Tropical Ecology 55(2): 263-269, 2014 ISSN 0564-3295 © International Society for Tropical Ecology www.tropecol.com

Roads as barriers to by small mammals in a neotropical forest

THOMAS D. LAMBERT1*, KENTON L. SUMPTER1, JACOB W. DITTEL2, SAMUEL DUPRE1, KENDRA CASANOVA2, ASHLEY WINKER2 & GREGORY H. ADLER2

1Biology Department, Frostburg State University, 101 Braddock Road, Frostburg, MD 21532 USA 2Department of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI 54901 USA

Abstract: We sought to answer the question of whether tropical forest roads act as barriers to seed dispersal by small mammals. Ten paired seed stations were placed 100 m apart along the first 2 km of Pipeline Road in Soberanía National Park, Panamá, with each station containing 5 standleyanum and 5 Attalea butyracea fruits with intact seeds. An industrial sewing bobbin was attached to each seed to allow movement to be tracked. We observed 154 seed movements; maximum distance moved was 20 m, with a mean of 5.75 m (SD = 5.19). More A. butyracea (131) were moved than A. standleyanum (23), and removal rates varied among the 10 stations. Although some seeds were moved sufficiently far to have crossed the road, none were, indicating that roads do act as barriers to seed dispersal in neotropical forests and that continued expansion of road networks into tropical forests may threaten biodiversity.

Resumen: Nosotros tratamos de responder a la pregunta de si los caminos en los bosques tropicales actúancomo barreras para la dispersión de semillas por mamíferos pequeños. Se colocaron 10 estaciones pareadas a intervalos de 100 m alo largo de los dos primeros kilómetros del Camino del Oleoducto en el Parque Nacional Soberanía, Panamá.Cada estación contenía cinco frutos de Astrocaryum standleyanum y cinco de Attalea butyracea con las semillas intactas. Se fijó una bobina de costura industrial a cada semillas para permitir rastrear su movimiento. Observamos 154 movimientos de semillas; la distancia máxima de movimiento fue 20 m, con una media de 5.75 m (DE = 5.19). Hubo más movimientos de A. butyracea (131) que de A. standleyanum (23) y las tasas de remoción variaron entre las 10 estaciones. Aunque algunas semillas fueron movidas a una distancia suficientemente grande como para poderhaber cruzado el camino, ninguna lo hizo. Esto indica que los caminos sí actúan como barreras para la dispersión de semillas en los bosques neotropicales y que la expansión continua de redes de caminos hacia el interior de los bosques tropicales pueden ser una amenaza para la biodiversidad.

Resumo: Procurou-se responder à questão de saber se as estradas florestais tropicais atuam como barreiras para a dispersão de sementes por pequenos mamíferos. Dez estações pareadas de colheita de sementes foram colocados a uma distância de 100 m ao longo dos primeiros 2 km daestrada Pipeline no Parque Nacional Soberania no Panamá, com cada estação contendo frutos com sementes intactas: 5 de Astrocaryum standleyanum e 5 de Attalea butyracea. Uma bobina industrial de linha de costura foi presa a cada semente para permitir que o seu movimento pudesse ser rastreado. Observou-se 154 movimentos de sementes sendo a

*Corresponding Author; e-mail: [email protected] 264 ROADS ARE BARRIERS TO SEED DISPERSAL

distância máxima dos mesmos de 20 m, com uma média de 5,75 m (SD = 5,19). Mais sementes de A. butyracea (131) foram movimentadas do que para a A. standleyanum (23), e as taxas de remoção variaram entre as 10 estações. Embora algumas sementes tivessem sido transferidas suficientemente longe para ter atravessado a estrada, nenhuma indicou que as estradas tenham agido como barreiras à dispersão de sementes em florestas Neotropicais e que a contínua expansão das redes de estradas em florestas neotropicais possa ameaçar a biodiversidade.

Key words: Central , forest regeneration, Proechimys semispinosus, roads, small mammals, seed dispersal.

Introduction (Lambert et al. 2003; Lambert et al. 2005; Struh- saker 1997; Terborgh et al. 2001). However, to Tropical forests contain the greatest bio- date no studies have examined the impacts of diversity on Earth but are also among the most smaller-scale disturbances such as road con- threatened and least understood ecosystems. struction in tropical forests. Given the continuing Sound conservation and management practices of expansion of road networks in many tropical such forests must be based on a thorough under- regions, such studies are urgently needed standing of the ecological system (Leigh & (Laurance 2006; Skole & Tucker 1993). Rubinoff 2005), but the general lack of such Studies conducted in temperate forests indi- knowledge has long hindered conservation efforts. cate that even unimproved roads can greatly Of particular importance is an understanding of impact ecosystems by fragmenting habitat, the origin and maintenance of tree diversity. providing sources of mortality, and acting as While numerous factors are certainly involved in barriers to animal movement (Arima et al. 2005; driving and maintaining tropical diversity, recent Forman & Alexander 1998; Spellerberg 1998; experimental studies have highlighted the impor- Swihart & Slade 1984). Roads that disrupt animal tance of negative feedback imposed by species- movement can influence density and home range specific pathogens in structuring forest commu- size (Clevenger et al. 2003; Marsh et al. 2005; nities (Comita et al. 2010; Mangan et al. 2010). McDonald & St. Clair 2004; McGregor et al. 2008). Such studies highlight the importance of seed Furthermore, roads create edge habitat, which can dispersal in maintaining the high levels of bio- profoundly affect animal communities (Lovejoy et diversity in tropical forests (sensu Connell 1971; al. 1986). Janzen 1970). If tropical small mammals respond to roads in Although tropical trees employ a wide variety manners similar to their temperate counterparts, of dispersal mechanisms, a high proportion of then the expansion of road networks in the tropics them are reliant on animal dispersers (Howe & could disrupt seed dispersal patterns by either Smallwood 1982), including small granivorous and changing the movement patterns of small mammals frugivorous rodents. These animals may play or affecting how and where mammals disperse and crucial roles in forest regeneration through their cache seeds. Such disruption may limit the ability actions as seed dispersers and predators (Adler of seeds to gain access to suitable areas in which to 1995; Adler & Kestell 1998; Asquith et al. 1997; germinate, which in turn may hinder forest Hoch & Adler 1997; Lambert et al. 2005; Struh- regeneration, thereby ultimately affecting bio- saker 1997; Terborgh et al. 2001). In fact, studies diversity. In this study, we sought to answer the in both the Old and New World tropics have question of whether tropical forest roads act as documented completely-suppressed forest regene- barriers to seed dispersal by small mammals. ration after disturbance, an effect at least partially attributable to increased small mammal abun- Materials and methods dance and consequent seed predation (Struhsaker 1997; Terborgh et al. 2001). Numerous studies The study was conducted along Pipeline Road have documented the effects of large-scale distur- in Soberanía National Park (9°10´N, 79°45´W), a bance, such as fragmentation and logging, on 22,000-ha tract of tropical moist forest in central small mammal communities and seed dispersal Panamá. Pipeline Road runs from southeast to LAMBERT et al. 265 northwest and provides access to second-growth the seed, passing a short piece of 22-gauge wire forest that is in various stages of regeneration and through the seed, and attaching the other end to patches of old-growth forest. The pipeline and its the bobbin. The loose end of the thread was secured associated road were constructed during World to vegetation. Bobbins contained ca. 200 m of War II. The road was formerly asphalt but has tightly-wound thread that unraveled as the seed since degraded to mostly dirt and gravel. was moved, thereby allowing us to view the path of Currently, the single lane road (~3m wide) receives removed seeds in three dimensions (Kilgore et al. periodic maintenance, including grading, and light 2010). Three species of seed-dispersing mammals vehicle and foot traffic (TDL pers obs.). Our study were common in the study area: the terrestrial was conducted along the first 2 km of Pipeline rodent Proechimys semispinosus (Tomes 1860) Road, at the southern terminus. Forest in this area (Central American spiny rat), the arboreal/ is mostly early successional (ca. 60 - 100 years old), scansorial Sciurus granatensis (Humboldt 1811) with canopy heights ranging from ca. 5 - 20 m. (red-tailed ) and the terrestrial Dasyprocta This area was selected because younger forests punctata (Gray 1842) (Central American ). often harbor higher-density small mammal popu- On a 5-day cycle, the sites were alternately lations than older forests, which would increase exclosed using semi-permeable wire exclosures and the number of seed removal events we could expect then exposed. The exclosures allowed access to (Lambert & Adler 2000) and because such forests seeds by smaller mammals (spiny rats and are actively regenerating from past widespread ), while excluding larger mammals (e.g., disturbances (e.g., logging and pasturage). ). The combination of alternating exclosures Elevation along the road ranges from ca. and the three-dimensional tracking capabilities of 40 - 200 m (Karr 1990), and the annual rainfall the bobbins allowed us to examine the relative ranges from a mean of 2188 mm at the southern importance of the three main seed-dispersing terminus of the road, where the study was mammals at the study site. conducted, to 2685 mm at the northern terminus Seed stations were examined daily, and all (Windsor 1990). The area is highly seasonal and overly-ripe, moldy, or removed fruits were replaced. experiences a pronounced four-month dry season For each removed fruit or seed, we recorded the from January through April, during which <10 % distance moved, the seed’s final location, and the of the annual precipitation occurs. The seasonal seed’s fate (fruit eaten in situ and seed intact, fruit patterns in rainfall produce distinct patterns in eaten and seed cached in the ground, fruit eaten fruit and seed availability (Adler & Lambert 2008; and seed dropped to the ground, and seed eaten). Adler et al. 1998). The project was conducted at Seeds that were either cached or dropped were the start of the rainy season (June & July) in 2009 further monitored for tertiary dispersal or (55 nights) and 2010 (45 nights), utilizing two predation events. species of large-seeded palms (Astrocaryum stand- Statistical analysis was conducted using a full leyanum (L. H. Bailey) and Attalea butyracea three-way ANOVA. We accounted for species, (Mutis ex L.f.) Wess. Boer)). Astrocaryum stand- presence of exclosures, and site, including all inter- leyanum fruits range in length between 2.5 - 6 cm action terms. Insignificant interactions (P > 0.05) and 3 - 4.5 cm in diameter, whereas A. butyracea were removed, and the analysis was repeated. All fruits are least 4.5 - 8.5 cm long and 3 - 4.5 cm in analysis was conducted using SAS. diameter (Henderson et al. 1995). Both species typically fruit when the study was conducted, with Results and discussion A. standleyanum fruit production generally peaking slightly earlier than that of A. butyracea During the course of the study, fruits were (Adler & Lambert 2008). presented for 55 nights in 2009 (six 5-day trials From the beginning of Pipeline Road, we exclosed; five 5-day trials exposed) and 45 nights placed two seed-removal stations on either side of in 2010 (four 5-day trials exclosed; five 5-day trials the road at ca. 100-m intervals, for a total of ten exposed) for a total of 10,000 fruit nights (5,000 for stations. Stations were placed within the forest A. standleyanum and 5,000 A. butyracea) where approximately 3 m from the edge of the road. Ten one fruit presented for one night equals 1 fruit fresh ripe fruits (5 A. standleyanum and 5 A. night. A total of 154 seeds were moved (23 A. butyracea) with seeds intact were placed at each standleyanum and 131 A. butyracea). None of station. To each seed, we attached an industrial these seeds were moved across Pipeline Road. sewing bobbin by drilling a small hole in one end of Of the 154 removed seeds, 33 were taken into 266 ROADS ARE BARRIERS TO SEED DISPERSAL

seed dispersal and thus may hinder forest regene- ration and ultimately pose a threat to biodiversity. The ability of roads to limit seed dispersal could be especially problematic in areas where road ex- pansion leads to habitat degradation and frag- mentation through logging, over hunting, and agriculture. In these areas, seeds produced in the few remaining tracts of intact forest may not cross even small barriers to colonize degraded habitat, leading to a gradual but continual loss of bio-

Distance Moved diversity from the landscape. The observation that the key seed-dispersing rodents often crossed the road but never carried Fig. 1. Number of seeds moved < 1 m, ≤ 1-3 m, ≤ 3-7 seeds with them is consistent with road effects in m, ≤ 7-10 m and distances greater than 10 m. As temperate areas, where roads disrupt home ranges, stations were set a maximum of 3 m from the edge of with the road often acting as one boundary of an the road and the road was approximately 3 m wide, individual’s home range (Clevenger et al. 2003; seeds moved 3 m would be able to reach the edge of Marsh et al. 2005; McDonald & St. Clair 2004; the road, and those moved ≤ 6 could have crossed the McGregor et al. 2008). Because the rodents are road. moving seeds, often to cache them for later consumption, it follows that they would deposit subterranean burrows where germination would such seeds within their home ranges. Although the not be successful; the remainder of the removed road likely represents habitat that would be seeds were cached under leaf litter where they inhospitable to seed caching, studies employing could presumably regenerate. The maximum similar methods (Kilgore et al. 2010) found cache distance moved was 20 m, with a mean distance of locations to be non-random. Therefore, within the 5.75 m (SD = 5.19). More seeds (89 total; 3 A. forest seeds are often carried through habitat stand-leyanum and 86 A. butyracea) were moved in unsuitable for caching. Furthermore, the lack of 2010 than in 2009 (65 total, 20 A. standleyanum cover on the roads represents areas of high and 45 A. butyracea). In addition to the seeds that predation risk for the seed-dispersing rodents. were moved, 37 total seeds (18 A. standleyanum Thus, while the rodents may be willing to cross the and 19 A. butyracea) had their fruit consumed road, they are less likely to do so while burdened without the seed being removed from its original with seeds. Indeed, we tracked numerous seeds location. The presence of the exclosures did not that moved toward the road, but all of those were affect removal rates (F = 0.30, d.f. = 8, P = 0.11), A. dropped by the removal agent at the road’s edge, butyracea had higher removal rates than A. perhaps indicating that the rodent crossed the standleyanum (F = 8.71, d.f. = 8, P = 0.0043) and road after dropping the seed. seed removal rates differed among the 10 sites (F = In central Panama, smaller spiny rats and 3.42, d.f. = 8, P = 0.0016). All removed seeds squirrels and larger agoutis move and cache seeds followed paths along the ground, with none being (Adler & Kestell 1998; Carvajal & Adler 2008; transported into the canopy or subcanopy. Flagel et al. 2009; Forget & Milleron 1991; Hoch & Despite recording 154 total seed movements, Adler 1997). However, little is known concerning including 54 seeds that moved ≥ 7 m farther than the relative importance of those two size classes of the distance across Pipeline Road (Fig. 1), no seeds seed dispersers. We examined relative removal were moved across the road. These observations rates by the two size classes by alternating between are in contrast to our concurrent observations of having seeds under exclosures that excluded the key seed-dispersing rodents in the study area. agoutis and exposed seeds that allowed access by Not only did we frequently observe agoutis crossing all three species. Similar removal rates of the the road during the day, but trapping and tracking exclosed and exposed seeds indicate that spiny rats studies (J. Dittel unpublished data) revealed that or squirrels were the primary seed removal agents P. semispinosus also crossed the road at night. and both apparently scatter-hoarded seeds. Thus, These observations indicate that even unimproved, smaller seed dispersers must be considered in infrequently-travelled roads may act as barriers to seed-dispersal models. However, it is likely that LAMBERT et al. 267 the relative importance of these species in seed maintenance of biodiversity in fragmented land- dispersal varies across the landscape. Kilgore et al. scapes. This effect is particularly important given (2010) used similar methods near our study site the patchy and over-dispersed spatial distribution and found that S. granatensis would frequently of many species of neotropical trees (Hubbell remove seeds from the ground and carry them into 1979). the canopy or subcanopy. However, all of tracked seeds moved along the ground, with none being Acknowledgments brought into the canopy or subcanopy, (Kilgore et al. 2010), indicating that in this study P. semis- We thank Julie Widholm and Davin Lopez for pinosus was the primary dispersal agent. Carvajal field assistance, Scott Mangan for providing & Adler (2008) found that seed removal by S. housing and comments on earlier drafts of the granatensis was higher in areas of intact forest manuscript, and the Smithsonian Tropical Research than forest gaps; as all of our seed stations were in Institute and Frostburg State University Biology the forest edge along the road, it is possible S. Department for logistical support. We thank Dr. granatensis avoided these areas. Removal rates in Christopher Lepczyk and two anonymous reviewers our study varied among the sites, further indi- for their helpful comments on earlier versions of cating that the local abundance of small mammals this manuscript. Funding was provided through directly influenced removal rates. Together, these an undergraduate research award to TDL from the results indicate that the relative importance of Frostburg State Office of Research and Sponsored various mammalian dispersal agents varies across programs and a grant to GHA from the University the landscape. of Wisconsin - Oshkosh Faculty Development We also observed higher removal rates for A. Board’s Small Grants Program. butyracea than for A. standleyanum. Previous studies (Flagel et al. 2009; Kilgore et al. 2010) also References documented more removals for A. butyracea. However, those studies did not simultaneously Adler, G. H. 1995. Fruit and seed exploitation by Central present removal agents with both seeds. Therefore, American spiny rats, Proechimys semispinosus. previous studies suggested that the greater Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 30: number of A. butyracea removals was the result of 237-244. those fruits tending to be available later in the Adler, G. H. & D. W. Kestell. 1998. Fates of neotropical rainy season when other fruits were less tree seeds influenced by spiny rats (Proechimys abundant. By contrast, our results indicate that A. butyracea is in fact preferred by the small semispinosus). Biotropica 30: 677-681. mammals, a result likely attributable to the higher Adler, G. H., S. A. Mangan & T. D. Lambert. 1998. nutritional value and larger size of A. butyracea Reproductive phenologies of Cryosophila warscewiczii (Henderson et al. 1995). in central Panamá. Principes 42: 185-189. In summary, our results support the findings Adler, G. H. & T. D. Lambert. 2008. Spatial and that small mammals play important roles in temporal variation in fruiting phenology of palms in tropical systems, acting as seed dispersers and isolated stands. Species Biology 23: 9-17. seed predators (Adler 1995; Adler & Kestell 1998; Arima, E. Y., R. T. Walker, S. G. Perz & M. Caldas. 2005. Asquith et al. 1997; Hoch & Adler 1997; Lambert Loggers and forest fragmentation: behavioral et al. 2005; Struhsaker 1997; Terborgh et al. 2001). models of road building in the Amazon Basin. Furthermore, our findings suggest that at least in Annals of the Association of American Geographers certain microhabitats, smaller rodents such as P. 95: 525-541. semispinosus may play a larger role in dispersal Asquith, N., S. Wright & M. Clauss. 1997. Does mammal than larger rodents such as D. punctata. Most community composition control recruitment in importantly, we found that roads do in fact act as neotropical forests? Evidence from Panama. Ecology barriers to seed movement because despite docu- 8: 941-946. menting 154 seed movements, we observed no seed Carvajal, A. & G. H. Adler. 2008. Seed dispersal and being dispersed across the road. Thus, expanding predation by Proechimys semispinosus and Sciurus road networks into tropical forests could limit seed granatensis in central Panama. Journal of Tropical dispersal and ultimately present a subtle yet Ecology: 24: 1-8. potentially significant threat to the long-term Clevenger, A., B. Chruszcz & K. Gunson. 2003. Spatial 268 ROADS ARE BARRIERS TO SEED DISPERSAL

patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate Lambert, T. D., J. R. Malcolm & B. L. Zimmerman. fauna road-kill aggregations. Biological Conservation 2005. Effects of mahogany (Swietenia marcophylla) 109: 15-26. logging on small mammal communities, habitat Comita, L. S., H. C. Muller-Landau, S. Aguilar & S. P. structure, and seed predation in the southeastern Hubbell. 2010. Asymmetric density dependence Amazon basin, with implications for conservation. shapes species abundance in a tropical tree Forest Ecology and Management 206: 381-398. community. Science 329: 330-332. Laurance, S. G. W. 2006. Rainforest roads and the Connell, J. H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in future of forest-dependent wildlife: A case study of preventing competitive exclusion in some marine understory birds. pp. 253-268. In: W. F. Laurance & animals and in rain forest trees. pp. 298-312. In: P. C. A. Peres (eds.) Emerging Threats to Tropical J. den Boer & G. R. Gradwell (eds.) Dynamics of Forests. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Populations. Center for Agricultural Publishing and IL. Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Leigh, E. G. Jr. & I. Rubinoff. 2005. Understanding and Flagel, D., G. H. Adler & T. D. Lambert. 2009. Influence conserving tropical diversity: perspectives from Barro of seed height on removal rates by rodents in Colorado Island. pp. 223-250. In: E. Bermingham, Central Panama. Mammalia 72: 55-56. C. W. Dick & C. Moritz. (eds.) Tropical Rainforests: Forget, P. -M. & T. Milleron. 1991. Evidence for Past, Present and Future. University of Chicago secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Press, Chicago IL. Oecologia 87: 596-599. Lovejoy, T. E., R. O. Bierregaard, A. B. Rylands, J. R. Forman, R. & L. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major Malcolm, C. E. Quintela, I. H. Harper, K. S. Brown, ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evo- A. H. Powell, G. V. N. Powell, H. O. R. Schubart & lution and Systematics 29: 207-231. M. B. Hay. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation Henderson, A., G. Galeano & R. Bernal. 1995. Field on Amazon forest fragments. pp. 257-285. In: M. E. Guide to the Palms of the Americas. Princeton Univ. Soule (ed.) Conservation Biology: the Science of Press, Princeton, NJ. Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunder- Hoch, G. A. & G. H. Adler. 1997. Removal of black palm land, MA, USA. (Astrocaryum standleyanum) seeds by spiny rats Mangan, S, S. Schnitzer, E. Herre, K. Mack, M. (Proechimys semispinosus). Journal of Tropical Valencia, E. Sanchez & J. Bever. 2010. Negative Ecology 13: 51-58. plant-soil feedback predicts tree species relative Howe, H. F. & J. Smallwood. 1982. Ecology of seed abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466: 752-756. dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics Marsh, D., G. Milam, N. Gorham & N. Beckman. 2005. 13: 201-228. Forest roads as partial barriers to terrestrial Hubbell, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and salamander movement. Conservation Biology 19: diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203: 2004-2008. 1299-1309. McDonald, W. & C. St. Clair. 2004. The effects of arti- Janzen, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree ficial and natural barriers on the movement of small species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist mammals in Banff National Park, Canada. Oikos 104: 501-528. 105: 397-407. Karr, J. R. 1990. The avifauna of Barro Colorado Island McGregor, R., D. Bender & L. Fahrig. 2008. Do small and pipeline road. pp. 183-198. In : A. H. Gentry mammals avoid roads because of the traffic? (ed.) Four Neotropical Forests. Yale Univ. Press, Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 117-123. New Haven, CT. Skole, D. & C. Tucker. 1993. Tropical deforestation and Kilgore, A., T. Lambert & G. H. Adler. 2010. Lianas habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data influence seed and fruit use by rodents in a tropical from 1978 to 1988. Science 260: 1905-1910. forest. Tropical Ecology 51: 265-271. Spellerberg, I. 1998. Ecological effects of road and traffic: Lambert, T. D. & G. H. Adler. 2000. Microhabitat use by a literature review. Global Ecology and Bio- a tropical forest rodent, Proechymis semispinosus, in geography Letters 7: 317-333. Central Panama. Journal of Mammalogy 81: 70-76. Struhsaker, T. T. 1997. Ecology of an African Rain Lambert, T. D., G. H. Adler, C. M. Riveros, L. Lopez, R. Forest: Logging in Kabale and the Conflict Between Ascanio & J. Terborgh. 2003. Rodents on tropical Conservation and Exploitation. University of Florida land-bridge islands. Journal of Zoology 260: Press, Gainesville, FL, USA. 179-187. Swihart, L. & N. Slade. 1984. Road crossing in LAMBERT et al. 269

Sigmodon hispidus and Microtus ochrogaster. 294: 1923-1926. Journal of Mammalogy 65: 357-360. Windsor, D. M. 1990. Climate and moisture variability Terborgh, J., L. Lopez, P. Nunez, M. Rao, G. Shaha- in a tropical forest: long-term records from Barro buddin, G. Orihuela, M. Riveros, R. Ascanio, G. H. Colorado Island, Panama. Smithsonian Contributions Adler, T. D. Lambert & L. Balbas. 2001. Ecological to the Earth Sciences 29: 1-145. meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science

(Received on 17.05.2012 and accepted after revisions, on 26.02.2013)