DOCSLIB.ORG

Northrop's 1-38 Talon This Trainer Can GO, GO GO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northrop's 1-38 Talon This Trainer Can GO, GO GO A new supersonic jet trainer, the Northrop T-38 Talon, has been undergoing extensive testing before entering service with USAF. The plane has drawn praise from pilots, mechanics, engineers . rAtoN Northrop's 1-38 Talon This Trainer Can GO, GO GO Ed Mack Miller ROM sunbaked Edwards AFB in California's Through the test period, the plane has drawn praise I Mojave Desert to the snowy winterscape of Malm- from pilots, mechanics, and engineers. They have strom AFB, Mont., to Eglin AFB on Florida's noted its simple maintenance, classic lines, impressive df Coast, Air Force test pilots have in recent months speed, range ( 1,150 miles), ceiling ( 60,000 feet). en getting to know a new supersonic jet that should Among its important features as a trainer are runway- e day become a familiar piece of hardware at USAF level ejection capability and excellent back-seat visi- ses here and abroad. bility for the instructor. The plane is the supersonic T-38 Talon trainer. Fif- The only supersonic trainer adopted by a major air Hi of the Northrop-produced aircraft are currently force and included in its inventory, the T-38 is forty- operation in the far-ranging and intensive test pro- four feet long; twelve feet, ten inches high. Wingspan am. The total present order includes 144 planes, is twenty-five feet, three inches. Power plant is two th further orders expected to follow. Service lightweight, high-thrust General Electric J85-5 after- arming is that the T-38, designed for training in super- burning engines. Performance is comparable to com- ak and high-altitude flight, formation flying, acro- bat aircraft weighing twice as much as T-38 takeoff ties, multijet-engine operations, and night or instru- weight of 11,500 pounds. The T-38 is capable of single- 'nt cross-country flying, will ultimately supplant the engine takeoff, go-around, and landing at maximum ickheed T-33 Tee Bird jet trainer. The plane's high weight with gear and flaps down. Each engine weighs formance and versatility may also suit it to a num- 525 pounds, delivers a maximum of 3,850 pounds of r of other missions. (Continued on following page) FORCE Magazine • March 1961 99 T-38 TALON attention was devoted to avoiding "built-in a that might result from accident-prone electri draulic, and fuel systems. The T-38's rear seat was placed ten inches than the front. The instructor, as one test pilot "will have so much visibility that he will feel The cockpit was put together with simplicity in Everything is in front of the pilot ., and easily r Air Force test pilot Capt. Swart Nelson, high-time pilot with either hand. in T-38, describes the plane's flight characteristics to writer Ed Mack Miller in interview at Edwards AFB, Calif. Fuselage lines on the Talon are charade "coke-bottle" curvature in line with the ar thrust, and has a thrust-to-weight ratio of 7.33 to 1. theory. Wings are placed in the rear section So far the T-38 has been powered by the "Yr fuselage just aft of the engine air scoops. The engine, which is rated at about 2,000 fewer pounds leading-edge wing, with low-drag charade of thrust than the J85 engine which will power the cambered at the front to prevent tip stall. The plane later on. Best cruise with the "Yr is Mach .86. bered nose of the fuselage, which gives the T Both speed and range will increase considerably with distinctive "anteater" or "porpoise" look, allows the "J" engine. Speed capability will be Mach 1.2 and lent visibility while still providing low drag. The mission endurance time better than two hours. Best tural load limit factor of the airplane is better afterburner climb speed of the aircraft is Mach .92. seven Gs. The afterburner can be used for more than twenty The wing is designed to let the plane transiti minutes. supersonic speeds without "tuck" or "pitch." The - Talon leaves ground in test flight at Edwards. Extensive Underbelly view shows T-38 design features including the 1 test program has been conducted at several bases. contoured fuselage, flat afterbody, split between engines. 1 The T-38 is a high-sink-rate aircraft. Power must uses conventional ailerons and rudder. All surfaces be used throughout the normal landing approach, hydraulically powered. The all-movable horizo which makes it an appropriate trainer for supersonic stabilizer is of aluminum-alloy honeycomb with a st aircraft such as the B-58, Century-series fighters, and spar. The vertical stabilizer is a semimonocoque, one- such foreign-built high-performance craft as France's spar structure. Dassault Mirage III jet fighter. The designers believe the T-38's fuel system to Three prime requirements were taken into con- almost goof-proof. The cockpit fuel panel has o sideration in design of the T-38: performance capa- three switches—two "supply," one "cross-feed." Each bility similar to supersonic combat aircraft; flying engine normally receives fuel from its own fuel tanks. qualities consistent with safety requirements for However, a cross-feed connection permits either engine trainer aircraft; and economy of maintenance and to receive fuel from the other supply when necessary. operation. Fuel is carried aft of the cockpits and is normally Safety and maintenance factors designed into the pumped by electrically powered boost pumps. Gravity T-38 are a result of comprehensive study by USAF feed will continue to furnish fuel at altitudes above and Northrop. An effort was made to identify the fre- 30,000 feet. Each system has 300 gallons for a total of quency of failures in jet trainers, where they took 3,880 pounds of fuel. When fuel is down to 300 pounds place, and where most man-hours were put in in in either tank, the pilot gets an indicator light. Test trouble-shooting and maintenance. The components pilots say it's no sweat to go around even when down that seemed to be the weakest were made easiest to to 300 pounds. get at for repair. Emphasis has been on making black Electrical power for the T-38 is supplied by two boxes readily accessible for maintenance. Considerable independent AC systems and a DC system that oh. 100 AIR FORCE Magazine • March 19 41 ir 1 CONTINUED tains power through two transformer-rectifiers in the The T-38's windshield is hinged so that it can be 111AC system. During normal operation, each generator swung up out of the way for facility of cockpit main- carries half the load. If one fails, uninterrupted per- tenance. A pilot bonus: no scratches on the glass. An formance is maintained by automatic switchover of engine can be changed on the T-38 in about twenty affected loads to the other generator. A small twenty- A complete double-engine change should take four-volt battery is also provided for emergency air- about two hours. starts, stand-by instrument-panel lighting, and ground Engine-driven accessories are mounted in the air- starts where no auxiliary power unit is available, frame—not the engine—to provide maximum acces- ,1 The T-38 also has two hydraulic systems, identical sibility. Below and forward of each engine is an inte- 1 in operation but differing in the units they supply. grated power package consisting of a two-speed, systemEach provides half the power required by the automatic-shifting gear box, an AC generator, and a flight controls. The primary "utility" system also sup- hydraulic pump. The engine can be removed from this plies all power needed by the landing gear, the nose- power package almost like unscrewing a light bulb or 1 wheel-steering system, the stability-augmenter, and pulling the cork from a bottle, or the power package 3 the speed brakes. Flaps are electrically driven. If can be removed as a unit through a forward access i either system fails, the other will automatically provide door without removing the engine. Removal or instal- ! adequate flight control power. Even when flamed-out lation of engines is facilitated by a built-in overhead and windmilling, the engines should generate enough track and roller arrangement in the aircraft engine hydraulic power to maintain flight control for glide base itself. and landing. Normal windmill speed is twenty-two One or two men are needed to handle the uni- percent. (Continued on following page) . tructor, student sit in tandem in T-38 cockpit, with Flight line of T-38s at Edwards. Supersonic, twin-engine , ctor behind and ten inches higher than the student. Talons will join the Air Training Command in numbers. (.; _ 81197 , _ ...,„ 81196 I Ecw• a TF-1;sto, 11.•„ia•1411h0 FO4 „te) 81191 Asz,,, ,-1 • 0 it Iffr' SJ,IR FORCE .11 FOI imempl0 T-38 TALON versal-lift trailer and several tubular steel adapters out Air Training Command people and settin that mount on the trailer for support of the engine, ATC program. The category III program, s after-fuselage, wing, or gear-box. Each adapter can the ATC Instructor School at Randolph AF be used for removal and installation of a component, this month, will run for a year. A group of tw for maintenance, inspection, transportation, and stor- students of Randolph's class 62F will be the age. The engine adapter can even be used in a test cell dents trained in the plane about a year from now. as an engine run-up stand. ATC bases currently scheduled to get T-38s fo From a pilot's standpoint, accessibility of cockpit training are Moody, Ga.; Craig, Ala.; Williams, controls is an outstanding feature; no controls are aft Vance, Okla.; Reese, Tex.; and Webb, Tex.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MASAD-83-22 Air Force and Navy Trainer Aircraft Acquisition Programs
    /-Gr - Y 4 , +Asl+H., c BY THECOMPTROLLER GENERAL ’ eport To The Congress8 z THEUNITED STATES r Force And Navy Trainer rcraft Acquisition Programs G41 examined the status of one Navy and tvAir Force Programs to acquire 1,184 tri ler aircraft costing an estimated $10.8 bi In over the next decade. GAO found th *The Department of Defense needs to firm up its plans to acquire T-45 aircraft for training Navy pilots. In doing so, the Navy should be directed to consider extending use of its present aircraft. -The Air Force’s T-46A has experienced some cost growth. Its accelerated en- ginadevelopment and concurrent test- ing and production are areas of poten- tial concern. -The Air Force planned to begin develop- ment of the Tanker-Transport-Bomber Training System in fiscal year 1983, but tha Congress did not authorize’ appropriations for the program in that! y@ar. The Air Force has applied for\\ fiscal year 1984 approval. \ 121798 GAO/MA#AD-82-22 &LY &I983 Request for copies of GAO reports should be sent to: U.S. General Accounting Off ice Document Handling and Information Services Facility P.O. Box 6015 Gaithersburg, Md. 20760 Telephone (202) 2756241 The first five copies of individual reports are free of charge. Additional copies of bound audit reports are $3.25 each. Additional copies of unbound report (i.e., letter reports) and most other publications are $1.00 each. There will be a 26% discount on all orders for 100 or more copies mailed to a single address. Salk orders must be prepaid on a cash, check, or money order basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Handley Page, Lachmann, Flow Control and Future Civil Aircraft
    Handley Page, Lachmann, flow control and future civil aircraft John Green ABSTRACT Frederick Handley Page and Gustav Lachmann independently developed and patented the concept of the slotted wing as a means of increasing maximum lift. Subsequently they co-operated on the project and Lachmann joined Handley Page Ltd. The Handley Page slotted wing became used worldwide, generating substantial income for the company from use of the patent, and its descendents can be found on all modern transport aircraft. In the years following World War II, Lachmann led research at Handley Page to reduce drag by keeping the boundary layer laminar by surface suction. Handley Page led this field in the UK and developed a number of aircraft concepts, none of which came to fruition as full scale projects. However, looking to the future, the basic concept of laminar flow control holds out arguably the greatest potential of all technologies for reducing the fuel burn and environmental impact of future civil aircraft. 1. INTRODUCTION This is the story of two men of genius, Frederick Handley Page and Gustav Lachmann, Figs. 1 and 2. They were brought together by chance, as a result of having independently, and unknown to each other, invented and patented the same aerodynamic concept. During World War I they had been on opposite sides. Handley Page, who had been 28 at the outbreak of hostilities, established his company’s reputation as the designer of the large biplane bombers, the ‘bloody paralysers’ sought by the Royal Navy in 1914, that made a great contribution to the war effort in 1917 and 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Pilot Training (APT T-X) Aircraft and 46 Ground-Based Training Systems (GBTS) to Replace the Existing Fleet of T-38C Jet Trainers
    Air Force T-7A Red Hawk Trainer Updated September 18, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44856 Air Force T-7A Red Hawk Trainer Summary NOTE: This report was originally written by Ceir Coral while he was an Air Force Fellow at the Congressional Research Service. Since his departure, it has been maintained by Jeremiah Gertler of CRS. On September 27, 2018, the United States Air Force (USAF) awarded The Boeing Company a contract, worth up to $9.2 billion, to procure 351 Advanced Pilot Training (APT T-X) aircraft and 46 Ground-Based Training Systems (GBTS) to replace the existing fleet of T-38C jet trainers. The Air Force had originally valued the contract at roughly $19.7 billion. Information on the value of other competitors’ bids was not available. On September 16, 2019, Acting Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan announced that in service, the T-X aircraft would be known as the T-7A Red Hawk. In this report, “APT T-X” will be used to identify the entire training system, while “T-7A” will refer to the aircraft portion of that system. The FY2020 Administration budget request included $348.473 million for the APT T-X. According to the USAF, the current T-38C trainer fleet is old, costly, and outdated, and lacks the technology to train future pilots for fifth-generation fighter and bomber operations. Based on Air Education Training Command’s evaluation of the required capabilities to train future pilots for fifth-generation fighters and bombers, the T-38C falls short in 12 of 18 capabilities, forcing the USAF to train for those capabilities in operational units where flying hours are costly and can affect fleet readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Command and Control and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Aircraft
    U.S. Command and Control and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Aircraft Jeffrey Nelson US Air Force Fellow July 15, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44108 c11173008 . U.S. Command and Control and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Aircraft Summary The fleet of manned aircraft accomplishing the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) Command and Control (C2) and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions for the joint military community (E-8, E-3, RC-135, WC-135, OC-135, and E-6) is primarily based on Boeing 707 aircraft procured from the 1960s to the early 1990s. As the age of these legacy C2ISR aircraft increases, understanding the Air Force and Navy modernization and recapitalization plans is likely important for Congress. This report examines the Air Force’s and Navy’s current sustainment, modernization, and recapitalization efforts for these Boeing 707-based aircraft, and issues Congress may take into account when considering appropriating funds for continued sustainment and modernization of these aircraft versus funding for recapitalization of these missions to new aircraft. This report addresses potential congressional oversight and appropriations concerns for the sustainment, modernization, and recapitalization of the DOD’s Boeing 707-based legacy C2ISR aircraft fleet. It does not address options for recapitalization currently being offered by industry to other countries. Congress has the authority to approve, reject, or modify Air Force and Navy funding requests for C2ISR aircraft sustainment, modernization, and recapitalization, as well as oversight of the nation’s C2ISR requirements and capabilities. Congress’s decisions on appropriations for the C2ISR force could impact the nation’s C2ISR capabilities and have additional consequences for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aeronautical and Space Industries of the Community Compared with Those of the United Kingdom and - the United States
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES The aeronautical and space industries of the Community compared with those of the United Kingdom and - the United States GENERAL REPORT Volume 4 COMPETITION INDUSTRY - 1971 - 4 I Survey carried out on behalf of the Commission of the European Communities (Directorate- General for Industry) Project coordinator: Mr Felice Calissano, with the assistance of Messrs Federico Filippi and Gianni Jarre of Turin Polytech­ nical College and Mr Francesco Forte of the University of Turin SORIS Working Group : Mr Ruggero Cominotti Mr Ezio Ferrarotti Miss Donata Leonesi Mr Andrea Mannu Mr Jacopo Muzio Mr Carlo Robustelli Interviews with government agencies and private companies conducted by : Mr Felice Calissano Mr Romano Catolla Cavalcanti Mr Federico Filippi Mr Gianni Jarre Mr Carlo Robustelli July 1969 I No. 7042 SORIS spa Economic studies, market research 11, via Santa Teresa, Turin, Italy Tel. 53 98 65/66 The aeronautical and space industries of the Community compared \ with those of the United Kingdom and the United States STUDIES Competition Industry No.4 BRUSSELS 1971 THE AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE INDUSTRIES OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED WITH THOSE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES VOLUME 1 The aeronautical and space research and development VOLUME 2 The aeronautical and space industry VOLUME 3 The space activities VOLUME 4 The aeronautical market VOLUME 5 Technology- Balance of payments The role of the aerospace industry in the economy Critical assessment of the results of the survey CHAPTER 3 The aeronautical market ! Contents PART 1 THE MARKET FOR CIVIL AIRCRAFT 1 • INTRODUCTION 675 2. TYPES OF AIRCRAFT 675 NUMBERS OF AIRCRAFT 680 3.1 Total Number 680 3.2 Breakdown by Type of Aircraft and by Country 688 4.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
    107TH CONGRESS I P S. PRT. 1st Session Comme Print 107-64 United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report on a Review of United States Assistance to Peruvian Counter-Drug Air Interdiction Efforts and the Shootdown of a Civilian Aircraft on April 20, 2001 October 2001 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 79-619 WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE BOB GRAHAM, Florida, Chairman RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama, Vice Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan JON KYL, Arizona JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, IV, West Virginia JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah RON WYDEN, Oregon PAT ROBERTS, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio EVAN BAYH, Indiana FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee JOHN EDWARDS, North Carolina RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland THOMAS A. DASCHLE, South Dakota, Ex Officio TRENT LOTI, Mississippi, Ex Officio ALFRED CUMMING, Staff Director BILL DUHNKE, Minority Staff Director KATHLEEN P. McGHEE, Chief Clerk CONTENTS Page Background .................................................... 1 Nature of the Intelligence Committee's Review .................................................... 1 History of the Program ........................................................................................... 2 Program Results .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Engineering
    AVIATION ENGINEERING “DTC IS THE SECRET-EDGE WEAPON OF THE SAF” DR NG ENG HEN MINISTER FOR DEFENCE The opinions and views expressed in this work are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect II the official views of the Ministry of Defence TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Message Preface 1 CHAPTER 1 : Where We Were Section 1.1 How It All Started Section 1.2 Some History of the Early Engineering Work in Support of the RSAF 22 CHAPTER 2 : Pioneering Spirit Section 2.1 Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Section 2.2 Engineering Development - Modifications and Upgrading Section 2.3 Service Life Extension Programme (SLEP) Section 2.4 Managing Technologies Section 2.5 “Commercialisation” Section 2.6 Values and Necessities 61 CHAPTER 3 : Some Major Milestones Section 3.1 The A-4 Crisis Section 3.2 Conversion Programmes 3.2.1 New Engine for the Skyhawk 3.2.2 A-4 Avionics Upgrade (1985) – First Major Avionics Upgrade Undertaken 3.2.3 F-5E/F WDNS Upgrade – Unleashing the Tiger 3.2.4 Giving the F-5 an Eye in the Sky – F-5E to RF-5E Conversion 3.2.5 Upgrade Capability Serving Overseas F-5 Users 3.2.6 Brazilian Air Force F-5E/F Upgrade 3.2.7 Upgrading of the Hercules C-130 3.2.8 F-16 3.2.9 F-15SG Capability Build-up Section 3.3 Surveillance Aircraft 3.3.1 E-2C 3.3.2 Fokker 50 Maritime Patrol Aircraft Conversion 3.3.3 G550 Section 3.4 Rotary Wing Evolution 3.4.1 Vertical Lift in the RSAF 3.4.2 The Super Puma Experience 3.4.3 Developing the Light Observation Helicopter and Light Attack Helicopter 3.4.4 Heavy-Lift Helicopter Evaluation – The Russian Experience
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2015. By Aaron M. U. Church, Senior Editor ■ 2016 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT B-1 Lancer Brief: Long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and de- livering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. COMMENTARY The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four proto- types were developed and tested before program cancellation in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998. Its three internal weapons bays accommodate a substantial payload of weapons, including a mix of different weapons in each bay. Lancer production totaled 100 aircraft. The bomber’s blended wing/ body configuration, variable-geometry design, and turbofan engines provide long range and loiter time. The B-1B has been upgraded with GPS, smart weapons, and mission systems. Offensive avionics include SAR for tracking, B-2A Spirit (SSgt. Jeremy M. Wilson) targeting, and engaging moving vehicles and terrain following. GPS-aided INS lets aircrews autonomously navigate without ground-based navigation aids Dimensions: Span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 and precisely engage targets. Sniper pod was added in 2008. The ongoing ft, height 34 ft. integrated battle station modifications is the most comprehensive refresh in Weight: Max T-O 477,000 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pilot Training Study: Advanced Pilot Training. Department of the Air
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 050 348 AC 010 341 AUTHOR Kennedy, P. J. TITLE The Pilot Training Study: Advanced Pilot Training. INSTITUTION Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif. SPONS AGENCY Department of the Air Force, Washington, D.C. FEPORT NO RM-6085-PR PUB DATE Dec 69 NOTE 59p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Advanced Programs, *Aircraft Pilots, *Cost Etfectiveness, *Educational Programs, *Military Personnel IDENTIFIERS *Advanced Pilot Training, APT, Project RAND ABSTRACT An overview is presented of advanced pilot training and of the formal advanced pilot training program that constitutes the primary means of providing this training. Section I deals with the various phases of advanced pilot training that a pilot may encounter during his career; Section II deals with the types of aircraft that require some form of advanced pilot training; Section I7J describes organizational frameworks for the conduct of the formal courses; Section IV describes the general contents of the formal training courses; Section V discusses he variations in course lengths, lead-in courses, and the pilot qualifications required for entry; Section VI presents a general equation relating course length to training hours; and Section VII deals with the problem of determining the resources that contribute to the cost of pilot training. A bibliography and glossary are included. For related documents, see AC 010 340 and AC 010 342-347.(Author/DB) U S IDEPARTIW NT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE CF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT H.e S BEE'. REPRO OUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PEPSON OR ORGANIZATION CP1G INA-INC: 1' POINTS OF VIEW CR OPEN IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY RETRESENI OF FICIAL OFFICE OF EDU CANON POT DON C9 POLICY SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE The ERIC Fact It ty hat WI .1 document for peaceatt.t Q " to: "NI /n our judgemeni,thd document ated of merest to the c.exmg.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 49 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2010 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice8President Air 2arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KC3 C3E AFC Committee Chairman Air 7ice82arshal N 3 3aldwin C3 C3E 7ice8Chairman -roup Captain 9 D Heron O3E Secretary -roup Captain K 9 Dearman FRAeS 2embership Secretary Dr 9ack Dunham PhD CPsychol A2RAeS Treasurer 9 3oyes TD CA 2embers Air Commodore - R Pitchfork 23E 3A FRAes ,in Commander C Cummin s :9 S Cox Esq 3A 2A :A72 P Dye O3E 3Sc(En ) CEn AC-I 2RAeS :-roup Captain 2 I Hart 2A 2A 2Phil RAF :,in Commander C Hunter 22DS RAF Editor & Publications ,in Commander C - 9efford 23E 3A 2ana er :Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS THE PRE8,AR DE7E.OP2ENT OF DO2INION AIR 7 FORCES by Sebastian Cox ANS,ERIN- THE @O.D COUNTRABSB CA.. by , Cdr 11 Colin Cummin s ‘REPEAT, PLEASE!’ PO.ES AND CCECHOS.O7AKS IN 35 THE 3ATT.E OF 3RITAIN by Peter Devitt A..IES AT ,ARE THE RAF AND THE ,ESTERN 51 EUROPEAN AIR FORCES, 1940845 by Stuart Hadaway 2ORNIN- G&A 76 INTERNATIONA.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Aviation T-28 Trojan Pods for All Types of Armaments Training, Sort of Record
    KiwiFlyer KiwiFlyer Warbird Feature KiwiFlyer Warbird Feature because it could be fitted with underwing World War II pilot even comes close to that The aircraft actually conforms to the North American Aviation T-28 Trojan pods for all types of armaments training, sort of record. old Group C, so if you could fly a Piper The Last Great Warbird contributed by Rob Silich including 30 and 50 caliber machine guns, Arrow, you could fly the T28. The biggest ? bombs and rockets, not to mention fuel Why you should want one difference is the fact that the seat of your Continuing our series on NZ Warbirds aircraft, Considerably larger than the T6 1956 they were being retired in favour of tanks. Most of the Warbird T-28s presently pants is about six feet further from the Pilot Rob Silich contributed this article about his it boasted an 800 bhp Wright R1300 the twin jet T37 trainer, with the last of The avionics and weapons systems flying came onto the market during the ground even when taxiing, so the super favourite aircraft. Rob is a 1200 hour PPL with and although this was regarded as the A model soldiering on at Air National were identical to the latest frontline aircraft late 1970’s and early 1980’s. They were absorbent carrier rated main landing gear a background in Pitts aerobatics. He has been somewhat underpowered it was felt to be Guard units as late as 1960. and were configured to be kept up to quickly snapped up by those who knew can come in very handy! involved with ‘Warbirds’ since 1988 and a member representative of the way the new jets flew The Navy meanwhile, had by 1952 seen date.
    [Show full text]
  • Flightlines JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2018
    Saturday April 28, 2018 LIVE & SILENT AUCTION BUY TICKETS NOW!! SAVE+WIN!! EARLY BUY DEAL $3999 $29999 (until March 31st) per person OR table of 8 includes chance for trip prize - reg. $49.99 reg. $399.99 All tickets to this casual event include buffet dinner & wine. Amazing Prizes to be Won including a Private Tour of Jay Leno’s Personal Garage* *Items subject to change without notice. 9280 Airport Road Mount Hope, Ontario, L0R 1W0 warplane.com Fundraiser supporting the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum plus Help A Child Smile President & Chief Executive Officer David G. Rohrer Vice President – Facilities Manager Controller Operations Cathy Dowd Brenda Shelley Pam Rickards Curator Education Services Vice President – Finance Erin Napier Manager Ernie Doyle Howard McLean Flight Coordinator Chief Engineer Laura Hassard-Moran Donor Services Jim Van Dyk Manager Retail Manager Sally Melnyk Marketing Manager Shawn Perras Al Mickeloff Building Maintenance Volunteer Services Manager Food & Beverage Manager Administrator Jason Pascoe Anas Hasan Toni McFarlane Board of Directors Christopher Freeman, Chair Nestor Yakimik Art McCabe David Ippolito Robert Fenn Dennis Bradley, Ex Officio John O’Dwyer Marc Plouffe Sandy Thomson, Ex Officio David G. Rohrer Patrick Farrell Bruce MacRitchie, Ex Officio Stay Connected Subscribe to our eFlyer Canadian Warplane warplane.com/mailing-list-signup.aspx Heritage Museum 9280 Airport Road Read Flightlines online warplane.com/about/flightlines.aspx Mount Hope, Ontario L0R 1W0 Like us on Facebook facebook.com/Canadian Phone 905-679-4183 WarplaneHeritageMuseum Toll free 1-877-347-3359 (FIREFLY) Fax 905-679-4186 Follow us on Twitter Email [email protected] @CWHM Web warplane.com Watch videos on YouTube youtube.com/CWHMuseum Shop our Gift Shop warplane.com/gift-shop.aspx Follow Us on Instagram instagram.com/ canadianwarplaneheritagemuseum Volunteer Editor: Bill Cumming Flightlines is the official publication of the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum.
    [Show full text]