DOCSLIB.ORG

Core Strategy March 2007 , Item 135. PDF 892 KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core Strategy March 2007 , Item 135. PDF 892 KB April 2007 Submission Edition Lancaster District Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy April 2007 Crook o’ Lune With thanks to the Environment Agency Moor Hospital and Lake District Hills Photograph by Nigel Slater With thanks to Lancaster & Morecambe Newspapers Lancaster City Council Planning and Building Control Service Palatine Hall Dalton Square Lancaster LA1 1PW If you would like a large print version of the text of this document or, if you need assistance with translating the text of this document, please contact the Forward Planning Team on 01524 582330 All maps contained in this document are reproduced from Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Lancaster City Council Licence No LA 078379 2007 SubmissionDocument/Planning and Building Control Service/April 2007 2 Lancaster District Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy April 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CORE STRATEGY KEY DIAGRAM 2 1. INTRODUCTION . 3 2. LANCASTER DISTRICT – PEOPLE AND INFLUENCES. 5 3. SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK . 11 4. BUILDING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES . 15 5. REGENERATING THE LOCAL ECONOMY 41 6. IMPROVING THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT . 55 7. CUSTOMER SERVICES . 62 8. MONITORING, REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION 63 1 Lancaster District Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy April 2007 Core Strategy Key Diagram Silverdale CARNFORTH ! Carnforth Town Centre Hornby Bolton-le-Sands and Slyne-with-Hest Wray Halton MORECAMBE Caton and White & HEYSHAM Brookhouse Lund Caton Road Morecambe Centre ! ! and West End ! LANCASTER Luneside! ! ! Lancaster City Centre South Lancaster Heysham University Galgate KEY Regeneration Environment Employment Transport International Nature Knowledge Nucleus National and Regional Urban Areas Conservation Site Strategic Highway Network Area of Outstanding Employment Area Natural Beauty Village with key Green Belt City or Town Centre National and Regional facilities Shopping Area Public Transport Corridor Regeneration Priority Core Greenspace Tourism Opportunities ! Area Network 2 Lancaster District Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy April 2007 1. Introduction . Background How the Strategy is Structured 1.1 Following Government planning reforms, 1.6 This Core Strategy is in 8 parts. Lancaster District’s spatial and • Part 1 introduces the strategy and development plans will be a series of explains how to comment; documents called a Local Development • Part 2 describes our District and its Framework (LDF). The LDF documents influences; and timetable are set out in a document • Part 3 is our Vision and Spatial called the Local Development Scheme. Development Framework – (our The Core Strategy is a key part of the overall strategy); Local Development Framework. This • document is its submission edition. Part 4 shows how we will build Appendix 1 shows the different LDF Sustainable Communities; • documents and what they do. Part 5 shows how we will regenerate the Local Economy; 1.2 The Strategy outlines a spatial vision of a • Part 6 shows how we will protect and sustainable District whose quality of life enhance the local Environment; and standards of development will lead • Part 7 shows how we will make public the North West, comprising a prosperous and private services more accessible; knowledge-based City, a regenerated • Part 8 shows how we will monitor, Coast and a conserved Countryside progress and review the Strategy; 1.3 The Strategy explains where new homes and jobs will be located, which areas will Additional Documents be regenerated and which areas will be conserved. It also sets out how public 1.7 This Document is accompanied by and private agencies will realise the vision • A Statement of Compliance (dealing in the period up to 2021. with Consultation measures); • Sustainability Appraisal Report and 1.4 The Core Strategy must; Annex on submission document; • have a clear spatial vision from which • Appropriate Assessment plans, policies and strategies will flow; • follow Sustainable Development 1.8 There is also a comprehensive evidence principles; base addressing issues such as; • be linked to the 1Sustainable • Urban Capacity Communities Agenda, and provide for • Housing needs; new housing and jobs in conformity • Employment Land needs; with the North West Regional Spatial • Shopping Floorspace needs; Strategy; • • Flood Risk; not repeat national and regional • policies. Recreation Open Space Needs; 1.5 The Core Strategy cannot allocate sites 1.9 Appendix 2 lists the evidence base. All for development or protection on a map. It documents are on the Council’s website. does however set out broad locations for land-use. Actual sites for development or protection will be identified in a forthcoming Land Allocations document. 1 The Communities Plan is the strategy for new communities and housing development across England. See www.communities.gov.uk for more. 3 Lancaster District Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy April 2007 Soundness How the Strategy has Emerged 1.15 The Inspector’s job is to consider whether the Strategy is ‘sound’. This means that it 1.10 Preparation of the Core Strategy has has; been guided by the Council’s Local • Development Scheme (see Para 1.1) and been prepared in accordance with the Statement of Community Involvement LDS and SCI (See Para 1.10); • (SCI) adopted in June 2006 as well as undergone sustainability appraisal; regulations and guidance produced by • conformity with national and regional Government. planning policies and regard to other relevant plans, policies and strategies 1.11 The Council consulted on Issues and in and adjoining the District; Options for the Core Strategy in Spring • regard to the Community Strategy; 2005. Six options were consulted upon • consistency with any other (see Appendix 3). A ‘preferred option’ of Development Plan Documents in or Urban Concentration was consulted on in adjoining the District; Spring 2006. An additional ‘addendum’ • the most appropriate solution, having consultation was then carried out on the considered relevant alternatives; other options considered. Full details of • a robust and credible evidence base; Community Involvement and consultation • clear mechanisms for implementation are set out in the Statement of and monitoring; and Compliance (see para 1.7). • flexibility to deal with change. 1.12 Sustainability appraisal, incorporating 1.16 These tests of soundness are set out in Strategic Environmental Assessment, has 1 been carried out throughout the Strategy full in Appendix 4. The Inspector will preparation process. Appropriate presume that the Strategy is sound unless Assessment has also been carried out. it is shown to be otherwise by evidence Options for achieving the vision have presented at the examination. Your been tested for their impact on the objection must state why you think the environment (including internationally Core Strategy does not satisfy these important nature conservation sites), the tests. economy and on the community. The Sustainability Appraisal confirmed the 1.17 The documents are available to view at Council’s preferred option of Urban Palatine Hall, Lancaster, Morecambe Concentration as the most sustainable Town Hall, all libraries in the District, option. The Sustainability Appraisal Kirkby Lonsdale Library and on the Report is published separately. Council’s Website www.lancaster.gov.uk. 1.13 The Strategy has now been submitted to 1.18 You can send your objection form by e- the Secretary of State for Independent mail to [email protected] Examination by a Planning Inspector. or send a paper copy to: He/she will consider representations and conduct oral hearings into key issues. Michelle Williams, Forward Planning They will help him/her decide whether to Administrator approve the Strategy as ‘sound’. At the Lancaster City Council end of the Examination, he/she will issue Planning Service a binding report approving, rejecting or Palatine Hall requiring changes to the Strategy. Dalton Square Lancaster LA1 1PW. How To Make Representations Representations must be received by 5:15 on Friday 8th June 2007. 1.14 If you wish to take part in the Independent Examination, you must make representations now. These must be submitted on an objections form, using a separate form for each objection. Representations must be received by th 5:15pm on Friday 8 June 2007. Comments made at earlier stages will not 1 Planning Policy Guidance Note 12 – Local be considered by the Inspector. Development Frameworks. Annexe D Para D9 4 Lancaster District Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy April 2007 2. Lancaster District – People and Influences. Lancaster District and its People Milnthorpe 2100 Kirkby Arnside Lonsdale 2500 2300 Burton & Holme 2500 Ingleton 3700 1500 Warton Silverdale 2100Carnforth 4200 Bolton-le-Sands Over Kellet 1200 4100 Hornby 700 Bentham Nether Kellet 600 Slyne-with Hest 3500 Wray 500 4200 Lancaster (North of Lune) Morecambe 13500 2400 2500 32100 Halton Caton & Brookhouse Heysham 16100 33600 Lancaster Middleton 500 (South of Lune) Overton 1000 Galgate 1600 Cockerham 600 Garstang and Pilling Catterall 2100 6900 Figure 2 – 2001 Population of main Settlements (thousands) • High levels of educational 2.1 Lancaster District contains the coastal qualification except in Morecambe, towns of Morecambe and Heysham, the Heysham and North
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heysham to M6 Link
    Heysham to M6 Link PROJECT: Heysham to M6 Link Road CLIENT: Costain Ltd /Lancashire County Council VALUE: £12.5 million AT-A-GLANCE: 2.1 million m³ cut to fill 140,000 m³ road haulage 80,000 t imported aggregate / 40,000 t site won aggregate 5.2km of new dual carriageway Up to 60 items of plant including 90t excavators Temporary structures to cross the A6 and Lancaster Canal PROJECT OUTLINE PROJECT DELIVERY The £120 million Heysham to M6 Link road was designed as a Working in partnership with Costain during the Early Contractor means of linking the existing A683 to the M6 at Junction 34 with a Involvement stage, Walters were the preferred earthworks delivery new dual carriageway and combined cycle / footway to give better partner for the Heysham to M6 link road project which involved access to Heysham Port and Power Station and attract investment the construction of 5.2km of dual carriageway. in to the area. Although the road was predominantly built through green fields The scheme also included the redesign of both northbound and there were eleven major structures to be constructed including southbound M6 slip roads to increase traffic flow on to and off of crossings to the River Lune, the A6, the West Coast Mainline and the motorway in addition to the construction of a park and ride Lancaster Canal; the scheme also required temporary crossings to facility to accommodate up to 600 vehicles. be built across the A6 and the Lancaster canal. 1 Heysham to M6 Link EXTENSIVE PLANT FLEET In order to complete the earthworks within two short seasons, a fleet of up to 30 articulated dump trucks and 25 road wagons were used with a number of excavators providing loading options of up to 90 tonne capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing the Air’ the Air Quality Strategy for Lancaster District
    ‘Clearing the Air’ The Air Quality Strategy for Lancaster district 2013 Prepared by PJ Cartmell, Air Quality Officer, Environmental Health Services ‘Clearing the Air’ – The Air Quality Strategy for Lancaster district Publication no. EHS-2013-02 Version 1.0 (final) November 2013 Approved Acknowledgements Thanks to the following for their help in the production of this document:- Dr Clare Beattie, Air Quality Consultants Ltd, Bristol Dr Thomas Keegan, Health & Medicine, Lancaster University Dr Duncan Whyatt Senior Lecturer in GIS, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University Stella Walton, Principal Engineer Strategic Highways & Planning, Lancashire County Council Nick Howard – Environmental Health Manger, Lancaster City Council Environmental Protection Team – Lancaster City Council Defra Air Quality Helpdesk 2 ‘Clearing the Air’ – The Air Quality Strategy for Lancaster district ‘Clearing the Air’ – Executive Summary Air pollution arising from vehicle emissions in Lancaster remains a health concern and there are no clear indications that the situation is improving. Levels or nitrogen dioxide are measured above acceptable concentrations and levels of particulate pollution are significantly elevated and of particular concern. Past action plans have had some success however their impact has been insufficient to resolve the situation. Research continues to be carried out to better understand the health impact of air pollution. Currently the national impact in terms of deaths caused is estimated (See Chapter 1 Part 1) to be similar to that for obesity and significantly greater than that attributed to alcohol and environmental tobacco smoke (passive smoking) prior to smoking restrictions. It is arguably the most significant outstanding environmental issue which has a day to day direct impact on public health.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lancashire County Council (Torrisholme to the M6 Link (A683 Completion of Heysham to M6 Link Road)) Order 2013
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. 675 INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING The Lancashire County Council (Torrisholme to the M6 Link (A683 Completion of Heysham to M6 Link Road)) Order 2013 Made - - - - 19th March 2013 Coming into force - - 9th April 2013 £15.50 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. 675 INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING The Lancashire County Council (Torrisholme to the M6 Link (A683 Completion of Heysham to M6 Link Road)) Order 2013 Made - - - - 19th March 2013 Coming into force - - 9th April 2013 CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Citation and commencement 2. Interpretation PART 2 PRINCIPAL POWERS 3. Development consent etc. granted by the Order 4. Maintenance of authorised development 5. Limits of deviation 6. Benefit of Order 7. Consent to transfer benefit of Order PART 3 STREETS 8. Power to alter layout etc. of streets 9. Street works 10. Construction and maintenance of new or altered streets 11. Classification of roads 12. Stopping up of streets 13. Temporary prohibition or restriction of use of streets 14. Access to and from works 15. Agreements with street authorities PART 4 SUPPLEMENTAL POWERS 16. Discharge of water [DfT 00099] 17. Protective Work to Buildings 18. Temporary closure of, and works in, the canal 19. Authority to survey and investigate land PART 5 POWERS OF ACQUISITION 20. Compulsory acquisition of land 21. Time limit for exercise of authority to acquire land compulsorily 22. Compulsory acquisition of rights 23. Private rights 24. Application of the Compulsory Purchase (Vesting Declarations) Act 1981 25. Acquisition of subsoil or air-space only 26. Acquisition of part of certain properties 27. Rights under or over streets 28.
    [Show full text]
  • 45-On the Road in the Lancaster Area
    ON THE ROAD IN THE LANCASTER AREA Lancaster Civic Society leaflet 45 Probably few people think of roads as ‘interesting’. Useful and sometimes congested, certainly; pleasurable or tricky to drive along, perhaps. Yet there are some roads in the Lancaster area that do have unexpectedly interesting histories and features. Tidal roads There are two roads in the Lancaster area that are tidal – the B5273 from Oxcliffe to Middleton and Overton, and the C road from Overton to Sunderland Point. They both follow closely the right (west) bank of the River Lune as it heads out into the Irish Sea. In places, the roads cross saltmarshes whose creeks are flooded at most high tides and even the marsh surface at spring high tides. The tidal range in the lower Lune is considerable for an estuary, reflecting the wide tidal range in Morecambe Bay. There are road signs warning drivers of the danger and when not to attempt to drive these roads. Up to the nineteenth century the most important local tidal road was the regular stage- coach route directly cross Morecambe Bay from Lancaster to Ulverston. The modern round-the-Bay roads and railway have made this very dangerous, across-the-Bay route redundant. The route is still used today for cross-Bay walks led by the Queen’s Guide. From Sunderland Point across the marshes New roads to open up Morecambe The development of Morecambe required now roads to service housing expansion and to ease access by car to the expanding eastern areas of the resort. One such road was Broadway, opened in 1923 and now part of the A589.
    [Show full text]
  • ABG Structural Drainage Bridge Abutment
    Structural Drainage Bridge Abutment, Deckdrain, Heysham to M6 Link, UK Case Study Case Project Description The Heysham to M6 Link Road is one of Lancashire's top Project Information priority transport projects. The new road completes the Client Lancashire County Council long awaited connection from the Heysham and Morecambe peninsula to Junction 34 of the M6. It is a Contractor Costain 4.8km dual carriageway with a footpath and cycleway along the entire route. Consultant Jacobs The new road will provide improved access for residents, businesses and tourists to the Heysham and Morecambe Products Deckdrain 1200S/ST170 BBA area. It will open up areas for regeneration and reduce congestion currently experienced within the City of Quantity 7,000m2 (majority of retaining structures) Lancaster. Quick and easy to install in difficult The Challenge access locations. The road alignment was carefully planned and adjusted No handling equipment needed to minimise earthworks and structure costs. The road Benefits Easy delivery and site transport crosses the River Lune near the M6, along with numerous Protects bitumen waterproofing roads, a rail line and built up areas resulting in many Exceeds flow of drainage blocks concrete structures each requiring back of wall drainage. BBA approved for highways Many of these structures have shaped wing walls, creating a challenge for earthworks contractors to place drainage materials against the wall and compact backfill without damaging the specified painted bituminous waterproof layer. Traditionally rough concrete drainage blocks are used. These heavy items have to be transported from the concrete works, across site to a remote bridge site. Pallets of blocks then have to be lifted over wing walls and each individual block stacked against the waterproof layer without damage.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Spring Local Waterway Forum 2015 Notes
    NORTH WEST SPRING LOCAL WATERWAY FORUM 2015 NOTES Lancaster Canal: 4 March 2015 at 18:30 Barton Village Hall | 844 Garstang Rd | Barton, Preston BWML Update - D Bramhall Darren provided an update of BWML projects on the Lancaster Canal and Glasson. Q&A Q. Can the moorings on the towpath opp. Galgate marina be re-instated? A. These moorings were removed about ten years ago so that boats in the marina could turn. They will not be re-instated. The new moorings have been created with sufficient turning space so that no further requests for removal of moorings need to be made to CRT. Q. What is happening with the CRT customer access to Galgate facilities? A. There is an annual fee of £25 for a key to access the services. A new key has not been required for the past three years. However, it is the plan that this will be renewed every year. Winter Works – Steve Bergquist provided update on winter works: Heysham – Milestone Bridge The Heysham to M6 Link Road is one of Lancashire's top priority transport projects. The new road will complete the long awaited connection from the Heysham and Morecambe peninsula to Junction 34 of the M6, and will be a 4.8km dual carriageway with a footpath and cycle way along the entire route. The cost of the overall scheme was estimated at £128 million but this is likely to rise to £150 million. Milestone Bridge was given this name as there was a milestone post where the bridge was to be built.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster City Centre Movement and Public Realm Strategy Route Options Report SEPTEMBER 2020 ~
    Lancaster City Centre Movement and Public Realm Strategy Route Options Report SEPTEMBER 2020 ~ Contents 1 Executive Summary 5 5 The Opportunities 85 1.1 The Vision 8 5.1 The vision for Lancaster City Centre 86 1.2 The Strategy 10 5.2 Rosemary Square 88 1.3 Baseline Assessment 12 5.3 Stonewell Nose 94 1.4 The Opportunities 14 5.4 Dalton Square 100 1.5 Appraisal Route Options 16 5.5 Penny Street Bridge 104 5.6 Penny Street Pocket Park 108 2 Introduction 19 5.7 Queen Square / Spring Gardens 112 5.8 Market Street Gateway 116 2.1 Geographic Scope 22 5.9 Castle Hill Place 120 2.2 Lancaster's key issues and challenges 24 2.3 Traffic congestion, air quality, severance and 6 Local Authority Workshop 125 climate change 26 2.4 Managing rapid growth sustainably 28 6.1 Summary of workshop outcomes 126 2.5 A Transport Vision for the City Centre 30 7 Route Options 129 3 Policy Context 33 7.1 Option One 132 7.2 Option Two 136 4 Baseline Assessment 39 7.3 Option Three 140 4.1 Overview of the assessment process 40 7.4 Option Four 144 4.2 Appraisal Framework 42 7.5 Option Five 148 4.3 Review of the existing situation 44 7.6 Option Six 152 7.7 Option Seven 156 7.8 Option Eight 160 8 Next Steps 165 Illustrative design work carried out by Planit-IE design practice on behalf of Lancashire County Council. 3 Lancaster City Centre Movement and Public Realm Strategy : Route Options Report ~ Executive Summary Executive Summary 4 5 Lancaster City Centre Movement and Public Realm Strategy : Route Options Report ~ Executive Summary This Lancaster City Centre Movement and Public Realm Strategy Route Options Report has been prepared by Lancashire County Council with the support of Lancaster City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Heysham to M6 Link
    FINAL VERSION 27/02/2008 CASE STUDY TO DEVELOP TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES TO DELIVER AN ECOSYSTEMS APPROACH – HEYSHAM TO M6 LINK DEFRA RESEARCH PROJECT NR0110 FINAL REPORT December 2007 Peter Ashworth BSc Hons, Sarah Bolton BSc Hons, Robert Edwards MSc AMIEMA, Alison Mole BSc Hons, Carol Somper BSc Hons MSc, Simon Weldon BSc Hons MRes FINAL VERSION 27/02/2008 Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study context............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Case study objectives.................................................................................. 3 1.3 Project structure and report outline.............................................................. 5 1.4 The Case Study area................................................................................... 6 1.5 Environmental Impact Assessments............................................................ 8 1.5.1 EIA strengths and weaknesses ............................................................ 8 1.5.2 Further limitations of the EIA process ................................................. 10 2 Defining The Problem ....................................................................... 14 3 Evaluation of the Heysham EIA process against Ecosystems approach Tasks........................................................................................... 17 3.1 Evaluation of Task 1: Societal Choice ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Lancashire Strategic Transport Prospectus PAGE 3
    Lancashire As part of an interconnected and productive Northern Powerhouse THE LANCASHIRE STRATEGIC TheTRANSPOR LancashireT P StrategicROSPECT TransportUS Prospectus January 2016 PAGE 2 FOREWORD Lancashire’s economic strengths, and more importantly its economic potential over the next two decades, are arguably one of the least understood dimensions of the emerging Northern Powerhouse vision. With an economy of over £25bn, Lancashire is home to over 40,000 businesses. We are the UK’s leading region for aerospace manufacture and related industries, and have rapidly growing clusters across energy, advanced manufacturing, chemicals and automotive sectors. We also have a strong visitor economy, boast three world-class universities and some of the country’s most outstanding rural and coastal beauty. But Lancashire also faces a huge challenge – how do we not only maintain the considerable competitive advantages and unique assets we already have but also grasp the opportunity offered by initiatives like the Northern Powerhouse? The answer from my point of view is clear – the integration of key strategic investments, clearly aligned to complementary economic strategies, and the robust physical connectivity to join all of these together in order that our residents and businesses, and those we need to attract in order to grow, can take full advantage of all we have to offer. Further, this connectivity needs to reach beyond the borders of Lancashire itself - improving local transport networks is a key priority of the Lancashire Enterprise Partnership and its partners – but it is our connection with the rest of the North, the rest of the United Kingdom, and the rest of the world which will largely determine the pace and level of our success going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Template Document
    LIST OF DELEGATED PLANNING DECISIONS LANCASTER CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION NO DETAILS DECISION 14/00059/DIS North West Water Reservoir, Seymour Grove, Heysham Request Completed Discharge of Conditions 3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14 and 17 on approved application 13/00896/FUL for Phil Rogerson (Heysham South Ward) 14/00100/DIS 5 - 7 Sir Simons Arcade, Lancaster, Lancashire Request Completed Discharge of condition 4 on approved application 12/00058/CU for . (Dukes Ward) 14/00106/DIS Heysham Sub Station, Borrans Lane, Middleton Request Completed Discharge of conditions 7, 12a, 12b and 20 on approved application 14/00422/VCN for National Grid Plc (Overton Ward) 14/00109/DIS Redmayne House, Back Lane, Wrayton Discharge of Request Completed condition 3 on approved application 14/00063/LB for Miss Helen Reid (Upper Lune Valley Ward) 14/00111/DIS Lancaster Moor Hospital Annex, Quernmore Road, Initial Response Sent Lancaster Discharge of conditions 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 18a and 18b on approved application 14/00324/FUL for Miss Diane Magee (Bulk Ward) 14/00112/DIS Halton Mill, Mill Lane, Halton Discharge of conditions 3, Initial Response Sent 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18 on approved application 14/00200/FUL for Mr Ian Hilliker (Halton With Aughton Ward) 14/00114/DIS Land And Buildings At Former British Waterways Depot, Application Permitted Aldcliffe Road, Lancaster Discharge of conditions 5, 9, 10 and 11 on approved application 11/01163/VCN for Mr Nick Wild (Dukes Ward) 14/00115/DIS Lancaster University, Bailrigg Lane, Lancaster Application
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster and District Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Transportation Lancaster City Council September 2012 Utilities Lancaster and District Infrastructure Delivery Plan Prepared by: ...... Checked by: Nick Ovenell Kevin Riley Consultant Regional Director Approved by: Dave Drury Regional Director Lancaster and District Infrastructure Delivery Plan Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 0 First Draft KR DD 19/07/2012 1 Final Issue KR DD 18/09/2012 3rd Floor , 8 Princes Parade, Princes Dock, Liverpool , L3 1QH Telephone: 0151 331 8900 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60264910 Reference LIV 369 Date Created September 2012 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. f:\projects\development - lancaster cil\8.0 reports\draft infrastructure delivery plan vfinal.docx Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Approach ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Lancaster Highways and Transport Master Plan
    District of Lancaster October 2016 District of Lancaster Foreword Lancaster's transport history is as long as it is innovative. From the first crossings of the river, to the The challenge for us is to ensure that we overcome the transport issues that could come to hold back the port, to the canal with its magnificent aqueduct, to the first overhead electrified railway in the country, whole district and we must act now to allow the district to grow and flourish as it once did. an early phase of the M6 with the Lancaster Bypass, and most latterly as a cycling demonstration town, Lancaster has never been afraid to take the lead. What has been a substantial issue for the district will be solved with the opening of the Heysham to M6 Link, 'The Bay Gateway'. As well as giving the peninsula the direct connection to the strategic road Its history owes much to its transport links, and to its position as the lowest crossing point of the River network it so desperately needs, the completion of the link road is the lever to unlock fundamental Lune. Later the Lune brought prosperity and a golden age for the city in the 18th century as the port change across the district. thrived on Atlantic trade. By the end of the 19th century, Lancaster was a world leader for linen cloth and famed for furniture and, more than anything else, lino, which gave the city its Town Hall and the Ashton But we have plans to do much, much, more. We want to build on Lancaster's past legacy and on its Memorial.
    [Show full text]