DOCSLIB.ORG

Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Representations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Representations Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Representations - by respondent Volume 11 of 11 Respondent number 7873 - 7910 7873 29912 7873 29912 7874 29914 7874 29914 7875 29915 7875 29915 7876 29916 7876 29916 7877 29917 7877 29917 7878 29919 7878 29919 7879 29921 7879 29921 7879 30000 7880 29925-29927 7780 29925 7880 29926 7880 29927 From John Gillespie 27 3 2016 Planning Policy Team, Notts County Council County Hall West Bridgford Nottingham NG2 7QP Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Submission Draft Representation Form Office use only Person No. 7881 Rep No. 29945-29946 Part A - Personal Details Personal details Agent details (where applicable) Title Mr - First Name John - Last name Gillespie - Address line 1 - Address line 2 - Address line 3 - Postcode - Email not available - Organisation not applicable - this is a personal response - Group not applicable - this is a personal response - Wishes for notification The submission of the Minerals Local Plan for independent examination yes please The publication of the recommendations of the inspector yes please The adoption of the Minerals Local Plan yes please I wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, if possible with other commitments. Signature Date 27 March 2016 Name John Gillespie 1 of 23 Office use only Person No. 7881 Rep No. 29945 Part B - Your representation 1. To which part of this document does this representation relate? Policy MP1 Site code - Map/Plan - Paragraph 4.10 - 4.14 Other 2. Do you consider the identified part of the document to be: Legally compliant? Yes No Sound? Yes No √ 3. Do you consider the identified part of the document to be unsound because it is not: (1) Positively √√ (2) Justified? √ (3) Effective ? √ (4) Consistent with prepared? national policy? 4. Please give details of why you consider the identified part of the document is not legally compliant or is unsound, having regard to the test(s)identified in question 3 (if applicable). 1. Paragraph 4.10 shows the annual aggregate production from 2002 to 2011. It is clear from this that the requirement for sand and gravel has decreased over the period in question. Of course, during this period there has been an economic downturn (in 2006 - 9) followed by a marked recovery, including an increase in house- building. Despite this, the actual production of sand and gravel has decreased over the whole period. 2. The production over years 2002 - 2004 averaged 3.22 m tonnes p.a. whereas the production over 2009 - 2011 averaged 1.51 m tonnes p. a. - only 46.9% as much. Even taking the first four years and comparing with the last four years the change is from an average of 3.19 to 1.73 - only 54.3% as much. 3. Furthermore there is no allowance made for the contribution from re-used aggregate, yet under MP5 (page 63) in the plan this re-use is clearly stated to take place, though no quantities or even estimate of quantities are given. Furthermore it is stated in para. 4.70 et seq. that government policy encourages this re-use to take place and that the Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Replacement Waste Plan has policies to promote “both temporary and permanent facilities for recycling aggregate centres” - para 4.71. It is quite possible, though not quantified anywhere in the report, that the increasing contribution from recycled aggregate is contributing to the significant reduction in demand for ‘new’ aggregate - of about 50% over the 20 year period as pointed out. 4. Overall therefore, bearing in mind that it is clearly of benefit to avoid overproduction from primary sites, in the interests of • conserving future supplies of finite sand and gravel resources, • reducing ecological damage to Nottinghamshire, • reducing the need for major traffic increases from specific sites - as recycled aggregate will be on balance produced from more, smaller sites operating over a few years at most, rather than over a 20 year period, it appears impossible to justify the figure in para. 4.10 of 2.58 m tonnes p.a., which represents approximately 50% more p.a. than the average production over the four years from 2008 - 2011. 5. In the adopted Nottinghamshire Waste Core Strategy (dated January 2015) it is stated that there are 1 million tonnes a year of construction and demolition waste available annually for recycling; this is forecast to rise to 2.75 million tonnes per annum for the years 2015 to 2030 - that is, over the majority of the duration for the Minerals Local Plan. In addition the Waste Core Strategy has a target of utilising 70% of construction and demolition waste through recycling, giving an annual target figure of utilising in excess of 1.9 million tonnes 2 of 23 per year. 6. Based on the figures quoted, and even without taking into account the significant and desired contribution from recycling, a more realistic though still generous estimate of demand for 2012 to 2030 would appear to be no more than 2 million tonnes per year with a total estimated demand of 38 million tonnes, a reduction of over 11 million tonnes over the 19 years. When the contribution from recycled aggregate is taken into account, this figure drops by a further 36.1 million tonnes. So, if even only 25% of such recycled waste is utilised, the total estimated demand drops by a further 9.025 million tonnes over the plan period to only 29 million tonnes. 7. We note that the total contribution of all the proposed new sites is as follows (para 4.47 et seq.): Barnby Moor MP2m - total less than 1 m tonnes Botany Bay MP2n - about 2.4 m tonnes Coddington MP2o - about 10 m tonnes Flash Farm MP2p - about 2.8 m tones Shelford MP2r - about 7 m tonnes giving a total from the five sites over the 19 years of 23.2 million tonnes - or about 1.22 m tonnes p.a. - nearly half of this from Coddington. 8. If the data in 7. is compared with the figures in para. 4.10, it can be seen that the realistic figure of 38 m tonnes could be met by contributions from no more than two of the proposed five sites (Coddington and Barnby or Coddington and Botany Bay for instance - to include sources from both the Trent and Idle valleys), obviating the need to use Shelford, Flash Farm and the remaining one of the two Idle valley source - Barnby or Botany Bay. If recycled aggregate is allowed to be included, four of the five new sites could be dropped. 9. In chapter 6. ‘Appraisal of Minerals Local Plan Sites’, a thorough appraisal of each potential site is laid out. In paragraphs 6.47 et seq., to summarise the factors contributing to the sites’ appraisals which have been quantified in the previous paragraphs, table 6.3 gives an overview of the site appraisal scores. In this table, scores for the sites above, with their river locations, are as follows: site code site name river location Overall site appraisal operational score PA01 Barnby Moor north Notts - Idle -13 PA06 Botany Bay north Notts - Idle -8 PA10 Coddington Newark - Trent -6 PA17 Flash Farm Newark - Trent -10 PA40/41 Shelford W and E South Notts - Trent combined -8 (-6 and -10) This table shows that the two high-scoring Trent valley sites - Flash Farm and Shelford East and West - do not need to be used at all in order to meet the more realistic output for the whole county, as outlined above in 5. As pointed out in para 8 above, if even 25% of recycled waste is utilised - a surely most attainable target - then the demand can be satisfied by Coddington alone, meaning that none of the four sites with more negative operational site appraisal scores - that is Barnby Moor, Botany Bay, Flash Farm and Shelford - need to be utilised. 3 of 23 Office use only Person No. 7881 29946 Rep No. 5. Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the identified part of the document legally compliant or sound, having regard to the test(s) identified in question 3 (if applicable). Please state why this change will make it legally compliant or sound and suggest revised wording of policy or text. Please be as precise as possible. 10 Para. 4.10 should be made consistent with the findings set out in my paras. 1 to 9 above so as to be sound. It should read: Based on the findings of the Local Aggregates Assessment published in July 2013 (December 2011 data) and taking into account the needs to • conserve future supplies of finite sand and gravel resources, • reduce ecological damage to Nottinghamshire, • reduce the need for major traffic increases from specific sites, the LAA Average Production figure and estimated total aggregate demand is as follows: LAA derived annual production Estimated demand 2012 - 2030 figure excluding contributions inclusive (19 years) from recycled waste Sand and gravel 1.55 29.0 Sherwood Sandstone 0.46 8.74 Limestone 0.08 1.52 The overall LAA derived annual production figure in million tonnes - including the contribution from recycled waste - is 2.025 million tonnes. 11 The necessary reduction in production could be achieved by the removal of Flash Farm (MP2p) and Shelford (MP2r) from the list of allocated sites. There are powerful reasons for removing MP2p from the list of sites in order that the allocation should comply with Policies DM1, DM2, DM5, DM6, DM7, DM8 and DM9. The reasons relating to DM1 are outlined in my paras. 12 to 15 below. 6. Have you raised this issue previously (during earlier stages of consultation)? Yes No √ If Yes, please give details Signature Date 27 March 2016 Name John Gillespie 4 of 23 Office use only Person No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cree Families of Newark on Trent
    The Cree Families of Newark on Trent by Mike Spathaky Cree Surname Research The Cree Families of Newark on Trent by Mike Spathaky Cree Booklets The Cree Family History Society (now Cree Surname Research) was founded in 1991 to encourage research into the history and world-wide distribution of the surname CREE and of families of that name, and to collect, conserve and make available the results of that research. The series Cree Booklets is intended to further those aims by providing a channel through which family histories and related material may be published which might otherwise not see the light of day. Cree Surname Research 36 Brocks Hill Drive Oadby, Leicester LE2 5RD England. Cree Surname Research CONTENTS Chart of the descendants of Joshua Cree and Sarah Hand Joshua Cree and Sarah Hand Crees at the Muskhams - Isaac Cree and Maria Sanders The plight of single parents - the families of Joseph and Sarah Cree The open fields First published in 1994-97 as a series of articles in Cree News by the Cree Family History Society. William Cree and Mary Scott This electronic edition revised and published in 2005 by More accidents - John Cree, Ellen and Thirza Maltsters and iron founders - Francis Cree and Mary King Cree Surname Research 36 Brocks Hill Drive Fanny Cree and the boatmen of Newark Oadby Leicester LE2 5RD England © Copyright Mike Spathaky 1994-97, 2005 All Rights Reserved Elizabeth CREE b Collingham, Notts Descendants of Joshua Cree and Sarah Hand bap 10 Mar 1850 S Muskham, Notts (three generations) = 1871 Southwell+, Notts Robert
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Monument Groupings
    CHAPTER V INTRODUCTION TO THE MONUMENT GROUPINGS The boundaries of individual volumes of the Corpus Nottinghamshire’s ‘main catalogue’ items, albeit in of Anglo-Saxon Stone Sculpture were not drawn to a far smaller data-base. Though they are not un- reflect groupings of monument types; still less were the common elsewhere in the country and the shafts here boundaries of historic English counties. One result of are likely to have required them, there are no single- this has been that — within eastern England anyway stone bases or socket stones identified as plausibly pre- — the groupings to which monuments reported in any Conquest in Nottinghamshire. There is only the very given volume belong sometimes fit within the volume’s impressive composite pyramidal base at Stapleford boundaries, but more often they extend outwards into — an outstanding monument in its own right — adjacent volumes. So it is with Nottinghamshire and which seems to be original to the shaft it still supports Nottinghamshire. With the exception of a tiny group and is associated with it by stone type and simple of local grave-markers, there is no monument type decoration (Stapleford 2, p. 195, Ills. 124, 141–4). whose distribution can be confined to the county. All but one of the Nottinghamshire shafts have lost Rather, the county is placed at the junction of several their cross-heads and strictly it is an assumption that monument groups. Again with the exception of that all were originally topped-off by crosses at all. There tiny group of local grave-markers, relatively little of the is, however, no example that positively suggests that a stone on which early sculpture of Nottinghamshire is decorated Nottinghamshire shaft was without a cross- cut was quarried within the county’s boundaries; most head — i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire Further electoral review December 2005 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 15 2 Current electoral arrangements 19 3 Submissions received 23 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 25 Electorate figures 26 Council size 26 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 28 a Clipstone, Edwinstowe and Ollerton wards 29 b Bilsthorpe, Blidworth, Farnsfield and Rainworth wards 30 c Boughton, Caunton and Sutton-on-Trent wards 32 d Collingham & Meering, Muskham and Winthorpe wards 32 e Newark-on-Trent (five wards) 33 f Southwell town (three wards) 35 g Balderton North, Balderton West and Farndon wards 36 h Lowdham and Trent wards 38 Conclusions 39 Parish electoral arrangements 39 5 What happens next? 43 6 Mapping 45 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 47 B Code of practice on written consultation 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Sculpture
    CHAPTER VI ARCHITECTURAL SCULPTURE We have seen in Chapter III above that there is no Viking date (Chapter IV, p. 41). As a fragment from a shortage of early church sites — both documented and monumental crucifixus, South Leverton 2 will have been presumed — in Nottinghamshire; but unfortunately part of a scene with approximately life-sized figures, not a single stone carrying architectural decoration and located either — like Bitton, Gloucestershire — sensu strictu has yet been recognised as belonging to over the chancel arch or — like that at Headbourne the pre-Viking period. No Nottinghamshire church, Worthy, Hampshire — over a west door (Bryant for example, retains evidence of external decorat- with Hare 2012, 147–50, ills. 67–84; Tweddle et al. ive panels to compare with those found in other 1995, 259–60, ills. 448–50). If the relevant church East Midland counties: at Edenham (Lincolnshire), was the fore-runner of the present All Saints at South Breedon-on-the-Hill (Leicestershire), Barnack (Soke Leverton, then the structural development of that of Peterborough) or Earls Barton (Northampton- fabric affords an explanation for the disturbance of shire).5 Such architectural decoration might have been the presumed rood sculpture: either from the external relatively rare in its time anyway, and Nottinghamshire west wall through the addition of a west tower in churches have been subject to much rebuilding, but the late twelfth or early thirteenth century, or by the its complete absence from the county remains dis- removal of the whole chancel-arch wall though the appointing. It is true that, when discovered in 1980, stylish addition of a grand new chancel of slightly later the impressive late eighth- or early ninth-century date (Pevsner and Williamson 1979, 315–16).
    [Show full text]
  • Diary Dates for May Wellow Maypole Day Monday 29Th May 12 Noon to 5
    Thank you to those who have Punch and Judy, fairground sent in their bluebell photos. organ, stationary engines and Pictures of bluebells always Ollerton Town Drum Corps! raise my spirits and these are Much of the hard work in no exception. We obviously terms of planning has been have some accomplished done, but as ever we appeal for photographers in the village. your help and support in Diary dates for May We’ve reproduced the photos several ways: so you can choose your Bric-a-brac / books / plants / 1st: May Day Auction, Jubilee favourite and let us know. They tombola prizes – the month of Hall are numbered 1 to 9. Please May in Wellow is a good time 2nd: Maypole Court Bring and select your favourite, complete for a turn out! Please search Buy Coffee Morning, 10.30am, the return slip under the your cupboards for good Maypole Court Community photos and return to Di at High quality bric-a-brac, books, Centre Lawn Cottage by 20th May, for jigsaws, toys, CDs, etc. and 4th: County Council Elections your choice to be included in items for the tombola. (Please 8th: Oil Cooperative, 7pm, the judging. If you prefer, you remember – no clothes or Memorial Hall can email your choice to electrical equipment.) All these 10th: Book Club, 7.30pm, High [email protected] by may be brought to the Lawn Cottage the same date. Memorial Hall on Tuesdays 11th: Red Lion Quiz Night, Don’t forget you can access the between 5.30 and 7pm. Plants 7.30pm newsletter on the village can be accepted over the 13th: Cemetery Tidy, 10am website (www.wellow.me).
    [Show full text]
  • The Farmstead, Maplebeck Road, Caunton
    PLANNING COMMITTEE - 6 MARCH 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 Application No: 17/01797/FUL (originally submitted as an outline application) Construction of 5 no. ecological low carbon bungalows, including new car Proposal: garage for existing dwelling, following demolition of existing farm buildings. Location: The Farmstead, Maplebeck Road, Caunton, Applicant: D & B Maskill 30 November 2017 Target Date: 25 January 2018 Registered: Extension of Time Agreed until 7 March 2018 This application is presented to the Planning Committee for determination as the officer recommendation differs from the views of Caunton Parish Council. The Site The application site lies to the north of Maplebeck Road within the parish of Caunton and comprises c0.74 hectares of land. The site is a former farmstead (called The Farmstead) and is occupied by a modern chalet bungalow (single storey but with rooms within its roof) its associated curtilage and former agricultural land. The dwelling itself is set back from the highway by c24m. To the north of the host dwelling and outside of its immediate garden curtilage there are a four former agricultural buildings; these are single storey and small scale in nature. The northern part of the site, which is not in residential curtilage, comprises mainly tall ruderal herbs and plantation woodland whilst to the site frontage (south) the land (excluding the residential curtilage) comprises amenity grassland with scattered trees. The topography of the site slopes gently down from Maplebeck Road to the north towards the ‘The Beck’ a local watercourse and the A616. The site frontage is formed by a managed native hedgerow c2m in height intersected by the existing vehicular access which comprises brick pillars with metaled gated.
    [Show full text]
  • KNEESALL. [Cook's
    KNEESALL. [Cook's N ewark, on the N ewark and Ollerton road. The living is a Vicarage in the gift of the Lord Chancellor, value £2 58. Population of Knee­ sail, 283. The Feast is held on the Sunday before September 5th. Letters arrive from Newark at 7.30 a.m.; despatched at 6.10 p.m. ; Oiler­ ton is the nearest Money Order and Telegraph Office. Adamson, J. J ., regis tar of births and Sampson, Mrs., farmer deaths Smalley, T., tailor, draper and shop- Bartle, G., cottager keeper Bates, A., bricklayer Smith, Mr., Lound farm Billyard, R., cottager Taylor, W. Carnell, W., cottager Taylor, F., farmer Chell, Rev. G. R., the Vicarage Ward, \V. T., Black Horse Inn Foster, W., shoemaker 'Voodcock, Mr., schoolmaster Gadsby, J., Kneesalllodge OMPTON. Gale, F., joiner and farmer Atkinson, w.• farmer Gibson, J., cottager Clipson, farmer Hall, Henry, brick and tile maker Corden, farmer Harrison, J., Buckshaw farm Rollins, H., farmer · Hayes, D., farmer Ward, H., cottager Heald, A., cottager \-Vatson, L., besom maker Howard, Mr., Park farm KERSALL. Hurst, H., farmer Bingham, farmer, the Lodge Hurt, W., postm;:tster, gardener and Bland, J ., cottager shopkeeper Ellis, J., cottager J ermyn, J. Martin, farmer Metham, W., miller Palin, S., farmer Newham, W., farmer Riley, T., cottager Padley, J., farmer Shephard, farmer · Pierrepoint, J., farmer Walker, Tom, cottager Pierrepoint, G., farmer Wombell, J., farmer Roose, J. W., farmer Wombell, W., cottager ANGFORD, Notts., is a Parish in the Newark Union; situate 3 miles North-east from Newark. The living is a Vicarage, with the Vicar­ age of Holme annexed, valued at £ 134 per annum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Haven Main Street, Kneesall, Newark, Nottinghamshire Offers Around £340,000
    The Haven Main Street, Kneesall, Newark, Nottinghamshire Offers Around £340,000 The Haven Main Street, Property Description Our View LOCATION and SPACE this property has it all, GREAT LOCATION AND COUNTRYSIDE VIEWS Kneesall, Newark, boasting TWO RECEPTION ROOMS, STUDY and TO THE REAR!!! Not to be missed a opportunity FOUR BEDROOMS it truly offers SPACIOUS to purchase this peacefully positioned property with Nottinghamshire ACCOMMODATION throughout. Externally is an views over surrounding open countryside. Offering great enclosed rear garden with OPEN VIEWS and DOUBLE versatility this family home will not be on the market for GARAGE. Viewing comes highly recommended to long. CALL NOW TO VIEW!!!! Offers Around £340,000 appreciate this truly exceptional property!!! For room dimensions please visit the property on your-move.co.uk. EPC grade E. Location Kneesall is a picturesque village with a restaurant/pub , an active community centre, a church, playgroup and a primary school.Supermarkets and a range of shops are to be found at Ollerton just 3 miles away. Kneesall is EPC Grade E also served by a main bus route and is 15 mins from the For full EPC please contact the branch historical town of Newark with regular train services to both Nottingham and London Kings Cross. IMPORTANT NOTE TO PURCHASERS: We endeavour to make our sales particulars accurate and reliable, however, they do not constitute or form part of an offer or any contract and none is to be relied upon as statements of representation or fact. The services, systems and appliances listed in this specification have not been tested by us and no guarantee as to their operating ability or efficiency is given.
    [Show full text]
  • English Hundred-Names
    l LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd 30. Nr 1. ,~ ,j .11 . i ~ .l i THE jl; ENGLISH HUNDRED-NAMES BY oL 0 f S. AND ER SON , LUND PHINTED BY HAKAN DHLSSON I 934 The English Hundred-Names xvn It does not fall within the scope of the present study to enter on the details of the theories advanced; there are points that are still controversial, and some aspects of the question may repay further study. It is hoped that the etymological investigation of the hundred-names undertaken in the following pages will, Introduction. when completed, furnish a starting-point for the discussion of some of the problems connected with the origin of the hundred. 1. Scope and Aim. Terminology Discussed. The following chapters will be devoted to the discussion of some The local divisions known as hundreds though now practi­ aspects of the system as actually in existence, which have some cally obsolete played an important part in judicial administration bearing on the questions discussed in the etymological part, and in the Middle Ages. The hundredal system as a wbole is first to some general remarks on hundred-names and the like as shown in detail in Domesday - with the exception of some embodied in the material now collected. counties and smaller areas -- but is known to have existed about THE HUNDRED. a hundred and fifty years earlier. The hundred is mentioned in the laws of Edmund (940-6),' but no earlier evidence for its The hundred, it is generally admitted, is in theory at least a existence has been found.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 AUGUST 2018 Application No: 18/00597/FULM Proposal
    PLANNING COMMITTEE – 7 AUGUST 2018 Application No: 18/00597/FULM Proposal: Proposed development of 12 affordable homes and 4 market bungalows (Re-submission of 16/01885/FULM) Location: Land at Main Street, North Muskham Applicant: Mrs M Wilson Registered: 5 April 2018 Target Date: 5 July 2018 Extension of time agreed in principle The application is being referred to Planning Committee for determination has been referred to Committee by the Business Manager for Growth and Regeneration due to the previous decision of the Planning Committee weighing in the planning balance to be applied in this instance. The Site The site comprises a rectangular shaped area of land of approximately 1.06 hectares which forms the north-east corner of a larger flat field currently used for arable farming. The site is bounded by Main Street to the east and its junction with Glebelands, to the north by a field access and beyond that The Old Hall and to the south and west by open arable fields. Beyond the arable field to the west is the A1. The Old Hall is Grade II listed building and to the north-east of the site is the Grade I listed parish landmark of St Wilfred’s Church. There are various historic buildings along Main Street, particularly close to the church, some of which are identified on the Nottinghamshire Historic Environment Record (HER) as Local Interest buildings. The majority of the built form of North Muskham is situated on the eastern side of Main Street, south of Nelson Lane. Whilst there is currently no defined village envelope for the village, the former 1999 Local Plan formerly identified this site as being outside the village envelope that was defined at that time, albeit could be considered to be adjacent to the boundary which ran down the eastern side of Main Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the North Muskham Parish Council Meeting Held on Monday
    DRAFT MINUTES SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION AT 10TH SEPTEMBER MEETING Minutes of the North Muskham Parish Council held on Tuesday, 31st July 2018 at 7pm in the Muskham Rural Community Centre Present: Councillor I Harrison, in the Chair Councillor E Catanach Councillor D Jones Councillor P Morris Councillor D Saxton Also in attendance: 9 members of the public NM29-19 Apologies for absence Received and accepted from Cllrs P Beddoe and S Dolby. NM30-19 Declarations of interest It was AGREED that any declarations of interest would be stated by Members as required during the meeting. NM31-19 Minutes The minutes of the meeting held on Monday, 9th July 2018 were accepted as a true and correct record and signed by the Chairman. NM32-19 Public 10 Minute Session The Chair suspended the meeting at 7.01pm to allow members of the public present to raise any questions. No matters were raised and the meeting was reconvened at 7.03pm. NM33-19 Planning (a) 18/00597/FULM – Land at Main Street, North Muskham - Proposed development of 12 affordable homes and 4 market bungalows (Re-submission of 16/01885/FULM) Members received and noted the decision notice granting planning permission for the proposed cart shed. The Chair outlined the background to the application being before Members again. It had been submitted in late 2016, revised in September 2017 and then resubmitted in April 2018. The description had changed to ’12 affordable homes and 4 market bungalows’ and there were minor alterations with plots 14, 15 and 16 moving approximately 1m further to the south with feature planting beds now sited in front of those units and an increase in the number of new trees planted along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Newark Primary Schools
    Newark Newark Primary Schools Newark - 2015 information school For Nottinghamshire community and voluntary controlled schools, the standard oversubscription criteria are detailed in the Admissions to schools: guide for parents. The application breakdown at the back of this document is based on information on national offer day 16 April 2014. For academy, foundation and voluntary aided schools which were oversubscribed in the intake year for 2014/2015 it is not possible to list the criterion under which each application was granted or refused as the criteria for each of these schools is different and is applied by the individual admission authority. For details of allocation of places, please contact the school for further information. - 2016 All school information is correct at the time of print (July 2014) but is subject to change. 1. All Saints Anglican/Methodist Primary School (5-11 voluntary aided school) Mrs Lisa Richmond 01636 525324 Top Street, Elston, Newark, Notts, NG23 5NP [email protected] www.elstonallsaints.notts.sch.uk DfE number 891 3539 Published admission number 15 Expected number on roll 103 Linked secondary school : Toothill School and The Newark Academy Summary of admission oversubscription criteria 2015/2016 1. Looked after children, or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, residence or special guardianship order. 2. Children living in the catchment area who, at the time of admission to school, have a sibling on roll. 3. Children living in the catchment area which consists of the parishes of Elston, East Stoke, Thorpe and Sibthorpe.
    [Show full text]