Naturemap Species Report Created by Guest User on 02/10/2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Naturemap Species Report Created by Guest User on 02/10/2017 382800 383100 9 1 DE DE 5 DE 10 2 DE 6317400 DE 6317400 8 7 DE DE Hewdon Rd Piggott Dr 3 DE 6 DE 6317100 6317100 4 DE Glentana App Aquila Dr Grand Ent Ditchingham Pl 382800 383100 Figure 12: Fauna Habitat Legend Scale 1:3,000 at A4 Existing cadastre m DE Habitat Assessment 0 30 60 90 ¹ Eucalyptus Woodland Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Project area Note that positional errors may occur in some areas Cleared Date: 11/01/2018 Author: JCrute [email protected] Shrubland www.strategen.com.au Source: Aerial image: Nearmap, flown 09/2017. Existing cadastre: Landgate 2017. Path: Q:\Consult\2017\WCO\WCO17452\01_GIS_documents\ArcMap_documents\WCO17452_G011_RevA.mxd FINAL Australind Wastewater Treatment Plant 5. Discussion 5.1 Flora 5.1.1 Flora composition The Swan Coastal Plain supports a high species and ecosystem diversity (Mitchell et al. 2002). A total of 4624 vascular flora taxa are known to occur on the Swan Coastal Plain (DBCA 2018). Of these, a total of 67 vascular flora taxa were recorded within the project area comprising 47 native flora taxa and 20 introduced flora taxa (weeds), representing 20 families and 53 genera. The most represented families were Orchidaceae, Myrtaceae and Fabaceae, while the most represented genera were Acacia, Caladenia and Eucalyptus. The total size of the project was 14.18 ha, and comprised a homogenous landscape of flat plain on grey loamy soils, except for where the historical WWTP had been located. Given the small size of the project area, the limited range of landforms and habitats, and large degraded areas, the low floral diversity that recorded was to be expected. 5.1.2 Survey adequacy A total of eight quadrats were sampled across the project area, with approximately 0.6 sites completed per hectare. Where possible three quadrats were sampled per vegetation type as per Technical Guidance: Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment (EPA 2016a). This was achieved for VT1 and VT4, however it was not deemed practical to sample three quadrats on VT3 and VT4 given the small area of each of these vegetation types. The species accumulation curve for the project indicated that survey effort was adequate with the observed data approaching the theoretical asymptote. 5.1.3 Flora of conservation significance Eighty-two threatened taxa are known to occur on the Swan Coastal Plain, however only one Threatened flora taxa, Drakaea micrantha, was identified from the desktop assessment as having the potential to occur within the project area. There were no flora taxa listed as Threatened under the EPBC Act or WC Act recorded within the project area. One DBCA listed Priority flora taxa, Caladenia speciosa (P4) was recorded within the project area. Four records of Caladenia speciosa were identified by the database searches within 6 km of the project area. None of these were recorded from within the project area. There are 83 records of Caladenia speciosa (P4), 79 of which are from the Swan Coastal Plain, distributed from Lancelin in the North, to Busselton in the South. 5.1.4 Flora of other significance. No flora taxa of other significance were recorded from within the project area. 5.1.5 Unknown flora taxa None of the unknown flora taxa collected (taxa that have not been confidently identified to species level) are likely be of conservation concern, given that none are analogous to DBCA listed Threatened or Priority flora taxa or likely to represent flora of other significance. WCO17452_01 R001 Rev B0 23-Nov-18 45 FINAL Australind Wastewater Treatment Plant 5.1.6 Introduced flora taxa No WoNS or DPs were recorded within the project area. The weeds recorded from the project area are all known from the Swan Coastal Plain and have previously been recorded from the local area (Naturemap 2017b). Most weeds within the project area were recorded in the completely degraded area near the middle of the site, or in the altered landscape in the north-west portion of the site. The introduced taxa recorded are consistent with disturbed lands in the Swan Coastal Plain, and are not considered to be new for the bioregion. 5.1.7 Vegetation types Four vegetation types were recorded within the project area, comprising Marri (Corymbia calophylla) woodland, Spearwood (Kunzea glabrescens) shrubland, and Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) woodland in native remnants, and a planted River Gum (Eucalyptus marginata) woodland. Vegetation within the project area is representative of those found on similar geology and landforms in built up and rural areas in the region. 5.1.8 Vegetation of significance The TEC/PEC database search (DBCA 2017c) identified the entire project area as comprising Banksia Dominated Woodlands of the swan Coastal Plain IBRA Region TEC or the associated buffer. Assessment against the key diagnostic criteria for the Banksia woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain TEC (TSSC 2016) however identified that only 4.84 ha (34%) within the project area meet the diagnostic criteria for the TEC. The remainder of the project area comprises Jarrah woodland, planted River Gum woodland and completely degraded or degraded vegetation and is not considered to be significant. 5.1.9 Vegetation condition Vegetation condition within the project area ranged from completely degraded throughout the cleared areas, to very good. The completely degraded area in the middle of the project area had previously been cleared, and had since been colonised by aggressive weed species. The large degraded area in the north-western part of the site had been previously cleared and the landform reshaped to form three infiltration channels. This area has since been planted with a monoculture of native species Eucalyptus camaldulensis. The degraded area comprises some native vegetation, however intensive management would be required to bring the area back good condition. The remainder of the project area was considered very good to good, with disturbances including edge effects from the disturbed surrounds, weeds, access tracks, and minor amounts of rubbish. 5.2 Fauna 5.2.1 Fauna of Conservation Significance During the field assessment, one conservation significant species was recorded; the Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo. A large number of FRTBC were recorded in Marri trees throughout the project area and foraging evidence was also present throughout the project area. There was also a small amount of evidence of Black Cockatoo feeding on Banksia cones on the ground. As a WRP and Black Cockatoo habitat assessment forms part of this report, these species will be discussed further below. WCO17452_01 R001 Rev B0 23-Nov-18 46 FINAL Australind Wastewater Treatment Plant Species Considered Likely to Occur Rainbow Bee-eater The Rainbow Bee-eater is listed as Marine under the EPBC Act and Schedule 5 under the WC Act. This species is one of the most common and widespread birds in Australia with a distribution that covers the majority of Australia (Barrett et al. 2003). It occurs in lightly wooded, often sandy country, preferring areas near water. It feeds on airborne insects, and nests throughout its range in WA in burrows excavated in sandy ground or banks, often at the margins of roads and tracks. In WA this species can occur as a ‘resident, breeding visitor, postnuptial nomad, passage migrant and winter visitor’ (Johnstone & Storr 1998b). DBCA Threatened Fauna Database returned 23 records of the Rainbow Bee-eater from the vicinity of the project area. Whilst no Rainbow Bee-eaters were recorded during the field survey, the project area contains potential foraging habitat for this species and as such is considered likely to occur. Southern Brown Bandicoot The Bandicoot is listed as P5 under the DPaW Priority List. This species once occurred throughout south- west WA; it now occurs from Guilderton southwards on the SCP, including the Perth Metropolitan area, in Jarrah and Karri (E. diversicolor) forests and adjacent coastal vegetation complexes. The species inhabits scrubby, often swampy, vegetation with dense cover up to about 1 m high. It feeds in adjacent forest and woodland that is burnt on a regular basis and in areas of pasture and cropland lying close to dense cover. The Bandicoot is patchily distributed in suitable habitat, with populations inhabiting Jarrah and Wandoo forests usually associated with watercourses. On the Swan Coastal Plain it is often associated with wetlands with dense vegetation where they feed on fruit, seeds, insects and fungi (Woinarski et al. 2014). The DBCA Threatened Fauna Database returned 7 records from the vicinity of the project area and suitable habitat is present. Whilst no Southern Brown Bandicoots were recorded during the field survey, the project area contains potential foraging habitat for this species and as such is considered likely to occur. Southern Brush-tailed Phascogale The Southern Brush-tailed Phascogale is listed Schedule 3 under the WC Act. It is restricted to the extreme south-west, and its characteristic low population densities make it vulnerable to localised extinction (Van Dyck & Strahan 2008). This subspecies has been observed in dry sclerophyll forests and open woodlands containing hollow-bearing trees with a sparse ground cover. Some sections of the project area do have potential foraging habitat for this species, however, there were very few hollows observed in which the species could den. The DBCA Threatened Fauna Database returned 16 records of the Southern Brush-tailed Phascogale from the vicinity of the project area and suitable habitat is present. Whilst no Southern Brush-tailed Phascogales were recorded during the field survey, the project area contains potential foraging habitat for this species and as such is considered likely to occur. Species Considered as Possibly Occurring No species are considered as Possibly occurring in the project area. Species Considered Unlikely to Occur No species are considered as unlikely to occur in the project area.
Recommended publications
  • BORR IPT 2019A - Part 1 of 12)
    APPENDIX C ATTACHMENTS LIST (BORR IPT 2019a - Part 1 of 12) Biota. (2019b). Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Section Targeted Fauna Assessment. Unpublished report prepared for Main Roads Western Australia. BORR IPT. (2019a). Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Section Vegetation and Flora Study. Unpublished report prepared for Main Roads Western Australia. Brad Goode & Associates. (2012). Aboriginal Heritage Survey Report of the Proposed Bunbury Outer Ring Road Stage 2, Western Australia. Unpublished report prepared for GHD Pty Ltd on behalf of Main Roads Western Australia. Main Roads WA. (2018). Environmental Policy. WRM. (2019). Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Investigation Area: Targeted Conservation Significant Aquatic Fauna Survey. Unpublished report prepared for BORR IPT on behalf of Main Roads Western Australia. Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Section Vegetation and Flora Study September 2019 Executive Summary The Commissioner of Main Roads Western Australia (Main Roads) is planning for the construction of the Bunbury Outer Ring Road (BORR) Project. BORR is a planned Controlled Access Highway linking the Forrest Highway and Bussell Highway. The completed BORR will provide a high standard route for access to the Bunbury Port and facilitate proposed development to the east of the City of Bunbury. BORR will also provide an effective bypass of Bunbury for inter-regional traffic. BORR forms a major component of the planned regional road network for the Greater Bunbury area. The land requirement for BORR is identified in the Greater Bunbury Region Scheme (GBRS). The proposed BORR comprises three sections: ‘BORR Northern Section’ – Forrest Highway to Boyanup-Picton Road ‘BORR Central Section’ – The Central Section has been previously constructed however further improvements are proposed for this section, including the extension of Willinge Drive southwards to South Western Highway ‘BORR Southern Section’ – South Western Highway (near Bunbury Airport) to Bussell Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Region
    Regional Services Division – South West Region South West Region ‐ Parks & Wildlife and FPC Disturbance Operations Flora and Vegetation Survey Assessment Form 1. Proposed Operations: (to be completed by proponent) NBX0217 Summary of Proposed Operation: Road Construction and Timber Harvesting New road construction – 3.75km Existing road upgrade – 14.9km New gravel pit construction – 2ha (exploration area) Contact Person and Contact Details: Adam Powell [email protected] 0427 191 332 Area of impact; District/Region, State Forest Block, Coupe/Compartment (shapefile to be provided): Blackwood District South West Region Barrabup 0317 Period of proposed disturbance: November 2016 to December 2017 1 2.Desktop Assessment: (to be completed by the Region) ‐ Check Forest Ecosystem reservation. Forest Ecosystems proposed for impact: Jarrah Forest‐Blackwood Plateau, Shrub, herb and sedgelands, Darling Scarp Y Are activities in a Forest Ecosystem that triggers informal reservation under the FMP? The Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem is a Poorly Reserved Forest Ecosystem and needs to be protected as an Informal Reserve under the Forest Management Plan (Appendix 11) ‐ Check Vegetation Complexes, extents remaining uncleared and in reservation (DEC 2007/EPA 2006). Vegetation Complex Pre‐European extent (%) Pre‐European extent (Ha) Extent in formal/informal reservation (%) Bidella (BD) 94% 44,898 47% Darling Scarp (DS) Figures not available Corresponds to Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem extent Gale (GA) 80% 899 17% Jalbarragup (JL) 91% 14,786 32% Kingia (KI) 96% 97,735 34% Telerah (TL) 92% 25,548 33% Wishart (WS2) 84% 2,796 35% Y Do any complexes trigger informal reservation under the FMP? Darling Scarp complex as discussed above Y Are any complexes significant as per EPA regionally significant vegetation? Gale (GA) complex is cleared below the recommended retention of 1,500ha (Molloy et.al 2007) ‐ Check Threatened flora and TEC/PEC databases over an appropriate radius of the disturbance boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unusual Pollinator Sexual Attractant Used by the Endangered Orchid Drakaea Micrantha Björn Bohman*[A,B], Monica M
    COMMUNICATION A specific blend of drakolide and hydroxymethylpyrazines – an unusual pollinator sexual attractant used by the endangered orchid Drakaea micrantha Björn Bohman*[a,b], Monica M. Y. Tan[a], Ryan D. Phillips[b,c,d], Adrian Scaffidi[a], Alexandre N. Sobolev[a], Stephen A. Moggach[a], Gavin R. Flematti[a] and Rod Peakall[a,b] Abstract: hydroxymethylpyrazines in Drakaea,[1e] (methylthio)phenols in Caladenia[1h] and tetrahydrofuranyl acids in Cryptostylis.[4] Most systems involve multiple compounds, usually derived from similar Bioactive natural products underpin the intriguing pollination strategy biosynthetic origins. Only one example of a mixed used by sexually deceptive orchids. These compounds, which mimic pheromone/pollinator attractant system originating from distinct the sex pheromones of the female insect, are emitted in particular biosynthetic pathways has been reported: the orchid Caladenia blends to lure male insect pollinators of specific species. By combining plicata attracts its Zeleboria sp. C thynnine wasp pollinator with a methods from field biology, analytical chemistry, electrophysiology, specific mixture of the terpene citronellol and a likely polyketide- crystallography, and organic synthesis, we report that an undescribed derived acetophenone.[1h] β-hydroxylactone, in combination with two specific hydroxymethylpyrazines, act as pollinator attractants in the rare Drakaea (hammer orchids) is a remarkable Australian genus hammer orchid Drakaea micrantha. This discovery represents an where all species are pollinated by sexual deception of thynnine unusual case of chemically unrelated compounds being used together wasps. Drakaea flowers are characterized by highly reduced as a sexual attractant. Furthermore, this is the first example of the tepals and a hinged insectiform labellum. Previous studies have identification of pollinator attractants in an endangered orchid, shown that hydroxymethylpyrazines in D.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021
    DRAFT 25/10/90; plant list updated Oct. 1992; notes added June 2021. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUES OF OPEN COUNTRY PADDOCK, BOOLARDY STATION Allan H. Burbidge and J.K. Rolfe INTRODUCTION Boolardy Station is situated about 150 km north of Yalgoo and 140 km west-north-west of Cue, in the Shire of Murchison, Western Australia. Open Country Paddock (about 16 000 ha) is in the south-east corner of the station, at 27o05'S, 116o50'E. The most prominent named feature is Coolamooka Hill, near the eastern boundary of the paddock. There are no conservation reserves in this region, although there are some small reserves set aside for various other purposes. Previous biological data for the station consist of broad scale vegetation mapping and land system mapping. Beard (1976) mapped the entire Murchison region at 1: 1 000 000. The Open Country Paddock area was mapped as supporting mulga woodlands and shrublands. More detailed mapping of land system units for rangeland assessment purposes has been carried out more recently at a scale of 1: 40 000 (Payne and Curry in prep.). Seven land systems were identified in open Country Paddock (Fig. 1). Apart from these studies, no detailed biological survey work appears to have been done in the area. Open Country Paddock has been only lightly grazed by domestic stock because of the presence of Kite-leaf Poison (Gastrolobium laytonii) and a lack of fresh water. Because of this and the generally good condition of the paddock and presence of a wide range of plant species, P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the SE Australian Clade of Hibbertia Subg. Hemistemma (Dilleniaceae)
    Phylogeny of the SE Australian clade of Hibbertia subg. Hemistemma (Dilleniaceae) Ihsan Abdl Azez Abdul Raheem School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Adelaide June 2012 The University of Adelaide, SA, Australia Declaration I, Ihsan Abdl Azez Abdul Raheem certify that this work contains no materials which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any universities or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no materials previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australian Digital Thesis Program (ADTP) and also through web search engine, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. ii This thesis is dedicated to my loving family and parents iii Acknowledgments The teacher who is indeed wise does not bid you to enter the house of his wisdom but rather leads you to the threshold of your mind--Khalil Gibran First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisors Dr John G. Conran, Dr Terry Macfarlane and Dr Kevin Thiele for their support, encouragement, valuable feedback and assistance over the past three years (data analyses and writing) guiding me through my PhD candidature.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Sci 2009 Bergh N G.Pdf
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Systematics of the Relhaniinae (Asteraceae- Gnaphalieae) in southern Africa: geography and evolution in an endemic Cape plant lineage. Nicola Georgina Bergh Town Thesis presented for theCape Degree of DOCTOR OF ofPHILOSOPHY in the Department of Botany UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN University May 2009 Town Cape of University ii ABSTRACT The Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) houses a flora unique for its diversity and high endemicity. A large amount of the diversity is housed in just a few lineages, presumed to have radiated in the region. For many of these lineages there is no robust phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships, and few Cape plants have been examined for the spatial distribution of their population genetic variation. Such studies are especially relevant for the Cape where high rates of species diversification and the ongoing maintenance of species proliferation is hypothesised. Subtribe Relhaniinae of the daisy tribe Gnaphalieae is one such little-studied lineage. The taxonomic circumscription of this subtribe, the biogeography of its early diversification and its relationships to other members of the Gnaphalieae are elucidated by means of a dated phylogenetic hypothesis. Molecular DNA sequence data from both chloroplast and nuclear genomes are used to reconstruct evolutionary history using parsimony and Bayesian tools for phylogeny estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
    Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • June 2011 Issue
    THE FROG AND TADPOLE STUDY GROUP NSW Inc. Email: [email protected] PO Box 296 Rockdale NSW 2216 Frogwatch Helpline 0419 249 728 Website: www.fats.org.au NEWSLETTER No. 113 June 2011 ABN: 34 282 154 794 Photo by Jodi Rowley Bidoup-Nui Ba National Park, Vietnam. Rhacophorus vampyrus Vampire Flying Frog Arrive 6.30 pm for a 7pm start. Friday 3rd June FATS meet at the Education Centre, Bicentennial Park Easy walk from Concord West railway station and straight down Victoria Ave. If walking, take a strong torch in winter. By car: Enter from Australia Ave at the Bicentennial Park main entrance, turn off to the right and drive through the park. It’s a one way road. Or enter from Bennelong Road / Parkway. It’s a short stretch of two way road. Park in p10f car park - the last car park before the exit gate. See map p12. CONTENTS PAGE DECCW amphibian licences must be sighted, to adopt frogs. Notes from April meeting Main speaker Jodi Rowley MEETING FORMAT Friday 3rd June 2011 Vampire Flying Frogs 2 Arthur White Darwin’s Frogs 3 6.30 pm Lost Perons frogs and a few others needing homes. Thank you to Marion Anstis, Lothar Please bring your FATS membership card and $$ donation. and Alice Voigt 3 DECCW amphibian licence must be sighted on the night. Herpdigest 4 The frogs can never be released. YouTube clips 5 7.00 pm Welcome and announcements. What’s at the bottom of your garden? 5-7 FATS AGM notice 5th August 2011 7 7..30 pm The main speaker is Robert Wall “The Barred Frogs Frog-o-graphic competition 2011 8 of the Gloucester Valley” Escape devices for animals in pools 8 -9 Grant Webster “ Driving along looking for Frogs” Photos by George Madani Joel Cassar “Toad catching scoop” Frogs use bladder 10 Punia Jeffery “FATS at the Royal Easter Show” to expel foreign objects FATS contact information 11 9.30 pm Show us your frog images, tell us about your frogging Field trips 12 trips or experiences, guessing competition, light refreshments FATS meeting location map 12 and a chance to relax and chat with frog experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey
    Shire of Dardanup Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey March 2015 Executive summary This report is subject to, and must be read in conjunction with, the limitations set out in Section 1.4 and the assumptions and qualifications contained throughout the Report. The Greater Bunbury Strategy and Structure Plan identified a potential significant urban expansion area located to the east of the Eaton locality and an industrial expansion area in Waterloo, in the Shire of Dardanup. The Shire of Dardanup (the Shire) and the Department of Planning have commenced preparation of District Structure Plans (DSP) for the urban expansion area and the industrial expansion area. The DSP will be informed by several technical studies including flora and fauna surveys. The Shire has commissioned GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) to undertake a flora and fauna survey and reporting for the Project. The Project Area is situated in the locality of Waterloo in the Shire of Dardanup. The Project Area includes the urban development area to the north of the South- west Highway (SWH) and the industrial development area to the south of the SWH. GHD undertook a desktop assessment of the Project Area and a flora and fauna field assessment with the first phase conducted from 13 to 14 August, 2014 and the second phase conducted from 29 to 31 October 2014. The purpose of this assessment was to identify the parts of the Project Area that have high, moderate and low ecological values so that the Shire can develop the DSP in consideration of these ecological values. This assessment identified the biological features of the Project Area and the key results are as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch Circus Flora and Fauna Survey PDF Document
    FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY Branch Circus and Hammond Road, Success Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS MUNTOC PTY LTD AND 290 Churchill Avenue, SUBIACO WA 6008 SILVERSTONE ASSET PTY LTD PO Box 465, SUBIACO WA 6904 C/O Koltasz Smith T: 618 9382 4744 PO Box 127 F: 618 9382 1177 E: [email protected] BURSWOOD WA 6100 W: www.rpsgroup.com.au Report No: L07263 Version/Date: Rev 0, June 2008 RPS Environment Pty Ltd (ABN 45 108 680 977) Document Set ID: 5546761 Version: 1, Version Date: 31/01/2017 Flora and Vegetation Survey Branch Circus and Hammond Road, Success Document Status Review Format RPS Release Issue Version Purpose of Document Orig Review Date Review Approval Date Draft A Draft For Internal Review KelMcC VanYeo 30.04.08 Draft B Draft For Client Review VanYeo KarGod 14.05.08 SN 30.05.08 Rev 0 Final for Issue VanYeo 10.06.08 DC 12.06.08 B. Hollyock 13.06.08 Disclaimer This document is and shall remain the property of RPS. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised copying or use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. L07263, Rev 0, June 2008 DOCUMENT STATUS / DISCLAIMER Document Set ID: 5546761 Version: 1, Version Date: 31/01/2017 Flora and Vegetation Survey Branch Circus and Hammond Road, Success EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Flora A total of 229 taxa were recorded from the survey area, of which 155 or 68% were native.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation by Introduced Cats Felis Catus on Australian Frogs: Compilation of Species Records and Estimation of Numbers Killed
    Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed J. C. Z. WoinarskiA,M, S. M. LeggeB,C, L. A. WoolleyA,L, R. PalmerD, C. R. DickmanE, J. AugusteynF, T. S. DohertyG, G. EdwardsH, H. GeyleA, H. McGregorI, J. RileyJ, J. TurpinK and B. P. MurphyA ANESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. BNESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CFenner School of the Environment and Society, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. DWestern Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. ENESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. FQueensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, Qld 4701, Australia. GCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3216, Australia. HNorthern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. INESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. JSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. KDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia. LPresent address: WWF-Australia, 3 Broome Lotteries House, Cable Beach Road, Broome, WA 6276, Australia. MCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. Data sources used in compilation of cat predation on frogs.
    [Show full text]