23 December 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

23 December 2016 23 December 2016 Executive Director Local Planning Liaison New South Wales Department of Planning and Environment GPO Box 39 SYDNEY, NSW 2001 Dear Sir, We refer to the proposed State Environmental Planning Policy (Penrith Lake Scheme) Amendment 2016 (Draft SEPP). In my capacity as the Chairman of the Penrith Lakes Development Corporation (PLDC), I wish to lodge an objection in response to the Draft SEPP on behalf of PLDC. I also note that the exhibited Draft SEPP does not in any way represent the Urban Instrument submission to the Minister for Planning and Environment dated 29 August 2014 nor the subsequent technical reports submitted in March 2016 by PLDC. PLDC rejects any claim that there has been collaboration on the development of this draft SEPP amendment. PLDC reserves all of its rights under the 1987 Deed (Deed) and in reserving its rights says that the provision of its submission in response to the Draft SEPP does not involve an acceptance or agreement by PLDC that the manner in which the Draft SEPP has been proposed, and its proposed contents, are either valid or appropriate. Nor does the making of submissions by PLDC constitute a withdrawal or waiver by PLDC of any of its claims that the State has acted and continues to act otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Deed. Clause 3.3(b) of the Deed expressly provides that: "(b) The Lakes Scheme cannot be successfully implemented and completed unless the Urban Land is rezoned and redeveloped for urban purposes as contemplated by this Agreement." (my emphasis) In PLDC's view, the Draft SEPP represents a radical departure from the intention of the parties as recorded in Part 3 of the Deed and the principal investigation undertaken by the NSW State Government documented in the Regional Environmental Study – Penrith Lakes Scheme 1984 (RES). The course being undertaken by the Government is likely to have adverse financial consequences for PLDC. The Draft SEPP is also, as far as we can discern, not supported by proper planning principles. We enclose a report prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd that fully outlines PLDC's planning concerns in response to the Draft SEPP, See Attachment 1. PLDC is of the view that it is premature for the Government to be proposing a whole of scheme planning regime. This is particularly so given that the Greater Sydney Commission Draft West District Plan has yet to be finalised and, as one would expect, this is a key consideration in the making of any State Environment Planning Policy for the Penrith Lakes Scheme. I wish to document the following matters of concern which have also been identified in respect of the Draft SEPP: Page 2 of 6 1) Infrastructure, Flood Planning and Evacuation DP&E has not provided PLDC (as the principal land holder to which the draft SEPP applies) sufficient technical information in the form of detailed reports or assessments to enable PLDC to make an informed view on the outcomes or objectives of the Draft SEPP. Of particular concern to PLDC is the lack of rigour and assessment undertaken by the Department in the development of this Draft SEPP surrounding the Scheme’s specific matters relating to New Castlereagh Road and the flood mitigation infrastructure provided within the Scheme, including the kilometres of structural weirs, extensive stormwater pipes and the earthen flood levees to protect significant cultural heritage sites, including the highly sensitive Hadley Park precinct. It would appear that no provision has been made for these major pieces of infrastructure in the zonings or planning controls and instead they have been effectively “Unzoned” by the proposed Draft SEPP. In March 2014 the Hawkesbury-Nepean Valley Flood Management Review Stage One report (Flood Review) was released. Key recommendations and strategies from this report included the development of a single appropriate flood model for the entire Hawkesbury-Nepean floodplain including an updated and contemporary flood model to replace the 1995 RUBICON model. It was also recommended that this model be informed by detailed rainfall and extensive bathymetry data. PLDC, in anticipation of the Department implementing the recommendations of the Flood Review undertook detailed, peer reviewed, 2D modelling taking into consideration the latest hydrological modelling technology, in order that we could contribute fully to the further works being undertaken Infrastructure NSW (INSW) in the Stage Two Flood Review. Stage Two of the Hawkesbury – Nepean Valley Flood Management Review has not been released and the NSW State Government has announced in July 2016 an interim Flood Policy to take effect until the Stage 2 Flood review has been completed. In the development of this Draft SEPP, the recommendations of the 2014 Flood review, the extensive flood studies undertaken by Cardno and BMT WBM on behalf of PLDC as well as the peer reviews by Worley Parsons and WMA Water on behalf of the NSW Government have not been incorporated within the Draft SEPP instrument or the proposed zonings. As the principal landholder, PLDC has not been provided adequate information regarding the interim Flood Policy or the environmental studies which have underpinned the interim Flood Policy or the viability of the urban development component of the Lakes Scheme. Further, PLDC has had no opportunity to test any environmental studies underpinning the Flood Policy by way of peer review. In respect of the July 2016 interim Flood Policy; I note that its purported aim is "to reduce the potential flood risk to life and property in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Valley". A review of the Draft SEPP reveals that the interim Flood Policy as it relates to the Scheme, has been interpreted by the Government in a way which results in the development for urban purposes being limited to 30 lots outside the “future urban land” as indicated on the 1998 Structure Plan. However, no rationale is given as to why these 30 lots, as distinct from, say, 100 lots are appropriate to the Scheme at this time; nor why the Department has decided to zone lands which were not previously considered in previous iterations of the Structure Plan for the Scheme. It appears to PLDC that the interim Flood Policy has been applied in an arbitrary manner. PLDC maintains that there is a range of proven solutions which could be implemented to meet the Flood Policy’s concerns and/or objectives so as to permit urban development of the Lakes Scheme. Page 3 of 6 In support of this position, I request that the Department review the studies which were provided in the August 2014 Urban Instrument submission and I also enclose a summary prepared by Molino Stewart Pty Ltd which addresses the July 2016 interim Flood Policy, See Attachment 2. I note, and indeed stress, that the findings of this report are that with no increased infrastructure, through the use of contra lanes for evacuation to the East, 1300 lots can be located on the Penrith Lakes Scheme. Given the lack of transparency around the interim Flood Policy, PLDC's position is to strongly oppose the making of the Draft SEPP in its current form. 2) Water Management Plan The Regional Environment Study 1984 included a Water Management Plan (1984 WMP) for the lakes within the Scheme which contained a number of significant objectives. Over a 30 year period PLDC has undertaken detailed studies and implemented the policies and strategies of the 1984 WMP. This Plan has been updated over time to incorporate changes in water management technology and to accommodate the changing catchment conditions. The last major review of the 1984 WMP was approved by the Director – General of the Department of Planning and Infrastructure in November 2013, See Attachment 3, and the subsequent detailed infrastructure construction plans were approved by the Department and implemented sequentially up until late 2015. These approvals incorporate 2 km of sandy beaches, 770 hectares of recreational lakes with two major external weirs, internal road networks, more than 5km of walking trails, landscaped foreshores, conservation zones and picnic areas. The current Draft SEPP amendment fails to incorporate the public recreation and flood mitigation works, which have been undertaken by PLDC, into the land use zonings. The draft SEPP amendment also fails to incorporate the detailed recommendations of the studies which were undertaken by independent consultants on the future zoning of lands within the Scheme. On this basis, PLDC’s position is to strongly oppose the making of the Draft SEPP in the proposed form. 3) The Structure Plan and Planning provisions amendment The Draft SEPP does not seek to amend or update the 1998 SEPP Structure plan and therefore fails to take into consideration the relevant approvals received by PLDC for the Stage 1 WMP and subsequent detailed construction certificates or 2 year plans for infrastructure and land forming. The Draft SEPP in the proposed form fails to realise the long held strategic directions set for the site, being to give rise to comprehensive and integrated land use changes. These include, and are not limited to, significant changes to the Main Lake shape as requested by the 2005 Hawkesbury - Nepean Expert Panel, along with additional water bodies and landforms which under typical circumstances would be incorporated into the Structure Plan on an amendment to the SEPP. In the development of this proposed Draft SEPP the “typical” process, being industry and DP&E planning policy standards, has not been carried out, giving rise to a fragmented and disjointed approach to updating the planning controls for the Scheme. PLDC is concerned that only the Sydney International Regatta Centre and White Water Stadium as Olympic Legacies are considered requiring strong, updated planning controls while the major lakes are effectively “Unzoned”.
Recommended publications
  • Branch Cuttings
    The newsletter of the Sydney and Northern New South Wales Branch of the Australian Garden History Society BRANCH CUTTINGS Issue 55 – February 2018 This branch is affiliated with the Royal Australian Historical Society & National Trust of Australia (NSW) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FILOLI – One of the finest remaining US country estates of the early 20th Century by Susan North On my way home from a recent holiday in Russia I spent two days with a friend’s family in Woodside, California. My friend had arranged for us to visit FILOLI, an historic property nearby. I had no idea what I was about to see…. FILOLI is one of 27 sites owned by the US National Trust for Historic Preservation and is operated by the Filoli Centre. It is located 51 kms outside central San Francisco and is recognised as one of the finest remaining country estates of the early 20th century. FILOLI was built by Mr & Mrs William Bowers Bourn II, a wealthy San Francisco family who relocated to the peninsula after the 1906 earthquake. The Bourns owned the Empire Gold Mine, the largest hard-rock mining operation in California, as well as the Spring Valley Water Company and the Crystal Springs Reservoir. Cambridge-educated Mr Bourn selected the site and called it FILOLI by combing the first two letters from the key words of his credo: “ FIght for a just cause; LOve your fellow man; LIve a good life.” The Bourns engaged Willis Polk, a San Francisco architect to design their country estate. The house is predominantly modified- Georgian in style, containing over 5000 square metres of interior Filoli house from a walled orchard garden in late floor space with 56 rooms, including 10 family bedrooms, 16 winter/early spring bathrooms, 17 fireplaces, a ballroom and a servants’ wing.
    [Show full text]
  • Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Wildlife Lake
    Wildlife Lake Landscape Concept Penrith Lakes Development Corporation October 2010 WILDLIFE LAKE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT REPORT Client Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Limited PO Box 457 Cranebrook NSW 2749 Prepared by CLOUSTON Associates Landscape Architects • Urban Designers • Landscape Planners 6A Wetherill Street • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 PO Box 44 • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 Telephone (02) 9569 3388 • Facsimile (02) 9569 3523 Email • [email protected] NS 1023 • R-01 • G • October 2010 Revision Date Description Checked A 14.05.09 Interim issue to client for review CD B 18.05.09 Draft issue for client review CD C 29.05.09 Document finalised for Two Year Plan submission CD D 29.06.09 Document revised and finalised for meeting with the Minister CD for Planning (prior to Two Year Plan submission) E 16.10.09 Further revisions prior to Two Year Plan Submission CD F 11.12.09 Further client revisions prior to Two Year Plan Submission CD G 29.10.10 Further client revisions prior to Two Year Plan Submission COMMENTS Revision A Interim issue of (document not complete) Revision B Base line and Opportunities plans completed Revision C Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision D Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision E Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision F Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision G Client revisions incorporated throughout document. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page no. 1.0 INTrODUCTION 4 2.0 PrOJECT BACKGrOUND 5 3.0 PrOPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN PrINCIPLES 10 4.0 PrOPOSED
    [Show full text]
  • 12925 ID Bentley1982penrithl
    PENRITH LAKES DEVELOPMENT SCHEME REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT ON THE NON-ABORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE RESEARCHED BY MS. FRAN BENTLEY FOR MS. J. BIRMINGHAM UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY JUNE 1982 -'" --- CITY OF PLNRITH w w o 01 \ o t'27l+ 500 N w' o o PLAN m o "(\,.1. SHOWING PART OF THE LAND ZONED RURAL A2 INTERIM DEVE.LOPMENT ':2:~ 000 N ORDER NI? 93 CITY OF PENRITH. IS u PARISH CA~,TLEREAGH COUNTY CUMBE.RLAND (\ 'O() 200 +O~i 500 ,,,;P SCA~E. ~">/ / / / "', ''<-<:'A' ,-, RAV·\ ~.~ ,"",'l/\J$ / / ...... ',:. ; '. , \, ___ J 1-- I 1271 soc \1 \ ---~---+ ---- ._. ., .,.~~~ ", \ 11 ,I --t ,j­ j-, i ! , , ~ A q ST1,'\i'SCN -~~--~-------~-~---r - - -f--,----~.-----~~ . /-., , .I1-~ ; < .' w..; I Cl I c­ l/" w, / 0, o ". b,','I' o -- -~, 4- -'-_-.(."""_ -----t - -" --d-f \, ); / , I ~--' w 1.1);' o ! ,; o<c, Ni 1'­ N _______ ~ _~ _--,- __'2_7_0000 N . ' C.·,5CC N -, 126", 500 11 \ , , " " !2(C~OOO \ : :-;." ____-l-- - --~---. '. -- ,'. '."l , '~ j~ j I i 1'2:0 8 COO N ----~---t-- --, +-_. ! I / -' -,1.- --'~ I '.'. , , ___ I ... ' ------ - - --- C4MAlCO . ----------- PQODUc1S I/ ' , .... ' PT";' '-r ... ', - - - :..., -,0.< '," 1267000 N -~ -~-"-------o::-.:t_-------:-~, '--,.~,"-------,-.-.~ --~""'------- t-i- --1- ---~-- i- 1206500 N ---+- --- ---·--I----~-- <"\.'" .........", >:- '" I 126::; CC;:) ~i 1266000 N - --,r'-- -i- , I, I / " '; LEGEND --~------ ----NOTE. : ~ .., ....... ;' .. .. BLL'[ ~1ETAL INDUSTRIES LTD PLAN SHOWS LANDS IN WHICH THE FARLEY AND LEWERS LTD RESPECTIVE COMPANIES HAVE A DIRECT .+ •••••• , PIONEER CONCRETE SERVICES LTD OR BENEFICIAL INTEREST AT '2 ,IIOIi£~BO / READY M IXED CONCRETE LTD GRAVEL BOUNDARY FROM B M I ............ PENRITH LAkES DEVUOPMENT DRAWING Ne MS -'291/A AND IS CORPORATION LTD APPROXIMATE ONLY , AREA "ZONED I. RURAL "A '2' UNC'U: I DO.
    [Show full text]
  • Penrith Lakes Visual Management Strategy Penrith Lakes Development Corporation August 2009 PENRITH LAKES PARKLAND VISUAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
    Penrith Lakes Visual Management Strategy Penrith Lakes Development Corporation August 2009 PENRITH LAKES PARKLAND VISUAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Client Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Limited PO Box 457 Cranebrook NSW 2749 Revision Date Description Checked A 27.08.08 Draft issue to client for review CD Prepared by B 10.02.09 Draft issue for client review CD CLOUSTON Associates C 20.05.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD Landscape Architects • Urban Designers • Landscape Planners D 02.06.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD 6A Wetherill Street • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 PO Box 44 • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 E 05.06.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD Telephone (02) 9569 3388 • Facsimile (02) 9569 3523 F 02.07.09 Draft issue for client review CD Email • [email protected] G 14.07.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD NS 1023 • Issue H • 25th AUGUST 2009 H 31.08.09 Final Report COMMENTS Revision A Draft Issue Revision B Additional photographs added Revision C PLDC and GML suggested revisions incorporated Revision D John Mulally adjustments incorporated Revision E John Mulally further adjustments incorporated Revision F Further revisions incorporated Revision G John Mulally further revisions incorporated Revision H Daryl Kite revisions incorporated PENRITH LAKES VISUAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AUGUST 2009 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 8.0 REFERENCES 34 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE STRATEGY 4 1.2 SCOPE AND LIMITS OF THE STRATEGY 4 APPENDICES 1.3 METHODOLOGY 4 A
    [Show full text]
  • Hadley Park Landscape Management Plan Penrith Lakes Development Corporation October 2009
    Hadley Park Landscape Management Plan Penrith Lakes Development Corporation October 2009 HADLEY PARK LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Limited PO Box 457 Cranebrook NSW 2749 CLOUSTON Associates Landscape Architects • Urban Designers • Landscape Planners 6A Wetherill Street • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 PO Box 44 • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 Telephone (02) 9569 88 • Facsimile (02) 9569 52 Email • [email protected] Issue Date Status Checked I 21/10/09 FINAL REPORT with revisions H 04/09/09 FINAL REPORT with revisions G 21/08/09 FINAL REPORT F 26/06/09 FINAL DRAFT with revisions CL E 06/05/09 FINAL DRAFT CL D 16/04/09 FINAL DRAFT CL C 31/01/09 FINAL DRAFT CL B 31/07/08 DRAFT CL A 04/07/08 DRAFT CL HADLEY PARK • LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN • ISSUE I OCTOBER 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 9 INTRODUCTION 9 FIGURE 1 - REGIONAL MAP CONTEXT 10 PURPOSE OF THE LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN 11 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 11 PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND REPORT FORMAT 12 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND PLANNING CONTEXT 13 FIGURE 2 - LOCAL CONTEXT MAP 14 REGIONAL AND LOCAL CONTEXT 1 A BRIEF HISTORY 1 - aBORIGINAL HISTOry - early EUROPEAN HISTOry - cONTEMPOrary HISTOry THE SITE TODAY 18 LAND USE 20 - ACCESS AND CirculatiON - Buildings AND STRUCTURES - INFRASTRUCTURE - GARDENS AND LANDSCAPE FIGURE 3 - ACCESS AND CIRCULATION 19 FIGURE 4 - NATURAL SYSTEMS 24 NATURAL SYSTEMS 2 - TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY AND SOILS - INDIGENOUS VegetatiON - INDIGENOUS Fauna - HYDROLOGY - MICROclimate HADLEY PARK • LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN • ISSUE I OCTOBER 2009
    [Show full text]
  • Download Here
    Heritage Newsletter of the Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc May-June 2018 ISSUE 56 ISSN 2203-4366 Hadley Park, Castlereagh The Heritage Council of NSW considers nominations for listing on the State Heritage Register based on an assessment of heritage significance and taking into account any submissions received from the public. Section 33 (3) of the NSW Heritage Act 1977 requires that the Heritage Council must be of the view that the item is of State heritage significance before it makes a recommendation to the Minister. Upon receipt of a recommendation for listing from the Heritage Council of NSW it is the Minister for Heritage who has to consider that recommendation and decide whether or not to direct the listing of the item on the State Heritage Register under Section 32 (1) of the Heritage Act. Hadley Park, Castereagh One such item currently under consideration is Hadley Park, Castlereagh. Castlereagh was one of the five Macquarie towns proclaimed by Governor Lachlan Macquarie in 1810. Hadley Park was the earliest known European settlement in this location at the time. Charles Hadley acquired land at Castlereagh and his home, possibly the small adjacent weatherboard cottage, was erected in about 1806. The main house may have been built nearer to 1801 and still stands today. Hadley Park is located on one of the 31 grants given out by Governor King in the Castlereagh (Mulgrave Place) area. Most of the grants had river frontages, and had a regular north-south orientation. They ranged from 70 to 160 acres, and the size reflected 1 HERITAGE May-June 2018 social status and family size.
    [Show full text]
  • Penrith Lakes Scheme Conservation Management Plan
    Penrith Lakes Scheme Conservation Management Plan Report prepared for Penrith Lakes Development Corporation September 2010 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Penrith Lakes Scheme—Conservation Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 07-0411 1 Draft report July 2008 07-0411 2 Draft report December 2009 07-0411 3 Draft report February 2010 07-0411 4 Final report July 2010 07-0411 5 Final Report (September 2010, reformatted November 2010) November 2010 Copyright Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced at the end of each section and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified or agreed, copyright in this report vests in Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd (‘GML’) and in the owners of any pre-existing historic source or reference material. Moral Rights GML asserts its Moral Rights in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. GML’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Right to Use GML grants to the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty-free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral Rights of GML or third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Karskens, Grace. "Water Dreams, Earthen Histories: Exploring Urban Environmental Histo
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Karskens, Grace. "Water Dreams, Earthen Histories: Exploring Urban Environmental History at the Penrith Lakes Scheme and Castlereagh, Sydney." Environment and History 13, no. 2 (May 2007): 115–54. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3291. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2007. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Water Dreams, Earthen Histories: Exploring Urban Environmental History at the Penrith Lakes Scheme and Castlereagh, Sydney GRACE KARSKENS School of History University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2051, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Urban environmental history comprises both human and ecological experience; the two were and are inseparable, and their interaction is dynamic. This essay explores the human and bioregional history of the Penrith Lakes Scheme at Castlereagh in outer Western Sydney as a case study in integrating the two ap- proaches. Conceived in the late 1960s, the Scheme is a quintessential ʻhybrid landscapeʼ, aiming to rehabilitate 2,000 hectares of open-cut gravel quarries by creating huge artificial lakes and landforms. But it destroyed a rich palimpsest of earlier farming and Aboriginal landscapes, both of which had also transformed the environment. By focusing on this place over time, it is possible to track the succession of Aboriginal, settler, industrial and urban histories, to explore the shifting meanings of this environment, the different ways they knew and shaped this country, and the politics and strategic uses of different types of environmental knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • OEH Annual Report 2017-18
    OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT & HERITAGE Annual Report 2017–18 www.environment.nsw.gov.au © 2018 Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. OEH has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) , subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons . OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Photos Cover: Basin Trail Ku-Rin-Gai National Park (C.Davidson). Page2: Bradleys Head and Chowder Head walking track Sydney Harbour National Park (J.Yurasek). Published
    [Show full text]
  • Toby's Gun and Other Selected Stories From
    Toby's Gun and other selected stories from James Tobias Ryan's REMINISCENCES OF AUSTRALIA (1788-1894) Edited and Introduced by Marcus Punch Toby's Gun and other selected stories from James Tobias Ryan's REMINISCENCES OF AUSTRALIA (1788-1894) Edited and Introduced by Marcus Punch Copyright © 2017. Marcus Bernard Vincent Punch. This text is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, review or as otherwise permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, optic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission from the publisher. ISBN 978-0-9807660-4-2 (paperback) RRP $AUD 24.95 incl. GST, plus postage and handling. Published by: Naughty Fuzzbot i ii Contents Introduction by Marcus Punch Original Title Page Original Dedication Original Preface by James Tobias Ryan Table of Contents Reminiscences of Australia Chronology of the Life of James Tobias Ryan Original Table of Contents Index iii Introduction James Tobias Ryan, or “Uncle” Toby Ryan1, as the older members of my family knew him, was an elusive ancestor who had brought fame and distinction to his family during the 1800s. A grand-child of First Fleet convicts, he rose to membership of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly in the late 1800s. He had owned both a Sydney pub and a famous racehorse. Then, in 1894, he had published his memoirs titled Reminiscences of Australia. In these terms he was described to me and little else was known about him by the family.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Strategic Business Plan
    Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Strategic Business Plan Planning Ministerial Corporation July 2020 www.dpie.nsw.gov.au Find out more www.dpie.nsw.gov.au Title: Strategic Business Plan Subtitle: Planning Ministerial Corporation First published: July 2020 Department reference number: DOC20/554122 © State of New South Wales through Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 2020. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment as the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to charge others for access to the publication (other than at cost), include the publication in advertising or a product for sale, modify the publication, or republish the publication on a website. You may freely link to the publication on a departmental website. Disclaimer The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2020) and may not be accurate, current or complete. The State of New South Wales (including the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment), the author and the publisher take no responsibility, and will accept no liability, for the accuracy, currency, reliability or correctness of any information included in the document (including material provided by third parties). Readers should make their own inquiries and rely on their own advice when making decisions related to material contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Phanfare Nov/Dec 2005
    Number 215 – November-December 2005 History Needs Nourishing Too!! Putting Flesh on the Bones PHANFARE No 215 – November-December 2005 1 Phanfare is the newsletter of the Professional Historians Association (NSW) Inc and a public forum for Professional History Published six times a year Annual subscription Email $20 Hardcopy $38.50 Articles, reviews, commentaries, letters and notices are welcome. Copy should be received by 6th of the first month of each issue (or telephone for late copy) Please email copy or supply on disk with hard copy attached. Contact Phanfare GPO Box 2437 Sydney 2001 Enquiries Annette Salt, email [email protected] Phanfare 2005-06 is produced by the following editorial collectives: Jan-Feb & July-Aug: Roslyn Burge, Mark Dunn, Shirley Fitzgerald, Lisa Murray Mar-Apr & Sept-Oct: Rosemary Broomham, Rosemary Kerr, Christa Ludlow, Terri McCormack, Anne Smith May-June & Nov-Dec: Ruth Banfield, Cathy Dunn, Terry Kass, Katherine Knight, Carol Liston, Karen Schamberger Disclaimer Except for official announcements the Professional Historians Association (NSW) Inc accepts no responsibility for expressions of opinion contained in this publication. The views expressed in articles, commentaries and letters are the personal views and opinions of the authors. Copyright of this publication: PHA (NSW) Inc Copyright of articles and commentaries: the respective authors ISSN 0816-3774 PHA (NSW) contacts see Directory at back of issue PHANFARE No 215 – November-December 2005 2 Contents One initiative that is being explored and will be discussed at the next executive meeting is President’s Report 3 an up date of the members’ register on our Flesh on the Bones 4 website.
    [Show full text]