTTE T.H. cow camp (get on map) - only access to pit - f/w long term special use 4000970 0.00 1.76 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $836 3 ANNUAL 474 $836 permit, Fish and wildlife cabin 4001000 0.00 0.38 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 4001000 0.38 4.03 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 4030000 0.00 5.40 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $2,095 2 REGULAR 266 $1,436

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 14 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4032000 0.00 2.65 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $167 2 AS NEEDED 63 $167 4040000 0.00 8.69 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $3,701 2 ANNUAL 426 $3,701 Brooks/Scanlon haul route 4040000 8.69 11.50 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 426 $1,198 2 ANNUAL 426 $1,198 Brooks/Scanlon haul route 4050000 0.00 3.90 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $293 2 AS NEEDED 75 $293 4070000 0.00 1.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $107 2 AS NEEDED 63 $107 4070000 1.70 2.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $51 2 AS NEEDED 63 $51 4070000 2.50 4.70 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,129 2 AS NEEDED 63 $139 High county interest - Besson day use area/subdivisions/river 4100000 0.00 1.21 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $946 3 ANNUAL 779 $946 access/hard rock pits/etc./etc./ High county interest - Besson day use area/subdivisions/river 4100000 1.21 7.11 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $4,593 3 ANNUAL 779 $4,593 access/hard rock pits/etc./etc./

4100000 7.11 11.31 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $6,602 4 ANNUAL 1572 $6,602 analyized as two segements, the 2nd seg has access Sunriver - Bend 4100200 0.00 0.90 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $702 3 ANNUAL 779 $702 Besson camp road - (put number on map) 4100200 0.90 1.47 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $443 3 ANNUAL 779 $443 Besson camp road - (put number on map) 4100200 1.47 2.67 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $601 2 ANNUAL 501 $601 4100200 2.67 4.17 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $752 2 ANNUAL 501 $752 4100220 0.00 0.50 NAT C 3 AS NEEDED 277 $139 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 back door into spring river subdivision off of besson camp road why on map as ml 3? - this is road into Benham Falls (needs to be added spatially) - original mapped road needs to be closed - four other developed sites are accessed off of 41 and not shown on map. See 4100400 0.00 2.30 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $637 3 AS NEEDED 277 $637 Bruce's "renumbering" map for this area! 4100750 0.00 0.47 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $269 3 ANNUAL 572 $269 BIG EDDIE DAY USE AREA 4100870 0.00 0.18 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $103 3 ANNUAL 572 $103 LAVA ISLAND TAKE OUT 4110000 0.00 3.35 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $749 2 REGULAR 224 $749 4120150 0.00 0.20 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $95 3 ANNUAL 474 $95 doesn't match map - shown near davis lake - check mapping 4120200 0.00 0.50 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $330 3 ANNUAL 659 $330 doesn't match map - shown near davis lake - check mapping 4120400 0.00 1.12 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $531 3 ANNUAL 474 $531 NEW ASPEN CAMP 4120700 0.00 0.20 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $132 3 ANNUAL 659 $132 doesn't match map - shown near davis lake - check mapping 4130000 0.00 4.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $303 2 AS NEEDED 63 $303 Kiowa springs - gate on one end 4133000 0.00 3.47 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $219 2 AS NEEDED 63 $219 designated as collector for "numbering" location wrong on our map, we have wanted to close it but public 4140000 0.00 2.24 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $142 2 AS NEEDED 63 $142 keeps it open 4140000 2.24 6.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $269 2 AS NEEDED 63 $269 Sheviln-Hixon camp and RR tresile Analyze as two segments (north to south with break at comm site) - one segment accesses cutover pvt 40 - need to change directionality in 4180000 0.00 0.95 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $310 2 ANNUAL 328 $310 system! Analyze as two segments (north to south with break at comm site) - one segment accesses cutover pvt 40 - need to change directionality in 4180000 0.95 3.70 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $904 2 ANNUAL 328 $904 system! 4180000 3.70 4.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $70 2 AS NEEDED 63 $70

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 15 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4180000 4.80 5.94 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $72 2 AS NEEDED 63 $72 4180000 5.94 6.38 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 4180000 6.38 6.89 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 4180000 6.89 8.46 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $100 2 AS NEEDED 63 $100 4180000 8.46 8.47 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 4180000 8.46 8.47 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 4180000 8.47 8.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 4180000 8.47 8.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 4188000 0.00 2.80 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $659 2 REGULAR 236 $659 Kuamaksi Butte, Jazz Festival, snowmobile trails, etc. 4200000 18.90 20.85 AC A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $3,061 5 ANNUAL 1572 $3,061 4200000 20.85 24.75 AC A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $6,136 5 ANNUAL 1572 $6,136 4200000 24.75 27.95 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $5,034 5 ANNUAL 1572 $5,034 4200000 27.95 28.07 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $187 5 ANNUAL 1572 $187 4200198 0.00 0.10 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $157 3 ANNUAL 1572 $157 GENERAL PATCH BRIDGE 4200199 0.00 0.19 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 462 $88 3 ANNUAL 462 $88 BIG RIVER CG COMPLEX 4200205 0.00 0.24 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $114 3 ANNUAL 474 $114 GENERAL PATCH GROUP SITE 4200210 0.00 1.10 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $1,438 4 ANNUAL 1307 $1,438 check numbering on map (main access to subdivision) 4200350 0.00 0.30 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $83 3 AS NEEDED 277 $83 fall river camp ground 4200355 0.00 0.10 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 fall river guard station (admin site) Foster Road - high county interest - FS is working with county to give 4205000 0.00 1.95 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $123 2 AS NEEDED 63 $123 jurisdiction - (missing a short piece on map/hanging segment) 4205000 1.95 2.12 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 4220000 0.00 3.10 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,590 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,590 school bus route/seconday route/custom stone special use permit 4230000 0.00 2.30 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,456 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,456 Pistol Butte - cinder pits - airport 4240000 0.00 5.32 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $2,066 2 ANNUAL 388 $2,066 experimental forest access 4240000 5.32 5.40 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $29 2 ANNUAL 388 $29 experimental forest access 4245000 0.00 4.20 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,378 2 ANNUAL 328 $1,378 lookout mountain - FS repeater site 4245000 4.20 4.67 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $154 2 ANNUAL 328 $154 lookout mountain - FS repeater site 4245000 4.67 4.89 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $114 2 REGULAR 236 $52 4245000 4.89 4.90 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $5 2 REGULAR 236 $2 4250000 0.00 3.68 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $2,330 2 ANNUAL 633 $2,330 Fall River to 4270 4250000 3.68 6.40 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,721 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,721 Fall River to 4270 4251000 0.00 4.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $303 2 AS NEEDED 63 $303 4255000 0.00 1.86 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $140 2 AS NEEDED 75 $140 4255000 1.86 3.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $93 2 AS NEEDED 75 $93 4256000 0.00 1.07 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $538 2 ANNUAL 501 $538 top of round mtn - principle lookout on forest 4256000 1.07 2.16 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $544 2 ANNUAL 501 $544 top of round mtn - principle lookout on forest 4256000 2.16 2.26 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $51 2 ANNUAL 501 $51 top of round mtn - principle lookout on forest 4256000 2.26 2.35 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $43 2 ANNUAL 501 $43 4256000 2.35 2.40 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 501 $27 2 ANNUAL 501 $27 4258000 0.00 2.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 cutoff road between 4240 and 42

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 16 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4260000 0.00 3.28 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $5,156 4 ANNUAL 1572 $5,156 Wickiup Dam road - lots of special uses and everything else! 4260000 3.28 7.72 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 1122 $4,982 3 ANNUAL 1122 $4,982 4260000 7.72 9.09 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 686 $936 3 ANNUAL 686 $936 4260000 9.09 9.27 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 686 $127 3 ANNUAL 686 $127 Wickiup Dam road - lots of special uses and everything else! 4260000 9.27 9.97 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 686 $480 3 ANNUAL 686 $480 4260040 0.00 0.20 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $55 3 AS NEEDED 277 $55 4260070 0.00 0.80 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $222 3 AS NEEDED 277 $222 4260070 0.80 0.90 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 3 AS NEEDED 277 $28 4260070 0.90 1.80 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 sheep bridge CG complex 4260130 0.00 0.10 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 387 $39 3 AS NEEDED 387 $39 South Twin campground - 131 is not on map and should be 4260131 0.00 0.40 IMP A 4 ANNUAL 534 $214 4 ANNUAL 534 $214 WEST S.TWIN CG 4260132 0.00 0.23 IMP A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 SOUTH TWIN RV PARK 4260132 0.23 0.26 IMP A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 SOUTH TWIN RV PARK 4260140 0.00 0.10 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $47 3 ANNUAL 474 $47 WICKIUP DUMPSTATION 4260200 0.00 1.20 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $1,568 4 ANNUAL 1307 $1,568 Gull Point campground 4260800 0.00 0.37 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 462 $170 3 ANNUAL 462 $170 WICKIUP RES. CG 4260815 0.00 0.08 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $46 3 ANNUAL 572 $46 WICKIUP BUTTE BOATING 4262000 0.00 1.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $698 2 ANNUAL 388 $698 powerline road east of twin lakes/wickiup 4262000 1.80 2.50 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $272 2 ANNUAL 388 $272 4270000 0.00 1.52 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,385 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,385 Crane Prairie road - two distinct segments - snow creek/crane 4270000 1.52 7.64 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,625 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,625 4270000 7.64 11.30 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $4,107 4 ANNUAL 1122 $4,107 4270476 0.00 0.13 AC A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 CRANE PRAIRIE LODGING 4270477 0.00 0.28 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $366 4 ANNUAL 1307 $366 CRANE PRAIRIE BOATING 4270478 0.00 2.50 NAT A 4 ANNUAL 277 $693 4 ANNUAL 277 $693 crane prairie campground 4270990 0.00 0.46 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $127 3 AS NEEDED 277 $127 deschutes bridge campground 4273000 0.00 0.35 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 4273000 0.35 0.56 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $13 2 AS NEEDED 63 $13 4273000 0.56 1.34 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $49 2 AS NEEDED 63 $49 4273000 1.34 3.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 4278000 0.00 0.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 4280000 0.00 3.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,474 2 ANNUAL 388 $1,474 back side of wickiup (small pvt) 4285000 0.00 1.20 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 1122 $1,346 3 ANNUAL 1122 $1,346 browns mtn to campground on crane prairie 4285000 1.20 2.15 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $60 2 AS NEEDED 63 $60 4285000 2.15 3.60 IMP D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $91 2 AS NEEDED 63 $91 browns mtn to campground on crane prairie 4285000 3.60 4.20 NAT D 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 4286000 0.00 1.74 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $110 2 AS NEEDED 63 $110 browns mountain 4286000 1.74 3.16 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $90 2 AS NEEDED 63 $90 browns mountain 4290000 0.00 2.72 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $204 2 AS NEEDED 75 $204 Waldo lake road - road of issue in Forest Plan (don't maintain) 4290000 2.72 4.07 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $102 2 AS NEEDED 75 $102 Waldo lake road - road of issue in Forest Plan 4290000 4.07 4.46 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $29 2 AS NEEDED 75 $29

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 17 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4290000 4.46 7.27 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $211 2 AS NEEDED 75 $211 4291000 0.00 5.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $367 2 AS NEEDED 63 $367 4292000 0.00 0.31 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 important Snowmobile Route on Crescent and Bend/Ft Rock 4292000 0.31 4.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $233 2 AS NEEDED 63 $233 important Snowmobile Route on Crescent and Bend/Ft Rock 4292000 4.00 4.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 important Snowmobile Route on Crescent and Bend/Ft Rock 4293000 0.00 2.18 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $138 2 AS NEEDED 63 $138 4293000 2.18 2.58 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 4296000 0.00 0.17 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 designated as collector for "numbering" - gated - snowmobile route 4296000 0.17 1.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $90 2 AS NEEDED 63 $90 designated as collector for "numbering" - gated - snowmobile route 4300500 0.00 0.08 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $46 3 ANNUAL 572 $46 PRINGLE SPECIAL INTEREST 4320000 1.70 1.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $8 2 AS NEEDED 75 $8 4320000 2.30 2.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $38 2 AS NEEDED 75 $38 4320000 2.90 3.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $23 2 AS NEEDED 75 $23 4320000 3.60 5.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $105 2 AS NEEDED 75 $105 secondary access to subdivision - Tetherow boat landing - accesses La 4330000 0.00 2.24 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $870 2 ANNUAL 388 $870 Pine state park road, pvt roads, county roads, etc. secondary access to subdivision - Tetherow boat landing - accesses La 4330000 2.24 3.70 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 388 $566 2 ANNUAL 388 $566 Pine state park road, pvt roads, county roads, etc. 4350000 0.00 2.10 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,329 2 ANNUAL 633 $1,329 Pringle Falls road - cutoff road from 42 to 43 4358000 0.00 5.12 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $1,618 2 AS NEEDED 63 $323 closed - gated - elk caving area - ml 2 should be ml 3 (?)

parallels deschutes river - north side of state/blm land - state has just 4360000 0.00 2.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $918 2 ANNUAL 328 $918 put in developed rec site - parking and trails into La Pine state park 4360000 5.80 6.40 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 328 $197 2 ANNUAL 328 $197 some segments planned to be closed under Dilman project - high 4370000 0.00 1.45 NAT B 2 ANNUAL 501 $726 3 ANNUAL 647 $938 importance for fire - access for Haner Park subdivision/community 4370000 1.45 3.67 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $140 1 AS NEEDED 63 $140 (needs resegmented per Dilman EA) 4370000 3.67 6.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $166 2 AS NEEDED 63 $166 some segments planned to be closed under Dilman project - high 4370000 6.30 6.58 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $18 2 AS NEEDED 63 $18 importance for fire - access for Haner Park subdivision/community cutoff road from Wickiup Dam to 43 - designated access route for 4380000 0.00 3.34 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 878 $2,928 3 ANNUAL 1024 $3,415 Haner Park community (snowplowing, etc.) cutoff road from Wickiup Dam to 43 - designated access route for 4380000 3.34 3.58 IMP B 2 ANNUAL 878 $215 3 ANNUAL 1024 $251 Haner Park community (snowplowing, etc.) 4400000 0.00 6.93 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $7,094 3 ANNUAL 1024 $7,094 Tenino Boat Launch - Waumpus Butte comm sites, etc. 4400000 6.93 7.16 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $238 3 ANNUAL 1024 $238 Tenino Boat Launch - Waumpus Butte comm sites, etc. 4400000 7.16 9.91 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 1012 $2,783 3 ANNUAL 1012 $2,783 4400000 9.91 16.59 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $6,840 3 ANNUAL 1024 $6,840 4410000 0.00 0.98 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $62 2 AS NEEDED 63 $62 Pringe Butte - access for Pringle Falls experimental Forest 4410000 0.98 1.48 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $31 2 AS NEEDED 63 $31 Pringe Butte - access for Pringle Falls experimental Forest

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 18 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4410000 1.48 1.89 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 4410000 1.48 1.89 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 4410000 1.48 1.89 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 4410000 1.89 1.91 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 4410000 1.89 1.91 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 4410000 1.89 1.91 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 4410000 1.91 1.97 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 4410000 1.91 1.97 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 4410000 1.91 1.97 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 2 AS NEEDED 63 $4 4410000 1.97 2.04 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 4410000 1.97 2.04 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 4410000 1.97 2.04 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 2 AS NEEDED 63 $5 4410000 2.04 2.43 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 4410000 2.43 2.56 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 2 AS NEEDED 63 $8 4410000 2.56 4.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $129 2 AS NEEDED 63 $129 4420000 0.00 0.11 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $7 2 AS NEEDED 63 $7 bottom of pringle falls experimental forest 4420000 0.00 0.11 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $7 2 AS NEEDED 63 $7 4420000 0.11 0.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $18 2 AS NEEDED 63 $18 4420000 0.40 1.55 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $73 1 AS NEEDED 63 $73 4420000 1.55 1.70 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 1 AS NEEDED 63 $10 4420000 1.70 2.43 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $46 2 AS NEEDED 63 $46 sunriver to mt bachelor road - sunriver maintenance - to become county road after 2005 FH reconstruction - accesses edison snowpark, rock 4500000 0.00 11.55 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $18,157 5 ANNUAL 1572 $18,157 festival, etc. 4500700 0.00 0.33 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $519 4 ANNUAL 1572 $519 EDISON SNOPARK 4525000 0.00 5.15 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $2,642 2 ANNUAL 513 $2,642 sheridan mtn, high use road, major timber haul route 4525000 5.15 9.80 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $2,385 2 ANNUAL 513 $2,385 sheridan mtn, high use road, major timber haul route 4525000 9.80 10.80 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 731 $731 2 ANNUAL 731 $731 4526000 0.00 2.81 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $178 2 AS NEEDED 63 $178 east side of sheridan, gate, snow hut 4528000 0.00 2.40 AGG A 1 AS NEEDED 63 $152 1 AS NEEDED 63 $152 west side of sheridan, gated but always open 4528000 2.40 4.50 IMP A 1 AS NEEDED 63 $133 1 AS NEEDED 63 $133 4529000 0.00 2.80 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $177 2 AS NEEDED 63 $177 back of hosmer lake 4600000 61.10 63.88 AC A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $4,370 5 ANNUAL 1572 $4,370 cascade lakes highway 4600100 0.00 0.82 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $639 3 ANNUAL 779 $639 4600160 0.00 0.20 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 viewpoint off 46 road - Virginial Misner (?) 4600210 0.00 0.40 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $629 4 ANNUAL 1572 $629 wanoga snowpark 4600225 0.00 0.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 swampy lakes snowpark 4600300 0.00 0.50 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 MT BACHELOR COMPLEX 4600310 0.00 0.70 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 MT BACHELOR COMPLEX 4600319 0.00 0.20 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 dutchman flat snowpark 4600320 0.00 1.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 4 ANNUAL 0 $0 MT BACHELOR COMPLEX

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 19 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4600400 0.00 1.65 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,249 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,249 sparks lake campground (370 to todd lake should be in list) 4600420 0.00 0.20 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 4 ANNUAL 1307 $261 green lakes trail head 4600430 0.00 0.25 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $323 4 ANNUAL 1307 $323 devils lake access 4600430 0.25 0.27 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $34 4 ANNUAL 1307 $34 4600430 0.25 0.27 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $34 4 ANNUAL 1307 $34 4600430 0.27 0.32 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $61 4 ANNUAL 1307 $61 4600440 0.00 0.20 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $95 3 ANNUAL 474 $95 MIRROR LAKE TH 4600450 0.00 0.80 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $251 3 AS NEEDED 314 $251 quinn meadow horse camp 4600472 0.00 0.20 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $314 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 elk lake lodge 4600472 0.20 0.23 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $52 4 ANNUAL 1572 $52 elk lake lodge 4600473 0.00 0.44 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1572 $692 3 ANNUAL 1572 $692 ELK LAKE CG COMPLEX 4600480 0.00 0.10 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $157 4 ANNUAL 1572 $157 point campground on elk lake 4600482 0.00 0.20 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $314 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 point day use 4600500 0.00 1.03 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $1,619 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,619 lava lake road 4600520 0.00 0.59 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $389 3 ANNUAL 659 $389 little lava road 4600530 0.00 0.34 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $444 4 ANNUAL 1307 $444 lava lake boat launch and loop 4600655 0.00 0.85 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $235 3 AS NEEDED 277 $235 quinn river campground and boat launch 4600656 0.00 0.36 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $465 4 ANNUAL 1307 $465 QUINN RIVER CG 4600657 0.00 0.23 AC B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $306 4 ANNUAL 1307 $306 QUINN RIVER CG LOOP 4600659 0.00 0.40 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $111 3 AS NEEDED 277 $111 osprey point day use (680 road is rock creek cg/boat not on map) 4600680 0.00 0.59 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $927 4 ANNUAL 1572 $927 ROCK CREEK ACCESS / BOAT RAMP 4600681 0.00 0.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 ROCK CREEK CG LOOP 9+ 4600688 0.00 0.19 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $248 4 ANNUAL 1307 $248 ROCK CREEK CG LOOP 1-8 4600840 0.00 0.40 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $229 3 ANNUAL 572 $229 LAVA FLOW CG ROAD 4600840 0.40 0.82 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $240 3 ANNUAL 572 $240 LAVA FLOW CG ROAD 4600850 0.00 0.27 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $424 4 ANNUAL 1572 $424 LAVA FLCG 4600850 0.27 1.85 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $1,231 3 ANNUAL 779 $1,231 4600850 1.85 3.15 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $1,013 3 ANNUAL 779 $1,013 4600855 0.00 2.60 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $2,025 3 ANNUAL 779 $2,025 4601000 10.20 14.80 NAT A 2 REGULAR 63 $291 2 REGULAR 63 $291 4601000 14.80 18.70 NAT A 2 REGULAR 63 $246 2 REGULAR 63 $246 4602000 0.00 0.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 to triangle hill - winter trail - comm site 4602000 0.60 4.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $253 2 AS NEEDED 63 $253 to triangle hill - winter trail - comm site 4603000 0.00 2.60 NAT B 2 ANNUAL 316 $822 3 ANNUAL 462 $1,201 tumalo falls - municipal watershed - water guy's residence 4605000 0.20 1.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 4606000 0.00 0.56 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $42 2 AS NEEDED 75 $42 Brooks-Scanlon Haul Road all the way to sisters 4606000 0.56 1.36 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $60 1 AS NEEDED 75 $60 4606000 1.36 5.40 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $304 1 AS NEEDED 75 $304 Brooks-Scanlon Haul Road all the way to sisters 4606000 5.40 5.58 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $14 1 AS NEEDED 75 $14 4606000 5.58 7.07 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $112 1 AS NEEDED 75 $112 4606000 7.07 7.75 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $51 1 AS NEEDED 75 $51 Brooks-Scanlon Haul Road all the way to sisters

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 20 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4606000 7.75 8.52 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $58 1 AS NEEDED 75 $58 Brooks-Scanlon Haul Road all the way to sisters, Brooks mainline 4606000 8.52 11.15 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $198 1 AS NEEDED 75 $198 railroad bed. 4606000 11.15 12.39 IMP C 2 AS NEEDED 75 $93 1 AS NEEDED 75 $93 4606000 12.39 17.74 IMP C 2 REGULAR 266 $1,420 1 REGULAR 266 $1,420 4606000 17.74 19.63 IMP C 2 REGULAR 266 $502 1 REGULAR 266 $502 4606000 19.63 21.60 IMP C 2 REGULAR 266 $523 1 REGULAR 266 $523 4606000 21.60 21.90 IMP C 2 REGULAR 266 $80 1 REGULAR 266 $80 4606000 21.90 23.28 IMP C 2 REGULAR 266 $366 1 REGULAR 266 $366 Brooks-Scanlon Haul Road all the way to sisters, Brooks mainline 4606000 23.28 25.73 IMP A 2 REGULAR 266 $651 2 REGULAR 266 $651 railroad bed. 4607000 0.00 1.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 all private 4610000 0.00 0.89 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 tie through road from 46 to 4601 4610000 0.89 4.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $222 2 AS NEEDED 63 $222 4612000 0.00 3.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $202 2 AS NEEDED 63 $202 4613000 0.00 3.87 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $244 2 AS NEEDED 63 $244 4613000 3.87 7.30 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $217 2 AS NEEDED 63 $217 4614000 0.00 2.70 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $171 2 AS NEEDED 63 $171 4614000 2.70 3.58 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 2 AS NEEDED 63 $56 4614000 3.58 6.16 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $163 2 AS NEEDED 63 $163 4615000 0.00 4.63 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $293 2 AS NEEDED 63 $293 4615000 4.63 8.94 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $272 2 AS NEEDED 63 $272 4625000 0.00 2.66 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 1122 $2,985 3 ANNUAL 1122 $2,985 Elk lake loop 4625000 2.66 3.85 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,871 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,871 4625100 0.00 0.30 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $392 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 Guard Station/admin site 4625300 0.00 0.15 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $71 3 ANNUAL 474 $71 Sunset view day use area on Elk Lake 4625500 0.00 0.90 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $1,176 3 ANNUAL 1307 $1,176 Little Fawn Campground 4625505 0.00 0.10 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 LITTLE FAWN CG LOOP 4625605 0.00 0.40 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $126 3 AS NEEDED 314 $126 Hosmer Lake (why is 600 not on list or map?)1 4625607 0.00 0.20 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $63 3 AS NEEDED 314 $63 4628000 0.00 2.40 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $152 2 AS NEEDED 63 $152 4628000 2.40 2.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 4630000 0.00 1.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $113 2 AS NEEDED 75 $113 pulled culverts out of access to Cultus corral horse camp 4630000 1.50 3.50 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,514 3 ANNUAL 757 $1,514 4630000 3.50 7.40 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 4631000 0.00 1.06 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $67 2 AS NEEDED 63 $67 benchmark butte road - gated 4631000 1.06 1.93 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $55 1 AS NEEDED 63 $55 4632000 0.00 2.60 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $164 2 AS NEEDED 63 $164 backside of benchmark butte 4632000 2.60 5.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $171 2 AS NEEDED 63 $171 4635000 0.00 1.74 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,735 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,735 cultus lake road 4635000 1.74 2.42 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $214 3 AS NEEDED 314 $214

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 21 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 4635100 0.00 0.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 4 ANNUAL 1572 $472 WINOPEE TH 4635100 0.30 0.68 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 632 $240 3 ANNUAL 632 $240 WINOPEE TH 4635100 0.68 0.90 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $126 3 ANNUAL 572 $126 WINOPEE TH 4635110 0.00 0.40 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $523 3 ANNUAL 1307 $523 to cultus lake resort 4635120 0.00 0.24 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $74 3 AS NEEDED 314 $74 cultus lake campground (should 100 rd be on list?) 4635120 0.24 0.50 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $84 3 AS NEEDED 314 $84 4635120 0.24 0.50 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $84 3 AS NEEDED 314 $84 4635120 0.50 0.56 IMP A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $18 3 AS NEEDED 314 $18 4636000 0.00 1.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $70 2 AS NEEDED 63 $70 Irish Taylor / Little Cultus road - road of issue in Forest Plan 4636000 1.10 7.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 4650000 0.00 2.98 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $188 2 AS NEEDED 63 $188 check termini against firemans map, snowmobile rd 4650000 2.98 5.82 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $179 2 AS NEEDED 63 $179 check termini against firemans map 4652000 0.00 0.00 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 trailhead 4652000 0.00 0.01 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 4652000 0.00 0.01 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 4652000 0.00 0.01 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 4652000 0.00 0.01 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 4652000 0.01 3.13 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $197 2 AS NEEDED 63 $197 4652000 0.01 3.13 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $197 2 AS NEEDED 63 $197 4652000 3.13 3.58 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 4652000 3.13 3.58 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 2 AS NEEDED 63 $28 4652000 3.58 4.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $83 2 AS NEEDED 63 $83 4652000 3.58 4.90 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $83 2 AS NEEDED 63 $83 4652000 4.90 5.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 4652000 4.90 5.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 4654000 0.00 2.49 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $157 2 AS NEEDED 63 $157 all high rankings but has sections of level 2 maintenance - should revist 4660000 0.00 5.68 AGG B 2 ANNUAL 426 $2,420 3 ANNUAL 572 $3,249 objective maintenance levels 4660000 5.68 7.81 AGG B 2 ANNUAL 426 $907 3 ANNUAL 572 $1,218 4660000 7.81 8.53 AGG B 2 ANNUAL 486 $350 3 ANNUAL 632 $455 4660000 8.53 11.50 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $2,600 3 ANNUAL 877 $2,600 4660000 11.50 11.53 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $31 3 ANNUAL 877 $31 4662000 0.00 2.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 2 AS NEEDED 63 $133 4664000 0.00 0.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 2 AS NEEDED 63 $32 developed rec = 5 because of trailhead 4664000 0.50 1.96 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 developed rec = 5 because of trailhead 4664000 1.96 3.48 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $96 2 AS NEEDED 63 $96 developed rec = 5 because of trailhead 4664000 3.48 5.06 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $100 2 AS NEEDED 63 $100 developed rec = 5 because of trailhead

4665000 0.00 1.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $114 2 AS NEEDED 63 $114 short "local" road probably classified as collector for road numbering high ranking for fire and timer, but brushing in - can we close?, poor 4666000 0.00 4.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $346 2 AS NEEDED 75 $346 quality pit

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 22 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS

historic road between crescent lake junction and davis lake - closed but 4668000 0.00 0.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $51 2 AS NEEDED 63 $51 heavily used (illegal use) - not recommended for use by FS 4668000 0.80 5.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $284 2 AS NEEDED 63 $284 at end of rd. there is a ski trail 4669000 0.00 2.29 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,085 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,085 campground spur 4670000 0.00 2.01 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $127 2 AS NEEDED 63 $127 directionality wrong on map - shows wrong end closed 4670000 2.01 2.35 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 heavy snowmobiles 4672000 0.00 5.47 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $346 2 AS NEEDED 63 $346 4672000 5.47 7.17 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $107 2 AS NEEDED 63 $107 4672000 7.17 8.02 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $54 2 AS NEEDED 63 $54 4672000 8.02 8.43 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 2 AS NEEDED 63 $26 4674000 0.00 2.72 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $172 2 AS NEEDED 63 $172 4676000 0.00 1.25 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $79 2 AS NEEDED 63 $79 4676000 1.25 2.40 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $73 2 AS NEEDED 63 $73 4676000 2.40 3.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 4678000 0.00 2.42 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $153 2 AS NEEDED 63 $153 4678000 2.42 2.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 4680000 0.00 4.70 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $1,106 2 REGULAR 236 $1,106 4680000 4.70 6.20 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $354 2 REGULAR 236 $354 back access out of diamond view estates subdivision - do not 4682000 0.00 4.60 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $291 2 AS NEEDED 63 $291 "encourage" access in the future 4685000 0.00 1.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 5800680 0.00 0.61 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $797 4 ANNUAL 1307 $797 trailhead 5800681 0.00 0.08 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $105 4 ANNUAL 1307 $105 NEAR ODELL RESORT OR CG? 5800685 0.00 0.46 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $601 3 ANNUAL 1307 $601 ODELL CR CG 5800700 0.00 0.10 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 campground spur 5800800 0.00 0.10 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 campground spur 5810000 0.00 1.88 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,955 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,955 got it all 5810000 1.88 2.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $660 4 ANNUAL 1572 $660 5810210 0.00 0.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 campground, no spu permit 5810350 0.00 0.14 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 0 $0 3 ANNUAL 0 $0 SHELTER COVE RESORT

mushroom camp road - maintenance level 2 road that gets lots of low 5814000 0.00 1.50 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 426 $639 2 ANNUAL 426 $639 clearance use (encouraged/required) - two months out of the year 5814000 1.50 2.72 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $273 2 REGULAR 224 $273 5814000 2.72 2.89 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $38 2 REGULAR 224 $38 5815000 0.00 2.24 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $528 2 REGULAR 236 $528 high special uses - access to multiple communication towers, etc. 5815000 2.24 2.27 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $7 2 REGULAR 236 $7 high special uses - access to multiple communication towers, etc. 5815000 2.27 2.90 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $141 2 REGULAR 224 $141 high special uses - access to multiple communication towers, etc. 5815000 2.90 4.20 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $306 2 REGULAR 236 $306 high special uses - access to multiple communication towers, etc. 5815000 4.20 7.96 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $885 2 REGULAR 236 $885 high special uses - access to multiple communication towers, etc.

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 23 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 5815000 7.96 8.04 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $19 2 REGULAR 236 $19 high special uses - access to multiple communication towers, etc. 5820000 0.00 0.26 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $20 2 AS NEEDED 75 $20 majority of road on crown pacific land 5820000 0.26 0.38 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $8 2 AS NEEDED 75 $8 5820000 0.26 0.38 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $8 2 AS NEEDED 75 $8 5820000 0.38 0.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $24 2 AS NEEDED 75 $24 3 basic segments, the 1st -main access into two rivers subdivision - major access for rail road,cinderpit,snowmobiles, 2nd seg - big marsh, 5825000 0.00 1.72 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,704 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,704 3rd seg -hunting-boyscotts 5825000 1.72 6.70 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $1,172 2 REGULAR 236 $1,172 main access into two rivers subdivision - major access for rail road 5825000 6.70 9.63 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $691 2 REGULAR 236 $691 main access into two rivers subdivision - major access for rail road 5825000 9.63 11.17 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $363 2 REGULAR 236 $363 main access into two rivers subdivision - major access for rail road 5825000 11.17 13.23 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $485 2 REGULAR 236 $485 main access into two rivers subdivision - major access for rail road 5825000 13.23 15.06 AGG A 2 REGULAR 334 $610 2 REGULAR 334 $610 main access into two rivers subdivision - major access for rail road 5826000 0.00 1.87 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $118 2 AS NEEDED 63 $118 Bob Elliot Road 5826000 1.87 4.09 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $140 2 AS NEEDED 63 $140 SPNM ? 5828000 0.00 1.92 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $121 2 AS NEEDED 63 $121 "Matzataki ridge" - high use for mushroom picking 5828000 1.92 2.22 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 1 AS NEEDED 63 $19 also high use for mushroom picking - a main access into two-rivers 5830000 0.00 1.99 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 572 $1,138 3 ANNUAL 572 $1,138 subdivision, only access to lower deschutes, snowmobiles 5830000 1.99 2.77 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 659 $514 3 ANNUAL 659 $514 5830000 2.77 9.42 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $420 2 AS NEEDED 63 $420 no ROW over private land but provides primary and secondary access 5834000 0.00 2.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $158 2 AS NEEDED 63 $158 to Crown Pacific and Rail Road 5834000 2.50 2.85 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 1 AS NEEDED 63 $22

5835000 0.00 2.74 IMP B 2 REGULAR 266 $727 3 REGULAR 412 $1,128 access two communities - secondary access to two-rivers subdivision 5835000 2.74 7.19 IMP B 2 REGULAR 266 $1,182 3 ANNUAL 534 $2,377 5840000 0.00 2.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $126 2 AS NEEDED 63 $126 goes onto the winnma, mushrooms 5840000 2.00 4.22 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 5840000 6.01 6.83 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 access to powerline, railroad. low standard collector - may be so 5850000 0.00 1.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 designated due to "numbering" access to powerline, railroad. low standard collector - may be so 5852000 0.00 0.39 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 designated due to "numbering" 5852000 0.39 0.68 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 low standard collector - may be so designated due to "numbering" 5852000 0.68 0.80 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 low standard collector - may be so designated due to "numbering" 5852000 0.80 0.80 NAT C 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 low standard collector - may be so designated due to "numbering" 6000000 2.26 8.11 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,196 4 ANNUAL 1572 $9,196 6000000 8.11 11.82 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 757 $2,808 3 ANNUAL 757 $2,808 6000000 11.82 16.71 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 462 $2,259 3 ANNUAL 462 $2,259 6000000 16.71 21.09 NAT A 3 ANNUAL 462 $2,024 3 ANNUAL 462 $2,024

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 24 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 6000180 0.00 1.04 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $1,359 4 ANNUAL 1307 $1,359 6000210 0.00 0.20 AGG A 3 REGULAR 480 $96 3 REGULAR 480 $96 6000220 0.00 0.46 AGG A 3 REGULAR 480 $221 3 REGULAR 480 $221 6000230 0.00 0.29 NAT A 3 REGULAR 370 $107 3 REGULAR 370 $107 6000250 0.00 0.22 IMP A 3 REGULAR 382 $84 3 REGULAR 382 $84 6000260 0.00 2.04 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $3,207 4 ANNUAL 1572 $3,207 6000280 0.00 1.30 NAT A 3 REGULAR 370 $480 3 REGULAR 370 $480 6000501 0.00 0.30 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $142 3 ANNUAL 474 $142 WINDIGO T.H. 6005000 0.15 2.00 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,908 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,908 6005100 0.00 0.39 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1572 $613 4 ANNUAL 1572 $613 Crescent lake resort 6005100 0.39 0.40 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $3 3 AS NEEDED 277 $3 6010000 0.00 8.09 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 32 $256 2 AS NEEDED 32 $256 summit lake road 6015000 0.00 4.04 IMP A 2 REGULAR 236 $951 2 REGULAR 236 $951 6020000 0.00 2.22 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,054 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,054 6020000 2.22 5.34 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,477 3 ANNUAL 474 $1,477 6030000 0.00 2.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $152 2 AS NEEDED 63 $152 big marsh, snowmobile route 6030000 2.40 4.00 NAT B 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 6030000 4.00 4.70 NAT A 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 6100650 0.00 0.42 IMP A 3 REGULAR 382 $160 3 REGULAR 382 $160 crescent creek CG road Goolich Road - main route into subdivisions - plowed, but barely 6125000 0.00 0.87 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $55 2 AS NEEDED 63 $55 passable in winter months - no known easements 6125000 0.87 1.14 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $17 2 AS NEEDED 63 $17 6125000 2.64 3.34 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $44 2 AS NEEDED 63 $44 6125000 3.34 6.09 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $174 2 AS NEEDED 63 $174 ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 0.00 0.60 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $943 4 ANNUAL 1572 $943 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 0.60 0.62 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $27 4 ANNUAL 1572 $27 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 0.62 1.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,071 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,071 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 1.30 2.13 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,308 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,308 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 2.13 3.80 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,625 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,625 maintained to current prescription

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 25 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 3.80 5.64 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,891 4 ANNUAL 1572 $2,891 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 5.64 5.76 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $185 4 ANNUAL 1572 $185 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 5.76 6.44 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,071 4 ANNUAL 1572 $1,071 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 6.44 10.91 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $7,033 4 ANNUAL 1572 $7,033 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 10.91 11.06 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $233 4 ANNUAL 1572 $233 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 11.06 13.40 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 534 $1,250 3 ANNUAL 534 $1,250 maintained to current prescription ringo road - treated first five segments as a group - last segment is native and gravel surfaced and should be reconstructed if to be 6200000 13.40 13.48 AC A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $126 4 ANNUAL 1572 $126 maintained to current prescription short segment can't find - (Gilcrest Haul Route?) - E. side Wickiup, 6203000 0.10 0.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $44 2 AS NEEDED 63 $44 dump (?) 6210000 0.00 1.46 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 6210000 3.00 6.12 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $197 2 AS NEEDED 63 $197 6212000 0.00 2.12 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 32 $67 2 AS NEEDED 32 $67 6214000 0.38 1.56 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 32 $37 2 AS NEEDED 32 $37 6220000 0.00 3.51 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $222 2 AS NEEDED 63 $222 2ndary access 6220000 3.51 4.57 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $67 2 AS NEEDED 63 $67 6220000 4.57 5.91 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $85 2 AS NEEDED 63 $85 6222000 0.00 1.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $63 2 AS NEEDED 63 $63 6222000 1.00 4.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $190 2 AS NEEDED 63 $190 6224000 0.00 3.46 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $219 2 AS NEEDED 63 $219 6230000 0.00 3.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $196 2 AS NEEDED 63 $196 6230000 3.10 3.70 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 6230000 3.70 10.00 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $398 2 AS NEEDED 63 $398 6240000 0.00 1.81 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $114 2 AS NEEDED 63 $114 6240000 1.81 2.41 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 6240000 2.41 4.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 32 $63 2 AS NEEDED 32 $63 6240000 4.40 6.10 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $107 2 AS NEEDED 63 $107 6245000 0.00 0.04 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 26 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 6245000 0.04 1.45 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $89 2 AS NEEDED 63 $89 6245000 1.45 1.63 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 2 AS NEEDED 63 $11 6245000 1.63 2.33 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $44 2 AS NEEDED 63 $44 6400600 0.00 0.59 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $771 3 ANNUAL 1307 $771 lower Perry South campground 6400620 0.00 0.20 BIT A 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 3 ANNUAL 1307 $261 upper Perry South campground 6400700 0.00 0.20 NAT A 3 AS NEEDED 314 $63 3 AS NEEDED 314 $63 Monte campground 9400000 0.29 0.60 AGG A 3 AS NEEDED 277 $86 3 AS NEEDED 277 $86 9402000 0.00 0.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 9402000 0.30 3.31 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $190 2 AS NEEDED 63 $190 9402000 3.42 3.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 2 AS NEEDED 63 $24 9407000 14.20 14.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 Boundary Springs Road 9407000 15.10 15.70 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 2 AS NEEDED 63 $38 Boundary Springs Road 9407000 15.90 16.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 Boundary Springs Road 9407000 16.40 16.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 Boundary Springs Road 9407000 17.10 17.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 Boundary Springs Road 9407000 18.00 18.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $13 2 AS NEEDED 63 $13 Boundary Springs Road all private on Deschutes - comes from 3115 on Winema - very 9410000 0.00 2.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $139 2 AS NEEDED 63 $139 important road to Winema 9450000 0.00 0.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 32 $6 2 AS NEEDED 32 $6 also all Winema road 9604000 0.00 0.30 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 0 $0 2 ANNUAL 0 $0 WINEMA ROAD (SHOULD BE 8604) 9700100 0.00 0.20 BIT C 5 ANNUAL 1572 $314 4 ANNUAL 1572 $314 Lava River Cave 9701000 0.00 5.51 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9702000 0.00 0.05 BIT A 5 ANNUAL 1572 $79 5 ANNUAL 1572 $79 9702000 0.05 3.87 AGG B 3 AS NEEDED 277 $1,058 4 AS NEEDED 277 $1,058 9702100 0.00 0.04 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $56 4 ANNUAL 1307 $56 9702100 0.00 0.04 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $56 4 ANNUAL 1307 $56 9702100 0.04 1.63 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $2,074 4 ANNUAL 1307 $2,074 9702101 0.00 0.10 BIT B 3 ANNUAL 1307 $131 4 ANNUAL 1307 $131 9710000 0.00 0.88 AGG A 3 ANNUAL 877 $772 3 ANNUAL 877 $772 9710000 0.88 8.38 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 779 $5,843 3 ANNUAL 779 $5,843 9710000 8.38 11.45 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $231 2 AS NEEDED 75 $231 9710000 11.45 13.08 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $103 2 AS NEEDED 63 $103 9710000 13.08 15.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $172 2 AS NEEDED 63 $172 9710000 15.80 20.67 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $308 2 AS NEEDED 63 $308 9710000 20.67 23.03 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 9710000 23.03 24.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $110 2 AS NEEDED 75 $110 9710000 24.50 25.13 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 75 $48 2 AS NEEDED 75 $48 9711000 0.00 5.15 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $325 2 AS NEEDED 63 $325 9714000 0.00 2.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $177 2 AS NEEDED 63 $177 9720000 0.00 0.26 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1572 $409 4 ANNUAL 1572 $409 9720000 0.26 0.54 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $316 4 ANNUAL 1572 $443

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 27 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 9720000 0.54 0.71 AGG B 3 ANNUAL 1122 $188 4 ANNUAL 1572 $264 9720000 0.71 0.77 IMP B 3 ANNUAL 1024 $59 4 ANNUAL 1572 $91 9720000 0.77 2.42 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $1,691 3 ANNUAL 1024 $1,691 9720000 2.42 3.16 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $761 3 ANNUAL 1024 $761 9720000 3.16 3.23 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $66 3 ANNUAL 1024 $66 9720000 3.23 3.35 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $128 3 ANNUAL 1024 $128 9720000 3.35 8.79 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 1024 $5,570 3 ANNUAL 1024 $5,570 9720000 8.79 10.74 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 0 $0 2 ANNUAL 0 $0 9720950 0.00 0.00 IMP A 3 ANNUAL 844 $1 3 ANNUAL 844 $1 9721000 0.00 3.21 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $203 2 AS NEEDED 63 $203 9723000 0.00 0.02 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 9723000 0.00 0.02 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 2 AS NEEDED 63 $1 9723000 0.02 3.53 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $222 2 AS NEEDED 63 $222 9724000 0.00 1.56 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $99 2 AS NEEDED 63 $99 9724000 1.56 4.48 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $185 2 AS NEEDED 63 $185 9725000 0.00 6.55 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $414 2 AS NEEDED 63 $414 9725000 6.55 8.62 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $131 2 AS NEEDED 63 $131 9725000 8.62 8.94 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $20 2 AS NEEDED 63 $20 9730000 0.00 5.80 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $367 2 AS NEEDED 63 $367 9730000 5.80 7.11 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $83 2 AS NEEDED 63 $83 9735000 0.00 4.05 AGG A 2 ANNUAL 731 $2,961 2 ANNUAL 731 $2,961 9735000 4.05 9.26 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $2,673 2 ANNUAL 513 $2,673 9735000 9.26 10.92 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $852 2 ANNUAL 513 $852 9735000 10.92 13.06 IMP A 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,098 2 ANNUAL 513 $1,098 9736000 0.00 3.98 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 316 $1,258 2 REGULAR 224 $892 9735 to McKay Crossing 9736000 3.98 4.17 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $12 2 AS NEEDED 63 $12 9736000 4.17 6.11 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $123 2 AS NEEDED 63 $123 9736000 6.11 6.72 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $39 2 AS NEEDED 63 $39 9736000 6.72 7.11 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 9736000 7.11 11.36 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $268 2 AS NEEDED 63 $268 9736000 11.36 13.71 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 2 AS NEEDED 63 $149 wooden pipe line. 9745000 2.13 2.67 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $34 2 AS NEEDED 63 $34 9745000 2.67 4.09 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $90 2 AS NEEDED 63 $90 9750000 0.00 0.03 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $2 2 AS NEEDED 63 $2 9750000 0.00 0.03 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $2 2 AS NEEDED 63 $2 9750000 0.03 0.19 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 9750000 0.03 0.19 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 9750000 0.19 0.47 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $18 2 AS NEEDED 63 $18 9750000 0.47 3.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $179 2 AS NEEDED 63 $179 9750000 3.30 3.31 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 2 AS NEEDED 63 $0 9750000 3.31 4.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 28 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 9751000 0.00 0.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9751000 0.50 2.50 AGG C 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 1 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9751000 2.50 4.97 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9753000 0.00 5.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9755000 0.00 5.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $322 2 AS NEEDED 63 $322 9755000 5.10 7.50 AGG A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $152 2 AS NEEDED 63 $152 only good rock 9756000 0.00 1.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $88 2 AS NEEDED 63 $88 9758000 0.00 4.12 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $260 2 AS NEEDED 63 $260 2ndary access 9758000 4.12 5.20 IMP A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $68 2 AS NEEDED 63 $68 9760000 0.00 4.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $253 2 AS NEEDED 63 $253 same as9410 but even more so 9760000 4.00 10.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $379 2 AS NEEDED 63 $379 9760000 11.60 12.80 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 2 AS NEEDED 63 $76 9760000 14.10 14.90 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $51 2 AS NEEDED 63 $51 9762000 0.00 2.18 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $138 2 AS NEEDED 63 $138 not on FS 9765000 0.00 1.40 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $313 2 REGULAR 224 $313 2ndary tie to cresent and Gilcrest 9765000 2.00 3.00 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $224 2 REGULAR 224 $224 9765000 3.30 4.40 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $246 2 REGULAR 224 $246 9765000 5.40 6.50 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $246 2 REGULAR 224 $246 9765000 6.80 6.88 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $18 2 REGULAR 224 $18 9765000 6.88 7.10 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $49 2 REGULAR 224 $49 9768000 0.00 0.58 AGG A 2 REGULAR 364 $212 2 REGULAR 364 $212 access to boundary springs CG (RR and private access) 9768000 0.58 1.00 AGG A 2 REGULAR 364 $152 2 REGULAR 364 $152 9768000 1.30 3.30 AGG A 2 REGULAR 364 $727 2 REGULAR 364 $727 9768000 3.55 3.90 AGG A 2 REGULAR 364 $127 2 REGULAR 364 $127 9768000 3.90 4.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 2 AS NEEDED 63 $25 9768000 4.60 4.90 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 9768000 5.20 6.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 9768000 6.30 7.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 9768000 7.20 8.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 2 AS NEEDED 63 $57 9768000 8.10 8.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 2 AS NEEDED 63 $6 9768058 0.00 0.30 BIT A 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 4 ANNUAL 1307 $392 ROSEDALE / CRESCENT HOUSING

9770000 0.00 0.30 AGG A 2 REGULAR 364 $109 2 REGULAR 364 $109 sole access to newly aquired land - accesses Schoonover Subdivision 9770000 0.30 0.40 NAT A 2 REGULAR 224 $22 2 REGULAR 224 $22 9770000 3.20 4.20 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $63 2 AS NEEDED 63 $63 9772000 4.00 4.05 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 9772000 4.00 4.05 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 9772000 4.05 6.60 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $161 2 AS NEEDED 63 $161 9772000 7.60 7.90 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 9772000 9.00 10.45 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 2 AS NEEDED 63 $92 9772000 10.45 10.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3 2 AS NEEDED 63 $3

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 29 Current Maintenance Proposed Maintenance

Mgmt Maint Maint cost Segment Maint Maint cost / Segment ROAD BMP EMP SURF Strategy Level Frequency /mile COST Level Frequency mile COST REMARKS 9774000 0.00 0.50 NAT A 2 ANNUAL 0 $0 2 ANNUAL 0 $0 CB 10 / ALL PRIVATE / NO INTEREST TO US 9775000 0.00 1.16 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 mostly private, goes to mill 9775000 1.16 2.03 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 2.03 2.17 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 2.17 2.18 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 2.17 2.18 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 2.18 2.34 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 2.34 3.27 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 3.27 3.95 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 Sheviln-Hixon camp and RR tresile 9775000 3.95 5.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 5.30 7.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 7.00 7.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 7.50 8.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 8.50 9.48 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 9.48 11.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 Sheviln-Hixon Summit Line and Station 9775000 11.00 12.64 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 12.64 14.40 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 14.40 14.91 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 14.91 16.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 16.00 17.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 17.00 18.50 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9775000 18.50 18.90 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 2 AS NEEDED 0 $0 9780000 0.00 1.93 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $122 2 AS NEEDED 63 $122 9780000 1.93 4.00 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $131 2 AS NEEDED 63 $131 9785000 0.00 0.30 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 2 AS NEEDED 63 $19 9785000 2.60 2.75 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 2 AS NEEDED 63 $10 9785000 2.75 3.10 NAT A 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22 2 AS NEEDED 63 $22

3/17/2003 RECOMMENDATIONS (Deschutes) 30 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Some surveys done. Low probability of No weeds currently. High fire No special habitats mapped within isolated Botrychium pumicola probability but no weeds on segment Badlands 1800000 6.12 005 M200 ft. of road. population. nor high infestations close by. No weeds currently. Risk of fire with potential for weeds to spread using No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of roads as a vehicle. Medium traffic 1840000 6.08 004 M200 ft. of road. road. flow. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1845000 6.75 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Same as 1840. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. Same notes as 1849000 4.69 004 M200 ft. of road. road. 1840. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1850000 1.25 003 L200 ft. of road. road. Some bull thistle in area.

Mid-late seral sage and bitterbrush (Castilleja habitat). Mt. Mahogany on CACH; up by observatory, will rank out ridgeline. Last .5 mi. flat, south side higher because known spotted Pine Mt. - low sage and pumice with knapweed population. BOPU in flat at Spotted knapweed; not concerned BOPU (soil change). Inlow sage flat bottom of slope. CACH at top of slope about bull thistle. Population relatively at bottom, potential for resource close to knapweed, which came in along stable unless fire, high fuel loading in damage from road access. Hunters the road. Just past observatory - area. If fire, high risk of spread - 2017000 3.91 366 Mand OHV's use area. moderate use. knapweed came in because of road. 6110024 No weeds currently. The road is No TES plants within 200 ft. of road, but allowing access for paragliders. Less road accesses CACH population at the than 5 knapweed plants at paraglider end of it. Road allows access to the takeoff point, which had been pulled No special habitats mapped within plant population. Seasonally high use, and may be eradicated. Need to 2017500 0.10 033 L200 ft. of road. but most of year not high use. check. At campground. No weeds currently. Same notes as No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1840. Accesses east side Newberry 2100000 3.21 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Crater. No special habitats mapped within BOPU in area but not right along the 2200000 8.52 003 L 200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle. Always threat of fire. 6110025 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2239000 0.55 LL200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2269000 1.69 003 L 200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle 6110048 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2270000 3.15 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently.

Buckwheat flats/rhyolite pumice; huge BOPU. BOPU in buckwheat flats? High pumice plain bisected by road. potential to occur around edges of Fragile habitat. Former WWII landing pumice plain. Road probably not big No weeds currently. Pretty clean area, strip; lodgepole encroaching. threat except for potential OHV use' site but OHV's on trailers being pulled out 2300000 17.80 663 MPotential off-roading risk. sensitive to even minimal off-roading. to Sand Spring; hunting use in fall. No weeds currently. Primarily lodgepole. Always risk of fire going through, and any weeds would take off along the road. Not as well used as Road allows access to some BOPU 1840, so a 3 instead of a 4 rating. Bit No special habitats mapped within populations; possibility of isolated BOPU farther out, not right next to China Hat 2310000 6.69 023 L200 ft. of road. plants along road. road like 1840.

Buckwheat flats/rhyolite pumice. Risk No weeds currently. Not sure about of off-roading into fragile habitat. Less fire risk, but assume some level of traffic than Rd. 23, but still OHV's and Rhyolite flat potential BOPU habitat. risk, with always the potential to then 2312000 3.59 643 Mother 4 wheel use in the area. Not surveyed. Off-road recreation risk. get weeds that will travel down road.

No weeds currently. Not sure about fire risk, but assume some level of No special habitats mapped within Pumice openings potential BOPU risk, with always the potential to then 2313000 3.50 023 L200 ft. of road. habitat; some isolated BOPU plants. get weeds that will travel down road.

No special habitats mapped within No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. No weeds currently, but similar threats 2315000 2.61 004 L200 ft. of road. More in ponderosa and out of pumice. mentioned above.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 1 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Bull thistle. Weed risk same as 2316000 4.60 004 L200 ft. of road. road. above. 6110045 BOPU; Historic woodcutting through No special habitats mapped within population; risk of off-roading (open No weeds currently, but fair amount of 2510000 10.99 064 M200 ft. of road. area). High traffic. use. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. Fire risk for 9710000 3.83 003 L200 ft. of road. road. weeds. Not a main road. Narrow road, with trees closing in. Badlands Total 99.61

Diffuse & spotted knapweed, Canada & bull thistle, St. Johnswort; tansy. Wetland on the road above Dell High weed risk because high traffic & Springs with Tritomaria exsectiformis . recreation; known weed sites; recent Paved, about 3 miles in watershed; does not Road itself may not impact Dell high disturbance along road. Reveg 6120004?; cross any streams. Reconstructed in 1995- Springs but weed risk. Couple small No TES plants known within 200 ft. of with fescue very successful in 3rd and 6120032; 1996 and there were a lot of concerns about Crescent 4600000 3.30 208 1Hwet areas also, both uphill from road. road. 4th years after planting. 6120031. weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of diffuse; bull thistle. High recreation 4660000 0.04 005 M200 ft. of road. road. summer & winter. 6120030 Gravel, only about 1/10 mi. in watershed. Goes around Royce Mt.; gravel; on relatively No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. Does go onto Rd. steep side of butte, so south side butte may 4672000 6.32 001 L200 ft. of road. road. 46. have some interception runoff.

6120030 but Diffuse; bull; St. Johnswort. Isolated Signe says Native surface rd.; connects to 6210 rd.; no No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of from other roads and guessing it's a it's 6120033 stream crossings; skirts the southwest portion 4674000 2.72 004 M200 ft. of road. road. bull thistle site in old timber sale. on our map. of Hamner Butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Gravel, same notes, same rating 4674. West 4676000 1.25 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. side of Hamner Butte. SE side Hamner Butte; Improved native surface; no stream crossings; may affect flow No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of and fine sediment bec. Native surface and on 4678000 2.42 001 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. steeper slope. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Same exact notes & rating as 4678. Down 4680000 4.70 005 M200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle. Open harvest areas. 6120033 the slope 1/2 mi. from 4678. No Special habitats within 200 ft. of road. Just mixed conifer dry; no Both ALVI and MIJE site but not on TES Same notes & rating as 4672; 1/4 mi. below 4682000 4.60 001 Lwetlands. list. No weeds currently. 4672. Goes around south base of Royce Mt.

Crosses Crescent Creek within this watershed plus at least 3 other intermittent tributaries. Paved, state hwy. 1 fine sed bec. Of sanding practices of ODOT (sanding & plowing contributes some fine sediment to stream system, and also will contribute to noxious Spotted; Canada Thistle; Bull thistle; weed threat. In Crescent watershed, road is St. Johnswort;Dalmation toadflax; rel. flat. Localized floodplain fnct. Crosses Butter & Eggs.; Lot of private land and bridge so impacts to wetland rel low because highway maintenance; cinder allows wetland to continue to function properly Lodgepole wetland; series of small distribution and removal a problem. as opposed to roadfill with culvert over stream wet areas along road. Cinder build-up No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Repeated disturbance with existing -- then lose function of wetland bec. 5800000 4.87 609 1His problem/sedimentation. road. weed populations. 6120061 channeling water thru wetland. 2 segments; one is aggregate crushed & one No weeds currently. Leads to is native surface - but both same ratings; no No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of mushroom camp, which could be a creek crossings, no wetlands; Connects to 5814000 2.72 003 L200 ft. of road. road. weed vector. 6020 from 58. Up to top of Odell Butte; crosses 4 intermittent tribs to Crescent Ck on north side in lower 2 miles; native surfaced (dirt or rock or whatever; did not bring in gravel); 3 for fine sed because steepness and 4 intermittent Alder drainage north side of butte. Bull thistle. 6120004 is not on this tributaries; prob. Intercepts surface water; Very steep; likely impacted by road. road -- it's at the base of it. Seven prob. pretty high risk for overland flow, but Sedimenation into creek. Lot past No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Buttes and Seven Buttes Return areas geology - landslide pushed up flow effects 5815000 3.84 505 Mtimber harvest. road. -- lot of harvest. 6120004 rating. Main Rd. to Big Marsh; no stream crossings; No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of native surface; far enough away from Big 5825000 4.48 101 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Marsh to not affect wetland.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 2 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Crosses Big Marsh, Otter, Dublin and Fly Creeks, and parallels Big Marsh for approx. 3/4 mi. Native surface; for fine sed - 2ish range bec. Road is flat. Appears close to Big Marsh; bec. Crosses 2 perennial streams and 2 intermittent streams - prob. some impact there. Small culverts, small creeks. Some dispersed camping, pullouts for canoeing. Engelmann spruce/sedge; lodgepole Low risk but in 3 end of things. Fish - wetland; south end of marsh; lot rec unknown culvert situations at Big Marsh & use & dispersed sites. Native surface, Otter Creek. 4 wetland range - likely getting poor shape (?), close to high water some sediment delivery to that part of marsh table. Road might restrict flow at Otter No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. Far from any that it parallels; prob. somewhat limited the 5826000 4.09 602 M& Fly Creeks. road. roads that have known weeds. volume, timing & distribution of water.

Lodgepole wetland, spruce Around Crescent Lake, then goes south to bottomland, wet meadow. Road Windigo Pass. Paved portion around CRE crosses several creeks, paved to Canada thistle, bull thistle. Dalmation lake; paved portion crosses Cold and gravel; connects to Hwy 58, goes up toadflax. Knapweed pulled at Whitefish Creeks. Gravelled. 5 segments to Windigo Pass. Small intermittent entrance to Spring Creek (change in surface). Lump into 2 segments - 3 (5 for drainages may be impacted by steep campground, not found since. Boy paved and gravel; Gravel portion crosses upper road. Moderate risk in upper portions scout camp in area,lot possibility for Refrigerator Creek & 10 intermittent tribs. gravelled (steep drainages) where No TES plants known within 200 ft. of weed introduction; lot ground Crosses at least one major wetland on Cold 6000000 21.09 ). 0 6 M gravelled/native surface. road. disturbance. 6120008 Creek. No Special habitats within 200 ft. of road according to botany glob. However, area contains numerous No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000180 1.04 205 Msprings and seeps. road. risk. 6120008 or gravel. No Special habitats within 200 ft. of road according to botany glob. However, area contains numerous No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000210 0.20 205 Msprings and seeps. road. risk. 6120008 or gravel. Engelmann spruce bottomland (Spring No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000220 0.46 305 MCreek?). road. risk. 6120008 or gravel. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000230 0.29 2 0 5 M Mumerous springs and seeps. road. risk. 6120008 or gravel. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000250 0.22 2 0 5 M Numerous springs and seeps. road. risk. 6120008 or gravel. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000260 2.04 2 0 5 M Numerous springs and seeps. road. risk. or gravel. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada & bull thistles. Recreation Either campground or boat ramp road. Paved 6000280 1.30 2 0 5 M Numerous springs and seeps. road. risk. or gravel. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Canada; Bull; toadflax. Up in north Might be road to resort at north end of 6005000 2.00 005 M200 ft. of road. road. end. High rec, high traffic. 6120009 Crescent Lake?

No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. Assuming same 6005100 0.40 005 M200 ft. of road. road. condition and problems as 6005.

Lodgepole wetland, impacted by road. Heavy sedimentation in some areas. Goes up to Summit Lake. Native surface, Road in bad shape - gullied and water crosses Summit Creek & 2 intermittent carrying road into wetlands. Parallels No TES plants known within 200 ft. of tributaries and 4 wetlands. Steep, big ruts. 6010000 8.09 802 1HSummit Creek part of way. road. Low risk Visible erosion. Canada thistle on lake side and not Upper seen since flooded for 1 1/2 years portion = long. Upper portion has higher weed 7; lower risk (where comes off Rd. 60; north Crosses Crescent Creek twice. Located on portion = No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of end of lake; campgrounds and resort 6120008; east side Crescent Lake, midslope, no other 6015000 4.04 005 1H; M 200 ft. of road. road. there). Bull thistle. 6120009 stream crossings.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 3 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes Lodgepole wetland, spruce bottomland. Wet areas created by railroad along this road; wet complex Crosses Refrigerator and Big Marsh Creeks on both sides of road (Big Marsh and associated wetlands. About 1 1/2 miles Creek area), culvert may impact in Crescent Watershed; native surface. wetlands. Road completely bisects Crosses 2 intermittent tributaries and 3 stream. Weed risk from railroad and No TES plants known within 200 ft. of wetlands. Culverts restricting floodplain 6020000 2.22 71Hroad. road. No weeds currently. function??

Numerous springs flow from hillside into Big Marsh. Road crosses them with culverts. Some culverts have highly impacted those drainages to point of probably disrupting amphibian migration patterns. Culverts must be West side of Big Marsh. 4 intermittent stream dealt with. Very steep slope on uphill No TES plants known within 200 ft. of crossings; midslope; follows contour; native 6030000 4.70 901 1Hside of road. road. No weeds currently. surface. Closed part of road. Spotted; Canada & bull thistles. Regraded road basein 1995-1996; Lodgepole wetland; willow/sedge. revegetated. Mostly bull thistle. Might be sediment build-up due to Knapweed controlled by pulling. high cinder distribution in winter; likely Canada thistle plants close to creek, impacting wetlands. Probably pulled, unknown status. High traffic & healthiest aspen stand on private land recreation; connects to Cascade Crosses Crescent Creek; paved; Crescent where Rd. 61 crosses Crescent No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Lakes Hwy from Hwy 58 (known weed Creek narrows where crosses, so 1 not 0 on 6100000 5.98 508 1HCreek; multi-age stand. road. corridor). 6120004 fine sed. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Campground road to Crescent Creek 6100650 0.42 2 0 6 M Willow/sedge. Crescent Creek. road. Spotted, Canada & bull thistles. 6120004 campground. Gravelled.

Diffuse & Spotted. Intermittent high 4 segments (in/out watershed); crosses Willow/sedge. Road impacts traffic, depending on where Crown Crescent Creek and one wetland assoc. with Crescent Creek (bridge abuttments No TES plants known within 200 ft. of logging. Traffic comes from mill, Crescent Creek and maybe 2 intermittents. 6200000 5.02 606 Mrestrict flow). road. where high weed problem. 6120012 Crescent Creek portion on Crown Pacific land. Gravel; 3 segments; crosses 4 intermittent No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of tributaries; Goes by base Ringo Butte. 6210000 6.12 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Connects 62 to 46. Bull thistle (in large timber harvest area). Area not been disturbed for 17- 20 years, but bull thistle sustaining No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of and not disappearing. High ground 6212000 2.12 005 M200 ft. of road. road. disturbance. 6120019 Gravel; crosses 1 intermittent tributaries; No Special habitats within 200 ft. of road. Mixed conifer, old timber No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Gravel; 2 segments; crosses no intermittent 6214000 1.56 001 Lharvest areas, .s. side Ringo Butte. road. No weeds currently. tributaries; goes up Ringo Butte. Crescent Total 114.65 Anywhere crosses grasslands on Hwy 97 - no Crooked River Grasslands US-97 2.09 007 1H Weed risk. streams. Crooked River Grasslands Total 2.09 Spotted knapweed actually up from Rd. 18 on Rd. 210 . About 1/2 mile away from BOPU, down another road. Pretty clean area (as far as weeds). 4 BOPU in cattle waterline by China Hat because weeds aren't on road No special habitats mapped within Guard Station. Small population, off & segment but high risk species on road Devils Garden 1800000 10.58 034 M200 ft. of road. not impacted by road. feeding into this road. 6110047 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. No weeds, and 1849000 1.71 002 L200 ft. of road. road. doesn't get ton of use. On top of China Hat. Scattered BOPU populations No special habitats mapped within immediately to south but not within this No weeds currently, but probably gets Border south base of China Hat; defines the 1850000 2.32 003 L200 ft. of road. road buffer. little more use than 1849. southern base. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. No big 2100000 4.62 002 L200 ft. of road. road. populations around there. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Bull thistle. Not really on this road, but 2125000 0.97 003 L 200 ft. of road. road. on spur road off this road. 6110069

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 4 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes BOPU adjacent to road on BFR map - probably 10 year old sighting and No special habitats mapped within probably small (< 5 plants) and probably 2127000 8.02 032 L200 ft. of road. within 200 ft. of road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2200000 7.76 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Couldn’t find on map; gave same rating as 22 2200550 0.10 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. rd. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. More of main 2230000 7.00 003 L200 ft. of road. road. road; logging haul route. Main road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2235000 0.21 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. BOPU population (beyond 200 ft.?); probably not impacted by road. Woodcutting concerns possibly that may No special habitats mapped within be less concern because designated 2236000 4.32 002 L200 ft. of road. areas now. No weeds currently. BOPU but not being affected by the road. In a basin, lower elevation below No special habitats mapped within the road and probably beyond 200 ft. 2238000 3.79 002 L200 ft. of road. buffer. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2239000 5.32 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No weeds currently. Potential No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of quackgrass population off this road 2248000 3.24 002 L200 ft. of road. road. along a spur road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2259000 6.84 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Spotted knapweed; bull thistle. High No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of infestation, right along the road (Opal 2268000 3.37 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. Mine). 6110012 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2269000 4.34 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2270000 2.72 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2274000 2.73 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Some Canada thistle. Suspect road not playing big factor, but high risk No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of species. Seasonally high use with 2300000 12.47 006 M200 ft. of road. road. hunting. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2315000 3.77 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2320000 3.14 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Different species out there (Antennaria 2325000 5.30 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. dimorpha), Mt. Mahogany zone. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2350000 4.98 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9710000 0.63 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAK-5-12 0.95 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Off Forest. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAK-5-12B 0.96 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Off Forest. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAK-6159 9.00 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Off Forest. Devils Garden Total 121.14 No special habitats within 200 ft. roads.

Crosses wet meadow on private land? Paved, crosses 2 intermittent tribs and a small wetland. Where it crosses Deschutes River, Fall 4000000 11.91 337 1H Wet meadow. CACH. Plants are protected by shrubs. Spotted knapweed. 6110109 it's in Pilot Butte watershed. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4030000 5.40 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4032000 2.65 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 5 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4040000 8.69 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4050000 3.90 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4100000 1.21 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Crosses 1 intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4100200 0.90 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Crosses 1 intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4140000 4.26 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4180000 5.50 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4188000 2.80 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. Crosses Deschutes River; paved; Crosses small wetland associated with Indian creek. Lodgepole wetland; Senecio wetland; No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed, dalmation Wetlands where crosses Deschutes River; 4200000 17.63 307 1H willow/sedge. road. toadflax. 6110117 one at Fall River. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4200210 1.10 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110106 Little spur that goes to campsite or ? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4200290 0.30 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110117 Little spur that goes to campsite or ? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4200300 0.15 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110117 Little spur that goes to campsite or ? No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4200350 0.30 304 M Senecio wetland. road. No weeds currently. Little spur that goes to campsite or ? No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4200355 0.10 304 M Senecio wetland. road. No weeds currently. Little spur that goes to campsite or ? No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4205000 3.75 304 M Lodgepole wetland. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within 4220000 3.10 034 M 200 ft. of road. CACH. Plants are protected by shrubs. No documented weeds. 6110106 No streams. No special habitats mapped within 6110109; 4230000 2.30 034 M 200 ft. of road. CACH. Plants are protected by shrubs. No documented weeds. 6110117 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4240000 5.32 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4245000 4.42 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. Goes up butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4250000 3.68 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4251000 4.80 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4256000 1.14 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. Goes up butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4258000 2.10 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110111 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Goes across the top of the dam; most not in 4260000 0.19 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. watershed. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Crosses Deschutes River; paved. Pringle 4300000 6.39 007 1H 200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed. 6110111 Falls private land -- high risk for weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4330000 1.46 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4350000 2.10 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110111 Cross 1 intermittent.

Follows east side Fall River. One intermittent No TES plants known within 200 ft. of trib; 2 wetland hits in botany glob; wetlands 4358000 5.12 304 M Senecio wetland; willow/sedge. road. No weeds currently. must be assoc. with Fall River Floodplain. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4360000 6.40 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110117 Appears to cross Fall River; native surface.

Native surface, parallels west side Deschutes Lodgepole wetland; sedge moist No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110111; River below Wickiup. Mostly up high, 4370000 6.30 307 1H meadow; willow/sedge. road. Spotted knapweed. 6110172 occasionally dips down, so 0 on floodplain. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4380000 3.34 007 1H 200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed by Wickiup Dam. 6110111 One intermittent stream; straight road.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 6 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4400000 6.93 307 1H Willow/sedge. road. Spotted knapweed by Pringle Butte. 6110177 East side of Deschutes River; native surface. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4410000 3.51 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Circles Pringle Butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4420000 1.66 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within 6110104; Links Rd. 40 and 46. Follows Dutchman 4500000 11.55 034 M 200 ft. of road. CACH. Plants are protected by shrubs. No documented weeds. 6110109 Creek (intermittent). No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4525000 5.15 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4526000 2.81 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600000 4.46 007 1H 200 ft. of road. road. toadflax. 6110104 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4613000 3.43 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4614000 2.58 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-LAPINE STATE REC 2.46 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. Paved. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAP-1ST ST 0.30 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAP-5TH ST 0.05 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAP-PARK D 0.68 004 M 200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. Fall Total 174.28 Hampton US-20 15.48 007 1H Weed risk. Hampton Total 15.48 Paved; crosses Snow Creek and Upper Deschutes River; flat, so in low area for flow No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation effects; Probably 2 wetlands and essentially Headwaters 4000000 6.22 3 0 7 1H Spruce/sedge; lodgepole wetland road. toadflax. 6110109 being blocked. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Road to cow camp. 3 on wetlands because 4000970 1.76 3 0 4 M Lodgepole wetland. road. Spotted knapweed 6110109 skirts doesn't cross. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4070000 4.70 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110109 No streams. Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Ccanada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch thistle; St. 4200000 0.12 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Johnswort 6120005 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4240000 0.08 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed 6110109 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4245000 0.48 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4250000 2.72 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4255000 1.86 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4256000 1.16 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. Skirts around side Crane Prairie Reservoir. Spruce/bog blueberry/sedge; Senecio No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Also crosses Snow Creek and Upper 4270000 9.78 304 Mwetland; sedge meadow. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Deschutes River (2nd gravelled section). No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4270478 2.50 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground rd? No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4270990 0.46 3 0 4 M Spruce/bog blueberry/sedge road. No documented weeds. Campground rd? Has wetland. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4273000 2.57 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4278000 0.10 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams.

Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch broom; Crosses 1 intermittent trib; parallels south 4285000 2.05 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle. 6120005 shore Crane Prairie.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 7 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch broom; 4286000 1.42 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle. 6120005 No streams.

Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotchbroom; Charlton Lake Rd. Crosses 2 intermittent 4290000 5.91 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle. 6120005 streams.

Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch broom; Once around the butte. Crosses the same 4291000 5.80 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle. 6120005 intermittent stream 2 times. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4292000 0.31 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4293000 2.58 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 2 segments; crosses one intermittent stream. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4296000 1.43 3 0 4 M Sedge moist meadow. road. No documented weeds. Wetland; comes close to Charlton Creek; No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4525000 5.65 3 0 4 M Spruce/bog blueberry/sedge road. No documented weeds. Wetland; 2 segments. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No streams; switchbacks up side butte, so 4528000 4.50 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. prob. Some fine sediment. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4529000 2.80 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. Alpine sedge; spruce/sedge; lodgepole wetland; Engelmann spruce bottomland; tufted hairgrass/sedge; Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada sedge subalpine meadow; sedge thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch broom; meadow; willow sedge; Mt. Alder, bog No TES plants known within 200 ft. of StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle; From Mt. Bachelor to south of Crane Prairie. 4600000 31.80 708 2Hblueberry. road. LINDAL. 6120005 Paved. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation For 46 spurs -- campground or trailhead 4600319 0.30 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. toadflax. 6110104 roads. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600400 1.65 3 0 7 1H Willow/sedge. road. toadflax. 6110104 Wetland No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600420 0.20 3 0 7 1H Tufted hairgrass/sedge; willow/sedge. road. toadflax. 6110104 Wetland No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600430 0.35 3 0 7 1H Willow/sedge. road. toadflax. 6110104 Wetland Senecio wetland; tufted No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600450 0.80 307 1Hhairgrass/sedge road. toadflax. 6110104 Wetland No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600472 0.23 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. toadflax. 6110104 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600480 0.10 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. toadflax. 6110104 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600482 0.20 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. toadflax. 6110104 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed; Dalmation 4600500 1.03 3 0 7 1H Engelmann spruce bottomland. road. toadflax. 6110104 Wetland Engelmann spruce bottomland; sedge No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600520 0.59 304 Mmeadow. road. No documented weeds. Wetland No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600530 0.34 3 0 4 M Sedge moist meadow. road. No documented weeds. Wetland

Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch broom; 4600655 0.85 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle. 6120005

Diffuse & Spotted knapweed; Canada No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle; Bull thistle; Scotch broom; 4600659 0.40 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. StJohnswort; LINVUL; scotch thistle. 6120005 Hosmer Lake Loop; paved and gravel (2 segments); 1 intermittent stream crossing; 1 fine sediment for portion that gravelled that No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of goes around Elk Lake and crosses 4625000 3.85 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Intermittent trib. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4625100 0.30 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Elk Lake Resort Rd.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 8 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4625300 0.15 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Rd. down to beach at Elk Lake. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4625500 0.90 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Goes to Elk Lake. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4625605 0.40 3 0 4 M Sedge meadow. road. No documented weeds. Campground Rds. In Hosmer. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4625607 0.20 3 0 4 M Sedge meadow. road. No documented weeds. Campground Rds. in Hosmer No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4628000 2.70 3 0 4 M Spruce/vaccinium sedge. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Wetland - check in ArcView.

Crushed gravel. Crosses Cultus River, Cultus Creek, Deer Creek (?), and one intermittent trib. Four wetland areas. Goes towards Spruce/bog blueberry/sedge; Lemish Lake. Hot spot for floodplain function Engelmann spruce bottomlands; wet No TES plants known within 200 ft. of is Cultus River. Adjacent to 2 wetlands and 4630000 7.40 304 Mmeadow; alder. road. No documented weeds on BFR. 6120005 prob. Crosses other 2 wetlands.

No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Crosses intermittent section of Cultus River. 4631000 1.93 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 2nd segment does not cross the River. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Crosses intermittent section of Culture River. 4632000 5.30 3 0 4 M Engelmann spruce bottomlands. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Wetland adjacent. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4635000 2.42 3 0 4 M Alder. road. No documented weeds on BFR. 6120005 Road into Cultus Lake. Gravelled. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4635110 0.40 3 0 4 M Alder. road. No documented weeds. Road to Cultus Lake Resort. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4635120 0.83 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground road. 4 segments. Engelmann spruce bottomland; sedge Road past Taylor and Irish Lakes?? Can't find 4636000 7.10 324 Mmoist meadow. SCHPAU. Not near road. No documented weeds. on Dan's map. From Little Cultus to Irish Taylor Lakes. Headwaters Total 139.68 Crosses wetlands. No special habitats mapped within Irrigation Canals NOLD MAR 0.09 018 1H200 ft. of road. Unknown. Very high weed potential. No special habitats mapped within DES-BILLADEAU 0.28 018 1H200 ft. of road. Unknown. Very high weed potential. No special habitats mapped within DES-GOSNEY 3.38 018 1H200 ft. of road. Unknown. Very high weed potential. No special habitats mapped within DES-RICKARD 1.06 018 1H200 ft. of road. Unknown. Very high weed potential. No special habitats mapped within US-20 2.73 018 1H200 ft. of road. Unknown. Very high weed potential. Irrigation Canals Total 7.54 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Lake Billy Chinook 1100000 1.44 256 M200 ft. of road. road. Intermittent tribs don't go anywhere. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1126000 2.77 2 3 6 M Wet meadow road. Wetland. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1129000 5.78 200 ft. of road. road. 2 segments; 1 intermittent stream crossing. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2050000 5.80 333 L200 ft. of road. road. 2 segments. Scablands. Weed risk and off-road Crosses 3 intermittent tribs that don't connect 2055000 5.77 778 3Huse. PEPE in area. Weed risk. Goes to Fly Lake. High weed risk. to anything. Lake Billy Chinook Total 21.55 Rd. to Paulina Lake. Paved. Only part of it in No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No documented weeds in this Little Deschutes watershed, that's why all Little Deschutes 2100000 1.51 004 M200 ft. of road. road. segment. 6110006 zeros. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100400 0.08 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110006 Campground road? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100500 0.67 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground road? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2121000 2.28 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2200000 0.61 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. .5 mi. paved road by LaPine No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2205000 2.87 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 9 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2215000 4.69 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle. 6110065 No streams. Wickiup Junction/Pringle Falls Rd. Crosses Little Deschutes River closer to 97. Floodplain can't function normally because of road; hot spot is Little Deschutes, but 1/4 mi. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed likely but not 6110001; stretch on 8 mile long road. Wetlands on 4300000 8.53 007 M200 ft. of road. road. documented. 6110111 private land. Lots segments. All zeros. Lots segments No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of bec. In and out private land. One tiny 4320000 10.84 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110111 intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4330000 2.24 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110111 One intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4410000 2.22 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Once around the butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4420000 0.88 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4678000 0.18 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Same road notes, different watershed. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Already looked at in Crescent watershed; 4680000 1.50 003 L200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle. 6120038 same notes as above. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4685000 1.20 00 200 ft. of road. road. No stream crossing. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Diffuse & spotted knapweeds; bull 6120006; Paved; 2 small intermittent streams don't go 6200000 5.21 006 M200 ft. of road. road. thistle. 6120038 anywhere. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6220000 3.51 003 L200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Crosses 4 intermittents. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6224000 3.46 003 L200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. One intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6230000 3.10 003 L200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle. 6120038 One intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6245000 1.41 003 L200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No intermittent streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9736000 4.64 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. Follows slope contour. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9745000 2.67 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110001 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9750000 3.33 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9775000 1.27 00 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9785000 2.75 006 M200 ft. of road. road. Diffuse & spotted knapweeds. 6120006 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-LAPINE STATE REC 0.94 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAP-5TH ST 0.25 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of LAP-PARK D 0.42 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Weed status unknown. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110001; US-97 5.95 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. Diffuse & spotted knapweeds. 6120006 Little Deschutes Total 79.20 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Long Prairie 2100500 1.76 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2121000 5.85 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2125000 3.43 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2200000 16.79 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2205000 0.44 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2210000 12.80 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2215000 1.56 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 10 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within 2220000 12.81 034 M200 ft. of road. BOPU No documented weeds. 6110011 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2222000 5.67 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2225000 14.35 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2227000 1.82 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2235000 1.13 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within 2400000 2.25 054 M200 ft. of road. BOPU No documented weeds. 6110011

Aspen stand (probably not impacted by road but stand is uncommon for Crescen). Aspen is on lava ridge with Holodiscus dumosus and Prunus Spotted knapweed. On Crescent, no virgiana (so moisture in the rock). No TES plants known within 200 ft. of spotted knapweed, but potential there 2415000 2.50 104 MRoad is above lava; not much impact. road. because connects to Rd. 31. 6110011 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2420000 3.91 04 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2422000 1.67 04 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2430000 10.86 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds.

Spotted knapweed. Biggest problems are weeds on private lands. Both BFR and Crescent treating weeds where No Special habitats within 200 ft. of find them. Population reduced but still road. Showcase ponderosa stand problem. Needs to be pulled every (near end of rim) on BFR and CRE year. High risk because high traffic, Divider road between BFR and Crescent. (especially Crescent) near intersection existing high risk species, and private Road between Summer Lake and LaPine. 3100000 13.35 037 1H of 31/3115 (along 31). BOPU on BFR side. land that isn't being treated. 6110011 Same as Hwy 97. Spotted knapweed. Contractor found BOPU; road vector for weeds. BOPU and pulled knapweed on Crescent plot close to road (within 1/4 mi.). Small District along this road. Potential is Becomes 3117 on BFR. Knapweed on BFR No special habitats mapped within closed road leads to BOPU plot; there for weeds because of knapweed section in a fire area. Road used quite a bit, 3115000 2.84 044 M200 ft. of road. reduced risk because of road closure. on Rd. 31. 6110011 especially by hunters, but less use than 9775. No special habitats mapped within 3117000 5.80 034 M200 ft. of road. BOPU No documented weeds. 6110011 No special habitats mapped within 3118000 3.37 034 M200 ft. of road. BOPU No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9736000 2.35 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9750000 0.90 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Ask Charmane for BFR opinion on No special habitats mapped within Historic BOPU site might have been this. Give same ratings for now as 9775000 4.66 034 M200 ft. of road. along this road. 9775 in Sellers watershed. No special habitats mapped within Due to private lands and off 9775, Little piece of road on Crescent. Goes to 9780000 2.07 034 M200 ft. of road. BOPU? there is a weed risk. private land (which is not Crown Pacific). No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9785000 0.65 200 ft. of road. road. 6110001; US-97 6.52 5?7 1H Wet meadow just south of LaPine. TES plant status unknown. Diffuse & spotted knapweeds 6120006 Long Prairie Total 142.08 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Lower Dry River 1800000 9.99 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1800200 1.60 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1814000 3.28 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110034; 1815000 1.80 007 200 ft. of road. road. Diffuse & spotted knapweeds 6110087

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 11 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1815800 0.24 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1818000 2.76 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1819000 2.96 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1820000 10.88 004 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within 1825000 9.49 034 200 ft. of road. CACH. Plants are protected by shrubs. No special habitats mapped within 2015000 1.80 034 200 ft. of road. CACH. Plants are protected by shrubs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9710000 2.73 004 200 ft. of road. road.

DES-ARNOLD MAR 0.97 0 0 7 1H Special habitat status unknown. TES plant status unknown. Weed status unknown; high potential.

DES-GOSNEY 0.72 0 0 7 1H Special habitat status unknown. TES plant status unknown. Weed status unknown; high potential.

DES-RICKARD 1.52 0 0 7 1H Special habitat status unknown. TES plant status unknown. Weed status unknown; high potential.

US-20 3.72 0 0 7 1H Special habitat status unknown. TES plant status unknown. Weed status unknown; high potential. Lower Dry River Total 54.45

Parallels Fly Creek, crosses Meadow Creek, Six Creek, and Prairie Farm Creek. Crosses 5 other intermittent tribs to Fly Creek. It's right Riparian, intermittent channels, at creek bottom, so water that would normally meadows. Risk is probably hydrologic Connects to populations. High push into the creek - doesn't affect timing and Lower Metolius 1100000 12.17 446 Mand weeds. Unknown. High potential. potential. High use. quantity of water (flow effects).

1129000 1.02 3 6 7 1H Unknown. Potential for PEPE. Weed risk is high. High weed risk in this area. Crosses Fly Creek once.

1130000 1.49 2 2 4 M Unknown. Potential for PEPE. Weed risk is high. High weed risk in this area. Top of Green Ridge, no streams. Top Green Ridge, 4 segments, crosses Creeks, riparian. Risk is hydrologic Unknown. Potential for AGEL. Weed Connects to known populations on Rd. Meadow Creek and headwaters of 3 1140000 10.59 445 Minterference and weeds. risk. 11. Not surveyed. intermittent tribs. Connects to known populations on Rd. 1149000 7.70 2 3 5 M Unknown. Potential for AGEL. Weed risk. 11. Not surveyed. Top Green Ridge, crosses 2 intermittent tribs.

Midslope on Eastside Green Ridge, crosses numerous intermittent tribs to Metolius and Fly Intermittent streams, riparian Not surveyed. Connects to weed Creek. More of risk relative to geology? 1150000 14.05 355 Mdrainages. Potential PEPE and AGEL. Weed risk. sites. Gravel most, part native surface. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1152000 1.50 200 ft. of road. road. No streams. Midslope, eastside Green Ridge, crosses 5 Crosses north fork Street Creek. Potential for PEPE and AGEL. Weed Not surveyed. Connects to weedy intermittent tributaries, actually on fairly flat 1158000 2.70 334 MRiparian. Intermittent channels. risk. areas. part of slope where comes across. Connects to weedy areas. Not 1160000 4.20 2 3 5 M Unknown. Potential for AGEL. Weed risk. surveyed. High recreation use. Crosses 1 intermittent stream. Potential for PEPE and AGEL. Weed Diffuse knapweed; Connects to Rd. 1170000 4.90 2 3 7 1H Unknown. risk. 64 (weeds). High use. 6150022 Crosses 1 intermittent stream. Connects to Rd. 64 (weeds). High 1180000 3.50 2 3 7 1H Unknown. PEPE; Weed risk. use. PEPE; No streams. Intermittent streams, riparian. Risks are hydrologic interference and Potential habitat for PEPE and AGEL. Not surveyed. Connects to weed Midslope, eastside Green Ridge, crosses 8 1190000 13.30 457 1Hweeds. Weed risk. areas. intermittent streams. Intermittent streams, riparian. Risks are hydrologic interference and Potential habitat for PEPE and AGEL. Not surveyed. Connects to weed Crosses N. Fork of Spring Creek 1193000 3.60 457 1Hweeds. Weed risk. areas. (intermittent). PEPE; 1st section is the worst - switchback -- 1490000 2.26 3 4 4 M Hydrologic interference. PEPE potential. Weed risk. High use. crosses 4 tribs 2X each.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 12 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Rating entire road in this watershed even though road is closed -- check, though. Diffuse and spotted knapweed, scotch Native surface; 31 intermittent streams on broom. Weeds difficult to treat map. Located in confined valley ( v-shaped Cypripedium montanum in area?. because inaccessible; lack of as opposed to broad); road not adjacent to Unknown TES. Weed risk, erosion. monitoring; erosion probably creating river, up above river. In significant watershed 1499000 8.09 6 5 7 1H Weed risk. Potential habitat for PEPE and AGEL. new sites. for at risk fish species (Bull Trout). No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Goes past Fly Lake; flat, crosses 1 intermittent 2055000 1.34 200 ft. of road. road. trib and Fly Creek.

Wet meadow; Follows Metolius, crosses Spring and Street Creeks; 18 intermittent tribs. Paved in portions; pretty well used, well maintained road. Pretty good surface and prob. Not much surface erosion. Because crosses so many streams - bumps up Diffuse knapweed; goes to Fly Lake. floodplain function; follows contour and pretty Bad weed populations. Not well down on slope. Has potential to be at completely surveyed; recently found risk and should get money to maintain it, but Wet meadow; weed risk and off-road huge populations. High rec use, high 6150022; prob. not high risk road right now. Wetland 6400000 20.50 549 1Huse. Potential habitat; not surveyed. traffic. 6150055 associated with creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6400600 0.59 200 ft. of road. road. Campground road? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6400620 0.20 200 ft. of road. road. Campground road? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6400700 0.20 200 ft. of road. road. Campground road? Lower Metolius Total 113.90 Crosses Paulina Creek, goes to Newberry Spotted knapweed at info kiosk near Crater; Paved except for about mile at very Newberry 2100000 18.27 537 1H Moist meadow; sedge meadow. BOPU jct. with 97 (BLM jurisdiction) 6110005 end. Adjacent to Paulina Creek. Weed & No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110005; 2100050 0.74 807 2Hrecreation issues. road. Spotted knapweed, bull thistle 6110088 Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100060 0.34 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100200 0.20 can't find 0 ? 200 ft. of road. road. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100400 0.16 can't find 0 ? 200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed. 6110006 Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Road to Paulina Peak; Gravelled or native 2100500 1.59 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. surface; pretty steep; big cut banks; No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100505 0.18 5 0 4 M Sedge meadow. road. No documented weeds. Sedge meadow. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100530 0.81 5 0 4 M Sedge meadow. road. No documented weeds. Sedge meadow. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100565 0.31 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100570 1.08 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100580 0.13 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100660 0.51 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100680 0.42 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100690 0.04 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100700 1.92 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2100710 0.10 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campground, boat ramp, or trailhead road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2120000 2.63 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. South side Paulina Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2121000 0.39 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 13 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Moist meadow. Crosses Little Deschutes. 4200000 3.22 3 0 7 1H Moist meadow. road. Diffuse & Spotted knapweed. 6110001 Restricts floodplain some. Paved. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9720000 1.09 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9724000 4.48 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110001 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9725000 8.62 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110001 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9730000 7.11 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9735000 10.92 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110001 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9736000 6.72 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Crosses Paulina Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9745000 1.60 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9750000 0.16 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. DES-LAPINE STATE REC 2.71 3 1 4 M Crosses Little Deschutes. TES plant status unknown. Weed status unknown. No streams. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of US-97 7.07 3 0 7 1H Moist meadow. road. Diffuse & Spotted knapweed. 6110001 No streams. (blank) 0.09 Newberry Total 83.60 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Pilot Butte 1800000 6.96 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Dalmatian toadflax & sp. Knapweed 6110022 China Hat Rd. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1801000 2.14 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1810000 10.57 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1814000 2.96 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1815000 1.76 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110087 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1815800 0.23 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1816000 3.17 5 0 4 M Wet meadow. road. No documented weeds. No streams, but goes to wet meadow. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1818000 1.34 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Diffuse & spotted knapweed, bull 6110001; 4000000 3.35 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. thistle 6110135 Crosses Deschutes; paved No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Connects into Cottonwood Rd. Maybe 4001000 4.03 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. powerline road. 6110104; 6110183; Crosses 9 intermittent tribs; no wetland 6110194; mapped on hydrology map; couple springs No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110195; mapped and spruce bottomland is prob. 4100000 10.10 3 0 7 1H Spruce bottomland. road. Spotted knapweed 6110196 Assoc. with one of those springs. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Heads towards Besson Day Use Area. Native 4100200 3.27 3 0 7 1H Sedge moist meadow. road. Spotted knapweed, bull thistle 6110105 surface. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of From 4100200 down to Besson Day Use 4100220 0.50 3 0 4 M Willow/sedge. road. No documented weeds Area. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4100400 2.30 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Crosses intermittent trib. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4110000 3.35 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. One intermittent trib. can't find No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4120150 0.20 can't find 0 rd. Sedge meadow. road. Spotted knapweed, dalmation toadflax 6110124 Off 4120, must be in a different watershed? No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4120200 0.50 3 0 7 1H Willow/sedge. road. Spotted knapweed, bull thistle 6110125 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4120700 0.20 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds 6110104; No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110126; Appears to cross 6 intermittent tribs; runs 4130000 4.80 3 0 7 1H Engelmann spruce bottomland. road. Canada thistle, Scotch broom 6110167 adjacent to 4 springs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4133000 3.47 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 14 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4140000 2.24 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4180000 3.23 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110183 No streams. 6110013, No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110104, 4600000 16.73 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, dalmation toadflax 6110174 Crosses 4 intermittent tribs. 6110104, No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed, Canada and bull 6110113, 4600100 0.82 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. thistle, Dalmation toadflax 6110174 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600160 0.20 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, dalmation toadflax 6110104 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600210 0.40 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, dalmation toadflax 6110104 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600225 0.30 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, dalmation toadflax 6110104 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Diffuse & spotted knapweeds, Tumalo Road (Skyliner). In this watershed, is 4601000 4.22 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. dalmation toadflax 6110102 1st part going out of Bend. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Diffuse & spotted knapweeds, 4606000 1.36 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. dalmation toadflax 6110102 Offf of 4106 Rd. Appears to make a triangle. Tie road between 46 and Skyliner Road. No special habitats mapped within Highly erosive road, but fine sed not really 4610000 3.51 034 M200 ft. of road. CACH site is protected by shrubs. No documented weeds. going anywhere. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4612000 3.20 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds 6110104 Occasionally cross intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4613000 3.87 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds 6110104 Occasionally cross intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4614000 3.58 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Occasionally cross intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4615000 8.94 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110104 Occasionally cross intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9700100 0.20 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Goes up Lava Butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9701000 5.51 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110090 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of To Benham Falls. Paved. Down by 9702000 3.87 3 0 7 1H Willow/sedge. road. Knapweed & bull thistle. 6110131 Deschutes River, willow sedge. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9702100 1.67 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campgrounds? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9702101 0.10 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Sp. Knapweed at beginning only (at 9710000 13.08 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. west end) 6110090 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9711000 5.15 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9714000 2.80 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9720000 9.65 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110001 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9720950 0.00 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Might be road to Lava Cast Forest?? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9721000 3.21 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9723000 3.55 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9725000 0.32 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9735000 2.14 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of BEN-14TH S 1.00 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. City of Bend. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-27TH STR 5.20 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. Big-time knapweed. Not USFS. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-ARNOLD MAR 2.34 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. Big-time knapweed. Not USFS. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-BILLADEAU 0.72 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. Big-time knapweed. Not USFS.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 15 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-COTTONWO 2.43 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. knapweed. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-KNOTT R 4.30 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. knapweed. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of DES-RICKARD 0.72 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. knapweed. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of US-20 3.29 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. knapweed No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Diffuse and spotted knapweed, Scotch US-97 11.48 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. thistle (?) 6110001 (blank) 0.43 Pilot Butte Total 200.94 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Pine 1800000 6.63 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2200000 7.53 003 L200 ft. of road. road. Major road. Haul route. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2222000 1.74 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2227000 3.62 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently. More of a major 2230000 3.94 003 L200 ft. of road. road. thoroughfare. Sugar pine - Not defined as special No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2233000 4.38 103 L habitat but unique for this area. road. Bull thistle 6110020 Up and over Sugar Pine Ridge. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2235000 3.85 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2240000 5.63 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2248000 0.71 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2259000 0.60 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2350000 3.62 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2400000 12.98 003 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2420000 0.66 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2422000 3.22 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently.

No special habitats mapped within BOPU; lots along road. Potential for off- 2424000 6.44 052 M200 ft. of road. roading into habitat and population. Spotted knapweed No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2428000 5.10 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2430000 5.13 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2435000 9.43 002 L200 ft. of road. road. Out by flat top. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2438000 4.35 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2440000 3.40 002 L200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed; sporadic in Rd. 31 corridor and GIS map does not reflect true population size. Dave L. keeping No special habitats mapped within knapweed out and not much, if any 2451000 6.52 052 M200 ft. of road. BOPU; Potential for off-roading. knapweed there. 6110011 South of road 31. Spotted knapweed; sporadic in Rd. 31 corridor and GIS map does not reflect true population size. Dave L. keeping No special habitats mapped within knapweed out and not much, if any 2524000 0.14 052 M200 ft. of road. BOPU knapweed there. 6110011

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 16 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes Spotted knapweed; sporadic in Rd. 31 corridor and GIS map does not reflect true population size. Dave L. keeping knapweed out and not much, if any No special habitats mapped within knapweed there. Main Rd. so 3 3100000 4.30 053 M200 ft. of road. BOPU instead of 2. 6110011 Spotted knapweed; sporadic in Rd. 31 corridor and GIS map does not reflect true population size. Dave L. keeping No special habitats mapped within knapweed out and not much, if any 3125000 5.13 052 M200 ft. of road. BOPU knapweed there. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 3130000 0.83 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 3145000 5.39 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Goes past E. side Hole in the Ground. Pine Total 115.26 Sellers essentially a closed basin, but Possibility for weeds because highly numerous intermittent streams come off travelled and main haul road for Walker Ridge and can hold water into June; Crown Pacific. Could be major weed north facing slopes. Just dealing with northern distribution road. Moderate because Deschutes part. Rest Winema. Road Small wetland in lodgepole forest (on Low possibility of TES plants; weed/road no known weed sites but private land, changes to 9775 in Sellers Watershed; 3115 Sellers 3115000 0.46 224 Mthis road?); holds water year round. concerns. high traffic, and knapweed habitat. ends at private.

Probably not much of a weed problem Landform: this road follows from flat land, because of distance from 9775 and starts to follow up above Walker Rim. Lot of other vectors. But heavy fall use due this road on the Winema. Big-time mushroom No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of to mushrooming and where they are road. Up on top mostly lodgepole. Follows 9407000 3.15 002 L200 ft. of road. road. coming from to get to this area. intermittent drainage. Goes behind a few buttes; pretty flat; probably not much risk of anything. Road in drainage, could be riparian No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Low risk. Coming off 9775 and Mushroomers use road but not many other 9410000 2.20 102 Lveg. road. mushroomers. people (fall use). No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9450000 0.20 200 ft. of road. road. High use and haul road, comes from High use -- probably mostly by Crown Pacific; No special habitats mapped within No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. In Hwy 97 and Crescent. Plus private goes through private and public land. Hunting 9772000 2.98 002 L200 ft. of road. this watershed not a problem. land concerns. use.

Possibility for weeds because highly travelled and main haul road for Crown Pacific. Could be major weed Small wetland in lodgepole forest; distribution road. Moderate because holds water year round (here or on Low possibility of TES plants. no known weed sites but private land, 9775000 5.43 224 M3115). Weed/road concerns. high traffic, and knapweed habitat. Borders private land and area has lot of No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of historic ground disturbance on both private 9780000 1.93 002 L200 ft. of road. road. Right off 9775. and federal lands. Sellers Total 16.35 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Soldier Cap US-20 3.70 road. Soldier Cap Total 3.70 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Steelhead 2610000 0.12 0 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4605000 2.62 0 200 ft. of road. road. Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4606000 1.44 0 200 ft. of road. road. Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of OR-126 14.51 0 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of US-20 5.24 071H200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of US-97 14.03 081H200 ft. of road. road. Steelhead Total 37.96 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Swamp Creek US-20 1.01 71H road.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 17 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes Swamp Creek Total 1.01

Paved about 3/4 way; rest 4 mi. is washboard. Three Creeks stream doesn't go anywhere. Crosses 3 Creek and adjacent assoc. wet meadows. Recreation probably Senecio wetland; sedge subalpine wet GENE; Important populations. Connected to knapweed sites on lower biggest factor affecting wetlands, but road meadow; willow/sedge. High use Recreation risk and off road use. Weed portion. Reduced winter use may provides access and crosses. Road flat as Three Creeks 1600000 8.49 565 Marea, mudbogging occurs. risk. lower risk compared to other areas. opposed to heading down into lake. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1600550 1.22 Engelmann spruce bottomland. road. Campgrounds and what not roads. Senecio wetland; tufted hairgrass/sedge; sedge subalpine wet 1600800 0.40 meadow; willow/sedge. GENE Campgrounds and what not roads. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1600820 0.12 200 ft. of road. road. Campgrounds and what not roads. 1600900 0.60 Sedge subalpine wet meadow. GENE Campgrounds and what not roads. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1608000 1.73 200 ft. of road. road. Crosses 3 Ck. And Melvin Creek. From Rd. 1610000 6.99 Swale. (Habitat for PEPE?). Peck's penstemon. Knapweeds. 16. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1612000 2.85 200 ft. of road. road. Crosses a ditch. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1620000 5.49 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1622000 0.60 200 ft. of road. road. Crosses Melvin Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1624000 1.40 200 ft. of road. road. Can't find it. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Switchbacks, prob. On steeper ground. No 1628000 4.36 200 ft. of road. road. tribs across it. No surveys. Potential habitat exists in No special habitats mapped within area for GENE, but not sure along this 4602000 4.00 004 M200 ft. of road. road. None known. Crosses Bull Ck. No special habitats mapped within 4605000 5.48 004 M200 ft. of road. 1 mile has been surveyed. None known. Crosses Bull Ck. Crosses Bull Spring Creek. Old haul route Knapweed, toadflax, and leafy spurge. from Sisters to Bend. Used to go to Suttle No surveys; probably not high potential Leafy spurge in area traded away to 6110101; Lake. Crosses 5 intermittent tribs and 3 4606000 14.76 0 3 8 1H Weed risk. habitat. Crown Pacific, near Bull Spring Creek. 6110149 ditches. No special habitats mapped within No surveys; probably not high potential Dalmation toadflax and leafy spurge at 4607000 1.80 008 1H200 ft. of road. habitat. jct. With 4606. 6110101 Crosses one intermittent stream. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of OR-126 1.62 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of US-20 5.41 200 ft. of road. road. Three Creeks Total 67.33

No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Diffuse & spotted knapweed and Skyliner Rd., crosses Tumalo Creek and goes Tumalo 4601000 14.48 3 0 7 1H Senecio wetland; Mt. Alder/spirea. road. Dalmation toadflax 6110102 up to ridge. 3 segments. Restricted at bridge. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Length of segment greater than 4601, so 4602000 0.60 3 0 4 M Wet meadow. road. No documented weeds. wetland gets higher in this one. Engelmann spruce bottomland; aspen/shrub wetland; sedge moist Rd. to Tumalo Falls. Couple of springs on meadow; willow/sedge; Mt. GENE does not occur within 200' of Diffuse & spotted knapweed and uphill side, so may be some flow effects. 4603000 2.60 407 1H Alder/spirea. road (is on south side of Tumalo Creek) Dalmation toadflax, bull thistle 6110102 Rated 4 wetlands bec. Bisects small wetlands. 6110184, No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110185, 4606000 5.71 3 0 7 1H Mt. Alder/spirea. road. Spotted knapweed 6110186 Crosses Tumalo Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4610000 0.89 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. One intermittent trib. Tumalo Total 24.28 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Upper Deschutes 4040000 2.81 004 M road. No documented weeds. No streams. Spruce/vaccinium/sedge; lodgepole No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed, bull thistle, St. 6110111, Crosses Deschutes River at Brown's 4200000 7.11 307 1Hwetland; willow/sedge. road. Johnswort 6110140 Crossing; Fall River Rd.;

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 18 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4255000 1.24 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. .1 mi. on top butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4256000 0.10 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams.

Rd. around North and South Twin Lakes, No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of crosses dam at Wickiup Reservoir. Comes 4260000 9.79 009 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, St. Johnswort 6110112 close to some arms of Wickiup Reservoir. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4260040 0.20 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campgrounds. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4260070 1.80 3 0 4 M Willow/sedge. road. No documented weeds. Campgrounds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4260130 0.10 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campgrounds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4260200 1.20 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Campgrounds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4262000 2.50 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. 6110111 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4270000 1.52 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4273000 1.13 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Diffuse, spotted, Canada thistle, bull No TES plants known within 200 ft. of thistle, Scotch broom, St. Johnswort, 4280000 3.80 3 0 4 M Lodgepole wetland. road. Scotch thistle, LINVUL 6120005 Crosses Brown's Creek and crosses wetland. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Spotted knapweed, bull thistle, St. 6110143, 4285000 2.15 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Johnswort 151, 153 Around Brown's Mt. Around Crane Prairie. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4286000 1.74 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4290000 1.36 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4292000 4.19 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. Crosses 2 intermittent streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4296000 0.17 004 M200 ft. of road. road. No documented weeds. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4370000 0.28 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, St. Johnswort 6110112 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4380000 0.25 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Spotted knapweed, St. Johnswort 6110112 Wet meadow. Goes around Wickiup No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Reservoir on south side. Crosses one 4400000 9.66 3 0 7 1H Wet meadow. road. Spotted knapweed. 6110133 wetland. Paved; Appears to cross 2 arms of Wickiup No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Reservoir, on downstream side of lava plug 4600000 14.12 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. Occasional spotted knapweed. 6110128 for Davis Lake. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600850 3.15 200 ft. of road. road. 6120005 Campround Rd. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4600855 2.60 Willow/sedge. road. 6120005 willow/sedge campground rd. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4650000 5.82 200 ft. of road. road. 6120005 Rd. to nowhere. Aspen off of this road (bet. 4652 and No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6120001, 4652000 10.61 103 L4654). Road not impacting. road. Bull thistle. 6120005 Unclaimed Lavas area. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4654000 2.49 1 0 3 L Same aspen potential as above. road. Comes off 46. No streams.

Lodgepole wetland; willow/sedge. Wetlands at both Odell and Ranger wetlands; to west, around Davis Lake; Creeks, both impacted by road, 6120030 crosses Ranger Creek and Odell Creek. especially Odell Creek. Need major No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Bull and Canada thistles at least. Lots and Crossing at Odell Ck. Restricts floodplain, so 4660000 11.50 906 1Hreconstruction of culverts and bridges. road. recreation traffic. 6120051 gets 3. Wetland prob. At Ranger Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Tansy ragwort in harvest units off of 4662000 2.10 008 1H200 ft. of road. road. this road. Mixed conifer dry. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4664000 5.06 200 ft. of road. road. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4665000 1.80 200 ft. of road. road.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 19 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Around steep side of Maklaks Mt., so flow 4666000 4.60 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. effects = 2. Spruce/sedge; spruce/vaccinium/ sedge; Engelmann spruce bottomland. Unnamed spring comes No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4668000 5.30 502 Mout below steep road. road. No weeds currently. wetlands; crosses Maklaks Creek; parallels it. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Has reed canary grass around Davis 4669000 2.29 004 M200 ft. of road. road. Lake. 6120028 W. Davis Campground. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4670000 2.35 200 ft. of road. road. 6120030 Crosses Odell Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4672000 2.11 200 ft. of road. road. 6120030 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 4676000 1.75 200 ft. of road. road. No streams. Spruce/vaccinium/sedge. Many small Wetlands; Cross Odell Creek and 13 tribs to creeks highly impacted by road. Road 6120002, Odell Lake; crosses through a wetland. restricting floodplain; cinder 6120003, Sanding and plowing will affect fine sedimentation from winter road No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Lots of weeds; high risk. 6120017, sediments. Culvert might be restricting the 5800000 5.58 908 2Hmaintenance. road. Houndstongue pulled on roadside. 6120027 floodplain. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5800680 0.71 L 200 ft. of road. road. 6120027 Campground Roads. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5800700 0.10 L 200 ft. of road. road. Campground Roads. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5800800 0.10 200 ft. of road. road. 6120002 Campground Roads.

6120002 (on botany glob, but not according to Wetlands; Trapper Creek Shelter Cove Engelmann spruce bottomland. our weed Resort? Floodplain prob. At Trapper Ck. Bridge impacts creeks, especially No TES plants known within 200 ft. of map); Wetland where crosses Trapper or West By 5810000 2.30 807 2HTrappe. Floodplain restricted by road. road. St. Johnswort. Pretty shady. 6120050 Ck?? No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5810210 0.30 Engelmann spruce bottomland. road. Wetlands; campground. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6200000 2.57 200 ft. of road. road. 6120005 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6203000 0.70 200 ft. of road. road.

No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Close to known weed sites. 6120017 6220000 2.40 2 0 3 L Intermittent drainages. road. may not be right on this road. 6120017 Crosses 1 intermittent. Logging road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6222000 4.00 200 ft. of road. road. 6120017 Crosses 3 intermittent. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6230000 6.90 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. Circles around Davis Mt. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6240000 6.10 002 L200 ft. of road. road. Couple bull thisle sites off of it? 6120038 Goes to west side Davis Mt. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6245000 0.92 200 ft. of road. road. Upper Deschutes Total 163.40 No special habitats mapped within Upper Dry River 1800000 8.42 003 L200 ft. of road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1800010 1.60 0 200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within 1825000 1.70 032 L200 ft. of road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within CACH; not degraded or directly 1829000 4.02 032 L200 ft. of road. impacted by road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1830000 5.10 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1835000 5.90 003 L200 ft. of road. road. Bull thistle. 6110061 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1840000 0.47 002 L200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 20 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes In watershed but on BLM and private; only No special habitats mapped within about .5 mi. in next watershed actually on 2015000 5.47 042 L200 ft. of road. CACH? No weeds on our maps. Forest. No special habitats mapped within 2016000 6.65 4M200 ft. of road. CACH No weeds currently. 6110037, 6110038, No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6110044, 2017000 8.60 4M200 ft. of road. road. 6110085 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2017500 0.13 4M200 ft. of road. road. 6110085 No special habitats mapped within 2017501 0.10 44 M200 ft. of road. CACH 6110085 No special habitats mapped within 2300000 12.38 43 M200 ft. of road. CACH No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within 2500000 4.75 43 M200 ft. of road. CACH No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within 2510000 2.77 43 M200 ft. of road. CACH No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9710000 4.87 4M200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of US-20 18.27 71H200 ft. of road. road. No weeds currently. No special habitats mapped within Upper Dry River Total 91.18 200 ft. of road.

Continuation of 6120034, which crosses wetland area on Crown. No Fine sediment because snow removal Lodgepole wetland; willow/sedge. weeds mapped at Little Deschutes activities. Wetland areas partly along Little Scotch broom above wetlands (weed No TES plants known within 200 ft. of crossing. Dispersed camping along Deschutes and part on Crown Land on north Upper Little Deschutes 5800000 6.42 606 Mrisk). road. river that could introduce weeds. 6120034 side 58. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5814000 0.17 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds but might be some along Rd. to Odell Butte; part of rd. in Crescent 5815000 4.20 004 M200 ft. of road. road. 58. High use as a pullout spot. watershed. Wet meadow downhill from road but No weeds currently. Pilot test area for No streams, flat. Dust is thick. Crown Pacific not adjacent to it. Probably highly No TES plants known within 200 ft. of smothering weeds with dust. Does haul road and tremendous amount of ground 5820000 1.45 003 Mimpacted by harvest acitivity. road. connect over to Hwy 58. disturbance in area.

Weed site at junction of 5825/58 and on 58. Spotted knapweed, St. Engelmann spruce bottomland; Johnswort, and Dalmation toadflax. willow/sedge. Spruce Creek on lower 5825 has moderate traffic. Lot shade southern portion of 5825. Culvert on road except for railroad. Monitor Wetlands - not on hyrdro map. 4 segments; would need to be maintained. railroad for weeds. Southern portion crosses 1 intermittent stream. Rd. to Big Southern portion = 5; northern portion No TES plants known within 200 ft. of lot more traffic. Weed ratings: Marsh. There are north and south segments 5825000 10.58 5 (3) 0 5 (4). M = 3. road. Northern = 5; southern = 4. 6120034 in this watershed. Crosses railroad.

No Special habitats mapped within Crosses trib to Rabbit Ck. Goes to edge of 200 ft. of road, but could be some No TES plants known within 200 ft. of OCRA, SE of Big Marsh. On top side of big 5828000 2.22 001 Lwithin drainages that aren't mapped? road. Far from other weed sites. ridge along Big Marsh.

Lodgepole wetland; willow/sedge; Mt. Alder/spirea, aspen stand about .5 mi. Not great weed risk but road comes off east of Swamp Creek crossing (above 58 and then goes through heavily Wetlands; crosses Spruce, Hemlock & Basin road; like a hanging swam). Rd. goes No TES plants known within 200 ft. of used residential private lands. ATV Creeks and Swamp Creek. Not paved, but 5830000 9.42 504 Mthrough Two Rivers (private land). road. recreation. only gets 2 for fine sediment because flat.

Parallels railroad. Used during mushroom season because close to 5 intermittent streams. Goes from 5825 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of mushroom camp by Little Odell Butte. northern part to southern part of 5825. 5834000 2.85 003 L200 ft. of road. road. Otherwise, not heavily used road. Parallels railroad.

No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Crosses Little Deschutes River. Crosses 5835000 2.74 0 0 5 M Willow/sedge. road. wetlands. Overall scope of road is minimal.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 21 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No streams. Road barely on Forest. Also in Walker Mt. Watershed. Comes off 5835, which comes off 97 (skirts bottom edge No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Forest). Goes to OCRA and Mt. Thielsen 5840000 0.82 001 L200 ft. of road. road. Far from any known weed sites. Wilderness Area. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5852000 0.29 00 200 ft. of road. road. can't find Major road, goes to Boy Scout Camp and Follows Little Odell Creek. Main route 6020 does not have weeds currently around Crescent Lake. Southern approach to to the mushroom camp and crosses No TES plants known within 200 ft. of mapped. High recreation use. Comes Crescent Lake. Goes around base of Little 6020000 3.12 705 1Hthe railroad; high weed vector risk. road. off 58. Probably moderate risk. Odell Butte.

Knapweed on private land is problem. Also have recorded Canada thistle, St. Lodgepole wetland (on private land?). Johnswort, dalmation toadflax. Not Healthy aspen stand on Crescent sure about Canada thistle. High Creek on private land. Culverts and traffic, private land weed problems, bridges (county road) seems to be should roadside maintenance. Hooks 6120004, functioning and not impacting bet. 97 and 58, which both have plenty 6120043, Pico wetland. Crosses Little Deschutes River - 6100000 6.27 206 Mfloodplain. of weeds. 6120046 cutoff Rd. No weeds currently present. However, because of proximity to river one intermittent trib; Gulick Ranch Road. Lot and private land residences, this road goes through Crown Pacific lands and serves as vector from 58 down to parallels Little Deschutes for quite aways. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of river. High priority for yearly Some private land holdings along Little 6125000 6.09 1 0 5 M Close to riparian at some point. road. monitoring for weeds. Deschutes. Dust problem.

Willow/sedge. Little Deschutes River. Weeds at junction w/ 97, about .75 Fairly broad floodplain. Cement No TES plants known within 200 ft. of mile from river. Plus Crown land. Crosses Little Deschutes River; same as Rd. 6200000 0.68 305 Mbridge that constricts river flow. road. Recreational use along river. 6120012 61. Tiny portion that is on Crown land. Crosses some riparian that are No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Road not used very much. Connects 9758000 1.08 004 Mintermittent drainages. road. to railroad. One intermittent stream. No streams. Road mostly on Crown land and it connects 9768 and 9775, parallels Hwy 97 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of No weeds currently present, but very on east side. Heavy use by Crown for portion 9765000 3.72 003 L200 ft. of road. road. close to 97 in some spots. of it at least. High dust. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9768000 0.58 006 M200 ft. of road. road. Pretty high weed risk. Adjacent to 97. No streams.

High road density on Crown Pacific Willow/sedge. No streams until get to Willow/sedge; wetlands where 9770 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of lands. No weeds currently mapped. wetlands = 1. Lot little intermittent channels 9770000 4.20 03 Lmeets Little Deschutes River? road. Old ASPE site? Not very high traffic. that it crosses. Most of road on private land. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9772000 0.05 00 200 ft. of road. road. In Walker Mt. Also - give same rating. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Close to 97, so high rating for weeds. 9775000 2.03 07 1H200 ft. of road. road. Main haul road. 6120006 No streams.

Knapweeds and dalmation toadflax. Pulled for years by YCC, but herbicide spraying finally contained population. High risk because of use levels and Willow/sedge. (Mill pond in No TES plants known within 200 ft. of goes through Crescent and Gilchrist 6120006, US-97 5.58 009 1HCrescent?) road. (private lands not treated). 6120046 Willow/sedge. No special habitats mapped within Upper Little Deschutes Total 74.56 200 ft. of road. This road is in an area where there's Engelmann spruce bottomland; been extensive amounts of logging on willow/sedge; Dry Creek Swamp is Intersects Dry Creek, which has huge private lands. Multiple sections have the special habitat that's being PEPE population. If 1014 gets big weed been logged. No inventory, yet referred to, but 1014 is below it and population, could carry this into lower extensive amounts of ground probably not a problem. Cottonwood reaches of dry creek. In flood years, disturbance. Road passes through Upper Metolius 1014000 1.48 2 45 Mbog and spruce. connects with Metolius. private lands. Crosses Dry Creek; might be old haul route.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 22 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Survey & Manage species occurs in area (white chanterelle). Intersects with both Dry and Cache Creeks, which both Private land population of knapweed have large PEPE populations in lower at Little Butte (1030 rd. which reaches, so if weeds become intersects w/ 1028 - about .5 mi. away established could wash down into those is population.) Passes through area of Aspen/shrubfield. 1028 intersects Dry populations. Bit higher risk than 1014 mixed ownership that has had Creek Swamp; may hydrologically because more major road and crosses extensive amounts of ground Crosses Dry Creek; bigger wetland than 1014. 1028000 3.16 55 impact swamp. both drainages. disturbance. Some surveys. 1 2067 turns into 1028. 1031 has a PEPE population on private land outside of watershed in the Whychus watershed (S31). Because weeds on this road, risk of spreading weeds and impacting TES plants. Connects to 1028 road, which can have Knapweed population on this road on No special habitats mapped within similar impacts as discussed above for private land in T14S, R9, S31. Not 1030000 2.24 146 M200 ft. of road. Old Growth LSR. 1028. being controlled. 0 No streams.

PEPE within 1/4 of mile. Protected High risk species on road feeding into populations associated with Black Butte this road. High amt. Groudn Goes around western side Black Butte. No No Special habitats within 200 ft. of Ranch (called Lower Black Butte) and disturbance (Rx fire and mowing from stream crossings. 1 for flow because 1105000 2.90 16Mroad. Old Growth pine stands. populations in Cache Creek. Hwy 20 project). contours slope. No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. If weeds got established could have No known weed populations. cumulative effect with Rd. 1120. 4 Extremely high use road and No Special habitats within 200 ft. of because of amount of use and PEPE on connected to Hwy 20 and Rd. 11, Goes up toward Black Butte top. Black Butte 1110000 4.45 145 Mroad. Old Growth. Rd. 1120. which have weeds. Road. Gravel. Steep so 2 for fine sed. PEPE; quite lot along this road. Some protected populations. Weeds put it at risk (tied into roads). Quite few Tied to Rds. 11 and 14. Populations Vernal pool (probably right outside the shelterwoods, so fair bit past logging in of weeds along both of those roads. No streams. Starts off 11 road. Ties into Rd. 1120000 4.73 556 Mwatershed?), off Rd. 1120, aspen. the area. Lot traffic. 6150008 14 weed sites.

Small Peck's penstemon populations; recently found new populations. Real risk on this road is non-native grasses (Agropyron intermedium). Lot historic sheep grazing, which may have surpressed AGIN. But, with no sheep Crosses Lake Creek, First Creek, Jack Creek, grazing, Maret has observed areas with Canyon Creek, Brush Creek, Abbott Creek, PEPE & Agoseris elata that have Candle Creek, Jefferson Creek (then hits decreased in 10 years, with marked Warm Springs and out of this watershed. increase in Agropyron. Protected Has weeds on it. Scattered knapweed 6150008, Substantial stream crossing. Gravel but in Mt. Alder/spirea. Direct interaction of populations with impacts from recreation that is not mapped. Very high use 6150010, good shape. Because road flat and not steep, road with multiple tribs to Metoliu; and non-native species, weed risk also. road. Lot people with hay and horse 6150012, don't get lot of erosion off this road. Small, 1200000 13.06 787 3HWeed risk. Habitat degradation exists. trailers. Major arterial road. 6150024 localized wetlands (riparian) so 3 for wetlands. 1200900 0.40 3 3 5 M Mt. Alder/spirea. PEPE Campgrounds, etc. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1200980 1.60 3 1 5 M Mt. Alder/spirea. road. Campgrounds, etc.

No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. In Santiam Restoration timber sale, Black cottonwood/alder/sedge, mt. Concern would be connections with high timber mortality, will be logging, Crosses and parallels First Creek, and loops Alder/spirea, cottonwood swamps w/ downstream areas, particularly First ground disturbance. Private land on up to Round Lake. Native surface on part of high degree lichen diversity (Lobaria Creek, which has a strong PEPE the eastern end of it. High recreation it. Small creek. Don't know if confines 1210000 11.00 356 Mhallii ). population on it - weed risk. route. HYPPER. Connects to Rd. 12. 6150046 floodplain; steep, confined? No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. But, extension of 1210 road; has been 1210600 0.60 3 5 6 M Mt. Alder/spirea. S&M species white chanterelle. Same notes for 1210. Road into Round Lake Christian Camp. Historic populations of PEPE on private HYPPER - lot. Scattered populations lands; AGEL occurs. On southern of knapweed & scotch broom. Goes boundary - most significant populations through private land, which has been of PEPE in the Metolius Basin. Weed- extensively logged. Moderate No Special habitats within 200 ft. of road risk and AGEL right there along the because high use road, existing weed 6150011, Crosses the Metolius but paved, by Allingham 1216000 3.28 165 Mroad. LSR. road. populations. 6150012 Bridge.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 23 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes Bisects significant population of PEPE - historic population that was re-mapped Fairly high use road. Feeds into Rd. this year. Also Agoseris elata. Right in 1420 and Rd. 12, which both have Crosses the Metolius, but paved where the middle of one of the largest PEPE in weeds. Entire area historic crosses. Bridges, too. Next crossing down 1217000 3.50 2 7 5 1H Mt. Alder/spirea. Riparian. the Metolius. disturbance. from 1216. In area of scattered shelterwoods and clearcuts. Ground disturbance. Also quite bit Rx fire and other activities. Below the road that goes to Jack Lake. Woodcutting in area. Gets moderate amount of use. Existing No special habitats mapped within PEPE; to the north. Risk of introducing populations, use, and previous 6150026, Crosses 2 intermittent streams. Because of 1220000 6.96 167 1H200 ft. of road. In LSR. weeds. disturbance. 6150029 steepness, 2 for fine sed. PEPE; Quite a bit in area. 6 populations that are fragmented In area of dispersed use and horse probably by past harvest. Small, use. 6 because of existing fragmented - populations vulnerable to populations and potential for Crosses Canyon Creek, Jack Creek, Roaring Mt. Alder/spirea. Multiple riparian weed invasion. High road density in this introduction. Knapweed and lot of bull Creek, Brush Creek, and 11 intermittent tribs. 1230000 8.60 476 1Hzones at each creek crossing. area. thistle in area. 6150034 Steep (Katie thinks).

PEPE; Recent Rx fire, thinning, high mortality, weeds. 7 because protected population, important populations downstream and high OHV use that is Knapweed and bull thistle. 7 because actually impacting populations. OHV's of existing population, high use, and No streams. Goes just past of Head of Jack 1232000 3.30 2 7 7 2H Mt. Alder/spirea. Riparian. creating new road network around it. high use of OHV's in this area. 6150048 Creek. PEPE; Protected. Weeds in area, high rec use, high OHV use, Rx fire and 1232200 0.90 1 6 5 M Mt. Alder/spirea. Riparian. thinning (recent). Weeds in area. Crosses intermittent trib to Jack Creek. Head of Jack Creek. Highly significant Weed populations nearby, high special habitat; very sensitive. Road No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. recreation, hig traffic, OHV's, high risk to it closed and rehabbed. Main risk - Connected to roads which lead into weed species. One of most popular 1232400 0.60 666 MOHV's.. PEPE populations. sites in Metolius Basin. No streams. PEPE; Roadside. Connects with No Special habitats within 200 ft. of important populations. Very high use to Tansy ragwort. Recent logging in high Crosses 2 intermittent tribs, switchbacks up to 1234000 5.90 156 Mroad. Old Growth LSR. Canyon Creek Meadows. mortality. Historic logging, too. 6150015 Jack Lake. Englemann spruce/sedge; Mt. Alder/spirea. Bear Valley - wetlands, No known TES plants within 200 ft. of Crosses Canyon Creek and Bear Valley huckleberry picking. Riparian road. Connects to other areas where Creek (trib to Canyon Ck.); Road to Bear 1235000 3.80 544 Minfluence. TES plants. No known weed populations. Valley. Hiking trails. No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. Connects to important downstream Crosses 3 intermittent tribs. Switchbacks to 1237000 3.70 2 5 4 M Mt. Alder/spirea. Riparian. PEPE sites. No known weed populations. nowhere. Goes up towards Two Springs. Mt. Alder/spirea. Floodplain for Canyon & Roaring Cks (wetlands, PEPE; road runs right through middle of Scattered weeds in area, surveys 1260000 3.00 576 1Hriparian). population; weed risk. unknown, high traffic, stock animals. Crosses Roaring Creek. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1260200 1.90 Mt. Alder/spirea. road. Campgrounds, etc.

Mt. Alder/spirea. Riparian. Rest Habitat for PEPE and AGEL. Weed 1270000 4.50 566 Munknown, low probability. Weed risk. risk. High traffic. High recreation use. Crosses 3 intermittent tribs. PEPE; weed risk, in vicinity of "Little 1280000 3.80 4 6 6 M Mt. Alder/spirea. Riparian, channels. Montana" site. Not surveyed much. Needs weed surveys; high potential. Crosses Abbot Creek and 4 intermittent tribs. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1290000 0.93 Mt. Alder/spirea. road. Mt. Alder/spirea. Unknown but fairly Parallels Candle Creek and crosses 3 high probability. Risk would be Surveys unknown, moderate probability. Unsurveyed. Large population intermittent tributaries. Close to Candle 1292000 2.30 555 Mhydrological. Weed risk. nearby. High traffic to trailhead. Creek? But doesn't cross it. PEPE population and potential habitat Crosses 5 intermittent tribs, on west side 1298000 2.40 5 6 6 M Sedge/moist meadow for AGEL. Tansy ragwort. 6150024 Metolius, Mt. Alder/spirea, riparian. Major access road to Metolius Basin and Main paved road down the Metolius. Does campgrounds. Runs along river, not actually cross the Metolius. On east side crosses intermittent channels and Known populations, high traffic. 6150008, Metolius. Crosses 17 intermittent tribs off of seeps. Hydrological interference and Scattered populations so hard to find 6150010, Green Ridge. In bottom, not really affecting 1400000 13.22 567 1Hweed risks. PEPE; AGEL. Weed risk. and treat. 6150011 flow that much.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 24 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes None of these little roads have impacted floodplain, most (all?) of them paved and go short distances into campgrounds. Not sure No special habitats mapped within which road crosses Metolius into fish 1400029 0.10 036 M200 ft. of road. PEPE 6150011 hatchery, but paved and bridge. No special habitats mapped within 1400140 0.30 036 M200 ft. of road. PEPE 6150008 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1400640 0.30 2 1 6 M Mt. Alder/spirea. road. 6150008 1400700 0.08 2 3 6 M Mt. Alder/spirea. PEPE 6150008 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1400800 0.40 2 1 6 M Mt. Alder/spirea. road. 6150008 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1400900 0.10 2 1 6 M Mt. Alder/spirea. road. 6150008

Main access road to Camp Sherman. Mt. Alder/spirea. Perennial streams High traffic. Private lands. Grazing. Comes into Camp Sherman from west. (Lake Ck.), meadows. Road crosses Lot weeds interspersed on private 6150008, Crosses Lake Creek and Metolius. Parallels 1419000 3.05 567 1Hstreams. Weed risk. PEPE; Weed risk. lands not being treated. 6150011 the Metolius for 2 miles. Paved. 1419700 1.53 5 6 7 1H Mt. Alder/spirea. PEPE 1419900 2.30 5 6 7 1H Mt. Alder/spirea. PEPE 6150008 Crosses First, Jack, and Canyon Creeks; Willow/sedge; mt. alder/spirea. appears to be paved. Floodplain 3 bec. Of Crosses several creeks, wetlands, PEPE; AGEL populations nearby and how crosses the slope. Lot water moves off riparian, meadows. Weed risk. potential habitat. Weed risk. High slope - intermittent tribs that during high flows 1420000 3.65 677 2HInterferance with hydrology. traffic. Known populations, high traffic. 6150011 get blocked up. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1420400 0.80 6 7 7 2H Mt. Alder/spirea. road. Campgrounds, etc.? No special habitats mapped within 1425000 1.60 200 ft. of road. PEPE Can't find on map.

Switchbacks intersect drainages with diverse plant communities. Hydrologic Connects to Rd. 14. Known Lot switchbacks that go through drainages 1430000 3.30 434 Minterference and weed risks. PEPE habitat. populations, vectors. 6150008 with Douglas maple. Road to top of Green Ridge. Crosses 18 intermittent tribs. Same ratings as 1490 in 1490000 3.58 3 4 4 M Hydrologic interference. PEPE at bottom. Weed risk. High use. 6150008 different watershed - high segments. Mt. Alder/spirea. Accesses lower Metolius. Seeps adjacent to Metolius Diffuse and spotted knapweed, scotch River. Lot erosion, lack road broom. Weeds difficult to treat maintenance. Large landslide Cypripedium montanum. Unknown because inaccessible; lack of Parallels Metolius and crosses 8 intermittent occurred along road. Erosion. Weed TES. Weed risk, erosion. Potential monitoring; erosion probably creating tribs. Same rating as 1499 in Lower 1499000 1.51 657 1Hrisk. habitat for PEPE and AGEL. new sites. 6150008 Metolius?? No special habitats mapped within 2060000 0.12 356 M200 ft. of road. PEPE 6150010 No streams.

Aspen/shrub wetland; Intermittent channels, TES plants, known weeds, Crosses Dry Creek and appears to bump into 2061000 3.83 555 Mprivate lands not being treated. PEPE Diffuse knapweed. 6150013 the wetland.

Mt. Alder/spirea. intermittent Known PEPE site near one end of road. 2064000 2.60 245 Mdrainages. Low risk. High probability for AGEL. Weed risk. Knapweeds. 6150010 No streams. 6150010, Spring near here but not right on this 6150018, 2066000 3.00 116 Mroad? Unknown. Unknown, low probability. High traffic. 6150031 Appears to go to Scout Lake. Connects to Cache Ck. Which has PEPE, leads to top Cache Ck. Private lands, next to HWY 20, high 2066700 0.40 1 3 5 M Not surveyed, low probability. Watershed and weed risk. traffic. 6150031 Scout Lake Campground Rd.? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2066705 0.20 200 ft. of road. road. Scout Lake Campground Rd.? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2067000 5.35 200 ft. of road. road. Crosses Cache Creek, Connects to Meadow Lakes Basin. Spotted knapweed. Weeds present, Goes toward Cache Lake. No stream 2068000 4.00 436 MSeeps are along there. SULP high traffic, OHV's. 6150018 crossings. Mt. Alder/spirea. Road around Suttle High traffic, known knapweed Lake; adjacent to lakes. Wetlands, populations are expanding and lot St. 6150010, 2070000 2.50 448 1Hstreams. TES habitat for Agoseris elata, sulp. Johnswort. 6150031 Road on southern side Suttle Lake. Paved.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 25 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2070450 0.11 200 ft. of road. road. 6150031 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2070500 0.30 200 ft. of road. road. 6150031 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2070700 0.20 200 ft. of road. road. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2070800 0.50 200 ft. of road. road. Willow/sedge. Meadow Lakes area. Small meadows, seeps, wetlands, High probability AGEL; surveys High traffic, OHV's, lot vegetation Road to Meadow Lakes Basin. Heads off small lakes. Highly impacted by unknown. Because of OHV's, dispersed management recently. Corbett Snow Hwy 20 by Corbett Snow Park. Road recreational traffic along roads camping, high impact to vegetation by Park is known site and leads into this 6150010, segment providing motorized access and 2076000 3.01 877 3H(provide OHV access). public. area. 6150036 degrading riparian habitat. Hwy 20 -- because of amt. Sanding -- 4 for fine sed. Not bad for flow effects because runs along flat and follows contours, but as goes past Suttle Lake will get a 3 rating because high sed delivery in Suttle Lake when rains hard. Instant delivery when rains Knapweed, St. Johnswort. High hard into streams instead soak into ground Willow/sedge, mt. Alder/spirea, seeps. Traffic. Difficult to control because and sponge release.. In rain on snow zone, Hydrologic interference, cinders from scattered and dangerous safety steep, wide - so rain and snow melt instant US-20 6.65 578 2Hhighway. PEPE; AGEL habitat. Weed risk. concerns. 6150010 delivery. Upper Metolius Total 173.58 No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Upper South Fork Crooke US-20 5.82 117 M road. Upper South Fork Crooked Total 5.82

St. Johnswort (.4 mi.). Pulled by YCC for 3 years and, due to persistence, reduced population. Use roadside as chain up area and Hwy Dept. cinder pile nearby. Hwy Dept. does lot of shoulder work in area. High traffic, lots maintenance, comes off Hwy 97, No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of brings species from westside at upper Walker Mountain 5800000 2.72 008 1H200 ft. of road. road. end. 6120014 Crosses 3 intermittent streams.

Weed treatment analysis area for 2nd EA. Probably high traffic due to Baja 58 harvest areas. Two Rivers area -- private land, OHV's -- probably high weed potential. High traffic in portion Crosses 3 intermittent streams. Baja 58 area. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of near private land (at least 1.5 mile of it Comes off 58 rd. Major route -- gets lot traffic; 5835000 4.45 005 M200 ft. of road. road. high potential for weeds). goes to private residences. Crosses 1 intermittent trib. Does not go past No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of any private land, but comes off 5835 and 5840000 4.22 200 ft. of road. road. heads west. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5850000 1.40 200 ft. of road. road. Not on map? No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 5852000 0.51 200 ft. of road. road. Not on map? Crosses 1 intermittent trib. Comes off Hwy 97 and is about .3 mile on Deschutes, then goes onto Winema, then back on DES for .5 mile. Switchbacks up Walker Rim onto top in No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Potential is there, heavily used road, Sellers watershed. Main road, goes to Silver 9400000 0.31 005 M200 ft. of road. road. comes off 97. 6120041 Lake (back road).

No Special habitats mapped within 200 ft. of road. Top of Walker Mt. might be subalpine fir. Steep Road up to top Walker Mt. Any road going to mountain road. Road affects top of mountain must affect flows. Old landscape. Subalpine fire ?? (not harvest areas choked with tall Ceanothus and common east Deschutes habitat, so No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. Not lot traffic but still has connectors to manzanita, on lower shoulders of Walker Mt. 9402000 3.69 501 Mkind of unique - like Odell Butte). Interesting place to look for bryophytes. 97; slight risk. Highly impacting road.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 26 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9407000 1.75 200 ft. of road. road. Not on map?

Diffuse & Spotted knapweeds, Canada thistle, St. John's wort. According to weed map, weeds might cover bet. .5- 1 mile of this road, close to its junction Crosses 1 intermittent trib. Comes off Hwy with 97. High potential to spread. Lot 97. Good road, well-maintained. Drainages No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of of road maintenance -- could spread 6120041, on it. Follows one intermittent at junction w/ 9751000 4.97 007 1H200 ft. of road. road. weeds. In Baja 58 harvest area. 6120059 97.

Comes off Rd. 94, which is about 1 Crosses 2 intermittent tribs. Goes around mile with it's intersection w/ 97. Don't base of Little Walker Mt. This road stays at No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of know weed status of Rd. 94, but just about same elevation all the way -- unlike 9753000 5.00 003 L200 ft. of road. road. weeds on 97. other roads in area that traverse topography. No weeds currently, but risk because comes off Hwy 97 (at both beginning Goes down the gut of a gully, highly eroding. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of and end of road). Lotof use by Closed system, though. Goes up hill and 9755000 7.50 003 L200 ft. of road. road. hunters and mushroomers. around Little Walker Mt.

No TES plants within 200 ft. of road, but Hooks to road that is only about 1.5 possibility of BOPU in adjacent lands. mi. from Hwy 97 (9755 -- which is Connection between 9765 and 9755. Not on No special habitats mapped within Ask Carolyn if site down by railroad. heavily used). Probably moderate map. Base of Walker Rim, goes along north 9756000 1.40 023 L200 ft. of road. High road density could impact BOPU. road use. edge of base of Walker Mt. Diffuse & spotted knapweeds, Canada thistle, St. Johnswort. High potential for spread. High traffic. Private land Crosses some riparian intermittent No TES plants known within 200 ft. of off of it. Goes right to Crown Pacific Crosses 2 intermittent tribs; appears to run 9758000 4.12 006 Mdrainages. road. land. 6120041 adjacent to a wetland. BOPU; powerline intersection concerns like on other roads in this watershed. No weeds currently, but risk because No special habitats mapped within Same concerns as far as weeds and of traffic from known weed sites (like 9760000 15.40 043 M200 ft. of road. traffic use. Hwy 97). Crosses 1 intermittent trib. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 9762000 2.18 200 ft. of road. road. Can't find on map. Comes off 9768, but not as much No special habitats mapped within traffic as some roads in this 9765000 6.88 043 M200 ft. of road. BOPU; Powerline population again. watershed. No streams.

Aspen toward Walker Rim (on unnamed creek); Boundary Spring. Sugarpine up Walker Rim. Road density and high traffic (Crown Pacific logging and hunters) combined with No weeds currently present but high ground disturbance from past potential and unusual habitat (aspen harvest is likely restricting floodplain and associated plants), and high and water table. Aspen has exclosure No TES plants known within 200 ft. of traffic, high ground disturbance in 9768000 7.62 604 Mand on-going rehab work. road. area. No streams. BOPU; Powerline intersects this road; No weeds currently present but BOPU found along powerline, not on potential because comes from this road, but on powerline road that epicenter of weed infestation. Well- No special habitats mapped within comes off of it. Same concerns as travelled, but not the main haul road No streams. Also covered this road in Sellers 9772000 8.24 044 M200 ft. of road. 9775: weeds, traffic. like 9775 (not as much traffic). Watershed.

BOPU; Powerline population but not federal land. BPA access for Crown. Weeds due to road could be a threat to TES plants. ASPE there, too. Higher rating than in Sellers Watershed No weeds known to be present. Wetland on Crown Land (see notes in because higher road use (BPA patrols Private land. But road originates in 9775000 5.53 45 MSellers Watershed). daily), closer to infestations. weed infested area on private land. No streams.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 27 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Nice ponderosa pine stands. 5 mile draw -- wildlife migration route for deer and elk (east and west) -- has some Spotted & diffuse knapweeds, Canada wet areas but not right along 97. thistle (?), St. Johnswort. Same site Major draw is not impeded by the road that's been showing up in this area. People = though we're sure deer have a Scattered plants. Low density. But 1; Deer different opinion. Sedges and other No TES plants known within 200 ft. of high traffic, high maintenance, and US-97 9.13 = 9. 0 6 water loving plants in area. road. existing seed bank. 6120041 No streams. Walker Mountain Total 97.02 No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Whychus 1000250 0.30 200 ft. of road. road. 6150004 Campgrounds, etc. 1000390 0.60 0.4 Aspen. PEPE 6150004 Aspen stand. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1000900 0.57 200 ft. of road. road. 6150004 Links to private lands and other weed 6150005, 1008000 6.44 2 5 6 M Unknown. PEPE; Weed risk. sites. 6150051 No streams. Aspen grove with wetland. Links known sites, high use. 6150004, 1012000 3.03 667 1HMudbogging occurs. PEPE; Weed risk. Coldsprings cutoff. 6150010 No streams. Unknown - private land. PEPE potential. Extensive logging on private No special habitats mapped within lands and private development. Risk is Private lands have weeds; extensive 1012300 3.80 147 1H200 ft. of road. moderate. ground disturbance. Goes to Graham corral horse camp. No special habitats mapped within Private lands have weeds; extensive 1012340 0.88 147 1H200 ft. of road. PEPE ground disturbance. No streams. Lot private lands that have been clearcut. High weed risk. Some Very intact old growth stands in high known weeds nearby leading to this 1014000 2.42 336 Mmortality area. Rest unknown. ALVI. Low probability of TES plants. road. Moderately high traffic. No streams. Spruce/sedge; spruce bottomland; Road up above Trout Creek Swamp. Crosses willow/sedge; Mt. Alder shrubfield; bog Unknown. Some potential habitat. High use, private land logging 6150004, Trout Creek. Allows access to Trout Creek 1018000 8.45 344 Mblueberry. Weed risk. extensive. 6150020 swamp - ohv's.

Spruce bottomland; Mt. Alder No streams. Wetland to east and road goes 1024000 1.70 324 Mshrubfield. Weed risk and horse use. Unknown. Weed risk. Vectors in area. Known sites. to west - so no affect on wetland. Nearby special habitats. Risk is 1026000 1.10 224 Mweeds. Lot horse use. Unknown. Weed risk. Vectors in area. Known sites. Gets close to Alder Creek. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6150004, 1028000 2.81 55 M200 ft. of road. road. 6150005 No streams. No streams. Appears to cross through middle No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of of spring, but botany glob does not show 1030000 3.16 146 M200 ft. of road. road. 6150005 wetland.

5 segments; No streams. Steep in places; Unknown. Connects to TES sites could potentially funnel runoff close to Trout 1040000 4.96 2 3 4 M Unknown. Weed risk. (PEPE). Private lands, logged (clearcut). 6150004 Creek, so gave fine sed rating. PEPE in area. Probably populations 6150006, Paved, crosses no streams. Road to Black 1100000 7.14 2 5 6 M Unknown. along this road. Weed risk. Known populations; high traffic. 6150007 Butte, Green Ridge. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1100021 0.65 Aspen. road. 6150007 Aspen. Indian ford campground road??

Goes to private land. Known weeds. 1102000 4.03 2 4 6 M Unknown. PEPE; Weed risk. Infested private lands in some areas. 6150006 No streams. PEPE potential habitat. Maybe known 1105000 3.10 2 3 3 L Unknown. Might be riparian seeps. populations. Weed risk. Mt. Bike trail. 6150007 Road goes around Black Butte. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1110000 0.80 145 M200 ft. of road. road. Same as Upper Metolius - see that rating. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1120000 0.30 556 M200 ft. of road. road. No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1126000 1.53 236 M200 ft. of road. road. No streams. Unknown. PEPE potential. Intermittent 1130000 3.01 2 2 4 M Unknown. stream. Connects to Rd. 11. Weed potential. No streams. Spruce/sedge; spruce bottomland; Senecio wetland. Major road; weed Probably some potential habitat. 1500000 10.80 556 Mrisk. Unknown. Weed risk. High use, high traffic. 6150004 Crosses N. Pole Creek. Parallels Pole Creek.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 28 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Aspen/wildrye. Intermittent channels 1505000 8.33 343 Mto Squaw Creek, Pole Creek. High probability habitat for PEPE.

Mt. Alder shrubfield. Riparian. Weed Horses, vectors, residential area, 1510000 3.10 355 Mrisk and hydrologic interference. PEPE; Weed risk, horses, vectors. traffic. Crosses Trout Ck. In intermittent section. Goes into private lands that have been extensively logged, connects to known 1512000 2.40 2 3 4 M Unknown. Potential habitat for PEPE. Weed risk. sites. No streams. Unknown. Connects to Rd. 15. High 1513000 3.88 3 3 4 M Unknown. Unknown. traffic. No streams. Spruce bottomland; spikerush; mt. Alder shrubfield. Crosses riparian Connects to Rd. 16. Known Wetlands. Crosses Pole and Squaw Creeks 1514000 8.25 334 Mareas. Weed risk; dispersed use. Unknown. Weed risk. populations. 6150003 and Snow Creek. 1516000 3.70 3 3 4 M Spruce bottomland PEPE 1 intermittent streams. Crosses Trout Creek below Trout Creek Swamp. 1/4 mi. road in a 3 mile stretch. That Spruce/sedge. Weed risk from horse No TES plants within 200 ft. of road. Connects to roads with known weeds; segment by the swamp will get high; other 1520000 4.00 434 Mcamp and Rd. 15. Connects to Trout Ck. Swamp. horse use. 6150020 segments won't. Spruce/sedge; spruce bottomland; Senecio wetland; spikerush; mt. alder Crosses Pole Creek and parallels a trib to shrubfield. Hydrologic interference Squaw Creek. Floodplain - don't know how 1526000 3.40 435 Mrisk and weed risk. Unknown. Weed risk. close really gets.

Cottonwood/sedge; Mt. Alder/spirea. Known populations and high probability Paved Rd. from Sisters to Three Creek Lake. 1600000 8.11 567 1HWeed risk. habitat for PEPE. Weed Risk. Knapweed. High traffic. 6150003 Partially within Squaw Creek floodplain. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 1600550 0.02 200 ft. of road. road. 1605000 1.20 Mt. Alder/spirea. PEPE 6150003 No streams. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Don't find on map, but based on other close 1608000 1.64 Mt. Alder/spirea. road. 6150003 roads - 0 ratings. 1610000 0.51 2 2 3 L Unknown. Unknown. Probably potential habitat. Private lands. 6150003 No streams. 1620000 0.31 2 2 4 M Unknown. Unknown. Known. 6150003 No streams. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6150001, 2000015 0.10 200 ft. of road. road. 6150010 Don't know - No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 2000115 0.36 200 ft. of road. road. 6150010 Don't know - No special habitats mapped within 2000357 0.10 200 ft. of road. PEPE 6150010 Don't know - Wet meadow; willow/sedge. Weed 6150002, 2050000 6.00 333 Lrisk. PEPE. Weed risk. 6150006 Connects to Indian Ford known weed 2052000 4.15 2 3 3 L Unknown. PEPE potential. Weed risk. populations. No streams. High risk. High use. County Willow/sedge. Hydrologic PEPE; affects hydrology of populations, maintenance (blading and drainage 6150001, Crosses Indian Ford Ck. And associated 2058000 4.20 467 1Hinterference, runoff. Dispersed use. bisects them. Weed risk. ditches). 6150002 wetlands. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of 6150002, 2058080 0.20 200 ft. of road. road. 6150010 Known sites at Cascade Meadows Ranch spreading onto FS lands. Fuel 2059000 3.40 2 3 6 M Unknown. PEPE potential habitat. Weed risk. reduction project in area. No streams. 2060000 4.10 2 5 6 M Unknown. PEPE; Weed risk. Known weeds; private lands. No streams.

Multiple springs. Lot private land. High use. All private - not good weed 2061000 0.87 456 MWeed risk & hydrologic interference. PEPE control. Residential. Grazing. Camp Polk Road. Poa meadow. Crosses Squaw Creek. No TES plants known within 200 ft. of Appears to have numerous springs on private 2610000 3.58 Meadow. road. ground. Paved. Aspen, riparian. Weeds and PEPE habitat, probably known sites. Crosses Squaw Ck. Old haul route past 4606000 2.45 556 Mdispersed use. Weed risk, dispersed use. Known sites. High use. 6150032 Sisters. No special habitats mapped within No TES plants known within 200 ft. of OR-126 2.69 200 ft. of road. road. Aspen. Goes by Cold Springs (riparian aspen), small meadows, lava fields. Weed risk and hydrologic PEPE; Weed risk. Extremely high OR-242 10.96 557 1Hinterference. traffic (scenic byway). Weeds, logging disturbance. 6150004 Aspen.

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 29 Length Special TES Noxious Summary Weed WATERSHED ROAD (mi) Habitats Plants Weeds Ratings Special Habitat Notes TES Notes Weeds Notes Site # General Notes

Willow/sedge; aspen/shrub wetland; aspen near Indian Ford campground. Weeds. High traffic. Lot fuel Road intersects special habitats. Risk PEPE; Weed risk & maybe dispersed reduction projects that have created 6150002, Wetlands. Crosses Indian Ford and Squaw US-20 8.97 346 Mis hydrologic interference, weeds. use. weed habitat. 6150010 Creeks. By Black Butte Ranch aspen. Whychus Total 172.57

3/17/2003 BOTANY (Deschutes) 30 http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map01.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map01.jpg5/31/2007 1:24:50 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map02.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map02.jpg5/31/2007 1:25:08 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map03.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map03.jpg (1 of 3)5/31/2007 1:25:28 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map03.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map03.jpg (2 of 3)5/31/2007 1:25:28 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map07.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map07.jpg (1 of 3)5/31/2007 1:42:20 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map07.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map07.jpg (2 of 3)5/31/2007 1:42:20 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map07.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map07.jpg (3 of 3)5/31/2007 1:42:20 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map08.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map08.jpg5/31/2007 1:42:39 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map12.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map12.jpg5/31/2007 1:44:02 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map14.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map14.jpg5/31/2007 1:45:32 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map15.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map15.jpg (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:45:45 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map15.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map15.jpg (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:45:45 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map16.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map16.jpg5/31/2007 1:46:05 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map17.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map17.jpg (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:46:13 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map17.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map17.jpg (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:46:13 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map18.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map18.jpg (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:46:29 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map18.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map18.jpg (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:46:29 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map19.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map19.jpg5/31/2007 1:46:47 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map20.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map20.jpg (1 of 2)5/31/2007 1:47:03 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map20.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map20.jpg (2 of 2)5/31/2007 1:47:03 PM http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map21.jpg

http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/local-resources/images/projects/roadsanalysis/150_map21.jpg5/31/2007 1:47:21 PM