DOCSLIB.ORG

NFI Woodland Ecological Condition Scoring Methodology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NFI Woodland Ecological Condition Scoring Methodology NFI woodland ecological condition in Great Britain: Methodology National Forest Inventory Issued by: National Forest Inventory, Forestry Commission, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh, EH12 7AT Date: February 2020 Enquiries: Ben Ditchburn, 0300 067 5561 [email protected] Statistician: David Ross [email protected] Website: www.forestresearch.gov.uk/inventory www.forestresearch.gov.uk/forecast NFI woodland ecological condition methodology Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 The NFI .......................................................................................................... 6 Why report on woodland ecological condition? ...................................................... 7 Development of the NFI condition monitoring approach .......................................... 9 Assessing broad and priority woodland habitat condition ...................................... 9 NFI WEC indicator selection .......................................................................... 10 Classifying and scoring woodlands ................................................................. 14 A straightforward, transparent and evidence-informed approach ......................... 15 Methodology .................................................................................................... 16 Categorising woodland area for reporting ........................................................... 16 Defining the native woodland population: identifying woodland type .................... 17 Classifying woodland habitat types ................................................................. 20 NFI survey square data structure ..................................................................... 20 Quality assurance ........................................................................................ 22 Extrapolating NFI field survey statistics to a reporting area ................................ 23 The NFI Condition Calculator ........................................................................... 23 Individual indicator assessment details ................................................................ 24 Population-level indicator methods: woodland area and loss ................................. 24 Stand-level indicators ..................................................................................... 25 1. Age distribution of trees .......................................................................... 26 Background ................................................................................................ 26 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 26 Classification .............................................................................................. 27 2. Wild, domestic and feral herbivore damage ................................................ 27 Background ................................................................................................ 27 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 28 Classification .............................................................................................. 31 3. Invasive plant species ............................................................................ 32 Background ................................................................................................ 32 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 33 Classification .............................................................................................. 33 2 NFI woodland ecological condition methodology 4. Number of native tree and shrub species ................................................... 34 Background ................................................................................................ 34 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 34 Classification .............................................................................................. 35 5. Occupancy of native species .................................................................... 35 Background ................................................................................................ 35 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 36 Classification .............................................................................................. 36 6. Open Space within woodland ................................................................... 36 Background ................................................................................................ 36 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 37 Classification .............................................................................................. 39 7. Proportion of favourable land cover around woodland .................................. 41 Background ................................................................................................ 41 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 41 Classification .............................................................................................. 42 8. Woodland regeneration ........................................................................... 43 Background ................................................................................................ 43 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 43 Classification (component group- and square-level) .......................................... 44 9. Tree health ........................................................................................... 46 Background ................................................................................................ 46 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 46 Classification .............................................................................................. 49 10. Vegetation and ground flora .................................................................... 49 Background ................................................................................................ 49 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 50 Classification .............................................................................................. 51 11. Vertical structure ................................................................................... 53 Background ................................................................................................ 53 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 53 Classification .............................................................................................. 53 3 NFI woodland ecological condition methodology 12. Veteran trees ........................................................................................ 54 Background ................................................................................................ 54 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 54 Classification .............................................................................................. 54 13. Volume of deadwood .............................................................................. 55 Background ................................................................................................ 55 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 55 Classification .............................................................................................. 56 14. Size of woodland ................................................................................... 57 Background ................................................................................................ 57 Data and method used for indicator measurement ............................................ 58 Classification .............................................................................................. 59 15. Overall stand-level condition score ........................................................... 59 Background ................................................................................................ 59 Method used for assessment ......................................................................... 60 Classification .............................................................................................. 60 Applying the NFI WEC scores to decision making .............................................. 61 Future work ..................................................................................................... 62 References ...................................................................................................... 64 Appendices ...................................................................................................... 76 Glossary ....................................................................................................... 107 NFI national reports ........................................................................................ 114 4 Introduction The National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carbon Sequestration in Managed Temperate Coniferous Forests Under Climate Change
    Biogeosciences, 13, 1933–1947, 2016 www.biogeosciences.net/13/1933/2016/ doi:10.5194/bg-13-1933-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Carbon sequestration in managed temperate coniferous forests under climate change Caren C. Dymond1, Sarah Beukema2, Craig R. Nitschke3, K. David Coates1, and Robert M. Scheller4 1Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, Canada 2ESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, Canada 3School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Australia 4Department of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State University, Portland, USA Correspondence to: Caren C. Dymond ([email protected]) Received: 16 November 2015 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 21 December 2015 Revised: 11 March 2016 – Accepted: 16 March 2016 – Published: 30 March 2016 Abstract. Management of temperate forests has the poten- 1 Introduction tial to increase carbon sinks and mitigate climate change. However, those opportunities may be confounded by nega- tive climate change impacts. We therefore need a better un- As a global society, we depend on forests and land to take −1 derstanding of climate change alterations to temperate for- up about 2.5 C 1.3 PgC yr , about one-third of our fossil est carbon dynamics before developing mitigation strategies. emissions (Ciais et al., 2013). A reduction in the size of The purpose of this project was to investigate the interac- these sinks could accelerate global change by further increas- tions of species composition, fire, management, and climate ing the accumulation rate of greenhouse gases in the atmo- change in the Copper–Pine Creek valley, a temperate conifer- sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrubl Maritime Juniper Woodland/Shrubland
    Maritime Juniper Woodland/ShrublWoodland/Shrublandand State Rank: S1 – Critically Imperiled The Maritime Juniper Woodland/ substrate stability; even Shrubland is a predominantly evergreen in stable situations community within the coastal salt spray community edges may zone; The trees tend to be short (less not be clear. Different than 15 feet) and scattered, with the types of communities tops sculpted by winds and salt spray; grade into and interdigitate with each forests, in areas of continuous changes of other. Very small patches levels of salt spray and substrate types. of any type within The dominant species is eastern red cedar another community (also called juniper), though the should be considered to Maritime Juniper Woodland/Shrubland above a abundance of red cedar is highly variable. be part of the variation of salt marsh. Photo: Patricia Swain, NHESP. It grows in association with scattered trees the main community. Description: Maritime Juniper and shrubs typical of the surrounding Maritime Pitch Pine Woodland/Shrublands occur on and vegetation such as pitch pine, various Woodlands on Dunes are between sand dunes, on the upper edges oaks, black cherry, red maple, blueberries, dominated by pitch pine. Maritime provide habitat for shrubland nesting birds of salt marshes and on cliffs and rocky huckleberries, sumac, and very often, Shrubland communities are dominated by and are important as feeding and resting/ headlands: all areas receiving salt spray poison ivy. Green briar can be abundant in a dense mixture of primarily deciduous roosting areas for migrating birds. from high winds. The maritime juniper more established woodlands, particularly shrubs, but may include red cedar.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd revised edition, January 2009 Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Report prepared by: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Network World Resources Institute (WRI) Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy (IFP) University of Freiburg Freiburg University Press 2nd revised edition, January 2009 The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world's foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation since 1989, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. Its core business is managing data about ecosystems and biodiversity, interpreting and analysing that data to provide assessments and policy analysis, and making the results
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart, Trees & Shrubs
    Excerpted from ©2001 by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. May not be copied or reused without express written permission of the publisher. click here to BUY THIS BOOK INTRODUCTION HOW THE BOOK IS ORGANIZED Conifers and broadleaved trees and shrubs are treated separately in this book. Each group has its own set of keys to genera and species, as well as plant descriptions. Plant descriptions are or- ganized alphabetically by genus and then by species. In a few cases, we have included separate subspecies or varieties. Gen- era in which we include more than one species have short generic descriptions and species keys. Detailed species descrip- tions follow the generic descriptions. A species description in- cludes growth habit, distinctive characteristics, habitat, range (including a map), and remarks. Most species descriptions have an illustration showing leaves and either cones, flowers, or fruits. Illustrations were drawn from fresh specimens with the intent of showing diagnostic characteristics. Plant rarity is based on rankings derived from the California Native Plant Society and federal and state lists (Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Two lists are presented in the appendixes. The first is a list of species grouped by distinctive morphological features. The second is a checklist of trees and shrubs indexed alphabetically by family, genus, species, and common name. CLASSIFICATION To classify is a natural human trait. It is our nature to place ob- jects into similar groups and to place those groups into a hier- 1 TABLE 1 CLASSIFICATION HIERARCHY OF A CONIFER AND A BROADLEAVED TREE Taxonomic rank Conifer Broadleaved tree Kingdom Plantae Plantae Division Pinophyta Magnoliophyta Class Pinopsida Magnoliopsida Order Pinales Sapindales Family Pinaceae Aceraceae Genus Abies Acer Species epithet magnifica glabrum Variety shastensis torreyi Common name Shasta red fir mountain maple archy.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Composition in Aspen Woodlands Under Various Modeled Fire Regimes Eva K
    Proceedings of the First Landscape State-and-Transition Simulation Modeling Conference, June 14–16, 2011 Landscape Composition in Aspen Woodlands Under Various Modeled Fire Regimes Eva K. Strand, Stephen C. Bunting, and Lee A. Vierling Authors woodlands according to historic fire occurrence probabili- Eva K. Strand, National Interagency, Fuels, Fire, and ties, are predicted to prevent conifer dominance and loss of Vegetation Technology Transfer Team, [email protected]. aspen stands. Stephen C. Bunting, [email protected] and Lee A. Keywords: Aspen, Populus tremuloides, VDDT, Vierling, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sci- TELSA, succession, disturbance, fire regime ences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA, leev@ Introduction uidaho.edu. Region-wide decline of quaking aspen has caused con- Abstract cerns that human alteration of vegetation successional and Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) is declining across disturbance dynamics jeopardize the long-term persistence the western United States. Aspen habitats are diverse plant of these woodlands. (Bartos 2001, Kay 1997, Shepperd et communities in this region and loss of these habitats can al. 2001, Smith and Smith 2005). Aspen are an important cause shifts in biodiversity, productivity, and hydrology component that provides ecosystem diversity in the conifer across spatial scales. Western aspen occurs on the majority dominated western mountains. Aspen ecosystems provide of sites seral to conifer species, and long-term maintenance a disproportionately diverse array of habitats for flora and of these aspen woodlands requires periodic fire. We use fauna for its relatively small area on the landscape (Bartos field data, remotely sensed data, and fire atlas information 2001, Jones 1993, Kay 1997, Winternitz 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary and Acronyms Glossary Glossary
    Glossary andChapter Acronyms 1 ©Kevin Fleming ©Kevin Horseshoe crab eggs Glossary and Acronyms Glossary Glossary 40% Migratory Bird “If a refuge, or portion thereof, has been designated, acquired, reserved, or set Hunting Rule: apart as an inviolate sanctuary, we may only allow hunting of migratory game birds on no more than 40 percent of that refuge, or portion, at any one time unless we find that taking of any such species in more than 40 percent of such area would be beneficial to the species (16 U.S.C. 668dd(d)(1)(A), National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act; 16 U.S.C. 703-712, Migratory Bird Treaty Act; and 16 U.S.C. 715a-715r, Migratory Bird Conservation Act). Abiotic: Not biotic; often referring to the nonliving components of the ecosystem such as water, rocks, and mineral soil. Access: Reasonable availability of and opportunity to participate in quality wildlife- dependent recreation. Accessibility: The state or quality of being easily approached or entered, particularly as it relates to complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Accessible facilities: Structures accessible for most people with disabilities without assistance; facilities that meet Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards; Americans with Disabilities Act-accessible. [E.g., parking lots, trails, pathways, ramps, picnic and camping areas, restrooms, boating facilities (docks, piers, gangways), fishing facilities, playgrounds, amphitheaters, exhibits, audiovisual programs, and wayside sites.] Acetylcholinesterase: An enzyme that breaks down the neurotransmitter acetycholine to choline and acetate. Acetylcholinesterase is secreted by nerve cells at synapses and by muscle cells at neuromuscular junctions. Organophosphorus insecticides act as anti- acetyl cholinesterases by inhibiting the action of cholinesterase thereby causing neurological damage in organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodlands Author: Kerry Dooley Historically the Primary Interest Area for National Inventories Was Timber
    Woodlands Author: Kerry Dooley Historically the primary interest area for national inventories was timber. Consequently, the national inventory framework and collection protocols were focused on productive timber- lands (USDA Forest Service 2005). Over time, information such as estimations of carbon sequestration, wildfire fuel loads, and nontimber forest products and services (e.g., biofuels and wildlife habitat) has become topics of increasing interest. The FIA program—the national inventory used in the United States—broadened the focus of its surveys to include non- timberland forests, including woodlands, better aligning with these changing focus areas. Woodlands generally occur in less productive growing condi- tions, such as the arid Southwestern United States. Woodlands provide much, if not all, of the same services provided by forests; that is, they function as important wildlife habitat, improve water quality, serve as carbon sinks (or sources, in the event of wildfires), and provide fuel during wildfire season. The species that comprise woodlands differ in characteristics from most trees. On average, woodland species tend to be slower growing, smaller in stature, and of a form with more forks and branches near the base of the tree. Woodland species often grow as clumps of stems rather than one central stem. Beyond the characteristics of the trees classified as woodland species, specific parameters pertain to classification of the land use category of woodlands, while the Resources Planning Act (RPA) derives calculations of woodland for this report from the FIA data, the FIA and RPA definitions of woodland differ somewhat, as outlined in the following paragraphs. Forest Inventory and Analysis Definitions and Parameters FIA defines woodlands strictly along the lines of species com- position and associated forest types, and considers woodlands a subset of forest lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Forest-Woodland-Savanna Mosaics in Uganda: with Implications for Conservation
    CHANGING FOREST-WOODLAND-SAVANNA MOSAICS IN UGANDA: WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION Grace Nangendo Promoters: Prof. Dr. F.J.J.M. Bongers Personal Professorship at Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands Prof. Dr. Ir. A. De Gier Professor, Geo-information for Forestry / Department of Natural Resources International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands Co-promoter: Dr. H. ter Steege Chair Plant Systematics (Ag.), Nationaal Herbarium Nederland - Utrecht Branch Utrecht University, The Netherlands Examining Committee: Dr. J. F. Duivenvoorden, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Prof. Dr. M. J. A. Werger, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Dr. J. R. W. Aluma, National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda Prof. Dr. M. S. M. Sosef, Wageningen University, The Netherlands CHANGING FOREST-WOODLAND-SAVANNA MOSAICS IN UGANDA: WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION Grace Nangendo Thesis To fulfil the requirements for the degree of Doctor on the authority of the Rector Magnificus of Wageningen University, Prof. Dr. Ir. L. Speelman, to be publicly defended on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 15:00 hrs in the auditorium at ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands. ISBN: 90-8504-200-3 ITC Dissertation Number: 123 International Institute for Geo-information Science & Earth Observation, Enschede, The Netherlands © 2005 Grace Nangendo CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Glossary of Common Forestry Terms
    W 428 A Glossary of Common Forestry Terms A Glossary of Common Forestry Terms David Mercker, Extension Forester University of Tennessee acre artificial regeneration A land area of 43,560 square feet. An acre can take any shape. If square in shape, it would measure Revegetating an area by planting seedlings or approximately 209 feet per side. broadcasting seeds rather than allowing for natural regeneration. advance reproduction aspect Young trees that are already established in the understory before a timber harvest. The compass direction that a forest slope faces. afforestation bareroot seedlings Establishing a new forest onto land that was formerly Small seedlings that are nursery grown and then lifted not forested; for instance, converting row crop land without having the soil attached. into a forest plantation. AGE CLASS (Cohort) The intervals into which the range of tree ages are grouped, originating from a natural event or human- induced activity. even-aged A stand in which little difference in age class exists among the majority of the trees, normally no more than 20 percent of the final rotation age. uneven-aged A stand with significant differences in tree age classes, usually three or more, and can be basal area (BA) either uniformly mixed or mixed in small groups. A measurement used to help estimate forest stocking. Basal area is the cross-sectional surface area (in two-aged square feet) of a standing tree’s bole measured at breast height (4.5 feet above ground). The basal area A stand having two distinct age classes, each of a tree 14 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) having originated from separate events is approximately 1 square foot, while an 8-inch DBH or disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Landscape and Vegetation Ecology for Alaska
    U. S. Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Technical Report to Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/TR-84/1 O December' 1984 reprinted October.·2001 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th Avenue, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Glossary of Landscape and Vegetation Ecology for Alaska Herman W. Gabriel and Stephen S. Talbot The Authors HERMAN w. GABRIEL is an ecologist with the USDI Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office in Anchorage, Alaskao He holds a B.S. degree from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and a Ph.D from the University of Montanao From 1956 to 1961 he was a forest inventory specialist with the USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Regiono In 1966-67 he served as an inventory expert with UN-FAO in Ecuador. Dra Gabriel moved to Alaska in 1971 where his interest in the description and classification of vegetation has continued. STEPHEN Sa TALBOT was, when work began on this glossary, an ecologist with the USDI Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office. He holds a B.A. degree from Bates College, an M.Ao from the University of Massachusetts, and a Ph.D from the University of Alberta. His experience with northern vegetation includes three years as a research scientist with the Canadian Forestry Service in the Northwest Territories before moving to Alaska in 1978 as a botanist with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. or. Talbot is now a general biologist with the USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Refuge Division, Anchorage, where he is conducting baseline studies of the vegetation of national wildlife refuges. ' . Glossary of Landscape and Vegetation Ecology for Alaska Herman W.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing and Restoring Woodland and Forest Communities
    CHAPTER 3 Managing and Restoring Woodland and Forest Communities Introduction...1 Forest or Woodland?...1 Trails and Canoeing/Boating Routes in the Laurentian Mixed CONTENTS Forest Region...2 Trails and Canoeing/Boating Routes in the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Region...3 Guiding Principle...6 Assessing Site-Specific Needs: Management or Restoration?...7 Conducting a Comprehensive Site Analysis...9 Focus on Management and Restoration...10 Conditions Encountered on Disturbed Sites...11 Restoration Considerations...11 Focus on Woodland/Forest Plantings...13 Identifying Distinct Community Requirements...13 Planting Strategies...14 Strategy 1: Final Spacing...14 Strategy 2: Dense Initial...14 Jack-in-the-pulpit Strategy 3: Sparse Initial...14 Strategy 4: Cover Crop...15 Strategy 5: Natural Invasion...15 A Method for Assessing Buckthorn Infestation Levels in Woodland/Forest Situations...16 (continued) Monitoring Management and Restoration Sites...17 Suppliers of Native Woody Plants...18 For Further Information...19 SIDEBAR Understanding Forest Succession as a Factor in Restoration and Management Decisions...8 FIGURES Figure 1: ECS province map...1 Figure 2: Minnesota state trails...4 Figure 3: Minnesota canoeing/boating routes...5 Wild sarsaparilla CHAPTER 3 Managing and Restoring Woodland and Forest Communities Introduction At the time of the Public Land Survey in Minnesota (1847-1907), the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province was primarily comprised of savannas, woodlands and deciduous forest. The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province covering the northern and eastern part of the state was primarily comprised of northern hardwood-coniferous forests and pine forests. (See Figure 1.) These are the natural communities we seek to preserve, manage and restore on state trails, canoeing and boating routes, and water access sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Midwestern Oak Woodlands and Savannas
    20 Restoration of Midwestern Oak Woodlands and Savannas Daniel C. Dey and John M. Kabrick CONTENTS 20.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 401 20.1.1 Savannas .................................................................................................................402 20.1.2 Woodlands ..............................................................................................................403 20.1.3 Important Drivers in Savannas and Woodlands ..............................................403 20.1.4 Historic and Modern Extent of Savannas and Woodlands .............................404 20.1.5 Importance of Savannas and Woodlands ..........................................................405 20.2 Restoration and Management of Savannas and Woodlands.......................................409 20.2.1 Site Assessment and Selection .............................................................................409 20.2.2 Defining Desired Future Conditions .................................................................. 410 20.2.3 Managing Stand Density ...................................................................................... 411 20.2.4 Managing Ground Flora ....................................................................................... 414 20.2.5 Invasive Species, Fire and Restoration ................................................................ 415 20.2.6 The Role of Grazing in Restoration ....................................................................
    [Show full text]