DOCSLIB.ORG

Referendum Groups Answer Pp7-9 ANNUAL FAMILY COVER ANNUAL FAMILY WORLDWIDE for JUST £94* TRAVEL INSURANCE for JUST £94*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Referendum Groups Answer Pp7-9 ANNUAL FAMILY COVER ANNUAL FAMILY WORLDWIDE for JUST £94* TRAVEL INSURANCE for JUST £94* The Scottish Educational Journal May 2014 Vol. 98 www.eis.org.uk Issue no. 03 EIS raises education Road to questions - the campaign Referendum groups answer pp7-9 ANNUAL FAMILY COVER ANNUAL FAMILY WORLDWIDE FOR JUST £94* TRAVEL INSURANCE FOR JUST £94* l Comprehensive Worldwide Annual family policy l Natural disasters e.g. volcanic eruption, tsunami, hurricane, fire, flood, earthquake etc l full Winter sports Cover l increased protection when booking not made through a travel agent l Enhanced delay benefit l Enhanced missed departure cover * For members aged under 65. Premiums for members aged 65 to 69 years is £164 per year. ADD BOTH THEsE EssENTiAl COVERs fOR jusT £36 HOME EMERGENCY COVER MOTOR BREAKDOWN COVER fOR YOu & YOuR pARTNER l Main Heating system l plumbing & Drainage l Roadside Assistance and Recovery l Home security l Home Assist Download l Alternative Travel l Toilet unit application l Domestic power supply l Emergency Overnight Accommodation form here l lost Keys l lost Keys l Vermin infestation l Message service * Home Emergency and Motor Breakdown Cover are also available to existing EIS Travel Insurance customers. For an application or immediate cover call: 0845 230 1653 or visit www.philipwilliams.co.uk/eistravel Big Choices Ahead for Scotland In this edition of the SEJ, conditions of teachers, future pension arrangements, and how best to deliver Contents we look ahead to two an education system that meets the significant events that will needs of all learners across Scotland. 4. News have major implications The EIS Manifesto is being sent to all 6. Council News for Scottish education. Scottish MPs and MSPs, to Scottish 7. EIS Referendum Manifesto political parties, to both sides of the The first of these, chronologically, is the Referendum Campaign, and to local 8. Manifesto - Campaign Responses EIS Annual General Meeting which will be authorities and their representatives. held in June at Perth Concert Hall. The We are urging everyone involved in 10. Guide to EIS AGM EIS AGM is one of the most significant the debate to consider the questions events on the Scottish education 11. Well-Being Survey raised in the EIS Manifesto and to make calendar, and brings together teachers, clear their views on how education 12. What Time for Teaching? lecturers and associated professionals will flourish, post Referendum. from across the country to debate the key 14. A year with the President issues facing education and to help shape You can read more about the launch of 16. Book Festival EIS policy priorities for the year ahead. the EIS Manifesto on p7 of this SEJ and, This year, AGM debates will include issues on pp8-9, you can also hear from both 18. CPD Focus such as CfE, the new qualifications, sides of the Referendum Campaign – 19. Health and Safety workload, pay and conditions and Better Together and Yes Scotland – who pensions. You can find more information outline their initial responses to the 20. Scottish Learning Festival on this year’s AGM on p10 of this SEJ and issues raised in the Manifesto. If you on the EIS website – www.eis.org.uk would like to read the EIS Manifesto, 21. Countdown to Savings copies have been sent to EIS Reps in Unusually, this year, an even more 22. Education Summit all establishments and it can also be significant event for Scottish education viewed online at www.eis.org.uk 23. Rape Crisis Scotland is also on the horizon. On the 18th of September, EIS members and voters This is a huge year, not just for Scottish 24. EIS Contacts across the country will have their say education but for Scotland itself. The 25. Classifieds in the independence Referendum – a EIS is determined that education will vote that will determine not just the be a key issue for all during the run up 26. FELA Conference future path of Scotland’s education to the Referendum. While it is for each system, but also the future of both individual member to make up their 27. STUC Congress Scotland and the United Kingdom. own mind whether to vote Yes or No to 28. SEJ Forum / Sudoku independence, the EIS will continue to In last month’s SEJ, we highlighted that push for a better future for education, 31. Crossword the EIS was developing its own Education for pupils and students, teachers and Manifesto for the Referendum. This has lecturers in post Referendum Scotland. now been finalised and was launched in early May. The EIS Manifesto sets out our priorities for Scottish education in the future, no matter what the result of September’s Referendum. As a politically neutral organisation, with no affiliation to any political party, the EIS has adopted neither a Yes nor a No position in the main Referendum debate. However, we are raising key questions about the future of Scottish education, including Cover the funding of education, the pay and Feature Page 8 All articles and letters in the SEJ represent the views THE EDITOR: of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the EIS view or EIS policy. To be considered The SEJ Editor, 46 Moray Place, for publication, all letters and unsolicited articles Edinburgh, EH3 6BH must be accompanied by a full name and address. t: 0131 225 6244 The Editor’s decision on publication is final, and the Editor reserves the right to edit all submissions. E: [email protected] Cover image: www.mkjphotography.co.uk www.eis.org.uk 3 News... Court Reform Proposals value of cases to be raised in the Court of Session from £5,000 to £150,000. Where 2013/14 Pay Award The Court Reform (Scotland) Bill 2014 is claims are to be pursued in the specialist Have you retired or moved currently at Stage 1 of procedures, and Sheriff Court there will be no automatic includes proposals to restructure the way right to instruct Counsel. local authority since civil and summary criminal cases are Mr Flanagan said, “It is hard to see 1 April 2013? dealt with in Scotland. The EIS is eager to how the specialist Sheriffs will be able to see key amendments made to the draft deal with the volume of cases which will To ensure you receive any arrears of legislation before proceeding. be raised in the Sheriff Court if the level of pay you are advised to contact your ex- Unless the Scottish Government £150,000 is maintained. employer directly in writing. If you are agrees to amendments to the Bill in due “There is serious concern that in touch with any ex-colleagues please course, access to justice in Scotland will members’ claims will be significantly advise them of this. be severely limited with many delays prejudiced by delay and that expenses will and blockages in the proposed system increase if Proofs require to be discharged anticipated. due to the unavailability of one of the Funding Secured For Commenting, EIS General Secretary Sheriffs. New Masters Level Larry Flanagan said, “This Bill, when “The litigation process which is already taken in conjunction with Section 69 of lengthy will become an even longer, more Programme the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform convoluted process given the real prospect Act 2013, will reduce access to justice The EIS, in partnership with City & Guilds, of the Sheriff Court being unable to cope and could have a negative impact on the have successfully secured funding from with the volume of business, thus causing safety of our members.” the Scottish Government for the Masters more upset to members.” The Bill proposes to increase the in Education Programme. Later this year, up to 200 teachers will be able to take the online Masters Level Learning Programme Unit 1 (SCQF Level 11), fully funded, and City & Guilds is Low Teacher EIS-ULA Members vote to now inviting applications from qualified Scottish Teachers to register their interest. Unemployment Figures accept new pay offer This programme offers high quality The EIS welcomed figures from the professional learning opportunities to Scottish Government that indicate Scottish teachers enabling them to a declining number of unemployed develop their expertise, experience, teachers across Scotland. According to and therefore improve their classroom labour market statistics from the Office performance. for National Statistics (ONS), only 90 It is delivered via Learning Assistant qualified teachers in Scotland were and is available to teachers Scotland- looking for work in February 2014. wide. Each candidate will be allocated Members of the EIS-University Lecturers This represents the lowest number their own tutor who will offer support, Association (EIS-ULA) have overwhelmingly since the first collection of these figures advice and guidance throughout the backed a new pay offer from employers in in 2005. However, levels of teacher programme. their recent ballot. employment are still variable across 79% of those voting opted to back the the country, and the EIS continues For details on registration and criteria new 2% pay offer which comes after a joint to highlight the need for a minimum please email: trade-union industrial action campaign in staffing standard to ensure equity of the HE sector following years of real-terms [email protected] provision across the country. salary decline. Acceptance of the offer resolves the current dispute, and all planned industrial NUT Conference action (including industrial action short of strike action) has now been cancelled. General Secretary Larry Flanagan addressed The EIS-ULA Executive is clear that over 1200 delegates at this year’s National the programme of industrial action over Union of Teachers (NUT) conference. Larry the past year, together with the threat of highlighted the contrasting circumstances of further industrial action, led to a greater Scotland’s comprehensive education system pay offer than would otherwise have been founded on the employment of GTCS registered achieved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House of Commons
    UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 140-xiii HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE SCOTTISH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE THE REFERENDUM ON SEPARATION FOR SCOTLAND WEDNESDAY 15 JANUARY 2014 PROFESSOR IAIN McLEAN, PROFESSOR ADAM TOMKINS and PROFESSOR KENNETH ARMSTRONG Evidence heard in Public Questions 4107 - 4258 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Scottish Affairs Committee on Wednesday 15 January 2014 Members present: Mr Ian Davidson (Chair) Mike Crockart Graeme Morrice Pamela Nash Sir James Paice Mr Alan Reid Lindsay Roy ________________ Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Professor Iain McLean, Professor of Politics, Official Fellow, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Professor Adam Tomkins, John Millar Chair of Public Law, University of Glasgow, and Professor Kenneth Armstrong, Professor of European Law, University of Cambridge, gave evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XX-2 | 2015 Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XX-2 | 2015 Le référendum sur l’indépendance écossaise du 18 septembre 2014 Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 La campagne du référendum écossais de 2014: la campagne officielle et la campagne de terrain Peter Lynch Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/405 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.405 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Peter Lynch, « Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XX-2 | 2015, Online since 23 July 2015, connection on 02 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/405 ; DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.405 This text was automatically generated on 2 May 2019. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum... 1 Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 La campagne du référendum écossais de 2014: la campagne officielle et la campagne de terrain Peter Lynch 1 The proposal to use the referendum device to achieve a mandate for Scottish independence had been the policy of the Scottish National Party since devolution was instituted in 1999. In office after 2007, the party had floated the idea of a two-step referendum on enhanced devolution and independence but its success at the 2011 Scottish election gave it the majority and the mandate required to press for a one- question referendum on independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Referendum (Scotland) Bill Committee
    REFERENDUM (SCOTLAND) BILL COMMITTEE Thursday 30 May 2013 Session 4 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Thursday 30 May 2013 CONTENTS Col. SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM BILL: STAGE 1 ................................................................................. 465 REFERENDUM (SCOTLAND) BILL COMMITTEE 15th Meeting 2013, Session 4 CONVENER *Bruce Crawford (Stirling) (SNP) DEPUTY CONVENER *James Kelly (Rutherglen) (Lab) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Annabelle Ewing (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP) Linda Fabiani (East Kilbride) (SNP) *Patricia Ferguson (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (Lab) *Rob Gibson (Caithness, Sutherland and Ross) (SNP) *Annabel Goldie (West Scotland) (Con) *Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) *Stewart Maxwell (West Scotland) (SNP) *Stuart McMillan (West Scotland) (SNP) *Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO PARTICIPATED: Colin Borland (Federation of Small Businesses) Dennis Canavan (Yes Scotland) John Downie (Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations) Craig Harrow (Better Together) Blair Jenkins (Yes Scotland) Bill Kidd (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP) (Committee Substitute) Blair McDougall (Better Together) Professor Aileen McHarg (University of Strathclyde) Euan Page (Equality and Human Rights Commission) Bill Scott (Inclusion Scotland) Kyle Thornton (Scottish Youth Parliament) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Andrew Mylne LOCATION Committee Room 1 465 30 MAY 2013 466 process. I hand over to Dennis Canavan for his Scottish Parliament remarks. Referendum (Scotland) Bill Dennis Canavan (Yes Scotland): Convener, thank you for inviting us. I chair the advisory board Committee of Yes Scotland, which consists of about a dozen members from various backgrounds such as Thursday 30 May 2013 politics, the business community, media and entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women for Independence and Women Together
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Edinburgh University Press in Scottish Affairs. The Version of Record is available online at: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/scot.2018.0234. Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women For Independence and Women Together Craig McAngus1 and Kirstein Rummery Abstract The 2014 Scottish independence referendum campaign saw a surge of campaigning activity from groups on both sides of the debate. The mainstream elements of the campaign were criticised for not bringing enough attention to women’s issues, and so Women For Independence (WFI) and Women Together (WT) were created in order to try and alleviate these concerns. This paper aims to compare the two organisations to ascertain whether or not they can be classified as part of wider social movements. Utilising data from the Scottish Political Archive at the University of Stirling, as well as face-to-face interviews and email conversations with activists from both groups, this paper explores the organisational structures and framing strategies of the two groups, as well as the opportunities and constraints they faced when it came to achieving their goals. Whilst WFI can be classified as a Social Movement Organisation operating within both the pro-independence and women’s movements, WT cannot be classified in this way and simply existed as a useful campaigning label during the independence referendum. WFI still continues to exist as a healthy, autonomous entitythat, should a second independence referendum be called, will be in a strong position to campaign for the female vote and overturn the persistent gender gap that exists in support for Scottish independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet
    Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet To cite this version: Laura Meynet. Referendum on the Independence of Scotland: the Campaign (2012-2014). Education. 2018. hal-02353499 HAL Id: hal-02353499 https://hal-univ-fcomte.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02353499 Submitted on 7 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License _____________________________________ Mémoire présenté pour l’obtention du Grade de MASTER « Métiers de l’Enseignement, de l’Education et de la Formation » Mention 2nd degré, Professeur des Lycées et Collèges, Anglais Referendum on the Independence of Scotland : the Campaign (2012- 2014) présenté par MEYNET Laura Sous la direction de : Monsieur LAPLACE Philippe (UFR SLHS) Année universitaire 2017-2018 Remerciements Je tiens à remercier sincèrement les personnes qui m’ont aidée dans l’écriture de ce mémoire, d’une manière ou d’une autre. Je souhaite remercier en premier lieu mon directeur de recherche, Monsieur Philippe Laplace, pour le temps qu’il m’a consacré, ses conseils, sa patience et sa bienveillance, ainsi que pour les nombreux ouvrages qu’il m’a généreusement confiés pendant la rédaction de ce mémoire.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Independence Referendum and the Deaf Community in Scotland
    Scottish Independence Referendum and the Deaf Community in Scotland Contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1. About British Deaf Association 6 1.2. About Empowering local Deaf Commnunities Project 7 1.3. Finding from the report on Impact of Welfare Reform on the 8 Deaf Community in Scotland 1.4. Scottish Independence Referendum 10 2. Scottish Independence Debate 12 2.1. BDA Scotland event 12 2.2. Question Time event 13 2.3. Key questions and concerns raised by the Deaf community in the event 16 2.4. Feedback from the Deaf community 18 3. Conclusion 19 3 4 1. Introduction The purpose of this consultation was to inform the Deaf community in Scotland about the Scottish Independence Referendum in their preferred language, which is British Sign Language (BSL). Representatives from the Yes Scotland and Better Together campaigns met members of the Deaf community to inform and discuss the upcoming referendum. BDA Scotland believes that the voices and opinions of Deaf people living in Scotland need to be heard in the debate about Scotland’s future; Deaf people should have equal access to all information and discussions about the Scottish Independence Referendum. 5 1.1. About the British Deaf Association The British Deaf Association (BDA) is the largest Deaf organisation in the UK that is run by Deaf people and united by shared experiences, history and, most importantly, by BSL. Our vision is “Deaf people fully participating and contributing as equal and valued citizens in the wider society”. Our Mission is to ensure a world in which the language, culture, community, diversity and heritage of Deaf people in the UK is respected and fully protected, ensuring that Deaf people can participate and contribute as equal and valued citizens in the wider society.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Smith
    BEYOND SMITH: Contributions to the continuing process of Scottish devolution Future of the UK and Scotland, Centre on Constitutional Change, University of Edinburgh Submissionsto the Smith Commission Future of the UK and Scotland Programme Contents Centre on Constitutional Change, University of Edinburgh The Smith Commission: An Introduction 3 The report of the Smith Commission serves to shift the focus in Scotland away from what Key Themes 6 powers the country wants or needs to how those powers might work and how they will be used. Tax and Welfare Devolution: How Did We Get Here? 10 The contributions contained in this ebook present opportunities to reflect on the pressures that created the commission and where Scotland’s devolutionary will go from here. Published Debates on additional devolution: What is happening elsewhere? 13 immediately before the report of the Smith Commission, this book is intended as a contribution So How Much More Devolution Does Scotland Want? 16 to the wider public discussion which, its authors believe, will and should follow the Lord Smith’s recommendations. The Case for Scottish Borrowing 20 The papers are based on submissions to the Smith Commission but have been largely updated to The Potential Economic Impacts of “DevoSmith” Powers* 23 consider what will come next in the ongoing process of Scottish devolution. The submissions have Maximal Devolution 26 been contributed by friends and fellows of the ESRC Centre on Constitutional Change. The centre is part of the Future of the UK and Scotland programme funded by the Economic and Social Research Devolution and Welfare 30 Council to contribute to policy and public debate around the Scottish referendum and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland: an Example of Constitutionalism
    SCOTLAND: AN EXAMPLE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Michael P. Clancy* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................................................................. 101 II. Early Development .................................................................................. 101 III. Anglo-Norman Influences ....................................................................... 102 IV. The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries ............................................... 103 V. The Eighteenth Century ........................................................................... 104 VI. The Scottish Enlightenment..................................................................... 105 VII. The Nineteenth and Early-Twentieth Centuries ...................................... 106 VIII. Resurgent Nationalism ............................................................................ 107 IX. Devolution ............................................................................................... 108 X. There Shall Be a Scottish Parliament ...................................................... 108 XI. The Proposals for the Referendum on Scottish Independence ................ 110 XII. The Referendum Campaign ..................................................................... 112 XIII. Post-Referendum Projects ....................................................................... 114 XIV. Issues Regarding the Further Devolution Proposals Since the Referendum ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum on Scotland's Future Saturday 25Th January 2014
    The Referendum on Scotland’s Future Saturday 25th January 2014 Menzies Hotel, Glasgow “Women need to have their voices heard as part of the debate around Scotland’s future. They are the cornerstone of communities – both socially and economically. The campaigns need to engage with women and listen to their concerns and emerging issues. This event has ensured that those attending are able to raise and seek answers to the issues which are important to them.” Agnes Tolmie Chair, SWC www.scottishwomensconvention.org BACKGROUND TO THE EVENT On 18th September 2014, people across the country will take to the polls to vote on the question: “Should Scotland be an independent country?” Since the announcement of the referendum on Scotland’s future, the SWC has consulted with women from a range of diverse backgrounds and geographical locations to ascertain their views on this historic vote. Throughout 2012 the SWC held roadshows in Aberdeen, Anstruther, Dumfries, Glenrothes, Islay, Motherwell, Paisley, Peterhead and Stranraer. Discussions in these areas focussed on whether women felt they had enough information to make an informed decision and use their vote. Overall, there was seen to be a general lack of information regarding the 2014 referendum. More should have been made readily available for local people, i.e. having literature available from both campaigns at local community centres, schools, colleges, libraries etc. Having impartial information, without any party political bias, would also help women when it comes to making a decision regarding the referendum. During the 2013 roadshow programme, the SWC visited Kyle of Lochalsh, Breakish, Portree, Eyemouth, Haddington, Greenock and Livingston.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Allies and Tricky Freelancers: Understanding the Differences in the Role of Social Media in the Campaigns for the Scottish Independence Referendum
    Langer, A. I., Comerford, M. and McNulty, D. (2019) Online allies and tricky freelancers: understanding the differences in the role of social media in the campaigns for the Scottish Independence Referendum. Political Studies, (doi:10.1177/0032321718811252). This is the author’s final accepted version. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/171337/ Deposited on: 15 October 2018 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Political Studies Online allies and tricky freelancers: understanding the differences in the role of social media in the campaigns for the Scottish Independence Referendum Journal:For Political Peer Studies Review Manuscript ID POST-02-18-0068.R3 Manuscript Type: Article Keywords: electoral campaigns, social media, referenda, Scottish independence Using the 2014 Scottish independence referendum as a case study, this paper asks: firstly, to what extent is the use of digital communications technologies (DCTs), in particular social media, associated with fundamental changes to campaign organisations, specifically to the command and control model? Secondly, under what conditions are challenges to the model more likely to emerge? Using mixed methods, our analysis of the case demonstrates that radical organisational or strategic change is not inevitable, nor is there a one-size- Abstract: fits-all approach. Technologies are not ‘just tools’ that any campaign with enough resources will adopt in similar ways. Instead, depending on a number of interdependent factors (i.e. context, resources, strategy, organisational structure and culture), some campaigns—like Better Together—selectively adopt digital tools that fit with the command and control model; in other cases—like Yes Scotland—the application of DCTs and the dynamics created by linking to other (digital-enabled) grassroots organisations can have transformative effects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Independence Referendum and After
    THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM AND AFTER Michael Keating Professor of Politics at the University of Aberdeen, and director of the Centre on Constitutional Change SUMMARY: The Scottish Dilemma. – Constitutional Traditions in Scotland. – The Na- tionalists in Government. – The Battle Ground. – Economy and Finance. – Welfare. – Defence and Security. – Europe. – The Campaign. – The Outcome. – The Aftermath. – The Smith Report. – EVEL and Barnett. – The European Context. – The Future of the State. – Abstract – Resum – Resumen. The Scottish Dilemma The Scottish independence referendum on 18 September 2014 was a highly unusual event, an agreed popular vote on secession in an advanced industrial democracy. The result, with 45 per cent for in- dependence and 55 per cent against, might seem to have settled the question decisively. Yet, paradoxically, it is the losing side that has emerged in better shape and more optimistic, while the winners have been plunged into difficulties. In order to understand what has hap- pened, we need to examine the referendum in light of the evolution of the United Kingdom and the changing place of Scotland within it. Scotland should be seen as a case of the kind of spatial rescaling that is taking place more generally across Europe, as new forms of state- hood and of sovereignty evolve. Scottish public opinion favours more self-government but no longer recognizes the traditional nation-state model presented in the referendum question. Article received 12/12/2014; approved 12/12/2014. 73 REAF núm. 21, abril 2015, p. 73-98 Michael Keating Constitutional Traditions in Scotland Since the late nineteenth century union, there have been three main constitutional traditions in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Fear – No Campaign’S Unbelievable Scares
    Project Fear – No campaign’s unbelievable scares Last month the Sunday Herald revealed that some inside the “Better Together” campaign actually refer to themselves as “Project Fear”. It has been easy to see why they use such a name. Better Together’s chief tactic – to do everything they can to scare Scots into voting No – contrasts starkly with the positive vision for the future of our country presented by Yes Scotland. Although the No campaign protest accusations of scaremongering, the sheer weight of their wholly negative rhetoric weighs increasingly heavy. And yet, their scare stories are often baseless or easily undermined. The UK Government’s latest paper in the “Scotland Analysis” series, like those before it, has been thoroughly discredited. Whether the No campaign’s scaremongering has been undermined by their own words, their own actions or by the demonstrable reality of the situation, the wholly negative nature of their campaigning is becoming increasingly transparent. And not least because some of the stories they tell today are virtually identical to those which were peddled in the past, and which were proved entirely wrong. SCOTLAND’S FUTURE IN SCOTLAND’S HANDS Undermined by their own words 1. “Scotland Could Be Forced To Join The Euro” It has long been a common argument of the No campaign to suggest that an independent Scotland could be made to enter the Eurozone if it wanted to be part of the EU. Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont has claimed that Scotland “could be forced to join the Euro”1 if we vote to become an independent state.
    [Show full text]