Cytochemical Studies on GERL, Provacuoles, and Vacuoles in Root

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cytochemical Studies on GERL, Provacuoles, and Vacuoles in Root Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 852-856, February 1978 Cell Biology Cytochemical studies on GERL, provacuoles, and vacuoles in root meristematic cells of Euphorbia (electron microscopy/enzyme localizations/lysosome/cellular autophagy/membrane flow) FRANCIS MARTY Institut de Biologie cellulaire, Unite d'Enseignement et de Recherche Scientifique de Luminy, Universit6 d'Aix-Marseille, 13288 Marseille Cedex 2, France Communicated by Alex B. Notikoff, November 9,1977 ABSTRACT The genesis of plant vacuoles has been studied M cacodylate buffer containing 0.22 M sucrose and then washed by high-voltage and conventional electron microscopy. Vacuole again with quick changes in graded buffers from pH 7.4 to 5.0 genesis is a lysosomal multistep rocess: (i) GERL (Golgi-asso- ciated Endoplasmic Reticulum from which Lysosomes appar- and finally in a citrate buffer (pH 4.8) to remove calcium salts. ently form) produces provacuoles into which lysosomal enzymes The pieces were incubated at 370 freely floating in acid phos- and probably other materials appear to be concentrated and phatase (EC 3.1.3.2) medium according to Novikoff (8, 9) or packaged; (ii) GERL-derived provacuoles cooperate to drive a in Bell and Barrnett medium for thiolacetic acid esterase (10). programmed cellular autophagy leading to young vacuoles; and Controls consisted of tissues either incubated without the sub- (iii) the young vacuoles swell and fuse together into a few large strate (sodium (3-glycerophosphate or cytidine 5'-monophos- mature vacuoles which continue to collect the GERL-derived phate (CMP) for acid phosphatase activities and thiolacetic acid provacuoles throughout the life of the cell. for the corresponding acid esterase) or in the presence of sodium Although vacuoles are the most conspicuous membrane- fluoride (0.01 M for acid phosphatase activities and 0.1 M for bounded organelles in differentiated plant cells and their bio- thiolacetic acid esterase). After the buffered rinses, subsequent chemical characterization is in progress (1, 2), the question of processing was conventional. their origin is unsettled despite many light and electron mi- Zinc Iodide-Osmium Reaction. After excision, 2-mm root croscopy studies (3-5). This report describes the use of marker tips were immediately fixed by immersion for 6-24 hr in a enzyme activities and electron microscopy, at conventional as mixture of zinc iodide and osmium tetroxide (ZIO) at room well as very high voltage, to investigate the pattern of vacu- temperature in the dark (11). Controls were fixed for the same olation in root meristematic cells. The results emphasize the role length of time in unbuffered 0.4% aqueous OsO4 at pH 5.9 of GERL* in the origin of vacuoles and establish the sequence without zinc iodide. of related lysosomal events. They suggest that the plant va- Sectioning and Microscopy. Thin sections (up to 800 A) cuome is an intracellular digestive system involved in cellular were examined in the Philips 300 electron microscope at 80kv. autophagy and in internal membrane flow. For morphological studies they were stained either with uranyl acetate and lead citrate or with 1% aqueous potassium per- MATERIAL AND METHODS manganate; sections from cytochemical specimens were ob- served without counterstain. Thick (1-10 jim) sections of tissues Germination. Seeds of Euphorbia characias L. harvested treated by selective cytochemical staining were held in 200- locally from wild plants were sterilized in 10% commercial mesh uncoated sandwich grids and were examined without bleach for 30 min. The seeds were rinsed, soaked for 18 hr. and counterstain at 2.5 MV with the Toulouse 3 MV electron mi- then placed in petri plates on filter paper moistened with croscope (11). deionized water. As soon as the root emerged, the seedlings were selected, transferred to a humid atmosphere, and grown ver- RESULTS tically at room temperature (220) in the dark. When the root Morphological Sequence. The most undifferentiated root reached 10 ± 2 mm, the seedlings were collected for processing cells just adjacent to the quiescent zone were devoid of vacuoles for electron microscopy. or their identifiable precursors. Nearby, in the youngest cells Morphological Studies. Whole seedlings were quickly im- where vacuolation is initiated, the primordial vacuole precursors mersed in an ice-cold fixative containing either 3% glutaral- or provacuoles arose in the immediate vicinity of dictyosomes dehyde/0. 1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4 or 2.5% glutaral- (Fig. 1 A-D). The Golgi stacks consisted of five or six evenly dehyde/2% formaldehyde (prepared from paraformaldehyde spaced elements. Rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) sheets immediately before use)/0.09 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4. approached the adjacent Golgi stack but provacuoles were not After 30 min, 1.5-mm apical root tips were excised while in seen budding from Golgi elements or from ER cisternae. Rather fixative, left immersed for an additional 90 min, and then they appeared to bud from GERL. GERL was at the "trans" processed as usual for observation by electron microscopy. side (12) of the dictyosomes and consisted of a twisted, Enzyme Activities. Preliminary processing included a short smooth-surfaced, polygonal meshwork of anastomosing tubules fixation in gfutaraldehyde or glutaraldehyde/formaldehyde and saccules, the saccules facing the Golgi stacks. The saccular followed by thorough rinses in 0.1 M cacodylatebuffer (pH 7.4). portions of GERL were separated from the trans element of the Root tips were generally cut axially and, in each experiment, Golgi stack by a distance greater than that between elements some tips were sectioned with the Sorvall TC 2 tissue chopper in the stack. Despite numerous small gaps between smooth ER at approximately 50 Am. Specimens were collected in cold 0.1 Abbreviations: CMP, cytidine 5'-monophosphate; ZIO, zinc iodide- The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the osmium tetroxide; ER, endoplasmic reticulum. payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked * The acronym GERL has been given by Novikoff (6, 7) to the region "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate of smooth ER that is located at the trans aspect of the Golgi apparatus this fact. and that appears to produce Lysosomes. 852 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 Cell Biology: Marty Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 (1978) 853 1.4 d FIG 1. Portions of meristematic cells from the root tip. AV, autophagic vacuole; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; G. Golgi stack; GE, GERL; M, mitochondrion; PV, provacuole; V, vacuole. (A) A dictyosome in a meristematic cell. (Not incubated; X57,600.) (B) Meristematic cell. (Incubated with f,-glycerophosphate 45 min. X64,000.) (C) Detailed view of a nascent provacuole. (ZIO stain 12 hr; X51,500.) (D) GERL portion in a highly meristematic cell. (Incubated with CMP 60 mmn section 1 ,um thick; X46,000.) (E) Elongated provacuoles in a vacuolating cell. (Not incubated; X31,250.) (F) Provacuolar channels in a cell. (Incubated with CMP 75 min, section 1 ,um thick; X25,000.) and GERL, direct continuities of rough and smooth ER sug- the bars of cages, around portions of the cytoplasm. It was dif- gested that rough ER gives rise to smooth elements of GERL. ficult to appreciate this architecture in ordinary thin sections In thin sections, nascent provacuoles were seen budding from where equatorial sections through the cage show only short or lying adjacent to GERL as if they arose from GERL at circumferentially arranged profiles (Fig. 2A, arrows). Although junctions of the anastomosing tubules. they would generally be erroneously interpreted as vesicles, In slightly more differentiated cells, provacuoles were ZIO-stained thick specimens (Fig. 2B) made it clear that each elongated into tubes 0. I Am in diameter (Fig. 1E). Their tri- short profile actually was a transverse section through one of dimensional aspect could be ascertained from sections 1 to 10 the tubes forming the bars of a cage. Subsequently, the tubes ,um thick studied by high-voltage electron microscopy (Fig. IF). of each sequestering cage merged laterally to entrap the pre- The branched provacuolar tubes formed continuous tracts viously demarcated portion of cytoplasm in a double-mem- throughout the cytoplasm. Because the tubes were cut at diverse brane system containing a continuous exoplasmic space. This angles, the observed profiles in thin sections were those of sequence of events led to autophagy but, initially, the seques- random sections through the sinuous and interconnected tubes tered cytoplasm was morphologically unaltered and might have (Fig. 1E). contained mitochondria, plastids, dictyosomes, ER, or peroxi- In the next stage, the provacuole tubes were wrapped, like somes. A webbed aspect of the forming double-membrane Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 854 Cell Biology: Marty Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 (1978) Gv*1 *lz.".... f 4 P V so *:O .S: .60 ma,i.... ..i,#, [ i F A: AlK *!:" # .. .. An.'... .>||;> AltA r 2. B i.ll ;$ %jo,~~~~~~~~ s .. "'I- -It' 4;7vIVW': 4 s,;fp .4:. ,.*.. ..1. f,,:I., I * esA, F: .^r:, >.. "I' ., 4 .t, An_ A.allude;> t~txtt;AlStak> /eJq e edil ee ,rAW E rk o A. As,... ti*W f t*9,~R ? e~~~~~~~4If~~~~~~~~~~~~go = ..S_ AM. .. A_ . .. e 2+<;sE:; \ti jot HEN ala ;'r'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ elf. < *Arts0s>9i;- * X t is jiFT 9 ?4,+f C A AL - n FIG. 2. Portions of meristematic cells from the root tip. Abbreviations as in Fig. 1. (A) Thin equatorial section through a.Rsequestration .R cage. (Not incubated; X18,900.) (B) Section 1 Asm thick including part of sequestration cage. (ZIO stain 12 h; X18,000.) (C) Typical.. ring-like.. ,.x@.:autophagic vacuole in a vacuolating cell. (Not incubated; X37,100.) (D) Autophagic vacuole in a root cell. (Incubated for the demonstration of thiolacetic acid esterase activity; X41,200.) .....t: :_>......
Recommended publications
  • Microorganisms – Protists: Euglena
    Microorganisms – Protists: Euglena Euglena are unicellular organisms classified into the Kingdom Protista, and the Phylum Euglenophyta. All euglena have chloroplasts and can make their own food by photosynthesis. They are not completely autotrophic though, euglena can also absorb food from their environment. Euglena usually live in quiet ponds or puddles. Euglena move by a flagellum (plural flagella), which is a long whip-like structure that acts like a little motor. The flagellum is located on the anterior (front) end, and twirls in such a way as to pull the cell through the water. It is attached at an inward pocket called the reservoir. Color and label the reservoir grey. Color and label the flagellum black. The Euglena is unique in that it is both heterotrophic (must consume food) and autotrophic (can make its own food). Chloroplasts within the euglena trap sunlight that is used for photosynthesis and can be seen as several rod-like structures throughout the cell. Color and label the chloroplasts green. Euglena also have an eyespot at the anterior end that detects light, it can be seen near the reservoir. This helps the euglena find bright areas to gather sunlight to make their food. Color and label the eyespot red. Euglena can also gain nutrients by absorbing them across their cell membrane, hence they become heterotrophic when light is not available, and they cannot photosynthesize. The euglena has a stiff pellicle outside the cell membrane that helps it keep its shape, though the pellicle is somewhat flexible, and some euglena can be observed scrunching up and moving in an inchworm type fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Physicochemical Perspective of Aging from Single-Cell Analysis Of
    TOOLS AND RESOURCES A physicochemical perspective of aging from single-cell analysis of pH, macromolecular and organellar crowding in yeast Sara N Mouton1, David J Thaller2, Matthew M Crane3, Irina L Rempel1, Owen T Terpstra1, Anton Steen1, Matt Kaeberlein3, C Patrick Lusk2, Arnold J Boersma4*, Liesbeth M Veenhoff1* 1European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; 2Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States; 3Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States; 4DWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Aachen, Germany Abstract Cellular aging is a multifactorial process that is characterized by a decline in homeostatic capacity, best described at the molecular level. Physicochemical properties such as pH and macromolecular crowding are essential to all molecular processes in cells and require maintenance. Whether a drift in physicochemical properties contributes to the overall decline of homeostasis in aging is not known. Here, we show that the cytosol of yeast cells acidifies modestly in early aging and sharply after senescence. Using a macromolecular crowding sensor optimized for long-term FRET measurements, we show that crowding is rather stable and that the stability of crowding is a stronger predictor for lifespan than the absolute crowding levels. Additionally, in aged cells, we observe drastic changes in organellar volume, leading to crowding on the *For correspondence: micrometer scale, which we term organellar crowding. Our measurements provide an initial [email protected] framework of physicochemical parameters of replicatively aged yeast cells. (AJB); [email protected] (LMV) Competing interest: See Introduction page 19 Cellular aging is a process of progressive decline in homeostatic capacity (Gems and Partridge, Funding: See page 19 2013; Kirkwood, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • A Signal-Anchor Sequence Stimulates Signal Recognition Particle Binding to Ribosomes from Inside the Exit Tunnel
    A signal-anchor sequence stimulates signal recognition particle binding to ribosomes from inside the exit tunnel Uta Berndta,b,1, Stefan Oellerera,b,c,1, Ying Zhanga,b,c, Arthur E. Johnsond, and Sabine Rosperta,b,2 aInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and bCenter for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Strasse 17, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany; cFakulta¨t fu¨ r Biologie, University of Freiburg, Scha¨nzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany; and dDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 116 Reynolds Medical Building, College Station, TX 77843 Edited by Arthur Horwich, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and approved December 15, 2008 (received for review August 29, 2008) Sorting of eukaryotic membrane and secretory proteins depends direct interaction between SRP and the nascent chain. Previous on recognition of ribosome-bound nascent chain signal sequences studies have addressed the question of whether or not specific by the signal recognition particle (SRP). The current model suggests amino acid sequences of segments inside the tunnel can further that the SRP cycle is initiated when a signal sequence emerges from the affinity of SRP for RNCs (9, 10). Because signal sequences the ribosomal tunnel and binds to SRP. Then elongation is slowed would be prime candidates for such effects, this possibility was until the SRP-bound ribosome–nascent chain complex (RNC) is tested in the eukaryotic system by using RNCs carrying prep- targeted to the SRP receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) rolactin, a secreted protein with a cleavable signal sequence. membrane. The RNC is then transferred to the translocon, SRP is However, when nascent preprolactin was too short to exit the released, and translation resumes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ins and Outs of Autophagic Ribosome Turnover
    Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology Publications Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology 2019 The Ins and Outs of Autophagic Ribosome Turnover Zakayo Kazibwe Iowa State University, [email protected] Ang-Yu Liu Iowa State University, [email protected] Gustavo C. Macintosh Iowa State University, [email protected] Diane C. Bassham Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bbmb_ag_pubs Part of the Cell and Developmental Biology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ bbmb_ag_pubs/260. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ins and Outs of Autophagic Ribosome Turnover Abstract Ribosomes are essential for protein synthesis in all organisms and their biogenesis and number are tightly controlled to maintain homeostasis in changing environmental conditions. While ribosome assembly and quality control mechanisms have been extensively studied, our understanding of ribosome degradation is limited. In yeast or animal cells, ribosomes are degraded after transfer into the vacuole or lysosome by ribophagy or nonselective autophagy, and ribosomal RNA can also be transferred directly across the lysosomal membrane by RNautophagy. In plants, ribosomal RNA is degraded by the vacuolar T2 ribonuclease RNS2 after transport by autophagy-related mechanisms, although it is unknown if a selective ribophagy pathway exists in plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation of Mitochondrial and ER Factors in Quality Control of Tail
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Cooperation of mitochondrial and ER factors in quality control of tail-anchored proteins Verena Dederer1, Anton Khmelinskii1,2, Anna Gesine Huhn1, Voytek Okreglak3, Michael Knop1,4, Marius K Lemberg1* 1Centre for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany; 3Calico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, United States; 4Cell Morphogenesis and Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany Abstract Tail-anchored (TA) proteins insert post-translationally into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) and peroxisomes. Whereas the GET pathway controls ER-targeting, no dedicated factors are known for OMM insertion, posing the question of how accuracy is achieved. The mitochondrial AAA-ATPase Msp1 removes mislocalized TA proteins from the OMM, but it is unclear, how Msp1 clients are targeted for degradation. Here we screened for factors involved in degradation of TA proteins mislocalized to mitochondria. We show that the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) E3 ubiquitin ligase Doa10 controls cytoplasmic level of Msp1 clients. Furthermore, we identified the uncharacterized OMM protein Fmp32 and the ectopically expressed subunit of the ER-mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES) complex Gem1 as native clients for Msp1 and Doa10. We propose that productive localization of TA proteins to the OMM is ensured by complex assembly, while orphan subunits are extracted by Msp1 and eventually degraded by Doa10. *For correspondence: DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45506.001 [email protected]. de Competing interests: The authors declare that no Introduction competing interests exist. Correct localization of proteins is essential to ensure their functionality and to establish the identity Funding: See page 19 of individual cellular organelles.
    [Show full text]
  • CILIA of a DISTINCTIVE STRUCTURE (G + O) in ENDOCRINE and OTHER TISSUES
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.42.489.403 on 1 July 1966. Downloaded from POSTGRAD MED. J. (1966), 42, 403 CILIA OF A DISTINCTIVE STRUCTURE (g + o) IN ENDOCRINE AND OTHER TISSUES A. R. CURRIE, BSC., F.R.C.P. (Edin. and Glas.), F.C.Path., F.R.S.E. D. N. WHEATLEY, B.Sc., Ph.D., 'MI.Biol. Department of Pathology, University Medical Buildings, Foresterhill, Aberdeen. CILIA or flagella control and effect the move- ear (Gray, 1960), and in sense cells of Pecten ment of many unicellular organisms, for (Miller, 1958) and crab (Whitear, 1960). They example Paramecium; they may also cause have been more frequently reported, however, in movement of the medium surrounding cells vertebrate tissues-particularly mammalian- as in flame cells of Platyhelminuthes and in the but this may be due to the fact that these tissues epidielium of the respiratory tract and fallopian have been more intensively studied with the tu)bes in tthe human subject. The fine structure electron microscope (Talble 1). of these cilia is well known and is essentially the same from the 'lowest ciliated creature to the highest mammals (for a brief review see Structure of 9 + 0 cilia 1962). Grimstone, 9 + 0 cilia in mammalian tissues differ from The cilia -are characterized by a 9 + 2 fibre the 9 + 2 form in that they are associated with copyright. patern (Fig. '1) and a single basal body; the a 'diplosome that is a pasir of centrioles, one basal 'body, which has been referred to variously usually lying at right angles to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Structure and Function
    Chapter 7 Membrane Structure and Function Lecture Outline Overview: Life at the Edge • The plasma membrane separates the living cell from its surroundings. • This thin barrier, 8 nm thick, controls traffic into and out of the cell. • Like all biological membranes, the plasma membrane is selectively permeable, allowing some substances to cross more easily than others. • The formation of a membrane that encloses a solution different from the surrounding solution while still permitting the uptake of nutrients and the elimination of waste products was a key event in the evolution of life. • The ability of the cell to discriminate in its chemical exchanges with its environment is fundamental to life. • It is the plasma membrane and its component molecules that make this selectivity possible. Concept 7.1 Cellular membranes are fluid mosaics of lipids and proteins. • The main macromolecules in membranes are lipids and proteins, but carbohydrates are also important. • The most abundant lipids are phospholipids. • Phospholipids and most other membrane constituents are amphipathic molecules, which have both hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions. Membrane models have evolved to fit new data. • The arrangement of phospholipids and proteins in biological membranes is described by the fluid mosaic model. • In this model, the membrane is a fluid structure with a “mosaic” of various proteins embedded in or attached to a double layer (bilayer) of phospholipids. • Models of membranes were developed long before membranes were first seen with electron microscopes in the 1950s. • In 1915, membranes isolated from red blood cells were chemically analyzed and found to be composed of lipids and proteins. • In 1925, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations!!! You Have Found the Vacuole!
    CONGRATULATIONS!!! YOU HAVE FOUND THE VACUOLE! How is the book room like the vacuole? What would represent the food, the water, and the waste? The vacuole is a very important cell organelle to all types of cells but it has the most important job in the plant cell. You can think of the vacuole as sort of a storage container, it can store water, food, and waste. Vacuoles also isolate unwanted bacteria and dispose of them so they do not harm the cell. The vacuoles in both plant and animal cells are made from Golgi bodies inside the cell. Vacuoles are made up of multiple membrane vesicles. Certain substances created by the cell that are unwanted and could be harmful to other organelles are isolated and taken care of by being sent to the Golgi bodies. Vacuoles bring their stored material to any organelle inside the cell that needs it or to other cells if they need the stored material. Vacuoles in plant and animal cells are different in size and numbers but they ultimately have the same functions. In a plant cell, there is one central vacuole that is very big and has lots of room. Animal cells have many vacuoles but they are really small. A plant cells vacuole would process chlorophyll and chloroplast while the animal cell does not even have chloroplast organelles. It is estimated that the central vacuole in a plant cell takes up 80% of the cell. Something to help you remember that it stores water is to think of a camel hump. When the camel has humps that means that it has water.
    [Show full text]
  • Content and Vacuole/Extravacuole Distribution of Neutral Sugars, Free
    Plant Physiol. (1979) 64, 88-93 0032-0889/79/64/0088/06/$00.50/0 Content and Vacuole/Extravacuole Distribution of Neutral Sugars, Free Amino Acids, and Anthocyanin in Protoplasts1 Received for publication December 26, 1978 and in revised form March 15, 1979 GEORGE J. WAGNER Department ofBiology, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973 ABSTRACT Hybrid (petals from anthesis stage flowers) and Tulipa cv. Red Shine for amino acid and other studies, and cv. Most Miles for Neutral sugar, free amino acid, and anthocyanin levels and vacuole/ sugar analysis (petals from 1- to 2-day postanthesis flowers and extravacuole distribution were determined for Hippeastum and Tulipa oldest leaves from 5-day postanthesis plants). Tulip bulbs were petal and Tudipa leaf protoplasts. Glucose and fructose, the predominant obtained from K. Van Bourgardein and Sons, Inc., Babylon, N.Y., neutral monosaccharides observed, were primarily vacuolar in location. and Hippeastrum from Jackson & Perkins Co. Tulip bulbs were Glutamine, the predominant free amino acid found, was primarily extra- rooted at 9 C then held at 0.6 C as long as 10 months before vacuolar. y-Methyleneglutamate was identified as a major constituent of induction of vegetative and floral growth at 22 C. In this way Tudpa protoplasts. Qualitative characterization of Hippeastrum petal and flowers and leaves were made available for 10 months of the year. vacuole organic acids indicated the presence of oxalic, malic, citric, and Hippeastrum flowers were made available year round. For this isocitric acids. Data are presented which indicate that vacuoles obtained plant, postflowering vegetative growth (3 months) was terminated by gentle osmotic shock of protoplasts in dibasic phosphate have good by drying the bulbs followed by vernalization for a minimum of purity and retain their contents.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Plant and Animal Cells Differ?
    Part 1: Cells and Kingdoms How do plant and animal cells differ? Both plant and animal cells are eukaryotic, so they contain membrane-bound organelles like the nucleus and mitochondria. The nucleus of eukaryotic cells is similar to the brain of the cell. It contains the genetic information (DNA) and directs the cell how to function. However, plant cells and animal cells do not look exactly the same or have all of the same organelles, since they each have different needs. For example, plant cells contain chloroplasts since they need to perform photosynthesis, but animal cells do not. Plants and animals are very different on the outside as well as on the cellular level. Both animal and plant cells have mitochondria, but only plant cells have chloroplasts. Plants don’t get their sugar ​ from eating food, so they need to make sugar from sunlight. This process (photosynthesis) takes place in the chloroplast. In order to do photosynthesis, a plant needs sunlight, carbon dioxide (CO2) and water. Once the sugar is made through photosynthesis, it is then broken down by the mitochondria to make energy for the cell. Because animals get sugar from the food they eat, they do not need chloroplasts: just mitochondria. Both plant and animal cells have vacuoles. A plant cell contains a large, singular ​ vacuole that is used for storage of water and nutrients. It also helps maintain the shape of the cell. In contrast, animal cells have many, smaller vacuoles, which also are used for storage of water and nutrients. Plant cells have a cell wall, as well as a cell membrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Structure and Function Section ●3 Structures and Organelles
    chapter 7 Cellular Structure and Function section ●3 Structures and Organelles Before You Read -!). )DEA The eukaryotic cell contains For cells to function correctly, each part must do its job. organelles. Members of families have jobs or chores that help the whole What You’ll Learn family. On the lines below, list your family members and their differences in the structures of jobs. plant and animal cells Read to Learn Identify the Parts Highlight Cytoplasm and Cytoskeleton each cell structure as you read The environment inside the plasma membrane is a about it. Underline the function semifl uid material called cytoplasm. Scientists once thought of each part. the organelles of eukaryotic cells fl oated freely in the cell’s cytoplasm. As technology improved, scientists discovered more about cell structures. They discovered a structure within the cytoplasm called the cytoskeleton. The cytoskeleton is a network of long, thin protein fi bers that provide an anchor for organelles inside the cell. The cell’s shape and movement depend on the cytoskeleton. Two types of protein fi bers make up the cytoskeleton. Microtubules are long, hollow protein cylinders that form a fi rm skeleton for the cell. They assist in moving substances within the cell. Microfi laments are thin protein threads that help give the cell shape and enable the entire cell or parts of the cell to move. 1. Name one cell function that takes place in organelles. Cell Structures Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Companies, a division of The McGraw-Hill © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, Copyright All chemical processes of a typical eukaryotic cell take place in the organelles, which move around in the cell’s cytoplasm.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of a New Ribosome Associated Quality
    CHARACTERIZATION OF A NEW RIBOSOME ASSOCIATED QUALITY CONTROL PATHWAY by William Barbeau A Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The University of Utah In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Degree in Bachelor of Science In Biology Approved: ______________________________ _____________________________ Markus Babst, PhD Denise Dearing, PhD Thesis Faculty Supervisor Chair, Department of Biology _______________________________ _____________________________ Martin Horvath, PhD Sylvia D. Torti, PhD Honors Faculty Advisor Dean, Honors College December 2016 Copyright © 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Proteins are life’s double edged sword. Proteins are essential macromolecules of life, and the tasks that some proteins accomplish are quite marvelous. At the same time, if proteins misfold they have the potential to kill the cell that harbors them. It is becoming increasingly clear that proteins have the potential to misfold from the very beginning of their life, during translation. To strike a balance between translational efficiency and accuracy, cells choose between various synonymous codons to regulate translation. Frequent codons are translated more quickly than rare codons, and the usage of frequent and rare codons is used to regulate translation dynamics. The balance between the usage of frequent and rare codons is fine, as synonymous mutations can disrupt the translational machinery enough to abort translation and degrade the nascent protein. Surprisingly, disruption of the ribosome happens quite frequently, and requires the response of ribosome associated quality control (RQC) to degrade the potentially misfolded proteins. So far only one RQC pathway has been described that responds to ribosomes that have been stalled for prolonged periods of time. In this study I present a novel RQC pathway where the ribosome is able to recover from stalling.
    [Show full text]