Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Technical Guide Referenc E Engineering # 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Technical Guide Referenc E Engineering # 8 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Technical Guide Reference Engineering # 8 D R A I N A G E A R E A S O F V E R M O N T S T R E A M S ( Note: Drainage areas or lengths of streams followed by an asterisk (* ) denotes only the amount of either which lies within the boundaries of Vermont.) Under remarks column, the name of the agency responsible for the computation is given. The following abbreviations are used. U.S.G.S, for United States Geological Survey. DWR for Vermont Department of Water Resources, or It’s Predecessor, the Vermont Water Conservation Board. By: Donald W. Webster Water Resource Engineer Prepared 1962, Retyped November 2004 1 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Major Stream Name Page Deerfield River 3 Falls River 3 West River 4 Saxton River 5 Williams River 6 Black River (Springfield) 6 Ottaquechee River 8 White River 9 Ompampanoosac 13 Waits River 13 Wells River 14 Passumpsic River 15 Nulhegan River 18 Clyde River 19 Barton River 20 Black River (Newport) 21 Missisquoi River 21 Lamoille River 24 Winooski River 27 Otter Creek 31 Poultney River 33 Batten Kill 34 2 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Miles Drainage Length of Above Area Stream Stream Name Location Mouth (Sq. Mi.) (Miles) Remarks Deerfield River Whitingham State Line 223.5* 30* DWR Harriman Deerfield River Whitingham Reservior 184 DWR West Branch Deerfield River Readsboro @ Mouth 33 11 DWR-DWW North Branch Deerfield River Wilmington @ Mouth 42 13 DWR-DWW Binney Brook Wilmington @ Mouth 4.5 3.5 DWR-DWW Beaver Brook Wilmington @ Mouth 8.3 5 DWR-DWW Cold Brook Wilmington @ Mouth 10 4.5 DWR-DWW Bill Brook Wilmington @ Mouth 8 2 DWR-DWW Bill Brook Wilmington 0.9 DWR-DWW Lake Rapon Ellis Brook Dover @ Mouth 9 4 DWR-DWW Blue Brook Dover @ Mouth 4 4 DWR-DWW East Branch Deerfield River Searsburg @ Mouth 40 15 DWR Rake Branch Searsburg @ Mouth 16.5 4 DWR-DWW Redfield Brook Woodford @ Mouth 7 3.5 DWR-DWW Castle Brook Somerset @ Mouth 4.5 3.5 DWR-DWW Note: Additional streams which drain into the Deerfield River, but enter into that Stream in Mass. North River Halifax State Line 45* 11* DWR East Branch North River Halifax @ Mouth 41* 11* DWR Branch Brook Halifax @ Mouth 7.8 5.2 DWR-DWW Green River Guilford @ Mouth 45* 13* DWR Deer Park Brook Guilford-Halifax @ Mouth 4.6 4.5 DWR-DWW Hinesburg Brook Guilford @ Mouth 5.1 4.2 DWR-DWW Pond Brook Halifax-Marlboro @ Mouth 3.4 3.3 DWR-DWW Falls River Guilford State Line 13.5* 4* DWR Shattuck Brook Guilford State Line 5* 2.5* DWR-DWW Newton Brook Vernon State Line 3* 3* DWR Central Park Brook Vernon @ Mouth 4.5 3 DWR-DWW Broad Brook Guilford @ Mouth 24.8 8 DWR 3 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Miles Drainage Length of Above Area Stream Stream Name Location Mouth (Sq. Mi.) (Miles) Remarks Whetstone Brook Brattleboro @ Mouth 26.6 11 DWR Whetstone Brook Marlboro 1.1 DWR-DWW-Hidden Ames Hill Brook Brattleboro @ Mouth 4.9 4 DWR-DWW Halliday Brook Brattleboro @ Mouth 6 4.5 DWR-DWW West River Brattleboro @ Mouth 423 46 Army Engineers West River Dummerston 8.3 400 Army Engineers-Williamsville Dam West River Newfane 340 Above Marlboro Bridge West River Newfane 10.8 326 Army Engineers-Newfane Dam West River Newfane 12.6 308 U.S.G.S. Gage West River Townshend 19.1 278 Army Engineers-Townshend Dam West River Jamaica 25.8 179 U.S.G.S. Gage West River Jamaica 29.1 172 Army Engineers-Ball Mountain Dam West River Londonderry 40.1 Army Engineers-The Island Dam Stickney Brook Dummerston @ Mouth 5.6 4 DWR-DWW Rock River Newfane @ Mouth 60 12 DWR Rock River Newfane 4.3 20.8 DWR Baker Brook Newfane @ Mouth 14 6 DWR-DWW Marlboro Branch Newfane-Marlboro 0.4 19.7 8.5 DWR Wardsboro Brook Newfane @ Mouth 13 8.5 DWR Grassy Brook Brookline @ Mouth 14 8.5 DWR-DWW Grassy Brook Brookline 1 12.6 DWR Mill Brook Townshend @ Mouth 14 6.5 DWR-DWW Simpson Brook Townshend @ Mouth 3 3.5 DWR-DWW Fair Brook Townshend @ Mouth 5 3.5 DWR-DWW Tannery Brook Townshend @ Mouth 7 4.5 DWR-DWW Whetstone Brook Jamaica @ Mouth 37 12 DWR-Army Engineers Whetstone Brook Jamaica 4.6 23.3 DWR Turkey Mountain Brook Jamaica @ Mouth 14 9 DWR-DWW Turkey Mountain Brook Windham 5.8 4.1 DWR-DWW-Burbee Pond Dam 4 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Miles Drainage Length of Above Area Stream Stream Name Location Mouth (Sq. Mi.) (Miles) Remarks Turkey Mountain Brook Windham 6 3.9 DWR-Bridge across Burbee Pond Ball Mountain Brook Jamaica @ Mouth 34 13 Army Engineers Ball Mountain Brook Jamaica 2.6 30.6 DWR North Branch Jamaica @ Mouth 13.5 7 DWR-DWW Cobb Brook Jamaica @ Mouth 6 5 DWR-DWW Winhall River Winhall-Jamaica @ Mouth 62 16 Army Engineers Winhall Brook Londonderry @ Mouth 14.5 9 DWR-DWW Mill Brook Winhall @ Mouth 11 9 DWR-DWW Eddy Brook Winhall @ Mouth 4 4.5 DWR-DWW Lowell Lake Brook Londonderry @ Mouth 10 5.5 DWR-DWW Flood Brook Londonderry-Peru @ Mouth 13.5 7.5 DWR-DWW Flood Brook Peru 2.7 DWR-DWW-Lyons Pond Flood Brook Peru 2.2 DWR-DWW-Hapgood Pond Orcutt Brook Londonderry-Landgrove @ Mouth 28 10 Army Engineers Orcutt Brook Londonderry-Landgrove 2.9 21 DWR Salmon Brook Dummerston @ Mouth 6.2 6 DWR-DWW Canoe Brook Dummerston @ Mouth 6.5 6.5 DWR-DWW Sacketts Brook Putney @ Mouth 17.5 7.5 DWR-DWW East Putney Brook Putney @ Mouth 16.5 8.5 DWR-DWW Pullam Brook Westminster @ Mouth 2.2 2.5 DWR-DWW Mill Brook Westminster @ Mouth 4 4 DWR-DWW Cobb Brook Westminster @ Mouth 7 5 DWR-DWW Saxtons River Westminster @ Mouth 78 20 Army Engineers Saxtons River Westminster 0.25 75 DWR Saxtons River Rockingham 3.8 72.2 U.S.G.S. Gage Saxtons River Rockingham 7.8 58 Army Engineers-Cambridgeport Dam Bull Creek Athens @ Mouth 11.5 5.5 DWR-DWW Athens Brook Athens @ Mouth 4.1 2 DWR-DWW Weaver Brook Grafton @ Mouth 3.5 3 DWR-DWW 5 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Miles Drainage Length of Above Area Stream Stream Name Location Mouth (Sq. Mi.) (Miles) Remarks South Branch Grafton @ Mouth 20.3 6 DWR-DWW South Branch Grafton 1.4 19 DWR South Branch Grafton 2.4 16.5 DWR Howe Brook Grafton @ Mouth 5.3 6 DWR-DWW Willie Brook Grafton @ Mouth 4 4.5 DWR-DWW Stiles Brook Townshend @ Mouth 4.3 4.5 DWR-DWW Hinkley Brook Grafton @ Mouth 2 2 DWR-DWW Williams River Rockingham @ Mouth 117 25 Army Engineers Williams River Rockingham 1.2 115 Army Engineers-Darby Hill Williams River Rockingham 5.3 103 U.S.G.S Gage Williams River Rockingham 5.5 102 Army Engineers-Brockway Hills Williams River Chester 19.6 13.5 DWR O'Brien Brook Rockingham @ Mouth 2.2 2.5 DWR-DWW Hall Brook Grafton @ Mouth 9 5.5 DWR-DWW Middle Branch Chester @ Mouth 38 13 DWR-DWW Middle Branch Chester 2.5 27 DWR Middle Branch Chester 4.2 23 DWR South Branch Chester @ Mouth 11 10 DWR-DWW South Branch Chester 2.5 9.2 DWR Andover Branch Andover 0.25 12.5 6.5 DWR Potash Brook Chester @ Mouth 4 3 DWR-DWW Trout Brook Andover @ Mouth 2.3 2.5 DWR-DWW Colmissary Brook Rockingham @ Mouth 3 3 DWR-DWW Black River Springfield @ Mouth 202 40 Army Engineers Black River Springfield 8.2 158 U.S.G.S. & Army E. - N. Springfield Dam Black River Weathersfield 10.4 Army Engineers- Power Black River Cavendish 15.4 113.3 DWR Black River Ludlow 27.7 56 Army Engineers-Ludlow Dam 6 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Miles Drainage Length of Above Area Stream Stream Name Location Mouth (Sq. Mi.) (Miles) Remarks Black River Ludlow 30.3 37.4 DWR-Reservoir Black River Ludlow 31.4 36.4 DWR-Rescue Lake Black River Plymouth 33 26.5 DWR-Echo Lake Black River Plymouth 33.9 19.4 DWR-Amherst Dam Beaver Brook Springfield @ Mouth 7 3.5 DWR-DWW Great Brook Chester @ Mouth 20.5 8.5 DWR-DWW Chandler Meadow Brook Chester @ Mouth 2 3 DWR-DWW North Branch Black River Weathersfield @ Mouth 33 11 DWR North Branch Black River Weathersfield 2.5 28.2 DWR Knapp Brook Cavendish @ Mouth 5 5.5 DWR-DWW Knapp Brook Cavendish 2.5 3.43 Fish & Game-Knapp Brook Dam Elm Brook Cavendish @ Mouth 5 2.5 DWR-DWW Twenty Mile Stream Cavendish @ Mouth 15.5 8.5 DWR-DWW Twenty Mile Stream Cavendish 2.2 13.3 DWR Jewell Brook Ludlow @ Mouth 9.7 4.5 DWR-DWW Branch Brook Mt. Holly-Ludlow @ Mouth 16 8 DWR-DWW Patch Brook Plymouth @ Mouth 5.5 3 DWR-DWW Buffalo Brook Plymouth @ Mouth 5.5 3 DWR-DWW Reading Pond Brook Plymouth @ Mouth 2.8 2 DWR-DWW Great Roaring Brook Plymouth @ Mouth 5.5 4.5 DWR-DWW Tinker Brook Plymouth @ Mouth 4 4.5 DWR-DWW Spencer Brook Springfield @ Mouth 7.5 7 DWR-DWW Barkmill Brook Weathersfield @ Mouth 2.5 2.5 DWR-DWW Blood Brook Weathersfield @ Mouth 2.6 2.7 DWR-DWW Mill Brook Weathersfield @ Mouth 11.5 6 DWR-DWW Mill Brook Windsor @ Mouth 46 17 DWR Beaver Brook West Windsor @ Mouth 7 4 DWR-DWW Willow Brook West Windsor @ Mouth 5 5 DWR-DWW Bailey Brook Reading @ Mouth 8.9 5 DWR-DWW 7 Drainage Areas of Vermont Streams Miles Drainage Length of Above Area Stream Stream Name Location Mouth (Sq.
Recommended publications
  • NH Trout Stocking - April 2018
    NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 111 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 ALSTEAD NEWELL POND 1 ALSTEAD WARREN LAKE 1 ALTON BEAVER BROOK 1 ALTON COFFIN BROOK 1 ALTON HURD BROOK 1 ALTON WATSON BROOK 1 ALTON WEST ALTON BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 11 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 11 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 11 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 11 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 1 1 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BELMONT POUT POND 1 BELMONT TIOGA RIVER 1 BELMONT WHITCHER BROOK 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 11 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BERLIN ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 11 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 11 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER 11 BRISTOL PEMIGEWASSET RIVER 11 BRISTOL SMITH RIVER 11 BROOKFIELD CHURCHILL BROOK 1 BROOKFIELD PIKE BROOK 1 BROOKLINE NISSITISSIT RIVER 11 CAMBRIDGE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 1 CAMPTON BOG POND 1 CAMPTON PERCH POND 11 CANAAN CANAAN STREET LAKE 11 CANAAN INDIAN RIVER 11 NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 CANAAN MASCOMA RIVER, UPPER 11 CANDIA TOWER HILL POND 1 CANTERBURY SPEEDWAY POND 1 CARROLL AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 CARROLL SACO LAKE 1 CENTER HARBOR WINONA LAKE 1 CHATHAM BASIN POND 1 CHATHAM LOWER KIMBALL POND 1 CHESTER EXETER RIVER 1 CHESTERFIELD SPOFFORD LAKE 1 CHICHESTER SANBORN BROOK
    [Show full text]
  • DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report
    DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report 2004-2008 Downstream of Fife Brook Dam The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251 Causeway Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2119 Mitt Romney GOVERNOR Kerry Healey LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Tel: (617) 626-1000 Fax: (617) 626-1181 Ellen Roy Herzfelder or (617) 626-1180 SECRETARY http://www.state.ma.us/envir November 19, 2004 Dear Friends of the Deerfield River Watershed: It is with great pleasure that I present you with the Assessment Report for the Deerfield River Watershed. The report helped formulate the 5-year watershed action plan that will guide local and state environmental efforts within the Deerfield River Watershed over the next five years. The report expresses some of the overall goals of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, such as improving water quality, restoring natural flows to rivers, protecting and restoring biodiversity and habitats, improving public access and balanced resource use, improving local capacity, and promoting a shared responsibility for watershed protection and management. The Deerfield River Watershed Assessment Report was developed with input from the Deerfield River Watershed Team and multiple stakeholders including watershed groups, state and federal agencies, Regional Planning Agencies and, of course, the general public from across the Watershed. We appreciate the opportunity to engage such a wide group of expertise and experience as it allows the state to focus on the issues and challenges that might otherwise not be easily characterized. From your input we have identified the following priority issues: • Water Quantity • Water Quality • Fish Communities • Wildlife and Terrestrial Habitat • Open Space • Recreation I commend everyone involved in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans Ol'
    Native Americans ol' Clarendon, Vermont *This is only a report of my early findings. This is subject to charge as new evidence and facts arise. I\rly research has led me to cliscover two groups of Native Americiurs that could have resided in Clarendon and one other that may have simply passed through time to time. The tribe of Native l[mericans that has the highest likelihood of being in Clarendon isi the Mahican, specifically the subdivision Mahican proper. Their territory extended from Poughkeepsie, New York to Deerfield, I\4assachusetts, and extended flrttrest north in Rutland. It is important to mention that tlhey are not to be mistaken with the Mohegan tribes of Connecticut; however, they do have lineage witkr one another. As a side note, the Mahicans have lineage with the Lenape and ['equot. Other names for the Mahicans is as follows: Akochakanen (koquois name that means "Those who,speak a strangertongue"), Canoe Indians (Given by colonists), Hikanagi/Nhilcana (Given by the Shawnee), Laups (Given by the French), Orunges (,Given by a school textbook author, Chauvignerie, who rvas referring to a specific Mahican tribe in 1736), River Indians (Given by the Dutch), and Uragees (Again given by an author, Colden, in reference to a specific tribe of the.Mahicans 1747). Mahicans were hunters of southwestem and western Vermont. lheir langrllge belonged to the linguistic family of the Algonquian, spoken with an r-dialect. Sieldom did they settle anywhere in Vermont to stay due to the fact that they were typically hLunters, hotvever, it is not irnprobable that they had permanent selllements in Clarendon.r Historic territory of the |tdahicans l Swanton, John R., The lndion Tribes of North America,1953 pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Town Plan
    Norton Town Plan Adopted: July 11, 2019 Norton Selectboard Daniel Keenan Christopher Fletcher Franklin Henry Norton Planning Commission Tonilyn Fletcher Suzanne Isabelle Gina Vigneault Patricia Whitney Daniel Keenan (ex officio) Table of Contents Norton Town Plan ................................................................................................................ i I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 II. Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 4 III. Employment/Economic Opportunity .......................................................................... 12 IV. Transportation ............................................................................................................. 15 V. Community Facilities & Utilities ................................................................................. 18 VI. Education .................................................................................................................... 27 VII. Natural, Scenic and Historic Resources .................................................................... 27 VIII. Energy ...................................................................................................................... 32 IX. Housing ....................................................................................................................... 34 X. Flood Resilience ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A
    RASM 1935-E(A) GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-0. DUFRESNE, Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. McGerrigle QUEBEC REDEMPTI PARADIS PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON. Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-O. DUFRESNE. Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. MeGerrigle QUEBEe RÉDEMPTI PARADIS • PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS by H. W. McGerrigle TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 Scope of report and method of work 5 Acknowledgments 6 Summary 6 Previous work . 7 Bibliography 9 DESCRIPTION OF PLACER LOCALITIES 11 Ascot township 11 Felton brook 12 Grass Island brook . 13 Auckland township. 18 Bury township .. 19 Ditton area . 20 General 20 Summary of topography and geology . 20 Table of formations 21 IIistory of development and production 21 Dudswell township . 23 Hatley township . 23 Horton township. 24 Ireland township. 25 Lamhton township . 26 Leeds township . 29 Magog township . 29 Orford township . 29 Shipton township 31 Moe and adjacent rivers 33 Moe river . 33 Victoria river 36 Stoke Mountain area .
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Resource Assessment at Non-Powered Usace Sites
    HYDROPOWER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AT NON-POWERED USACE SITES Prepared by the Hydropower Analysis Center for USACE Headquarters July 2013 Final Report Hydropower Resource Assessment at Non-Powered USACE Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the largest owner-operator of hydropower plants in the United States, with 75 plants and an installed capability of 21,000 megawatts (MW), or about 24% of the total hydroelectric capacity. This report describes a national hydropower resource assessment study that assessed the potential and economic feasibility of adding hydroelectric power to these non- powered USACE projects over a 50-year period of analysis. Site Selection In selecting non-powered USACE projects with hydropower potential, the study employed a 2012 report by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) that identified the hydropower potential of 54,000 non- powered dams in the United States. Among these dams, 419 were USACE non-powered dams. This number was reduced to 223 sites using the following screening, as shown on the table below. • Generate 1 MW or more of potential hydropower. • No current Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license. • No obvious hindrances in developing hydropower. Distribution of USACE Sites with Potential Hydropower Capability FERC Preliminary or No FERC Permits Total Projects Pending Preliminary Permit Division Identified Total Percentage Total Percent Number of Total Number of Total Great Lakes & Ohio River (LRD) 71 40 56% 31 44% Mississippi Valley (MVD) 50 28 56% 22 44% Southwestern (SWD) 39 7 18% 32 82% North Atlantic (NAD) 21 2 10% 19 90% South Atlantic (SAD) 19 8 42% 11 58% Northwestern (NWD) 12 5 42% 7 58% South Pacific (SPD) 11 2 18% 9 82% USACE Total 223 92 41% 131 59% Data Collection To improve the study data, the daily hydraulic head and flow values for all 223 sites were obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shopper 05-02-18
    56 FREE Years We’ve Acquired the Message Treat your ECRWSS PRSRT STD US Postage Mom for PAID Permit #2 North Haverhill, NH See Page 3B POSTAL CUSTOMER Our Contact Information is on Page 6A Independently Owned & Locally Operated MAY 02, 2018 | WWW.VERMONTJOURNAL.COM VOLUME 56, ISSUE 49 Apple Blossom Cotillion See Pages 8A - 10A KMA Publications Inc. Construction on Woolson acquires The Message of the Block building expected to Week start in the fall REGION – Robert Miller of 1970s. “I feel like The Message BY PATRICK ADRIAN include the Springfield Housing Au- “This is a complicated project,” KMA Publications Inc., owner and is home again, back to where it The Shopper thority, Springfield Regional Devel- Morelock told the Select Board. publisher of The Vermont Journal VermontTHE started,” he said. Miller recalled opment Corporation, Springfield on “We’ve been lucky to get partners and The Shopper, announced Fri- feeling the same way when he SPRINGFIELD, Vt. – The Wool- the Move, and several social services in this particular project. If it wasn’t day, April 27, 2018 that he has pur- purchased The Shopper back in son Block building renovation organizations. for [them] we wouldn’t be doing this chased The Message of the Week. 2009, acquiring another paper has come with hurdles, including The amendment, which the Se- project. Nobody would be doing this The sale will merge the newspa- Journal his parents had started years al- revenue shortfalls and added con- lect Board unanimously approved, project.” pers but continue to be published most 57 years ago. “I grew up in struction costs, but despite chal- changes the original loan terms from Needed architectural revisions only under The Vermont Journal & the newspaper business work- lenges developers say they expect repayment over 20 years with a one have resulted in $200,000 additional and The Shopper banners.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine
    Comparison of Observed and Predicted Abutment Scour at Selected Bridges in Maine By Pamela J. Lombard and Glenn A. Hodgkins Prepared in cooperation with the Maine Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5099 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lombard, P.J., and Hodgkins, G.A., 2008, Comparison of observed and predicted abutment scour at selected bridges in Maine: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5099, 23 p., available only online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5099. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin
    JUST THE FACTS SERIES June 2019 DAMS AND RESERVOIRS IN THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN RICHELIEU RIVER BASIN MYTH Water released from tributary dams in the United States causes flooding in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River. FACT Water levels in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River Generally, mass releases of water from flood control are primarily affected by precipitation from rain or dams are avoided. In addition to compromising the snowmelt. structural integrity of the dams, mass releases would also endanger the very communities that these dams are built Because of its size, Lake Champlain can store a lot of to protect. water; the flood control dams and reservoirs in the basin, which are very small in comparison to the lake, do not When conditions force the release of more water than significantly change water levels of the lake and river as hydropower plants can handle, the increase in water they release water. levels immediately below the dam will be much greater than the increase on Lake Champlain. This is true even during high water and flooding events. Consider, for instance, when Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River experienced extreme flooding between April and June 2011, the additional releases flowing from Waterbury Reservoir—the largest flood control reservoir in the Vermont portion of the basin, contributed less than 2 centimetres (¾ inch) to the elevation of Lake Champlain and the upper Richelieu River. International Lake Champlain-Richelieu River Study Board FACT FACT Dams in the US portion of the basin are built for one of Waterbury Reservoir in Vermont is the largest reservoir two purposes: flood control or hydroelectric power.
    [Show full text]
  • Vtrans TS4 NOI, Question D.1 List of First Waters to Which Designated MS4 Areas Discharge, Impairment Status, and Pollutants for Impaired Waters November 17, 2017
    Notice of Intent (NOI) For Stormwater Discharges from the State Transportation Separate Storm Sewer System (TS4) General Permit 3-9007 Submission of this Notice of Intent (NOI) constitutes notice that the entity in Section A intends to be authorized to discharge pollutants to waters of the State under Vermont’s State Transportation Separate Storm Sewer System (TS4) permit. Submission of the NOI also constitutes notice that the party identified in Section A of this form has read, understands and meets the eligibility conditions; agrees to comply with all applicable terms and conditions; and understands that continued authorization under the TS4 General Permit is contingent on maintaining eligibility for coverage. In order to be granted coverage, all information required on this form must be completed and a complete Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) Plan must be submitted. A. Permittee Information 1a. Mailing Address: 1b. Town: 1c. State: 1d. Zip: 2 . Phone: 3. Email: B. Primary contact responsible for overall coordination of SWMP, if different than PEO 1. Name: 2a. Mailing Address: 2b. Town: 2c. State: 2d. Zip: 3. Phone: 4. Email: 5. Additional Contact Name: 6 . Additional Contact Email: C. Partnering organization responsible for Minimum Control Measure (MCM) implementation (if applicable) 1. If you are participating in the Chittenden County Reginal Planning Commission Memorandum Of Understanding to implement MCM1 & MCM2, check here: If you are relying on another entity to implement a MCM, please complete the following: 2. Organization: 3. Contact Name: 4. Minimum Control Measure being implemented: 5a. Mailing Address 5b. Town: 5c. State: 5d. Zip: 6. Phone: 7. Email: 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Trains, Logs, Moose, and Birds: Building on the Past and Reaching Toward the Future with Cultural Heritage and Nature-Based Ecotourism in Island Pond, Vermont
    Trains, Logs, Moose, and Birds: Building on the Past and Reaching toward the Future with Cultural Heritage and Nature-based Ecotourism in Island Pond, Vermont Environmental interpretation involves communicating about natural history, cultural heritage, and environmental issues to visitors engaged in recreational pursuits in a way that is interesting and entertaining. Interpreters seek to enhance visitors’ recreational experiences while assisting recreation managers in protecting the resources through the use of interpretive media. By Thomas R. Hudspeth* he Vermont Landscape Conference considers views of the past and visions of the future, using the paintings of Vermont Tlandscape painter Charles Louis Heyde as a jumping off point. This paper looks at trains and logs in Island Pond’s past and their contri- bution to the area’s unique sense of place. It then considers moose and birds and other watchable wildlife as potential contributors to Island Pond’s economic revival and sustainable development—development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the needs of future generations. Island Pond is a village in the Town of Brighton in the wild and re- mote Northeast Kingdom of Vermont, a region that encompasses Cale- donia, Essex, and Orleans counties and is currently confronting high unemployment, poverty, and outmigration of youth. The village takes its name from the adjacent body of water, which in turn is named for the twenty-acre island in the pond. This paper describes a collaborative Vermont History 70 (Winter/Spring 2002): 47–60. © 2002 by the Vermont Historical Society. ISSN: 0042-4161; online ISSN: 1544-3043 48 ..................... project between the University of Vermont (UVM) and the Island Pond community that develops watchable wildlife and other year- round ecotourism opportunities in the area, primarily through the use of environmental interpretation media.
    [Show full text]