DOCSLIB.ORG

Ordinances—1932

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ordinances—1932 Australian Capital Territory Ordinances—1932 A chronological listing of ordinances notified in 1932 [includes ordinances 1932 Nos 1-26] Ordinances—1932 1 Motor Traffic Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1936-45 notified 28 January 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 10) s 2 (1) commenced 28 January 1932 (see Seat of Government 29 October 1936 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 2 Auctioneers Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1959-2 notified 28 January 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 10) sch 1 commenced 28 January 1932 (see Seat of Government 25 March 1959 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 3 * City of Canberra Arms Ordinance 1932 notified 11 February 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 13) commenced 11 February 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 4 Canberra University College Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1953-8 s 3 notified 11 February 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 13) 1 July 1954 commenced 11 February 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 5 * Dentists Registration Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A2000-80 notified 18 February 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 15) sch 4 commenced 18 February 1932 (see Seat of Government 21 December 2000 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 6 * Church Lands Leases Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A1991-118 notified 25 February 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 17) sch 2 commenced 25 February 1932 (see Seat of Government 2 April 1992 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 7 * Leases (Special Purposes) Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A1991-118 notified 25 February 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 17) sch 2 commenced 25 February 1932 (see Seat of Government 2 April 1992 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 8 Industrial Board Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1936-12 notified 24 February 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 16) sch commenced 24 February 1932 (see Seat of Government 22 May 1936 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 9 Liquor Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1975-19 notified 10 March 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 20) sch commenced 10 March 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 1 November 1975 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 10 Trustee Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1957-14 notified 7 April 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 27) sch 1 commenced 7 April 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 1 December 1957 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) * This ordinance became an ACT Act on or after self-government. † Reserved Law ie a law that may not be amended or repealed by the ACT Legislative Assembly (see Self-Government Act, s 34 (5)). These laws are administered by the Commonwealth. page 2 Ordinances—1932 Ordinances—1932 11 * Weights and Measures Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A1995-5 s 5 notified 7 April 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 27) 9 June 1995 commenced 1 August 1933 (s 2, see Weights and Measures Ordinance 1929 Ord1929-9, s 2 and Cwlth Gaz 1933 No 44) 12 Industrial Board Ordinance (No 2) 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1936-12 notified 28 April 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 38) sch commenced 28 April 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 22 May 1936 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 13 * Administration and Probate Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A2000-80 notified 28 April 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 38) sch 4 commenced 28 April 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 21 December 2000 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 14 Advisory Council Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1936-49 notified 12 May 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 44) s 2 (1) commenced 12 May 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 23 December 1936 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 15 Liquor Ordinance (No 2) 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1975-19 notified 23 June 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 52) sch s 4 taken to have commenced 11 April 1932 (s 4 (5)) 1 November 1975 remainder commenced 23 June 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 16 Deserted Wives and Children Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1968-20 notified 4 August 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 58) sch commenced 4 August 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 1 January 1969 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 17 * Dentists Registration Ordinance (No 2) 1932 (repealed) repealed by A2000-80 notified 4 August 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 58) sch 4 commenced 4 August 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 21 December 2000 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 18 * Police Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A1994-75 notified 18 August 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 61) sch 2 s 2 taken to have commenced 1 August 1931 (s 2 (2)) 1 December 1994 remainder commenced 18 August 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 19 Companies Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1954-14 notified 24 August 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 62) sch 1 commenced 24 August 1932 (see Seat of Government 1 October 1954 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 20 * Trespass on Commonwealth Lands Ordinance 1932 (renamed as Trespass on Territory Land Act 1932) notified 10 November 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 79) commenced 10 November 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) * This ordinance became an ACT Act on or after self-government. † Reserved Law ie a law that may not be amended or repealed by the ACT Legislative Assembly (see Self-Government Act, s 34 (5)). These laws are administered by the Commonwealth. Ordinances—1932 page 3 Ordinances—1932 21 * Court of Petty Sessions Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by A2000-80 notified 17 November 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 81) sch 4 commenced 17 November 1932 (see Seat of Government 21 December 2000 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 22 Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1977-65 notified 24 November 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 83) sch 1 commenced 1 March 1933 (s 2 and Cwlth Gaz 1933 No 8) 22 December 1977 23 Sheriff Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1934-1 s 2 notified 1 December 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 85) 8 February 1934 commenced 1 December 1932 (see Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 24 Coroners Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1956-14 notified 1 December 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 85) s 3 commenced 1 December 1932 (see Seat of Government 14 December 1956 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 25 Juries Ordinance 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1967-47 notified 1 December 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 85) sch 1 commenced 1 December 1932 (see Seat of Government 1 January 1968 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 26 Juries Ordinance (No 2) 1932 (repealed) repealed by Ord1967-47 notified 6 December 1932 (Cwlth Gaz 1932 No 86) sch 1 commenced 6 December 1932 (see Seat of Government 1 January 1968 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) * This ordinance became an ACT Act on or after self-government. † Reserved Law ie a law that may not be amended or repealed by the ACT Legislative Assembly (see Self-Government Act, s 34 (5)). These laws are administered by the Commonwealth. page 4 Ordinances—1932 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • University Archives Inventory
    University Archives Inventory Record Group Number: UR001.03 Title: Burney Lynch Parkinson Presidential Records Date: 1926-1969 Bulk Date: 1932-1952 Extent: 42 boxes Creator: Burney Lynch Parkinson Administrative/Biographical Notes: Burney Lynch Parkinson (1887-1972) was an educator from Lincoln, Tennessee. He received his B.S. from Erskine College in 1909, and rose up the administrative ranks from English teacher in Laurens, South Carolina public schools. He received his M.A. from Peabody College in 1920, and Ph.D. from Peabody in 1926, after which he became president of Presbyterian College in Clinton, SC in 1927. He was employed as Director of Teacher Training, Certification, and Elementary Education at the Alabama Dept. of Education just before coming to MSCW to become president in 1932. In December 1932, the university was re-accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, ending the crisis brought on the purge of faculty under Governor Theodore Bilbo, but appropriations to the university were cut by 54 percent, and faculty and staff were reduced by 33 percent, as enrollment had declined from 1410 in 1929 to 804 in 1932. Parkinson authorized a study of MSCW by Peabody college, ultimately pursuing its recommendations to focus on liberal arts at the cost of its traditional role in industrial, vocational, and technical education. Building projects were kept to a minimum during the Parkinson years. Old Main was restored and named for Mary Calloway in 1938. Franklin Hall was converted to a dorm, and the Whitfield Gymnasium into a student center with the Golden Goose Tearoom inside. Parkinson Hall was constructed in 1951 and named for Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: the June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic Author(S): Charles W
    American Economic Association Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic Author(s): Charles W. Calomiris and Joseph R. Mason Source: The American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 5 (Dec., 1997), pp. 863-883 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951329 . Accessed: 10/08/2011 14:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Economic Review. http://www.jstor.org Contagion and Bank Failures Duringthe Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic By CHARLES W. CALOMIRIS AND JOSEPH R. MASON * We examine the social costs of asymmetric-information-inducedbank panics in an environment without government deposit insurance. Our case study is the Chicago bank panic of June 1932. We compare the ex ante characteristics of panic failures and panic survivors. Despite temporaryconfusion about bank asset quality on the part of depositors during the panic, which was associated with widespread depositor runs and bank stock price declines, the panic did not pro- duce significant social costs in terms offailures among solvent banks.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mykola Doroshko the Ruling Stratum in the Ukrainian SSR
    Mykola Doroshko The Ruling Stratum in the Ukrainian SSR during the Holodomor of 1932–33 In recent times a large body of literature has been published about the initiators of the Holodomor, that is, those who engineered the famine-genocide that took place in Ukraine in 1932–33. The general public is familiar with their names. However, there are far fewer scholarly works devoted to the activities of the immediate executors of Stalin’s directives during the greatest national catastrophe in Ukrainian history—the Communist Party and Soviet nomenklatura (party appointees) of the Ukrainian SSR, which constituted the nucleus of the Kremlin’s colonial administration in the republic. Stalin’s intention to punish the Ukrainian peasants for their resistance to the policy of all-out collectivization by means of a terror-famine depended both on the top ranks of the Soviet Ukrainian leadership and on the utterly compliant local apparatus of power in the republic. Was this apparatus capable of starving the Ukrainian peasants into submission? The state grain-procurement campaigns of 1932 and 1933, the main goal of which was to confiscate grain from the Ukrainian peasantry, were directed by Stanislav Kosior, general secretary of the Central Committee, Communist Party (Bolshevik) of Ukraine (CC CP[B]U), Vlas Chubar, head of the Council of People’s Commissars of the Ukrainian SSR, and Hryhorii Petrovsky, head of the All-Ukrainian Central Executive Committee (VUTsVK). In possession of information about the actual state of affairs in Ukrainian agriculture, the leaders of Soviet Ukraine took certain steps to convince the Kremlin leadership that the grain-procurement plans issued from above were unrealistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Austerity and the Rise Of
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES AUSTERITY AND THE RISE OF THE NAZI PARTY Gregori Galofré-Vilà Christopher M. Meissner Martin McKee David Stuckler Working Paper 24106 http://www.nber.org/papers/w24106 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2017 Earlier versions of this paper were presented at Oxford, UC Davis, UC Berkeley, Michigan, New York University, UCLA, University of Groningen, University of Bocconi, Australian National University, and UC Irvine. We thank seminar participants at those institutions. We would also like to thank Philipp Ager, Barbara Biasi, Víctor Durà-Vilà, Barry Eichengreen, Peter Lindert, Petra Moser, Burkhard Schipper, Veronica Toffolutti, Nico Voigtländer, Tamás Vonyó, Hans- Joachim Voth, and Noam Yuchtman, for a series of constructive suggestions and assistance. We acknowledge Maja Adena, Ruben Enikolopov, Hans-Joachim Voth and Nico Voigtländer for sharing data. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w24106.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M. Meissner, Martin McKee, and David Stuckler. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Current Business June 1932
    JUNE, 1932 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE WASHINGTON VOLUME 12 NUMBER 6 Over 100 new of statistical and an index have been added in this issue of the SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS. The contents of the monthly business statistics section have been changed markedly, both as to presentation and arrangement. With the aid of the index these changes will enable the reader to find those series in which he is more particularly interested with a minimum of effort. The SURVEY now assembles under one cover more than 2,100 series of data on current busi- ness movements—simplifying the work of business men, research workers, and others desiring to keep informed on all phases of business activity. The 1932 annual supplement to the SURVEY is in process of printing. This volume contains the same series as the current number, on a monthly basis back to 1923, together with monthly averages for earlier years, where available. It has been revised thoroughly in form and content and the joint use of the monthly and the annual is facilitated by the uniform presentation of data. Volume 12 JUNE, 1932 Number 6 WEEKLY DATA THROUGH MAY 21, 1932 MONTHLY DATA THROUGH APRIL SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS PUBLISHED BY UNITED STATERS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE WASHINGTON CONTENTS SUMMARIES AND CHARTS STATISTICAL DATA—Continued Page Page Business indicators 2 Monthly business statistics: Business situation summarized 3 Business indexes 22 Comparison of principal data,
    [Show full text]
  • Shadowy Banks and Financial Contagion During the Great Depression: a Retrospective on Friedman and Schwartz
    Shadowy Banks and Financial Contagion during the Great Depression: A Retrospective on Friedman and Schwartz Kris James Mitchener, University of Warwick & NBER Gary Richardson, UC Irvine & NBER Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz’s Monetary History of the United States revolutionized economists’ understanding of the role of money in the aggregate economy. Until its publication, many scholars and practitioners believed that monetary forces played little independent role in economic affairs, and that monetary policy had little influence on the business cycle. The Monetary History also reshaped our views of the defining moments of the U.S. economy, none more so than the contraction of 1929 to 1933. One-sixth of their magnum opus focuses on what they call the Great Contraction – a period when output, prices, and money fell by more than a third, unemployment peaked at more than 25%, and the commercial banking system’s collapse culminated in President Roosevelt’s declaration of a nationwide banking holiday in March, 1933. Friedman and Schwartz view the Great Contraction as a “tragic testimonial to the importance of monetary forces.” They conclude that the Fed had “ample powers” to cut short the catastrophic process of monetary deflation and banking collapse, and argue that the bureaucratic structure and distribution of power within the Federal Reserve prevented officials from implementing national policies that might have had “palliative effects” and prevented “successive liquidity crises (Friedman and Schwartz, 1963, p.2.).” Their account, which emphasizes how declining depositor confidence in banks depressed monetary aggregates, contrasts with many analyses of the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, 1 which focus on financial networks, contagion, and systemic risk.1 Shadow banks (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • France and the World Disarmament Conference of 1932-3
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Davies, T. R. (2004). France and the World Disarmament Conference of 1932- 34. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 15(4), pp. 765-780. doi: 10.1080/09592290490886838 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/19047/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592290490886838 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] France and the World Disarmament Conference Page 1 of 21 France and the World Disarmament Conference of 1932-34 ABSTRACT: Traditional accounts of the disastrous World Disarmament Conference of 1932-34 have placed the blame for its failure on France. Recent historians have revised this picture by describing the internal and external constraints on French policymakers and by delineating the equally obstructive policies adopted by the Anglo-Saxon countries. This article outlines each of these approaches, but takes the defence of France one step further.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weimar Constitution – Recap!
    The Weimar Constitution – Recap! How is the President of Germany chosen? What is the role of the President? How is the Chancellor of Germany chosen? What is the role of the Chancellor? BONUS: Can you name any previous Presidents or Chancellors of Germany? The Weimar Constitution – Recap! How is the President of Germany chosen? He is chosen by a public vote every seven years. What is the role of the President? He does not get involved in day to day government, but in an emergency can use Article 48 or mobilise the army. How is the Chancellor of Germany chosen? He is chosen by the President. Usually this is given to the leader of the largest party in the Reichstag. What is the role of the Chancellor? He runs the government and proposes laws for the members of the Reichstag to pass. BONUS: Can you name any previous Presidents or Chancellors of Germany? Friedrich Ebert (chancellor and president), Gustav Stresemann (chancellor briefly) Paul von Hindenburg (President), Heinrich Bruning (Chancellor) 19/03/2021 How Hitler became the German Chancellor – 1932-1933 January 1932 • At the start of 1932 the Weimar Republic was struggling. The Wall Street Crash had led to huge economic trouble and growing unemployment. • Heinrich Bruning was the Chancellor of Germany, but was struggling to control the situation. He relied more and more on persuading President Hindenburg to pass laws using Article 48. Hindenburg was at heart a monarchist and didn’t really like democracy, so he was happy to rule by decree. • Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party was doing better than ever, they had won 108 seats during the 1930 Reichstag elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Accountancy, December 1932 Vol. 54 Issue 6 [Whole Issue]
    Journal of Accountancy Volume 54 Issue 6 Article 11 12-1932 Journal of Accountancy, December 1932 Vol. 54 Issue 6 [whole issue] American Institute of Accountants Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jofa Part of the Accounting Commons Recommended Citation American Institute of Accountants (1932) "Journal of Accountancy, December 1932 Vol. 54 Issue 6 [whole issue]," Journal of Accountancy: Vol. 54 : Iss. 6 , Article 11. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jofa/vol54/iss6/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Archival Digital Accounting Collection at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Accountancy by an authorized editor of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SINGLE COPY 35 CENTS PER ANNUM $4.00 The JOURNAL of ACCOUNTANCY volume LIV DECEMBER, 1932 number 6 CONTENTS Editorial ......... 401 A Legal Department — Temporary Relief from Fees — The Niceties of Professional Conduct — The Sawdust Trail —Another Important Means of Grace — A Common Interest — The Cause May Be Anything — Con­ ventions Present Great Opportunities — The Benefits of Fellowship — The Other Fellow Has His Virtues American Institute of Accountants’ Examinations, November, 1932 . .411 The Profitable Employment of Idle Time 433 By Norman Loyall McLaren Some Economic and Accounting Phases of Lumber Manufacturing ....... 448 By Marvin F. Pixton American Institute of Accountants, riaT l INSTITUTE Students’ Department 467 Edited by H. P. Baumann Book Reviews . 474 Accounting Questions 476 Current Literature 479 Issued Monthly by AMERICAN INSTITUTE PUBLISHING CO., INC. Publication Office, 10 Ferry Street, Concord, N. H. Editorial and General Offices, 135 Cedar Street, Manhattan, New York, N.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson from the Great Depression That the Fed Might Have Learned
    A Lesson from the Great Depression that the Fed Might have Learned: A Comparison of the 1932 Open Market Purchases with Quantitative Easing Michael Bordo1 Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Hoover Institute (Stanford University) and NBER Arunima Sinha2 (Department of Economics, Fordham University) September 2015 . 1 Email: [email protected]. Contact: New Jersey Hall, 75 Hamilton Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. 2 Email: [email protected]. Contact: 113 W 60th street, Lowenstein building Rm 924, New York, NY 10024. We are grateful to Vasco Cúrdia for providing us access to his codes, and discussing our paper. Comments from audiences at the conferences on Expectations in Dynamic Macroeconomic Models, the Econometric Society World Congress (Montreal) and European Economic Association (Mannheim) meetings are gratefully acknowledged. 1 Abstract We examine the first QE program through the lens of an open-market operation under- taken by the Federal Reserve in 1932, at the height of the Great Depression. This program entailed large purchases of medium- and long-term securities over a four-month period. There were no prior announcements about the size or composition of the operation, how long it would be put in place, and the program ended abruptly. Using a dataset with weekly-level Treasury holdings of the Federal Reserve in 1932, and the corresponding yields, we first conduct an event study analysis. This indicates that the 1932 program significantly low- ered medium- and long-term Treasury yields. We then use a segmented markets model to analyze the channel through which the open-market purchases affected the economy. Quar- terly data from 1920-32 is used to estimate the model with Bayesian methods, employing the methodology of Chen, Cúrdia and Ferrero (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Friendly Endeavor, December 1932
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Northwest Yearly Meeting of Friends Church Friendly Endeavor (Quakers) 12-1932 Friendly Endeavor, December 1932 George Fox University Archives Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/nwym_endeavor Recommended Citation George Fox University Archives, "Friendly Endeavor, December 1932" (1932). Friendly Endeavor. 111. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/nwym_endeavor/111 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Northwest Yearly Meeting of Friends Church (Quakers) at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Friendly Endeavor by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Friendly Endeavor Volume 11, Number 12. PORTLAND, OREGON December, 1932. A T R A V E L E R A N D A L L T H E P R O U D "For behold, the day cometh that Have you read the November issue of shall burn as an oven; and all the the Friendly Endeavor? If so you know of the sailing of Laura Cammack " T H E C H R I S T M A S G I F T " proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble; and the day that com for China on October 22nd. Knowing eth shall burn them up, saith the Lord that the experiences encountered on her He was only a babe born in a stable, but wandering shepherds made Him of Hosts, that it shall leave them neither journey would be of interest to our r o o t n o r b r a n c h .
    [Show full text]