2 0 0 Jt COPYRIGHT This Is a Thesis Accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 0 0 Jt COPYRIGHT This Is a Thesis Accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS Degree Year Name of Author 2 0 0 jT COPYRIGHT This is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London. It is an unpublished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide by the Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOAN Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the University Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the premises of those libraries. Application should be made to: The Theses Section, University of London Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the University of London Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962. Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The University Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962- 1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 - 1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied. This thesis comes within category D. <— This copy has been deposited in the Library of This copy has been deposited in the University of London Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. C:\Documents and Settings\lproctor.ULL\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK36\Copyright - thesis.doc Disagreeable Objects: The Sculptural Strategies of Louise Bourgeois by Catherine Margaret Burge Thesis submitted for the examination of Doctor of Philosophy University College London September 2004 UMI Number: U592654 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592654 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract This thesis explores Louise Bourgeois’ practice as a matrix of strategies, and is positioned in opposition to the psycho-biographical approach that has dominated writing about Bourgeois’ art. I take Giacometti’s title at its most literal: that the object may disagree with the discourse around it. Chapter one places Bourgeois in her moment of the 1940s to historicize an artist who is seen as out-of-time and to explore her early strategies. Chapter two considers Bourgeois’ studio as an alternative site for meaning in her work. Her studio strategies can be seen to be at once invisible, dominated by her personality and biography and yet simultaneously central to the curatorial and commercial activities. Bourgeois’ narratives, that dominate our understanding of her work, are discovered to operate mythically (Midgley). I interrogate the status of Bourgeois’ words and her self-images in relation to her objects. I suggest that they exist in a complex relationship to the sculptures, slipping between context and sculptural intervention. Consequently, there are moments when it can be argued that even Bourgeois’ body is a part of her work. Hence, I undermine the art-life trajectory, not by separating the artist from the work, through the expressive fallacy and the critique of authorship, but by paying close attention to the blurring between life and art. The inevitable conclusion is that, in a very real sense, the art may be producing the life. My final chapter investigates how Bourgeois’ objects co-opt the audience as one’s peripatesis becomes a walk into her environments and in some cases one substitutes for the sculptural symbolic object. Concluding with Bourgeois’ most recent work I ask if her most well known art of recent years is best understood in terms of her aging and examine how understanding an aging subjectivity may alter our perception of Bourgeois’ work. 1 Table of Contents Abstract 1 Table of Contents 2 List of Plates 3-7 Introduction 8-43 1 Complete Shutdown: Strategies of Engagement 44-81 2 Shop talk: Developing Strategies of Practice and Mythmaking 82-113 3 Bourgeois Truth: Strategies in Interviews and Images 114-150 4 Vanishing Memory: Reflecting upon the Present and the Past 151-176 Concluding Remarks 177-179 Plates 180-266 Bibliography 267-281 Acknowledgements 282 2 List of Plates 1. Alberto Giacometti, Disagreeable Object (1931) plaster (10.4 x 49.3 x 15 cm) Musee d’art Moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris Photo: Renst Scheidegger, Neue Zurcher Zeitung 2. Fallen Woman (1981) marble (8.3 x 10.2 x 34.3 cm) collection of the artist Photo: courtesy of Louise Bourgeois Studio 3. Max Ernst, Lunar Asparagus (1935) plaster (165.5 cm) The Museum of Modern Art New York 4. Morning (1944) drypoint, third state of six states (8.8 x 6.3 cm) Photo: Kate Keller, The Museum of Modern Art, New York 5. Easton (1940/1) drypoint, third state of three states (19.1 x 12.6 cm) Photo: David Allison 6. Natural History (1944) oil on canvas (30.5 x 45.7 cm) private collection, New York Photo: Max Rayner, New York 7. Connecticutiana (1944-5) oil on wood (28.0 x 106.7 cm) private collection, New York Photo: Donald Greenhaus, courtesy of Max Hutchinson Gallery 8. Adolph Gottlieb, Pictograph 4 (1943) oil on canvas (89.5 x 58.1 cm) Adolph and Ester Gottlieb Foundation, Inc., New York Photo: Geoffrey Clements 9. Untitled (1946-7) oil on linen (68.6 x 114.3 cm) private collection, New York Photo: Donald Greenhaus, courtesy of Max Hutchinson Gallery 10. Roof Song (1947) oil on linen (53.3 x 78.7 cm) The Grenoble collection of Mr. And Mrs. Eugene P. Gorman, New York Photo: Allan Finkelman, courtesy Robert Miller Gallery, New York 11 .H e Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 1 , alternative titles, La Maison Solitaire and One Figure (1946-7) a suite of nine engravings with text (25.3 x 35.5 cm) Courtesy Cheim and Read, New York Photo: Eeva Inkeri 12. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 2, alternative titles, Abandoned Skyscrapers, Les Maisons Solitaires and Two Figures 13. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 3, alternative titles, Three Figures and New York (USA) 14. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 4, alternative titles, Steel Structure and The Solitary Death of the Woolworth Building 15. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 5 ’ alternative title, Porte Tableau 16. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 6, alternative title, Leprosarium, Louisiana 17. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 7, alternative title, Two Personages 18. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 8, alternative titles, The Prisoner, Ghost Ladders and Ghosts 19. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, plate 9, alternative titles, The Hudson River, The Gentle Revenge of the Hudson River and Flood: le Gratte d e l 20. He Disappeared into Complete Silence, alternative plate, alternative title, Ceiling Floating’ 21. Louise Bourgeois Recent Work 1947-49: Seventeen Standing Figures in Wood, installation view, Peridot Gallery, New York (1949) Photo: Jeremiah Russell 3 22. Louise Bourgeois, Sculptures, installation view Peridot Gallery, New York (1950) Photo: H. Messer, courtesy of Robert Miller Gallery New York 23. Femme Maison (Woman House) (1946-47) oil and ink on linen (91.4 x 35.6 cm) the Grenoble collection of Mr. and Mrs. Eugene P. Gorman, New York Photo: Donald Greenhaus, courtesy of Max Hutchinson Gallery 24. A visitor greeting Mason’s Mannequin at the opening of the 1938 Surrealist Exhibition News photo from Paris Soir reprinted in Martica Sawin Surrealism In Exile p. 5 25. Janus Fleurie (1968) bronze (25.7 x 31.8 x 21.2 cm) Robert Miller Gallery, New York Photo: Peter Bellamy 26. Double Negative (1963) latex over plaster (49.1 x 94.9 x 79.6 cm) Galerie Lelong, Zurich Photo: Zindman/Fremont 27. Installation view of Eccentric Abstraction, 1966 Fischbach Gallery papers, Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution 28. Fold detail (1964), plaster and latex. Photo: courtesy of Louise Bourgeois Studio 29. Lair (1962-3) plaster (46 x 74.9 x 59.6 cm) Photo: Rudolph Burckhardt 30. Fee Couturiere (1963) gypsum cement (100.3 x 57.2 cm) Rober Miller Gallery, New York Photo: Steve Sloman, New York 31. Fee Couturiere (1963) detail Photo: Steve Sloman, New York 32. Portrait (1963) latex (39 x 31.5 x 10.5 cm) The Museum of Modern Art, New York, gift of Arthur Drexler Photo: Peter Bellamy 33. Le Regard (1967) latex and fabric (12.7 x 39.3 x 36.8 cm) Robert Miller Gallery, New York Photo: Peter Bellamy 34. Solo Exhibition Stable Gallery (1964) Photo: Rudolph Burckhardt 35. Spiral Summer ( 1960) plaster (approx. 25.5 x 53.3 cm) Photo: Rudolph Burckhardt 36. Life Flower 1 (1960) plaster (57.1 X 86.3 X 58.4 cm) Photo: Rudolph Burckhardt 37. Untitled (1954) painted wood (162.5 cm) Robert Miller Gallery, New York Photo: Peter Moore 38. 20th Street studio (late 1960s) Photo: Peter Moore 39.
Recommended publications
  • The Creative Arts at Brandeis by Karen Klein
    The Creative Arts at Brandeis by Karen Klein The University’s early, ardent, and exceptional support for the arts may be showing signs of a renaissance. If you drive onto the Brandeis campus humanities, social sciences, and in late March or April, you will see natural sciences. Brandeis’s brightly colored banners along the “significant deviation” was to add a peripheral road. Their white squiggle fourth area to its core: music, theater denotes the Creative Arts Festival, 10 arts, fine arts. The School of Music, days full of drama, comedy, dance, art Drama, and Fine Arts opened in 1949 exhibitions, poetry readings, and with one teacher, Erwin Bodky, a music, organized with blessed musician and an authority on Bach’s persistence by Elaine Wong, associate keyboard works. By 1952, several Leonard dean of arts and sciences. Most of the pioneering faculty had joined the Leonard Bernstein, 1952 work is by students, but some staff and School of Creative Arts, as it came to faculty also participate, as well as a be known, and concentrations were few outside artists: an expert in East available in the three areas. All Asian calligraphy running a workshop, students, however, were required to for example, or performances from take some creative arts and according MOMIX, a professional dance troupe. to Sachar, “we were one of the few The Wish-Water Cycle, brainchild of colleges to include this area in its Robin Dash, visiting scholar/artist in requirements. In most established the Humanities Interdisciplinary universities, the arts were still Program, transforms the Volen Plaza struggling to attain respectability as an into a rainbow of participants’ wishes academic discipline.” floating in bowls of colored water: “I wish poverty was a thing of the past,” But at newly founded Brandeis, the “wooden spoons and close friends for arts were central to its mission.
    [Show full text]
  • National Endowment for the Arts Annual Report 1982
    Nat]onal Endowment for the Arts National Endowment for the Arts Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. President: I have the honor to submit to you the Annual Report of the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Council on the Arts for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1982. Respectfully, F. S. M. Hodsoll Chairman The President The White House Washington, D.C. March 1983 Contents Chairman’s Statement 3 The Agency and Its Functions 6 The National Council on the Arts 7 Programs 8 Dance 10 Design Arts 30 Expansion Arts 46 Folk Arts 70 Inter-Arts 82 International 96 Literature 98 Media Arts: Film/Radio/Television 114 Museum 132 Music 160 Opera-Musical Theater 200 Theater 210 Visual Arts 230 Policy, Planning and Research 252 Challenge Grants 254 Endowment Fellows 259 Research 261 Special Constituencies 262 Office for Partnership 264 Artists in Education 266 State Programs 272 Financial Summary 277 History of Authorizations and Appropriations 278 The descriptions of the 5,090 grants listed in this matching grants, advocacy, and information. In 1982 Annual Report represent a rich variety of terms of public funding, we are complemented at artistic creativity taking place throughout the the state and local levels by state and local arts country. These grants testify to the central impor­ agencies. tance of the arts in American life and to the TheEndowment’s1982budgetwas$143million. fundamental fact that the arts ate alive and, in State appropriations from 50 states and six special many cases, flourishing, jurisdictions aggregated $120 million--an 8.9 per­ The diversity of artistic activity in America is cent gain over state appropriations for FY 81.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary American Painting and Sculpture
    AT UR8ANA-GHAMPAIGN ARCHITECTURE The person charging this material is responsible for .ts return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below '"" """"""'"9 "< "ooks are reason, ™racTo?,'l,°;'nary action and tor di,elpl(- may result in dismissal from To renew the ""'*'e™«y-University call Telephone Center, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN I emp^rary American Painting and Sculpture University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1959 Contemporary American Painting and Scuipttfre ^ University of Illinois, Urbana March 1, through April 5, 195 9 Galleries, Architecture Building College of Fine and Applied Arts (c) 1959 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Library of Congress Catalog Card No. A4 8-34 i 75?. A^'-^ PDCEIMtBieiiRr C_>o/"T ^ APCMi.'rri'Ht CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN PAINTING AND SCULPTURE DAVID D. HENRY President of the University ALLEN S. WELLER Dean, College of Fine and Applied Arts Chairman, Festival of Contemporary Arts N. Britsky E. C. Rae W. F. Doolittlc H. A. Schultz EXHIBITION COMMITTEE D. E. Frith J. R. Shipley \'. Donovan, Chairman J. D. Hogan C. E. H. Bctts M. B. Martin P. W. Bornarth N. McFarland G. R. Bradshaw D. C. Miller C. W. Briggs R. Perlman L. R. Chesney L. H. Price STAFF COMMITTEE MEMBERS E. F. DeSoto J. W. Raushenbergcr C. A. Dietemann D. C. Robertson G. \. Foster F. J. Roos C. R. Heldt C. W. Sanders R. Huggins M. A. Sprague R. E. Huh R. A. von Neumann B. M. Jarkson L. M. Woodroofe R. Youngman J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art Show 2018 Press
    DOWNLOAD HI-RES IMAGES AT: HTTP://BIT.LY/2EVIOWJ THE ART SHOW 2018 HIGHLIGHTS 303 GALLERY D8 ALTMAN SIEGEL D20 Mary Heilmann Liam Everett 303 Gallery presents a solo exhibition of Altman Siegel presents a solo booth of new works by Mary Heilmann, whose highly work by Liam Everett. Building on investiga- inventive approach to abstraction has tions explored in his 2017 solo exhibition at made her one of the foremost painters SFMOMA, Everett will present a suite of new of her generation. Recent paintings, glazed paintings that unfold interrelated systems and ceramics and an arrangement of furniture made interpretations of support. Everett’s installation by the artist appear alongside several examples will continue along these investigative threads: in these mediums from previous decades. By jux- the physical act of supporting a painting and taposing new works with historic ones, the exhibition the routine practice an artist undertakes daily, becomes a storyboard, charting the evolution of her as well as pedagogical rituals shaped through practice while allowing visitors to draw parallels across rehearsal. Focused on what he calls “systems time periods. Brightly colored chairs transform the booth of support,” Everett’s framed paintings—like into a social space akin to a living room or the artist’s studio, previous bodies of work—will implicate the floor, inviting viewers to relax and spend time in Heilmann’s world. wall and body, exposing the animate qualities of 1 3 the artworks and affirming his interest in investi- Mary Heilmann. Shadow Cup 2, 1985. Glazed ceramic, 21 ⁄4 × 24 × 1 ⁄4 in. © Mary Heilmann.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hepworth Wakefield's First Sculpture Prize Opens
    PRESS RELEASE Date of issue: 20 October 2016 THE HEPWORTH WAKEFIELD’S FIRST SCULPTURE PRIZE OPENS AS GALLERY PRESENTS ITS MOST AMBITIOUS SHOW EVER An exhibition by the four artists shortlisted for the inaugural Hepworth Prize for Sculpture - Phyllida Barlow, Steven Claydon, Helen Marten and David Medalla – opens at The Hepworth Wakefield on 21 October 2016. The show, which includes new and recent work, is the most ambitious ever mounted by the gallery. The winner of the £30,000 prize will be announced at an award dinner at The Hepworth Wakefield on 17 November 2016. Sculpture is the art form of the moment – and this new Prize aims to demystify contemporary sculpture. Visitors to the exhibition will be encouraged to experience, debate and judge the Prize for themselves. The shortlist is multi-generational and covers the widest range of work in the medium. The Hepworth Prize for Sculpture recognises a British or UK-based artist of any age, at any stage in their career, who has made a significant contribution to the development of contemporary sculpture. The shortlist reflects the wide range of sculptural practice taking place in the UK today. The Prize was created to celebrate the gallery's 5th anniversary during 2016. Significantly, it is named after Barbara Hepworth, one of Britain's greatest sculptors and arguably its most celebrated female artist, who was born and brought up in Wakefield. The Hepworth Wakefield has the largest number of works by the artist on permanent display anywhere in the UK. Sophie Bowness, art historian and granddaughter of Barbara Hepworth, said: "The Hepworth Prize for Sculpture is a fitting legacy to Barbara Hepworth, one of Britain's greatest sculptors, whose career was enhanced through a variety of awards from early in her professional life." The Hepworth Wakefield’s Director, Simon Wallis said: “Britain is home to a long line of great sculptors from Barbara Hepworth, Henry Moore and Anthony Caro and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Tworkov: Becoming Himself
    Jack Tworkov: Becoming Himself By Carter Ratcliff, May 2017 Jack Tworkov developed an acclaimed Abstract Expressionist style and then left it behind, seeking to transcend style and achieve true self­expression through painting. In 1958, the Museum of Modern Art in New York launched one of its most influential exhibitions. Titled “The New American Painting,” it sent works by leading Abstract Expressionists on a tour of eight European cities. Responses were varied. Some Old World critics saw canvases by Jackson Pollock, Barnett Newman, and their colleagues as unnecessarily large and aesthetically naïve. Others acknowledged, with differing degrees of reluctance, that the unfamiliar imagery confronting them was genuinely innovative. A critic in Berlin praised Jack Jack Tworkov, X on Circle in the Square (Q4-81 #2), Tworkov for dispensing 1981, acrylic on canvas, 49 x 45 in.; Courtesy Alexander with ready-made premises Gray Associates, New York © Estate of Jack Tworkov / and assumptions, seeing the Licensed by VAGA, New York, NY world afresh, and painting what is “real.” “The New American Painting” advanced an ambitious hypothesis: the Abstract Expressionists now formed the modernist vanguard. Convinced that they were no less significant than Impressionists or Cubists, the painters themselves had come to this conclusion a decade earlier. No longer American provincials, they had merged personal ambition with historical destiny. with historical destiny. Understandably, then, when an Abstract Expressionist achieved a mature style he—or she, in the cases of Lee Krasner and Joan Mitchell—tended to stay with it. Of course, signature styles evolved over the years. Mark Rothko’s imagery grew darker.
    [Show full text]
  • From the on Inal Document. What Can I Write About?
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 470 655 CS 511 615 TITLE What Can I Write about? 7,000 Topics for High School Students. Second Edition, Revised and Updated. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-5654-1 PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 153p.; Based on the original edition by David Powell (ED 204 814). AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock no. 56541-1659: $17.95, members; $23.95, nonmembers). Tel: 800-369-6283 (Toll Free); Web site: http://www.ncte.org. PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS High Schools; *Writing (Composition); Writing Assignments; *Writing Instruction; *Writing Strategies IDENTIFIERS Genre Approach; *Writing Topics ABSTRACT Substantially updated for today's world, this second edition offers chapters on 12 different categories of writing, each of which is briefly introduced with a definition, notes on appropriate writing strategies, and suggestions for using the book to locate topics. Types of writing covered include description, comparison/contrast, process, narrative, classification/division, cause-and-effect writing, exposition, argumentation, definition, research-and-report writing, creative writing, and critical writing. Ideas in the book range from the profound to the everyday to the topical--e.g., describe a terrible beauty; write a narrative about the ultimate eccentric; classify kinds of body alterations. With hundreds of new topics, the book is intended to be a resource for teachers and students alike. (NKA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the on inal document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art Show 2018 Program Highlights
    The ADAA Announces Program Highlights for the 30th Annual Edition of The Art Show, February 28 – March 4, 2018 The Art Show 2018 Celebrates Three Decades of Partnership Between the ADAA, Henry Street Settlement, and the Park Avenue Armory Eleven Galleries from the Founding 1989 Fair and Many First-time Exhibitors to Showcase Ambitious Solo Shows, Curated Group Presentations, and Never-Before-Seen Works New York, January 17, 2018—The Art Dealers Association of America (ADAA) today announced additional program highlights of the 30th edition of The Art Show, the nation’s longest-running and most respected art fair. Open to the public February 28 – March 4, 2018, The Art Show 2018 marks an unprecedented three decades of partnership between three major cultural organizations, the ADAA, the venerable community nonprofit Henry Street Settlement and New York City’s foremost cross-disciplinary cultural institution, the Park Avenue Armory. Since the fair’s inception, The Art Show has raised nearly $30 million for Henry Street Settlement through fair admission and proceeds from the annual Gala Preview, which kicks off this year’s fair on February 27. AXA Art Americas Corporation, the world’s premier insurance specialist for art and collections, continues its decade-long support of the ADAA and serves for the seventh year as Lead Partner of The Art Show. Organized by the ADAA, a nonprofit membership organization of art dealers across the country, The Art Show 2018 welcomes eleven returning galleries from the first fair in 1989, as well as many first-time exhibitors presenting ambitious solo shows, curated group presentations and never-before-seen works.
    [Show full text]
  • Not for the Uncommitted: the Alliance of Figurative Artists, 1969–1975 By
    Not for the Uncommitted: The Alliance of Figurative Artists, 1969–1975 By Emily D. Markert Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Curatorial Practice California College of the Arts April 22, 2021 Not for the Uncommitted: The Alliance of Figurative Artists, 1969–1975 Emily Markert California College of the Arts 2021 From 1969 through the early 1980s, hundreds of working artists gathered on Manhattan’s Lower East Side every Friday at meetings of the Alliance of Figurative Artists. The art historical canon overlooks figurative art from this period by focusing on a linear progression of modernism towards medium specificity. However, figurative painters persisted on the periphery of the New York art world. The size and scope of the Alliance and the interests of the artists involved expose the popular narrative of these generative decades in American art history to be a partial one promulgated by a few powerful art critics and curators. This exploration of the early years of the Alliance is divided into three parts: examining the group’s structure and the varied yet cohesive interests of eleven key artists; situating the Alliance within the contemporary New York arts landscape; and highlighting the contributions women artists made to the Alliance. Keywords: Post-war American art, figurative painting, realism, artist-run galleries, exhibitions history, feminist art history, second-wave feminism Acknowledgments and Dedication I would foremost like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their support and guidance. I am grateful to Jez Flores-García, my thesis advisor, for encouraging rigorous and thoughtful research and for always making time to discuss my ideas and questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf Stream
    The Gulf Stream During those long war years, the cafeteria was our hangout evenings and nights. Sometimes though, we would just adjourn for a walk. Our walks would follow closely an itinerary of favorite streets. We started and ended always at the cafeteria. First we would walk east on Eighth Street passing the Hofmann School. On the corner of Eighth and Macdougal was the Jumble Shop restaurant. It was most active at lunchtime with art people from the Whitney Museum, which was in the middle of Eighth Street. [The building is now occupied by the New York Studio School.] The Whitney was an art group somewhat detached from us. Through the large windows of the Jumble Shop we would see on some evenings the cubist painter Stuart Davis talking away and Arshile Gorky waving his arms and stroking his long mustache. With them, especially when they were at the bar, were important-looking people. Maybe collectors. Very often they were Gorky’s own coterie—Raoul Hague, the sculptor, and Emanuel Navaretta, the poet. In later years, Emanuel and his wife Cynthia hosted a weekly open house for poets and writers, where Gorky was a regular. Or taking a left on Fifth Avenue to Fourteenth Street, then right on University Place and back to the park and Washington Square Arch, and across to Sullivan and MacDougal Streets, and another block further down on MacDougal Street we would go to the San Remo restaurant. Around this area in little Italy were various cafés and restaurants. Wandering here and there and stopping now and then, we zigzagged Sullivan and Thompson Streets, crossing and re-crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • (OPENING) Another Energy: Power to Continue Challenging
    ANOTHER ENERGY Press Release vol.2 APRIL 21, 2021 (OPENING) Another Energy: Power to Continue Challenging - 16 Women Artists from around the World APRIL 22 [THU] - SEPTEMBER 26 [SUN], 2021 MORI ART MUSEUM [53F, ROPPONGI HILLS MORI TOWER] AGED 71 to 105, ALL ACTIVE AND BUSY AT WORK! The Mori Art Museum, Tokyo, is proud to present Another Energy: Power to Continue Challenging - 16 Women Artists from around the World from Thursday, April 22 to Sunday, September 26, 2021. Recent years have witnessed growing moves worldwide to right inequalities around aspects of identity such as gender, race, ethnicity, and beliefs, and attach greater value to diversity. Also in contemporary art for the past decade or so, attention has turned increasingly to female artists who began their contemporary art careers between the 1950s and 1970s and continue to stay active as artists today. Another Energy focuses on 16 of these female artists in their 70s or older, from across the globe, who continue to embark on new challenges. Ranging in ages 71-105 with their careers spanning over 50 years, they are originally from 14 different countries, and equally diverse in their current locations. Nonetheless, what these women share regardless of recognition or evaluation by art museums and the art market is a determination to pursue their own distinctive creative paths in turbulent environment and times. Showcasing their wide array of powerful works from paintings, video, sculptures, to large-scale installations and performances, about 130 works to total, this exhibition contemplates the nature of the special strength or what one may call the driving force - “ another energy ” - of these artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcnay ART MUSEUM 2013 | 2015 Annual Report Visitors Enjoy a Free Family John and Peg Emley with Bill Chiego at the Margaritaville at the Day at the Mcnay
    McNAY ART MUSEUM 2013 | 2015 Annual Report Visitors enjoy a free family John and Peg Emley with Bill Chiego at the Margaritaville at the day at the McNay. McNay Spring Party. Lesley Dill and René Paul Barilleaux, Chief Curator/Curator of Contemporary Art, at the Opening of Lesley Dill: Performance as Art. McNay Second Thursday band plays indie tunes on the Brown Sculpture Terrace. Visitors enjoy a free family day at the McNay. Emma and Toby Calvert at the 60th Sarah E. Harte and John Gutzler at the 60th Anniversary Celebration Anniversary Celebration Visitor enjoys field day activities during a free A local food truck serves up delicious dishes at McNay Second Suhail Arastu at the McNay Gala Hollywood Visions: Dressing the Part. family day at the McNay. Thursdays. Table of Contents Board of Trustees As of December 31, 2015 Letter from the President ................................................................................4 Tom Frost, Chairman Sarah E. Harte, President Letter from the Director ...................................................................................5 Connie McCombs McNab, Vice President Museum Highlights ...........................................................................................6 Lucille Oppenheimer Travis, Secretary Barbie O’Connor, Treasurer Notable Staff Accomplishments ...................................................................10 Toby Calvert Acquisitions ..........................................................................................................13 John W. Feik
    [Show full text]