Why Farming Matters in Coastal Suffolk
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Felixstowe, 85-93 St Andrews Road
PROMINENT TOWN CENTRE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 85-93 ST. ANDREWS ROAD, FELIXSTOWE, SUFFOLK, IP11 7BW LOCATION The property is situated on the north side of St Andrews Road close to the junction with Hamilton Road in Felixstowe town centre. Felixstowe lies approximately 10 miles south east of Ipswich accessed via the A14 trunk road which provides a direct dual carriageway link with the M1, the A12 and the M25. DESCRIPTION The property comprises a cleared level site of approximately 0.3 acres with frontage of some 33 metres to St Andrews Road. PLANNING The property was subject to planning consent for: the erection of 6 shops, 5 flats and 2 offices together with construction of new vehicular access and shared parking court (application number CO7/0193/FUL). This planning consent expired on 1st August 2010. Interested parties should make their own enquiries of Suffolk Coastal District Council Planning Department but it is believed that consent is likely to be forthcoming for a predominantly retail development of this site. SERVICES It is understood that mains services are available. LOCAL AUTHORITY Suffolk Coastal District Council, Melton Hill, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP12 1AU. Telephone 01394 383789. TERMS The owners would welcome discussions with interested parties who have requirements for retail or other commercial uses which could be accommodated on this site, subject to planning. VIEWING Strictly by prior appointment with the Sole Agent: Fenn Wright, 1 Buttermarket, Ipswich, Suffolk IP1 1BA Telephone 01473 232701 Fax 01473 230745 Email: [email protected] Messrs. Fenn Wright for themselves and for the vendors or lessors of this property whose agents they are give notice that: i. -
1. Parish: Chillesford
1. Parish: Chillesford Meaning: Gravel ford (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Plomesgate Deanery: Orford ( -1914), Wilford (1914-1972), Woodbridge (1972-) Union: Plomesgate RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Plomesgate RD (1894-1934), Deben RD (1934-1974), Suffolk Coastal DC (1974- ) Other administrative details: Woodbridge Petty Sessional Division and County Court District 3. Area: 1,850 acres land, 2 acres water, 4 acres tidal water, 16 acres foreshore (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a) Deep well drained sandy often ferruginous soils, risk wind and water erosion b) Deep stoneless calcareous/non calcareous clay soils localized peat, flat land, risk of flooding 5. Types of farming: 1500–1640 Thirsk: Problems of acidity and trace element deficiencies. Sheep-corn region, sheep main fertilizing agent, bred for fattening, barley main cash crop 1804 Young: “This corner of Suffolk practices better husbandry than elsewhere” … identified as carrot growing region 1818 Marshall: Management varies with condition of sandy soils. Rotation usually turnip, barley, clover, wheat or turnips as preparation for corn and grass 1937 Main crops: Barley, oats Mainly arable/dairying region 1969 Trist: Dairying has been replaced by arable farming 6. Enclosure: 1 7. Settlement: 1958 Butley river forms part of SW boundary. Tunstall wood intrudes quite extensively into northern sector of parish and Wantisden Heath intrudes into western sector. Small dispersed settlement. Church situated to west of development. Few scattered farms Inhabited houses: 1674 – 3, 1801 – 15, 1851 – 43, 1871 – 48, 1901 – 46, 1951 – 54, 1981 – 48 8. Communications: Road: Roads to Tunstall, Orford and Butley 1912 Carriers pass through from Orford to Woodbridge daily (except Wednesday) Carriers pass through to Ipswich Wednesday and Saturday Rail: 1891 5½ miles Wickham Market station: Ipswich – Lowestoft line, opened (1859), still operational Water: River Butley: formerly navigable (circa 1171). -
Suffolk Coastal Local Plan
East Suffolk Council – Suffolk Coastal Local Plan Addendum to the Sustainability Appraisal Report Proposed Main Modifications to the Local Plan April 2020 East Suffolk Council – Suffolk Coastal Local Plan Main Modifications to the Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal Addendum April 2020 Contents Non Technical Summary ............................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. Assessment of Main Modifications ...................................................................................... 10 3. Updates to Sustainability Appraisal Report ....................................................................... 357 4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 423 Page 1 East Suffolk Council – Suffolk Coastal Local Plan Main Modifications to the Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal Addendum April 2020 Non-Technical Summary Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is an iterative process which must be carried out during the preparation of a Local Plan. Its purpose is to promote sustainable development by assessing the extent to which the emerging plan, when considered against alternatives, will help to achieve relevant environmental, economic and social objectives. Section 19 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 requires a local planning authority to carry -
Minutes-217Th-Meeting-11-04-18 (Pdf)
ORFORD & GEDGRAVE PARISH COUNCIL The Town Hall, Market Hill, Orford, Woodbridge, Suffolk. IP12 2NZ Tel: 01394 459172 E-mail: [email protected] Minutes of the 217th meeting of Orford & Gedgrave Parish Council held on Wednesday 11th April 2018 at 7.00pm in the New Room of the Town Hall Present: Cllr Michelle Golder Cllr Derick Brenchley Cllr Richard Mallett Cllr Ian Thornton Cllr James Robinson Cllr Margaret Green Cllr Mary Iliff Cllr Peter Smith Cllr Anne Macro Cllr Matthew Smy Cllr Jonnie Howard In Attendance, Marie Backhouse (Clerk). Opening remarks Public Forum There were 2 members of the public. Both members of the public were invited to speak but had no comments to make; one introduced himself to the Councillors, Mr Nigel Squirrell – owner of the land re the Shepherds Hut. MINUTES 1. Reports from Representatives 1. County Councillor Andrew Reid. Absent and no report sent.. 2. District Councillor Ray Herring Absent and no report sent. 2. Apologies for absence: None 3. Declarations of interest: Cllr M Golder – Shepherd’s Hut application is sited on land that used to belong to her grandfather. 4. Applications for dispensation: None 5. It was unanimously agreed that the minutes of the 216th Parish Council Meeting held on Wednesday 14th March 2018 be accepted as a true record. Cllr P Smith asked if an amendment could be made to paragraph 4 under the “Village Meeting re Estuary Plan” to say: Cllr P Smith commented that the representative of the Parish Council on the Estuary Partnership should represent the views of the entire community. There was a feeling in the community that money raised in Orford for flood defences should be used specifically for Orford as early in the work schedule as possible. -
Asking Price £175,000 Freehold Ash Ground Close | Trimley St. Martin
Ash Ground Close | Trimley St. Martin | Felixstowe | IP11 0YA Asking Price £175,000 Freehold Ash Ground Close, Trimley St. Martin, Felixstowe, IP11 0YA A chain free well presented two bedroom semi-detached house located in a pleasant close within the popular village of Trimley St Martin. The freshly decorated accommodation comprises; hallway, modern fitted kitchen, lounge-diner with conservatory off, spiral staircase to first floor, two bedrooms and classic bathroom. To the outside there is a small front and side lawn, two allocated parking spaces within a residents parking area and enclosed southerly facing rear garden mainly laid to lawn with patio and shed. Further benefits include; double glazing, gas central heating and utilities smart metering. In the valuer's' opinion the property would make an ideal first time purchase or investment and as such, early viewing is recommended. SHELTERED ENTRA NCE Double glazed door to entrance hall ENTRA NCE HALL Built-in cupboard, opening to kitchen, door to lounge- diner, BT open reach point, tile effect flooring. KITCHEN 7' 05" x 7' 02" (2.26m x 2.18m) Double glazed window to side, modern range of base and eye level gloss fronted cupboard and drawer units, granite effect rolled edge worktops, inset stainless steel one and a quarter bowl sink drainer unit with mixer tap, tiled splash backs, built-in electric oven and grill with inset electric hob and extractor over, under counter spaces for fridge and washing machine, wall mounted gas fired boiler, tiled flooring. LOUNGE DINER 16' 02" x 12' 07" (4.93m x 3.84m) Double glazed window to front, radiator, television and telephone points, spiral staircase rising to first floor, opening through to conservatory. -
Letter from Over 100 Rural Business Owners September 2020
LETTER BY OVER 100 RURAL BUSINESS OWNERS to PM & SECRETARIES OF STATE 25 September 2020 The letter below is also signed by a further four businesses, represented by seven individuals, who requested their names be withheld from publication. It was published in the East Anglian Daily Times https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/sizewell-c-construction-opposed-by-suffolk-businesses-2700468 To: The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP, The Rt Hon Alok Sharma MP, The Rt Hon George Eustice MP, Minette Batters, President National Farmers’ Union Mark Bridgeman, President, Country Landowners’ Association Stephen Miles, President, Suffolk Agricultural Association cc Rt Hon Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park, Victoria Prentis MP, Lord Gardiner of Kimble, The Rt Hon Therese Coffey MP, Dr Dan Poulter MP, Peter Aldous MP, The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP, James Cartlidge MP, Jo Churchill MP, Tom Hunt MP Cllrs Matthew Hicks and Richard Rout, Suffolk County Council. Cllrs Steve Gallant and Craig Rivett, East Suffolk Council We the undersigned, as rural business owners, farmers and landowners in Suffolk, write to express our opposition to EDF’s plans to build two new nuclear reactors at Sizewell. The threat of Sizewell C has been hanging over the heads of many of our number for at least eight years now with no immediate end in sight. This would be tolerable if the Sizewell C project was for the “greater good” but we have concluded that it is not necessary to meet the UK’s commitment to net zero, and would be a slow, risky and expensive waste of taxpayers’ money that removes opportunities to make use of alternative, green, deliverable and cost-effective energy solutions. -
Baptism Data Available
Suffolk Baptisms - January 2019 Data Available Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping From To Acton, All Saints Sudbury 1754 1900 Akenham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1903 Aldeburgh, St Peter & St Paul Orford 1754 1904 Alderton, St Andrew Wilford 1754 1902 Aldham, St Mary Sudbury 1754 1902 Aldringham cum Thorpe, St Andrew Dunwich 1754 1900 Aldringham, Particular Baptist Baptist 1809 1837 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul Sudbury 1754 1901 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul (BTs) Sudbury 1780 1792 Ampton, St Peter Thedwastre 1650 1903 Ashbocking, All Saints Bosmere 1754 1900 Ashby, St Mary Lothingland 1813 1900 Ashfield cum Thorpe, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Great Ashfield, All Saints Blackbourn 1765 1901 Aspall, St Mary of Grace Hartismere 1754 1900 Assington, St Edmund Sudbury 1754 1900 Athelington, St Peter Hoxne 1754 1904 Bacton, St Mary Hartismere 1754 1901 Badingham, St John the Baptist Hoxne 1754 1900 Badley, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1902 Badwell Ash, St Mary Blackbourn 1650 1900 Bardwell, Baptist Baptist 1820 1837 Bardwell, St Peter & St Paul Blackbourn 1650 1901 Barham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Barking, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1900 Barnardiston, All Saints Clare 1650 1899 Barnby, St John the Baptist Lothingland 1813 1900 Barnham, St Gregory Blackbourn 1730 1902 Barningham, St Andrew Blackbourn 1650 1901 Barrow, All Saints Thingoe 1754 1900 Barsham, Holy Trinity Wangford 1813 1900 Great Barton, Holy Innocents Thedwastre 1650 1901 Barton Mills, St Mary Fordham 1663 1901 01 January 2019 Copyright © Suffolk Family History Society 2019 Page 1 of 16 Baptism Register -
Minutes of the Cabinet Meeting Held at the Council Chamber, Woodbridge
Confirmed Minutes of the Cabinet Meeting held in the Deben Conference Room, East Suffolk House, Riduna Park, Melton on Tuesday 6 November 2018 at 6.30 pm Members of Cabinet present: R Herring (Leader), G Holdcroft (Deputy Leader), A Fryatt, S Gallant, R Kerry, S Lawson, C Poulter, A Smith. Other Members present: C Blundell, A Cooper, J Fisher. Officers present: S Baker (Chief Executive), L Beighton (Planning Development Manager), C Bing (Legal and Licensing Services Manager), K Blair (Head of Operations), S Bleese (Coastal Community Engagement Manager), K Cook (Democratic Services & Cabinet Business Manager), T Howarth (Principal Environmental Health Officer), A Jarvis (Strategic Director), N Khan (Strategic Director), K Scott (Development Management Team Leader – Central), R Scrimgeour (Principal Design and Conservation Officer), S Taylor (Interim Chief Finance Officer and S151 Officer), A Turk (CPE Project Manager). 1. Apologies for Absence Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Haworth-Culf. 2. Declarations of Interest There were no declarations of interest declared. 3. Minutes It was proposed, seconded and unanimously RESOLVED That the Minutes of the Cabinet Meeting held on 2 October 2018 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. 4. Announcements There were no announcements. 1 5. Transformation Funding – Acceptance of Grant Cabinet received report CAB 38/18 by the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Housing who reported that Suffolk Coastal District Council, on behalf of all the Suffolk Authorities, had been awarded a grant of £87,500 to deliver a pilot scheme to support patients with housing needs to have a better discharge from hospital and a reduced chance of admission. -
Summary of Analysis and Recommendations for the Review of Local Government in Suffolk on the Basis of Extensive Public Opinion Surveys 1993-94
Summary of analysis and recommendations for the review of local government in Suffolk on the basis of extensive public opinion surveys 1993-94 Original research carried out by Opinion Research Services Ltd Original report written by Dale Hall, Managing Director 1 Introduction The original report was based upon fifteen public opinion surveys conducted discontinuously throughout Suffolk during the period July 1993 to February 1994. 1.1 Structure of local government In the Ipswich residents' survey there was almost an absolute majority in favour of a unitary structure for local government; in Forest Heath and Mid Suffolk there was majority support for the two-tier system; and elsewhere opinion was about evenly divided on the merits of one- and two-tier authorities. 2 Structural options - possible mergers Respondents were asked for their first, second and most disliked options and a 'weighted net score' was derived for each option. The weighting system used multiplies every percentage point for a first preference by +2, every percentage point for a second preference by +1, and every percentage point for a most disliked option by -1; and then aggregates the products. Thus: % First preferences x +2 % Second preference x +1 Æ aggregated to the weighted net score % Worst Option x -1 2.1 Unitary County option There was very little support indeed for the idea of a unitary county when people were asked about specific options for change. The following results contrast the low 'weighted net scores' for the unitary county with the corresponding scores for the most popular option in the respective districts or areas. -
MAP BOOKLET Site Allocations and Area Specific Policies
MAP BOOKLET to accompany Issues and Options consultation on Site Allocations and Area Specific Policies Local Plan Document Consultation Period 15th December 2014 - 27th February 2015 Suffolk Coastal…where quality of life counts Woodbridge Housing Market Area Housing Market Settlement/Parish Area Woodbridge Alderton, Bawdsey, Blaxhall, Boulge, Boyton, Bredfield, Bromeswell, Burgh, Butley, Campsea Ashe, Capel St Andrew, Charsfield, Chillesford, Clopton, Cretingham, Dallinghoo, Debach, Eyke, Gedgrave, Great Bealings, Hacheston, Hasketon, Hollesley, Hoo, Iken, Letheringham, Melton, Melton Park, Monewden, Orford, Otley, Pettistree, Ramsholt, Rendlesham, Shottisham, Sudbourne, Sutton, Sutton Heath, Tunstall, Ufford, Wantisden, Wickham Market, Woodbridge Settlements & Parishes with no maps Settlement/Parish No change in settlement due to: Boulge Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Bromeswell No Physical Limits, no defined Area to be Protected from Development (AP28) Burgh Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Capel St Andrew Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Clopton No Physical Limits, no defined Area to be Protected from Development (AP28) Dallinghoo Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Debach Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Gedgrave Settlement in Countryside (as defined in Policy SP19 Settlement Hierarchy) Great Bealings Currently working on a Neighbourhood -
History of the Suffolk Coast
History of the Suffolk Coast Last Ice-age At the end of the last ice-age there was no Suffolk coast and England was connected to mainland Europe through Doggerland. Since then through a combination of; weak sediment based land forms which are easily eroded, sea level rise through the melting of land-based ice, and isostatic readjustment (the rebound of the Earth’s crust once the weight of the ice is removed, in north and west Britain, which leads to the tilt and subsequent sinking of southeast England) has lead to the coastline we know today. Demise of Dunwich Probably the best known example of coastal change and erosion on the Suffolk coast is the demise of Dunwich. In 1286 and again in 1328, storms destroyed the harbour and swept a large portion of the town into the sea. Again, in 1347, approximately 400 houses were destroyed by a storm and much of the remainder of the town was lost to coastal erosion over the next two to three hundred years. This led to Dunwich going from a major port and religious centre to being the quiet village that it is today. Victorian era and looking forwards The major man-made defences along the Suffolk coast were constructed in the Victorian era with the development of coastal resorts, such as Felixstowe and Lowestoft, which we can still see today. Erosion and sea-level rise continue to be a threat and coastal communities are at risk of flooding and loss of land to the sea. They are likely to become more vulnerable in future with the impact of a changing climate. -
BSA 2: Butley Ferry Crossing (West Side) to Orford Quay
www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Bawdsey to Aldeburgh Report BSA 2: Butley Ferry crossing (west side) to Orford Quay Part 2.1: Introduction Start Point: Butley Ferry crossing (west side) (TM 3917 4811) End Point: Orford Quay (TM 4251 4952) Relevant Maps: BSA 2a to BSA 2l 2.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between Bawdsey to Aldeburgh 2.1.2 This report covers length BSA 2 of the stretch, which is the coast between Butley Ferry and Orford Quay. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 2.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.