DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Statement Planning Statement in Support of a Full Planning Application (made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) to Consolidate the Previous Planning Permissions for Seisdon Quarry, Allowing for the Continued Winning and Working of the Remaining Mineral Reserve and Import of Restoration Materials, Enabling the Restoration of Seisdon Quarry by 31st December 2018 Seisdon Quarry, Ebstree Road, Seisdon Wolverhampton. WV11 7EY. Report Reference: CE-SD0609-RP04-FINAL Produced by Crestwood Environmental Ltd. Crestwood Report Reference: CE-SD0609-RP04-FINAL: Version & Date Written / Updated by: Checked & Authorised by: Status Produced Adam Collinge – Senior Landscape Draft v1i Aug 2015 Sid Lambert – Managing Director Architect Adam Collinge – Senior Landscape FINAL Aug 2015 Sid Lambert – Managing Director Architect This report has been prepared in good faith, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, based on information provided or known available at the time of its preparation and within the scope of work agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. The report is provided for the sole use of the named client and is confidential to them and their professional advisors. No responsibility is accepted to others. Crestwood Environmental Ltd. 1 & 2 Nightingale Place Pendeford Business Park Wobaston Road Wolverhampton WV9 5HF Tel: 01902 824 037 Email: [email protected] Web: www.crestwoodenvironmental.co.uk Full Planning Application for the Mineral Extraction and Restoration at Seisdon Quarry Planning Statement CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 PREFACE ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 THE APPLICANT .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 THE SITE AND EXISTING SITUATION .............................................................................. 3 1.4 ACCESS ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 THE PROPOSALS AND PLANNING CONTEXT .................................................................. 8 1.6 SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... 11 2 DEVELOPMENT DETAILS .......................................................................................................... 12 2.1 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................... 12 2.2 RATE OF EXPORT/IMPORTATION AND VEHICLE MOVEMENTS ..................................... 16 2.3 HOURS OF OPERATION .................................................................................................. 17 2.4 SITE SECURITY, STAFFING AND ACCOMODATION ......................................................... 17 2.5 ESTIMATED LIFE OF OPERATIONS .................................................................................. 17 2.6 MINERAL DEMAND AND JUSTIFICATION ....................................................................... 18 3 POLICY ................................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.2 NATIONAL POLICY .......................................................................................................... 20 3.3 STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON-TRENT MINERALS LOCAL PLAN 1994-2006 .............. 26 3.4 STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON-TRENT JOINT WASTE LOCAL PLAN 2010-2026 ......... 29 3.5 OTHER POLICY ................................................................................................................ 30 3.6 COMMENTARY ............................................................................................................... 30 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................... 32 4.1 NOISE ............................................................................................................................. 32 4.2 AIR QUALITY (ODOUR & DUST) ...................................................................................... 32 4.3 ECOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 33 4.4 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ............................................................................................... 34 4.5 HIGHWAYS / TRANSPORT .............................................................................................. 41 4.6 AGRICULTURE AND SOILS .............................................................................................. 42 4.7 ARBORICULTURE AND HEDGEROWS ............................................................................. 43 4.8 LAND CONTAMINATION AND GROUND CONDITIONS .................................................. 43 4.9 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ................................................................................... 43 4.10 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT, HYDROLOGY AND FLOOD RISK ............................... 44 4.11 CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY ................................................................... 45 4.12 LIGHTING ....................................................................................................................... 45 4.13 GENERAL AMENITY & OTHER ISSUES ............................................................................ 45 5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 47 LIST OF APPENDICES: Planning Drawings consisting of: Location Plan (ref: CE-SD0609-DW01) Appendix A Illustrative Mineral Working and Remediation Plan (ref: CE-SD0609-DW10) Restoration Concept and Land-Use Plan (ref: CE-SD0609-DW09) Outline Restoration Phasing Plan (ref: CE-SD0609-DW15) Appendix B Plant and Equipment Details Appendix C Planning Permission SS.08/08/627 M and SS.10.04.627 M CE-SD0609-RP04-FINAL Page 1 Aug 201503/09/15 Full Planning Application for the Mineral Extraction and Restoration at Seisdon Quarry Planning Statement 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PREFACE 1.1.1 This Planning Statement provides the planning justification in support of a planning application for the continuation of quarry operations, enabling the restoration by 31st December 2018 of Seisdon Quarry, Ebstree Road, Seisdon. WV11 7EY. 1.1.2 The planning application is further supported by an Environmental Statement (ES) in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (EIA) Regulations 2011, which has been provided voluntarily. During its long planning and operational history, Seisdon Quarry is not known to have been subject to an EIA application and no previous ES has been submitted. In consultation with Staffordshire County Council, consideration has been given to the requirements of an ES. 1.1.3 As the proposals are not considered to incorporate any significant additional operations beyond those previously permitted for the Site and will primarily lead to a brief intensification of operations in order to facilitate the restoration of the quarry in the quickest viable timeframe, the only potentially significant environmental impact is considered to be in relation to highways and traffic issues. A highways and Traffic Impact Assessment forms the primary purpose of the submitted ES. Further environmental considerations for which it was considered necessary to undertake additional assessment have also been included in the ES for completeness, including chapters assessing the restoration impacts and ecology impacts. Other environmental considerations which are unlikely to have changed or will not significantly change from the previously permitted situation are described within this Planning Statement and Volume 1 of the ES. 1.1.4 Crestwood Environmental Ltd (CEL), an environmental and planning consultancy specialising in the minerals and waste management sector have been appointed to act as Agent on behalf of the Applicant. CEL has prepared this Supporting Statement. 1.2 THE APPLICANT 1.2.1 JPE Holdings Ltd (the ‘Applicant’) began operating Seisdon Quarry on behalf of Tarmac Group Limited in 2012. The Applicant fully acquired the Seisdon Quarry in 2014 in order to facilitate completion of mineral extraction operations and complete restoration of the quarry. 1.2.2 The Applicant is one of the Midlands’ leading suppliers of aggregates, sand and soils to the construction industry, operating almost entirely from quarry sites within Staffordshire. They supply from their own strategically located local sources that ensures the highest levels of product quality. With an in-house fleet of vehicles they also offer a full muck-shift service for both one off and large volume jobs that includes disposal, recovery and a back to back service with deliveries of sand, aggregate or soil. 1.2.3 The Applicant is committed to helping improve the sustainability of construction projects, and operate the latest recovery plant to return recovered, fully washed sand and stone from waste arising’s to the construction market. 1.2.4 The Applicant has steadily developed its business, supplying aggregates,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wyre Forest District Local Development Framework Site Allocations DPD - Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report (April 2008) Page 2
    Wyre Forest District Local Development Framework Site Allocations Development Plan Document Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report April 2008 Forward Planning Section Planning, Health & Environment Division Wyre Forest District Council Duke House Clensmore Street Kidderminster Worcestershire DY10 2JX CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Background Page 1 3. The SA Process Page 2 4. Purpose of the SA Scoping Report Page 2 5. SEA Directive Requirements Page 4 6. Identifying Relevant Plans, Polices, Programmes and Sustainability Objectives Page 5 7. Baseline Data Collection Page 7 8. Identification of Main Sustainability Issues Page 9 9. Developing the SA Framework Page 12 10. Emerging Site Allocations Objectives Page 16 11. Testing the Compatibility of the SA Objectives Page 18 12. Consultation on the SA Scoping Report Page 20 13. Next Steps Page 22 Appendix A: Identification of other Relevant Plans, Policies, Programmes and Sustainability Objectives Appendix B: Baseline Data SEA Directive requirements and Where they are met: SEA Directive Requirement Where it is Met (a) an outline of the contents, main objectives of the plan or programme and Section 6 and relationship with other relevant plans and programmes; Appendix A (b) the relevant aspects of the current state of the environment and the likely Section 7 and evolution thereof without implementation of the plan or programme; Appendix B (c) the environmental characteristics of areas likely to be significantly affected; Section 7 and Appendix B (d) any existing environmental problems
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    Nuneaton and Bedworth Landscape Character Assessment Published August 2012 Nuneaton and Bedworth Landscape Character Assessment Document Reference: 2534.016 Version 4.0 June 2011 Prepared by: TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Fax: 01925 844002 e-mail: [email protected] for Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council Council House Nuneaton Warwickshire CV11 5AA Written: Checked: Approved: JTS IJG IJG Nuneaton and Bedworth Landscape Character Assessment CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 6 2.0 STUDY OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 8 3.0 METHOD ............................................................................................... 9 4.0 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................ 15 5.0 NATIONAL, COUNTY & NEIGHBOURING LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS . 19 6.0 LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ......................................................................... 23 7.0 NUNEATON & BEDWORTH BOROUGH LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS .... 31 8.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................... 33 APPENDICIES Appendix 1 Landscape Character Summaries DRAWINGS Figure 1.1 Borough Location Plan Figure 4.1 Borough Green Belt, Areas of Restraint and Countryside Figure 5.1 National Landscape Character Areas Figure 5.2 Warwickshire Landscape Guidelines Figure 5.3 Entec Landscape Character Areas within Areas
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase to Sutton Park Draft Green Infrastructure Action Plan
    Cannock Chase to Sutton Park Draft Green Infrastructure Action Plan Stafford East Staffordshire South Derbyshire Cannock Chase Lichfield South Staffordshire Tam wo r t h Walsall Wo lver ha mp ton North Warwickshire Sandwell Dudley Birmingham Stafford East Staffordshire South Derbyshire Cannock Chase Lichfield South Staffordshire Tam wor t h Wa l s al l Wo lv e r ha mpt on North Warwickshire Sandwell Dudley Birmingham Stafford East Staffordshire South Derbyshire Cannock Chase Lichfield South Staffordshire Ta m wo r t h Walsall Wo lverha mpton North Warwickshire Sandwell Dudley Birmingham Prepared for Natural England by Land Use Consultants July 2009 Cannock Chase to Sutton Park Draft Green Infrastructure Action Plan Prepared for Natural England by Land Use Consultants July 2009 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Introduction........................................................................................ 1 Purpose of this draft plan..........................................................................................................................1 A definition of Green Infrastructure.......................................................................................................3 Report structure .........................................................................................................................................4 2. Policy and strategic context .............................................................. 5 Policy review method.................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Baseline Conditions
    Walsall Site Allocation Document (SAD) and Town Centre Action Plan (AAP) Sustainability Appraisal Report (March 2016) 4. Review of ‘Baseline’ Evidence 4.1 Background to Review Appendix E to the Revised SA Scoping Report (v2 May 2013) summarises the baseline evidence reviewed by the Council at the scoping stage, by SA Topic, and Chapters 5 and 6 of the report provides a summary of existing environmental, economic and social conditions and problems, how they are likely to develop, and the areas likely to be affected. This chapter provides an updated summary of ‘baseline’ environmental, social and economic conditions, which is based on the most up-to-date evidence available at the time the SA Framework was reviewed in July 2015. The baseline date for the evidence used in the appraisal (unless otherwise specified) is April 2015, although more up-to-date information has been used where available. 4.2 Development of Evidence Base Evidence Used in Appraisal and Plan Preparation Schedule 2 of the SEA Regulations states that the SA Report should include a description of: “The relevant aspects of the current state of the environment and the likely evolution thereof without implementation of the plan or programme;” “The environmental characteristics of areas likely to be significantly affected;” and “Any existing environmental problems which are relevant to the plan or programme, including areas of particular environmental importance,” such as ‘European Sites’ designated under the Habitats and Birds Directives.1 This Chapter addresses these requirements (see Appendix P). As the SA is an integrated assessment that includes EqIA and HIA as well as SEA, the baseline evidence must include 1 These are sites of European importance for biodiversity, including sites which are designated or proposed to be designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Ramsar sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan
    Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan Laura Cox Geodiversity Officer © 2003/2004 Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Contributors Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan Steering Group: Paul Wilcox - SGAP Chairman. Staffordshire County Planning Alastair Fleming - Education Dept, Keele University Sue Lawley* - Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Laurence Crump - Hanson Aggregates Paul Brewer - Tarmac Central Ltd Jonathan Blowers - English Nature Vicki Shenton* - Chairman, SRIGS John Reynolds * - ESTA / UKRIGS Laura Cox* - SWT Geodiversity Officer *indicates members of Staffordshire RIGS group Additional Thanks To: Craig Slawson, Staffordshire Ecological Records Don Steward, Potteries Museum and Art Gallery Keith Ambrose, British Geological Survey Funding Bodies: Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund through English Nature Front cover photograph: Highshutt Quarry RIGS (L Cox) STAFFORDSHIRE GEODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN i How This Action Plan Should Be Used The Staffordshire Geodiversity Action Plan provides a framework within which various targets and actions are outlined to deliver a sustainable and local approach to the conservation and promotion of the geodiversity of the county. The SGAP is structured around the following key elements: 1. What geodiversity means in Staffordshire and whom it affects – this is detailed in Chapter 1 and explains how the SGAP will focus on target areas to deliver the key aims such as promoting geodiversity, protecting and enhancing SSSI and RIGS sites and their educational and amenity value within the county. 2. SGAP Objectives, Targets and Actions – this represents an integrated approach to conserving and promoting geodiversity in Staffordshire. It provides a summary of the targets and actions that are detailed in the following Chapters. This can be found in Chapter 2 3. The geodiversity of Staffordshire – this is shown through a detailed stratigraphy of the geology of Staffordshire and the use of English Nature’s Natural Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • TEMPERANCE HALL, HALL STREET, WEDNESFIELD, WOLVERHAMPTON Historic Building Recording
    Wessex Archaeology FORMER TEMPERANCE HALL, HALL STREET, WEDNESFIELD, WOLVERHAMPTON Historic Building Recording Ref: 79360.01 September 2011 FORMER TEMPERANCE HALL, HALL STREET, WEDNESFIELD, WOLVERHAMPTON Historic Building Recording Prepared for: Turley Associates 9 Colmore Row Birmingham B3 2BJ by Wessex Archaeology Unit R6, Riverside Block Sheaf Bank Business Park Prospect Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S2 3EN Report reference: 79360.01 September 2011 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2011 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Former Temperance Hall, Hall Street, Wednesfield Historic Building Recording DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT. LOSS OR DAMAGE AS REFERRED TO ABOVE SHALL BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR ANTICIPATED PROFITS DAMAGE TO REPUTATION OR GOODWILL LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED BUSINESS DAMAGES COSTS EXPENSES INCURRED OR PAYABLE TO ANY THIRD PARTY (IN ALL CASES WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OR ANY OTHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS OR DAMAGE COPYRIGHT THIS REPORT, AND THE ARCHIVE GENERALLY, MAY CONTAIN MATERIAL THAT IS NON-WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY COPYRIGHT (E.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Strategy Baseline for Redditch Borough
    MARCH 2014 Borough of Redditch Local Plan No.4 Green Infrastructure Strategy Baseline for Redditch Borough Draft DRAFT GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE BASELINE FOR REDDITCH BOROUGH – MARCH 2014 DRAFT Green Infrastructure Strategy Baseline for Redditch Borough March 2014 Redditch Borough Green Infrastructure Strategy Baseline Report – Draft (March 2014) 1 DRAFT GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE BASELINE FOR REDDITCH BOROUGH – MARCH 2014 CONTENTS Introduction..........................................................................................................................3 Purpose of the Study ...........................................................................................................4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................5 Defining Green Infrastructure...............................................................................................6 The Worcestershire Sub Regional GI Strategy ....................................................................7 Green Infrastructure Baseline ..............................................................................................9 Biodiversity .....................................................................................................................10 Landscape......................................................................................................................17 Historic Environment ......................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Strategy 2020
    APPENDIX A CONTAMINATED LAND STRATEGY 2020 FEBRUARY 2020 CONTENTS 1 INTRODRODUCTION AND LEGISLATIVE 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Background To The Legislation 1.2 Terminology 3 1.3 Relevant Legislation 1.3.1 Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part 2A 1.3.2 Town and Country Planning Acts 5 1.3.3 The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations 2009 1.3.4 Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010 (as 6 amended) 1.3.5 Water Resource Act 1991 2 POLICY CONTEXT 2.1 European Union Policy 2.2 Central Government Policy 6 2.2.1 Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance 2.2.2 National Planning Policy Framework 7-9 2.3 Regional Government Policy 2.3.1 Staffordshire County Council Policy 2.3.2 The Minerals Local Plan 1994-2006 2.3.3 Lichfield District Council Planning Policy 3 STRATEGY OUTLINE 3.1 Roles and Responsibilities 3.1.1 Lichfield District Council 3.1.2 The Environment Agency 9 3.1.3 Other Agencies 10 3.2 Aims and Objectives 3.3 Priorities 3.4 Addressing Contamination 11 4 THE DISTRICT OF LICHFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL 4.1 Geographical Location 4.2 Brief Description of Lichfield District 12 4.3 Historical Development 13 4.4 Size 14 4.5 Population Distribution 4.6 Current and Past Industrial History 4.7 Roads, Canals and Railways 4.8 Burntwood 15 4.9 Lichfield 16 4.10 Other Areas 17 4.11 Geological Characteristics 4.12 Key Water Resource/ Protection Issues 19 4.13 Hydrogeology 20 4.14 Hydrology 21 4.15 Natural Contamination 4.15.1 Radon 4.15.2 Methane, Carbon Dioxide and Oil Susceptibility 4.16 Soil Geochemistry 22 4.17 Protected Locations 23 5 STRATEGIC
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Character Areas
    Bromsgrove Green Infrastructure Baseline Report 2013 Update Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Method ...................................................................................................................... 6 The Worcestershire Sub Regional GI Strategy ...................................................... 7 Natural Areas .......................................................................................................... 10 Landscape .............................................................................................................. 12 National Character Areas ..................................................................................... 12 Landscape Character Type .................................................................................. 16 Landscape Sensitivity Mapping ............................................................................ 24 Landscape and Green Infrastructure .................................................................... 25 Geodiversity ........................................................................................................... 27 Geological Site of Special Scientific Interests ....................................................... 27 Local Geological Sites .......................................................................................... 29 Sites of Geological Interest ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    locafenvironment agency plan WEST MIDLANDS STOUR ACTION PLAN OCTOBER 1998 Wo E n v iro n m e n t A g e n c y WOLVERHAMPTON Information Services Unit Please return or renew this item by the due date Due Date V T En v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y T West Midlands Stour Key Details General Water Companies Severn Trent Water Ltd Area 374km2 South Staffordshire Water Pic To pograph y Highest point 315m (AOD) Population Year Population (top of Walton Hill) (estimated from 1991 437,341 Lowest point 20m (AOD) 1991 Census) 2001 (predicted)439,152 (River Stour/River Severn confluence) Administrative Details County Councils Metropolitan Borough Councils District Councils Staffordshire Wolverhampl:on South Staffordshire Shropshire Dudley Bridgnorth Worcestershire Sandwell Wyre Forest Bromsgrove Wychavon Water Resources and Flood Defence Land Use Length of Main River Type Area covered in catchment 90.0km Urban development 32.07% Average annual rainfall Arable 35.78% (1961 - 1990) 697mm Grass 18.85% Length of navigable canal Woodland 7.55% (administered by British Waterways) 75.1km Fallow/bare soil 5.66% River Stour flows at Kidderminster: Mean daily flow (1953 - 1996) 241 Ml/day Conservation and Fisheries Maximum recorded flow 24km of the Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal (1953 - 1996) 4,500 Ml/day is designated under the EC Freshwater Fisheries Mean annual flood flow Directive (/8/659 EEC) (1976 - 1996) 1,827 Ml/day Sites of Special Scientific Interest 20 Total licensed abstraction: 76,543 Ml/year Special Wildlife Sites 82 Groundwater 74,839 Ml/year Scheduled Ancient Monuments 25 Surface water 1,704 Ml/year English Nature Natural Area Midlands Plateau Number of licensed abstractions: 156 Groundwater 94 Waste Management Facilities Surface water 62 Landfill sites (inert) 5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Evidence of Ian Grimshaw on Landscape and Views Daw Mill
    Daw Mill Colliery Development Ian Grimshaw Proof of Evidence Landscape and Views IG/2 Proof of Evidence of Ian Grimshaw on Landscape and Views Daw Mill Colliery, Tamworth Road, Arley For the Appellant, Harworth Estates PINS ref no: APP/R3705/W/16/3149827 5781.003 January 2017 Issue Daw Mill Colliery Development Ian Grimshaw Proof of Evidence Landscape and Views 5781.003 January 2017 Issue Daw Mill Colliery Development Ian Grimshaw Proof of Evidence Landscape and Views CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope of Evidence .................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Description of the Appeal Proposals and Alternative Restoration Proposals ............ 5 4.0 Planning Policy ........................................................................................................ 9 5.0 Assessment of Anticipated Effects on Landscape ................................................. 16 6.0 Assessment of Anticipated Effects on Views ......................................................... 47 7.0 Assessment of Effects on Openness of the Green Belt ......................................... 71 8.0 Compliance with Relevant Planning Policy ............................................................ 73 9.0 Third Party Representations .................................................................................. 87 10.0 Conclusions ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 97. Arden Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 97. Arden Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 97. Arden Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper1, Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention3, we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) knowledge.
    [Show full text]