Summary Benchmarks for Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary Benchmarks for Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines SUMMARY BENCHMARKS FOR PREFERRED PRACTICE PATTERN® GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Benchmarks for Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines Introduction . 1 Glaucoma Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (Initial Evaluation) . 3 Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (Follow-up Evaluation) . 4 Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suspect (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 5 Primary Angle Closure (Initial Evaluation and Therapy) . 6 Retina Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 7 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Management Recommendations) . 8 Diabetic Retinopathy (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 9 Diabetic Retinopathy (Management Recommendations) . 10 Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane and Vitreomacular Traction (Initial Evaluation and Therapy) . 11 Idiopathic Macular Hole (Initial Evaluation and Therapy) . 12 Posterior Vitreous Detachment, Retinal Breaks, and Lattice Degeneration (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 14 Retinal and Ophthalmic Artery Occlusions (Initial Evaluation and Therapy) . 15 Retinal Vein Occlusions (Initial Evaluation and Therapy) . 16 Cataract/Anterior Segment Cataract (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 17 Cornea/External Disease Bacterial Keratitis (Initial Evaluation) . 19 Bacterial Keratitis (Management Recommendations) . 20 Blepharitis (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 21 Conjunctivitis (Initial Evaluation) . 22 Conjunctivitis (Management Recommendations) . 23 Corneal Ectasia (Initial Evaluation and Follow-up) . 24 Corneal Edema and Opacification (Initial Evaluation) . 25 Corneal Edema and Opacification (Management Recommendations) . 26 Dry Eye Syndrome (Initial Evaluation) . 27 Dry Eye Syndrome (Management Recommendations) . 28 Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Amblyopia (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 29 Esotropia (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 30 Exotropia (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 31 Refractive Management/Intervention Keratorefractive Surgery (Initial and Follow-up Evaluation) . 32 Adult Strabismus Adult Strabismus with a History of Childhood Strabismus . 33 © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology October 2019 aao org. SUMMARY BENCHMARKS FOR PREFERRED PRACTICE PATTERN® GUIDELINES Introduction Cochrane Library for articles in the English language These are summary benchmarks for the Academy’s is conducted . The results are reviewed by an expert Preferred Practice Pattern® (PPP) guidelines . The panel and used to prepare the recommendations, Preferred Practice Pattern series of guidelines has which are then given a rating that shows the strength been written on the basis of three principles . of evidence when sufficient evidence exists . • Each Preferred Practice Pattern should be clinically To rate individual studies, a scale based on the relevant and specific enough to provide useful Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) is information to practitioners . used . The definitions and levels of evidence to rate • Each recommendation that is made should be given individual studies are as follows: an explicit rating that shows its importance to the • I++: High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews care process . of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or RCTs with • Each recommendation should also be given an a very low risk of bias explicit rating that shows the strength of evidence • I+: Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic that supports the recommendation and reflects the reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias best evidence available . • I–: Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or Preferred Practice Patterns provide guidance RCTs with a high risk of bias for the pattern of practice, not for the care of a • II++: High-quality systematic reviews of case-control particular individual. While they should generally or cohort studies; high-quality case-control or meet the needs of most patients, they cannot possibly cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding best meet the needs of all patients . Adherence to or bias and a high probability that the relationship is these Preferred Practice Patterns will not ensure a causal successful outcome in every situation . These practice • II+: Well-conducted case-control or cohort studies patterns should not be deemed inclusive of all proper with a low risk of confounding or bias and a methods of care or exclusive of other methods of moderate probability that the relationship is causal care reasonably directed at obtaining the best results . It may be necessary to approach different patients’ • II–: Case-control or cohort studies with a high risk of needs in different ways . The physician must make the confounding or bias and a significant risk that the ultimate judgment about the propriety of the care of relationship is not causal a particular patient in light of all of the circumstances • III: Nonanalytic studies (e g. ., case reports, case presented by that patient . The American Academy series) of Ophthalmology is available to assist members in resolving ethical dilemmas that arise in the course of Recommendations for care are formed based on the ophthalmic practice . body of the evidence . The body of evidence quality ratings are defined by Grading of Recommendations The Preferred Practice Pattern® guidelines are not Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) medical standards to be adhered to in all individual as follows: situations. The Academy specifically disclaims any • Good quality (GQ): Further research is very unlikely and all liability for injury or other damages of any kind, to change our confidence in the estimate of effect from negligence or otherwise, for any and all claims that may arise out of the use of any recommendations • Moderate quality (MQ): Further research is likely to or other information contained herein . have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate For each major disease condition, recommendations • Insufficient quality (IQ): Further research is for the process of care, including the history, physical very likely to have an important impact on our exam and ancillary tests, are summarized, along with confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to major recommendations for the care management, change the estimate; any estimate of effect is very follow-up, and education of the patient . For each uncertain PPP, a detailed literature search of PubMed and the © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology October 2019 aao org. 1 SUMMARY BENCHMARKS FOR PREFERRED PRACTICE PATTERN® GUIDELINES Introduction (continued) • Level I includes evidence obtained from at least Key recommendations for care are defined by GRADE one properly conducted, well-designed randomized as follows: controlled trial . It could include meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials . • Strong recommendation (SR): Used when the desirable effects of an intervention clearly outweigh • Level II includes evidence obtained from the following: the undesirable effects or clearly do not • Well-designed controlled trials without • Discretionary recommendation (DR): Used when the randomization trade-offs are less certain—either because of low- • Well-designed cohort or case-control analytic quality evidence or because evidence suggests studies, preferably from more than one center that desirable and undesirable effects are closely • Multiple-time series with or without the balanced intervention In PPPs prior to 2011, the panel rated recommendations • Level III includes evidence obtained from one of the according to its importance to the care process . This following: “importance to the care process” rating represents • Descriptive studies care that the panel thought would improve the quality • Case reports of the patient’s care in a meaningful way . The ratings • Reports of expert committees/organizations (e g. ., of importance are divided into three levels . PPP panel consensus with external peer review) • Level A, defined as most important • Level B, defined as moderately important This former approach, however, will eventually be • Level C, defined as relevant but not critical phased out as the AAO adopted the SIGN and GRADE rating and grading systems . The panel also rated each recommendation on the strength of evidence in the available literature to The PPPs are intended to serve as guides in patient support the recommendation made . The “ratings of care, with greatest emphasis on technical aspects . In strength of evidence” also are divided into three levels . applying this knowledge, it is essential to recognize that true medical excellence is achieved only when skills are applied in a such a manner that the patients’ needs are the foremost consideration . The AAO is available to assist members in resolving ethical dilemmas that arise in the course of practice . (AAO Code of Ethics) © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology October 2019 aao org. 2 GLAUCOMA Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (Initial Evaluation) Initial Exam History (Key elements) • Laser trabeculoplasty can be considered as initial • Ocular history therapy in selected patients or an alternative for • Race/ethnicity patients at high risk for nonadherence to medical therapy who cannot or will not use medications • Family history reliably due to cost, memory problems, difficulty • Systemic history with instillation, or intolerance to medication (I+, GQ, • Review of pertinent records DR) • Current medications • Trabeculectomy is effective in lowering IOP; it is gen- • Ocular surgery erally indicated when medications and appropriate laser therapy are insufficient to control disease
Recommended publications
  • Differentiate Red Eye Disorders
    Introduction DIFFERENTIATE RED EYE DISORDERS • Needs immediate treatment • Needs treatment within a few days • Does not require treatment Introduction SUBJECTIVE EYE COMPLAINTS • Decreased vision • Pain • Redness Characterize the complaint through history and exam. Introduction TYPES OF RED EYE DISORDERS • Mechanical trauma • Chemical trauma • Inflammation/infection Introduction ETIOLOGIES OF RED EYE 1. Chemical injury 2. Angle-closure glaucoma 3. Ocular foreign body 4. Corneal abrasion 5. Uveitis 6. Conjunctivitis 7. Ocular surface disease 8. Subconjunctival hemorrhage Evaluation RED EYE: POSSIBLE CAUSES • Trauma • Chemicals • Infection • Allergy • Systemic conditions Evaluation RED EYE: CAUSE AND EFFECT Symptom Cause Itching Allergy Burning Lid disorders, dry eye Foreign body sensation Foreign body, corneal abrasion Localized lid tenderness Hordeolum, chalazion Evaluation RED EYE: CAUSE AND EFFECT (Continued) Symptom Cause Deep, intense pain Corneal abrasions, scleritis, iritis, acute glaucoma, sinusitis, etc. Photophobia Corneal abrasions, iritis, acute glaucoma Halo vision Corneal edema (acute glaucoma, uveitis) Evaluation Equipment needed to evaluate red eye Evaluation Refer red eye with vision loss to ophthalmologist for evaluation Evaluation RED EYE DISORDERS: AN ANATOMIC APPROACH • Face • Adnexa – Orbital area – Lids – Ocular movements • Globe – Conjunctiva, sclera – Anterior chamber (using slit lamp if possible) – Intraocular pressure Disorders of the Ocular Adnexa Disorders of the Ocular Adnexa Hordeolum Disorders of the Ocular
    [Show full text]
  • A Microbiological Study of Neonatal Conjunctivae and Conjunctivitis
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.61.9.601 on 1 September 1977. Downloaded from British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1977, 61, 601-607 A microbiological study of neonatal conjunctivae and conjunctivitis M. J. PRENTICE, G. R. HUTCHINSON, AND D. TAYLOR-ROBINSON From the Division of Communicable Diseases, MRC Clinical Research Centre, and Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex SUJMMARY To investigate the importance of chlamydiae, ureaplasmas, Mycoplasma hominis, and anaerobic bacteria in the pathogenesis of neonatal conjunctivitis in the Harrow population con- junctival specimens from 104 infants with conjunctivitis and 104 similar healthy neonates were examined. The incidence of neonatal conjunctivitis was 8 2%, and no case of neomycin-resistant disease occurred during the study. Staphylococcus aureus, viridans Streptococci, and Eschlerichia coli were the only micro-organisms isolated significantly more frequently from affected than from control eyes, which suggests that these bacteria may be a cause of the conjunctivitis. All cultures for chlamydiae, M. hominis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and anaerobic bacteria were negative. The mother's race, social status, illness, and obstetric events were found to have no effect on the incidence, time of onset of conjunctivitis, or micro-organisms isolated. The clinical characteristics of conjunc- tivitis were also not related to the micro-organisms isolated. No potential pathogens were isolated from 63-5 % of the eyes showing conjunctivitis. The results suggest that some of these cases may be caused by chemical irritation, and the possibility of an infectious aetiology is also discussed. copyright. Neonatal conjunctivitis is a common disease et al., 1974; Burns et al., 1975), but some cases of affecting between 2-6% (Watson and Gairdner, cervicitis may be caused by this organism (Chiang 1968) and 5 to 8% (Hurley, 1966) of infants born et al., 1968; Hobson et al., 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Infections in & Around The
    Starship Children’s Health Clinical Guideline Note: The electronic version of this guideline is the version currently in use. Any printed version can not be assumed to be current. Please remember to read our disclaimer. INFECTIONS IN & AROUND THE EYE Examining the Eyes Herpes Simplex Keratitis Preseptal vs Orbital cellulitis Herpes Zoster Opthalmicus Preseptal (periorbital) cellulitis Non-infectious conditions that may cause Orbital Cellulitis diagnostic confusion Dacryocystitis o Watery & Sticky eyes in the Stye / Hordeolum Newborn Neonatal conjunctivitis o Allergic Conjunctivitis Conjunctivitis (non-neonatal) o Chalazion o Viral conjunctivitis References o Bacterial conjunctivitis Examining the eyes Always assess visual acuity in each eye separately > 6 weeks fixing & following or reaching for objects of interest. >12 months – see and pick up small objects such as hundred-and-thousands > 3 to 4 years – letter or shape matching is usually possible > 5-6 year olds - Snellen chart usually possible (NB: 6/9 means the child can read line 9 at 6 metres) Check pupil responses and for a red reflex, examine the conjunctiva, stain with fluorescein and examine with the BLUE light on the ophthalmoscope (not the green light), check for a foreign body including beneath the upper eyelid by everting the lid over a cotton bud. Preseptal versus Orbital cellulitis It is essential to distinguish between these conditions as they differ considerably in terms of severity of complications, urgency of investigations & management. The orbital septum is a thin membrane that extends from the orbital periosteum & inserts into the tarsal plates of both eyelids. It acts as a physical barrier to infection. Preseptal (periorbital) Cellulitis Infection of the superficial eyelid & periorbital structures anterior to the orbital septum.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Conjunctivitis
    Clinical Perinatal/Neonatal Case Presentation nnnnnnnnnnnnnn Bacteremia, Meningitis, and Brain Abscesses in a Hospitalized Infant: Complications of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Conjunctivitis Samir S. Shah, MD dosis. The white blood cell count was 50,900/mm3 with 59% seg- Peter Gloor, MD mented neutrophils and 17% band forms. The platelet count was 3 Patrick G. Gallagher, MD 20,000/mm , and prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times were prolonged at 26.5 seconds and .2 minutes, respectively. Cere- This report describes a preterm infant hospitalized in a neonatal brospinal fluid examination revealed a glucose of 22 mg/dl, a protein 3 3 intensive care unit who developed Pseudomonas aeruginosa of 164 mg/dl, 5/mm erythrocytes, and 387/mm leukocytes. Blood, conjunctivitis associated with bacteremia, meningitis, and multiple urine, endotracheal secretion, and cerebrospinal fluid cultures were brain abscesses. P. aeruginosa conjunctivitis can rapidly progress to an obtained. Cranial ultrasonography was normal. Treatment included invasive eye infection, such as corneal ulceration or endophthalmitis, intravenous fluid boluses, dopamine infusion, mechanical ventila- leading to poor vision or blindness. Progression of this infection may tion, and transfusion with packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, lead to systemic disease. However, as illustrated in this report, P. and platelets. Intravenous ampicillin and ceftriaxone were prescribed. aeruginosa conjunctivitis may be associated with the development of These were subsequently changed to intravenous gentamicin and systemic complications such as bacteremia and meningitis in the ceftazidime when Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from absence of invasive eye disease. P. aeruginosa is a relatively common blood, endotracheal, and conjunctival cultures. Both eyes were treated cause of conjunctivitis in hospitalized preterm and low birth weight with ophthalmic gentamicin ointment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Universal Eye Screening in Newborns Including RETINOPATHY of Prematurity
    GUIDELINES FOR UNIVERSAL EYE SCREENING IN NEWBORNS INCLUDING RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY RASHTRIYA BAL SWASthYA KARYAKRAM Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India June 2017 MESSAGE The Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, under the National Health Mission launched the Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK), an innovative and ambitious initiative, which envisages Child Health Screening and Early Intervention Services. The main focus of the RBSK program is to improve the quality of life of our children from the time of birth till 18 years through timely screening and early management of 4 ‘D’s namely Defects at birth, Development delays including disability, childhood Deficiencies and Diseases. To provide a healthy start to our newborns, RBSK screening begins at birth at delivery points through comprehensive screening of all newborns for various defects including eye and vision related problems. Some of these problems are present at birth like congenital cataract and some may present later like Retinopathy of prematurity which is found especially in preterm children and if missed, can lead to complete blindness. Early Newborn Eye examination is an integral part of RBSK comprehensive screening which would prevent childhood blindness and reduce visual and scholastic disabilities among children. Universal newborn eye screening at delivery points and at SNCUs provides a unique opportunity to identify and manage significant eye diseases in babies who would otherwise appear healthy to their parents. I wish that State and UTs would benefit from the ‘Guidelines for Universal Eye Screening in Newborns including Retinopathy of Prematurity’ and in supporting our future generation by providing them with disease free eyes and good quality vision to help them in their overall growth including scholastic achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Paediatric Conjunctivitis
    Paediatric Conjunctivitis - Shivanand Sheth Unilateral pussy discharge in a white eye Unilateral pussy discharge in a white eye • Dacryocystitis or Mucocoele • Due to Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (CNLDO) • Unlikely to be conjunctivitis • No need of antibiotics or any eye drops • Can sometimes be bilateral Plan: Swab and refer to ophthalmologist Needs nasolacrimal duct probing if does not spontaneously resolve Bilateral pussy discharge with pink/red eyes Bilateral pussy discharge with pink/red eyes • Typically simultaneous onset or one eye follows other eye shortly, but can be unilateral • Acute conjunctivitis • Plan: Start Chlorsig eye drops qid (antibiotic) • Expect to get better in 2-3 days • If no improvement or gets worse – Refer! Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) • Mostly viral in origin (adenovirus most common) • Very red • Very swollen • Can be unilateral or bilateral • Mucous discharge • Highly contagious • Cornea is near perfect – (but some may develop punctate erosions later on) • If cornea affected Refer to consultant Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) • Can linger for weeks (1 to 6 weeks) • Treatment symptomatic mainly: – No treatment or lubricants – Cold compresses for relief – NSAIDS orally if discomfort/pain (Panadol) – Mild steroid eye drops (Flarex or FML tds) if cornea shows punctate erosions – Refer if not better in 3 days Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) Most important: – Isolate patient. Highly contagious. – In-office infection control after seeing patient. – Clean slit-lamp and other ophthal equipment in contact with patient – Can easily transmit to other patients if not careful – Also commonest conjunctivitis amongst eye care personnel Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) – When conjunctivitis starts getting better cornea may show subepithelial infiltrates. – These can cause blurry vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Blindness in Children: a Worldwide Perspective
    STATISTICS Blindness in children: a worldwide perspective Parikshit Gogate Head, ORBIS-supported Dept of Paediatric Ophthalmology, HV Desai Eye Hospital, 93/2 Taravde Vasti, Mohamadwadi, Gilbert Clare Hadapsar, Pune 411 028, India. Clare Gilbert Reader, International Centre for Eye Health, Chief Medical Advisor, Sightsavers International, UK. Many of the causes of childhood blindness are avoidable, being either preventable or treatable.1 Only three per cent of the world’s blind population are children. However, because children have a lifetime of blindness ahead of them, the number of ‘blind person years’ resulting from blindness Children in a school starting in childhood is second only to for the blind. KENYA cataract.2 Controlling blindness in children is a priority of VISION 20203,4; however, as • lens (e.g. cataract, aphakia) rubella or thalidomide) its causes differ from that of blindness in • uvea (e.g. aniridia) • perinatal (e.g. retinopathy of prematurity, adults, different strategies, personnel, infra- • retina (e.g. retinal dystrophies) birth injury, neonatal conjunctivitis/ structure, and equipment are required to • optic nerve (e.g. atrophy) ophthalmia neonatorum) combat it. There is also a greater urgency • glaucoma • childhood (e.g. vitamin A deficiency when managing children, as delays in • conditions where the eye appears normal disorders, measles, trauma) treatment can lead to amblyopia (lazy eye). (e.g. refractive errors, cortical blindness, • unknown/cannot be determined (e.g. amblyopia). congenital abnormalities). Classifying the causes of The information necessary for this Information about underlying causes of blindness in children descriptive classification can be collected blindness, although often more difficult to on every child following examination and collect, is more useful for planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophthalmia Neonatorum
    PREGLED REVIEW Gynaecol Perinatol 2014;23(4):121–126 *Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital Dubrava; **University of Zagreb, School of medicine; ***General Hospital Karlovac; ****Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Stubi~ke Toplice OPHTHALMIA NEONATORUM Snje`ana Ka{telan*, Ema Kasun**, @eljko [tajcer***, Boris Kasun**** Review article Key words: neonatal conjunctivitis, aetiology, clinical features, treatment, prophylaxis SUMMARY. Ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) or neonatal conjunctivitis is an acute mucopurulent infection of the conjunctivae occurring within 28 days of life. It is a relatively common disease affecting 1.6% to 12% of all newborn infants with an increase up to 23% in developing countries. ON can be divided into noninfectious and infectious categories. The most common noninfectious cause is chemical conjunctivitis whilst the infec- tious category includes bacterial, chlamydial and viral infections with chlamydia being the most common. Affected newborns present with a purulent, mucopurulent or mucoid discharge from one or both eyes, in- jected conjunctiva and lid swelling. In some cases there may also be an association with systemic infection. The time of onset of conjunctivitis as well as conjunctival scraping can aid in the diagnosis of the specifi c aetiology. A number of prophylactic antibiotic or antiseptic agents have been used to prevent ON namely 1% silver nitrate ophthalmic drops, 0.5% erythromycin or 1% tetracycline ophthalmic ointment and recently a 2.5% povidone-iodine ophthalmic solution. Despite this fact ON still remains a significant cause of ocular mor- bidity, blindness and even death in underdeveloped countries. The organisms causing ON are transmitted mainly from the mother’s birth canal during delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Red Eye Deserves an Antibiotic
    Ocular Infection Management- The Next Generation Bruce E. Onofrey, OD, RPh, FAAO Professor, U. Houston UEI SERIOUS PROBLEMS REQUIRE SERIOUS DOCUMENTATION THE BIG 6 “I’s” • INFECTION • INFLAMMATION • ISCHEMIA • INJURY • IDIOPATHIC • IATROGENIC (idiotpathic) Just the facts Mrs. Johnson • 65 y/o female visiting her friend Madge from Portland, Oregon. • Madge is one of your favorite long-term patients • Madge refers patient to you • Patient is very concerned about her “eye infection” The Simple Conjunctivitis Case • 65 y/o female recently in LA to visit son • Both developed red eyes • Son told mom he has genital herpes • and chlamydia • Mother seen by local ophthalmologist HX • My vision is getting worse in my left eye • It feels very “sore” and itches a lot • It waters all the time and it feels like my eye is too big for the eye socket • It’s glued shut every morning and very swollen • People are afraid to talk to me –they think I’m going to give them “pink eye” • Am I contagious? Will I lose my vision? Case : cont’d • Mom has Hx of trachoma as child and TB in remission. Worked in a TB ward-Was treated years ago • Mom wears mono-vision CL on OS only. Disposable-wears X wears X 2 weeks. Last worn 9 days ago Case : Cont’d • Eye now very painful and vision very bad • Calif. Dr said the cornea was all “torn up” • The doctor said the drops he gave me would make it better right-away-it made it worse and I stopped it after a day • I’ve been using the new drops daily and taking the pills, but it’s just getting worse every day • Am I going blind?!? QUESTION: Differential DX • 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Conjunctivitis
    Review Article Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review Amir A. Azari, MD1,2, Amir Arabi, MD, MPH1,2 1Ophthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Ophthalmology, Torfeh Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ORCID: Amir A. Azari: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2013-3284 Abstract Conjunctivitis is a commonly encountered condition in ophthalmology clinics throughout the world. In the management of suspected cases of conjunctivitis, alarming signs for more serious intraocular conditions, such as severe pain, decreased vision, and painful pupillary reaction, must be considered. Additionally, a thorough medical and ophthalmic history should be obtained and a thorough physical examination should be done in patients with atypical findings and chronic course. Concurrent physical exam findings with relevant history may reveal the presence of a systemic condition with involvement of the conjunctiva. Viral conjunctivitis remains to be the most common overall cause of conjunctivitis. Bacterial conjunctivitis is encountered less frequently and it is the second most common cause of infectious conjunctivitis. Allergic conjunctivitis is encountered in nearly half of the population and the findings include itching, mucoid discharge, chemosis, and eyelid edema. Long-term usage of eye drops with preservatives in a patient with conjunctival irritation and discharge points to the toxic conjunctivitis as the underlying etiology. Effective management of conjunctivitis includes timely diagnosis, appropriate differentiation of the various etiologies, and appropriate treatment. Keywords: Allergic; Bacterial; Conjunctivitis; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Viral; Toxic J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2020; 15 (3): 372–395 INTRODUCTION by engorgement of the blood vessels, ocular discharge, and pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophthalmology
    LECTURE NOTES For Health Science Students Ophthalmology Dereje Negussie, Yared Assefa, Atotibebu Kassa, Azanaw Melese University of Gondar In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education 2004 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2004 by Dereje Negussie, Yared Assefa, Atotibebu Kassa, Azanaw Melese All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. PREFACE This lecture note will serve as a practical guideline for the hard-pressed mid-level health workers. We hope that it will be a good introduction to eye diseases for health science students working in Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • OPHTHALMIA-NEONATORUM.Pdf
    Author: Consultant Ophthalmologist, Birmingham and Midlands Eye Centre (BMEC); Lucy Titcomb, Lead Pharmacist, BMEC Approved: Drugs and Therapeutic Committee, May 2011 Child Health Clinical Governance Group, June 2011 Updated: May 2011 Review date: May 2013 Ophthalmia Neonatorum Definition Ophthalmia neonatorum is a conjunctival inflammation occurring during the first month of life. As of April 2010, it is no longer a notifiable disease (http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/InfectionsAZ/NotificationsOfInfecti ousDiseases/ListOfNotifiableDiseases/). Causes These include bacteria, most commonly Staphylococcus aureus, chlamydiae and rarely Herpes simplex virus and chemical irritants. Almost any common bacterial pathogen can cause the condition, but Neiserria gonorrhoea infection is of particular concern as it can cause corneal ulceration. Chlamydial conjunctivitis: o This is an increasingly common cause of neonatal conjunctivitis in the UK. o The incubation period is 5 -14 days. o Initially unilateral, it usually becomes bilateral. o The lids are swollen and there is a watery, mucopurulent discharge which may be blood stained. The conjunctival reaction is papillary rather than follicular. o It can give rise to a superior pannus, conjunctival scarring and rarely, a corneal opacity. o Systemic complications include rhinitis, otitis and pneumonitis. Gonococcal conjunctivitis: o Occurs in the first few days of life. o There is a rapidly progressing severe purulent conjunctivitis. o The cornea can be rapidly affected: ulceration and even perforation can occur resulting destruction of the eye. Conjunctivitis caused by other bacteria: o Typically, symptoms develop in the first 4-5 days of life, but they can occur at any time. o Organisms include: S.aureus, S.epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Serratia spp., Pseudomonas spp.
    [Show full text]