After the Coup, Where Next for the Labour Party in Scotland?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

After the Coup, Where Next for the Labour Party in Scotland? After the Coup, Where Next for the Labour Party in Scotland? As we look back on a second successful Jeremy Corbyn leadership election campaign in just over 12 months, and prepare for a possible snap General Election and the unifying moment it must surely provide, we should recall the circumstances which led to the emergence of a left leadership in the first instance only 13 months ago. As he is at pains to point out, Jeremy did not singlehandedly give life to what now constitutes an authentic, but still evolving mass Labour Party in the UK. Nor can he claim exclusive personal credit for the re-emergence of socialism as a viable, oft-discussed and ‘live’ political creed capable of attracting fresh adherents and interest. He may have provided the catalyst for the various historic, economic and political variables swirling around UK and global life, but to target Corbyn’s character, politics or approach out with a context where millions of ordinary people are looking for alternatives to the tired and discredited shibboleths of the unregulated economy and its political cheerleaders is to fail to grasp the variables which give rise to movements and provide traction for previously marginalized ideas. His re-election, achieved with an even more emphatic mandate, should give pause to those both inside and outside our movement for whom socialist ideas are always by default a vote loser. However, if we are to engender the kind of enthusiasm his tenure has already spread across the Party, our celebrations should be tempered by an acknowledgement that broadening the appeal of transformative ideas beyond our numbers will necessitate the development of not 1 only policy and principle but a compelling narrative capable of entrenching itself in the public consciousness. Socialists do not come in to politics to make virtuous noise from the side lines. Our ambitions are not limited to the merits of sound policy. Ideas remain arid, irrelevant to the lives of working people if they are not deployed by politicians in office. A vigilant mass movement can foster the ground upon which radical ideas become self-evident and widely accepted. It can offer permission for radical politicians to legislate radical programmes. But a Party must first convince a wide and varied section of the population that it is capable of an effective implementation of its manifesto. Now Corbyn’s tenure – for now – is once again democratically secured, CFS, Momentum and all unaffiliated members and supporters who support the general thrust of redistributive policy must roll up their sleeves, integrate into and transform the life of their CLPs, union branches and communities. Only then can we provide the animated base of support that can propel a leadership in full command of their message into government. It is the failure to place Corbyn’s victory within a specific set of historical circumstances that perhaps more than their obsolete politics exposes our dwindling but still powerful opponents in the movement to censure. Their preoccupation with models of Presidential leadership, of spin, dissembling and manipulation of the public mood, of parliamentary trickery and media schmoozing leaves them vulnerable to being left behind by a sweep of history they barely register, never mind grasp. In contrast, the left must reach out not only beyond its traditional 2 constituencies (though without winning back the confidence of working people and those elements of the progressive middle classes anxious to see radical governance, our hopes of achieving power will remain unrealised), but do so in ways which are not content with being right, but with winning purchase amongst the population. There are many trenches in the war of ideas. The more we occupy, the more deeply our political offensive resonates with the lived experience of the people. We must reach out also to those supporters of Owen Smith who are of decent intent, who genuinely support the more radical elements of his platform. Only by resisting the rear-guard manoeuvers of Progress/Saving Labour et al will they see any of their policy hopes realised. Funded from Sainsbury’s millions and other corporate sources, the rump of the Old Right no doubt saw Owen as a useful patsy, a stop gap until further destabilisation becomes possible. If we can unite around a programme which acknowledges the progressive aspects of Owen Smith’s campaign, we can formulate the kind of unity essential if we are to take the fight to a Tory administration utterly consumed with ideological fervour. Those Labour MPs whose perspectives remain detained within the corridors of Westminster cannot feign surprise if, as they have demanded of Corbyn, their own CLPs now hold them to account should they fail to acknowledge the result of a democratic contest they themselves demanded. The narcissism demonstrated by some elements of the PLP stands in sharp contrast to the patient work of Labour Party socialists over the decades who, despite everything, stayed with our movement, fought our corner and organised on the basis of ideas and policy. The Party needs more, not less democracy. The trawling of social media in search of perceived infractions is seen by a bewildered and connected generation of young people as akin to the state rooting around for dissenting bloggers. A newly elected NEC must confirm democratic policy making, freedom of comradely expression and the accountability of the Shadow Cabinet to members as priorities. In Scotland, if we are to effectively expose the Emperor’s clothes now concealing the government’s record of failure, Kezia too must register 3 that a sea change is in progress, a shift that will continue with or without her support. The SLP can either embrace the possibilities offered by a mass Party desperate to move on and confront poverty, inequalities and nationalism in all its guises, or, in a hapless attempt to impose control, deny and squander energies which might otherwise be harnessed to transform our fortunes. As members, supporters and affiliates once again confirm Jeremey Corbyn as the Leader of our Party, a binary choice confronts us all. Embrace the prospects for electoral success a mass Party offers, or indulge an internecine rancour that can only let the Tories and the SNP off the hook. A mandate has been confirmed. It is up to those who opposed Corbyn – sometimes on the basis of genuine principle, but too often by echoing the narratives of the right wing press – to accept that the Party is changing, has changed, and will continue to evolve as events outside reverberate through its structures. If that is not possible, if a version of ‘loyalty’ continues to circulate which prioritises behind the scenes machinations over honest and transparent debate, only the Tories and SNP will benefit. We have a world to win, let’s get to work. For access to the London School of Economics report into systematic media bias against Jeremey Corbyn and his supporters, please see: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/Mainstream-Media-Representations-of-Jeremy- Corbyn.aspx; http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/pdf/JeremyCorbyn/Cobyn-Report- FINAL.pdf To contact the Media Response Unit, launched at the 2016 LP Conference and currently looking for skilled volunteers, ideas and contributions, see: www.mru.org.uk If you would like to find out more about Campaign forfor Socialism please contactcontact:::: info@campaignforsocialism,, or if you would like to join CfS please visit: wwwwww.campaignforsocialism.org.uk/join.php Currently, 5.3 million people receive less than the living wage and 700,000 people are on zero hours contracts. The UK state pension, at less than 30% of the average income, is almost the lowest in western industrialised nations. The poorest 10% of the households pay 47% of income in direct/indirect taxes, compared to 35% for the richest 10%. The increase in personal allowances from £10,600 in 2014-5 to £10,800 in 2015-6 and inflation- busting rise in the threshold at which the higher marginal rate begins will not change any the above. Tax exemption for the first £1,000 interest on savings does not amount to redistribution and will not help those struggling to make ends meet. The government claims that it will raise £3.1bn from a clampdown on tax avoidance, but £34bn of tax revenues are going astray.’ Professor Prem Sikka (writing in 2015) is co-author of HMRC: Making it fit for the 21 st Century. 4 Faustian Alliances and the SNP Dale Street, Glasgow Momentum In late May Compass Chairperson Neal Lawson penned an open letter to the SNP calling for a “progressive alliance” with the Labour Party. Other candidates for his “progressive alliance” are the Lib Dems, Plaid Cymru and the Greens. Anxious to press all the right buttons, Lawson wrote his letter “as a Londoner” (you can still smell the sackcloth and ashes as he typed that phrase) and referred admiringly to “your country” (even though, as confirmed by the 2014 referendum, Lawson inhabits the same country as the SNP). Adopting the language of the “progressive” (sic) SNP, Lawson denounced the unholy trinity of “English Tory rule, the Daily Mail and the City of London”. As chair of an “influential left-wing think tank”, he probably found it too vulgar to go the whole hog and inveigh against “Westmonster” rule. Lawson was “jealous of the political conversation you had as a nation over independence”. But, he continued, it was time to move on and to go beyond “tribalism”: The SNP should join “the progressive alliance conversation” with Labour and other parties. “As ever,” concluded Lawson, “you must be bold and take the lead in forging a new politics.
Recommended publications
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G. Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol) at the University of Edinburgh
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. How Did Young Left Wing Political Activists Learn to Become Active and Critical Citizens? Stuart Moir A Thesis SuBmitted in Fulfilment of Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education (EdD) The University of Edinburgh 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT 6 1.2. Lay Summary 8 1.3. Acknowledgments 10 2. INTRODUCTION 12 2.1. Setting the Scene 12 2.2. The Contested Nature of Citizenship and Citizenship Education 13 2.3. Thesis Inspiration and Motivation: Professional Experience and Political Activity 14 2.4. Framing the Key ProBlem 18 2.5. Research Questions and Approach 22 2.6. Summary of Findings 25 2.7. Overview of Thesis Chapters 29 3. UNDERSTANDING EDUCATION FOR CITIZENSHIP AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL ACTIVISTS: CONCEPTS, THEORIES & POLICY CONTEXT 32 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Can't We All Just Get Along? Left Unity
    Issue 44 January/February 2008 scottishleftreview £2.00 CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG? LEFT UNITY IN SCOTLAND HenDi socialist review aslef 25/10/06 5:39 pm Page 1 scottishleftreviewIssue 44 January/February 2008 Contents Comment ........................................................2 Reaching out from inside... ...........................16 Unity is possible - look at Europe... ...............4 Vince Mills Left a bit ........................................................18 Gregor Gall Christina McKelvie Political earthquakes in the heart of Europe .....8 Ending old attitudes ......................................20 Victor Grossman Lou Howson News from the south ....................................10 No end to privatisation ..................................21 Andy Newman Gerry McCartney Workers - and eco-systems - unite ..............12 A flow of problems ........................................22 Justin Kenrick Antonio Ioris Comment he beginning point for all political discussion should be to on whether Scotland is now moving in a better direction. The Tdismiss the ridiculous idea that there is no ‘right’ or ‘left’ Labour left is caught knowing that the SNP is implementing in politics. These are not outmoded terms and neither Tony traditional Labour policies but also see them introducing Blair or anyone else can change the reality of how power, New Labour policies too. What do you criticise? The SNP left wealth and people are interconnected through the repetition can make all the accommodations it likes, but it knows that Scotrail’s job is to make profits for its investors - of platitudes. It is not true to say that there is no necessary money spent cutting business taxes is money spent prolonging contradiction between the policies of the left and the right. It is Thatcher’s shadow over Scotland. Those from the smaller left not true to say that increasing inequality by encouraging wealth parties will note that the SNP’s proposals for changing PFI do not to provide a service for the Scottish public.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Interests
    REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s name: Brian Adam Constituency/Region: Aberdeen Donside Date on which initial statement lodged: 24 May 2011 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006. Remuneration and No registrable interests related undertaking Gifts No registrable interests Overseas visits No registrable interests Heritable property No registrable interests Interest in shares No registrable interests Voluntary No registrable interests REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s name: George Adam Constituency/Region: Paisley Date on which initial statement lodged: 9 June 2011 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006. Remuneration and I am a local authority councillor for Renfrewshire Council related undertaking (of Cotton Street, Paisley). I work 40 hours per week and receive remuneration of between £15,001 and £20,000 per annum. I will be donating my council salary to local charities. Gifts No registrable interests Overseas visits No registrable interests Heritable property No registrable interests Interest in shares No registrable interests Voluntary I am a member of Unite (T and G Section). I am a member of the MS Society of Scotland. I am a member of the Club @ Renfrewshire. I am a member of the 1820 Society. I am a board member of Renfrewshire Leisure Trust. I am a member of the Paisley Burgh Branch of the SNP. REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s name: Clare Adamson Constituency/Region: Central Scotland Date on which initial statement lodged: 31 May 2011 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Black and White, Migrant and Local, Religious Or Not: Workers Unite! 2 NEWS
    For a Solidarity workers’ government For social ownership of the banks and industry No 342 5 November 2014 30p/80p www.workersliberty.org Down with UKIP! Up with solidarity! Black and white, migrant and local, religious or not: workers unite! 2 NEWS What is the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty? NHS staff to strike again Today one class, the working class, lives by selling its labour power to another, the capitalist class, which owns the means of production. By Todd Hamer defending our already much Society is shaped by the capitalists’ relentless drive to increase their degraded terms and condi - wealth. Capitalism causes poverty, unemployment, the Health unions have an - tions, then we will have blighting of lives by overwork, imperialism, the nounced a further four helped speed on the end of destruction of the environment and much else. hour strike on 24 Novem - the NHS as a free state-of- Against the accumulated wealth and power of the ber in their ongoing pay the-art health service. capitalists, the working class has one weapon: dispute. solidarity. But the current strategy of The Alliance for Workers’ Liberty aims to build Since 2010 the NHS has the unions is risible. So far solidarity through struggle so that the working class can overthrow been starved of £20 billion. the campaign has involved a capitalism. We want socialist revolution: collective ownership of By 2020 the gap between four hour strike, four days industry and services, workers’ control and a democracy much fuller funding and necessary ex - of not doing unpaid over - than the present system, with elected representatives recallable at any penditure will be around time (so-called “action short time and an end to bureaucrats’ and managers’ privileges.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 85 January February 2015 Press Quality
    Scottish Left Review Issue 85 January/February 2015 - £2.00 1 Scottish Left Review Comment – new year but not new times Issue 85 January/February 2015 Contents n time honoured fashion, we wish our Ireaders, subscribers, contributors and Comment .......................................................................................................2 supporters a heartfelt happy new year. But Keeping the NHS fit for purpose - Shona Robison .......................................4 we also know that no mere well wishes will stop 2015 from becoming yet another Social care is the key to freeing up our NHS- Neil Findlay ..........................5 annus horribilis for most of the populace TTIP – threatening terrible, traumatic, invasive potential as austerity and neo-liberalism continue - Richard Doherty .........................................................................................6 to destroy lives, living standards and life Health and social care integration: equal access for all? Tressa Burke .....7 chances. At the forthcoming Westminster general election, we face three different When the political is highly personal - John Daly ........................................9 colours of austerity – blue (Tory), yellow Can good intentions lead to good results? Paul Arkison ..........................10 (LibDem) and pink (Labour). To stop another annus horribilis will take Potential problems aplenty - it doesn’t have to be this way - Dave Watson ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Labour – the Return of Its Radical Roots Mike Cowley
    ScottishLeft Review Issue 109 January/February 2019 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' 'best 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 109 January/February 2019 ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer LRD TUC Sept15_Layout ASLEF1 10/07/2015 the 14:09 train Page 1 drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk FIGHT ANTI-UNION LAWS www.rmt.org.uk General Secretary: Mick Cash President President: PSeaneter P Hoyleinkney 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 109 January/February 2019 feedback comment Bastards of Brexit and the 'national interest' appy New Year to all our crisis. And, many more bemoan that the negotiating against twenty seven others subscribers, readers and whole system of politics itself in Britain (in the form of the EU which includes Hsupporters. And, with the is in a mess. No politician or party stands Germany, France, Italy and Spain as the pleasantries now done, let’s get back to out with any dignity or stature in this major constituents). This is a moment the matters at hand - of hard politics. situation according to this view. of power play where the balance of Over the last few months, day-in-and- forces needs to be realistically appraised. The problem with such an analysis day-out in the pages of the Guardian, Second, clubs which are engaged in the is that it tends to depoliticise what its parliamentary sketch writer, John job of self-preservation and expansion remains an intensely political process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pro-Independence Radical Left in Scotland Since 2012 Nathalie DUCLOS Université De Toulouse 2-Jean Jaurès
    The Pro-independence Radical Left in Scotland since 2012 Nathalie DUCLOS Université de Toulouse 2-Jean Jaurès The Pro-independence Radical Left in Scotland since 2012 Nathalie DUCLOS Université de Toulouse 2-Jean Jaurès CAS EA 801 [email protected] Résumé Cet article a pour objectif de dessiner les contours de la gauche radicale et indépendantiste dans l’Écosse d’aujourd’hui. La longue campagne qui a précédé le référendum sur l’indépendance écossaise de 2014 (celle-ci ayant commencé dès 2012, soit plus de deux ans avant le référendum lui-même) a donné naissance à un nouveau paysage politique, surtout à gauche. Celui-ci se caractérise par deux tendances : la multiplication de nouvelles organisations (par exemple la Radical Independence Campaign, Common Weal et le Scottish Left Project), souvent (mais pas toujours) favorables à l’indépendance écossaise, et le renforcement des partis indépendantistes de gauche ou de centre-gauche déjà existants, qui ont tous gagné énormément de nouveaux adhérents. Cet article se concentre sur les organisations indépendantistes de la gauche radicale en Écosse : celles créées depuis 2012, ainsi que celles qui leur ont donné naissance. Après avoir présenté chacune de ces organisations et les liens qui existent entre elles, il se penche sur leurs stratégies à court terme (présenter des candidats et remporter des sièges aux élections parlementaires écossaises de 2016) et à moyen ou long terme (faire campagne pour l’organisation d’un nouveau référendum sur l’indépendance écossaise et proposer une vision de l’indépendance différente de celle mise en avant par le Scottish National Party). Abstract This article aims at mapping the pro-independence radical left in today’s Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Leftreview
    ScottishLeft Review Issue 90 November/December 2015 - £2.00 Issue 90 November/December 2015 ScottishLeftReview - 1 ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer ASLEF the train drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk ScottishLeftReview Cover and illustrations: Issue 90 November/December 2015 Nadia Lucchesi Contents ([email protected]) Comment – Ninety not out.................................................................................3 Proofing services: Labour is the only Britain wide anti-austerity party now - John McDonnell .....4 Bob Thomson and John Daly How the contest was won - Martyn Cook and Tommy Kane .............................5 Communications and Kez + Jez = something spezial? - Lesley Brennan ...............................................7 organisational development: Challenges for Corbynmania in Scotland - Daniel Kenealy ................................8 Carole Ewart Corbyn challenges cosy consensus - Tom Mills .............................................. 10 Corbyn and the anti-austerity movement - Phil McGarry and Keith Stoddart 11 Trade union development officer: Corbyn’s challenge: to survive and prosper - Eric Shaw ................................ 12 David Brockett Workers’ rights are human rights - Carole Ewart ............................................ 14 Editor Email: Indyref 2014: nation vs class - John Foster and Neil
    [Show full text]
  • Corbyn's Labour at the Crossroads
    the issue 5: MARch 2017 clarion £1 (unwaged 50p) An unofficial magazine by LABOUR AND Momentum activists CORBYN’S LABOUR AT THE CROSSROADS By Simon Hannah, Wandsworth Momentum Windows closing The defeat in Copeland inevitably ushered in another round of crisis-soul- The truth is that the Labour Party may be a coalition (the much talked about searching-existential-fear in Labour and whoops of derision from oppo - broad church) but it is also one where tendencies and factions vie for control nents. Journalists rushed to their keyboards to pile blame onto Corbyn, and where energy and initiative counts for a lot. If you are in the driving seat, gleeful that another Two Minute Hate was about to commence. then you need to steer the car, you need to set the velocity and direction of The problem facing the left renaissance in Labour now is that a lot of Cor - travel. If you want to win the party, then you have to be all in. Look at Blair byn’s own base of support are now openly talking up the need for “succession”. when he won. Within a year he had changed the entire party branding and Before the right tried to beat him, then a soft left candidate was presented, abolished Clause IV. He wasn’t fucking about. The left recently hasn’t even now the battle to unseat him moves to the inner core. Corbyn loyal MPs names come close to that kind of bold vision. keep surfacing, Angela Rayner, Emily Thornberry and others. The problem Corbyn opted to be a peacemaker in the party, no doubt trying to delay a isn’t particularly Corbyn.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Election Preview: the Last Beats of a Labour 'Heartland
    Scottish Parliament election preview: the last beats of a Labour ‘heartland’ in Central Scotland? democraticaudit.com /2016/04/25/scottish-parliament-election-preview-the-last-beats-of-a-labour-heartland-in- central-scotland/ By Democratic Audit UK 2016-4-25 The Scottish Parliament elections take place early next month, with the SNP expected to solidify their dominance in the post-referendum Scotland. The Central Scotland region has long been a Labour stronghold with the party’s legendary and revered first leader Keir Hardie from the area. Here, Judith Sijstermans previews the contests, and suggests that this election may represent the ‘last beats’ of the Labour ‘heartland’. Motherwell (Credit: Pete Birkinshaw, CC BY 2.0) The Central Scotland region is the birthplace of the Labour Party’s first leader Keir Hardie and forms part of what used to be seen as solidly Scottish Labour Party “heartland.” However, Central Scotland was decisively changed by the 2011 elections. In those elections, the SNP gained 5 constituency seats from Labour. Two more of Labour’s remaining three MSPs in Central Scotland won on precarious margins. Motherwell and Wishaw Labour MSP John Pentland won by only 587 votes (2.4%) and Uddingston and Bellshill Labour MSP Michael McMahon won by only 714 votes (2.8%). The 2011 elections also suggest that it is unlikely that this region will contribute to attempts by the Tories to overtake Labour in opposition. In 2011, both the Conservative constituency vote in Central Scotland (7.24%) and the Central Scotland regional list vote (6.4%) were only half of the Tories’ national average.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Scottish Parliament 25
    DEVOLUTION MONITORING PROGRAMME 2006-08 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Peter Jones (ed.) Honorary Senior Research Fellow The Constitution Unit www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit ISSN 1751-3855 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell and Akash Paun at the Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Peter Jones Honorary Senior Research Fellow, The Constitution Unit, UCL Former political correspondent for The Economist Wales: Dr Richard Wyn Jones & Dr Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Martin Burch & James Rees, IPEG, University of Manchester Alan Harding, SURF, University of Salford The Centre: Professor Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL Akash Paun, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Interests on 4 September 2008
    REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s name: Brian Adam Constituency/Region: Aberdeen North Date on which initial statement lodged: 15 May 2007 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006. Remuneration During a visit to Japan from 14 to 20 February 2010 I gave a lecture at Kwansei Gakiun University Osaka (of Uegahara, Nishiomiya, Hyogo, Japan, 662-8501) for which I received remuneration of between £501 - £1000. [Registered 24 February 2010] Related Undertaking No registrable interests. Election expenses No registrable interests. Sponsorship No registrable interests. Gifts No registrable interests. Overseas visits [Ceased interest removed from entry: 9 February 2009] [Ceased interest removed from entry: 14 February 2010] [Ceased interest removed from entry: 14 February 2010] From 14 to 20 February 2010 I visited Japan to discuss devolution/decentralisation and renewables with Japanese Central, Regional and Local Government, academic institutions and businesses. The costs of the visit (approximately £4,800 for travel, accommodation and meals) were met by the Foreign Ministry, Japanese Government, Tokyo, Japan. [Registered 24 February 2010] Heritable property No registrable interests. Interest in shares No registrable interests. Voluntary [Ceased interest removed from entry: 9 February 2009] My wife is employed as a lecturer in nursing at The Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen. REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s name: Bill Aitken Constituency/Region: Glasgow Date on which initial statement lodged: 8 May 2007 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006.
    [Show full text]