Ground Water in the Prineville Area Crook County, Oregon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ground Water in the Prineville Area Crook County, Oregon Ground Water in the Prineville Area Crook County, Oregon s f GEOLOGICAL SUR'VEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1619-P t i Prepared in cooperation with the Office of the Oregon State Engineer Ground Water in the Prineville Area Crook County, Oregon By J. W. ROBINSON and DON PRICE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1619-P Prepared in cooperation with the Office of the Oregon State Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract___________________________________________________ P 1 Introduction..____________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of the investigation.__________________________ 2 Location and extent of the area_--_----__----_--_--_-__--_-__--_ 2 Previous in vestigations___ _________ _____________________________ 3 Acknowledgments.. _________________________________________ 4 Well-numbering system________________________________-______- 4 Geography____________________________________________________ 5 Surface features and drainage___________________________._______ 5 Climate_____________________________________________________ 7 Culture and industry____________________________________ 7 Geologic setting.__________________________________________________ 8 Summary of stratigraphy______________________________________- 8 Geologic history_____________________________________________ 10 Ground water____________________________________ ________ 11 Occurrence.__________________________________________________ 11 General features_____-__-_______-________-_________-__-___- 11 Bedrock um'ts_____________________________________________ 13 Fluviolacustrine deposits__________________________________ 14 Unconfined aquifers__________________________________ 14 The artesian aquifer_______________________________ 15 Alluvium__ _____________________________________ 18 Landslide debris__________________________ ________ 19 Water-level fluctuations and long-term trends.____________________ 19 Chemical character of the ground water__________________________ 27 Withdrawal from the artesian aquifer______________________ 30 Present development___________________________________ 30 Effects of present withdrawals______________________ _ 32 Possible effects of increased withdrawals____________________ 33 Conclusions_____________________________________________________ 35 References______________________________________________________ 36 in IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Geologic map of the Prineville ares, Oregon, showing location of wells and contours on the artesian pressure surface, Novem­ ber 1953______________________________ In pocket Page FIGURE 1. Map of Oregon showing location of the Prineville area ____ P3 2. Annual precipitation and cumulative departure from average. 6 3. Hydrographs of wells_____-________________-___-_-___-__ 20 4. Hydrographs of wells___________________________________ 21 5. Map showing decline of pressure head in the aquifer._______ 25 6. Hydrograph of well 14/16-32N1 showing fluctuations caused by pumping of nearby wells__________________________ 26 7. Diagram for the classification of irrigation waters_________ 31 TABLES TABLE 1. Summary of rock units exposed in the Prineville area, Oregon_________________________________ P9 2. Records of selected wells in the Prineville area, Oregon_____ 38 3. Logs of wells in the Prineville area____________________ 42 4. Chemical analyses of typical waters from the Prineville area, Oregon.._______________________________________ 49 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GROUND WATER IN THE PRINEVILLE AREA CROOK COUNTY, OREGON BY J. W. ROBINSON and DON PRICE ABSTRACT The area studied includes about 60 square miles of the valleys of Ochoco Creek and Crooked River in semiarid central Oregon, the city of Prineville, and the surrounding agricultural district. The principal source of ground water in the area is a single artesian aquifer of sand and gravel locally more than 30 feet thick, which occurs at the base of the unconsolidated valley fill deposits. This artesian aquifer yields as much as 1,000 gallons per minute to wells in the area, and at places contains water under sufficient pressure to rise 50 feet or more above the land surface. Shallower aquifers, which contain unconfined water, generally yield less than 20 gpm; the bedrock underlying the artesian aquifer does not yield appreciable amounts of water to wells. The ground water is of generally good chemical quality, although that from some wells is harder than desirable or contains iron in amounts that are troublesome for some uses. Since the artesian aquifer was first tapped by wells in 1912, there has been both a progressive increase in the number of wells producing water from it and a general lowering of artesian pressures in the aquifer. Sharp declines of the pres­ sures at some wells in the summer of 1944 caused local concern about the continued availability of the artesian water, and led to the present study. Between October 1944 and November 1953, the decline in artesian pressure was less than 20 feet throughout most of the area, but was more than 30 feet in localities of intensive pumping. At Prineville, the relatively great drawdown is caused largely by mutual interference between large-capacity wells. The long-term decline of artesian pressures was caused by the progressively greater withdrawals from wells. It represents chiefly an increase in the rate at which ground water moves through the aquifer from the principal recharge area to points of discharge rather than the permanent removal of water stored in the aquifer. Increased withdrawal from the artesian aquifer would tend to cause further decline of artesian pressures, but it also might result in some increase in recharge to the aquifer, salvage of some water presently discharging from the aquifer by leakage to shallower zones, and possibly, some local increase in the concentrations of dissolved minerals in the artesian water in districts of greatest decline of artesian levels. The additional water that might be available for withdrawal, owing to increased recharge and decreased natural discharge from the aquifer, would tend to counteract the decline of artesian levels owing to the increased withdrawal. In 1953, the recharge to the aquifer may have been about 2,000 acre-feet. PI P2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION The principal source of ground water in the Prineville area is a single artesian aquifer or water-bearing zone that underlies the valley floor in the vicinity of, and downstream from, Prineville. Since it was first tapped by wells in 1912, there has been a progressive increase in the number of wells producing water from this aquifer. In the summer of 1944, owners and operators of wells in the area became concerned when large withdrawals from the aquifer caused the water levels in some of the artesian wells to decline rapidly to new low levels. Thus, it became apparent that a better understanding of the extent and water-bearing properties of the aquifer would be necessary in order to guide future development and management of ground water in the area. The principal purposes of this investigation were to determine the extent of the aquifer, the source and the approximate amount of water that moves through the aquifer, and the possible effects of increased withdrawals from the aquifer. This investigation was made in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer as part of a continuing program of appraisal of the ground- water resources of Oregon. Most of the fieldwork for this report was done from October 1944 to November 1946 by the senior author. The fieldwork during that period included reconnaissance geologic mapping and collection of basic ground-water data. Additional information on wells, ground-water levels, and chemical quality of the ground water have since been obtained, mostly during fieldwork in the area in November 1953 and November 1959. In May 1960, the earlier geologic mapping was checked and revised in the field by the junior author and E. R. Hampton. A preliminary version of the report, based on data collected through 1946, was prepared by the senior author and was released to the open file for public inspection in April 1947. LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE ABBA The area of this study is in Crook County in central Oregon (fig. 1). It lies between lat 44°15/ and 44°22/ N., and long 120°43' and 120°58/ W., and it covers about 60 square miles. The area is about 15 miles long (in a northwest direction), and about 7 miles at its widest point. It comprises the valleys of Ochoco Creek downstream from the Ochoco Reservoir, and of Crooked River from the vicinity of Prineville downstream for about 7 miles (pi. 1). GROUND WATER IN THE PRINEVILLE AREA, OREGON P3 123° 122° 121' 120' 119" FIGURE 1. Map of Oregon showing the location of the Prineville area. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS Although the Prineville area has been included in larger areas of general geologic studies, no detailed investigation of the ground-water resources of the area was made prior to this study. The geology and water resources of the Prineville area were men­ tioned briefly in a report by I. C. Russell (1905, p. 82-86) that de­ scribes a reconnaissance trip through central
Recommended publications
  • Transportation System Plan
    CROOK COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN CROOK COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted November 2017 v CROOK COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN This page intentionally left blank vi CROOK COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN PREFACE The development of this plan was guided by the Project Management Team (PMT), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and Public Advisory Committee (PAC). Each individual devoted their time/effort and their participation was instrumental in the development of the plan update. PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM (PMT) Crook County ODOT/TGM Grant Manager Ann Beier Devin Hearing TECHNICAL AND PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC AND PAC) MEMBERS Ron Cholin Duane Garner Levi Roberts Michael Warren II Local Freight Industry Crook County Parks and Crook County GIS Crook County Planning Recreation Commission Kelly Coffelt John Gautney James Savage Holly Wenzel Prineville Airport Manager Crook County Sheriff Crook County Sheriff Crook County Health Department Russ Deboodt Casey Kaiser Scott Smith Matt Wiederholt Crook County Fire and Rescue Chamber of Commerce Prineville Public Works Prineville Railway Scott Edelman Jackson Lester Phil Stenbeck Randy Winders Department of Land Cascades East Transit Prineville Planning Central Oregon Trail Conservation and Development Department Alliance Caroline Ervin Bob O'Neal Jesse Toomey Bill Zelenka Economic Development of Crook County Road Central Oregon Trail Crook County Community Central Oregon Department Alliance Development CONSULTANT TEAM Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Angelo Planning Group, Inc. Marc Butorac, PE Darci Rudzinski, AICP Ashleigh Ludwig, AICP, PE Jamin Kimmell Camilla Dartnell This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage Feasibility Assessment Bowman Dam Hydroelectric Project (FERC No
    Fish Passage Feasibility Assessment Bowman Dam Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-14791) Prepared for: Ochoco Irrigation District Prepared by 15250 NE 95th Street Redmond, WA 98052 April 2020 Fish Passage Feasibility Assessment for Bowman Dam Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-14791) Prepared for: Ochoco Irrigation District 1001 NW Deer St. Prineville, Oregon 97754 Prepared by: R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. 15250 NE 95th Street Redmond, WA 98052 April 2020 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT SETTING AND FISH PASSAGE CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................. 1 STUDY SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................... 4 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 5 REVIEW OF EXISTING BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION .......................................................................... 5 REVIEW OF SITE AND ENGINEERING INFORMATION ........................................................................ 5 DESIGN CRITERIA....................................................................................................................... 6 BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ochoco Irrigation District Infrastructure Modernization Project Draft Watershed Plan- Environmental Assessment
    Ochoco Irrigation District Infrastructure Modernization Project Draft Watershed Plan- Environmental Assessment Crook County, Oregon September 2020 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service – Lead Federal Agency in cooperation with the Deschutes Basin Board of Control, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and Ochoco Irrigation District Prepared by Farmers Conservation Alliance Ochoco Irrigation District Infrastructure Modernization Project Draft Watershed Plan-Environmental Assessment Draft Watershed Plan-Environmental Assessment for the Ochoco Irrigation District Infrastructure Modernization Project Lead Agency: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Oregon Cooperating Agency: Department of Interior, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) Sponsoring Local Organization: Deschutes Basin Board of Control (DBBC) (lead sponsor) and Ochoco Irrigation District (OID) (co-sponsor). Authority: This Watershed Plan-Environmental Assessment (Plan-EA) has been prepared under the Authority of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (Public Law [PL] 83-566). The Plan-EA has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, PL 91-190, as amended (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 43221 et seq.). Abstract: This document is intended to fulfill requirements of the NEPA and to be considered for authorization of PL 83-566 funding of the OID Infrastructure Modernization Project (Project). The Project seeks to improve water conservation and water delivery reliability in Oregon’s Deschutes Basin. The Project would include installing 16.8 miles of buried pipeline, installing four new pump stations and associated pipe, and canal improvements along 15.2 miles of canal where needed. Total estimated Project costs are $30,788,000 of which $7,727,000 would be paid by the sponsors and other non-federal funding sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation and Streamflow Depletion in Columbia River Basin Above the Dalles, Oregon
    Irrigation and Streamflow Depletion in Columbia River Basin above The Dalles, Oregon Bv W. D. SIMONS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1220 An evaluation of the consumptive use of water based on the amount of irrigation UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1953 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 50 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope....................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments......................................................................................................... 3 Irrigation in the basin......................................................................................................... 3 Historical summary...................................................................................................... 3 Legislation................................................................................................................... 6 Records and sources for data..................................................................................... 8 Stream
    [Show full text]
  • Crooked River Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Crooked River Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan February 2021 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Crooked River Local Advisory Committee with support from the Crook County Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Crook County SWCD Water Quality Program 498 SE Lynn Blvd 635 Capitol St. NE Prineville, OR 97754 Salem, OR 97301 (41) 477-3548 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms ....................................................................................................................................i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Required Elements of Area Plans .......................................................................................................... iii Plan Content .................................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans ..... 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Basin Climate Impact Assessment Final Report
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West West-Wide Climate Risk Assessment Columbia River Basin Climate Impact Assessment Final Report \ / --~-- U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Regional Office March 2016 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Photographs on front cover: The shrub-steppe around Grand Coulee Dam, parched desert soil, a crop field with rain clouds, and snow covered mountain peaks. These images represent the varied ecosystems in the Columbia River Basin. West-Wide Climate Risk Assessment Columbia River Basin Climate Impact Assessment Final Report Prepared for United States Congress Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Policy and Administration Denver, Colorado March 2016 Notes Regarding this West-Wide Climate Risk Assessment – Impact Assessment The Columbia River Basin Impact Assessment is a reconnaissance-level assessment of the potential hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Columbia River Basin. For this study, it was necessary to isolate the impacts of climate change from other changes that may occur within the basin. Therefore, Reclamation has assumed that current water operations by all water management entities in the Columbia River Basin would continue unchanged in the future. This assessment does not consider any operational changes that may or may not be made by basin stakeholders in the future and does not reflect the position of any entity regarding future operational changes.
    [Show full text]
  • County Natural Resources Policy
    Crook County Oregon Natural Resources Policy Crook County Board of County Commissioners CROOK COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN REVISION 013 1 | Page Table of Contents Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Revision .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Severability ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Crook County Overview ............................................................................................................................... 6 Land Use & Management ......................................................................................................................... 8 Agriculture & Timber ............................................................................................................................... 9 Recreation & Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 10 Wilderness and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................................................................... 10 Principles for Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination
    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadromous Salmonid Restoration in the Lower Crooked River: Can Collaboration and Legislation Coexist?
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Owen McMurtrey for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Policy and Management presented on June 6, 2018. Title: Anadromous Salmonid Restoration in the Lower Crooked River: Can Collaboration and Legislation Coexist?. Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Edward P. Weber In watersheds across the American Pacific Northwest, changes in the cultural and regulatory landscape have increased pressure to restore and protect populations of anadromous fish. But restoration of anadromous fish populations constitutes a ‘wicked problem’, relentless in character, affecting diverse stakeholder groups, and defying ‘once and for all’ solutions (Weber & Khademian, 2008). Existing top-down institutions and adversarial processes appear to be poorly matched to resolve ‘wicked problems.’ In the Lower Crooked River watershed in Central Oregon, the management of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Crooked River Project is the preeminent factor influencing stream flow conditions for anadromous fish. Given the abundant opportunities for the use of litigation in systems with federal storage projects, and that legislation is typically required to make significant changes to the operation of federal storage projects, can collaboration offer a path to success, even when used alongside legislation? This research investigates the specific dynamics of the Lower Crooked River effort using a qualitative case study methodology. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the Lower Crooked River effort
    [Show full text]
  • The Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (DBHCP)
    Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan NEPA Public Scoping August 14, 2017 – Madras, OR August 15, 2017 – Bend, OR The Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (DBHCP) An HCP is required for activities covered by an Incidental Take Permit issued under the Federal Endangered Species Act Deschutes Basin HCP will modify Irrigation District and City of Prineville activities to minimize and mitigate the impacts of those activities on the species covered by the Incidental Take Permits Has been in collaborative development since 2010 DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP Covered Parties Eight Irrigation Districts of the Deschutes Basin Board of Control (DBBC) • Arnold Irrigation District (AID) • Central Oregon Irrigation District (COID) • Lone Pine Irrigation District (LPID) • North Unit Irrigation District (NUID) • Ochoco Irrigation District (OID) • Swalley Irrigation District (SID) • Three Sisters Irrigation District (TSID) • Tumalo Irrigation District (TID) City of Prineville, Oregon DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP Covered Species Bull Trout Middle Columbia River Steelhead Trout Middle Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Deschutes River Summer/Fall Chinook Salmon Sockeye Salmon Oregon Spotted Frog DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 DBHCP Covered Activities Storage and Release of Irrigation Water Diversion of Irrigation Water Conveyance and Delivery of Irrigation Water Irrigation Return Flows Existing Hydropower City of Prineville Activities DBHCP August 14 -15, 2017 Storage and Release of Water Five Main
    [Show full text]
  • Crooked River Project, Oregon
    The Crooked River Project Toni Rae Linenberger Bureau of Reclamation 2001 Table of Contents The Crooked River Project ......................................................2 Project Location.........................................................3 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................9 Construction History .....................................................9 The Ochoco Project................................................9 The Crooked River Project .........................................10 Post-Construction History................................................16 The Crooked River Extension .......................................16 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................20 Conclusion............................................................21 About the Author .............................................................21 Bibliography ................................................................22 Archival Collections ....................................................22 Government Documents .................................................22 Articles...............................................................22 Books ................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Crooked River Redband Trout Final Report
    Crooked River Redband Trout Study Jason Vaughan1, Shadia Duery1, Todd W. Kassler2, and Ian Courter1 1Cramer Fish Sciences 600 NW Fariss Road Gresham, OR 2WDFW Molecular Genetics Laboratory 600 Capitol Way N Olympia, WA For Ochoco Irrigation District October 2013 Page i Suggested Literature Citation: Vaughan, J., S. Duery, T. Kassler, and I. Courter*. 2013. Crooked River Redband Trout Study. Cramer Fish Sciences. Gresham, Oregon. Report Prepared for Ochoco Irrigation District, Prineville, Oregon. *Corresponding author: [email protected], 503-491-9577 Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Brett Hodgson, ODFW for his assistance planning our study, as well as Tim Porter, ODFW for helping with the electrofishing surveys and sending us valuable information from ODFW’s database. We also appreciate the generosity of those that shared their reports and research findings. Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv Project Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Redband Trout Distribution in the Crooked River Basin ............................................................... 2 Life-History of Redband Trout in the Crooked River Basin .........................................................
    [Show full text]