DOCSLIB.ORG

German Research 2/2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
German Research 2/2008 german research 2/2008 In this issue Commentary research Ulrike Beisiegel Magazine of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Environmental History A Question of Integrity ......................... p. 2 Taking stock of the DFG White Paper on Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice The Tibetan Plateau, which covers some 1.5 million square Natural Sciences kilometres, has had a signifi- cant influence on the global Antje Schwalb et al. climate over the past fifty The Top of the World as a Climate Sensor .......... p. 4 million years. A Sino-German team of researchers is search- Harald Lesch and Axel Jessner ing for new insights into the When Dead Stars Emit Signals ...................p. 8 far-reaching climate and envi- Astrophysicists investigate the mystery of pulsars ronmental changes of the past in the sediment of the Nam Co. Portrait Page 4 german Rembert Unterstell The King’s Discipline and its Master .............. p. 12 Robust Biocoenoses Leibniz Prizewinner and algebraic topologist Wolfgang Lück Because they are able to defy Engineering Sciences even the most inhospitable of Knut Urban habitats, microalgae are ubi- quitous. The algal biocoenoses The Long Road to Visible Atoms .................p. 13 often appear as a “green skin”. Advances using high-resolution transmission electron microscopes Depending on the humidity of the substrate, the biofilm Life Sciences can vary between being moist U. Karsten, R. Schumann, L. Gustavs and T. Friedl and slimy or powdery and dry. The Secret of the Green Skin ....................p. 16 Bioscientists are on a quest to better understand how micro- On tour with german research algae live and how they adapt to such different environmental Magdalena Schaeffer conditions. Page 16 Between Two Different Worlds ..................p. 20 A visit to the DFG’s Office in Delhi Funeral Cultures Arts and Humanities Oliver Krüger Changes in religious convic- tions and ideologies also result The Price of Death ............................p. 22 in adaptations in burial cus- toms. On the basis of the burial and grave rituals in the United States, researchers have dem- onstrated that the economic Research Site: interests of undertakers and Tibetan Plateau 2/2008 . The Top of the World as a Climate Sensor . The funeral parlours play a major Long Road to Visible Atoms . The King's Discipline and its role that has so far received German and Chinese scientists use lake little attention. Page 22 sediments to investigate and trace the Master . When Dead Stars Emit Signals . The climate and environmental history of the Secret of the Green Skin . The Price of Death Cover: Mugler region and its global impact. Page 4 german research 2 / 2008 Commentary decade has passed since the eration and leadership responsibility, course, to ensure confidentiality, this Publications are the most im- any queries we receive relate in the scientific system is obliged to DFG’s white paper on “Safe- the promotion of young researchers is only possible if the person who in- portant “currency” in our scientific to issues of a lack of leadership play their part, be it those submitting A guarding Good Scientific and the obligation of absolute con- formed us agrees to us doing so. If system. This makes honesty with M responsibility and insufficient funding proposals, peer reviewers, Practice” was published, and nine fidentiality of peer reviews. To fa- there is any disagreement between respect to the work done by each promotion of young researchers. This or staff at research institutions, as years since the DFG ombudsman, the cilitate the implementation of these the two statements, we invite both contributor to a publication particu- is a matter of particular concern, since well as doctorate students. independent committee on good sci- recommendations, and to provide a parties concerned to a hearing. Ideal- larly important. “Honorary author- it is the quality of young researchers Particular importance needs to be entific practice and scientific miscon- source of advice and support to re- ly, this allows us to solve the problem ship” by lead researchers who did and scientists that determines the fu- given to integrating “good scientific duct, was established. The conclu- searchers and scientists, the white immediately by rectifying the viola- not actually contribute to the work ture of our scientific system. In spite practice” in the teaching given to all sion of the ombudsman’s work so far paper recommended the installation tion of the rules, for example by pub- is out of the question, for instance. of excellent programmes established undergraduate students. It is neces- is that the white paper remains just of the DFG ombudsman and inde- lishing an erratum if there was a case In my opinion, the ever-increasing by the DFG and other funding bodies sary to establish a specific curricu- as relevant now as it was when it was pendent, local ombudsmen. regarding authorship. These cases pressure to perform that exists in the to promote young researchers, we see lum, but also to integrate the topic published – and that it is still not suf- time and time again that of scientific conduct in all regular ficiently familiar or established in the those affected are nei- teaching activities. Graduate schools minds of the scientific community. ther given the necessary and other research groups ought to Despite the fact that it was uni- working conditions, nor offer seminars on the subject, and versally accepted, a decade ago, the afforded the independ- this needs to be given much greater white paper and the recommenda- ence that they need. priority by scientific institutions, and tions it contained could only achieve Ulrike Beisiegel Especially in medicine, it must be discussed by departments their intended objectives by being cases of obstruction in- and committees. First and foremost, implemented as widely as possible stead of promotion of re- the university administrations need and by becoming as self-evident and search are frequent, due to be made more sensitive to the is- present in the scientific community’s to the clinical work that sue, because so far there has been a consciousness as possible. takes priority. In such tendency to play it down and not fol- The case of Herrmann/Brach in cases it is very important low cases up, rather than to actively 1997 had revealed just how vulner- A Question to create the necessary promote good scientific practice and able the scientific system was to structural conditions for take serious action against those who abuse. After this case, which was good scientific practice violate the rules. probably the most serious case of to be put into practice. Adherence to the rules of good scientific misconduct in German his- One terribly sad fact scientific practice has been given in- tory, the scientific community – with of Integrity is that people who re- creasing prominence at an interna- the DFG at its forefront – sought ways port their suspicions can tional level recently. In this debate, to establish rules for good scientific be put at a serious disad- the German ombudsman system practice and how to deal with scien- vantage as whistleblow- which is independent of state control tific misconduct. It was specifically ers. In order to develop is envied by other countries, which intended that this should be done The DFG’s recommendations for ensuring good an efficient ombudsman have state-run monitors. We need to by the scientific community itself, as system where self-regu- recognise the benefits of this auton- a form of self-regulation and as the scientific practice are still current, even ten years lation by scientists and omy that science in Germany enjoys “main aim of self governance of the researchers is a matter in having a scientific system that is scientific community”. after they were published – and yet they have of course it is thus ex- characterised by honesty and integ- The DFG white paper also marked tremely important that rity, and do everything in our power the first time that the critical areas that still not really arrived in everyday science all information is treated to implement the recommendations lead to violation of the rules of good in strict confidence. Uni- even more consistently and effec- scientific practice were clearly identi- Illustration: private versity lecturers who tively than we have done in the last fied and recommendations made on are exposed must not ten years. Otherwise, we run the risk how to address these problems. be allowed to make the of ending up in a situation where this Probably the most fundamental he system of ombudsmen that are closed by presenting a written scientific community demands more matter public in order to obtain the system proves to be ineffectual. recommendation is for research- was subsequently established statement about the matter to both detailed evaluation of performance. support of colleagues and university ers to exercise strict honesty, both T on the basis of this recommen- parties. However, if a serious case of It is simply not fair for the director management. with themselves and with others. dation reveals the significance of the scientific misconduct is suspected, we of an institution to be credited for All in all, after ten years of “ensur- This applies not only to the presen- DFG white paper. Since that time, pass the matter back to the committee the number of publications cur- ing good scientific practice”, we can tation of research findings, but also every researcher and scientist in Ger- at the institution affected. This com- rently generated by the institution conclude that the DFG succeeded in to the contributions made by part- many has been able to turn either to mittee – also called for by the white in the same way as younger, more drawing up a very good set of guide- ners, predecessors and competing a trusted person at their own institu- paper – then checks the information active researchers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Die Ausgrenzung Und Vertreibung Von Physikern Im Nationalsozialismus - Welche Rolle Spielte Die DPG?
    1 Die Ausgrenzung und Vertreibung von Physikern im Nationalsozialismus - welche Rolle spielte die DPG? In: D. Hoffmann; M. Walker (Hrsg.): Physiker zwischen Autonomie und Anpassung. Berlin: Wiley, 2006, S. 91-138. Einleitung Die „Machtergreifung“ der Nationalsozialisten führte bereits im Frühjahr 1933 zu einer schwerwiegenden Zäsur im deutschen Kultur- und Geistesleben. Das Instrumentarium dafür verschaffte sich die neue Regierung mit jener Gesetzgebung, die euphemistisch angeblich „das Berufsbeamtentum wiederherstellen“ wollte, aber als wichtigste Bestimmung die sogenannten Nichtarier aus dem öffentlichen Dienst entfernte. An den deutschen Universitäten kam es daraufhin zu einer großen Zahl von Beurlaubungen und Entlassungen. Das trieb viele von den Betroffenen, insbesondere die Jüngeren unter ihnen, denen damit die Existenzgrundlage entzogen worden war, recht bald in die Emigration. Es war 1933 noch nicht zwingend abzusehen, dass es sich nicht nur um eine vorübergehende Maßnahme, sondern erst um den Beginn einer Abfolge von diskriminierenden Gesetzen und Verordnungen handelte. Sie schufen die Grundlage dafür, politische Gegner und „Nichtarier“ bzw. später in etwas engerem Sinn als Juden definierte Bürger aus dem öffentlichen Leben Deutschlands völlig auszuschließen. Die Physik gehörte zu den davon überdurchschnittlich stark betroffenen Disziplinen.1 Vor diesem Hintergrund stellt sich die Frage, inwieweit die Berufsorganisation der Physiker, die Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft (DPG), willens und in der Lage war, eventuelle Handlungsspielräume zu nutzen, um auch die Interessen der auf diese Weise ausgegrenzten Kollegen zu vertreten. Anmerkungen 1 Siehe z. B. S.L.Wolff, Vertreibung und Emigration in der Physik, Physik in unserer Zeit 24 (1993), S. 267-273. 2 Die Reaktionen der DPG auf die Entlassungen durch die nationalsozialistische Gesetzgebung Für die DPG gab es zwei zentrale Aufgabenbereiche.
    [Show full text]
  • The Father of Aberration Correction
    Otto Scherzer The father of aberration correction Biography Electron optical foundations Otto Scherzer was born 9 March, 1909 in Passau. He studied physics from Scherzer spent his two years at AEG design- 1927 to 1931 at the Munich Technical University and the Ludwig Maximilians ing electron lenses, deflection elements and University (LMU) of Munich, where his thesis advisor was the renowned other electron optical components used in Arnold Sommerfeld. His PhD thesis in 1931 was on x-ray Bremsstrahlung. oscilloscopes and image converter tubes. From 1932 to 1933, he worked on electron optics at the AEG Research Insti- This led to the first comprehensive book on tute in Berlin, where Ernst Brüche was head of the Physics Department. He electron optics published together with Ernst returned in 1934 to LMU, where he completed is his Habilitation, as an assis- Brüche (Brüche and Scherzer, 1934; Figs 1,2). tant to Sommerfeld. In 1935, Scherzer moved to the Technische Hochschule in Darmstadt, and in 1936 he became Professor of Theoretical Physics. At age 26, he was the youngest Professor in Germany. From 1939 to 1945 he remained at Darmstadt and worked on radar for the German Navy. In 1947 and 1948, he spent a brief period doing similar work for the US signal Corps in New Jersey. On the condition that he have his own workshop to construct experimental instruments, he returned to the Technische Hochschule in Fig. 2. Left to right: Brüche, Scherzer’s wife, unidentified, Darmstadt, where he became a senior Professor in 1954. He remained there Scherzer. Courtesy of Dieter Typke.
    [Show full text]
  • Lust Am Lesen Schon Bezahlt! Pressesendung Nr
    3 Jahrgang 8 10. Dezember 2012 Die Zeitung der Technischen Universität Darmstadt www.tu-darmstadt.de hochHandeln Denken Abschluss Sensibel Aufmerksam Unachtsam Die TU Darmstadt orientiert sich in Forschung und Roboter können binnen kurzer Zeit menschliches Landminen könnten mit einfachem technischem Lehre an zivilen Zwecken und friedlichen Zielen. Verhalten adaptieren und hinzulernen. Gerät entschärft werden. Aber es fehlt die Lobby. Seite 8 Seite 19 Seite 24 Bild: Katrin Binner Katrin Bild: Lust am Lesen Schon bezahlt! Schon F D 14253 Nr. Pressesendung 2012 7/Dezember Nr. Technische Universität Darmstadt | hoch3 | Dezember 2012 Seite 2 Bild: Katrin Binner Binner Katrin Bild: 2 Ein bedeutendes, weil für alle Mitglieder der Universität 37.000 m Fläche im Grunde unverzichtbares Gebäude ist eröffnet: der Neubau der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek. Im Jahr 2013 wird ausprobiert, ob Rund-um-die-Uhr-Öffnungs - zeiten des architektonisch reizvollen Wissensspeichers an- 5,5 Millionen Medien genommen werden. Viele Zahlen, Fakten und Berichte im Themenschwerpunkt ab Seite 4. 700 Leseplätze Seite 3 Technische Universität Darmstadt | hoch3 | Dezember 2012 Editorial Fokus 4 Viel Raum für Wissbegierige bietet die neue Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek (ULB). Wer arbeiten, lernen oder einfach schmökern will, kann das hier tun. Merken 7 Liebe Leserinnen Der Fachbereich Physik ehrt mit seinem neu gestalteten Herzberg-Hörsaal Dr. Gerhard Herzberg, einen von den Nazis vertriebenen Privatdozenten. und Leser, Merken sollte man sich neben diesem Namen auch die Redaktionstermine Binner Katrin Bild: der hoch3 für das kommende Jahr. eines der wichtigsten Bauprojekte der TU Darm- stadt in den letzten Jahrzehnten ist vollendet – die Handeln 8 neue Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek bildet ein neues und attraktives Zentrum auf dem Campus Die TU Darmstadt will freie Forschung, aber auch Frieden und Folgenab- Stadtmitte.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory and the Electromagnetic World-View
    SUMAN SETH* Quantum theory and the electromagnetic world-view IN THE WINTER of 1906, Munich’s new professor of theoretical physics, Arnold Sommerfeld (1868-1951), began a series of lectures on “Maxwell’s theory and electron theory,” a topic described in a letter that December to H.A. Lorentz as the “burning questions of electrons.”1 In a manner that would become characteristic of his lecturing style, Sommerfeld introduced his students almost immediately to the current problems plaguing the subject area at hand.2 After a short historical over- view of the topic, he noted:3 *Department of Science and Technology Studies, 303 Rockefeller Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850; [email protected]. I wish to thank Norton Wise, Michael Mahoney, Otto Sibum and Ole Molvig for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. Thanks also to John Heilbron for his insightful criticisms. Richard Staley’s detailed engagement with the specific issues considered here has been invaluable. Beyond those works specifically cited in the footnotes, I am indebted to Michael Eckert’s work on Arnold Sommerfeld. Research for this project was completed while I was a guest research fellow at the Deutsches Museum, Munich, and the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin. The following abbreviations are used: AS, Arnold Sommerfeld Papers, Deutsches Museum, Munich, NL 089 (028); EM, Michael Eckert and Karl Märker, eds., Arnold Sommerfeld: Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, 1 (Berlin, 2000). 1. Sommerfeld to Lorentz, 12 Dec 1906 (EM, 257-258). 2. Sommerfeld’s students often remarked on how up-to-date his lectures were. “It is charac- teristic of his way of teaching that many of the problems he discussed in his lectures for advanced students, and in his seminar, were those which he was just going to solve him- self,” Otto Scherzer has been quoted as saying.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Physicists in the World
    Scientist Country Birth-Death Jules Aarons United States 1921-2008 Ernst Karl Abbe Germany 1840-1905 Derek Abbott Australia born 1960 Hasan Abdullayev Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, Soviet Union, Azerbaijan 1918-1993 Alexei Alexeyevich Abrikosov Soviet Union, Russia born 1928 Nobel laureate Robert Adler United States 1913-2007 Stephen L. Adler United States born 1939 Franz Aepinus Rostock Ronald Ernest Aitchison Australia 1921-1996 David Z Albert, United States Miguel Alcubierre Mexico born 1964 Zhores Ivanovich Alferov Russia born 1930 Nobel laureate Hannes Olof Gösta Alfvén Sweden 1908-1995 Nobel laureate Alhazen Basra, Iraq 965-1040 Artem Alikhanian Moscow Abraham Alikhanov Ganja William Allis United States 1901-1999 Samuel King Allison United States 1900-1965 Yakov Lvovich Alpert Russia, United States 1911-2010 Ralph Asher Alpher United States 1921-2007 Semen Altshuler Vitebsk Luis Walter Alvarez United States 1911-1988 Nobel laureate Viktor Ambartsumian Soviet Union, Armenia 1908-1996 André-Marie Ampère France 1775-1836 Anja Cetti Andersen Denmark born 1965 Hans Henrik Andersen Denmark born 1937 Philip Warren Anderson United States born 1923 Nobel laureate Carl David Anderson United States 1905-1991 Nobel laureate Herbert L. Anderson United States 1914-1988 Elephter Andronikashvili Georgia 1910-1989 Anders Jonas Ångström Sweden 1814-1874 Alexander Animalu, Nigeria born 1938 Edward Victor Appleton U.K. 1892-1965 Nobel laureate François Jean Dominique Arago France 1786-1853 Archimedes Syracuse, Greece ca. 287-212BC Manfred von
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Eckert Statement and Readings
    Michael Eckert Statement and Readings Five decades of quantum physics: How Sommerfeld faced the quantum (r)evolution in the first half of the 20th century—a biographical perspective Michael Eckert Deutsches Museum, Munich, Germany Abstract Sommerfeld's attitude towards foundational questions—in particular with regard to the quantum—will be described with respect to the changing context and content of his research at significant stages from the 1910s to the 1940s. In the early period (before 1913) Sommerfeld focused on his so-called "h-hypothesis" as a general scheme to account for processes like the photoelectric effect, the emission of x-ray bremsstrahlung and other non-periodic elementary processes. In the subsequent period of the "Bohr–Sommerfeld model" he perceived foundational questions from the vantage point of atomic spectra. With the advent of quantum mechanics and new discoveries like the Compton effect and electron diffraction in the 1920s Sommerfeld made wave mechanics the basis from which he perceived quantum riddles. This became a major effort during the 1930s when he transformed the Wavemechanical Supplementary Volume of Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines from 1929 into a new edition in 1939. Sommerfeld kept a vivid interest in the progress of quantum research until his death in 1951. I hope that this biographical approach illustrates how foundational questions in physics depend on time and on the broader context. Although I reach only a little beyond the formative period of quantum mechanics I hope the lessons drawn from this example are more generally of interest. Michael Eckert translated by Tom Artin Arnold Sommerfeld Science, Life and Turbulent Times 1868–1951 Michael Eckert Deutsches Museum Munich , Germany Translation of Arnold Sommerfeld: Atomphysiker und Kulturbote 1868–1951, originally published in German by Wallstein Verlag, Göttingen ISBN ---- ISBN ---- (eBook) DOI ./---- Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: © Springer Science+Business Media New York Th is work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • In Remembrance of Otto Scherzer, the Eminent Pioneer of Electron Optics
    1452 Microsc Microanal 15(Suppl 2), 2009 doi: 10.1017/S1431927609092150 Copyright 2009 Microscopy Society of America In Remembrance of Otto Scherzer, the Eminent Pioneer of Electron Optics Harald Rose Institute of Applied Physics, Technical University Darmstadt, Hochschulstrasse 6, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany This year, MSA celebrates the hundredth birthday of its late Distinguished Scientist Otto Scherzer who was born on March 9, 1909 in the Bavarian town Passau. In 1927, he attended the Technical University Munich where he studied electrical engineering. After receiving his bachelor’s degree, he joined the institute of the famous theoretical physicist Arnold Sommerfeld at the Maximilian University Munich. Somewhat more than two years later, at age 22, he received his Ph.D. degree. In his doctoral thesis he treated fundamental quantum mechanical properties of the Bremsstrahlung. During the economic crisis after Black Friday, Sommerfeld had no funds anymore for a post doc position. To find some support for his gifted post doc, he recommended him to Professor Ernst Brueche, who was director of research at the company AEG at that time. The change from Munich to Berlin proved to be a stroke of luck for the emerging field of electron optics because Scherzer had the masterly ability to solve actual technological problems by means of appropriate theoretical tools. His tasks involved the design of electron lenses, deflection elements and other electron optical components used in oscilloscopes and image converter tubes. The results of his two-year investigations culminated in the book, Geometrische Elektronenoptik, which he published together with Ernst Brueche in 1934. This comprehensive treatise on geometrical electron optics was the standard book on the subject for many years.
    [Show full text]