Page 01 May 12.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												
												Slice Proof Swing Tony Finau Take the Flagstick Out! Hot List Golf Balls
VOLUME 4 | ISSUE 1 MAY 2019 `150 THINK YOUNG | PLAY HARD PUBLISHED BY SLICE PROOF SWING TONY FINAU TAKE THE FLAGSTICK OUT! HOT LIST GOLF BALLS TIGER’S SPECIAL HERO TRIUMPH INDIAN GREATEST COMEBACK STORY OPEN Exclusive Official Media Partner RNI NO. HARENG/2016/66983 NO. RNI Cover.indd 1 4/23/2019 2:17:43 PM Roush AD.indd 5 4/23/2019 4:43:16 PM Mercedes DS.indd All Pages 4/23/2019 4:45:21 PM Mercedes DS.indd All Pages 4/23/2019 4:45:21 PM how to play. what to play. where to play. Contents 05/19 l ArgentinA l AustrAliA l Chile l ChinA l CzeCh republiC l FinlAnd l FrAnCe l hong Kong l IndIa l indonesiA l irelAnd l KoreA l MAlAysiA l MexiCo l Middle eAst l portugAl l russiA l south AFriCA l spAin l sweden l tAiwAn l thAilAnd l usA 30 46 India Digest Newsmakers 70 18 Ajeetesh Sandhu second in Bangladesh 20 Strong Show By Indians At Qatar Senior Open 50 Chinese Golf On The Rise And Yes Don’t Forget The 22 Celebration of Women’s Golf Day on June 4 Coconuts 54 Els names Choi, 24 Indian Juniors Bring Immelman, Weir as Laurels in Thailand captain’s assistants for 2019 Presidents Cup 26 Club Round-Up Updates from courses across India Features 28 Business Of Golf Industry Updates 56 Spieth’s Nip-Spinner How to get up and down the spicy way. 30 Tournament Report 82 Take the Flagstick Out! Hero Indian Open 2019 by jordan spieth Play Your Best We tested it: Here’s why putting with the pin in 60 Leadbetter’s Laser Irons 75 One Golfer, Three Drives hurts more than it helps. - 
												
												20. BMW International Open
BMW Golfsport bmw-golfsport.com Freude am Fahren Henrik Stenson, Sieger 2006 Niclas Fasth, Sieger 2007 John Daly, Sieger 2001 David Howell, Sieger 2005 Thomas Björn, Sieger 2000 / 2002 Miguel Angel Jiménez, Sieger 2004 Paul Azinger, Sieger 1990 / 1992 Colin Montgomerie, Sieger 1999 20. BMW International Open Media Information 20. BMW International Open Media Information 20. BMW International Open. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1. Das Turnier 2008 ............................................................................................................. 004 Der neue Turnierpräsident. Philipp von Sahr .......................................................................................................004 BMW International Open 2008. Das Turnier auf einen Blick. .........................................................................006 Die Spitzenspieler der 20. BMW International Open .......................................................................................007 Martin Kaymer: Nicht zu stoppen ..........................................................................................................................010 Auf neun Löchern mit den Allergrößten ...............................................................................................................013 Die Zwei wollen ganz nach oben ...........................................................................................................................014 „Der Herr der Halme.“ Ein Job zwischen Abenddämmerung und Morgenröte .......................................015 - 
												
												(20180321)CHAMPIONSHIP INFORMATION(2018).Hwp
The 37th GS Caltex Maekyung Open Golf Championship DATE : 3rd - 6th May, 2018 / VENUE : NAMSEOUL COUNTRY CLUB CHAMPIONSHIP INFORMATION (including CONDITIONS OF THE COMPETITION) 1. Eligibility Players in the following categories are eligible for The 37th GS Caltex Maekyung Open Golf Championship. 1) Any former Champions of the Tournament in the past 5 years 2) Leading 10 players from Official World Golf Ranking as at close of entries (capped at 250th position) 3) Any players from the Top 65th place from the KPGA Korean Tour exemption ranking as of 27 Mar 2018 4) Leading 50 players from AsianTour Categories 5) Winner of 2017 Golfzon Charity Korea Senior Open Golf Championship 6) The Lowest amateur players of 2017 Kolon Korea Open and GS Caltex Maekyung Open 7) Winner of 2017 Korea Amateur Golf Championship and Maekyung Sollago Cup 8) Winner of 2017 Korea Mid Amateur Golf Federation Ranking(as of 31 Dec 2017) 9) 2018 Korea National Team players 10) 10 Qualified players from The 37th GS Caltex Maekyung Open Golf Championship Qualifying 11) Any player who has won a KPGA Korean Tour Championship after the close of entry of The 37th GS Caltex Maekyung Open Golf Championship Qualifying 12) Tournament Invitations Note 1: The starting field will be 144 players. Residual positions will be allocated to players exempt from the KPGA Korean Tour exemption ranking. Note 2: Categories 6~9 are only applicable when the entrant concerned is still an amateur on 3 May 2018. 2. Schedules The championship shall be decided by strokes over four rounds of 18 holes stroke play. - 
												
												House of Commons
UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 140-xiii HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE SCOTTISH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE THE REFERENDUM ON SEPARATION FOR SCOTLAND WEDNESDAY 15 JANUARY 2014 PROFESSOR IAIN McLEAN, PROFESSOR ADAM TOMKINS and PROFESSOR KENNETH ARMSTRONG Evidence heard in Public Questions 4107 - 4258 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Scottish Affairs Committee on Wednesday 15 January 2014 Members present: Mr Ian Davidson (Chair) Mike Crockart Graeme Morrice Pamela Nash Sir James Paice Mr Alan Reid Lindsay Roy ________________ Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Professor Iain McLean, Professor of Politics, Official Fellow, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Professor Adam Tomkins, John Millar Chair of Public Law, University of Glasgow, and Professor Kenneth Armstrong, Professor of European Law, University of Cambridge, gave evidence. - 
												
												Current Ranking Projected 2017 Year End Ranking (Week 52) Firstname
Projected 2017 Year End Playing Current Ranking Ranking (Week 52) FirstName Surname Country Total Pts Events Avg Points (1) 1 Dustin Johnson USA 468.40505 45 10.4090 (2) 2 Jordan Spieth USA 441.97951 48 9.2079 (3) 3 Justin Thomas USA 434.75223 52 8.3606 (4) 4 Jon Rahm ESP 322.17032 40 8.0543 (5) 5 Hideki Matsuyama JPN 388.06439 49 7.9197 (6) 6 Justin Rose ENG 352.70545 45 7.8379 (7) 7 Rickie Fowler USA 326.16344 48 6.7951 (8) 8 Brooks Koepka USA 297.44344 47 6.3286 (9) 9 Henrik Stenson SWE 259.65729 44 5.9013 (11) 10 Sergio Garcia ESP 249.2501 44 5.6648 (10) 11 Rory McIlroy NIR 225.54165 40 5.6385 (13) 12 Marc Leishman AUS 266.04568 52 5.1163 (12) 13 Jason Day AUS 211.81394 42 5.0432 (14) 14 Paul Casey ENG 229.78666 47 4.8891 (15) 15 Matt Kuchar USA 246.38665 52 4.7382 (16) 16 Tyrrell Hatton ENG 231.54236 50 4.6308 (17) 17 Tommy Fleetwood ENG 236.73385 52 4.5526 (18) 18 Alex Noren SWE 207.0526 46 4.5011 (19) 19 Pat Perez USA 170.82268 40 4.2706 (20) 20 Rafael Cabrera Bello ESP 206.11968 52 3.9638 (21) 21 Francesco Molinari ITA 192.24007 50 3.8448 (23) 22 Charley Hoffman USA 196.78533 52 3.7843 (22) 23 Louis Oosthuizen RSA 164.89562 44 3.7476 (24) 24 Patrick Reed USA 192.10453 52 3.6943 (25) 25 Xander Schauffele USA 179.49093 52 3.4517 (26) 26 Kevin Kisner USA 174.01506 52 3.3464 (27) 27 Brian Harman USA 172.93339 52 3.3256 (28) 28 Daniel Berger USA 162.86991 51 3.1935 (29) 29 Matthew Fitzpatrick ENG 164.47612 52 3.1630 (30) 30 Branden Grace RSA 161.04258 52 3.0970 (31) 31 Adam Scott AUS 124.69842 42 2.9690 (33) 32 Ross Fisher ENG 141.70478 - 
												
												Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XX-2 | 2015 Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum
Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XX-2 | 2015 Le référendum sur l’indépendance écossaise du 18 septembre 2014 Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 La campagne du référendum écossais de 2014: la campagne officielle et la campagne de terrain Peter Lynch Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/405 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.405 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Peter Lynch, « Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XX-2 | 2015, Online since 23 July 2015, connection on 02 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/405 ; DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.405 This text was automatically generated on 2 May 2019. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum... 1 Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 La campagne du référendum écossais de 2014: la campagne officielle et la campagne de terrain Peter Lynch 1 The proposal to use the referendum device to achieve a mandate for Scottish independence had been the policy of the Scottish National Party since devolution was instituted in 1999. In office after 2007, the party had floated the idea of a two-step referendum on enhanced devolution and independence but its success at the 2011 Scottish election gave it the majority and the mandate required to press for a one- question referendum on independence. - 
												
												Official Media Guide
OFFICIAL MEDIA GUIDE OCTOBER 6-11, 2015 &$ " & "#"!" !"! %'"# Table of Contents The Presidents Cup Summary ................................................................. 2 Chris Kirk ...............................................................................52 Media Facts ..........................................................................................3-8 Matt Kuchar ..........................................................................53 Schedule of Events .............................................................................9-10 Phil Mickelson .......................................................................54 Acknowledgements ...............................................................................11 Patrick Reed ..........................................................................55 Glossary of Match-Play Terminology ..............................................12-13 Jordan Spieth ........................................................................56 1994 Teams and Results/Player Records........................................14-15 Jimmy Walker .......................................................................57 1996 Teams and Results/Player Records........................................16-17 Bubba Watson.......................................................................58 1998 Teams and Results/Player Records ......................................18-19 International Team Members ..................................................59-74 2000 Teams and Results/Player Records - 
												
												Referendum (Scotland) Bill Committee
REFERENDUM (SCOTLAND) BILL COMMITTEE Thursday 30 May 2013 Session 4 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Thursday 30 May 2013 CONTENTS Col. SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM BILL: STAGE 1 ................................................................................. 465 REFERENDUM (SCOTLAND) BILL COMMITTEE 15th Meeting 2013, Session 4 CONVENER *Bruce Crawford (Stirling) (SNP) DEPUTY CONVENER *James Kelly (Rutherglen) (Lab) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Annabelle Ewing (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP) Linda Fabiani (East Kilbride) (SNP) *Patricia Ferguson (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (Lab) *Rob Gibson (Caithness, Sutherland and Ross) (SNP) *Annabel Goldie (West Scotland) (Con) *Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) *Stewart Maxwell (West Scotland) (SNP) *Stuart McMillan (West Scotland) (SNP) *Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO PARTICIPATED: Colin Borland (Federation of Small Businesses) Dennis Canavan (Yes Scotland) John Downie (Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations) Craig Harrow (Better Together) Blair Jenkins (Yes Scotland) Bill Kidd (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP) (Committee Substitute) Blair McDougall (Better Together) Professor Aileen McHarg (University of Strathclyde) Euan Page (Equality and Human Rights Commission) Bill Scott (Inclusion Scotland) Kyle Thornton (Scottish Youth Parliament) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Andrew Mylne LOCATION Committee Room 1 465 30 MAY 2013 466 process. I hand over to Dennis Canavan for his Scottish Parliament remarks. Referendum (Scotland) Bill Dennis Canavan (Yes Scotland): Convener, thank you for inviting us. I chair the advisory board Committee of Yes Scotland, which consists of about a dozen members from various backgrounds such as Thursday 30 May 2013 politics, the business community, media and entertainment. - 
												
												Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women for Independence and Women Together
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Edinburgh University Press in Scottish Affairs. The Version of Record is available online at: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/scot.2018.0234. Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women For Independence and Women Together Craig McAngus1 and Kirstein Rummery Abstract The 2014 Scottish independence referendum campaign saw a surge of campaigning activity from groups on both sides of the debate. The mainstream elements of the campaign were criticised for not bringing enough attention to women’s issues, and so Women For Independence (WFI) and Women Together (WT) were created in order to try and alleviate these concerns. This paper aims to compare the two organisations to ascertain whether or not they can be classified as part of wider social movements. Utilising data from the Scottish Political Archive at the University of Stirling, as well as face-to-face interviews and email conversations with activists from both groups, this paper explores the organisational structures and framing strategies of the two groups, as well as the opportunities and constraints they faced when it came to achieving their goals. Whilst WFI can be classified as a Social Movement Organisation operating within both the pro-independence and women’s movements, WT cannot be classified in this way and simply existed as a useful campaigning label during the independence referendum. WFI still continues to exist as a healthy, autonomous entitythat, should a second independence referendum be called, will be in a strong position to campaign for the female vote and overturn the persistent gender gap that exists in support for Scottish independence. - 
												
												Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet
Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet To cite this version: Laura Meynet. Referendum on the Independence of Scotland: the Campaign (2012-2014). Education. 2018. hal-02353499 HAL Id: hal-02353499 https://hal-univ-fcomte.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02353499 Submitted on 7 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License _____________________________________ Mémoire présenté pour l’obtention du Grade de MASTER « Métiers de l’Enseignement, de l’Education et de la Formation » Mention 2nd degré, Professeur des Lycées et Collèges, Anglais Referendum on the Independence of Scotland : the Campaign (2012- 2014) présenté par MEYNET Laura Sous la direction de : Monsieur LAPLACE Philippe (UFR SLHS) Année universitaire 2017-2018 Remerciements Je tiens à remercier sincèrement les personnes qui m’ont aidée dans l’écriture de ce mémoire, d’une manière ou d’une autre. Je souhaite remercier en premier lieu mon directeur de recherche, Monsieur Philippe Laplace, pour le temps qu’il m’a consacré, ses conseils, sa patience et sa bienveillance, ainsi que pour les nombreux ouvrages qu’il m’a généreusement confiés pendant la rédaction de ce mémoire. - 
												
												Scottish Independence Referendum and the Deaf Community in Scotland
Scottish Independence Referendum and the Deaf Community in Scotland Contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1. About British Deaf Association 6 1.2. About Empowering local Deaf Commnunities Project 7 1.3. Finding from the report on Impact of Welfare Reform on the 8 Deaf Community in Scotland 1.4. Scottish Independence Referendum 10 2. Scottish Independence Debate 12 2.1. BDA Scotland event 12 2.2. Question Time event 13 2.3. Key questions and concerns raised by the Deaf community in the event 16 2.4. Feedback from the Deaf community 18 3. Conclusion 19 3 4 1. Introduction The purpose of this consultation was to inform the Deaf community in Scotland about the Scottish Independence Referendum in their preferred language, which is British Sign Language (BSL). Representatives from the Yes Scotland and Better Together campaigns met members of the Deaf community to inform and discuss the upcoming referendum. BDA Scotland believes that the voices and opinions of Deaf people living in Scotland need to be heard in the debate about Scotland’s future; Deaf people should have equal access to all information and discussions about the Scottish Independence Referendum. 5 1.1. About the British Deaf Association The British Deaf Association (BDA) is the largest Deaf organisation in the UK that is run by Deaf people and united by shared experiences, history and, most importantly, by BSL. Our vision is “Deaf people fully participating and contributing as equal and valued citizens in the wider society”. Our Mission is to ensure a world in which the language, culture, community, diversity and heritage of Deaf people in the UK is respected and fully protected, ensuring that Deaf people can participate and contribute as equal and valued citizens in the wider society. - 
												
												Beyond Smith
BEYOND SMITH: Contributions to the continuing process of Scottish devolution Future of the UK and Scotland, Centre on Constitutional Change, University of Edinburgh Submissionsto the Smith Commission Future of the UK and Scotland Programme Contents Centre on Constitutional Change, University of Edinburgh The Smith Commission: An Introduction 3 The report of the Smith Commission serves to shift the focus in Scotland away from what Key Themes 6 powers the country wants or needs to how those powers might work and how they will be used. Tax and Welfare Devolution: How Did We Get Here? 10 The contributions contained in this ebook present opportunities to reflect on the pressures that created the commission and where Scotland’s devolutionary will go from here. Published Debates on additional devolution: What is happening elsewhere? 13 immediately before the report of the Smith Commission, this book is intended as a contribution So How Much More Devolution Does Scotland Want? 16 to the wider public discussion which, its authors believe, will and should follow the Lord Smith’s recommendations. The Case for Scottish Borrowing 20 The papers are based on submissions to the Smith Commission but have been largely updated to The Potential Economic Impacts of “DevoSmith” Powers* 23 consider what will come next in the ongoing process of Scottish devolution. The submissions have Maximal Devolution 26 been contributed by friends and fellows of the ESRC Centre on Constitutional Change. The centre is part of the Future of the UK and Scotland programme funded by the Economic and Social Research Devolution and Welfare 30 Council to contribute to policy and public debate around the Scottish referendum and its aftermath.