DOCSLIB.ORG

Iron-Age and Roman Coins Jonathan Williams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iron-Age and Roman Coins Jonathan Williams IRON-AGE AND ROMAN COINS JONATHAN WILLIAMS Introduction THE twin subjects of this essay, the study of Iron-Age and Roman coinage within Britain over the past century, present a somewhat paradoxical picture when viewed from the particular perspective of British Numismatic Journal.' Over the century of its existence the Journal has published approximately three times as many pieces on Iron-Age coins as on Roman coins and, for the sake of a comparison with a series from a different period, twice as many on the coins of Charles I. The coinages of the peoples of Britain before the Roman conquest are fairly represented, as are the various coinages of medieval and later Britain, whereas the Romans seem, to have been given the cold shoulder.2 On the face of it, the under-representation of studies on Roman coinage which, after all, was more voluminous in quantity than any other in circulation within Britain before or since for a thousand years or more, is somewhat startling. Yet perhaps this should not come as too much of a surprise. This is, after all, a journal of a soci- ety whose object is 'the . promotion of . the study of the coins, medals and tokens of the peo- ples of the British Isles . .'. According to one view of the British past, this counts our Celtic ancestors in and the Roman invaders out. The problem is that this view is about as old as the Society itself. The prevailing idea of 'British' history around 1900 did tend to exclude the Romans from its story. They came, saw and conquered, provisionally in 55 BC under Julius Caesar, then again rather more permanently in AD 43, and sailed away in AD 410 just in time for the fall of Rome. The Romans were regarded as a foreign power ruling over the British, rather than as per- manent settlers who contributed to the peopling of Britain. (Not surprisingly perhaps, late Victorian Britons tended to imagine that the Romans lived separately from their British subjects in much the same ways as they themselves tended to keep apart from their African and Indian sub- jects.) The Romans were thus held to be different from Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans, in that they had left no genetic inheritance and, therefore, had exerted no lasting influence on the development of the British character, of which the historical origins and development were the focus of much attention in the period of Britain's imperial zenith. A key text in this regard is Matthew Arnold's Study of Celtic Literature, published in 1867, in which Arnold analyses the national character of the Britons as though it were an alloy of different historic elements - Celtic, Anglo-Saxon and Norman - and attributes different aspects of it to each of these constituent parts. The Romans are notably, and characteristically, absent from this compound (except indirectly via the Normans). Very few in late nineteenth-century Britain regarded the Romans as even part- ancestors of the British.3 This view of the Romans would receive its first major critique at around the same time as the foundation of the British Numismatic Society. In 1906 Francis Haverfield first published his ground-breaking work entitled The Romanization of Roman Britain, in which he set out a very different view of Roman Britain, according to which the Britons became thoroughly, though not 1 I am grateful to Richard Abdy, Roger Bland, Andrew Burnett, Clive Cheesman, Peter Guest, Colin Haselgrove, Richard Hingley, Richard Hobbs, Philip de Jersey, Michael Morse and Richard Reece for their many helpful comments on this paper. 2 Figures taken from Contents of the British Numismatic Journal, volumes 1 to 66 (1903/4-1996) (edited by R.H. Thompson, London, 1996). Later volumes do not substantially alter the picture. 3 But see R. Hingley, Roman Officers and English Gentlemen (London, 2000), who argues that this attitude was beginning to gain ground in the late nineteenth century. IRON-AGE AND ROMAN COINS 45 uniformly, imbued with Roman culture, and essentially became Roman in the course of centuries of interaction and participation in the life of the Roman Empire.4 This set Romano-British studies off in a completely new direction, such that to R.G. Collingwood, writing in 1924, the old view already seemed crude and dated.5 However, it has left its mark and is arguably still with us to this day. Insofar as the general public still has commonly held misconceptions about the British past, the idea of the Romans leaving Britain en masse to go back to Italy in 410 is, I would suggest, prominent among them. It is the persistence of this dated view of the Romans in Britain that best explains their absence from the pages of Britain's numismatic journal over the twentieth century. The fault does not lie solely with the successive editors of the Journal. Classicists have, after all, tended to gravitate towards the Numismatic Chronicle, the Journal of Roman Studies or, more recently, to Britannia. Harold Mattingly, perhaps the greatest British Roman numismatist of the twentieth century, did not publish a single article in BNJ, although he submitted many reports to the Chronicle on Roman coin hoards from Britain. This is all by way of introduction. Nevertheless, it is telling how deep and lasting a mark was left on the character of the Journal by views of British history that were prevalent in the years around the birth of the Society. Quite apart from the spat over Andrew's article in the Chronicle for 1901 which caused the initial secession, there was clearly something nationalist about the intentions of the Society's founding fathers, which was expressed as concern over the neglect among British numismatists of their great numismatic heritage. There was also clearly something imperialist, as evidenced by the inclusion within the Society's range of interests of the numismat- ics of the Commonwealth, the United States of America, and their various subject territories. So wrote the first President of the Society, Carlyon-Britton, in his introduction to the first volume of the Journal: The explanation [of the general want of appreciation of British Numismatics] must be that the true interest, worth and significance of British Numismatics have hitherto not been made known to the general public. The science has been tied up in the hands of those who have devoted their energies to the elucidation of the money of any pal- try state, rather than face the historical importance of the great coinage of Britain, which in the making of its sov- ereign, as the standard currency of the world, has made its Empire and its trade of to-day. But for the efforts of a few private individuals, the pages relating to British Numismatics would be chiefly con- spicuous by their absence. This it is confidently trusted will, in course of time, be remedied by the volumes of this Journal, for no other country has hitherto shown such indifference to the knowledge of its own money.6 The tone is unmistakably that of the frustrated, insular antiquarian chaffing at what appeared as the excessively cosmopolitan interests of his contemporaries, and is made all the more obvious by the tendentiousness of his remarks.7 But it was not untypical of the times. In the years before the outbreak of the First World War the increasingly tense international situation and the obvious decline of Britain's supremacy in world affairs, despite the apparent pre-eminence of the Empire, led to an ever more shrill note of nationalist patriotism in public discourse and, in the world of antiquarianism and the arts, a growing concern for the preservation and protection of Britain's national heritage from foreign acquisition, and for the raising of its profile in the public mind. The National Trust was founded in 1895, followed soon after by the British Academy in 1902 'for the Promotion of Historical, Philosophical and Philological Studies', and the National Art Collections Fund in 1903 by a group of enthusiasts who were determined to save works of art for British pub- lic collections.8 The foundation of the British Numismatic Society in the same year can be seen as another example of these trends at the turn of the century. These in turn seem also to have led to the imbalance in the amount of space devoted within the pages of its journal to the subjects of this chapter, British Iron-Age and Roman coins, to which I shall now turn. 4 First published in Proceedings of the British Academy 2 (1906), 185-217, and later reissued in an expanded version as a book. For a recent study of Haverfield's influence on Roman studies, see R. Hingley, as in n. 3. 5 R.G. Collingwood Roman Britain (Oxford. 1924). pp. 11-12 6 P.W.P. Carlyon-Britton. 'Introduction: British Numismatics',BNJ 1 (1903-4), 1-8, at pp. 7-8. 7 See the discussion in R.A.G. Carson, A History of the Royal Numismatic Society (London, 1986), pp. 20-24. 8 I am grateful to Neil MacGregor for this information. 46 IRON-AGE AND ROMAN COINS The Iron Age In 1903 the only authoritative works on Iron-Age coins, or Ancient British coins as they were then generally known, were those of Sir John Evans: his Coins of the Ancient Britons (1864) and its Supplement (1890).9 Evans (1823-1908) was a remarkable polymath among whose many interests numismatics was not the most prominent. A Fellow of the Royal Society, he researched into ques- tions of water supply and aquiferous strata and was President of the Royal Geological Society from 1874 to 1876 and of the Society of Antiquaries, in addition to his long presidency of the (Royal) Numismatic Society, which lasted from 1874 to 1908.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Architecture, Style and Structure in the Early Iron Age in Central Europe
    TOMASZ GRALAK ARCHITECTURE, STYLE AND STRUCTURE IN THE EARLY IRON AGE IN CENTRAL EUROPE Wrocław 2017 Reviewers: prof. dr hab. Danuta Minta-Tworzowska prof. dr hab. Andrzej P. Kowalski Technical preparation and computer layout: Natalia Sawicka Cover design: Tomasz Gralak, Nicole Lenkow Translated by Tomasz Borkowski Proofreading Agnes Kerrigan ISBN 978-83-61416-61-6 DOI 10.23734/22.17.001 Uniwersytet Wrocławski Instytut Archeologii © Copyright by Uniwersytet Wrocławski and author Wrocław 2017 Print run: 150 copies Printing and binding: "I-BIS" Usługi Komputerowe, Wydawnictwo S.C. Andrzej Bieroński, Przemysław Bieroński 50-984 Wrocław, ul. Sztabowa 32 Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER I. THE HALLSTATT PERIOD 1. Construction and metrology in the Hallstatt period in Silesia .......................... 13 2. The koine of geometric ornaments ......................................................................... 49 3. Apollo’s journey to the land of the Hyperboreans ............................................... 61 4. The culture of the Hallstatt period or the great loom and scales ....................... 66 CHAPTER II. THE LA TÈNE PERIOD 1. Paradigms of the La Tène style ................................................................................ 71 2. Antigone and the Tyrannicides – the essence of ideological change ................. 101 3. The widespread nature of La Tène style ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coin Inscriptions and the Origins of Writing in Pre-Roman Britain1 Jonathan Williams
    COIN INSCRIPTIONS AND THE ORIGINS OF WRITING IN PRE-ROMAN BRITAIN1 JONATHAN WILLIAMS Introduction THE subject of writing in pre-Roman Britain has, until recently, been the object of curious neglect among archaeologists and historians. One simple reason for this is that there is not very much of it in evidence. There are no lapidary inscriptions, and only a few, short graffiti and other scraps of evidence (on which see more below). Contrast this with the situation after the Roman conquest, and the overwhelming impression is that pre-Roman Britain was essentially a pre-literate society, and that writing was brought to Britain by the Romans. And yet there is the not inconsiderable corpus of coin legends from pre-Roman Britain which, if allowed to do so, might seem to tell a rather different story. The object of this paper is to see what kind of story that might be. It has always been a major blind-spot of numismatists, and increasingly archaeologists too since they stopped reading ancient texts, that they tend not to think very much about coin legends other than as a key to attributing the coin to a particular tribe, city or ruler. One result of this is that it seems to have gone more or less unremarked upon in most treatments of late iron-age Britain that the coin legends that appear on the coins in the late first century BC are the first, and by far the largest, body of evidence for the introduction of writing into these islands and of its uses in the pre-Roman period.
    [Show full text]
  • Celtic Coins and Their Archetypes
    Celtic Coins and their Archetypes The Celts dominated vast parts of Europe from the beginning of the 5th century BC. On their campaigns they clashed with the Etruscans, the Romans and the Greeks, they fought as mercenaries under Philip II and Alexander the Great. On their campaigns the Celts encountered many exotic things – coins, for instance. From the beginning of the 3rd century, the Celts started to strike their own coins Initially, their issued were copies of Greek, Roman and other money. Soon, however, the Celts started to modify the Greek and Roman designs according to their own taste and fashion. By sheer abstraction they managed to transform foreign models into typically Celtic artworks, which are often almost modern looking. 1 von 27 www.sunflower.ch Kingdom of Macedon, Alexander III the Great (336-323 BC) in the Name of Philip II, Stater, c. 324 BC, Colophon Denomination: Stater Mint Authority: King Alexander III of Macedon Mint: Colophon Year of Issue: -324 Weight (g): 8.6 Diameter (mm): 19.0 Material: Gold Owner: Sunflower Foundation Through decades of warfare, King Philip II had turned Macedon into the leading power of the Greek world. In the summer of 336 BC he was assassinated, however, and succeeded by his son Alexander, who would later be known as "the Great." This coin was minted one year before Alexander's death. It bears a beautiful image of Apollo. The coin is a so-called Philip's stater, as Alexander's father Philip had already issued them for diplomatic purposes (bribery thus) and for the pay of his mercenaries.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Roman Frontier1
    Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Impact of Empire Roman Empire, c. 200 B.C.–A.D. 476 Edited by Olivier Hekster (Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) Editorial Board Lukas de Blois Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt Elio Lo Cascio Michael Peachin John Rich Christian Witschel VOLUME 21 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/imem Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Edited by Daniëlle Slootjes and Michael Peachin LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016036673 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 1572-0500 isbn 978-90-04-32561-6 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-32675-0 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxons
    Anglo-Saxons Plated disc brooch Kent, England Late 6th or early 7th century AD Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Anglo-Saxons Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: The Franks Casket Gallery activity: Personal adornment Gallery activity: Design and decoration Gallery activity: Anglo-Saxon jobs Gallery activity: Material matters After your visit Follow-up activities Anglo-Saxons Before your visit Anglo-Saxons Before your visit Background information The end of Roman Britain The Roman legions began to be withdrawn from Britain to protect other areas of the empire from invasion by peoples living on the edge of the empire at the end of the fourth century AD. Around AD 407 Constantine III, a claimant for the imperial throne based in Britain, led the troops from Britain to Gaul in an attempt to secure control of the Western Roman Empire. He failed and was killed in Gaul in AD 411. This left the Saxon Shore forts, which had been built by the Romans to protect the coast from attacks by raiding Saxons, virtually empty and the coast of Britain open to attack. In AD 410 there was a devastating raid on the undefended coasts of Britain and Gaul by Saxons raiders. Imperial governance in Britain collapsed and although aspects of Roman Britain continued after AD 410, Britain was no longer part of the Roman empire and saw increased settlement by Germanic people, particularly in the northern and eastern regions of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Gifts, Goods and Money
    Gifts, Goods and Money Gifts, Goods and Money: Comparing currency and circulation systems in past societies explores and Hofmann (eds) Brandherm, Heymans the economic and social roles of exchange systems in past societies from a variety of different perspectives. Based on a broad range of individual case studies, the authors tackle problems Comparing currency and circulation systems surrounding the identification of (premonetary) currencies in the archaeological record. These concern the part played by weight measurement systems in their development, the changing role of objects as they shift between different spheres of exchange, e.g. from gifts in past societies to commodities, as well as wider issues regarding the role of exchange networks as agents of social and economic change. Among the specific questions the papers address is what happens when new objects of value are introduced into a system, or when existing objects go out of use, as well as how exchange systems react to events such as crises or the emergence of new polities and social constellations. One theme that unites most of the papers is the tension between what is introduced from the outside and changes that are driven by social transformations within a given group. Dirk Brandherm studied Archaeology, Classics and Social Anthropology at the universities of Münster, Edinburgh and Freiburg. Most of his work has been in European Bronze and Iron Age archaeology, with one focus on metalwork production and depositional practices. He currently holds a position of Lecturer at Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland. Elon Heymans studied archaeology at the University of Amsterdam and at Tel Aviv University.
    [Show full text]
  • IG II2 2325, Divided Here Into Published by Peppas-Delmousou in 1977
    CHAPTER FOUR THE VICTORS LISTS: IG II2 2325A–H The inscriptions conventionally referred to as appears in IG II2; two additional fragments were the Victors Lists (IG II2 2325, divided here into published by Peppas-Delmousou in 1977. Our eight separate parts, which we label A–H) are reconstruction also incorporates SEG XLVIII 183, preserved on 43 fragments of a set of architrave which has not previously been associated with blocks of white “Pentelic” marble.1 Köhler (1878) this monument. 241 reported that most of the fragments known What must be the exterior face of fr. q of IG II2 to him had been found on the south slope of the 2325 preserves the badly battered remains of a Acropolis, a circumstance that has generally been commemorative agonistic inscription (IG II2 3080) taken to suggest that the building to which the for a year in which Deinon of Aegina (Stephanis blocks belonged stood in the sacred precinct of #590, where the inscription is mistakenly cited Dionysus. There can in any case be no question as “IG II2 308”) served as the pipe-player for the of any connection with the wall or structure on victorious tribe in the boys’ dithyramb, sc. at the which IG II2 2318 was inscribed, which dates to City Dionysia.3 Deinon is known to have com- the mid-340s BCE or earlier and probably stood peted in a festival in Delphi in either 260/59 or somewhere on the Acropolis.2 39 fragments of 256/5 BCE (SGDI 2563.28 = Nachtergael, Galates the Victors Lists were known in Kirchner’s time no.
    [Show full text]
  • Uvic Thesis Template
    The Transformation of Administrative Towns in Roman Britain by Lara Bishop BA, Saint Mary‟s University, 1997 MA, University of Wales Cardiff, 2001 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Lara Bishop, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The Transformation of Administrative Towns in Roman Britain by Lara Bishop BA, Saint Mary‟s University, 1997 MA, University of Wales Cardiff, 2001 Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Supervisor Dr. J. Geoffrey Kron, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Supervisor Dr. J. Geoffrey Kron, (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Departmental Member The purpose of this thesis is to determine whether the Roman administrative towns of Britain continued in their original Romanized form as seen in the second century AD, or were altered in their appearance and function in the fourth and fifth century, with a visible reduction in their urbanization and Romanization. It will be argued that British town life did change significantly. Major components of urbanization were disrupted with the public buildings disused or altered for other purposes, and the reduction or cessation of public services. A reduction in the population of the towns can be perceived in the eventual disuse of the extramural cemeteries and abandonment of substantial areas of settlement or possibly entire towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Pick-Up Cabins Price List and Equipment Versions // 01/2020 En Trail/Box 200 Trail/Box 220 /230 /230S Trail/Box 240 Trail/Box 250 / 275S
    PICK-UP CABINS PRICE LIST AND EQUIPMENT VERSIONS // 01/2020 EN TRAIL/BOX 200 TRAIL/BOX 220 /230 /230S TRAIL/BOX 240 TRAIL/BOX 250 / 275S MOTOR HOME CABIN kg EUR MOTOR HOME CABIN kg EUR MOTOR HOME CABIN kg EUR MOTOR HOME CABIN kg EUR BOX 200 empty cabin --- 14,857.00 BOX 220 / 230 / 230S empty cabin --- 15,678.00 BOX 240 empty cabin --- 15,800.00 BOX 250 with equipment 699.00 33,400.00 TRAIL 200 empty cabin --- 16,243.00 TRAIL 220 / 230 / 230S empty cabin --- 17,064.00 TRAIL 240 empty cabin --- 17,186.00 BOX 275S with equipment 741.00 33,677.00 BOX 200 with equipment 542.00 24,623.00 BOX 220 with equipment 625.00 31,719.00 BOX 240 with equipment 648.00 31,900.00 TRAIL 250 with equipment 717.00 35,648.00 TRAIL 200 with equipment 560.00 26,871.00 BOX 230 / 230S with equipment 635.00 31,900.00 TRAIL 240 with equipment 666.00 34,148.00 TRAIL 275S with equipment 759.00 35,924.00 Surcharge for use on a Land Rover --- 1,310.00 TRAIL 220 with equipment 643.00 33,967.00 Surcharge for use on a Land Rover --- 1,310.00 Surcharge for use on 8 ft truck bed --- 3,288.00 TRAIL 230 / 230S with equipment 653.00 34,148.00 EMPTY CABINS Modern sandwich construction technique with accessible roof Stove-enamelled, smooth aluminium outer skin Crank supports with plastic washers Rear light support with lights Windows, door with safety lock 12 V connection with 13-pin connector PVC flooring and interior panelling Aluminium swivel table (except for TRAIL/BOX 280/280S) Not included: roof covers, storage compartment flaps and interior fittings TRAIL/BOX 260/ 260S/
    [Show full text]
  • Diocletian's Palace at Split in Light of Sasanian Palace Design
    CHAPTER 11 Rival Powers, Rival Images: Diocletian’s Palace at Split in Light of Sasanian Palace Design Anne Hunnell Chen It is well known that the third century AD saw intense and prolonged conflict between the Romans and their eastern neighbors, the Sasanian Persians.1 What has often remained unrecognized, however, is the Roman court’s poignant use of visual media—both architectural and iconographical—to counter Sasanian claims of superiority on the world stage in this period.2 In particular, a signifi- cant parallel between the ideologically charged palatial spaces built in the two realms has remained overlooked due in large part to our conditioned way of viewing the fortified imperial palaces that began to appear in the eastern part of the Roman Empire in the late third century. Entrenched ideas about one of the touchstone monuments of the late Roman period, Diocletian’s palace at Split, located on the modern Croatian coast, have shaped the discussion of comparable, contemporary imperial resi- dences discovered in the last forty years at Šarkamen and Gamzigrad in east- ern Serbia. For this reason, a fresh look at Diocletian’s palace, informed by new archaeological data and a theoretical approach sensitive to inter- and trans- cultural perspectives, is necessary. Consideration of the Split residence with reference to comparanda both inside and outside the Roman Empire reveals that the design choices made in Roman palaces from the late third and early fourth centuries AD were part of a concerted effort on the part of late Roman 1 Matthew P. Canepa, The Two Eyes of the Earth: Art and Ritual of Kingship Between Rome and Sasanian Iran (Berkeley, 2009); Jan Willem Drijvers, “Rome and the Sasanid Empire: Confrontation and Coexistence,” in A Companion to Late Antiquity, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • NEMA Standard Dimensions IEC Critical Dimensions
    1-800-ASK-4WEG 1-800-ASK-4WEG Sales After Hours Sales Select after hours option 1-800-839-2529 1-877-WEG-DRIV Warranty Drives Tech Support NEMA Standard Dimensions IEC Critical Dimensions Frames 143T to 444/5T Frames 445/7T to 586/7T Frame 588/9T C Flange B5 Flange (FF) WEG W22 Terminal Box WEG W22 Terminal Box Reference Reference D Flange B14 Flange (C-DIN) This drawing is not representative of all frame sizes. It is used as a dimension guide This drawing is not representative of all frame sizes. It is used as a dimension guide only. only. Dimension C, O, P and all Terminal Box dimensions are specific to WEG W22 General Purpose Motors. Dimension L is specific to WEG W22 IEC General Purpose Metric Motors. Dimensions in inches WARRANTY Dimensions in millimeters inches SHAFT “C” FLANGE DIMENSIONS “D” FLANGE DIMENSIONS Shaft B5 Flange (FF) Dimensions B14 Flange (C-DIN) Dimensions NEMA MOUNTING KEYWAY TERMINAL BOX BEARINGS Frame A AC B C L ABCDGJOKPT EXTENSION d1 BF BF DE Flange M N P Flange M N P Frames BA AJ AK BD BB BC AH BA AJ AK BD BB 100 125 80 40 11 23 216 115 95 140 75 60 90 2E 2F H BA S R ES N-W U AB HB HF HG HH HK LL LM AA D.E. N.D.E NUMBER TAP SIZE NUMBER TAP SIZE FF-115 C-90 63 3.937 4.921 3.150 0.433 0.433 0.906 8.504 4.528 3.740 5.512 2.953 2.362 3.543 143T 4.000 5.157 12.346 4.250 2.250(A) UNC 112 141 90 45 14 30 248 130 110 160 85 70 105 5.500 0.344 2.250 6.457 3.500 0.354 1.437 7.122 7.047 - 0.187 0.765 1.575 2.250 0.875 6.181 1.728 3.500 2.638 4.527 4.094 NPT3/4" 6205 ZZ 6204 ZZ 5.875 4.500 6.500 0.156 2.125 2.250 71 FF-130
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of Trace Element and Isotopic Analyses to the Study of Celtic Gold Coins and Their Metal Sources
    The Application of Trace Element and Isotopic Analyses to the Study of Celtic Gold Coins and their Metal Sources. Chris Bendall Johann Wolfgang Goethe University-Frankfurt 2003 The Application of Trace Element and Isotopic Analyses to the Study of Celtic Gold Coins and their Metal Sources. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften vorgelegt beim Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt am Main Von Chris Bendall Oxford Frankfurt (2003) ii vom Fachberiech Geowissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität als Dissertation angenommen Dekan: Gutachter: Datum der Disputation: iii I would firstly like to thank those people and institutions which provided coins and gold samples for analysis, they include: Celtic coins: S. Berger; Historisches Museum, Frankfurt Dr. K.-J. Gilles; Rheinisches Landesmuseum, Trier Johan van Heesch;Cabinet des Medailles, Biblioteque Royale, Brussels Gino Languini; Wallendorf Francois Reinert, M.A. ; Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art, Luxemburg Dr. David Wigg-Wolf ; Fundmünzen der Antike, Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Universität (Includes the coins excavated from the Martberg, Sanctuary site) Gold Samples: Bruno van Eerdenbrugh; Belgium Dr. Beda Hofmann; Naturisches Museum Bern, Switzerland Werner Störk; AG Minifossi, Stuttgart Secondly, I would like to thank everyone within the Institute of Mineralogy, Uni- Frankfurt, who have all helped in one way or another to make the study possible. And last but not least my beautiful family Adi and Avi who are
    [Show full text]