DOCSLIB.ORG

Iso/Iwa 26:2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iso/Iwa 26:2017 This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 INTERNATIONAL IWA WORKSHOP 26 AGREEMENT First edition 2017-08 Using ISO 26000:2010 in management systems Utilisation de la norme ISO 26000:2010 dans les systèmes de management Reference number IWA 26:2017(E) © ISO 2017 This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 IWA 26:2017(E) COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form orthe by requester. any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401 ISOCH-1214 copyright Vernier, office Geneva, Switzerland Tel. +41 22 749 01 11 Fax +41 22 749 09 47 www.iso.org [email protected] ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 IWA 26:2017(E) Contents Page Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v 1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Normative references ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 3 Terms and definitions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 4 Guidance on MSS for users of ISO 26000:2010 ..................................................................................................................... 4 5 Guidance on ISO 26000:2010 for users of MSS ..................................................................................................................... 7 6 Integrated management systems and ISO 26000:2010 ............................................................................................... 9 Annex A (informative) Main linkages between ISO 26000:2010 and the HLS for MSS ..................................11 Annex B (informative) Main linkages between the HLS for MSS and ISO 26000:2010 ..................................15 Annex C (informative) Workshop contributors ......................................................................................................................................19 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................21 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved iii This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 IWA 26:2017(E) Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodiescommittee (ISO hasmember been bodies).established The haswork the of rightpreparing to be International represented Standardson that committee. is normally International carried out throughorganizations, ISO technical governmental committees. and non-governmental, Each member body in interestedliaison with in ISO, a subject also take for whichpart in a thetechnical work. electrotechnical standardization. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives). different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patenton the ISOrights. list ISOof patent shall declarationsnot be held responsible received (see for www identifying .iso .org/ any patents or all). such patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or constitute an endorsement. Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not ForWorld an Trade explanation Organization on the (WTO) voluntary principles nature in theof standards, Technical Barriersthe meaning to Trade of ISO(TBT) specific see the terms following and expressionsURL: www .iso related .org/ iso to/ forewordconformity .html assessment,. as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the Standards Institute (SIS), in association with the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS), held in International Workshop Agreement IWA 26 was approved at two workshops hosted by the Swedish Stockholm,In the development Sweden, in of March this 2017,document, and in ISO London, Guide UK, 82 in hasMay been2017. taken into account in addressing sustainability issues. iv © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 IWA 26:2017(E) Introduction 1), which are drafted in accordance with the High Level ThisStructure document (HLS) is2) intendedfor MSS. Itto is help also organizations intended to help apply users ISO of26000:2010 ISO 26000 in to management better understand systems the based MSS on ISO management system standards (MSS) approach in their work on social responsibility. The intended benefits to an organization of using this document are: guidance; a) to improve the performance of a management system by incorporating social responsibility b)The tovalue improve of using social this responsibility document isperformance that it enhances by using an a organization’s structured management contribution system to sustainable approach. development through the synergies of applying social responsibility guidance with a management system approach. Manyunderstanding organizations the organization around the world and its have context, chosen stakeholder an MSS to manage engagement areas and such continual as anti-bribery, improvement. energy, environment, food safety, information security and quality. MSS have many common core elements, e.g. There are believed to be more than 1,5 million management systems in place that are certified to an MSS. An organization’s management system can be supported by standards that specify requirements (e.g. ISO 9001 on quality management; ISO 22000 on food safety management) and by standards providing guidance (e.g. ISO 26000 on social responsibility; ISO 19011 on auditing). In contrast to MSS, ISO 26000:2010 does not specify any requirements, but provides practical guidance on integrating social responsibility into an organization, thereby contributing to sustainable development. It offers guidance on how to build an organizational culture of social responsibility and thisan MSS benefits and continual the use improvement.of management systems. The guidance given in ISO 26000:2010, Clause 7, on integrating social responsibility throughout the organization is structured around the fundamentals of In this document, the following guidance is given: — Clause 4 MSS and how this relates to ISO 26000; is aimed primarily at users who are more familiar with ISO 26000: it focuses on the HLS for — Clause 5 given in ISO 26000 and how this relates to the HLS for MSS; is aimed primarily at users who are more familiar with the MSS: it focuses on the guidance — Clause 6 — Annex A describesshows the howmain integrated linkages between management the clauses systems of andISO 26000:2010ISO 26000 can and be the used HLS together; for MSS, and is intended to help users of ISO 26000:2010 to use the HLS; — Annex B shows the main linkages between the HLS for MSS and the clauses of ISO 26000:2010, and is intended to help users of MSS to use the guidance in ISO 26000:2010. 1) A list of ISO MSS is available at: https:// www .iso .org/ management -standards -list .html 2) The ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement, 2017, Annex SL, Appendix 2, (see www .iso -system .org/ directives all ISO MSS. The purpose of the HLS is to help users of MSS in a particular discipline to use additional MSS in other disciplines, and) tospecifies support the the high integration level structure between (HLS), the MSS. identical core text, common terms and core definitions for © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved v This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922224 International Workshop Agreement IWA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iso/Iwa 26:2017
    INTERNATIONAL IWA WORKSHOP 26 AGREEMENT First edition 2017-08 Using ISO 26000:2010 in management systems Utilisation de la norme ISO 26000:2010 dans les systèmes de management Reference number IWA 26:2017(E) © ISO 2017 IWA 26:2017(E) COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form orthe by requester. any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401 ISOCH-1214 copyright Vernier, office Geneva, Switzerland Tel. +41 22 749 01 11 Fax +41 22 749 09 47 www.iso.org [email protected] ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved IWA 26:2017(E) Contents Page Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v 1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Certification Consulting 2
    www.excelledia.com Excelledia Quality Consulting EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Excelledia Quality Consulting is a leading business process improvement and management consulting firm, helping organizations to be significantly more effective, efficient and financially profitable. We provide best practice business optimization solutions that address processes, technology & organizational improvements. Excelledia facilitates enhanced competitiveness through multi-faceted interventions leading to Business Improvement through consulting, people, process and operational assessments, benchmarking and resource provisioning through Quality Outsourcing. We are specialized in the following areas: Excelledia’s Market Segments: 3 Training Services: Excelledia Consultancy Project programmes focus on Business Optimizations principles. Our Consultancy Project programs are organized in public or in-house sessions and mainly focus on knowledge and skills to equip your team to get rid of non-value added work, avoid unnecessary costs, streamline processes, increase customer satisfaction, and establish a culture of business excellence. Excelledia provides a range of specialized, targeted Consultancy Project courses that focus on growing peoples’ competencies, which will equip the trainees / delegates with the necessary tools to successfully assess a company’s systems and processes and improve the effectiveness and efficiency. Some of these trainings are in the areas of: 1. Lean Six Sigma – Green Belt & Black Belt 2. ISO Management Systems – Lead Auditor & Internal Auditor Programmes 3. Business Strategy & Leadership 4. Sales Skills & Soft Skills (ILM & CIPS Accredited) 5. Project Management 6. HSE Programmes Consulting Services: Excelledia works with organizations across various industries, for enterprise-wide deployment of process improvement and quality initiatives using various models like ISO Management System, Lean Six Sigma, Project Management from PMI, Risk Management etc.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use the GRI Guidelines in Conjunction with ISO 26000
    GRI and ISO 26000: How to use the GRI Guidelines in conjunctionThe Amsterdam Global Conference with on Topics Topics Topics May 7-9 2008 Topics Topics Topics ISO 26000Topics Topics Topics SustainabilityTrends Reporting Today: The Readers’ Verdict Reporting Reporting Practices Practices Trends Trends Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting GRI Research & Development GRI Research & Development Series Practices GRI Research & Development Series Practices Practices Practices UpdatedTools with linkage tables for GRI’s G3 and G3.1 Guidelines Tools Tools GRI Research & Development GRI Research & Development GRI Research & Development Series This document is freely available to download atGRI Research & Development Series www.globalreporting.org Tools GRI Research & Development Series Tools GRI Research & Development Series Tools ToolsTools Tools Topics Topics Topics Topics Reporting Practices Topics Topics Reporting Topics Reporting Practices Practices GRI Research & Development Series Topics Topics Trends Tools Trends GRI Research & Development Series GRI Research & Development Series GRI Research & Development Trends Trends Tools GRI Research & Development Tools Trends Trends Tools GRI Research & Development GRI Research & Development Tools GRI Research & Development Tools GRI Research & Development Tools Tools Tools The Amsterdam Global Conference on May 7-9 2008 Sustainability Reporting Today: The Readers’ Verdict About GRI’s Research and Development Publication Series Copyright This document is copyright-protected by Stichting GRI’s research and development program supports Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The reproduction GRI’s commitment to the continuous improvement and distribution of this document for information of its Reporting Framework by investigating and/or use in preparing a sustainability report challenging issues around reporting and innovating is permitted without prior permission from GRI. new ways to apply the GRI Reporting Framework in However neither this document nor any extract conjunction with other standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Success Codes
    a Volume 2, No. 4, April 2011, ISSN 1729-8709 Success codes • NTUC FairPrice CEO : “ International Standards are very important to us.” • Fujitsu innovates with ISO standards a Contents Comment Karla McKenna, Chair of ISO/TC 68 Code-pendant – Flourishing financial services ........................................................ 1 ISO Focus+ is published 10 times a year World Scene (single issues : July-August, November-December) International events and international standardization ............................................ 2 It is available in English and French. Bonus articles : www.iso.org/isofocus+ Guest Interview ISO Update : www.iso.org/isoupdate Seah Kian Peng – Chief Executive Officer of NTUC FairPrice .............................. 3 Annual subscription – 98 Swiss Francs Special Report Individual copies – 16 Swiss Francs A coded world – Saving time, space and energy.. ..................................................... 8 Publisher ISO Central Secretariat From Dickens to Dante – ISBN propels book trade to billions ................................. 10 (International Organization for Uncovering systemic risk – Regulators push for global Legal Entity Identifiers ..... 13 Standardization) No doubt – Quick, efficient and secure payment transactions. ................................. 16 1, chemin de la Voie-Creuse CH – 1211 Genève 20 Vehicle ID – ISO coding system paves the way for a smooth ride ........................... 17 Switzerland Keeping track – Container transport security and safety.. .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • IT Gurus and Gadgets
    a Volume 2, No. 10, November-December 2011 ISSN 1729-8709 IT gurus and gadgets • Guest Interview : Sony and the value of standards th • ISO 34 General Assembly INDIA a Contents Comment Sadao Takeda, ISO Vice-President (policy) Tech-timing – Creating tomorrow’s gadgets today ................................................... 1 ISO Focus+ is published 10 times a year World Scene (single issues : July-August, November-December) International events and international standardization ............................................ 2 It is available in English and French. Guest Interview Bonus articles : www.iso.org/isofocus+ ISO Update : www.iso.org/isoupdate Ken Wheatley – Sony Electronics, Inc. .................................................................... 3 The electronic edition (PDF file) of ISO Special Report Focus+ is accessible free of charge on the Daring visions – Laying the foundations for innovation .......................................... 8 ISO Website www.iso.org/isofocus+ An annual subscription to the paper edition Gurus and ICT standards – Translating visions into technical success stories ....... 10 costs 38 Swiss francs. Cloud computing – Building firm foundations for standards development ............. 12 Publisher Entertainment of the future – From 3D to virtual reality ........................................ 15 ISO Central Secretariat (International Organization for Zoomed in – The evolving landscape of digital photography .................................. 18 Standardization) 1, chemin de la Voie-Creuse Driving
    [Show full text]
  • International Standards, Approaches and Frameworks Relevant to Software Quality Management and Software Process Improvement
    International standards, approaches and frameworks relevant to Software Quality Management and Software Process Improvement To help organizations managing software quality and improving software processes several standards, models, approaches and frameworks have been developed during the last decades. The most widely known and recognized of them are presented in this document. • Capability Maturity Model (CMM) • CMM Integration (CMMI) • Personal Software Process (PSP) and Team Software Process (TSP) • ISO 9000 standards family • TickIT • ISO/IEC TR 15504 Information Technology - Software Process Assessment (SPICE) • ISO/IEC 12207 Information Technology - Software Life-Cycle Processes • BOOSTRAP • Rational Unified Process CMM Publication Date: Version 1.1 - February 1993 Description: The Capability Maturity Model for Software (SW-CMM or CMM) is a model used by organizations for appraising the maturity of their software processes and for identifying practices that will increase the maturity of those processes. It was developed by the Software Engineering Institute, in cooperation with industry representatives. The Software CMM has become a de facto standard for assessing and improving software processes. Through the SW-CMM, the SEI and community have put in place an effective means for modeling, defining, and measuring the maturity of the processes used by software professionals. The Capability Maturity Model for Software describes the principles and practices underlying software process maturity and is intended to help software organizations
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Signalling Theory to the ISO 26000 Standard for Social Responsibility
    sustainability Article Signalling Responsibility? Applying Signalling Theory to the ISO 26000 Standard for Social Responsibility Lars Moratis 1,2 1 The Netherlands & Sustainable Transformation Lab, NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, 4817 JT Breda, The Netherlands 2 Corporate Social Responsibility, Antwerp Management School, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium; [email protected] Received: 17 September 2018; Accepted: 8 November 2018; Published: 13 November 2018 Abstract: Many global challenges cannot be addressed by one single actor alone. Achieving sustainability requires governance by state and non-state market actors to jointly realise public values and corporate goals. As a form of public–private governance, voluntary standards involving governments, non-governmental organisations and companies have gained much traction in recent years and have been in the limelight of public authorities and policymakers. From a firm perspective, sustainability standards can be a way to demonstrate that they engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) in a credible way. To capitalise on their CSR activities, firms need to ensure their stakeholders are able to recognise and assess their CSR quality. However, because the relative observability of CSR is low and since CSR is a contested concept, information asymmetries in firm–stakeholder relationships arise. Adopting CSR standards and using these as signalling devices is a strategy for firms to reduce these information asymmetries, by revealing their true CSR quality. Against this background, this article investigates the voluntary ISO 26000 standard for social responsibility as a form of public-private governance and contends that, despite its objectives, this standard suffers from severe signalling problems. Applying signalling theory to the ISO 26000 standard, this article takes a critical stance towards this standard and argues that firms adhering to this standard may actually emit signals that compromise rather than enhance stakeholders’ ability to identify and interpret firms’ underlying CSR quality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposal Concept of Development and Implementation in Strategy of Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility in the Context of the Hcs Model 3E
    RESEARCH PAPERS FACULTY OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN TRNAVA SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY IN BRATISLAVA 10.1515/rput-2016-0006 2016, Volume 24, Number 37 THE PROPOSAL CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION IN STRATEGY OF SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE HCS MODEL 3E Peter SAKÁL1, Gabriela HRDINOVÁ2 1SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY in Bratislava, FACULTY OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN TRNAVA, INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, UL. JÁNA BOTTU 25, 917 24 TRNAVA, SLOVAK REPUBLIC, e-mail: [email protected], 2Department of Road Transport and Land Communications, Krajinská cesta 5053/13, 921 25 Piešťany, Slovak Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article is the result of a conceptual design methodology for the development of a sustainable strategy of sustainable corporate social responsibility (SCSR) in the context of the HCS model 3E formed, as a co-author within the stated grants and dissertation. On the basis of the use of propositional logic, the SCSR procedure is proposed for incorporation into the corporate strategy of sustainable development and the integrated management system (IMS) of the industrial enterprise. The aim of this article is the proposal of the concept of development and implementation strategy of SCSR in the context of the HCS model 3E. Key words Sustainable strategic management, sustainable corporate social responsibility, integrated management system, HCS model 3E INTRODUCTION As we noted in the Final KEGA report: “Despite this grant being rejected, we will continue in our research activities in the field of CSR, SCSR and sustainable development (SD). Encouraging news is, that the members of the research team also becames part of a newly submitted project, APVV the “System analysis and assessment of the main management processes of industrial enterprises of the SR for supporting the introduction of 51 the circular economy” and the project VEGA no.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting
    sustainability Article Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting Edward Kassem * and Oldrich Trenz Department of Informatics, Mendel University, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 13 July 2020; Published: 15 July 2020 Abstract: Sustainability assessment is a mainstream business activity that demonstrates the link between the organization’s strategy for and commitment to a sustainable global economy, and the prevention of economic crises. Small- and medium-sized businesses/enterprises (SMBs/SMEs) have significant effects on the European economy. However, because of a lot of restriction factors, like business risk, the high expenses of data collection and management, and the lack of resources, sustainability reporting is considered a superfluous and burdensome activity for them. The aim of this research is to propose an automated, comprehensive and simplified system for the sustainability assessment of SMEs. This system is achieved by implementing three main phases. The first phase includes key performance indicators design, which starts with the identification of various key performance indicators for comprehensive sustainability assessment, and ends with proposing an optimal set of KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) that can encompass long-term issues and be applicable to SMEs in the EU. The second phase involves a new comprehensive method of sustainability assessment for all KPIs designed in the first phase. Therefore, a multi-criteria model, which involves four main pillars of sustainability assessment (economic, environmental, social and governance), is proposed. It gives different enterprises the ability to verify and compare their efficiency and sustainability with other companies within the same sector in an almost automated manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Use of ISO 19011
    Edition 2 Date: 2020-09-21 ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on: Effective Use of ISO 19011 Content INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 ISO 19011:2018 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 2 Principles of auditing ..................................................................................................................... 2 Managing an audit program .......................................................................................................... 3 Performing an audit ....................................................................................................................... 3 Competence and evaluation of auditors ........................................................................................ 4 Annex A – Additional guidance ..................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems provides guidelines for first, second and third-party auditing of management systems. The standard contains guidelines relating to managing an audit program, auditing methods and auditor competence. Although its content is not mandatory, the standard is the foundation for management system audits. It is specifically referenced in many management systems and sector scheme documents (see the Note in ISO 9001:2015, subclause
    [Show full text]
  • ITSSD Assessment of the New ISO 26000 Social Responsibility Standard
    ITSSD Assessment of the new ISO 26000 Social Responsibility Standard December 2005 Preliminary Conclusions: 1. It may be possible to procedurally shape and/or delay the development of the ISO SR guidance standard at the national mirror and international levels. 2. It may be impossible to prevent the actual adoption of an SR standard at the DIS and FDIS stages, unless the ISO voting rules are first modified to reflect only one vote for the European Community as a whole through its regional standards representative (e.g., CEN), as opposed to twenty-five separate votes representing the national standards bodies of each of the EU member states. 3. It is likely to be difficult to reverse the new stakeholder engagement process that has been introduced at the ISO incident to the commencement of this SR standard initiative, though it may arguably be shaped by filing procedural objections, and by strengthening traditional ISO benchmarks for consensus. 4. The real challenge is to prevent the new process from being expanded institutionally to all of ISO’s technical standards work, and thereby from being incorporated within business contracts that reference or directly incorporate such standards as conditions of manufacture, sale, service, etc. This is likely to be quite difficult given the current efforts of governments, NGOs and UN agencies to incorporate sustainable development dimensions into all ISO technical standards. 5. Further study and analysis of the evolving ISO SR operating procedures, the multi-stakeholder engagement process, and the ISO’s general consensus procedures is necessary to determine the proper course of action and the appropriate actors with which/whom to collaborate.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Guide 82 2019(E)
    GUIDE 82 Second edition 2019-11 Guidelines for addressing sustainability in standards Lignes directrices pour la prise en compte de la durabilité dans les normes Reference number ISO GUIDE 82:2019(E) © ISO 2019 ISO GUIDE 82:2019(E) COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2019 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8 CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva Phone: +41 22 749 01 11 Fax:Website: +41 22www.iso.org 749 09 47 Email: [email protected] iiPublished in Switzerland © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved ISO GUIDE 82:2019(E) Contents Page Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v 1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]