Optimal Isolation and Characterisation of Chondroitin Sulfate From
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 Optimal isolation and characterisation of chondroitin sulfate from 2 Rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa) 3 4 José Antonio Vázqueza, Javier Fraguasa,b, Ramon Novoa-Carballalc,d, Rui L. 5 Reisc,d,e, Ricardo I. Pérez-Martínb & Jesus Valcarcela* 6 7 aGrupo de Reciclado y Valorización de Materiales Residuales (REVAL), Instituto 8 de Investigacións Mariñas (IIM-CSIC). Eduardo Cabello, 6. Vigo-36208, Galicia– 9 Spain. 10 11 bGrupo de Bioquímica de Alimentos, Instituto de Investigacións Mariñas (IIM- 12 CSIC). Eduardo Cabello, 6, Vigo-36208, Galicia–Spain. 13 14 c3B´s Research Group – Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University 15 of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue 16 Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, 17 Portugal. 18 19 dICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal. 20 21 eThe Discoveries Centre for Regenerative and Precision Medicine, Headquarters 22 at University of Minho, Avepark, 4805-017 Barco, Guimarães, Portugal 23 24 25 *corresponding author: [email protected] 26 Tel: +34 986231930; fax: +34 986292762 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 36 Abstract 37 Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is a glycosaminoglycan widely explored for cartilage 38 regeneration. Its bioactivity is influenced by sulfation degree and pattern, and 39 distinct sulfation in marine CS may open new therapeutic possibilities. In this 40 context, we studied for the first time the isolation and characterisation of CS from 41 Rabbit Fish (Chimaera monstrosa). We propose an efficient process starting with 42 enzymatic hydrolysis, followed by chemical treatments and ending in membrane 43 purification. All steps were optimised by response surface methodology. Chemical 44 treatment by alkaline-hydroalcoholic precipitation led to 99% purity CS suitable for 45 biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, and treatment by alkaline hydrolysis 46 yielded CS adequate for nutraceutical formulations (89% purity). Molecular weight 47 and sulfation profiles were similar for both materials. Gel permeation 48 chromatography analyses resulted in molecular weights (Mn) of 51-55 kDa. NMR 49 and SAX-HPLC revealed dominant 6S-GalNAc sulfation (4S/6S ratio of 0.4), 17% 50 of GlcA 2S-GalNAc 6S and minor quantities of other disaccharides. 51 52 Keywords: Chondroitin sulfate isolation; C. monstrosa cartilage; sulfation pattern; 53 molecular weight; process optimisation; response surface methodology. 2 54 1. Introduction 55 Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear polysaccharides ubiquitous at the cell 56 surface and in the extracellular matrix of most animal tissues (Yamada & 57 Sugahara, 2008). Beyond structural functions, GAGs participate in fundamental 58 biological processes such as cellular communication, differentiation, and growth. 59 As a consequence, GAGs have found applications in the pharmacological and 60 nutraceutical fields and are actively explored for regenerative medicine (Celikkin et 61 al., 2017; Choi & Choi, 2012; Lima, Rudd, & Yates, 2017). The biological activity of 62 GAGs depends on their capacity to interact with proteins. In sulfated GAGs, this 63 interaction is influenced by changes in charge density based on the relative 64 abundance of sulfated disaccharides; the presence of particular sulfated units; and, 65 sometimes, specific saccharide sequences (Valcarcel, Novoa-Carballal, Pérez- 66 Martín, Reis, & Vázquez, 2017) 67 68 Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is a sulfated GAG formed by disaccharide units of 69 glucuronic acid (GlcA) and N-acetyl galactosamine (GalNAc) linked by β-(1,4)- 70 glycosidic bonds. Sulfation can occur in both rings at different positions, leading to 71 considerable heterogeneity in CS chains. In the marine environment, CS shows 72 distinct characteristics compared to conventional porcine and bovine sources, 73 mainly in terms of molecular weight and sulfation (Valcarcel et al., 2017). 74 Abundance of particular units in CS chains seems to be related to therapeutic 75 properties and is characteristic of particular marine organisms (Kozlowski et al., 76 2011). CS from different marine species display antiviral, anti-metastatic and 77 anticoagulant properties; has shown to improve the mechanical and signalling 3 78 properties of cartilage engineering structures; and promote neurite outgrowth when 79 hybridized with dermatan sulfate (DS) (Valcarcel et al., 2017; Yamada & Sugahara, 80 2008). 81 82 In this context, extraction of CS from sources not previously explored holds 83 potential to discover novel sequences and ultimately therapeutic applications. This 84 is the case of chimaera (Chimaera monstrosa), an ancient cartilaginous fish related 85 to sharks, occasionally appearing as by-catch in deep water North Atlantic trawlers. 86 To the best of our knowledge, only two previous reports have dealt with the 87 characterization of CS from Chimaera species (Higashi et al., 2015b; Rahemtulla, 88 Höglund, & Løvtrup, 1976), none of them describing optimal isolation processes 89 nor the molecular weight of the polymers. 90 91 Depending on the application, CS must meet specific characteristics, which are 92 influenced by the isolation process. Commercially, marine CS is released from 93 shark after hydrolysis to disrupt the cartilage structure and eliminate proteins, 94 followed by recovery and purification steps. Conventional processes include 95 hydrolysis with high concentrations of alkali and toxic chemicals, such as guanidine 96 hydrochloride, and final purification with chromatographic methods (Vázquez et al., 97 2013). 98 99 Bearing this in mind, the present work aims at isolating for the first time CS from 100 the cartilage of C. monstrosa, optimizing the process from a sustainability 101 perspective. This comprises alternative enzymatic hydrolysis to replace corrosive 4 102 alkali and comparison of selective precipitation of CS using alkaline hydroalcoholic 103 solutions with less specific NaOH treatment. Optimal conditions are defined by 104 response surface methodology. Finally, CS purity is increased by ultrafiltration- 105 diafiltration techniques instead of time-consuming chromatographic separations, 106 achieving CS of variable purity suitable for different applications. A schematic 107 flowchart describing the steps developed to isolate CS from rabbit fish is shown in 108 Figure A (Supplementary material). 109 110 2. Materials and Methods 111 2.1. Reagents 112 Ethanol 95-97% (Prod. No. 20905.365, VWR), sodium hydroxide (Prod. No. 113 BDH9292, VWR), Sodium azide (Prod. No. S2002, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium 114 dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate (Prod. No.1.06346.1000, Merck), deutherium 115 oxide (Prod. No. 151882, Sigma-Aldrich), tris (hydroxyethyl)-aminomethane (Prod. 116 No. KB313482, Merck), sodium acetate (Prod. No. 27653.292, VWR), sodium 117 chloride (Prod. No. 27810.295, VWR), phenol (Prod. No. 1.00206.0250, Merck), 118 hydrazine sulfate (Prod. No. 1.04603, Merck), sulphuric acid 95% (Prod. No. 119 20700.298, VWR), sodium carbonate anhydrous (Prod. No. 27771.290, VWR), 120 copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate (Prod. No. BDH9312, VWR), potassium/sodium 121 L(+)-tartrate tetrahydrate (Prod. No. 27068.290, VWR), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent 122 (Prod. No. RE00180250, Scharlau), disodium tetraborate decahydrate (Prod. No. 123 S007050500, Scharlau), sodium salicylate (Prod. No.71948, Sigma-Aldrich), 124 sodium nitroprussiate (Prod. No. 31444, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium 5 125 dichloroisocyanurate dihydrate (Prod. No. 110887, Merck), diethyl ether (Prod. No. 126 ET00792500, Scharlau). 127 128 2.2. Cartilage preparation 129 Rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa) individuals of 800-2000 g, captured as discards, 130 were kindly provided by Opromar (Marín, Spain) and stored at -18ºC until use. 131 Specimens were eviscerated and heated in a water bath at 90ºC for 30 min. 132 Cartilaginous material was then milled and homogenized at ~1-3 mm size using a 133 grinder and stored at -18ºC. Chemical composition of cartilage was assessed by 134 determination of water and ash content, fat concentration, total nitrogen and total 135 protein as total nitrogen × 6.25 (AOAC, 1997). Total carbohydrate content was 136 estimated by substracting protein, fat, ash and moisture from total sample weight. 137 This value of carbohydrates was confirmed by total sugar determination (Dubois et 138 al., 1956) after exhaustive enzymatic proteolysis of cartilage. 139 140 2.3. Experimental designs for CS isolation 141 Initially, the joint effect of pH, temperature (T) and enzyme/substrate ratio (E/S) on 142 cartilage digestion by Esperase (Esperase 8L: 8 KNovo Protease Unit/g, KNPU/g, 143 Novozymes, Nordisk, Denmark). was studied. In this case, 20 experiments were 144 run (with 6 replicates in the center of the experimental domain) following the 145 combinations indicated in Table A (supplementary material), being the ranges of 146 the independent variables: pH (6-10), T (30-80ºC) and E/S (0.01-2%). 147 Subsequently, two strategies were followed for the chemical processing of the 148 previous hydrolysates: 1) alkaline treatment, evaluating the simultaneous effect of 6 149 time (ranging between 1 and 24 h) and NaOH concentration (from 0.2 to 1.5M) and 150 2) selective precipitation of CS with alkaline-hydroalcoholic solutions (NaOH 151 concentration (0.1-0.8M) and EtOH volume (0.3-1.4 v) as independent variables). 152 In both designs, 13 experiments were performed (with 5 replicates in the center of 153 the experimental domain). In all cases, the experimental procedure was based on 154