Scottish Labour – the Return of Its Radical Roots Mike Cowley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scottish Labour – the Return of Its Radical Roots Mike Cowley ScottishLeft Review Issue 109 January/February 2019 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' 'best 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 109 January/February 2019 ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer LRD TUC Sept15_Layout ASLEF1 10/07/2015 the 14:09 train Page 1 drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk FIGHT ANTI-UNION LAWS www.rmt.org.uk General Secretary: Mick Cash President President: PSeaneter P Hoyleinkney 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 109 January/February 2019 feedback comment Bastards of Brexit and the 'national interest' appy New Year to all our crisis. And, many more bemoan that the negotiating against twenty seven others subscribers, readers and whole system of politics itself in Britain (in the form of the EU which includes Hsupporters. And, with the is in a mess. No politician or party stands Germany, France, Italy and Spain as the pleasantries now done, let’s get back to out with any dignity or stature in this major constituents). This is a moment the matters at hand - of hard politics. situation according to this view. of power play where the balance of Over the last few months, day-in-and- forces needs to be realistically appraised. The problem with such an analysis day-out in the pages of the Guardian, Second, clubs which are engaged in the is that it tends to depoliticise what its parliamentary sketch writer, John job of self-preservation and expansion remains an intensely political process. reviews Crace, has lambasted Theresa May as (which the increasingly intergrationist EU The view is almost as if there were at an automaton, a robot called Maybot. very much is) do not allow members to hand competent and skilled politicians Maybot has, according to Crace, entered leave the club and maintain the benefits prepared to work together in the such a state of malfunction that she is of the membership of the club (especially ‘national interest’ that the situation only able to repeat that she is ‘very clear’ without paying for them). This was would be different and so much better. about ‘being clear’. Her behaviour would always going to be a no-brainer. Both But this is a deeply apolitical and naïve seem, according to some, to amount to points eluded the quite deluded brash appraisal. The reason why May’s deal is the tip of one almighty mess in British and buccaneering perspective of the likes unlikely to get passed in parliament is politics over Brexit. After the pulling of Boris Johnson (with Tory leadership because the Tory party is not only weak of the meaningful vote in parliament pretensions), who grandstanding and (reliant upon the Democratic Unionist and the inability to gain any further playing to the audience of Tory activists, Party (DUP)) and badly split (with the concessions, the prospect of falling off told us that all that was needed was to likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg of the European the cliff of a ‘no deal’ departure is seen say ‘give us what we want or we won’t Research Group and Boris Johnson being as a literal crashing out of the EU. To this, play ball’ (or handover £39bn). These the obvious ‘hard’ Brexiteers). But behind others moan that the political system are the instances of the most obvious this are a few seldom recognised realities. has been so skewered on the knife of cases of the bastards of Brexit. But there Brexit that there’s a policy vacuum on First, the likelihood of May negotiating are many others too, like Dominic Raab, other matters (although it should be a deal that would satisfy both hard Tommy Robinson or Nigel Farage. What noted - as Chris Stephens points out in Brexiteers and DUP was always going to binds them together is that they want to his article - Universal Credit continues as be extremely slight because although use Brexit as a means to deliver an even does austerity). Others go further and Britain is a substantial economy it smaller state, with protections from the called this mess downright chaos and is, nevertheless, just one economy market on workers’ rights, environmental regulation and consumer rights even ScottishLeftReview further reduced. Sounds like England as a Issue 109 January/February 2019 green and pleasant land of the Victorian Contents or Edwardian eras. Editorial comment .................................................................................................................................... 3 Just Transitioning – marrying environment protection and social justice Stephen Smellie..................... 5 The political crisis around Brexit is now so Greening economics and politics with social justice Francis Stuart......................................................... 7 profound that the case for a referendum Partnership for progress Matthew Crighton ............................................................................................ 9 on either May’s deal or a ‘no deal’ is very Rebelling against extinction Douglas Rogers ......................................................................................... 10 much required. This is not a betrayal of The global dimension of the Just Transition Bill Bonnar ........................................................................11 Why and how the SNP must stop being ‘the party of oil’ Simon Barrow ..............................................12 the ‘no’ vote in 2016 precisely because Opportunities for Scotland’s climate related legislation Gordon Morgan .............................................13 that referendum did not take a view on Capitalism is the climate crisis Dave Sherry ........................................................................................... 14 what form Brexit should take. It is clear Universal Credit – universal cruelty for the poor and vulnerable Chris Stephens .................................15 Death in Police Custody: the case of Sheku Bayoh Aamer Anwar .........................................................16 that May’s deal is not a good one and a On the frontline: fighting the fascists Talat Ahmed ............................................................................... 17 ‘no deal’ is even worse. Rather, another ‘Value Education, Value Teachers’ campaign marches on Larry Flanagan .............................................18 referendum would allow ‘no’ voters Tories in tatters results in rise of right? Sean Duffy ............................................................................... 19 the opportunity to express their view Scottish Labour – the return of its radical roots Mike Cowley ...............................................................20 Labour’s Scottish problem Róisín McLaren ............................................................................................ 21 on what kind of Brexit they wish for. Scotland needs a community organising movement Linda Somerville .................................................22 Whether this turns into a referendum Another Edinburgh revolt: staff and students elect a radical rector Angi Lamb ....................................23 to reverse the decision of the 2016 one Betrayal of the Sandinista revolution Joseph McAleer ..........................................................................24 would depend on what the question Catalonia and the continuing Spanish crisis George Kerevan ................................................................25 Age, ageing and ageism: how ageist is Scotland? Bill Johnston .............................................................26 (binary choice between May’s deal and Scottish theatrical revolution Mark Brown ............................................................................................ 27 ‘no deal’) was or questions (the binary Film and book reviews Jackie Bergson, Sean Sheehan, Robin Jones ......................................................28 choice plus the options to delay leaving, Kick up The Tabloids ............................................................................................................................... 31 rescind Article 50, stay in the EU/rejoin 3 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 109 January/February 2019 the EU etc etc) were. Of course, what defined as juxtaposing the masses against imprecision of use here has in parallel in makes the political crisis as profound elites. Is there a case for the left trying to the imprecision of using the other terms as it is are the intractable divisions in use the same terms and language for its discussed above. This is not to suggest Labour, between ‘leavers’ like Corbyn and own purposes? Put more starkly, can the that properly using terms like socialism ‘remainers’ like Keir Starmer and how left refashion what is usually the preserve would miraculously strengthen Labour’s this influences many tactical questions of the right, turning it against the right? electoral standing or its radicalism. But including the relationship between Recall, David Cameron’s ‘we are all in it is to suggest for the longer term that calling for a general election and any it together’ mantra of the Coalition socialism rather than social democracy is kind of further referendum. Corbyn and government era. In Gramscian terms, what is required to address and end the a section of the left in Labour have been this would mean establishing a counter- ills of capitalism. against the EU for decades in the vein hegemony with it. Certainly, Corbyn’s Speaking of Labour’s electoral standing, of Tony Benn. Starmer and
Recommended publications
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary Debates
    Monday Volume 652 7 January 2019 No. 228 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 7 January 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE—The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. Stephen Barclay, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Gavin Williamson, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Matt Hancock, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Amber Rudd, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The IR35 MP Hit List ­ the 100 Politicians Most Likely to Lose Their Seats
    The UK's leading contractor site. 200,000 monthly unique visitors. GUIDES IR35 CALCULATORS BUSINESS INSURANCE BANKING ACCOUNTANTS INSURANCE MORTGAGES PENSIONS RESOURCES FREE IR35 TEST The IR35 MP hit list ­ The 100 politicians most likely to lose their seats Last December research conducted by ContractorCalculator identified the MPs for whom it will prove most costly to lose the self­employed vote, and published the top 20 from each party. The results were based on data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and contractor sentiment indicated by a previous ContractorCalculator survey. The full results of this research are now published, with the top 100 MPs, ordered by risk of losing their seat, due to the Off­payroll (IR35) reforms that Treasury, HMRC and the Chancellor are attempting to push through Parliament. In total, 85 MPs hold a majority in Parliament that would feasibly be overturned if the expected turnout of IR35­opposing self­employed voters from their constituency were to vote against them, and we list the next 15, making 100 in total, that are potentially under threat if the self­ employed voter turnout is higher than expected. "This single piece of damaging policy could prove catastrophic for all parties involved, not least the Tories, who make up 43% of the at­risk seats,” comments ContractorCalculator CEO, Dave Chaplin. “There is also potentially a lot to gain for some, but those in precarious positions will have to act swiftly and earnestly to win over contractors’ trust.” How we identified the at­risk MPs The research leveraged the data and compared the MPs majority at the last election with the likely number of self­employed voters in their area who would turn out and vote against them.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.12 MB
    Published: Tuesday 6 October 2020 Early Day Motions tabled on Monday 5 October 2020 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 957 Black History Month and the British Hotel and the Scots Jamaican Nurse Mary Seacole Tabled: 5/10/20 Signatories: 1 Anne McLaughlin That this House notes October is Black History Month; welcomes the opportunity to highlight some of those people largely forgotten in history but who have made a significant contribution nonetheless; celebrates the tale of Scots Jamaican nurse Mary Seacole who set up her own convalescent home named The British Hotel, to tend wounded soldiers with traditional herbal remedies in the Crimean war of the 1850s; considers it all the more impressive that she did so after being rejected by the War Office and by fundraising for the costs herself; understands she was so well loved for the voluntary work she carried out that when she returned to London in 1857, destitute, and a fundraising gala in her honour on the banks of the River Thames attracted 80,000 guests; understands that Mary Seacole then disappeared from history books for over a century; finds it inexplicable that when her contribution began to be acknowledged in more recent times, there were campaigns against doing so; and considers it fitting that she is now considered one of the greatest black role models and has been remembered with a community hospital named after her in Surrey and a statue erected in her honour outside St Thomas’ Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.08 MB
    Published: Friday 23 July 2021 Early Day Motions tabled on Thursday 22 July 2021 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 362 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report on women's state pension age Tabled: 22/07/21 Signatories: 1 Liz Saville Roberts That this House welcomes the publication of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report titled Women’s State Pension age: our findings on the Department for Work and Pensions' communication of changes; is concerned by the report’s findings of maladministration and failure by DWP to appropriately inform women of changes to their State Pension Allowance; and calls upon the UK Government to fully engage with the Ombudsman's findings and meet with campaigners to come to an equitable solution to address the injustice of state pension inequality, a problem which affects 3.7 million women in the UK, including 194,000 in Wales. 363 Rise in antisemitic hate crime Tabled: 22/07/21 Signatories: 1 Layla Moran That this House condemns the appalling rise in antisemitism in the weeks during and after the devastating escalation of violence in Israel and Palestine; notes with concern that the Community Security Trust (CST) recorded 628 antisemitic
    [Show full text]
  • 1 - Scottishleftreview Issue 100 July/August 2017 2 - Scottishleftreview Issue 100 July/August 2017 Feedback
    1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 100 July/August 2017 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 100 July/August 2017 feedback comment Where we are now ay didn’t quite end in June situation has afflicted the SNP – still an election campaign, under which but her mantra of providing the biggest party by seats and votes reporting had to be more balanced, M‘strong and stable’ in Scotland but looking and feeling a Labour’s pledge to govern for the leadership turned into the actuality lot like Labour after its involvement reviewsmany and not the few resonated of being ‘weak and wobbly’ while in the ‘Better Together’ campaign – widely. Jeremy Corbyn was more at Corbyn went from being (allegedly) somewhat dejected and on the back home and a much better performer unelectable and an electoral liability foot. at the countless mass street rallies into something akin to a conquering than in the Westminster chamber. hero – certainly if his reception at Serious left analysis must start And, Labour was able to create its UNISON annual conference and by asking two fundamental own direct link to voters, especially Glastonbury were anything to go by. questions, namely, why did Labour younger ones, via social media Just as with after the independence do much better than any of the without being reliant upon the referendum in September 2014, it polls (including its own) indicated mainstream media. Its organisation seemed that the vanquished were it would, and why did Labour not of activists especially via a dedicated actually the victors. But there are actually win? The exposure of app used by Momentum in also other historical parallels to Theresa May as weak and wobbly particular was also notable.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G. Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol) at the University of Edinburgh
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. How Did Young Left Wing Political Activists Learn to Become Active and Critical Citizens? Stuart Moir A Thesis SuBmitted in Fulfilment of Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education (EdD) The University of Edinburgh 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT 6 1.2. Lay Summary 8 1.3. Acknowledgments 10 2. INTRODUCTION 12 2.1. Setting the Scene 12 2.2. The Contested Nature of Citizenship and Citizenship Education 13 2.3. Thesis Inspiration and Motivation: Professional Experience and Political Activity 14 2.4. Framing the Key ProBlem 18 2.5. Research Questions and Approach 22 2.6. Summary of Findings 25 2.7. Overview of Thesis Chapters 29 3. UNDERSTANDING EDUCATION FOR CITIZENSHIP AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL ACTIVISTS: CONCEPTS, THEORIES & POLICY CONTEXT 32 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP Secretary of State for Home Affairs Home Office 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF 15 March 2019 Dear
    The Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP Secretary of State for Home Affairs Home Office 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF 15 March 2019 Dear Home Secretary, Refugees (Family Reunion) (No. 2) Bill 2017-19 Almost a year ago, MPs from across the political spectrum united behind a common cause as they overwhelmingly voted to introduce a law that would help reunite refugee families. The current rules condemn child refugees, fleeing conflict and persecution, to live in the UK without their parents. It also prevents parents from bringing their children over the age of 18. At a time when refugees need their families the most, they are being forced to be without them indefinitely. They say a week is a long time in politics, but a year is a long time to wait. For refugee families it means a year of missed birthdays, Christmases, Mother’s Days, Father’s Day and Eids. We cannot let the urgent crowd out the important. We urge you to use your power to stop the delays on this Bill and allow it the necessary time to proceed and be debated. With your help we can bring families together. Yours sincerely, The Rt Hon Diane Abbott Dr Stella Creasy MP Mr Roger Godsiff MP MP Mr Martyn Day MP Mr Patrick Grady MP Ms Mhairi Black MP Mr Stephen Doughty MP Mr Neil Gray MP The Rt Hon Ian Blackford Dr David Drew MP Ms Margaret Greenwood MP MP Ms Rosie Duffield MP Ms Deidre Brock MP Ms Helen Hayes MP Mr Jonathan Edwards MP Mr Alan Brown MP Mr Drew Hendry MP Ms Vicky Foxcroft MP Ms Ruth Cadbury MP Ms Liz Kendall MP Ms Gill Furniss MP The Rt Hon Alistair Mr Afzal Khan MP Carmichael MP Mr Hugh Gaffney MP The Rt Hon David Lammy Mr Douglas Chapman MP Ms Ruth George MP MP Ms Joanna Cherry QC MP Mr Stephen Gethins MP Mr Chris Law MP Mr Ronnie Cowan MP Ms Patricia Gibson MP Ms Karen Lee MP Mr Neil Coyle MP Ms Preet Kaur Gill MP Mr David Linden MP Ms Angela Crawley MP Mr Angus MacNeil MP CC - The Rt Hon Andrea Leadsom MP - Leader of Mr Sandy Martin MP the House of Commons Mr Steve McCabe MP Ms Rebecca Harris MP - Ms Kerry McCarthy MP Lord Commissioner (HM Treasury) (Whip) Mr Stewart Malcolm McDonald MP Mr Stuart C.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 678 22 July 2020 No. 91 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 22 July 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 2133 22 JULY 2020 2134 Kemi Badenoch: My hon. Friend is completely right. House of Commons It is important to remember that the PHE review findings did not take into account comorbidities or other factors Wednesday 22 July 2020 such as occupations. I agree with her that it is imperative for us to understand the key drivers of these disparities, the relationships between the risk factors and what we The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock can do to close the gap in the evidence that the review highlighted. PRAYERS Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton North) (Con): The recommendations in the Marmot review [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] and the Marmot review 10 years on would be a good Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Order, place to start when addressing health inequalities impacting 4 June). BAME communities. Is 10 years enough time to consider [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] the recommendations of the original review, and how long will it be before we see the recommendations of either implemented? Oral Answers to Questions Kemi Badenoch: I had a meeting with Professor Marmot just last month, and we discussed the recommendations of his review. If my right hon. Friend has seen the WOMEN AND EQUALITIES report, she will know that many of the recommendations are at a very high level.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.12 MB
    Published: Friday 22 January 2021 Early Day Motions tabled on Thursday 21 January 2021 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 1388 Plastic waste exports Tabled: 21/01/21 Signatories: 1 Sarah Olney That this House notes that UK exports of unsorted plastic waste to non-OECD countries are allowed when given prior informed consent; further notes that from 1 January 2021, the EU no longer allows that practice; recognises that a ban on plastic exports outside of developed countries was a commitment in the 2019 Conservative Party Manifesto; and is concerned that continuation of global trade in plastics could mean the UK exports plastic waste to lower income countries instead of taking responsibility for its own refuse. 2 Friday 22 January 2021 EARLY DAY MOTIONS Added Names Below are EDMs tabled in the last two weeks to which names have been added. Only the first 6 names and any new names are included. 1332 Proposed Directors' Income Support Scheme Tabled: 11/01/21 Signatories: 20 Angela Crawley Ben Lake Jim Shannon Chris Law Caroline Lucas John McDonnell Alyn Smith That this House notes the merits of the proposed Directors’ Income Support Scheme (DISS) which is currently under consideration by the HM Treasury;
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Leftreview
    ScottishLeft Review Issue 103 January/February 2018 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' PLUS: PFI/PPP scandal in North Ayrshire I Universal Credit Politics in Germany after their election I and more ... 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 103 January/February 2018 ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer ASLEF the train drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 103 January/February 2018 feedback comment 2018: here we go cottish Left Review wholeheartedly interview with Richard, we have asked campaign, it became clear that Leonard welcomes the election of Richard others to lay out their perspectives on did not command a majority of support SLeonard to the leadership of what difference his election makes and from his parliamentary colleagues in Scottish Labour. As outlined in the last what difference he may make in future. the 24 strong Labour group at Holyrood. editorial, his election was we argued to Indeed, the composition of his front He won by a sizable margin (57% to 43%) be a benefit to all of the left in the age bench team reflects this, with the likes of overall but not amongst individual party of the hegemony of austerity and neo- Jackie Ballie, Sarwar and Iain Gray in its members (52% to 48%) or registered liberalism. How much worse off the left ranks. supporters (48% to 52%), indicating that reviews would have been without his election despite progress being made the right is What this all means is that the task can be gleaned when one considers not still a considerable force within Scottish of Scottish Labour under Leonard’s just his competitor’s personal behaviour Labour.
    [Show full text]
  • Can't We All Just Get Along? Left Unity
    Issue 44 January/February 2008 scottishleftreview £2.00 CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG? LEFT UNITY IN SCOTLAND HenDi socialist review aslef 25/10/06 5:39 pm Page 1 scottishleftreviewIssue 44 January/February 2008 Contents Comment ........................................................2 Reaching out from inside... ...........................16 Unity is possible - look at Europe... ...............4 Vince Mills Left a bit ........................................................18 Gregor Gall Christina McKelvie Political earthquakes in the heart of Europe .....8 Ending old attitudes ......................................20 Victor Grossman Lou Howson News from the south ....................................10 No end to privatisation ..................................21 Andy Newman Gerry McCartney Workers - and eco-systems - unite ..............12 A flow of problems ........................................22 Justin Kenrick Antonio Ioris Comment he beginning point for all political discussion should be to on whether Scotland is now moving in a better direction. The Tdismiss the ridiculous idea that there is no ‘right’ or ‘left’ Labour left is caught knowing that the SNP is implementing in politics. These are not outmoded terms and neither Tony traditional Labour policies but also see them introducing Blair or anyone else can change the reality of how power, New Labour policies too. What do you criticise? The SNP left wealth and people are interconnected through the repetition can make all the accommodations it likes, but it knows that Scotrail’s job is to make profits for its investors - of platitudes. It is not true to say that there is no necessary money spent cutting business taxes is money spent prolonging contradiction between the policies of the left and the right. It is Thatcher’s shadow over Scotland. Those from the smaller left not true to say that increasing inequality by encouraging wealth parties will note that the SNP’s proposals for changing PFI do not to provide a service for the Scottish public.
    [Show full text]