DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Evidence Submitted by Professor Trudie Lang (GHS0003)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Evidence Submitted by Professor Trudie Lang (GHS0003) Written evidence submitted by Professor Trudie Lang (GHS0003) Coronavirus: lessons learnt Written evidence: Global Health Security Committee Trudie Lang, Professor of Global Health Research, University of Oxford. December 1st , 2020 Overview Within this pandemic I have had the privilege of working with large numbers of healthcare laboratory and research teams in low-and-middle-income countries as we collaborate, support and guide them in implementing a locally-led research response. Through this effort, for which we received UK government funding, I have had the opportunity of gaining a deep understanding of the varied, and not-so-varied, challenges that other countries have been tackling through the shared experience of this devastating pandemic. We also undertook a comprehensive research study to determine where there were gaps in local knowledge and ability to respond. I have several points to make around working in stronger collaborations, achieving better equity (that is needed for better security), improving early warning and response, and finally how to improve ensuring how all the questions that arise within an outbreak are answered within the window of opportunity. I write this from having worked in global infectious disease research for over 25 years and also from drawing on my recent experiences with the Ebola, Zika and now with COVID-19. Optimising Collaborative effort for Faster Progress Working in collaborative partnerships can increase efficiency, remove duplication and thereby bring faster progress for all. Having competition can be positive but unchecked and without strategy it can also be wasteful and slow. By working together everyone gets there faster and surely the shared end goal of treatments, vaccines and optimal testing outweigh nationalist or commercial gain. How well has the UK fostered international collaboration and partnership? One example to consider here is whether having many hundreds of separate clinical trials asking the same question in the same type of patient was money and effort well spent? Especially when we had radical and highly successful platform trials that were getting these answers very quickly. Also, could faster progress have been made if countries worked together to develop rapid tests rather than many hundreds of companies working in competition, and therefore isolation, to win the potential golden goose of being the company to come up with the cheapest, quickest and most reliable rapid-tests for both antigen and antibodies? What could be done better to positively foster true and equitable partnerships? I will return to this point later. Understanding Public Perceptions and Evidence to Support Measures We undertook a study this summer where we asked health workers and researchers across the globe where they would prioritise research and where the most important unknowns remained. We found that there was a strong call for increased evidence into how to build public trust and undertake better engagement within communities. Further, we also learnt that we needed to run more studies to better understand the impact of public health interventions such as lockdown, social distancing and closing schools. What was most striking was the commonalities across countries. Although perhaps not surprising? COVID- 19 was new to us all and discussing this between teams across such varied countries as the US, Bangladesh, Egypt, Peru and Rwanda (for example) these shared gaps where clear and so was their determination that we work together and learn from each other. The ability of Health Systems to respond has clearly been key. How affectively each country could engage with their healthcare delivery teams, respond quickly and build trust came down to how joined up they were and their ability to build consensus and deliver. Public trust, behaviour and response has been a fundamental factor in this pandemic and getting this right will also be key in how quickly and well we can get beyond this. This is true across the globe and there is plenty evidence, interventions, experiences to draw upon and I believe we could do much better and thinking and working globally here too. Key lessons to take forward for next time here too. Polarised Research Effort? Here I think we could have worked better. The UK’s GECCO (global) funding scheme followed a considerable time after the first wave of funding, where the review panels where asked to prioritise applications that would benefit the UK and specifically not to take a global view. This lag in funding global research can be observed across the world. There has been vast inequity in where research has happened, been funded and therefore where the evidence can achieve the greatest benefit. If we consider this from a global health security perspective then it is in everyone’s interest to understand the disease everywhere. We therefore need to equip all regions of the globe with the ability to undertake research so that local responses are possible. Here there is a strong role for the FCDO and I will return to this point later. The effort to identify treatments is an important element to explore and this must be considered globally. There were competing and highly duplicative efforts. A key consideration is what trials were funded where and whether this was efficient and has been conclusive? Antivirals work by stopping replication and so to stand the best chance of being effective need to be given as early as possible in infections. Many studies have been undertaken in hospital with patients probably on day 7-10 or later of infection and so this is not giving them at the optimal point in the course of an infection. I consider this to be important and certainly a key area to learn from. Did this dampened the willingness to explore new use for existing drugs? We have not seen too many more come through, certainly nothing like the pipeline we have for vaccines. We need a range of anti-viral drugs ready for clinical trials, and then these should be tested in the community at the point of diagnosis / positive test. I suggest better global coordination and strategic leadership would have helped here? Clinical trials have had much better success in treating severe disease, and the UK has led the world here. How quickly and well the RECOVERY trial rolled out has been incredible. My only comment here is that RECOVERY international is following so late within this pandemic. When we look at the data on where and at what point research happened across the globe there is vast inequity. These platform trials, such as RECOVERY, REMAP and SOLIDARITY have worked very well and the mechanisms and processes that these used can and should now be taken forward into other diseases and settings. However, we need platform trials for asking other questions, such understanding public knowledge, practices and perceptions. Also, for gaining an evidence-based understanding of the effectiveness of different public health interventions in varied situations. Faster Progress and Learning for Next Time During a disease outbreak research is essential, and we need the whole spectrum of health research to answer all the questions that immediately arise. My colleagues and I were making this point during the Ebola and Zika crisis. Now the world has experienced first-hand why this is so important. To undertake research rapidly and optimally there need to be local capability and experience in place and already active in every corner of the globe. Indeed, this is essential because spotting and identifying a new pathogen and being able to characterise and notify the world requires existing, and ongoing local research that is part and embedded within health systems. I truly hope that governments across the globe, including the UK, have learnt that investing in research capacity where such abilities are lacking is critical and a vital component in preparation and mitigation for future pandemics. Previous approaches have largely failed and have not left lasting, capable teams because they have been focussed on one product, disease or particular individual. We need to completely rethink this and my team has been working to understand the barriers and we have a vast body of evidence and mechanisms that could now guide the new approaches we need. An essential component of early warning and early action I would strongly urge that the FCDO make building lasting research capabilities in the world most resource-poor nations a priority. This needs to be evidence-led and take new approaches. I would be very happy to discuss this further. Through such an effort we would be better placed globally for the most rapid and immediate detection, understand and mitigation. Currently we are exposed if the next new pathogen emerges somewhere with no existing and embedded research capabilities. There is also a finite window to ask the research questions that can only be answered during ongoing transmission. These questions require all types of studies, not just drug and vaccine trials. Here, in this pandemic, we can see that research has been polarised and funding has not been spread across all the required areas. There is vast global inequity and also very high numbers of duplicative clinical trials being funded that ask the same question in the same clinical setting. There are also important unknowns and lack of evidence on messaging, building trust and public health interventions. Funding and activity was much lower in these areas. Yet, in the absence of drugs and vaccines we relied entirely on public health measures and the behaviour of communities in adhering and following guidance. Should we have more evidence? What proportion of the research funding went to asking these questions? Did we make a strong enough effort to ask questions in these windows to improve the outcomes now, but also to learn for next time? Is it that research teams are not coming forward or not being encouraged? Or is how we assign research funding to projects biased to favour clinical trials? And I write this as a clinical trialist! I think we can change this if we update the way we review and fund research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coronavirus: Covid-19 Has Killed More People Than SARS and MERS Combined, Despite Lower Case Fatality Rate
    BMJ 2020;368:m641 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m641 (Published 18 February 2020) Page 1 of 1 News BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.m641 on 18 February 2020. Downloaded from NEWS Coronavirus: covid-19 has killed more people than SARS and MERS combined, despite lower case fatality rate Elisabeth Mahase The BMJ The novel coronavirus that has so far spread from China to 26 This comment came after the first case of covid-19 was countries around the world does not seem to be as “deadly as confirmed in Africa (in Egypt). Commenting on this milestone other coronaviruses including SARS and MERS,” the World in the outbreak, Trudie Lang, director of the Global Health Health Organization has said. Network at the University of Oxford, said it was “important but At a briefing on 17 February WHO’s director general, Tedros not unexpected.” She highlighted the fact that WHO had Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that more than 80% of patients declared the outbreak a “public health emergency” to “support with covid-19 have a “mild disease and will recover” and that less well resourced nations in responding and preparing for it is fatal in 2% of reported cases. In comparison, the 2003 cases.” outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) had a Lang praised the response of the Africa Centres for Disease case fatality rate of around 10% (8098 cases and 774 deaths), Control and Prevention, which is based in Ethiopia and supports http://www.bmj.com/ while Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) killed 34% countries with surveillance, emergency responses, and of people with the illness between 2012 and 2019 (2494 cases prevention of infectious disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting
    Volume 97 | Number 5 Volume VOLUME 97 NOVEMBER 2017 NUMBER 5 SUPPLEMENT SIXTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING November 5–9, 2017 The Baltimore Convention Center | Baltimore, Maryland USA The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene The American Journal of Tropical astmh.org ajtmh.org #TropMed17 Supplement to The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene ASTMH FP Cover 17.indd 1-3 10/11/17 1:48 PM Welcome to TropMed17, our yearly assembly for stimulating research, clinical advances, special lectures, guests and bonus events. Our keynote speaker this year is Dr. Paul Farmer, Co-founder and Chief Strategist of Partners In Health (PIH). In addition, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, will deliver a plenary session Thursday, November 9. Other highlighted speakers include Dr. Scott O’Neill, who will deliver the Fred L. Soper Lecture; Dr. Claudio F. Lanata, the Vincenzo Marcolongo Memorial Lecture; and Dr. Jane Cardosa, the Commemorative Fund Lecture. We are pleased to announce that this year’s offerings extend beyond communicating top-rated science to direct service to the global community and a number of novel events: • Get a Shot. Give a Shot.® Through Walgreens’ Get a Shot. Give a Shot.® campaign, you can not only receive your free flu shot, but also provide a lifesaving vaccine to a child in need via the UN Foundation’s Shot@Life campaign. • Under the Net. Walk in the shoes of a young girl living in a refugee camp through the virtual reality experience presented by UN Foundation’s Nothing But Nets campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by the BBC
    Written evidence submitted by the BBC The DCMS Sub-committee on Online Harms and Disinformation Covid-19 Inquiry April 2020 Executive summary 1. The BBC is the leading public service broadcaster in the UK, with a mission to inform, educate and entertain. Our first public purpose is to provide impartial news and information to help people understand and engage with the world around them, and we deliver this across national, local and global news services.1 2. The Editorial Guidelines are the standards that underpin all our journalism, at all times, including during the Covid-19 pandemic. They apply to all our content, wherever and however it is received. Producing and upholding these Editorial Guidelines is an obligation across the BBC and all output made in accordance with these Editorial Guidelines fulfills our public purposes and meets and goes beyond the requirements of our regulator, Ofcom. 3. Coverage of Covid-19 is dominating the UK news across all platforms. And with a plethora of cross platform content, people are most likely to turn to the BBC’s TV, radio and online services for the latest news on the pandemic (82%)2, significantly more than any other source. 4. BBC News has attracted record audiences across platforms with our nations and regions, UK wide and international coverage highlighting the importance of impartial and accurate news at this time. 5. The BBC remains the UK’s primary source for news. In a world of fake news and disinformation online, audiences said they turn to the BBC for a reliable take on events and this reputation for accuracy and trust sends audiences to the BBC during breaking news and to verify facts.3 During the Covid-19 pandemic 83% of people trust coverage on BBC TV4; and audiences from the UK and around the world have come to BBC News in their millions to stay informed and seek trusted advice on how they can protect themselves and those most at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda, WHO Ebola Research and Development Summit
    WHO Ebola Research and Development Summit Geneva, 11 – 12 May 2015 WHO Executive Board Room Agenda Rapporteur: Elisabeth Heseltine Monday 11 May 2015 8:00-9:00 Registration Session 1: Introduction Chair: John Mackenzie (Curtin University, Australia) 9:00-9:15 Welcome: Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO) and Objectives of meeting, expected outcomes: Marie-Paule Kieny, Assistant-Director General, Health Systems and Innovation (WHO) 9:15-9:35 Keynote lecture: The Ebola response/getting to zero (20 min), Bruce Aylward (WHO) 9:35-10:15 Country perspectives on R&D during the Ebola epidemic (10 min each) • Wiltshire Johnson (Pharmacy Board, Sierra Leone) • Stephen Kennedy (Ministry of Health, Liberia) • Mandy Kader Konde (CEFORPAG, Guinea) Discussion (10 min) 10:15-10:45 Coffee break SESSION 2: Main lessons learnt on R&D in the 2014-15 EVD outbreak in West Africa. Main challenges, and factors that facilitated implementation of research activities in the affected countries Chair: Nicole Lurie (HHS/ASPR, USA) 10:45-11:30 What were the known facts, pipelines and major challenges to Ebola R&D when the international emergency was declared in August 2014, and what has been achieved since then? This presentation and discussion will identify crucial knowledge gaps at the start of the outbreak, e.g., in immunopathogenesis, appropriate animal models, use of in vitro data, natural history of disease ; and map out the current (May 2015) achievements in filling these gaps. Peter Jahrling (NIH/NIAID, USA): Addressing knowledge
    [Show full text]
  • Wet News Water Special Interest Group Newsletter
    Wet News Water Special Interest Group Newsletter Issue 81, May 2020 WATER SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP Water Water Special Interest Group Special Interest Group News from the IChemE Water Special Interest Group Wet News Water Special Interest Group Newsletter Issue 81, May 2020 Editor: Paul Curtis, email: [email protected] or [email protected] Contents Editorial 1 Backwashings 1 From the Chair - Composting Toilets & Everything the Water Industry is doing on Covid-19 2 Secretary's Report 5 AGM 6 Unflushables 2030? Mapping Change Points for Intervention for Sewer Blockages: Workshop Proceedings 27 & 28 January 2020 6 European Biosolids & Organic Resources Conference & Exhibition, 19 & 20 November 2019 8 Water & Sustainability 9 Wanted: Book Reviewers 9 WATER SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP C0490_17 www.icheme.org/water Water Water Special Interest Group Special Interest Group EDITORIAL I turn on my computer and try to remember what day it is, as one day seems to merge into another – always the same home environment but with different calls on Skype, Teams or conference calls. Sometimes I get a moment from the incessant meetings to catch up on emails or important tasks such as editing this newsletter! The world is in turmoil and the challenges of COVID-19 affect how we, at the @one Alliance (Anglian Water’s Capital Delivery Team) engage with site teams, operations teams and managing a design team working from home, whilst managing home schooling and all the usual demands of life! Little different, I am sure, from most of our readers…….the Summer weather is enticing and looking out the window I see signs of things returning to some sort of normality.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT GOALS for COVID-19 in AFRICA the African Academy of Sciences Priority Setting Exercise CONTENTS
    UPDATE – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GOALS FOR COVID-19 IN AFRICA The African Academy of Sciences Priority Setting Exercise CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................3 Aim ............................................................................................................................................................................4 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................................5 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................6 Results ......................................................................................................................................................................7 A. Quantitative Data ..............................................................................................................................................7 1. Virus natural history, transmission and diagnostics .......................................................................................................... 8 2. Animal and environmental research on the virus origin, and management measures at the human-animal interface ........ 9 3. Epidemiology studies ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioethics Tool for the Implementation of Global Principles by the Pharmaceutical Industry Daniel J
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 1-1-2017 A Bioethics Tool for the Implementation of Global Principles by the Pharmaceutical Industry Daniel J. Hurst Duquesne University Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons Recommended Citation Hurst, D. J. (2017). A Bioethics Tool for the Implementation of Global Principles by the Pharmaceutical Industry (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/193 This One-year Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A BIOETHICS TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GLOBAL PRINCIPLES BY THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Daniel J. Hurst, ThM, MDiv December 2017 Copyright by Daniel J. Hurst 2017 A BIOETHICS TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GLOBAL PRINCIPLES BY THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY By Daniel J. Hurst Approved August 31, 2017 ________________________________ ________________________________ Henk ten Have, MD, PhD Gerard Magill, PhD Director, Center for Healthcare Ethics The Vernon F. Gallagher Chair Professor of Healthcare Ethics
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines and Global Health :: Ethics and Policy
    Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review 6 February 2021 :: Issue 593 Center for Vaccine Ethics & Policy (CVEP) This weekly digest targets news, events, announcements, articles and research in the vaccine and global health ethics and policy space and is aggregated from key governmental, NGO, international organization and industry sources, key peer-reviewed journals, and other media channels. This summary proceeds from the broad base of themes and issues monitored by the Center for Vaccine Ethics & Policy in its work: it is not intended to be exhaustive in its coverage. Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review is published as a PDF and scheduled for release each Saturday [U.S.] at midnight [0000 GMT-5]. The PDF is posted and the elements of each edition are presented as a set of blog posts at https://centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.net. This blog allows full-text searching of over 9,000 entries. Comments and suggestions should be directed to David R. Curry, MS Editor and Executive Director Center for Vaccine Ethics & Policy [email protected] Request email delivery of the pdf: If you would like to receive the PDF of each edition via email [Constant Contact], please send your request to [email protected]. Support this knowledge-sharing service: Your financial support helps us cover our costs and to address a current shortfall in our annual operating budget. Click here to donate and thank you in advance for your contribution. Contents [click on link below to move to associated content] A. Milestones :: Perspectives :: Featured Journal Content B. Emergencies C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Compiled Snapshots
    Dear WIPO Re:Search Members and Friends, Happy New Year! It comes as no surprise to the WIPO Re:Search community that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has risen to the forefront of the global public health agenda. Since the Consortium’s inception in 2011, BVGH has established numerous WIPO Re:Search collaborations aimed at developing novel drugs to combat drug resistant tuberculosis, outpace emerging antimalarial resistance, and more. Although continued drug development is needed, there is mounting evidence that vaccines are necessary to prevent and circumvent AMR. For example, a recent article demonstrated that if children across 75 countries were vaccinated against pneumonia, the infections prevented would result in 11 million less days of antibiotic use annually. Given the relative costs of vaccines and antibiotics, vaccinations are also a cost-effective approach to AMR control. Beyond drugs, BVGH is also catalyzing vaccine development. Notably, through WIPO Re:Search, researchers at Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) have formalized a partnership to assess an injection-free administration of a malaria vaccine candidate. Please continue reading this Snapshot to learn more. I am pleased to welcome our two newest Members, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and the University of South Carolina. As we dive into the New Year, BVGH thanks you for your continued support and participation in WIPO Re:Search. And as always, please forward this Snapshot to your colleagues and reach out to us with any partnering requests or ideas. Sincerely, Jennifer Dent President, BVGH Accelerating Diagnostic Development for Tuberculosis The Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), McGill International TB Centre, Stop TB Partnership, Unitaid, and WHO have launched the TB Diagnostics Critical Pathway, an online tool for tuberculosis diagnostic developers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk
    This PDF is available from The National Academies Press at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18998 Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk ISBN Committee on Strategies for Responsible Sharing of Clinical Trial Data; 978-0-309-31629-3 Board on Health Sciences Policy; Institute of Medicine 280 pages 6 x 9 PAPERBACK (2015) Visit the National Academies Press online and register for... Instant access to free PDF downloads of titles from the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 10% off print titles Custom notification of new releases in your field of interest Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Request reprint permission for this book Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk Sharing Clinical Trial Data Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk Committee on Strategies for Responsible Sharing of Clinical Trial Data Board on Health Sciences Policy PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Week in Review
    The Sentinel Human Rights Action: Humanitarian Response: Health: Holistic Development:: Sustainable Resilience __________________________________________________ Period ending 22 August 2015 This weekly digest is intended to aggregate and distill key content from a broad spectrum of practice domains and organization types including key agencies/IGOs, NGOs, governments, academic and research institutions, consortiums and collaborations, foundations, and commercial organizations. We also monitor a spectrum of peer-reviewed journals and general media channels. The Sentinel’s geographic scope is global/regional but selected country-level content is included. We recognize that this spectrum/scope yields an indicative and not an exhaustive product. The Sentinel is a service of the Center for Governance, Evidence, Ethics, Policy & Practice (GE2P2), which is solely responsible for its content. Comments and suggestions should be directed to: David R. Curry Editor & Founding Director GE2P2 – Center for Governance, Evidence, Ethics, Policy, Practice The Sentinel is also available as a pdf document linked from this page: http://ge2p2-center.net/ Editor’s Note: The Sentinel resumes publication today following annual leave for the editor. This edition covers highlights for the interim period since 2 August 2015. _____________________________________________ Contents [click on link below to move to associated content] :: Week in Review :: Key Agency/IGO/Governments Watch - Selected Updates from 30+ entities :: INGO/Consortia/Joint Initiatives Watch - Media Releases, Major Initiatives, Research :: Foundation/Major Donor Watch -Selected Updates :: Journal Watch - Key articles and abstracts from 100+ peer-reviewed journals :: Week in Review A highly selective capture of strategic developments, research, commentary, analysis and announcements spanning Human Rights Action, Humanitarian Response, Health, Education, Holistic Development, Sustainable Resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 09 September 2020 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Seelig, Frederik and Bezerra, Haroldo and Cameron, Mary and Hii, Jerey and Hiscox, Alexandra and Irish, Seth and Jones, Robert T. and Lang, Trudie and Lindsay, Steven W. and Lowe, Rachel and Nyoni, Tanaka Manikidza and Power, Grace M. and Quintero, Juliana and Stewart-Ibarra, Anna M. and Tusting, Lucy S. and Tytheridge, Scott and Logan, James G. (2020) 'The COVID-19 pandemic should not derail global vector control eorts.', PLoS neglected tropical diseases., 14 (8). e0008606. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008606 Publisher's copyright statement: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modied, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
    [Show full text]