From the Crises of W Hiteness to Western Supremacism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association Journal, Vol. 1, 2005 FROM THE CRISES OF W HITENESS TO WESTERN SUPREMACISM ALASTAIR BONNETT Introduction figure in any of the British parties who confessed to a faith in the white man‘s This article explores the rise of the West in mission to rule‘ (1953: 201). In the short- relation to the decline of whiteness. It does term at least, the crisis of whiteness had so by comparing two Victorian intellectuals different consequences in Australia, which who helped articulate this transition, the had witnessed the production of a political English Social Darwinist Benjamin Kidd class highly conscious of the spectre of (1858œ1916) and the English-born ”Asianisation‘. The policies and politics of Australian politician and social reformer ”White Australia‘ were the principle product Charles Pearson (1830œ1894). of this sensibility. However, by the time ”White Australia‘ finally came to an end (it The decline of whiteness may seem a is conventional to cite the deracialisation of surprising theme. Whiteness is, after all, immigration law in 1973 and 1978 as an still very much with us. Indeed, the close end point), the idea of ”the West‘, with its relationship between the globalisation of corollary of westernisation, had already neo-liberalism and the image of the ideal been in circulation for over a century. consumer appears to be producing a new Although John Howard can be seen to have symbolic economy of exchange with re-asserted elements of a white Australia whiteness at or near its centre (Bonnett immigration policy, by the close of the last 2000). Whiteness is being reinvented, as century the explicit assertion of whiteness well as sustained, as the cornerstone of had become dangerous territory for ”global racism‘ well into the twenty-first mainstream politicians. Indeed, today, in century. both Britain and Australia, the overt celebration of ”white identity‘ is widely However, the story of whiteness is one of construed as an anachronism; part of the transitions and changes. Moreover, this ”cringe-making‘ repertoire of popularism story is also a geography. The associated with the politically development of white supremacism has unsophisticated. been highly varied, both nationally and regionally. One of the most intriguing This article is an attempt to explore some moments of transition that we can detect of the ingredients that went into the from this diverse scene concerns the geographically complex shift from white to impact of a ”crisis of whiteness‘ at the end western. It argues that the ”crisis of of the nineteenth and beginning of the whiteness‘ needs to be understood as a twentieth centuries. It was an international moment of disruption and challenge to and transnational crisis. In both Australia white supremacism. Moreover, that within and Britain, it provoked the desire to this crisis we can find some of the reasons ”protect‘ and ”insulate‘ whiteness against why ”western‘ identity gained ground. those forces that were imagined to be threatening it. However, for a variety of These arguments do not imply the ”death reasons, whilst both countries saw the of whiteness‘. They form a limited introduction of racialised immigration laws, intervention in the development of the the language of race was challenged much wider debate on the relationship (though not, of course, entirely displaced) between whiteness and modernity that is in Britain by the assertion of ”the West‘ and finally beginning to emerge. It is significant ”western‘ as more acceptable and that whiteness experienced crisis and that significant categories. Even as early as the it was demoted within public discourse. At end of the First World War, the explicit the start of the last century, ”white affirmation of white supremacism had civilisation‘ had a clear and important place begun to assume the contours of an in the lexicon of many public figures in embarrassment for the political and European-heritage dominated societies, intellectual elite. Indeed, Pannikar says of and many others beside. To imagine that this time that: ”With the solitary exception its removal from public rhetoric merely of Churchill, there was not one major reflects a shift to euphemism by an ISSN 1832-3898 © 2005 Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association ALASTAIR BONNETT: CRISES OF WHITENESS unchanging, essential white racism is to Later works on ”the West‘, from Spengler dismiss the profound social and political (1918; 1922; 1926; 1928) and Toynbee shifts of the last century. This argument (1922; 1931; 1934; 1953) onwards, have also implies that, whilst ”westerner‘ can revelled in the potential for social and does operate as a substitute term for abstraction that the category seems to ”white‘, it may also reflect new landscapes license. By contrast, the material and of discrimination that have new and more prosaic stuff of the body, which is the fragile relationships to the increasingly centre of Pearson‘s contribution, as of widely repudiated language of race. other treatise on race, seems to generate a ”common sense‘, ”no-nonsense‘ approach. The twentieth century saw the rise of ”the By the same token, once the idea of ”race‘ West‘ as a political and social entity with is rendered as falsehood, this very what was claimed to be its own discrete earthiness instantly appears merely history and traditions. It was employed to ignorant, clumsy and not a little ludicrous. narrate the great political clash of the last century, that between communism and The Crises of W hiteness capitalism (and also, to a lesser extent, between Nazism and the capitalist Charles Pearson was an English historian democracies). In recent years it has been who migrated to South Australia in 1864, used to structure the conflict between the and, after an unsuccessful stint at farming, United States and its allies and ”Islamic achieved a name for himself as a social fundamentalism‘. Whiteness features reformer in Victoria. Pearson occupied a relatively rarely in these debates. Of series of public positions in Victoria, the course we know that whiteness still first of which was as author of a report on matters, both within everyday culture and the provision of free education in the State. as a developing, structural aspect of the From 1878 Pearson was the Liberal allocation of social roles and material member for Castlemaine and, from 1883, rewards within ”post-Fordist‘, globalised the Liberal member for East Bourke capitalism. Yet any attempt to grasp the Boroughs and Minister of Education. scope and nature of whiteness, either Pearson‘s political career was notable for today or historically, cannot proceed on the his support of a series of liberal and assumption that it is comprehensible in progressive causes. I mention this fact isolation. It seems that, in reality, neither because, for Pearson, his concerns to ”whiteness‘ nor ”the West ” are discrete protect white dominion did not represent a identities with their own history and departure from his generally ”protectionist‘ sociology: they must be engaged and social agenda. The wide-ranging nature of examined in relation to each other and Pearson‘s political values were apparent in other supremacist ideologies. the book published the year before his death, National Life and Character. Pearson and Kidd are emblematic figures in the transition from white to western. Both Australia‘s first Prime Minister, Edmund produced books that represent seminal Barton, called Charles Pearson ”the most statements in, respectively, the discourse intellectual statesman who ever lived in of whiteness in crisis and the birth of the this country‘ (quoted by Lake 2004: 44). modern idea of the West.1 The publication Marilyn Lake draws on Barton‘s assessment of Pearson‘s National Life and Character in her recent study of how Pearson‘s ideas (first published 1893) and Kidd‘s The were employed and deployed in the service Principles of Western Civilisation (1901) of the legislative and ideological pursuit of was separated by a mere eight years. Yet ”White Australia‘ in the early twentieth they are strikingly different in tone and century. Thus she quotes Barton, reciting content. Whilst Pearson is resolutely from Pearson‘s National Life and Character pessimistic, repeatedly intoning that the to the federal parliament in 1901, during days of white supremacy are at an end, his contribution to the debate that led to Kidd is aggressively up-beat, repeatedly the white Australia policy. The passage is asserting that the West is destined to be particularly interesting for the stress it utterly triumphant now and for all time. It places on the end of white economic may seem a flip observation, but another control over global markets. obvious contrast is that Kidd‘s book is dizzyingly pompous whilst Pearson‘s is The day will come, and perhaps is not lucid and pithy. It is a contrast that, so far distant, when the European perhaps, provides a clue to other observer will look round to see the distinctions between the two discourses. globe girdled with a continuous zone of the black and yellow races, no longer 9 ALASTAIR BONNETT: CRISES OF WHITENESS too weak for aggression or under used to explore the politics of white crisis. tutelage, but independent, or Hyslop‘s focus is on the formation of a practically so, in government, transnational white labour movement that monopolising the trade of their own drew together workers in Britain, South regions, and circumscribing the industry of the Europeans; when Africa and Australia. My own emphasis has Chinamen and the native of Hindostan, been on how working-class white identity the states of Central and South America, was bound up with a sense of racial by that time predominately Indian … ownership of an emergent ”welfare state‘. are represented by fleets in the Such studies are useful to mention here European seas, invited to international because they make it clear that this debate conferences and welcomed as allies in can be moved well beyond the relatively quarrels of the civilised world.