DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocene Extinctions and the Loss of Feature Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holocene Extinctions and the Loss of Feature Diversity CHAPTER 14 Holocene extinctions and the loss of feature diversity Arne Ø. Mooers, Simon J. Goring, Samuel T. Turvey, and Tyler S. Kuhn mouse 2}, because, on the tree, species {mouse 1} 14.1 Introduction preserves much of the feature diversity represented Species are hard to de/ ne, but under all de/ nitions by {beaver, mouse 2}. We can say that each of {bea- they are unique. Each species can be considered to ver, mouse 1, mouse 2} are redundant with respect possess a set of unique characters which comprise to the features represented by the rodent lineage its feature diversity, the diversity that would be lost that gave rise to them. when that species goes extinct. However, because The mouse/aardvark comparison and Fig. 14.1 species differentiate via evolution from other spe- allow us to consider a set of interesting observa- cies, they also share features as a function of degree tions about how feature diversity is distributed of relationship. So, within placental mammals, all across biodiversity, and what the impacts of his- mice share all the characteristics that allow us to torically and prehistorically recent (i.e. Holocene) call something a mouse, whereas the sole living extinctions have been on this distribution. First, species of aardvark shares very few basic mam- it is now well known that biodiversity is very mal characteristics with anything: it must be true unevenly distributed across the tree of life: the fact that the Earth loses less diversity when any single that at the ordinal level the mammals are approxi- mouse species goes extinct than when the last liv- mately 50% rodents (Rodentia) and 0.02% aard- ing aardvark shuf7 es off its mortal coil. This is one vark (Tubulidentata) is typical (reviewed in Purvis well-established way in which species are not cre- and Hector 2000). The few living monotremes are ated equal (Vane-Wright et al. 1991; Faith 1992). another obvious case within mammals, being only We can start to formalize this simple idea with distantly related to the remaining approximately the help of Fig. 14.1. It depicts the common pattern 5500 known Holocene species. In phylogenetic of a diversifying phylogenetic tree, but also can terms, the tree of life is very imbalanced, because represent the pattern of shared feature diversity, clades differ greatly in the net diversi/ cation with branch lengths representing the number of they have experienced. Interestingly, the simplest unique features that have evolved along that lin- null models of diversi/ cation also lead to imbal- eage. Pruning the tree illustrates how species and ance, although they are usually not as extreme groups of species may differ in the number of as those observed in nature (reviewed in Mooers unique features they have: if we prune distinct- et al. 2007). ive species (such as the aardvark in Fig. 14.1) we The second observation, made most clearly by will lose more of the tree (more unique features) Nee and May (1997), is that, at least under sim- than if we prune less distinctive species (e.g. the ple null models of diversi/ cation, random loss of cat). Likewise, if we prune species {dog, cat}, we species has a mild impact on the total loss of the will lose more of the tree than if we prune {beaver, tree. This is easy to intuit: if loss is random, more 263 114-Turvey-Chap14.indd4-Turvey-Chap14.indd 226363 112/5/20082/5/2008 112:31:032:31:03 PPMM 264 HOLOCENE EXTINCTIONS concentrated within slowly diversifying groups could lead to very large losses. AardvarkBeaver Mouse 1 Mouse 2 Dog Cat The Nee and May (1997) result spurred a ser- ies of empirical investigations into how much of the tree of life would be lost if current extinction risk projections were predictive: von Euler (2001) considered birds of the world, Purvis et al. (2000a) considered both the world’s birds and the world’s carnivores and primates, Sechrest et al. (2002) looked at these latter two groups in the world’s biodiversity hotspots, Johnson et al. (2002) studied marsupials in Australia, Russell et al. (1998) looked at historical and projected extinctions for all mam- mals and birds (using taxonomies), and Mooers and Figure 14.1 Schematic diagram demonstrating clumping of Atkins (2003) considered at-risk birds in Indonesia. extinction on a phylogenetic tree. Branch lengths represent the All these studies agreed that projected losses are number of unique features. The loss of the aardvark would lead to signi/ cantly greater than if extinctions were ran- the greatest loss of feature diversity. If both dog and cat go extinct, their shared feature diversity (dashed branch) would also be lost. dom, because projected losses are clumped and/or Extinction of beaver and mouse 2 would lead to less loss, because concentrated in species-poor groups. In addition, mouse 1 would represent the shared features of the set (dotted von Euler (2001) offered evidence that projected branches). extinctions will make the future bird tree even less balanced than it is today. This means that feature diversity will be even less uniformly distributed species will be chosen from the most speciose parts among living species than at present, increasing of the tree, which are those parts that contain the the distinctiveness of some remaining lineages. most redundancy. From the point of view of con- It might help to contextualize the main observa- serving the products of evolution in the face of cur- tion (non-random loss of feature diversity) by com- rent extinctions, this observation is often cited with parison with past extinctions, and this is the focus of some relief (see e.g. Avise 2005). Importantly, Nee this / nal chapter. For this we must move from time- and May (1997) highlighted that the actual amount based model trees to primarily morphology-based of evolutionary history lost depends strongly on taxonomies, and this presents several interesting the shape of the tree: the more imbalanced the issues. Phylogenetic trees are often depicted with tree, and the shorter the branches near the root, the all the species an equal distance from their com- more that can be lost (Vazquez and Gittleman 1998; mon root, so that we can think of branch lengths Heard and Mooers 2000). Interestingly, Rauch and as equal to time. Elapsed time must be correlated Bar-Yam (2004) applied diversi/ cation models simi- with feature diversity (Crozier 1997). However, we lar to Nee and May’s to make a very different claim: know of no good quantitative test of the strength the distribution of genetic redundancy (for them, of this correlation, partly because the very notion within species) is highly skewed, such that some of feature diversity is vague. Williams and Gaston lineages (individuals) would be genetically much (1994) argue clearly that the correlation may be low, more distinct than others; that is, non-random loss and indeed there is no theoretical reason to expect of these lineages would have a large effect on total that morphological evolution should proceed at genetic diversity. This perspective of non-random a constant rate (this is the reason why molecu- loss is very important, and the question of the fail- lar clocks based on neutral genetic mutations are safe of phylogenetic redundancy becomes largely used instead of cumulative phenotypic character- empirical. Heard and Mooers (2000) documented state changes to estimate phylogenetic divergence that (1) although non-random loss alone may con- dates). So, for example, Amborella trichopoda seems tribute little to loss overall, (2) non-random loss to be the sister group to all other living 7 owering 114-Turvey-Chap14.indd4-Turvey-Chap14.indd 226464 112/5/20082/5/2008 112:31:032:31:03 PPMM THE LOSS OF FEATURE DIVERSITY 265 plants (Mathews and Donoghue 1999). As such it is recently published supertree for all mammals a monotypic lineage on a very long branch of the (Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007), to examine how tree of life. However, it is presented in textbooks as Holocene extinctions were distributed among classically ‘primitive’, representing a suite of ‘basal’ taxa. We begin by examining taxonomies, a classi- characters rather than a suite of novel ones: time / cation system based primarily on morphological seems to have stood still for this particular lineage. differences. Taxonomies may offer a crude com- The tuatara Sphenodon punctatus is another case. pound measure of feature diversity and time, in so Recent genetic studies (Hay et al. 2008) suggest that far as they can often be interpreted as re7 ections although morphologically unchanged since the of underlying phylogeny (especially following the Cretaceous, S. punctatus may in fact possess one of incorporation of cladistic methodology into tax- the fastest rates of molecular evolution for the mito- onomy from the mid twentieth century onwards). chondrial DNA control region ever observed, mak- New taxa are probably more likely to be recognized ing a strong case that although morphologically when groups of individuals or species are pheno- ‘primitive’ it might be inappropriate to label S. punc- typically distinct (Scotland and Sanderson 2003), tatus as primitive in a phylogenetic context. A. tri- and so a taxonomy must contain at least some chopoda and S. punctatus are only two examples of information about how feature diversity is shared many such small-taxon number lineages, and con- among its members. We recognize, however, that siderable quantitative work still needs to be done until we have a better concept of feature diversity, to de/ ne and understand the relationships between this argument is weak (e.g. A. trichopoda had already feature diversity and phylogenetic diversity. been assigned to its own order before phylogenetic Furthermore, it is important to bear in mind work was conducted, and it is ‘different’ because it that there are two different hypotheses to explain is primitive, not because it is derived).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond Endocasts: Using Predicted Brain-Structure Volumes of Extinct Birds to Assess Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Inferences
    diversity Article Beyond Endocasts: Using Predicted Brain-Structure Volumes of Extinct Birds to Assess Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Inferences 1, , 2 2 Catherine M. Early * y , Ryan C. Ridgely and Lawrence M. Witmer 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA; [email protected] (R.C.R.); [email protected] (L.M.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Current Address: Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. y Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 30 December 2019; Published: 17 January 2020 Abstract: The shape of the brain influences skull morphology in birds, and both traits are driven by phylogenetic and functional constraints. Studies on avian cranial and neuroanatomical evolution are strengthened by data on extinct birds, but complete, 3D-preserved vertebrate brains are not known from the fossil record, so brain endocasts often serve as proxies. Recent work on extant birds shows that the Wulst and optic lobe faithfully represent the size of their underlying brain structures, both of which are involved in avian visual pathways. The endocasts of seven extinct birds were generated from microCT scans of their skulls to add to an existing sample of endocasts of extant birds, and the surface areas of their Wulsts and optic lobes were measured. A phylogenetic prediction method based on Bayesian inference was used to calculate the volumes of the brain structures of these extinct birds based on the surface areas of their overlying endocast structures. This analysis resulted in hyperpallium volumes of five of these extinct birds and optic tectum volumes of all seven extinct birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Current Status of Rodents in the Galapagos
    April 1994 NOTICIAS DE GALÁPAGOS 2I DISTRIBUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF RODENTS IN THE GALÁPAGOS By: Gillian Key and Edgar Muñoz Heredia. INTRODUCTION (GPNS) and the Charles Darwin Resea¡ch Station (CDRS) in their continuing efforts to protecr the The uniqueness and scientific importance of the unique wildlife of the islands. Galápagos Islands has longbeenrecognized, although the c¡eation of the National Park in 1959 came after ENDEMIC RODENTS several centuries of sporadic use and colonization by man. Undoubtedly, the lack of water in the islands Seven species of endemicricerats a¡eknown from has been thei¡ savior by limiting the extent and dura- the Archipelago, of which the seventh was only rel- tion of many early attempts to colonize. Even so the atively recently discove¡ed from owl pellets on impact of man has been severe in the Archipelago, Fernandina island (Ilutterer & Hirsch 1979), Brosset and the biggest problems for conservation today are ( 1 963 ) and Niethammer ( 1 9 64) have summarized the the introduced species of plants and animals. These available information on the six species known at introduced species are frequently pests to the human that time, including last sightings and probable dates inhabitants as well as to the native flora and fauna, to ofextinction. Galápagosricerats belongto twoclosely the former by damaging crops and goods, and to the related generaof oryzomys rodents and were distrib- latter by competition, predation and transmission of uted among the six islands (Table 1). disease. Patton and Hafner (1983) concluded that rats of The feral mammals in particular constitute a ma- the genus Nesoryzomys arrived in the Archipelago jorproblem, principally due to their size and numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Bird Bones Redate Human Activity in Madagascar by 6,000 Years 12 September 2018
    Ancient bird bones redate human activity in Madagascar by 6,000 years 12 September 2018 first arrived in Madagascar 2,400-4,000 years ago. However, the new study provides evidence of human presence on Madagascar as far back as 10,500 years ago—making these modified elephant bird bones the earliest known evidence of humans on the island. Lead author Dr. James Hansford from ZSL's Institute of Zoology said: "We already know that Madagascar's megafauna—elephant birds, hippos, giant tortoises and giant lemurs—became extinct less than 1,000 years ago. There are a number of theories about why this occurred, but the extent of human involvement hasn't been clear. Disarticulation marks on the base of the tarsometatarsus. These cut marks were made when removing the toes from the foot. Credit: ZSL Analysis of bones, from what was once the world's largest bird, has revealed that humans arrived on the tropical island of Madagascar more than 6,000 years earlier than previously thought—according to a study published today, 12 September 2018, in the journal Science Advances. A team of scientists led by international conservation charity ZSL (Zoological Society of London) discovered that ancient bones from the This chop mark would have been made with a large extinct Madagascan elephant birds (Aepyornis and sharp tool. The clear straight line of the cut with no Mullerornis) show cut marks and depression continued cracks indicate the mark was made on fresh fractures consistent with hunting and butchery by bone and chopped into different cuts of meat. Credit: ZSL prehistoric humans.
    [Show full text]
  • EDGE of EXISTENCE 1Prioritising the Weird and Wonderful 3Making an Impact in the Field 2Empowering New Conservation Leaders A
    EDGE OF EXISTENCE CALEB ON THE TRAIL OF THE TOGO SLIPPERY FROG Prioritising the Empowering new 10 weird and wonderful conservation leaders 1 2 From the very beginning, EDGE of Once you have identified the animals most in Existence was a unique idea. It is the need of action, you need to find the right people only conservation programme in the to protect them. Developing conservationists’ world to focus on animals that are both abilities in the countries where EDGE species YEARS Evolutionarily Distinct (ED) and Globally exist is the most effective and sustainable way to Endangered (GE). Highly ED species ensure the long-term survival of these species. have few or no close relatives on the tree From tracking wildlife populations to measuring of life; they represent millions of years the impact of a social media awareness ON THE of unique evolutionary history. Their campaign, the skill set of today’s conservation GE status tells us how threatened they champions is wide-ranging. Every year, around As ZSL’s EDGE of Existence conservation programme reaches are. ZSL conservationists use a scientific 10 early-career conservationists are awarded its first decade of protecting the planet’s most Evolutionarily framework to identify the animals that one of ZSL’s two-year EDGE Fellowships. With Making an impact are both highly distinct and threatened. mentorship from ZSL experts, and a grant to set in the field Distinct and Globally Endangered animals, we celebrate 10 The resulting EDGE species are unique up their own project on an EDGE species, each 3 highlights from its extraordinary work animals on the verge of extinction – the Fellow gains a rigorous scientific grounding Over the past decade, nearly 70 truly weird and wonderful.
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL200 Strategy 2018
    A world where wildlife thrives CONTENTS Introduction from Director General Dominic Jermey 3 4 Getting set for the next century Our purpose and vision 5 ZSL 200: our strategy – 6 a world where wildlife thrives Wildlife and People 8 10 Wildlife Health Wildlife Back from the Brink 12 16 Implementing our strategy Our Zoos: inspiring visitors through fun and wonder 18 Science for conservation campus: 21 informing future generations of conservation scientists Conservation: empowering communities and influencing policy 22 People, values and culture: 24 fit for the future Engaging and partnering with our conservation family 26 27 How we’ll know we’ve got there? 2 ZSL 200 I came to the Zoological Society of London to make a difference. I joined an extraordinary organisation at a defining moment in its nearly 200 year history. After enabling millions of people to experience wildlife through its Zoos, after multiple scientific discoveries and conservation successes, ZSL is positioned to set out an agenda for positive impact on wildlife throughout the 21st century. This is a period of enormous strain on wildlife. ZSL’s Living Planet Index has charted the devastating decline in biodiversity across many species in the last half century. That is why a bold, ambitious strategy for the Society is right. A strategy which sets out the difference we will make to the world of wildlife over decades to come. A strategy which builds on our people, our expertise and our partnerships, all of which have helped us inspire, inform and empower so many people to stop wild animals going extinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Murid Rodents of Timor Part I: New Material of Coryphomys Buehleri Schaub, 1937, and Description of a Second Species of the Genus
    QUATERNARY MURID RODENTS OF TIMOR PART I: NEW MATERIAL OF CORYPHOMYS BUEHLERI SCHAUB, 1937, AND DESCRIPTION OF A SECOND SPECIES OF THE GENUS K. P. APLIN Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO Division of Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra and Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy) American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) K. M. HELGEN Department of Vertebrate Zoology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington and Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy) American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 341, 80 pp., 21 figures, 4 tables Issued July 21, 2010 Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2010 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................... 3 Introduction . ...................................................... 3 The environmental context ........................................... 5 Materialsandmethods.............................................. 7 Systematics....................................................... 11 Coryphomys Schaub, 1937 ........................................... 11 Coryphomys buehleri Schaub, 1937 . ................................... 12 Extended description of Coryphomys buehleri............................ 12 Coryphomys musseri, sp.nov.......................................... 25 Description.................................................... 26 Coryphomys, sp.indet.............................................. 34 Discussion . ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Cumulative Impacts on Biotic Diversity of Wetland Vertebrates
    The Nature of Cumulative Impacts on Biotic Diversity of Wetland Vertebrates I.ARRu D. HARRIS about--makes using food chain support as a variable for Department of Wildlife and Range Sciences predicting environmental impacts very questionable. School of Forest Resources and Conservation Historical instances illustrate the effects of the accumula- University of Florida tion of impacts on vertebrates. At present it is nearly impos- Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA sible to predict the result of three or more different kinds of perturbations, although long-range effects can be observed. One case in point is waterfowl; while their ingestion of lead ABSTRACT/There is no longer any doubt that cumulative shot, harvesting by hunters during migration, and loss of impacts have important effects on wetland vertebrates. Inter- habitat have caused waterfowl populations to decline, the actions of species diversity and community structure produce proportional responsibility of these factors has not been de- a complex pattern in which environmental impacts can play termined. a highly significant role. Various examples show how wet- Further examples show muttiplicative effects of similar ac- lands maintain the biotic diversity within and among verte- tions, effects with long time lags, diffuse processes in the brate populations, and some of the ways that environmental landscape that may have concentrated effects on a compo- perturbations can interact to reduce this diversity. nent subsystem, and a variety of other interactions of in- The trophic and habitat pyramids are useful organizing creasing complexity. Not only is more information needed at concepts. Habitat fragmentation can have severe effects at all levels; impacts must be assessed on a landscape or re- all levels, reducing the usable range of the larger habitat gional scale to produce informed management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics of the Native Rodents of the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador
    Population Genetics of the Native Rodents of the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University By Sarah Johnson Master of Science Stephen F. Austin State University, 2005 Bachelor of Science Texas A&M University, 2003 Director: Dr. Cody W. Edwards, Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Science and Public Policy Summer Semester 2009 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2009 Sarah Johnson All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my parents (Michael and Kay Johnson) and my sisters (Kris and Faith) for their unwavering support throughout my academic career. This dissertation is lovingly dedicated to my parents. I would like to thank my Aggie Family (Brad and Kristin Atchison, Reece and Erin Flood, Samir Moussa, Doug Fuentes, and the rest of the IV Horsemen). They have always lovingly provided a shoulder to lean on and kind ear willing to listen. I would like to thank my fellow graduate students at GMU (Jeff Streicher, Mike Jarcho, Kat Bryant, Tammy Henry, Geoff Cook, Ryan Peters, Kristin Wolf, Trishna Dutta, Sandeep Sharma, and Jolanda Luksenburg) for their help in the field, lab, classroom, and all aspects of student life. I am eternally indebted to Dr. Pat Gillevet and Masi Sikaroodi for their invaluable assistance in the lab, and to Dr. Jesús Maldonado for his assistance in writing the dissertation. They are infinite sources of help and support for which I am forever grateful. The project would not have been possible without Dr. Cody W. Edwards and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Scanned Documents
    / Chapter 2 THE FOSSIL RECORD OF BIRDS Storrs L. Olson Department of Vertebrate Zoology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC. I. Introduction 80 II. Archaeopteryx 85 III. Early Cretaceous Birds 87 IV. Hesperornithiformes 89 V. Ichthyornithiformes 91 VI. Other Mesozojc Birds 92 VII. Paleognathous Birds 96 A. The Problem of the Origins of Paleognathous Birds 96 B. The Fossil Record of Paleognathous Birds 104 VIII. The "Basal" Land Bird Assemblage 107 A. Opisthocomidae 109 B. Musophagidae 109 C. Cuculidae HO D. Falconidae HI E. Sagittariidae 112 F. Accipitridae 112 G. Pandionidae 114 H. Galliformes 114 1. Family Incertae Sedis Turnicidae 119 J. Columbiformes 119 K. Psittaciforines 120 L. Family Incertae Sedis Zygodactylidae 121 IX. The "Higher" Land Bird Assemblage 122 A. Coliiformes 124 B. Coraciiformes (Including Trogonidae and Galbulae) 124 C. Strigiformes 129 D. Caprimulgiformes 132 E. Apodiformes 134 F. Family Incertae Sedis Trochilidae 135 G. Order Incertae Sedis Bucerotiformes (Including Upupae) 136 H. Piciformes 138 I. Passeriformes 139 X. The Water Bird Assemblage 141 A. Gruiformes 142 B. Family Incertae Sedis Ardeidae 165 79 Avian Biology, Vol. Vlll ISBN 0-12-249408-3 80 STORES L. OLSON C. Family Incertae Sedis Podicipedidae 168 D. Charadriiformes 169 E. Anseriformes 186 F. Ciconiiformes 188 G. Pelecaniformes 192 H. Procellariiformes 208 I. Gaviiformes 212 J. Sphenisciformes 217 XI. Conclusion 217 References 218 I. Introduction Avian paleontology has long been a poor stepsister to its mammalian counterpart, a fact that may be attributed in some measure to an insufRcien- cy of qualified workers and to the absence in birds of heterodont teeth, on which the greater proportion of the fossil record of mammals is founded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biogeography of Large Islands, Or How Does the Size of the Ecological Theater Affect the Evolutionary Play
    The biogeography of large islands, or how does the size of the ecological theater affect the evolutionary play Egbert Giles Leigh, Annette Hladik, Claude Marcel Hladik, Alison Jolly To cite this version: Egbert Giles Leigh, Annette Hladik, Claude Marcel Hladik, Alison Jolly. The biogeography of large islands, or how does the size of the ecological theater affect the evolutionary play. Revue d’Ecologie, Terre et Vie, Société nationale de protection de la nature, 2007, 62, pp.105-168. hal-00283373 HAL Id: hal-00283373 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00283373 Submitted on 14 Dec 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE BIOGEOGRAPHY OF LARGE ISLANDS, OR HOW DOES THE SIZE OF THE ECOLOGICAL THEATER AFFECT THE EVOLUTIONARY PLAY? Egbert Giles LEIGH, Jr.1, Annette HLADIK2, Claude Marcel HLADIK2 & Alison JOLLY3 RÉSUMÉ. — La biogéographie des grandes îles, ou comment la taille de la scène écologique infl uence- t-elle le jeu de l’évolution ? — Nous présentons une approche comparative des particularités de l’évolution dans des milieux insulaires de différentes surfaces, allant de la taille de l’île de La Réunion à celle de l’Amé- rique du Sud au Pliocène.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Survivors: Current Status and Conservation of the Non-Volant Land
    1 The Last Survivors: current status and conservation of the non-volant land 2 mammals of the insular Caribbean 3 4 SAMUEL T. TURVEY,* ROSALIND J. KENNERLEY, JOSE M. NUÑEZ-MIÑO, AND RICHARD P. 5 YOUNG 6 7 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4RY (STT) 8 Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Les Augrès Manor, Trinity, Jersey JE3 5BP, Channel 9 Islands (RJK, JNM, RPY) 10 11 *Correspondent: [email protected] 12 13 Running header: Status of Caribbean land mammals 14 1 15 The insular Caribbean is among the few oceanic-type island systems colonized by non-volant 16 land mammals. This region also has experienced the world’s highest levels of historical 17 mammal extinctions, with at least 29 species lost since AD 1500. Representatives of only 2 18 land-mammal families (Capromyidae and Solenodontidae) now survive, in Cuba, Hispaniola, 19 Jamaica, and the Bahama Archipelago. The conservation status of Caribbean land mammals 20 is surprisingly poorly understood. The most recent IUCN Red List assessment, from 2008, 21 recognized 15 endemic species, of which 13 were assessed as threatened. We reassessed all 22 available baseline data on the current status of the Caribbean land-mammal fauna within the 23 framework of the IUCN Red List, to determine specific conservation requirements for 24 Caribbean land-mammal species using an evidence-based approach. We recognize only 13 25 surviving species, 1 of which is not formally described and cannot be assessed using IUCN 26 criteria; 3 further species previously considered valid are interpreted as junior synonyms or 27 subspecies.
    [Show full text]