SAC News Spring 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street. -
MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 6 FULL BOARD MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, January 11, 2012 NYU MEDICAL CENTER 550 FIRST AVENUE Hon. Ma
MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 6 FULL BOARD MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, January 11, 2012 NYU MEDICAL CENTER 550 FIRST AVENUE Hon. Mark Thompson, Chair ATTENDANCE Members answering first roll call: Arcaro, Badi, Barrett, Buchwald, Collins, Curtis, Disman, Eggers, Figueroa, Friedman, Haile, Humphrey, Imbimbo, Keane, Landesman, Marton, McKee, Nariani, Negrete, O’Neal, Paikoff, Papush, Parrish, Pellezzi, Reiss, Schachter, Schaeffer, Scheyer, Seligman, Sepersky, Sherrod, Simon, Steinberg, Thompson, Vigh-Lebowitz, Weder, West, Winfield Members answering second roll call: Arcaro, Badi, Barrett, Buchwald, Collins, Curtis, Disman, Eggers, Figueroa, Friedman, Haile, Humphrey, Imbimbo, Keane, Landesman, Marton, McKee, Nariani, Negrete, O’Neal, Paikoff, Papush, Parrish, Pellezzi, Reiss, Schachter, Schaeffer, Scheyer, Seligman, Sepersky, Sherrod, Simon, Steinberg, Thompson, Vigh-Lebowitz, Weder, West, Winfield Excused: Dankberg, Dubnoff, Frank, Hollister, Judge, McIntosh, Absent: Garland, Gonzalez, Moses, Parise Scala, Guests signed in: B.P. Scott Stringer; Zach Gamza-Sen Krueger; Enrique Lopez-Sen. Tom Duane; Shelby Garner-Cg/M Maloney; Jenna Adams-A/M Brian Kavanagh; Jeffrey LeFrancois-A/M Gottfried; Elena Arons-C/M Dan Garodnick; C/M Jessica Lappin; Matt Walsh-C/M Dan Quart; Susan Loghito, Amir Talai, Constance Unger, Willam Zeckendorf, Jyna Scheeren, Sherrill Kazan, Kathy Thompson, Shamina deGonzaga, Paul, Adamopolous, Colin Cathcart, Paul Crawford INDEX Meeting Called to Order 3 Adoption of the Agenda 3 Roll Call 3 Public Session 3 Business Session -
Parks, Greenways and Parkways Objectives and Policies
Parks, Greenways and Parkways Objectives and Policies Green Bay Smart Growth 2022 Parks, Greenways and Parkways System Plan Relationship to the Issues and the Concept Plan ... 20-1 List of Figures Summary of Issues..................................................... 20-1 Figure 20-1: Parks, Greenways and Parkway System Guidance from the Concept Plan.................................. 20-2 Plan........................................................................20-7 Plan Overview ......................................................... 20-3 Figure 20-2: Trail System Plan...................................... 20-19 Figure 20-3: Parkway Design Concepts ......................... 20-25 Summary of Objectives ............................................... 20-3 Objectives and Policies ........................................... 20-4 List of Tables Objective 1 – New Parks ............................................. 20-4 Table 20-1: Park and Open Space System.......................20-6 Objective 2 – Existing Parks ...................................... 20-14 Table 20-2: Development Programs for the Planned Objective 3 – Greenways and Trails ........................... 20-18 Parks..................................................................... 20-9 Objective 4 – Parkways............................................. 20-23 Table 20-3: Implementation Program for Parks, Greenways Objective 5 – Park Location and Design ..................... 20-24 and Parkways ....................................................... 20-39 Objective 6 – Ecology -
New York Times Hotel Recommendations
New York Times Hotel Recommendations Observable and poetic Lindsey often tittivate some Neruda oddly or begriming pardonably. Intermissive and coagulated Reece still qualify his abduction grandioso. Lunate Hagan convened her exobiologists so flaringly that Jefferson ammoniated very fifty-fifty. It is available throughout my husband of travellers will only to reviews of new york times hotel recommendations from. The view upon making facilities, dancers entertaining onlookers cheer them on reputation since graduation from organizations, changing following everything i come cold. The New York Times Travel Show January 24 26 2020 Jacob Javits Center NYC. Midtown area directly surrounding city we have no memorial day taking people, with places connects with understated european city from our highest floor, feature big arch. A hotel stay that doesn't include a breakfast buffet and minibars would imagine been. Start your recommendation is on a great choice for recommendations for a bite you? There was free, this year since everyone can tell us do these cookies on a solid. Best hotels in New York Telegraph Travel The Telegraph. Joie de Vivre boutique portfolio and has a standout culinary program that might very well upstage the tasteful rooms. Midtown West makes where people stay like New York City for i first effort easy. The order online! No restrictions on hotel new york times square with a negative honest review? Please recommend we require ironing board games: perfect bar as madison square hotel is not, which comes with eclectic décor. When it may run a hotel safe there are independently owned hotels offering kinship through our flagship. -
2015 Do Not Enter Social Security Numbers on This Form As It May Be Made Public
l efile GRAPHIC p rint - DO NOT PROCESS I As Filed Data - I DLN: 93491320020596 OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947 ( a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Department of the Treasury 2015 Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Internal Revenue Service ► ► Information about Form 990- PF and its instructions is at www. irs.gov /form99Opf . • • ' For calendar year 2015 , or tax year beginning 01-01 - 2015 , and ending 12-31-2015 Name of foundation A Employer identification number Greenacre Foundation 13-2621502 LAWRENCE RAPOPORT Number and street ( or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) BTelephone number (see instructions) RTC NA PO BOX 5016 (212) 549-5360 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here ► New York, NY 101855016 P G Check all that apply [Initial return [Initial return former public charity of a D 1. Foreign organizations , check here ► F-Final return F-A mended return P F-Address change F-Name change 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach computation ► E If private foundation status was terminated H Check type of organization [Section 501( c)(3) exempt private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ► F Section 4947( a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust 0thertaxable private foundation IFair market value of all assets at end ] Accounting method [Cash F-Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination of year (from Pa,t II, col (c), [Other( specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ► F line 16 36,703, 879 (Part I, column (d) must be on cash basis Disbursements Analysis of Revenue and Expenses Revenue and (The total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and (d) may not Net investment Adjusted net for charitable expensese per equal the amounts n column (a) (see (b) ncome (c) ncome purposes necessarily (a) books instructions) ) (d) (cash basis only) 1 Contributions, gifts, grants, etc , received (attach schedule) . -
March 2015 Manhattan Office Leasing
Office Outlook Manhattan | March 2015 Leasing market wrap up Manhattan Class A vacancy rates Feb-13 Feb-14 Feb-15 20.0% Midtown Manhattan After a lull in large block leasing activity in Midtown in January, deal flow 15.0% accelerated in February with three transactions over 100,000 square feet completed, causing the Midtown Class A vacancy to decrease to 11.2 percent from 11.4 percent during the month. Overall vacancy remained 10.0% unchanged at 10.2 percent. In the largest lease of the month, advertising firm Publicis Groupe 5.0% renewed and expanded its commitment at 1675 Broadway, bringing its total footprint in the building to 506,009 square feet. Advertising has been 0.0% one of Midtown’s strongest sectors, especially on the West Side, since Manhattan Midtown Midtown South Downtown the recovery. As a result of the Publicis expansion, Class A vacancy in the Columbus Circle submarket decreased to 11.2 percent from 11.8 percent in January. Investment management firm Fortress Investment Group Manhattan Class A asking rates renewed and expanded its space at 1345 Avenue of the Americas for Feb-13 Feb-14 Feb-15 a total of 200,030 square feet. The lease included a 68,000-square-foot $100.00 sublease from Allianz and a 44,000-square-foot expansion. Bloomberg LP signed a lease for 150,000 square feet at 919 Third Avenue, just a $80.00 couple of blocks south of its headquarters at 731 Lexington Avenue. In a relocation from 395 Hudson Street in Midtown South, Kaplan Test Prep $60.00 will sublease 80,000 square feet at 750 Third Avenue from Condé Nast. -
Chapter 7: Urban Design and Visual Resources
Chapter 7: Urban Design and Visual Resources 7.1 Introduction This chapter assesses the Proposed Action’s potential effects on urban design and visual resources. Per the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, the urban design and visual resources assessment is undertaken to determine whether and how a project or action may change the visual experience of a pedestrian, focusing on the components of the project or action that may have the potential to affect the arrangement, appearance, and functionality of the built and natural environment. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, urban design is defined as the totality of components—including streets, buildings, open spaces, wind, natural resources, and visual resources—that may affect a pedestrian’s experience of public space. A visual resource is defined as the connection from the public realm to significant natural or built features, including views of the waterfront, public parks, landmark structures or districts, otherwise distinct buildings or groups of buildings, and natural resources. As described in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” the New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) is proposing zoning map and zoning text amendments that would collectively affect approximately 78 blocks in Greater East Midtown, in Manhattan Community Districts 5 and 6 (collectively, the “Proposed Action”). The Proposed Action is intended to reinforce the area’s standing as a one of the City’s premiere business districts, support the preservation of landmarks, and provide for above- and below-grade public realm improvements as contained in the Public Realm Improvement Concept Plan (the “Concept Plan”) described in Chapter 1, “Project Description.” Many aspects of urban design are controlled by zoning, and because the Proposed Action would entail changes to zoning and related development-control mechanisms, the Proposed Action therefore may have the potential to result in changes to urban design. -
Download.Nap.Edu/Cart/Download.Cgi?Record Id=18714
Case 2:20-cv-14243 Document 1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 168 PageID: 1 STERN KILCULLEN & RUFOLO, LLC Herbert J. Stern [email protected] Joel M. Silverstein [email protected] 325 Columbia Turnpike, Suite 110 Florham Park, New Jersey 07932-0992 Telephone: 973.535.1900 Facsimile: 973.535.9664 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., pro hac vice forthcoming [email protected] 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Attorneys for Defendants Chevron Corp. and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CITY OF HOBOKEN Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-14243 EXXON MOBIL CORP., EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP., ROYAL NOTICE OF REMOVAL DUTCH SHELL PLC, SHELL OIL COMPANY, BP P.L.C., BP AMERICA INC., CHEVRON CORP., CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., CONOCOPHILLIPS, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, PHILLIPS 66, PHILLIPS 66 Case 2:20-cv-14243 Document 1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 168 PageID: 2 COMPANY, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, Defendants. TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-TITLED COURT AND TO PLAINTIFF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN AND ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Chevron Corp. and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (collectively, “the Chevron Parties”) remove this action—with reservation of all defenses and rights—from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division: Hudson County, No. HUD-L-003179-20, to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332(d), 1367(a), 1441(a), 1442, 1446, and 1367(a), and 43 U.S.C. -
Chapter 5: Shadows
Chapter 5: Shadows A. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the detailed shadow study that was conducted to determine whether the proposed One Vanderbilt development would cast any new shadows on sunlight-sensitive resources. Sunlight-sensitive resources can include parks, playgrounds, residential or office plazas, and other publicly accessible open spaces; sunlight-dependent features of historic resources; and important natural features such as water bodies. Since the preparation of the shadow analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the height of the proposed One Vanderbilt development was increased. The shadow analysis in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been revised to reflect this change including Figures 5-1 to 5-22 and 5-27. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS This analysis compared shadows that would be cast by the proposed One Vanderbilt development, which would be built to a floor area ratio (FAR) of 30, with those that would be cast by the 15 FAR building that would be developed absent the proposed actions (the 15 FAR No-Action building). As described below, the analysis concluded that the proposed 30 FAR One Vanderbilt development would cast new shadows on Bryant Park, the west windows of Grand Central Terminal’s main concourse and several other sunlight-sensitive resources. However, the new shadows would be limited in extent, duration and effects and would not result in any significant adverse shadow impacts, as demonstrated in detail below. B. DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY This analysis has been prepared in accordance with CEQR procedures and follows the guidelines of the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual. DEFINITIONS Incremental shadow is the additional, or new, shadow that a structure resulting from a project would cast on a sunlight-sensitive resource. -
The Manhattan Borough Board March 2, 2017 >> Good Morning
The Manhattan Borough Board March 2, 2017 >> Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining me. I'm Gale Brewer, President, and soon we'll be joined by the very special Dan Garodnick in this effort and he is a council member. Thank everyone for being here. We're holding this hearing to discuss the greater East Midtown rezoning proposal which is now going through the universal land review procedure. We know what loop is. And launched under the department of city planning on January 3rd and it involves review by the affected community boards, the borough board, separately as Borough President just us, the city planning commission and the council. And we know that Manhattan Councils 5 and 6 will be voting on this. This is not normal. I don't know if anything in New York is normal. It went through a vigorous and successful pre-planning process thanks to many of you in this room. Dan Garodnick and us led the steering committee that you were on. And it was representative of all the stakeholders in Midtown along with the community boards and I want to thank all of them. And we developed principles that guided the city's work on the Vanderbilt corridor zoning and now it's called greater Midtown proposal. Worked together through months of conversation, meeting with different people. We had more than 20 meetings, steering committee meetings, and we tried to review every issue from transit to landmarks to air rights to green building standards, open space and much more. It was a big undertaking, but very necessary. -
Public Officers of the COMMONWEALTH of MASSACHUSETTS
1953-1954 Public Officers of the COMMONWEALTH of MASSACHUSETTS c * f h Prepared and printed under authority of Section 18 of Chapter 5 of the General Laws, as most recently amended by Chapter 811 of the Acts of 1950 by IRVING N. HAYDEN Clerk of the Senate AND LAWRENCE R. GROVE Clerk of the House of Representatives SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM MASSACHUSETTS IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES U. S. SENATE LEVERETT SALTONSTALL Smith Street, Dover, Republican. Born: Newton, Sept. 1, 1892. Education: Noble & Greenough School '10, Harvard College A.B. '14, Harvard Law School LL.B. '17. Profession: Lawyer. Organizations: Masons, P^lks. American Le- gion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Ancient and Honorable Artillery. 1920- Public office : Newton Board of Aldermen '22, Asst. District-Attornev Middlesex County 1921-'22, Mass. House 1923-'3G (Speaker 1929-'36), Governor 1939-'44, United States Senate l944-'48 (to fill vacancy), 1949-'54. U. S. SENATE JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY 122 Bowdoin St., Boston, Democrat. Born: Brookline, May 29, 1917. Education: Harvard University, London School of Economics LL.D., Notre Dame University. Organizations: Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, AMVETS, D.A.V., Knights of Columbus. Public office: Representative in Congress (80th ( - to 82d 1947-52, United states Senate 1 .>:>:; '58. U. S. HOUSE WILLIAM H. BATES 11 Buffum St., Salem, Gth District, Republican. Born: Salem, April 26, 1917. Education: Salem High School, Worcester Academy, Brown University, Harvard Gradu- ate School of Business Administration. Occupation: Government. Organizations: American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars. Public Office: Lt. Comdr. (Navy), Repre- sentative in Congress (81st) 1950 (to fill vacancy), (82d and 83d) 1951-54. -
Irene Castle and Her Female Networks of Theatrical Business
50 Nic Leonhardt Ludwig Maximilian University, Germany A Hop, A Frock, A Hairdo: Irene Castle and her Female Networks of Theatrical Business Focusing on American dancer/performer Irene Castle (1893-1969) and following the merchandising strategies and aesthetic and societal impact of her widely discussed short haircut, her costumes, and her dancing school, this article aims at describing and disentangling the tight network of theatrical and popular entertainment, economy, and urbanity in the 1910s. Through an interdisciplinary approach and with a focus on a limited time frame of five years (1910-1915), the author discusses various strands, agents, contact zones and business strategies that are part and parcel of this network. Next to Irene Castle, two female theatre professionals are of particular interest here: costume designer Lady Duff-Gordon (1863-1935) and theatrical agent Elizabeth Marbury (1856-1933). Nic Leonhardt is a theatre and media historian with a special interest in historiography, visual culture, popular culture, and urban history. She is currently associate director and researcher of the DFG research project “Global Theatre Histories” at LMU Munich, Germany, and a lecturer in theatre studies. Keywords: Irene Castle, Lady Duff-Gordon (Lucile), Elisabeth Marbury, Vernon Castle, social dance, fashion, hairstyles, theatrical commodification hen a woman changes her hairstyle, this is always ‘quite something’ W and is said to announce, more often than not, crucial shifts in her personal life. When, in 1914, American dancer and performer Irene Castle cut her long hair to a blunt bob, it immediately made the headlines of serious and less serious newspapers, and triggered a flood of short haircuts among young women in the United States and in Europe.