The Foundation Center Moving the Field Forward
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tracking Distributions from the 9/11 Relief Funds
CONTRIBUTING STAFF Rick Schoff Senior Vice President for Information Resources and Publishing Steven Lawrence Director of Research Mirek Drozdzowski Special Projects Associate Mark Carway Programmer Aamir Cheema Editorial Assistant Janie Wong Project Assistant Bruce Thongsack Editorial Associate Cheryl Loe Director of Communications Christine Innamorato Production Coordinator, Publications ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report owes much to the 111 relief and recovery funds, listed on page 27, that responded to our survey of 9/11- related charities. Their involvement provided important insights into the process and challenges involved in the delivery of immediate disaster relief and long-term assistance. Special thanks are also due to the many 9/11 relief funds that submitted detailed information to the Foundation Center regarding their grants and beneficiaries as well as their plans for distributing unspent funds. PHILANTHROPY’S RESPONSE TO 9/11 PROJECT The Foundation Center is documenting private philanthropy’s response to the September 11 terrorist attacks. Using our experience in collecting and analyzing giving data, we are constructing a comprehensive picture of giving by foundations and corporations in the aftermath of 9/11, as well as tracking contributions by intermediaries and direct-service providers. We are also presenting news and in-depth interviews concerning the philanthropic response to 9/11 in the Foundation Center’s online journal, Philanthropy News Digest. Some of these have been reproduced in September 11: Perspectives from the Field of Philanthropy. To access all of the Foundation Center’s 9/11-related reports and other resources, visit www.fdncenter.org/research/911. We are grateful to the following for their support of this project: the California Endowment, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Annie E. -
A Report from Project Streamline Grants Managers Network
A report from Project Streamline a collaborative initiative of the Grants Managers Network In partnership with Association of Fundraising Professionals Association of Small Foundations Council on Foundations Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Foundation Center Grantmakers for Effective Organizations National Council of Nonprofit Associations Report written by Jessica Bearman, Bearman Consulting Project design and research conducted by Intersector Consulting (Kristin Lindsey and Jessica Bearman) Additional data and analysis provided by the Center for Effective Philanthropy THIS PROJECT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE WITHOUT FUNDING FROM: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation Ford Foundation Frey Foundation Harold K. L. Castle Foundation Kansas Health Foundation The Kresge Foundation The McKnight Foundation Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Saint Luke’s Foundation WE WISH TO THANK REPORT REVIEWERS FOR THEIR ASTUTE FEEDBACK AND DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES: Joel Fleishman, Duke University Dahna Goldstein, PhilanTech, LLC. Jan Jaffe, GrantCraft Trisha Lester, North Carolina Center for Nonprofits Carol Lukas, Fieldstone Alliance Robin Platts, The Dresher Foundation Jennifer Ratay, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Marcia Sharp, Millennium Communications Group, Inc. Paul Shoemaker, Social Venture Partners Seattle NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS WHOSE LEADERSHIP HAS GUIDED THIS INITIATIVE: Richard Toth, Director, Office of Proposal Management, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Project Chair) Tonia Bain, Director of Special Projects, -
990-PF Return of Private Foundation
Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. M015 Department of the Treasury ► Internal R venue Service ► Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990 For calendar year 2015 or tax year beg innin g and endin g Name of foundation A Employer identification number CHUBB C HARITABLE FOUNDATION Number and street (or P O box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite 26-2456949 436 WALNUT STREET, WA09C B Telephone number (see instructions) City or town State ZIP code PHILADELPHIA PA 19106 215-640-1000 Foreign country name Foreign province/state/county Foreign postal code I q C If exemption application is pending, check here ► q q G Check all that apply, Initial return q Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ► q Final return q Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, q q Address change Q Name change check here and attach computation ► H Check type of organization Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated under q section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ► q Section 4947 (a)( 1 ) nonexem pt charitable trust Other taxable p rivate foundation Fair market value of all assets at J Accounting method © Cash q Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination q end of year (from Part fl, co/ (c), q Other (specify) under section 507(b)( 1)(B), check here ------------------------- ► '9 line 10; t . -
Norms and Narratives That Shape US Charitable and Philanthropic Giving Benjamin Soskis March 2021
CENTER ON NONPROFITS AND PHILANTHROPY RESEARCH REPORT Norms and Narratives That Shape US Charitable and Philanthropic Giving Benjamin Soskis March 2021 ABOUT THE URBAN INSTITUTE The nonprofit Urban Institute is a leading research organization dedicated to developing evidence-based insights that improve people’s lives and strengthen communities. For 50 years, Urban has been the trusted source for rigorous analysis of complex social and economic issues; strategic advice to policymakers, philanthropists, and practitioners; and new, promising ideas that expand opportunities for all. Our work inspires effective decisions that advance fairness and enhance the well-being of people and places. Copyright © March 2021. Urban Institute. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban Institute. Cover image by Tim Meko. Contents Acknowledgments iv Executive Summary v Norms and Narratives That Shape US Charitable and Philanthropic Giving 1 The Rise of Large-Scale Philanthropy 3 Narratives of Mass Giving’s Decline in the United States 9 Megaphilanthropy and Everyday Giving during the COVID-19 Crisis 13 The COVID-19 Crisis, Mutual Aid, and the Revitalization of Everyday Giving 16 The Surging Popularity of Cash Transfers during the COVID-19 Crisis 21 The Development of Norms around Time-Based Giving 26 Time-Based Norms and Narratives during the COVID-19 Crisis 32 Giving Norms and Narratives in a Postpandemic World 36 Notes 39 References 46 About the Author 49 Statement of Independence 50 Acknowledgments This report was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, with additional support from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. -
Annual.Foundationcenter.Org from OUR PRESIDENT
annual.foundationcenter.org FROM OUR PRESIDENT ow many times have you heard Foundation Center’s print directory became Landscape sites that focus on youth giving, the success of an organization Foundation Directory Online, the most widely the sustainable development goals, and the Hdescribed in terms of a bigger used database of foundations and their critical issues of our time. budget, more staff, or larger office space? grants in the world. Today’s Foundation Foundation Center’s evolution continues to As indicators, those all tell us something but Center is a global resource for trusted data, be a story of transparency, technology, and miss what is most critical. In a world of deep insight, and analysis of the many ways in talent. Our team, whether they be writing technological and societal transformation, as which, through philanthropy, private wealth computer code, teaching a class on proposal important as it may be for organizations to is contributing to the public good. writing, or designing a new website, is grow, it is essential that they evolve. The following pages describe how the key to our success. Philanthropy is an Foundation Center was born in 1956, in the Foundation Center evolved even further engine for positive social change worldwide wake of McCarthy era hearings investigating in 2016. In a historic milestone for our and at Foundation Center, we’re using the foundations for alleged support of un- organization, we fully launched a new latest data, technology, and analysis to help American activities. Conceived as a means database system that had been years in the those doing good be strategic. -
"11 Trends in Philanthropy for 2020" Report
11 TRENDS IN PHILANTHROPY FOR 2020 Anticipate and embrace what’s next. Our Contributors Kallie Bauer, M.B.A. Interim Director of the Community Data & Research Lab, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Teresa (Teri) Behrens, Ph.D. Executive Director, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Rachel Borashko Data Analyst, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Jamie DeLeeuw, Ph.D. Research Manager, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Patty Janes, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Grand Valley State University, 2019–2020 Russell G. Mawby Fellow in Philanthropic Studies Tory Martin, M.A. Director of Communications & Engagement, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Michael Moody, Ph.D. Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Juan Olivarez, Ph.D. Distinguished Scholar in Residence for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Adriana Paz, M.S.C.I.S. Senior Database Administrator, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Michael Pratt Project Manager, Johnson Center for Philanthropy Olivia Rau Graduate Assistant, Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Grand Valley State University Copyright © 2020 Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University. All rights reserved. To connect with the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy, write to [email protected] or call (616) 331-7585. Inside this report Data & Collabor- Increasing Mapping Tools Critiques ation & 1 Come Together to Empower 3 of (Big) Consolid- Community Decision-Making Philanthropy 2 ation -
Philanthropy New York, 2008
History of U.S. Philanthropy The word "philanthropy" derives from the Ancient Greek phrase philanthropia , meaning "to love people." Today, the concept of philanthropy includes the act of voluntary giving by individuals or groups to promote the common good. It also refers to the formal practice of grantmaking by foundations to nonprofit organizations. Cultural Origins in the U.S. Philanthropy in the Unites States has emerged from a number of cultural influences, such as: • Strong religious beliefs and traditions • Practices of collective hunting, food distribution and potlatches in Native American communities • Cultures of mutual assistance and support among multiple waves of settler and immigrant communities It wasn't until after the Civil war that the modern business of philanthropy began to form. Until then, charity was a mostly fragmented endeavor driven largely by religious groups and characterized by almsgiving and volunteerism aimed at assisting the immediate problems of the urban poor. Industrialization and the Rise of Modern Philanthropy. At the end of the 19th century, charities started taking a more systematic approach to the work of improving social conditions, and adopted management methods that were gaining a following in the business world. Modern grantmaking was founded on the large-scale donations of a number of individuals and families who made their wealth during the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the steel, oil, railroad, telegraph, and automobile industries (such as Sage, Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford). Democratization and Growth of the Field. American generosity and volunteerism was spurred again by World War I. During this time, Americans gave more then $400 million in gifts and membership dues to the Red Cross in connection with the war, signaling the growth of grassroots fundraising and the democratization of giving. -
Jack Campbell, Chair Emeritus Art Thompson, Chair Victoria Grasso, President
Jack Campbell, Chair Emeritus Art Thompson, Chair Victoria Grasso, President 2018 Board of Trustees and Staff 1977 Board of Trustees Back Row: Kim Robak, Brad Korell, Pam Snow, Rick Vierk, Kimberle Hall, Victoria Grasso; From left: Richard Knudsen (legal counsel), Jack D. Campbell, E.N. “Jack” Thompson, Front Row: Jack Campbell, Robert Nefsky, Jane Renner Hood, Art Thompson, Linda 2019 Staff R.E. Campbell, Burnham Yates, T.A. “Ted” Sick, Robert Dobson, W.W. Nuernberger Crump (retired Trustee); Seated: T.J. McDowell, Connie Duncan From left: Tram Kieu, Victoria Grasso, Kimberle Hall Jack D. Campbell has served as a Trustee of the Cooper Foundation for more than Art Thompson joined the Board of Trustees in 1984. He was appointed President Victoria Grasso was appointed President by the Trustees of the Cooper 44 years, since May of 1974, and as Chair of the board for 16 years from 2002 in 1990 and served in that role through 2018. He was elected Chair in December Foundation on January 1, 2019. Victoria joined the Foundation in 1994 as to 2018. In December 2018, the Board of Trustees named him Chair Emeritus in 2018. Under his leadership, the Foundation’s endowment grew 180% while Secretary/Receptionist and was promoted to various grants management recognition of his long-standing service and leadership. granting $18 million, and the Foundation broadened its grantmaking priorities and positions throughout her career. As Senior Program Officer she led all aspects community outreach. of the Foundation’s grantmaking and much of the day-to-day management. “The Cooper Foundation originally had a two-fold function, which was to own and operate a theater business in a five state area while using profits to make grants to “The Foundation’s most memorable achievements over the past 30 years are “Working for the Foundation has been a gift in my life, where I have fund charitable needs. -
Entrepreneurs' Transition to Philanthropy and the Vibrancy of Place
3. Local champions: entrepreneurs’ transition to philanthropy and the vibrancy of place* Maryann P. Feldman and Alexandra Graddy- Reed 3.1 INTRODUCTION Often the story of successful places is predicated on the story of an individ- ual who was instrumental in creating institutions and making connections that were transformative for a local economy. Certainly this is the case for Silicon Valley in California and Fred Terman, the Dean of Engineering at Stanford University, USA, who offered his garage to his students, Hewlett and Packard, and encouraged other start- ups. Or George Kozmetsky, the founder of Teledyne, who created the Institute for Innovation, Creativity and Capital (IC2) and mentored over 260 local computer companies in Austin, Texas. Any reading of the lives of these individuals highlights their connection to community and motivations beyond making profits. These individuals are ‘regional champions’ (Feldman and Zoller, 2012) – highly connected individuals who live and work in a region and take responsibil- ity for the stewardship of the place. This defines a class of individuals who have attachment to a community and who, through their actions, make a difference in the economic vibrancy and prosperity of a place. Driven by an attachment to a place, facilitated by a developed ability to perceive opportunity, and aided by a longer-term perspective, entrepreneurs are ideal agents for engaging the vibrancy of place. It also makes good busi- ness sense for regional champions as they expand their firms. Rather than unique individual stories, these actions appear to be fairly regular events, consistently making a difference in local economies. Many places attempt to create vibrant economies by following the rather simple recipe that involves a heavy dose of venture capital funding, research universities as a driving force, concentrations of skilled talent and an open culture – the factors associated with the current functioning of Silicon Valley. -
2019-2020 Foundation Annual Report
MAKE A CHOICE,C TO TAKE A CHANCE,C TO CHANGEC A LIFE fFOREVER. Annual Report 2019-2020 Contents Staff Foundation Executive Director Report......................................... 2 Dean Moors College President Report ............................................................ 2 Executive Director 402-460-2153 or 402-469-7916 Foundation President Report....................................................... 3 [email protected] Foundation Board of Directors..................................................... 4 Jessica Rohan Balance Sheet ............................................................................. 6 Development Director 402-460-2165 or 402-469-3052 Income Statement ....................................................................... 7 [email protected] Planned Giving ............................................................................ 8 Cheri Beda Legacy Society ............................................................................ 9 CCC Alumni Director 402-460-2157 Hall of Fame .............................................................................. 10 [email protected] Memorials/Honorariums ............................................................ 12 Sharon Liske Foundation Treasurer CCC Retirees ............................................................................ 13 308-398-7577 Pro-Am Golf Tournament ........................................................... 14 [email protected] Community Appreciation Event ................................................. 15 Pat Stange -
Wake Forest Magazine December 2001
2000-2001 Honor Roll of Donors Wake For e st M A G A Z I N E Volume 49, Number 2 December 2001 Wake For e st M A G A Z I N E and Honor Roll of Donors Features 16 After Disaster by Cherin C. Poovey An American tragedy bonds the University community in patriotism, compassion, unity, and hope. 23 Religion of Peace? by Charles A. Kimball Understanding Islam means grasping its complexities, which are rooted in rancor. 28 Opportunity Knocks by Liz Switzer The Richter Scholarships open doors for five students to study abroad— and open their eyes as well. Page 16 Essay 34 Great Expectations Page 28 by Leah P. McCoy Reflective students in the Class of 2001 say Wake Forest met most of theirs. Departments Campus Chronicle 2 52 Honor Roll of Donors 14 Sports 37 Class Notes Page 34 Volume 49, Number 2 December 2001 2 Campus Chronicle New school ‘a natural partnership’ Engineering a President Thomas K. Hearn Dean, senior vice president for Jr. said the new school will aid health affairs of Wake Forest. r esource in the transformation of “Currently, all of the top NIH- Winston-Salem’s economy. funded institutions have an AKE FOREST and “The school will strengthen engineering school or biomed- WVirginia Tech (Virginia Wake Forest’s intellectual ical engineering department. Polytechnic Institute and resources, thereby strengthening This new school will address State University) have the capabilities of the Piedmont the goals of both institutions.” announced plans to establish Triad Research Park.” If the planning proceeds as a joint School of Biomedical “This is a natural partner- hoped, the universities will Engineering and Sciences. -
A Fundraising Primer for Regional Networks
A FUNDRAISING PRIMER FOR REGIONAL NETWORKS Abstract A primer to help regional networks design and implement a fundraising plan Contents Document Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................2 Create a Budget .........................................................................................................................................................2 Evaluate Network Revenue Options..........................................................................................................................2 A Closer Look at Three Revenue Options...................................................................................................................3 Member Dues ........................................................................................................................................................3 Foundation Grants .................................................................................................................................................5 Leverage Accessible Resources..............................................................................................................................6 California Funder Inventory .......................................................................................................................................7 Top Giving Foundations in California.....................................................................................................................7