Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices 14779

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices 14779 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices 14779 Interested persons may obtain a copy of Tula, S.A. de C.V., Col Juarez, DF, Division), Pleasanton, CA; Videotron the EA from SEA by writing to it at Mexico; Cable TV, Inc., Hazleton, PA; Ltee, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Western (Room 3219, Interstate Commerce Cablevision Industries Corp., Liberty, Co-Axial Ltd., Hamilton, ON, Canada; Commission, Washington, DC 20423) or NY; Cablevision Systems Corporation, WinDBreak Cable, Gering, NE; World by calling Elaine Kaiser, Chief, SEA at Woodbury, NY; CF Cable TV Inc., Company (The), Fort Collins, CO. (202) 927±6248. Comments on Montreal, PQ, Canada; Chambers The area of planned activity is environmental and historic preservation Communications Corp., Eugene, OR; researching and developing matters must be filed within 15 days Classic Communications Ltd., specifications for equipment that will after the EA becomes available to the Richmond Hill, ON, Canada; Coaxial enable cable television systems to public. Communications, Columbus, Ohio; deliver telecommunications services to Environmental and historic Cogeco Inc., Montreal, PQ Canada; customers via a hybrid fiber/coax preservation, public use, or trail use/rail Colony Communications, Inc., network architecture. banking conditions will be imposed, Providence, RI; Comcast Corporation, Constance K. Robinson, where appropriate, in a subsequent Philadelphia, PA; Continental Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. decision in Docket No. AB±12 (Sub-No. Cablevision, Inc., Boston, MA; Cox [FR Doc. 95±6737 Filed 3±17±95; 8:45 am] 183X). Cable Communications, Inc., Atlanta, BILLING CODE 4410±01±M Decided: March 14, 1995. GA; Cross Country Cable, Inc., Warren, By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, NJ; Crown Media, Inc., Dallas, TX; C± Director, Office of Proceedings. TEC Cable Systems, Dallas, PA; CUC Notice Pursuant to the National Vernon A. Williams, Broadcasting Limited, Scarborough, ON, Cooperative Research and Production Secretary. Canada; Douglas Communications Act of 1993; Financial Services [FR Doc. 95±6887 Filed 3±17±95; 8:45 am] Corporation II, Ridgewood, NJ; Duhanel Technology Consortium, Inc. BILLING CODE 7035±01±P Cable, Rapid City, SD; Fairmont Cable Notice is hereby given that, on TV, Rochester, MN; Fundy Cable Ltd./ November 22, 1994, pursuant to Section Ltee, St. John, NB, Canada; Greater 6(a) of the National Cooperative DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Media, Inc., East Brunswick, NJ; Guam Research and Production Act of 1993, Cable TV, Agana, Guam; Helicon Corp., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Antitrust Division Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Higgins Lake Financial Services Technology Cable, Inc., Iron Mountain, MI; Hornell Consortium, Inc. (the ``Consortium'') has Notice Pursuant to the National Television Service, Inc., Hornell, NY; filed written notifications Cooperative Research and Production Insight Communications Company, New simultaneously with the Attorney Act of 1993ÐCable Television York, NY; InterMedia Partners, San General and the Federal Trade Laboratories, Inc. Francisco, CA; ITC, Bala Cynwyd, PA; Commission disclosing changes in its Notice is hereby given that, on Jones Intercable, Inc., Englewood, CO; membership. The notifications were September 26, 1994, pursuant to Section Lenfest Group (The), Pottstown, PA; filed for the purpose of extending the 6(a) of the National Cooperative Maclean Hunter Cable TV, Etobicoke, Act's provisions limiting the recovery of Research and Production Act of 1993, ON, Canada; Monmouth Cablevision antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cable Associate, Falls Church, VA; under specified circumstances. Television Laboratories, Inc. Multimedia Cablevision, Inc., Wichita, Specifically, the new Principal Member (``CableLabs'') filed written notifications KS; New Heritage Associates, Des of the Consortium is: Banc One Services simultaneously with the Attorney Moines, IA; Newhouse Broadcasting Corporation, Columbus, OH. The General and the Federal Trade Corporation, Syracuse, NY; News, Press following parties were admitted as Commission disclosing: (1) The & Gazette Co. (The), St. Joseph, MO; Associate Members of the Consortium: identities of the parties and (2) the North Star Cable, Inc., Kingston, WA; Motorola, Schaumburg, IL; American nature and objectives of the venture. Northern Cablevision Ltd., Edmonton, Express TRS Co., Inc., Salt Lake City, The notifications were filed for the AB, Canada; Paradigm Communications, UT; Visa International, San Francisco, purpose of invoking the Act's provisions Inc., Greenwich, CT; Post-Newsweek CA; Proprietary and Financial Products, limiting the recovery of antitrust Cable, Inc., Phoenix, AZ; Prestige Cable Inc., Charleston, SC; Bank of Montreal, plaintiffs to actual damages under TV of Maryland, Inc., Cartersville, GA; Toronto, Ontario, CANADA; OKI specified circumstances. Pursuant to Prime Cable, Alutin, TX; Princetown Advanced Products Division, Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of Cable Company, Schenectady, NY: Marlborough, MA; and IBM the parties are CableLabs, Louisville, CO Regina Cablevision Cooperative, Regina, Corporation, New York, NY. and: Adelphia Communications SK, Canada; Rock Associates, Kirkland, No other changes have been made in Corporation, Coudersport, PA; ALLTEL WA; Rogers Cable TV Limited, Toronto, either the membership or planned Service Corporation, Little Rock, AR; ON, Canada; Sammons activity of the Consortium. Membership Apollo Cablevision, Inc., Cerritos, CA; Communications, Inc., Dallas, TX; remains open, and the Consortium Armstrong Utilities, Inc., Butler, PA; Scripps Howard Cable Company, intends to file additional written Avenue TV Cable Service, Inc., Ventura, Cincinnati, OH; Shaw Communications notifications disclosing all changes in CA; Barden Communications, Inc., Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada; membership. Detroit, MI; Benchmark Susquehanna Cable Co., York, PA; Tele- On October 21, 1993, the Consortium Communications, Sterling, VA; Bend Communications, Inc., Englewood, CO; filed its original notification pursuant to Cable Communications, Inc., Eugene, Tele-Media Corporation, Pleasant Gap, Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department OR; Bresnan Communications PA; TeleCable Corporation, Norfolk, VA; of Justice published a notice in the Company, White Plains, NY; Buckeye Time Warner Cable, Stamford, CT; Federal Register pursuant to Section Cablevision, Inc., Toledo, OH; Buford Times Mirror Cable Television, Irvine, 6(b) of the Act on December 14, 1993 Television, Inc., Dallas, TX; Bluffton CA; TKR Cable Company, Warren, NJ; (58 Fed. Reg. 65399). Cablevision, Ltd., Bluffton, SC; Cable Valley Cable TV Inc., Fort Valley, GA; The last notification was filed with America Corp., Phoenix, AZ; Cable de Viacom International, Inc. (Cable the Department on August 15, 1994. A.
Recommended publications
  • Download the 54Th Annual Program Book
    THE 54TH ANNUAL DECEMBER 4, 2020 1 Welcome To The We celebrate Fifty-Fourth Annual Cable TV Pioneers and appreciate Induction Celebration everything you are, and all that you do. Class of 2020 Induction Gala Charter Field Operations In Appreciation of C-SPAN would like to congratulate Ann Our Sponsors on joining the esteemed ranks How It All Began Officers and Managing Board of the Cable TV Pioneers The Spirit of the Pioneers who have shaped the Presenting the Class of 2020 Cable TV industry. Congratulations to the 25th Anniversary Class of 1995 In Memorium Active Membership 2020 Celebration Executive Committee David Fellows Yvette Kanouff Patricia Kehoe Michael Pandzik Sean McGrail Your leadership Susan Bitter Smith and forward thinking Jim Faircloth personifi es what it means to be a Cable TV Pioneer. 2 3 We’re Going Special Thanks Primetime Thanks To Our Sponsors To Thank you to our friends at C-SPAN for televising and streaming the induction ceremony for the Class of 2020. C-SPAN was created by the cable industry in 1979 as a gift to the American people and today with their stellar reputation, they are more relevant than ever. Unique to media as a non-profit, C-SPAN is a true public service of the cable and satellite providers that fund it. It’s thanks to the support of so many Cable TV Pioneers that C-SPAN has thrived. Many have served on C-SPAN’s board of directors, while others committed to add the services to their channel line-ups. So many local cable folks have welcomed C-SPAN into their markets to meet with the community and work with educators and local officials.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 BCE Annual Information Form
    Annual Information Form BCE Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2011 March 8, 2012 In this Annual Information Form, Bell Canada is, unless otherwise indicated, referred to as Bell, and comprises our Bell Wireline, Bell Wireless and Bell Media segments. Bell Aliant means, collectively, Bell Aliant Inc. and its subsidiaries. All dollar figures are in Canadian dollars, unless stated otherwise. The information in this Annual Information Form is as of March 8, 2012, unless stated otherwise, and except for information in documents incorporated by reference that have a different date. TABLE OF CONTENTS PARTS OF MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANNUAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INFORMATION (REFERENCE TO PAGES OF THE BCE INC. FORM 2011 ANNUAL REPORT) Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 2 32-34; 54-69 Corporate Structure 4 Incorporation and Registered Offices 4 Subsidiaries 4 Description of Our Business 5 General Summary 5 23-28; 32-36; 41-47 Strategic Imperatives 6 29-31 Our Competitive Strengths 6 Marketing and Distribution Channels 8 Our Networks 9 32-34; 54-69 Our Employees 12 Corporate Responsibility 13 Competitive Environment 15 54-57 Regulatory Environment 15 58-61 Intangible Properties 15 General Development of Our Business 17 Three-Year History (1) 17 Our Capital Structure 20 BCE Inc. Securities 20 112-114 Bell Canada Debt Securities 21 Ratings for BCE Inc. and Bell Canada Securities 21 Ratings for Bell Canada Debt Securities 22 Ratings for BCE Inc. Preferred Shares 22 Outlook 22 General Explanation 22 Explanation of Rating Categories Received for our Securities 24 Market for our Securities 24 Trading of our Securities 25 Our Dividend Policy 27 Our Directors and Executive Officers 28 Directors 28 Executive Officers 30 Directors’ and Executive Officers’ Share Ownership 30 Legal Proceedings 31 Lawsuits Instituted by BCE Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM (For
    ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007) March 4, 2008 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM INDEX The following is an index of the Annual Information Form of Rogers Communications Inc. (“RCI”) referencing the requirements of Form 51-102F2 of the Canadian Securities Administrators. Certain parts of this Annual Information Form are contained in RCI’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and RCI’s 2007 Annual Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, each of which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and incorporated herein by reference as noted below. Page reference / incorporated by reference from Annual Information 2007 Form MD&A Item 1 — Cover Page p. 1 Item 2 — Index p. 2 Item 3 — Corporate Structure 3.1 — Name and Incorporation p. 3 3.2 — Intercorporate Relationships pgs. 3-5 Item 4 — General Development of the Business 4.1 — Three Year History pgs. 6-10 4.2 — Significant Acquisitions p. 10 Item 5 — Narrative Description of the Business 5.1 — General — Business Overview p. 11 p. 2 — Rogers Wireless pgs. 10-12 — Rogers Cable pgs. 16-19 — Rogers Media pgs. 25-26 — Employees p. 9 — Properties, Trademarks, Environmental and Other Matters pgs. 10-11 5.2 — Risk Factors p. 11 Item 6 — Dividends 6.1 — Dividends p. 12 Item 7 — Description of Capital Structure 7.1 — General Description of Capital Structure p. 12 7.2 — Constraints pgs. 12-13 7.3 — Ratings pgs. 13-14 Item 8 — Market for Securities 8.1 — Trading Price and Volume p.
    [Show full text]
  • Igniting Growth at a Glance Highlights for 2015
    Rogers Communications Inc. 2015 Annual Report Igniting growth At a glance highlights for 2015 Rogers Communications Inc. Wireless Rogers Communications (TSX: RCI; NYSE: RCI) Wireless is Canada’s largest provider of voice and data is a diversified Canadian communications and communications services. We provide these services to media company. We report our results of approximately 9.9 million customers under the Rogers, Fido, chatr and Mobilicity brands. We provide customers operations in the four segments of Wireless, with the best and latest wireless devices, applications and Cable, Business Solutions and Media. leading network speeds. Our far-reaching LTE network covers approximately 93% of all Canadians. Our strategic spectrum investments position us well to provide the network connectivity, speed and reliability our customers Operating revenue Adjusted operating profit have come to enjoy and expect. Wireless also provides (In billions of dollars) (In billions of dollars) seamless wireless roaming across the U.S. and more than 200 other countries and is the Canadian leader in the 2015 13.4 2015 5.0 deployment of machine-to-machine communications and Internet of Things applications. 2014 12.9 2014 5.0 2013 12.7 2013 5.0 Free cash flow Annualized dividend Operating revenue Adjusted operating profit (In billions of dollars) rate at year end ($) (In billions of dollars) (In billions of dollars) 2015 1.7 2015 $1.92 2015 7.7 2015 3.2 2014 1.4 2014 $1.83 2014 7.3 2014 3.2 2013 1.5 2013 $1.74 2013 7.3 2013 3.2 2015 Operating revenue 2015 Operating revenue $13.4 Billion $7.7 Billion Wireless 56% $13.4 Cable 26% $7.7 Network 90% Billion Billion Media 15% Business Solutions 3% Equipment 10% Cable and Business Solutions Media Cable is a leading Canadian cable services provider whose Media is Canada’s premier destination for category-leading service territory covers approximately 4.2 million homes sports entertainment, digital media, television and radio in Ontario, New Brunswick and Newfoundland representing broadcasting and publishing properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Time Cable Shows Come to End of the Line
    Coming in 2 weeks... the best Suds and Sauce in Aurora ALL YOU CAN EAT The Totten Beverley Varcoe 905-727-3154 Wealth Advisory DINNER BUFFET Highly Qualified to Handle Your Group Real Estate Needs with Over 20 $11.95 years of Award Winning service! DavidB. Totten Only Senior Vice President, Wealth Advisor Nightly from 5 pm - 9 pm 17310 Yonge Street, Suite 11 *Per Person, plus taxes. Newmarket, Ontario 905.830.4468 Howard Johnson Hotel Aurora www.davidtotten.ca 15520 Yonge Street Your Community Realty, Aurora If you are already a client of BMO Nesbitt Burns, please contact your Investment Advisor for more information. Reservations - 905-727-1312 BROKER, CRES, SRES Please visit us at www.beverleyvarcoe.com www.hojoaurora.com Market Value Appraiser Aurora’s Independent Community Newspaper Vol. 8 No. 42 905-727-3300 auroran.com FREE Week of August 26, 2008 Briefly Permanent markers Probably one of the nicest evening attractions in Aurora is about to get better. For the last several years, Aurora Legion members have placed candles on headstones of people buried in the Aurora Cemetery, who served in the armed forces. It’s a spectacular sight and this year, it will happen Saturday, Sept. 20, followed by a graveside service the next day. However, in addition to the candlelight ceremony, the Legion’s Ladies Auxiliary, headed up by Jean Anderson, will place permanent three-inch markers on the foundation or the side of all affected memorial stones. Some 350 markers have been ordered and are expected to be in place for this year’s ceremony.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Effects of Subsidized Broadband Internet for Low-Income Americans
    Online Appendix: Wired and Hired: Employment Effects of Subsidized Broadband Internet for Low-Income Americans George W. Zuo Appendix A: Appendix Tables and Figures Figure A1: Major Comcast Cable M&A Events: 1990-2018 1994 • Comcast acquires Canadian based Maclean Hunter’s U.S. cable operation based in New Jersey, Michigan, and Florida, adding 550,000 subscribers 1995 • Comcast acquires E.W. Scripps cable systems based in California, Tennessee, Georgia, West Virginia, Florida, and Kentucky, adding 800,000 subscribers 1998 • Comcast acquires Jones Intercable, Inc in the Mid-Atlantic adding 1 million subscribers 1998 • Comcast acquires Prime Communications in Maryland, Virginia, adding 430,000 subscribers 1999 • Comcast acquires Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc in Philadelphia, adding 79,000 subscribers 1999 • Comcast and AT&T enter agreement to exchange cable communications systems, gaining cable communications systems serving 1.5 million subscribers 2000 • Comcast acquires Lenfest Communications in Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey adding 1.3 millions subscribers 2000 • Comcast completes cable swaps with Adelphia and AT&T broadband, gaining customers in Florida, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Washington D.C. 2001 • Comcast acquires select AT&T Broadband cable systems in New Mexico, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Tennessee adding 585,000 subscribers 2001 • Comcast acquires AT&T Broadband cable systems in Baltimore adding 112,000 subscribers 2001 • Comcast and A&T Broadband merge forming
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 London Majors Program
    MORTGAGES we make mortgages ••• make sense www.omac-mortgages.com Thank you London for making us your #I mortgage team! Helping Londoners for over 12 years achieve home ownership, and save on their mortgages The banks make their profits from charging you higher rates. We make our living, at no cost to you (OAC), by getting you the lowest rate! Is your bank really giving you the lowest rate they can offer? Not sure? Call us. WESTMOUNT SHOPPING 99 HORTON ST. W. CENTRE (just west of Wharncliffe) 471-4218 432-0622 Dave Provident! Jill Houston Karrl Sims Pat Brown AS SEEN ON: Rogers Cable 13 • The London Knights • No Price Like Home AS HEARD ON: AM 980 • AM 1290 • AM 1410 • AM 900 • AM 800 • AM 1070 • FM 96 • FM 103.9 H E AD O F FI C E : 3 46 WONDERLAND RD . S . LONDON, ON • 432 - 0026 Jletter J[rom t!Je ,J)resibent/@bJner What a phenomenal 2004 season the Majors had. We went from a team that no one was worried about during the regular season to league championship finalists and a real giant killer in the playoffs; knocking off Kitchener in 7 games, Toronto in 5 games before finally succumbing to Guelph in the finals. It was a great feeling from being the owner of the team, but also from being a fan of the game. I can't even begin to describe the electricity in the air during our home games in the playoffs. For that Scott Dart - brief period in time all the talk was about the incredible run that the Majors were on and speculating on far we were going to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2003-602
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2003-602 Ottawa, 17 December 2003 Rogers Broadcasting Limited Toronto, London and Ottawa, Ontario Application 2002-0641-8 Public Hearing in the National Capital Region 26 May 2003 CJMT-TV (OMNI.2) Toronto – New transmitters in Ottawa and London The Commission approves an application by Rogers Broadcasting Limited to amend the licence for the television programming undertaking CJMT-TV, Toronto to add transmitters at Ottawa and London. CJMT-TV is generally known as OMNI.2. The application 1. The Commission received an application by Rogers Broadcasting Limited (Rogers) to amend the licence for CJMT-TV, Toronto, which is generally known as OMNI.2, by adding transmitters at Ottawa and London. The applicant proposed that the Ottawa transmitter would operate on channel 14C with an effective radiated power of 435,000 watts and the London transmitter would operate on channel 20B with an effective radiated power of 18,800 watts. 2. In New multilingual ethnic television station to serve Toronto, Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2002-82, 8 April 2002 (Decision 2002-82), the Commission licensed CJMT-TV to provide an ethnic programming service for Toronto that would focus on the provision of programming for the Asian and African communities. These communities were not fully served by Roger’s existing ethnic station CFMT-TV, which is now generally known as OMNI.1. Decision 2002-82 stipulated, however, that Rogers must submit an application for use of a television channel other than channel 52, which it had originally proposed to use. Rogers subsequently filed an application to use channel 44 for CJMT-TV in Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • BCE 2014 Annual Information Form
    Annual Information Form For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 10 0 Results speak volumes. MARCH 5, 2015 In this Annual Information Form, we, us, our and BCE mean, as the context may require, either BCE Inc. or, collectively, BCE Inc., its subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates. Bell means our Bell Wireline, Bell Wireless and Bell Media segments on an aggregate basis. Bell Aliant means, as the context may require, until December 31, 2014, either Bell Aliant Inc. or, collectively, Bell Aliant Inc. and its subsidiaries and associates, or, after December 31, 2014, either Bell Aliant Regional Communications Inc. or, collectively, Bell Aliant Regional Communications Inc. and its subsidiaries and associates. Each section of BCE’s 2012, 2013 and 2014 management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (BCE 2012 MD&A, BCE 2013 MD&A and BCE 2014 MD&A, respectively) that is referred to in this Annual Information Form is incorporated by reference herein. The BCE 2012 MD&A, BCE 2013 MD&A and BCE 2014 MD&A have been filed with the Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities (available at sedar.com) and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (available at sec.gov). They are also available on BCE’s website at BCE.ca. All dollar figures are in Canadian dollars, unless stated otherwise. The information in this Annual Information Form is as of March 5, 2015, unless stated otherwise, and except for information in documents incorporated by reference that have a different date. Trade-marks: The following are trade-marks referred to and used as such in this Annual Information Form that BCE Inc., its subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates or other entities in which we hold an equity interest own or use under licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    President s Message Change, evolution, ability to adapt - these are all key to the survival of the content production industry today. The new regulations of the Canada Media Fund have impacted the basic principles of television program financing, by requiring, among other things, a second platform for the exhibition of content. Advances in new technologies and new patterns of audience viewing habits require that we rethink our own practices and revise our procedures in order to operate effectively in this evolving environment. In these conditions, the ability to adapt becomes a fundamental condition for success. The Cogeco Fund has shown, year after year, that it can indeed adapt to change and has not hesitated to modify its guidelines in order to respond to the growing needs of the industry. The pre-development program, created in 2008, is an example. The Fund has received 123 applications for funding in this pre-development program in the past two years, while receiving an average of thirty requests per year for development of series and MOW’s. The innovative Corporate Theatrical Feature Film Development Program has also been widely appreciated with nearly 200 requests for funding from feature film production companies across the country since its inception in 1999. Last year, the Cogeco Fund expanded its mandate to include drama series funding in order to collaborate with the Independent Production Fund to meet the demand for drama series financing. The Cogeco Fund approved a total of $2,750,000 for the production of 14 drama series and MOW’s destined for both private and public broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • AN Winter 2007
    Reunion Weekend, July 6-8, including PhysEd 50th, P. 28 UNB Vol. 15 No. 2 ALUMNI NEWS Winter 2007 MAKING A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE RECOGNIZING UNB UNIVERSITY OF OUR BEST NEW BRUNSWICK WWW.UNB.CA/UNBDIFFERENCE Where it’s hopping. In New Brunswick, where there are great jobs, affordable housing, safe communities and a quality of life that’s virtually unmatched. Along with many other New Brunswickers who’ve come home for challenging careers and a balanced lifestyle. Right now. Employers need talented people like you. Don’t wait. Log on and check out the career level opportunities posted on the website. NBjobs.ca BE PROUD OF IT. Winter 2007UNB Vol. 15 No. 2 BE PART OF IT. ALUMNI NEWS INSIDE 18 In celebration of UNB The first annual UNB Celebration Dinner in November drew alumni Associated Alumni and friends from far afield. Council Members See a photo gallery of President a memorable evening. Barry Beckett (PhD’70) Vice-President Kevin Ferguson (BBA’92, BA’93) 28 50 years of PhysEd at UNB Treasurer Carol Foley (BBA’83) This year marks the 50th Secretary Larry Hachey (BBA-SJ’87) anniversary of the Immediate Past President establishment of a program Carey A. Ryan (BA’70, MEd’79) in physical education at Board of Governors Representatives Andy Devereaux (BScEE’71, BA’73, DLitt’98) UNB under the direction Carey A. Ryan (BA’70, MEd’79) Gary Donahee (BPE’70) of Dr. John Meagher, and a Councillors full slate of activities is Ian Allen (BA’97, MEd’98) Renée Fleming (BScF’00) planned throughout the Todd Grimes (BBA’01) year to mark this milestone Anne Higgins (BEd’92, MEd’96) Peter Jolly (BScCE’60) anniversary.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Il Quadro Economico E Regolamentare
    Il sistema globale delle comunicazioni 1. IL QUADRO ECONOMICO E REGOLAMENTARE Lo sviluppo della tecnologia digitale sta ridisegnando i confini tra i di- versi servizi di telecomunicazione, le trasmissioni radiotelevisive ed i servizi informatici on line. Tradizionalmente, infatti, tali servizi erano forniti attraverso reti e piattaforme differenti; oggi, invece, la tecnolo- gia digitale è in grado di fornire una codificazione comune e una mag- giore capacità di banda così da poter veicolare più servizi di comuni- cazione sulle stesse reti. Paradigma del veloce progredire di tale fe- nomeno di convergenza è il rapido sviluppo di Internet, Rete delle re- ti oramai in grado di fornire una varietà completa di servizi di comu- nicazione, compresa la telefonia vocale e la televisione. La conver- genza dei servizi, stimolata dal progresso tecnologico, ed i conse- guenti cambiamenti nelle strutture del mercato costituiscono il punto di partenza ma anche la sfida per le attività di regolamentazione del- le comunicazioni. Innanzitutto il quadro giuridico-regolamentare si presenta ancora frammentato. In Europa, ma anche negli Stati Uniti, le norme relative alla televisione, alle telecomunicazioni e ad Internet sono diverse. Anche i principi ispiratori sono differenti. La televisione (in Europa) viene per lo più regolamentata per assicurare il pluralismo politico e sociale. Le telecomunicazioni rispondono a imperativi di carattere economico-concorrenziale. Internet presenta maggiore flessibilità ma con il rischio che una liberalità derivante dal carattere innovativo del mezzo presti il fianco ad abusi o a sviluppi non uniformi nei vari pae- si. Inoltre, nella maggior parte dei paesi, le istituzioni responsabili della regolamentazione nel settore della radiotelevisione e delle tele- comunicazioni sono distinte l’una dall’altra.
    [Show full text]