Solar Energy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Solar Energy Appendices Solar energy Black silicon dry etching – textured surface on multi cell Black silicon wet etching – textured surface on multi cell Source: GCL-Poly Source: GCL-Poly Black silicon texturing Black silicon texturing improve multi cell efficiency by 0.6ppts to 0.7ppts improve multi cell efficiency by 0.6ppts to 0.7ppts Source: GCL-Poly 17 November 2020 [email protected] 201 Appendices Solar energy Appendix 14: Solar tech: Round-shaped ribbon Round-shaped ribbon A thinner, round-shape A thinner, and round-shape ribbon for the MBB rather than a flat ribbon could be ribbon reduces shading and used - this reduces shading and increases the photons hitting the surface of the increases the photons semiconductor. With a round-shape wire, incident light gets reflected at various hitting the surface of the angles, and more light hits the cells. At the same time, according to CPIA, the usage semiconductor of silver paste is reduced significantly for MBB (9BB reduces silver paste usage by 25% versus 5BB), at the same time increasing power output by 2% and reducing micro-cracks. A flat rectangular ribbon blocks light A round-shape ribbon reflects light Source: LG Source: LG 202 [email protected] 17 November 2020 Appendices Solar energy Appendix 15: Solar tech: Half-cut solar cells Half cut solar cell modules Another small tweak to the Another small tweak to the cell-module fabrication technique is half cut cells, which cell-module fabrication is done by cutting a full-size solar cell into two half-size cell with an infrared laser. technique is half cut cell The logic is simple, with half-cut cells, the electrical current flowing in each busbar is halved, and for that reason the amount of internal losses in a solar module with half-cut cells is only a quarter of a full-sized cell module. With half-cut, module With half-cut, module power output is boosted by another 2-3%, a tweak that is power output is boosted by straightforward and logical. CPIA foresees that half-cell will increase its share from another 2-3% 21% in 2019 to over 70% by 2025, of course, with full-size cells seeing diminishing market share. Half-cell modules will be Half-cell modules will be the mainstream the mainstream (%) Overlapping Half-cut Full-size 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2018 2019 2020F 2021F 2022F 2023F 2025F Source: CPIA With half-cut, module Modules with half-cut cells versus full-size cells power output is boosted by another 2-3% Source: Jinko Solar 17 November 2020 [email protected] 203 Appendices Solar energy Joule’s Law - Power dissipation = I^2 x R Source: Jinko Solar Half-cut cells lower the hot spot temperature Half-cut cell enables Hot spot refers to the heating up of a solar cells when the cell is shaded, either by better reliability tress, leafs, bird droppings, or by other solar modules. With half-cut cells, because the current is half of a full-size cell, the hot spot temperature could be substantially reduced (10-20Ԩ, according to Longi), which enables better reliability. Having a hot spot is in no way good, but half-cut is an effective mitigation. Half-cut cell reduce hot spot temperature Source: Longi The long explanation: Recall that solar cells are connected in a series in a solar module (and the fact that a solar cell is essentially a diode). When a particular cell is shaded while other cells in series are unshaded, the illuminated cells are operated in “forward bias” (i.e. electrons following from the P-region to the N-region, which is triggered by photons), and the energy collected by the unshaded cells would be sent to the shaded cell, which is operating as if a diode was in “reverse bias”. This shaded cell will dissipate the energy in the form of heat, which is referred as “hot spot”. If the duration is long enough, the hot spot would bring irreversible degradation of solar modules. 204 [email protected] 17 November 2020 Appendices Solar energy Half-cut lowers operating temperature The operating temperature For a similar reasons, even if a hot spot does not exist in a module, the operating in the half-cell module is temperature in the half-cell module is going to be lower, simply because the going to be lower working current is 50% of its full-cell counterpart. Lower operating temperature Source: Longi Working temperature is Working temperature is ~2 degrees lower for half-cell modules ~2 degrees lower for half-cell modules Source: Jinko Solar Half-cut cells arrangement offers less shading impact Shading causes hot Shading causes hot spot issues, but another serious consequence is that the power spot issues output of other solar cells connected in the same series will be affected. This is because the solar energy captured by the unshaded cells will be dissipated by the shaded cells. A typical standard solar module nowadays consists of 72 cells (6x12 cells), which are usually grouped in 3 x 24 cells, with each group protected by one bypass diode (i.e. 3 bypass diodes in total, at the junction box). If any one of the cells in a group is shaded, the power output from the other 23 cells in the same series will drop to zero, or a 33% power loss. In the most extreme cases, if at each string of cells there is one shaded cell, the power output of the whole module would drop to zero. 17 November 2020 [email protected] 205 Appendices Solar energy One solution to this is to add one bypass diode to every solar cell (i.e. 72 bypass diodes), which would enable the current from the unshaded cells to flow through the bypass diode instead of the shaded cells. Sunpower and AE Solar (and some others) do offer hot-spot-free modules that have bypass diodes for all the cells. The downside is the additional cost of the bypass diodes. By doubling the strings of Here is where the half-cut cells come in. The half-cell module would put together cells, the power loss from 144 half-cells (6 x 24 cells), and the cells are connected in 6 groups, instead of 3 shading would be reduced groups. The cells are arranged in the upper half and lower half, with 2 string of cells connected to one bypass diode in parallel, so still using a total of 3 bypass diodes. By doubling the strings of cells, the power loss from shading would be reduced. Modules built with 210mm solar cells with triple cut Triple-cut a 210mm cell, Another twist to the half-cut cell is “triple-cut” cells, by cutting a piece of 210mm half-cut a 166mm cell solar cells into 3 pieces. The logic is similar to the half-cut modules, lowering the power dissipation in the busbar. Trina Solar has already launched new products with that arrangement to provide 500 watt+ solar modules. The reason that a triple cut is selected for 210mm cells is because half-cutting the 210mm cells would result in higher series resistance otherwise (a half-cut 210mm cell would be bigger than a half-cut 166mm cell, as simple as that). Module power of different cutting forms, versus the number of busbars Source: Trina Solar Source: Trina Solar, PV Tech At the same time, 1/4 cut or even 1/5 cut cells were considered, but the increase in manufacturing complexity outweighs (and higher process risk) the increase in power output. The 1/4 cut would increase open circuit voltage, impacting number of modules per string and increase BOS. Trina also said 1/4 cut or 1/5 cut cells arrangement would require more bypass diodes, but triple cut cells arrangement only requires 3 diodes. Managing the process risk, at the same time strike for higher output Full cell Half cut 1/3 cell 1/4 cell Power (max) 473 watt 495 Watt 500 Watt 502 Watt Mono-facial current 18.2A 18.2A 12.1A 9.1A Voltage (open circuit) 34.3V 34.3V 51.5V 68.7V Process risk Low Low Normal High Source: Trina Solar 206 [email protected] 17 November 2020 Appendices Solar energy Appendix 16: Solar tech: Multi-busbar Multi-busbar (MBB) Busbars and fingers are Busbars and fingers are metalised thin strips printed on the front and back of the metalised thin strips printed solar cell. They are responsible for collecting the electrons flowing from the emitter, on the front and back of the and the busbars are ultimately connected to the junction box at the panels. solar cell In 2019, the mainstream cells were wired with 5 busbar (“5BB”), but CPIA expects a rapid migration to 9BB in the next 5 years. Historically, the number of busbars on a single cell has been increasing, initially at 2BB. The latest cell design aims at more busbars, or MBB technology, with the aim to reduce the series resistance in the cells. For a similar argument, more busbars shorten the travel distance of current on the fingers (or the small grid on the cells). That is why, 12BB (e.g. LG Solar) or even more are busbars are being proposed. More busbars, enabling More busbars, enabling short power collection path, which reduces power loss short power collection path, which reduces power loss Source: Trina Solar 9 busbars quickly becoming 9 busbars quickly becoming the most popular among cell makers the most popular among cell makers (%) Others >9 BBs 9 BBs 5 BBs 4 BBs 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2018 2019 2020F 2021F 2022F 2023F 2025F Source: CPIA 17 November 2020 [email protected] 207 Appendices Solar energy Appendix 17: Solar tech: Encapsulation Encapsulation The cell spacing of a conventional solar panel is 2mm, due to the restriction of ribbon strength.
Recommended publications
  • Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether Or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China
    ACCESS C-570-980 Administrative Review POR: 01/01/2017-12/31/2017 Public Document E&C/OVII: GHC January 31, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey I. Kessler Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance FROM: James Maeder Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations SUBJECT: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China; 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ I. SUMMARY The Department of Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells) from the People’s Republic of China (China), covering the period of review (POR) January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. The mandatory respondents are JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. (JA Solar) and Risen Energy Co., Ltd. (Risen Energy). This is the sixth administrative review of the CVD order on solar cells from China. We preliminarily find that JA Solar and Risen Energy received countervailable subsidies during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we will issue the final results of this review by no later than 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register.
    [Show full text]
  • CSPV Solar Cells and Modules from China
    Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China Investigation Nos. 701-TA-481 and 731-TA-1190 (Preliminary) Publication 4295 December 2011 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert Robert B. Koopman Acting Director of Operations Staff assigned Christopher Cassise, Senior Investigator Andrew David, Industry Analyst Nannette Christ, Economist Samantha Warrington, Economist Charles Yost, Accountant Gracemary Roth-Roffy, Attorney Lemuel Shields, Statistician Jim McClure, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China Investigation Nos. 701-TA-481 and 731-TA-1190 (Preliminary) Publication 4295 December 2011 C O N T E N T S Page Determinations.................................................................. 1 Views of the Commission ......................................................... 3 Separate Views of Commission Charlotte R. Lane ...................................... 31 Part I: Introduction ............................................................ I-1 Background .................................................................. I-1 Organization of report.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Countervailing Duty Administrative (NAICS 621) About Telemedicine Solar Cells from China
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 79163 service delivery for the healthcare DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE days.2 On July 21, 2020, Commerce industry, and its importance has tolled the due date for these final results increased during the current pandemic. International Trade Administration an additional 60 days.3 On September 25, 2020, Commerce extended the Expanding the collection of data on [C–570–980] telemedicine use will support deadline for issuing the final results of measurement on changes in its adoption Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, this review by 60 days, until November 4 during this unprecedented public health Whether or Not Assembled Into 27, 2020. emergency. SAS currently asks Modules, From the People’s Republic Scope of the Order of China: Final Results of ambulatory health care providers The products covered by the order are Countervailing Duty Administrative (NAICS 621) about telemedicine solar cells from China. A full Review; 2017 services in relation to patient visits. description of the scope of the order is This proposal will add a question about AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, contained in the Issues and Decision revenues from telemedicine services for International Trade Administration, Memorandum.5 hospitals (NAICS 622) and nursing Department of Commerce. homes (NAICS 623). Furthermore, to Analysis of Comments Received SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce standardize content across industries All issues raised in interested parties’ (Commerce) determines that and provide consistency for briefs are addressed in the Issues and countervailable subsidies are being respondents, the current telemedicine Decision Memorandum accompanying provided to producers/exporters of this notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2/Q3 2020 Solar Industry Update
    Q2/Q3 2020 Solar Industry Update David Feldman Robert Margolis December 8, 2020 NREL/PR-6A20-78625 Executive Summary Global Solar Deployment PV System and Component Pricing • The median estimate of 2020 global PV system deployment projects an • The median residential quote from EnergySage in H1 2020 fell 2.4%, y/y 8% y/y increase to approximately 132 GWDC. to $2.85/W—a slower rate of decline than observed in any previous 12- month period. U.S. PV Deployment • Even with supply-chain disruptions, BNEF reported global mono c-Si • Despite the impact of the pandemic on the overall economy, the United module pricing around $0.20/W and multi c-Si module pricing around States installed 9.0 GWAC (11.1 GWDC) of PV in the first 9 months of $0.17/W. 2020—its largest first 9-month total ever. • In Q2 2020, U.S. mono c-Si module prices fell, dropping to their lowest • At the end of September, there were 67.9 GWAC (87.1 GWDC) of solar PV recorded level, but they were still trading at a 77% premium over global systems in the United States. ASP. • Based on EIA data through September 2020, 49.4 GWAC of new electric Global Manufacturing generating capacity are planned to come online in 2020, 80% of which will be wind and solar; a significant portion is expected to come in Q4. • Despite tariffs, PV modules and cells are being imported into the United States at historically high levels—20.6 GWDC of PV modules and 1.7 • EIA estimates solar will install 17 GWAC in 2020 and 2021, with GWDC of PV cells in the first 9 months of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether Or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’S Republic of China
    A-570-979 Administrative Review POR: 12/1/2014 - 11/30/2015 Public Document E&C/IV: KH, JP, MK, EL DATE: June 20, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald K. Lorentzen Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance FROM: James Maeder Senior Director, Office I Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations Enforcement and Compliance SUBJECT: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China SUMMARY On December 22, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published its Preliminary Results in the 2014-2015 administrative review of the antidumping duty order of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).1 The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2014, through November 30, 2015. This administrative review covers two mandatory respondents: (1) Canadian Solar International Limited, which we have treated as a single entity with five affiliated additional companies (collectively, Canadian Solar);2 and (2) Trina Solar, consisting of 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2015, 81 FR 93888 (December 22, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 The Department has continued to treat the following six companies as a single entity: Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc./CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI-GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power (China) Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Investing: Global Comparison of Investment Returns
    Clean Energy Investing: Global Comparison of Investment Returns March 2021 A Joint Report by the International Energy Agency and the Centre for Climate Finance & Investment Table of Contents 03 Executive Summary 05 Introduction 08 Analytical Methods 11 Key Investment Characteristics 14 Results 14 Global Markets 18 Advanced Economies 19 Emerging Market and Developing Economies 20 China 21 Transition Companies 22 The Covid Market Shock 24 Irrational Exuberance? 26 Conclusions 29 Acknowledgments 30 Annex A – Definition of Key Terms 32 Annex B – IEA Scenarios 33 Annex C – Fama-French Five-Factor Model 34 Annex D – Fossil Fuel Portfolio 48 Annex E – Renewable Power Portfolio 2 Executive Summary To shed light on the long-term prospects for clean energy, we investigate the historical financial performance of energy companies around the world in search of broad structural trends. This is the second in a series of joint reports by the International Energy Agency and Imperial College Business School examining the risk and return proposition in energy transitions. In this paper, we extend our coverage of publicly-traded renewable power and fossil fuel companies to the following: 1) global markets, 2) advanced economies, 3) emerging market and developing economies, and 4) China. We calculate the total return and annualized volatility of these portfolios over 5 and 10-year periods. Table 1 shows the 5 and 10-year results, up to December 31, 2020. Table 1 – Summary of Key Findings Global Markets Portfolios Advanced Economies Portfolios Fossil Fuel Renewable
    [Show full text]
  • SEIA BOARD FACEBOOK *Updated March 2016
    SEIA BOARD FACEBOOK *Updated March 2016 8MINUTENERGY RENEWABLES, LLC 8minutenergy Renewables, LLC is one of the country's leading developers of ground- mounted solar PV projects, with a portfolio of more than 2,000 megawatts (MW) of solar PV power plant projects. Martin Hermann Board At-Large CEO & Founder Serial entrepreneur with 24 years of experience in the solar, clean-tech and high- tech industries, Developed a 100MW solar PV module manufacturing plant as Chief Strategy Officer with Advent Solar. Arthur Haubenstock Board Alternate General Counsel and Vice President, Government & Regulatory ALLEARTH RENEWABLES, INC. AllEarth Renewables – an Inc. 500 recognized company -- is the designer and manufacturer of the AllSun Tracker, a complete grid-tied, dual-axis solar electric system that uses GPS technology to follow the sun, producing up to 45% more energy than fixed rooftop systems. Made in the U.S.A, the ground-mounted solar tracker has a 120 mph wind rating, 10-year warranty, and is designed for residential and commercial-scale installations. Andrew Savage Elected Director Chief Strategy Officer Served as deputy chief of staff, legislative director and communications director for Vermont Congressman Peter Welch. Chief Strategy Officer at AllEarth Renewables, manufacturer of the AllSun Tracker. Part of President Barack Obama’s successful 2008 presidential primary campaign team Andrew received his bachelor’s degree in political science and environmental studies from Middlebury College graduating summa cum laude. AZTEC SOLAR INC. Aztec Solar is a full-service solar energy provider, including Solar Thermal, Solar AC and Solar Photovoltaic systems for both residential sites and commercial businesses. Aztec offers in-house solar water heating, solar pool heating and solar electric power.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Remedies: Targeting the Renewable Energy Sector UNITED NATIONSN a CONFERENCE on TRADE and DEVELOPMENT
    UNITED NATIONSN A CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Trade Remedies: Targeting the Renewable Energy Sector UNITED NATIONSN A CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Trade Remedies: Targeting the Renewable Energy Sector New York and Geneva, 2014 Note This study expresses the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD or its member states. The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document has been reproduced without formal editing. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a reference to the document number. It would be appreciated if a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint were sent to the UNCTAD secretariat at the following address: Chief, Trade, Environment, Climate Change and Sustainable Development Branch (TED), Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities (DITC), UNCTAD, E Building, Palais des Nations, CH - 1211 Genève 10, Suisse. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2014/3 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Copyright © United Nations, 2014 All rights reserved I. Contents iii Contents Note ...........................................................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2018 / Q1 2019 Solar Industry Update
    Q4 2018/Q1 2019 Solar Industry Update David Feldman Robert Margolis May 2019 NREL/PR-6A20-73992 Executive Summary • At the end of 2018, global PV installations reached 509 GW-DC, • The United States installed 10.7 GW-DC of PV in 2018 (8.3 GW- an annual increase of 102 GW-DC from 2017. AC), with 4.2 GW-DC coming in Q4—cumulative capacity reached 62.5 GW-DC (49.7 GW-AC). – In 2018, the leading markets in terms of annual deployment were China (44 GW-DC), the United States (11 GW-DC), and – Analysts also expect U.S. PV capacity to double by 2022. India (8 GW-DC). • In 2018, global PV shipments were approximately 89 GW—a Analysts expect cumulative PV capacity to double by 2022. – decrease of 5% from 2017. More than 96% of those PV shipments used c-Si technology and were shipped from Asian • At the end of 2018, cumulative global CSP installations reached countries. 6.2 GW, up 710 MW from 2017. • In 2018, the United States produced approximately 1 GW of c-Si • Solar installations represented 22% of all new U.S. electric modules and 0.4 GW of thin film. generation capacity in 2018—second to natural gas (58%). – The United States expanded its PV manufacturing capacity • In 2018, solar represented 4.6% of net summer capacity and to 6 GW in Q1 2019 (up from 2.5 GW in 2017), and it is 2.3% of annual net generation. expected to add another 3 GW in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support
    U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business January 27, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42509 U.S. Solar PV Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Summary Every President since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. Job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing base have joined national security and environmental concerns as reasons for promoting the manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains a variety of tax credits and targeted research and development programs to encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar projects. The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming the US Solar Supply Chain from China by Jeff Ferry, Chief Economist – Coalition for a Prosperous America
    Coalition for a Prosperous America Reclaiming the US Solar Supply Chain from China By Jeff Ferry, Chief Economist – Coalition for a Prosperous America Key Points • Several US solar module manufacturers have ramped up production substantially in the last three years under the stimulus of the Section 201 safeguard tariffs on solar module imports, leading US producers to achieve a 10-year high in market share of 19.8% in 2019, a noteworthy achievement. • The Section 201 solar tariffs have had no negative impact on the US market for solar energy installations, which grew 43% in 2020. Solar installations are set to be more than 50% greater than they were expected to be prior to the implementation of the 201 tariffs in 2017. • However, Chinese manufacturers continue to hold a dominant, near-monopoly, position in several important sectors of the upstream solar supply chain, endangering the health and future of the US solar industry. China continues to raise the stakes with large subsidies supporting billions of dollars of Chinese solar industry expansion. Beijing’s goal is global dominance of this industry. • Chinese dominance threatens US energy independence and US technology leadership in solar and other clean energy technologies. It also threatens our semiconductor industry, which relies on polysilicon as a raw material. • The US government should implement policies designed to secure the long-term future of an end-to-end US solar supply chain, using a mixture of incentives, tax credits, government procurement policies, and tariffs. These policies should be explicitly long-term. They should not be conditional on any foreign nation’s behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges
    Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis Suggested Citation Smith, Brittany L., and Robert Margolis. (2019). Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-73363. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73363.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office.
    [Show full text]