2007-2008 Annual Operating Budget

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2007-2008 Annual Operating Budget City of Mesquite, Texas Fiscal Year 2007 – 2008 Annual Budget John Monaco Mayor David L. Paschall Mayor Pro Tem Shirley Roberts Deputy Mayor Pro Tem John L. Heiman, Jr. Councilmember Stan H. Pickett Councilmember Dennis Tarpley Councilmember Ted Barron City Manager Carol Zolnerowich Deputy City Manager Mark Hindman Assistant City Manager Ted Chinn Budget Director This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year’s budget by $2,981,385 (7.84%), and of that amount $798,806 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. The above statement is required by Section 102.005(b), Local Government Code as amended by HB 3195 of the 80th Texas Legislature. i ii Understanding the Budget The City of Mesquite's adopted budget is produced in conformance with guidelines developed for use by local governments and is intended to ensure proficiency in four major categories as follows: 1. Policy Document – The budget should serve as a policy document for elected officials and management to convey how the organization will operate, and what process will be used to adopt and amend the annual budget. 2. Financial Plan – The budget should serve as a financial plan describing all sources of funding, including summaries of revenues and expenditures for multiple years, and changes in fund balances. 3. Operations Guide – The budget should serve as an operations guide to the departments that receive funding through the budget by identifying the resources to be provided and the objectives to be met. 4. Communications Device – The budget should serve as a communications device to convey essential information to the diverse groups who use the budget information – elected officials, the public, bond rating agencies and investors. To help ensure that the budget document meets the above criteria and contributes to the effectiveness of communication to its readers, the budget document is organized into the following sections: Organizational Structure This section provides information about elected officials and the City of Mesquite organization. Included in this section are an organizational chart, information on the City’s advisory boards and commissions and detailed staffing information that lists all authorized full-time and part-time positions by fund. Budget Message The Budget Message includes a formal transmittal letter designed to summarize major issues facing the City of Mesquite and briefly explains key budget decisions and major initiatives to be taken. This section also includes budget information on the General Fund and other major funds, detailing significant revenue and expenditure changes, growth, debt policies and tax rate history. Financial Summaries This section describes the City’s fund structure and presents the budget information for each appropriated fund on detailed schedules with summaries of revenues, expenditures and other financing sources. These financial schedules show actual historical results from the prior fiscal year, the current year adopted and amended budgets, and the budget year. Policies and Goals This section contains all of the City’s financial and non-financial policies, as well as City Council goals and priorities for the immediate future. The City’s long-term financial planning process is also described in this section along with multi-year financial forecasts of major funds. iii Department Profiles The Department Profile section of the budget includes a cover page highlighting the City’s programs and activities, program objectives and performance measures, and cost and personnel summaries over a three-year timeframe by division. Capital Budget The Capital Budget section summarizes all capital expenditures included in both the operating budget and the first year budget of the Capital Improvement Program. Statistical This section offers demographic information and graphical representation of local economic and financial indicators, or benchmarks, that the City uses to assess its overall financial health. Appendix The Appendix contains ordinances that adopt the budget and establish the tax rate. This section also offers schedules of the City’s total outstanding general obligation and revenue debt. Debt service costs (amount of principal and interest) for each bond issue are shown for the budget year and for each fiscal year until the bonds are retired. Glossary The Glossary section defines technical terms related to finance and accounting, as well as non- financial terms related to the City’s programs and activities. Common acronyms and abbreviations are also defined to assist readers. Budget Process The City of Mesquite annual budget is a Target Based Budget developed in accordance with State law, the City Charter, and input from the public and all stakeholders within the framework of best practices identified by the National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB). According to City Charter, "The City Manager shall have prepared on or before the 15th day of August in each year a budget to cover all proposed expenditures of the City for the succeeding fiscal year which begins on October 1 and ends on September 30, of each calendar year. The budget shall be prepared in conformity with the state laws of Texas." Much work takes place before and after this deadline, and the following overview summarizes the entire budget process. Budget Preparation In January the Budget Department works with other City departments in preparing multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasts for the City’s major funds. The City Manager’s executive team then reviews and updates, as needed, the City’s budget and financial policies and Long-Term Financial Plan. During this time the budget calendar is developed and salary and benefit projections are completed by the Budget Department. Based on revenue and expenditure projections a budget target amount is determined for each department. This budget target is, in effect, an expenditure cap that iv cannot be exceeded by the department head in preparing their budget requests. Budget preparation manuals are distributed along with budget target numbers to each department head by mid-March. Department heads then develop their budget requests within the constraints of their target number, and any new programs or services sought by the department head are submitted as expanded programs, which could be considered later in the year once the budget is further developed and depending on available resources. City Manager Review Departments have about a month’s time to submit their budget requests to the Budget Department, usually by mid-April. Once the budget requests are entered into the City’s budget and accounting system, the Budget staff then formats the budget requests in useful reports for the City Manager’s executive team to review. During the month of May the City Manager’s budget review team meets individually with each department head to go over their budget requests by division, making preliminary decisions on existing service levels, staffing levels and learning about new expanded program requests. On May 15th the Chief Appraiser sends preliminary notices of appraised values to taxing entities. The City’s Tax Office then calculates the amount of property tax that may be generated from the preliminary appraisal and tax rate, and any adjustments are made to the revenue forecast for the budget year. The management review process is usually completed by mid-June. Citizen Input In June the City Council provides for several public hearings to gather citizen input on the budget. During these public hearings citizens are encouraged to offer their suggestions and ideas of what programs they would like included in the upcoming budget or what levels of service they desire. These public hearings are not required by law, but are viewed as an important part of the budget process. A state law mandated public hearing is held after the proposed budget is filed with the City Secretary’s Office and made available to the public. Council Review After citizen input is gathered at the public hearings a draft budget is submitted to the City Council for their review by the first week of July. Throughout the month of July the City Council holds several budget workshops to receive presentations by department heads and to discuss their budget needs and any fiscal impacts. These budget workshops are also open to the public and are used to encourage further citizen input on the budget as details are discussed. On July 25 the Chief Appraiser certifies the approved appraisal roll to each taxing entity, and the budget is modified to reflect any changes in anticipated property tax revenue. The City Council usually holds a budget retreat workshop, also open to public input, once the certified roll is received to discuss the budget and consider any changes to the draft budget. Budget Adoption Upon conclusion of the Council/Staff budget workshops, but before August 15th, the City Manager submits a proposed budget to the City Council for consideration and adoption. A copy is also filed with the City Secretary’s Office and posted on the City’s Web site for public review in accordance with State law. Prior to City Council adoption, a final, State law mandated public hearing is held on the proposed budget. At this public hearing, all interested persons are given a final opportunity to be heard regarding any item on the proposed budget. The Council then has the option of approving the v budget at this meeting or postponing the vote to the next Council meeting. Once approved, the City Council adopts the budget by ordinance, which becomes effective on October 1. Budget Amendments The adopted budget authorizes the amount of spending, also known as appropriations, that is allowed for the fiscal year. Appropriation changes, or revisions, are allowed to account for situations that were not anticipated at the beginning of the year. Budget revisions may be approved by the City Manager between departments in the same fund, but any changes to the appropriated amount at the fund level, or transfers between funds, require Council approval.
Recommended publications
  • Presidential Election Not Yet Over BKIHFS Deadline for Certifying Votes Nears by DAVID ESPO (AP) - Soon As They Received Friday Set His Lead
    •• ^ ^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^1 MfONA Division of Iffligp^portunityNewunc SERVING PLANO, DALLAS, RICHARDSON, ALLEN, MCKINNEY AND FRISCO Volume 9, Number 22 "The Paper of Opportunity' November 15-31, 2000 Niiws Presidential election not yet over BKIHFS Deadline for certifying votes nears BY DAVID ESPO (AP) - soon as they received Friday set his lead. filed by three Bush supporters staunch Bush supporter. Texas set to break execu­ The election long over but the morning mail delivery. Still, they conceded the from Brevard County. They Republicans pointed out that all tion record winner unknown, presidential At the same time, officials recounts wouldn't be completed claim their rights are being vio­ seven members of the Texas is expected to break rivals Al Gore and George W. in Broward and Palm Beach before Harris' deadline, adding lated because their counties are Florida Supreme Court its ovk'n U.S. record for most Bush are t>oth reaching for vic­ coimties -heavily Democratic to the prospect of more legal not owe their appointments to executions in a year with the tory in Florida, a combustible areas around Ft. Lauderdale action in a case that has gener- recanvassing votes by hand. Democrats. deaths of three men this week. blend of overseas ballotSj hand and West Palm Beach were In Tallahassee, Florida There were moments of The three executions would recounts, legal skirmishing and human emotion as well as polit­ give Texas 38 for the year, the a midnight deadline for certify­ most by any state since U.S. ical spin. ing votes that may or may not authorities began keeping "We're going to have a trial," death penalty records in 1930.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Meeting and Work Session Held Beginning at 12:Oo Noon, February 15, 1993, City Council Chamber, City Hall, 711 N
    MINUTES OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND WORK SESSION HELD BEGINNING AT 12:OO NOON, FEBRUARY 15, 1993, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL, 711 N. GALLOWAY. Present: Mayor Cathye Ray, Councilmembers John Heiman, Bill Newman, Steve Alexander, Mike Anderson, Teny Brimer and Carole Lochhead; City Manager Jim Prugel and City Secretary Lynn Prugel. PBULME~MG - cm comcr~CONFERENCE ROOM - =oo NOON. ..~~ The City Council met in the City Council Conference Room beginning at 12:W noon to discuss the items on the Work and Regular Agenda. +.i v-- ~m om --~ .-<. Don Simons, Director of Finance. presented the monthlv financial report for Mr. Brimer moved to accept the monthly financial report for January, 1993, as presented. Motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and approved unanimously. APPROVED PARTICIPATlON IN RECONSTRUCnON~OF RANGE *. :, ".... ~ . comply with the City's standards. Staff requested that the plans be revised to provide for reconstruction of the section of Range Drive adjacent to Wal-Mart site with concrete pavement and underground storm sewer drainage in accordance with the Street Standards. .........>. ...*. Minutes of reylar City Council meeting held February 15, 1993 Page 2 ?...?.... ... , .....A%, > Mart's share of this total cost is approximately $55,000.00 and the City's share would be approximately $101,000.00. The estimated cost of installation of the traffic signal at Range Drive and Belt Line Road is $41,000.00. Since this sipal would serve traffic other than that generated by Wal-Mart, it is recommended that the City participate in one-half of the cost, estimated at $20,500.00. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Mesquite Downtown Market Analysis
    City of Mesquite Downtown Market Analysis CITY OF MESQUITE DOWNTOWN MARKET ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR : CITY OF MESQUITE M AY 2017 1 City of Mesquite Downtown Market Analysis CITY OF MESQUITE DOWNTOWN MARKET ANALYSIS MAY 2017 Prepared for: City of Mesquite 1515 N Galloway Mesquite, TX 75149 Prepared by: CDS Community Development Strategies 1001 S. Dairy Ashford, Suite 450 Houston, TX 77077 (713) 465-8866 www.cdsmr.com 2 City of Mesquite Downtown Market Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 8 CDS Company Bio .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 The Purpose of this Study ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary – Study Area Potential For Development .......................................................................... 8 Single Family Housing Market ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Recommendations for the Downtown Study Area........................................................................................................ 9 Multifamily Market .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • About the Author
    About the Author as a college student in 1987, working as an intern at Texas InstrumentsA native of Houston, in Dallas. Oscar After Slotboom receiving first a BSME moved from to TexasNorth A&MTexas and MSME from the University of Texas at Austin, he held a to Houston in 1991 to work as a project engineer in the energy industry.position at In MCI 1998 (now he began Verizon) working in Richardson in web and before software returning devel - opment, and he continues to work in the information technol- ogy industry as a software developer in 2014. Oscar’s efforts to document the history of Texas highways be- gan in 2000 when he launched the web site TexasFreeway.com. In 2003 he published Houston Freeways, a Historical and Visual Journey covering the history of Houston’s freeways. Oscar moved back to North Texas in 2004 and began efforts to docu- ment the history of North Texas freeways. In 2006 he launched in 2012 released the digital book Dallas-Fort Worth Freeways, Texas-Sizedthe web site Ambition DFWFreeways.info. (now DFWFreeways.com) and Interstate 35E at SH 121, January 2012 533 Bandwagon 357 Bush, Laura 147 Index Barker photo (reenactment of John F. Bush Turnpike 60, 61, 65, 68, 69, 202, Kennedy assassination) 175 215, 232, 235, 261–276, 521 baseball, teams at Burnett Field 281 ground breaking 15 A Bass, Anne T. 496, 497 ACT (Association Concerned about Bass, Robert 67, 461, 496, 497 C Tomorrow) 69, 269 Beckley Avenue 277 C-119 188 Addison 230, 240 Belknap Freeway 511 Cabell, Earl, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metroplex!
    Welcome to the Metroplex! Leonard Critcher and Mary Tullie Critcher Copyright© 2017 Leonard Critcher and Mary Tullie Critcher i Cover photo courtesy of Matt Pasant, photographer ISBN: 978-1-62249-409-5 Published by Biblio Publishing BiblioPublishing.com ii Welcome to The Metroplex! Whatever brought you to The Metroplex, there is one thing that is a certainty- You are going to love it! The Metroplex is comprised of thirty cities full of interesting, welcoming, friendly and helpful people. They want you to enjoy your life as much as they do theirs, and it probably wasn’t that long ago that a good many of them were also new to the area, trying to find their way around the sometimes overwhelmingly large number of freeways, highways and by-ways that crisscross hundreds and hundreds of square miles. The Metroplex is also affectionately known as DFW, which obviously stands for Dallas-Fort Worth. It is also the acronym for the airport built between the two cities that served as a tangible and holistic link between the once bitter rivals- Dallas and Fort Worth. For as long as some of the “old timers” can remember there was no love lost between the two cities. Dallas was viewed by Fort Worth as the bullying Big Brother who looked down on everything Fort Worth. A Dallas newspaper even fueled the rivalry by claiming in an article that Fort Worth was so dead a panther had been seen sleeping unmolested in the main street. As the geographical region separating the two cities began experiencing steady growth, new cities like Arlington, Irving, and Grand Prairie were established, and it became difficult to know where one ended and another began.
    [Show full text]
  • Poynter, Bobby
    Interview with BOBBY POYNTER Texas Ranger, Retired ©2008, Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum Project: Texas Rangers Interview Conducted at the Poynter’s Home Edgewood, Texas Saturday—July 26, 2008 Interviewed By: Robert Nieman and Nancy Ray Longview, Texas Present At Interview: Bobby Poynter, Robert Nieman, Nancy Ray 1 This Texas Ranger Hall of Fame E-Book™ is ©2008 by the Author. All Rights Reserved. Contact Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum. PO Box 2570, Waco, Texas 76702-2570. Introduction Welcome to the E-Book Project of the Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum (TRHFM). The TRHFM, located in Waco, Texas, is the State-designated Official Historical Center of the Texas Rangers. It is operated as a service of City of Waco by authorization of the Texas Department of Public Safety and the State of Texas. The mission of this project is to provide easy access to books, oral histories dissertations, articles, and other literary works on Texas Ranger history. Public Domain Works: Many of the works in this non-commercial library are in the public domain and may be freely enjoyed—please follow the conditions set forth below. Copyrighted Works: Some works, which are clearly noted, are under copyright. They are in this library through the courtesy and permission of the copyright holders. Please read and enjoy them, but they may not be redistributed, copied or otherwise used without the written permission of the author or copyright holder. Conditions & Statements 1. The Adobe Acrobat™ or other file format in which this work resides may not be redistributed for profit—including commercial redistribution, sales, rentals, or fees for handling, access, download etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Documents
    CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BIG TOWN 2.0 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE CITY OF MESQUITE, TEXAS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY CONTRACT NO. E2017-004 Prepared by: Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-928 KHA No. 061056015 June 2017 Contract Documents Template Update: January 11, 2016 Page 1 of 108 TABLE OF CONTENTS TENTATIVE SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................................................................Page 7 NOTICE TO OFFERORS .......................................................................................................................................................Page 9 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS .........................................................................................................................................Page 11 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT ................................................................................................................................................Page 21 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL PROPOSAL ..................................................................................................................................................................Page 23 PROPOSAL FORM ......................................................................................................................................................Page 25 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) INFORMATION ...................................................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • 463-6666 [email protected] A
    A – AMFM 15 A to Z Mobile Disc Jockey Services AEG Live Southwest Mailboxes, Etc. 6800 Westgate Blvd., Suite 132 Box 182 3001 Maple Avenue, Suite 201, Dallas, TX 75201 A Austin, TX 78745 (972) 343-2424 (512) 791-4543 Danny Eaton, Senior Vice President [email protected] A-All About Music Allen Deaver AFP Group 4919 Griggs Road, Houston, TX 77021 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1200, Houston, TX 77056 (713) 747-7734; Fax (713) 747-3204 A-Town Disc Jockey Service, Inc. (713) 626-9820; (800) 966-8656; Fax (713) 621-5327 Rise Joiner, Manager 6501 Goodall Court, Austin, TX 78739 Gilbert Baker, President (512) 899-1300; Fax (512) 233-1709 A&G Records [email protected] AIM Productions, Inc. 2833 South Padre Island Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 78415 Todd Turlington, President 24815 Hamilton Pool Road, No. 5 (361) 857-6760 Round Mountain, TX 78663 Rapito Garcia A Weir Design (830) 825-0133 10603 Newcombe Drive, Dallas, TX 75228 Ric Sternberg, President A&L Music Company, Inc. (214) 660-7217; (214) 662-7249; Fax (903) 438-0281 819 North Marshall Drive, Henderson, TX 75652-5937 Cindy A. Weir, Owner AJ Limousines (903) 657-3818 501 East Koenig Lane, Austin, TX 78751 Chuck Dennard ABC Music Company (512) 454-7000; (888) 455-3673; Fax (512) 323-9200 17302 Scenic Lake Court, Cypress, TX 77429-6710 Rachel Austin, Manager A&M Entertainment (713) 849-5700; Fax (713) 849-5774 1716 Valley View Lane No. 1056, Irving, TX 75061 Ken McAvoy, Owner A.K.’s Sports Pub (972) 871-7746; Fax (972) 618-2145 601 East Nolana, McAllen, TX 78504 [email protected] ABC Piano Shop (956) 618-4611; Fax (956) 681-0829 Mike Coates, General Manager 1024 West Mistletoe Avenue, San Antonio, TX 78201 Lisa Sanchez, Owner/Booking Agent (210) 224-4097 A&M Image and Design, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimco Realty Corporation 2003 Annual Report CORPORATE PROFILE
    S TABILITY & G ROWTH Kimco Realty Corporation 2003 Annual Report CORPORATE PROFILE Kimco Realty Corporation, operating as a real estate investment trust (REIT), is the largest pub- licly traded owner and operator of neighborhood and community shopping centers in North America. In addition, the Company develops retail properties for sale, invests in real estate related securities and mortgages secured by retail real estate, and provides capital and expertise to retail- ers with surplus real estate. Kimco held its initial public offering in November 1991, and has generated a total annualized return for shareholders, including the reinvestment of dividends, of 21.8 percent through March 8, 2004. $100,000 invested in Kimco shares at the IPO would be approximately $1.1 million on March 8, 2004, including the reinvestment of dividends. HISTORICAL TOTAL RETURN ANALYSIS (NOVEMBER 1991 TO DECEMBER 2003) KIM: 1,000 930.0% 800 600 NAREIT: 358.4% 400 200 S&P 500: 277.0% Indexed TRA (November 1991=100) KIM S&P 500 NAREIT Note: Includes reinvestment of dividends Source: NAREIT TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Chairman and CEO............................1 Report of Independent Auditors................................41 2003 Operating Review ............................................11 Consolidated Financial Statements ............................42 Portfolio of Properties ...............................................18 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements..............46 Funds From Operations Glossary of Terms .....................................................67
    [Show full text]
  • Professiona Services
    F Professional Services National Assn. of TV Radio -TV Galleriesof Congress. F-44 Station and CATV Broke -s Program Executives F-32 Other National Associations F-47 and Consultants F-1 Radio -Television News Directors Assn. F-37 State Broadcasters Associations F-51 Station Financing F-9 Broadcast Rating Council F-41 Unions/Labor Groups F-52 Research Services F-12 Television Information Office F-41 Broadcast Education Engineering and Technical Consultants Radio Information Office F-41 Schools Specializing in Radio -TV... F-53 F-14 National Radio Broadcasters Assn.. F-41 Books on Broadcasting F-55' Law Firms and Attorneys F-18 Television Bureau of Advertising F-41 Colleges and Universities F-59 Public Relations F-28 Radio Advertising Bureau F-42 Talent Agents and Managers F-30 National Assn. of Farm Broadcasters. F-42 International Employment Services F-24 National Cable Television Assn. F-44 World Radio and Television F-61 Associations Community Antenna Television Assn.. F-44 International Producers F-66 Natiolal Assn. of Broadcasters F-31 Canadian Cable Television Assn. F-44 International Equipment F-70 Broadcastingm Yearbook11980 ProfessionaServices Station and CATV Brokers American Media Associates Inc. 305 Degree of Business Broker Associates. 3306 Glenview Caroline Media Brokers. 516 Fenton Place, Honor Bldg., St. Paul 55101(612) 227-7577. M.D. Place, Chattanooga 37408. (615) 756-7635. C. Alfred Charlotte, N.C. 28207. (704) 376-1161. Donald S. Price Jr. Dick, owner. Capozolli, gen mgr. Owned by CSB Inc.: Bill Vaughn, pros; Mike Spargo, VP Harry W. Alexander Organization. 230 Park Ave., New York 10017. (212) 532-1048.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy Recap Plano Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan on April 7
    Economy Recap Plano Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan On April 7, 2014, the Planning & Zoning Commission completed a work session for the economy component of the Plano Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan. The Commission was provided a summary document that contained descriptions of each topic of the economy along with three policy recommendations to consider. The policy options included the city's current policy, as well as alternative options to discuss and potential outcomes of each option were included for the Commission’s consideration. The Commission recommended the following six policy statements on the economy. Economic Development Plano will diversify its economic base by seeking a variety of companies, both large and small, as well as from different business sectors with a sharpened focus to attract unique firms with knowledge workers. Jobs and Workforce Development Plano will serve as a liaison between the business community and education service providers. The city will facilitate discussions and assist with the development of solutions to ensure residents have the job skills necessary to compete in the market place. Diversifying Economic Base through Targeted Industries Plano will seek to diversify its economic base through targeting companies on the edge of emerging business trends which would attract knowledge workers associated with these industries. The city will enhance its current business sector strengths through recruiting companies similar to those found in the community which could also utilize the talents and experience of current residents. Business Retention and Development Plano will cultivate close relationships with business leaders of larger companies to stay in the city and consider expansion of operations. The city will work with local entrepreneurs to get new businesses established and assume responsibilities for small business development activities in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • DFW Retail Marketview
    MARKETVIEW Dallas / Fort Worth Retail, Q3 2018 Construction, deliveries show signs of strength in the third quarter 94.9% 4,205,134 SF 633,188 SF -226,227 SF *Arrows indicate trend from previous quarter. Figure 1: Net Absorption and Market Occupancy Net Absorption (MSF) Occupancy (%) 10 95.0 9 8 93.5 7 6 92.0 5 4 90.5 3 2 89.0 1 0 87.5 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD 2018 Annual Net Absorption Occupancy Source: CBRE Research, Q3 2018. BIG BOX VACANCY GIVING OPPORTUNITIES FOR DFW’S JOB GROWTH WELL ABOVE AVERAGE NEW CONCEPTS CLASS A BOX AVAILABILITY ON THE RISE, BUT DEMAND STEADY VICTORY PARK’S RETAIL REVIVAL Q3 2018 CBRE Research © 2018 CBRE, Inc. | 1 MARKETVIEW DALLAS / FORT WORTH RETAIL Figure 2: Historical Market Statistics 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 YTD 2018 CENTRAL DALLAS Absorption (Net, SF) 66,710 161,648 245,906 416,648 -36,509 -37,156 66,269 31,324 60,437 Delivered Construction (SF) 47,325 21,000 148,821 208,549 0 0 0 46,571 46,571 Rentable Building Area (RBA) 9,106,345 9,082,276 9,093,061 13,879,294 13,943,581 13,976,675 13,962,585 14,376,303 14,376,303 Occupancy Rate (%) 94.9 94.9 95.7 97.3 97.4 97.1 97.3 97.4 97.4 EAST DALLAS OUTLYING Absorption (Net, SF) 48,929 -8,769 97,990 -12,589 93,844 -5,252 13,447 3,903 12,098 Delivered Construction (SF) 0 0 62,000 0 87,406 0 10,000 0 10,000 Rentable Building Area (RBA) 3,503,104 3,482,829 3,633,860 3,607,505 3,863,835 3,822,234 3,832,654 3,837,460 3,837,460 Occupancy Rate (%) 97 95.9 97.7 98.3 97.6 97.5 97.6 96.4 96.4 FAR NORTH DALLAS Absorption
    [Show full text]